UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2007
Commission File Number 0-16421
PROVIDENT BANKSHARES
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| | |
Maryland | | 52-1518642 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
114 East Lexington Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(410) 277-7000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filed, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
At May 8, 2007, the Registrant had 32,241,256 shares of $1.00 par value common stock outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Forward-looking Statements
This report, as well as other written communications made from time to time by Provident Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) (including, without limitation, the Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders) and oral communications made from time to time by authorized officers of the Corporation, may contain statements relating to the future results of the Corporation (including certain projections and business trends) that are considered “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). Such forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “intend” and “potential.” Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, possible or assumed estimates with respect to the financial condition, expected or anticipated revenue, and results of operations and business of the Corporation, including earnings growth determined using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); revenue growth in retail banking, lending and other areas; origination volume in the Corporation’s consumer, commercial and other lending businesses; asset quality and levels of non-performing assets; current and future capital management programs; non-interest income levels, including fees from services and product sales; tangible capital generation; market share; expense levels; and other business operations and strategies. For these statements, the Corporation claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the PSLRA.
2
The Corporation cautions you that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated in any forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the factors identified in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 under the headings “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” prevailing economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all areas in which the Corporation conducts business or conditions in the securities markets or the banking industry; changes in interest rates, deposit flows, loan demand, real estate values and competition, which can materially affect, among other things, consumer banking revenues, revenues from sales on non-deposit investment products, origination levels in the Corporation’s lending businesses and the level of defaults, losses and prepayments on loans made by the Corporation, whether held in portfolio or sold in the secondary markets; changes in the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios; the Corporation’s ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management personnel the Corporation may acquire into its operations and its ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames; the Corporation’s timely development of new and competitive products or services in a changing environment, and the acceptance of such products or services by customers; operational issues and/or capital spending necessitated by the potential need to adapt to industry changes in information technology systems, on which it is highly dependent; changes in accounting principles, policies, and guidelines; changes in any applicable law, rule, regulation or practice with respect to tax or legal issues; risks and uncertainties related to mergers and related integration and restructuring activities; conditions in the securities markets or the banking industry; changes in the quality or composition of the investment portfolio; litigation liabilities, including costs, expenses, settlements and judgments; or the outcome of other matters before regulatory agencies, whether pending or commencing in the future; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting the Corporation’s operations, pricing, products and services. Additionally, the timing and occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to circumstances beyond the Company’s control. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which are made as of the date of this report, and, except as may be required by applicable law or regulation, the Corporation assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
3
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands, except per share and share amounts) | | March 31, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | (Unaudited) | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 124,528 | | | $ | 142,794 | | | $ | 138,404 | |
Short-term investments | | | 2,603 | | | | 7,118 | | | | 12,059 | |
Mortgage loans held for sale | | | 12,356 | | | | 10,615 | | | | 8,007 | |
Securities available for sale | | | 1,569,279 | | | | 1,582,736 | | | | 1,805,972 | |
Securities held to maturity | | | 68,904 | | | | 101,867 | | | | 110,681 | |
Loans | | | 3,890,421 | | | | 3,865,492 | | | | 3,713,169 | |
Less allowance for loan losses | | | 45,519 | | | | 45,203 | | | | 44,754 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loans | | | 3,844,902 | | | | 3,820,289 | | | | 3,668,415 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment, net | | | 64,670 | | | | 67,936 | | | | 64,558 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 34,997 | | | | 37,084 | | | | 32,465 | |
Goodwill | | | 253,906 | | | | 254,543 | | | | 254,855 | |
Intangible assets | | | 8,515 | | | | 8,965 | | | | 10,315 | |
Other assets | | | 250,032 | | | | 261,946 | | | | 266,703 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,234,692 | | | $ | 6,295,893 | | | $ | 6,372,434 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing | | $ | 769,081 | | | $ | 761,830 | | | $ | 826,598 | |
Interest-bearing | | | 3,513,319 | | | | 3,378,282 | | | | 3,335,841 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | | 4,282,400 | | | | 4,140,112 | | | | 4,162,439 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 498,118 | | | | 658,887 | | | | 760,110 | |
Long-term debt | | | 781,776 | | | | 828,079 | | | | 783,702 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 36,601 | | | | 35,184 | | | | 35,987 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 5,598,895 | | | | 5,662,262 | | | | 5,742,238 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock (par value $1.00) authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued 32,243,534, 32,433,387 and 32,974,784 shares at March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively | | | 32,244 | | | | 32,433 | | | | 32,975 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 362,224 | | | | 370,425 | | | | 393,640 | |
Retained earnings | | | 259,115 | | | | 252,880 | | | | 230,155 | |
Net accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (17,786 | ) | | | (22,107 | ) | | | (26,574 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 635,797 | | | | 633,631 | | | | 630,196 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 6,234,692 | | | $ | 6,295,893 | | | $ | 6,372,434 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income - Unaudited
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Interest Income: | | | | | | | | |
Loans, including fees | | $ | 69,254 | | | $ | 61,147 | |
Investment securities | | | 22,645 | | | | 23,952 | |
Tax-advantaged loans and securities | | | 1,200 | | | | 806 | |
Short-term investments | | | 97 | | | | 79 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total interest income | | | 93,196 | | | | 85,984 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest Expense: | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 25,646 | | | | 17,066 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 7,742 | | | | 8,548 | |
Long-term debt | | | 10,965 | | | | 9,122 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | | 44,353 | | | | 34,736 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | 48,843 | | | | 51,248 | |
Less provision for loan losses | | | 1,052 | | | | 318 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | | 47,791 | | | | 50,930 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Non-Interest Income: | | | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | | 22,271 | | | | 22,052 | |
Commissions and fees | | | 1,662 | | | | 1,608 | |
Net gains | | | 1,203 | | | | 540 | |
Net derivative losses on swaps | | | (63 | ) | | | (603 | ) |
Net cash settlement on swaps | | | 206 | | | | 290 | |
Other non-interest income | | | 4,682 | | | | 4,338 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-interest income | | | 29,961 | | | | 28,225 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Non-Interest Expense: | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 27,929 | | | | 27,632 | |
Occupancy expense, net | | | 6,104 | | | | 5,729 | |
Furniture and equipment expense | | | 3,785 | | | | 3,847 | |
External processing fees | | | 5,090 | | | | 4,967 | |
Restructuring activities | | | 867 | | | | — | |
Other non-interest expense | | | 10,993 | | | | 10,616 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-interest expense | | | 54,768 | | | | 52,791 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 22,984 | | | | 26,364 | |
Income tax expense | | | 6,870 | | | | 8,106 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 16,114 | | | $ | 18,258 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Income Per Share Amounts: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.50 | | | $ | 0.55 | |
Diluted | | | 0.50 | | | | 0.55 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Unaudited
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 16,114 | | | $ | 18,258 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 4,938 | | | | 5,604 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 1,052 | | | | 318 | |
Provision for deferred income tax (benefit) | | | (1,389 | ) | | | 100 | |
Net gains | | | (1,203 | ) | | | (540 | ) |
Net derivative losses on swaps | | | 63 | | | | 603 | |
Originated loans held for sale | | | (31,052 | ) | | | (20,188 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale | | | 29,491 | | | | 20,473 | |
Restructuring activities | | | 867 | | | | — | |
Cash payments for restructuring activities | | | (510 | ) | | | — | |
Net decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets | | | 13,804 | | | | 594 | |
Net increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 1,417 | | | | 2,797 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total adjustments | | | 17,478 | | | | 9,761 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 33,592 | | | | 28,019 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Principal collections and maturities of securities available for sale | | | 39,616 | | | | 58,999 | |
Principal collections and maturities of securities held to maturity | | | 31,815 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale | | | 37,015 | | | | 11,141 | |
Purchases of securities available for sale | | | (56,993 | ) | | | (94,472 | ) |
Loan originations and purchases less principal collections | | | (25,165 | ) | | | (19,824 | ) |
Purchases of premises and equipment | | | (1,753 | ) | | | (2,151 | ) |
Sale of branch facility | | | 1,967 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | | | 26,502 | | | | (46,307 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in deposits | | | 142,288 | | | | 38,251 | |
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings | | | (160,769 | ) | | | 112,358 | |
Proceeds from long-term debt | | | 25,000 | | | | 30,000 | |
Payments and maturities of long-term debt | | | (71,225 | ) | | | (167,128 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of stock | | | 1,729 | | | | 5,405 | |
Tax benefits associated with share based payments | | | 100 | | | | 1,070 | |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | (10,119 | ) | | | (5,278 | ) |
Cash dividends paid on common stock | | | (9,879 | ) | | | (9,393 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | | | (82,875 | ) | | | 5,285 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (22,781 | ) | | | (13,003 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 149,912 | | | | 163,466 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 127,131 | | | $ | 150,463 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Supplemental Disclosures: | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid, net of amount credited to deposit accounts | | $ | 26,781 | | | $ | 23,438 | |
Income taxes paid | | | 90 | | | | 155 | |
Impairment of premises and equipment | | | 357 | | | | — | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
Provident Bankshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—Unaudited
March 31, 2007
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Provident Bankshares Corporation (“the Corporation”), a Maryland corporation, is the bank holding company for Provident Bank (“the Bank”), a Maryland chartered stock commercial bank. The Bank serves individuals and businesses through a network of banking offices and ATMs in Maryland, Virginia, and southern York County, Pennsylvania. Related financial services are offered through its wholly owned subsidiaries. Securities brokerage, investment management and related insurance services are available through Provident Investment Center and leases through Court Square Leasing and Provident Lease Corporation.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and prevailing practices within the banking industry for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements and prevailing practices within the banking industry. The following summary of significant accounting policies of the Corporation is presented to assist the reader in understanding the financial and other data presented in this report. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future quarters or for the year ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 1, 2007.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Bank and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities for the reporting periods. Management evaluates estimates on an on-going basis and believes the following represent its more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its consolidated financial statements: allowance for loan losses, non-accrual loans, other real estate owned, estimates of fair value and intangible assets associated with mergers, other than temporary impairment of investment securities, pension and post-retirement benefits, asset prepayment rates, goodwill and intangible assets, share-based payment, derivative financial instruments, litigation and income taxes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Each estimate and its financial impact, to the extent significant to financial results, is discussed in the audited Consolidated Financial Statements or in the notes to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. It is at least reasonably possible that each of the Corporation’s estimates could change in the near term or that actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could be material to the Corporation’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation uses various derivative financial instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy to mitigate the exposure to changes in market interest rates. The derivative financial instruments used separately or in combination are interest rate swaps and caps. Derivative financial instruments are required to be measured at fair value and recognized as either assets or liabilities in the financial statements. Fair value represents the payment the Corporation would receive or pay if the item were sold or bought in a current transaction. Fair values are generally based on market quotes. The accounting for changes in fair value (gains or losses) of a derivative is dependent on whether the derivative is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”), the Corporation assigns derivatives to one of these categories at the purchase date: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or non-designated derivative. SFAS No. 133 requires an assessment of the expected and ongoing hedge effectiveness of any derivative designated a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Derivatives are included in other assets and other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition.
7
Fair Value Hedges—For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the derivative instrument and related hedge item are marked-to-market through the related interest income or expense, as applicable, except for the ineffective portion which is recorded in non-interest income.
Cash Flow Hedges—For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, marked-to-market adjustments are recorded net of income taxes as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) in stockholders’ equity, except for the ineffective portion which is recorded in non-interest income. Amounts recorded in OCI are recognized into earnings concurrent with the hedged items’ impact on earnings.
Non-Designated Derivatives—Certain economic hedges are not designated as cash flow or as fair value hedges for accounting purposes. As a result, changes in the fair value are recorded in non-interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Interest income or expense related to non-designated derivatives is also recorded in non-interest income.
All qualifying relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items are fully documented by the Corporation. Risk management objectives, strategies and the projected effectiveness of the chosen derivatives to hedge specific risks are also documented. At inception of the hedging relationship and periodically as required under SFAS No. 133, the Corporation evaluates the effectiveness of its hedging instruments. For hedges qualifying for “short-cut” treatment at inception, the ongoing effectiveness testing includes a review of the hedge and the hedged item to determine if the hedge continues to qualify for short-cut treatment. An assumption of no hedge ineffectiveness is allowed for derivatives qualifying for short-cut treatment. For all other derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting, a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of the hedge is required at each reporting date. The Corporation performs effectiveness testing quarterly for all of its hedges. The Corporation uses benchmark interest rates such as LIBOR to hedge the interest rate risk associated with interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities. Using benchmark rates and complying with specific criteria set forth in SFAS No.133, the Corporation has concluded that, for qualifying hedges, changes in fair value or cash flows that are attributable to risks being hedged will be highly effective at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis.
When it is determined that a derivative is not, or ceases to be effective as a hedge, the Corporation discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. When a fair value hedge is discontinued due to ineffectiveness, the Corporation continues to carry the derivative on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition at its fair value as a non-designated derivative, but discontinues marking-to-market the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value. Any previous marked-to-market adjustments recorded to the hedged item are amortized over the remaining life of the asset or liability. All ineffective portions of fair value hedges are reported in and affect net income immediately. When a cash flow hedge is discontinued due to termination of the derivative, the Corporation continues to carry the previous marked-to-market adjustments in accumulated OCI and recognizes the amount into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. If the cash flow hedge is discontinued due to ineffectiveness, the derivative is considered a non-designated derivative and continues to be marked-to-market in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition as an asset or liability, and marked-to-market through current period earnings in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and not through OCI.
Counter-party credit risk associated with derivatives is controlled by dealing with well-established brokers that are highly rated by credit rating agencies and by establishing exposure limits for individual counter-parties. Market risk on interest rate swaps is minimized by using these instruments as hedges and by continually monitoring the positions to ensure ongoing effectiveness. For significant derivative positions, credit risk is controlled by entering into bilateral collateral agreements with brokers, in which the parties pledge collateral to indemnify the counter-party in the case of default. The Corporation’s hedging activities and strategies are monitored by the Bank’s Asset / Liability Committee (“ALCO”) as part of its oversight of the treasury function.
Share-Based Payment
Effective January 1, 2006, the Corporation adopted SFAS No.123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”) that requires companies to recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and nonemployees in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Compensation cost for stock options granted after January 1, 2006 and restricted stock grants is recognized as non-interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of each stock option and restricted share grant. Compensation cost for stock options includes the impact of an estimated forfeiture rate. The impact of forfeitures on the restricted stock grants is recorded as they occur.
8
At March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, no stock options had vesting conditions linked to the performance of the Corporation. The tax benefits associated with tax deductions in excess of compensation costs are recognized as a financing activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Income Taxes
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN No. 48”), which prescribes the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN No. 48 provides guidance for derecognition and classification of previously recognized tax positions that did not meet the certain recognition criteria in addition to recognition of interest and penalties, if necessary.
Other Changes in Accounting Principles
In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (“EITF 06-4”), which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The issue addresses the accounting for the liability and related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements that provide benefits to employees that extend to postretirement periods. The Corporation has split-dollar arrangements that provide certain postretirement death benefits to certain employees. Under the provisions of EITF 06-4, the application of this guidance can be recognized through a cumulative adjustment of beginning retained earnings. Accordingly, this treatment will not have any impact on the Corporation’s results of operations. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact on the financial condition of the Corporation from the application of this guidance.
In September 2006, the EITF issued EITF No. 06-5, “Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance – Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4” (“EITF 06-5”), which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The issue addresses the determination of which amounts should be included in the contractual terms of insurance policies, other than cash surrender values, and whether the impact of the contractual ability to surrender all of the policies at the same time should affect the amounts. The Corporation currently owns various cash surrender and bank owned life insurance policies. Under the provisions of EITF 06-5, the application of this guidance can be recognized through a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. If it is determined that certain amounts are not to be included as part of the life insurance policies or if surrender charges exist, these amounts should be deducted from the cash surrender values and an adjustment will be necessary. Accordingly, this treatment will not have any impact on the Corporation’s results of operations. The Corporation adopted the provisions as of January 1, 2007 and has evaluated the terms of each policy and determined that there was no impact on the financial condition of the Corporation at March 31, 2007.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which will be effective for an entity’s financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those years. The statement provides enhanced guidance on the definition of fair value, the methods to measure fair value and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and should be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The Corporation is currently evaluating the implications of this guidance on the operations of the Corporation.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”), which will be effective for an entity’s financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 159 is permitted for certain eligible items as of the beginning of the fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, if certain condition are met. The statement permits all entities to elect, at specific dates, to measure certain eligible items at fair value. Once fair value is elected for any items, changes in unrealized gains and losses shall be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. This guidance may be applied to specific financial assets or liabilities, is irrevocable once elected and must be applied to the entire instrument, not to only specific risks, cash flows or portions of an instrument. The Corporation is currently evaluating the implications of this guidance on the Corporation.
9
NOTE 2—INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The following table presents the aggregate amortized cost and fair values of the investment securities portfolio as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
March 31, 2007 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations | | $ | 68,327 | | $ | 1 | | $ | 1,686 | | $ | 66,642 |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 700,119 | | | 1,272 | | | 15,614 | | | 685,777 |
Municipal securities | | | 122,513 | | | 706 | | | 314 | | | 122,905 |
Other debt securities | | | 688,550 | | | 6,941 | | | 1,536 | | | 693,955 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total securities available for sale | | | 1,579,509 | | | 8,920 | | | 19,150 | | | 1,569,279 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Securities held to maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other debt securities | | | 68,904 | | | 1,809 | | | 244 | | | 70,469 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total securities held to maturity | | | 68,904 | | | 1,809 | | | 244 | | | 70,469 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total investment securities | | $ | 1,648,413 | | $ | 10,729 | | $ | 19,394 | | $ | 1,639,748 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
December 31, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations | | $ | 73,105 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,694 | | $ | 71,411 |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 718,697 | | | 1,105 | | | 18,947 | | | 700,855 |
Municipal securities | | | 100,973 | | | 693 | | | 293 | | | 101,373 |
Other debt securities | | | 706,748 | | | 3,619 | | | 1,270 | | | 709,097 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total securities available for sale | | | 1,599,523 | | | 5,417 | | | 22,204 | | | 1,582,736 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Securities held to maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other debt securities | | | 101,867 | | | 2,223 | | | 1,140 | | | 102,950 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total securities held to maturity | | | 101,867 | | | 2,223 | | | 1,140 | | | 102,950 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total investment securities | | $ | 1,701,390 | | $ | 7,640 | | $ | 23,344 | | $ | 1,685,686 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
March 31, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies and corporations | | $ | 70,832 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,429 | | $ | 68,403 |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 1,011,815 | | | 644 | | | 39,094 | | | 973,365 |
Municipal securities | | | 82,266 | | | 97 | | | 835 | | | 81,528 |
Other debt securities | | | 680,834 | | | 2,687 | | | 845 | | | 682,676 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total securities available for sale | | | 1,845,747 | | | 3,428 | | | 43,203 | | | 1,805,972 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Securities held to maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other debt securities | | | 110,681 | | | 265 | | | 1,502 | | | 109,444 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total securities held to maturity | | | 110,681 | | | 265 | | | 1,502 | | | 109,444 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total investment securities | | $ | 1,956,428 | | $ | 3,693 | | $ | 44,705 | | $ | 1,915,416 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
10
At March 31, 2007, a net unrealized after-tax loss of $5.8 million on the securities portfolio was reflected in net accumulated other comprehensive loss, an element of the Corporation’s capital. This compared to a net unrealized after-tax loss of $22.2 million at March 31, 2006 and a net unrealized after-tax loss of $9.1 million at December 31, 2006.
Management reviews the investment portfolio on a periodic basis to determine the cause of declines in the fair value of each security. Thorough evaluations of the causes of the unrealized losses are performed to determine whether the impairment is temporary or other than temporary in nature. Considerations such as recoverability of invested amount over a reasonable period of time, the length of time the security is in a loss position and receipt of amounts contractually due, for example, are applied in determining other than temporary impairment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized. At March 31, 2007, the unrealized losses contained within the Corporation’s investment portfolio were considered temporary because the declines in fair value were due to changes in market interest rates, not in estimated cash flows of the underlying debt securities. Management currently has the intent and ability to retain investment securities with unrealized losses until the decline in value has been recovered.
For further details regarding investment securities at December 31, 2006, refer to Notes 1 and 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
NOTE 3—LOANS
A summary of loans outstanding as of the dates indicated is shown in the table below.
| | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2006 |
Residential real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Originated and acquired residential mortgage | | $ | 319,437 | | $ | 333,568 | | $ | 421,122 |
Home equity | | | 1,003,666 | | | 991,327 | | | 924,311 |
Other consumer: | | | | | | | | | |
Marine | | | 374,206 | | | 374,652 | | | 398,060 |
Other | | | 25,065 | | | 28,427 | | | 28,652 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total consumer | | | 1,722,374 | | | 1,727,974 | | | 1,772,145 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial mortgage | | | 454,096 | | | 445,563 | | | 470,364 |
Residential construction | | | 586,127 | | | 599,275 | | | 483,309 |
Commercial construction | | | 369,657 | | | 357,594 | | | 311,036 |
Commercial business | | | 758,167 | | | 735,086 | | | 676,315 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial | | | 2,168,047 | | | 2,137,518 | | | 1,941,024 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total loans | | $ | 3,890,421 | | $ | 3,865,492 | | $ | 3,713,169 |
| | | | | | | | | |
11
NOTE 4—ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The following table reflects the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
(in thousands) | | 2007 | | 2006 |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 45,203 | | $ | 45,639 |
Provision for loan losses | | | 1,052 | | | 318 |
Less loans charged-off, net of recoveries: | | | | | | |
Originated and acquired residential mortgage | | | 138 | | | 331 |
Home equity | | | 26 | | | 98 |
Marine and other consumer | | | 465 | | | 292 |
Commercial business | | | 107 | | | 482 |
| | | | | | |
Net charge-offs | | | 736 | | | 1,203 |
| | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 45,519 | | $ | 44,754 |
| | | | | | |
NOTE 5—INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The table below presents an analysis of the goodwill and deposit-based intangible activity for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Goodwill | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Net Goodwill | |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | | $ | 255,165 | | | $ | (622 | ) | | $ | 254,543 | |
Adjustment of intangible related to 2004 merger with Southern Financial Bancorp | | | (637 | ) | | | — | | | | (637 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2007 | | $ | 254,528 | | | $ | (622 | ) | | $ | 253,906 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
(in thousands) | | Deposit-based Intangible | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | | $ | 15,429 | | | $ | (6,464 | ) | | $ | 8,965 | |
Amortization expense | | | — | | | | (450 | ) | | | (450 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2007 | | $ | 15,429 | | | $ | (6,914 | ) | | $ | 8,515 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The adjustment to goodwill during the first quarter of 2007 was due to the resolution of income tax uncertainties related to the Corporation’s merger with Southern Financial on April 30, 2004.
12
NOTE 6—DEPOSITS
The table below presents a summary of deposits as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2006 |
Interest-bearing deposits: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand | | $ | 580,557 | | $ | 559,682 | | $ | 648,878 |
Money market | | | 560,085 | | | 545,584 | | | 616,039 |
Savings | | | 605,602 | | | 596,434 | | | 692,044 |
Direct time certificates of deposit | | | 1,227,188 | | | 1,156,709 | | | 935,618 |
Brokered certificates of deposit | | | 539,887 | | | 519,873 | | | 443,262 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 3,513,319 | | | 3,378,282 | | | 3,335,841 |
Noninterest-bearing deposits | | | 769,081 | | | 761,830 | | | 826,598 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | $ | 4,282,400 | | $ | 4,140,112 | | $ | 4,162,439 |
| | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 7—SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
The table below presents a summary of short-term borrowings as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2006 |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements | | $ | 335,637 | | $ | 306,437 | | $ | 324,838 |
Federal funds purchased | | | 160,000 | | | 320,000 | | | 378,000 |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances—variable rate | | | — | | | 30,000 | | | 55,000 |
Other short-term borrowings | | | 2,481 | | | 2,450 | | | 2,272 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total short-term borrowings | | $ | 498,118 | | $ | 658,887 | | $ | 760,110 |
| | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 8—LONG-TERM DEBT
The table below presents a summary of long-term debt as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2006 |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances—fixed rate | | $ | 24,963 | | $ | 30,795 | | $ | 111,712 |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances—variable rate | | | 620,000 | | | 660,427 | | | 535,000 |
Junior Subordinated Debentures | | | 136,813 | | | 136,857 | | | 136,990 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 781,776 | | $ | 828,079 | | $ | 783,702 |
| | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 9—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share-Based Payment Plan Description
The Corporation issues nonqualified stock options and restricted share grants to certain of its employees and directors pursuant to the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan (“the Plan”), which has been approved by the Corporation’s shareholders. The Plan allows for a maximum of 12.5 million shares of common stock to be issued. At March 31, 2007, 4.3 million shares were available to be granted by the Corporation pursuant to the plan.
Stock Option Plan
Stock options (“options”) are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Corporation’s shares at the date of the grant. Options granted subsequent to January 1, 2005 vest based on four years of continuous service and have eight year contractual terms. All options issued prior to January 1, 2005 have contractual terms of ten years and are vested.
13
All options provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control (as defined in the Plan). Stock options exercised result in the issuance of new shares.
On the date of each grant, the fair value of each award is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on assumptions made by the Corporation as follows:
• | | Dividend yield is based on the dividend rate of the Corporation’s stock at the date of the grant |
• | | Risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bond rate with a term equaling the expected life of the granted options |
• | | Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock price |
• | | Expected life represents the period of time that granted options are expected to be outstanding based on historical trends |
Below is a tabular presentation of the option pricing assumptions and the estimated fair value of the options using these assumptions.
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2007 | | 2006 |
Weighted average dividend yield | | | 3.41% | | | 3.14% |
Weighted average risk-free interest rate | | | 4.72% | | | 4.58% |
Weighted average expected volatility | | | 16.69% | | | 19.92% |
Weighted average expected life | | | 5.25 years | | | 5.25 years |
Weighted average fair value of options granted | | $ | 5.44 | | $ | 6.50 |
The Corporation recognized compensation expense related to options of $246 thousand and $57 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the intrinsic value of options exercised was $323 thousand and $2.7 million, respectively. Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options is $3.0 million and $1.8 million at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.5 years and 3.9 years, respectively.
The following table presents a summary of the activity related to options for the period indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Contractual Remaining Life (in years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006 | | 2,113,371 | | | $ | 28.21 | | | | | |
Granted | | 317,708 | | | $ | 35.70 | | | | | |
Exercised | | (43,833 | ) | | $ | 27.51 | | | | | |
Cancelled or expired | | (20,343 | ) | | $ | 33.48 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding at March 31, 2007 | | 2,366,903 | | | $ | 29.18 | | 5.80 | | $ | 9,006 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Options exercisable at March 31, 2007 | | 1,823,930 | | | $ | 27.20 | | 5.28 | | $ | 10,567 |
Restricted Stock Awards
The Corporation issues restricted stock grants, in the form of new shares, to its directors and certain key employees. The restricted stock grants are issued at the fair market value of the common shares on the date of each grant. The Corporation grants shares of restricted stock to directors of the Corporation as part of director compensation, and as such, those restricted stock grants vest immediately. For the first three months of 2007, no restricted stock was granted to any director, accordingly no expense was recognized. During the first three months of 2006, the Corporation recognized an expense of $8 thousand for restricted stock granted to directors. The restricted stock grants to the directors may not be sold or otherwise divested until six months subsequent to their departure from the board of directors. The restricted stock grants to employees vest ratably over four years. The Corporation recorded expense related to the employee restricted stock awards of $232 thousand and $110 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
14
The following table presents a summary of the activity related to restricted stock grants for the period indicated:
| | | | | | |
| | Common Shares | | | Weighted Average Grant Fair Value |
Unvested at December 31, 2006 | | 78,641 | | | $ | 35.33 |
Awards granted | | 57,656 | | | $ | 35.61 |
Vested | | (21,028 | ) | | $ | 35.19 |
Cancelled | | (1,846 | ) | | $ | 35.10 |
| | | | | | |
Unvested at March 31, 2007 | | 113,423 | | | $ | 35.50 |
| | | | | | |
At March 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock grants was $3.9 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years.
NOTE 10—DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value hedges that meet the criteria for effectiveness have changes in the fair value of the derivative and the designated hedged item recognized in earnings. At and during all periods presented, the derivatives designated as fair value hedges were determined to be effective. Accordingly, the designated hedges and the associated hedged items were marked to fair value by an equal and offsetting amount of $83 thousand and $909 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash flow hedges have the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative, net of taxes, recorded in net accumulated other comprehensive loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Corporation recorded an increase in value of derivatives of $1.0 million compared to a decrease of $2.0 million for the same period in 2006, net of taxes, in net accumulated other comprehensive loss to reflect the effective portion of cash flow hedges. Amounts recorded in net accumulated other comprehensive loss are recognized into earnings concurrent with the impact of the hedged item on earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, there was no ineffectiveness with respect to cash flow hedges compared to a $4 thousand charge to earnings for the same period in 2006.
Non-designated derivatives, which are interest rate swaps, are marked-to-market and the gains or losses are recorded in non-interest income at the end of each reporting period. These non-designated derivatives represent interest rate protection on the Corporation’s net interest income but do not meet the requirements to receive hedge accounting treatment. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Corporation recorded a net loss of $63 thousand and a net loss of $603 thousand, respectively, to reflect the change in value of the non-designated interest rate swaps. The net cash settlements on these interest rate swaps are recorded in non-interest income. The net cash benefit from these interest rate swaps was $206 thousand and $290 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
15
The table below presents the Corporation’s open derivative positions as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) Derivative Type | | Objective | | Notional Amount | | Credit Risk Amount | | Market Risk | |
March 31, 2007 Designated Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | Hedge investment rate risk | | $ | 293,450 | | $ | 716 | | $ | (282 | ) |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | Hedge borrowing cost | | | 25,000 | | | — | | | (83 | ) |
Interest rate caps/corridors | | Hedge borrowing cost | | | 100,000 | | | 422 | | | 422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total designated derivatives | | | | | 418,450 | | | 1,138 | | | 57 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Non-designated Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | | | | 40,000 | | | 3,245 | | | 3,245 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-designated derivatives | | | | | 40,000 | | | 3,245 | | | 3,245 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives | | | | $ | 458,450 | | $ | 4,383 | | $ | 3,302 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
December 31, 2006 Designated Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | Hedge investment rate risk | | $ | 293,450 | | $ | 471 | | $ | (1,410 | ) |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | Hedge borrowing cost | | | 29,900 | | | — | | | (280 | ) |
Interest rate caps/corridors | | Hedge borrowing cost | | | 140,000 | | | 615 | | | 615 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total designated derivatives | | | | | 463,350 | | | 1,086 | | | (1,075 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Non-designated Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | | | | 40,000 | | | 2,465 | | | 2,465 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-designated derivatives | | | | | 40,000 | | | 2,465 | | | 2,465 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives | | | | $ | 503,350 | | $ | 3,551 | | $ | 1,390 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
March 31, 2006 Designated Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pay fixed/receive variable | | Hedge borrowing cost | | $ | 50,000 | | $ | 533 | | $ | 533 | |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | Hedge investment rate risk | | | 218,163 | | | — | | | (3,397 | ) |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | Hedge borrowing cost | | | 57,900 | | | — | | | (909 | ) |
Interest rate caps/corridors | | Hedge borrowing cost | | | 165,000 | | | 1,535 | | | 1,535 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total designated derivatives | | | | | 491,063 | | | 2,068 | | | (2,238 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Non-designated Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receive fixed/pay variable | | | | | 40,000 | | | 3,288 | | | 3,288 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-designated derivatives | | | | | 40,000 | | | 3,288 | | | 3,288 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives | | | | $ | 531,063 | | $ | 5,356 | | $ | 1,050 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
16
NOTE 11—CONTINGENCIES AND OFF—BALANCE SHEET RISK
Commitments
Commitments to extend credit in the form of consumer, commercial real estate and business loans at the date indicated were as follows:
| | | |
(in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 |
Commercial business and real estate | | $ | 1,073,268 |
Consumer revolving credit | | | 778,039 |
Residential mortgage credit | | | 25,003 |
Performance standby letters of credit | | | 128,008 |
| | | |
Total loan commitments | | $ | 2,004,318 |
| | | |
Historically, many of the commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent realizable future cash requirements.
Litigation
The Corporation is involved in various legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of its business. All active lawsuits entail amounts which management believes, individually and in the aggregate, are immaterial to the financial condition and the results of operations of the Corporation.
NOTE 12—NET GAINS
Net gains include the following components for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
(in thousands) | | 2007 | | 2006 |
Net gains: | | | | | | |
Securities sales | | $ | 212 | | $ | 117 |
Asset sales | | | 838 | | | 141 |
Debt extinguishment | | | 153 | | | 282 |
| | | | | | |
Net gains | | $ | 1,203 | | $ | 540 |
| | | | | | |
17
NOTE 13—RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
Costs associated with restructuring activities are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as they are incurred. The costs include incremental expenses associated with corporate efficiency and infrastructure initiatives implemented to simplify the Corporation’s business model and do not represent on-going costs of the organization. For the first quarter of 2007, these costs relate to branch closures consummated by the Corporation. The branch closure costs are composed of contract termination costs and the write-down of premises and equipment values. These costs are shown in the following table.
| | | |
(in thousands) | | For the three months ended March 31, 2007 |
Contract terminations | | $ | 473 |
Impairment of premises and equipment | | | 357 |
Other related costs | | | 37 |
| | | |
| | $ | 867 |
| | | |
Subsequent to March 31, 2007, the Corporation does not anticipate incurring any further costs relating to the previously announced branch closures. In addition, the branch closure initiative realized a gain associated with the sale of a branch facility that amounted to $767 thousand. This gain is reflected in net gains from asset sales in Note 12.
All amounts accrued with respect to the branch closure initiative have been recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Accordingly, the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition do not contain any reserves for such costs at March 31, 2007.
No amounts have been accrued for the corporate efficiency and infrastructure initiatives that are in process because the amounts and timing cannot be reasonably estimated.
NOTE 14—UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN No. 48”), which prescribes the recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN No. 48 provides guidance for derecognition and classification of previously recognized tax positions that did not meet the certain recognition criteria in addition to recognition of interest and penalties, if necessary. The Corporation did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption. The Corporation’s policy is to recognize interest penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. At January 1, 2007, no interest and penalties were required to be recognized. At January 1, 2007, the tax years that remain subject to examination are 2003 through 2006 for both the Federal and State of Maryland tax authorities.
18
NOTE 15—EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table presents a summary of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, |
(in thousands, except per share data) | | 2007 | | 2006 |
Net income | | $ | 16,114 | | $ | 18,258 |
| | |
Basic EPS shares | | | 32,196 | | | 32,948 |
| | |
Basic EPS | | $ | 0.50 | | $ | 0.55 |
| | |
Dilutive shares | | | 300 | | | 417 |
| | |
Diluted EPS shares | | | 32,496 | | | 33,365 |
| | |
Diluted EPS | | $ | 0.50 | | $ | 0.55 |
| | |
Antidilutive shares | | | 627 | | | 10 |
NOTE 16—COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Presented below is a reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income including the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Three Months ended March 31, | |
| 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| Before Income Tax | | | Tax Expense (Benefit) | | | Net of Tax | | | Before Income Tax | | | Tax Expense (Benefit) | | | Net of Tax | |
Securities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year | | $ | 5,690 | | | $ | 2,251 | | | $ | 3,439 | | | $ | (12,295 | ) | | $ | (5,115 | ) | | $ | (7,180 | ) |
Reclassification of net losses (gains) realized in net income | | | (212 | ) | | | (84 | ) | | | (128 | ) | | | (117 | ) | | | (46 | ) | | | (71 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities arising during the year | | | 5,478 | | | | 2,167 | | | | 3,311 | | | | (12,412 | ) | | | (5,161 | ) | | | (7,251 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains (losses) from derivative activities arising during the year | | | 1,370 | | | | 360 | | | | 1,010 | | | | (3,204 | ) | | | (1,164 | ) | | | (2,040 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 6,848 | | | $ | 2,527 | | | $ | 4,321 | | | $ | (15,616 | ) | | $ | (6,325 | ) | | $ | (9,291 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | | 16,114 | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,258 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | $ | 20,435 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 8,967 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 17—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The actuarially estimated net benefit cost includes the following components for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| Qualified Pension Plan | | | Non-qualified Pension Plan | | Postretirement Benefit Plan | |
| 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Service cost—benefits earned during the period | | $ | 632 | | | $ | 842 | | | $ | 57 | | $ | 36 | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 72 | |
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | | | 724 | | | | 908 | | | | 215 | | | 153 | | | 6 | | | | 58 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (1,107 | ) | | | (1,444 | ) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | |
Net amortization and deferral of loss (gain) | | | 211 | | | | 117 | | | | 268 | | | 182 | | | (2 | ) | | | (107 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net pension cost included in employee benefits expense | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 423 | | | $ | 540 | | $ | 371 | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 23 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No contributions were made to the qualified pension plan in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The minimum required contribution in 2007 for the qualified plan is estimated to be zero. The decision to contribute further amounts is dependent on other factors, including the actual investment performance of the plan assets and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. Given these uncertainties and the lack of available data at this time, the Corporation is not able to reliably estimate the maximum deductible contribution or the amount that will be contributed in 2007 to the qualified plan.
19
For the unfunded non-qualified pension plans and postretirement benefit , the Corporation will contribute the minimum required amount in 2007, which is equal to the benefits paid under the plans.
NOTE 18—BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Corporation’s lines of business are structured according to the channels through which its products and services are delivered to its customers. For management purposes the lines are divided into the following segments: Consumer Banking, Commercial Banking, and Treasury and Administration.
The Corporation offers consumer and commercial banking products and services through its wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Bank. The Bank offers its services to customers in the key metropolitan areas of Baltimore, Washington D.C. and Richmond, Virginia, through 85 traditional and 63 in-store banking offices in Maryland, Virginia and southern York County, Pennsylvania. Additionally, the Bank offers its customers 24-hour banking services through 245 bank owned ATMs, telephone banking and the Internet. The Bank is also a member of the MoneyPass network which provides customers with free access to more than 11,000 ATMs nationwide. Consumer banking services include a broad array of small business and consumer loan, deposit and investment products offered to retail and commercial customers through the retail branch network and direct channel sales center. Commercial Banking provides an array of commercial financial services including asset-based lending, equipment leasing, real estate financing, cash management and structured financing to middle market commercial customers. Treasury and Administration is comprised of balance sheet management activities that include managing the investment portfolio, discretionary funding, utilization of derivative financial instruments and optimizing the Corporation’s equity position.
The financial performance of each business segment is monitored using an internal profitability measurement system. This system utilizes policies that ensure the results reflect the economics for each segment compiled on a consistent basis. Line of business information is based on management accounting practices that support the current management structure and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions. This profitability measurement system uses internal management accounting policies that generally follow the policies described in Note 1. The Corporation’s funds transfer pricing system utilizes a matched maturity methodology that assigns a cost of funds to earning assets and a value to the liabilities of each business segment with an offset in the Treasury and Administration business segment. The provision for loan losses is charged to the consumer and commercial segments based on actual charge-offs with the balance to the Treasury and Administration segment. Operating expense is charged on a fully absorbed basis. Income tax expense is calculated based on the segment’s fully taxable equivalent income and the Corporation’s effective tax rate. Revenues from no individual customer exceeded 10% of consolidated total revenues.
The table below summarizes results by each business segment for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | -------2007 ------- | | | | -------2006 ------- |
(in thousands) | | Commercial Banking | | Consumer Banking | | Treasury and Administration | | Total | | | | Commercial Banking | | Consumer Banking | | Treasury and Administration | | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | $ | 15,737 | | $ | 24,916 | | $ | 8,190 | | $ | 48,843 | | | | $ | 14,873 | | $ | 27,379 | | $ | 8,996 | | | $ | 51,248 |
Provision for loan losses | | | 17 | | | 582 | | | 453 | | | 1,052 | | | | | 351 | | | 521 | | | (554 | ) | | | 318 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | | 15,720 | | | 24,334 | | | 7,737 | | | 47,791 | | | | | 14,522 | | | 26,858 | | | 9,550 | | | | 50,930 |
Non-interest income | | | 4,853 | | | 25,044 | | | 64 | | | 29,961 | | | | | 4,758 | | | 24,063 | | | (596 | ) | | | 28,225 |
Non-interest expense | | | 6,116 | | | 40,939 | | | 7,713 | | | 54,768 | | | | | 6,413 | | | 38,487 | | | 7,891 | | | | 52,791 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 14,457 | | | 8,439 | | | 88 | | | 22,984 | | | | | 12,867 | | | 12,434 | | | 1,063 | | | | 26,364 |
Income tax expense | | | 4,321 | | | 2,523 | | | 26 | | | 6,870 | | | | | 3,956 | | | 3,823 | | | 327 | | | | 8,106 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 10,136 | | $ | 5,916 | | $ | 62 | | $ | 16,114 | | | | $ | 8,911 | | $ | 8,611 | | $ | 736 | | | $ | 18,258 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,182,262 | | $ | 3,156,421 | | $ | 896,009 | | $ | 6,234,692 | | | | $ | 1,968,816 | | $ | 3,129,567 | | $ | 1,274,051 | | | $ | 6,372,434 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 19—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Branch Sale
On May 4, 2007, the Corporation entered into a definitive agreement to sell six branches in western and central Virginia to Union Bankshares of Bowling Green, Virginia. These branches have an unamortized core deposit intangible of $1.2 million associated with the deposits that will be netted against the sale proceeds as part of the net gain on this transaction. The transaction is expected to close sometime during the third quarter of 2007.
20
The sale of the six branches is consistent with the Corporation’s strategy to rationalize the branch network and to focus on the Corporation’s core markets – the high growth, metropolitan areas of Baltimore, Washington and Richmond.
The branches that will be sold are located in western and central Virginia, in the towns of Charlottesville, Middleburg, Warrenton and Winchester. The six branches have total deposits of approximately $46 million at March 31, 2007. Premises and equipment associated with the branches will be included as part of the branch sale and sold at their fair value, however, loans associated with these branches will not be included in the sale.
Legislative Development
In early April 2007, the State of Maryland passed legislation eliminating a previously legal dividend deduction for captive real estate investment trusts. The new legislation has not been signed by the Governor into law as of May 10, 2007. If signed into law, it will be effective July 1, 2007 and will be retroactive to January 1, 2007. The Corporation, which maintains a trust to which the new legislation is applicable, is evaluating the impact of this change in legislation and its supporting tax regulations on the Corporation’s operations. The actual amount of the increase in annual tax expense is uncertain at May 10, 2007.
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
GENERAL
Provident Bankshares Corporation (“the Corporation”), a Maryland corporation, is the holding company for Provident Bank (“Provident” or the “Bank”), a Maryland chartered stock commercial bank. At March 31, 2007, the Bank is currently the largest independent commercial bank, in asset size, headquartered in Maryland, with $6.2 billion in assets. Provident is a regional bank serving Maryland, Virginia and Southern York County, PA, with emphasis on the key urban centers within these states – the Baltimore, Washington, D.C. and Richmond metropolitan areas.
Provident’s principal business is to acquire deposits from individuals and businesses and to use these deposits to fund loans to individuals and businesses. Provident focuses on providing its products and services to three segments of customers – individuals, small businesses and middle market businesses. The Corporation offers consumer and commercial lending products and services through the Consumer Banking group and the Commercial Banking group. Provident also offers related financial services through wholly owned subsidiaries. Securities brokerage, investment management and related insurance services are available through Provident Investment Center (“PIC”) and leases through Court Square Leasing and Provident Lease Corporation.
Provident’s mission is to exceed customer expectations by delivering superior service, products and banking convenience. Every employee’s commitment to serve the Bank’s customers in this fashion will assist in establishing Provident as the primary bank of choice of individuals, families, small businesses and middle market businesses throughout its chosen markets. To achieve this mission and to improve financial fundamentals, the strategic priorities of the organization are to:
Maximize Provident’s position as the right size bank in the marketplace. Provident’s position as the largest bank headquartered in Maryland provides a unique opportunity as the “right size” bank in its market areas, or footprint. The Bank provides the service of a community bank combined with the convenience and wide array of products and services that a strong regional bank offers. In addition, the 63 in-store banking offices throughout its footprint reinforce its right size strategy through convenient locations, hours and a full line of products and services. Provident currently has 148 banking offices concentrated in the Baltimore-Washington, D.C. corridor and beyond to Richmond, Virginia. Of the 148 banking offices, 47% are located in the Greater Baltimore region and 53% are located in the Greater Washington, D.C. and Central Virginia regions, reflecting the successful development of the Bank into a highly competitive regional commercial bank. Provident also offers its customers 24-hour banking services through ATMs, telephone banking and the Internet. The Bank’s network of 245 ATMs enhances the banking office network by providing customers increased opportunities to access their funds. In addition, the Bank is a member of the MoneyPass network which provides free access to more than 11,000 ATMs nationwide for its customers.
Profitably grow and deepen customer relationships in all four key market segments: Commercial, Commercial Real Estate, Consumer and Small Business. Consumer banking continues to be an important component of the Bank’s strategic priorities. Consumer banking services include a broad array of consumer and small business loan, lease, deposit and investment products offered to consumer and commercial customers through Provident’s banking office network and ProvidentDirect, the Bank’s direct channel sales center. The small business segment is further supported by relationship managers who provide comprehensive business product and sales support to expand existing customer relationships and acquire new clients. Commercial banking is the other key component to the
21
Corporation’s regional presence in its market area. The Commercial Banking group provides customized banking solutions to middle market commercial customers and provides the lending expertise and financing options to real estate customers. The Bank has an experienced team of relationship managers with expertise in business and real estate lending to companies in various industries in the region. It also has a suite of cash management products managed by responsive account teams that deepen customer relationships through competitively priced deposit based services, responsive service and frequent personal contact with each customer. Most recently, management has introduced a remote deposit product, which allows a customer to electronically post their deposits directly from the workplace. This product was designed to attract and retain commercial deposits. Business clients have enthusiastically embraced this convenience based product.
Consistently execute a higher-performance, customer relationship-focused sales culture.The Corporation’s transition to a customer relationship driven sales culture requires deepening relationships through cross-selling and the continuing emphasis on retention of valued customers. The Bank has segmented its customers to better understand and anticipate their financial needs and provide Provident’s sales force with a targeted approach to customers and prospects. The successful execution of this strategic priority will be centered on the right size bank commitment—providing the service of a community bank combined with the convenience and wide array of products and services that a strong regional bank offers.
Sustain a culture that attracts and retains employees who provide the differentiating “Provident Way” customer experience.Provident has always placed a high priority on its employees and has approached employee development and training with renewed emphasis. Employee development is viewed as a critical part of executing Provident’s strategic priority as the right size bank and transforming the Company’s sales culture with a focus on the employee’s development and approach with Provident’s customers.
Expand delivery (branch and non-branch) within the market Provident serves; supplement with acquisitions within pricing discipline. Provident continues to evaluate expansion opportunities within the regions that it serves. Provident supplements growth opportunities with acquisitions if it is a strategic fit and is within the Corporation’s pricing model.
Restructuring Activities
During the fourth quarter of 2006, management initiated a corporate-wide efficiency and infrastructure initiative program that focuses on three major areas: the rationalization of the branch network; the composition and execution of fee generation activities, and the third and largest focus, the fundamental efficiency of basic loan and deposit operational support activities. The identified financial objective is to improve pre-tax earnings for 2007 by $10 million, with approximately one-third being generated by increased revenue and two-thirds derived from reduced operating expenses.
The initial phase of this program was an extensive internal review of the branch network locations to consider each location’s profitability, opportunity for growth and proximity to other branches. That work was completed in the first quarter of 2007 and is in the final stages of implementation. In the first quarter of 2007, the Corporation closed 1 branch in Maryland and 6 branches in Virginia, with $76 million in deposits that were transferred and retained. The associated pre-tax earnings benefit from this action, commencing in the second quarter, is approximately $459 thousand per quarter. This benefit represents the first $1.4 million delivery under the aforementioned $10 million 2007. The first quarter of 2007 earnings were not materially impacted as the gain realized from the sale of an owned branch facility substantially offset the branch closure costs. This action does not represent the entirety of the Corporation’s branch network rationalization program as additional activity is currently in its final evaluation. It is in this segment of the program that results will be initially realized.
Management has established four internal efficiency and infrastructure teams to identify revenue and efficiency opportunities. These cross-functional teams have been working with outside consultants to analyze expense and revenue opportunities based on industry best practices.
Increased revenue will come from a combination of both loan and deposit product sources and will include increased pricing and new fees where both are competitively available. It will also include improved collection of currently generated but waived or uncollected fees. With respect to operating expenses, reductions will almost entirely be provided by reduced staffing, the bulk of which is to be achieved via attrition. The attrition method renders expense reduction that is less immediate but more tactical. Reduced staffing will be realized from the rationalization of: (1) the branch network and composition of branch and branch support personnel and (2) improved efficiency in the loan, credit and customer support functions. Management is currently evaluating pricing and staffing models and believes that the $10 million is achievable. The quarterly distribution of these amounts is uncertain given the required amount of advance customer and staff notification. The Corporation expects to deliver the bulk of the 2007 amounts over the third and fourth quarter. The costs associated with initiatives are being reported separately in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
22
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The principal objective of this Financial Review is to provide an overview of the financial condition and results of operations of Provident Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries for the periods indicated. This discussion and tabular presentations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes as well as the other information herein.
Overview of Income and Expenses
Income
The Corporation has two primary sources of pre-tax income. The first is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income—which is the income that the Corporation earns on its loans and investments—and interest expense—which is the interest that is paid on its deposits and borrowings.
The second principal source of pre-tax income is non-interest income—the compensation received from providing products and services. The majority of the non-interest income comes from service charges on deposit accounts. The Corporation also earns income from insurance commissions, mortgage banking fees and other fees and charges.
The Corporation recognizes gains or losses as a result of sales of investment securities or the disposition of loans, foreclosed property or fixed assets. In addition, the Corporation also recognizes gains or losses on its outstanding derivative financial instruments. These gains and losses are not a regular part of the Corporation’s primary source of income.
Expenses
The expenses the Corporation incurs in operating its business consist of salaries and employee benefits expense, occupancy expense, furniture and equipment expense, external processing fees, deposit insurance premiums, advertising expenses, and other miscellaneous expenses.
Salaries and employee benefits expense consists primarily of the salaries and wages paid to employees, payroll taxes, and expenses for health care, retirement and other employee benefits.
Occupancy expenses, which are fixed or variable costs associated with premises and equipment, consist primarily of lease payments, real estate taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance and cost of utilities.
Furniture and equipment include expenses and depreciation charges related to office and banking equipment. Depreciation of premises and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of related assets. Estimated lives are 5 to 15 years for building and leasehold improvements, and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment.
External processing fees are fees paid to third party for data processing services.
Restructuring activities are incremental expenses associated with corporate efficiency and infrastructure initiatives implemented to simplify the Corporation’s business model as discussed in Note 13 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other expenses include expenses for attorneys, accountants and consultants, fees paid to directors, franchise taxes, charitable contributions, insurance, office supplies, postage, telephone, merger expense, restructuring activities and other miscellaneous operating expenses.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities for the reporting periods. Management evaluates estimates on an on-going basis, and believes the following represent its more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its consolidated financial statements: allowance for loan losses, non-accrual loans, other real estate owned, estimates of fair value and intangible assets associated with mergers, other than temporary impairment of investment securities, pension and post-retirement benefits, asset prepayment rates, goodwill and intangible assets, share-based payment, derivative financial instruments, litigation and income taxes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
23
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: allowance for loan losses, other than temporary impairment of investment securities, derivative financial instruments, goodwill and intangible assets, asset prepayment rates, and income taxes. Each estimate and its financial impact, to the extent significant to financial results, is discussed in the notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. It is at least reasonably possible that each of the Corporation’s estimates could change in the near term or that actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could be material to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The financial condition of the Corporation reflects the continued improvement in financial fundamentals through the continued execution of the Bank’s strategic priorities and strengthening of the balance sheet by growing loans and retaining customer deposits in the Bank’s core business segments and key major markets of Greater Baltimore, Greater Washington, D.C. and Virginia. Solid growth in relationship-based loan portfolios (loans other than the Corporation’s originated and acquired residential mortgage loans) was financed by proceeds from payments and maturities in the Bank’s wholesale assets (originated and acquired residential mortgages and investment securities). The Corporation was also successful in retaining customer deposits over the past 12 months. Customer demand for higher rates has led to slower deposit growth for the industry as a whole. These successful efforts mentioned above have led to growth in average relationship-based loans of $284.9 million, or 8.7%, and average deposits of $81.7 million, or 2.0%, over the first quarter of 2006. At March 31, 2007, total assets were $6.2 billion, while total loans and deposits were $3.9 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively.
Over the past 12 months, growth in internally generated loan portfolios has replaced the decline in wholesale assets (originated and acquired residential mortgages and investment securities) as the Corporation continues to execute its strategy of strengthening the balance sheet by growing relationship-based portfolios and de-emphasizing wholesale assets. In addition, capital growth continues to be a specific focus for the Corporation. Tangible common equity as a percentage of assets has grown to 6.55% for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 compared to 6.50% and 6.41% at December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively. Tangible common equity ratio is a non-GAAP measure used by management to evaluate capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total equity less net accumulated other comprehensive income, goodwill and deposit-based intangibles. Tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and deposit-based intangibles. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the “Purchase Accounting” method accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Management believes this is an important benchmark for the Corporation and for the investors. The following table is a reconciliation of the Corporation’s tangible common equity and tangible assets for the periods ended March 31. 2007, December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
Total equity capital per consolidated financial statements | | $ | 635,797 | | | $ | 633,631 | | | $ | 630,196 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | 17,786 | | | | 22,107 | | | | 26,574 | |
Goodwill | | | (253,906 | ) | | | (254,543 | ) | | | (254,855 | ) |
Deposit-based intangible | | | (8,515 | ) | | | (8,965 | ) | | | (10,315 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tangible common equity | | $ | 391,162 | | | $ | 392,230 | | | $ | 391,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Total assets per consolidated financial statements | | $ | 6,234,692 | | | $ | 6,295,893 | | | $ | 6,372,434 | |
Goodwill | | | (253,906 | ) | | | (254,543 | ) | | | (254,855 | ) |
Deposit-based intangible | | | (8,515 | ) | | | (8,965 | ) | | | (10,315 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tangible assets | | $ | 5,972,271 | | | $ | 6,032,385 | | | $ | 6,107,264 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Tangible common equity ratio | | | 6.55 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | 6.41 | % |
24
Lending
Total average loan balances increased to $3.9 billion in the first quarter of 2007, an increase of $170.8 million, or 4.6%, from the first quarter of 2006. The following table summarizes the composition of the Bank’s average loans for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | $ Variance | | | % Variance | |
(dollars in thousands) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | |
Residential real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Originated and acquired residential mortgage | | $ | 325,377 | | $ | 439,513 | | $ | (114,136 | ) | | (26.0 | )% |
Home equity | | | 996,519 | | | 914,182 | | | 82,337 | | | 9.0 | |
Other consumer: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marine | | | 373,271 | | | 406,826 | | | (33,555 | ) | | (8.2 | ) |
Other | | | 27,678 | | | 30,401 | | | (2,723 | ) | | (9.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total consumer | | | 1,722,845 | | | 1,790,922 | | | (68,077 | ) | | (3.8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial mortgage | | | 450,402 | | | 475,354 | | | (24,952 | ) | | (5.2 | ) |
Residential construction | | | 585,987 | | | 447,792 | | | 138,195 | | | 30.9 | |
Commercial construction | | | 371,302 | | | 309,123 | | | 62,179 | | | 20.1 | |
Commercial business | | | 740,810 | | | 677,346 | | | 63,464 | | | 9.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial | | | 2,148,501 | | | 1,909,615 | | | 238,886 | | | 12.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total loans | | $ | 3,871,346 | | $ | 3,700,537 | | $ | 170,809 | | | 4.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Solid loan growth in the Corporation’s relationship-based loan portfolios more than replaced the continued strategic reductions in the wholesale loan portfolio. Relationship-based loans increased in the aggregate, $284.9 million, or 8.7%, over the same quarter in 2006. The Corporation’s focus on business development, combined with the experience of lending officers in the market, has resulted in strong growth in the home equity, commercial real estate and commercial business loan portfolios. As a result, total average loans increased by 4.6%, primarily due to an increase of $82.3 million, or 9.0%, in average home equity loans, $138.2 million, or 30.9%, in average residential construction loans, $62.2 million, or 20.1%, in commercial construction loans and $63.5 million, or 9.4%, in average commercial business loans. These increases more than offset planned reductions in originated and acquired residential mortgage loans of $114.1 million. These positive results illustrate the effectiveness of the Bank’s strategy to profitably grow and deepen customers relationships in all four key market segments: commercial, commercial real estate, consumer and small business.
The variety of home equity loan products, along with the Corporation’s relationship sales approach and competitive pricing have proven to be successful in the markets of Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Virginia. This marketing strategy resulted in the $82.3 million, or 9.0%, increase in home equity average loan balances, continuing the growth of $189.5 million, or 26.1%, that occurred in first quarter of 2006. The production of direct consumer loans, primarily home equity loans and lines, are generated through the Bank’s retail banking offices, phone center and internet channels. The strong growth in home equity lending was partially offset by a decline in marine and other consumer loans. Currently, management has chosen to limit marine lending loan growth due to low pricing margins in the industry.
Commercial Banking is the other key component to the Corporation’s regional presence in its market area. Average total commercial loans increased $238.9 million, or 12.5%, compared to the first quarter of 2006. Residential and commercial construction loans posted increases compared to the same quarter of 2006 of $138.2 million and $62.2 million, respectively, reflecting continued strength and balanced growth in the regional real estate construction markets. During this same period, commercial business loans increased by $63.5 million, or 9.4%. This growth has occurred within the Corporation’s market footprint and is a reflection of the vibrancy in our markets and the group’s ability to deepen historical lending relationships with seasoned borrowers in familiar markets. These expanded relationships and associated risks are managed through an effective level of loan administration and credit monitoring by an experienced credit management staff.
The overall result is a fairly balanced mix of revenue sources between consumer and commercial loan products with $1.7 billion, or 44.5%, in consumer loans, and $2.1 billion, or 55.5%, in commercial loans. In the first quarter of 2007 average loan balances of $1.5 billion were in the Greater Washington and Central Virginia regions and represent 38.2% of total average loan balances while 61.8% were in the Greater Baltimore region.
25
Asset Quality
The following table presents information with respect to non-performing assets and 90-day delinquencies as of the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | |
Non-Performing Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Originated and acquired residential mortgage | | $ | 7,910 | | | $ | 7,202 | |
Home equity | | | 542 | | | | 280 | |
Other consumer | | | 673 | | | | 492 | |
Commercial mortgage | | | 1,335 | | | | 1,335 | |
Commercial business | | | 10,259 | | | | 10,417 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-accrual loans | | | 20,719 | | | | 19,726 | |
Total renegotiated loans | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-performing loans | | | 20,719 | | | | 19,726 | |
Total other assets and real estate owned | | | 3,117 | | | | 2,483 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-performing assets | | $ | 23,836 | | | $ | 22,209 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
90-Day Delinquencies: | | | | | | | | |
Originated and acquired residential mortgage | | $ | 1,795 | | | $ | 3,030 | |
Home equity | | | 683 | | | | 648 | |
Other consumer | | | 994 | | | | 1,413 | |
Residential real estate construction | | | 18 | | | | — | |
Commercial business | | | 8 | | | | 97 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total 90-day delinquencies | | $ | 3,498 | | | $ | 5,188 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Quality Ratios: | | | | | | | | |
Non-performing loans to loans | | | 0.53 | % | | | 0.51 | % |
Non-performing assets to loans | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.57 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to loans | | | 1.17 | % | | | 1.17 | % |
Net charge-offs in quarter to average loans | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.14 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans | | | 219.70 | % | | | 229.15 | % |
The Corporation’s loan portfolio continues to experience strong asset quality in the first quarter of 2007. The success within the Corporation’s loan portfolio is a reflection of management’s high credit standards, in-house administration and strong oversight procedures along with the strategy of shifting the balance sheet away from wholesale loans to relationship-based loan portfolios. In addition, regional credit conditions were favorable for the first quarter of 2007.
The level of non-performing assets to total loans was 0.61% at March 31, 2007 compared to 0.57% at December 31, 2006. The level of 90-day delinquent loans declined during the same period, decreasing $1.7 million, or 32.6%, to $3.5 million from the $5.2 million level at December 31, 2006. In addition, net charge-offs in the quarter as a percentage of average loans declined from 0.14% in the fourth quarter of 2006 to 0.08%.
Overall, the asset quality ratios of the Corporation remain favorable. During the quarter, non-performing assets increased $1.6 million to $23.8 million at March 31, 2007, a 7.3% increase from the level at December 31, 2006. The increase in non-performing assets was mainly due to the $708 thousand increase in non-performing originated and acquired residential mortgage loans and a $634 thousand increase in other assets and real estate owned. Non-performing commercial business loans include $2.1 million of loans that have U.S. government guarantees.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses (“the allowance”), which is intended to be management’s best estimate of inherent losses in the outstanding loan portfolio. The allowance is reduced by actual credit losses and is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries of previous loan losses. The provisions for loan losses are charges to earnings to bring the total allowance to a level considered necessary by management.
The allowance is based on management’s continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio. This process provides an allowance consisting of two components, allocated and unallocated. To arrive at the allocated component of the allowance, the Corporation combines estimates of the allowances needed for loans analyzed individually and on a pooled basis. The allocated component of the allowance is supplemented by an unallocated component.
26
The portion of the allowance that is allocated to individual internally criticized and non-accrual loans is determined by estimating the inherent loss on each problem credit after giving consideration to the value of underlying collateral. Management emphasizes loan quality and close monitoring of potential problem credits. Credit risk identification and review processes are utilized in order to assess and monitor the degree of risk in the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s lending and credit administration staff are charged with reviewing the loan portfolio and identifying changes in the economy or in a borrower’s circumstances that may affect the ability to repay debt or the value of pledged collateral. The loan classification and review system identifies those loans with a higher than normal risk of uncollectibility. Each commercial loan is assigned a risk rating based upon an assessment of the borrower’s financial capacity to service the debt and the presence and value of collateral for the loan.
In addition to being used to categorize risk, the Bank’s internal ten-point risk rating system is used to determine the allocated allowance for the commercial portfolio. Reserve factors, based on the actual loss history for a 5-year period for criticized loans, are assigned. If the factor, based on loss history, for classified credits is lower than the minimum established factor, the higher factor is applied. For loans with satisfactory risk profiles, the factors are based on the rating profile of the portfolio and the consequent historic losses of bonds with equivalent ratings.
For the consumer portfolios, the determination of the allocated allowance is conducted at an aggregate, or pooled, level. Each quarter, historical rolling loss rates for homogenous pools of loans in these portfolios provide the basis for the allocated reserve. For any portfolio where the Bank lacks sufficient historic experience, industry loss rates are used. If recent history is not deemed to reflect the inherent losses existing within a portfolio, older historic loss rates during a period of similar economic or market conditions are used.
The Bank’s credit administration group adjusts the indicated loss rates based on qualitative factors. Factors that are considered in adjusting loss rates include risk characteristics, credit concentration trends and general economic conditions, including job growth and unemployment rates. For commercial and real estate portfolios, additional factors include the level and trend of watched and criticized credits within those portfolios; historic loss rates, commercial real estate vacancy, absorption and rental rates; and the number and volume of syndicated credits, construction loans, or other portfolio segments deemed to carry higher levels of risk. Upon completion of the qualitative adjustments, the overall allowance is allocated to the components of the portfolio based on the adjusted loss factors.
The purpose of the unallocated component of the allowance is to mitigate the imprecision inherent in management’s estimates of expected credit losses and includes its determination of the amounts necessary for concentrations, economic uncertainties and other subjective factors that may not have been fully considered in the allocated allowance. The relationship of the unallocated component to the total allowance may fluctuate from period to period. Although management has allocated the majority of the allowance to specific loan categories, the evaluation of the allowance is considered in its entirety.
Lending management meets at least quarterly with executive management to review the credit quality of the loan portfolios and to evaluate the allowance. The Corporation has an internal risk analysis and review staff that continuously reviews loan quality and reports the results of its reviews to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Such reviews also assist management in establishing the level of the allowance.
Management believes that it uses the relevant information available to make determinations about the allowance and that it has established its existing allowance in accordance with GAAP. If circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making determinations, adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and results of operations could be affected. Because events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that increases to the allowance will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate.
The FDIC examines the Bank periodically and, accordingly, as part of this examination, the allowance is reviewed for adequacy utilizing specific guidelines. Based upon their review, the regulators may from time to time require reserves in addition to those previously provided.
At March 31, 2007, the allowance was $45.5 million, or 1.17% of total loans outstanding, compared to an allowance at December 31, 2006 of $45.2 million, or 1.17% of total loans outstanding. The allowance coverage was 219.7% of non-performing loans at March 31, 2007 compared to 229.15% at December 31, 2006. Portfolio-wide net charge-offs represented 0.08% of average loans in first quarter of 2007, compared to 0.13% in first quarter of 2006 and 0.14% in the fourth quarter of 2006.
27
Deposits
The following table summarizes the composition of the Corporation’s average deposit balances for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | $ Variance | | | % Variance | |
(dollars in thousands) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | |
Transaction accounts: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing | | $ | 724,805 | | $ | 791,615 | | $ | (66,810 | ) | | (8.4 | )% |
Interest-bearing | | | 518,115 | | | 569,191 | | | (51,076 | ) | | (9.0 | ) |
Savings/money market: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings | | | 598,591 | | | 692,013 | | | (93,422 | ) | | (13.5 | ) |
Money market | | | 542,751 | | | 614,094 | | | (71,343 | ) | | (11.6 | ) |
Certificates of deposit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct | | | 1,184,343 | | | 898,518 | | | 285,825 | | | 31.8 | |
Brokered | | | 526,907 | | | 448,418 | | | 78,489 | | | 17.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | $ | 4,095,512 | | $ | 4,013,849 | | $ | 81,663 | | | 2.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deposits by source: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer | | $ | 2,779,804 | | $ | 2,707,438 | | $ | 72,366 | | | 2.7 | |
Commercial | | | 788,801 | | | 857,993 | | | (69,192 | ) | | (8.1 | ) |
Brokered | | | 526,907 | | | 448,418 | | | 78,489 | | | 17.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | $ | 4,095,512 | | $ | 4,013,849 | | $ | 81,663 | | | 2.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | �� | | | | |
Average deposits increased $81.7 million, or 2.0%, in the first quarter of 2007 over the first quarter of 2006. Consumer deposits grew by 2.7%, or $72.4 million to $2.8 billion, while commercial deposits experienced a decline of $69.2 million, or 8.1%. Consumer certificates of deposit increased by $230.2 million from a year ago and were partially offset by $157.9 million decline in all other sources of consumer deposits. Commercial certificates of deposit also increased over the same period a year ago, growing by $55.7 million, or 51.8%, while all other sources of commercial deposits declined by $124.9 million. Over the past year, consumer and commercial customers have been shifting their deposits away from low yielding checking and savings accounts to higher yielding certificates of deposit or moving their deposits to alternative markets. This change in deposit mix is a result of the current rate environment and the intense level of competition. The use of brokered deposits increased from $448.4 million to $526.9 million as they provide a less expensive alternative to funding loan growth compared to other forms of borrowing.
Treasury Activities
The Treasury Division manages the wholesale segments of the balance sheet, including investments, purchased funds, long-term debt and derivatives. Management’s objective is to achieve the maximum level of stable earnings over the long term, while controlling the level of interest rate and liquidity risk, and optimizing capital utilization. In managing the investment portfolio to achieve its stated objective, the Corporation invests predominately in U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), asset-backed securities (“ABS”), corporate bonds and municipal bonds. Treasury strategies and activities are overseen by the Bank’s Asset / Liability Committee (“the ALCO”), which also reviews all investment and funding transactions. ALCO activities are summarized and reviewed monthly with the Corporation’s Board of Directors.
At March 31, 2007, the investment portfolio totaled $1.6 billion, or 26.3% of total assets, compared to 30.1% of total assets at March 31, 2006. The portfolio declined $278.5 million from the level at March 31, 2006, reflecting management’s strategy to de-emphasize wholesale assets. Management continues to invest primarily in fixed and floating rate mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and municipal bonds to diversify investment portfolio risks, maximize stable earnings, and manage the Bank’s interest rate sensitivity. In the first quarter of 2007, $22.8 million of municipal bonds and $34.2 million of non-agency MBS were purchased, reinvesting proceeds of MBS sales and prepayments. Investment allocations as of March 31, 2007 include MBS (41.9%), ABS (40.7%), municipal (7.5%), corporate (5.8%), and U.S. Government
28
securities (4.1%). The ABS portfolio consists of Aaa, Aa and single A rated pooled trust preferred securities. The municipal bond portfolio consists of geographically diversified Aaa rated securities. Other debt securities primarily include investments in single issuer corporate bonds rated investment-grade by Moody’s or S&P, single or double A rated home equity ABS, and U.S. Treasury, Agency, and municipal securities. Typically, management classifies securities as available for sale to maximize management flexibility, although securities may be purchased with the intention of holding to maturity.
The primary risk in the investment portfolio is duration risk. Duration measures the expected change in the market value of an investment for a 100 basis point (or 1%) change in interest rates. The higher an investment’s duration, the longer the time until its rate is reset to current market rates. The Bank’s risk tolerance, as measured by the duration of the investment portfolio, is typically between 2% and 3.5%. The portfolio duration is currently 3.0%. Another risk in the investment portfolio is credit risk. At March 31, 2007, approximately 56.7% of the entire investment portfolio was rated Aaa, 42.2% was investment grade below Aaa, and 1.1% was rated below investment grade or was not rated.
Investment securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other than temporary. If a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized. The Corporation had a limited number of securities in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more at March 31, 2007. Because the declines in fair value were due to changes in market interest rates or liquidity, not in estimated cash flows, no other than temporary impairment was recorded at March 31, 2007. Management currently has the intent and ability to retain investment securities with unrealized losses until the decline in value has been recovered.
Treasury funding, representing brokered certificates of deposit, short-term borrowings, long term debt and trust preferred, totaled $1.48 billion on March 31, 2007, down $216.3 million since year-end 2006. The decline offset core deposit growth of $122.3 million, commercial sweep repo growth of $29.2 million, and a $61.2 million reduction in total assets over that time period. One component of Treasury funding, brokered CDs, was increased by $20.0 million, to $539.9 million, due to continued favorable pricing in this market relative to other wholesale funding markets.
Provident’s funds management objectives are two-fold: to minimize the cost of borrowings while assuring sufficient funding availability to meet current and future customer requirements, and to contribute to interest rate risk management goals through match-funding loan and investment activity. Management utilizes a variety of sources to raise borrowed funds at competitive rates, including federal funds purchased (“fed funds”), Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings, securities sold under repurchase agreements (“repos”), and brokered and jumbo certificates of deposit (“CDs”). FHLB borrowings and repos typically are borrowed at rates approximating the LIBOR rate for the equivalent term because they are secured with investments or high quality real estate loans. Fed funds, which are generally overnight borrowings, are typically purchased at the Federal Reserve target rate. Brokered CDs are generally added when market conditions permit issuance at rates favorable to other funding sources.
The Corporation formed wholly owned statutory business trusts in 1998, 2000 and 2003. In 2004, the Corporation also acquired three wholly owned statutory business trusts from Southern Financial as part of the merger. In all cases, the trusts issued trust preferred securities that were sold to outside third parties. The junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation to the trusts are presented net of unamortized issuance costs as long-term debt in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition and are includable in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations. Any of the junior subordinated debentures are redeemable at any time in whole, but not in part, from the date of issuance on the occurrence of certain events. There are no issuances callable in 2007.
Liquidity
An important component of the Bank’s asset/liability structure is the level of liquidity available to meet the needs of customers and creditors. Traditional sources of bank liquidity include deposit growth, loan repayments, investment maturities, asset sales, borrowings and interest received. Management believes the Bank has sufficient liquidity to meet future funding needs.
The Bank’s chief source of liquidity is the assets it possesses, which can either be pledged as collateral for secured borrowings or sold outright. The Bank’s primary sources for raising secured borrowings are the FHLB and securities broker/dealers. At March 31, 2007, $980.6 billion of secured borrowings were employed, with sufficient collateral available to immediately raise an additional $870.0 million. An excess liquidity position of $516.7 million remains after covering $353.3 million of unsecured funds that mature in the next three months. Additionally, over $380 million of assets are maintained as collateral with the Federal Reserve that is available as a contingent funding source.
The Bank also has several sources of unsecured funding that it uses routinely. At March 31, 2007, the Bank possessed $1.2 billion of overnight borrowing capacity, of which only $160 million was in use at quarter-end. The brokered certificates of
29
deposit and unsecured debt markets, which generally are more expensive than secured funds of similar maturity, are also vital funding alternatives. In the first quarter of 2007, the Bank issued $136.5 million of brokered certificates of deposit at favorable pricing levels.
As an alternative to raising secured funds, the Bank can raise liquidity through asset sales. At March 31, 2007, over $600 million of the Bank’s investment portfolio was immediately saleable at a market value equaling or exceeding its amortized cost basis. Additionally, over a 90-day time frame, a majority of the Bank’s $1.7 billion consumer and residential loan portfolios is saleable under normal conditions.
A significant use of the Corporation’s liquidity is the dividends it pays to shareholders. The Corporation is a one-bank holding company that relies upon the Bank’s performance to generate capital growth through Bank earnings. A portion of the Bank’s earnings is passed to the Corporation in the form of cash dividends. As a commercial bank under the Maryland Financial Institution Law, the Bank may declare cash dividends from undivided profits or, with the prior approval of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation, out of paid-in capital in excess of 100% of its required capital stock, and after providing for due or accrued expenses, losses, interest and taxes. These dividends paid to the Corporation are utilized to pay dividends to stockholders, repurchase shares and pay interest on junior subordinated debentures. The Corporation and the Bank, in declaring and paying dividends, are also limited insofar as minimum capital requirements of regulatory authorities must be maintained. The Corporation and the Bank comply with such capital requirements. If the Corporation or the Bank were unable to comply with the minimum capital requirements, it could result in regulatory actions that could have a material impact on the Corporation.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Corporation has various contractual obligations, such as long-term borrowings, that are recorded as liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Other items, such as certain minimum lease payments for the use of banking and operations offices under operating lease agreements, are not recognized as liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but are required to be disclosed. Each of these arrangements affects the Corporation’s determination of sufficient liquidity.
The following table summarizes significant contractual obligations at March 31, 2007 and the future periods in which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash. In addition, the table reflects the timing of principal payments on outstanding borrowings.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Contractual Payments Due by Period | | Total |
| Less than 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 4-5 Years | | After 5 Years | |
Lease obligations | | $ | 12,945 | | $ | 22,538 | | $ | 16,435 | | $ | 23,224 | | $ | 75,142 |
Long-term debt | | | 229,987 | | | 384,978 | | | 29,998 | | | 136,813 | | | 781,776 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 242,932 | | $ | 407,516 | | $ | 46,433 | | $ | 160,037 | | $ | 856,918 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arrangements to fund credit products or guarantee financing take the form of loan commitments (including lines of credit on revolving credit structures) and letters of credit. Approvals for these arrangements are obtained in the same manner as loans. Generally, cash flows, collateral value and a risk assessment are considered when determining the amount and structure of credit arrangements. Commitments to extend credit in the form of consumer, commercial real estate and business loans at March 31, 2007 were as follows:
| | | |
(in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 |
Commercial business and real estate | | $ | 1,073,268 |
Consumer revolving credit | | | 778,039 |
Residential mortgage credit | | | 25,003 |
Performance standby letters of credit | | | 128,008 |
| | | |
Total loan commitments | | $ | 2,004,318 |
| | | |
Historically, many of the commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Obligations also take the form of commitments to purchase loans. At March 31, 2007, the Corporation did not have any firm commitments to purchase loans.
30
Risk Management
The nature of the banking business, which involves paying interest on deposits at varying rates and terms and charging interest on loans at other rates and terms, creates interest rate risk. As a result, earnings and the market value of assets and liabilities are subject to fluctuations, which arise due to changes in the level and directions of interest rates. Management’s objective is to minimize the fluctuation in the net interest margin caused by changes in interest rates using cost-effective strategies and tools. The Bank manages several forms of interest rate risk, including asset/liability mismatch, basis risk, and prepayment risk.
The Corporation both purchases and originates amortizing loan pools and investment securities in which the underlying assets are residential mortgage loans subject to prepayments. The actual principal reduction on these assets varies from the expected contractual principal reduction due to principal prepayments resulting from borrowers’ elections to refinance the underlying mortgages based on market and other conditions. Prepayment rate projections utilize actual prepayment speed experience and available market information on like-kind instruments. The prepayment rates form the basis for income recognition of premiums or discounts on the related assets. Changes in prepayment estimates may cause the earnings recognized on these assets to vary over the term that the assets are held, creating volatility in the net interest margin. Prepayment rate assumptions are monitored and updated monthly to reflect actual activity and the most recent market projections.
Management continually monitors Prime/LIBOR basis risk and asset/liability mismatch. Basis risk exists as a result of having much of the Bank’s earning assets priced using either the prime rate or the U.S. Treasury yield curve, while much of the liability portfolio, which finances earning assets, is priced using the certificates of deposit yield curve or LIBOR yield curve. These different yield curves typically do not move in lock-step with one another.
Measuring and managing interest rate risk is a dynamic process that management performs continually to meet the objective of maintaining a stable net interest margin. This process relies chiefly on simulation modeling of shocks to the balance sheet under a variety of interest rate scenarios, including parallel and non-parallel rate shifts, such as the forward yield curves for both short and long term interest rates. The results of these shocks are measured in two forms: first, the impact on the net interest margin and earnings over one and two year time frames; and second, the impact on the market value of equity. In addition to measuring the basis risks and prepayment risks noted above, simulations also quantify the earnings impact of rate changes and the cost / benefit of hedging strategies.
The following table shows the anticipated effect on net interest income in parallel shift (up or down) interest rate scenarios. These shifts are assumed to begin on April 1, 2007 for the March 31, 2007 data and on January 1, 2007 for the December 31, 2006 data and evenly increase or decrease over a 6-month period. The effect on net interest income would be for the next twelve months.
| | | | | | |
Interest Rate Scenario | | At March 31, 2007 Projected Percentage Change in Net Interest Income | | | At December 31, 2006 Projected Percentage Change in Net Interest Income | |
-200 basis points | | -2.30 | % | | -3.20 | % |
-100 basis points | | -1.50 | % | | -2.30 | % |
No change | | — | | | — | |
+100 basis points | | -0.20 | % | | +0.30 | % |
+200 basis points | | 0.00 | % | | +1.00 | % |
The projected outcomes presented above are based on a balance sheet growth forecast and parallel shifts in interest rates, i.e. all interest rates moving by the same amount. Management models many non-parallel rate change scenarios as well, including several yield-curve flattening scenarios. The results of each scenario differ; however, the results above are an accurate indication of the magnitude and direction of the Corporation’s interest rate risk.
The percentage changes displayed in the table above relate to the Corporation’s projected net interest income. Management’s intent is for derivative interest income to mitigate risk to the Corporation’s net interest income stemming from changes in interest rates. For comparison purposes, these projections include all interest earned on derivatives in net interest income. The analysis includes the interest income and expense relating to non-designated interest rate swaps that is classified in non-interest income as net cash settlement on swaps.
31
The isolated modeling environment, assuming no action by management, shows that the Corporation’s net interest income volatility is less than 2.5% under the assumed single direction scenarios. The Corporation’s one-year forward earnings are minimally impacted by changes in short-term interest rates. A prolonged decline in long-term rates could negatively impact net interest income, as shown above. Short-term interest rates, such as 3-month LIBOR, have increased approximately 35 basis points in the past 12 months while long-term rates have decreased approximately 22 basis points. A prolonged yield curve inversion is a growing possibility. Management routinely models several yield curve flattening scenarios as part of its interest rate risk management function, and this modeling discloses little risk under most yield curve flattening scenarios. Management is also focused on the potential for interest rates to begin falling in the near future, and is employing strategies to reduce the exposure to net interest margin from falling interest rates.
Management employs the investment, borrowings, and derivatives portfolios in implementing the Bank’s interest rate strategy. As noted above, mitigating yield curve inversion risk has been a significant element of interest rate risk management. To protect the Bank from rising short-term interest rates, over $530 million of the investment portfolio reprices semiannually or more frequently. In the borrowings portfolio, $180.0 million of funds reset their rates with long-term interest rates, such as the 10-year constant maturity swap rate, to protect the net interest margin from falling long-term interest rates. The interest expense associated with these borrowings declines when long-term interest rates decline. Additionally, $358.5 million of interest rate swaps were in force to reduce interest rate risk, and $100.0 million of interest rate caps were employed specifically to protect against rising interest rates in the future.
In addition to managing interest rate risk, which applies to both assets and liabilities, the Corporation must understand and manage risks specific to lending. Much of the fundamental lending business of Provident is based upon understanding, measuring and controlling credit risk. Credit risk entails both general risks, which are inherent in the process of lending, and risk specific to individual borrowers. Each consumer and residential lending product has a generally predictable level of credit loss based on historical loss experience. Home mortgage and home equity loans and lines generally have the lowest credit loss experience. Loans with medium credit loss experience are primarily secured products such as auto and marine loans. Unsecured loan products such as personal revolving credit have the highest credit loss experience; therefore the Bank has chosen not to engage in a significant amount of this type of lending. Credit risk in commercial lending varies significantly, as losses as a percentage of outstanding loans can shift widely from period to period and are particularly sensitive to changing economic conditions. Generally improving economic conditions result in improved operating results on the part of commercial customers, enhancing their ability to meet debt service requirements. However, this improvement in operating cash flow is often at least partially offset by rising interest rates often seen in an improving economic environment. In addition, changing economic conditions often impact various business segments differently, giving rise to the need to manage industry concentrations within the loan portfolio. Further discussion relating to asset quality is presented in “Financial Condition – Asset Quality.”
Other lending risks include liquidity risk and specific risk. The liquidity risk of the Corporation arises from its obligation to make payment in the event of a customer’s contractual default. The evaluation of specific risk is a basic function of underwriting and loan administration, involving analysis of the borrower’s ability to service debt as well as the value of pledged collateral. In addition to impacting individual lending decisions, this analysis may also determine the aggregate level of commitments the Corporation is willing to extend to an individual customer or a group of related customers.
Capital Resources
Total stockholders’ equity was $635.8 million at March 31, 2007, an increase of $2.2 million from December 31, 2006. The change in stockholders’ equity for the period was attributable to $16.1 million in earnings that was partially offset by dividends paid of $9.9 million. Net accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased by $4.3 million during the period primarily due to the impact of changing interest rates on the market value of the debt securities portfolio and cash flow hedges. Capital was also increased by $1.8 million associated with the exercise of vested stock options and was reduced by $10.1 million from the repurchase of 290 thousand shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an average price of $34.93. The Corporation is authorized to repurchase up to an additional 1,456,112 thousand shares under its stock repurchase program.
32
The Corporation is required to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of core capital to adjusted quarterly average assets (“leverage ratio”) and of tier 1 and total regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets. The actual regulatory capital ratios and required ratios for capital adequacy purposes under FIRREA and the ratios to be categorized as “well capitalized” under prompt corrective action regulations are summarized in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | | | | | | | |
Total equity capital per consolidated financial statements | | $ | 635,797 | | | $ | 633,631 | | | | | | | |
Qualifying trust preferred securities | | | 129,000 | | | | 129,000 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | 17,786 | | | | 22,107 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted capital | | | 782,583 | | | | 784,738 | | | | | | | |
Adjustments for tier 1 capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and disallowed intangible assets | | | (262,568 | ) | | | (263,665 | ) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total tier 1 capital | | | 520,015 | | | | 521,073 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments for tier 2 capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | 45,519 | | | | 45,203 | | | | | | | |
Allowance for letter of credit losses | | | 577 | | | | 534 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total tier 2 capital adjustments | | | 46,096 | | | | 45,737 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total regulatory capital | | $ | 566,111 | | | $ | 566,810 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Risk-weighted assets | | $ | 4,749,400 | | | $ | 4,781,982 | | | | | | | |
Quarterly regulatory average assets | | | 5,971,930 | | | | 6,108,492 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | Minimum Regulatory Requirements | | | To be “Well Capitalized” | |
Ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 leverage | | | 8.71 | % | | | 8.53 | % | | 4.00 | % | | 5.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | | | 10.95 | | | | 10.90 | | | 4.00 | | | 6.00 | |
Total regulatory capital to risk-weighted assets | | | 11.92 | | | | 11.85 | | | 8.00 | | | 10.00 | |
As of March 31, 2007, the Corporation is considered “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Financial Highlights
Provident reported net income of $16.1 million, or $0.50 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to $18.3 million and $0.55 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2006. The decline in year over year net income was driven by lower net interest income that resulted mainly from the change in deposit mix as customers have been shifting their deposits from low yielding checking and savings accounts to higher yielding certificate of deposit accounts due to the rate environment and the intense level of competition. The financial results for first quarter of 2007 reflect the Corporation’s continued commitment to produce positive loan growth by executing the basic strategies of broadening its presence and customer base in the Greater Washington and Virginia regions, growing commercial business and enhancing business results in all markets. In addition, asset quality continued to be strong and management’s focus on expense control produced modest expense growth for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. Solid growth in average relationship-based loans of $284.9 million in the Corporation’s business segments enabled the Corporation to strengthen the balance sheet by shifting away from wholesale assets to internally generated portfolios. The Corporation’s key performance measurements such as return on assets, return on common equity and net interest margin were 1.05%, 10.21% and 3.62%, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to 1.17%, 11.40%, and 3.72%, respectively, for the first quarter of 2006.
Earnings for the first quarter of 2007 include a decrease of $2.4 million in net interest income, a $734 thousand increase in provision for loan losses, an increase in non-interest income of $1.7 million, an increase of $2.0 million in non-interest expense and a $1.2 million decrease in income tax expense, resulting in a decrease of $2.1 million in net income from first quarter of 2006. Overall, the financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 reflect the consistent execution by all lines of business, which produced growth in relationship-based loans, maintenance of deposit balances in a challenging banking environment and increased fee income. An overview of the Corporation’s strategies is discussed on pages 21-22 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
33
Net Interest Income
The Corporation’s principal source of revenue is net interest income, the difference between interest income on earning assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis to recognize associated tax benefits in order to provide a basis for comparison of yields with taxable earning assets. The following table presents information regarding the average balance of assets and liabilities, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing annualized income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances, however, accrued interest income has been excluded from these loans. The tables on the following pages also analyze the reasons for the changes from year-to-year in the principal elements that comprise net interest income. Rate and volume variances presented for each component will not total the variances presented on totals of interest income and interest expense because of shifts from year-to-year in the relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
34
Consolidated Average Balances and Analysis of Changes in Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 | |
(dollars in thousands) (tax-equivalent basis) | | Average Balance | | Income/ Expense | | Yield/ Rate | | | Average Balance | | Income/ Expense | | Yield/ Rate | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Originated and acquired residential | | $ | 325,377 | | $ | 5,072 | | 6.32 | % | | $ | 439,513 | | $ | 6,883 | | 6.35 | % |
Home equity | | | 996,519 | | | 17,072 | | 6.95 | | | | 914,182 | | | 14,278 | | 6.33 | |
Marine | | | 373,271 | | | 5,017 | | 5.45 | | | | 406,826 | | | 5,234 | | 5.22 | |
Other consumer | | | 27,678 | | | 549 | | 8.04 | | | | 30,401 | | | 592 | | 7.90 | |
Commercial mortgage | | | 450,402 | | | 7,991 | | 7.20 | | | | 475,354 | | | 7,917 | | 6.75 | |
Residential construction | | | 585,987 | | | 12,615 | | 8.73 | | | | 447,792 | | | 9,009 | | 8.16 | |
Commercial construction | | | 371,302 | | | 7,263 | | 7.93 | | | | 309,123 | | | 5,461 | | 7.16 | |
Commercial business | | | 740,810 | | | 13,732 | | 7.52 | | | | 677,346 | | | 11,786 | | 7.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total loans | | | 3,871,346 | | | 69,311 | | 7.26 | | | | 3,700,537 | | | 61,160 | | 6.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans held for sale | | | 11,016 | | | 176 | | 6.48 | | | | 7,477 | | | 126 | | 6.83 | |
Short-term investments | | | 4,039 | | | 97 | | 9.74 | | | | 8,475 | | | 79 | | 3.78 | |
Taxable investment securities | | | 1,554,391 | | | 22,645 | | 5.91 | | | | 1,849,174 | | | 23,952 | | 5.25 | |
Tax-advantaged investment securities | | | 108,944 | | | 1,619 | | 6.03 | | | | 72,705 | | | 1,105 | | 6.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment securities | | | 1,663,335 | | | 24,264 | | 5.92 | | | | 1,921,879 | | | 25,057 | | 5.29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 5,549,736 | | | 93,848 | | 6.86 | | | | 5,638,368 | | | 86,422 | | 6.22 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: allowance for loan losses | | | 45,248 | | | | | | | | | 45,396 | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 112,091 | | | | | | | | | 121,465 | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 617,919 | | | | | | | | | 623,221 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,234,498 | | | | | | | | $ | 6,337,658 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | $ | 518,115 | | | 652 | | 0.51 | | | $ | 569,191 | | | 669 | | 0.48 | |
Money market deposits | | | 542,751 | | | 4,472 | �� | 3.34 | | | | 614,094 | | | 3,635 | | 2.40 | |
Savings deposits | | | 598,591 | | | 591 | | 0.40 | | | | 692,013 | | | 552 | | 0.32 | |
Direct time deposits | | | 1,184,343 | | | 13,387 | | 4.58 | | | | 898,518 | | | 7,150 | | 3.23 | |
Brokered time deposits | | | 526,907 | | | 6,544 | | 5.04 | | | | 448,418 | | | 5,060 | | 4.58 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 662,715 | | | 7,742 | | 4.74 | | | | 835,299 | | | 8,548 | | 4.15 | |
Long-term debt | | | 793,976 | | | 10,965 | | 5.60 | | | | 805,654 | | | 9,122 | | 4.59 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 4,827,398 | | | 44,353 | | 3.73 | | | | 4,863,187 | | | 34,736 | | 2.90 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | | | 724,805 | | | | | | | | | 791,615 | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 42,459 | | | | | | | | | 33,576 | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 639,836 | | | | | | | | | 649,280 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 6,234,498 | | | | | | | | $ | 6,337,658 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest-earning assets | | $ | 722,338 | | | | | | | | $ | 775,181 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (tax-equivalent) | | | | | | 49,495 | | | | | | | | | 51,686 | | | |
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment | | | | | | 652 | | | | | | | | | 438 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | $ | 48,843 | | | | | | | | $ | 51,248 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net yield on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis | | | | | | | | 3.62 | % | | | | | | | | 3.72 | % |
35
Consolidated Average Balances and Analysis of Changes in Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income (Continued)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 2007/2006 Income/Expense Variance | |
| | 2007 Quarter to 2006 Quarter Increase/(Decrease) | | | Due to Change In | |
(dollars in thousands) (tax-equivalent basis) | | Average Balance | | | % Change | | | Income/ Expense | | | % Change | | | Average Rate | | | Average Volume | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Originated and acquired residential | | $ | (114,136 | ) | | (26.0 | )% | | $ | (1,811 | ) | | (26.3 | )% | | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | (1,779 | ) |
Home equity | | | 82,337 | | | 9.0 | | | | 2,794 | | | 19.6 | | | | 1,448 | | | | 1,346 | |
Marine | | | (33,555 | ) | | (8.2 | ) | | | (217 | ) | | (4.1 | ) | | | 227 | | | | (444 | ) |
Other consumer | | | (2,723 | ) | | (9.0 | ) | | | (43 | ) | | (7.3 | ) | | | 11 | | | | (54 | ) |
Commercial mortgage | | | (24,952 | ) | | (5.2 | ) | | | 74 | | | 0.9 | | | | 502 | | | | (428 | ) |
Residential construction | | | 138,195 | | | 30.9 | | | | 3,606 | | | 40.0 | | | | 667 | | | | 2,939 | |
Commercial construction | | | 62,179 | | | 20.1 | | | | 1,802 | | | 33.0 | | | | 627 | | | | 1,175 | |
Commercial business | | | 63,464 | | | 9.4 | | | | 1,946 | | | 16.5 | | | | 799 | | | | 1,147 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total loans | | | 170,809 | | | 4.6 | | | | 8,151 | | | 13.3 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans held for sale | | | 3,539 | | | 47.3 | | | | 50 | | | 39.7 | | | | (7 | ) | | | 57 | |
Short-term investments | | | (4,436 | ) | | (52.3 | ) | | | 18 | | | 22.8 | | | | 76 | | | | (58 | ) |
Taxable investment securities | | | (294,783 | ) | | (15.9 | ) | | | (1,307 | ) | | (5.5 | ) | | | 2,778 | | | | (4,085 | ) |
Tax-advantaged investment securities | | | 36,239 | | | 49.8 | | | | 514 | | | 46.5 | | | | (25 | ) | | | 539 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment securities | | | (258,544 | ) | | (13.5 | ) | | | (793 | ) | | (3.2 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | (88,632 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | | | 7,426 | | | 8.6 | | | | 8,803 | | | | (1,377 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: allowance for loan losses | | | (148 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | (9,374 | ) | | (7.7 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | (5,302 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | (103,160 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | $ | (51,076 | ) | | (9.0 | ) | | | (17 | ) | | (2.5 | ) | | | 45 | | | | (62 | ) |
Money market deposits | | | (71,343 | ) | | (11.6 | ) | | | 837 | | | 23.0 | | | | 1,297 | | | | (460 | ) |
Savings deposits | | | (93,422 | ) | | (13.5 | ) | | | 39 | | | 7.1 | | | | 120 | | | | (81 | ) |
Direct time deposits | | | 285,825 | | | 31.8 | | | | 6,237 | | | 87.2 | | | | 3,551 | | | | 2,686 | |
Brokered time deposits | | | 78,489 | | | 17.5 | | | | 1,484 | | | 29.3 | | | | 542 | | | | 942 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | (172,584 | ) | | (20.7 | ) | | | (806 | ) | | (9.4 | ) | | | 1,109 | | | | (1,915 | ) |
Long-term debt | | | (11,678 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | | 1,843 | | | 20.2 | | | | 1,977 | | | | (134 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | (35,789 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | | 9,617 | | | 27.7 | | | | 9,875 | | | | (258 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | | | (66,810 | ) | | (8.4 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 8,883 | | | 26.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | (9,444 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | (103,160 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest-earning assets | | $ | (52,843 | ) | | (6.8 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (tax-equivalent) | | | | | | | | | | (2,191 | ) | | (4.2 | ) | | $ | (1,072 | ) | | $ | (1,119 | ) |
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment | | | | | | | | | | 214 | | | 48.9 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | | | | | $ | (2,405 | ) | | (4.7 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
36
The net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased 10 basis points to 3.62% for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 compared to March 31, 2006. The decline was primarily caused by the current yield curve environment and the shift in deposit mix as customers have been moving balances from lower yielding checking and savings accounts to higher yielding certificate of deposit accounts. Over the past 12 months, management’s strategy of replacing lower yielding net interest-earning assets with higher yielding net interest-earning assets continues to be successful. The Corporation has experienced solid loan growth in its home equity and residential and commercial construction loan portfolios as well as commercial business from the same period a year ago. Growth in these portfolios was offset by planned declines in wholesale assets (investment securities and originated and acquired residential portfolios). Overall, average earning assets declined $88.6 million to $5.5 billion which was mainly attributable to the $258.5 million reduction in average investment securities that resulted primarily from the securities and debt restructuring transaction that occurred in December 2006. This decline was partially offset by the $170.8 million increase in average loans. The yields on loans and investments grew 56 and 63 basis points, respectively. The yield increase in loan and investment portfolios resulted from the increase in market interest rates and the Corporation’s greater emphasis on variable rate assets. Interest-bearing liabilities decreased $35.8 million while the average rate paid increased 83 basis points. The increase in the average rate paid was primarily due to rising interest rates that impacted all sources of deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Interest expense was negatively impacted from the $66.8 million decline in average noninterest-bearing demand deposit balances during the first quarter of 2007 as compared to same quarter a year ago as a result of the rising interest rate environment.
The 6.86% yield on earning assets in the first quarter 2007 increased 64 basis points from the first quarter 2006 as a result of rising interest rates and the continued demand for both commercial and consumer loans, but only partially offset the increased cost on interest-bearing liabilities of 83 basis points to 3.73%. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $49.5 million in the first quarter of 2007, compared to $51.7 million in first quarter of 2006. Total interest income increased $7.4 million and total interest expense increased $9.6 million resulting in the decline in net interest income of $2.2 million on a tax-equivalent basis. Growth in commercial and consumer loans, along with the impact from rising interest rates, were the primary drivers behind the $7.4 million increase year-over-year in total interest income. The impact from rising interest rates along with the change in deposit mix towards higher yielding certificates of deposit from lower yielding checking and savings accounts were the primary causes of the increase in interest expense of $9.6 million.
Future growth in net interest income will depend upon several factors including loan demand, growth in deposits, and deposit mix and the general level of interest rates.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Corporation’s continued emphasis on quality underwriting as well as aggressive portfolio management of potential problem loans resulted in net charge-offs of $736 thousand, or 0.08% of average loans in the first quarter of 2007 compared to $1.2 million, or 0.13% of average loans, in the first quarter of 2006. The decline in net charge-offs in both the consumer and commercial portfolios is a reflection of management’s credit policies and strategy of shifting the balance sheet to relationship-based loan portfolios. As a result of strong loan growth, the provision for loan losses increased by $734 thousand over the first quarter of 2006.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income increased $1.7 million, or 6.2%, to $30.0 million in the first quarter of 2007. The improvement in non-interest income was mainly driven by an increase in deposit fee income of $219 thousand, net gains of $663 thousand, and a decline in net derivative losses on swaps of $540 thousand.
Deposit fee income increased $219 thousand, or 1.0%, from the first quarter of 2006, reflecting increases in both consumer and commercial accounts and activity. The increase in deposit fee income resulted from the implementation of a change made in processing customer transactions and the benefit from the termination of a vendor agreement in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Commission and fees increased by 3.4% to $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 over the same period a year ago. This increase is mainly from the improved performance in Provident Investment Company activities.
During the first quarter 2007, net gains associated with the sale of securities, asset sales and debt extinguishments increased by $663 thousand over the same period a year ago to $1.2 million. The first quarter of 2007 included securities sales that were focused on reducing sensitivity to changes in interest rates. These transactions generated net gains of $212 thousand. The first quarter of 2007 also included net gains of $180 thousand from the sale of mortgage loans, $767 thousand gain from the sale of a branch facility, $153 thousand from debt extinguishments of $5.8 million from FHLB borrowings and net losses of $109 thousand from other asset sales and other real estate writedowns. First quarter of 2006 included investment/borrowing transactions that were focused on reducing fixed rate mortgage-backed securities to reduce interest rate risk. These transactions generated net gains of $117 thousand. The first quarter of 2006 also included net gains of $141 thousand primarily from the sale of loans and $282 thousand from the extinguishments of $100 million of FHLB borrowings.
37
Net derivative losses on swaps were $63 thousand in the first quarter of 2007, compared to a $603 thousand loss in the first quarter of 2006. These non-cash amounts represent the change in the value of certain derivatives that are used to mitigate the impact of changing interest rates. The positive change in income resulted mainly from the impact of changing interest rates on the value of the non-designated interest rate swap.
Net cash settlement on swaps, representing interest income and expense on non-designated interest rate swaps, decreased $84 thousand from first quarter of 2006 as a result of rising short-term interest rates. Provident’s non-designated interest rate swaps are receive fixed/pay LIBOR positions. LIBOR rates have increased approximately 44 basis points from first quarter of 2006 to first quarter of 2007.
Other non-interest income also benefited from increases in lease income of $222 thousand and $108 thousand in loan fees, offset by declines in mortgage banking fees, insurance and other miscellaneous income.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense increased by $2.0 million, or 3.7%, from the same period a year ago. In the first quarter of 2007, total non-interest expense includes $867 thousand associated with seven branch closures and consulting costs of $747 thousand relating to corporate efficiency and infrastructure initiatives that are currently in process. Excluding the branch closure costs and the efficiency initiatives, non-interest expense increased by 0.7%.
Salaries and employee benefits increased $297 thousand, or 1.1% from the same period a year ago. This increase is mainly attributable to increased labor costs of $786 thousand from annual merit increases and two employee separation agreements. Salaries and employee benefits expense also included an increase of $258 thousand relating to share-based payments. These increases were offset by lower employee incentive and commission payments of $503 thousand and a decline in health care costs of $439 thousand. Occupancy expense increased $375 thousand over the first quarter of 2006 mainly due to lease expense on new locations opened late in 2006, an increase in lease expense on existing facilities and increased depreciation and amortization of related leasehold improvements. Furniture and equipment decreased 1.6% from the first quarter of 2006 mainly as a result of a decline in depreciation expense on premises and equipment and leased equipment. External processing fees increased by $123 thousand, or 2.5%. Restructuring costs related to the seven branch closures was $867 thousand for the first quarter of 2007. The branch closure costs are composed of contract termination costs and the write down of premises and equipment values. Other non-interest expense increased by $377 thousand mainly from the increase in marketing costs of $287 thousand and consulting costs of $747 thousand related to the on going corporate efficiency infrastructure initiatives that were partially offset by lower professional fees, training, travel and other miscellaneous expenses.
Income Taxes
The Corporation accounts for income taxes under the asset/liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. It is at least reasonably possible that management’s judgment about the need for a valuation allowance for deferred taxes could change in the near term. The valuation allowance was $2.8 million at March 31, 2007 versus $2.4 million at March 31, 2006. The valuation allowance relates to additional state operating losses that are unlikely to be realized in the foreseeable future.
The Corporation recorded income tax expense of $6.9 million based on pre-tax income of $23.0 million, representing an effective tax rate of 29.9% in first quarter of 2007. The effective tax rate was favorable compared to the 30.8% rate for the same period a year ago and reflects the increase in average tax-advantaged investments in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the same period a year ago. In the first quarter of 2006, the Corporation recorded a tax expense of $8.1 million on pre-tax income of $26.4 million, an effective tax rate of 30.8%.
38
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
For information regarding market risk at December 31, 2006, see “Interest Sensitivity Management” and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Corporation’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2007. The market risk of the Corporation has not experienced any material changes as of March 31, 2007 from December 31, 2006. Additionally, refer to Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional quantitative and qualitative discussions about market risk at March 31, 2007.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
The Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Corporation files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
The Corporation is involved in various legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of its business. All active lawsuits entail amounts which management believes, individually and in the aggregate, are immaterial to the financial condition and the results of operations of the Corporation.
In early April 2007, the State of Maryland passed legislation eliminating a previously legal dividend deduction for captive real estate investment trusts. The new legislation has not been signed by the Governor into law as of May 10, 2007. If signed into law, it will be effective July 1, 2007 and will be retroactive to January 1, 2007. The Corporation, which maintains a trust to which the new legislation is applicable, is evaluating the impact of this change in legislation and its supporting tax regulations on the Corporation’s operations. The actual amount of the increase in annual tax expense is uncertain at May 10, 2007.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, the reader should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which could materially affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that the Corporation faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Corporation or that the Corporation currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
During 1998, the Corporation initiated a stock repurchase program for its outstanding stock. Under this plan, the Corporation approved the repurchase of specific additional amounts of shares without any specific expiration date. As the Corporation fulfilled each specified repurchase amount, additional amounts were approved. On June 17, 2005, and on January 17, 2007 the Corporation approved an additional stock repurchase of up to 1.3 million and 1.6 million shares, respectively. Currently, the maximum number of shares remaining to be purchased under this plan is 1,456,112. All shares have been repurchased pursuant to the publicly announced plan. The repurchase plan will continue until it is completed or terminated by the Board of Directors. No plans expired during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The Corporation currently has no plan to terminate the stock repurchase plan.
39
The following table provides certain information with regard to shares repurchased by the Corporation in the first quarter of 2007.
| | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased Under Plan | | Maximum Number of Shares Remaining to be Purchased Under Plan |
January 1—January 31 | | 255,000 | | $ | 35.01 | | 255,000 | | 1,491,112 |
February 1—February 28 | | 35,000 | | | 34.33 | | 35,000 | | 1,456,112 |
March 1—March 31 | | — | | | — | | — | | 1,456,112 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | 290,000 | | $ | 34.93 | | 290,000 | | 1,456,112 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None |
Item 5. | Other Information – None |
The exhibits and financial statements filed as a part of this report are as follows:
| | | |
(3.1 | ) | | Articles of Incorporation of Provident Bankshares Corporation (1) |
| |
(3.2 | ) | | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Provident Bankshares Corporation (1) |
| |
(3.3 | ) | | Sixth Amended and Restated By-Laws of Provident Bankshares Corporation (2) |
| |
(10.1 | ) | | Form of Provident Bank 2007 Executive Incentive Plan (3) |
| |
(11.0 | ) | | Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings (4) |
| |
(31.1 | ) | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
| |
(31.2 | ) | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
| |
(32.1 | ) | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
| |
(32.2 | ) | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-58881) filed with the Commission on July 10, 1998. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-16421) filed with the Commission on January 18, 2007. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference from Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-16421 filed with the Commission on March 26, 2007. |
(4) | Included in Note 15 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| | Principal Executive Officer: |
| | |
May 10, 2007 | | By | | /s/ Gary N. Geisel |
| | | | Gary N. Geisel |
| | | | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| | Principal Financial Officer: |
| | |
May 10, 2007 | | By | | /s/ Dennis A. Starliper |
| | | | Dennis A. Starliper |
| | | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
41
| | |
EXHIBIT | | DESCRIPTION |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
| |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
| |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
| |
32.2 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
42