Item 8.01. Other Events.
As previously announced on August 9, 2021, Sanderson Farms, Inc., a Mississippi business corporation (the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), with Walnut Sycamore Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), Sycamore Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), and solely for purposes of certain provisions specified therein, Wayne Farms LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Wayne Farms”). The Merger Agreement provides, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, that Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.
In connection with the Merger, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a definitive proxy statement of the Company, dated September 13, 2021 (the “Proxy Statement”), which the Company commenced mailing to stockholders of the company on or about September 13, 2021. In the Proxy Statement, the Company disclosed one lawsuit relating to the Merger that was filed: Ryan O’Dell v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-7588 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “O’Dell Lawsuit”). Following the filing of the Proxy Statement and prior to the filing of this Current Report on Form 8-K, seven additional lawsuits relating to the Merger were filed: (i) Alex Ciccotelli v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-07727 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Ciccotelli Lawsuit”); (ii) Yurie Hoberg v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-05329 (E.D.N.Y.) (the “Hoberg Lawsuit”); (iii) Jeanne Androsiglio v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-08024 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Androsiglio Lawsuit”); (iv) Patrick Oswald v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-08170 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Oswald Lawsuit”); (v) Matthew Walker v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-08185 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Walker Lawsuit”); (vi) Anthony Morgan v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-08187 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Morgan Lawsuit); and (vii) Matthew Hopkins v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-04389 (E.D. Pa.) (the “Hopkins Lawsuit and together with the O’Dell Lawsuit, Ciccotelli Lawsuit, Hoberg Lawsuit, Androsiglio Lawsuit, Oswald Lawsuit, Walker Lawsuit and Morgan Lawsuit, the “Lawsuits”). The Lawsuits generally allege that the Proxy Statement omits material information in violation of Section 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, rendering the Proxy Statement materially incomplete and misleading. The Oswald Lawsuit also alleges breaches of fiduciary duty related to information disclosed in the Proxy Statement. The Lawsuits generally seek, among other things, injunctive relief to prevent the consummation of the Merger, or alternatively, rescission or rescissory damages in the event the Merger is consummated, damages, costs, including attorneys’ fees, and such other and further equitable relief as the court may deem just and proper. Additionally, on October 14, 2021 a purported Company stockholder sent a demand letter alleging insufficiencies relating to the disclosures in the Proxy Statement (such letter, the “Demand Letter” and together with the Lawsuits, the “Matters”).
The Company believes that the claims asserted in the Matters are without merit and that no supplemental disclosure is required under applicable law. However, in order to moot the unmeritorious disclosure claims, to avoid the risk of the Matters delaying or adversely affecting the Merger and to minimize the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Proxy Statement as described in this Current Report on Form 8-K. Nothing in this Current Report on Form 8-K shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, the Company specifically denies all allegations in the Matters, including allegations that any additional disclosure was or is required, and believes that the supplemental disclosures contained herein are immaterial.
The supplemental disclosures contained herein should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. Defined terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement.
The resolution of the Matters is not expected to affect the timing of the special meeting of the Company’s stockholders, which is scheduled to be held on October 21, 2021, or the amount of the consideration to be paid to the Company’s stockholders in connection with the Merger.
AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
The following disclosure supplements as an additional thirty-sixth paragraph the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Background of the Merger” beginning on page 29 of the Proxy Statement: