Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-9334
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 13-3258160 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
2000 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite 402, Boca Raton, FL | 33431 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
561-367-2950
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filero | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filero | Smaller reporting companyþ | |||
(do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso Noþ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at October 31, 2011 | |
Class A Common Stock ($0.01 par value) | 14,623,942 | |
Class B Common Stock ($0.01 par value) | 1,092,555 |
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
1-2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5-6 | ||||||||
7-14 | ||||||||
15-20 | ||||||||
20-21 | ||||||||
22-23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
EX-31.01 | ||||||||
EX-31.02 | ||||||||
EX-32.01 | ||||||||
EX-32.02 | ||||||||
EX-99.1 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
Table of Contents
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
ASSETS
September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 14,148 | $ | 15,814 | ||||
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,358 ($1,398 at June 30, 2011) | 23,199 | 28,068 | ||||||
Notes receivable, trade | 2,080 | 2,511 | ||||||
Inventories | 20,457 | 20,629 | ||||||
Deferred taxes, net | 764 | 834 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 4,729 | 6,361 | ||||||
Total current assets | 65,377 | 74,217 | ||||||
MARKETABLE SECURITIES: | ||||||||
(Cost $959 at September 30, 2011 and $907 at June 30, 2011) | 544 | 565 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: | ||||||||
Land and buildings | 1,076 | 1,176 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment | 6,186 | 6,223 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 4,745 | 4,872 | ||||||
Capital leases | 107 | 118 | ||||||
12,114 | 12,389 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation | (8,227 | ) | (8,081 | ) | ||||
Net property, plant and equipment | 3,887 | 4,308 | ||||||
INTANGIBLES, less accumulated amortization of $12,297 ($12,222 at June 30, 2011) | 10,045 | 10,729 | ||||||
GOODWILL, less accumulated amortization of $1,577 ($1,606 at June 30, 2011) | 19,424 | 19,925 | ||||||
DEFERRED TAXES, NET | 4,497 | 4,087 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS | 4,863 | 5,291 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 108,637 | $ | 119,122 | ||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
are an integral part of these financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Loans payable | $ | 3,894 | $ | 4,965 | ||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 16,468 | 696 | ||||||
Accounts payable, trade | 14,352 | 16,937 | ||||||
Notes payable, trade | 3,642 | 3,879 | ||||||
Accrued salaries, commissions, bonus and profit-sharing | 4,504 | 5,216 | ||||||
Customer deposits | 1,771 | 2,911 | ||||||
Accrued and withheld taxes | 1,058 | 1,295 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 420 | 109 | ||||||
Deferred taxes | 93 | 93 | ||||||
Other accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 9,810 | 11,519 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 56,012 | 47,620 | ||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion | 3,969 | 18,552 | ||||||
Deferred taxes | 627 | 718 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 9,771 | 9,881 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 14,367 | 29,151 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 70,379 | 76,771 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | ||||||||
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par, 45,000,000 shares authorized,14,623,942 shares issued at September 30, 2011 and 14,574,997 shares issued at June 30, 2011 | 146 | 146 | ||||||
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par, 4,500,000 shares authorized, 1,092,555 at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 | 11 | 11 | ||||||
Capital contributed in excess of par value | 48,894 | 48,748 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (15,309 | ) | (12,585 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 4,516 | 6,031 | ||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 38,258 | 42,351 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 108,637 | $ | 119,122 | ||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
For the three months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net sales | $ | 35,856 | $ | 39,998 | ||||
Cost of sales | 26,964 | 27,649 | ||||||
Gross profit | 8,892 | 12,349 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
General and administrative | 5,048 | 5,930 | ||||||
Selling | 3,461 | 3,553 | ||||||
Engineering and development | 1,934 | 3,415 | ||||||
Restructuring | — | 191 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 10,443 | 13,089 | ||||||
Loss from operations | (1,551 | ) | (740 | ) | ||||
Interest, net | 1,226 | 540 | ||||||
Other expense, net | 77 | 171 | ||||||
1,303 | 711 | |||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | (2,854 | ) | (1,451 | ) | ||||
Benefit for income taxes | (130 | ) | (489 | ) | ||||
Loss income from continuing operations | $ | (2,724 | ) | $ | (962 | ) | ||
Discontinued operations, net of tax | ||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | — | (111 | ) | |||||
Net loss | $ | (2,724 | ) | $ | (1,073 | ) | ||
Basic: | ||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||
Loss per share from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||
Loss per share | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||
Diluted: | ||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||
Loss per share from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||
Loss per share | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic | 15,703 | 15,568 | ||||||
Diluted | 15,703 | 15,568 | ||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except shares) (Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except shares) (Unaudited)
Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Capital Contributed in Excess of | Accumulated Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Treasury Stock | Comprehensive Income for the Three Months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Par Value | Shares | Amount | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 | 14,574,997 | $ | 146 | 1,092,555 | $ | 11 | $ | 48,748 | $ | (12,585 | ) | $ | 6,031 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2011 | (2,724 | ) | $ | (2,724 | ) | $ | (1,073 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment | (1,293 | ) | (1,293 | ) | 3,932 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax | (42 | ) | (42 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognition of pension funded status, net of tax | (180 | ) | (180 | ) | 92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income | $ | ( 4,239 | ) | $ | 2,937 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock based compensation | 112 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares surrendered as payment of tax withholding | (7,721 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of treasury stock | (8 | ) | 7,721 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under stock option plan | 48,945 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 | 14,623,942 | $ | 146 | 1,092,555 | $ | 11 | $ | 48,894 | $ | (15,309 | ) | $ | 4,516 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
For the three months ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,724 | ) | $ | (1,073 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss (income) from discontinued operations | — | 111 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 704 | 612 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (243 | ) | (1,649 | ) | ||||
Provision for losses on accounts receivable | 7 | 63 | ||||||
Accrued retirement | — | (33 | ) | |||||
Deferred financing charge | — | 118 | ||||||
Stock based compensation expense | 112 | 228 | ||||||
Restructuring charges | — | 192 | ||||||
Payment of restructuring charges | (1,114 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||
Severance charge (former CEO) | — | 878 | ||||||
Severance charge payments | (172 | ) | — | |||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | — | 80 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable | 4,680 | (4,309 | ) | |||||
Inventories | (665 | ) | 93 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 1,522 | 514 | ||||||
Other assets | (24 | ) | 641 | |||||
Customer deposits | (1,079 | ) | (399 | ) | ||||
Accrued compensation | 154 | (238 | ) | |||||
Accounts and notes payable, trade | (2,512 | ) | 7 | |||||
Income taxes payable | 250 | 817 | ||||||
Accrued and withheld taxes | (989 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||
Other accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 218 | (376 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operating activities | (1,875 | ) | (4,005 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Additions of property, plant and equipment | (62 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Additions of patents and trademarks | (15 | ) | (189 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used in) by investing activities | (77 | ) | (243 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Long-term and short-term debt borrowings | 1,287 | 2,184 | ||||||
Long-term and short-term debt repayments | (1,287 | ) | — | |||||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations | — | (29 | ) | |||||
Payment of debt financing costs | (64 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||
Share repurchase | (8 | ) | — | |||||
Other long-term liabilities | 136 | 27 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | 64 | 1,962 | ||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||
Cash provided (used in) by operating activities | — | (219 | ) | |||||
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities | — | (13 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | — | (232 | ) | |||||
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash | 222 | 699 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (1,666 | ) | (1,819 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents (including discontinued operations at beginning of period) | 15,814 | 15,710 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (including discontinued operations at end of period) | 14,148 | 13,891 | ||||||
Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at end of period | — | — | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (excluding discontinued operations) at end of period | $ | 14,148 | $ | 13,891 | ||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
Table of Contents
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
For the three months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 337 | $ | 282 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 19 | $ | 376 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Warrants issued in connection with debt financing | $ | — | 441 |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.
are an integral part of these statements.
6
Table of Contents
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 1 — Organization and Basis of Presentation:
Baldwin Technology Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Baldwin” or the “Company”) are engaged primarily in the development, manufacture and sale of press automation equipment and related parts and consumables for the printing and publishing industry.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Baldwin and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature, which are in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results for the interim periods. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, which was filed on October 13, 2011.
Effective July 1, 2011, as a result of certain organizational changes that more closely aligns engineering resources with specific products and production processes (i.e. process changes, maintenance, efficiency, and productivity improvements of current products), the Company now records these engineering costs as a component of cost of sales. The realignment resulted in approximately $1,331 of certain global engineering costs that were previously recorded as operating expenses to be recorded as cost of sales.
Revenue Recognition. The Company’s products are sold with varying terms and conditions depending on the nature of the product sold and the geographic location of the customer. The Company’s revenues also include installation and service contracts. The Company may also enter into multi-element revenue arrangements that may consist of multiple deliverables of its product and service offerings. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the sale price is reasonably assured. In addition to these general revenue recognition criteria, the following specific revenue recognition policies are followed:
Products and Equipment— For product and equipment sales (one deliverable only), revenue recognition generally occurs when products or equipment have been shipped, risk of loss has transferred to the customer, objective evidence exists that customer acceptance provisions, if applicable, have been met, no significant obligations remain and, where applicable, an allowance for discounts, returns and customer incentives can be reliably estimated. Recorded revenues are reduced by these allowances. The Company bases its estimates of these allowances on historical experience taking into consideration the type of products sold, the type of customer, and the specific type of transaction in each arrangement.
Services— Revenue for services is generally recognized at completion of the contractually required services.
Multiple-Element Arrangements—The Company as required (1) separates deliverables into separate units of accounting when deliverables are sold in a bundled arrangement and (2) to allocates the arrangement’s consideration to each unit in the arrangement (such as, equipment, installation or commissioning services). The Company determines an estimated selling price for each separate deliverable following a hierarchy of evidence — Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), Third Party Evidence (“TPE”) and, if VSOE and TPE do not exist, best estimate of selling price (“BESP”).
• | VSOE — The price of a deliverable when the Company regularly sells it on a stand -alone basis. |
Typically, the Company is unable to determine VSOE for the installation and commissioning services portion, as well as, the equipment portion of a multiple-element arrangement. Since the Company does not sell its installation and commissioning services on a stand-alone basis, the Company is not able to determine VSOE for these portions of a multiple-element arrangement. In addition, in certain instances, similar equipment included in a multiple-element arrangement is sold separately in stand-alone arrangements as customers may perform installations themselves. The Company has determined that the applicability of this stand-alone pricing is not appropriate to serve as the VSOE for equipment in multiple-element arrangements since this pricing considers the geographies in which the products or services are sold, major product and service groups, customer classification (OEM versus End User) and other market variables.
• | TPE — Third party (competitor, subcontractors, etc) sales prices for the same or largely interchangeable products or services to similar customers in stand-alone sales. TPE can only be used if VSOE is not available. |
Generally, the Company’s strategy for many of its products differs from that of its peers and its offerings contain a level of customization and differentiation such that the comparable pricing of products with similar functionality sold by other companies cannot be obtained. Furthermore, the Company is unable to reliably determine what similar competitor products’ selling prices are on a stand-alone basis. Therefore, the Company is typically not able to determine TPE for the equipment portion of a multiple-element arrangement. However, there are others (subcontractors) in the industry with sufficient knowledge about the installation and commissioning process that the Company uses on occasion to perform these services. Overall, installation and commissioning services may vary, due in part, to the size and complexity of the installation and commissioning, however, these subcontractor rates may provide a basis for TPE after considering the type of services to be performed (i.e. mechanical, electrical) and negotiated subcontractor rates.
• | BESP — When the Company is unable to establish VSOE or TPE, the Company uses BESP. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis. |
The Company determines BESP for a deliverable in a multiple element arrangement by first collecting all reasonably available data points including sales, cost and margin analysis of the product, and other inputs based on the Company’s normal pricing practices. Second, the Company makes any reasonably required adjustments to the data based on market conditions and Company-specific factors (customer, cost structure, etc.). Third, the Company stratifies the data points, when appropriate, based on customer, magnitude of the transaction and sales volume. In addition, the Company has negotiated supply agreements, primarily with large OEM customers, for pricing some of its products and installation and commissioning services. The Company has experience selling the products and installation and commissioning services at the published price list and considers this to be BESP when contracting with customers under the supply agreements.
After determination of the estimated selling price of each deliverable in a multiple-element arrangement, the arrangement consideration is then allocated using the relative selling price method. Under the relative selling price method, the estimated selling price for each deliverable is compared to the sum of the estimated selling prices for all deliverables. The percentage that is calculated for each deliverable is then multiplied by the total contractual value of the multiple-element arrangement to determine the revenue allocated to each deliverable.
The revenue allocated to each deliverable is then recorded in accordance with existing revenue recognition guidance for stand alone product/equipment sales and unbundled services.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” was amended in June 2011 to require entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income under current GAAP. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2012. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued revised authoritative guidance for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The guidance allows an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment for a reporting unit. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the quantitative two-step impairment test is unnecessary. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent interim period have not yet been issued. The Company does not expect that adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The results of operations for the interim period presented are not necessarily indicative of trends or of results to be expected for any future period including the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2012.
Note 2 — Discontinued Operations:
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company discontinued its non-core food blending and packaging business. As a result of this decision and having met the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation, the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the food blending and packaging business are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The blending and packaging business was sold on June 3, 2011.
Revenues and net loss of the food blending and packaging business included in discontinued operations are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Revenues | $ | — | $ | 1,836 | ||||
Pre-tax loss from operations of blending and packaging | ||||||||
business | — | 171 | ||||||
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations | — | 171 | ||||||
Tax benefit | — | 60 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | 111 | ||||
7
Table of Contents
Note 3 — Long Term Debt:
September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Long-Term | Current | Long-Term | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revolving Credit Agreement due July 2, 2012, interest rate one-month LIBOR rate 0.23% plus 5.50% (a) | $ | 13,700 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 13,700 | ||||||||
Revolving Credit Agreement due July 2, 2012, interest rate one-month LIBOR rate 1.30% plus 5.50% (a) | 2,008 | — | — | 2,175 | ||||||||||||
Term loan payable by foreign subsidiary due April 28, 2016, with annual payments, interest rate 1.53% (b) | 260 | 1,038 | 248 | 993 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated promissory note due June 30, 2015, interest one year LIBOR rate 1.2% plus 4.50% (c) | 448 | 1,684 | 448 | 1,684 | ||||||||||||
Term loan payable by foreign subsidiary due October 15, 2016, with annual payments, interest rate 1.50% (d) | 52 | 1,247 | — | — | ||||||||||||
$ | 16,468 | $ | 3,969 | $ | 696 | $ | 18,552 | |||||||||
(a) The Company’s primary source of external financing is its revolving Credit Agreement, as amended with certain lenders (the “Lenders”) and Bank of America (“BofA”), as agent (the “Credit Agreement”), which has a term that ends on July 2, 2012. The borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured in the U.S. by a pledge of substantially all of the Company’s domestic assets (approximately $17,000) and in Europe by a pledge of the Company’s European assets and the stock of the Company’s European subsidiaries and certain of the Company’s Asian subsidiaries. The Company is in discussions regarding replacement of its Credit Agreement and anticipates finalizing a replacement Credit Agreement although there are no assurances that such agreement will be completed by the loan maturity date or at commercially reasonable terms.
The Credit Agreement, as amended, requires the Company to satisfy certain minimum EBITDA, Minimum Currency Adjusted Net Sales, Capital Expenditures, and Minimum Liquidity covenants. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement at September 30, 2011.
Under the terms of waiver and amendment agreements entered into in September 2010 and May 2011 to the Credit Agreement, the Company issued to the Lenders two tranches of Warrants. The first tranche (“the 2010 Warrants”) have a term of 10 years to purchase 352,671 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock for $0.01 per share and contains a put provision that enables the holders after September 28, 2012 to request a cash settlement of the then fair market value of the 2010 Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share for each share issuable upon exercise of the Warrants. The 2010 Warrants are presented as a liability ($420 at September 30, 2011) under other long-term liabilities. The value of the 2010 Warrants is marked to market at the end of each reporting period and the change in value is recorded in interest expense. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the value of the 2010 Warrants was unchanged.
The second tranche (“the May 2011 Warrants”) also have a term of ten years to purchase 372,374 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock for $0.01 per share and contains a put provision that enables the holders after May 16, 2013 to request a cash settlement of the then fair market value of the 2011 Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share for each share issuable upon exercise of the Warrants . The 2011 Warrants are presented as a liability ($443 at September 30, 2011) under other long-term liabilities. The value of the 2011 Warrants is marked to market at the end of each reporting period and the change in value is recorded in interest expense. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the value of the May 2011 Warrants was unchanged.
On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into Amendment No. 11 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 11”) with certain lenders and BofA as agent. Among other things, Amendment No. 11 (i) extended the maturity date of the revolving Credit Agreement from November 21, 2011 to July 2, 2012, (ii) adjusted the interest payment provisions pursuant to which euro and U.S. dollar borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 7.50%, and (iii) increased the incremental interest rate for the deferred interest to be paid at maturity. At September 30, 2011 the amount of deferred interest recorded in other accounts payable and accrued liabilities is approximately $280. As part of the consideration for Amendment No. 11, the Company will (a) pay the Lenders a potential fee of $1,100 as follows: $200 upon signing
8
Table of Contents
of Amendment No. 11, and scheduled weekly installments ranging from $200 to $50 beginning February 10, 2012 through April 20, 2012 unless the Credit Agreement is fully refinanced prior to the payment due dates, in which case any remaining payments will be waived, (b) grant to the Lenders ten year Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 434,200 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, with a put provision exercisable after two (2) years that enables the holder to request a cash settlement equal to the then fair market value of the Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share for each share issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants (the “October 2011 Warrants”); and (c) if the Credit Agreement is not refinanced prior to certain scheduled dates, the Company may grant to the Lenders additional ten year Warrants in four monthly installments beginning March 1, 2012 and on the first day of each month through June 1, 2012, to purchase an aggregate of 1,592,067 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company (equal to an amount not to exceed 20 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company on September 27, 2010) each at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and each with a put provision exercisable after two (2) years that enables the holder to request a cash settlement equal to the then fair market value of the Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share for each share issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants.
The Credit Agreement, as amended by Amendment No 11, continues to require that the Company satisfy certain minimum EBITDA, Minimum Currency Adjusted Net Sales, Capital Expenditures, and Minimum Liquidity tests. The Company anticipates that it will be in compliance with these covenants for the remainder of the term of the Credit Agreement. However, the Company’s ability to meet its debt obligations (including compliance with applicable financial covenants) is dependent upon the Company’s future performance and its cash flows from operations, both of which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, and other known and unknown risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control.
(b) $1,298 five year term loan with principal and interest payments due and payable in five annual installments.
(c) Five year subordinated promissory note with principal and interest payments due and payable in five annual installments. The balance at September 30, 2011 was $2,132.
(d) $1,299 five year term loan with principal and interest payable in five annual installments.
The Company maintains relationships with both foreign and domestic banks, which combined have extended short- and long-term credit facilities to the Company totaling $29,086. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had $23,302 outstanding (including Letters of Credit of $1,103). The amount available under these credit facilities at September 30, 2011 was $0.
Note 4 — Net (loss) income per share:
Basic net (loss) income per share includes no dilution and is calculated by dividing net (loss) income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net (loss) income per share reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the weighted average shares outstanding used to compute diluted net (loss) income per share includes potentially dilutive securities of zero shares. Outstanding options and warrants to purchase 3,034,819 and 1,180,000 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are not included in the calculation of diluted net (loss) income per share, because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
9
Table of Contents
Note 5 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”) is comprised of various items, which affect equity that result from recognized transactions and other economic events other than transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. AOCI is included in shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. AOCI consists of the following:
September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments | $ | 6,223 | $ | 7,516 | ||||
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax benefit of $175 (benefit of $144 at June 30, 2011) | (240 | ) | (198 | ) | ||||
Pension and other, net of tax benefit of $1,062 (benefit of $930 at June 30, 2011) | (1,467 | ) | (1,287 | ) | ||||
$ | 4,516 | $ | 6,031 | |||||
Note 6 — Inventories:
Inventories consist of the following:
September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 12,076 | $ | 12,110 | ||||
In process | 4,491 | 4,761 | ||||||
Finished goods | 3,890 | 3,758 | ||||||
$ | 20,457 | $ | 20,629 | |||||
Foreign currency translation effects decreased inventories by $837 from June 30, 2011 to September 30, 2011.
Note 7 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended September 30, 2011 were as follows:
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Net | ||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Book Value | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2011 | $ | 21,531 | $ | 1,606 | $ | 19,925 | ||||||
Effects of currency translation. | (530 | ) | (29 | ) | (501 | ) | ||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2011 | $ | 21,001 | $ | 1,577 | $ | 19,424 | ||||||
10
Table of Contents
Intangible assets subject to amortization were comprised of the following:
As of September 30, 2011 | As of June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intangible Assets: | Amortization Period | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Patents and trademarks | 12-20 | $ | 11,833 | $ | 8,111 | $ | 11,930 | $ | 8,010 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships | 2-13 | 576 | 137 | 597 | 137 | |||||||||||||||
Trademarks | 30 | 1,460 | 242 | 1,547 | 241 | |||||||||||||||
Existing product technology | 15 | 6,079 | 1,566 | 6,442 | 1,574 | |||||||||||||||
Non-compete/solicitation Agreements | 5 | 64 | 54 | 66 | 55 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 5-30 | 2,330 | 2,187 | 2,369 | 2,205 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 22,342 | $ | 12,297 | $ | 22,951 | $ | 12,222 | ||||||||||||
Amortization expense associated with these intangible assets was $313 and $348, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Note 8 — Supplemental Compensation:
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s defined benefit plans for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
For the three months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Service cost | $ | 72 | $ | 100 | ||||
Interest cost | 78 | 79 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Amortization of net actuarial (loss) gain | 25 | 18 | ||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 169 | $ | 190 | ||||
During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the Company made no contributions to the plans.
Note 9 — Customers:
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, one customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales. Koenig and Bauer Aktiengesellschaft (“KBA”) accounted for approximately 18% of the Company’s net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, KBA accounted for 13% of the Company’s net sales.
11
Table of Contents
Note 10 — Warranty Costs:
The Company’s standard contractual warranty provisions are to repair or replace, at the Company’s option, product that is proven to be defective. The Company estimates its warranty costs as a percentage of revenues on a product by product basis, based on actual historical experience. Hence, the Company accrues estimated warranty costs reported in other accounts payable and accrued liabilities, at the time of sale. In addition, should the Company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for separate from the percent of revenue discussed above.
For the three months | ||||||||
ended September 30 | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Warranty reserve at June 30 | $ | 2,123 | $ | 1,999 | ||||
Additional warranty expense accruals. | 520 | 363 | ||||||
Payments against reserve | (421 | ) | (401 | ) | ||||
Effects of currency rate fluctuations | (113 | ) | 221 | |||||
Warranty reserve at September 30 | $ | 2,109 | $ | 2,182 | ||||
Note 11 — Share Based Payments:
Total share-based compensation for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized in the following table:
For the three months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Share based compensation | ||||||||
Stock options | $ | 70 | $ | 234 | ||||
Restricted stock | 42 | (6 | ) | |||||
Total share-based compensation | $ | 112 | $ | 228 | ||||
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted to OBX Partners LLC (“OBX”) an option (the “Option”) to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (the “Shares”) at an exercise price per share of $1.26, having a grant date fair value of $167 and three month vesting, exercisable on or after October 1, 2011. Additionally, there was no expense recorded related to performance shares based on an assessment of probability of achievement during the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
12
Table of Contents
Note 12 — Restructuring:
Quarter 1 FY 2011 Plan:
In September 2010, the Company committed to the principle features of a plan to restructure its operations in the UK and Japan. Actions under the plan to consolidate facilities in the UK and to reduce employment levels in Japan commenced in September.
Balance at | Payments | Balance at | ||||||||||||||
Initial | June 30, | against | September 30, | |||||||||||||
Reserve | 2011 | Reserve | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | $ | 145 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Other | 46 | 15 | (12 | ) | 3 | |||||||||||
Total restructuring costs | $ | 191 | $ | 15 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 3 | |||||||
Quarter 2 FY 2011 Plan:
In December 2010, the Company committed to the principle features of a plan to restructure its operations in Germany and further restructure its operations in Japan. Actions under the plan to reduce employment levels commenced in December.
Balance at | Payments | Balance at | ||||||||||||||
Initial | June 30, | against | September 30, | |||||||||||||
Reserve | 2011 | Reserve | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | $ | 417 | $ | 20 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | — | |||||||
Total restructuring costs | $ | 417 | $ | 20 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | — | |||||||
Quarter 3 FY 2011 Plan:
In March 2011, the Company committed to the principle features of a plan to additionally further restructure its operations in Japan, Germany, the U.K. and Sweden. Actions under the plan primarily relate to reduction in employment levels, consolidation of facilities and fixed asset write-downs.
Balance at | Payments | Balance at | ||||||||||||||
Initial | June 30, | against | September 30, | |||||||||||||
Reserve | 2011 | Reserve | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,229 | $ | (1,082 | ) | $ | 147 | |||||||
Other | 577 | 736 | — | 736 | ||||||||||||
Total restructuring costs | $ | 2,358 | $ | 1,965 | $ | (1,082 | ) | $ | 883 | |||||||
Note 13 — Legal Proceedings:
Baldwin is involved in various legal proceedings from time to time, including actions with respect to commercial, intellectual property and employment matters. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses against the claims currently asserted against it and intends to defend them vigorously. However, the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain, and the Company cannot be sure that it will prevail in any of the cases currently in litigation. The Company believes that the ultimate outcome of any such cases will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows; however, there can be no assurances that an adverse determination would not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
13
Table of Contents
Note 14 — Income Taxes:
The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by several factors including but not limited to (i) having significant operations outside the United States, which are taxed at rates different than the U.S. statutory rate, (ii) no tax benefit being recognized for losses incurred in certain countries as the realization of such benefits is not more likely than not, and (iii) certain foreign and domestic permanent items.
Note 15 — Fair Value Measurements:
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Observable inputs consist of market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own market assumptions. These inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
• | Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | ||
• | Level 2 — Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or all other inputs that are observable | ||
• | Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data which require the Company to develop its own assumptions |
If the inputs used to measure the fair value of a financial instrument fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the financial instrument is categorized based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Whenever possible, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine fair value. In the absence of quoted market prices, the Company uses independent sources and data to determine fair value.
At September 30, 2011, the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, consistent with the fair value hierarchy provision and valued as Level 1 are comprised of marketable securities and amount held in trust included in other assets and valued as Level 2 are warrants. At September 30, 2011, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities valued at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
There has been no change in the Company’s valuation technique during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
Note 16 — Subsequent Event:
On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into Amendment No. 11 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 11”) with certain lenders and BofA as agent (See Note 3).
14
Table of Contents
ITEM 2: | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS) |
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain factors, which have affected the consolidated financial statements of Baldwin.
Forward-looking Statements
Except for the historical information contained herein, the following statements and certain other statements contained herein are based on current expectations. Similarly, the press releases issued by the Company and other public statements made by the Company from time to time may contain language that is forward-looking. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “forecast,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “should,” “plan,” “estimate,” and “potential,” among others. Such statements are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The Company cautions investors that any such forward-looking statements made by the Company are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to the following: (i) the ability to comply with requirements of credit agreements; the availability of funding under such agreements; the ability to maintain adequate liquidity in declining and challenging economic conditions impacting the Company as well as customers, (ii) general economic conditions in the U.S. and other foreign locations, (iii) the ability to obtain, maintain and defend challenges against valid patent protection of certain technology, primarily as it relates to the Company’s cleaning systems, (iv) material changes in foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. Dollar, (v) changes in the mix of products and services comprising revenues, (vi) a decline in the rate of growth of the installed base of printing press units and the timing of new press orders, (vii) the ultimate realization of certain trade receivables and the status of ongoing business levels with the Company’s large OEM customers, and (viii) competitive market influences. Additional factors are set forth in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, which should be read in conjunction herewith.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
For further information regarding the Company’s critical accounting policies, please refer to the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. There have been no material changes during the three months ended September 30, 2011.
Overview
Baldwin is a leading global supplier of process automation equipment and related parts and consumables for the printing and publishing industries. Baldwin offers its customers a broad range of market-leading technologies, products and systems that enhance the quality of printed products and improve the economic and environmental efficiency of printing presses. Headquartered in Boca Raton, FL, the Company has sales and service centers and product development and production facilities in the Americas, Asia and Europe. Baldwin’s technology and products include cleaning systems and related consumables, fluid management and ink control systems, web press protection systems, drying and curing systems, and related services and parts.
The Company manages its business as one reportable business segment built around its core competency in accessories and controls.
The market for printing equipment continues to face significant challenges. These challenges have translated into a lower level of business activity for the Company.
15
Table of Contents
Quarter Ended September 30, 2011 Overview
• | Revenues decreased 10% versus the year ago comparable period. | ||
• | Backlog of $36,248 at September 30, 2011 flat versus backlog at June 30, 2011 and a 14% increase compared to September 30, 2010. | ||
• | In October 2011, the Company concluded an amendment to its Credit Agreement with its Lenders, extending the term of the agreement to July 2, 2012. |
See discussions below related to consolidated results of operations, liquidity and capital resources.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Consolidated Results
Net Sales
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 decreased by $4,142 or 10%, to $35,856 from $39,998 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact of $2,314 in the current period.
The decrease in consolidated sales reflects lower sales in Europe of $522, including $1,486 of favorable foreign currency translation. The decrease was primarily attributable to the following:
• | lower revenue associated with the UV/IR systems business primarily attributable to production delays which have caused delayed shipments, rescheduling of product installations by certain customers as well as higher shipments of lower value systems; | ||
• | lower sales activity by OEM press manufacturers for new printing equipment; and | ||
• | lower demand level from end user customers. |
In Asia, net sales decreased approximately $3,813, including $827 of favorable foreign currency translation. The decrease primarily reflects the delivery of several large newspaper equipment orders in Japan in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, not repeated during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and lower UV shipments in China.
Net sales in the Americas increased $193, and reflect increased equipment and consumables sales.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $8,892 (24.8% of net sales) compared to $12,349 (30.9% of net sales) for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact of $568 in the current period. The decrease in gross profit primarily relates to the following:
• | Lower sales volume, unfavorable product mix and unfavorable overhead absorption; and | ||
• | Realignment of approximately $1,331 of certain global engineering costs that were previously recorded as operating expenses. Effective July 1, 2011, as a result of certain organizational changes that more closely align engineering resources with specific products and production processes (i.e. process changes, maintenance, efficiency, and productivity improvements of current products), the Company now records these engineering costs as a component of cost of sales. |
These negative impacts on gross profit were partially offset by cost savings from the restructuring actions completed in fiscal year 2011.
16
Table of Contents
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $8,509 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $9,483 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, a decrease of $974. Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact of $426 in the current period. G&A expenses decreased $1,092, and selling expenses decreased $308. The decrease in SG&A primarily reflects the savings associated with restructuring actions, and non-recurrence of costs associated with the termination agreement with the Company’s former CEO of $878.
Engineering and Development Expenses
Engineering and development expenses decreased by $1,481 in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact of $132 in the current period. Approximately $1,331 of the decrease reflects the realignment of global engineering costs to more closely align these costs with the production process and, effective July 1, 2011 are included as a component of cost of sales.
Restructuring
The Company recorded no restructuring costs during the three months ended September 30, 2011 versus $192 in the comparable prior year period. The restructuring costs in the prior year period primarily reflect employment reductions in Japan and the UK and the consolidation of office facilities in the UK.
Interest and Other
Interest, net of interest income, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $1,226 as compared to $540 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase reflects higher amortization of deferred financing costs and deferred interest due at the planned maturity date of the Credit Agreement with Bank of America.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $130 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, (an effective rate of 4.6%). The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2011 differed from the statutory rate due to: (a) foreign income being taxed at rates different than the U.S. statutory rate, (b) no benefit being recognized for losses incurred in certain countries, as the realization of such benefits is not more likely than not, and (c) the impact of foreign and domestic permanent items.
The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $489 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, (an effective rate of 33.7%). The effective rate is impacted by the distribution of the company’s earnings and losses in the various jurisdictions in which it operates.
The Company continues to assess the need for deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Any adjustments to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, either positive or negative, would be recorded in the income statement of the period during which the adjustments were determined to be required.
Net (Loss) Income from continuing operations
The Company’s net loss amounted to $2,724 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to net loss of $962 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Net loss per share amounted to $0.17 basic and diluted for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and compared to net loss per share of $0.06 basic and diluted for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
17
Table of Contents
Discontinued Operations
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company discontinued its non-core food blending and packaging business. As a result of this decision and having met the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation, the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the food blending and packaging business are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company sold the food blending and packaging business in June 2011.
Revenues and net income (loss) of the food blending and packaging business included in discontinued operations are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Revenues | $ | — | $ | 1,836 | ||||
Pre-tax loss from operations of blending and packaging business | — | 171 | ||||||
Pre-tax loss from discontinued operations | — | 171 | ||||||
Tax benefit | — | 60 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | 111 | ||||
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. These non-GAAP measures are provided because management of the Company uses these financial measure as an indicator of business performance in maintaining and evaluating the Company’s on-going financial results and trends. The Company believes that both management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP measures in assessing the performance of the Company’s ongoing operations and liquidity and when planning and forecasting future periods. These non-GAAP measures also facilitates management’s internal comparisons to the company’s historical operating results and liquidity. The following is a reconciliation of the net income (loss) as reported to Consolidated and Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations.
For the three months ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Net (loss) as reported, from continuing operations | $ | (2,724 | ) | $ | (962 | ) | ||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes | (130 | ) | (489 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net | 1,226 | 540 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 704 | 612 | ||||||
CONSOLIDATED EBITDA | $ | (924 | ) | $ | (299 | ) | ||
Expense related to inventory step up | — | 243 | ||||||
Expense related to former Pres/CEO termination | — | 878 | ||||||
Restructuring | — | 191 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (924 | ) | $ | 1,013 | |||
18
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources at September 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, are summarized as follows:
Cash (used in)provided by | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Operating activities | $ | (1,875 | ) | $ | (4,005 | ) | ||
Investing activities | (77 | ) | (243 | ) | ||||
Financing activities | 64 | 1,962 | ||||||
Net cash used by discontinued operations | — | (232 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | 222 | 699 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (1,666 | ) | $ | (1,819 | ) | ||
Cash from operating activities improved by $2,130 during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 versus the prior year period. The improvement in cash flows primarily relates to lower working capital requirements in the quarter ended September 30, 2011 compared to the comparable period in the prior year. Partially offsetting the lower working capital requirements were $953 in higher restructuring payments and lower income in the quarter ended September 30, 2011 primarily driven by lower sales volume.
The Company used $166 less for investing activities in the three months ended September 30, 2011 versus the prior year period primarily as a result of lower payments related to patents and other intangibles.
The decrease in cash flow from financing activities primarily reflects lower borrowings in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010.
The Company’s primary source of external financing is its Credit Agreement, as amended (the “Credit Agreement”), with Bank of America (“BofA”) which has a current term that ends on July 1, 2012. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured in the U.S. by a pledge of substantially all of the Company’s domestic assets (approximately $17,000) and in Europe by a pledge of the Company’s European assets and the stock of the Company’s European subsidiaries and certain Asian subsidiaries.
Under the terms of waiver and amendment agreements entered into in September 2010 and May 2011 to the Credit Agreement, the Company issued to the Lenders two tranches of Warrants. The first tranche (“the 2010 Warrants”) has a term of 10 years to purchase 352,671 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock for $0.01 per share and contains a put provision that enables the holders after September 28, 2012 to request a cash settlement of the then fair market value of the 2010 Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share. The second tranche (“the May 2011 Warrants”) also has a term of ten years to purchase 372,374 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock for $0.01 per share. The 2011 Warrants also contain a put provision that enables the holders after May 16, 2013 to request a cash settlement of the then fair market value of the 2011 Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share.
On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into Amendment No. 11 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 11”) with BofA. Among other things, Amendment No 11 (i) extended the maturity date of the revolving Credit Agreement from November 21, 2011 to July 2, 2012, (ii) adjusted the interest payment provisions pursuant to which euro and U.S. dollar borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 7.50%, and (iii) increased the incremental interest rate for the deferred interest to be paid at maturity. At September 30, 2011 the amount of defferred interest recorded in other accounts payable and accrued liabilities is approximately $280. As part of the consideration for Amendment No. 11, the Company will (a) pay the Lenders a potential fee of $1,100 as follows: $200 upon signing of Amendment No. 11, and scheduled weekly installments ranging from $200 to $50 beginning February 10, 2012 through April 20, 2012 unless the Credit Agreement is fully refinanced prior to the payment due dates, in which case any remaining payments will be waived, (b) grant to the Lenders ten year Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 434,200 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company at a strike price of $0.01 per share, with a put provision
19
Table of Contents
exercisable after two (2) years that enables the Holder to request a cash settlement of the then fair market value of the Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share (the “October 2011 Warrants”); and (c) if the Credit Agreement is not refinanced prior to certain scheduled dates, the Company may grant to the lenders additional ten year Warrants in four monthly installments beginning March 1, 2012 through June 1, 2012, to purchase an aggregate of 1,592,067 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company (equal to an amount less than 20 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company on September 27, 2010) each at a strike price of $0.01 per share, and each with a put provision exercisable after two (2) years that enables the Holder to request a cash settlement of the then fair market value of the Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share.
The Credit Agreement, as amended by Amendment No 11, continues to require that the Company satisfy certain minimum EBITDA, Minimum Currency Adjusted Net Sales, Capital Expenditures, and Minimum Liquidity tests. The Company anticipates that it will be in compliance with these covenants for the remainder of the term of the Credit Agreement. However, the Company’s ability to meet its debt obligations (including compliance with applicable financial covenants) is dependent upon the Company’s future performance and its cash flows from operations, both of which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, and other known and unknown risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control.
The Company maintains relationships with both foreign and domestic banks, which combined have extended short- and long-term credit facilities to the Company totaling $29,086. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had $23,302 outstanding (including Letters of Credit of $1,103). The amount available under these credit facilities as September 30, 2011 was $0.
The Company believes that its cash flow from operations, along with its available bank lines of credit is sufficient to finance its operations and other capital requirements over the remaining term of the Credit Agreement which expires July 2, 2012. However, the Company believes that, if needed, other available sources of liquidity could be limited. The Company is in discussions regarding replacement of its Credit Agreement and anticipates finalizing a replacement Credit Agreement prior to July 2, 2012 although there are no assurances that such agreement will be completed by the loan maturity date.
At September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance entities, special purpose entities or variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, the Company is not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if the Company had engaged in such relationships.
20
Table of Contents
The following summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations at September 30, 2011 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands).
Fiscal Years Ending June 30th | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September | 2017 and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30, 2011 | 2012* | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans payable | $ | 3,894 | $ | 3,894 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 20,437 | 16,468 | 987 | 1,132 | 1,201 | 571 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable operating lease Obligations | 15,735 | 3,762 | 3,473 | 2,441 | 1,589 | 1,370 | 3,100 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase commitments (materials) | 12,957 | 11,729 | 1,228 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental compensation | 10,378 | 1,160 | 1,011 | 908 | 1,014 | 1,266 | 5,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring payments | 886 | 886 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Fees (2) | 900 | 900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (1) | 1,530 | 545 | 826 | 95 | 54 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations | 66,718 | 39,345 | 7,525 | 4,576 | 3,858 | 3,217 | 8,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||
* | Includes only the remaining nine months of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. | |
1. | the anticipated future interest payments are based on the Company’s current indebtedness and interest rates at September 30, 2011. | |
2. | the anticipated future bank fee payments are based on the Company’s current indebtedness and interest rates at September 30, 2011. | |
At September 30, 2011, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $1,719. A reasonable estimate of timing related to the $1,719 is not possible. |
ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures:
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports it files or submits under the Exchange act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company has not made any changes in the internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company continues to review, document and test its internal control over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that its systems evolve with the Company’s business. These efforts may lead to various changes in its internal control over reporting.
21
Table of Contents
Part II: Other Information
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There has been no activity under the Company’s stock repurchase program for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into Amendment No. 11 to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 11”) with certain lenders and BofA as agent. Among other things, Amendment No. 11 (i) extended the maturity date of the revolving Credit Agreement from November 21, 2011 to July 2, 2012, (ii) adjusted the interest payment provisions pursuant to which euro and U.S. dollar borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 7.50%, and (iii) increased the incremental interest rate for the deferred interest to be paid at maturity. As part of the consideration for Amendment No. 11, the Company will (a) pay the Lenders a potential fee of $1,100 as follows: $200 upon signing of Amendment No. 11, and scheduled weekly installments ranging from $200 to $50 beginning February 10, 2012 through April 20, 2012 unless the Credit Agreement is fully refinanced prior to the payment due dates, in which case any remaining payments will be waived, (b) grant to the Lenders ten year Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 434,200 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, with a put provision exercisable after two (2) years that enables the holder to request a cash settlement equal to the then fair market value of the Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share for each share issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants (the “October 2011 Warrants”); and (c) if the Credit Agreement is not refinanced prior to certain scheduled dates, the Company may grant to the Lenders additional ten year Warrants in four monthly installments beginning March 1, 2012 and on the first day of each month through June 1, 2012, to purchase an aggregate of 1,592,067 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company (equal to an amount not to exceed 20 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company on September 27, 2010) each at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and each with a put provision exercisable after two (2) years that enables the holder to request a cash settlement equal to the then fair market value of the Warrants in an amount not to exceed $1.50 per share for each share issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants.
Neither the warrants nor the shares acquirable upon the exercise thereof have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the securities laws of any state, in reliance upon an exemption from such registration.
ITEM 5. Other Events
On November 10, 2011, the Company reported its results of operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2011. Details of this announcement are contained in the press release of the Company dated November 10, 2011, and furnished with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q as Exhibit 99.1.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
31.01 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
31.02 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
32.01 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished herewith). | |
32.02 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished herewith). | |
99.1 | Company Press Release entitled “Baldwin Announces Results for First Quarter FY2012” dated November 10, 2011 (filed herewith). |
22
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC. | ||||
BY | /s/ Ivan R. Habibe | |||
Ivan R. Habibe | ||||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||||
Dated: November 14, 2011
23