SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of YEI on a consolidated basis. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between YEI, YCI, Exploration, Petroleum, TSM and POL have been eliminated in the consolidation. All events described or referred to as prior to September 10, 2014 relate to Yuma Co. as the accounting acquirer. All references to “Pyramid” refer to the Company prior to the closing of the merger on September 10, 2014. |
|
The companies maintain their accounts on the accrual method of accounting in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Each of the Companies has a fiscal year ending December 31. |
Management's Use of Estimates | Management’s Use of Estimates |
|
In preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make informed estimates and assumptions with consideration given to materiality. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and changes in these estimates are recorded when known. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include: estimates of proved reserves and related estimates of the present value of future net revenues; the carrying value of oil and gas properties; estimates of fair value; asset retirement obligations; income taxes; derivative financial instruments; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets; uncollectible receivables; useful lives for depreciation; future cash flows associated with assets; obligations related to employee benefits; and legal and environmental risks and exposures. |
Reclassifications | Reclassifications |
|
When required for comparability, reclassifications are made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. |
Fair Value | Fair Value |
|
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The standard characterizes inputs used in determining fair value according to a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs based upon the degree to which they are observable. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows: |
|
Level 1 – inputs represent quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (for example, exchange-traded commodity derivatives). |
|
Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (for example, quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets not considered to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or market-corroborated inputs). |
|
Level 3 – inputs that are not observable from objective sources, such as the Company’s internally developed assumptions about market participant assumptions used in pricing an asset or liability (for example, an estimate of future cash flows used in the Company’s internally developed present value of future cash flows model that underlies the fair value measurement.) |
|
In determining fair value, the Company utilizes observable market data when available, or models that utilize observable market data. In addition to market information, the Company incorporates transaction-specific details that, in management’s judgment, market participants would take into account in measuring fair value. |
|
If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the category is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument (see Note G – Fair Value Measurements). |
|
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value. |
|
Nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value include asset retirement obligations and exit or disposal costs. |
|
Level 3 Valuation Techniques – Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the Series A Preferred Stock issued July 1, 2011, and the Series B Preferred Stock issued July and August of 2012, for which there was no current market for these securities and such that the determination of fair value required significant judgment or estimation. The Company has historically valued certain possible financial scenarios relating to its preferred and common stock securities prior to being publicly traded using a Monte Carlo simulation model with the assistance of an independent valuation consultant. Prior to being publicly traded, the Company’s preferred stock securities had certain provisions, including automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control, default and follow-on offering that necessitated financial modeling. These models incorporated transaction details such as the stock price of comparable companies in the same industry, contractual terms, maturity, and risk free interest rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of issuance, and each quarter thereafter (see Note I – Preferred Stock). |
Statement of Cash Flow | Statement of Cash Flow |
|
Cash on hand, deposits in banks and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash and cash equivalents. The cash flow of a derivative instrument of an identifiable transaction is classified in the same category as the cash flow from the item being hedged. |
Short-term Investments | Short-term Investments |
|
Short-term investments consist of commercial bank certificates of deposit maturing in May 2015 and are valued at cost. |
Trade Receivables | Trade Receivables |
|
Accounts receivable are stated net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $138,960 and $55,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
Management evaluates accounts receivable quarterly on an individual account basis, making individual assessments of collectability, and reserves those amounts it deems potentially uncollectible. |
Natural Gas Imbalances | Natural Gas Imbalances |
|
Pipeline gas imbalances represent the differences in measured volumes between gas receipts from suppliers and/or transporters and gas deliveries to end users, transporters and/or other purchasers. Most imbalances are settled monthly through cash-out mechanisms provided for in sales and transportation contracts. Other imbalances are carried forward until over or under deliveries in succeeding months can offset them. Gas imbalances are valued at cost utilizing the weighted average method. |
|
Exploration utilizes the sales method to account for natural gas production volume imbalances. Under this method, income is recorded based on Exploration’s net revenue interest in production taken for delivery. At December 31, 2014, Exploration had a net payable of approximately 23,248 Mcf under various natural gas balancing agreements, as compared to a 23,669 Mcf net payable at December 31, 2013. |
Inventories | Inventories |
|
Inventories, consisting principally of oilfield equipment, are carried at the lower of cost or market. The Company will often have tangible materials purchased for a well carried for the joint account (oil and gas property full cost pool on the balance sheet) pending sale or disposition. |
Derivative Instruments | Derivative Instruments |
|
All derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or liability and measured at fair value. Changes in the derivative instrument’s fair value are recognized currently in earnings, unless the derivative instrument was designated as a cash flow hedge. Under cash flow hedge accounting, unrealized gains and losses were reflected in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to the extent they were effective until the forecasted transaction occurred. The Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting effective January 1, 2013. The result of this change in policy was that the amount carried in AOCI at December 31, 2012 was amortized to oil and gas revenues during the month the hedges settle. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, all hedges are treated as non-qualifying derivative instruments and all new mark-to-market adjustments are in “Sales of natural gas and crude oil” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
|
For cash flow hedge accounting, a company must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. Only derivative instruments that are expected to be highly effective in offsetting anticipated gains or losses on the hedged cash flows and that are subsequently documented to have been highly effective can qualify for hedge accounting. Effectiveness must be assessed both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis. Any ineffectiveness in derivative instruments whereby gains or losses do not exactly offset anticipated gains or losses of hedged cash flows is measured and recognized in earnings in the period in which it occurs. When using hedge accounting, hedge effectiveness is assessed quarterly based on total changes in the derivative instrument’s fair value by performing regression analysis. A hedge is considered effective if certain statistical tests are met. The Company recorded hedge ineffectiveness in “Sales of natural gas and crude oil” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Oil and Natural Gas Properties | Oil and Natural Gas Properties |
|
Investments in oil and natural gas properties are accounted for using the full cost method of accounting. Under this method, all costs directly related to the acquisition, exploration, exploitation and development of oil and natural gas properties are capitalized. |
|
Costs of reconditioning, repairing, or reworking of producing properties are expensed as incurred. Costs of workovers adding proved reserves are capitalized. Projects to deepen existing wells, recomplete to a shallower horizon, or improve (not restore) production to proved reserves are capitalized. |
|
Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. Abandonments of properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs with no loss recognized. |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization – The capitalized cost of oil and natural gas properties, excluding unevaluated properties, is amortized using the unit-of-production method (equivalent physical units of 6 Mcf of natural gas to each barrel of oil equivalent, or “Boe”) using estimates of proved reserve quantities. Investments in unproved properties are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results of the assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of impairment is added to the proved oil and gas property costs to be amortized. The amortizable base includes future development, abandonment and restoration costs. The rate for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A” or “depletion”) per Boe for the Company was $24.92, $23.87 and $19.84 for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DD&A expense for oil and natural gas properties was $19,490,653, $11,927,872 and $4,956,196 for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
Impairments – Total capitalized costs of oil and gas properties are subject to a limit, or so-called “ceiling test.” The ceiling test limits total capitalized costs less related accumulated DD&A and deferred income taxes to a value not to exceed the sum of (i) the present value, discounted at a ten percent annual interest rate, of future net revenue from estimated production of proved oil and gas reserves, including the impact of cash flow hedges, based on current economic and operating conditions less future development costs (excluding retirement costs); plus (ii) the cost of properties not subject to amortization; less (iii) income tax effects related to differences in the book and tax basis of oil and gas properties. If unamortized capitalized costs less related deferred income taxes exceed this limit, the excess is charged to DD&A in the quarter the assessment is made. An expense recorded in one period may not be reversed in a subsequent period even though higher oil and gas prices may have increased the ceiling applicable to the subsequent period. These net unamortized costs, tested each calendar quarter, have not exceeded the cost center ceiling for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012. |
|
Oil and natural gas properties not subject to amortization consist of undeveloped leaseholds and exploratory and developmental wells in progress before the assignment of proved reserves. Management reviews the costs of these properties periodically for impairment, with the impairment provision included in the cost of oil and natural gas properties subject to amortization. Factors considered by management in impairment assessments include drilling results by the Company and other operators, the terms of oil and gas leases not held for production, and available funds for exploration and development. |
|
The table below shows the cost of unproved properties,along with well and development costs in progress not subject to amortization at December 31, 2014, and the year in which those costs were incurred. |
|
| Year of acquisition | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Prior | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold acquisition cost | $154,194 | | $1,704,190 | | $15,349,192 | | $3,897,844 | | $21,105,420 |
Exploration and development cost | 891,610 | | 1,059,262 | | 111,910 | | 71,455 | | 2,134,237 |
Capitalized interest | 609,970 | | 829,456 | | 670,190 | | 357,779 | | 2,467,395 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | $1,655,774 | | $3,592,908 | | $16,131,292 | | $4,327,078 | | $25,707,052 |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
Capitalized Interest – Capitalized interest is included as part of the cost of oil and natural gas properties. The Company capitalized $1,059,350, $1,031,816 and $681,090 of interest associated with the line of credit (see Note L – Debt and Change in Banking Line and Agent Bank) during fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The capitalization rates are based on the Company’s weighted average cost of borrowings used to finance prospect generation. |
|
Capitalized Internal Costs – Internal costs incurred that are directly identified with acquisition, exploration and development activities undertaken by the Company for its own account, and that are not related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities, are also capitalized. The Company capitalized $3,442,095, $2,702,952 and $2,589,342 of allocated indirect costs, excluding interest, related to these activities during fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
The Company develops oil and natural gas drilling projects called “prospects” by industry participants and markets participation in these projects. In doing this, the Company typically earns a profit over its actual costs in seismic, land, brokerage, brochuring and marketing. It typically markets interests in the project on a “third for a quarter” basis, whereby the participant pays a percentage of the cost to casing point or through prospect payout and then has its participation interest reduced by twenty-five percent (25%) with the Company earning the difference. This difference is referred to as the “carried interest.” |
|
The Company assembles 3-D seismic survey projects and markets participating interests in the projects. The Company typically recovers all of its costs plus allocated overhead, and receives a quarterly general and administrative (“G&A”) expense reimbursement paid by the various participants in the project during the 3-D seismic acquisition phase and the 3-D seismic interpretation phase. The proceeds from the sale of the 3-D seismic survey along with the quarterly G&A reimbursements are included in the full cost pool caption “Not subject to amortization.” In addition, the participants in the 3-D seismic survey typically carry the Company for a percentage of the costs associated with the 3-D survey acquisition, ranging from 25 to 35 percent. The Company received G&A expense reimbursements of $-0-, $42,329 and $172,173 in fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
Other Property and Equipment | Other Property and Equipment |
|
Other property and equipment is recorded at cost with Pyramid property acquired in the merger marked to fair value as of the closing date of the merger. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized, while maintenance, repairs and minor replacements which do not improve or extend the life of such assets are charged to operations as incurred. Property and equipment sold, retired or otherwise disposed of are removed at cost less accumulated depreciation, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in “Other” in “Total Expenses” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
|
Office business machines and furniture and fixtures are depreciated using the modified accelerated cost recovery system (“MACRS”) for financial reporting purposes. MACRS depreciation methods approximate depreciation expense computed under GAAP using the double declining balance method. |
|
Depreciation of drilling and operating equipment, automotive, and buildings are computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the applicable lease terms. |
|
Leasehold improvements for the corporate office space in Houston, Texas are depreciated by the straight line method over the term of the lease. |
|
| Estimated | | | | | | | | |
| useful | | December 31, | | | | |
| life in years | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Land | n/a | | $2,469,000 | | $ - | | | | |
Office business machines | 5-Mar | | 1,361,149 | | 1,350,568 | | | | |
Drilling and operating equipment | 14 | | 982,010 | | - | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | 7 | | 412,215 | | 383,585 | | | | |
Automotive | 5 | | 351,707 | | - | | | | |
Office leasehold improvements | 5 | | 332,607 | | 332,607 | | | | |
Buildings and improvements | 25-Mar | | 326,000 | | - | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total other property and equipment | | | 6,234,688 | | 2,066,760 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation and | | | | | | | | | |
leasehold improvement amortization | | | -1,909,352 | | -1,822,925 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net book value | | | $4,325,336 | | $243,835 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
Depreciation and leasehold improvement amortization expense totaled $174,338, $149,496 and $117,874 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
Goodwill | Goodwill |
|
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired net of the fair value of liabilities assumed in an acquisition. The provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”) requires that intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, be evaluated on an annual basis for impairment, or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that could potentially result in impairment. The goodwill impairment test requires the allocation of goodwill and all other assets and liabilities to reporting units. However, the Company has only one reporting unit. To assess impairment, the Company has the option to qualitatively assess if it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the book value. Absent a qualitative assessment, or, through the qualitative assessment, if the Company determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the book value, a quantitative assessment is prepared to calculate the fair market value of the reporting unit. If it is determined that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the book value, the recorded goodwill is impaired to its implied fair value with a charge to operating expense. The Company’s goodwill as of December 31, 2014 relates to its acquisition of Pyramid. Refer to Note M– Merger with Pyramid Oil Company and Goodwill for more details regarding the merger. The Company performs its goodwill impairment test annually, using a measurement date of July 1, or more often if circumstances require. |
Accounts Payable | Accounts Payable |
|
Accounts payable consist principally of trade payables and costs associated with oil and natural gas exploration. |
Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies |
|
Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation or other sources, along with liabilities for environmental remediation or restoration claims, are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Expenditures related to environmental matters are expensed or capitalized in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy for property and equipment. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenue is recognized by the Company when deliveries of crude oil, natural gas and condensate are delivered to the purchaser and title has transferred. Crude oil sales in Louisiana, representing a significant portion of the Company’s production, are typically indexed to Light Louisiana Sweet (“LLS”). TSM recognizes revenue from sales of natural gas primarily to other marketing companies and industrials in the period in which the natural gas is delivered and billed to the customer. Sales are based on index prices per MMBtu or the daily “spot” price as published in national publications with a mark-up or mark-down defined by contract with each customer. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes |
|
The Company files a consolidated federal tax return. Deferred taxes have been provided for temporary timing differences. These differences create taxable or tax-deductible amounts for future periods (see Note O – Income Taxes). |
Other Taxes | Other Taxes |
|
Taxes incurred, other than income taxes, are as follows: |
|
| December 31, | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Production and severance tax | $2,693,396 | | $2,403,263 | | $2,002,397 | | | | |
Ad valorem tax | 1,046,134 | | 732,302 | | 114,261 | | | | |
Sales tax | 62,864 | | 180,498 | | 40,146 | | | | |
State franchise taxes | 40,740 | | 41,072 | | 2,390 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | $3,843,134 | | $3,357,135 | | $2,159,194 | | | | |
|
The Company reports oil and natural gas sales on a gross basis and, accordingly, includes net production, severance, and ad valorem taxes on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of lease operating expenses. Sales taxes are collected from customers on sales of natural gas by TSM, and remitted to the appropriate state agency. Exploration accrues sales tax on applicable purchases of materials, and remits funds directly to the taxing jurisdictions. |
Financial Instruments | Financial Instruments |
|
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, receivables, payables, long-term debt, oil and natural gas derivatives, and (prior to the merger as described in Note M – Merger with Pyramid Oil Company and Goodwill) Series A and Series B Preferred Stock. The carrying amount of cash, receivables and payables approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. The carrying amount of long-term debt as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 approximates fair value because the interest rate on this obligation is variable. The fair value of the oil and natural gas derivative instruments is included below in Note H – Commodity Derivative Instruments. The embedded derivative associated with each of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock (eliminated in the merger) was bifurcated and carried at fair value as further described in Note I – Preferred Stock. |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
AOCI includes changes in equity that are excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and were recorded directly into a separate section of equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s AOCI shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity consists of unrealized income and losses on cash flow hedges; however, the Company discontinued hedge accounting effective January 1, 2013. AOCI is now comprised of the balance as of December 31, 2012 for the derivative instruments that qualified for hedge accounting at that time less those contracts that have subsequently expired. AOCI will continue to be adjusted for the contracts as they settle. |
General and Administrative Expenses - Stock-Based Compensation | General and Administrative Expenses – Stock-Based Compensation |
|
This includes payments to employees in the form of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock options. As such, these amounts are non-cash Company stock-based awards. |
|
The Company adopted the 2011 Stock Option Plan on June 21, 2011, and the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan effective September 10, 2014 (see Note N – Stockholders’ Equity).The Company adopted an Annual Incentive Plan for fiscal years 2014 and 2013 (see Note Q – Employee Benefit Plans). |
|
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation at fair value. The Company grants equity-classified awards including stock options and vested and non-vested equity shares (restricted stock awards and units). |
|
The fair value of stock option awards is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Restricted stock awards and units are valued using the market price of common stock. |
|
The Company records compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, for non-vested stock units over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. An adjustment is made to compensation cost for any difference between the estimated forfeitures and the actual forfeitures related to the awards. For equity-classified share-based compensation awards, expense is recognized based on the grant-date fair value. For liability-classified share-based compensation awards, expense is recognized for those awards expected to ultimately be paid. The amount of expense reported for liability-classified awards is adjusted for fair-value changes so that the expense recognized for each award is equivalent to the amount to be paid. See Note J – Stock-Based Compensation. |
General and Administrative Expenses - Other | General and Administrative Expenses - Other |
|
G&A expenses are reported net of amounts capitalized pursuant to the full cost method of accounting. |
|
Reimbursements of G&A expenses, if received from working interest owners of producing oil and natural gas properties operated by the Company (COPAS, or Council of Petroleum Accountants Societies, overhead), are reported as a reduction to G&A expense. Reimbursements of G&A expenses, if received from joint venture participants in 3-D seismic acquisition surveys, are initially reported as a reduction of capitalized G&A expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the full cost pool caption “Not subject to amortization”. |
Re-engineering and Workovers | Re-engineering and Workovers |
|
One of the Company’s core business strategies is to perform a comprehensive field re-engineering and design to increase and maintain production, lower per-unit operating expenses, and improve field economics. Re-engineering projects are undertaken with the intent of lowering per-unit operating expenses and/or reducing field down-time. In addition, the Company seeks to implement more efficient production practices in order to increase production and/or arrest natural field production declines. These practices are often deployed in fields in connection with or in anticipation of further field development activities such as installation of secondary recovery operations or additional drilling. Workovers included within this category relate to significant non-recurring operations. |
Other Noncurrent Assets | Other Noncurrent Assets |
|
Included in the 2013 noncurrent assets are deferred offering costs. During 2013, the Company explored several options to go public, including a possible listing on the Australian Stock Exchange. To accomplish this, the Company engaged legal, accounting, and reserve engineering specialists to assist in this process. These costs were charged to G&A during the first quarter of 2014. |
Earnings per Share | Earnings per Share |
|
The Company’s basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes the effect of the Company’s outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and performance-based stock awards, if the inclusion of these items is dilutive. See Note N – Stockholders’ Equity. |
Changes in Accounting Principles | Changes in Accounting Principles |
|
Not Yet Adopted |
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and industry-specific guidance in Subtopic 932-605, Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas – Revenue Recognition, and requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning in 2017 and is required to be adopted using one of two retrospective application methods, with no early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures, both for discontinued operations and for individually significant dispositions and assets classified as held for sale not qualifying as discontinued operations. This ASU is effective beginning in 2015, with early adoption permitted for disposals or for assets classified as held for sale not reported in previously issued financial statements. Management does not believe that the adoption of this ASU will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |
|
Recently adopted |
|
In June 2013, FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force consensus which requires that an unrecognized tax benefit (or a portion thereof) be presented as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for an available net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward. This accounting standards update was effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of 2014 and was applied prospectively to unrecognized tax benefits that existed as of the effective date. Adoption of this accounting standards update did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |
|
In February 2013, an ASU was issued to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date, which are separately addressed within GAAP. An entity is required to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date as the sum of 1) the amount the entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and 2) any amount the entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. Disclosure of the nature of the obligation, including how the liability arose, the relationship with other co-obligors and the terms and conditions of the arrangement is required. In addition, the total outstanding amount under the arrangement, not reduced by the effect of any amounts that may be recoverable from other entities, plus the carrying amount of any liability or receivable recognized must be disclosed. This ASU was effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2014 and was applied retrospectively for those in-scope obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements that existed at the beginning of 2014. Adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |