SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-13200
Astro-Med, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Rhode Island | | 05-0318215 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
600 East Greenwich Avenue, West Warwick, Rhode Island | | 02893 (Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (401) 828-4000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | |
Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
None | | None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.05 Par Value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated files, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes ¨ No x
As of July 30, 2005, the aggregate market value of the voting common equity of the Registrant held by non-affiliates of the Registrant based on the closing price on the NASDAQ Stock Market was $39,269,110.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding (excluding treasury shares)
of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of March 24, 2006.
Common Stock $0.05 Par Value 5,394,877 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
ASTRO-MED, INC.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
ASTRO-MED, INC.
PART I
Item 1.Business
General
Astro-Med, Inc. (the Company) designs, develops, manufactures and distributes a broad range of specialty printers and electronic instruments which incorporate advance technologies including both hardware and software. Target markets for products of the Company include Aerospace, Automotive, Transportation, Communications, Computer Peripherals, Apparel, Food and Beverages, Chemicals, Distribution, Life Sciences, and General Manufacturing.
The Company’s products are distributed through its own domestic and international sales force in North America and Western Europe and by authorized dealers elsewhere in the world. Approximately 30% of the Company’s sales in fiscal 2006 were outside the United States.
The Company and its subsidiaries and their representatives may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in its reports to shareholders which constitute or contain “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or by the SEC in its rules, regulations and releases.
All statements, other than statements of historical facts included in this annual report and the letter to our shareholders distributed in connection with our annual meeting regarding the Company’s financial position and operating and strategic initiatives and addressing industry developments are forward-looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, the Company or its management expresses an expectation or belief as to future results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the statement of expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include, but are not limited to, general economic, financial and business conditions and those detailed herin under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and from time to time in other filings with the SEC.
Narrative Description of Business
Product Overview
The Company develops and manufactures systems that have the ability to acquire, process, analyze, store and present electronic data in a variety of useable forms. The Company sells its product under brand names including Astro-Med (T&M), QuickLabel Systems (QuickLabel) and Grass-Telefactor (G-T). Products sold under the Astro-Med brand acquire and record data and print the output onto charts or electronic media. Products sold under the QuickLabel Systems brand create product and packaging labels and tags in one or many colors. Products sold under the Grass-Telefactor brand electronically capture and record neurological data that is used to diagnose epilepsy or to study sleep disorders. The Company supplies a range of products that include hardware, software and consumables to customers who are in a variety of industries.
Products sold under the Astro-Med brand include Toughwriter page printers and Tough Switches for use in passenger and military aircraft. These and other similar products are ruggedized and comply with rigorous MIL-STD specifications for operation under extreme environmental conditions. The Company’s Toughwriters will be used in the new Boeing 787 and Airbus A380, as well as the C-17 and C-130 military cargo planes.
3
Other products sold under the Astro-Med brand include the Everest, a telemetry workstation used widely in the aerospace industry to monitor and track space vehicles, aircraft, and missiles under test. The Everest ranges in price from $18,000 to $35,000 depending on features and options selected.
The Astro-Med brand Dash Series constitute a family of portable electronic data acquisition systems which are used as maintenance and troubleshooting instruments for pulp, paper, and metal mills, power plants, automotive R & D centers and manufacturing plants. Included in the Dash Series are the Dash 2EZ, Dash 8X, Dash 8HF, Dash 8XPM and the Dash 18 and they range in price from $3,500 to $20,000 depending on model and features and options selected.
Products sold under the QuickLabel System brand include a family of digital color label printers including the Vivo!, the first electrophotographic roll-to-roll printer, the QLS-4100 XE, the QLS-8100 XE, the QLS-2000, the QLS-3000 thermal transfer label printers, as well as a line of monochrome thermal transfer digital label printers including the Pronto! Series which total four models which are used to print bar code labels.
QuickLabel digital color label printers are sold via a direct sales force throughout the US, Canada, and Western Europe, and serviced by a factory-trained, direct technical support staff. In the rest of the world, QuickLabel uses a broad network of dealers to sell and support its products. QuickLabel’s unique labeling solutions are aimed at label printing applications in which product packaging requires frequent content changes. QuickLabel digital color label printers fill a critical need in environments which require on-demand flexibility to package multiple product variations, and to add value to the product itself, as in private labeling, to produce OEM packaging, and to customize virtually any product. Industries that require instant label production flexibility include food and beverage, foodservice distribution, grocery retailing, chemical and sanitary supplies, pharmaceutical and medical products, personal care products, advertising specialties, tire manufacturing, and apparel, among others.
Custom QuickLabel, a custom label creation software package, is an integral part of the QuickLabel printing system, and was designed by the same team of engineers who designed the digital label printers. The latest generation of QuickLabel’s proprietary user-friendly label creation software offers significant new tools for simplifying label creation and for controlling and enhancing label output. The Company’s patented MicroCell® half-toning algorithms have been improved in this latest version of the software, so that printers driven by Custom QuickLabel now render process-color print quality that closely approximates digital artwork.
QuickLabel digital label printers generate revenue through label, tag, thermal transfer ribbon and toner cartridge consumables sales. The Company engineers and manufactures unique printing supplies especially for use in optimizing the performance of the QuickLabel brand of digital label printers.
Products sold under the Grass-Telefactor brand include systems, instruments and software products to detect, amplify, and display the electrical activity of the human brain commonly called electroencephalography (EEG). EEG data is used by clinicians to diagnose epilepsy and other neurological conditions including sleep apnea.
Included in the Grass-Telefactor line of products are the Comet, the Aura, the wireless Aura PSG, and the Beehive. These systems are all operated under the Twin software system, a Windows-based multi-module software program developed by the Company over the past six years. Included also is a line of amplifiers, electrodes, transducers and stimulators used by clinicians and researchers.
Products sold under the Grass-Telefactor brand are sold to hospitals, sleep centers and clinics. All Grass-Telefactor products which are connected to the human body are controlled by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
4
Technology
The core technologies of the Company relate to (1) acquiring data, (2) conditioning the data, (3) displaying the data on hard copy, monitor, or electronic storage media, and finally (4) analyzing the data.
The Company is continually improving the performance and functionality of core technologies, enabling the Company to lead the competition with innovative products.
Patents and Copyrights
The Company holds a number of product patents in the United States and in foreign countries. It has filed applications for other patents that are pending. The Company considers its patents to be important, but does not believe that its business is materially dependent on them. The Company copyrights its extensive software and registers its trademarks.
Manufacturing and Supplies
The Company designs its products and manufactures many of the component parts. The balance of the parts are produced to the Company’s specifications by suppliers. Raw materials required for the manufacture of products, including parts produced to the Company’s specifications, are generally available from numerous suppliers. However, the Company does obtain certain components of our products and certain finished products from sole sources.
Product Development
The Company has maintained an active program of product research and development since its inception. During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred costs of $4.0 million, $4.0 million, and $3.7 million, respectively, on Company-sponsored product development. The Company is committed to product development as a requisite to its growth and expects to continue its focus on research and development efforts in fiscal 2007.
Marketing and Competition
The Company competes worldwide in many markets including clinical and research medicine, aerospace, automotive and general manufacturing. The Company retains a competitive position in its respective markets by virtue of proprietary technology, product reputation, delivery, technical assistance and service to customers.
The Company markets its products worldwide by advertising and promotion using major national and international trade journals, scientific meetings and trade shows, direct mailing campaigns, and the internet.
The products are sold by direct field sales persons as well as independent dealers and representatives. In the United States, the Company has direct field sales people located in major cities from coast to coast specializing in either T&M Recorders and Data Acquisitions systems, QuickLabel Color Label printers and media systems, or G-T Neurological Instrumentation products. Additionally, the Company has direct field sales and service centers in Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Holland. In the remaining parts of the world, the Company utilizes approximately 80 independent dealers and representatives selling and marketing its products in 40 countries.
The Company has a number of competitors in each of the markets that it serves. In the T&M area, the Company feels that it leads the field in Data Acquisition Recorders. It competes with the Gould Instrument Division of SPX Technologies.
In the Color Label Printer field, the Company believes it leads the world in color printing using the thermal transfer printing technology. The Company introduced the very first thermal transfer color printers late in 1995. The Company believes it is the first to introduce an electrophotgraphic roll-to-roll color label printer
5
The Grass-Telefactor products of the Company are devoted to clinical applications in EEG, PSG, and Long Term Epilepsy Monitoring (LTM). There are about fourteen companies that compete in one or more of the three modalities (EEG, PSG, LTM), but none are the clear leader. The Company feels it offers superior products based upon its long history and pioneering efforts in the field since 1935. The Company, unlike most of its competitors, designs, manufactures and produces complete systems including transducers, amplifiers, sensors, and Windows-based application software. Additionally, the Company produces a range of life science products for the research market. Many of the latter products eventually find their way into clinical applications.
No single customer accounted for 10% of the Company’s net sales in any of the last three fiscal years. The Company’s products were sold to approximately 5,000 customers.
International Sales
In fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, net sales to customers in various geographic areas outside the United States, primarily in Canada and Western Europe, amounted to $17.6 million, $17.0 million, and $16.3 million, respectively.
Order Backlog
The Company’s backlog fluctuates regularly. It consists of a blend of orders for end user customers as well as original equipment manufacturer customers. Manufacturing is geared to forecasted demands and applies a rapid turn cycle to meet customer expectations. Accordingly, the amount of order backlog does not indicate future sales trends. The Company’s backlog at January 31, 2006 and 2005 was $5.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Other Information
The Company’s business is not seasonal in nature; however, the Company’s sales are impacted by the size and complexity of the transactions, which can cause fluctuations in sales from quarter to quarter.
Most of the Company’s products are generally warranted for one year against defects in materials or workmanship. Warranty expenses have generally averaged approximately $357,000 a year for the Company’s last five fiscal years.
As of January 31, 2006, the Company employed approximately 375 persons. The Company is generally able to satisfy its employment requirements. No employees are represented by a union. The Company believes that employee relations are good.
Item 1A.Risk factors
Investing in our common stock involves a degree of risk. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer.
Astro-Med competes in highly competitive markets which are likely to become more competitive. The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and frequent new product introductions. Current competitors or new market entrants may develop new products with features that could adversely affect the competitive position of our products. We may not be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or enhancing our existing products or in responding effectively to technological changes, new standards or product announcements by competitors. The timely availability of new products and enhancements, and their acceptance by customers are important to our future success. Delays in such availability or a lack of market acceptance could have an adverse effect on our business. Additionally, there may be technological innovation that eliminates or reduces the needs for our products.
6
Astro-Med could incur liabilities as a result of installed product failures due to design or manufacturing defects. Our products may have defects despite testing internally or by current or potential customers. These defects could result in product returns or recalls and loss or delay in market acceptance which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition.
Astro-Med sells a significant portion of its products internationally. We sell our products worldwide through several foreign locations and distributors. Our worldwide operations are subject to the risks normally associated with foreign operations including, but not limited to:
| • | | Customer and vendor financial stability; |
| • | | Volatility in general world economic conditions; |
| • | | The disruption of markets; |
| • | | Changes in export or import laws; |
| • | | Restrictions on currency exchanges; |
| • | | The modification or introduction of government policies with potentially adverse effects; |
International sales, which are both direct and indirect sales to customers outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 30% of our sales in fiscal 2006. We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenue. We invoice our customers in various currencies. Occasionally we use rate protection agreements or derivative agreements to hedge any foreign currency exposure. Accordingly, we may be exposed to exchange losses based upon currency exchange rate fluctuations, which losses could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Astro-Med depends on the ongoing service of its senior management and ability to attract and retain other key personnel. Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continuing contributions of key management, sales, marketing, research and development and manufacturing personnel, many of whom we would have difficulty replacing. We believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled engineers and management, sales and marketing personnel. Failure to attract and retain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial position.
Astro-Med cannot provide any assurance that current laws, or any laws enacted in the future, will not have a material adverse effect on our business. Our operations are subject to laws, rules, regulations, including environmental regulations, government policies and other requirements in each of the jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Changes in laws, rules, regulations, policies or requirements could result in the need to modify our products and could affect the demand for our products, which may have an adverse impact on our future operating results. In addition, we must comply with new regulations restricting our ability to include lead and certain other substances in our products. If we do not comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations we could be subject to costs and liabilities and our business may be adversely impacted.
Astro-Med relies on sole source suppliers that may result in product delays or price increases. We currently obtain certain components of our products and certain finished products from sole sources. In the future, our suppliers may not be able to meet our demand for components and products in a timely and cost effective manner. Our inability to secure and qualify alternative sources of supply in a timely manner may disrupt our ability to fulfill customer orders.
Astro-Med spends a significant amount of time and effort related to the development of our Ruggedized and Color Printer products. Failure to develop these products and markets as anticipated could adversely affect our growth.
Astro-Med will be relocating the Braintree, MA manufacturing facility during fiscal 2007. Failure to effectively execute the relocation plan could cause potential disruptions to our business.
7
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 2.Properties
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s principal owned properties, all of which are included in the consolidated balance sheet appearing elsewhere in this report.
| | | | |
Location | | Approximate Square Footage | | Principal Use |
West Warwick, RI | | 116,000 | | Corporate headquarters, research and development, manufacturing |
Braintree, MA | | 91,000 | | Manufacturing |
Slough, England | | 1,700 | | Sales and service |
The Company also leases facilities in seven locations. The following information pertains to each location:
| | | | |
Location | | Approximate Square Footage | | Principal Use |
West Conshohocken, PA | | 2,500 | | Sales and service |
Longueuil, Quebec, Canada | | 3,800 | | Sales and service |
Rodgau, Germany | | 5,435 | | Manufacturing, sales and service |
Trappes, France | | 2,164 | | Sales and service |
Zwolle, Netherlands | | 475 | | Sales and service |
Schaumburg, IL | | 1,131 | | Sales and service |
Milano, Italy | | 753 | | Sales and service |
During fiscal 2006 the Company entered into an agreement with Hanover R.S. Limited Partnership for the sale of the manufacturing facility in Braintree, MA. As a result of this agreement the Company will need to relocate this manufacturing facility to a location to be determined.
The Company believes its facilities are well maintained, in good operating condition and generally adequate to meet its needs for the foreseeable future.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
There are no pending or threatened legal proceedings against the Company believed to be material to the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company’s security holders, through solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the last quarter of the period covered by this report.
8
PART II
Item 5. | Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder’s Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Company’s common stock trades on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol ALOT. The following table sets forth dividend data and the range of high and low closing prices, as furnished by NASDAQ, for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | |
Years Ended January 31, | | High | | Low | | Dividends Per Share |
2006 | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter | | $ | 10.69 | | $ | 8.40 | | $ | 0.04 |
Second Quarter | | $ | 10.25 | | $ | 8.65 | | $ | 0.04 |
Third Quarter | | $ | 13.07 | | $ | 9.79 | | $ | 0.04 |
Fourth Quarter | | $ | 12.15 | | $ | 9.80 | | $ | 0.04 |
2005 | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter | | $ | 13.29 | | $ | 10.29 | | $ | 0.04 |
Second Quarter | | $ | 12.71 | | $ | 9.67 | | $ | 0.04 |
Third Quarter | | $ | 10.90 | | $ | 9.00 | | $ | 0.04 |
Fourth Quarter | | $ | 9.69 | | $ | 7.88 | | $ | 0.04 |
The Company had approximately 331 shareholders of record as of March 24, 2006, which does not reflect shareholders with beneficial ownership in shares held in nominee name.
Shareholder Services
Shareholders of Astro-Med, Inc. who desire information about the Company are invited to contact the Investor Relations Department, Astro-Med, Inc., 600 East Greenwich Avenue, West Warwick, RI 02893 or call (401) 828-4000. Visit our Investor Relations website at WWW.ASTRO-MEDINC.COM. We make available free of charge on our Internet website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. These filings are also accessible on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Dividend Policy
The Company began a program of paying annual cash dividends in the second quarter of fiscal 1992. The Company anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis. The Company has paid a dividend for 58 consecutive quarters. During fiscal 2007 the Company announced its intention to increase the annual dividend by twenty-five percent.
Stock Repurchases
On August 16, 2004, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the repurchase of 600,000 shares of common stock. This is an ongoing authorization without any expiration date.
The Company made no purchases of its common stock pursuant to this authority during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.
9
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | | 2003 | | | 2002 | |
Results of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Sales | | $ | 59,301 | | $ | 55,975 | | $ | 55,781 | | | $ | 49,165 | | | $ | 49,391 | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $ | 2,551 | | $ | 2,710 | | $ | 3,217 | | | $ | (1,882 | ) | | $ | (233 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share—Basic | | $ | 0.48 | | $ | 0.51 | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | (.05 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share—Diluted | | $ | 0.44 | | $ | 0.47 | | $ | 0.60 | | | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | (.05 | ) |
Dividends Declared per Common Share | | $ | 0.16 | | $ | 0.16 | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | |
Financial Condition: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Working Capital | | $ | 31,222 | | $ | 29,268 | | $ | 24,499 | | | $ | 18,825 | | | $ | 21,455 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 49,647 | | $ | 47,039 | | $ | 42,065 | | | $ | 35,210 | | | $ | 38,404 | |
Long-Term Debt, less Current Maturities | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Shareholders’ Equity | | $ | 40,301 | | $ | 38,408 | | $ | 34,547 | | | $ | 29,081 | | | $ | 31,425 | |
Restructuring and Impairment (Credits) Charges | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | (15 | ) | | $ | 490 | | | $ | — | |
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Astro-Med is a multi-national enterprise, which designs, develops, manufactures, distributes and services a broad range of products that acquire, store, analyze and present data in multiple formats. The Company organizes its structure around a core set of competencies, including research and development, manufacturing, service, marketing and distribution. It markets and sells its products and services through three business segments including:
Test and Measurement Product Group (T&M) represents a suite of telemetry recorder products sold to the aerospace and defense industries, as well as portable data acquisition recorders, which offer diagnostic and test functions to a wide range of manufacturers including paper, energy, automotive and steel fabrication. In addition, T&M also includes a suite of ruggedized printer products designed for military and commercial applications to be used to print weather maps, communications and other flight critical information.
QuickLabel Systems Product Group (QuickLabel) offers hardware, software and media products that create color labels, store the images and produce the images in color or non-color formats on a broad range of media substrates.
Grass-Telefactor Product Group (G-T) centers on diagnostic and monitoring products that serve the clinical neurophysiology markets, as well as a range of biomedical instrumentation products and supplies focused on the life sciences markets.
The Company markets and sells its products and services globally through a diverse distribution structure of sales personnel, manufacturing representatives and dealers that deliver a full complement of branded products and services to customers in our respective markets.
The Company’s growth strategy centers on product innovation made possible by research and development initiatives, as well as acquisitions that strategically fit into existing core businesses. Research and development activities are funded by the Company at approximately 7% of annual sales.
The Company’s continued success in increasing its product revenues will be dependent on the Company’s ability to introduce new and/or enhanced product lines each year. The Company attempts to have approximately 45% of annual hardware sales generated by products developed or acquired within the past three years.
10
The Company improved its liquidity position during the year by effectively managing its working capital, generating cash from operations and realizing proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.
To ensure its continued growth and profitability in fiscal 2007, the Company will increase its capital investment in: personnel by adding salespersons in underserved markets, productivity by increasing manufacturing capabilities through the acquisition of new equipment, such as a label press, thermal transfer ribbon processing machinery, metal fabrication equipment and electronic circuit board automatic test equipment; distribution by expanding our global dealer organization; and information technology by providing hardware and software tools that improve the knowledge and efficiency of our employee population.
Results of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | 2006 Sales | | 2006 Sales as a % of Total | | | % Change Over Prior Year | | | 2005 Sales | | 2005 Sales as a % of Total | | | % Change Over Prior Year | | | 2004 Sales | | 2004 Sales as a % of Total | |
T&M | | $ | 11,467 | | 19.3 | % | | 3.5 | % | | $ | 11,082 | | 19.8 | % | | (4.8 | )% | | $ | 11,639 | | 20.9 | % |
QuickLabel | | | 29,698 | | 50.1 | % | | 4.5 | % | | | 28,420 | | 50.8 | % | | 12.4 | % | | | 25,290 | | 45.3 | % |
G-T | | | 18,136 | | 30.6 | % | | 10.1 | % | | | 16,473 | | 29.4 | % | | (12.6 | )% | | | 18,852 | | 33.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 59,301 | | 100 | % | | 5.9 | % | | $ | 55,975 | | 100.0 | % | | 0.3 | % | | $ | 55,781 | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2006 compared to Fiscal 2005
The Company’s sales in fiscal 2006 were $59.3 million, up from the prior year’s sales of $56.0 million. Domestic sales of $41.7 million increased 7% from the prior year sales of $38.9 million. The increase results from a mixed performance by the product groups. QuickLabel System domestic sales were healthy during the year increasing 7.5% over the prior year sales as demand for the Company’s consumables remained strong. G-T domestic sales were also healthy during the year increasing 9%, as sales of the LTM (long term monitoring), sleep and Electrode consumable products each experienced growth over the prior year. T&M domestic sales were flat with the prior year as sales growth in Ruggedized and Dash Series products were tempered by sales declines in the Everest Series products as the aerospace telemetry market continues to decline. Sales through the Company’s international channels were $17.6 million, representing a 3% increase from the prior year sales of $17.0 million. Similar to the domestic channel the increase was the result of a mixed performance by the product groups. T&M international sales were 15% ahead of the prior year due to increased sales within Ruggedized products. However, the T&M international channel also experienced sales declines within the Everest series. G-T international sales experienced a 12% increase over the prior year as a result of an increase in sleep system sales. QLS international sales were essentially flat with the prior year as a 4% increase in consumable sales was offset by lower hardware sales. The impact of foreign exchange rate changes during the year was nominal when compared to the prior year.
The Company’s gross profit was $24.7 million, an increase of $1.7 million over the prior year’s gross profit of $23.0 million. This year’s gross profit margin of 41.6% was slightly higher than the prior year’s gross margin of 41.2%. This slight increase was the result of favorable product mix.
Operating expenses grew 5% to $21.5 million. Specifically, selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased 6% to $17.5 million, representing 29% of sales which was consistent with the prior year’s 29% of sales. The increased SG&A spending is the result of selling and marketing initiatives which include additional selling personnel of $0.4 million, an increase in travel and trade show expenses of $0.2 million and an increase in commissions of $0.3 million related to the higher sales, as well as an increase in G&A staffing. Research & Development (R&D) expenses of $4.0 million were flat with the prior year. This level of spending represents 6.8% of sales which was slightly lower than the prior year’s level of 7.2%.
Investment income in fiscal 2006 was $0.3 million, down from $0.4 million in fiscal 2005. The decrease in investment income during fiscal year 2006 was attributable to a change in the composition of our underlying
11
investment portfolio and resulting yields. Other expense, net was $0.1 million as compared to last fiscal year’s other expense, net of $0.2 million. The change of $0.1 million was the result of the change in foreign exchange rates.
The Company recorded tax expense of $0.9 million and $0.1 million in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the twelve months ended January 31, 2006, an income tax expense of $0.9 million was recognized as a result of income tax expense of $1.2 million on the current year’s pretax income of $3.4 million and a $0.3 million non-cash tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 due to the reversal of tax reserves related to the favorable resolution of certain income tax examinations. For the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 an income tax expense of $0.1 million was recorded as a result of income tax expense of $1.0 million on the current year’s pretax income of $2.8 million and a $0.9 million one-time non-cash tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 related to the release of the valuation allowance on the net deferred tax asset that was established in fiscal 2003.
The Company reports three segments that mirror the Company’s sales product groups (i.e., T&M, QuickLabel and G-T). The Company evaluates segment performance based on the operating segment’s profit before corporate and financial administration expenses.
The following table summarizes selected financial information by segment:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Sales | | Segment Operating Profit (Loss) | | Segment Operating Profit (Loss) % | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
T&M | | $ | 11,467 | | $ | 11,082 | | $ | 11,639 | | $ | 331 | | $ | (170 | ) | | $ | 839 | | 2.9 | % | | (1.5 | )% | | 7.2 | % |
QuickLabel | | | 29,698 | | | 28,420 | | | 25,290 | | | 2,874 | | | 3,760 | | | | 2,954 | | 9.7 | % | | 13.2 | % | | 11.7 | % |
G-T | | | 18,136 | | | 16,473 | | | 18,852 | | | 2,906 | | | 1,800 | | | | 2,695 | | 16.0 | % | | 10.9 | % | | 14.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 59,301 | | $ | 55,975 | | $ | 55,781 | | $ | 6,111 | | $ | 5,390 | | | $ | 6,488 | | 10.3 | % | | 9.6 | % | | 11.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,956 | | | 2,820 | | | | 2,843 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,155 | | | 2,570 | | | | 3,645 | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income and Expense, net | | | | | | | | | | | | 247 | | | 197 | | | | 139 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Before Income Taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,402 | | | 2,767 | | | | 3,784 | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax Provision | | | | | | | | | | | | 851 | | | 57 | | | | 567 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,551 | | $ | 2,710 | | | $ | 3,217 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The operating results of each segment are summarized as follows:
T&M’s sales increased 3.5% in fiscal 2006 to $11.5 million from $11.1 million in the previous year. The increase is traceable to sales growth within the Dash Series products which were up 15.1% over the prior year and the Ruggedized products which were up 130.0%. These increases were offset by lower shipments of the Everest product line which was down 41% from the prior year. Customers in the Company’s aerospace markets have continued to delay capital purchases due to limited appropriations for workstation telemetry recorder products. T&M’s segment operating profit was $0.3 million in fiscal 2006. This result compares favorably to the prior year’s segment operating loss of $0.2 million. The current year’s improvement is due to higher sales volume and better margins. T&M selling expenses were consistent with the prior year.
Sales of the QuickLabel Systems products increased 4.5% in fiscal 2006 to $29.7 million from $28.4 million in the prior year. This year’s sales growth was driven by a 10.3% increase in QLS consumable products. The sales growth of the consumables products was shared between the Company’s labels and tags, up 17.1% and, ribbons, up 4.4% from the prior year. However, the growth in QLS consumables was tempered by lower QLS Hardware sales. The QLS Product Group segment operating profit was $2.9 million during fiscal 2006. This
12
result compares unfavorably to the prior year’s segment operating profit of $3.8 million. The lower segment operating profit on increased sales was due to higher personnel costs, investment in marketing campaigns and increased manufacturing and R&D expenses on the development of the new VIVO color printer.
G-T’s sales increased 10.0% in fiscal 2006 to $18.1 million from $16.5 million in the prior year. The product group’s higher sales were due to increases within LTM products, which were up 29%, increases within sleep products, which were up 33.0% and an increase in the product group’s consumable sales which were up 22.1%. G-T’s operating profit increased 61.4% in fiscal 2006 to $2.9 million from $1.8 million in the prior year. This year’s segment operating profit was driven by higher sales volume and product mix, as well as decreased spending within R&D for this product group.
Fiscal 2005 compared to Fiscal 2004
The Company’s sales in fiscal 2005 were $56.0 million, up from the prior year’s sales of $55.8 million. Domestic sales of $38.9 million declined 1% from the prior year sales of $39.5 million. The nominal decline was an outgrowth of a mixed performance by the product groups. Domestic QuickLabel System sales were healthy during the year increasing 15% over the prior year sales as demand for the Company’s printer systems and consumables remained strong. Domestic G-T sales were down from the prior year by 17%, as sales of the LTM (long term monitoring) products and legacy products in the clinical markets were below last year’s sales. However, sales of the Company’s new Comet product line increased 35% from the prior year in both the EEG (electroencephalographic) and PSG (sleep) applications. Domestic T&M sales were lower by 7% from the previous year as customers in our aerospace markets deferred buying decisions on workstation telemetry recorders until fiscal 2006. However, the product group’s portable suite of recorders, i.e. Dash series, increased 18% over the prior year. Sales through the Company’s international channels were $17.0 million, representing a 4% increase from the prior year. However, excluding the favorable impact from foreign exchange via the weak dollar, international sales for fiscal 2005 were 2% lower than the prior year. In a similar profile to the domestic channel, the results in the international channel were down due to lower volume of G-T LTM product sales. Shipments of QuickLabel Systems products grew year over year, whereas T&M product sales volume were flat with the prior year.
The Company’s gross profit was $23.0 million, essentially flat with the prior year’s gross profit of $23.0 million. Fiscal 2005 gross profit margin of 41.2% also matched the prior year’s gross profit margin of 41.2% on comparable sales volume.
Operating expenses grew 6% to $20.5 million. Specifically, selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased 5% to $16.4 million, representing 29% of sales as compared to the prior year’s 28% of sales. The increased SG&A spending is confined to selling and marketing initiatives which include additional selling personnel of $0.2 million, an increase in trade show expenses of $0.1 million, an expansion of the Company’s advertising formats of $0.1 million and foreign exchange increases of $0.3 million. Research & Development (R&D) expenses increased 10% from last year to $4.0 million. This level of spending represents 7.1% of sales and a 50 basis point increment from the previous year’s level of 6.6%. The increase is traceable to additional engineering personnel of $0.1 million, outside engineering services of $0.1 million and prototype parts of $0.1 million.
Interest income in fiscal 2005 was $0.4 million, up significantly from $0.2 million in fiscal 2004. The increase in interest income during fiscal year 2005 is attributable to a higher yield on the investment portfolio and higher average cash balances available for a full year in fiscal 2005 from the cash generated in the second half of fiscal 2004. Other expense, net was $0.2 million as compared to last fiscal year’s other expense, net of $0.1 million. The increase of $0.1 million was the result of additional unrealized losses on intercompany balances driven by the change in foreign exchange rates.
The Company recorded tax expense of $0.1 million and $0.6 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the twelve months ending January 31, 2005, an income tax expense of $0.1 million was recognized as a result of income tax expense of $1.0 million on the current year’s pretax income of $2.8 million and a $0.9
13
million one-time non-cash tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 related to the release of the valuation allowance on the net deferred tax asset that was established in fiscal 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company expects to finance its future working capital needs, capital expenditures and acquisition requirements through internal funds. To the extent the Company’s capital and liquidity requirements are not satisfied internally, the Company may utilize a $3.5 million unsecured bank line of credit, all of which is currently available. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at the bank’s prime rate.
The Company’s Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are included on page 30. Net cash flow provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2006 was $2.4 million. The net cash flow provided by operations is attributed to the positive cash flow generated from net income of $2.6 million during the year and depreciation of $1.2 million. Cash flow from operating activities was adversely affected by a $1.3 million increase in accounts receivable. This increase was primarily due to the record quarterly sales level achieved in the fourth quarter.
Net cash flow used by investing activities was $3.4 million, which was mostly the result of the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $1.0 million and a net increase in the Company’s portfolio of investment securities of $2.4 million. Property, plant and equipment purchases included machinery and equipment of $0.5 million, information technology of $0.3 million, building improvements of $0.1 million and tools and dies of $0.1 million.
Net cash flow used by financing activities was $0.6 million in fiscal 2006. During the year the Company paid dividends of $0.8 million. Also during the current year, the Company generated $0.3 million in cash through the exercise of employee stock options.
Dividends paid for fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 were $0.8, million, $0.8 million and $0.7 million in each year, respectively. The Company’s annual dividend per share was $0.16 in all three years. Since the inception of the common stock buy back program in fiscal 1997, the Company has repurchased 994,035 shares of its common stock. At January 31, 2006, the Company has the Board of Directors’ authorization to purchase an additional 547,589 shares of the Company’s common stock in the future.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies
The Company had a contingent obligation relating to the 1999 Telefactor acquisition that required the Company to pay additional consideration to the seller if certain sales amounts are achieved during the 72 months following the closing of the transaction. The purchase and sales agreement contains a clause which would require the Company to pay additional purchase price of up to $3,000,000 if certain sales levels are achieved. The earnout provision expired in December 2005 with no additional consideration owed to the sellers.
On June 17, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with Hanover R.S. Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership (the “Purchaser”) for the sale of approximately 24.692 acres of land located in Braintree, Massachusetts owned by the Company (the “Property”) for the purchase price of $6,100,000 to be paid in cash at the closing. The sale of the Property was subject to a 90 day feasibility period which ended on September 17, 2005, during which time the Purchaser could inspect the property and terminate the sale due to any adverse conditions discovered on the Property. With the successful completion of the feasibility period, the Purchaser has 16 months to obtain final zoning and site plan approval from all state and local governmental entities for use of the Property as a multi-family residential rental property, subject to two 30 day extensions exercisable at the option of the Purchaser upon payment to the Company of $25,000 per extension.
Upon execution of the agreement, $250,000 of earnest money was placed in escrow pending completion of the sale and an additional $250,000 was placed in escrow at the expiration of the feasibility period. Following the feasibility period, all such earnest money is forfeited by the Purchaser in the event that the sale is not completed due to a breach by the Purchaser.
14
As of January 31, 2006 the Purchaser has placed a total of $500,000 in escrow pending the completion of the sale. This amount is recorded as both an Other Current Asset and a Deposit on Pending Sale on the balance sheet of the Company. In the event that this transaction is completed, the Company would recognize an estimated pre-tax gain of approximately $5,400,000 to $5,600,000.
A summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and commitments as of January 31, 2006 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
In Millions | | Payment Due Within 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | Thereafter |
Operating Leases | | $ | 0.2 | | $ | 0.3 | | $ | — |
Purchase Obligations | | $ | 4.7 | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 4.9 | | $ | 0.3 | | $ | — |
| | | | | | | | | |
Purchase obligations include amounts committed under legally enforceable contracts or purchase orders for goods and services with defined terms as to price, quantity, delivery and termination liability.
The Company is subject to contingencies, including legal proceedings and claims arising out of its businesses that cover a wide range of matters, including, among others, contract and employment claims, workers compensation claims, product liability, warranty and modification, adjustment or replacement of component parts of units sold.
The Company provides accruals for direct costs associated with the estimated resolution of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated. Costs accrued have been estimated and are based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies and outcomes. While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Company’s control.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. (See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.) Certain of the Company’s accounting policies require the application of judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. The Company periodically evaluates the judgments and estimates used for its critical accounting policies to ensure that such judgments and estimates are reasonable for its interim and year-end reporting requirements. These judgments and estimates are based on the Company’s historical experience, current trends and information available from other sources, as appropriate. If different conditions result from those assumptions used in the Company’s judgments, the results could be materially different from the Company’s estimates. The Company’s critical accounting policies include:
Revenue Recognition: The majority of the Company’s product sales are recorded at the time of shipment, when legal title has transferred and risk of loss passes to the customer, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured
15
in accordance with the requirements in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” When a sale arrangement involves training or installation, the deliverables in the arrangement are evaluated to determine whether they represent separate units of accounting in accordance with SAB 104 and EITF 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables”. This evaluation occurs at inception of the arrangement and as each item in the arrangement is delivered. The total fee from the arrangement is allocated to each unit of accounting based on its relative fair value. Fair value for each element is established generally based on the sales price charged when the same or similar element is sold separately.
Revenue is recognized when revenue recognition criteria for each unit of accounting are met. When other significant obligations remain after products are delivered, revenue is recognized only after such obligations are fulfilled. All of the Company’s equipment contains embedded operating systems and data management software which is included in the purchase price of the equipment. The software is deemed incidental to the systems as a whole as it is not sold separately or marketed separately and its production costs are minor as compared to those of the hardware system. Returns and customer credits are infrequent and are recorded as a reduction to sales. Rights of return are not included in sales arrangements. Revenue associated with products that contain specific customer acceptance criteria is not recognized before the customer acceptance criteria are satisfied. Discounts from list prices are recorded as a reduction to sales. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling fees are included in sales while related shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales.
Warranty Claims and Bad Debts: Provisions for the estimated costs for future product warranty claims and bad debts are recorded in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively, at the time a sale is recorded. The amounts recorded are generally based upon historically derived percentages while also factoring in any new business conditions that might impact the historical analysis such as new product introduction for warranty and bankruptcies of particular customers for bad debts. The Company also periodically evaluates the adequacy of its reserves for warranty and bad debts recorded in its consolidated balance sheet as a further test to ensure the adequacy of the recorded provisions. Warranty and bad debt analysis often involves subjective analysis of a particular customer’s ability to pay. As a result, significant judgment is required by the Company in determining the appropriate amounts to record and such judgments may prove to be incorrect in the future. The Company believes that its procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable and historically have not resulted in material adjustments in subsequent periods when the estimates are adjusted to the actual amounts.
Customer Returns: Customer returns are recorded on an actual basis throughout the year and also include an estimate at the end of each reporting period for future customer returns related to sales recorded prior to the end of the period. The Company generally estimates customer returns based upon its historical experience while making adjustments for any changes in business conditions. The Company believes that its principles for estimating such amounts are reasonable and historically have not resulted in material adjustments in subsequent periods when the estimates are adjusted to actual experience.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. The Company records provisions to write-down obsolete and excess inventory to its estimated net realizable value. The process for evaluating obsolete and excess inventory consists of the Company analyzing the inventory supply on hand and estimating the net realizable value of the inventory based on historical experience, current business conditions and anticipated future sales. The Company believes that its procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable and historically have not resulted in material adjustments in subsequent periods when the estimates are adjusted to actual experience.
Income taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This SFAS requires that deferred income taxes be determined based on estimated future tax effects of differences between the tax and book bases of assets and liabilities considering the provisions of enacted tax laws. The Company has historically had deferred tax assets due principally to the unfavorable tax consequences of recording expenses for required book reserves for such things as, bad debts, inventory valuation, and warranty that cannot be deducted for income tax purposes until such expenses are actually paid or losses realized. The Company’s deferred tax liabilities consist of
16
favorable tax consequences associated with accelerated depreciation methods for tax purposes. SFAS No. 109 requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is “more likely than not” that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence must be considered, including the Company’s performance, the market environment in which the Company operates, length of carryforward periods, existing sales backlog and future sales projections. The Company had previously provided valuation allowances only for future tax benefits resulting from certain foreign losses. In fiscal 2003, as required by SFAS No. 109, the Company established a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax asset as a result of the uncertainty as to whether these deferred tax assets would “more likely than not” be realized in the future. Based on the facts and circumstances at that time it was determined that a full valuation allowance was required and it was stated that until an appropriate level of profitability could be sustained no tax benefits would be realized. As of the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company believed that an appropriate level of profitability had been established and maintained and that it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets would be realized in the future except for possible future tax benefits from the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards attributable to the Company’s Italian subsidiary. The Company made this determination based on a review of the facts and circumstances as of May 1, 2004. This review consisted of an analysis of the Company’s performance, the market environment in which the Company currently operates, the length of the carryforward periods, the existing sales backlog and the future sales projections.
Long-Lived Asset and Goodwill: The impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. Goodwill impairment reviews are performed in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Management evaluates the recoverability of goodwill annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances, such as declines in sales, earnings or cash flows, or material adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that the carrying value of an asset might be impaired. Goodwill is considered to be impaired when the net book value of a segment exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair values are established using a discounted cash flow methodology. The determination of discounted cash flows is based on the long-range planning forecast.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2005, the FASB issues SFAS No. 154, “Accounting for Changes and Error Corrections”. This Statement changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. It requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This Statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. When a pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should be followed. This Statement is effective for the Company with the first quarter of fiscal 2007. It is not expected to have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) and superseded APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123R requires companies to measure compensation costs for share-based payments to employees, including stock options, at fair value and expense such compensation over the service period. For the Company, this is effective February 1, 2006.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123R, until January 31, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognized no
17
compensation expense for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 123R’s fair value method will have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, although it will have no impact on the Company’s overall financial position. Effective February 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective basis. This method requires us to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 123R to any awards that are unvested on the effective date and to any new awards. Under this method, we will not be required to restate prior periods. Compensation expense for the unvested awards will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation expense calculated for our pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The pro forma earnings impact of stock-based compensation expense on our results of operations for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004 is described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report. It is important to note that such pro forma disclosures are not necessarily indicative of the potential impact of recognizing compensation expense for share-based payments under SFAS No. 123R in future periods.
Our adoption of SFAS No. 123R is expected to result in compensation expense that will reduce diluted net income per share by approximately $0.03 to $0.05 per share in fiscal 2007. This estimated range does not include any stock-based awards our Board of Directors may grant in fiscal 2007. Also, our estimate of future stock-based compensation expense will be affected by our stock price and a number of complex and subjective valuation assumptions, and the related tax impact, as well as the number of stock based awards our Board of Directors may grant in the future. These valuation assumptions include, but are not limited to, the volatility of our stock price and employee stock option behaviors. As such, our actual share-based compensation expense may differ materially from this estimated range.
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
The Company’s financial results are affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets in which products are sold. The Company’s primary currency exposures are European Common Currency (Euro), British Pound, and Canadian Dollar. At January 31, 2006, the Company’s investment in foreign assets was $3.6 million. An overall unfavorable change in foreign exchange rates of 10% would have resulted in an additional net loss of approximately $0.1 million and a $0.2 million reduction in shareholders’ equity as a result of the impact on the cumulative translation adjustment.
The Company, on occasion, utilizes foreign exchange option contracts to minimize its exposure associated with unfavorable changes in foreign exchanges rates on certain foreign denominated receivables. At January 31, 2006, the Company did not have any open contracts. The functional currencies of the Company’s foreign affiliates are their respective local operating currencies, which are translated for consolidated financial reporting purposes into U.S. dollars.
18
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements required under this item are submitted as a separate section of this report on the pages indicated at Item 15(a)(1). The supplementary data regarding annual results of operations is set forth in the following table.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarters Ended |
| | April 30, 2005 | | July 30, 2005 | | October 29, 2005 | | January 31, 2006 |
Net Sales | | $ | 14,193 | | $ | 14,648 | | $ | 14,455 | | $ | 16,005 |
Gross Profit | | $ | 5,688 | | $ | 6,331 | | $ | 5,784 | | $ | 6,856 |
Net Income | | $ | 398 | | $ | 622 | | $ | 674 | | $ | 856 |
Net Income Per Common Share—Basic | | $ | 0.08 | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | 0.13 | | $ | 0.16 |
Net Income Per Common Share—Diluted | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 0.11 | | $ | 0.11 | | $ | 0.15 |
| | | | |
| | May 1, 2004 | | July 31, 2004 | | October 30, 2004 | | January 31, 2005 |
Net Sales | | $ | 14,242 | | $ | 13,990 | | $ | 13,246 | | $ | 14,497 |
Gross Profit | | $ | 5,794 | | $ | 5,920 | | $ | 5,152 | | $ | 6,180 |
Net Income | | $ | 1,598 | | $ | 602 | | $ | 52 | | $ | 458 |
Net Income Per Common Share—Basic | | $ | 0.30 | | $ | 0.11 | | $ | 0.01 | | $ | 0.09 |
Net Income Per Common Share—Diluted | | $ | 0.27 | | $ | 0.10 | | $ | 0.01 | | $ | 0.08 |
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act of 1934, the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company will initiate activities related to the assessment of its internal control environment in preparation for the compliance requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In its assessment management will use the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Management is required to disclose its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and have its outside auditors attest such assessment by the fiscal year ending January 31, 2008.
19
Item 9B.Other Information
Nothing to report
PART III
Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The response to this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
The following is a list of the names and ages of, and the positions and offices presently held by, all executive officers of the Company. All officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.
| | | | |
Name | | Age | | Position |
Albert W. Ondis | | 80 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Everett V. Pizzuti | | 69 | | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director |
Joseph P. O’Connell | | 62 | | Vice President and Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer |
John B. Chatten | | 78 | | President, Grass—Telefactor Product Group |
Elias G. Deeb | | 63 | | Vice President—Media Products |
Michael J. Sullivan | | 55 | | Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
Stephen M. Petrarca | | 43 | | Vice President—Instrument Manufacturing |
John D. McGuinness | | 41 | | Corporate Controller |
All of the persons named above have held the positions identified since January 31, 1985, except as indicated below.
Mr. Ondis has been a Director and Chief Executive Officer since 1969. He was previously President and the Chief Financial Officer (Treasurer) of the Company from 1969 to 1985.
Mr. Pizzuti was previously a Vice President of the Company functioning as Chief Operating Officer since 1971.
Mr. O’Connell joined the Company in 1996. He previously held senior financial management positions with Cherry Tree Products Inc., IBI Corporation and Dennison Manufacturing Company. Mr. O’Connell is also Assistant Secretary of the Company.
Mr. Chatten joined the Company in December 1999 as President of Grass-Telefactor Product Group. Prior to that, Mr. Chatten was founder and President of Telefactor Corporation which was acquired by Astro-Med in December 1999.
Mr. Deeb has held the position identified since 1987. In 1985, he was named General Manager—Media Products after having been Vice President and General Manager since 1981 of a business sold by the Company in 1984.
Mr. Sullivan was appointed Vice President and Chief Technology Officer in 2000. He is an electronic engineer and has been with the Company since 1983.
Mr. Petrarca was appointed Vice President of Instrument Manufacturing in November 1998. He has previously held positions as General Manager of Manufacturing, Manager of Grass Operations and Manager of Grass Sales. He has been with the Company since 1980.
Mr. McGuinness joined the Company in 2004. He previously held financial management positions with Paramount Cards, Inc., Nortek, Inc., The Monitor Company, and KPMG LLP. He is a certified public accountant.
20
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics which applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (who is both the principal financial and accounting officer) and Controller, as supplemented by a Code of Ethical Conduct for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which meets the requirements of a “code of ethics” as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K. The Company will provide a copy of the Codes to shareholders, without charge, upon request directed to the Investor Relations Contact listed on the Company’s website, WWW.ASTRO-MEDINC.COM, under the headings “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance”. The Company has posted the Codes on the Company’s website under “Investor Relations – Corporate Governance” and to disclose any amendment to, or waiver of, a provision of the Codes for the CEO, COO, CFO, Controller or persons performing similar functions by posting such information on its website and filing a Form 8-K as required under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.
Item 11.Executive Compensation
The response to this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The response to this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of January 31, 2006:
| | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuances Under Equity Compensation Plans | |
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | | 1,565,355 | (1) | | $ | 6.47 | | 628,485 | (2) |
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | | — | | | | N/A | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | 1,565,355 | (1) | | $ | 6.47 | | 628,485 | (2) |
(1) | Includes 740,765 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options granted under the Company’s incentive stock option plans and 801,490 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options granted under the Company’s non-qualified stock option plans under which options may be granted to officers and key employees and 23,100 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options granted under the Astro-Med, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. |
(2) | Includes 235,155 shares under the Astro-Med, Inc. 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 390,030 shares under the Astro-Med, Inc. 1998 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and 3,300 shares reserved for issuance under the Astro-Med, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. |
Additional information regarding these equity compensation plans is contained in Note 5 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15 hereto.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The response to this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
21
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees And Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a)(1)Financial Statements:
The following consolidated financial statements of Astro-Med, Inc. and subsidiaries are incorporated by reference in Item 8:
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore, have been omitted.
(a)(3)Exhibits:
| | |
Exhibit Number | | |
| |
(3A) | | Articles of Incorporation of the Company and all amendments thereto (filed as Exhibit No. 3A to the Company’s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 1992 and by this reference incorporated herein). |
| |
(3B) | | By-laws of the Company and all amendments thereto (filed as Exhibit 3B to the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004 and by this reference incorporated herein). |
| |
(4) | | Specimen form of common stock certificate of the Company (filed as Exhibit No. 4 to the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1985 and by this reference incorporated herein). |
| |
(10.1) | | Astro-Med, Inc. 1989 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-32317 and incorporated by reference herein. (a) |
| |
(10.2) | | Astro-Med, Inc. 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, filed as Exhibit 28 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-43700, and incorporated by reference herein. (a) |
| |
(10.3) | | Astro-Med, Inc. 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-24127, and incorporated by reference herein. (a) |
22
| | |
Exhibit Number | | |
| |
(10.4) | | Astro-Med, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-24123, and incorporated by reference herein. (a) |
| |
(10.5) | | Astro-Med, Inc. 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statements on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 333-32315, 333-93565 and 333-44414, and incorporated by reference herein. (a) |
| |
(10.6) | | Astro-Med, Inc. 1998 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 333-62431 and 333-63526, and incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
(10.8) | | Astro-Med, Inc. Management Bonus Plan (Group III) (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2003 and by this reference incorporated herein. (a) |
| |
(21) | | List of Subsidiaries of the Company. |
| |
(23.1) | | Consent of Grant Thornton LLP |
| |
(23.2) | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
| |
(31.1) | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
| |
(31.2) | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
| |
(32.1) | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(32.2) | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(a) | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | ASTRO-MED, INC. |
| | | | (Registrant) |
| | | |
Date: April 14, 2006 | | | | By: | | /s/ ALBERT W. ONDIS |
| | | | | | | | (Albert W. Ondis, Chairman) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
| | | | |
Name | | Title | | Date |
| | |
/s/ ALBERT W. ONDIS Albert W. Ondis | | Chairman and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | | April 14, 2006 |
| | |
/s/ EVERETT V. PIZZUTI Everett V. Pizzuti | | President and Director (Principal Operating Officer) | | April 14, 2006 |
| | |
/s/ JOSEPH P. O’CONNELL Joseph P. O’Connell | | Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) | | April 14, 2006 |
| | |
/s/ JOHN D. MCGUINNESS John D. McGuinness | | Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) | | April 14, 2006 |
| | |
/s/ JACQUES V. HOPKINS Jacques V. Hopkins | | Director | | April 14, 2006 |
| | |
/s/ HERMAN VIETS Herman Viets | | Director | | April 14, 2006 |
| | |
/s/ GRAEME MACLETCHIE Graeme MacLetchie | | Director | | April 14, 2006 |
24
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors of
Astro-Med, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Astro-Med, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income and changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Astro-Med, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Schedule II is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic consolidated financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended January 31, 2006 and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material aspects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2006
25
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Astro-Med, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Astro-Med, Inc. as of January 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income and changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended January 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) as it relates to the two years ended January 31, 2005. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and schedule referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Astro-Med, Inc. at January 31, 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended January 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Providence, Rhode Island
March 19, 2005
26
ASTRO-MED, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of January 31, 2006 and 2005
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | | $ | 4,598,993 | | | $ | 6,225,122 | |
Securities Available for Sale | | | 10,124,725 | | | | 7,757,904 | |
Accounts Receivable, net of reserves of $511,648 and $523,859, respectively | | | 10,623,553 | | | | 9,351,704 | |
Inventories | | | 9,809,770 | | | | 9,364,279 | |
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets | | | 1,116,269 | | | | 603,369 | |
Deferred Taxes | | | 3,388,756 | | | | 3,423,928 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Current Assets | | | 39,662,066 | | | | 36,726,306 | |
| | |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | | | | | | | | |
Land and Improvements | | | 490,202 | | | | 401,566 | |
Buildings and Improvements | | | 7,768,913 | | | | 7,789,180 | |
Machinery and Equipment | | | 19,092,213 | | | | 18,213,743 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 27,351,328 | | | | 26,404,489 | |
Less Accumulated Depreciation | | | (20,251,669 | ) | | | (19,098,543 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, net | | | 7,099,659 | | | | 7,305,946 | |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 2,336,721 | | | | 2,336,721 | |
Amounts Due from Officers | | | 480,314 | | | | 480,314 | |
Other | | | 68,520 | | | | 189,384 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Other Assets | | | 2,885,555 | | | | 3,006,419 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 49,647,280 | | | $ | 47,038,671 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Accounts Payable | | $ | 2,672,555 | | | $ | 2,192,581 | |
Accrued Compensation | | | 1,848,029 | | | | 1,602,144 | |
Accrued Expenses | | | 2,304,247 | | | | 2,596,486 | |
Deferred Revenue | | | 752,049 | | | | 613,017 | |
Income Taxes Payable | | | 362,747 | | | | 453,620 | |
Deposit on Pending Sale | | | 500,000 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | 8,439,627 | | | | 7,457,848 | |
| | |
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES | | | 906,157 | | | | 1,172,420 | |
| | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | | | | | | |
| | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stock, $10 Par Value, Authorized 100,000 Shares, Issued None | | | — | | | | — | |
Common Stock, $0.05 Par Value, Authorized 13,000,000 Shares, Issued 6,342,321 and 6,298,842 Shares, respectively | | | 317,120 | | | | 314,949 | |
Additional Paid-in Capital | | | 16,385,210 | | | | 16,045,503 | |
Retained Earnings | | | 30,030,652 | | | | 28,328,239 | |
Treasury Stock, at Cost, 1,024,106 and 1,020,722 Shares, respectively | | | (6,579,147 | ) | | | (6,548,984 | ) |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | | 147,661 | | | | 268,696 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Shareholders’ Equity | | | 40,301,496 | | | | 38,408,403 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 49,647,280 | | | $ | 47,038,671 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
27
ASTRO-MED, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Net Sales | | $ | 59,301,180 | | | $ | 55,974,654 | | | $ | 55,780,636 | |
Cost of Sales | | | 34,643,046 | | | | 32,928,545 | | | | 32,791,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross Profit | | | 24,658,134 | | | | 23,046,109 | | | | 22,989,190 | |
Costs and Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, General and Administrative | | | 17,460,141 | | | | 16,429,604 | | | | 15,673,388 | |
Research and Development | | | 4,042,710 | | | | 4,046,583 | | | | 3,685,838 | |
Restructuring and Impairment Credits | | | — | | | | — | | | | (15,014 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 21,502,851 | | | | 20,476,187 | | | | 19,344,212 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | 3,155,283 | | | | 2,569,922 | | | | 3,644,978 | |
Other Income (Expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Income | | | 337,094 | | | | 416,079 | | | | 202,065 | |
Other, net | | | (90,163 | ) | | | (218,890 | ) | | | (62,842 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 246,931 | | | | 197,189 | | | | 139,223 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before Income Taxes | | | 3,402,214 | | | | 2,767,111 | | | | 3,784,201 | |
Income Tax Provision | | | 851,629 | | | | 57,581 | | | | 567,380 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 2,550,585 | | | $ | 2,709,530 | | | $ | 3,216,821 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Per Common Share—Basic | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Per Common Share—Diluted | | $ | 0.44 | | | $ | 0.47 | | | $ | 0.60 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding— Basic | | | 5,290,861 | | | | 5,290,201 | | | | 4,837,033 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding—Diluted | | | 5,786,257 | | | | 5,781,253 | | | | 5,342,095 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends Declared Per Common Share | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
28
ASTRO-MED, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Comprehensive Income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 2,550,585 | | | $ | 2,709,530 | | | $ | 3,216,821 | |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | (143,691 | ) | | | (13,460 | ) | | | 500,195 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of taxes | | | 22,656 | | | | (35,042 | ) | | | (28,324 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | | | (121,035 | ) | | | (48,502 | ) | | | 471,871 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income | | $ | 2,429,550 | | | $ | 2,661,028 | | | $ | 3,688,692 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 314,949 | | | $ | 285,803 | | | $ | 258,418 | |
Par value from issuance of Company common stock | | | 2,171 | | | | 5,057 | | | | 27,385 | |
10% Common stock dividend | | | — | | | | 24,089 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | 317,120 | | | | 314,949 | | | | 285,803 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additional Paid-In Capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | 16,045,503 | | | | 8,336,806 | | | | 5,647,568 | |
Net proceeds from issuance of Company common stock | | | 24,528 | | | | 24,207 | | | | 14,342 | |
Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options | | | 259,819 | | | | 500,620 | | | | 2,561,992 | |
Tax benefit of employee stock options | | | 55,360 | | | | 189,474 | | | | 112,904 | |
Reversal of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | 1,762,352 | | | | — | |
10% Common stock dividend | | | — | | | | 5,232,044 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | 16,385,210 | | | | 16,045,503 | | | | 8,336,806 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retained Earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | 28,328,239 | | | | 31,703,077 | | | | 29,190,013 | |
Net income | | | 2,550,585 | | | | 2,709,530 | | | | 3,216,821 | |
Dividends paid | | | (848,172 | ) | | | (828,235 | ) | | | (703,757 | ) |
10% Common stock dividend | | | — | | | | (5,256,133 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | 30,030,652 | | | | 28,328,239 | | | | 31,703,077 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury Stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | (6,548,984 | ) | | | (6,095,755 | ) | | | (5,860,609 | ) |
Purchases of Company common stock | | | (30,163 | ) | | | (453,229 | ) | | | (235,146 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | (6,579,147 | ) | | | (6,548,984 | ) | | | (6,095,755 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | 268,696 | | | | 317,198 | | | | (154,673 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net | | | (121,035 | ) | | | (48,502 | ) | | | 471,871 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | 147,661 | | | | 268,696 | | | | 317,198 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Shareholders’ Equity | | $ | 40,301,496 | | | $ | 38,408,403 | | | $ | 34,547,129 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
29
ASTRO-MED, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 2,550,585 | | | $ | 2,709,530 | | | $ | 3,216,821 | |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and Amortization | | | 1,209,296 | | | | 1,228,632 | | | | 1,248,453 | |
Deferred Income Tax (Benefit) | | | (148,703 | ) | | | (1,020,409 | ) | | | — | |
Changes in Assets and Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts Receivable | | | (1,271,848 | ) | | | 463,080 | | | | (1,467,409 | ) |
Inventories | | | (445,491 | ) | | | (254,112 | ) | | | (213,907 | ) |
Other | | | 31,233 | | | | 250,502 | | | | 290,081 | |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses | | | 572,652 | | | | (428,648 | ) | | | 1,336,654 | |
Income Taxes Payable | | | (90,873 | ) | | | 419,240 | | | | 34,380 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Adjustments | | | (143,734 | ) | | | 658,285 | | | | 1,228,252 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | | | 2,406,851 | | | | 3,367,815 | | | | 4,445,073 | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from Sales/Maturities of Securities Available for Sale | | | 4,763,422 | | | | 3,479,406 | | | | 2,580,548 | |
Purchases of Securities Available for Sale | | | (7,168,910 | ) | | | (3,725,219 | ) | | | (6,178,524 | ) |
Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment | | | (1,035,675 | ) | | | (1,143,943 | ) | | | (722,018 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash (Used in) Investing Activities | | | (3,441,163 | ) | | | (1,389,756 | ) | | | (4,319,994 | ) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Payments on Capital Leases | | | — | | | | — | | | | (8,290 | ) |
Proceeds from Common Shares Issued Under Employee Benefit Plans and Employee Stock Option Plans | | | 286,518 | | | | 529,884 | | | | 2,603,722 | |
Purchases of Treasury Stock | | | (30,163 | ) | | | (453,229 | ) | | | (235,146 | ) |
Dividends Paid | | | (848,172 | ) | | | (828,235 | ) | | | (703,757 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities | | | (591,817 | ) | | | (751,580 | ) | | | 1,656,529 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | (1,626,129 | ) | | | 1,226,479 | | | | 1,781,608 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year | | | 6,225,122 | | | | 4,998,643 | | | | 3,217,035 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year | | $ | 4,598,993 | | | $ | 6,225,122 | | | $ | 4,998,643 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental Information: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Paid During the Period for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Taxes | | $ | 1,095,804 | | | $ | 220,181 | | | $ | 311,900 | |
Non-Cash Items: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Demonstration Equipment Transferred from Inventory to Property, Plant and Equipment | | $ | 115,106 | | | $ | 277,801 | | | $ | 4,203 | |
Escrow Deposit Received on Pending Sale of the Braintree, MA property | | $ | 500,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2006
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Astro-Med, Inc. (the Company) and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year reporting format.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Similar investments with original maturities beyond three months are classified as securities available for sale.
Securities Available for Sale: Securities available for sale are carried at market value based on quoted market prices. The difference between cost and market value, net of related tax effects, is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity.
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets (land improvements—10 to 20 years; buildings and improvements—10 to 45 years; machinery and equipment—3 to 10 years).
Officer Notes: Amounts due from officers is comprised of unsecured non-interest bearing demand notes for loans made to certain officers prior to fiscal 1992. The notes are not expected to be repaid during fiscal 2007.
Revenue Recognition: The majority of the Company’s product sales are recorded at the time of shipment, when legal title has transferred and risk of loss passes to the customer, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured in accordance with the requirements in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” When a sale arrangement involves training or installation, the deliverables in the arrangement are evaluated to determine whether they represent separate units of accounting in accordance with SAB 104 and EITF 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables”. This evaluation occurs at inception of the arrangement and as each item in the arrangement is delivered. The total fee from the arrangement is allocated to each unit of accounting based on its relative fair value. Fair value for each element is established generally based on the sales price charged when the same or similar element is sold separately. Revenue is recognized when revenue recognition criteria for each unit of accounting are met. When other significant obligations remain after products are delivered, revenue is recognized only after such obligations are fulfilled. All of the Company’s equipment contains embedded operating systems and data management software which is included in the purchase price of the equipment. The software is deemed incidental to the systems as a whole as it is not sold separately or marketed separately and its production costs are minor as compared to those of the hardware system. Returns and customer credits are infrequent and are recorded as a reduction to sales. Rights of return are not included in sales arrangements. Revenue associated with products that contain specific customer acceptance criteria is not recognized before the customer acceptance criteria are satisfied. Discounts from list prices are recorded as a reduction to sales. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling fees are included in sales while related shipping and handling costs are included in Cost of Sales.
Research & Development Costs: The Company complies with SFAS No. 2 “Accounting for Research & Development Costs” by charging any costs to expense when incurred, as well as by disclosing in the financial statements the amount of R&D charged to expense. These charges include: salaries and benefits, external engineering service costs, engineering related information costs and supplies. The Company also complies with SFAS 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed” and SOP 98-1, “Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use” for guidance in accounting for the costs of software either developed or acquired.
31
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Foreign Currency: The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. The Company translates foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates with the translation adjustment recorded as a component of accumulated comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the year.
Advertising: The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Such costs of advertising, advertising production, trade shows and other activities are designed to enhance demand for the Company’s products.
Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset.
The carrying value of goodwill is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. In accordance with the provisions of this statement, management evaluates the recoverability of goodwill annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances, such as declines in sales, earnings or cash flows, or material adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that the carrying value of an asset might be impaired. Goodwill is considered to be impaired when the net book value of a segment exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair values are established using a discounted cash flow methodology. The determination of discounted cash flows is based on the long-range planning forecast. The Company completed the goodwill impairment reviews and it has been determined that the goodwill is not impaired. The Company performs its goodwill impairment review in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless events or circumstances change.
Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. SFAS No. 109 requires that deferred income taxes be determined based on estimated the future tax effects of differences between the tax and book bases of assets and liabilities considering the provisions of enacted tax laws. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. At January 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company provided a valuation allowance on certain of its deferred tax assets for the net operating losses of a foreign subsidiary.
Net Income Per Common Share: Net income per common share has been computed and presented pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”. Net Income per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Net income per share assuming dilution is based on the basic weighted average number of shares and potential common shares for stock options outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Options to purchase 1,565,355, 1,530,265 and 1,427,635 shares of common stock were outstanding during fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, there were 3,300, 239,800, and 44,550 options that were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Stock compensation plans are more fully described in Note 5, Shareholders’ Equity.
| | | | | | |
| | January 31, |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding—Basic | | 5,290,861 | | 5,290,201 | | 4,837,033 |
Dilutive Effect of Options Outstanding | | 495,396 | | 491,052 | | 505,062 |
| | | | | | |
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding—Diluted | | 5,786,257 | | 5,781,253 | | 5,342,095 |
32
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
10% Common Stock Dividend: On April 19, 2004, the Company declared a 10% common stock dividend to shareholders of record on May 4, 2004 that was distributed to shareholders on May 26, 2004. An amount equal to the fair value of the additional shares was transferred from Retained Earnings to Additional Paid in Capital and Common Stock as of the declaration date. All income per share and weighted average share amounts for all periods were previously restated to reflect the impact of the 10% common stock dividend.
Use of Estimates: The presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect these financial statements and accompanying notes. Some of the more significant estimates include the allowances for bad debts and credits, inventory valuation, impairment of long-lived assets, income taxes and warranty reserves. Management’s estimates are based on the facts and circumstances available at the time estimates are made, past historical experience, risk of loss, general economic conditions and trends, and management’s assessments of the probable future outcome of these matters. Consequently, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, an allowance is established. The majority of accounts are individually evaluated on a regular basis and appropriate allowances are established as deemed appropriate. The remainder of the allowance is based upon historical trends and current market assessments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The Company’s financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, securities available for sale, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments as of January 31, 2006 and 2005 approximate fair value.
Stock-Based Compensation: The Company follows Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations in accounting for stock-based compensation plans and has elected to continue to use the intrinsic value-based method to account for stock option grants. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure”, an amendment of SFAS No. 123. No compensation expense has been required to be recognized for our stock-based compensation plans.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended January 31 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Net Income | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 2,550,585 | | $ | 2,709,530 | | $ | 3,216,821 |
Pro forma | | $ | 2,208,743 | | $ | 2,481,821 | | $ | 3,076,062 |
Net Income per share | | | | | | | | | |
As reported, Basic | | $ | 0.48 | | $ | 0.51 | | $ | 0.67 |
Pro forma, Basic | | $ | 0.42 | | $ | 0.47 | | $ | 0.64 |
As reported, Diluted | | $ | 0.44 | | $ | 0.47 | | $ | 0.60 |
Pro forma, Diluted | | $ | 0.38 | | $ | 0.43 | | $ | 0.57 |
The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $3.93, $5.73 and $0.98, respectively.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended January 31, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 3.43 | % | | 3.1 | % | | 3.5 | % |
Expected life (years) | | 5 | | | 5 | | | 5 | |
Expected volatility | | 57.9 | % | | 59.0 | % | | 45.0 | % |
Expected dividend yield | | 1.7 | % | | 1.4 | % | | 4.3 | % |
33
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”. This Statement changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principles. It requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This Statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. When a pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should be followed. This Statement is effective for the Company with the first quarter of fiscal 2007. It is not expected to have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) and superseded APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires companies to measure compensation costs for share-based payments to employees, including stock options, at fair value and expense such compensation over the service period. For the Company, this is effective February 1, 2006.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123R, until January 31, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognized no compensation expense for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 123R’s fair value method will have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, although it will have no impact on the Company’s overall financial position. Effective February 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective basis. This method requires us to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 123R to any awards that are unvested on the effective date and to any new awards. Under this method, we will not be required to restate prior periods. Compensation expense for the unvested awards will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation expense calculated for our pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The pro forma earnings impact of stock-based compensation expense on our results of operations for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004 is described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report. It is important to note that such pro forma disclosures are not necessarily indicative of the potential impact of recognizing compensation expense for share-based payments under SFAS No. 123R in future periods.
Our adoption of SFAS No. 123R is expected to result in compensation expense that will reduce diluted net income per share by approximately $0.03 to $0.05 per share in fiscal 2007. This estimated range does not include any stock-based awards our Board of Directors may grant in fiscal 2007. Also, our estimate of future stock-based compensation expense will be affected by our stock price and a number of complex and subjective valuation assumptions, and the related tax impact, as well as the number of stock based awards our Board of Directors may grant in the future. These valuation assumptions include, but are not limited to, the volatility of our stock price and employee stock option behaviors. As such, our actual share-based compensation expense may differ materially from this estimated range.
34
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 2—Securities Available for Sale
Securities available for sale include corporate debt securities and governmental obligations with various contractual or anticipated maturity dates. Governmental obligations include U.S. Government, State, Municipal and Federal Agencies securities. The fair value, amortized cost and gross unrealized gains and losses of the securities are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | | Amortized Cost |
January 31, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Auction Rate Securities | | $ | 3,550,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,550,000 |
Governmental | | | 6,574,725 | | | 1,843 | | | (90,004 | ) | | | 6,662,886 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 10,124,725 | | $ | 1,843 | | $ | (90,004 | ) | | $ | 10,212,886 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2005 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Auction Rate Securities | | $ | 1,175,000 | | | — | | | — | | | $ | 1,175,000 |
Corporate | | | 1,012,140 | | $ | 837 | | $ | (27,235 | ) | | | 1,038,538 |
Governmental | | | 5,570,764 | | | 19,176 | | | (31,563 | ) | | | 5,583,151 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 7,757,904 | | $ | 20,013 | | $ | (58,798 | ) | | $ | 7,796,689 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The cost of securities available for sale is based on specific identification in determining realized gains or losses.
The expected maturity dates of these securities are as follows: Less than one year—$594,712; One to Five Years—$3,215,943; and greater than Five Years—$6,314,070. Actual maturities may differ as a result of sales or earlier issuer redemptions.
Note 3—Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and include material, labor and manufacturing overhead. The components of inventories are as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | January 31, |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
Materials and Supplies | | $ | 5,879,486 | | $ | 5,154,931 |
Work-in-Progress | | | 1,050,910 | | | 969,767 |
Finished Goods | | | 2,879,374 | | | 3,239,581 |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,809,770 | | $ | 9,364,279 |
| | | | | | |
Note 4—Debt
The Company has a $3.5 million unsecured bank line of credit, all of which is currently available. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at the bank’s prime rate. This line of credit is scheduled to expire on July 1, 2006 and is expected to be renewed at that time.
Note 5—Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock: The Company repurchased 3,384, 51,027 and 71,800 shares of its common stock for $30,163, $453,229 and $235,146 in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the purchase of up to an additional 547,589 shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market in the future as of January 31, 2006.
35
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company maintains the following benefit plans involving the Company’s common stock:
Stock Option Plans: As of January 31, 2006, the Company has one incentive stock option plan and one non-qualified stock option plan under which options may be granted to officers and key employees. Options vest over various periods that range from six months to four years. Options for an aggregate of 1,375,000 shares may be granted under the incentive stock option plan at option prices of not less than fair market value at the date of grant. Options for an aggregate of 1,100,000 shares may be granted under the non-qualified plan at option prices of not less than 50% of fair market value at the date of grant.
In addition, the Company has a Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan under which each non-employee director automatically receives an annual grant of options to acquire 1,100 shares of common stock. The options are granted as of the first business day of January of each year at an option price equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. Options for a total of 33,000 shares may be granted under the plan.
Summarized option data for all plans is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | | Option Price Per Share | | Weighted Average Option Price Per Share |
Options Outstanding, January 31, 2003 | | 2,225,932 | | | $ | 2.91–$11.82 | | $ | 5.48 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options Granted | | 170,720 | | | $ | 3.00–$11.98 | | $ | 3.17 |
Options Exercised | | (600,380 | ) | | $ | 3.00–$ 9.32 | | $ | 4.31 |
Options Expired | | (368,637 | ) | | $ | 2.91–$11.82 | | $ | 6.00 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options Outstanding, January 31, 2004 | | 1,427,635 | | | $ | 3.00–$11.98 | | $ | 5.57 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options Granted | | 252,450 | | | $ | 8.83–$10.91 | | $ | 10.88 |
Options Exercised | | (105,820 | ) | | $ | 3.00–$ 9.32 | | $ | 4.78 |
Options Expired | | (44,000 | ) | | $ | 9.32–$10.91 | | $ | 9.78 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options Outstanding, January 31, 2005 | | 1,530,265 | | | $ | 3.00–$11.98 | | $ | 6.34 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options Granted | | 87,800 | | | $ | 8.46–$10.91 | | $ | 8.55 |
Options Exercised | | (40,810 | ) | | $ | 3.00–$10.91 | | $ | 6.42 |
Options Expired | | (11,900 | ) | | $ | 8.46–$10.91 | | $ | 9.92 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options Outstanding, January 31, 2006 | | 1,565,355 | | | $ | 3.00– 11.98 | | $ | 6.47 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Options Exercisable, January 31, 2006 | | 1,307,154 | | | $ | 3.00–$11.98 | | $ | 5.75 |
Options Exercisable, January 31, 2005 | | 1,290,465 | | | $ | 3.00–$11.98 | | $ | 5.50 |
Options Exercisable, January 31, 2004 | | 1,424,142 | | | $ | 3.00–$ 9.32 | | $ | 5.55 |
Set forth below is a summary of options outstanding at January 31, 2006:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding | | Exercisable |
Range of Exercise prices | | Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Remaining Contractual Life | | Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
$3.00-$4.49 | | 579,948 | | $ 3.78 | | 6yrs. | | 579,948 | | $ 3.78 |
$5.34-$6.82 | | 387,695 | | $ 6.61 | | 3yrs. | | 387,695 | | $ 6.61 |
$7.39-$8.41 | | 362,450 | | $ 7.75 | | 2yrs. | | 279,950 | | $ 7.54 |
$10.91-$11.98 | | 235,262 | | $10.92 | | 9yrs. | | 59,561 | | $10.97 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1,565,355 | | | | | | 1,307,154 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
36
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
At January 31, 2006, options covering 235,155 shares under the incentive plan, 390,030 shares under the non-qualified plan and 3,300 shares under the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan were available for future grant.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan allowing eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock at a 10% discount from fair market value on the date of purchase. A total of 198,000 shares were initially reserved for issuance under the Plan. Summarized plan activity is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended January 31, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Shares Reserved, Beginning | | 87,719 | | | 90,429 | | | 92,496 | |
Shares Purchased | | (2,669 | ) | | (2,710 | ) | | (2,067 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Shares Reserved, Ending | | 85,050 | | | 87,719 | | | 90,429 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Employee Stock Ownership Plan: The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) providing retirement benefits to all eligible employees. Annual contributions in amounts determined by the Company’s Board of Directors are invested by the ESOP’s Trustees in shares of common stock of the Company. Contributions may be in cash or stock. The Company’s contributions (paid or accrued) amounted to $0, $0 and $75,000 in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. All shares owned by the ESOP have been allocated to participants.
Note 6—Income Taxes
The components of domestic and foreign income before the provision for income taxes are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended January 31, |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Domestic | | $ | 1,931,304 | | $ | 1,711,668 | | $ | 2,815,448 |
Foreign | | | 1,470,910 | | | 1,055,443 | | | 968,753 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 3,402,214 | | $ | 2,767,111 | | $ | 3,784,201 |
| | | | | | | | | |
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended January 31, |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 |
Current: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | 303,866 | | | $ | 530,697 | | | $ | 210,911 |
State | | | 161,474 | | | | 11,989 | | | | 11,989 |
Foreign | | | 534,992 | | | | 535,304 | | | | 344,480 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,000,332 | | | | 1,077,990 | | | | 567,380 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | (137,379 | ) | | | (882,676 | ) | | | — |
State | | | (11,324 | ) | | | (137,733 | ) | | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (148,703 | ) | | | (1,020,409 | ) | | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 851,629 | | | $ | 57,581 | | | $ | 567,380 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
37
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate (34%) to income before income taxes, due to the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended January 31, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Income Tax Provision at Statutory Rate | | $ | 1,156,752 | | | $ | 940,818 | | | $ | 1,286,628 | |
State Taxes, Net of Federal Income Tax Benefits | | | 99,099 | | | | (82,991 | ) | | | 49,236 | |
Change in Valuation Allowance | | | — | | | | (1,092,415 | ) | | | (745,925 | ) |
Reversal of Reserve No Longer Required | | | (361,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Other, Net | | | (43,222 | ) | | | 292,169 | | | | (22,559 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 851,629 | | | $ | 57,581 | | | $ | 567,380 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
In the third quarter of fiscal 2006 the Company recorded a $361,000 non-cash tax benefit resulting from the reversal of tax reserves related to the favorable resolution of certain income tax examinations.
The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards which gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | January 31, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Deferred Tax Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Net Operating Loss Carryforward | | $ | 214,623 | | | $ | 530,877 | |
Inventory Reserves | | | 1,075,777 | | | | 1,065,665 | |
R&D Credits | | | 994,059 | | | | 762,498 | |
Vacation Accrual | | | 254,399 | | | | 306,100 | |
Foreign Tax Credits | | | 364,105 | | | | 337,650 | |
Deferred Service Contract Revenue | | | 250,156 | | | | 236,747 | |
Reserve for Doubtful Accounts | | | 166,778 | | | | 167,403 | |
Other | | | 439,598 | | | | 279,419 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 3,759,495 | | | | 3,686,359 | |
Deferred Tax Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated Tax Depreciation in Excess of Book Depreciation | | | 650,568 | | | | 1,035,247 | |
Other | | | 411,705 | | | | 187,745 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,062,273 | | | | 1,222,992 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 2,697,222 | | | | 2,463,367 | |
Valuation Allowance | | | (214,623 | ) | | | (211,859 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Deferred Tax Assets | | $ | 2,482,599 | | | $ | 2,251,508 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Compliance with SFAS 109 requires the Company to periodically evaluate the necessity of establishing or increasing a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets depending on whether it is more likely than not that a related benefit will be recognized in future periods. In fiscal 2003, as required by SFAS No. 109, the Company established a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax asset as a result of the uncertainty as to whether these deferred tax assets would “more likely than not” be realized in the future. Based on the facts and circumstances at that time it was determined that a full valuation allowance was required and it was stated that until an appropriate level of profitability could be sustained no tax benefits would be realized. As of the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company reversed approximately $2.6 million of its valuation allowance on its deferred tax asset with a $0.9 million credit to the fiscal 2005 tax provision and a $1.7 million credit to Additional Paid in Capital. The Company believed an appropriate level of profitability had been established and maintained that it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized in the future. The Company
38
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
made this determination based on a review of the facts and circumstances as of May 1, 2004. This review consisted of an analysis of the Company’s performance, the market environment in which the Company currently operates, the length of the carryforward periods, the existing sales backlog and the future sales projections. $0.2 million of the valuation allowance relates to the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Astro-Med SRL. At January 31, 2006 this subsidiary has a $0.6 million net operating loss carryforward that can be carried forward indefinitely. The future tax benefits of this net operating loss carryforward is uncertain because it is limited to future annual taxable income of the subsidiary.
During fiscal 2006 and 2005, the Company received proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options. The majority of the stock acquired upon exercise of employee stock options was sold in disqualified dispositions for tax purposes. Disqualified dispositions of stock acquired upon exercise by employee stock options provide the Company a tax benefit that is treated differently for book and tax purposes. For book purposes, the tax benefit is recorded in Additional Paid-in-Capital (APIC) in Shareholders’ Equity. For tax purposes, the tax benefit is a valid deduction that lowers the Company’s current income tax payable. The Company had a deferred tax benefit relating to disqualified dispositions of stock acquired upon exercise of employee stock options equal to approximately $0 and $0.2 million at January 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For tax purposes, this amount has been used to offset current and future income taxes payable. For book purposes, approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million of the tax benefit was recognized in APIC in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company records foreign translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on Securities Available for Sale as a component of Other Comprehensive Income. During fiscal 2006, the Company recorded a tax benefit to Other Comprehensive Income related to these items of $0.1 million.
Note 7—Leases and Other Contractual Obligations
Minimum payments under noncancellable operating leases at January 31, 2006 were as follows:
| | | |
Year Ending January 31, | | |
2007 | | $ | 228,250 |
2008 | | | 168,185 |
2009 | | | 96,454 |
2010 | | | 42,960 |
2011 and Thereafter | | | — |
| | | |
Minimum Lease Payments | | $ | 535,849 |
| | | |
The Company incurred rent expense in the amount of $485,311, $457,805 and $410,465 for the fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company has purchase obligations in the amount of $4,729,737 due within one year for goods and services with defined terms as to price, quantity, delivery and termination liability.
In December 1999, the Company acquired the assets and business of Telefactor Corporation, a privately held corporation. The purchase and sales agreement contains a clause which would require the Company to pay an additional purchase price of up to $3,000,000 if certain sales levels are achieved. The earnout provision was effective over a period of 72 months and expired in December 2005. At January 31, 2006, no additional consideration was owed to the sellers.
39
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 8—Nature of Operations, Segment Reporting and Geographical Information
The Company’s operations consist of the design, development, manufacture and sale of specialty data recorder and acquisition systems, label printing and applicator systems, neuropsychological instrumentation systems, and consumable printer supplies. The Company organizes and manages its business as a portfolio of products and services designed around a common theme of data acquisition and information output. The Company reports three reporting segments consistent with its sales product groups Test & Measurement (T&M); QuickLabel Systems (QuickLabel) and Grass-Telefactor (G-T).
T&M produces data recording equipment used worldwide for a variety of recording, monitoring and troubleshooting applications for the aerospace, automotive, metal mill, power and telecommunications industries. QuickLabel produces an array of high-technology digital label printers, automatic labelers, print and apply systems, labeling software and consumables for a variety of commercial industries worldwide. G-T produces a range of instrumentation equipment and supplies for clinical neurophysiology (EEG and epilepsy monitoring), polysomnography (PSG – Sleep Monitoring) and biomedical research applications used worldwide by universities, medical centers and companies engaged in a variety of clinical and research activities. The accounting policies of the reporting segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies within the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluates segment performance based on the segment profit before corporate and financial administration expenses.
Business is conducted in the United States and through foreign affiliates in Canada and Europe. Substantially all manufacturing activities are conducted in the United States. Sales and service activities outside the United States are conducted through wholly owned entities and, to a lesser extent, through authorized distributors and agents. Transfer prices are intended to produce gross profit margins commensurate with the sales and service effort associated with the product sold.
The following tables summarizes selected financial information by segment:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Sales | | Segment Operating Profit (Loss) | | Segment Operating Profit (Loss) % | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
T&M | | $ | 11,467 | | $ | 11,082 | | $ | 11,639 | | $ | 331 | | $ | (170 | ) | | $ | 839 | | 2.9 | % | | (1.5 | )% | | 7.2 | % |
QuickLabel | | | 29,698 | | | 28,420 | | | 25,290 | | | 2,874 | | | 3,760 | | | | 2,954 | | 9.7 | % | | 13.2 | % | | 11.7 | % |
G-T | | | 18,136 | | | 16,473 | | | 18,852 | | | 2,906 | | | 1,800 | | | | 2,695 | | 16.0 | % | | 10.9 | % | | 14.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 59,301 | | $ | 55,975 | | $ | 55,781 | | $ | 6,111 | | $ | 5,390 | | | $ | 6,488 | | 10.3 | % | | 9.6 | % | | 11.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,956 | | | 2,820 | | | | 2,843 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,155 | | | 2,570 | | | | 3,645 | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income and Expense, net | | | | | | | | | | | | 247 | | | 197 | | | | 139 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Before Income Taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,402 | | | 2,767 | | | | 3,784 | | | | | | | | | |
Income Taxes Provision | | | | | | | | | | | | 851 | | | 57 | | | | 567 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,551 | | $ | 2,710 | | | $ | 3,217 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
40
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Presented below is selected information by segment:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Amortization and Depreciation | | Capital Expenditures |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
T&M | | $ | 319 | | $ | 349 | | $ | 382 | | $ | 365 | | $ | 307 | | $ | 211 |
QuickLabel | | | 516 | | | 474 | | | 461 | | | 399 | | | 561 | | | 323 |
G-T | | | 374 | | | 406 | | | 405 | | | 271 | | | 276 | | | 188 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,209 | | $ | 1,229 | | $ | 1,248 | | $ | 1,035 | | $ | 1,144 | | $ | 722 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Presented below are selected assets by segment:
| | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Assets |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
T&M | | $ | 6,951 | | $ | 7,325 |
QuickLabel | | | 15,139 | | | 12,186 |
G-T | | | 8,659 | | | 8,597 |
Corporate* | | | 18,898 | | | 18,931 |
| | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 49,647 | | $ | 47,039 |
| | | | | | |
* | Corporate assets consist of cash, investments, income tax accounts and miscellaneous fixed assets. |
Presented below is selected financial information by geographic area:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Sales | | Long-Lived Assets |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
United States | | $ | 41,707 | | $ | 38,937 | | $ | 39,451 | | $ | 8,781 | | $ | 8,935 |
Europe | | | 11,746 | | | 11,098 | | | 10,551 | | | 563 | | | 556 |
Canada | | | 2,548 | | | 2,336 | | | 2,410 | | | 93 | | | 152 |
Asia | | | 1,948 | | | 1,557 | | | 1,149 | | | — | | | — |
Central and South America | | | 1,102 | | | 1,292 | | | 1,293 | | | — | | | — |
Other | | | 250 | | | 755 | | | 927 | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 59,301 | | $ | 55,975 | | $ | 55,781 | | $ | 9,437 | | $ | 9,643 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in Long-Lived Assets is Goodwill assigned to the following segments; T&M $0.7 million and G-T $1.6 million at January 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Note 9—Profit-Sharing Plan
Along with the ESOP described in Note 5, the Company has a Profit-Sharing Plan which provides retirement benefits to all eligible employees. The Plan allows participants to defer a portion of their cash compensation and contribute such deferral to the Plan through payroll deductions. The Company makes matching contributions up to specified levels. The deferrals are made within the limits prescribed by Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
All contributions are deposited into trust funds. It is the policy of the Company to fund any contributions accrued. The Company’s annual contribution amounts are determined by the Board of Directors. The Company’s contributions paid or accrued amounted to $152,500, $154,200 and $223,100 in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
41
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 10—Restructuring and Impairment Charges
In fiscal 2003, the Company implemented an organizational restructuring in an effort to reduce costs and streamline operations. The restructuring included workforce reductions in all areas of the Company and the closing of a research facility. The Company eliminated 28 employees or approximately 8% of its workforce. In fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded $490,225 of restructuring and impairment charges. These charges included $364,313 of severance and related termination benefits that were accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” and $125,912 of long-lived asset impairment which was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “ Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. An analysis of the severance charge is summarized below:
| | | | |
| | Severance | |
Balance at January 31, 2003 | | | 336,181 | |
| | | | |
Cash Payments | | | (321,167 | ) |
Reserve Reversed | | | (15,014 | ) |
| | | | |
Balance at January 31, 2004 | | $ | — | |
| | | | |
Note 11—Product Warranty Liability
The Company offers a one-year warranty for the majority of its products. The specific terms and conditions of warranties vary depending upon the product sold and country in which the Company does business. For products sold in the United States, the Company provides a basic limited warranty, including parts and labor. The Company estimates the costs based on historical claims experience and records a liability in the amount of such estimates at the time product revenue is recognized. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary. Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability during the years ended January 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Product Warranty Liability | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Balance, beginning of the period | | $ | 208,642 | | | $ | 176,000 | | | $ | 170,000 | |
Warranties issued during the period | | | 395,265 | | | | 397,362 | | | | 295,124 | |
Settlements made during the period | | | (365,265 | ) | | | (364,720 | ) | | | (289,124 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of the period | | $ | 238,642 | | | $ | 208,642 | | | $ | 176,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 12—Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company generally extends credit on an uncollateralized basis to almost all customers. Concentration of credit and geographic risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the large number and general dispersion of accounts which constitute the Company’s customer base. The Company periodically performs credit evaluations of its customers. At January 31, 2006 and 2005, no single customer accounted for no more than 10% of net sales. The Company has not experienced significant credit losses on customers’ accounts.
The Company invests its excess cash principally in investment grade government and corporate debt securities. The Company has established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities that maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are periodically reviewed and modified to reflect changes in market conditions. The Company has not experienced any significant losses on its cash equivalents or short-term investments.
42
ASTRO-MED, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to contingencies, including legal proceedings and claims arising in the normal course of business that cover a wide range of matters including, among others, contract and employment claims, workers compensation claims, product liability, warranty and modification, adjustment or replacement of component parts of units sold.
The Company provides accruals for direct costs associated with the estimated resolution of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated. Costs accrued have been estimated and are based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies and outcomes. While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Company’s control.
The Company had a contingent obligation relating to the 1999 Telefactor acquisition that required the Company to pay additional consideration to the sellers if certain sales amounts are achieved during the 72 months following the closing of the transaction. The purchase and sales agreement contains a clause which would require the Company to pay additional purchase price of up to $3,000,000 if certain sales levels are achieved. The earnout provision expired in December 2005 with no additional consideration owed to the sellers.
On June 17, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with Hanover R.S. Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership (the “Purchaser”) for the sale of approximately 24.692 acres of land located in Braintree, Massachusetts owned by the Company (the “Property) for the purchase price of $6,100,000 to be paid in cash at the closing. The sale of the Property was subject to a 90 day feasibility period which ended on September 17, 2005, during which time the Purchaser could inspect the property and terminate the sale due to any adverse conditions discovered on the Property. With the successful completion of the feasibility period, the Purchaser has 16 months to obtain final zoning and site plan approval from all state and local governmental entities for use of the Property as a multi-family residential rental property, subject to two 30 day extensions exercisable at the option of the Purchaser upon payment to the Company of $25,000 per extension.
Upon execution of the agreement, $250,000 of earnest money was placed in escrow pending completion of the sale and an additional $250,000 was placed in escrow at the expiration of the feasibility period. Following the feasibility period, all such earnest money is forfeited by the Purchaser in the event that the sale is not completed due to a breach by the Purchaser.
As of January 31, 2006 the Purchaser has placed a total of $500,000 in escrow pending the completion of the sale. This amount is recorded as both an Other Current Asset and a Deposit on Pending Sale on the balance sheet of the Company. In the event that this transaction is completed, the Company would recognize an estimated pre-tax gain of approximately $5,400,000 to $5,600,000.
Note 14—Subsequent Event
In March 2006, the Company announced that the Board of Directors raised the quarterly cash dividend from $0.04 to $0.05 per share. The Company expects to maintain the annual cash dividend rate of $.20 per share throughout fiscal 2007.
43
ASTRO-MED, INC.
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Provision Charged to Operations | | Deductions(2) | | | Balance at End of Year |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts(1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2006 | | $ | 523,859 | | $ | 89,995 | | $ | (102,206 | ) | | $ | 511,648 |
2005 | | $ | 367,194 | | $ | 142,358 | | $ | 14,307 | | | $ | 523,859 |
2004 | | $ | 366,700 | | $ | 94,990 | | $ | (94,496 | ) | | $ | 367,194 |
(1) | The allowance for doubtful accounts has been netted against accounts receivable as of the respective balance sheet dates. |
(2) | Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
44