On July 24, 2020, at a hearing on consequential matters, Justice Smith gave permission to appeal the ranking issues at both LBHI2 and PLC, but did not give Deutsche Bank permission to appeal the Release and Discounting issues. Justice Smith also granted LBHI a cost award against Deutsche Bank and granted PLC a cost award against LBHI.
For further information please refer to:
www.pwc.co.uk/services/business-
recovery/administrations/non-lbie-companies/
lbh-plc-in-administration.html and
www.pwc.co.uk/services/business-
recovery/administrations/non-lbie-companies
/lbhi2-limited-in-administration.html
(c) | Guarantee Claims For Which LBIE Is The Primary Obligor |
LBHI previously filed an objection to disallow six, LBIE-based, prime-brokerage-related guarantee claims seeking $118 million filed by funds related to Maverick Capital Ltd (“Maverick”) [ECF No. 53107]. On March 24, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court granted LBHI’s objection, disallowed Maverick’s claims, and ruled that Maverick could not amend its proofs of claim to assert direct (as opposed to guarantee) liability against LBHI [ECF No. 55346]. Maverick appealed that decision to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On September 30, 2018, the District Court reversed the Bankruptcy Court’s decision that section 562 of the Bankruptcy Code and certain exculpatory clauses contained in the prime brokerage agreement at issue applied to Maverick’s claims, and remanded the case to the Bankruptcy Court for further proceedings. On July 3, 2019, LBHI filed a motion seeking to reduce Maverick’s claims to $4.3 million. On August 8, 2019, Maverick filed its opposition to that motion. On September 10, 2019, the Court heard argument on the Motion and reserved decision. On September 14, 2020, Maverick filed a supplemental brief in connection with the pending motion. On October 19, 2020, LBHI filed its response to Maverick’s supplemental brief. On May 20, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court read its decision from the bench, ruling that Maverick was entitled to allowed guarantee claims against LBHI of $118 million, subject to the single satisfaction rule, and therefore, Maverick was entitled to receive distributions on those allowed claims until it recovers $16.2 in cash. The ruling is subject to appeal.
The outcome of the following litigation may impact LBHI’s potential indirect recoveries from LBIE:
AG Financial Products Inc.
On November 28, 2011, LBIE sued AG Financial Products Inc. (“AGR”), an affiliate of Assured Guaranty Corp., which in the past had provided credit protection to counterparties under credit default swaps. LBIE’s complaint, which was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the “New York Supreme Court”), alleged that AGR improperly terminated nine credit derivative transactions between LBIE and AGR and improperly calculated the termination payment in connection with the termination of 28 other credit derivative transactions between LBIE and AGR. LBIE asserted in the complaint that AGR owes LBIE a termination payment of approximately $1.4 billion.
On July 2, 2018, the New York Supreme Court dismissed LBIE’s claims with respect to the nine allegedly improperly terminated transactions in their entirety. That ruling remains subject to appeal. The Court also dismissed the claim that AGR breached its implied duty of good faith and fair dealing with respect to the valuation of the 28 terminated credit derivatives transactions, but found that there is a genuine question of fact as to the reasonableness and good faith of AGR’s calculation of its loss, and so LBIE may proceed with its claim against AGR for breach of contract. On July 31, 2018, AGR filed a Notice of Appeal with the New York State Appellate Division with respect to the surviving claims. On January 17, 2019, the Appellate Division denied AGR’s appeal. The trial was originally scheduled for March 9-20, 2020, but was adjourned by the Court as a result of risks posed by the coronavirus.