UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| (Mark one) | ||
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
| or | ||
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the transition period from to | ||
Commission file number 001-34912
CELGENE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 22-2711928 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
86 Morris Avenue Summit, New Jersey (Address of principal executive offices) | 07901 (Zip Code) | |
(908) 673-9000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Common Stock, par value $.01 per share | NASDAQ Global Select Market | |
| Contingent Value Rights | NASDAQ Global Market | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | ||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2014, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second quarter, was $68,638,903,046 based on the last reported sale price of the registrant's Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date.
There were 800,590,656 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 12, 2015.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference into the following parts of the Form 10-K:
| Part II, Item 5.(d) | Equity Compensation Plan Information. |
| Part III, Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
| Part III, Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
| Part III, Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
| Part III, Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
| Part III, Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
CELGENE CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Item No. | Page | |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Celgene Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively “we,” “our,” “us,” “Celgene” or the “Company”), is an integrated global biopharmaceutical company engaged primarily in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases through gene and protein regulation. We are dedicated to innovative research and development designed to bring new therapies to market and we are involved in research in several scientific areas designed to deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas including intracellular signaling pathways, protein homeostasis and epigenetics in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmune diseases and therapeutic application of cell therapies. Celgene Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1986.
Our primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, ABRAXANE®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, VIDAZA®, azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®), THALOMID® (sold as THALOMID® or Thalidomide CelgeneTM outside of the U.S.), OTEZLA® and ISTODAX®. OTEZLA® was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2014 for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis and in September 2014 for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. In January 2015, OTEZLA® was approved by the European Commission (EC) for the treatment of both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in certain adult patients. We began recognizing revenue related to OTEZLA® during the second quarter of 2014. Additional sources of revenue include royalties from Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis) on their sales of FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of products and services through our Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (CCT) subsidiary and other licensing arrangements.
We continue to invest substantially in research and development in support of multiple ongoing proprietary clinical development programs which support our existing products and pipeline of new drug candidates. REVLIMID® is in several phase III trials across a range of hematological malignancies that include multiple myeloma, lymphomas, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). POMALYST®/IMNOVID® was approved in the United States and the European Union for indications in multiple myeloma based on phase II and phase III trial results, respectively, and an additional phase III trial is underway with POMALYST®/IMNOVID® in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Phase III trials are also underway for CC-486 in MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and ISTODAX® in first-line peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). In solid tumors, ABRAXANE® is currently in various stages of investigation for breast, pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancers. In inflammation and immunology, OTEZLA® is being evaluated in phase III trials for Behçet's disease and expanded indications in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. Also in the inflammation and immunology therapeutic area, we have acquired a global development and commercialization license to GED-0301 from Nogra Pharma Limited and have initiated a multi-trial clinical program that is designed to support global registrations of GED-0301 in Crohn's disease. For more information see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Beyond our phase III programs, we have access to a growing early-to-mid-stage pipeline of novel potential therapies to address significant unmet medical needs that consists of new drug candidates and cell therapies developed in-house, licensed from other companies or able to be optioned from collaboration partners.
We believe that continued use of our primary commercial stage products, participation in research and development collaboration arrangements, depth of our product pipeline, regulatory approvals of new products and expanded use of existing products will provide the catalysts for future growth.
The diseases that our primary commercial stage products are approved to treat are described below for the major markets of the United States, the European Union and Japan. Approvals in other international markets are indicated in the aggregate for the disease indication that most closely represents the majority of the other international approvals.
1
REVLIMID® (lenalidomide): REVLIMID® is an oral immunomodulatory drug marketed in the United States and many international markets for the treatment of patients as indicated below:
| Disease | Geographic Approvals |
| Multiple myeloma (MM) | |
| Multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone, in patients who have received at least one prior therapy | - United States - European Union - Japan - Other international markets |
| Multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone for newly diagnosed patients | - United States (Approved February 2015) |
| Adult patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who are not eligible for transplant | - European Union (Approved February 2015) |
| Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) | |
| Transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS associated with a deletion 5q abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities | - United States - Other international markets |
| Transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS in patients with isolated deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality when other options are insufficient or inadequate | - European Union |
| MDS with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality. The efficacy or safety of REVLIMID for International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) intermediate-2 or high risk MDS has not been established. | - Japan |
| Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in patients whose disease has relapsed or progressed after two prior therapies, one of which included bortezomib | - United States |
REVLIMID® continues to be evaluated in numerous clinical trials worldwide either alone or in combination with one or more other therapies in the treatment of a broad range of hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma, MDS, various lymphomas, and CLL. In December 2014, the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a positive opinion for continuous oral treatment with REVLIMID® in adult patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who are not eligible for stem cell transplantation. In February 2015, the indication for REVLIMID® in combination with dexamethasone was expanded by the FDA to include the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the United States and REVLIMID® was approved in the EU for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who are not eligible for transplant.
REVLIMID® is distributed in the United States through contracted pharmacies under the REVLIMID® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program, which is a proprietary risk-management distribution program tailored specifically to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of REVLIMID®. Internationally, REVLIMID® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local authorities' specifications to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of REVLIMID®. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies.
2
ABRAXANE® (paclitaxel albumin-bound particles for injectable suspension): ABRAXANE® is a solvent-free chemotherapy product which was developed using our proprietary nab® technology platform. This protein-bound chemotherapy agent combines paclitaxel with albumin. ABRAXANE® is approved for the treatment of patients as indicated below:
| Disease | Geographic Approvals |
| Breast Cancer | |
| Metastatic breast cancer, after failure of combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease or relapse within six months of adjuvant chemotherapy. Prior therapy should have included an anthracycline unless clinically contraindicated. | - United States - Other international markets |
| Metastatic breast cancer in adult patients who have failed first-line treatment for metastatic disease for whom standard, anthracycline containing therapy is not indicated | - European Union |
| Breast cancer | - Japan |
| Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | |
| Locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, as first-line treatment in combination with carboplatin, in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy | - United States - Other international markets |
| NSCLC | - Japan |
| Pancreatic Cancer | |
| Metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, a form of pancreatic cancer, as first line treatment in combination with gemcitabine | - United States - European Union - Other international markets |
| Unresectable pancreatic cancer | - Japan (Approved December 2014) |
| Gastric cancer | - Japan |
ABRAXANE® is currently in various stages of investigation for breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is currently under review by the EMA for first-line treatment of NSCLC in adult patients who are not candidates for potentially curative surgery.
POMALYST®/IMNOVID®-(pomalidomide)1: POMALYST®/IMNOVID® is a proprietary, distinct, small molecule that is administered orally and modulates the immune system and other biologically important targets. POMALYST®/IMNOVID® received its first approvals from the FDA and the EC during 2013 for the treatment of patients as indicated below:
| Disease | Geographic Approvals |
| Multiple myeloma for patients who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy | - United States |
| Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, in combination with dexamethasone, for adult patients who have received at least two prior therapies including both lenalidomide and bortezomib and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy | - European Union |
1 We received FDA approval for pomalidomide under the trade name POMALYST®. We received EC approval for pomalidomide under the trade name IMNOVID®.
POMALYST®/IMNOVID® is also being evaluated in multiple trials in various phases for expanded usage in multiple myeloma and in a phase II trial for systemic sclerosis. POMALYST® is distributed in the United States through contracted pharmacies under the POMALYST REMSTM program, which is a proprietary risk-management distribution program tailored specifically to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of POMALYST®. Internationally, IMNOVID® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local authorities' specifications to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of IMNOVID®. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product is sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies.
3
VIDAZA® (azacitidine for injection): VIDAZA® is a pyrimidine nucleoside analog that has been shown to reverse the effects of DNA hypermethylation and promote subsequent gene re-expression. VIDAZA® is a Category 1 recommended treatment for patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS, according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The U.S. regulatory exclusivity for VIDAZA® expired in May 2011. After the launch of a generic version of VIDAZA® in the United States by a competitor in September 2013, we experienced a significant reduction in our U.S. sales of VIDAZA®. In 2013, we also contracted with Sandoz AG to sell a generic version of VIDAZA® in the United States, which we supply. Regulatory exclusivity for VIDAZA® is expected to continue in Europe through 2018. VIDAZA® is marketed in the United States and many international markets for the treatment of patients as indicated below:
| Disease | Geographic Approvals |
| Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) | |
| All French-American-British (FAB) subtypes | - United States |
| Intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS | - European Union - Other international markets |
| MDS | - Japan |
| Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with 10% to 29% marrow blasts without myeloproliferative disorder | - European Union - Other international markets |
| Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20% to 30% blasts and multi-lineage dysplasia | - European Union - Other international markets |
azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®): We contracted with Sandoz AG to sell azacitidine for injection, which they launched after the introduction of a generic version of VIDAZA® in the United States by a competitor in September 2013. We recognize net product sales from our sales of azacitidine for injection to Sandoz AG.
THALOMID® (thalidomide): THALOMID®, sold as THALOMID® or Thalidomide CelgeneTM outside of the United States, is administered orally for the treatment of diseases as indicated below:
| Disease | Geographic Approvals |
| Multiple myeloma | |
| Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, in combination with dexamethasone | - United States |
| Thalomid in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for induction therapy prior to high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue, for the treatment of patients with untreated multiple myeloma | - Other international markets |
| Multiple myeloma after failure of standard therapies (relapsed or refractory) | - Other international markets |
Thalidomide CelgeneTM in combination with melphalan and prednisone as a first line treatment for patients with untreated multiple myeloma who are aged sixty-five years of age or older or ineligible for high dose chemotherapy | - European Union - Other international markets |
| Erythema nodosum leprosum | |
| Cutaneous manifestations of moderate to severe erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), an inflammatory complication of leprosy | - United States - Other international markets |
| Maintenance therapy for prevention and suppression of the cutaneous manifestation of ENL recurrence | - United States - Other international markets |
THALOMID® is distributed in the United States under our THALOMID REMSTM program, which is a proprietary risk-management distribution program tailored specifically to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID®. Internationally, THALOMID® and Thalidomide CelgeneTM are also distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local authorities' specifications to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID® and Thalidomide CelgeneTM. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the products are sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies.
4
OTEZLA® (apremilast): OTEZLA® is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) specific for cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). PDE4 inhibition results in increased intracellular cAMP levels. During 2014 and January 2015, OTEZLA® received initial approvals in the U.S. and EU as indicated below:
| Disease | Geographic Approvals |
| Psoriatic arthritis | |
| Adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis | - United States (Approved March 2014) |
| Adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis who have had an inadequate response or who have been intolerant to a prior DMARD therapy | - European Union (Approved January 2015) |
| Psoriasis | |
| Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy | - United States (Approved September 2014) - Other international markets (Approvals beginning November 2014) |
| Adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis who failed to respond to or who have a contraindication to, or are intolerant to other systemic therapy including cyclosporine, methotrexate or psoralen and ultraviolet-A light | - European Union (Approved January 2015) |
ISTODAX® (romidepsin): ISTODAX® is administered by intravenous infusion for the treatment of diseases as indicated below and has received orphan drug designation for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s T-cell lymphomas, including CTCL and PTCL.
| Disease | Geographic Approvals |
| Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy | - United States - Other international markets |
| Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in patients who have received at least one prior therapy | - United States - Other international markets |
FOCALIN®, FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN LA®: We licensed the worldwide rights (excluding Canada) regarding certain chirally pure forms of methylphenidate for FOCALIN® and FOCALIN XR® to Novartis. We also licensed to Novartis the rights related to long-acting formulations of methylphenidate and dex-methylphenidate products which are used in FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN LA®. We receive royalties from Novartis on their sales of these products.
PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL-STAGE PIPELINE
Our preclinical and clinical-stage pipeline of new drug candidates and cell therapies is highlighted by multiple classes of both small molecule and biologic therapeutic agents designed to selectively regulate disease-associated genes and proteins. These product candidates are at various stages of preclinical and clinical development.
Oral anti-inflammatory agents: We are developing novel, orally administered small molecules that specifically target PDE4, an intracellular enzyme that modulates the production of multiple pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators including interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-10, IL-12, IL-23, INF-gamma, TNF-α, leukotrienes and nitric oxide synthase.
Next generation of Cereblon Modulatory drugs: CC-122 (a PPMTM Pleiotropic Pathway Modifier) and CC-220 represent novel compounds that are in phase I clinical trials for hematological and solid tumor cancers and inflammation and immunology diseases. They have been differentiated from previous compounds (such as Thalidomide, Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide) and have been developed based on our scientific understanding of Cereblon-mediated protein homeostasis.
Cellular therapies: At CCT we are conducting research with stem cells derived from the human placenta as well as from the umbilical cord. CCT is our research and development division dedicated to fulfilling the promise of cellular technologies by developing products and therapies to significantly benefit patients. Our goal is to develop proprietary cell therapy products for the treatment of unmet medical needs.
Stem cell based therapies offer the potential to provide disease-modifying outcomes for serious diseases that lack adequate therapy. We have developed proprietary technology for collecting, processing and storing placental stem cells with potentially broad therapeutic applications in cancer, auto-immune diseases, and other inflammatory diseases.
5
We are developing our cellular therapies, PDA-001 (IV formulation) and PDA-002 (IM/SC injectable formulation), with the initiation of a PDA-001 phase I safety and dose finding study for Crohn’s disease and a PDA-002 phase II study in peripheral arterial diseases. We are also continuing research to define the potential of placental-derived stem cells and to characterize other placental-derived products.
CC-486: We have initiated two phase III trials of CC-486 that are currently enrolling to evaluate CC-486 in the treatment of MDS and AML. In addition, a phase I trial of CC-486 for the treatment of solid tumors is currently in progress.
Sotatercept (ACE-011) and luspatercept (ACE-536): We have collaborated with Acceleron Pharma, Inc. (Acceleron) to develop sotatercept and luspatercept to treat anemia in patients with rare blood disorders. Several phase II trials are in progress to evaluate the use of sotatercept or luspatercept in the treatment of anemia in patients with rare blood disorders and chronic kidney disease, beta-thalassemia and MDS.
mTOR pathway inhibitors: CC-223 and CC-115 target the important cancer pathway that is dysregulated in a large proportion of cancers. In particular, activity is being investigated in lymphomas, hepatocellular and prostate cancers in phase I/II trials.
Epigenetics: The current insights into molecular regulation of genetic information (Epigenetics) has the potential to transform human diseases. Celgene has two epigenetic modifiers on the market, VIDAZA® and ISTODAX®. In addition, we are collaborating with Epizyme Inc. (Epizyme) to develop EPZ-5676 for AML.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
We devote significant resources to research and development programs in an effort to discover and develop potential future product candidates. Research and development expenses amounted to $2.431 billion in 2014, $2.226 billion in 2013 and $1.724 billion in 2012. The product candidates in our pipeline are at various stages of preclinical and clinical development. The path to regulatory approval ordinarily includes three phases of clinical trials in which we collect data to support an application to regulatory authorities to allow us to market a product for treatment of a specified disease. There are many difficulties and uncertainties inherent in research and development of new products, resulting in a high rate of failure. To bring a drug from the discovery phase to regulatory approval, and ultimately to market, takes many years and significant cost. Failure can occur at any point in the process, including after the product is approved, based on post-marketing events or developments. New product candidates that appear promising in development may fail to reach the market or may have only limited commercial success because of efficacy or safety concerns, inability to obtain necessary regulatory approvals, limited scope of approved uses, reimbursement challenges, difficulty or excessive costs of manufacture, alternative therapies or infringement of the patents or intellectual property rights of others. Uncertainties in the FDA approval process and the approval processes in other countries can result in delays in product launches and lost market opportunities. Consequently, it is very difficult to predict which products will ultimately be submitted for approval, which will obtain approval and which will be commercially viable and generate profits. Successful results in preclinical or clinical studies may not be an accurate predictor of the ultimate safety or effectiveness of a drug or product candidate.
Phase I Clinical Trials
Phase I clinical trials begin when regulatory agencies allow initiation of clinical investigation of a new drug or product candidate and usually involve up to 80 healthy volunteers or subjects. These trials study a drug's safety profile, and may include a preliminary determination of a drug or product candidate's safe dosage range. The phase I clinical trial also determines how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized and excreted by the body, and therefore the potential duration of its action. Phase I clinical trials generally take from one to three years to complete.
Phase II Clinical Trials
Phase II clinical trials are conducted on a limited number of subjects with the targeted disease. An initial evaluation of the drug's effectiveness on subjects is performed and additional information on the drug's safety and dosage range is obtained. Phase II clinical trials normally include up to several hundred subjects and may take as many as two to three years to complete.
Phase III Clinical Trials
Phase III clinical trials are typically controlled multi-center trials that involve a larger target patient population that normally consists of from several hundred to several thousand subjects to ensure that study results are statistically significant. During phase III clinical trials, physicians monitor subjects to determine efficacy and to gather further information on safety. These trials are generally global in nature and are designed to generate the clinical data necessary to submit an application for marketing approval to regulatory agencies. Phase III testing varies by disease state, but can often last from two to seven years.
6
Regulatory Review
If a product candidate successfully completes clinical trials and is submitted to governmental regulators, such as the FDA in the United States or the EC in the European Union, the time to final marketing approval can vary from six months (for a U.S. filing that is designated for priority review by the FDA) to several years, depending on a number of variables, such as the disease state, the strength and complexity of the data presented, the novelty of the target or compound, risk-management approval and whether multiple rounds of review are required for the agency to evaluate the submission. There is no guarantee that a potential treatment will receive marketing approval, or that decisions on marketing approvals or treatment indications will be consistent across geographic areas.
The current stage of development of our commercial stage products and new drug candidates in various areas of research are outlined in the following table:
| Area of Research | Status | Entered Current Status | ||||
| Multiple Myeloma (MM) | ||||||
REVLIMID® | Relapsed/refractory | Post-approval research1 | 2006 | |||
| Newly diagnosed | Post-approval research1 | February 2015 | ||||
| Maintenance | Phase III | 2004 | ||||
POMALYST®/IMNOVID® | Relapsed/refractory2 | Post-approval research1 | 2013 | |||
THALOMID®/Thalidomide CelgeneTM | Newly diagnosed | Post-approval research1 | 2006 | |||
Anti-CD38 Antibody: MOR2023 | Relapsed/refractory | Phase I | 2011 | |||
| Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) | ||||||
VIDAZA® | . | Post-approval research1 | 2004 | |||
REVLIMID® | Deletion 5q | Post-approval research1 | 2005 | |||
| Non-deletion 5q | Phase III | 2010 | ||||
| CC-486 | Lower-risk | Phase III | 2013 | |||
sotatercept (ACE-011)4 | MDS | Phase II | 2012 | |||
luspatercept (ACE-536)4 | MDS | Phase II | 2013 | |||
| Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) | ||||||
VIDAZA® | AML (20%-30% blasts) (EU) | Post-approval research1 | 2008 | |||
| AML (>30% blasts) (EU) | Regulatory filing and approval | December 2014 | ||||
| CC-486 | Post-induction AML maintenance | Phase III | 2013 | |||
IDH2 Inhibitor: AG-2215 | . | Phase I | 2013 | |||
DOT 1L Inhibitor: EPZ-56766 | . | Phase I | 2012 | |||
7
| Area of Research | Status | Entered Current Status | ||||
| Lymphoma | ||||||
REVLIMID® | Mantle cell lymphoma: Relapsed/refractory (US) | Post-approval research1 | 2013 | |||
| Mantle cell lymphoma: Relapsed/refractory (EU) | Regulatory filing and approval | November 2014 | ||||
| Diffuse large B-cell: Maintenance | Phase III | 2009 | ||||
| Diffuse large B-cell (ABC-subtype): First line | Phase III opened for enrollment | January 2015 | ||||
| Relapsed/refractory indolent lymphoma | Phase III | 2013 | ||||
| Follicular lymphoma: First-line | Phase III | 2011 | ||||
| Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (Japan) | Phase II | 2012 | ||||
| ISTODAX® | Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (US)7 | Post-approval research1 | 2009 | |||
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma: Relapsed/refractory (US)7 | Post-approval research1 | 2011 | ||||
| Peripheral T-cell lymphoma: Relapsed/refractory (Japan) | Phase II | 2013 | ||||
| Peripheral T-cell lymphoma: First-line | Phase III | 2013 | ||||
PPMTM Pleiotropic Pathway Modifier: CC-122 | Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | Phase Ib | January 2014 | |||
| Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) | ||||||
REVLIMID® | Maintenance: Second-line | Phase III | 2009 | |||
| Anemias | ||||||
sotatercept (ACE-011)4 | Renal anemia with metabolic bone disease | Phase II | 2010 | |||
| Beta-thalassemia | Phase II | 2012 | ||||
| MDS | Phase II | 2012 | ||||
luspatercept (ACE-536)4 | Beta-thalassemia | Phase II | 2013 | |||
| MDS | Phase II | 2013 | ||||
| Solid Tumors | ||||||
ABRAXANE® | Breast: Metastatic | Post-approval research1 | 2005 | |||
| Breast: Metastatic (first-line, triple negative) | Phase II/III | 2013 | ||||
| Non-small cell lung: Advanced (first-line) (US, Japan) | Post-approval research1 | 2012 | ||||
| Non-small cell lung: Advanced (first-line) (EU) | Regulatory filing and approval | June 2014 | ||||
| Pancreatic: Advanced (first-line) | Post-approval research1 | 2013 | ||||
| Pancreatic: Adjuvant | Phase III | April 2014 | ||||
Gastric: Metastatic (Japan)8 | Post-approval research1 | 2013 | ||||
| Dual TORK Inhibitor: CC-223 | . | Phase I | 2012 | |||
| Dual TORK/DNA PK Inhibitor: CC-115 | . | Phase I | 2011 | |||
PPMTM Pleiotropic Pathway Modifier: CC-122 | . | Phase I | 2011 | |||
| CC-486 | . | Phase I | 2011 | |||
8
| Area of Research | Status | Entered Current Status | ||||
| Anti-Inflammatory | ||||||
OTEZLA® (apremilast) | Psoriatic arthritis (US) | Post-approval research1 | March 2014 | |||
| Psoriatic arthritis (EU) | Post-approval research1 | January 2015 | ||||
| Psoriasis (US) | Post-approval research1 | September 2014 | ||||
| Psoriasis (EU) | Post-approval research1 | January 2015 | ||||
| Ankylosing spondylitis | Phase III | 2012 | ||||
| Behçet's disease | Phase III | December 2014 | ||||
| Atopic dermatitis | Phase II | June 2014 | ||||
| Ulcerative colitis | Phase II | December 2014 | ||||
| GED-0301 | Crohn's disease | Noted below9 | December 2014 | |||
| CC-220 | Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) | Phase II | December 2014 | |||
| Sarcoidosis and Systemic sclerosis | Phase I | 2013 | ||||
| CC-90001 | Fibrosis | Phase I | February 2014 | |||
| Cellular Therapies | ||||||
BIOVANCE® 10,11 | Wound management | Post-approval research1 | 2005 | |||
Dermal Repair Scaffold 12 | Wound management | Regulatory filing | July 2014 | |||
| PDA-001 | Crohn's disease | Phase I | 2013 | |||
| PDA-002 | Peripheral artery disease/Diabetic foot ulcers | Phase II | October 2014 | |||
1 Includes Celgene-sponsored and Celgene-supported studies.
2 In the United States, regulatory approval is based on pivotal phase II data; phase III program ongoing.
3 In collaboration with MorphoSys AG.
4 In collaboration with Acceleron Pharma, Inc.
5 In collaboration with Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6 In collaboration with Epizyme, Inc.
7 Regulatory approval based on pivotal phase II data.
8 Trial conducted by licensee partner, Taiho Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd.
9 Phase II is complete and we have initiated a multi-trial clinical program that is designed to support global registrations of GED-0301 in Crohn's disease.
10 Regulated under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act.
11 Processed for Alliqua Biomedical by Celgene Cellular Therapeutics.
12 510(k) device manufactured for Alliqua Biomedical by Celgene Cellular Therapeutics.
9
PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY
We consider intellectual property protection to be critical to our operations. For many of our products, in addition to compound (e.g., drug substance) and composition (e.g., drug product) patents, we hold polymorph, formulation, methods of treatment or use, delivery mechanism and methods of manufacture patents, as well as manufacturing trade secrets, that may extend exclusivity beyond the expiration of the compound patent or composition patent.
Key patent expirations and exclusivities:
The following table shows the expected expiration dates in the United States and Europe of the last-to-expire period of exclusivity (primary patent or regulatory approval) related to our primary marketed drug products. In some instances, there are later-expiring patents relating to particular forms or compositions, methods of manufacturing, or use of the drug in the treatment of particular diseases or conditions. However, such additional patents may not protect our drug products from generic competition after the expiration of the primary patent.
U.S.1 | Europe | |||
REVLIMID® brand drug | 2027 | 2024** | ||
| (U.S. and European use patents) | ||||
THALOMID® brand drug | 2023 | 2019 | ||
| (U.S. formulation/ European use patents) | ||||
VIDAZA® brand drug | 20112 | 2018 | ||
| (U.S. use patent and EMA regulatory exclusivities only) | ||||
ABRAXANE® brand drug | 2026 | 2022 | ||
| (U.S. use patent and European use/formulation patents) | ||||
ISTODAX® brand drug | 2021 | * | ||
| (U.S. drug substance patents) | ||||
POMALYST®/IMNOVID® brand drug | 20243 | 20234 | ||
| (U.S. drug substance/use patent) | ||||
FOCALIN® brand drug | 2015 | N/A | ||
| (U.S. use patents) | ||||
FOCALIN XR® brand drug | 2015 | 2018 | ||
| (U.S. use patent/European formulation patent) | ||||
| (European Patent Office (EPO) drug product patent) | ||||
OTEZLA® brand drug | 20245 | 2028** | ||
| (U.S./European drug substance patent) | ||||
_____________________
* Generally, ten years regulatory exclusivity upon approval of submitted application for an orphan indication.
** Subject to ongoing EPO opposition proceedings.
1 | The patents covering these drugs include patents listed in the U.S. Orange Book. The date provided reflects the last-to-expire key patent as listed in the U.S. Orange Book, which may not be the last date on which all relevant patents (e.g., polymorph and manufacturing patents) expire. Certain of the products listed may be the subject of patent litigation. See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
2 | We contracted with Sandoz to sell azacitidine for injection, which they launched after the introduction of a generic version of VIDAZA® in the United States by a competitor in September 2013. |
3 | Application for Patent Term Extension pending, receipt of which would extend exclusivity through 2025. |
4 | This date is based on ten years regulatory exclusivity. A patent application is pending, receipt of which would likely extend exclusivity beyond 2023. |
5 Application for Patent Term Extension pending, receipt of which would extend exclusivity through 2028.
The term of individual patents and patent applications will depend upon the legal term of the patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In the United States, the patent term is 20 years from the date of filing of the patent application although term extensions are available. We may obtain patents for certain products many years before marketing approval is obtained for those
10
products. Because of the limited life of patents, which ordinarily commences prior to the commercial sale of the related product, the commercial value of the patent may be limited. However, we may be able to obtain patent term extensions upon marketing approval. For example, supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) on some of our products have been granted in a number of European countries, compensating in part for delays in obtaining marketing approval. Also, under the Hatch-Waxman Act, the term of a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug may also be eligible for patent term extension (for up to five years, but not beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval) as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. When possible, depending upon the length of clinical trials and other factors involved in the filing of a new drug application (NDA) with the FDA, we expect to apply for patent term extensions for patents covering our drug products and their use in treating various diseases.
In most cases, our drugs are also covered in foreign countries by patents and patent applications that correspond to certain of those listed in the U.S. Orange Book. For example, patents related to the active pharmaceutical ingredient, uses and pharmaceutical compositions for most of our drugs have been granted in Europe. Although certain of the patents granted by the regulatory authorities of the European Union may expire at specific dates, patents granted in certain European countries, such as Spain, France, Italy, Germany and the United Kingdom, will extend beyond such European Union patent expiration date due to the SPCs granted in these countries for many of our drugs. The table above may also reflect patents in Europe that relate to certain polymorphic forms of the active pharmaceutical ingredient of our drugs.
Patent term extensions have been granted in other markets as well for certain of our patents related to REVLIMID®. Patent term extensions for certain of our patents related to lenalidomide have been granted in Australia, Korea, Japan and Russia. Further, patent term extensions for certain of our patents related to ABRAXANE® have been secured and/or are actively being sought in Australia, Japan, Russia and Korea. We are also considering alternative exclusivity strategies, mostly through international treaties, in a variety of countries throughout Latin America.
The existence of issued patents does not guarantee our right to practice the patented technology or commercialize the patented product. Third parties may have or obtain rights to patents which could be used to prevent or attempt to prevent us from commercializing the patented product candidates. Patents relating to pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology products, compounds and processes, such as those that cover our existing compounds, products and processes and those that we will likely file in the future, do not always provide complete or adequate protection. Future litigation or re-examination proceedings (including oppositions and invalidity proceedings such as interparty reviews) regarding the enforcement or validity of our existing patents or any future patents could invalidate such patents or substantially reduce their protection.
Our patents are subject to challenge by generic drug companies and others for a variety of reasons. For more information regarding challenges to certain of our patents, see Item 1A. "Risk Factors” and Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As of December 31, 2014, we owned or had exclusively licensed 591 issued U.S. patents and 596 additional pending U.S. patent applications. We have a policy to seek broad global patent protection for our inventions and have foreign patent rights corresponding to most of our U.S. patents.
Trade secret strategies and intellectual property rights in our brand names, logos and trademarks are also important to our business. We maintain both registered and common law trademarks. Common law trademark protection typically continues where and for as long as the mark is used. Registered trademarks continue in each country for as long as the trademark is registered.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
General: Regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and other countries is a significant factor in the manufacture and marketing of pharmaceuticals and in our ongoing research and development activities. Our therapeutic products require regulatory approval by governmental agencies. Human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical testing and clinical trials and other pre-marketing and post-marketing approval requirements of the FDA and regulatory authorities in other countries. In the United States, various federal and, in some cases, state statutes and regulations also govern, or impact the manufacturing, testing for safety and effectiveness, labeling, storage, record-keeping and marketing of such products. The lengthy process of seeking required approvals and the continuing need for compliance with applicable statutes and regulations, require the expenditure of substantial resources. Regulatory approval, if and when obtained, may be limited in scope which may significantly limit the uses for which a product may be promoted. Further, approved drugs, as well as their manufacturers, are subject to ongoing post-marketing review, inspection and discovery of previously unknown problems with such products or the manufacturing or quality control procedures used in their production, which may result in restrictions on their manufacture, sale or use or in their withdrawal from the market. Any failure or delay by us, our suppliers of manufactured drug product, collaborators or licensees, in obtaining
11
regulatory approvals could adversely affect the marketing of our products and our ability to receive product revenue, license revenue or profit sharing payments. For more information, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
Clinical Development: Before a product may be administered to human subjects, it must undergo preclinical testing. Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of a product candidate's chemistry and biological activities and animal studies to assess potential safety and efficacy. The results of these studies must be submitted to the FDA as part of an Investigational New Drug (IND) application which must be reviewed by the FDA primarily for safety considerations before clinical trials in humans can begin.
Typically, clinical trials in humans involve a three-phase process as previously described under “- Product Development.”
In some cases, further studies beyond the three-phase clinical trial process described above are required as a condition for an NDA or biologics license application (BLA) approval. The FDA requires monitoring of all aspects of clinical trials and reports of all adverse events must be made to the FDA. The FDA may also require the conduct of pediatric studies for the drug and indication either before or after submission of an NDA.
FDA Review and Approval: The results of the preclinical testing and clinical trials are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA or BLA for evaluation to determine if there is substantial evidence that the product is sufficiently safe and effective to warrant approval. In responding to an NDA or BLA, the FDA may grant marketing approval, deny approval, or request additional information, including data from new clinical trials.
Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions: The FDA has developed four distinct approaches to make new drugs available as rapidly as possible in cases where there is no available treatment or there are advantages over existing treatments.
The FDA may grant “accelerated approval” to products that have been studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments. For accelerated approval, the product must have an effect on a surrogate endpoint or an intermediate clinical endpoint that is considered reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of a drug, such as an effect on irreversible morbidity and mortality. When approval is based on surrogate endpoints or clinical endpoints other than survival or morbidity, the sponsor will be required to conduct additional post-approval clinical studies to verify and describe clinical benefit. These studies are known as "confirmatory trials." Approval of a drug may be withdrawn or the labeled indication of the drug changed if these trials fail to verify clinical benefit or do not demonstrate sufficient clinical benefit to justify the risks associated with the drug.
The FDA may grant “fast track” status to products that treat serious diseases or conditions and fill an unmet medical need. Fast track is a process designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of such products by providing, among other things, more frequent meetings with the FDA to discuss the product's development plan, more frequent written correspondence from the FDA about trial design, eligibility for accelerated approval if relevant criteria are met, and rolling review, which allows submission of individually completed sections of an NDA or BLA for FDA review before the entire submission is completed. Fast track status does not ensure that a product will be developed more quickly or receive FDA approval.
“Breakthrough Therapy” designation is a process designed to expedite the development and review of drugs that are intended to treat a serious condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over available therapy on a clinically significant endpoint. For drugs and biologics that have been designated as Breakthrough Therapies, robust FDA-sponsor interaction and communication can help to identify the most efficient and expeditious path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens.
The FDA may grant “priority review” status to products that, if approved, would provide significant improvement in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions. Priority review is intended to reduce the time it takes for the FDA to review an NDA or BLA, with the goal to take action on the application within six months.
Orphan Drug Act: Pursuant to the United States Orphan Drug Act, a sponsor may request that the FDA designate a drug intended to treat a “rare disease or condition” as an “orphan drug.” A “rare disease or condition” is one which affects less than 200,000 people in the United States, or which affects more than 200,000 people, but for which the cost of developing and making available the product is not expected to be recovered from sales of the product in the United States. Upon the approval of the first NDA or BLA for a drug designated as an orphan drug for a specified indication, the sponsor of that NDA or BLA is entitled to seven years of exclusive marketing rights in the United States unless the sponsor cannot assure the availability of sufficient quantities to meet the needs of persons with the disease. However, orphan drug status is particular to the approved indication and does not prevent another company from seeking approval of an off-patent drug that has other labeled indications that are not under orphan or other exclusivities. Orphan drugs may also be eligible for federal income tax credits for costs associated with the drugs' development.
12
In order to increase the development and marketing of drugs for rare disorders, regulatory bodies outside the United States have enacted regulations similar to the Orphan Drug Act.
Review and Approval Outside of the United States: Approval procedures must be undertaken in virtually every other country comprising the market for our products. The approval procedure and the time required for approval vary from country to country and may involve additional testing. In certain countries such as the EU countries, Switzerland, Canada and Australia, regulatory requirements and approval processes are similar to those in the United States, where approval decisions by regulators are based on the regulators’ review of the results of clinical trials performed for specific indications. Other countries may have a less comprehensive review process in terms of data requirements and may rely on prior marketing approval from a foreign regulatory authority in the United States or the EU.
Manufacturing Quality Control: Among the conditions for NDA or BLA approval is the requirement that the prospective manufacturer’s quality control and manufacturing procedures continually conform with the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations (which are regulations established by the FDA governing the manufacture, processing, packing, storage and testing of drugs and biologics intended for human use). In complying with cGMP, manufacturers must devote substantial time, money and effort in the areas of production, quality control and quality assurance to maintain compliance. Material changes in manufacturing equipment, location or process, may result in additional regulatory review and approval. The FDA, the EC and other regulatory agencies conduct periodic visits to inspect equipment, facilities, and processes following the initial approval of a product. If a manufacturing facility is not in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations and requirements imposed when the product was approved, regulatory enforcement action may be taken, which may include a warning letter or an injunction against shipment of products from the facility and/or recall of products previously shipped.
Post-approval Review and Enforcement: Regulatory authorities closely review and regulate the marketing and promotion of drug and biologic products. In most countries, regulatory approval is granted for a specified indication and is required before marketing or promoting a product for that indication. Regulatory authorities may take enforcement action against a company for promoting unapproved uses of a product ("off-label promotion") or for other violations of advertising and labeling laws and regulations.
When an NDA or BLA is approved, the NDA or BLA holder must, among other things, (a) employ a system for obtaining reports of adverse events and side effects associated with the drug and make appropriate submissions to the FDA and (b) timely advise the FDA if any marketed product fails to adhere to specifications established by the NDA or BLA. If the FDA concludes that a drug previously shown to be effective can be safely used only if distribution or use is restricted, the FDA will require post-marketing restrictions as necessary to assure safe use. The sponsor may be required to establish systems to assure use of the product under safe conditions. The FDA may require the drug sponsor to implement programs similar to our REMSTM programs to ensure that benefits of a drug outweigh risks and that safety protocols are adhered to.
In addition, a sponsor of a drug product has an ongoing obligation to update product labels with new information and to report to regulatory authorities concerning assessment of serious risks associated with the drug. Following assessment of these reports, regulatory authorities can require product label updates to reflect new safety data or warnings. If the FDA or other regulatory authorities become aware of new safety information, they can also require us to conduct studies or clinical trials to assess the potential for a serious risk. The FDA and other regulatory authorities can also impose marketing restrictions, including the suspension of marketing or complete withdrawal of a product from the market.
The FDA may issue publicly available warning letters and non-compliance letters, which may require corrective actions, including modification of advertising or other corrective communications to consumers or healthcare professionals.
Failure to comply with applicable FDA or other regulatory agency requirements can result in enforcement actions, such as license revocation or suspension; orders for retention, recall, seizure or destruction of product; cessation of manufacturing; injunctions; inspection warrants; search warrants; civil penalties, including fines based on disgorgement; restitution; and criminal prosecution.
Other Regulations: We are also subject to various federal and state laws, as well as foreign laws, pertaining to healthcare “fraud and abuse,” including anti-kickback laws and false claims laws. Anti-kickback laws make it illegal to solicit, offer, receive or pay any remuneration in exchange for or to induce the referral of business, including the purchase or prescription of a particular drug that is reimbursed by a state or federal program. False claims laws prohibit knowingly and willingly presenting, or causing to be presented for payment to third-party payers (including Medicare and Medicaid) any claims for reimbursed drugs or services that are false or fraudulent, claims for items or services not provided as claimed or claims for medically unnecessary items or services. Our activities related to the sale and marketing of our products may be subject to scrutiny under these laws. Violations of fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal and/or civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, as well as the possibility of exclusion from federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid).
13
We are also subject to regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and other federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Our research and development activities may involve the controlled use of hazardous materials, chemicals, biological materials and various radioactive compounds. We believe our procedures comply with the standards prescribed by federal, state or local laws, rules and regulations; however, the risk of injury or accidental contamination cannot be completely eliminated.
Additionally, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prohibits U.S. corporations and their representatives from offering, promising, authorizing or making payments to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate, with corrupt intent for the purpose of obtaining or retaining an improper business advantage. The scope of the FCPA includes interactions with certain healthcare professionals in many countries. Other countries have enacted similar anti-corruption laws and regulations to which our activities are subject.
COMPETITION
Our current products and products under development face competition from other innovative drugs and, in some cases, generic drugs. The relative speed with which we develop new products, complete clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, receive pricing and reimbursement approvals, and finalize manufacturing and distribution arrangements, and market our products are critical factors in gaining a competitive advantage. Competition among approved products depends, among other things, on product efficacy, safety, convenience, reliability, availability, price, third-party reimbursement, sales and promotional activities, product liability issues and patent and non-patent exclusivity. For additional information, see Item 1A. "Risk Factors.”
SIGNIFICANT ALLIANCES
We have entered into a variety of alliances in the ordinary course of our business. Although we do not consider any individual alliance to be material, a brief description of certain of the more notable alliances are identified in Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
MANUFACTURING
We own and operate an FDA approved manufacturing facility in Zofingen, Switzerland which produces the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for REVLIMID® and THALOMID® and have contracted with FDA approved third-party contract manufacturers to provide backup API manufacturing services for these products. Manufacturing services for REVLIMID® and THALOMID®, which consist of formulation, encapsulation, packaging, warehousing and distribution, are performed at our FDA approved drug product manufacturing facility in Boudry, Switzerland. We have contracted with a number of third-party drug product manufacturing service providers and packaging service providers to provide backup manufacturing and packaging services. All of our third-party service providers are approved by the regulatory authorities for the geographies that they serve.
The API for ABRAXANE® is generally available from two sources and is normally available in quantities adequate to meet our needs. Manufacturing services for ABRAXANE® are performed at our manufacturing facility in Arizona and by an approved third party contract manufacturing facility.
The API for POMALYST®/IMNOVID® is supplied from two sources with primary manufacturing services being performed at our Boudry manufacturing facility. We have contracted with a number of third-party drug product manufacturing service providers and packaging service providers to provide backup manufacturing and packaging services for this product.
The API for VIDAZA® is supplied by two suppliers. Manufacturing and packaging services are provided by a number of third-party service providers.
The API for azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®) is supplied from two sources. Manufacturing and packaging services are provided by a number of third-party service providers.
The API for OTEZLA® is supplied by two suppliers, with manufacturing services being performed at our Boudry manufacturing facility. Packaging services are provided by a number of third-party service providers.
The API for ISTODAX® and manufacturing services are supplied by a single-source. Packaging services are provided by a number of third-party service providers.
The API for FOCALIN® and FOCALIN XR® is currently obtained from two suppliers, and we rely on a single manufacturer for the tableting and packaging of FOCALIN® finished product.
CCT currently operates an FDA registered facility in Cedar Knolls, New Jersey for the recovery and storage of cord blood and placental stem cells for LifeBankUSA®. In addition, our Warren, New Jersey facility is FDA registered for production of PDA-001
14
and PDA-002, which are culture-expanded placenta-derived stem cell products, under cGMP to supply clinical studies. This is a multi-purpose facility capable of supporting other products.
Failure to comply with applicable regulatory agency requirements can result in enforcement actions, such as license revocation or suspension; orders for retention, recall, seizure or destruction of product; cessation of manufacturing; injunctions; inspection warrants; search warrants; civil penalties; restitution; and criminal prosecution.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
We have significant operations outside the United States conducted both through our subsidiaries and through distributors. Revenues from operations outside the United States were $3.188 billion, or 41.6% of total revenues in 2014, $2.632 billion, or 40.5% of total revenues in 2013 and $2.338 billion, or 42.4% of total revenues in 2012. The increase in the percentage of total revenues from outside of the United States in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to an 84% decline in VIDAZA in the United States after the launch of a generic version of VIDAZA® in the United States by a competitor in 2013 as well as increased international sales of POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, which was approved in the EU in September 2013, and ABRAXANE®, which was approved in the EU for pancreatic cancer in December 2013.
Our international headquarters and a drug product manufacturing facility which performs formulation, encapsulation, packaging, warehousing and distribution are located in Boudry, Switzerland. We continue to expand our international regulatory, clinical and commercial infrastructure and currently conduct our international operations in over 50 countries and have sales in over 70 countries and regions including Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Asia/Pacific and Canada.
Our international operations are subject to risks associated with operating on an international basis, including currency fluctuations, price and exchange controls and other restrictive governmental actions. Our international operations are also subject to government-imposed constraints, including laws on pricing, reimbursement and patient access to our products. Depending on the direction of change relative to the U.S. dollar, foreign currency values can increase or decrease the reported dollar value of our net assets and results of operations. While we cannot predict with certainty future changes in foreign exchange rates or the effect they will have, we attempt to mitigate their impact through operational means and by using foreign currency derivative instruments. See the discussions under Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."
SALES AND COMMERCIALIZATION
We promote our brands globally through our hematology, oncology, and inflammation and immunology commercial organizations which support our currently marketed brands and prepare for the launches of new products, as well as new indications for existing products. We have a team of dedicated market access professionals to help physicians, patients and payers understand the value our products deliver. Given our goal to ensure that patients who might benefit from our therapies have the opportunity to do so and given the complex reimbursement environment in the United States, we offer the services of Celgene Patient Support® or similar outside services to serve as a dedicated, central point of contact for patients and healthcare professionals who use or prescribe our products. Celgene Patient Support® is a free service that helps patients and healthcare professionals navigate the challenges of reimbursement, providing information about co-pay assistance and answering questions about obtaining our products.
In most countries, we promote our products through our own sales organizations. In some countries, particularly in Latin America, we partner with third-party distributors. Generally, we distribute our products through commonly used channels in local markets. However, REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and THALOMID®/Thalidomide CelgeneTM are distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local authorities' specifications to provide for their safe and appropriate distribution and use.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2014, we had 6,012 full-time employees, of whom 2,101 were engaged primarily in research and development activities, 2,161 were engaged primarily in sales and commercialization activities, 572 were engaged primarily in manufacturing, and the remaining 1,178 were engaged primarily in management and general and administrative activities. The number of full-time employees in our international operations has grown from 1,933 at the end of 2013 to 2,292 at the end of 2014. We also employ a number of part-time employees and maintain consulting arrangements with a number of researchers at various universities and other research institutions around the world.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our Current Reports on Form 8-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Reports on Form 10-K are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and all such reports and amendments to such reports have been and will be made available, free of charge, through our website (http://www.celgene.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after submission to the SEC. Such reports will remain available on our website for at least 12 months. The contents of our website
15
are not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549.
The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT OF 2012
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (ITRSHRA) added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which requires, among other things, disclosure by an issuer, in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly conducted, without specific authority from a U.S. federal department or agency, any transaction or dealing with the Government of Iran, which includes, without limitation, any person or entity owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Government of Iran or any of its political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities. Neither Celgene nor, to its knowledge, any of its affiliates engaged in activities during 2014 that are required to be disclosed pursuant to ITRSHRA.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are considered forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) concerning our business, results of operations, economic performance and/or financial condition, based on management's current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and projections. Forward-looking statements are included, for example, in the discussions about:
| • | strategy; |
| • | new product discovery and development; |
| • | current or pending clinical trials; |
| • | our products' ability to demonstrate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile; |
| • | actions by the FDA and other regulatory authorities; |
| • | product manufacturing, including our arrangements with third-party suppliers; |
| • | product introduction and sales; |
| • | royalties and contract revenues; |
| • | expenses and net income; |
| • | credit and foreign exchange risk management; |
| • | liquidity; |
| • | asset and liability risk management; |
| • | the outcome of litigation and other proceedings; |
| • | intellectual property rights and protection; |
| • | economic factors; |
| • | competition; and |
| • | operational and legal risks. |
Any statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "intends," "estimates," "aims," "plans," "may," "could," "will," "will continue," "seeks," "should," "predict," "potential," "outlook," "guidance," "target," "forecast," "probable," "possible" or the negative of such terms and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are subject to change and may be affected by risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in light of new information or future events, although we intend to continue to meet our ongoing disclosure obligations under the U.S. securities laws and other applicable laws.
We caution you that a number of important factors could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements, and therefore you should not place too much reliance on them. These factors include, among others, those described herein, under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report and in our other public reports filed with the SEC. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors, and therefore the factors that are noted are not intended to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties that may affect forward-looking statements. If these or other risks and uncertainties materialize, or if the assumptions underlying any of the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, our actual performance and future actions may be materially different from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-
16
looking statements. We can offer no assurance that our estimates or expectations will prove accurate or that we will be able to achieve our strategic and operational goals.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following describes the major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. Any of these factors could significantly and negatively affect our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results or credit ratings, which could cause the trading prices of our equity securities to decline. The risks described below are not the only risks we may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or risks that we currently consider immaterial, could also negatively affect us.
Our operating results are subject to significant fluctuations.
Our operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year for a number of reasons, including the risks discussed elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section. Events such as a delay in product development or a revenue shortfall may cause financial results for a particular period to be below our expectations. In addition, we have experienced and may continue to experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to the timing of charges that we may take. We have recorded, or may be required to record, charges that include development milestone and license payments under collaboration and license agreements, amortization of acquired intangibles and other acquisition related charges, and impairment charges.
Our revenues are also subject to foreign exchange rate fluctuations due to the global nature of our operations. We recognize foreign currency gains or losses arising from our operation in the period in which we incur those gains or losses. Although we utilize foreign currency forward contracts and occasionally foreign currency put and call options to manage foreign currency risk, our efforts to reduce currency exchange losses may not be successful. As a result, currency fluctuation among our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar, and the currencies in which we do business will affect our operating results. Our net income may also fluctuate due to the impact of charges we may be required to take with respect to foreign currency and other hedge transactions. In particular, we may incur higher than expected charges from hedge ineffectiveness or from the termination of a hedge arrangement. For more information, see Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Market Risk Management - Foreign Currency Risk Management.”
We are dependent on the continued commercial success of our primary products, REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, THALOMID®, ABRAXANE®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and OTEZLA®.
Currently, our business is largely dependent on the commercial success of REVLIMID®, VIDAZA®, THALOMID®, ABRAXANE®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and OTEZLA®. The success of these products depends on acceptance by regulators, key opinion leaders, physicians, and patients as effective drugs with certain advantages over other therapies. A number of factors, as discussed in greater detail below, may adversely impact the degree of acceptance of these products, including their efficacy, safety, price and benefits over competing products, as well as the reimbursement policies of third-party payers, such as government and private insurance plans.
If unexpected adverse events are reported in connection with the use of any of these products, physician and patient acceptance of the product could deteriorate and the commercial success of such product could be adversely affected. We are required to report to the FDA or similar bodies in other countries events associated with our products relating to death or serious injury. Adverse events could result in additional regulatory controls, such as for the imposition of costly post-approval clinical studies or revisions to our approved labeling which could limit the indications or patient population for a product or could even lead to the withdrawal of a product from the market. THALOMID® is known to be toxic to the human fetus and exposure to the drug during pregnancy could result in significant deformities. REVLIMID® and POMALYST®/IMNOVID® are also considered toxic to the human fetus and their respective labels contain warnings against use which could result in embryo-fetal exposure. While we have restricted distribution systems for THALOMID®, REVLIMID®, and POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, and endeavor to educate patients regarding the potential known adverse events, including pregnancy risks, we cannot ensure that all such warnings and recommendations will be complied with or that adverse events resulting from non-compliance will not occur.
Our future commercial success depends on gaining regulatory approval for products in development, and obtaining approvals for our current products for additional indications.
The testing, manufacturing and marketing of our products require regulatory approvals, including approval from the FDA and similar bodies in other countries. Certain of our pharmaceutical products, such as FOCALIN®, also require authorization by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) of the U.S. Department of Justice. Our future growth would be negatively impacted if we fail to obtain timely, or at all, requisite regulatory approvals in the United States and internationally for products in development and approvals for our existing products for additional indications.
17
The principal risks to obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals are as follows:
| • | In general, preclinical tests and clinical trials can take many years and require the expenditure of substantial resources, and the data obtained from these tests and trials may not lead to regulatory approval; |
| • | Delays or rejections may be encountered during any stage of the regulatory process if the clinical or other data fails to demonstrate compliance with a regulatory agency’s requirements for safety, efficacy and quality; |
| • | Requirements for approval may become more stringent due to changes in regulatory agency policy or the adoption of new regulations or legislation; |
| • | Even if a product is approved, the scope of the approval may significantly limit the indicated uses or the patient population for which the product may be marketed and may impose significant limitations in the nature of warnings, precautions and contra-indications that could materially affect the sales and profitability of the product; |
| • | After a product is approved, the FDA or similar bodies in other countries may withdraw or modify an approval in a significant manner or request that we perform additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product due to a number of reasons, including safety concerns, adverse events and side effects; |
| • | Products, such as REVLIMID® and POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, that receive accelerated approval can be subject to an expedited withdrawal if post-marketing restrictions are not adhered to or are shown to be inadequate to assure safe use, or if the drug is shown to be unsafe or ineffective under its conditions of use; |
| • | Guidelines and recommendations published by various governmental and non-governmental organizations can reduce the use of our approved products; |
| • | Approved products, as well as their manufacturers, are subject to continuing and ongoing review by regulatory agencies, and the discovery of previously unknown problems with these products or the failure to comply with manufacturing or quality control requirements may result in restrictions on the manufacture, sale or use of a product or its withdrawal from the market; and |
| • | Changes in regulatory agency policy or the adoption of new regulations or legislation could impose restrictions on the sale of our approved products. |
If we fail to comply with laws or government regulations or policies our business could be adversely affected.
The discovery, preclinical development, clinical trials, manufacturing, risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (such as our REMSTM program), marketing and labeling of pharmaceuticals and biologics are all subject to extensive laws and government regulations and policies. In addition, individual states, acting through their attorneys general, are increasingly seeking to regulate the marketing of prescription drugs under state consumer protection and false advertising laws. If we fail to comply with the laws and regulations regarding the promotion and sale of our products, appropriate distribution of our products under our restricted distribution systems, off-label promotion and the promotion of unapproved products, government agencies may bring enforcement actions against us or private litigants may assert claims on behalf of the government against us that could inhibit our commercial capabilities and/or result in significant damage awards and penalties.
Other matters that may be the subject of governmental or regulatory action which could adversely affect our business include laws, regulations and policies governing:
| • | protection of the environment, privacy, healthcare reimbursement programs, and competition; |
| • | parallel importation of prescription drugs from outside the United States at prices that are regulated by the governments of various foreign countries; and |
| • | mandated disclosures of clinical trial or other data, such as the EMA’s policy on publication of clinical data. |
The FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research currently regulates human tissue or cells intended for transplantation, implantation, infusion or transfer to a human, requiring, among other things, cell and tissue establishments to screen and test donors, prepare and follow written procedures for the prevention of the spread of communicable disease and register with FDA. Through our Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (CCT) subsidiary, we are licensed in certain states to operate our allogeneic and private stem cell banking businesses. If we are unable to maintain those licenses or are unable to obtain licenses in other states that may adopt similar licensing requirements, those businesses could be adversely affected.
18
Sales of our products will be significantly reduced if access to and reimbursement for our products by governmental and other third-party payers are reduced or terminated.
Sales of our current and future products depend, in large part, on the conditions under which our products are paid for by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefit and similar health care management organizations (HCMOs), or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers and other third-party payers.
The influence of HCMOs has increased in recent years due to the growing number of patients receiving coverage through a few large HCMOs as a result of industry consolidation. One objective of HCMOs is to contain and, where possible, reduce healthcare expenditures. HCMOs typically use formularies (lists of approved medicines available to members of a particular HCMO), clinical protocols, volume purchasing, long-term contracts and other methods to negotiate prices with pharmaceutical providers. Due to their lower cost generally, generic medicines are typically placed in preferred tiers of HCMO formularies. Additionally, many formularies include alternative and competitive products for treatment of particular medical problems. Exclusion of our products from a formulary or HCMO-implemented restrictions imposed upon our products can significantly impact drug usage in the HCMO patient population, and consequently our revenues.
Generally, in Europe and other countries outside the United States, the government-sponsored healthcare system is the primary payer of patients’ healthcare costs. These health care management organizations and third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services, seeking to implement cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Our products continue to be subject to increasing price and reimbursement pressure due to price controls imposed by governments in many countries; increased difficulty in obtaining and maintaining satisfactory drug reimbursement rates; and the tendency of governments and private health care providers to favor generic pharmaceuticals. In addition, governmental and private third-party payers and purchasers of our products may restrict access to formularies or otherwise discourage use of our products. Limitations on patient access to our drugs, adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures could adversely affect our business. In addition, our operating results may also be affected by distributors seeking to take advantage of price differences among various markets by buying our products in low cost markets for resale in higher cost markets.
The Affordable Care Act and other legislation may affect our pricing policies and government reimbursement of our products that may adversely impact our revenues and profitability.
In the U.S. there have been and may continue to be a number of legislative and regulatory proposals and enactments related to drug pricing and reimbursement that could impact our profitability. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 were signed into law on March 23, 2010 and March 30, 2010, respectively, and are referred to collectively as the Healthcare Reform Acts. Although these reforms have significantly impacted the pharmaceutical industry, the full effects of these provisions will become apparent over time as these laws are implemented and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other agencies issue applicable regulations or guidance as required by the Healthcare Reform Acts. Moreover, in the coming years, additional changes could be made to governmental healthcare programs that could significantly impact the profitability of our products.
The Healthcare Reform Acts, among other things, made significant changes to the Medicaid rebate program by increasing the minimum rebates that manufacturers like us are required to pay. These changes also expanded the government’s 340B drug discount program by increasing the category of entities qualified to participate in the program and benefit from its deeply discounted drug pricing. We have received inquiries from the Health Resources and Services Administration of the Department of Health & Human Services (“HRSA”) regarding our compliance with the 340B program. We have responded to these inquiries and believe that we have complied with applicable legal requirements. If, however, we are ultimately required to change our sales or pricing practices, there would be an adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Our ability to sell our products to hospitals in the United States depends in part on our relationships with group purchasing organizations.
Many existing and potential customers for our products become members of group purchasing organizations (GPOs). GPOs negotiate pricing arrangements and contracts, sometimes on an exclusive basis, with medical supply manufacturers and distributors and these negotiated prices are made available to a GPO’s affiliated hospitals and other members. If we are not one of the providers selected by a GPO, affiliated hospitals and other members may be less likely to purchase our products, and if the GPO has negotiated a strict sole source, market share compliance or bundling contract for another manufacturer’s products, we may be precluded from making sales to members of the GPO for the duration of that contractual arrangement. Our failure to enter into or renew contracts with GPOs may cause us to lose market share and could adversely affect our sales.
19
Our long-term success depends, in part, on intellectual property protection.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, protect trade secrets, obtain licenses to technology owned by third parties and to conduct our business without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, including ours, can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. There can be no assurance that if claims of any of our owned or licensed patents are challenged by one or more third parties, a court or patent authority ruling on such challenge will determine that our patent claims are valid and enforceable. If a third party is found to have rights covering products or processes used by us, we could be forced to cease using such products or processes, be subject to significant liabilities to such third party and/or be required to obtain license rights from such third party. Lawsuits involving patent claims are costly and could affect our results of operations, result in significant expense and divert the attention of managerial and scientific personnel. For more information on challenges to certain of our patents, see Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition, we do not know whether any of our owned or licensed pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents or, if patents are issued, whether they will be dominated by third-party patent rights, provide significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage or be circumvented, opposed, invalidated, rendered unenforceable or infringed by others.
Our intellectual property rights may be affected in ways that are difficult to anticipate at this time under the provisions of the America Invents Act enacted in 2011. This law includes a number of important changes to established practices, including transition to a first-to-file system, post-grant review for issued patents, and various procedural changes. The scope of these changes and the lack of experience with their practical implementation may result in uncertainty over the next few years.
On October 2, 2014, the EMA adopted its clinical transparency policy, "Policy on Publication of Clinical Data for Medicinal Products for Human Use" (the “Clinical Data Policy”), which became effective on January 1, 2015. In general, under the Clinical Data Policy, clinical data is not deemed to be commercially confidential data. Therefore, there is a risk that unpublished proprietary information, including trade secrets, that are incorporated into a marketing application before the EMA may be made publicly available. While it is difficult to predict how the EMA will interpret and apply the Clinical Data Policy, any public disclosure of our trade secrets or other confidential and proprietary information may adversely impact our patent rights and our competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Also, different countries have different procedures for obtaining patents and patents issued by different countries provide different degrees of protection against the use of a patented invention by others. There can be no assurance that the issuance to us in one country of a patent covering an invention will be followed by the issuance in other countries of patents covering the same invention or that any judicial interpretation of the validity, enforceability or scope of the claims in a patent issued in one country will be similar to or recognized by the judicial interpretation given to a corresponding patent issued in another country.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction.
We also rely upon unpatented, proprietary and trade secret technology that we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our collaborative partners, employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors. Despite precautions taken by us, there can be no assurance that these agreements provide meaningful protection, that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach or that our proprietary and trade secret technologies will not otherwise become known to others or found to be non-proprietary.
We receive confidential and proprietary information from collaborators, prospective licensees and other third parties. In addition, we employ individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. We may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed confidential information of these third parties or our employees’ former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims, which can result in significant costs if we are found to have improperly used the confidential or proprietary information of others. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of personnel and resources.
20
Our products may face competition from lower cost generic or follow-on products.
Manufacturers of generic drugs are seeking to compete with our drugs and present a significant challenge to us. Those manufacturers may challenge the scope, validity or enforceability of our patents in court, requiring us to engage in complex, lengthy and costly litigation. If any of our owned or licensed patents are infringed or challenged, we may not be successful in enforcing or defending those intellectual property rights and, as a result, may not be able to develop or market the relevant product exclusively, which would have a material adverse effect on our sales from that product. In addition, manufacturers of innovative drugs as well as generic drug manufacturers may be able to design their products around our owned or licensed patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology. For more information concerning certain pending proceedings relating to our intellectual property rights, see Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Upon the expiration or loss of patent protection for a product, or upon the “at-risk” launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation against the generic product) by a manufacturer of a generic version of one of our products, we can quickly lose a significant portion of our sales of that product. In addition, if generic versions of our competitors’ branded products lose their market exclusivity, our patented products may face increased competition or pricing pressure.
Our business operates in an extremely competitive environment.
The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries in which we operate are highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our present and potential competitors include major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as specialty pharmaceutical firms, including, but not limited to:
| • | Hematology and Oncology: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eisai, Gilead, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi and Takeda. |
| • | Inflammation and Immunology: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis and UCB S.A. |
Some of these companies have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have, enabling them, among other things, to make greater research and development investments. We also experience competition in drug development from universities and other research institutions, and we compete with others in acquiring technology from these sources. The pharmaceutical industry has undergone, and is expected to continue to undergo, rapid and significant technological change and we expect competition to intensify as technical advances are made and become more widely known. The development of products or processes by our competitors with significant advantages over those that we are developing could adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.
A decline in general economic conditions would adversely affect our results of operations.
Sales of our products are dependent, in large part, on third-party payers. As a result of global credit and financial market conditions, these organizations may be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations or may delay payment. For information about amounts receivable from the government-owned or -controlled hospitals in Spain, Italy and Portugal, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
In addition, due to tightened global credit, there may be a disruption or delay in the performance of our third-party contractors, suppliers or collaborators. We rely on third parties for several important aspects of our business, including portions of our product manufacturing, clinical development of future collaboration products, conduct of clinical trials and supply of raw materials. If such third parties are unable to satisfy their commitments to us, our business could be adversely affected.
We may be required to modify our business practices, pay fines and significant expenses or experience other losses due to governmental investigations or other enforcement activities.
We may become subject to litigation or governmental investigations in the United States and foreign jurisdictions that may arise from the conduct of our business. Like many companies in our industry, we have from time to time received inquiries and subpoenas and other types of information requests from government authorities and we have been subject to claims and other actions related to our business activities. For more information relating to governmental investigations and other legal proceedings, see Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
21
While the ultimate outcomes of investigations and legal proceedings are difficult to predict, adverse resolutions or settlements of those matters could result in, among other things:
| • | significant damage awards, fines, penalties or other payments, and administrative remedies, such as exclusion and/or debarment from government programs, or other rulings that preclude us from operating our business in a certain manner; |
| • | changes and additional costs to our business operations to avoid risks associated with such litigation or investigations; |
| • | product recalls; |
| • | reputational damage and decreased demand for our products; and |
| • | expenditure of significant time and resources that would otherwise be available for operating our business. |
The development of new biopharmaceutical products involves a lengthy and complex process and we may be unable to commercialize any of the products we are currently developing.
Many of our drug candidates are in the early or mid-stages of research and development and will require the commitment of substantial financial resources, extensive research, development, preclinical testing, clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up and regulatory approval prior to being ready for sale. This process takes many years of effort without any assurance of ultimate success. Our product development efforts with respect to a product candidate may fail for many reasons, including:
| • | the failure of the product candidate in preclinical or clinical studies; |
| • | adverse patient reactions to the product candidate or indications of other safety concerns; |
| • | insufficient clinical trial data to support the effectiveness or superiority of the product candidate; |
| • | our inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product candidate for development or commercialization activities in a timely and cost-efficient manner; |
| • | our failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, the required regulatory approvals for the product candidate, the facilities or the process used to manufacture the product candidate; |
| • | changes in the regulatory environment, including pricing and reimbursement, that make development of a new product or of an existing product for a new indication no longer attractive; |
| • | the failure to obtain or maintain satisfactory drug reimbursement rates by governmental or third-party payers; and |
| • | the development of a competitive product or therapy. |
The stem cell products that we are developing through our CCT subsidiary may represent substantial departures from established treatment methods and will compete with a number of traditional products and therapies which are now, or may be in the future, manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies. Furthermore, public attitudes may be influenced by claims that stem cell therapy is unsafe and stem cell therapy may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community.
If a product were to fail to be approved or if sales fail to materialize for a newly approved product, we may incur losses related to the write-down of inventory, impairment of property, plant and equipment dedicated to the product or expenses related to restructuring.
Disruptions of our manufacturing and distribution operations could significantly interrupt our production and distribution capabilities.
We have our own manufacturing facilities for many of our products and we have contracted with third parties to provide other manufacturing, finishing, and packaging services. Any of those manufacturing processes could be partially or completely disrupted by fire, contamination, natural disaster, terrorist attack or governmental action. A disruption could lead to substantial production delays and the need to establish alternative manufacturing sources for the affected products requiring additional regulatory
22
approvals. In the interim, our finished goods inventories may be insufficient to satisfy customer orders on a timely basis. Further, our business interruption insurance may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur.
In all the countries where we sell our products, governmental regulations define standards for manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distributing and storing pharmaceutical products. Our failure to comply, or the failure of our contract manufacturers and distributors to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on them or us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, disgorgement, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions.
We have contracted with distributors to distribute REVLIMID®, THALOMID®, VIDAZA®, ABRAXANE®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, ISTODAX® and OTEZLA®. If our distributors fail to perform and we cannot secure a replacement distributor within a reasonable period of time, our revenue could be adversely affected.
The consolidation of drug wholesalers and other wholesaler actions could increase competitive and pricing pressures.
We sell our pharmaceutical products in the United States primarily through wholesale distributors and contracted pharmacies. These wholesale customers comprise a significant part of our distribution network for pharmaceutical products in the United States. This distribution network is continuing to undergo significant consolidation. As a result, a smaller number of large wholesale distributors and pharmacy chains control a significant share of the market. We expect that consolidation of drug wholesalers and pharmacy chains will increase competitive and pricing pressures on pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us. In addition, wholesalers may apply pricing pressure through fee-for-service arrangements and their purchases may exceed customer demand, resulting in increased returns or reduced wholesaler purchases in later periods.
Risks from the improper conduct of employees, agents, contractors or collaborators could adversely affect our business or reputation.
We cannot ensure that our compliance controls, policies and procedures will in every instance protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators that violate the laws or regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including employment, anti-corruption, environmental, competition and privacy laws. Such improper actions, particularly with respect to foreign healthcare professionals and government officials, could subject us to civil or criminal investigations, monetary and injunctive penalties, adversely impact our ability to conduct business in certain markets, negatively affect our results of operations and damage our reputation.
We are subject to a variety of risks related to the conduct and expansion of our business internationally, particularly in emerging markets.
As our operations expand globally, we are subject to risks associated with conducting business in foreign markets, particularly in emerging markets. Those risks include:
| • | increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs; |
| • | longer payment and reimbursement cycles; |
| • | difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable; |
| • | local marketing and promotional challenges; |
| • | lack of consistency, and unexpected changes, in foreign regulatory requirements and practices; |
| • | increased risk of governmental and regulatory scrutiny and investigations; |
| • | increased exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
| • | the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and legal standards; |
| • | operating in locations with a higher incidence of corruption and fraudulent business practices; |
| • | difficulties in staffing and managing foreign sales and development operations; |
| • | import and export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other trade barriers; |
23
| • | weak or no protection of intellectual property rights; |
| • | possible enactment of laws regarding the management of and access to data and public networks and websites; |
| • | possible future limitations on foreign-owned businesses; |
| • | increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities; and |
| • | other factors beyond our control, including political, social and economic instability, popular uprisings, war, terrorist attacks and security concerns in general. |
As we continue to expand our business into multiple international markets, our success will depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks associated with our international operations. Any of these risks could harm our international operations and reduce our sales, adversely affecting our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects.
We may not realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and strategic initiatives.
We may face significant challenges in effectively integrating entities and businesses that we acquire and we may not realize the benefits anticipated from such acquisitions. Achieving the anticipated benefits of our acquired businesses will depend in part upon whether we can integrate our businesses in an efficient and effective manner. Our integration of acquired businesses involves a number of risks, including:
| • | demands on management related to the increase in our size after an acquisition; |
| • | the diversion of management’s attention from daily operations to the integration of acquired businesses and personnel; |
| • | higher than anticipated integration costs; |
| • | failure to achieve expected synergies and costs savings; |
| • | difficulties in the assimilation and retention of employees; |
| • | difficulties in the assimilation of different cultures and practices, as well as in the assimilation of broad and geographically dispersed personnel and operations; and |
| • | difficulties in the integration of departments, systems, including accounting systems, technologies, books and records and procedures, as well as in maintaining uniform standards and controls, including internal control over financial reporting, and related procedures and policies. |
In addition, we may not be able to realize the projected benefits of corporate strategic initiatives we may pursue in the future.
We may not be able to continue to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific, manufacturing and commercial talent.
The success of our business depends, in large part, on our continued ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific, medical, manufacturing, commercial and other professional personnel, and competition for these types of personnel is intense. We cannot be sure that we will be able to attract or retain skilled personnel or that the costs of doing so will not materially increase.
Risks associated with using hazardous materials in our business could subject us to significant liability.
We use certain hazardous materials in our research, development, manufacturing and other business activities. If an accident or environmental discharge occurs, or if we discover contamination caused by prior owners and operators of properties we acquire, we could be liable for remediation obligations, damages and fines that could exceed our insurance coverage and financial resources. Additionally, the cost of compliance with environmental and safety laws and regulations may increase in the future, requiring us to expend more financial resources either in compliance or in purchasing supplemental insurance coverage.
24
Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Product liability claims could result in significant damage awards or settlements. Such claims can also be accompanied by consumer fraud claims or claims by third-party payers seeking reimbursement of the cost of our products. In addition, adverse determinations or settlements of product liability claims may result in suspension or withdrawal of a product marketing authorization or changes to our product labeling, including restrictions on therapeutic indications, inclusion of new contraindications, warnings or precautions. Although we purchase product liability coverage from third-party carriers, it is increasingly difficult and costly to obtain. There can be no assurance that we will be able to recover under any insurance policy or that such coverage will be adequate to fully cover all risks or damage awards or settlements. Product liability claims, regardless of their merits or ultimate outcome, are costly, divert management's attention, may harm our reputation and can impact the demand for our products.
Changes in our effective income tax rate could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions and our domestic and international tax liabilities are largely dependent upon the distribution of income among these different jurisdictions. Various factors may have favorable or unfavorable effects on our effective income tax rate. These factors include interpretations of existing tax laws, the accounting for stock options and other share-based compensation, changes in tax laws and rates, future levels of research and development spending, changes in accounting standards, changes in the mix of earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate, the outcome of examinations by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, the accuracy of our estimates for unrecognized tax benefits and realization of deferred tax assets and changes in overall levels of pre-tax earnings. The impact on our income tax provision resulting from the above-mentioned factors and others could have a material impact on our results of operations. For more information, see Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Currency fluctuations and changes in exchange rates could adversely affect our revenue growth, increase our costs and cause our profitability to decline.
We collect and pay a substantial portion of our sales and expenditures in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Therefore, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect our operating results. We utilize foreign currency forward contracts and occasionally foreign currency put and call options, all of which are derivative instruments, to manage foreign currency risk. We use these derivative instruments to hedge certain forecasted transactions, manage exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings and reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies. The use of these derivative instruments is intended to mitigate a portion of the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce our risk or cost, but generally would not fully offset any change in operating results as a consequence of fluctuations in foreign currencies. Any significant foreign exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We may experience an adverse market reaction if we are unable to meet our financial reporting obligations.
As we continue to expand at a rapid pace, the development of new and/or improved automated systems will remain an ongoing priority. During this expansion period, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements in our financial reporting. Such misstatements may result in litigation and/or negative publicity and possibly cause an adverse market reaction that may negatively impact our growth plans and the value of our common stock.
Impairment charges or write downs in our books and changes in accounting standards could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
New or revised accounting standards, rules and interpretations could result in changes to the recognition of income and expense that may materially and adversely affect our financial results. In addition, the value allocated to certain of our assets could be substantially impaired due to a number of factors beyond our control. Also, if any of our strategic equity investments decline in value, we may be required to write down such investment.
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The market for our shares of common stock may fluctuate significantly. The following key factors may have an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock:
| • | results of our clinical trials or adverse events associated with our marketed products; |
25
| • | fluctuations in our commercial and operating results; |
| • | announcements of technical or product developments by us or our competitors; |
| • | market conditions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks in particular; |
| • | changes in laws and governmental regulations, including changes in tax, healthcare, environmental, competition and patent laws; |
| • | new accounting pronouncements or regulatory rulings; |
| • | public announcements regarding medical advances in the treatment of the disease states that we are targeting; |
| • | patent or proprietary rights developments; |
| • | changes in pricing and third-party reimbursement policies for our products; |
| • | the outcome of litigation involving our products, processes or intellectual property; |
| • | the existence and outcome of governmental investigations and proceedings; |
| • | regulatory actions that may impact our products or potential products; |
| • | disruptions in our manufacturing processes or supply chain; |
| • | failure of our collaboration partners to successfully develop potential drug candidates; |
| • | competition; and |
| • | investor reaction to announcements regarding business or product acquisitions. |
In addition, a market downturn in general and/or in the biopharmaceutical sector in particular, may adversely affect the market price of our securities, which may not necessarily reflect the actual or perceived value of our Company.
Our business would be adversely affected if we are unable to service our debt obligations.
We have incurred various forms of indebtedness, including senior notes, commercial paper and a senior unsecured credit facility. Our ability to pay interest and principal amounts when due, comply with debt covenants or repurchase the senior notes if a change of control occurs, will depend upon, among other things, continued commercial success of our products and other factors that affect our future financial and operating performance, including prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and regulatory factors, many of which are beyond our control.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service the debt service requirements under our debt instruments, we may be forced to take remedial actions such as:
| • | restructuring or refinancing our debt; |
| • | seeking additional debt or equity capital; |
| • | reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, including research and development expenditures; or |
| • | selling assets, businesses, products or other potential revenue streams. |
Such measures might not be successful and might not enable us to service our debt obligations. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms, if at all.
A breakdown or breach of our information technology systems could subject us to liability or interrupt the operation of our business.
We rely upon our information technology systems and infrastructure for our business. The size and complexity of our computer systems make them potentially vulnerable to breakdown and unauthorized intrusion. We could also experience a business
26
interruption, theft of confidential information, or reputational damage from industrial espionage attacks, malware or other cyber attacks, which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to data leakage, either internally or at our third-party providers.
Similarly, data privacy breaches by those who access our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data, including intellectual property, trade secrets or personal information belonging to us, our patients, employees, customers or other business partners, may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. There can be no assurance that our efforts to protect our data and information technology systems will prevent breakdowns or breaches in our systems that could adversely affect our business and result in financial and reputational harm to us.
The illegal distribution and sale by third parties of counterfeit versions of our products or stolen products could have a negative impact on our reputation and business.
Third parties might illegally distribute and sell counterfeit or unfit versions of our products, which do not meet our rigorous manufacturing and testing standards. A patient who receives a counterfeit or unfit drug may be at risk for a number of dangerous health consequences. Our reputation and business could suffer harm as a result of counterfeit or unfit drugs sold under our brand name. In addition, thefts of inventory at warehouses, plants or while in-transit, which are not properly stored and which are sold through unauthorized channels, could adversely impact patient safety, our reputation and our business.
We have certain charter and by-law provisions that may deter a third-party from acquiring us and may impede the stockholders’ ability to remove and replace our management or board of directors.
Our board of directors has the authority to issue, at any time, without further stockholder approval, up to 5.0 million shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, privileges and preferences of those shares. An issuance of preferred stock could discourage a third-party from acquiring a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Additionally, our by-laws contain provisions intended to strengthen the board’s position in the event of a hostile takeover attempt. These provisions could impede the stockholders’ ability to remove and replace our management and/or board of directors. Furthermore, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an anti-takeover law, which may also dissuade a potential acquirer of our common stock.
In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, holders of our CVRs are subject to additional risks.
On October 15, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (Abraxis) and in connection with our acquisition, contingent value rights (CVRs) were issued entitling each holder of a CVR to a pro rata portion of certain milestone and net sales payments if certain specified conditions are satisfied. In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, CVR holders are subject to additional risks, including:
| • | an active public market for the CVRs may not continue to exist or the CVRs may trade at low volumes, both of which could have an adverse effect on the market price of the CVRs; |
| • | if the clinical approval milestones or net sales targets specified in the CVR Agreement are not achieved within the time periods specified, no payment will be made and the CVRs will expire valueless; |
| • | since the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the CVRs is unclear, any part of a CVR payment could be treated as ordinary income and the tax thereon may be required to be paid prior to the receipt of the CVR payment; |
| • | any payments in respect of the CVRs are subordinated to the right of payment of certain of our other indebtedness; |
| • | we may under certain circumstances redeem the CVRs; and |
| • | upon expiration of our obligations under the CVR Agreement to continue to commercialize ABRAXANE® or any of the other Abraxis pipeline products, we may discontinue such efforts, which would have an adverse effect on the value of the CVRs. |
27
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters are located in Summit, New Jersey and our international headquarters are located in Boudry, Switzerland. Summarized below are the locations, primary usage and approximate square footage of the facilities we own worldwide:
| Location | Primary Usage | Approximate Square Feet | |||
| Summit, New Jersey | Administration, marketing, research | 400,000 | |||
| Boudry, Switzerland | Manufacturing, administration and warehousing | 269,000 | |||
| Phoenix, Arizona | Manufacturing and warehousing | 254,000 | |||
| Zofingen, Switzerland | Manufacturing | 8,100 | |||
We occupy the following facilities, located in the United States, under operating lease arrangements, none of which are individually material to us. Under these lease arrangements, we may be required to reimburse the lessors for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs. All leases are with unaffiliated parties.
| Location | Primary Usage | Approximate Square Feet | |||
| Berkeley Heights, New Jersey | Office space | 347,000 | |||
| Warren, New Jersey | Office space and research | 177,600 | |||
| San Diego, California | Research | 190,100 | |||
| Basking Ridge, New Jersey | Office space | 95,900 | |||
| San Francisco, California | Office space and research | 55,800 | |||
| Durham, North Carolina | Clinical trial management | 36,000 | |||
| Overland Park, Kansas | Office space | 29,600 | |||
| Seattle, Washington | Office space | 27,400 | |||
| Cedar Knolls, New Jersey | Office space and stem cell recovery | 25,300 | |||
| Bedford, Massachusetts | Office space | 23,000 | |||
| Los Angeles, California | Office space | 9,800 | |||
| Washington, D.C. | Office space | 3,500 | |||
| Dallas, Texas | Office space | 3,000 | |||
| Destin, Florida | Office space | 1,600 | |||
We also lease a number of offices under various lease agreements outside of the United States for which the minimum annual rents may be subject to specified annual rent increases. At December 31, 2014, the non-cancelable lease terms for our operating leases expire at various dates between 2015 and 2023 and in some cases include renewal options. The total amount of rent expense recorded for all leased facilities in 2014 was $49.6 million. Our Summit, New Jersey facility is currently in the midst of an expansion project which will include a four-story parking structure below a two-story office facility. The approximate size of the office facility is 200,000 square feet and the project is anticipated to be completed at the end of 2015.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
28
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a) MARKET INFORMATION
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "CELG." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the intra-day high and low prices per share of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market:
| High* | Low* | |||||||
| 2014: | ||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 119.84 | $ | 83.16 | ||||
| Third Quarter | 96.50 | 82.90 | ||||||
| Second Quarter | 87.37 | 66.85 | ||||||
| First Quarter | 87.33 | 69.51 | ||||||
| 2013: | ||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 86.90 | $ | 71.05 | ||||
| Third Quarter | 78.02 | 59.08 | ||||||
| Second Quarter | 65.91 | 55.27 | ||||||
| First Quarter | 58.48 | 39.88 | ||||||
*adjusted to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effected in June 2014.
| Cumulative Total Return | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/09 | 12/10 | 12/11 | 12/12 | 12/13 | 12/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Celgene Corporation | $ | 100.00 | $ | 106.21 | $ | 121.41 | $ | 140.93 | $ | 303.46 | $ | 401.80 | ||||||||||||
| S&P 500 | 100.00 | 114.82 | 117.22 | 135.83 | 179.36 | 203.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NASDAQ Composite | 100.00 | 117.99 | 117.08 | 137.81 | 192.78 | 221.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NASDAQ Biotechnology | 100.00 | 115.95 | 129.93 | 172.44 | 286.14 | 384.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
* $100 Invested on 12/31/09 in Stock or Index – Including Reinvestment of Dividends, Fiscal Year Ended December 31.
29
(b) HOLDERS
The closing sales price per share of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on February 12, 2015 was $115.72. As of February 12, 2015, there were approximately 438 holders of record of our common stock.
(c) DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention to pay a cash dividend on our common stock.
(d) EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
We incorporate information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plan into this section by reference from the section entitled "Equity Compensation Plan Information" to be included in the proxy statement for our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
(e) REPURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
In June 2014, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation that increased the number of shares of common stock that we are authorized to issue and effected a two-for-one stock split. As a result, our total number of authorized shares of common stock increased from 575.0 million to 1.150 billion on June 18, 2014. Stockholders of record received one additional share of common stock for each share of common stock owned. All impacted share numbers and per share amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been restated to reflect the impact of the stock split. Common stock held in treasury was not adjusted for the stock split.
From April 2009 through December 2014, our Board of Directors approved purchases of up to $13.500 billion of our common stock, including $4.000 billion approved by our Board of Directors in April 2014. Approved amounts exclude share purchase transaction fees.
The following table presents the number of shares purchased during the three-month period ended December 31, 2014, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could have been purchased, pursuant to our repurchase authorization:
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That Still Could Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||
| October 1 - October 31 | 2,194,300 | $ | 93.13 | 2,194,300 | $ | 3,475,762,655 | ||||||||
| November 1 - November 30 | 1,242,144 | $ | 106.46 | 1,242,144 | $ | 3,343,524,386 | ||||||||
| December 1 - December 31 | 1,837,712 | $ | 110.51 | 1,837,712 | $ | 3,140,441,345 | ||||||||
During the period covered by this report, we did not sell any of our equity shares that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
30
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following Selected Consolidated Financial Data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The data set forth below with respect to our Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are qualified by reference to such Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto. The data set forth below with respect to our Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements, which are not included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (amounts in millions, except per share data).
| Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Income: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 7,670.4 | $ | 6,493.9 | $ | 5,506.7 | $ | 4,842.1 | $ | 3,625.7 | ||||||||||
| Costs and operating expenses | 5,151.4 | 4,685.0 | 3,760.3 | 3,399.4 | 2,636.1 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating income | 2,519.0 | 1,808.9 | 1,746.4 | 1,442.7 | 989.6 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest and investment income, net | 28.2 | 22.0 | 15.3 | 25.9 | 44.7 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest (expense) | (176.1 | ) | (91.6 | ) | (63.2 | ) | (42.7 | ) | (12.6 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | (43.7 | ) | (73.9 | ) | (17.0 | ) | (6.4 | ) | (9.1 | ) | ||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 2,327.4 | 1,665.4 | 1,681.5 | 1,419.5 | 1,012.6 | |||||||||||||||
| Income tax provision | 327.5 | 215.5 | 225.3 | 102.1 | 132.4 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | $ | 1,317.4 | $ | 880.2 | ||||||||||
| Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests | — | — | — | 0.7 | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to Celgene | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | $ | 1,318.1 | $ | 880.5 | ||||||||||
| Net income per share attributable to Celgene:* | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 2.49 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.65 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 0.94 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average shares:* | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 802.7 | 827.7 | 861.9 | 910.7 | 924.6 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 836.0 | 860.6 | 881.6 | 925.5 | 939.0 | |||||||||||||||
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 7,546.7 | $ | 5,687.0 | $ | 3,900.3 | $ | 2,648.2 | $ | 2,601.3 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | 17,340.1 | 13,378.2 | 11,734.3 | 10,005.9 | 10,177.2 | |||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | 605.9 | 544.8 | 308.5 | 526.7 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of discount | 6,265.7 | 4,196.5 | 2,771.3 | 1,275.6 | 1,247.6 | |||||||||||||||
| Retained earnings | 6,472.4 | 4,472.5 | 3,022.6 | 1,566.4 | 248.3 | |||||||||||||||
| Total equity | 6,524.8 | 5,589.9 | 5,694.5 | 5,512.7 | 5,995.5 | |||||||||||||||
*adjusted to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effected in June 2014.
31
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Celgene Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively “we,” “our,” “us,” “Celgene” or the “Company”), is an integrated global biopharmaceutical company engaged primarily in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases through gene and protein regulation. We are dedicated to innovative research and development designed to bring new therapies to market and we are involved in research in several scientific areas designed to deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas including intracellular signaling pathways, protein homeostasis and epigenetics in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmune diseases and therapeutic application of cell therapies.
Our primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, ABRAXANE®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, VIDAZA® , azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®), THALOMID® (sold as THALOMID® or Thalidomide CelgeneTM outside of the U.S.), OTEZLA® and ISTODAX®. OTEZLA® was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2014 for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis and in September 2014 for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. In January 2015, OTEZLA® was approved by the European Commission (EC) for the treatment of both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in certain adult patients. We began recognizing revenue related to OTEZLA® during the second quarter of 2014. Additional sources of revenue include royalties from Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis) on their sales of FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of products and services through our Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (CCT) subsidiary and other licensing arrangements.
Our primary commercial stage products are approved to treat a number of diseases in the hematology, oncology, and inflammation and immunology therapeutic areas as described in Item 1. “Business.”
We continue to invest substantially in research and development in support of multiple ongoing proprietary clinical development programs which support our existing products and pipeline of new drug candidates. REVLIMID® is in several phase III trials across a range of hematological malignancies that include multiple myeloma, lymphomas, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). POMALYST®/IMNOVID® was approved in the United States and the European Union for indications in multiple myeloma based on phase II and phase III trial results, respectively, and an additional phase III trial is underway with POMALYST®/IMNOVID® in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Phase III trials are also underway for CC-486 in MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and ISTODAX® in first-line peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). In solid tumors, ABRAXANE® is currently in various stages of investigation for breast, pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancers. In inflammation and immunology, OTEZLA® is being evaluated in phase III trials for Behçet's disease and expanded indications in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. Also in the inflammation and immunology therapeutic area, we have acquired a global development and commercialization license to GED-0301 from Nogra Pharma Limited and have initiated a multi-trial clinical program that is designed to support global registrations of GED-0301 in Crohn's disease. For more information see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Beyond our phase III programs, we have access to a growing early-to-mid-stage pipeline of novel potential therapies to address significant unmet medical needs that consists of new drug candidates and cell therapies developed in-house, licensed from other companies or able to be optioned from collaboration partners.
We believe that continued use of our primary commercial stage products, participation in research and development collaboration arrangements, depth of our product pipeline, regulatory approvals of new products and expanded use of existing products will provide the catalysts for future growth.
32
The following table summarizes total revenue and earnings for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (dollar amounts in millions, except per share data):
| % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| Years Ended December 31, | 2014 versus 2013 | 2013 versus 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 7,670.4 | $ | 6,493.9 | $ | 5,506.7 | 18.1 | % | 17.9 | % | ||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | 37.9 | % | (0.4 | )% | ||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share* | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.65 | 42.3 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
*adjusted to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effected in June 2014.
Revenue increased by $1.177 billion in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to the continued growth in sales of REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, ABRAXANE® and the U.S. launch of OTEZLA® in the second quarter of 2014, partially offset by a reduction in sales of VIDAZA® in the U.S. following the September 2013 launch in the U.S. of a generic version of VIDAZA®. The $550.0 million increase in net income and $0.71 increase in diluted earnings per share in 2014 were primarily due to a higher level of net product sales partly offset by an increase in expenses, including a $129.2 million impairment charge for in-process research and development (IPR&D), increase in share-based compensation expense, increase in drug discovery and development activities, expenses associated with our growing organization to support inflammation and immunology products and product candidates and an increase in selling and marketing activities primarily related to launch activities in recently approved indications for OTEZLA®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and ABRAXANE®.
Results of Operations:
Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Total Revenue: Total revenue and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions, except per share data):
| % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2014 versus 2013 | 2013 versus 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| Net product sales: | ||||||||||||||||||
REVLIMID® | $ | 4,980.0 | $ | 4,280.3 | $ | 3,766.6 | 16.3 | % | 13.6 | % | ||||||||
ABRAXANE® | 848.2 | 648.9 | 426.7 | 30.7 | % | 52.1 | % | |||||||||||
POMALYST®/IMNOVID® | 679.7 | 305.4 | 12.0 | 122.6 | % | N/M | ||||||||||||
VIDAZA® | 611.9 | 803.3 | 823.2 | (23.8 | )% | (2.4 | )% | |||||||||||
| azacitidine for injection | 78.2 | 23.3 | — | 235.6 | % | N/M | ||||||||||||
THALOMID® | 221.2 | 244.5 | 302.1 | (9.5 | )% | (19.1 | )% | |||||||||||
OTEZLA® | 69.8 | — | — | N/M | N/M | |||||||||||||
ISTODAX® | 65.6 | 54.0 | 50.0 | 21.5 | % | 8.0 | % | |||||||||||
| Other | 9.2 | 2.6 | 5.0 | 253.8 | % | (48.0 | )% | |||||||||||
| Total net product sales | $ | 7,563.8 | $ | 6,362.3 | $ | 5,385.6 | 18.9 | % | 18.1 | % | ||||||||
| Other revenue | 106.6 | 131.6 | 121.1 | (19.0 | )% | 8.7 | % | |||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 7,670.4 | $ | 6,493.9 | $ | 5,506.7 | 18.1 | % | 17.9 | % | ||||||||
N/M - Not meaningful
The increase in total revenue of $1.177 billion in 2014 compared to 2013 reflected increases of $620.7 million, or 16.1%, in the United States, and $555.8 million, or 21.1%, in international markets. The increase in total revenue of $987.2 million in 2013 compared to 2012 reflected increases of $693.0 million, or 21.9%, in the United States, and $294.2 million, or 12.6%, in international markets.
Net Product Sales: Total net product sales for 2014 increased by $1.202 billion, or 18.9%, to $7.564 billion compared to 2013. The increase was comprised of net volume increases of $999.9 million and net price increases of $213.9 million, offset slightly
33
by a $12.3 million unfavorable foreign exchange impact, including the impact of foreign exchange hedging activity. The increase in volume was driven by increased unit sales of REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, ABRAXANE® and OTEZLA®, partly offset by a decrease in unit sales of VIDAZA® resulting from the September 2013 introduction of a generic version of VIDAZA® in the U.S. by a third party. The increase in price was primarily due to price increases in the U.S. market.
Total net product sales for 2013 increased by $976.7 million, or 18.1%, to $6.362 billion compared to 2012. The increase was comprised of net volume increases of $950.3 million and price increases of $117.0 million, partly offset by an unfavorable impact from foreign exchange of $90.6 million. The increase in volume was driven by increased unit sales of REVLIMID®, the favorable impact from increased U.S. sales of ABRAXANE® resulting from the October 2012 and September 2013 FDA approvals for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic cancer, respectively, as well as the February 2013 FDA and August 2013 EC approvals of POMALYST®/IMNOVID® for treatment of multiple myeloma. The increase in price was primarily due to price increases on REVLIMID®, VIDAZA® and THALOMID® in the U.S. market.
REVLIMID® net sales increased by $699.7 million, or 16.3%, to $4.980 billion in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to increased unit sales in both U.S. and international markets in addition to price increases in the U.S. market. Increases in market penetration and treatment duration of patients using REVLIMID® in multiple myeloma contributed to the increase in U.S. unit sales. The growth in international markets resulted from volume increases, primarily driven by increased duration of use and market share gains.
Net sales of REVLIMID® increased by $513.7 million, or 13.6%, to $4.280 billion in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to increased unit sales in both international and U.S. markets in addition to price increases in the U.S. market. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable changes in price in international markets and unfavorable foreign exchange impacts, including the impact of foreign exchange hedging activity. Increases in market penetration and treatment duration of patients using REVLIMID® in multiple myeloma contributed to the increase in United States unit sales. The growth in international markets resulted from volume increases, primarily driven by increased duration of use and market share gains.
ABRAXANE® net sales increased by $199.3 million, or 30.7%, to $848.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to increased unit volumes in both the U.S. and international markets reflecting increased acceptance of the product for the treatments of both metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and NSCLC. ABRAXANE® was approved for the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the United States in September 2013 and the European Union in December 2013.
Net sales of ABRAXANE® increased by $222.2 million, or 52.1%, to $648.9 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to increased unit volumes in both U.S. and international markets, reflecting increased acceptance of the product in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, the October 2012 FDA approval for treatment of NSCLC and the September 2013 FDA approval for treatment of pancreatic cancer.
POMALYST®/IMNOVID® net sales increased by $374.3 million, or 122.6%, to $679.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to increased unit sales in both U.S. and international markets, reflecting increases in market penetration. POMALYST® was approved by the FDA in February 2013 for patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy. IMNOVID® (the non-U.S. trade name) in combination with dexamethasone was approved by the EC in August 2013 for adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including both lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.
Net sales of POMALYST®/IMNOVID® totaled $305.4 million in 2013, reflecting the approval of POMALYST® by the FDA in February 2013 and IMNOVID® by the EC in August 2013. Net sales of POMALYST® totaled $246.0 million in the United States and IMNOVID® net sales totaled $59.4 million in international markets. The 2013 period included a partial period of sales in the U.S. and sales in Europe were derived primarily from approved early access programs.
VIDAZA® net sales decreased by $191.4 million, or 23.8%, to $611.9 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to a $232.7 million decrease in the U.S. market resulting from the September 2013 introduction of a generic version of VIDAZA® by a competitor. The decrease in U.S. sales was partly offset by volume increases in international markets. VIDAZA® retains orphan drug exclusivity in Europe through the end of 2018.
Net sales of VIDAZA® decreased by $19.9 million, or 2.4%, to $803.3 million in 2013 compared to 2012, reflecting volume decreases in the U.S. market due to the launch of a generic version of VIDAZA® by a competitor in September 2013 and the launch of a generic version of VIDAZA® (azacitidine for injection) by Sandoz AG in the fourth quarter of 2013, which we supply. Foreign exchange also unfavorably impacted sales. These decreases were partly offset by price increases in the U.S. market and volume increases in international markets.
34
Azacitidine for injection net sales were $78.2 million for 2014. Azacitidine for injection is a generic version of VIDAZA® supplied by Celgene to Sandoz AG beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013. Net sales of azacitidine for injection were $23.3 million in 2013.
THALOMID® net sales decreased by $23.3 million, or 9.5%, to $221.2 million for 2014 compared to 2013, primarily resulting from lower unit volumes in the U.S. and international markets, partly offset by U.S. price increases.
Net sales of THALOMID® decreased by $57.6 million, or 19.1%, to $244.5 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to lower unit volumes in the U.S. and international markets and an increase in estimated returns related to the transition of THALOMID® distribution from retail to specialty pharmacies. The reductions in volume were partially offset by price increases in the United States.
OTEZLA® net sales were $69.8 million for 2014. OTEZLA® was approved by the FDA in March 2014 for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis and in September 2014 for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. OTEZLA® received approvals for psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis in the EU in January 2015. Launch activities for OTEZLA® commenced in March 2014 and we began recognizing revenue related to OTEZLA® during the second quarter of 2014.
ISTODAX® net sales increased by $11.6 million, or 21.5%, to $65.6 million for 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to an increase in unit volume.
Net sales of ISTODAX® increased by $4.0 million, or 8.0%, to $54.0 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to increases in price in the United States.
The "other" net product sales category, which includes sales of FOCALIN®, increased by $6.6 million, to $9.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The "other" net product sales category decreased by $2.4 million to $2.6 million in 2013 compared to 2012.
Other Revenue: Other revenue decreased by $25.0 million to $106.6 million for 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to a $24.1 million decrease in royalty revenue. The decrease in royalty revenue was driven by lower royalties earned from Novartis based on its sales of FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN®, which have both been negatively impacted by generic competition in certain markets. Generic competition entered the market in the United States for certain strengths of FOCALIN XR® in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Other revenue increased by $10.5 million to $131.6 million in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due to increased royalty revenue related to higher royalties earned from Novartis based upon its sales of both RITALIN® and FOCALIN XR®. The increase also included a $5.0 million milestone payment received in 2013 related to the approval of additional indications for ABRAXANE® in Japan.
Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We record gross to net sales accruals for sales returns and allowances, sales discounts, government rebates, chargebacks and distributor service fees.
REVLIMID®, POMALYST® and THALOMID® are distributed in the United States primarily through contracted pharmacies under the REVLIMID® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), POMALYST REMSTM and THALOMID REMSTM programs, respectively. These are proprietary risk-management distribution programs tailored specifically to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of REVLIMID®, POMALYST® and THALOMID®. Internationally, REVLIMID®, THALOMID®/Thalidomide CelgeneTM and IMNOVID® are distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local authorities’ specifications to provide for the product’s safe and appropriate distribution and use. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. VIDAZA®, ABRAXANE®, ISTODAX® and OTEZLA® are distributed through the more traditional pharmaceutical industry supply chain and are not subject to the same risk-management distribution programs as REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and THALOMID®/Thalidomide CelgeneTM.
We base our sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains, as applicable. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates do not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, we track actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in
35
determining the current sales return allowance. As noted above, REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and THALOMID®/Thalidomide CelgeneTM are distributed primarily through hospitals and contracted pharmacies, which are typically subject to tighter controls of inventory quantities within the supply channel and, thus, resulting in lower returns activity.
Sales discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers.
Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Medicaid rebate percentage was increased and extended to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations in March 2010. The accrual of the rebates associated with Medicaid Managed Care Organizations is calculated based on estimated historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. We also analyze actual billings received from the states to further support the accrual rates. Subsequent to implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the 2010 U.S. Health Care Reform Law), certain states have not completed their Medicaid Managed Care Organization billing for the years of 2010 through 2014. Our accruals for these Medicaid Managed Care Organization rebates had been at elevated levels given the delays in the receipt of complete invoices from certain states. Due to the receipt of more complete claims data during 2013 and 2014, the accruals for certain states were reduced from these elevated levels as a result of both payments being applied to the accrual during 2013 and 2014 and changes in estimate of the ultimate obligation during the fourth quarters of both 2013 and 2014. We will continue to adjust the rebate accruals as more information becomes available and to reflect actual claims experience. Effective January 1, 2011, manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are responsible for 50% of the patient’s cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate the cost to us of this coverage gap responsibility, we analyze data for eligible Medicare Part D patients against data for eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with our products as well as the historical invoices. This expense is recognized throughout the year as costs are incurred. In certain international markets government-sponsored programs require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales.
Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. We record a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. We regularly review the information related to these estimates and adjust the provision accordingly.
Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are included in chargeback accruals and are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.
See Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies below for further discussion of gross to net sales accruals.
36
Gross to net sales accruals and the balance in the related allowance accounts for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (in millions):
Returns and Allowances | Discounts | Government Rebates | Chargebacks and Distributor Service Fees | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 8.7 | $ | 137.0 | $ | 64.3 | $ | 219.0 | ||||||||||
| Allowances for sales during prior periods | (7.5 | ) | — | (13.3 | ) | (2.4 | ) | (23.2 | ) | |||||||||||
| Allowances for sales during 2012 | 15.0 | 64.9 | 208.7 | 212.6 | 501.2 | |||||||||||||||
| Credits/deductions issued for prior year sales | 1.7 | (4.3 | ) | (60.2 | ) | (54.8 | ) | (117.6 | ) | |||||||||||
| Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2012 | (4.9 | ) | (58.1 | ) | (146.4 | ) | (158.5 | ) | (367.9 | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 13.3 | $ | 11.2 | $ | 125.8 | $ | 61.2 | $ | 211.5 | ||||||||||
| Allowances for sales during prior periods | (1.1 | ) | — | (27.8 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (30.8 | ) | |||||||||||
| Allowances for sales during 2013 | 10.7 | 74.3 | 262.1 | 290.8 | 637.9 | |||||||||||||||
| Credits/deductions issued for prior year sales | (3.1 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (53.4 | ) | (42.0 | ) | (103.7 | ) | ||||||||||
| Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2013 | (4.3 | ) | (68.2 | ) | (172.6 | ) | (224.9 | ) | (470.0 | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 15.5 | $ | 12.1 | $ | 134.1 | $ | 83.2 | $ | 244.9 | ||||||||||
| Allowances for sales during prior periods | (5.4 | ) | — | (7.1 | ) | (8.4 | ) | (20.9 | ) | |||||||||||
| Allowances for sales during 2014 | 7.9 | 87.9 | 293.1 | 382.9 | 771.8 | |||||||||||||||
| Credits/deductions issued for prior year sales | (4.1 | ) | (8.8 | ) | (78.8 | ) | (43.3 | ) | (135.0 | ) | ||||||||||
| Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2014 | (3.7 | ) | (79.7 | ) | (202.8 | ) | (320.0 | ) | (606.2 | ) | ||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 10.2 | $ | 11.5 | $ | 138.5 | $ | 94.4 | $ | 254.6 | ||||||||||
A comparison of provisions for allowances for sales within each of the four categories noted above for 2014 and 2013 follows:
2014 compared to 2013: Returns and allowances decreased by $7.1 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to a $7.9 million sales returns reserve recorded in 2013 for estimated returns related to the transition of THALOMID® distribution from retail to specialty pharmacies. Subsequently, during 2014 a $3.5 million reduction in this reserve was recorded due to lower returns experience. This decrease was partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in the returns provision for international markets, a $1.0 million increase in the returns allowance associated with REVLIMID® due to a higher returns experience in the United States driven by sales volume growth and a net increase of $0.9 million in the VIDAZA® returns allowance related to inventory levels held by distributors at the end of 2014.
Discounts increased by $13.6 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to sales increases in the United States.
Government rebates increased by $51.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to a $44.7 million increase in Medicaid rebates and a $17.6 million increase in rebates in certain international markets, both due to increased sales volumes. These increases were partially offset by a $10.6 million decrease in expense related to Medicare Part D Coverage Gap as a result of the refinement of the accrual rates.
Chargebacks and distributor service fees increased by $85.6 million in 2014 compared to 2013. Chargebacks increased by approximately $73.1 million, including a $7.5 million increase related to the TRICARE program driven by higher volume and increased rebate rates. Chargeback increases were primarily due to higher sales volumes and a greater portion of sales qualifying for chargeback rebates. Distributor service fees increased by approximately $12.5 million driven by higher sales volume.
2013 compared to 2012: Returns and allowances increased by $2.1 million in 2013 compared to 2012, partly due to a first quarter 2012 reversal of approximately $7.5 million in reserves established for certain products with quality issues which were resolved in 2012. In addition, during 2013 we recorded a sales returns reserve of $7.9 million for estimated returns related to the transition of THALOMID® distribution from retail to specialty pharmacies. The increases were partly offset by a $12.5 million net reduction in the VIDAZA® returns provision, which included a $7.5 million reduction in the returns allowance related to inventory levels held by distributors in early 2013 and a $2.8 million increase in the returns allowance related to inventory held by distributors at the end of 2013 given the launch of a generic version of VIDAZA® in September 2013.
Discounts increased by $9.4 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to sales increases in the United States.
37
Government rebates increased by $38.9 million in 2013 compared to 2012, partly due to an increase of approximately $21.1 million in government rebates related to U.S. governmental agencies, primarily attributable to volume increases and higher expense rates for the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap, partially offset by the refinement of the accrual for rebates to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations completed in the latter part of 2013. Rebates related to international markets increased by approximately $17.8 million, primarily due to a reduction in rebates recorded during 2012 for an amendment to a price/volume agreement for VIDAZA® in a specific European country that resulted in a reduction in government rebates of approximately $10.9 million in 2012. Sales growth in multiple countries worldwide also contributed to higher rebates.
Chargebacks and distributor service fees increased by $78.7 million in 2013 compared to 2012. Chargebacks and distributor service fees increased by approximately $46.2 million and $32.5 million, respectively, primarily due to higher sales volumes and contract eligible sales. Rebates specifically related to the TRICARE program increased by $6.8 million also due to higher sales volume.
Cost of Goods Sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets): Cost of goods sold and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) | $ | 385.9 | $ | 340.4 | $ | 299.1 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) from prior year | $ | 45.5 | $ | 41.3 | $ | (126.8 | ) | |||||
| Percent increase (decrease) from prior year | 13.4 | % | 13.8 | % | (29.8 | )% | ||||||
| Percent of net product sales | 5.1 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||||
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased by $45.5 million to $385.9 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase was primarily due to the higher level of net product sales, partly offset by a $7.8 million reduction in royalty payments, primarily related to sales of REVLIMID® which resulted from the expiration of our royalty obligations to Children's Medical Center Corporation (CMCC) at the end of February 2013. See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details of our royalty agreement and related litigation with CMCC. As a percent of net product sales, cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) decreased to 5.1% in 2014 compared to 5.4% in 2013, partly due to the elimination of royalty payments to CMCC on our sales of REVLIMID® as noted above, and the continued growth in net sales of lower cost REVLIMID®.
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased by $41.3 million to $340.4 million in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due to the higher level of REVLIMID® and ABRAXANE® sales, partly offset by the elimination of royalty payments on sales of REVLIMID® resulting from the expiration of our royalty obligations to CMCC at the end of February 2013. As a percent of net product sales, cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) decreased to 5.4% in 2013 compared to 5.6% in 2012 primarily due to the increase in lower cost REVLIMID® sales and the elimination of royalty payments on our sales of REVLIMID® as noted above.
Research and Development: Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and primarily include salary and benefit costs, third-party grants and fees paid to clinical research organizations, supplies and upfront and milestone payments resulting from collaboration arrangements.
Research and development expenses and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | 2,430.6 | $ | 2,226.2 | $ | 1,724.2 | ||||||
| Increase from prior year | $ | 204.4 | $ | 502.0 | $ | 123.9 | ||||||
| Percent increase from prior year | 9.2 | % | 29.1 | % | 7.7 | % | ||||||
| Percent of total revenue | 31.7 | % | 34.3 | % | 31.3 | % | ||||||
Research and development expenses increased by $204.4 million to $2.431 billion in 2014, compared to 2013. The increase was primarily due to a $129.2 million impairment charge resulting from an adjustment in the probability-weighted forecasted cash flows related to the CC-292 IPR&D intangible asset obtained in the acquisition of Avila and an increase in activity in support of our early- to mid-stage product pipeline as well as an increase in general research activity. These increases were partly offset by a $141.0 million decrease in expenses related to collaboration arrangements.
38
Research and development expenses increased by $502.0 million to $2.226 billion in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due to a $462.0 million increase in payments made related to research and development collaboration arrangements as well as an increase in general research activity. The increases were partly offset by 2012 IPR&D asset impairment charges of $122.5 million, of which $53.4 million related to ISTODAX® for PTCL in Europe and $69.2 million related to an adjustment to the probability-weighted forecasted cash flows of CC-292 compared to prior estimates. No IPR&D asset impairment charges were recorded in 2013.
The following table provides a breakdown of research and development expenses (in millions):
| Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2014 versus 2013 | 2013 versus 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Human pharmaceutical clinical programs | $ | 837.0 | $ | 825.3 | $ | 781.0 | $ | 11.7 | $ | 44.3 | ||||||||||
| Other pharmaceutical programs | 640.9 | 526.0 | 439.1 | 114.9 | 86.9 | |||||||||||||||
| Drug discovery and development | 291.4 | 202.9 | 166.6 | 88.5 | 36.3 | |||||||||||||||
| Cellular therapy | 27.0 | 25.9 | 30.9 | 1.1 | (5.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Collaboration arrangements | 505.1 | 646.1 | 184.1 | (141.0 | ) | 462.0 | ||||||||||||||
| IPR&D impairments | 129.2 | — | 122.5 | 129.2 | (122.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,430.6 | $ | 2,226.2 | $ | 1,724.2 | $ | 204.4 | $ | 502.0 | ||||||||||
We make significant investments in research and development in support of multiple ongoing proprietary clinical development programs which support both our existing products and pipeline of new drug candidates. See Item 1. "Business" for a table summarizing the current stage of development of both our commercial stage products and new drug candidates. See Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details related to our collaboration arrangements.
We do not collect costs on a project basis or for any category of projects for the majority of costs involved in carrying out research projects. While we do perform cost calculations to facilitate our internal evaluation of individual projects, these calculations include significant estimations and allocations that are not relevant to, or included in, our external financial reporting mechanisms. As a consequence, we do not report research and development costs at the project level.
39
The following table presents significant developments in our phase III clinical trials and regulatory approval requests that occurred during the three-month period ended December 31, 2014, as well as developments that are expected to occur if the future occurrence is material and reasonably certain:
New phase III trials:
| Product | Disease Indication | |||||||
OTEZLA® | Behçet's disease | |||||||
REVLIMID® | Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Opened for enrollment) | |||||||
Regulatory approval requests in major markets:
| Product | Disease Indication | Major Market | Regulatory Agency | Date of Submission or Filing | ||||
REVLIMID® | Mantle cell lymphoma | EU | EC | Q4 2014 (Filed) | ||||
REVLIMID® | Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma | Japan | PMDA | Q4 2014 (Filed) | ||||
VIDAZA® | Acute myeloid leukemia | EU | EC | Q4 2014 (Filed) | ||||
ABRAXANE® | Metastatic pancreatic cancer | Japan | PMDA | Q4 2014 (Filed) | ||||
Regulatory agency actions:
| Product | Disease Indication | Major Market | Regulatory Agency | Action | ||||
OTEZLA® | Psoriatic arthritis | EU | EC | Approval | ||||
OTEZLA® | Plaque psoriasis | EU | EC | Approval | ||||
REVLIMID® | Expanded indication for multiple myeloma | U.S. | FDA | Approval | ||||
REVLIMID® | Previously untreated multiple myeloma not eligible for transplant | EU | EC | Approval | ||||
ABRAXANE® | Non-small cell lung cancer | EU | CHMP | Positive opinion | ||||
ABRAXANE® | Unresectable pancreatic cancer | Japan | PMDA | Approval | ||||
Selling, General and Administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include salary and benefit costs for employees included in our sales, marketing, finance, legal and administrative organizations, costs related to the launch of new products or those approved for new indications, outside professional services, donations to independent non-profit patient assistance organizations in the United States and facilities costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses and related percentages for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 2,027.9 | $ | 1,684.5 | $ | 1,373.5 | ||||||
| Increase from prior year | $ | 343.4 | $ | 311.0 | $ | 147.2 | ||||||
| Percent increase from prior year | 20.4 | % | 22.6 | % | 12.0 | % | ||||||
| Percent of total revenue | 26.4 | % | 25.9 | % | 24.9 | % | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $343.4 million to $2.028 billion for 2014 compared to 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increase in expenses associated with our growing organization to support inflammation and immunology products and product candidates, such as OTEZLA® and GED-0301, as well as increases in selling and marketing activities related to recently approved indications for OTEZLA®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and ABRAXANE®. The increase also included $25.0
40
million of expense related to the settlement of a contingent obligation to make matching contributions to The Chan Soon-Shiong Institute for Advanced Health.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $311.0 million to $1.685 billion in 2013 compared to 2012, partly due to an increase in headcount related costs, including share based compensation expense, and marketing activities primarily related to the global launch of POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, expenses related to the launch of ABRAXANE® in pancreatic cancer, headcount increases and marketing expenses to prepare for the 2014 launch of OTEZLA®, a $27.7 million increase in service fees attributable to Latin American operations, an increase in incentive accruals and continued support of our currently marketed products, partially offset by a $23.6 million decrease in donations to independent non-profit patient assistance organizations in the United States.
Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets: Amortization of intangible assets acquired as a result of business combinations is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Avila | $ | 47.3 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 39.4 | ||||||
| Abraxis | 155.5 | 160.0 | 99.6 | |||||||||
| Gloucester | 51.5 | 51.5 | 51.5 | |||||||||
| Pharmion | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | |||||||||
| Total amortization | $ | 258.3 | $ | 262.8 | $ | 194.5 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) from prior year | $ | (4.5 | ) | $ | 68.3 | $ | (94.7 | ) | ||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets decreased by $4.5 million to $258.3 million in 2014 compared to 2013 due to a certain Abraxis related intangible asset becoming fully amortized during the first half of 2014.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased by $68.3 million to $262.8 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a $61.9 million increase attributable to the October 2012 approval of ABRAXANE® in the United States for the treatment of NSCLC, which resulted in the commencement of amortization of the related intangible asset, and a $7.9 million increase in amortization related to intangible assets obtained in the March 2012 acquisition of Avila, partly offset by certain Abraxis related intangibles becoming fully amortized early in 2012.
Acquisition Related Charges, net: Acquisition related charges, net is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (dollar amounts in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Acquisition related charges, net | $ | 48.7 | $ | 171.1 | $ | 169.0 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) from prior year | $ | (122.4 | ) | $ | 2.1 | $ | 311.3 | |||||
| Percentage increase (decrease) from prior year | (71.5 | )% | 1.2 | % | N/M | |||||||
Acquisition related charges, net decreased by $122.4 million to $48.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily due to a $122.5 million reduction in expense from the change in fair value of our contingent liabilities related to publicly traded contingent value rights (CVRs) that were issued as part of the acquisition of Abraxis and a $75.5 million reduction in expense related to the fair value of our contingent consideration payable to the former shareholders of Avila due to an adjustment to the probability-weighted forecasted cash flows related to CC-292, partly offset by a $75.6 million expense in the current year period for an increase in the fair value of our contingent consideration payable related to the Nogra Pharma Limited (Nogra) acquisition which reflects both the passage of time and an increase of $19.8 million related to an increase in the estimated probability of making one of the additional contingent developmental milestone payments.
Acquisition related charges, net increased by $2.1 million to $171.1 million in 2013 compared to $169.0 million in 2012. The net increase was primarily due to a combined $80.8 million unfavorable change in the income statement impact related to the fair values of our contingent consideration liabilities related to the Gloucester and Avila acquisitions, partly offset by a $76.1 million favorable change in the income statement impact related to the fair value of our publicly traded CVRs that were issued as part of the acquisition of Abraxis.
41
Interest and Investment Income, Net: Interest and investment income, net is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (dollar amounts in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Interest and investment income, net | $ | 28.2 | $ | 22.0 | $ | 15.3 | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) from prior year | $ | 6.2 | $ | 6.7 | $ | (10.6 | ) | |||||
| Percentage increase (decrease) from prior year | 28.2 | % | 43.8 | % | (41.0 | )% | ||||||
Interest and investment income, net increased by $6.2 million to $28.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher investment balances compared to the prior year, a decrease in losses on sales of marketable securities and a decrease in the net amortization expense of premiums and discounts related to marketable securities.
Interest and investment income, net increased by $6.7 million to $22.0 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to higher investment balances compared to the prior year, partly offset by a $6.1 million increase in losses on sales of marketable securities.
Interest Expense: Interest expense is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense | $ | 176.1 | $ | 91.6 | $ | 63.2 | ||||||
| Increase from prior year | $ | 84.5 | $ | 28.4 | $ | 20.5 | ||||||
Interest expense increased by $84.5 million to $176.1 million for 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to interest expense associated with the issuance of $1.500 billion of senior notes in August 2013 and an additional $2.500 billion of senior notes in May 2014.
Interest expense increased by $28.4 million to $91.6 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to interest and fees associated with the issuance of $1.500 billion in senior notes in both August 2013 and August 2012.
Other Income (Expense), Net: Other income (expense), net is summarized below for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Foreign exchange gains (losses), including foreign exchange derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments | $ | (9.5 | ) | $ | 22.2 | $ | (10.8 | ) | ||||
| Fair value adjustments of forward point amounts | (18.0 | ) | 6.3 | 2.5 | ||||||||
| Celgene puts sold | 11.6 | 1.2 | — | |||||||||
| Premium paid on equity investment | (9.7 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Impairment charges | (4.0 | ) | (99.2 | ) | (25.5 | ) | ||||||
| Other | (14.1 | ) | (4.4 | ) | 16.8 | |||||||
| Total other income (expense), net | $ | (43.7 | ) | $ | (73.9 | ) | $ | (17.0 | ) | |||
Other income (expense), net was a net expense of $43.7 million for 2014 and a net expense of $73.9 million for 2013. The $30.2 million decrease in net expense was primarily due to a decrease in impairment charges in 2014 related to certain investments and gains related to the sale of puts on our common stock in 2014. The decrease was partially offset by the impact of foreign exchange losses recorded in the 2014 period compared to gains recorded in the 2013 period. In addition, the 2014 period included an unfavorable change in spreads between forward and spot rates related to foreign exchange contracts compared to a favorable change in spreads between forward and spot rates in the 2013 period.
Other income (expense), net increased by $56.9 million to $73.9 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to a $73.7 million increase in investment related impairment charges, including an $80.0 million impairment charge related to a royalty receivable asset that was received in April 2011 as partial consideration for the sale of the Abraxis non-core assets. The increase was partly offset by increased gains related to foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments which were intended to mitigate the impact of exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings.
Income Tax Provision: The income tax provision increased by $112.0 million to $327.5 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily as a result of an increase in income before taxes combined with an increase in the effective tax rate. The full year 2014 underlying
42
effective tax rate of 14.3% reflects the impact of our global business footprint. The increase in the underlying effective tax rate from 2013 reflects a decrease in tax benefits from certain collaboration and acquisition-related items and an increase in tax expense associated with the launch of new products. The effective tax rate for 2014 was decreased by 0.2 percentage points as a result of discrete items, including a net decrease in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from ongoing examinations, settlements with taxing authorities, and expirations of statutes of limitations.
The income tax provision decreased by $9.8 million to $215.5 million in 2013 compared to 2012. The full year 2013 underlying effective tax rate of 12.2% reflected the impact of our global business footprint. The decrease in the underlying effective tax rate from 2012 reflected an increase in tax benefits from certain collaboration and acquisition-related items, including an impairment of a royalty receivable asset in the amount of $80.0 million and upfront payments to collaboration partners of $227.0 million that were incurred in the fourth quarter of 2013. The effective tax rate for 2013 was increased by 0.7 percentage points as a result of discrete items, including a net increase in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from ongoing examinations and settlements with taxing authorities, partially offset by tax benefits from the retroactive reinstatement of the 2012 U. S. research and development tax credit. The U.S. research and development tax credit expired on December 31, 2011 and was retroactively reinstated in the first quarter of 2013.
The income tax provision for 2012 included a full year underlying effective tax rate of 13.5%. The effective tax rate was reduced by 0.1 percentage points in 2012 as a result of discrete items, including tax benefits related to the settlement of tax examinations and expirations of statutes of limitations offset by an increase in deferred tax liabilities recorded on certain unremitted foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested in such foreign jurisdictions and tax expense related to the filing of our 2011 income tax returns with certain items being less favorable than originally estimated. The U.S. research and development tax credit expired on December 31, 2011 and was retroactively reinstated in the first quarter of 2013. The tax benefit of our 2012 research credit was recorded in the first quarter of 2013. This change in tax law did not have a significant impact on our income tax provisions.
Net Income: Net income and per common share amounts for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions, except per share data):
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | ||||||
| Per common share amounts:* | ||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 2.49 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.69 | ||||||
| Diluted | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.65 | ||||||
| Weighted average shares:* | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 802.7 | 827.7 | 861.9 | |||||||||
| Diluted | 836.0 | 860.6 | 881.6 | |||||||||
*adjusted to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effected in June 2014.
The $550.0 million increase in net income to $2.000 billion in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to a higher level of net product sales partly offset by an increase in expenses, including a $129.2 million impairment charge for IPR&D, increase in share-based compensation expense, increase in drug discovery and development activities, expenses associated with our growing organization to support inflammation and immunology products and product candidates and an increase in selling and marketing activities primarily related to launch activities in recently approved indications for OTEZLA®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and ABRAXANE®. The $0.71 increase in diluted earnings per share in 2014 compared to 2013 was favorably impacted by the repurchase of 22.0 million common shares under our common share repurchase program, reducing our outstanding share base.
The $6.3 million decrease in net income to $1.450 billion in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to a $462.0 million increase in payments made related to research and development collaboration arrangements, a $61.9 million increase in ABRAXANE® amortization expense due to the October 2012 FDA approval of ABRAXANE® for treatment of NSCLC, a $94.8 million increase in share-based compensation expense, and increased spending in support of our currently marketed products and those that we plan to launch. The increases in expense were nearly offset by the favorable impact from a higher level of net product sales. The $0.03 increase in diluted earnings per share in 2013 compared to 2012 was favorably impacted by the repurchase of 22.3 million common shares under our common share repurchase program, reducing our outstanding share base.
43
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes the components of our financial condition for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):
| Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2014 versus 2013 | 2013 versus 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,121.6 | $ | 3,234.4 | $ | 2,090.4 | $ | 887.2 | $ | 1,144.0 | ||||||||||
| Marketable securities available for sale | 3,425.1 | 2,452.6 | 1,809.9 | 972.5 | 642.7 | |||||||||||||||
| Total financial assets | $ | 7,546.7 | $ | 5,687.0 | $ | 3,900.3 | $ | 1,859.7 | $ | 1,786.7 | ||||||||||
| Debt: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | $ | 605.9 | $ | 544.8 | $ | 308.5 | $ | 61.1 | $ | 236.3 | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of discount | 6,265.7 | 4,196.5 | 2,771.3 | 2,069.2 | 1,425.2 | |||||||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | 6,871.6 | $ | 4,741.3 | $ | 3,079.8 | $ | 2,130.3 | $ | 1,661.5 | ||||||||||
Working capital1 | $ | 7,617.2 | $ | 5,607.4 | $ | 3,767.6 | $ | 2,009.8 | $ | 1,839.8 | ||||||||||
| 1 | Includes cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale, accounts receivable, net of allowances, inventory and other current assets, less short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt, accounts payable, accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other current liabilities. |
We rely primarily on positive cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from sales of available-for-sale marketable securities and borrowings in the form of long-term notes payable and short-term commercial paper to provide for our liquidity requirements. We expect continued growth in our expenditures, particularly those related to research and development, clinical trials, commercialization of new products, international expansion and capital investments. However, we anticipate that existing cash and cash equivalent balances, marketable securities available for sale, cash generated from operations and existing sources of and access to financing are adequate to fund our operating needs, capital expenditures, debt service requirements and our plans to purchase our stock or pursue other strategic business initiatives for the foreseeable future.
Many of our operations are conducted outside the United States and significant portions of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are held internationally. As of December 31, 2014, we held approximately $6.737 billion of these short-term funds in foreign tax jurisdictions. The amount of funds held in U.S. tax jurisdictions can fluctuate due to the timing of receipts and payments in the ordinary course of business and due to other reasons, such as repurchases of our common stock and business-development activities. As part of our ongoing liquidity assessments, we regularly monitor the mix of domestic and international cash flows (both inflows and outflows). Repatriation of overseas funds can result in additional U.S. federal, state and local income tax payments. We record U.S. deferred tax liabilities for certain unremitted earnings, but when amounts earned overseas are expected to be permanently reinvested outside of the United States, no accrual for U.S. taxes is provided. Approximately $900.0 million of our foreign earnings, included in the $6.737 billion of short-term funds in foreign tax jurisdictions, may not be required for use in offshore operations and may be available for use in the United States. These earnings are not treated as permanently reinvested and accordingly, our deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 included $316.5 million for the estimated U.S. federal and state income taxes that may be incurred should these earnings be repatriated. The remaining foreign earnings are unremitted and expected to be permanently reinvested outside the United States. We do not rely on these earnings as a source of funds for our domestic business as we expect to have sufficient current cash resources combined with future cash flows in the United States to fund our U.S. operational and strategic needs.
Share Repurchase Program: Our Board of Directors has approved an aggregate $13.500 billion common stock repurchase program of which we have approximately $3.140 billion remaining for future share repurchases. During 2014, we used $2.975 billion for repurchases of our common stock, measured on a settlement date basis.
Components of Working Capital
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available for Sale: We invest our excess cash primarily in money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government agency and supranational securities, global corporate debt securities and asset backed securities. All liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents
44
and all investments with maturities of greater than three months from the date of purchase are classified as marketable securities available for sale. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase. The $1.860 billion increase in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale at December 31, 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to the issuance of $2.500 billion in senior notes in May 2014 and by cash generated from operations, partly offset by $2.975 billion paid under our share repurchase program, $710.0 million paid to acquire the GED-0301 license from Nogra and a net decrease of $445.3 million in short-term borrowings.
Marketable securities available for sale are carried at fair value, held for an unspecified period of time and are intended for use in meeting our ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses and other than temporary impairment charges, is included in interest and investment income, net. For more information related to the fair value and valuation of our marketable securities, see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Accounts Receivable, Net: Accounts receivable, net increased by $105.3 million to $1.167 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to December 31, 2013 primarily due to increased sales of REVLIMID®, ABRAXANE® and POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, partially offset by foreign exchange impact. Sales made outside the United States typically have payment terms that are greater than 60 days, thereby extending collection periods beyond those in the United States. We expect our accounts receivable balance to continue to grow as our international sales continue to expand.
We continue to monitor economic conditions, including the volatility associated with international economies, the sovereign debt crisis in certain European countries and associated impacts on the financial markets and our business. Our current business model in these markets is typically to sell our products directly to principally government owned or controlled hospitals, which in turn directly deliver critical care to patients. Our products are used to treat life-threatening diseases and we believe this business model enables timely delivery and adequate supply of products. Many of the outstanding receivable balances are related to government-funded hospitals and we believe the receivable balances are ultimately collectible. Similarly, we believe that future sales to these customers will continue to be collectible.
The credit and economic conditions within Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece, as well as increasing sales levels in those countries have in the past resulted in, and may continue to result in, an increase in the average length of time it takes to collect accounts receivable. Our total net receivables in Spain, Italy and Portugal are composed almost entirely of amounts receivable from government-owned or controlled hospitals and the public sector and amounted to $241.8 million at December 31, 2014 compared to $348.4 million at December 31, 2013. Approximately $44.4 million of the $241.8 million receivable at December 31, 2014 was greater than one year past due. Our exposure to the sovereign debt crisis in Greece is limited, as we do not have a material amount of receivables in Greece. We maintain timely and direct communication with hospital customers in Spain, Italy and Portugal regarding both the current and past due receivable balances. We continue to receive payments from these countries and closely monitor the plans for payment at the regional government level. Payments from customers in these countries are not received on regular intervals and several months could elapse between significant payments. We also regularly request and receive positive confirmation of the validity of our receivables from most of the regional governmental authorities.
In determining the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts for Spain, Italy and Portugal, we considered the balance of past due receivables related to sales made to government-owned or supported customers. We regularly monitor developments in Europe to assess whether the level of risk of default for any customers has increased and note the ongoing efforts by the European Union, European Monetary Union and International Monetary Fund to support countries with large public deficits and outstanding debt balances. We also monitor the efforts of individual countries to support their regions with large public deficits and outstanding debt balances. We have not experienced significant losses or write-offs with respect to the collection of our accounts receivable in these countries as a result of their economic difficulties and we do not expect to have write-offs or adjustments to accounts receivable that would have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Inventory: Inventory balances increased by $52.7 million to $393.1 million at the end of 2014 compared to 2013. The increase was primarily due to increases in ABRAXANE® and OTEZLA® inventories to support recent approvals. ABRAXANE® was approved for the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the United States in September 2013 followed by European Union approval for the same indication in December 2013 and unresectable pancreatic cancer in Japan in December 2014. OTEZLA® received approvals for psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis in the U.S. during 2014 and in the EU in January 2015. We began recognizing revenue related to OTEZLA® during the second quarter of 2014.
Other Current Assets: Other current assets increased by $158.0 million to $594.4 million at the end of 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to a $205.1 million increase in the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts, partly offset by a $18.0 million decrease in prepaid taxes and a net decrease in other prepaid accounts.
45
Commercial Paper: In September 2011, we entered into a commercial paper program (Program) under which we issue unsecured commercial paper notes (Commercial Paper) on a private placement basis, the proceeds of which are used for general corporate purposes. The maximum aggregate amount available under the Program is currently $1.500 billion. The maturities of the Commercial Paper may vary, but may not exceed 270 days from the date of issue. The Commercial Paper is sold under customary terms to a dealer or in the commercial paper market and is issued at a discount from par or, alternatively, is sold at par and bears varying interest rates on a fixed or floating basis. Borrowings under the Program are accounted for as short-term borrowings. As of December 31, 2014, $99.6 million of Commercial Paper was outstanding bearing an effective interest rate of 0.4%.
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility: In September 2011, we entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) providing for revolving credit in the aggregate amount of $1.000 billion, which was increased to $1.500 billion in April 2013. The term of the Credit Facility was also extended from September 2, 2016 to April 18, 2018. Subject to certain conditions, we have the right to increase the amount of the Credit Facility (but in no event more than one time per annum), up to a maximum aggregate amount of $1.750 billion.
Amounts may be borrowed under the Credit Facility for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. The Credit Facility serves as backup liquidity for our Commercial Paper borrowings. As of December 31, 2014, there was no outstanding borrowing against the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants including certain customary financial covenants. We were in compliance with those covenants as of December 31, 2014.
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities: Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities increased by $108.1 million to $1.465 billion at the end of 2014 compared to 2013. The increase was primarily due to increases of $131.2 million in deferred tax liabilities, $34.0 million in compensation related accrued expenses, $15.6 million in sales adjustments and $10.1 million in accrued interest. The increases were partly offset by decreases of $53.3 million related to foreign exchange contracts, $28.2 million of contingent consideration related to business acquisitions and a $18.0 million decrease related to collaboration agreements.
Income Taxes Payable (Current and Non-Current): Income taxes payable increased by $34.6 million to $285.6 million at the end of 2014 compared to 2013, primarily from the current provision for income taxes of $599.8 million and net deferred intercompany credits of $26.3 million, offset by income tax payments of $294.6 million, a tax benefit of stock options of $252.6 million, and a decrease in refundable income taxes of $41.8 million.
Senior Notes: In May 2014, we issued an additional $2.500 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2019 (the 2019 notes), $1.000 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.625% Senior Notes due 2024 (the 2024 notes) and $1.000 billion aggregate principal amount of 4.625% Senior Notes due 2044 (the 2044 notes and, together with the 2019 notes and 2024 notes, the “2014 issued notes”). The 2014 issued notes were issued at 99.751%, 99.659% and 99.646% of par, respectively, and the discount is being amortized as additional interest expense over the period from issuance through maturity. Offering costs of $21.2 million have been recorded as debt issuance costs on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the period from issuance through maturity. Interest on the 2014 issued notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 each year beginning November 15, 2014 and the principal on each note is due in full at their respective maturity dates. The 2014 issued notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equaling accrued and unpaid interest plus the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the 2014 issued notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis plus 10 basis points in the case of the 2019 notes, 15 basis points in the case of the 2024 notes and 20 basis points in the case of the 2044 notes. If we experience a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the debt to below investment grade, we will be required to offer to repurchase the 2014 issued notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. We are subject to covenants which limit our ability to pledge properties as security under borrowing arrangements and limit our ability to perform sale and leaseback transactions involving our property.
In anticipation of issuing debt in 2014, we entered into an aggregate notional value of $1.500 billion in forward starting swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact the issuance of debt. In April 2014 we accelerated our planned debt issuance date, which resulted in hedge ineffectiveness in the forward starting swaps and a $3.6 million charge to other income (expense), net due to differences between the effective date of the swaps and the accelerated debt issuance date. In addition, all forward starting swaps were settled upon the issuance of debt in May 2014 when the net fair value of the forward starting swaps in accumulated other comprehensive income was a loss position of $25.9 million. The net loss of $25.9 million will be recognized as interest expense over the life of the associated senior notes. At December 31, 2014 we had $250.0 million notional value of forward starting interest rate swaps outstanding with effective dates in November 2015, maturing in ten years to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact an anticipated issuance of debt in 2015. The carrying value of all of our senior notes issued was $6.772 billion at December 31, 2014.
46
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (in millions):
| $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2014 versus 2013 | 2013 versus 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 2,806.3 | $ | 2,225.9 | $ | 2,018.6 | $ | 580.4 | $ | 207.3 | ||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (1,438.0 | ) | $ | (528.6 | ) | $ | (1,553.6 | ) | $ | (909.4 | ) | $ | 1,025.0 | ||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (417.4 | ) | $ | (553.7 | ) | $ | (248.8 | ) | $ | 136.3 | $ | (304.9 | ) | ||||||
Operating Activities: Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $580.4 million to $2.806 billion in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily as a result of an expansion of our operations and a related increase in net earnings.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $207.3 million to $2.226 billion in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily as a result of an expansion of our operations and a related increase in net earnings.
Investing Activities: Net cash used in investing activities increased by $909.4 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was principally related to a cash use of $710.0 million for the Nogra acquisition. In addition, net purchases of marketable securities available for sale during 2014 were $144.2 million higher than in 2013.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $1.025 billion in 2013 compared to 2012. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities was principally related to a cash use of $341.3 million for net purchases of marketable securities available for sale during 2013 compared to a cash use of $1.025 billion for net purchases in 2012, plus the use of $352.2 million for the acquisition of Avila in 2012.
Financing Activities: Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $136.3 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The decrease was principally related to a $991.0 million increase in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt in 2014 compared to 2013, partly offset by a $210.5 million increase in payments for the purchase of treasury shares in 2014 compared to 2013 and a net repayment of $445.3 million in short-term borrowing in 2014 compared to a net increase of $234.1 million in short-term borrowing in 2013.
Net cash used in financing activities in 2013 was $553.7 million compared to a net cash use of $248.8 million in 2012. The $304.9 million increase in net cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to a $721.0 million increase in cash used for the purchase of treasury shares and a cash use of $225.0 million recorded as a financing activity to reflect the portion of a $300.0 million milestone payment to holders of our CVRs that represents the original fair value of Abraxis contingent consideration. These increases were partially offset by net proceeds from borrowing of $234.1 million during 2013 compared to net repayments of $217.4 million in 2012. Proceeds from issuances of common stock under our employee stock plans plus the excess tax benefit from share-based compensation arrangements provided an aggregate $721.0 million during 2013, which is an increase of $195.5 million from 2012.
47
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014 (in millions):
| Payment Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 Year | 1 to 3 Years | 3 to 5 Years | More than 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Senior notes1 | $ | 740.2 | $ | 955.9 | $ | 1,327.7 | $ | 7,205.8 | $ | 10,229.6 | ||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 99.6 | — | — | — | 99.6 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | 57.1 | 84.3 | 41.3 | 36.0 | 218.7 | |||||||||||||||
| Other contract commitments | 71.6 | 57.7 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 133.8 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 968.5 | $ | 1,097.9 | $ | 1,372.0 | $ | 7,243.3 | $ | 10,681.7 | ||||||||||
1 | The senior note obligation amounts include future principal and interest payments for both current and non-current obligations. |
Senior Notes: In May 2014, we issued a total of $2.500 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2019, $1.000 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.625% Senior Notes due 2024 and $1.000 billion aggregate principal amount of 4.625% Senior Notes due 2044.
In August 2013, we issued a total of $1.500 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.300% Senior Notes due 2018, $700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2023 and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2043.
In August 2012, we issued a total of $1.500 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.90% Senior Notes due 2017, and $1.000 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.25% Senior Notes due 2022.
In October 2010, we issued a total of $1.250 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2015, $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2020 and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.7% Senior Notes due 2040.
Short-term Borrowings: Contractual obligations related to short-term borrowings included principal, interest and fees of $99.6 million related to commercial paper outstanding at December 31, 2014.
Operating Leases: We lease office and research facilities under various operating lease agreements in the United States and various international markets. The non-cancelable lease terms for operating leases expire at various dates between 2015 and 2023 and include renewal options. In general, we are also required to reimburse the lessors for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs associated with the leases. For more information on the major facilities that we occupy under lease arrangements refer to Part I, Item 2. "Properties" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Contract Commitments: Other contract commitments of $133.8 million on December 31, 2014 primarily included $123.8 million in contractual obligations related to product supply contracts and a remaining $8.0 million balance due in connection with our acquisition of a manufacturing facility in Switzerland.
Collaboration Arrangements: We have entered into certain research and development collaboration agreements with third parties that include the funding of certain development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts with the potential for future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets. Our obligation to fund these efforts is contingent upon continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs. Due to the nature of these arrangements, the future potential payments related to the attainment of specified development and regulatory approval milestones over a period of several years are inherently uncertain, and accordingly, no amounts have been recorded for these future potential payments in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013 contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Potential milestone payments (not including potential royalty payments) total approximately $4.784 billion, including approximately $3.934 billion contingent on the achievement of various research, development and regulatory approval milestones and approximately $0.850 billion in sales-based milestones. For additional information about our collaboration agreements, see Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
New Accounting Standards
For a discussion of new accounting standards please see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
48
Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operation and requires management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we believe the following accounting estimates and policies to be critical:
Revenue Recognition: Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when title and risk of loss of the product is transferred to the customer and the sales price is fixed and determinable. Provisions for discounts, early payments, rebates, sales returns and distributor chargebacks under terms customary in the industry are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. We record estimated reductions to revenue for volume-based discounts and rebates at the time of the initial sale. The estimated reductions to revenue for such volume-based discounts and rebates are based on the sales terms, historical experience and trend analysis.
We recognize revenue from royalties based on licensees' sales of our products or products using our technologies. Royalties are recognized as earned in accordance with the contract terms when royalties from licensees can be reasonably estimated and collectability is reasonably assured. If royalties cannot be reasonably estimated or collectability of a royalty amount is not reasonably assured, royalties are recognized as revenue when the cash is received.
Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We base our sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains, as applicable. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates do not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, we track actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in determining the current sales return allowance. REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and THALOMID®/Thalidomide CelgeneTM are distributed primarily through hospitals and contracted pharmacies, which are typically subject to tighter controls of inventory quantities within the supply channel, resulting in lower returns activity.
Sales discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers.
Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Medicaid rebate percentage was increased and extended to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations in March 2010. The accrual of the rebates associated with Medicaid Managed Care Organizations is calculated based on estimated historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. We also analyze actual billings received from the states to further support the accrual rates. Subsequent to implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the 2010 U.S. Health Care Reform Law), certain states have not completed their Medicaid Managed Care Organization billing for the years of 2010 through 2014. Our accruals for these Medicaid Managed Care Organization rebates had been at elevated levels given the delays in the receipt of complete invoices from certain states. Due to the receipt of more complete claims data during 2013 and 2014, the accruals for certain states were reduced from these elevated levels as a result of both payments being applied to the accrual during 2013 and 2014, and changes in estimate of the ultimate obligation during the fourth quarters of both 2013 and 2014. We will continue to adjust the rebate accruals as more information becomes available and to reflect actual claims experience. Effective January 1, 2011, manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are responsible for 50% of the patient’s cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate the cost to us of this coverage gap responsibility, we analyze data for eligible Medicare Part D patients against data for eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with our products as well as the historical invoices. This expense is recognized throughout the year as costs are incurred. In certain international markets government-sponsored programs require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales.
Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. We record a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. We regularly review the information related to these estimates and adjust the provision accordingly.
49
Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are included in chargeback accruals and are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts primarily based on the credit worthiness of our customers, historical payment patterns, aging of receivable balances and general economic conditions, including publicly available information on the credit worthiness of countries themselves and provinces or areas within such countries where they are the ultimate customers.
Income Taxes: We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. We provide a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized.
We account for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of our provision for income taxes. These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues common among multinational corporations in our industry. We apply a variety of methodologies in making these estimates which include studies performed by independent economists, advice from industry and subject experts, evaluation of public actions taken by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities, as well as our own industry experience. We provide estimates for unrecognized tax benefits. If our estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, our results of operations could be materially impacted.
We periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and reduce the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including our recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, various income tax strategies and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is required in making this assessment and, to the extent future expectations change, we would have to assess the recoverability of our deferred tax assets at that time. At December 31, 2014, it was more likely than not that we would realize our deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances.
Share-Based Compensation: We utilize share based compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, or RSUs, and performance-based restricted stock units, or PSUs. Compensation expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on the estimated fair value of the awards at grant date. Compensation expense recognized reflects an estimate of the number of awards expected to vest after taking into consideration an estimate of award forfeitures based on actual experience and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period required to obtain full vesting. Management expectations related to the achievement of performance goals associated with PSU grants is assessed regularly and that assessment is used to determine whether PSU grants are expected to vest. If performance-based milestones related to PSU grants are not met or not expected to be met, any compensation expense recognized to date associated with grants that are not expected to vest will be reversed.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Available-For-Sale Marketable Securities: A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale marketable security below its cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to operations and a new cost basis for the security established. The determination of whether an available-for-sale marketable security is other-than-temporarily impaired requires significant judgment and requires consideration of available quantitative and qualitative evidence in evaluating the potential impairment. Factors evaluated to determine whether the investment is other-than-temporarily impaired include: significant deterioration in the issuer's earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, business prospects of the issuer, adverse changes in the general market conditions in which the issuer operates, length of time that the fair value has been below our cost, our expected future cash flows from the security, our intent not to sell, an evaluation as to whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell before recovery of our cost basis, and issues that raise concerns about the issuer's ability to continue as a going concern. Assumptions associated with these factors are subject to future market and economic conditions, which could differ from our assessment.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities: All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether a derivative instrument is designated as part of a hedging transaction and, if it is, the type of hedging transaction. For a derivative to qualify as a hedge at inception and throughout the hedged period, we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged item. We assess, both at inception and on an on-going basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used in cash flow hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in cash flows of hedged items. We assess hedge effectiveness on a quarterly basis and record the gain or loss related to the ineffective
50
portion of derivative instruments, if any, to current earnings. If we determine that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring, we discontinue hedge accounting and any related unrealized gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in current earnings. We use derivative instruments, including those not designated as part of a hedging transaction, to manage our exposure to movements in foreign exchange and interest rates. The use of these derivative instruments modifies the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce our risk or cost.
Investments in Other Entities: We hold a portfolio of investments in equity securities and certain investment funds that are accounted for under either the equity method or cost method. Investments in companies or certain investment funds over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method, with our share of earnings or losses reported in other income (expense), net. Investments in equity securities of companies that become publicly traded are accounted for as available-for-sale marketable securities prospectively from the date of such companies' initial public offering.
Our cost method and equity method investments are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
All investments are reviewed on a regular basis for possible impairment. If an investment's fair value is determined to be less than its net carrying value and the decline is determined to be other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to its fair value. Such an evaluation is judgmental and dependent on specific facts and circumstances. Factors considered in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: market value or exit price of the investment based on either market-quoted prices or future rounds of financing by the investee; length of time that the market value was below its cost basis; financial condition and business prospects of the investee; our intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in market value of the investment; issues that raise concerns about the investee's ability to continue as a going concern; any other information that we may be aware of related to the investment.
Accounting for Long-Term Incentive Plans: We have established a Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP, designed to provide key officers and executives with performance-based incentive opportunities contingent upon achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives covering a three-year period. We currently have three separate three-year performance cycles running concurrently ending December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Performance measures for each of the performance cycles are based on the following components: 37.5% on non-GAAP earnings per share, as defined; 37.5% on total non-GAAP revenue, as defined; and 25% on relative total shareholder return, which is a measurement of our stock price performance during the applicable three-year period, compared with a group of other companies in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Threshold, target and maximum cash payout levels under the three current LTIP performance cycles are calculated as a percentage between 0% and 200% of each participant’s base salary at the time the LTIP was approved by the Compensation Committee. Such awards are payable in cash or common stock or a mixture of cash and common stock, which will be determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of award delivery. Share-based payout levels are calculated using the cash-based threshold, target and maximum levels, divided by the average closing price of Celgene stock for the 30 trading days prior to the commencement of each performance cycle. Therefore, final share-based award values are reflective of the stock price at the end of the measurement period. The Compensation Committee may determine that payments made in common stock are restricted from trading for a period of time. We accrue the long-term incentive liability over each three-year cycle. Prior to the end of a three-year cycle, the accrual is based on an estimate of our level of achievement during the cycle. Upon a change in control, participants will be entitled to an immediate payment equal to their target award or, if higher, an award based on actual performance through the date of the change in control.
Accruals recorded for the LTIP entail making certain assumptions concerning future non-GAAP earnings per share, non-GAAP revenues and relative total shareholder return, as defined; the actual results of which could be materially different than the assumptions used. Accruals for the LTIP are reviewed on a regular basis and revised accordingly so that the liability recorded reflects updated estimates of future payouts. In estimating the accruals, management considers actual results to date for the performance period, expected results for the remainder of the performance period, operating trends, product development, pricing and competition.
Valuation of Goodwill, Acquired Intangible Assets, Other Assets and IPR&D: We have recorded goodwill, acquired intangible assets and IPR&D primarily through the acquisitions of Pharmion, Gloucester, Abraxis, Avila, and Nogra. When identifiable intangible assets, including in-process research and development and securitized financial assets, are acquired, we determine the fair values of these assets as of the acquisition date. Discounted cash flow models are typically used in these valuations if quoted market prices are not available, and the models require the use of significant estimates and assumptions including but not limited to:
| • | projecting regulatory approvals; |
| • | estimating future cash flows from product sales resulting from completed products and in-process projects or estimating future cash flows expected to be collected; and |
| • | developing appropriate discount rates and probability rates. |
51
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination accounted for by the acquisition method of accounting and is not amortized, but is subject to impairment testing. We test our goodwill for impairment at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment by assessing qualitative factors or performing a quantitative analysis in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of net assets are below their carrying amounts.
Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized to their estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment if certain events occur. Intangible assets related to IPR&D product rights are treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets and not amortized until the product is approved for sale by regulatory authorities in specified markets. At that time, we will determine the useful life of the asset, reclassify the asset out of IPR&D and begin amortization. Impairment testing is also performed at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment. Such test entails completing an updated discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the asset.
Valuation of Contingent Consideration Resulting from a Business Combination: We record contingent consideration resulting from a business combination at its fair value on the acquisition date, and for each subsequent reporting period revalue these obligations and record increases or decreases in their fair value as an adjustment to operating earnings in the consolidated statements of income. Changes to contingent consideration obligations can result from movements in publicly traded share prices of CVRs, adjustments to discount rates and periods, updates in the assumed achievement or timing of any development milestones or changes in the probability of certain clinical events and changes in the assumed probability associated with regulatory approval. The assumptions related to determining the value of a contingent consideration include a significant amount of judgment and any changes in the assumptions could have a material impact on the amount of contingent consideration expense recorded in any given period. Our contingent consideration liabilities were recorded in the acquisitions of Gloucester, Abraxis, Avila and Nogra. The fair values of the Gloucester, Avila and Nogra contingent consideration liabilities are based on the discount rate, probability and estimated timing of cash milestone payments to the former shareholders of each business. The fair value of the Abraxis contingent consideration liability is based on the quoted market price of the publicly traded CVRs.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following discussion provides forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risk. Market risk represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in the value of financial instruments. The risk of loss is assessed based on the likelihood of adverse changes in fair values, cash flows or future earnings.
We have established guidelines relative to the diversification and maturities of investments to maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are reviewed periodically and may be modified depending on market conditions. Although investments may be subject to credit risk, our investment policy specifies credit quality standards for our investments and limits the amount of credit exposure from any single issue, issuer or type of investment. At December 31, 2014, our market risk sensitive instruments consisted of marketable securities available for sale, our long-term debt and certain derivative contracts.
Marketable Securities Available for Sale: At December 31, 2014, our marketable securities available for sale consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed (MBS) securities, non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities, global corporate debt securities, asset backed securities and marketable equity securities. U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS include mortgage backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities consist of direct obligations of highly rated governments of nations other than the United States and obligations of sponsored agencies and other entities that are guaranteed or supported by highly rated governments of nations other than the United States. Corporate debt – global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies. Asset backed securities consist of triple-A rated securities with cash flows collateralized by credit card receivables and auto loans.
Marketable securities available for sale are carried at fair value, held for an unspecified period of time and are intended for use in meeting our ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses and other than temporary impairment charges, is included in interest and investment income, net.
52
As of December 31, 2014, the principal amounts, fair values and related weighted-average interest rates of our investments in debt securities classified as marketable securities available for sale were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):
| Duration | ||||||||||||||||
| Less than 1 Year | 1 to 3 Years | 3 to 5 Years | Total | |||||||||||||
| Principal amount | $ | 452.0 | $ | 1,780.1 | $ | 117.4 | $ | 2,349.5 | ||||||||
| Fair value | $ | 456.4 | $ | 1,795.1 | $ | 122.3 | $ | 2,373.8 | ||||||||
| Weighted average interest rate | 0.7 | % | 1.0 | % | 1.9 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
Debt Obligations:
Short-Term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt: The carrying value of short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 includes:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Commercial paper | $ | 99.6 | $ | 544.8 | ||||
| 2.450% senior notes due 2015 | 506.3 | — | ||||||
| Total | $ | 605.9 | $ | 544.8 | ||||
Long-Term Debt: We have issued an aggregate $6.750 billion principal amount of senior notes at varying maturity dates and interest rates. The principal amounts and carrying values of the long-term portion of these senior notes as of the end of December 31, 2014 are summarized below:
| Principal Amount | Carrying Value | |||||||
| 1.900% senior notes due 2017 | $ | 500.0 | $ | 501.0 | ||||
| 2.300% senior notes due 2018 | 400.0 | 401.2 | ||||||
| 2.250% senior notes due 2019 | 500.0 | 502.5 | ||||||
| 3.950% senior notes due 2020 | 500.0 | 502.8 | ||||||
| 3.250% senior notes due 2022 | 1,000.0 | 1,010.2 | ||||||
| 4.000% senior notes due 2023 | 700.0 | 708.5 | ||||||
| 3.625% senior notes due 2024 | 1,000.0 | 996.8 | ||||||
| 5.700% senior notes due 2040 | 250.0 | 249.5 | ||||||
| 5.250% senior notes due 2043 | 400.0 | 396.7 | ||||||
| 4.625% senior notes due 2044 | 1,000.0 | 996.5 | ||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | 6,250.0 | $ | 6,265.7 | ||||
At December 31, 2014, the fair value of our senior notes outstanding was $6.988 billion.
53
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Our revenue and earnings, cash flows and fair values of assets and liabilities can be impacted by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. We actively manage the impact of foreign exchange rate and interest rate movements through operational means and through the use of various financial instruments, including derivative instruments such as foreign currency options, foreign currency forward contracts, treasury rate lock agreements and interest rate swap contracts.
Foreign Currency Risk Management
We maintain a foreign exchange exposure management program to mitigate the impact of volatility in foreign exchange rates on future foreign currency cash flows, translation of foreign earnings and changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
Through our revenue hedging program, we endeavor to reduce the impact of possible unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates on our future U.S. dollar cash flows that are derived from foreign currency denominated sales. To achieve this objective, we hedge a portion of our forecasted foreign currency denominated sales that are expected to occur in the foreseeable future, typically within the next three years. We manage our anticipated transaction exposure principally with foreign currency forward contracts and occasionally foreign currency put and call options.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies, manage exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings and to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
We manage a portfolio of foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 had settlement dates within 36 months. The spot rate components of these foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and, to the extent effective, any unrealized gains or losses are reported in other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. If a hedging relationship is terminated with respect to a foreign currency forward contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract remain in OCI until the hedged forecasted transaction occurs and are reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffectiveness on these foreign currency forward contracts is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net. The forward point components of these foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges and all fair value adjustments of forward point amounts are recorded to other income (expense), net. Foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
| Notional Amount | ||||||||
| Foreign Currency: | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Australian Dollar | $ | 18.8 | $ | — | ||||
| British Pound | 304.8 | 279.4 | ||||||
| Canadian Dollar | 43.7 | — | ||||||
| Euro | 3,375.7 | 3,318.2 | ||||||
| Japanese Yen | 541.1 | 559.1 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 4,284.1 | $ | 4,156.7 | ||||
We consider the impact of our own and the counterparties’ credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract on an ongoing basis. As of December 31, 2014, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts.
We also manage a portfolio of foreign currency contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and, from time to time, we enter into foreign currency contracts to manage exposure related to translation of foreign earnings. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net in the current period. The aggregate notional amount of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $835.5 million and $878.5 million, respectively.
54
Although not predictive in nature, we believe a hypothetical 10% threshold reflects a reasonably possible near-term change in foreign currency rates. Assuming that the December 31, 2014 exchange rates were to change by a hypothetical 10%, the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts would change by approximately $505.5 million. However, since the contracts either hedge specific forecasted intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies or relate to assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the entities' functional currencies, any change in the fair value of the contract would be either reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings or re-measured through earnings each period along with the underlying asset or liability.
Foreign Currency Option Contracts: From time to time, we may hedge a portion of our future foreign currency exposure by utilizing a strategy that involves both a purchased local currency put option and a written local currency call option that are accounted for as hedges of future sales denominated in that local currency. Specifically, we sell (or write) a local currency call option and purchase a local currency put option with the same expiration dates and local currency notional amounts but with different strike prices. This combination of transactions is generally referred to as a “collar.” The expiration dates and notional amounts correspond to the amount and timing of forecasted foreign currency sales. If the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the currency of the hedged anticipated sales, the purchased put option value reduces to zero and we benefit from the increase in the U.S. dollar equivalent value of our anticipated foreign currency cash flows; however, this benefit would be capped at the strike level of the written call, which forms the upper end of the collar. The premium collected from the sale of the call option is equal to the premium paid for the purchased put option, resulting in a net zero cost for each collar. Foreign currency option contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue were as follows at December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Notional Amount1 | |||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Foreign currency option contracts designated as hedging activity: | |||||||
| Purchased Put | $ | 152.6 | $ | — | |||
| Written Call | $ | 160.9 | $ | — | |||
1 U.S. dollar notional amounts are calculated as the hedged local currency amount multiplied by the strike value of the foreign currency option. The local currency notional amounts of our purchased put and written call that are designated as hedging activities are equal to each other.
Assuming that the December 31, 2014 exchange rates were to change by a hypothetical 10%, the fair value of the foreign currency option contracts would increase by approximately $12.3 million if the US Dollar were to strengthen and decrease by approximately$12.1 million if the US Dollar were to weaken. However, since the contracts hedge specific forecasted intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies, any change in the fair value of the contract would be reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings.
Interest Rate Risk Management
In anticipation of issuing fixed-rate debt, we may use forward starting interest rate swaps (forward starting swaps) or treasury rate lock agreements (treasury rate locks) that are designated as cash flow hedges to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact expected future issuances of debt. To the extent these hedges of cash flows related to anticipated debt are effective, any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the treasury rate locks or forward starting swaps are reported in OCI and are recognized in income over the life of the anticipated fixed-rate notes.
Forward Starting Interest Rate Swaps: During 2014, we entered into forward starting swaps, that were designated as cash flow hedges, with an aggregate notional value of $250.0 million and effective dates in November 2015, maturing in ten years to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact an anticipated issuance of debt in 2015. During January 2015, we entered into additional forward starting swaps with effective dates in November 2015.
In anticipation of issuing debt in 2014, we entered into an aggregate notional value of $1.500 billion in forward starting swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges. In April 2014, we accelerated our planned debt issuance date, which resulted in hedge ineffectiveness in the forward starting swaps and a $3.6 million charge to other income (expense), net due to differences between the effective date of the swaps and the accelerated debt issuance date. In addition, all forward starting swaps were settled upon the issuance of debt in May 2014 when the net fair value of the forward starting swaps in accumulated OCI was a loss position of $25.9 million. The net loss of $25.9 million will be recognized as interest expense over the life of the associated senior notes.
A sensitivity analysis to measure potential changes in the market value of our forward starting interest rate swap contracts from a change in interest rates indicated that a one percentage point increase in interest rates at December 31, 2014 would have increased
55
the fair value of our contracts by $21.0 million. A one percentage point decrease at December 31, 2014 would have decreased the aggregate fair value of our contracts by $23.5 million.
Interest Rate Swap Contracts: From time to time we hedge the fair value of certain debt obligations through the use of interest rate swap contracts. The interest rate swap contracts are designated hedges of the fair value changes in the notes attributable to changes in interest rates. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap are intended to match those of the debt being hedged, it is assumed to be a highly effective hedge and all changes in fair value of the swap are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with no net impact recorded in income. Any net interest payments made or received on interest rate swap contracts are recognized as interest expense. If a hedging relationship is terminated for an interest rate swap contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract are measured and recorded as a reduction or increase of current and future interest expense associated with the previously hedged debt obligations.
We have entered into swap contracts that were designated as hedges of certain of our fixed rate notes and also terminated the hedging relationship by settling certain of those swap contracts during 2012, 2013 and 2014. The settlement of swap contracts resulted in the receipt of net proceeds of $25.5 million and $22.9 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are accounted for as a reduction of current and future interest expense associated with these notes. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details related to reductions of current and future interest expense.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of our outstanding swap contracts at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
| Notional Amount | ||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Interest rate swap contracts entered into as fair value hedges of the following fixed-rate senior notes: | ||||||||
| 2.450% senior notes due 2015 | $ | 300.0 | $ | 300.0 | ||||
| 1.900% senior notes due 2017 | 300.0 | 300.0 | ||||||
| 2.300% senior notes due 2018 | 200.0 | 200.0 | ||||||
| 2.250% senior notes due 2019 | 500.0 | — | ||||||
| 3.950% senior notes due 2020 | 500.0 | 500.0 | ||||||
| 3.250% senior notes due 2022 | 750.0 | 850.0 | ||||||
| 4.000% senior notes due 2023 | 150.0 | 150.0 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 2,700.0 | $ | 2,300.0 | ||||
During 2015, we continued to actively manage our interest rate swaps and have terminated the hedging relationships of certain swap contracts and entered into new swaps that were designated as fair value hedges of our senior notes.
A sensitivity analysis to measure potential changes in the market value of our debt and interest rate swap contracts from a change in interest rates indicated that a one percentage point increase in interest rates at December 31, 2014 would have reduced the aggregate fair value of our net payable by $396.4 million. A one percentage point decrease at December 31, 2014 would have increased the aggregate fair value of our net payable by $472.9 million.
56
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Page | |
| Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| Financial Statement Schedule | |
57
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Celgene Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the consolidated financial statement schedule, "Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts." These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013 and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
February 20, 2015
58
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
| December 31, | |||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Assets | |||||||
| Current assets: | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,121.6 | $ | 3,234.4 | |||
| Marketable securities available for sale | 3,425.1 | 2,452.6 | |||||
| Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $32.1 and $40.0 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively | 1,166.7 | 1,061.4 | |||||
| Inventory | 393.1 | 340.4 | |||||
| Deferred income taxes | 11.7 | 25.3 | |||||
| Other current assets | 594.4 | 436.4 | |||||
| Total current assets | 9,712.6 | 7,550.5 | |||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 642.6 | 593.4 | |||||
| Intangible assets, net | 4,067.6 | 2,839.7 | |||||
| Goodwill | 2,191.2 | 2,041.2 | |||||
| Other assets | 726.1 | 353.4 | |||||
| Total assets | $ | 17,340.1 | $ | 13,378.2 | |||
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |||||||
| Current liabilities: | |||||||
| Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | $ | 605.9 | $ | 544.8 | |||
| Accounts payable | 198.2 | 156.2 | |||||
| Accrued expenses | 991.1 | 1,001.1 | |||||
| Income taxes payable | 12.7 | 16.0 | |||||
| Current portion of deferred revenue | 28.5 | 27.7 | |||||
| Other current liabilities | 275.8 | 199.7 | |||||
| Total current liabilities | 2,112.2 | 1,945.5 | |||||
| Deferred revenue, net of current portion | 27.8 | 23.7 | |||||
| Income taxes payable | 272.9 | 235.0 | |||||
| Deferred income taxes | 555.6 | 804.9 | |||||
| Other non-current liabilities | 1,581.1 | 582.7 | |||||
| Long-term debt, net of discount | 6,265.7 | 4,196.5 | |||||
| Total liabilities | 10,815.3 | 7,788.3 | |||||
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 18) | |||||||
| Stockholders' Equity: | |||||||
| Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, 5.0 million shares authorized; none outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively | — | — | |||||
| Common stock, $.01 par value per share, 1,150.0 million shares authorized; issued 924.8 million and 906.5 million shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively (Note 1) | 9.2 | 9.1 | |||||
| Common stock in treasury, at cost; 124.6 million and 101.5 million shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively (Note 1) | (10,698.8 | ) | (7,662.1 | ) | |||
| Additional paid-in capital (Note 1) | 9,827.2 | 8,676.4 | |||||
| Retained earnings | 6,472.4 | 4,472.5 | |||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | 914.8 | 94.0 | |||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 6,524.8 | 5,589.9 | |||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 17,340.1 | $ | 13,378.2 | |||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
59
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except per share amounts)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
| Revenue: | |||||||||||
| Net product sales | $ | 7,563.8 | $ | 6,362.3 | $ | 5,385.6 | |||||
| Other revenue | 106.6 | 131.6 | 121.1 | ||||||||
| Total revenue | 7,670.4 | 6,493.9 | 5,506.7 | ||||||||
| Expenses: | |||||||||||
| Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) | 385.9 | 340.4 | 299.1 | ||||||||
| Research and development | 2,430.6 | 2,226.2 | 1,724.2 | ||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 2,027.9 | 1,684.5 | 1,373.5 | ||||||||
| Amortization of acquired intangible assets | 258.3 | 262.8 | 194.5 | ||||||||
| Acquisition related charges, net | 48.7 | 171.1 | 169.0 | ||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 5,151.4 | 4,685.0 | 3,760.3 | ||||||||
| Operating income | 2,519.0 | 1,808.9 | 1,746.4 | ||||||||
| Other income and (expense): | |||||||||||
| Interest and investment income, net | 28.2 | 22.0 | 15.3 | ||||||||
| Interest (expense) | (176.1 | ) | (91.6 | ) | (63.2 | ) | |||||
| Other income (expense), net | (43.7 | ) | (73.9 | ) | (17.0 | ) | |||||
| Income before income taxes | 2,327.4 | 1,665.4 | 1,681.5 | ||||||||
| Income tax provision | 327.5 | 215.5 | 225.3 | ||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | |||||
| Net income per share (Note 1): | |||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 2.49 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.69 | |||||
| Diluted | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.65 | |||||
| Weighted average shares (Note 1): | |||||||||||
| Basic | 802.7 | 827.7 | 861.9 | ||||||||
| Diluted | 836.0 | 860.6 | 881.6 | ||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
60
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in millions)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | |||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | — | 27.4 | 25.9 | ||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (49.8 | ) | 27.4 | 25.9 | |||||||
| Pension liability adjustment | (8.6 | ) | 3.2 | (4.7 | ) | ||||||
| Change in functional currency of a foreign subsidiary | — | — | 13.1 | ||||||||
| Net asset transfer of a common control foreign subsidiary | — | — | 0.6 | ||||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) related to cash flow hedges: | — | 128.0 | 1.4 | ||||||||
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) | 568.1 | (3.2 | ) | 39.2 | |||||||
| Tax (expense) benefit | 12.3 | (2.6 | ) | 13.8 | |||||||
| Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax | 580.4 | (5.8 | ) | 53.0 | |||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for (gains) included in net income | (23.1 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (79.6 | ) | |||||
| Tax expense (benefit) | (1.7 | ) | (6.9 | ) | 1.9 | ||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income, net of tax | (24.8 | ) | (14.2 | ) | (77.7 | ) | |||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities available for sale: | |||||||||||
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) | 494.0 | 205.1 | 1.3 | ||||||||
| Tax (expense) benefit | (173.9 | ) | (77.1 | ) | 0.1 | ||||||
| Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax | 320.1 | 128.0 | 1.4 | ||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income | 5.4 | 7.3 | 1.1 | ||||||||
| Tax (benefit) | (1.9 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |||||
| Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of tax | 3.5 | 5.1 | 1.0 | ||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income | 820.8 | 143.7 | 12.6 | ||||||||
| Comprehensive income | $ | 2,820.7 | $ | 1,593.6 | $ | 1,468.8 | |||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
61
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | |||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
| Depreciation | 104.3 | 96.9 | 84.9 | ||||||||
| Amortization | 269.3 | 277.2 | 198.6 | ||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (272.3 | ) | (246.6 | ) | 100.2 | ||||||
| Impairment charges | 133.2 | 105.4 | 148.0 | ||||||||
| Change in value of contingent consideration | 48.7 | 171.1 | 166.4 | ||||||||
| Share-based compensation expense | 447.6 | 325.8 | 231.0 | ||||||||
| Share-based employee benefit plan expense | 40.7 | 32.6 | 19.3 | ||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for cash flow hedges included in net income | (23.1 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (79.6 | ) | |||||
| Unrealized change in value of derivative instruments | (48.8 | ) | (1.4 | ) | 71.7 | ||||||
| Other, net | (8.1 | ) | 18.0 | 11.8 | |||||||
| Change in current assets and liabilities, excluding the effect of acquisitions: | |||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | (166.3 | ) | (101.4 | ) | (30.1 | ) | |||||
| Inventory | (56.5 | ) | (89.7 | ) | (69.7 | ) | |||||
| Other operating assets | 52.6 | (90.9 | ) | 91.7 | |||||||
| Accounts payable and other operating liabilities | 252.3 | 287.2 | 68.2 | ||||||||
| Payment of contingent consideration | (14.3 | ) | (75.0 | ) | — | ||||||
| Income tax payable | 39.1 | 57.4 | (455.5 | ) | |||||||
| Deferred revenue | 8.0 | 16.7 | 5.5 | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 2,806.3 | 2,225.9 | 2,018.6 | ||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||
| Proceeds from sales of marketable securities available for sale | 2,175.9 | 3,642.3 | 1,743.7 | ||||||||
| Purchases of marketable securities available for sale | (2,661.4 | ) | (3,983.6 | ) | (2,768.8 | ) | |||||
| Payments for acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | (710.0 | ) | — | (352.2 | ) | ||||||
| Purchases of intellectual property and other assets | (24.8 | ) | (19.4 | ) | (48.9 | ) | |||||
| Capital expenditures | (150.3 | ) | (119.7 | ) | (111.5 | ) | |||||
| Purchases of investment securities | (67.4 | ) | (47.1 | ) | (30.0 | ) | |||||
| Other investing activities | — | (1.1 | ) | 14.1 | |||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (1,438.0 | ) | (528.6 | ) | (1,553.6 | ) | |||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||
| Payment for treasury shares | (2,975.1 | ) | (2,764.6 | ) | (2,043.6 | ) | |||||
| Proceeds from short-term borrowing | 2,566.9 | 4,462.0 | 4,494.8 | ||||||||
| Principal repayments on short-term borrowing | (3,012.2 | ) | (4,227.9 | ) | (4,712.2 | ) | |||||
| Proceeds from sale of common equity put options | 10.3 | 1.2 | — | ||||||||
| Payment of contingent consideration | (25.7 | ) | (225.0 | ) | — | ||||||
| Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | 2,470.6 | 1,479.6 | 1,486.7 | ||||||||
| Net proceeds from share-based compensation arrangements | 297.2 | 551.6 | 476.2 | ||||||||
| Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation arrangements | 250.6 | 169.4 | 49.3 | ||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (417.4 | ) | (553.7 | ) | (248.8 | ) | |||||
| Effect of currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (63.7 | ) | 0.4 | 14.7 | |||||||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 887.2 | 1,144.0 | 230.9 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 3,234.4 | 2,090.4 | 1,859.5 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 4,121.6 | $ | 3,234.4 | $ | 2,090.4 | |||||
62
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – (Continued)
(Dollars in millions)
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
| Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activity: | |||||||||||
| Acquisition date fair value of contingent consideration issued in business combinations | $ | 1,060.0 | $ | — | $ | 171.7 | |||||
| Change in net unrealized gain on marketable securities available for sale | $ | (494.0 | ) | $ | (205.1 | ) | $ | (1.3 | ) | ||
| Investment in NantBioScience, Inc. preferred equity | $ | 90.0 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||||||
| Interest paid | $ | 196.2 | $ | 90.8 | $ | 48.4 | |||||
| Income taxes paid | $ | 294.6 | $ | 291.9 | $ | 469.6 | |||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
63
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in millions)
| Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 | Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2011 (Note 1) | $ | 8.6 | $ | (2,760.7 | ) | $ | 6,760.7 | $ | 1,566.4 | $ | (62.3 | ) | $ | 5,512.7 | ||||||||||
| Net income | 1,456.2 | 1,456.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | (13.7 | ) | 12.6 | (1.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mature shares tendered related to option exercise | (1.2 | ) | 0.6 | (0.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options and warrants and conversion of restricted stock units | 0.2 | (10.6 | ) | 482.9 | 472.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shares purchased under share repurchase program | (2,050.7 | ) | (2,050.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans | 19.2 | 19.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expense related to share-based compensation | 230.5 | 230.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit upon exercise of stock options | 55.8 | 55.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2012 | $ | 8.8 | $ | (4,823.2 | ) | $ | 7,536.0 | $ | 3,022.6 | $ | (49.7 | ) | $ | 5,694.5 | ||||||||||
| Net income | 1,449.9 | 1,449.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | 143.7 | 143.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and conversion of restricted stock units | 0.2 | (69.7 | ) | 623.5 | 554.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shares purchased under share repurchase program | (2,769.2 | ) | (2,769.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans | 0.1 | 21.9 | 22.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Expense related to share-based compensation | 325.0 | 325.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit upon exercise of stock options | 170.0 | 170.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2013 | $ | 9.1 | $ | (7,662.1 | ) | $ | 8,676.4 | $ | 4,472.5 | $ | 94.0 | $ | 5,589.9 | |||||||||||
| Net income | 1,999.9 | 1,999.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | 820.8 | 820.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and conversion of restricted stock units | 0.1 | (126.1 | ) | 424.2 | 298.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shares purchased under share repurchase program | (2,929.5 | ) | (2,929.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans | 18.9 | 26.5 | 45.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Expense related to share-based compensation | 447.5 | 447.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit upon exercise of stock options | 252.6 | 252.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2014 | $ | 9.2 | $ | (10,698.8 | ) | $ | 9,827.2 | $ | 6,472.4 | $ | 914.8 | $ | 6,524.8 | |||||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
64
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Celgene Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively “we,” “our,” “us,” “Celgene” or the “Company”), is an integrated global biopharmaceutical company engaged primarily in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases through gene and protein regulation. We are dedicated to innovative research and development designed to bring new therapies to market and we are involved in research in several scientific areas designed to deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas including intracellular signaling pathways, protein homeostasis and epigenetics in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmune diseases and therapeutic application of cell therapies.
Our primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, ABRAXANE®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, VIDAZA®, azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®), THALOMID® (sold as THALOMID® or Thalidomide CelgeneTM outside of the U.S.), OTEZLA® and ISTODAX®. OTEZLA® was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2014 for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis and in September 2014 for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. In January 2015, OTEZLA® was approved by the European Commission (EC) for the treatment of both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in certain adult patients. We began recognizing revenue related to OTEZLA® during the second quarter of 2014.
Additional sources of revenue include royalties from Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis) on their sales of FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of products and services through our Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (CCT) subsidiary and other licensing agreements.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries. Investments in limited partnerships and interests where we have an equity interest of 50% or less and do not otherwise have a controlling financial interest are accounted for by either the equity or cost method. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
In June 2014, our stockholders voted to approve an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation that increased the number of shares of common stock that we are authorized to issue and effected a two-for-one stock split of outstanding shares (Stock Split). As a result, our total number of authorized shares of common stock increased from 575.0 million to 1.150 billion on June 18, 2014. Stockholders of record received one additional share of common stock for each share of common stock owned. All impacted share numbers and per share amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements have been restated to reflect the impact of the Stock Split. Common stock held in treasury was not adjusted for the Stock Split.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We are subject to certain risks and uncertainties related to, among other things, product development, regulatory approval, market acceptance, scope of patent and proprietary rights, competition, outcome of legal and governmental proceedings, European credit risk, technological change and product liability.
Financial Instruments: Certain financial instruments reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (e.g., cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, certain other assets, accounts payable, short-term borrowings and certain other liabilities) are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair values of financial instruments other than marketable securities are determined through a combination of management estimates and information obtained from third parties using the latest market data. The fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities is determined utilizing the valuation techniques appropriate to the type of security (See Note 4).
Derivative Instruments and Hedges: All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether a derivative instrument is designated as part of a hedging transaction and, if it is, the type of hedging transaction. For a derivative to qualify as a hedge at inception and throughout the hedged period, we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged item. We assess, both at inception and on an on-going basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used in cash flow hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in cash
65
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
flows of hedged items. We assess hedge ineffectiveness on a quarterly basis and record the gain or loss related to the ineffective portion of derivative instruments, if any, to current earnings. If we determine that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring, we discontinue hedge accounting and any related unrealized gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in current earnings. We use derivative instruments, including those not designated as part of a hedging transaction, to manage our exposure to movements in foreign exchange, on our stock price and interest rates. The use of these derivative instruments modifies the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce our risk or cost.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available for Sale: We invest our excess cash primarily in money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities, global corporate debt securities and asset backed securities. All liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents and all investments with maturities of greater than three months from date of purchase are classified as marketable securities available for sale. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase. In addition, our equity investments in the publicly traded common stock of companies with whom we have entered into collaboration agreements are also designated as marketable securities available for sale.
Marketable securities available for sale are carried at fair value, held for an unspecified period of time and are intended for use in meeting our ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses and other-than-temporary impairment charges, is included in interest and investment income, net.
A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below its carrying value that is determined to be other-than-temporary would result in a charge to earnings and decrease in the security's carrying value down to its newly established fair value. Factors evaluated to determine if an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired include significant deterioration in earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality or business prospects of the issuer; adverse changes in the general market condition in which the issuer operates; our intent to hold to maturity and an evaluation as to whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell before recovery of its cost basis; our expected future cash flows from the security; and issues that raise concerns about the issuer's ability to continue as a going concern.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk. We invest our excess cash primarily in money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS, non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities, global corporate debt securities and asset backed securities (See Note 6). We have established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities to maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are reviewed periodically and may be modified to take advantage of trends in yields and interest rates.
We sell our products in the United States primarily through wholesale distributors and specialty contracted pharmacies. Therefore, wholesale distributors and large pharmacy chains account for a large portion of our U.S. trade receivables and net product revenues (See Note 19). International sales are primarily made directly to hospitals, clinics and retail chains, many of which in Europe are government owned and have extended their payment terms in recent years given the economic pressure these countries are facing. We continuously monitor the creditworthiness of our customers, including these governments, and have internal policies regarding customer credit limits. We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts primarily based on the credit worthiness of our customers, historical payment patterns, aging of receivable balances and general economic conditions, including publicly available information on the credit worthiness of countries themselves and provinces or areas within such countries where they are the ultimate customers.
We continue to monitor economic conditions, including the volatility associated with international economies, the sovereign debt crisis in certain European countries and associated impacts on the financial markets and our business. Our current business model in these markets is typically to sell our products directly to principally government owned or controlled hospitals, which in turn directly deliver critical care to patients. Our products are used to treat life-threatening diseases and we believe this business model enables timely delivery and adequate supply of products. Many of the outstanding receivable balances are related to government-funded hospitals and we believe the receivable balances are ultimately collectible. Similarly, we believe that future sales to these customers will continue to be collectible.
The credit and economic conditions within Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece, as well as increasing sales levels in those countries have in the past resulted in, and may continue to result in, an increase in the average length of time it takes to collect accounts receivable. Our total net receivables in Spain, Italy and Portugal are composed almost entirely of amounts receivable from government-owned or controlled hospitals and the public sector and amounted to $241.8 million at December 31, 2014, compared to $348.4 million at December 31, 2013. Approximately $44.4 million of the $241.8 million receivable at December 31, 2014 was greater than one year past due. Our exposure to the sovereign debt crisis in Greece is limited, as we do not have a material amount of receivables in Greece. We maintain timely and direct communication with hospital customers in Spain, Italy and Portugal
66
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
regarding both the current and past due receivable balances. We continue to receive payments from these countries and closely monitor the plans for payment at the regional government level. Payments from customers in these countries are not received on regular intervals and several months could elapse between significant payments. We also regularly request and receive positive confirmation of the validity of our receivables from most of the regional governmental authorities.
In determining the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts for Spain, Italy and Portugal, we considered the balance of past due receivables related to sales made to government-owned or supported customers. We regularly monitor developments in Europe to assess whether the level of risk of default for any customers has increased and note the ongoing efforts by the European Union, European Monetary Union and International Monetary Fund to support countries with large public deficits and outstanding debt balances. We also monitor the efforts of individual countries to support their regions with large public deficits and outstanding debt balances. We have not experienced significant losses or write-offs with respect to the collection of our accounts receivable in these countries as a result of their economic difficulties and we do not expect to have write-offs or adjustments to accounts receivable which would have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Inventory: Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. We periodically review the composition of inventory in order to identify obsolete, slow-moving or otherwise non-saleable items. If non-saleable items are observed and there are no alternate uses for the inventory, we will record a write-down to net realizable value in the period that the decline in value is first recognized. Included in inventory are raw materials used in the production of preclinical and clinical products, which are charged to research and development expense when consumed.
We capitalize inventory costs associated with certain products prior to regulatory approval of products, or for inventory produced in new production facilities, when management considers it highly probable that the pre-approval inventories will be saleable. The determination to capitalize is based on the particular facts and circumstances relating to the expected regulatory approval of the product or production facility being considered, and accordingly, the time frame within which the determination is made varies from product to product. The assessment of whether or not the product is considered highly probable to be saleable is made on a quarterly basis and includes, but is not limited to, how far a particular product or facility has progressed along the approval process, any known safety or efficacy concerns, potential labeling restrictions and other impediments. We could be required to write down previously capitalized costs related to pre-launch inventories upon a change in such judgment, or due to a denial or delay of approval by regulatory bodies, a delay in commercialization or other potential factors.
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of plant and equipment is recorded using the straight-line method. Building improvements are depreciated over the remaining useful life of the building. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the economic useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease, including anticipated renewal options. The estimated useful lives of capitalized assets are as follows:
| Buildings | 40 years |
| Building and operating equipment | 15 years |
| Manufacturing machinery and equipment | 10 years |
| Other machinery and equipment | 5 years |
| Furniture and fixtures | 5 years |
| Computer equipment and software | 3-7 years |
Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred, while expenditures for improvements which extend the life of an asset are capitalized.
Capitalized Software Costs: We capitalize software costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software. Capitalized software costs are included in property, plant and equipment, net and are amortized over their estimated useful life of three to seven years from the date the systems are ready for their intended use.
Investments in Other Entities: We hold a portfolio of investments in equity securities and certain investment funds that are accounted for under either the equity method or cost method. Investments in companies or certain investment funds over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method, with our share of earnings or losses reported in other income (expense), net. Investments in equity securities of companies that become publicly traded are accounted for as available-for-sale marketable securities prospectively from the date of such companies' initial public offering.
Our cost method and equity method investments are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
All investments are reviewed on a regular basis for possible impairment. If an investment's fair value is determined to be less than its net carrying value and the decline is determined to be other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to its fair value. Such an evaluation is judgmental and dependent on specific facts and circumstances. Factors considered in determining whether
67
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
an other-than-temporary decline in value has occurred include: market value or exit price of the investment based on either market-quoted prices or future rounds of financing by the investee; length of time that the market value was below its cost basis; financial condition and business prospects of the investee; our intent and ability to retain the investment for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in market value of the investment; issues that raise concerns about the investee's ability to continue as a going concern; any other information that we may be aware of related to the investment.
Other Intangible Assets: Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized to their estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment if certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Intangible assets which are not amortized include acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) and acquired intangible assets held for sale. Amortization is initiated for IPR&D intangible assets when their useful lives have been determined. IPR&D intangible assets which are determined to have had a drop in their fair value are adjusted downward and an expense recognized in the income statement. These IPR&D intangible assets are tested at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment.
Goodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination accounted for by the acquisition method of accounting and is not amortized, but is subject to impairment testing. We test our goodwill for impairment at least annually or when a triggering event occurs that could indicate a potential impairment by assessing qualitative factors or performing a quantitative analysis in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of net assets are below their carrying amounts.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and certain other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. If the carrying amount of the assets exceed their estimated future undiscounted net cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets.
Contingent Consideration from Business Combinations: Subsequent to the acquisition date, we measure contingent consideration arrangements at fair value for each period with changes in fair value recognized in income as acquisition related charges, net. Changes in fair values reflect new information about related IPR&D and other assets and the passage of time. In the absence of new information, changes in fair value reflect only the passage of time as development work towards the achievement of the milestones progresses, and is accrued based on an accretion schedule.
Foreign Currency Translation: Operations in non-U.S. entities are recorded in the functional currency of each entity. For financial reporting purposes, the functional currency of an entity is determined by a review of the source of an entity's most predominant cash flows. The results of operations for non-U.S. dollar functional currency entities are translated from functional currencies into U.S. dollars using the average currency rate during each month, which approximates the results that would be obtained using actual currency rates on the dates of individual transactions. Assets and liabilities are translated using currency rates at the end of the period. Adjustments resulting from translating the financial statements of our foreign entities into the U.S. dollar are excluded from the determination of net income and are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction gains and losses are recorded in other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We had a net foreign exchange loss of $9.5 million in 2014, a gain of $22.2 million in 2013, and a loss of $10.8 million in 2012. These amounts include the impact of gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments (See Note 5).
Research and Development Costs: Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These include all internal and external costs related to services contracted by us. Upfront and milestone payments made to third parties in connection with research and development collaborations are expensed as incurred up to the point of regulatory approval. Milestone payments made to third parties upon regulatory approval are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the related product. Upfront payments are recorded when incurred, and milestone payments are recorded when the specific milestone has been achieved.
Income Taxes: We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. We recognize the benefit of an uncertain tax position that we have taken or expect to take on income tax returns we file if such tax position is more likely than not to be sustained.
Revenue Recognition: Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when title and risk of loss of the product is transferred to the customer and the sales price is fixed and determinable. Provisions for discounts, early payments, rebates, sales returns and distributor chargebacks under terms customary in the industry are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
68
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
We record estimated reductions to revenue for volume-based discounts and rebates at the time of the initial sale. The estimated reductions to revenue for such volume-based discounts and rebates are based on the sales terms, historical experience and trend analysis.
We base our sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains, as applicable. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates do not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, we track actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in determining the current sales return allowance.
Sales discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers.
Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Medicaid rebate percentage was increased and extended to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations in March 2010. The accrual of the rebates associated with Medicaid Managed Care Organizations is calculated based on estimated historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. We also analyze actual billings received from the states to further support the accrual rates. Subsequent to implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the 2010 U.S. Health Care Reform Law), certain states have not completed their Medicaid Managed Care Organization billing for the years of 2010 through 2014. Our accruals for these Medicaid Managed Care Organization rebates had been at elevated levels given the delays in the receipt of complete invoices from certain states. Due to the receipt of more complete claims data during 2013 and 2014, the accruals for certain states were reduced from these elevated levels as a result of both payments being applied to the accrual during 2013 and 2014 and changes in estimate of the ultimate obligation during the fourth quarters of both 2013 and 2014. We will continue to adjust the rebate accruals as more information becomes available and to reflect actual claims experience. Effective January 1, 2011, manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are responsible for 50% of the patient’s cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate the cost to us of this coverage gap responsibility, we analyze data for eligible Medicare Part D patients against data for eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with our products as well as the historical invoices. This expense is recognized throughout the year as costs are incurred. In certain international markets government-sponsored programs require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales.
Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. We record a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. We regularly review the information related to these estimates and adjust the provision accordingly.
Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are included in chargeback accruals and are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.
We record estimated reductions to revenue for free goods and volume-based discounts at the time of the initial sale. The estimated reductions to revenue for such free goods and volume-based discounts are based on the sales terms, historical experience and trend analysis. The cost of free goods is included in Cost of Goods Sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets).
We recognize revenue from royalties based on licensees' sales of our products or products using our technologies. Royalties are recognized as earned in accordance with the contract terms when royalties from licensees can be reasonably estimated and collectability is reasonably assured. If royalties cannot be reasonably estimated or collectability of a royalty amount is not reasonably assured, royalties are recognized as revenue when the cash is received.
Share-Based Compensation: We utilize share based compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs). Compensation expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
69
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Income based on the estimated fair value of the awards at grant date. Compensation expense recognized reflects an estimate of the number of awards expected to vest after taking into consideration an estimate of award forfeitures based on actual experience and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period required to obtain full vesting. Management expectations related to the achievement of performance goals associated with PSU grants is assessed regularly and that assessment is used to determine whether PSU grants are expected to vest. If performance-based milestones related to PSU grants are not met or not expected to be met, any compensation expense recognized to date associated with grants that are not expected to vest will be reversed.
The fair values of stock option grants are estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair values of RSU and PSU grants are based on the market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, assuming potentially dilutive common shares resulting from option exercises, RSUs, PSUs, warrants and other incentives had been issued and any proceeds thereof used to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The assumed proceeds used to repurchase common stock is the sum of the amount to be paid to us upon exercise of options, the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized and, if applicable, the amount of excess income tax benefit that would be credited to paid-in capital upon exercise.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09). ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP and requires revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. Additionally, qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required about customer contracts, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. This accounting guidance is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2017 using one of two prescribed transition methods. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
2. Acquisitions
Nogra Pharma Limited (Nogra) Acquisition
On April 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Nogra, pursuant to which Nogra granted us an exclusive, royalty-bearing license for its intellectual property relating to GED-0301, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting Smad7, to develop and commercialize products containing GED-0301 for the treatment of Crohn’s disease and other indications. A phase II trial of GED-0301 in patients with active Crohn's disease has been completed and we have initiated a multi-trial clinical program that is designed to support global registrations of GED-0301 in Crohn's disease.
Under the terms of the agreement, which became effective on May 14, 2014 after receipt of certain governmental clearances and approvals, we made an upfront payment of $710.0 million and may make additional contingent developmental, regulatory and sales milestone payments as well as payments based on percentages of annual sales of licensed products. The maximum aggregate amount payable for development and regulatory milestones is approximately $815.0 million, which covers such milestones relating to Crohn’s disease and other indications. Starting from global annual net sales of $500.0 million, aggregate tiered sales milestone payments could total a maximum of $1.050 billion if global annual net sales reach $4.000 billion.
The development and application of the intellectual property covered under the license agreement will be managed by joint committees composed of members from each of Nogra and us. We have the tie-breaking vote on the joint steering committee and as such have ultimate decision-making authority for development, regulatory and commercialization decisions. The agreement also includes provisions for access to employees of Nogra, technical assistance, transfer of manufacturing agreements and transfer of Nogra know-how related to GED-0301. Based on the foregoing factors, for accounting purposes, we have concluded that the acquired assets meet the definition of a business and have accounted for the GED-0301 license as IPR&D acquired in a business combination. The acquisition method of accounting requires that (a) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date and (b) the fair value of IPR&D be classified as an indefinite-lived asset until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. Pro-forma results of operations for this acquisition have not been presented because this acquisition is not material to our consolidated results of operations.
70
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The fair value of consideration transferred to acquire the license amounted to:
| Fair Value at the Acquisition Date | |||
| Cash | $ | 710.0 | |
| Contingent consideration | 1,060.0 | ||
| Total fair value of consideration transferred | $ | 1,770.0 | |
Our potential contingent consideration payments are classified as liabilities, which were measured at fair value as of the acquisition date, with $5.0 million classified as current liabilities and $1.055 billion classified as non-current liabilities. We estimated the fair value of potential contingent consideration using a probability-weighted income approach, which reflects the probability and timing of future potential payments. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represents a level three liability within the fair value hierarchy. The resulting probability-weighted cash flows were discounted using a discount rate based on a market participant assumption. See Note 4 for post-acquisition changes in fair value. The purchase price allocation resulted in the following amounts being allocated to the assets acquired at the acquisition date based on their respective fair values:
| Fair Value at the Acquisition Date | |||
| In-process research and development product rights | $ | 1,620.0 | |
| Current deferred tax assets | 1.3 | ||
| Non-current deferred tax liabilities, net | (1.3 | ) | |
| Total identifiable net assets | 1,620.0 | ||
| Goodwill | 150.0 | ||
| Total net assets acquired | $ | 1,770.0 | |
The fair value of the acquired IPR&D asset was based on the present value of expected net cash flows from the GED-0301 product candidate. Net cash flows were determined by estimating future sales, net of the costs to complete development of GED-0301 into a commercially viable product. Estimated net cash flows were adjusted to reflect the probability of successfully developing a new drug from a product candidate that has completed a phase II trial. Additionally, the projections considered the relevant market sizes and growth factors and the nature and expected timing of a new product introduction. The resulting net cash flows from such potential products include our estimates of cost of sales, operating expenses, and income taxes. The rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value were commensurate with the stage of development of the project and uncertainties in the economic estimates used in the projections described above. The acquired IPR&D asset is accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until regulatory approval in a major market or discontinuation.
The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition. The goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition is largely attributable to intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. We expect this goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes.
The license agreement may be terminated (i) at our discretion upon 180 days’ written notice to Nogra, provided that such termination will not become effective before May 14, 2017, and (ii) by either party upon material breach of the other party, subject to cure periods. Upon the expiration of our royalty payment obligations under the license agreement, on a country-by-country and licensed product-by-licensed product basis, the license granted under the license agreement will become fully paid-up, irrevocable, perpetual, and non-terminable with respect to such licensed product in such country.
Avila Acquisition
On March 7, 2012 (the Avila Acquisition Date), we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Avila Therapeutics, Inc., subsequently renamed Celgene Avilomics Research, herein referred to as Avila, for consideration valued at the Avila Acquisition Date at $535.1 million, consisting of $363.4 million of cash ($352.2 million, net of cash acquired) and contingent developmental and regulatory milestone payments valued at $171.7 million. The acquisition resulted in Avila becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. The results of operations for Avila are included in our consolidated financial statements from the Avila Acquisition Date and the assets and liabilities of Avila were recorded at their respective fair values on the Avila Acquisition Date and consolidated with our other assets and liabilities.
71
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The acquisition has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date and requires the fair value of acquired IPR&D to be classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts.
Our potential contingent consideration payments are classified as liabilities, which were measured at fair value as of the Avila Acquisition Date and subsequently adjusted for the passage of time and probability of payment. We have paid $40.0 million in contingent consideration payments to the former shareholders of Avila subsequent to the Avila Acquisition Date and the range of remaining potential milestone payments is from no payment if none of the remaining milestones are achieved to an estimated maximum of $555.0 million if all remaining milestones are achieved. The potential milestones consist of developmental and regulatory achievements, including milestones for the initiation of phase III studies, investigational new drug, or IND, filings, and other regulatory events.
As part of the acquisition of Avila, we recorded intangible assets to reflect the fair value of the platform technology intangible asset as well as IPR&D. The $330.8 million fair value assigned to platform technology intangible asset was based primarily on expected cash flows from future product candidates to be developed from the Avilomics platform and the $198.4 million fair value assigned to acquired IPR&D was primarily based on expected cash flows from the CC-292 product candidate. The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition. The goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition is largely attributable to full ownership rights to the Avilomics platform.
During 2014 and 2012, we recorded $129.2 million and $69.2 million in impairment charges, respectively, which were recorded as research and development expense, to write down the IPR&D asset recorded for the CC-292 program due to adjustments to the probability-weighted forecasted cash flows related to CC-292 compared to prior estimates. The adjustments to the probability-weighted forecasted cash flows related to CC-292 also resulted in reductions in the fair value of our contingent consideration payable to the former shareholders of Avila of $58.0 million in 2014 and $4.5 million in 2012, which were recorded as reductions of acquisition related charges, net.
3. Earnings Per Share
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,999.9 | $ | 1,449.9 | $ | 1,456.2 | ||||||
| Weighted-average shares: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 802.7 | 827.7 | 861.9 | |||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
| Options, RSUs, PSUs, warrants and other | 33.3 | 32.9 | 19.7 | |||||||||
| Diluted | 836.0 | 860.6 | 881.6 | |||||||||
| Net income per share: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 2.49 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.69 | ||||||
| Diluted | $ | 2.39 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.65 | ||||||
The total number of potential shares of common stock excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive was 18.7 million in 2014, 14.3 million in 2013 and 25.3 million in 2012.
During the period of April 2009 through December 2014, our Board of Directors has approved repurchases of up to an aggregate of $13.500 billion of our common stock, including the April 2014 authorization to repurchase an additional $4.000 billion of our common stock.
As part of the management of our share repurchase program, we may, from time to time, sell put options on our common stock with strike prices that we believe represent an attractive price to purchase our shares. If the trading price of our shares exceeds the strike price of the put option at the time the option expires, we will have economically reduced the cost of our share repurchase program by the amount of the premium we received from the sale of the put option. If the trading price of our stock is below the strike price of the put option at the time the option expires, we would purchase the shares covered by the option at the strike price of the put option. During 2014 and 2013, we recorded net gains of $11.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, from selling put options on our common stock. At December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding put options.
72
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
We repurchased 22.0 million shares of common stock under the program from all sources during 2014 at a total cost of $2.928 billion, excluding transaction fees. As of December 31, 2014, we had a remaining open-ended repurchase authorization of $3.140 billion.
4. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement
The table below presents information about assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the valuation techniques we utilized to determine such fair value.
| • | Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1 assets consist of marketable equity securities. Our Level 1 liability relates to our publicly traded Contingent Value Rights (CVRs). See Note 18 for a description of the CVRs. |
| • | Level 2 inputs utilize observable quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and observable quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not very active. Our Level 2 assets consist primarily of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS, non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities, global corporate debt securities, asset backed securities, foreign currency forward contracts, purchased foreign currency options and interest rate swap contracts. Our Level 2 liabilities relate to written foreign currency options, foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swap contracts. |
| • | Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable inputs and include valuations of assets or liabilities for which there is little, if any, market activity. We do not have any Level 3 assets. Our Level 3 liabilities consist of contingent consideration related to undeveloped product rights resulting from the acquisitions of Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Gloucester) and Nogra in addition to contingent consideration related to the undeveloped product rights and technology platform acquired as part of the acquisition of Avila. The maximum potential remaining payments related to the contingent consideration from the acquisitions of Gloucester, Avila and Nogra are estimated to be $120.0 million, $555.0 million and $1.865 billion, respectively. |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities | $ | 3,425.1 | $ | 1,051.3 | $ | 2,373.8 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Forward currency contracts | 550.7 | — | 550.7 | — | ||||||||||||
| Purchased currency options | 9.8 | — | 9.8 | — | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 20.0 | — | 20.0 | — | ||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 4,005.6 | $ | 1,051.3 | $ | 2,954.3 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Contingent value rights | $ | (136.3 | ) | $ | (136.3 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| Written currency options | (4.6 | ) | — | (4.6 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Other acquisition related contingent consideration | (1,279.0 | ) | — | — | (1,279.0 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | (1,419.9 | ) | $ | (136.3 | ) | $ | (4.6 | ) | $ | (1,279.0 | ) | ||||
73
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Balance at December 31, 2013 | Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities | $ | 2,452.6 | $ | 433.1 | $ | 2,019.5 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Cash equivalents | 20.0 | — | 20.0 | — | ||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 2,472.6 | $ | 433.1 | $ | 2,039.5 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Forward currency contracts | $ | (9.2 | ) | $ | — | $ | (9.2 | ) | $ | — | ||||||
| Contingent value rights | (118.1 | ) | (118.1 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | (49.6 | ) | — | (49.6 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Other acquisition related contingent consideration | (228.5 | ) | — | — | (228.5 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | (405.4 | ) | $ | (118.1 | ) | $ | (58.8 | ) | $ | (228.5 | ) | ||||
The following table represents a roll-forward of the fair value of Level 3 liabilities (significant unobservable inputs):
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | (228.5 | ) | $ | (198.1 | ) | ||
| Amounts acquired or issued | (1,060.0 | ) | — | |||||
| Net change in fair value | (30.5 | ) | (30.4 | ) | ||||
| Settlements | 40.0 | — | ||||||
| Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | — | — | ||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | (1,279.0 | ) | $ | (228.5 | ) | ||
Level 3 liabilities increased by $1.051 billion in 2014 compared to 2013. Amounts acquired or issued represents $1.060 billion from the May 2014 acquisition of Nogra. The $30.5 million net increase in fair value included an increase of $75.6 million in the fair value of the contingent consideration related to our acquisition of Nogra, which reflects both the passage of time and an increase of $19.8 million related to an increase in the estimated probability of one milestone payment. This increase was partly offset by a $46.2 million decrease in the contingent consideration related to our acquisition of Avila, which included a $58.0 million adjustment based on a change in the estimated probability-weighted forecasted cash flows related to CC-292. The $40.0 million settlement represents two milestone payments related to our acquisition of Avila. The $30.4 million increase in the fair value of Level 3 liabilities in 2013 was primarily due to probability adjustments for two Avila milestones.
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Our revenue and earnings, cash flows and fair values of assets and liabilities can be impacted by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. We actively manage the impact of foreign exchange rate and interest rate movements through operational means and through the use of various financial instruments, including derivative instruments such as foreign currency option contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, treasury rate lock agreements and interest rate swap contracts. In instances where these financial instruments are accounted for as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges we may from time to time terminate the hedging relationship. If a hedging relationship is terminated we generally either settle the instrument or enter into an offsetting instrument.
Foreign Currency Risk Management
We maintain a foreign exchange exposure management program to mitigate the impact of volatility in foreign exchange rates on future foreign currency cash flows, translation of foreign earnings and changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
Through our revenue hedging program, we endeavor to reduce the impact of possible unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates on our future U.S. dollar cash flows that are derived from foreign currency denominated sales. To achieve this objective, we
74
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
hedge a portion of our forecasted foreign currency denominated sales that are expected to occur in the foreseeable future, typically within the next three years. We manage our anticipated transaction exposure principally with foreign currency forward contracts and occasionally foreign currency put and call options.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies, manage exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings, and to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
We manage a portfolio of foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 had settlement dates within 36 months. The spot rate components of these foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and, to the extent effective, any unrealized gains or losses are reported in other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. If a hedging relationship is terminated with respect to a foreign currency forward contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract remain in OCI until the hedged forecasted transaction occurs and are reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. Any ineffectiveness on these foreign currency forward contracts is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net. The forward point components of these foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges and all fair value adjustments of forward point amounts are recorded to other income (expense), net. Foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
| Notional Amount | ||||||||
| Foreign Currency: | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Australian Dollar | $ | 18.8 | $ | — | ||||
| British Pound | 304.8 | 279.4 | ||||||
| Canadian Dollar | 43.7 | — | ||||||
| Euro | 3,375.7 | 3,318.2 | ||||||
| Japanese Yen | 541.1 | 559.1 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 4,284.1 | $ | 4,156.7 | ||||
We consider the impact of our own and the counterparties’ credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract on an ongoing basis. As of December 31, 2014, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts.
We also manage a portfolio of foreign currency contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and, from time to time, we enter into foreign currency contracts to manage exposure related to translation of foreign earnings. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net in the current period. The aggregate notional amount of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $835.5 million and $878.5 million, respectively.
Foreign Currency Option Contracts: From time to time, we may hedge a portion of our future foreign currency exposure by utilizing a strategy that involves both a purchased local currency put option and a written local currency call option that are accounted for as hedges of future sales denominated in that local currency. Specifically, we sell (or write) a local currency call option and purchase a local currency put option with the same expiration dates and local currency notional amounts but with different strike prices. This combination of transactions is generally referred to as a “collar.” The expiration dates and notional amounts correspond to the amount and timing of forecasted foreign currency sales. If the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the currency of the hedged anticipated sales, the purchased put option value reduces to zero and we benefit from the increase in the U.S. dollar equivalent value of our anticipated foreign currency cash flows; however, this benefit would be capped at the strike level of the written call, which forms the upper end of the collar. The premium collected from the sale of the call option is equal to the premium paid for the purchased put option, resulting in a net zero cost for each collar. Foreign currency option contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue were as follows at December 31, 2014 and 2013:
75
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Notional Amount1 | |||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Foreign currency option contracts designated as hedging activity: | |||||||
| Purchased Put | $ | 152.6 | $ | — | |||
| Written Call | $ | 160.9 | $ | — | |||
1 U.S. dollar notional amounts are calculated as the hedged local currency amount multiplied by the strike value of the foreign currency option. The local currency notional amounts of our purchased put and written call that are designated as hedging activities are equal to each other.
Interest Rate Risk Management
In anticipation of issuing fixed-rate debt, we may use forward starting interest rate swaps (forward starting swaps) or treasury rate lock agreements (treasury rate locks) that are designated as cash flow hedges to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact expected future issuances of debt. To the extent these hedges of cash flows related to anticipated debt are effective, any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the treasury rate locks or forward starting swaps are reported in OCI and are recognized in income over the life of the anticipated fixed-rate notes.
Forward Starting Interest Rate Swaps: During 2014, we entered into forward starting swaps, that were designated as cash flow hedges, with an aggregate notional value of $250.0 million and effective dates in November 2015, maturing in ten years to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact an anticipated issuance of debt in 2015. During January 2015, we entered into additional forward starting swaps with effective dates in November 2015.
In anticipation of issuing debt in 2014, we entered into an aggregate notional value of $1.500 billion in forward starting swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges. In April 2014 we accelerated our planned debt issuance date, which resulted in hedge ineffectiveness in the forward starting swaps and a $3.6 million charge to other income (expense), net due to differences between the effective date of the swaps and the accelerated debt issuance date. In addition, all forward starting swaps were settled upon the issuance of debt in May 2014 when the net fair value of the forward starting swaps in accumulated OCI was a loss position of $25.9 million. The net loss of $25.9 million will be recognized as interest expense over the life of the associated senior notes.
Interest Rate Swap Contracts: From time to time we hedge the fair value of certain debt obligations through the use of interest rate swap contracts. The interest rate swap contracts are designated hedges of the fair value changes in the notes attributable to changes in interest rates. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap are intended to match those of the debt being hedged, it is assumed to be a highly effective hedge and all changes in fair value of the swap are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with no net impact recorded in income. Any net interest payments made or received on interest rate swap contracts are recognized as interest expense. If a hedging relationship is terminated for an interest rate swap contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract are measured and recorded as a reduction or increase of current and future interest expense associated with the previously hedged debt obligations.
We have entered into swap contracts that were designated as hedges of certain of our fixed rate notes and also terminated the hedging relationship by settling certain of those swap contracts during 2012, 2013 and 2014. The settlement of swap contracts resulted in the receipt of net proceeds of $25.5 million and $22.9 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are accounted for as a reduction of current and future interest expense associated with these notes. See Note 11 for additional details related to reductions of current and future interest expense.
76
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of our outstanding interest rate swap contracts at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
| Notional Amount | ||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Interest rate swap contracts entered into as fair value hedges of the following fixed-rate senior notes: | ||||||||
| 2.450% senior notes due 2015 | $ | 300.0 | $ | 300.0 | ||||
| 1.900% senior notes due 2017 | 300.0 | 300.0 | ||||||
| 2.300% senior notes due 2018 | 200.0 | 200.0 | ||||||
| 2.250% senior notes due 2019 | 500.0 | — | ||||||
| 3.950% senior notes due 2020 | 500.0 | 500.0 | ||||||
| 3.250% senior notes due 2022 | 750.0 | 850.0 | ||||||
| 4.000% senior notes due 2023 | 150.0 | 150.0 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 2,700.0 | $ | 2,300.0 | ||||
The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for derivative instruments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
| December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||
| Fair Value | ||||||||||
| Instrument | Balance Sheet Location | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts1 | Other current assets | $ | 264.9 | $ | 44.9 | |||||
| Other current liabilities | 0.1 | 1.7 | ||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 322.3 | 17.5 | ||||||||
| Interest rate swap agreements | Other current assets | 17.9 | — | |||||||
| Other non-current assets | 4.8 | 0.3 | ||||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | — | 3.8 | ||||||||
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts1 | Other current assets | 39.7 | 6.0 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 0.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||
| Interest rate swap agreements | Other current assets | 0.1 | — | |||||||
| Other non-current assets | 1.3 | — | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 651.2 | $ | 75.3 | ||||||
| December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||
| Fair Value | ||||||||||
| Instrument | Balance Sheet Location | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts1 | Other current assets | $ | 63.6 | $ | 24.9 | |||||
| Other current liabilities | 41.5 | 84.7 | ||||||||
| Other non-current assets | 60.6 | 41.9 | ||||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | 4.3 | 25.6 | ||||||||
| Interest rate swap agreements | Other current assets | 17.1 | — | |||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | — | 68.3 | ||||||||
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts1 | Other current assets | 11.3 | 0.7 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 6.0 | 18.7 | ||||||||
| Interest rate swap agreements | Other current assets | 0.1 | — | |||||||
| Other non-current assets | 1.5 | — | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 206.0 | $ | 264.8 | ||||||
77
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
1Derivative instruments in this category are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented on a net basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASC 210-20.
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments designated as cash-flow hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
| 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Effective Portion) | (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded From Effectiveness Testing) | |||||||||||||||||
| Instrument | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative1 | Location of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | |||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 600.4 | Net product sales | $ | 27.5 | Other income, net | $ | (12.2 | ) | 2 | ||||||||
| Treasury rate lock agreements | $ | — | Interest expense | $ | (3.5 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Forward starting interest rate swaps | $ | (32.3 | ) | Interest expense | $ | (0.9 | ) | Other income, net | $ | (3.6 | ) | 3 | ||||||
1 | Net gains of $230.7 million are expected to be reclassified from Accumulated OCI into income in the next 12 months. |
2 | The amount of net losses recognized in income represents $18.0 million of losses related to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness (fair value adjustments of forward point amounts) and $5.8 million in gains related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships. |
3 | The amount of net loss recognized in income relates to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships. |
| 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (Effective Portion) | (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded From Effectiveness Testing) | |||||||||||||||||
| Instrument | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative1 | Location of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | |||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | (9.7 | ) | Net product sales | $ | 10.7 | Other income, net | $ | 12.6 | 1 | ||||||||
| Treasury rate lock agreements | $ | — | Interest expense | $ | (3.4 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Forward starting interest rate swaps | $ | 6.5 | Interest expense | $ | — | |||||||||||||
1 | The amount of net gain recognized in income represents $6.3 million in gains related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and $6.3 million of gains related to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. |
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | |||||||||
| Instrument | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | Interest expense | $ | 43.0 | $ | 31.4 | |||||
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
78
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | |||||||||
| Instrument | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | Other income, net | $ | 79.3 | $ | 34.1 | |||||
| Interest rate swap agreements | Other income, net | $ | — | $ | 0.7 | |||||
| Put options sold | Other income, net | $ | 11.6 | $ | 1.2 | |||||
The impact of gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments related to changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are generally offset by net foreign exchange gains and losses, which are also included on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income (expense), net for all periods presented. When we enter into foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments to mitigate the impact of exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings, gains and losses will generally be offset by fluctuations in the U.S. Dollar translated amounts of each Income Statement account in current and/or future periods.
6. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available-for-Sale
Money market funds of $2.251 billion and $1.697 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were recorded at cost, which approximates fair value and are included in cash and cash equivalents.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities by major security type and class of security at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
| December 31, 2014 | Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gain | Gross Unrealized Loss | Estimated Fair Value | ||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities | $ | 1,044.7 | $ | 0.3 | $ | (0.8 | ) | $ | 1,044.2 | |||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agency securities | 145.1 | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 145.1 | |||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS | 531.1 | 1.0 | (2.7 | ) | 529.4 | |||||||||||
Non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities | 32.4 | — | (0.1 | ) | 32.3 | |||||||||||
| Corporate debt – global | 446.3 | 0.6 | (1.2 | ) | 445.7 | |||||||||||
| Asset backed securities | 177.3 | — | (0.2 | ) | 177.1 | |||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | 335.2 | 716.3 | (0.2 | ) | 1,051.3 | |||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale marketable securities | $ | 2,712.1 | $ | 718.3 | $ | (5.3 | ) | $ | 3,425.1 | |||||||
| December 31, 2013 | Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gain | Gross Unrealized Loss | Estimated Fair Value | ||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities | $ | 795.2 | $ | 0.3 | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | 795.1 | |||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agency securities | 208.9 | 0.2 | (0.2 | ) | 208.9 | |||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS | 450.8 | 0.1 | (6.9 | ) | 444.0 | |||||||||||
Non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities | 10.4 | — | — | 10.4 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate debt – global | 379.2 | 1.1 | (0.6 | ) | 379.7 | |||||||||||
| Asset backed securities | 181.6 | — | (0.2 | ) | 181.4 | |||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | 212.9 | 220.2 | — | 433.1 | ||||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale marketable securities | $ | 2,239.0 | $ | 221.9 | $ | (8.3 | ) | $ | 2,452.6 | |||||||
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS include mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities consist of direct obligations of highly rated governments of nations other than the United States and obligations of sponsored agencies and other entities that are guaranteed
79
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
or supported by highly rated governments of nations other than the United States. Corporate debt-global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations, including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies. Asset backed securities consist of triple-A rated securities with cash flows collateralized by credit card receivables and auto loans. Marketable equity securities consist of investments in equity securities that have become publicly traded. The increase in net unrealized gains in marketable equity securities in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily reflects the increase in market value for certain equity investments subsequent to their respective initial public offerings. Net unrealized losses in marketable securities primarily reflect the impact of increased interest rates at December 31, 2014.
The fair value of all available-for-sale securities, which have been in an unrealized loss position for less than and longer than 12 months at December 31, 2014, was as follows:
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2014 | Estimated Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Loss | Estimated Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Loss | Estimated Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities | $ | 641.8 | $ | (0.8 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 641.8 | $ | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agency securities | 72.3 | (0.1 | ) | 2.9 | — | 75.2 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS | 178.9 | (1.4 | ) | 107.3 | (1.3 | ) | 286.2 | (2.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Non-U.S. government, agency and supranational securities | 30.8 | (0.1 | ) | — | — | 30.8 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate debt – global | 273.2 | (1.2 | ) | 0.8 | — | 274.0 | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Asset backed securities | 155.1 | (0.2 | ) | — | — | 155.1 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | 4.7 | (0.2 | ) | — | — | 4.7 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,356.8 | $ | (4.0 | ) | $ | 111.0 | $ | (1.3 | ) | $ | 1,467.8 | $ | (5.3 | ) | |||||||||
The Company believes that the decline in fair value of securities held at December 31, 2014 below their cost is temporary and intends to retain its investment in these securities for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery in the market value of these investments.
Duration periods of available-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 2014 were as follows:
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
| Duration of one year or less | $ | 456.2 | $ | 456.4 | ||||
| Duration of one through three years | 1,797.8 | 1,795.1 | ||||||
| Duration of three through five years | 122.9 | 122.3 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 2,376.9 | $ | 2,373.8 | ||||
7. Inventory
A summary of inventories by major category at December 31, 2014 and 2013 follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Raw materials | $ | 200.0 | $ | 147.4 | ||||
| Work in process | 101.5 | 99.6 | ||||||
| Finished goods | 91.6 | 93.4 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 393.1 | $ | 340.4 | ||||
Raw materials increased by $52.6 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to increases of $45.7 million and $5.4 million in ABRAXANE® and OTEZLA® inventories, respectively. The FDA approved ABRAXANE® for treatment of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the United States in September 2013 followed by European Union approval for the same indication in December 2013. OTEZLA® was approved by the FDA in March 2014 for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis and in September 2014 for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. We began recognizing revenue related to OTEZLA® during the second quarter of 2014.
80
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
8. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Land | $ | 37.9 | $ | 37.9 | ||||
| Buildings | 260.8 | 258.0 | ||||||
| Building and operating equipment | 32.0 | 30.8 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 135.5 | 128.2 | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment | 213.5 | 193.8 | ||||||
| Furniture and fixtures | 48.8 | 46.3 | ||||||
| Computer equipment and software | 332.8 | 286.1 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 104.8 | 44.6 | ||||||
| Subtotal | 1,166.1 | 1,025.7 | ||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 523.5 | 432.3 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 642.6 | $ | 593.4 | ||||
The balance of construction in progress at December 31, 2014 primarily relates to an expansion of our corporate headquarters in Summit, New Jersey.
9. Other Financial Information
Accrued expenses at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Compensation | $ | 285.2 | $ | 261.7 | ||||
| Rebates, distributor chargebacks and distributor services | 232.9 | 217.3 | ||||||
| Clinical trial costs and grants | 189.5 | 192.6 | ||||||
| Common share repurchases | — | 45.7 | ||||||
| Interest | 59.1 | 49.0 | ||||||
| Royalties, license fees and collaboration agreements | 26.7 | 52.4 | ||||||
| Commercial related activities | 56.2 | 46.6 | ||||||
| Sales returns | 10.2 | 15.5 | ||||||
| Rent | 14.0 | 14.8 | ||||||
| Professional services | 7.9 | 9.3 | ||||||
| Other taxes | 9.3 | 7.6 | ||||||
| Other | 100.1 | 88.6 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 991.1 | $ | 1,001.1 | ||||
81
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Other current liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Deferred tax liability | $ | 131.2 | $ | — | ||||
| Contingent consideration – Nogra acquisition | 24.7 | — | ||||||
| Contingent consideration – Avila acquisition | 9.8 | 62.7 | ||||||
| Compensation | 32.6 | 22.1 | ||||||
| Sales, use and value added tax | 56.8 | 50.9 | ||||||
| Derivative contracts | 2.6 | 55.9 | ||||||
| Collaboration agreement upfront payable | 14.0 | 7.0 | ||||||
| Other | 4.1 | 1.1 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 275.8 | $ | 199.7 | ||||
Other non-current liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Contingent consideration – Nogra acquisition | $ | 1,110.8 | $ | — | ||||
| Contingent consideration – Avila acquisition | 114.2 | 147.5 | ||||||
| Contingent consideration – Gloucester acquisition | 19.5 | 18.3 | ||||||
| Contingent value rights - Abraxis acquisition | 136.3 | 118.1 | ||||||
| Deferred compensation and long-term incentives | 150.5 | 127.2 | ||||||
| Derivative contracts | 3.8 | 89.6 | ||||||
| Deferred lease incentive | 31.4 | 28.7 | ||||||
| Collaboration agreement | 14.0 | 28.0 | ||||||
| Other | 0.6 | 25.3 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 1,581.1 | $ | 582.7 | ||||
10. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets: Our finite lived intangible assets primarily consist of developed product rights and technology obtained from the Pharmion Corp. (Pharmion), Gloucester, Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (Abraxis) and Avila acquisitions. Our indefinite lived intangible assets consist of acquired IPR&D product rights from the Nogra and Gloucester acquisitions. The remaining weighted-average amortization period for finite-lived intangible assets not fully amortized is approximately 11.1 years at December 31, 2014.
| December 31, 2014 | Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Intangible Assets, Net | |||||||||
| Amortizable intangible assets: | ||||||||||||
| Acquired developed product rights | $ | 3,405.9 | $ | (1,234.1 | ) | $ | 2,171.8 | |||||
| Technology | 333.7 | (135.1 | ) | 198.6 | ||||||||
| Licenses | 67.0 | (18.1 | ) | 48.9 | ||||||||
| Other | 42.5 | (22.9 | ) | 19.6 | ||||||||
| 3,849.1 | (1,410.2 | ) | 2,438.9 | |||||||||
| Non-amortized intangible assets: | ||||||||||||
| Acquired IPR&D product rights | 1,628.7 | — | 1,628.7 | |||||||||
| Total intangible assets | $ | 5,477.8 | $ | (1,410.2 | ) | $ | 4,067.6 | |||||
82
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
| December 31, 2013 | Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Intangible Assets, Net | |||||||||
| Amortizable intangible assets: | ||||||||||||
| Acquired developed product rights | $ | 3,405.9 | $ | (1,026.4 | ) | $ | 2,379.5 | |||||
| Technology | 333.7 | (87.4 | ) | 246.3 | ||||||||
| Licenses | 66.2 | (13.9 | ) | 52.3 | ||||||||
| Other | 42.5 | (18.8 | ) | 23.7 | ||||||||
| 3,848.3 | (1,146.5 | ) | 2,701.8 | |||||||||
| Non-amortized intangible assets: | ||||||||||||
| Acquired IPR&D product rights | 137.9 | — | 137.9 | |||||||||
| Total intangible assets | $ | 3,986.2 | $ | (1,146.5 | ) | $ | 2,839.7 | |||||
The gross carrying value of intangible assets increased by $1.492 billion in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily resulting from the addition of $1.620 billion of IPR&D from the Nogra acquisition, partly offset by a $129.2 million impairment charge recorded as research and development expense to write down the IPR&D asset recorded for the CC-292 program due to an adjustment to the probability-weighted forecasted cash flows related to CC-292 compared to prior estimates. The adjustment to the probability-weighted forecasted cash flows related to CC-292 also resulted in a $58.0 million reduction in the fair value of our contingent consideration payable to the former shareholders of Avila (see Note 4).
Amortization expense was $263.9 million, $270.1 million and $196.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization expense decreased by a net $6.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to a certain Abraxis related intangible asset becoming fully amortized during the first half of 2014 . Assuming no changes in the gross carrying amount of intangible assets, the amortization of intangible assets for years 2015 through 2018 is estimated to be in the range of approximately $255.0 million to $260.0 million annually and 2019 is estimated to be approximately $215.0 million.
Goodwill: At December 31, 2014, our goodwill related to the 2014 Nogra acquisition (see Note 2), the 2012 acquisition of Avila, the 2010 acquisitions of Abraxis and Gloucester, the 2008 acquisition of Pharmion and the 2004 acquisition of Penn T Limited.
The change in carrying value of goodwill is summarized as follows:
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 2,041.2 | |
| Acquisition of Nogra | 150.0 | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 2,191.2 | |
11. Debt
Short-Term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt: The carrying value of short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 includes:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Commercial paper | $ | 99.6 | $ | 544.8 | ||||
| 2.450% senior notes due 2015 | 506.3 | — | ||||||
| Total | $ | 605.9 | $ | 544.8 | ||||
83
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Long-Term Debt: We have issued an aggregate $6.750 billion principal amount of senior notes at varying maturity dates and interest rates. The carrying values of the long-term portion of these senior notes at December 31, 2014 and 2013 are summarized below:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| 2.450% senior notes due 2015 | $ | — | $ | 513.9 | ||||
| 1.900% senior notes due 2017 | 501.0 | 499.9 | ||||||
| 2.300% senior notes due 2018 | 401.2 | 399.0 | ||||||
| 2.250% senior notes due 2019 | 502.5 | — | ||||||
| 3.950% senior notes due 2020 | 502.8 | 484.6 | ||||||
| 3.250% senior notes due 2022 | 1,010.2 | 956.6 | ||||||
| 4.000% senior notes due 2023 | 708.5 | 696.3 | ||||||
| 3.625% senior notes due 2024 | 996.8 | — | ||||||
| 5.700% senior notes due 2040 | 249.5 | 249.6 | ||||||
| 5.250% senior notes due 2043 | 396.7 | 396.6 | ||||||
| 4.625% senior notes due 2044 | 996.5 | — | ||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | 6,265.7 | $ | 4,196.5 | ||||
At December 31, 2014, the fair value of our outstanding Senior Notes was $6.988 billion and represented a Level 2 measurement within the fair value measurement hierarchy.
In May 2014, we issued an additional $2.500 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2019 (the 2019 notes), $1.000 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.625% Senior Notes due 2024 (the 2024 notes) and $1.000 billion aggregate principal amount of 4.625% Senior Notes due 2044 (the 2044 notes and together with the 2019 notes and 2024 notes, referred to herein as the “2014 issued notes”). The 2014 issued notes were issued at 99.751%, 99.659% and 99.646% of par, respectively, and the discount is being amortized as additional interest expense over the period from issuance through maturity. Offering costs of approximately $21.2 million have been recorded as debt issuance costs on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the period from issuance through maturity. Interest on the 2014 issued notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 each year beginning November 15, 2014 and the principal on each 2014 issued note is due in full at their respective maturity dates.
The 2014 issued notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equaling accrued and unpaid interest plus the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the 2014 issued notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis plus 10 basis points in the case of the 2019 notes, 15 basis points in the case of the 2024 notes and 20 basis points in the case of the 2044 notes. If we experience a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the debt to below investment grade, we will be required to offer to repurchase the 2014 issued notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. We are subject to covenants which limit our ability to pledge properties as security under borrowing arrangements and limit our ability to perform sale and leaseback transactions involving our property.
From time to time, we have used treasury rate locks and forward starting interest rate swap contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates in anticipation of issuing fixed-rate notes. As of December 31, 2014, a balance of $52.1 million in losses remained in accumulated OCI related to these derivative instruments and will be recognized as interest expense over the life of the notes.
At December 31, 2014, we were party to pay-floating, receive-fixed interest rate swap contracts designated as fair value hedges
of fixed-rate notes as described in Note 5. Our swap contracts outstanding at December 31, 2014 effectively convert the hedged portion of our fixed-rate notes to floating rates. From time to time we terminate the hedging relationship on certain of our swap contracts by settling the contracts or by entering into offsetting contracts. Any net proceeds received or paid in these settlements are accounted for as a reduction or increase of current and future interest expense associated with the previously hedged notes. As of December 31, 2014, we had a balance of $38.6 million of unamortized gains recorded as a component of our debt as a result of past swap contract settlements, including $17.8 million related to the settlement of swap contracts during 2014.
Commercial Paper: The carrying value of Commercial Paper as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $99.6 million and $544.8 million, respectively, and approximated its fair value. The effective interest rate on the outstanding Commercial Paper balance at December 31, 2014 was 0.4%.
84
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility: We maintain a senior unsecured revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) that provides revolving credit in the aggregate amount of $1.500 billion, which was increased from $1.000 billion in April 2013. During April 2013, the term of the Credit Facility was also extended from September 2, 2016 to April 18, 2018. Subject to certain conditions, we have the right to increase the amount of the Credit Facility (but in no event more than one time per annum) up to a maximum aggregate amount of $1.750 billion. Amounts may be borrowed in U.S. dollars for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. The Credit Facility currently serves as backup liquidity for our Commercial Paper borrowings. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no outstanding borrowing against the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants including certain customary financial covenants. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of December 31, 2014.
12. Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock: Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue, at any time, without further stockholder approval, up to 5.0 million shares of preferred stock, and to determine the price, rights, privileges, and preferences of such shares.
Common Stock: At December 31, 2014, we were authorized to issue up to 1.150 billion shares of common stock of which shares of common stock issued totaled 924.8 million.
Treasury Stock: During the period of April 2009 through December 2014, our Board of Directors has approved repurchases of up to an aggregate $13.500 billion of our common stock, including the April 2014 authorization to repurchase an additional $4.000 billion of our common stock. We repurchased $2.928 billion, $2.769 billion, and $2.050 billion of treasury stock under the program in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, excluding transaction fees. As of December 31, 2014 an aggregate 118.7 million common shares were repurchased under the program at an average price of $87.24 per common share and total cost of $10.360 billion.
Other: When employee awards of RSUs vest and are settled net in order to fulfill minimum statutory tax withholding requirements, the shares withheld are reflected as treasury stock.
A summary of changes in common stock issued and treasury stock is presented below:
| Common Stock | Common Stock in Treasury | |||||
| December 31, 2011 | 858.8 | (49.9 | ) | |||
| Exercise of stock options, warrants and conversion of restricted stock units | 21.5 | (0.2 | ) | |||
| Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans | 0.6 | — | ||||
| Shares repurchased under share repurchase program | — | (28.6 | ) | |||
| December 31, 2012 | 880.9 | (78.7 | ) | |||
| Exercise of stock options and conversion of restricted stock units | 25.0 | (0.5 | ) | |||
| Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans | 0.6 | — | ||||
| Shares repurchased under share repurchase program | — | (22.3 | ) | |||
| December 31, 2013 | 906.5 | (101.5 | ) | |||
| Exercise of stock options and conversion of restricted stock units | 18.3 | (1.3 | ) | |||
| Issuance of common stock for employee benefit plans | — | 0.2 | ||||
| Shares repurchased under share repurchase program | — | (22.0 | ) | |||
| December 31, 2014 | 924.8 | (124.6 | ) | |||
13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The components of other comprehensive income (loss) consist of changes in pension liability, changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities classified as available-for-sale, net unrealized gains (losses) related to cash flow hedges and changes in foreign currency translation adjustments, which includes changes in a subsidiary's functional currency and net asset transfers of common control subsidiaries. The accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are summarized as follows:
85
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Pension Liability | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) From Marketable Securities | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) From Hedges | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment | Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2012 | $ | (10.1 | ) | $ | 4.2 | $ | (16.0 | ) | $ | (27.8 | ) | $ | (49.7 | ) | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 3.2 | 128.0 | (5.8 | ) | 27.4 | 152.8 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | — | 5.1 | (14.2 | ) | — | (9.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) | 3.2 | 133.1 | (20.0 | ) | 27.4 | 143.7 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2013 | $ | (6.9 | ) | $ | 137.3 | $ | (36.0 | ) | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | 94.0 | |||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (8.6 | ) | 320.1 | 580.4 | (49.8 | ) | 842.1 | |||||||||||||
| Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | — | 3.5 | (24.8 | ) | — | (21.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) | (8.6 | ) | 323.6 | 555.6 | (49.8 | ) | 820.8 | |||||||||||||
| Balance December 31, 2014 | $ | (15.5 | ) | $ | 460.9 | $ | 519.6 | $ | (50.2 | ) | $ | 914.8 | ||||||||
Gains (Losses) Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||||||||||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components | Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Income | Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) from cash-flow hedges: | ||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts | Net product sales | $ | 27.5 | $ | 10.7 | $ | 80.9 | |||||||
| Treasury rate lock agreements | Interest (expense) | (3.5 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (1.3 | ) | |||||||
| Interest rate swap agreements | Interest (expense) | (0.9 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 1.7 | 6.9 | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||||
| Gains (losses) from available-for-sale marketable securities: | ||||||||||||||
| Realized income (loss) on sales of marketable securities | Interest and investment income, net | (5.4 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (1.1 | ) | |||||||
| Income tax benefit | 1.9 | 2.2 | 0.1 | |||||||||||
| Total reclassification, net of tax | $ | 21.3 | $ | 9.1 | $ | 76.7 | ||||||||
14. Share-Based Compensation
We have a stockholder-approved stock incentive plan, the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 17, 2013 and as further amended on April 17, 2014) (Plan) which provides for the granting of options, RSUs, stock appreciation rights, PSUs and other share-based awards to our employees and officers. The Management Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors (Compensation Committee) may determine the type, amount and terms, including vesting, of any awards made under the Plan.
On June 18, 2014, our stockholders approved an amendment of the Plan, which included the following key modifications: adoption of an aggregate share reserve of 228.0 million shares of Common Stock (after giving effect to the Stock Split), which includes 18.0 million new post-split shares of Common Stock; and an extension of the term of the Plan through April 16, 2024.
With respect to options granted under the Plan, the exercise price may not be less than the market closing price of the common stock on the date of grant. In general, options granted under the Plan vest over periods ranging from immediate vesting to four-year vesting and expire ten years from the date of grant, subject to earlier expiration in case of termination of employment unless the participant meets the retirement provision under which the option would have a maximum of three additional years to vest.
86
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The vesting period for options granted under the Plan is subject to certain acceleration provisions if a change in control, as defined in the Plan, occurs. Plan participants may elect to exercise options at any time during the option term. However, any shares so purchased which have not vested as of the date of exercise shall be subject to forfeiture, which will lapse in accordance with the established vesting time period.
Shares of common stock available for future share-based grants under all plans were 33.7 million at December 31, 2014.
The following table summarizes the components of share-based compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| Cost of goods sold | $ | 26.2 | $ | 18.5 | $ | 12.4 | ||||||
| Research and development | 196.5 | 144.7 | 102.4 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 224.9 | 162.6 | 116.2 | |||||||||
| Total share-based compensation expense | 447.6 | 325.8 | 231.0 | |||||||||
| Tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense | 129.3 | 94.5 | 61.3 | |||||||||
| Reduction in income | $ | 318.3 | $ | 231.3 | $ | 169.7 | ||||||
Included in share-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was compensation expense related to non-qualified stock options of $276.3 million, $197.6 million and $155.2 million, respectively. Net proceeds received from share-based compensation arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $297.2 million, $551.6 million and $476.2 million, respectively, and the excess tax benefit recognized was $250.6 million, $169.4 million and $49.3 million, respectively. We do not recognize a deferred tax asset for excess tax benefits that have not been realized and have adopted the tax law method as our accounting policy regarding the ordering of tax benefits to determine whether an excess tax benefit has been realized.
Stock Options: As of December 31, 2014, there was $558.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under the plans. That cost will be recognized over an expected remaining weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of the stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $27.92 per share, $20.22 per share and $9.67 per share, respectively. We estimated the fair value of options granted using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.51% - 1.90% | 0.68% - 1.70% | 0.21% - 1.23% | |||
| Expected volatility | 28% - 37% | 27% - 35% | 27% - 30% | |||
| Weighted average expected volatility | 33% | 31% | 28% | |||
| Expected term (years) | 5.02 - 5.06 | 5.03 - 5.50 | 1.30 - 5.17 | |||
| Expected dividend yield | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon curve. Expected volatility of stock option awards is estimated based on the implied volatility of our publicly traded options with settlement dates of six months. The use of implied volatility was based upon the availability of actively traded options on our common stock and the assessment that implied volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. The expected term of an employee share option is the period of time for which the option is expected to be outstanding. We made a determination of expected term by analyzing employees' historical exercise experience from its history of grants and exercises in our option database and management estimates. Forfeiture rates are estimated based on historical data.
87
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following table summarizes all stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2014:
| Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Option | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In Millions) | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 79.2 | $ | 38.47 | 7.1 | $ | 3,643.4 | |||||||
| Changes during the Year: | |||||||||||||
| Granted | 14.5 | 88.38 | |||||||||||
| Exercised | (14.8 | ) | 28.41 | ||||||||||
| Forfeited | (1.6 | ) | 53.14 | ||||||||||
| Expired | (0.1 | ) | 32.45 | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2014 | 77.2 | $ | 49.47 | 6.9 | $ | 4,823.8 | |||||||
| Vested at December 31, 2014 or expected to vest in the future | 76.4 | $ | 49.18 | 6.9 | $ | 4,794.1 | |||||||
| Vested at December 31, 2014 | 36.4 | $ | 33.34 | 5.4 | $ | 2,861.3 | |||||||
The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $211.3 million, $159.3 million and $144.1 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $946.6 million, $814.7 million and $293.5 million, respectively. We primarily utilize newly issued shares to satisfy the exercise of stock options.
Restricted Stock Units: We issue RSUs, under our equity program in order to provide an effective incentive award with a strong retention component. Equity awards may, at the option of employee participants, be divided between stock options and RSUs. The employee may choose between alternate Company defined mixes of stock options and RSUs, with the number of options to be granted reduced by four for every one RSU to be granted. Information regarding the Company's RSUs for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
| Nonvested RSUs | Share Equivalent | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
| Nonvested at December 31, 2013 | 10.1 | $ | 44.08 | ||||
| Changes during the period: | |||||||
| Granted | 2.3 | 90.28 | |||||
| Vested | (2.7 | ) | 30.75 | ||||
| Forfeited | (0.3 | ) | 50.28 | ||||
| Nonvested at December 31, 2014 | 9.4 | $ | 59.02 | ||||
As of December 31, 2014, there was $272.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards of RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years. The Company primarily utilizes newly issued shares to satisfy the vesting of RSUs.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units: The Company's performance-based restricted stock units vest contingent upon the achievement of pre-determined performance-based milestones typically related to product development. The following table summarizes the Company's performance-based restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2014 (shares in thousands):
88
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
| Nonvested Performance-Based RSUs | Share Equivalent | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
| Nonvested at December 31, 2013 | 116 | $ | 53.44 | ||||
| Changes during the period: | |||||||
| Granted | 48 | 87.54 | |||||
| Vested | (24 | ) | 30.39 | ||||
| Forfeited | (7 | ) | 59.68 | ||||
| Non-vested at December 31, 2014 | 133 | $ | 69.57 | ||||
As of December 31, 2014, there was $5.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards of performance-based RSUs that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
15. Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor an employee savings and retirement plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the Code) for our U.S. employees. Our contributions to the U.S. savings plan are discretionary and have historically been made in the form of our common stock (See Note 12). Such contributions are based on specified percentages of employee contributions up to 6% of eligible compensation or a maximum permitted by law. Total expense for contributions to the U.S. savings plans were $40.7 million, $32.6 million and $19.3 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
We also sponsor defined contribution plans in certain foreign locations. Participation in these plans is subject to the local laws that are in effect for each country and may include statutorily imposed minimum contributions. We also maintain defined benefit plans in certain foreign locations for which the obligations and the net periodic pension costs were determined to be immaterial at December 31, 2014.
In 2000, our Board of Directors approved a deferred compensation plan. The plan was frozen effective as of December 31, 2004, and no additional contributions or deferrals can be made to that plan. Accrued benefits under the frozen plan will continue to be governed by the terms under the tax laws in effect prior to the enactment of Section 409A.
In February 2005, our Board of Directors adopted the Celgene Corporation 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005, and amended the plan in February 2008. This plan operates as our ongoing deferred compensation plan and is intended to comply with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Section 409A. Eligible participants, which include certain top-level executives as specified by the plan, can elect to defer up to an amended 90% of the participant's base salary, 100% of cash bonuses and equity compensation allowed under Section 409A of the Code. Company contributions to the deferred compensation plan represent a match to certain participants' deferrals up to a specified percentage, which currently ranges from 10% to 20%, depending on the employee's position as specified in the plan, of the participant's base salary. We recorded expenses of $0.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million related to the deferred compensation plans in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company's matches are fully vested upon contribution. All other Company contributions to the plan do not vest until the specified requirements are met. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had a deferred compensation liability included in other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of approximately $91.0 million and $73.7 million, respectively, which included the participant's elected deferral of salaries and bonuses, the Company's matching contribution and earnings on deferred amounts as of that date. The plan provides various alternatives for the measurement of earnings on the amounts participants defer under the plan. The measurement alternatives are based on returns of a variety of funds that offer plan participants the option to spread their risk across a diverse group of investments.
In 2003, we established a Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) designed to provide key officers and executives with performance-based incentive opportunities contingent upon achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives covering a three-year period. We currently have three separate three-year performance cycles running concurrently ending December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Performance measures for each of the performance cycles are based on the following components: 37.5% on non-GAAP earnings per share (as defined in the LTIP); 37.5% on total non-GAAP revenue (as defined in the LTIP); and 25% on relative total shareholder return, which is a measurement of our stock price performance during the applicable three-year period compared with a group of other companies in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Threshold, target and maximum cash payout levels under the three current LTIP performance cycles are calculated as a percentage between 0% to 200% of each participant’s base salary at the time the LTIP was approved by the Compensation Committee. Such awards are payable in cash or common stock or a mixture of cash and common stock, which will be determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of award delivery. Share-based payout levels are calculated using the cash-based threshold, target and maximum levels, divided by the average closing price of Celgene stock for the 30 trading days prior to the commencement of
89
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
each performance cycle. Therefore, final share-based award values are reflective of the stock price at the end of the measurement period. The Compensation Committee may determine that payments made in common stock are restricted from trading for a period of time. The estimated payout value for the concluded 2014 Plan is $36.5 million, which is included in accrued expenses at December 31, 2014, and the maximum potential cash-based payout, assuming maximum objectives are achieved for the 2015, 2016 and 2017 Plans are $22.6 million, $25.2 million and $16.4 million, respectively. The reduction in the maximum potential cash-based payout for the 2017 Plan reflects a shift in the mix of compensation components for certain senior executives, including performance-based equity compensation in lieu of LTIP participation. We accrue the long-term incentive liability over each three-year cycle. Prior to the end of a three-year cycle, the accrual is based on an estimate of our level of achievement during the cycle. Upon a change in control, participants will be entitled to an immediate payment equal to their target award or, if higher, an award based on actual performance through the date of the change in control. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recognized expense related to the LTIP of $42.3 million, $40.8 million and $10.0 million, respectively.
16. Income Taxes
Income before income taxes is as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| U.S. | $ | 565.0 | $ | 36.8 | $ | 279.6 | ||||||
| Non-U.S. | 1,762.4 | 1,628.6 | 1,401.9 | |||||||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 2,327.4 | $ | 1,665.4 | $ | 1,681.5 | ||||||
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, U.S. income before income taxes reflects charges related to share-based compensation, up-front collaboration payments, asset impairments and acquisitions, which in the aggregate, increased in the United States from 2012 to 2013 and decreased from 2013 to 2014. Many of these charges are not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes. These charges were lower outside the United States in those years.
The provision (benefit) for taxes on income is as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
| United States: | ||||||||||||
| Taxes currently payable: | ||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | 489.4 | $ | 352.6 | $ | 101.5 | ||||||
| State and local | 56.3 | 45.4 | (31.8 | ) | ||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (273.8 | ) | (245.1 | ) | 107.3 | |||||||
| Total U.S. tax provision | 271.9 | 152.9 | 177.0 | |||||||||
| International: | ||||||||||||
| Taxes currently payable | 54.1 | 64.1 | 55.4 | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 1.5 | (1.5 | ) | (7.1 | ) | |||||||
| Total international tax provision | 55.6 | 62.6 | 48.3 | |||||||||
| Total provision | $ | 327.5 | $ | 215.5 | $ | 225.3 | ||||||
Amounts are reflected in the preceding tables based on the location of the taxing authorities. We do not provide for U.S. federal or state income taxes on unremitted earnings of our international subsidiaries that are indefinitely invested outside the United States. As of December 31, 2014, we have not made a U.S. tax provision on $7.541 billion of unremitted earnings of our international subsidiaries. As these earnings are expected to be reinvested overseas indefinitely, it is not practicable to compute the estimated deferred tax liability on these earnings.
Deferred taxes arise because of different treatment between financial statement accounting and tax accounting, known as temporary differences. We record the tax effect on these temporary differences as deferred tax assets (generally items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in future periods) or deferred tax liabilities (generally items for which we received a tax deduction but that have not yet been recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income). We periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and reduce the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including our recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, tax planning strategies and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is required
90
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
in making this assessment. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, it was more likely than not that we would realize our deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances. The principal valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets generated by certain fair value adjustments which, if realized for tax purposes, are expected to result in non-deductible losses. The increase in gross deferred tax assets and liabilities for intangible assets was primarily related to our license agreement with Nogra Pharma Limited, which was accounted for as a business combination.
Approximately $900.0 million of our foreign earnings may not be required for use in offshore operations and may be available for use in the United States. These earnings are not treated as permanently reinvested, and our deferred tax liabilities include $316.5 million for the estimated U.S. federal and state income taxes that may be incurred should these earnings be repatriated. In drawing this conclusion, we considered our future sources of funds as well as our global operating and strategic liquidity needs, including common share repurchase activities and expansion of our commercial, research, manufacturing and administrative infrastructure worldwide.
At December 31, 2014 and 2013 the tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||
| NOL carryforwards | $ | 4.5 | $ | — | $ | 5.3 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Deferred revenue | 1.7 | — | 2.3 | — | ||||||||||||
| Capitalized research expenses | 4.8 | — | 6.1 | — | ||||||||||||
| Tax credit carryforwards | 5.0 | — | 4.2 | — | ||||||||||||
| Non-qualified stock options | 250.5 | — | 183.3 | — | ||||||||||||
| Plant and equipment, primarily differences in depreciation | — | (7.4 | ) | — | (9.6 | ) | ||||||||||
| Inventory | 14.5 | — | 8.4 | — | ||||||||||||
| Other assets | 41.5 | (4.0 | ) | 32.7 | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||||
| Intangible assets | 654.7 | (1,183.2 | ) | 311.9 | (1,005.0 | ) | ||||||||||
| Accrued and other expenses | 191.6 | — | 161.3 | — | ||||||||||||
| Unremitted earnings | — | (316.5 | ) | — | (316.5 | ) | ||||||||||
| Unrealized (gains) losses on securities | — | (236.5 | ) | — | (71.4 | ) | ||||||||||
| Subtotal | 1,168.8 | (1,747.6 | ) | 715.5 | (1,403.2 | ) | ||||||||||
| Valuation allowance | (39.7 | ) | — | (35.5 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Total deferred taxes | $ | 1,129.1 | $ | (1,747.6 | ) | $ | 680.0 | $ | (1,403.2 | ) | ||||||
| Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ | (618.5 | ) | $ | (723.2 | ) | ||||||||||
At December 31, 2014 and 2013, deferred tax assets and liabilities were classified on the Company's balance sheet as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Current assets | $ | 11.7 | $ | 25.3 | ||||
| Other assets (non-current) | 56.6 | 56.4 | ||||||
| Current liabilities | (131.2 | ) | — | |||||
| Other non-current liabilities | (555.6 | ) | (804.9 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ | (618.5 | ) | $ | (723.2 | ) | ||
91
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate is as follows:
| Percentages | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| U.S. statutory rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | |||
| Foreign tax rate differences | (22.3 | )% | (28.8 | )% | (28.0 | )% | |||
| Unremitted earnings | — | % | — | % | 18.8 | % | |||
| State taxes, net of federal benefit | 1.0 | % | 0.6 | % | 1.1 | % | |||
| Change in valuation allowance | 0.2 | % | 1.2 | % | 0.4 | % | |||
| Acquisition related differences | (0.3 | )% | 3.7 | % | 3.8 | % | |||
| Changes in uncertain tax positions | (0.4 | )% | 0.8 | % | (19.3 | )% | |||
| Other | 0.9 | % | 0.4 | % | 1.6 | % | |||
| Effective income tax rate | 14.1 | % | 12.9 | % | 13.4 | % | |||
In our reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate, we disclose changes in uncertain tax positions which include the effect of settlements, expirations of statutes of limitations, and other changes in prior year tax positions.
We have operations in many foreign tax jurisdictions, which impose income taxes at different rates than the United States. The impact of these rate differences is included in the foreign tax rate differences that we disclose in our reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate. The benefit related to foreign tax rate differences primarily results from our commercial operations in Switzerland, which include significant research and development and manufacturing for worldwide markets. We operate under an income tax agreement in Switzerland through 2015 that provides an exemption from most Swiss income taxes on our operations in Switzerland. In 2013, we entered into a new agreement with the Swiss tax authorities which reflects the planned expansion of our Swiss operations and coupled with a 2014 reorganization of our Swiss operations will result in similar tax benefits through the end of 2024. The difference between the maximum statutory Swiss income tax rate (approximately 18.4% in 2014, 19.7% in 2013 and 21.0% in 2012) and our Swiss income tax rate under the tax agreement resulted in a reduction in the 2014, 2013 and 2012 effective tax rates of 18.0, 25.1 and 26.6 percentage points, respectively. The decrease in benefits reflected in the foreign tax rate differences from 2013 to 2014 results primarily from a decrease in the proportion of consolidated income before taxes from non-U.S. operations.
At December 31, 2014, we had combined state NOL carryforwards of approximately $507.2 million that will expire in the years 2015 through 2034. We also have research and experimentation credit carryforwards of approximately $10.2 million that will expire in the years 2018 through 2028. Excess tax benefits related to stock option deductions incurred after December 31, 2005 are required to be recognized in the period in which the tax deduction is realized through a reduction of income taxes payable. As a result, we have not recorded deferred tax assets for certain stock option deductions included in our state NOL carryforwards and research and experimentation credit carryforwards. At December 31, 2014, deferred tax assets have not been recorded on state NOL carryforwards of approximately $344.1 million and for research and experimentation credits of approximately $5.7 million. These stock option tax benefits will be recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital when realized.
We realized stock option deduction benefits in 2014, 2013 and 2012 for income tax purposes and have increased additional paid-in capital in the amount of approximately $252.6 million, $170.0 million and $55.8 million, respectively. We have recorded deferred income taxes as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income resulting in a deferred income tax liability at December 31, 2014 and 2013 of $236.5 million and $71.4 million, respectively.
Our tax returns are under routine examination in many taxing jurisdictions. The scope of these examinations includes, but is not limited to, the review of our taxable presence in a jurisdiction, our deduction of certain items, our claims for research and development credits, our compliance with transfer pricing rules and regulations and the inclusion or exclusion of amounts from our tax returns as filed. During 2012, we settled an examination with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Our U.S. federal income tax returns have now been audited by the IRS through the year ended December 31, 2008. Tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, and 2011 are currently under examination by the IRS, which is scheduled to be completed within the next twelve months. We are also subject to audits by various state and foreign taxing authorities, including, but not limited to, most U.S. states and major European and Asian countries where we have operations.
We regularly reevaluate our tax positions and the associated interest and penalties, if applicable, resulting from audits of federal, state and foreign income tax filings, as well as changes in tax law (including regulations, administrative pronouncements, judicial precedents, etc.) that would reduce the technical merits of the position to below more likely than not. We believe that our accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years. Many factors are considered in making these evaluations, including past history, recent interpretations of tax law and the specifics of each matter. Because tax regulations are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently uncertain, these evaluations can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely
92
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
heavily on estimates and assumptions. We apply a variety of methodologies in making these estimates and assumptions, which include studies performed by independent economists, advice from industry and subject experts, evaluation of public actions taken by the IRS and other taxing authorities, as well as our industry experience. These evaluations are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management. However, if management's estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, our results of operations could be materially impacted.
Unrecognized tax benefits, generally represented by liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and all subject to tax examinations, arise when the estimated benefit recorded in the financial statements differs from the amounts taken or expected to be taken in a tax return because of the uncertainties described above. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 219.2 | $ | 174.7 | ||||
| Increases related to prior year tax positions | 2.8 | 25.5 | ||||||
| Decreases related to prior year tax positions | — | — | ||||||
| Increases related to current year tax positions | 44.4 | 30.2 | ||||||
| Settlements | (10.0 | ) | (10.3 | ) | ||||
| Lapse of statute | (4.6 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | 251.8 | $ | 219.2 | ||||
These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues common among multinational corporations. If recognized, unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $229.5 million would have a net impact on the effective tax rate. We account for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of our provision for income taxes. Accrued interest at December 31, 2014 and 2013 is approximately $28.1 million and $23.2 million, respectively.
We have recorded changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits for current and prior year tax positions related to ongoing income tax audits in various taxing jurisdictions. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is expected to increase in the next twelve months relating to operations occurring in that period. Any settlements of examinations with taxing authorities or statute of limitations expirations would likely result in a decrease in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding increase in taxes paid or payable and/or a decrease in income tax expense. Certain examinations are scheduled to conclude within the next twelve months. It is reasonably possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could change by a significant amount during the next twelve-month period as a result of settlements or statute of limitations expirations. Finalizing examinations with the relevant taxing authorities can include formal administrative and legal proceedings and, as a result, it is difficult to estimate the timing and range of possible change related to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits. An estimate of the range of the possible change cannot be made until issues are further developed or examinations close. Our estimates of tax benefits and potential tax benefits may not be representative of actual outcomes, and variation from such estimates could materially affect our financial statements in the period of settlement or when the statutes of limitations expire.
17. Collaboration Agreements
From time to time, we enter into collaborative arrangements for the research and development, license, manufacture and/or commercialization of products and/or product candidates. In addition, we also acquire product and research and development technology rights and establish research and development collaborations with third parties to enhance our strategic position within our industry by strengthening and diversifying our research and development capabilities, product pipeline and marketed product base. These arrangements may include non-refundable, upfront payments, option payments for the purchase or license of additional rights, development, regulatory and commercial performance milestone payments, cost sharing arrangements, royalty payments, profit sharing and equity investments. Certain of these arrangements obligate us to make additional equity investments in the event of an initial public offering of equity by our partners. The activities under these collaboration agreements are performed with no guarantee of either technological or commercial success. Although we do not consider any individual alliance to be material, certain of the more notable alliances are described below. Summarized financial information related to our alliances is presented in tabular format after the description of alliances:
Novartis Pharma AG: On April 19, 2000, we licensed the worldwide rights (excluding Canada) regarding certain chirally pure forms of methylphenidate for FOCALIN® and FOCALIN XR® to Novartis. We also licensed to Novartis the rights related to long-acting formulations of methylphenidate and dex-methylphenidate products which are used in FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN LA®. We sell FOCALIN® to Novartis and receive royalties of between 30% and 35% on Novartis' sales of FOCALIN XR® and RITALIN LA®. The arrangement with Novartis will continue until the later of (i) the tenth anniversary of the first commercial launch on a country-by-country basis or (ii) when the last applicable patent expires with respect to that country. At the expiration date, we will
93
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
grant Novartis a perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to make, have made, use, import and sell products using the dex-methylphenidate and long-acting formulation technology. The agreement may be terminated by Novartis upon 12 months prior written notice or by either party upon, among other things, the breach of a material obligation by the other party or in the event of withdrawal of the dex-methylphenidate product or RITALIN® product from the market because of regulatory mandate.
If the agreement is terminated by us, then all licenses granted to Novartis under the agreement will terminate and Novartis will grant us a non-exclusive license to certain of their intellectual property related to the compounds and products. If the agreement is terminated by Novartis then all licenses granted to Novartis under the agreement will terminate.
A generic version of methylphenidate hydrochloride was introduced in January 2012 and resulted in a decrease in royalties we received from Novartis related to sales of RITALIN LA®. A generic version of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride was introduced in November 2013 and resulted in a decrease in royalties we received from Novartis related to sales of FOCALIN XR® .
Acceleron Pharma (Acceleron): We have worldwide strategic collaboration agreements with Acceleron for the joint development and commercialization of sotatercept (ACE-011) and luspatercept (ACE-536). Sotatercept is currently in phase II studies for treatment of renal anemia, beta-thalassemia and MDS, and luspatercept is currently in phase II studies for beta-thalassemia and MDS.
On January 1, 2013 we became responsible for the payment of all development costs related to sotatercept and luspatercept and have recognized development expenses as research and development expense as they were incurred.
With respect to the sotatercept program, Acceleron is eligible to receive up to $367.0 million in development, regulatory approval and sales-based milestones and up to an additional $348.0 million for each of three specific discovery stage programs. We also agreed to co-promote the developed products in North America. Acceleron will receive tiered royalties on worldwide net sales upon the commercialization of a development compound.
With respect to the luspatercept program, we have an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license to luspatercept and future Acceleron products for the treatment of anemia. We also agreed to co-promote the products in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Acceleron is eligible to receive development, regulatory approval and sales-based milestones of up to $217.5 million for luspatercept and up to an additional $170.8 million for the first discovery stage program, $148.8 million for the second discovery stage program and $125.4 million for each additional discovery stage program thereafter. Acceleron will receive tiered royalties on worldwide net sales upon the commercialization of a development compound.
The sotatercept agreement may be terminated by us, at our sole discretion, at any time or by either party, among other things, upon a material breach by the other party. The luspatercept agreement may be terminated by us, at our sole discretion, after completion of the initial phase II clinical trial or by either party, among other things, upon a material breach by the other party.
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Agios): During 2010, we entered into a discovery and development collaboration and license agreement with Agios that focuses on cancer metabolism targets and the discovery, development and commercialization of associated therapeutics. We have an exclusive option to license any potential products that result from the Agios cancer metabolism research platform through the end of phase I clinical trials.
With respect to each product that we choose to license, Agios could receive up to approximately $120.0 million upon achievement of certain milestones and other payments plus royalties on worldwide sales, and Agios may also participate in the development and commercialization of certain products in the United States. In December 2014, Celgene elected to extend the collaboration and license agreement for an additional year for a payment of $20.0 million. Our option to license products will terminate on April 14, 2016.
In June 2014, we exercised our option to license AG-221 from Agios on an exclusive worldwide basis, with Agios retaining the right to conduct a portion of commercialization activities for AG-221 in the United States. AG-221 is currently in a phase I study in patients that harbor an IDH2 mutation with advanced hematologic malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Epizyme Inc. (Epizyme): In April 2012, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Epizyme to discover, develop and commercialize novel therapeutic compounds by inhibiting histone methyltransferases (HMT), an important epigenetic target class. Under the terms of the agreement, we made an upfront payment to Epizyme and also made an equity investment in Epizyme and received an exclusive option to license rights outside the United States to HMT inhibitors targeting the DOT1L HMT, including the Company’s product candidate EPZ-5676 and each Epizyme compound associated with such licensed compounds during the option term. If the option is exercised, Epizyme could receive up to $165.0 million in milestone payments associated with each
94
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Epizyme compound developed to inhibit each distinct HMT target under the collaboration plus royalties on sales. Epizyme will retain the rights to develop and commercialize compounds in the United States.
The option term expires on either July 9, 2015 (or July 9, 2016 if we extend the option term for a fourth year and pay an option extension fee). Further, if an HMT target or targets are selected, the collaboration agreement will expire upon the expiration of all applicable royalty terms with respect to all licensed Epizyme compounds. Upon the expiration of the collaboration agreement, we will have a fully paid-up, royalty-free license to use Epizyme intellectual property to manufacture, market, use and sell such licensed Epizyme compounds outside the United States.
Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (Sutro): In December 2012, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Sutro for the development of an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) and a bispecific antibody construct (BAC). Sutro controls and conducts initial development activities. We have the right to select one ADC among a number of different sequence-payload combinations and positional variants, and one BAC. Sutro will provide adequate quantities of any selected ADC and selected BAC to allow us to conduct all necessary preclinical studies, including toxicology and pharmacokinetics studies.
Under the terms of the 2012 agreement, Sutro received payments totaling $35.0 million, which included an equity investment and other rights. In addition, the 2012 collaboration and license agreement includes certain development and regulatory milestones that could total up to $204.0 million for a selected ADC if approved in multiple indications, and up to $279.0 million for a selected BAC if approved in multiple indications, as well as tiered royalties based on annual net sales of licensed products.
In September 2014, we entered into a second collaboration and license agreement with Sutro to jointly develop up to six prioritized anti-cancer BACs and/or ADCs directed primarily to immune-oncology targets. Sutro will control and conduct initial development activities. We have the right to advance any BAC and/or ADC to investigational new drug (IND)-enabling studies or to designate it as a development candidate, and in either case, we would then have the sole right and responsibility for development activities, although Sutro would still have certain limited manufacturing and supply obligations.
Under the terms of the 2014 agreement, Sutro received payments totaling $95.0 million, which includes an equity investment that increases our ownership to approximately 15%, rights with respect to manufacturing and supply of BAC and ADC development candidates, and an option to acquire all of the outstanding equity of Sutro based on a pre-specified valuation procedure. The option is exercisable beginning September 2016 and expires upon the termination of the research term (as extended).
For a future one-time payment, we have the right to obtain access to Sutro’s proprietary protein expression platform to use in conjunction with our intellectual property. Additionally, we have the right to have Sutro evaluate the performance of certain monospecific ADCs directed against up to five non-natural amino acid targets, and reengineer, express, and provide antibodies which incorporate a single non-natural amino acid sequence in a number of preferred locations.
The research term of the collaboration and license agreement is three years, with an extension available for an additional one-and-a-half years for a payment of an additional fee. We have worldwide commercialization rights for development candidates in which at least one binding domain is directed to a certain undisclosed target, plus the first development candidate which does not include at least one binding domain directed to that certain undisclosed target but which achieves IND clearance in the U.S. For all other development candidates, Sutro has U.S. rights, while we have all ex-U.S. rights.
Under the terms of the 2014 agreement, Sutro is eligible to receive research and manufacturing milestones of up to $75.0 million, clinical development and regulatory approval milestones of up to $275.0 million for each compound selected under the collaboration if approved in multiple indications, as well as tiered royalties based on annual net sales of licensed products.
The collaboration and license agreement may be terminated by us at our discretion on a program-by-program basis upon one hundred twenty (120) days prior written notice, or by either party for material breach, intellectual property challenge, or bankruptcy by the other party. With certain exceptions, the collaboration and license agreement expires in its entirety upon the expiration of all applicable royalty terms under the Agreement.
bluebird bio, Inc. (bluebird): In March 2013, we entered into a collaboration agreement with bluebird to discover, develop and commercialize novel disease-altering gene therapies in oncology. The collaboration focuses on applying gene therapy technology to modify a patient’s own T-cells, known as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, to target and destroy cancer cells. The collaboration has the potential to lead to the development of multiple CAR T-cell products. We have an option to license any products resulting from the collaboration after the completion of a phase I clinical study by bluebird for each product.
We made an upfront payment and may be obligated to pay up to $225.0 million per licensed product in aggregate potential option fees and clinical and regulatory milestone payments. bluebird also has the option to participate in the development and
95
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
commercialization of any licensed products resulting from the collaboration through a 50/50 co-development and profit share in the United States in exchange for a reduction of milestone payments. Royalties would also be paid to bluebird in regions where there is no profit share, including in the United States, if bluebird declines to exercise their co-development and profit sharing rights.
The agreement has a termination date of March 19, 2016 and we have the option to extend the agreement until March 19, 2019 with the payment of extension fees. Further, we have the ability to terminate the collaboration at our discretion upon 90 days written notice to bluebird. If a product is optioned, the parties will enter into a pre-negotiated license agreement and potentially a co-development agreement should bluebird exercise its option to participate in the development and commercialization in the United States. The license agreement, if not terminated sooner, would expire upon the expiration of all applicable royalty terms under the agreement with respect to the particular product, and the co-development agreement, if not terminated sooner, would expire when the product is no longer being developed or commercialized in the United States. Upon the expiration of a particular license agreement, we will have a fully paid-up, royalty-free license to use bluebird intellectual property to manufacture, market, use and sell such licensed product.
FORMA Therapeutics Holdings, LLC (FORMA): On April 19, 2013, we entered into a collaboration agreement with FORMA under which the parties will discover, develop and commercialize drug candidates to regulate protein homeostasis targets. Protein homeostasis, which is important in oncology, neurodegenerative and other disorders, involves a tightly regulated network of pathways controlling the biogenesis, folding, transport and degradation of proteins.
The collaboration was launched with an upfront payment that enables us to evaluate selected targets and lead assets in protein homeostasis pathways during the pre-clinical phase. Based on such evaluation, we will have the right to obtain exclusive licenses with respect to the development and commercialization of multiple drug candidates outside of the United States, in exchange for research and early development payments of up to approximately $200.0 million to FORMA. Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, FORMA is incentivized to advance the full complement of drug candidates through Phase I, while Celgene will be responsible for all further global clinical development for each licensed candidate. FORMA is eligible to receive up to an additional $315.0 million in potential payments based upon development, regulatory and sales objectives for the first ex-U.S. license. FORMA is also eligible to receive potential payments for successive licenses, which escalate for productivity, increasing up to a maximum of an additional $430.0 million per program. In addition, FORMA will receive royalties on ex-U.S. sales and additional payments if multiple drug candidates reach defined cumulative sales objectives. The collaboration agreement includes provisions for Celgene to obtain rights with respect to development and commercialization of drug candidates inside the United States in exchange for additional payments.
Under the collaboration, the parties will perform initial research and development for a term of four years. If, during such research term, a drug candidate meets certain criteria, then the parties will enter into a pre-negotiated license agreement and the collaboration will continue until all license agreements have expired and all applicable royalty terms under the collaboration with respect to the particular products have expired. Each license agreement, if not terminated sooner, would expire upon the expiration of all applicable royalty terms under such agreement. Upon the expiration of each license agreement, we will have an exclusive, fully-paid, royalty-free license to use the applicable FORMA intellectual property to manufacture, market, use and sell the product developed under such agreement outside of the United States. On October 7, 2013, we entered into the first ex-US license with FORMA and paid the applicable upfront payment under such license.
On March 21, 2014, we entered into a second collaboration arrangement with FORMA, pursuant to which FORMA granted us an option for an additional fee to license the rights to select current and future FORMA drug candidates during a term of three and one half years. We agreed to pay an upfront payment of $225.0 million. In addition, with respect to each licensed drug candidate, we have the obligation to pay designated amounts when certain development, regulatory and sales milestone events occur, with such amounts being variable and contingent on various factors. With respect to each licensed drug candidate, we will assume responsibility for all global development activities and costs after completion of phase I clinical trials. FORMA will retain U.S. rights to all such licensed assets, including responsibility for manufacturing and commercialization.
Under this collaboration arrangement, we also have an option to enter into up to two additional collaborations with successive terms of two years each for additional payments totaling approximately $375.0 million. If we exercise our option to enter into both of these additional collaborations, we will receive an exclusive option to acquire FORMA, including the U.S. rights to all licensed drug candidates, and worldwide rights to other wholly owned assets within FORMA at that time.
MorphoSys AG (MorphoSys): In June 2013, we signed a collaboration, license and equity purchase agreement with MorphoSys to jointly develop MOR202 globally and to co-promote MOR202 in Europe. We retain the right to commercialize MOR202 outside of the co-promotion territory. In August 2013, the transaction became effective. MOR202 is a fully human monoclonal antibody
96
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
targeting CD38 to treat patients with multiple myeloma and certain leukemias. MOR202 is currently being evaluated in a phase I/IIa trial in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
MorphoSys could receive up to EUR 511.0 million (approximately $620.0 million) in development, regulatory and sales milestones and tiered royalties on net sales of MOR202 outside the co-promotion territory. In the co-promotion territory, MorphoSys retains a 50/50 profit sharing right on MOR202 in exchange for paying one third of the MOR202 development costs. Should MorphoSys choose to opt out of its co-promotion rights, MorphoSys would receive tiered royalties on net sales of MOR202 globally.
The agreement may be terminated at our discretion upon six months written notice to MorphoSys, or by either party upon material breach of the other party. Upon the expiration of the agreement, we will have a fully paid-up, irrevocable, perpetual, non-terminable license to use the intellectual property licensed from MorphoSys to research, develop, make, commercialize, use and sell MOR202.
Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Acetylon): In July 2013, we entered into a collaboration and option agreement with Acetylon. Under the agreement, the parties will support the development of Acetylon's portfolio of oral, selective HDAC inhibitors in oncology, hematology, immunology and neurologic disease indications. In addition, we have rights to receive certain research and development services from Acetylon and an exclusive right to acquire Acetylon at a later date at a purchase price based upon future independent company valuations.
The collaboration focuses on the continued clinical advancement of Acetylon's lead candidate, ACY-1215, an HDAC6 inhibitor being developed for hematological malignancies, ACY-738 for neurological diseases, an HDAC1/2 inhibitor and a yet unnamed project, spanning cancer and non-cancer disease indications. Under the agreement, we made an upfront payment to Acetylon, which included a fee for entering into the collaboration, fees for the exclusive right to acquire Acetylon and the rights to receive certain research and development services from Acetylon. During the term of the agreement, Acetylon will retain control of its drug development programs. If we exercise our right to acquire Acetylon, in addition to the purchase price based upon independent company valuations to be paid at the time of the acquisition, Acetylon shareholders will be eligible to receive potential future milestone payments for approvals, or additional indications, of drugs developed by Acetylon and for accomplishing defined sales targets. If all the milestones are achieved, the aggregate amount of the milestone payments would be $1.100 billion.
The agreement has an expiration date of December 31, 2015 and we have the right to extend the agreement until either June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2016 with the payment of an extension fee. Further, we have the ability to terminate the agreement at our discretion upon written notice to Acetylon.
OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OncoMed): On December 2, 2013, we entered into a collaboration agreement to jointly develop and commercialize up to six anti-cancer stem cell (CSC) product candidates from OncoMed’s biologics pipeline, including demcizumab (OMP-21M18, Anti-DLL4). OncoMed will control and conduct initial clinical studies. We will have an option to license worldwide rights to up to six novel anti-CSC therapeutic candidates commencing upon the completion of enrollment of patients in a phase I trial (and with respect to Demcizumab, a phase II trial) and ending 60 days after delivery by OncoMed of the applicable data package for each therapeutic candidate, subject to certain extensions. We will also have research, development and commercialization rights to small molecule compounds in another cancer stem cell pathway, with OncoMed eligible to receive milestones and royalties on any resulting products.
Demcizumab is currently in multiple phase Ib, phase Ib/II, and phase II clinical studies in combination with standard-of-care therapeutics, including a trial in patients with first-line advanced pancreatic cancer. Subsequent to the exercise of our option rights, the parties will co-develop demcizumab and share global development costs on a one-third OncoMed and two-thirds Celgene split. Outside the United States, we would lead development and commercialization efforts, with OncoMed eligible to receive milestones and tiered royalties on sales outside the United States. For sales in the United States, OncoMed and Celgene would share profits equally.
In addition to demcizumab, the collaboration includes up to five phase Ia, preclinical- or discovery-stage biologics programs: OncoMed’s anti-DLL4/VEGF bispecific antibody and up to four additional biologics programs targeting either the RSPO-LGR CSC pathway or another CSC pathway. We have exclusive options on these programs during or after completion of certain phase I clinical trials to be conducted by OncoMed, which if exercised, contain U.S. profit sharing and co-commercialization terms, plus one-third OncoMed and two-thirds Celgene global development cost-sharing and royalties outside the profit-sharing territory.
The collaboration agreement also includes option exercise payments and payments for achievement of development, regulatory and commercial milestones, paid on a per-program basis. For the demcizumab program, these contingent payments could total up to approximately $790.0 million, and include a payment for achievement of predetermined safety criteria in phase II clinical trials. For the anti-DLL4/VEGF bispecific antibody program, contingent payments could total up to $505.0 million. For the other
97
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
four programs, each program is eligible for up to approximately $440.0 million of contingent payments. OncoMed could also receive more than $100.0 million in contingent payments for the small molecule program.
The collaboration agreement may be terminated by us on a program-by-program basis upon one hundred twenty (120) days prior written notice before exercise of that program option, and after such program option exercise, by either party for material breach by the other party. With certain exceptions, the collaboration agreement expires upon the later of (a) the last-to-expire option term and (b) if one or more options are exercised, the termination or expiration of the last to expire agreement with respect to such exercised option.
NantBioScience, Inc. (NantBioScience): In January 2014, we entered into a collaboration agreement with NantBioScience, an entity controlled by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong in which Celgene contributed $75 million of cash, the rights to the future royalty stream based on net sales of certain products of Active Biomaterials, LLC, another entity controlled by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, and licenses to two nab® product candidates. In return, Celgene received a 14 percent preferred equity ownership in NantBioScience, an option to license a certain number of product candidates developed by NantBioScience, including the two nab® product candidates that Celgene is licensing to NantBioScience, and the parent company of NantBioScience assumed, and agreed to pay and satisfy when due, our obligation to pay The Chan Soon-Shiong Institute for Advanced Health (CSS Institute) $50.0 million in contingent, matching contributions. The transaction became effective in March 2014. Unless Celgene terminates the collaboration earlier, in Celgene’s sole discretion upon 30 days written notice, the collaboration will continue until the earliest to occur of: (a) Celgene licensing four NantBioScience product candidates; (b) NantBioScience presenting data packages for ten product candidates; and (c) the date which is 10 years after the effective date. Regardless of any termination of the collaboration, the 14 percent preferred equity ownership in NantBioScience and the assumption of the $50.0 million in contingent, matching contributions by the parent company of NantBioScience remain in effect. We performed a valuation of the components of the transaction and allocated the consideration transferred as follows: $50.0 million for the collaboration agreement upfront expense; $25.0 million related to the settlement of contingent matching contributions, and; $90.0 million related to the equity ownership in NantBioScience.
Other Collaboration Arrangements in 2014: In addition to the collaboration arrangements described above, we entered into a number of collaborative arrangements during 2014 that include the potential for future milestone payments of up to an aggregate $134.5 million related to the attainment of specified developmental, regulatory and sales milestones over a period of several years. Our obligation to fund these efforts is contingent upon our continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs.
98
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Summarized financial information related to our collaboration agreements is presented below:
| Year ended December 31, | As of December 31,1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Research and Development Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upfront Fees | Milestones | Extension of Agreements | Amortization of Prepaid Research and Development | Additional Equity Investments Made | Intangible Asset Balance | Equity Investment Balance | Percentage of Outstanding Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleron | 2014 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 52.4 | $ | — | $ | 179.7 | 14 | % | |||||||||
| 2013 | — | 17.0 | — | — | 10.0 | — | 127.2 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 and prior | 70.0 | 27.5 | — | — | 30.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Acetylon | 2014 | — | — | — | 15.3 | — | 20.4 | 25.0 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 50.0 | — | — | 4.3 | 10.0 | 35.7 | 25.0 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | — | — | — | — | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | — | — | — | — | 10.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Agios | 2014 | — | — | 20.0 | — | 38.3 | — | 587.4 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | — | — | 20.0 | — | 12.8 | — | 113.0 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 and prior | 121.2 | — | 20.0 | — | 37.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| bluebird | 2014 | — | — | — | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 74.7 | — | — | — | — | 0.2 | — | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
| Epizyme | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 9.9 | — | 69.3 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | — | 25.0 | — | — | 1.0 | — | 69.4 | 12 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 65.0 | — | — | — | 25.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| FORMA | 2014 | 225.0 | — | — | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 52.8 | — | — | — | — | 0.2 | — | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
| MorphoSys | 2014 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 73.9 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 94.3 | — | — | — | 61.3 | — | 61.4 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
NantBioScience2 | 2014 | 50.0 | — | — | — | 90.0 | — | 90.0 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| OncoMed | 2014 | 2.5 | — | — | — | — | — | 32.0 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 155.0 | — | — | — | 22.2 | — | 43.4 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Sutro | 2014 | 72.6 | — | — | 0.2 | 11.9 | 12.8 | 17.6 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | — | — | — | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 26.3 | — | — | 0.2 | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Collaboration Arrangements | 2014 | 103.5 | 8.3 | — | 7.5 | 55.7 | 34.4 | 58.8 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 149.0 | 1.0 | — | 0.9 | 10.4 | 23.1 | 6.1 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 87.2 | 5.4 | — | — | 6.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year-end balance and percentage of outstanding equity are presented for the current and prior year.
2 $25.0 million of expense related to the settlement of contingent matching contributions was also recognized at the inception of the collaboration agreement with NantBioScience and included in Selling, General and Administrative expense.
99
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
18. Commitments and Contingencies
Contingent Value Rights: In connection with the acquisition of Abraxis in 2010, CVRs were issued under a Contingent Value Rights Agreement, or CVR Agreement, entered into between Celgene and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as trustee. The CVRs are registered for trading on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "CELGZ." The fair value of the liability of the Company related to payments under the CVR Agreement are subject to fluctuation based on trading prices for the publicly traded CVRs. Subsequent to the Abraxis Acquisition Date, we measured the contingent consideration represented by the CVRs at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in operating earnings. The fair value of our liability related to the CVRs was $136.3 million at the end of 2014 compared to $118.1 million at the end of 2013.
Each holder of a CVR is entitled to receive a pro rata portion, based on the number of CVRs then outstanding, of each of the following contingent cash payments:
| • | Milestone Payment #1. $250.0 million upon FDA approval of ABRAXANE® for use in the treatment of NSCLC if such approval permits us to market ABRAXANE® with FDA approval that includes a progression-free survival, or PFS, claim, but only if this milestone is achieved no later than the fifth anniversary of the Merger. |
| • | Milestone Payment #2. $400.0 million (if achieved no later than April 1, 2013) or $300.0 million (if achieved after April 1, 2013 and before the fifth anniversary of the Merger) upon FDA approval of ABRAXANE® for use in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, if such approval permits us to market ABRAXANE® with FDA approval that includes an overall survival claim. |
| • | Net Sales Payments. For each full one-year period ending December 31 during the term of the CVR Agreement, which we refer to as a net sales measuring period (with the first net sales measuring period beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011): |
| ◦ | 2.5% of the net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $1.000 billion but are less than or equal to $2.000 billion for such period, plus |
| ◦ | an additional amount equal to 5% of the net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $2.000 billion but are less than or equal to $3.000 billion for such period, plus |
| ◦ | an additional amount equal to 10% of the net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $3.000 billion for such period. |
No payments will be due under the CVR Agreement with respect to net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products after December 31, 2025, which we refer to as the net sales payment termination date, unless net sales for the net sales measuring period ending on December 31, 2025 are equal to or greater than $1.000 billion, in which case the net sales payment termination date will be extended until the last day of the first net sales measuring period subsequent to December 31, 2025 during which net sales of ABRAXANE® and the Abraxis pipeline products are less than $1.000 billion or, if earlier, December 31, 2030.
Milestone Payment #1 update: In October 2012, the FDA approved ABRAXANE® for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, in combination with carboplatin, in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy. The FDA approval was based on tumor response rates and did not result in the use of a marketing label that includes a progression-free survival claim, and accordingly, the CVR Milestone Payment #1, as described above, has not been achieved. This approval resulted in the related $1.172 billion intangible asset obtained from the Abraxis acquisition being reclassified in October 2012 from an acquired IPR&D intangible to an acquired developed product rights intangible asset and amortization commenced in October 2012.
Milestone Payment #2 update: In September 2013, the FDA approved ABRAXANE® for use in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, permitting us to market ABRAXANE® with a label that includes an overall survival claim. This approval resulted in the achievement of milestone #2 and the subsequent payment of $300.0 million to CVR holders in October 2013.
Leases: We lease offices and research facilities under various operating lease agreements in the United States and international markets. We also lease automobiles and certain equipment in these same markets. At December 31, 2014, the non-cancelable lease terms for the operating leases expire at various dates between 2015 and 2023 and include renewal options. In general, the Company is also required to reimburse the lessors for real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance and other operating costs associated with the leases.
100
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2014 are:
Operating Leases | |||
| 2015 | $ | 57.1 | |
| 2016 | 47.2 | ||
| 2017 | 37.1 | ||
| 2018 | 25.1 | ||
| 2019 | 16.2 | ||
| Thereafter | 36.0 | ||
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 218.7 | |
Total rental expense under operating leases was approximately $62.2 million in 2014, $50.9 million in 2013 and $41.9 million in 2012.
Lines of Credit: We maintain lines of credit with several banks to support our hedging programs and to facilitate the issuance of bank letters of credit and guarantees on behalf of our subsidiaries. Lines of credit supporting our hedging programs as of December 31, 2014 allowed us to enter into derivative contracts with settlement dates through 2017. As of December 31, 2014, we have entered into derivative contracts with net notional amounts totaling $8.231 billion. Lines of credit facilitating the issuance of bank letters of credit and guarantees as of December 31, 2014 allowed us to have letters of credit and guarantees issued on behalf of our subsidiaries totaling $130.3 million.
Other Commitments: Our obligations related to product supply contracts totaled $177.5 million at December 31, 2014. We are also committed to pay the remaining $8.0 million balance due from our acquisition of a manufacturing facility in Switzerland.
Collaboration Arrangements: We have entered into certain research and development collaboration agreements, as identified in Note 17 above, with third parties that include the funding of certain development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts with the potential for future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets. Our obligation to fund these efforts is contingent upon continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs. Due to the nature of these arrangements, the future potential payments are inherently uncertain, and accordingly no amounts have been recorded for the potential future achievement of these targets in our accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Contingencies: We believe we maintain insurance coverage adequate for our current needs. Our operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations, which impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for the treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. We review the effects of such laws and regulations on our operations and modify our operations as appropriate. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.
We have ongoing customs, duties and VAT examinations in various countries that have yet to be settled. Based on our knowledge of the claims and facts and circumstances to date, none of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, are deemed to be material to our financial condition.
Legal Proceedings:
Like many companies in our industry, we have from time to time received inquiries and subpoenas and other types of information requests from government authorities and others and we have been subject to claims and other actions related to our business activities. While the ultimate outcome of investigations, inquires, information requests and legal proceedings is difficult to predict, adverse resolutions or settlements of those matters may result in, among other things, modification of our business practices, product recalls, costs and significant payments, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Pending patent proceedings include challenges to the scope, validity and/or enforceability of our patents relating to certain of our products, uses of products or processes. Further, we are subject to claims of third parties that we infringe their patents covering products or processes. Although we believe we have substantial defenses to these challenges and claims, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these matters and an adverse decision in these proceedings could result in one or more of the following: (i) a loss of patent protection, which could lead to a significant reduction of sales that could materially affect future results of operations, (ii) our inability to continue to engage in certain activities, and (iii) significant liabilities, including payment of damages, royalties and/or license fees to any such third party.
101
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Among the principal matters pending are the following:
Patent Related Proceedings:
REVLIMID®: We received Notice Letters, dated August 30, 2010 and June 12, 2012 from Natco Pharma Limited of India (Natco) notifying us of Natco’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA), which contain Paragraph IV certifications against certain of Celgene’s patents that are listed in the FDA Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”) for REVLIMID® (lenalidomide). Natco’s Notice Letters were sent in connection with its filing of an ANDA seeking permission from the FDA to market a generic version of 25mg, 15mg, 10mg and 5mg REVLIMID® capsules. We filed separate infringement actions (which were subsequently consolidated) in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Natco, Natco’s U.S. partner, Arrow International Limited (Arrow), and Arrow’s parent company, Watson Laboratories, Inc. (Watson, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Actavis, Inc. and formerly known as Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) (Natco, Arrow and Watson are collectively referred to hereinafter as “Natco”). In its answer and counterclaim, Natco asserts that our patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed by Natco’s proposed generic products.
The patents in dispute include United States Patent Nos. 5,635,517; 6,045,501; 6,315,720; 6,555,554; 6,561,976; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 7,119,106; 7,465,800; 6,281,230; 7,189,740; 7,968,569; 8,288,415; 8,315,886 and 8,404,717, plus three non-Orange Book listed patents, United States Patent Nos. 7,977,357; 8,193,219 and 8,431,598.
A claim construction decision was issued on May 27, 2014. Fact discovery closed on August 4, 2014. On October 23, 2014, the court denied: (i) Natco’s motion to limit the patent claims asserted by us and (ii) Natco’s motion to dismiss its inequitable-conduct claims and strike our unclean-hands defense. In addition, the court granted our motion to bifurcate and stay expert discovery pertaining to the REMS patents. On November 18, 2014, the court granted-in-part Natco’s motion to amend its invalidity contentions. We appealed that decision on December 2, 2014 and briefing on the appeal was completed on January 20, 2015. A hearing has not yet been set for the appeal. Expert discovery is set to close on July 21, 2015. No trial date has been set.
We believe that Natco’s defenses and counterclaims are unlikely to be sustained and we intend to vigorously assert our patent rights. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of this proceeding, we currently expect that it will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. However, if Natco is successful in challenging all the patents in dispute or if the court rules that certain of our key patent claims are invalid or not infringed, such events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We received a third Notice Letter from Natco dated April 3, 2014, notifying us of Natco’s Paragraph IV certifications against five patents, including United States Patent Nos. 8,404,717 (already in suit), 8,530,498; 8,589,188; 8,626,531; and 8,648,095. On May 15, 2014, we filed an infringement action in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Natco, Arrow and Watson. Natco filed its answer and counterclaim on June 13, 2014, and asserts that our patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed by Natco’s proposed generic products. A scheduling order has yet to be issued.
ABRAXANE®: On December 14, 2011, Cephalon, Inc. and Acusphere, Inc. filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleging, among other things, that the making, using, selling, offering to sell and importing of ABRAXANE® brand drug infringes claims of United States Patent No. RE40,493. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and injunctive relief. On December 3, 2013, the court issued an order construing certain claim terms. Based on that order, on March 18, 2014, the parties agreed to a judgment of noninfringement in Celgene’s favor. On April 15, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit seeking a review of the lower court’s construction of certain claim terms. On April 22, 2014 we filed a Notice of Cross-Appeal seeking review of certain terms defined in the lower court’s order.
On May 23, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss our cross-appeal, which motion was denied on June 30, 2014. Briefing on the appeal was completed on November 24, 2014. The Court has yet to schedule a hearing on the appeal and cross-appeal.
THALOMID® and REVLIMID®: On October 2, 2013, Andrulis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Andrulis) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware claiming infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,140,346 (“the ‘346 patent”). Andrulis alleges that we are liable for infringement of one or more claims of the ‘346 patent, which covers the use of THALOMID® (and, as asserted by Andrulis, REVLIMID®) in combination with an alkylating agent (e.g., melphalan) to treat cancers. Andrulis is seeking an unspecified amount of damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. We disagree with Andrulis’ allegations and intend to vigorously defend against this infringement suit. On November 25, 2013, we filed a motion to dismiss Andrulis’ complaint. Andrulis’ motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint was granted on December 30, 2013. We filed a motion to dismiss Andrulis’ amended complaint on January 30, 2014. On April 11, 2014, the court denied our motion in part and granted our motion in part, dismissing two of Andrulis' four infringement claims without leave to amend. We filed an answer
102
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
to the remaining claims on April 25, 2014. On December 23, 2014 we requested from the court leave to file a partial summary judgment motion and on February 6, 2015 the court granted our request.
Fact discovery is set to close on June 16, 2015. A joint claim construction brief is due on March 30, 2015. A claim construction hearing is scheduled for April 30, 2015. Expert discovery is set to close on December 21, 2015. Trial is scheduled to begin on June 6, 2016. We do not expect the ultimate outcome of this lawsuit to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
ISTODAX® (romidepsin): We received a Notice Letter dated March 17, 2014 from Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (Fresenius) notifying us of Fresenius’s ANDA that seeks approval from the FDA to market a generic version of romidepsin for injection. The Notice Letter contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 7,608,280 and 7,611,724 (the ‘280 and ‘724 patents) that are listed in the Orange Book for ISTODAX®.
On April 30, 2014, Celgene and Astellas Pharma Inc., filed an infringement action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Fresenius. In its answer and counterclaim, Fresenius asserts that the ‘280 and ‘724 patents are invalid and/or not infringed by its proposed generic products. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of Fresenius’s ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed; or (ii) May 5, 2017.
On August 4, 2014, we received a Notice Letter from InnoPharma, Inc. (InnoPharma) notifying us of Innopharma's ANDA that seeks approval from the FDA to market a generic version of romidepsin for injection. The Notice Letter contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 7,608,280 and 7,611,724 (the '280 and '724 patents) that are listed in the Orange Book for ISTODAX®.
On September 12, 2014, we and Astellas Pharma Inc., filed an infringement action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against InnoPharma. In its answer and counterclaim, InnoPharma asserts that the ‘280 and ‘724 patents are invalid and/or not infringed by its proposed generic products. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of InnoPharma's ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed; or (ii) May 5, 2017.
These two cases were consolidated in December 2014. Fact discovery is set to close in the consolidated cases on November 6, 2015. A claim construction hearing is scheduled for October 16, 2015. Expert discovery in the consolidated cases is set to close on July 13, 2016 and trial is scheduled to begin on September 19, 2016.
THALOMID® (thalidomide): We received a Notice Letter dated December 18, 2014 from Lannett Holdings, Inc. (Lannett) notifying us of Lannett’s ANDA which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 5,629,327; 6,045,501; 6,315,720; 6,561,976; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 6,869,399; 6,908,432; 7,141,018; 7,230,012; 7,435,745; 7,874,984; 7,959,566; 8,204,763; 8,315,886; 8,589,188; and 8,626,531 that are listed in the Orange Book for THALOMID® (thalidomide). Lannett is seeking to market a generic version of 50mg, 100mg, 150mg and 200mg of THALOMID® capsules. On January 30, 2015, we filed an infringement action against Lannett in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Other Proceedings:
In 2009, we received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) seeking documents and other information relating to requests by manufacturers of generic drugs to purchase our patented REVLIMID® and THALOMID® brand drugs in order for the FTC to evaluate whether there may be reason to believe that we have engaged in unfair methods of competition. In 2010, the State of Connecticut issued a subpoena referring to the same issues raised by the 2009 CID. Also in 2010, we received a second CID from the FTC relating to this matter. We continue to cooperate with the FTC and State of Connecticut investigations.
On April 3, 2014, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Mylan) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that we violated various federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws by allegedly refusing to sell samples of our THALOMID® and REVLIMID® brand drugs so that Mylan can conduct the bioequivalence testing needed to submit ANDAs to the FDA for approval to market generic versions of these products. Mylan is seeking injunctive relief, damages and declaratory judgment. We filed a motion to dismiss Mylan’s complaint on May 25, 2014. Mylan filed its opposition to our motion to dismiss on June 16, 2014. The Federal Trade Commission filed an amicus curiae brief in opposition to our motion to dismiss on June 17, 2014. Oral arguments on our motion to dismiss were heard on December 9, 2014. On December 22, 2014, the court granted (i) Celgene’s motion to dismiss Mylan’s claims based on Section 1 of the Sherman Act without prejudice, and (ii) the claims arising under the New Jersey Antitrust Act. The court denied our motion to dismiss the rest of the claims which
103
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
primarily relate to Section 2 of the Sherman Act and to the statute of limitations with respect to THALOMID®. On January 6, 2015 we filed a motion to certify for interlocutory appeal the order denying our motion to dismiss with respect to the claims relating to Section 2 of the Sherman Act and on January 20, 2015 we filed an answer to the Complaint. On January 30, 2015 the District Court granted our motion allowing us to file a Petition for permission to appeal to the United State Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The Petition was filed with United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on February 9, 2015. A scheduling order has not yet been issued in this case. We intend to vigorously defend against Mylan’s claims.
In 2011, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California informed us that they were investigating possible off-label marketing and improper payments to physicians in connection with the sales of THALOMID® and REVLIMID®. In 2012, we learned that two other United States Attorneys’ offices (the Northern District of Alabama and the Eastern District of Texas) and various state Attorneys General were conducting related investigations. In February 2014, three civil qui tam actions related to those investigations brought by three former Celgene employees on behalf of the federal and various state governments under the federal false claims act and similar state laws were unsealed after the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) declined to intervene in any of these actions. The DOJ retains the right to intervene in these actions at any time. Additionally, while several states have similarly declined to intervene in some of these actions, they also retain the right to intervene in the future. The plaintiffs in the Northern District of Alabama and Eastern District of Texas actions have voluntarily dismissed their cases. On April 25, 2014, we filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in the remaining (Central District of California) action, United States of America ex. rel. Beverly Brown V. Celgene Corp., unsealed February 5, 2014 (the Brown Action). The plaintiff filed an opposition to our motion to dismiss on May 23, 2014. The DOJ as well as several state Attorneys General filed Statements of Interest opposing certain arguments made in our motion to dismiss. The judge issued an order on July 10, 2014 largely denying our motion to dismiss, but granting in part our motion with respect to certain state claims. We filed our answer to the complaint on August 28, 2014. Fact discovery is set to close on July 24, 2015. Expert discovery is set to close on September 25, 2015. Summary judgment motions are due November 16, 2015. We intend to vigorously defend against the remaining claims in the Brown Action.
In a related matter, in July 2014, we received a letter purportedly on behalf of two stockholders that demands, primarily on the basis of the allegations in the Brown Action, that our board of directors take action on the Company’s behalf to correct alleged deficiencies in the Company’s internal controls and to recover from current and past directors and officers damages those stockholders allege to have resulted from breaches of fiduciary duties related to the matters alleged in the Brown Action. Our Board has formed a Demand Investigation Committee, and with the assistance of independent counsel retained by it, the Committee is considering the issues raised in the stockholders’ letter.
In November 2014, we received another letter purportedly on behalf of a stockholder that demands access to certain books and records of the Company for the purpose of investigating matters pertaining to the Brown Action. The Company intends to comply with the demand to the extent it considers reasonable in view of the Demand Investigation Committee’s ongoing consideration of matters pertaining to the Brown Action.
On June 7, 2013, Children's Medical Center Corporation (CMCC) filed a lawsuit against us in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts alleging that our obligation to pay a 1% royalty on REVLIMID® net sales revenue and a 2.5% royalty on POMALYST®/IMNOVID® net sales revenue under a license agreement entered into in December 2002 extended beyond February 28, 2013 and that our failure to make royalty payments to CMCC subsequent to February 28, 2013 breached the license agreement. CMCC is seeking unspecified damages and a declaration that the license agreement remains in full force and effect. In July 2013, we removed these proceedings to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. On August 5, 2013, we filed an answer to CMCC’s complaint and a counterclaim for declaratory judgment that our obligations to pay royalties have expired. On August 26, 2013, CMCC filed an answer to our counterclaim. On November 24, 2014, the scheduling order was amended and the close of fact discovery was extended to February 13, 2015. No trial date has as yet been set by the court. On July 8, 2014, CR Rev Holdings, LLC (“CR Rev”) filed a complaint against Celgene in the same action. CR Rev alleges that CMCC sold and assigned a substantial portion of the royalty payments owed by Celgene on the sale of REVLIMID® to CR Rev. CR Rev has alleged causes of action with respect to REVLIMID® identical to those alleged by CMCC, and seeks unspecified damages and a declaration that the license agreement is still in effect. We intend to vigorously defend against CMCC's and CR Rev’s claims. As of December 31, 2014, we consider the range of reasonably possible loss relating to this lawsuit to be between zero and $85.5 million, with the high end of the range being the royalty payments on REVLIMID® we would have made to CMCC under the license agreement through December 31, 2014, if our obligation to pay royalties remained in effect. CMCC contends that our royalty obligation continues on net sales of REVLIMID®, as well as POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, at least until May 2016 and if CMCC prevails, we may be obligated to continue to pay royalties on sales for periods after December 31, 2014.
In the second quarter of 2014, we received a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts requesting certain documents relating to an investigators meeting in 2011 with respect to a clinical study relating to ABRAXANE®. The Company is cooperating with the United States Attorney in connection with this subpoena.
104
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
On October 2, 2014, a complaint was filed in Delaware Chancery Court by a stockholder asserting derivative claims on behalf of the Company against the non-employee members of the Board of Directors. The complaint alleges that equity grants made to non-employee directors in 2012 and 2013 were excessive compared to the equity grants to directors of peer companies, and that the award of such allegedly excessive compensation constituted a breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks equitable relief, disgorgement of the alleged excess compensation, modification of the Company’s compensation process to limit the equity awards that may be granted to non-employee directors, and attorneys’ fees and other costs.
On November 7, 2014, the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craft Workers Local 1 Health Fund (IUB) filed a putative class action lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that we violated various state antitrust, consumer protection, and unfair competition laws by (a) allegedly securing an exclusive supply contract with Seratec S.A.R.L. so that Barr Laboratories (“Barr” who at one time held an ANDA for THALOMID®) allegedly could not secure its own supply of thalidomide active pharmaceutical ingredient; (b) allegedly refusing to sell samples of our THALOMID® and REVLIMID® brand drugs to Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Lannett Company, and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories so that those companies could conduct the bioequivalence testing needed to submit ANDAs to the FDA for approval to market generic versions of these products; and (c) allegedly bringing unjustified patent infringement lawsuits against Barr and Natco Pharma Limited in order to allegedly delay those companies from obtaining approval for proposed generic versions of THALOMID® and REVLIMID®. IUB, on behalf of itself and a putative class of third party payors, is seeking injunctive relief and damages. On February 6, 2015, we filed a motion to dismiss IUB’s complaint. We intend to vigorously defend against IUB’s claims.
19. Geographic and Product Information
Operations by Geographic Area: Revenues primarily consisted of sales of REVLIMID®, ABRAXANE®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, VIDAZA®, azacitidine for injection, THALOMID®, OTEZLA® and ISTODAX®. Additional sources of revenue included a licensing agreement with Novartis, which entitles us to royalties on FOCALIN XR® and the entire RITALIN® family of drugs, the sale of services through our Cellular Therapeutics subsidiary and other miscellaneous licensing agreements.
| Revenues | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
| United States | $ | 4,482.8 | $ | 3,862.1 | $ | 3,169.1 | ||||||
| Europe | 2,310.8 | 1,865.7 | 1,617.7 | |||||||||
| All other | 876.8 | 766.1 | 719.9 | |||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 7,670.4 | $ | 6,493.9 | $ | 5,506.7 | ||||||
Long-Lived Assets1 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| United States | $ | 406.1 | $ | 348.0 | ||||
| Europe | 222.2 | 230.4 | ||||||
| All other | 14.3 | 15.0 | ||||||
| Total long lived assets | $ | 642.6 | $ | 593.4 | ||||
1 | Long-lived assets consist of net property, plant and equipment. |
105
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Revenues by Product: Total revenues from external customers by product for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
| 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||
REVLIMID® | $ | 4,980.0 | $ | 4,280.3 | $ | 3,766.6 | ||||||
ABRAXANE® | 848.2 | 648.9 | 426.7 | |||||||||
POMALYST®/IMNOVID® | 679.7 | 305.4 | 12.0 | |||||||||
VIDAZA® | 611.9 | 803.3 | 823.2 | |||||||||
| azacitidine for injection | 78.2 | 23.3 | — | |||||||||
THALOMID® | 221.2 | 244.5 | 302.1 | |||||||||
OTEZLA® | 69.8 | — | — | |||||||||
ISTODAX® | 65.6 | 54.0 | 50.0 | |||||||||
| Other | 9.2 | 2.6 | 5.0 | |||||||||
| Total net product sales | 7,563.8 | 6,362.3 | 5,385.6 | |||||||||
| Other revenue | 106.6 | 131.6 | 121.1 | |||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 7,670.4 | $ | 6,493.9 | $ | 5,506.7 | ||||||
Major Customers: We sell our products primarily through wholesale distributors and specialty pharmacies in the United States, which account for a large portion of our total revenues. International sales are primarily made directly to hospitals, clinics and retail chains, many of which are government owned. During the three-year period of 2014, 2013 and 2012, only Amerisource Bergen accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue in at least one of those years and is summarized below. The percentage of amounts due from this customer compared to total net accounts receivable is also summarized below as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
| Percent of Total Revenue | Percent of Net Accounts Receivable | ||||||||||||||
| Customer | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Amerisource Bergen Corp. | 4.2 | % | 10.7 | % | 11.5 | % | 3.6 | % | 6.4 | % | |||||
20. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
| 2014 | 1Q 3 | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Year | |||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 1,730.0 | $ | 1,872.7 | $ | 1,982.2 | $ | 2,085.5 | $ | 7,670.4 | ||||||||||
Gross profit1 | 1,621.4 | 1,745.7 | 1,859.1 | 1,951.7 | 7,177.9 | |||||||||||||||
| Income tax provision | 52.6 | 109.0 | 69.0 | 96.9 | 327.5 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | 279.7 | 597.8 | 508.5 | 613.9 | 1,999.9 | |||||||||||||||
Net income per share:2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 2.49 | ||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 2.39 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average shares: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 811.5 | 799.6 | 799.6 | 800.2 | 802.7 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 845.1 | 831.0 | 832.8 | 834.6 | 836.0 | |||||||||||||||
106
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
| 2013 | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q 4 | Year | |||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 1,464.6 | $ | 1,599.0 | $ | 1,674.4 | $ | 1,755.9 | $ | 6,493.9 | ||||||||||
Gross profit1 | 1,348.8 | 1,483.2 | 1,557.8 | 1,632.1 | 6,021.9 | |||||||||||||||
| Income tax provision | 63.5 | 79.7 | 69.5 | 2.8 | 215.5 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income | 384.9 | 478.1 | 372.5 | 214.4 | 1,449.9 | |||||||||||||||
Net income per share:2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 1.75 | ||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 1.68 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average shares: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 835.8 | 828.2 | 824.5 | 822.4 | 827.7 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 864.4 | 858.5 | 857.7 | 857.2 | 860.6 | |||||||||||||||
1 | Gross profit is computed by subtracting cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) from net product sales. |
2 | The sum of the quarters may not equal the full year due to rounding. In addition, quarterly and full year basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated separately. |
3 | Net income for 2014 was lower in the first quarter compared to each of the other three quarters primarily due to a higher level of expense related to research and development collaborations. |
4 | Net income for 2013 was lower in the fourth quarter compared to each of the other three quarters primarily due to a higher level of expense related to research and development collaborations, an increase in fair value of our liability related to CVRs and an asset impairment charge related to a royalty receivable asset. |
107
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
CONCLUSION REGARDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (the "Exchange Act"). Based on the foregoing evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In connection with the preparation of our annual consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, or the COSO Framework. Management's assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014.
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this report, has issued their report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, a copy of which is included herein.
108
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Celgene Corporation:
We have audited Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, or COSO. Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO in 2013.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Celgene Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
February 20, 2015
109
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Pursuant to Paragraph G(3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K, the information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) is being incorporated by reference herein from our definitive proxy statement (or an amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K) to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 in connection with our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
See Item 10.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
See Item 10.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
See Item 10.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
See Item 10.
110
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| Page | |
| (a) 1. Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| (a) 2. Financial Statement Schedule | |
| (a) 3. Exhibit Index | |
| The following exhibits are filed with this report or incorporated by reference: | |
111
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
| 2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 18, 2007, among Pharmion Corporation, Celgene Corporation and Cobalt Acquisition LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 19, 2007). | |
| 2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 30, 2010, among Celgene Corporation, Artistry Acquisition Corp. and Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2010). | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended June 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 29, 2014). | |
| 3.2 | Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 16, 1996), as amended effective May 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006), as further amended effective December 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2009), and as further amended effective February 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009). | |
| 4.1 | Contingent Value Rights Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2010, between Celgene Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as trustee, including the Form of CVR Certificate as Annex A (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-A12B filed on October 15, 2010). | |
| 4.2 | Indenture, dated as of October 7, 2010, relating to the 2.450% Senior Notes due 2015, 3.950% Senior Notes due 2020 and 5.700% Senior Notes due 2040, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2010). | |
| 4.3 | Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2012, relating to the 1.900% Senior Notes due 2017 and 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2012). | |
| 4.4 | Indenture, dated as of August 6, 2013, relating to the 2.300% Senior Notes due 2018, 4.000% Senior Notes due 2023 and the 5.250% Senior Notes due 2043, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2013). | |
| 4.5 | Indenture, dated as of May 15, 2014, relating to the 2.250% Senior Notes due 2019, 3.625% Senior Notes due 2024 and the 4.625% Senior Notes due 2044, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 15, 2014). | |
| 4.6 | Form of 2.450% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2010). | |
| 4.7 | Form of 3.950% Senior Notes due 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2010). | |
| 4.8 | Form of 5.700% Senior Notes due 2040 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2010). | |
| 4.9 | Form of 1.900% Senior Notes due 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2012). | |
| 4.10 | Form of 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2012). | |
| 4.11 | Form of 2.300% Senior Notes due 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2013). | |
| 4.12 | Form of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2013). | |
| 4.13 | Form of 5.250% Senior Note due 2043 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2013). | |
| 4.14 | Form of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 15, 2014). | |
| 4.15 | Form of 3.625% Senior Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 15, 2014). | |
| 4.16 | Form of 4.625% Senior Notes due 2044 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 15, 2014). | |
112
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
| 10.1 | 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company's Proxy Statement dated May 30, 1997), as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, effective as of June 22, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). | |
| 10.2 | 1995 Non Employee Directors' Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company's Proxy Statement, dated May 24, 1999), as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, effective as of June 22, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002), as further amended by Amendment No. 2 thereto, effective as of April 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002), as further amended by Amendment No. 3 thereto, effective as of April 23, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005), as further amended by Amendment No. 4 thereto, effective as of April 5, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-126296)), as amended by Amendment No. 5 thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007), as further amended by Amendment No. 6 thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008). | |
| 10.3 | Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each officer and director of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996). | |
| 10.4 | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective May 1, 2006 between the Company and Robert J. Hugin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006), as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, effective as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008), as further amended by Amendment No. 2 thereto, effective as of June 16, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2010). | |
| 10.5 | Celgene Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of April 17, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2013), as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, effective as of April 17, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 19, 2014). | |
| 10.6 | Development and License Agreement between the Company and Novartis Pharma AG, dated April 19, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000). | |
| 10.7 | Collaborative Research and License Agreement between the Company and Novartis Pharma AG, dated December 20, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000). | |
| 10.8 | Celgene Corporation 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004), as amended and restated, effective January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed on May 12, 2008). | |
| 10.9 | Anthrogenesis Corporation Qualified Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002). | |
| 10.10 | Distribution and Supply Agreement between SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline and Celgene Corporation, dated as of March 31, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003). | |
| 10.11 | Technical Services Agreement among the Company, Celgene UK Manufacturing II, Limited (f/k/a Penn T Limited), Penn Pharmaceutical Services Limited and Penn Pharmaceutical Holding Limited, dated October 21, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
| 10.12 | Lease Agreement between the Company and Powder Horn Associates, with respect to the Warren, New Jersey property, dated January 16, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated July 24, 1987) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
| 10.13 | Finished Goods Supply Agreement between the Company and Penn Pharmaceutical Services Limited, dated September 8, 2004 (certain portions of the agreement have been redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which has been granted) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005). | |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |
| 10.14 | Distribution Services and Storage Agreement between the Company and Sharp Corporation, dated January 1, 2005 (certain portions of the agreement have been redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which has been granted) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005). | |
| 10.15 | Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreement between Celgene Corporation and Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, dated as of June 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2010). | |
| 10.16 | Stockholders' Agreement among Celgene Corporation, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, California Capital LP, Patrick Soon-Shiong 2009 GRAT 1, Patrick Soon-Shiong 2009 GRAT 2, Michele B. Soon-Shiong GRAT 1, Michele B. Soon-Shiong GRAT 2, Soon-Shiong Community Property Revocable Trust, California Capital Trust and Michele B. Chan Soon-Shiong, dated as of June 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2010). | |
| 10.17 | Letter Agreement between the Company and Jacqualyn A. Fouse, dated August 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2010). | |
| 10.18 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Celgene Corporation, the lender parties named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, dated as of April 18, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2013). | |
| 10.19 | Celgene Corporation Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013). | |
| 10.20 | Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012). | |
| 10.21 | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012). | |
| 10.22 | Letter agreement with Mark J. Alles (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013). | |
| 10.23 | Letter agreement with Thomas O. Daniel, M.D. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013). | |
| 10.24 | Letter agreement with Perry A. Karsen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013). | |
| 10.25† | License Agreement among the Company, Celgene Alpine Investment Company II LLC and Nogra Pharma Limited, dated as of April 23, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 29, 2014). | |
| 10.26 | Letter Agreement between the Company and Peter N. Kellogg, dated May 21, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2014). | |
| 14.1 | Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
| 21.1* | List of Subsidiaries. | |
| 23.1* | Consent of KPMG LLP. | |
| 24.1* | Power of Attorney | |
| 31.1* | Certification by the Company's Chief Executive Officer. | |
| 31.2* | Certification by the Company's Chief Financial Officer. | |
| 32.1* | Certification by the Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
| 32.2* | Certification by the Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
| 101* | The following materials from Celgene Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | |
113
*Filed herewith.
† Confidential treatment requested as to certain portions, which portions have been omitted and submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission
114
SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person or entity whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert J. Hugin its true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for it and in its name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all contents and purposes as it might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| CELGENE CORPORATION | ||||
| By: | /s/ Robert J. Hugin Robert J. Hugin Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) | |||
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Date: February 20, 2015
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Robert J. Hugin Robert J. Hugin | Chairman of the Board; Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) | February 20, 2015 | ||
/s/ Peter N. Kellogg Peter N. Kellogg | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) | February 20, 2015 | ||
* Richard W. Barker | Director | February 20, 2015 | ||
* Michael D. Casey | Director | February 20, 2015 | ||
* Carrie S. Cox | Director | February 20, 2015 | ||
* Michael A. Friedman | Director | February 20, 2015 | ||
* Gilla Kaplan | Director | February 20, 2015 | ||
* James Loughlin | Director | February 20, 2015 | ||
* Ernest Mario | Director | February 20, 2015 | ||
*By: /s/ Robert J. Hugin
Robert J. Hugin
Attorney-in-fact
115
Celgene Corporation and Subsidiaries
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(In Millions)
| Year ended December 31, | Balance at Beginning of Year | Charged to Expense or Sales | Deductions | Balance at End of Year | ||||||||||||
| 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 27.9 | $ | (2.7 | ) | $ | 4.6 | $ | 20.6 | |||||||
| Allowance for customer discounts | 12.1 | 87.9 | 1 | 88.5 | 11.5 | |||||||||||
| Subtotal | 40.0 | 85.2 | 93.1 | 32.1 | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for sales returns | 15.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 7.8 | 10.2 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 55.5 | $ | 87.7 | $ | 100.9 | $ | 42.3 | ||||||||
| 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 21.8 | $ | 6.2 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 27.9 | ||||||||
| Allowance for customer discounts | 11.2 | 74.3 | 1 | 73.4 | 12.1 | |||||||||||
| Subtotal | 33.0 | 80.5 | 73.5 | 40.0 | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for sales returns | 13.3 | 9.6 | 1 | 7.4 | 15.5 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 46.3 | $ | 90.1 | $ | 80.9 | $ | 55.5 | ||||||||
| 2012: | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 10.1 | $ | 12.5 | $ | 0.8 | $ | 21.8 | ||||||||
| Allowance for customer discounts | 8.7 | 64.9 | 1 | 62.4 | 11.2 | |||||||||||
| Subtotal | 18.8 | 77.4 | 63.2 | 33.0 | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for sales returns | 9.0 | 7.5 | 1 | 3.2 | 13.3 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 27.8 | $ | 84.9 | $ | 66.4 | $ | 46.3 | ||||||||
1 | Amounts are a reduction from gross sales. |
116