UNITED STATES |
| For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 | Commission File Number: 33-22603 |
BAYOU STEEL CORPORATION |
| Delaware (State of Incorporation) 138 Highway 3217 P.O. Box 5000 LaPlace, Louisiana (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | 72-1125783 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 70069 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (504) 652-4900 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| Title of Each Class Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value | Name of Exchange on Which Registered American Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_| Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.|X| The aggregate market value and the number of voting shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding on October 31, 2001 was: |
| Title of Each Class | Shares Outstanding Held By | Market Value Held By | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| of Common Stock | Affiliates | Non-Affiliates | Non-Affiliates | ||||||||
| Class A, $.01 par value | 533,545 | 10,085,835 | $5,345,493 | ||||||||
| Class B, $.01 par value | 2,271,127 | 0 | N/A | ||||||||
| Class C, $.01 par value | 100 | 0 | N/A | ||||||||
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCEPortions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III and portions of the registrant’s 2001 Annual Report filed as an exhibit, are incorporated herein by reference in Part II hereof. |
BAYOU STEEL CORPORATIONTABLE OF CONTENTS |
| PART I | Page |
| ITEM 1. | BUSINESS | 1 |
| General Manufacturing Process and Facilities Products Customers and Sales Distribution Strategy Competition Raw Materials Energy Environmental Matters Safety and Health Matters Employees | 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 8 |
| ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES | 8 |
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 9 |
| ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS | 9 |
| PART II |
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 9 |
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | 10 |
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 10 |
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK | 10 |
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | 11 |
| ITEM 9. | DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | 11 |
| PART III |
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | 11 |
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 11 |
| ITEM 12. | OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 11 |
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS | 11 |
| PART IV |
| ITEM 14. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K | 12 |
ii |
PART IItem 1. BusinessGeneralBayou Steel Corporation (the “Company”) is a leading producer of light structural shapes and merchant bar steel products. The Company owns and operates a steel minimill and a stocking warehouse on the Mississippi River in LaPlace, Louisiana (the “Louisiana Facility”), three additional stocking locations directly accessible to the Louisiana Facility through the Mississippi River waterway system, and a rolling mill with warehousing facility in Harriman, Tennessee (the “Tennessee Facility”) also accessible through the Mississippi River waterway system. The Company produces merchant bar and light structural steel products ranging in size from two to eight inches at the Louisiana Facility and merchant bar products ranging from one-half to four inches at the Tennessee Facility. The Louisiana Facility, which was constructed in 1981 at a cost of $243 million, is a minimill consisting of two electric arc furnaces (one of which is used as a back-up), a rolling mill, a climate controlled warehouse facility, and a deep-water dock on the Mississippi River. A “minimill” is a relatively low-cost steel production facility which uses steel scrap rather than iron ore as its basic raw material. In general, minimills recycle scrap using electric arc furnaces, continuous casters, and rolling mills. The Louisiana Facility’s minimill includes two Krupp computer-controlled electric arc furnaces utilizing water-cooled sidewalls and roof, two Voest-Alpine four-strand continuous casters, a computer supervised Italimpianti reheat furnace, and a 15-stand Danieli rolling mill. The Tennessee Facility was acquired and restarted by the Company in late 1995 following the purchase of substantially all of the assets of the Tennessee Valley Steel Corporation (the “TVSC”). The rolling mill at the Tennessee Facility includes a computer supervised reheat furnace, a 16-stand rolling mill and automated straightening, continuous cut-to-length, stacking and bundling equipment. The Company purchases most of its scrap in the open market from a large number of steel scrap dealers, although it also operates an automobile shredder and scrap processing facility to produce some of the scrap used in its operations. At the Louisiana Facility, steel scrap is used to produce finished steel in a variety of merchant bar and structural products, including angles, flats, channels, standard beams, and wide flange beams. At the Tennessee Facility, billets are rolled to produce merchant bar products, including angles, flats, rounds, and squares, and also has the capability to produce rebar. The location of the production and distribution facilities allows the Company to serve customers across a wide geographic area, including its primary markets in the Southeast, the lower Midwest, the Northeast, the Mid-Atlantic and the Appalachian states. The Company sells its products to nearly 400 customers, the majority of which are steel service centers, in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and occasionally overseas. Manufacturing Process and FacilitiesSteel scrap is the principal raw material used in the production process. The Company purchases most of its scrap needs on the open market and transports it to the Louisiana Facility by barge, ocean going vessel, rail, and truck, and stores it in a scrap receiving yard. The Company has been able to control the availability and the cost of steel scrap to some degree by producing its own shredded and cut grade scrap through its scrap processing division. The division currently supplies 30% of the steel scrap requirements. Steel scrap is melted in a 99-ton capacity alternating current electric arc furnace which heats the steel scrap to approximately 3000°F. During the melting and refining process, impurities are removed from the molten steel. After the scrap reaches a molten state, it is poured from the furnace into ladles, where final heating takes place in a ladle metallurgical facility and adjustments of alloying elements and carbon are made to obtain the desired chemistry. The ladles of steel are then transported to one of two four-strand continuous casters in which the molten steel is solidified in water-cooled molds. The casters produce long strands of steel that are cut by torch into billets (semi-finished product of specified weights), moved to a cooling bed and marked for identification. After cooling, the billets are transferred to a rolling mill for further processing. Billets in excess of the Louisiana Facility’s rolling mill requirements are shipped to the Tennessee Facility via rail for its rolling mill. 1 |
In the Louisiana Facility’s rolling mill, billets are reheated in a walking beam reheat furnace equipped with a recuperator before being rolled. Once the billets are heated to approximately 2000°F, they are rolled through up to fifteen mill stands which form the billets into the dimensions and sizes of the finished products. The heated finished shapes are placed on a cooling bed and then straightened and cut into either standard 20 or 40-foot lengths or specific customer lengths. The products are then stacked into 2½ to 5-ton bundles, processed (if needed) through an off-line saw, and placed in a climate-controlled warehouse where they are subsequently shipped to the Company’s stocking locations via barge or to customers directly via truck, rail, or barge. In the Tennessee Facility’s rolling mill, billets are reheated in a pusher reheat furnace equipped with a recuperator before being rolled. Once the billets are heated to approximately 2000°F, they are rolled through up to sixteen mill stands which form the billets into the dimensions and sizes of the finished products. The heated finished shapes are placed on a cooling bed and then straightened and cut into either standard 20 or 40-foot lengths or specific customer lengths. The products are then stacked into 2½ ton bundles and placed in a climate-controlled warehouse where they are subsequently shipped to the Company’s stocking locations via barge or to customers directly via truck or rail. ProductsThe Louisiana Facility is capable of producing a variety of merchant bar and light structural steel products and the Tennessee Facility is capable of producing a wide range of merchant bar products and rebar. |
| Size Range (In Inches) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profile | Tennessee | Louisiana | |||||||
| Equal Angles | ¾-2 | 2-6 | |||||||
| Flats | 1-4 | 4-8 | |||||||
| Channels | N/A | 3-8 | |||||||
| Squares | ½-1 | N/A | |||||||
| Rounds | ½-2 | N/A | |||||||
| Unequal Angles | N/A | 4-7 | |||||||
| Rebar | #4-#11 | N/A | |||||||
| Standard Beams | N/A | 3-6 | |||||||
| Wide Flange Beams | N/A | 4-8 | |||||||
The Company’s finished products are used for a wide range of commercial and industrial applications, including the construction and maintenance of petrochemical plants, barges and light ships, railcars, trucks and trailers, rack systems, tunnel and mine support products, joists, sign and guardrail posts for highways, power and radio transmission towers, and bridges. Rebar is used in highway and bridge construction, concrete structures such as parking garages, and home construction for driveways, sidewalks and swimming pools. The Company plans to continue to emphasize the production of light structural shapes and merchant bar products. Rebar was last produced in 1995. Shape and merchant bar margins are historically higher than those of rebar. The Tennessee Facility will produce rebar in fiscal 2001 in order to maintain capacity utilization. The Company’s products are manufactured to various national specifications, such as those set by the American Society for Testing and Materials, or to specific customer specifications which have more stringent quality criteria. In addition, the Company is one of a few minimills that is certified by the American Bureau of Shipping. The Company certifies that its products are tested in accordance with nuclear, state highway, bridge and military specifications and are also certified for state highway and bridge structures. In fiscal 1999, all of the facilities were certified to the International Standards Organization (ISO) management standards 9002 for quality and the Louisiana Facility was certified to ISO 14001 for environment. Customers and SalesThe Company has nearly 400 customers in the United States, Canada and Mexico. The majority of the Company’s finished products (approximately 71% in fiscal 2001) are sold to domestic steel service centers, while the remainder are sold to original equipment manufacturers (approximately 20% in fiscal 2001) and export customers (approximately 9% in fiscal 2001). Steel service centers warehouse steel products from various minimills and integrated mills and sell combinations of products from different mills to their customers. Some steel service centers also provide additional labor-intensive value-added services such as fabricating, cutting or selling steel by the piece rather than by the bundle. Rebar will be selectively sold to a few customers who are not necessarily part of the existing customer base. 2 |
In fiscal 2001, the Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 53% of total sales and one customer accounted for approximately 11% of total sales. The Company believes that it is not dependent on any customer and that it could, over time, replace lost sales attributable to any one customer. The Company maintains a real-time computer information system, which tracks prices offered by competitors, as well as freight rates from its customers to both the stocking locations and the nearest competitive facilities. An electronic data interchange system that allows the Company to manage its customers’ inventory (Vendor Managed Inventories, VMI) needs was recently expanded from one customer to several. The system, which interfaces with a customer’s system, reduces overhead and is intended to increase sales while providing the customer with just-in-time inventory capabilities, thus improving inventory turns. The Company expects to continue expansion of this system and believes that the system gives it a competitive advantage. Although sales tend to be slower during the winter months due to the impact of winter weather on construction and transportation activities and during the late summer due to planned plant shutdowns of end-users, seasonality has not been a material factor in the Company’s business. As of September 30, 2001 and 2000, backlog of unfilled cancelable orders totaled, $70 million and $77 million respectively. As of October 31, 2001, backlog totaled $67 million. The level of billet sales to third parties is dependent on the Company’s billet requirements and worldwide market condition, which may vary greatly from year to year. In the past three fiscal years the Company has consumed substantially all of its billet production. DistributionThe Louisiana Facility, which includes a deep-water dock, is strategically located on the Mississippi River, which the Company believes enhances its competitive posture by reducing overall transportation costs because it can receive steel scrap and ship its product by barge, normally the most economical method of transportation in the steel industry. The Company also believes that the location of its minimill on the Mississippi River and its network of inland waterway warehouses enable it to access markets for its products that would otherwise be uneconomical due to the high freight costs of its products relative to selling price. The Company operates inventory stocking warehouses near Chicago, Tulsa, and Pittsburgh, which complement its operations in Louisiana and Tennessee. These facilities, each of which is equipped with an inland waterway dock, enable the Company to significantly increase its marketing territory by providing storage capacity for finished products in three additional markets and by allowing the Company to meet customer demand far from its Louisiana and Tennessee mills on a timely basis. From these locations, product is primarily distributed by truck. In addition, rail shipments are made to some customers, primarily those on the West Coast and in Mexico. The Louisiana Facility’s deep-water dock enables the Company to load vessels or ocean-going barges for overseas shipments, giving the Company low cost access to overseas markets if business conditions warrant. Additionally, the dock enables the Company to access steel scrap from the Caribbean and South and Central America, an important strategic factor. Since the facility is only 35 miles from the Port of New Orleans, smaller quantities of shapes or billets can be shipped overseas on cargo ships from that port. The Company believes it has a freight cost advantage over landlocked domestic competitors in serving the export market. The Tennessee Facility provides access to the Appalachian states and the lower Midwest, plus additional access to the upper Midwest, the Southeast and the Mid-Atlantic regions. The Tennessee Facility’s location is accessible by all forms of transportation; the rolling mill is in close proximity to two major interstate highways, is four miles from a barge dock, and is situated on the main line of the Norfolk Southern Railroad. 3 |
StrategyThe Company’s strategy is to focus on customer service, enhanced product quality, and to be a low cost producer of merchant bar and light structural steel products. The Company will also consider strategic acquisitions which complement, enhance, expand or diversify its current operations, and/or captures finished goods or raw material capacity. Work Culture. The Company continues its development of a high performance work culture through extensive training and individual development efforts, which reinforces its basic values of employee improvement, teamwork, and individual accountability. During fiscal 2000 a major project was undertaken designed to improve operating efficiencies and effectiveness. The project was completed early in the second quarter of fiscal 2001 and the Company believes that the workforce, through this program, has been provided additional resources, training, and knowledge that has and will continue to have a positive impact in achieving operational and productivity improvement to insure a low cost producer status. In fiscal 1999, the United Steelworkers of America Local 9121 (the “Union”) ratified a Company- proposed seven year labor agreement. Although the previous bargaining agreement was not to expire for another three years, the new agreement was recommended to address several issues concerning the high performance work culture. First, team-based productivity plans were changed to increase the reward to employees for greater productivity. Second, a progressive pay structure was put in place that rewards employees with increased pay for developing additional skills and competencies relevant to operations. Finally, improvements were made to the retirement program and vacation benefits packages to help retain experienced personnel. Scrap Procurement. The Company continues to implement strategies that improve the quality and price of the steel scrap utilized by its melting operations. The Company maintains a program for purchasing steel scrap from local vendors, an automobile shredding operation and on-site scrap processing. Future expansion into this area may include acquisitions of strategically located existing scrap processing operations or opening new scrap processing operations in strategic locations; however, given current market conditions, scrap procurement efforts will be focused on maximization of existing operations. Capital Improvements. In fiscal 2000, the Company completed a two year program of capital projects designed to increase billet production to supply a greater share of the billet requirements of the Tennessee Facility as well as any future Louisiana rolling mill growth. In fiscal 2001, the efficiency of the melting operation as measured in tons per scheduled hour improved 6% from fiscal 2000 as the operation supplied all of the billet requirement for the Louisiana and Tennessee rolling mills. In fiscal 2001, the Company completed the installation of significant equipment expected to improve productivity, yield and rolling mill reliability at the Tennessee Facility. The equipment was installed in the third fiscal quarter and, in the fourth, the Company experienced record yield and significantly reduced its operating cost. The Company has completed its significant capital enhancement programs and, given current market conditions, intends for its capital programs over the next twelve months to be directed towards maintenance programs which are expected to require $2 to $3 million. The immediate focus will be to utilize the capital recently employed to obtain even further improvements in productivity and cost reduction. Operating Capacity. The Company’s operating strategy continues to focus on improving cost. Both the Louisiana Facility the Tennessee Facility operated at a reduced mode of operations throughout fiscal 2001 and as such produced well below capacity. By adding new products and targeting additional markets, the Company wants to increase capacity utilization. Shipments The Company plans to improve operating results by improving the mix of high margin products shipped. Additionally, shipments should increase, over the years, as the VMI program is expanded with existing customers and actively marketed to others. The Company also expects to improve customer service, utilize more extensively its distribution system, add products to its mills, and target various end-user customer groups. Acquisition Program and Tax Benefits The Company may, from time to time, seek vertical, horizontal or other strategic acquisitions. Attractive candidates may include ferrous and non-ferrous metal production and/or recycling operations which provide the opportunity to accelerate growth while complementing or expanding current operations. 4 |
In addition, entities that the Company believes create synergistic relationships or other opportunities are potential candidates. The Company will seek to maximize and accelerate its utilization of net operating loss carryforwards to offset taxable earnings achieved through efficiency improvements, cost savings, and acquisitions. As of September 30, 2001, the Company had approximately $133 million of net operating loss carryforwards which could be used to offset taxable earnings, including the earnings of acquired entities. CompetitionThe Company competes in the market for light structural and merchant bar steel products and does not currently compete with minimill flat rolled producers or most domestic integrated steel producers. Structural Shapes. The Louisiana Facility’s location on the Mississippi River, as well as the stocking locations in three additional regions of the country, provide access to large markets in the Eastern, Midwestern, Southern, and Central portions of the United States. As a result, the Company competes in the light structural shape market with several major domestic minimills in each of these regions. Depending on the region and product, the Company primarily competes with Nucor Corporation, Structural Metals, Inc., North Star Steel Co., Lake Ontario Steel Corporation, Birmingham Steel Corporation, and Ameristeel Corporation, among others. Certain of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources than the Company. Merchant Bar Shapes. The Tennessee Facility’s location accessible to the Mississippi River waterway system, as well as the Company’s stocking locations in three additional regions of the country, provide access to large markets in the Appalachian states, and the Eastern, Midwestern, upper Midwestern, Mid-Atlantic, and Central portions of the United States. Merchant bar competitors in the region are Ameristeel Corporation, Structural Metals, Inc., Nucor Corporation, Birmingham Steel Corporation, Roanoke Electric, North Star Steel Co., and Marion Steel. Rebar. The Tennessee Facility may produce rebar in varying quantities depending on economic and market trends. The Tennessee Facility’s main competitor would be Ameristeel Corporation in Knoxville, Tennessee. Ameristeel Corporation, however, fabricates a large portion of its rebar in competition with independent fabricators who would be the target customers of the Tennessee Facility. Independent fabricators opting not to buy from a competitor may create a significant niche. Other competitors include SMI/Cayce Steel, Birmingham Steel Corporation, Nucor Corporation, and Co-Steel. Foreign steel producers historically have not competed significantly with the Company in the domestic market for merchant bar and light structural shape sales due to higher freight costs relative to end product prices. However, in fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company experienced significant competition from foreign producers adversely impacting both price and shipment volumes. Continued market pressures created by the oversupply due to imports for a sustained period of time may have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial position. Raw MaterialsThe Company’s major raw material is steel scrap, which is generated principally from industrial, automotive, demolition, railroad, and other scrap sources and is primarily purchased directly in the open market through a large number of steel scrap dealers. The Company is able to efficiently transport steel scrap from suppliers throughout the inland waterway system and through the Gulf of Mexico, permitting it to take advantage of steel scrap purchasing opportunities far from its minimill, and to protect itself from supply imbalances that develop from time to time in specific local markets. In addition, unlike many other minimills, the Company, through its own scrap purchasing staff, buys scrap primarily from scrap dealers and contractors rather than through brokers. The Company believes that its enhanced knowledge of scrap market conditions gained by being directly involved in scrap procurement on a daily basis, coupled with management’s extensive experience in metals recycling markets, gives the Company a competitive advantage. The Company does not currently depend upon any single supplier for its scrap. No single vendor supplies more than 10% of the Company’s scrap needs. The Company, on average, maintains a 15 to 20-day inventory of steel scrap. 5 |
The Company has a program of buying directly from local steel scrap dealers for cash. Through this program, the Company has procured approximately 21% of its steel scrap at prices lower than those of large steel scrap dealers. The Company also maintains an automobile shredder and scrap processing facility at a site adjacent to the Louisiana Facility to produce shredded steel scrap and cut grades, two of several types used by the Company. The scrap processing division began operating the automobile shredder in late fiscal 1995 and commenced scrap processing in late fiscal 1998. During fiscal 2001, approximately 30% of the total steel scrap requirements were met by this operation. The Company plans, and the operation has the capacity to produce a greater quantity of steel scrap; however, low scrap prices in recent years limited the availability of raw material to process. The cost of steel scrap is subject to market forces, including demand by other steel producers. The cost of steel scrap and the availability of raw material for its scrap processing operations can vary significantly, and finished product prices generally cannot be adjusted in the short-term to recover large increases in steel scrap costs. Over longer periods of time, however, finished product prices and steel scrap prices have tended to move in the same direction. The long-term demand for steel scrap and its importance to the domestic steel industry may be expected to increase as steel makers continue to expand scrap-based electric arc furnace capacity. For the foreseeable future, however, the Company believes that supplies of steel scrap will continue to be available in sufficient quantities at competitive prices. In addition, a number of technologies exist for the processing of iron ore into forms which may be substituted for steel scrap in electric arc furnace-based steel making. Such forms include direct-reduced iron, iron carbide, and hot-briquetted iron. While such forms may not be cost competitive with steel scrap at present, a sustained increase in the price of steel scrap could result in increased implementation of these alternative technologies. Except in fiscal 2001 due to operating in a reduced mode the Tennessee Facility purchases billets on the open market to supply part of its billet requirements. The Company has not experienced any shortages or significant delays in delivery of these materials and believes that an adequate supply of raw materials will continue to be available to supplement internally supplied billets. EnergyThe Company’s manufacturing process at the Louisiana Facility consumes large volumes of electrical energy and natural gas. The Company purchases its electrical service needs from a local utility pursuant to a contract originally executed in 1980 and extended in 1995 for a six year period. The contract is automatically extended on a rolling six month basis until either party notifies the other of its intent to change. The Company is presently negotiating with the utility a new multi year contract. Based on present negotiations, there is no reason to believe that a multi year contract with similar terms cannot be executed. Under the present contract, the Company receives discounted peak power rates in return for the utility’s right to periodically curtail service during periods of peak demand. These curtailments are generally limited to a few hours and, in prior years, have had a negligible impact on operations; however, the Louisiana Facility experienced an unusual number and duration of power curtailments in fiscal 1998 and 1999 due to generating and transmission failures at the local utility. The Louisiana Facility’s contract with the local utility contains a fuel adjustment clause which allows the utility company to pass on to its customers any increases in price paid for the various fuels used in generating electrical power and other increases in operating costs. This fuel adjustment applies to all of the utility’s consumers. The Company experienced high fuel cost adjustments in the later part of fiscal 2000 and throughout most of fiscal 2001 due to the high cost of natural gas used by the utility in generating electrical power. The Company believes that its electrical energy rates at the Louisiana Facility during this period have not been competitive in the domestic minimill steel industry. To a lesser extent, the Louisiana Facility consumes quantities of natural gas via two separate pipelines serving the facility. The Company generally purchases natural gas on a month-to-month basis from a variety of suppliers. In the latter part of fiscal 2000 and throughout most of fiscal 2001, the cost of natural gas increased dramatically, and in fiscal 2001 the Company entered into commitments to purchase a certain portion of its future natural gas requirements over a period of less than twelve months. Historically, the Louisiana Facility has been adequately supplied with electricity and natural gas and does not anticipate any significant curtailments in its operations resulting from energy shortages. However, volatility in the cost of power and natural gas can have a significant impact on the results of operations and financial position of the Company. 6 |
The Tennessee Facility’s manufacturing process consumes both electricity and natural gas. The Tennessee Facility purchases its electricity from a local utility. Historically, the local utility has had one of the lowest power rates in the country, however, in fiscal 1999, 2000, and 2001 the Company experienced higher power costs under its power contract. In 1995, the Company negotiated a ten year contract at a favorable rate with the local utility and has no reason to believe that a similar contract will not be renewed with similar terms. The Harriman, Tennessee area is served by only one gas pipeline. Natural gas cost increased significantly at the end of fiscal 2000 and throughout most of fiscal 2001. Currently, the Tennessee Facility does not have a direct interconnect with this pipeline so all gas for the plant must be purchased through a Local Distribution Company (“LDC”). Thus, the Company must pay the wellhead price plus transportation charges and the LDC mark up. The Company believes this premium adds approximately $1 per ton to the Tennessee Facility’s cost structure. (This is not an uncommon arrangement throughout the industry.) Environmental MattersLike others in the industry, the Company’s minimill is required to control the emission of dust from its electric arc furnaces, which contains, among other contaminants, lead, cadmium, and chromium, which are considered hazardous. The Company is subject to various Federal, state and local laws and regulations, including, among others, the Clean Air Act, the 1990 Amendments, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act and the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act, and the regulations promulgated in connection therewith, concerning the discharge of contaminants that may be emitted into the environment including into the air, and discharged into the waterways, and the disposal of solid and/or hazardous waste such as electric arc furnace dust. The Company has a full-time manager who is responsible for monitoring the Company’s procedures for compliance with such rules and regulations. The Company does not anticipate any substantial increase in its costs for environmental compliance or that such costs will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s competitive position, operations or financial condition. In the event of a release or discharge of a hazardous substance to certain environmental media, the Company could be responsible for the costs of remediating the contamination caused by such a release or discharge. The Company plans to close two storm water retention ponds at the Louisiana Facility. The Company has conducted an analysis of the sediments of these ponds consistent with the sampling plan approved by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (the “LDEQ”). Pursuant to the sampling plan, analysis in support of a petition for clean closure of the units has been submitted. The analysis concludes that pond sample results for indicator parameters are not significantly different from background samples and additional closure efforts are not necessary. In addition, a relevant LDEQ guidance which was promulgated since the submission of the sampling plan provides screening standards for the evaluation of the significance of reported concentrations of various contaminants in environmental media. The Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (“RECAP”) was promulgated in December 1998. The pond sediment concentrations were below the relevant screening standards. Based on the data analysis and the recently promulgated RECAP, the Company believes that even if LDEQ requires some additional risk assessment, focused remediation, or both, the costs will not be material. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regulates, among other plant operations, the management of emission dust from electric arc furnaces. The Company currently collects the dust resulting from its melting operation through an emissions control system and recycles it through an approved high temperature metals recovery firm. The dust management costs were approximately $1.1 million, $0.9 million, and $1.1 million in fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. TVSC, the prior owners of the Tennessee Facility, entered into a Consent Agreement and Order (“the TVSC Consent Order”) with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation under its voluntary clean-up program. The Company, in acquiring the assets of TVSC, entered into a Consent Agreement and Order (“the Bayou Steel Consent Order”) with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, which is supplemental to the previous TVSC Consent Order and does not affect the continuing validity of the TVSC Consent Order. The ultimate remedy and clean-up goals will be dictated by the results of human health and ecological risk assessment which are components of a required, structured investigative, remedial, and assessment process. As of September 30, 2001, investigative, remedial, and risk assessment activities have resulted in expenditures of approximately $1.4 million with an estimated $0.5 million remaining to complete the remediation. 7 |
In fiscal 1999, the Louisiana Facility became certified to the ISO 14001 management standard. The ISO 14001 standard for environmental management is a voluntary management system whereby companies undergo rigorous independent audits to meet some of the world’s strictest standards. The Company was the first United States minimill to receive the ISO 14001 certification. The Company believes it is in compliance, in all material respects, with applicable environmental requirements and that the cost of such continuing compliance is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s competitive position, operations or financial condition, or cause a material increase in currently anticipated capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2001 and 2000, loss contingencies have been accrued for certain environmental matters. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s recorded estimates of its obligations may change in the near term. The Company’s future expenditures for installation of environmental control facilities are difficult to predict. Environmental legislation, regulations, and related administrative policies are continuously modified. Environmental issues are also subject to differing interpretations by the regulated community, the regulating authorities, and the courts. Consequently, it is difficult to forecast expenditures needed to comply with future regulations. Therefore, at this time, the Company cannot estimate those costs associated with compliance and the effect of the upcoming regulations will have on the Company’s competitive position, operations, or financial condition. In fiscal 2001, the Company had minimal capital spending on environmental programs and expects to have minimal spending again in fiscal 2002. There can be no assurance that material environmental liabilities will not be incurred in the future or that future compliance with environmental laws (whether those currently in effect or enacted in the future) will not require additional expenditures or require changes to current operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Safety and Health MattersThe Company is subject to various regulations and standards promulgated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. These regulations and standards are administered by OSHA, and constitute minimum requirements for employee protection and health. It is the Company’s policy to meet or exceed these minimum requirements in all of the Company’s safety and health policies, programs, and procedures. The Company knows of no material safety or health issues. EmployeesAs of September 30, 2001, the Company had 464 employees, 123 of whom were salaried office, supervisory and sales personnel, and 341 were hourly employees. Approximately 330 are covered by labor contracts. The Company believes its relations with employees to be good. Item 2. PropertiesThe Company’s principal operating properties are listed in the table below. The Company believes that its properties and warehouse facilities are suitable and adequate to meet its needs. In order to improve customer service beyond current levels or to distribute additional capacity improvements, additional warehouse space would be needed of the Louisiana Facility. |
| Location | Property | |
| LaPlace, Louisiana | Approximately 287 acres of land, including a shredder, melt shop, rolling mill, related equipment, a 75,000 square foot warehouse, and dock facilities situated on state-leased water bottom in the Mississippi River under a 45-year lease with 36 years remaining. | |
| Harriman, Tennessee | Approximately 198 acres of land, 175,000 square feet of steel mill buildings, including a melt shop (which the Company does not intend to use), a 39,600 square foot warehouse, a rolling mill, and related equipment. | |
| Chicago, Illinois | Approximately 7 acres of land, a dock on the Calumet River, and buildings, including a 100,000 square foot warehouse. | |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | 63,500 square foot warehouse facility with a dock on the Arkansas River system. Located on land under a long-term lease. The original term of the lease is from April 1, 1989 through March 31, 1999; the Company is in the first of two 10-year renewal options through March 31, 2019. | |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | 253,200 square foot leased warehouse facility with a dock on the Ohio River. The amended term of the lease was from October 15, 1998 to October 31, 2007; the Company has two 5-year renewal options through October 31, 2017. | |
| Louden County, Tennessee | Approximately 25 acres of undeveloped land along the Tennessee River, available for future use as a stocking location. | |
8 |
Item 3. Legal ProceedingsThe Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings which involve claims for damages exceeding 10% of its current assets. The Company is not a party to any material pending litigation which, if decided adversely, would have a significant impact on the business, income, assets, or operation of the Company, and the Company is not aware of any material threatened litigation which might involve the Company. See also “—Environmental Matters” and “—Safety and Health Matters,” included elsewhere herein and the Footnotes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in its 2001 Annual Report. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersNo matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. PART IIItem 5. Market for Registrant’s Class A Common Stock and Related Stockholder MattersMarket Information and Stock PriceThe Class A Common Stock of the Company is traded on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) under the symbol BYX. The approximate number of stockholders of record on November 15, 2001 was 318. In addition, there are approximately 2,500 shareholders whose stock is held in street name. The stock has been trading since July 27, 1988. The closing price per share on October 31, 2001 was $0.53. The following tables set forth the high and low sales prices for the periods indicated. |
| Sales Price Per Share | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year 2001 | Fiscal Year 200 | |||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||
| October-December | $ | 1.625 | 0.563 | $ | 4.000 | $ | 3.063 | |||||||
| January-March | 1.130 | 0.625 | 3.688 | 2.688 | ||||||||||
| April-June | 1.500 | 0.600 | 2.875 | 2.000 | ||||||||||
| July-September | 1.100 | 0.600 | 2.437 | 1.438 | ||||||||||
9 |
There is no public trading market for the Class B Common Stock and the Class C Common Stock. DividendsThe Company’s ability to pay dividends to Class A Common Stock stockholders is subject to restrictive covenants under the Indenture pursuant to which the Company’s first mortgage notes due 2008 were issued, and the Company’s line of credit. See “Note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements” included in the Company’s 2001 Annual Report. Item 6. Selected Financial DataSet forth below is selected consolidated financial information for the Company. SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
| As of and For Years Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | |||||||||||||
| INCOME STATEMENT DATA: | |||||||||||||||||
| Net Sales | $ | 140,447 | $ | 202,498 | $ | 206,373 | $ | 253,881 | $ | 232,161 | |||||||
| Cost of Sales | 156,900 | 191,608 | 180,797 | 213,732 | 209,930 | ||||||||||||
| Gross Margin | (16,453 | ) | 10,890 | 25,576 | 40,149 | 22,231 | |||||||||||
| Selling, General and Administrative | 6,837 | 7,051 | 7,155 | 6,219 | 6,311 | ||||||||||||
| Strike/Corporate Campaign Expenses | — | — | — | — | 3,323 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Profit (Loss) | (23,290 | ) | 3,839 | 18,421 | 33,930 | 12,597 | |||||||||||
| Interest Expense | (11,269 | ) | (11,388 | ) | (11,036 | ) | (9,229 | ) | (8,962 | ) | |||||||
| Interest Income | 374 | 1,501 | 1,437 | 1,251 | 12 | ||||||||||||
| Miscellaneous | 66 | 471 | 528 | (1,300 | ) | 187 | |||||||||||
| Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Extraordinary Item | (34,119 | ) | (5,577 | ) | 9,350 | 24,652 | 3,834 | ||||||||||
| Provision (Benefit) for Income Tax | — | — | 3,273 | (10,954 | ) | 50 | |||||||||||
| Income (Loss) Before Extraordinary Item | (34,119 | ) | (5,577 | ) | 6,077 | 35,606 | 3,784 | ||||||||||
| Extraordinary Item | — | — | — | (5,507 | ) | — | |||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | $ | (34,119 | ) | $ | (5,577 | ) | $ | 6,077 | $ | 30,099 | (1) | $ | 3,784 | (1) | |||
| BALANCE SHEET DATA: | |||||||||||||||||
| Working Capital | $ | 63,393 | $ | 98,107 | $ | 106,321 | $ | 106,626 | $ | 61,683 | |||||||
| Total Assets | 206,990 | 243,259 | 248,550 | 249,778 | 196,465 | ||||||||||||
| Total Debt | 119,242 | 119,127 | 119,013 | 118,899 | 83,540 | ||||||||||||
| Preferred Stock | — | — | — | — | 13,089 | ||||||||||||
| Common Stockholders’ Equity | $ | 61,971 | $ | 96,090 | $ | 103,417 | $ | 97,340 | $ | 71,512 | |||||||
| (1) | In fiscal 1997 and 1998 income (loss) applicable to common shares after dividends accrued and accretion on preferred stock and a loss on the redemption of the preferred stock in 1998 was $1.2 and $25.8 million, respectively. |
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe requirements to satisfy this item are incorporated by reference to the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” section of the Company’s 2001 Annual Report. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market RiskThe Company is exposed to certain market risks that are inherent in financial instruments arising from transactions that are entered into in the normal course of business. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market risk or for speculative purposes but is subject to interest rate risk on its long-term fixed interest rate first mortgage notes. The revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate which reduces the potential exposure of interest rate risk from a cash flow perspective. The fair market value of fixed rate debt with a fixed interest rate generally will increase as interest rates fall given consistency in all other factors. Conversely, the fair market value of debt will decrease as interest rates rise. 10 |
The Company maintains $120 million of first mortgage notes which accrue interest at 9.5% per annum and mature in 2008. There are no scheduled principal payments under the notes prior to the maturity date. However, all or some of the notes may be redeemed at a premium after May 15, 2003. The fair value of the notes on September 30, 2001 was approximately $65 million. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataThe financial statement and supplementary data information required by this item are incorporated by reference to the “Consolidated Financial Statements” and “Footnotes to Consolidated Financial Statements” sections of the Company’s 2001 Annual Report. Item 9. Disagreements on Accounting and Financial DisclosureNone. PART IIIItem 10. Directors and Executive OfficersInformation regarding Directors and Executive Officers is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Item 11. Executive CompensationInformation regarding executive compensation is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Item 12. Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and ManagementInformation regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of October 31, 2001 by certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsInformation regarding certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. PART IVItem 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K |
| (a) | (1) Financial Statements |
The Consolidated Financial Statements are incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders and the Accountant’s Report relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. |
| (2) Financial Statement Schedules | 10-K Page |
| Auditor’s Report Relating to Schedule | 15 |
| Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the three years in the period ended September 30, 2001 | 16 |
Schedules not listed above are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements submitted. 11 |
| (3) Exhibits |
| Number | Exhibit |
| 3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996). |
| 3.2 | Amended Restated By-laws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000). |
| 4.1 | Specimen Certificate for Class A Common Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-10745)). |
| 4.2 | Indenture (including form of First Mortgage Note and Subsidiary Guarantee between each recourse subsidiary of the Company and the Trustee), dated May 22, 1998, between the Company, Bayou Steel Corporation (Tennessee) (“BSCT”), River Road Realty Corporation (“RRRC”) and Bank One (formerly First National Bank of Commerce), as trustee (the “Trustee”) (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-58263)). |
| 4.3 | Mortgage and Collateral Assignment of Leases granted by the Company and RRRC to the Trustee, dated as of May 22, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-58263)). |
| 4.4 | Security Agreement, dated May 22, 1998, between the Company and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-58263)). |
| 4.5 | Security Agreement, dated May 22, 1998, between RRRC and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-58263)). |
| 4.6 | Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of May 22, 1998, between the Trustee and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as agent under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-58263)). |
| 4.7 | Credit Agreement dated as of April 18, 2001, among the Company, and Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest) (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001). |
| 4.8 | Security Agreement dated as of June 28, 1989, as amended and restated through May 22, 1998, among the Company, the lenders named in the Credit Agreement, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as agent. |
| 4.9 | Form of Release of Federal Income Tax Ownership and Agreement between the Trustee and the Company, Voest-Alpine A.G. and Howard M. Meyers (incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-10745)). |
| 4.10 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 1986, between BSAC and the purchasers of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-10745)). |
| 4.11 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 1986, between BSAC and RSR, the sole purchaser of the Company’s Class B Common Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-22603)). |
| 4.12 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 1986, between BSAC and Allen & Company, Incorporated (incorporated herein by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-22603)). |
| 4.13 | Subsidiary Guarantee, dated as of May 22, 1998, between BSCT, RRRC and The Chase Manhattan Bank (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1999 (No. 33-22603)). |
| 10.1 | Employment Letter dated July 26, 1988, between Howard M. Meyers and the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-10745)). |
| 10.2 | Warehouse (Stocking Location) Leases. |
| (i) | Restated lease agreement dated October 15, 1998 between the Company and Leetsdale Industrial II, Leetsdale, Pennsylvania, and the First Amendment thereto dated October 15, 1998. |
| (ii) | Catoosa, Oklahoma (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1989). |
| 10.3 | Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees dated March 3, 1988 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1991). |
| 10.4 | 1991 Employees’ Stock Option Plan dated April 18, 1991 with technical amendments (incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-10745)). |
12 |
| 10.5 | Pension Plan for Bargained Employees and the Employees Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-10745)). |
| 10.6 | Labor Agreement between the Company and the United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO-CIC, dated October 18, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1999 (No. 33-22603)). |
| 10.7 | Labor Agreement between BSCT and the United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO, dated May 17, 1997 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1999 (No. 33-22603)). |
| 13.1 | Annual Report filed with this report. |
| 23.1 | Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-KNo reports were filed on Form 8-K by the Registrant during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001. 13 |
SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
| BAYOU STEEL CORPORATION By: /s/ Howard M. Meyers —————————————— Howard M. Meyers Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on the date indicated. |
| Signature | Title | Date |
|---|
| /s/ | HOWARD M. MEYERS —————————— Howard M. Meyers | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director | December 5, 2001 |
| /s/ | JERRY M. PITTS —————————— Jerry M. Pitts | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | December 5, 2001 |
| /s/ | RICHARD J. GONZALEZ —————————— Richard J. Gonzalez | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | December 5, 2001 |
| /s/ | LAWRENCE E. GOLUB —————————— Lawrence E. Golub | Director | December 5, 2001 |
| /s/ | MELVYN N. KLEIN —————————— Melvyn N. Klein | Director | December 5, 2001 |
| /s/ | ALBERT P. LOSPINOSO —————————— Albert P. Lospinoso | Director | December 5, 2001 |
14 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSTo the Stockholders of We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2001 included in Bayou Steel Corporation’s annual report to stockholders incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated November 9, 2001. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts for the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000, and 1999 is the responsibility of the Company’s management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and is not part of the basic consolidated financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP New Orleans, Louisiana 15 |
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTSFOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001, 2000, AND 1999 |
| Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions Charged to Expenses | Other(1) | Balance at end of Period | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2001 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 521,619 | $ | 463,645 | $ | — | $ | 985,264 | ||||||
| Provision for plant turnaround | $ | 295,206 | $ | 2,596,319 | $ | (1,084,182 | ) | $ | 1,807,343 | |||||
| September 30, 2000 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 551,101 | $ | (29,482 | ) | $ | — | $ | 521,619 | |||||
| Provision for plant turnaround | $ | 1,228,230 | $ | 2,755,596 | $ | (3,688,620 | ) | $ | 295,206 | |||||
| September 30, 1999 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 773,984 | $ | (211,212 | ) | $ | (11,671 | ) | $ | 551,101 | ||||
| Provision for plant turnaround | $ | 1,797,331 | $ | 2,766,238 | $ | (3,335,339 | ) | $ | 1,228,230 | |||||
| (1) | (Write-offs)/recoveries of uncollectible accounts receivable. Decreases to the provision for plant turnaround actual spending. |
16 |
