The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (“PNC”) and Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) are the largest stockholders of BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). Due to the ownership structure, PNC is an affiliate for 1940 Act purposes, but Barclays is not.
The Master LLC, on behalf of the Master Portfolios, entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the “Manager”), the Master Portfolios’ investment advisor, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BlackRock, to provide investment advisory and administration services. The Manager is responsible for the management of each Master Portfolio’s portfolio and provides the necessary personnel, facilities, equipment and certain other services necessary to the operations of each Master Portfolio. For such services, the Master Portfolios pay the Manager a monthly fee at an annual rate of 0.05% of each Master Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
The Manager entered into a sub-advisory agreement with BlackRock Institutional Management Corporation (“BIMC”), an affiliate of the Manager.
The Manager pays BIMC for services it provides, a monthly fee that is a percentage of the investment advisory fees paid by each Master Portfolio to the Manager. Effective July 1, 2011, the sub-advisory agreement was terminated.
Certain officers and/or Directors of the Master LLC are officers and/or directors of BlackRock and its affiliates.
In the normal course of business, the Master Portfolios invest in securities and enter into transactions where risks exist due to fluctuations in the market (market risk) or failure of the issuer of a security to meet all its obligations (issuer credit risk). The value of securities held by the Master Portfolios may decline in response to certain events, including those directly involving the issuers whose securities are owned by the Master Portfolios; conditions affecting the general economy; overall market changes; local, regional or global political, social or economic instability; and currency and interest rate and price fluctuations. Similar to issuer credit risk, the Master Portfolios may be exposed to counterparty credit risk, or the risk that an entity with which the Master Portfolios have unsettled or open transactions may fail to or be unable to perform on its commitments. The Master Portfolios manage counterparty credit risk by entering into transactions only with counterparties that they believe have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by monitoring the financial stability of those counterparties. Financial assets, which potentially expose the Master Portfolios to market, issuer and counterparty credit risks, consist principally of financial instruments and receivables due from counterparties. The extent of the Master Portfolios’ exposure to market, issuer and counterparty credit risks with respect to these financial assets is generally approximated by their value recorded in the Master Portfolios’ Statements of Assets and Liabilities, less any collateral held by the Master Portfolios.
Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on each Master Portfolio through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment or additional disclosure in the financial statements.
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement |
The Board of Directors of Master Institutional Money Market LLC (the “Master LLC”) met on April 5, 2011 and May 17–18, 2011 to consider the approval of the Master LLC’s investment advisory agreement (the “Master LLC Agreement”) with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the “Manager” or “BlackRock”), the Master LLC’s investment advisor, on behalf of each of Master Institutional Portfolio, Master Institutional Tax-Exempt Portfolio and Master Premier Institutional Portfolio (each a “Master Portfolio,” and together, the “Master Portfolios”).
FFI Institutional Fund, FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, FFI Premier Institutional Fund and FFI Select Institutional Fund (each a “Feeder Fund,” and together, the “Feeder Funds”), four of the series comprising Funds For Institutions Series (the “Series Fund”), currently invest all of their respective investable assets in Master Portfolios of the Master LLC as follows: FFI Institutional Fund and FFI Select Institutional Fund in Master Institutional Portfolio, FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund in Master Institutional Tax-Exempt Portfolio and FFI Premier Institutional Fund in Master Premier Institutional Portfolio. Accordingly, the Board of Trustees of the Series Fund also considered the approval of the Master LLC Agreements. The Feeder Funds do not require investment advisory services since all investments are made at the Master Portfolio level. The Board of Trustees of the Series Fund also considered the approval of the investment advisory agreement (the “Government Fund Agreement”) between the Manager and the Series Fund on behalf of FFI Government Fund, a series of the Series Fund, and the investment advisory agreement (the “Treasury Fund Agreement”) between the Manager and the Series Fund on behalf of FFI Treasury Fund, also a series of the Series Fund.
The Master LLC Agreement, the Government Fund Agreement and the Treasury Fund Agreement are referred to herein as the “Agreements.” For simplicity, the Board of Directors of the Master LLC and the Board of Trustees of the Series Fund are referred to herein collectively as the “Board,” and the members are referred to as “Board Members,” and the Feeder Funds, the corresponding Master Portfolios, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund are sometimes referred to individually as a “Fund” and collectively as “Funds.”
Activities and Composition of the Board
The Board consists of thirteen individuals, eleven of whom are not “interested persons” of the Master LLC or the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (the “Independent Board Members”). The Board Members are responsible for the oversight of the operations of the Master LLC or Fund, as pertinent, and perform the various duties imposed on the directors of investment companies by the 1940 Act. The Independent Board Members have retained independent legal counsel to assist them in connection with their duties. The Co-Chairs of the Board are each Independent Board Members. The Board has established five standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Governance and Nominating Committee, a Compliance Committee, a Performance Oversight and Contract Committee and an Executive Committee, each of which is composed of Independent Board Members (except for the Executive Committee, which also has one interested Board Member) and is chaired by Independent Board Members.
The Agreements
Pursuant to the 1940 Act, the Board is required to consider the continuation of the Agreements on an annual basis. In connection with this process, the Board assessed, among other things, the nature, scope and quality of the services provided to the Funds by BlackRock, its personnel and its affiliates, including investment management, administrative and shareholder services, oversight of fund accounting and custody, marketing services, risk oversight, compliance program and assistance in meeting applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
The Board, acting directly and through its committees, considers at each of its meetings, and from time to time as appropriate, factors that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of the Agreements, including the services and support provided by BlackRock to each Fund and its shareholders. Among the matters the Board considered, with respect to each Fund, were: (a) investment performance for one-, three- and five-year periods, as applicable, against peer funds, and applicable benchmarks, if any, as well as senior management’s and portfolio managers’ analysis of the reasons for any over performance or underperformance against its peers and/or benchmark, as applicable; (b) fees, including advisory, administration, if applicable, and other amounts paid to BlackRock and its affiliates by the Fund for services, such as transfer agency, marketing and distribution, call center and fund accounting; (c) Fund operating expenses and how BlackRock allocates expenses to the Fund; (d) the resources devoted to, risk oversight of, and compliance reports relating to, implementation of the Fund’s investment objective, policies and restrictions; (e) each of the Master LLC’s and the Series Fund’s compliance with its respective Code of Ethics and other compliance policies and procedures; (f) the nature, cost and character of non-investment management services provided by BlackRock and its affiliates; (g) BlackRock’s and other service providers’ internal controls and risk and compliance oversight mechanisms; (h) BlackRock’s implementation of the proxy voting policies approved by the Board; (i) execution quality of portfolio transactions; (j) BlackRock’s implementation of each Fund’s valuation and liquidity procedures; (k) an analysis of contractual and actual management fees for products with similar investment objectives across the open-end fund, exchange traded fund (“ETF”), closed-end fund and institutional account product channels, as applicable; (l) BlackRock’s compensation methodology for its investment professionals and the incentives it creates; and (m) periodic updates on BlackRock’s business.
| | | |
| | | |
| FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 | 43 |
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement (continued) |
Board Considerations in Approving the Agreements
The Approval Process: Prior to the April 5, 2011 meeting, the Board requested and received materials specifically relating to the Agreements. The Board is engaged in a process with BlackRock to review periodically the nature and scope of the information provided to better assist its deliberations. The materials provided in connection with the April meeting included (a) information independently compiled and prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”) on fees and expenses of each applicable Fund and the investment performance of each Feeder Fund, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund as compared with a peer group of funds as determined by Lipper (collectively, “Peers”); (b) information on the profitability of the Agreements to BlackRock and a discussion of fall-out benefits to BlackRock and its affiliates and significant shareholder; (c) a general analysis provided by BlackRock concerning investment management fees (a combination of the advisory fee and the administration fee, if any) charged to other clients, such as institutional clients, ETFs and closed-end funds, under similar investment mandates, as well as the performance of such other clients, as applicable; (d) the impact of economies of scale; (e) a summary of aggregate amounts paid by the applicable Fund to BlackRock; (f) sales and redemption data regarding each Feeder Fund’s, FFI Government Fund’s and FFI Treasury Fund’s shares; and (g) if applicable, a comparison of management fees to similar BlackRock open-end funds, as classified by Lipper.
At an in-person meeting held on April 5, 2011, the Board reviewed materials relating to its consideration of the Agreements. As a result of the discussions that occurred during the April 5, 2011 meeting, and as a culmination of the Board’s year-long deliberative process, the Board presented BlackRock with questions and requests for additional information. BlackRock responded to these requests with additional written information in advance of the May 17–18, 2011 Board meeting.
At an in-person meeting held on May 17–18, 2011, the Board of the Master LLC, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Master LLC Agreement between the Manager and the Master LLC on behalf of each Master Portfolio for a one-year term ending June 30, 2012; and the Board of the Series Fund, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Government Fund Agreement between the Manager and the Series Fund on behalf of FFI Government Fund and the Treasury Fund Agreement between the Manager and the Series Fund on behalf of FFI Treasury Fund, each for a one-year term ending June 30, 2012. The Board of the Series Fund, including the Independent Board Members, also considered the continuation of the Master LLC Agreement with respect to the corresponding Master Portfolios of the Feeder Funds and found the Master LLC Agreement to be satisfactory. In approving the continuation of the Agreements, the Board considered: (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BlackRock; (b) the investment performance of the applicable Fund and BlackRock; (c) the advisory fee and the cost of the services and profits to be realized by BlackRock and its affiliates from their relationship with the applicable Fund; (d) economies of scale; (e) fall out benefits to BlackRock as a result of its relationship with the Funds; and (f) other factors deemed relevant by the Board Members.
The Board also considered other matters it deemed important to the approval process, such as payments made to BlackRock or its affiliates relating to the distribution of shares of each Feeder Fund, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund, services related to the valuation and pricing of portfolio holdings of the applicable Fund, direct and indirect benefits to BlackRock and its affiliates and significant shareholder from their relationship with the applicable Fund and advice from independent legal counsel with respect to the review process and materials submitted for the Board’s review. The Board noted the willingness of BlackRock personnel to engage in open, candid discussions with the Board. The Board did not identify any particular information as controlling, and each Board Member may have attributed different weights to the various items considered.
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services Provided by BlackRock: The Board, including the Independent Board Members, reviewed the nature, extent and quality of services provided by BlackRock, including the investment advisory services and the resulting performance of each Feeder Fund, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund. Throughout the year, the Board compared the applicable Fund’s performance to the performance of a comparable group of mutual funds and/or the performance of a relevant benchmark, if any. The Board met with BlackRock’s senior management personnel responsible for investment operations, including the senior investment officers. The Board also reviewed the materials provided by the applicable Fund’s portfolio management team discussing the performance of the applicable Fund and the investment objective, strategies and outlook of the applicable Fund.
The Board considered, among other factors, the number, education and experience of BlackRock’s investment personnel generally and the applicable Fund’s portfolio management team, investments by portfolio managers in the funds they manage, BlackRock’s portfolio trading capabilities, BlackRock’s use of technology, BlackRock’s commitment to compliance, BlackRock’s credit analysis capabilities, BlackRock’s risk analysis capabilities and BlackRock’s approach to training and retaining portfolio managers and other research, advisory and management personnel. The Board engaged in a review of BlackRock’s compensation structure with respect to the applicable Fund’s portfolio management team and BlackRock’s ability to attract and retain high-quality talent and create performance incentives.
| | |
| | |
44 | FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 |
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement (continued) |
In addition to advisory services, the Board considered the quality of the administrative and non-investment advisory services provided to the Funds. BlackRock and its affiliates provide the Funds with certain administrative, transfer agency, shareholder and other services (in addition to any such services provided to the Funds by third parties) and officers and other personnel as are necessary for the operations of the Funds. In addition to investment advisory services, BlackRock and its affiliates provide the Funds with other services, including (i) preparing disclosure documents, such as the prospectus, the statement of additional information and periodic shareholder reports; (ii) assisting with daily accounting and pricing; (iii) overseeing and coordinating the activities of other service providers; (iv) organizing Board meetings and preparing the materials for such Board meetings; (v) providing legal and compliance support; and (vi) performing other administrative functions necessary for the operation of each of the Funds, such as tax reporting, fulfilling regulatory filing requirements and call center services. The Board reviewed the structure and duties of BlackRock’s fund administration, accounting, legal and compliance departments and considered BlackRock’s policies and procedures for assuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
B. The Investment Performance of the Funds and BlackRock: The Board, including the Independent Board Members, also reviewed and considered, as applicable, the performance history of each Feeder Fund, each Master Portfolio, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund. The Board noted that each Master Portfolio’s investment results correspond directly to the investment results of the applicable Feeder Fund(s). In preparation for the April 5, 2011 meeting, the Board worked with BlackRock and Lipper to develop a template for, and was provided with, reports independently prepared by Lipper, which included a comprehensive analysis of the performance of each Feeder Fund, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund. The Board also reviewed a narrative and statistical analysis of the Lipper data that was prepared by BlackRock, which analyzed various factors that affect Lipper’s rankings. In connection with its review, the Board received and reviewed information regarding the investment performance of each Feeder Fund, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund as compared to funds in the Fund’s applicable Lipper category. The Board was provided with a description of the methodology used by Lipper to select peer funds. The Board and the Board’s Performance Oversight and Contract Committee regularly review and meet with the pertinent Fund management to discuss, as applicable, the performance of each Fund throughout the year.
The Board noted that each of FFI Government Fund, FFI Institutional Fund, FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund and FFI Premier Institutional Fund, in general, performed better than its Peers in that the Fund’s performance was at or above the median of its Lipper Performance Universe in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported.
The Board noted that, in general, FFI Select Institutional Fund performed better than its Peers in that the Fund’s performance was at or above the median of its Lipper Performance Universe in both the one-year and since-inception periods reported.
The Board noted that, in general, FFI Treasury Fund performed better than its Peers in that the Fund’s performance was at or above the median of its Lipper Performance Universe in two of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported.
C. Consideration of the Advisory/Management Fees and the Cost of the Services and Profits to be Realized by BlackRock and its Affiliates from their Relationship with the Funds: The Board, including the Independent Board Members, reviewed the contractual management fee ratio, as well as the actual management fee ratio, of each Master Portfolio/Feeder Fund, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund compared with the other funds in the applicable Fund’s Lipper category. It also compared the total expense ratio of each Feeder Fund, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund to those of other funds in the applicable Fund’s Lipper category. The Board considered the services provided and the fees charged by BlackRock to other types of clients with similar investment mandates, including separately managed institutional accounts.
The Board received and reviewed statements relating to BlackRock’s financial condition and profitability with respect to the services it provided the Funds. The Board was also provided with a profitability analysis that detailed the revenues earned and the expenses incurred by BlackRock for services provided to the Funds. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability with respect to the Funds and other funds the Board currently oversees for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to available aggregate profitability data provided for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability with respect to other fund complexes managed by the Manager and/or its affiliates. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s assumptions and methodology of allocating expenses in the profitability analysis, noting the inherent limitations in allocating costs among various advisory products. The Board recognized that profitability may be affected by numerous factors including, among other things, fee waivers and expense reimbursements by the Manager, the types of funds managed, expense allocations and business mix, and the difficulty of comparing profitability as a result of those factors.
| | | |
| | | |
| FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 | 45 |
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement (continued) |
The Board noted that, in general, individual fund or product line profitability of other advisors is not publicly available. The Board considered BlackRock’s operating margin, in general, compared to the operating margin for leading investment management firms whose operations include advising open-end funds, among other product types. That data indicates that operating margins for BlackRock, in general and with respect to its registered funds, are generally consistent with margins earned by similarly situated publicly traded competitors. In addition, the Board considered, among other things, certain third party data comparing BlackRock’s operating margin with that of other publicly-traded asset management firms. That third party data indicates that larger asset bases do not, in themselves, translate to higher profit margins.
In addition, the Board considered the cost of the services provided to the applicable Fund by BlackRock, and BlackRock’s and its affiliates’ profits relating to the management and distribution of the applicable Fund and the other funds advised by BlackRock and its affiliates. As part of its analysis, the Board reviewed BlackRock’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the applicable Fund. The Board also considered whether BlackRock has the financial resources necessary to attract and retain high quality investment management personnel to perform its obligations under the Agreements and to continue to provide the high quality of services that is expected by the Board.
The Board noted that the contractual management fee ratio (a combination of the advisory fee and the administration fee, if any) of Master Institutional Portfolio/FFI Institutional Fund, Master Institutional Tax-Exempt Portfolio/FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, Master Premier Institutional Portfolio/FFI Premier Institutional Fund and Master Institutional Portfolio/FFI Select Institutional Fund was lower than or equal to the median contractual management fee ratio paid by the pertinent Fund’s Peers, in each case before taking into account any expense reimbursements or fee waivers. The Board also noted that with respect to FFI Select Institutional Fund, BlackRock has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses in order to limit, to a specified amount, FFI Select Institutional Fund’s total operating expenses as a percentage of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
The Board noted that FFI Government Fund’s contractual management fee ratio (a combination of the advisory fee and the administration fee, if any) was above the median contractual management fee ratio paid by the Fund’s Peers, in each case before taking into account any expense reimbursements or fee waivers. The Board also noted, however, that although the Fund’s contractual management fee ratio was above the median contractual management fee ratio paid by the Fund’s Peers, the contractual management fee ratio was in the third quartile. The Board additionally noted that BlackRock has voluntarily agreed to waive advisory fees for the Fund.
The Board noted that FFI Treasury Fund’s contractual management fee ratio (a combination of the advisory fee and the administration fee, if any) was above the median contractual management fee ratio paid by the Fund’s Peers, in each case before taking into account any expense reimbursements or fee waivers. The Board also noted, however, that although the Fund’s actual total expense ratio, after giving effect to any expense reimbursements or fee waivers by BlackRock and/or other parties, if applicable, was above the median actual total expense ratio of its Peers, after giving effect to any expense reimbursements or fee waivers, the actual total expense ratio was in the third quartile. The Board additionally noted that BlackRock has voluntarily agreed to waive advisory fees for the Fund.
The Board also noted that each of FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund has an advisory fee arrangement that includes breakpoints that adjust the fee rate downward as the size of the relevant Fund increases above certain contractually specified levels.
The Board further noted that BlackRock and the Funds’ distributor have voluntarily agreed to waive a portion of their respective fees and/or reimburse operating expenses to enable each Fund to maintain a minimum level of daily net investment income. This waiver and/or reimbursement may be discontinued at any time without notice.
D. Economies of Scale: The Board, including the Independent Board Members, considered the extent to which economies of scale might be realized as the assets of the applicable Fund increase. The Board also considered the extent to which the Funds benefit from such economies and whether there should be changes in the advisory fee rate or structure in order to enable the Funds to participate in these economies of scale, for example, in the case of FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund, through the use of revised breakpoints in the advisory fee based upon the asset level of the relevant Fund, or in the case of the Master Portfolios and Feeder Funds, through the use of breakpoints in the advisory fee rate based upon the asset level of the relevant Master Portfolio.
E. Other Factors Deemed Relevant by the Board Members: The Board, including the Independent Board Members, also took into account other ancillary or “fall-out” benefits that BlackRock or its affiliates and significant shareholder may derive from their respective relationships with the applicable Fund, both tangible and intangible, such as BlackRock’s ability to leverage its investment professionals who manage other portfolios and risk management personnel, an increase in BlackRock’s profile in the investment advisory community, and the engagement of BlackRock’s affiliates as service providers to the applicable Fund, including for administrative, transfer agency, distribution and securities lending services. The Board also considered BlackRock’s overall operations and its efforts to expand the scale of, and improve the quality of, its operations. The Board
| | |
| | |
46 | FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 |
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement (concluded) |
also noted that BlackRock may use and benefit from third party research obtained by soft dollars generated by certain registered fund transactions to assist in managing all or a number of its other client accounts. The Board further noted that BlackRock’s funds may invest in affiliated ETFs without any offset against the management fees payable by the funds to BlackRock.
In connection with its consideration of the Agreements, the Board also received information regarding BlackRock’s brokerage and soft dollar practices. The Board received reports from BlackRock which included information on brokerage commissions and trade execution practices throughout the year.
The Board noted the competitive nature of the open-end fund marketplace, and that shareholders of the Feeder Funds, FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund are able to redeem their shares if they believe that the applicable Fund’s fees and expenses are too high or if they are dissatisfied with the performance of the Fund.
Conclusion
The Board of the Master LLC, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Master LLC Agreement between the Manager and the Master LLC on behalf of each Master Portfolio for a one-year term ending June 30, 2012. The Board of the Series Fund, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of (i) the Government Fund Agreement between the Manager and the Series Fund on behalf of FFI Government Fund and (ii) the Treasury Fund Agreement between the Manager and the Series Fund on behalf of FFI Treasury Fund, each for a one-year term ending June 30, 2012. Based upon its evaluation of all of the aforementioned factors in their totality, the Board of the Master LLC, including the Independent Board Members, was satisfied that the terms of the Master LLC Agreement were fair and reasonable and in the best interest of each Master Portfolio and its shareholders. Based upon its evaluation of all of the aforementioned factors in their totality, the Board of the Series Fund, including the Independent Board Members, was satisfied that the terms of the Government Fund Agreement and the Treasury Fund Agreement were fair and reasonable and in the best interest of FFI Government Fund and FFI Treasury Fund and their respective shareholders. The Board of the Series Fund, including the Independent Board Members, also considered the continuation of the Master LLC Agreement with respect to each Master Portfolio and found the Master LLC Agreement to be satisfactory. In arriving at its decision to approve the Agreements, the Board of the Master LLC and the Board of the Series Fund did not identify any single factor or group of factors as all-important or controlling, but considered all factors together, and different Board Members may have attributed different weights to the various factors considered. The Independent Board Members were also assisted by the advice of independent legal counsel in making this determination. The contractual fee arrangements for each applicable Fund reflect the results of several years of review by the Board Members and predecessor Board Members, and discussions between such Board Members (and predecessor Board Members) and BlackRock. As a result, the Board Members’ conclusions may be based in part on their consideration of these arrangements in prior years.
| | | |
| | | |
| FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 | 47 |
|
|
Officers and Directors |
|
Ronald W. Forbes, Co-Chairman of the Board and Director |
Rodney D. Johnson, Co-Chairman of the Board and Director |
Paul L. Audet, President1 and Director |
David O. Beim, Director |
Henry Gabbay, Director |
Dr. Matina S. Horner, Director |
Herbert I. London, Director |
Cynthia A. Montgomery, Director |
Joseph P. Platt, Director |
Robert C. Robb, Jr., Director |
Toby Rosenblatt, Director |
Kenneth L. Urish, Director |
Frederick W. Winter, Director |
John M. Perlowski, President2 and Chief Executive Officer3 |
Richard Hoerner, CFA, Vice President |
Brendan Kyne, Vice President |
Simon Mendelson, Vice President |
Christopher Stavrakos, CFA, Vice President |
Neal Andrews, Chief Financial Officer |
Jay Fife, Treasurer |
Brian Kindelan, Chief Compliance Officer and |
Anti-Money Laundering Officer |
Ira P. Shapiro, Secretary |
|
1 President of the Trust. |
2 President of the Master LLC. |
3 Chief Executive Officer of both the Trust and the Master LLC. |
|
Investment Advisor and Administrator |
BlackRock Advisors, LLC |
Wilmington, DE 19809 |
|
Custodian and Accounting Agent |
State Street Bank and Trust Company |
Boston, MA 02110 |
|
Transfer Agent |
Boston Financial Data Services |
Quincy, MA 02169 |
|
Distributor |
BlackRock Investments, LLC |
New York, NY 10022 |
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Boston, MA 02116 |
|
Legal Counsel |
Sidley Austin LLP |
New York, NY 10019 |
|
Address of the Trust |
One Financial Center |
Boston, MA 02111 |
|
Effective September 22, 2011, Richard S. Davis resigned as President and Director of the Trust and Director of the Master LLC, and Paul L. Audet became President and Director of the Trust and Director of the Master LLC. |
| | |
| | |
48 | FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 |
|
|
Additional Information |
|
General Information |
Electronic Delivery
Electronic copies of most financial reports and prospectuses are available on the Funds’ website at http://www.fundsforinstitutions.com or shareholders can sign up for e-mail notifications of quarterly statements, annual and semi-annual reports and prospectuses by enrolling in the Funds’ electronic delivery program.
To enroll:
Shareholders Who Hold Accounts with Investment Advisors, Banks or Brokerages:
Please contact your financial advisor. Please note that not all investment advisors, banks or brokerages may offer this service.
Householding
The Funds will mail only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports and proxy statements, to shareholders with multiple accounts at the same address. This practice is commonly called “householding” and is intended to reduce expenses and eliminate duplicate mailings of shareholder documents. Mailings of your shareholder documents may be householded indefinitely unless you instruct us otherwise. If you do not want the mailing of these documents to be combined with those for other members of your household, please call the Funds at (800) 225-1576.
Availability of Quarterly Schedule of Investments
The Trust/Master LLC file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Trust’s/Master LLC’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on how to access documents on the SEC’s website without charge may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. The Trust’s/Master LLC’s Forms N-Q may also be obtained upon request and without charge by calling (800) 225-1576.
Availability of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
A description of the policies and procedures that the Trust/Master LLC use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling (800) 225-1576; (2) at http://www.blackrock.com; and (3) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Availability of Proxy Voting Record
Information about how the Trust/Master LLC voted proxies relating to securities held in the Trust’s/Master LLC’s portfolios during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available upon request and without charge (1) at http://www.blackrock.com or by calling (800) 225-1576 and (2) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
| | | |
| | | |
| FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 | 49 |
|
|
Additional Information (concluded) |
|
BlackRock Privacy Principles |
BlackRock is committed to maintaining the privacy of its current and former fund investors and individual clients (collectively, “Clients”) and to safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information BlackRock collects, how we protect that information and why in certain cases we share such information with select parties.
If you are located in a jurisdiction where specific laws, rules or regulations require BlackRock to provide you with additional or different privacy-related rights beyond what is set forth below, then BlackRock will comply with those specific laws, rules or regulations.
BlackRock obtains or verifies personal non-public information from and about you from different sources, including the following: (i) information we receive from you or, if applicable, your financial intermediary, on applications, forms or other documents; (ii) information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others; (iii) information we receive from a consumer reporting agency; and (iv) from visits to our websites.
BlackRock does not sell or disclose to non-affiliated third parties any non-public personal information about its Clients, except as permitted by law or as is necessary to respond to regulatory requests or to service Client accounts. These non-affiliated third parties are required to protect the confidentiality and security of this information and to use it only for its intended purpose.
We may share information with our affiliates to service your account or to provide you with information about other BlackRock products or services that may be of interest to you. In addition, BlackRock restricts access to non-public personal information about its Clients to those BlackRock employees with a legitimate business need for the information. BlackRock maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that are designed to protect the non-public personal information of its Clients, including procedures relating to the proper storage and disposal of such information.
| | |
| | |
50 | FUNDS FOR INSTITUTIONS SERIES | OCTOBER 31, 2011 |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not authorized for use as an offer of sale or a solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Funds unless accompanied or preceded by the Trust’s current prospectus. An investment in the Funds is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although each Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in a Fund. Total return information assumes reinvestment of all distributions. Past performance results shown in this report should not be considered a representation of future performance. For current month-end performance information, call (800) 225-1576. Each Fund’s current 7-day yield more closely reflects the current earnings of the Fund than the total returns quoted. Statements and other information herein are as dated and are subject to change.

| |
#50405-10/11-SAR | 
|
Item 2 – | Code of Ethics – Not Applicable |
| |
Item 3 – | Audit Committee Financial Expert – Not Applicable |
| |
Item 4 – | Principal Accountant Fees and Services – Not Applicable |
| |
Item 5 – | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants – Not Applicable |
| |
Item 6 – | Investments |
| (a) The registrants’ Schedule of Investments are included as part of the Reports to Stockholders filed under Item 1 of this form. |
| (b) Not Applicable due to no such divestments during the semi-annual period covered since the previous Form N-CSR filing. |
| |
Item 7 – | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable |
| |
Item 8 – | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable |
| |
Item 9 – | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers – Not Applicable |
| |
Item 10 – | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – There have been no material changes to these procedures. |
| |
Item 11 – | Controls and Procedures |
| |
| (a) – The registrants’ principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
| |
| (b) – There were no changes in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting. |
| |
Item 12 – | Exhibits attached hereto |
| |
| (a)(1) – Code of Ethics – Not Applicable |
| |
| (a)(2) – Certifications – Attached hereto |
| |
| (a)(3) – Not Applicable |
| |
| (b) – Certifications – Attached hereto |
| Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
| |
| Funds For Institutions Series and Master Institutional Money Market LLC |
| |
| By: | /s/ John M. Perlowski | |
| | John M. Perlowski |
| | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of |
| | Funds For Institutions Series and Master Institutional Money Market LLC |
| |
| Date: January 03, 2012 |
| |
| Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
| |
| By: | /s/ John M. Perlowski | |
| | John M. Perlowski |
| | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of |
| | Funds For Institutions Series and Master Institutional Money Market LLC |
| |
| Date: January 03, 2012 |
| |
| By: | /s/ Neal J. Andrews | |
| | Neal J. Andrews |
| | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of |
| | Funds For Institutions Series and Master Institutional Money Market LLC |
| | |
| Date: January 03, 2012 |