Neiman Marcus 10-Q 2004 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

ý        QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended May 1, 2004

OR

o        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file no. 1-9659

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	95-4119509
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Marcus Square 1618 Main Street Dallas, Texas  75201
(Address of principal executive offices)
(214) 741-6911
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES   ý NO   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES   ý NO   o

As of June 1, 2004, the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock was:

Class	Outstanding Shares
Class A Common Stock, $.01 Par Value	29,341,253
Class B Common Stock, $.01 Par Value	19,941,833

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

INDEX

Part I.		Financial Information
	Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 1, 2004, August 2, 2003 and May 3, 2003
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Thirteen Weeks and Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
Part II.		Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)	May 1, 2004			August 2, 2003			May 3, 2003
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	311,985		$	206,950		$	133,670
Undivided interests in NMG Credit Card Master Trust	—			243,145			279,556
Accounts receivable, net	599,581			22,595			25,132
Merchandise inventories	715,539			687,062			719,118
Other current assets	46,372			86,369			58,681
Total current assets	1,673,477			1,246,121			1,216,157
Property and equipment, net	685,928			674,185			676,059
Other assets	104,158			114,124			107,851
Total assets	$	2,463,563		$	2,034,430		$	2,000,067
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term liabilities	$	1,237		$	1,241		$	1,799
Current portion of borrowings under Credit Card Facility	37,500			—			—
Accounts payable	234,264			262,909			224,945
Accrued liabilities	316,305			266,259			293,145
Total current liabilities	589,306			530,409			519,889
Long-term liabilities:
Notes and debentures	249,751			249,733			249,727
Borrowings under Credit Card Facility	187,500			—			—
Other long-term liabilities	97,307			108,234			87,530
Total long-term liabilities	534,558			357,967			337,257
Minority interest	12,799			8,206			9,462
Common stocks	493			479			482
Additional paid-in capital	484,151			458,520			447,456
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(26,752		)	(25,573		)	(11,729		)
Retained earnings	891,054			719,442			712,270
Treasury stock, at cost (699,777 shares at May 1, 2004 and 524,177 shares at August 2, 2003 and May 3, 2003)	(22,046		)	(15,020		)	(15,020		)
Total shareholders’ equity	1,326,900			1,137,848			1,133,459
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,463,563		$	2,034,430		$	2,000,067

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(UNAUDITED)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands, except per share data)	May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003			May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003
Revenues	$	877,576		$	722,917		$	2,756,563		$	2,395,467
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs	543,275			463,713			1,768,852			1,572,222
Selling, general and administrative expenses	214,706			187,372			680,827			617,765
Operating earnings	119,595			71,832			306,884			205,480
Interest expense, net	4,589			4,245			11,814			12,183
Earnings before income taxes, minority interest and change in accounting principle	115,006			67,587			295,070			193,297
Income taxes	44,852			26,020			107,576			74,419
Earnings before minority interest and change in accounting principle	70,154			41,567			187,494			118,878
Minority interest in net earnings of subsidiaries	(1,305		)	(437		)	(3,249		)	(1,946		)
Earnings before change in accounting principle	68,849			41,130			184,245			116,932
Change in accounting principle – writedown of intangible assets, net of taxes	—			—			—			(14,801		)
Net earnings	$	68,849		$	41,130		$	184,245		$	102,131
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
Basic	48,208			47,240			47,929			47,498
Diluted	49,124			47,497			48,806			47,772
Basic earnings per share:
Earnings before change in accounting principle	$	1.43		$	0.87		$	3.84		$	2.46
Change in accounting principle – writedown of intangible assets, net of taxes	—			—			—			(0.31		)
Basic earnings per share	$	1.43		$	0.87		$	3.84		$	2.15
Diluted earnings per share:
Earnings before change in accounting principle	$	1.40		$	0.87		$	3.78		$	2.45
Change in accounting principle – writedown of intangible assets, net of taxes	—			—			—			(0.31		)
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.40		$	0.87		$	3.78		$	2.14

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands)	May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003
CASH FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings	$	184,245		$	102,131
Change in accounting – non-cash writedown of intangible assets, net of taxes	—			14,801
Earnings before change in accounting principle	184,245			116,932
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	69,163			57,924
Minority interest	3,249			1,946
Other – primarily costs related to defined benefit pension and other long-term benefit plans	24,367			14,168
	281,024			190,970
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable	(576,986		)	(5,354		)
Increase merchandise inventories	(28,477		)	(62,274		)
Decrease in other current assets	27,803			4,125
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	35,347			21,156
Funding of defined benefit pension plan	(30,000		)	(30,760		)
NET CASH (USED FOR) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	(291,289		)	117,863
CASH FLOWS - INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	(80,906		)	(80,817		)
Transactions related to undivided interests in NMG Credit Card Master Trust:
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities	(240,808		)	(747,396		)
Maturities of held-to-maturity securities	483,373			678,003
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES	161,659			(150,210		)
CASH FLOWS - FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from borrowings	2,000			81,051
Repayment of debt	(1,500		)	(80,000		)
Borrowings under Credit Card Facility	225,000			—
Acquisitions of treasury stock	(7,026		)	(15,020		)
Proceeds from exercises of stock options and restricted stock grants	23,235			1,642
Cash dividends paid	(6,312		)	—
Distributions paid	(732		)	(294		)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR)  FINANCING ACTIVITIES	234,665			(12,621		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Increase (decrease) during the period	105,035			(44,968		)
Beginning balance	206,950			178,638
Ending balance	$	311,985		$	133,670
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	9,050		$	9,329
Income taxes	$	70,657		$	42,489

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1.Basis of Presentation

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted for complete financial statements.  Therefore, the financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2003.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to July 31.  All references to the third quarter of 2004 relate to the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2004 and all references to the third quarter of 2003 relate to the thirteen weeks ended May 3, 2003.  All references to 2004 relate to the thirty-nine weeks ended May 1, 2004 and all references to 2003 relate to the thirty-nine weeks ended May 3, 2003.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments (as well as a change in accounting principle made in the first quarter of 2003 as more fully described in Note 9) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the applicable interim periods.  The results of operations for these periods are not necessarily comparable to, or indicative of, results of any other interim period or for the fiscal year as a whole.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events.  These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of gain and loss contingencies at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company evaluates its estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicates those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  Management makes adjustments to its assumptions and judgments when facts and circumstances dictate.  Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results may differ from the estimates used by the Company in preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Management of the Company believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, encompass the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements:

•Revenue recognition;

•Valuation of merchandise inventories, including determination of original retail values, recognition of markdowns and vendor allowances, estimation of inventory shrinkage, and determination of cost of goods sold;

•Recognition of income and expenses related to the Company’s securitization program;

•Determination of impairment of long-lived assets;

•Recognition of advertising and catalog costs;

•Recognition of costs related to the Company’s loyalty programs;

•Recognition of income taxes; and

•Measurement of accruals for litigation, general liability, workers’ compensation and health insurance as well as short-term disability, pension and postretirement health care benefits.

A description of the Company’s critical accounting policies is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form  10-K for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2003.

4

Stock-Based Compensation.  The Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards to employees in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock options since all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.

The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for the thirteen weeks and thirty-nine weeks ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands, except per share data)	May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003			May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003
Net earnings:
As reported	$	68,849		$	41,130		$	184,245		$	102,131
Less: stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related taxes	(2,210		)	(2,095		)	(6,411		)	(6,333		)
Pro forma	$	66,639		$	39,035		$	177,834		$	95,798
Basic earnings per share:
As reported	$	1.43		$	0.87		$	3.84		$	2.15
Pro forma	$	1.38		$	0.83		$	3.71		$	2.02
Diluted earnings per share:
As reported	$	1.40		$	0.87		$	3.78		$	2.14
Pro forma	$	1.36		$	0.82		$	3.64		$	2.01

The effects on pro forma net earnings and earnings per share of expensing the estimated fair value of stock options are not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net earnings for future periods due to such factors as the vesting periods of stock options and the potential issuance of additional stock options in future years.  In addition, the Black-Scholes option-pricing model has inherent limitations in calculating the fair value of stock options for which no active market exists since the model does not consider the inability to sell or transfer options, vesting requirements and a reduced exercise period upon termination of employment - all of which would reduce the fair value of the options.

5

2.Operating Segments

The Company has identified two reportable segments: Specialty Retail Stores and Direct Marketing.  The Specialty Retail Stores segment includes all Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman retail stores, including Neiman Marcus clearance stores.  The Direct Marketing segment conducts both print catalog and online operations under the Neiman Marcus, Horchow and Chef’s Catalog brand names.  Other includes the operations of Kate Spade LLC and Gurwitch Products, LLC (the Brand Development Companies) and corporate expenses.

The following table sets forth the information for the Company’s reportable segments:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands)	May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003			May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003
REVENUES:
Specialty Retail Stores	$	721,971		$	591,268		$	2,230,071		$	1,948,486
Direct Marketing	126,204			112,767			445,694			388,401
Other	29,401			18,882			80,798			58,580
Total	$	877,576		$	722,917		$	2,756,563		$	2,395,467
OPERATING EARNINGS:
Specialty Retail Stores	$	115,176		$	68,337		$	279,084		$	186,008
Direct Marketing	9,842			10,386			45,226			35,787
Other	(5,423		)	(6,891		)	(17,426		)	(16,315		)
Total	$	119,595		$	71,832		$	306,884		$	205,480

3.Cash Dividend Program

In the second quarter of 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors initiated a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per share.  The Company declared dividends on January 30, 2004 and on April 30, 2004.  As of May 1, 2004, the Company had dividends payable in the amount of $6.3 million (included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet), which were paid in May 2004.

4.Stock Repurchase Program

In prior years, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized various stock repurchase programs and increases in the number of shares subject to repurchase.  During the first quarter of 2004, the Company repurchased 175,600 shares at an average purchase price of $40.01.  As of May 1, 2004, approximately 1.2 million shares remain authorized for repurchase under the Company’s stock repurchase programs.

6

5.Earnings per Share

The weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) are presented in the table below.  No adjustments were made to net earnings for the computations of basic and diluted EPS during the periods presented.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands of shares)	May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003		May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003
Weighted average shares outstanding	48,557		47,530		48,313		47,789
Less: shares of non-vested restricted stock	(349	)	(290	)	(384	)	(291	)
Shares for computation of basic EPS	48,208		47,240		47,929		47,498
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock	916		257		877		274
Shares for computation of diluted EPS	49,124		47,497		48,806		47,772
Shares represented by antidilutive stock options	—		1,937		9		1,950

Antidilutive stock options are not included in the computation of diluted EPS when the exercise price of those options is greater than the average market price of the common shares.

6.Undivided Interests in NMG Credit Card Master Trust

Pursuant to a revolving credit card securitization program (the Credit Card Facility), the Company transfers substantially all of its credit card receivables to a wholly-owned subsidiary, Neiman Marcus Funding Corporation, which in turn sells such receivables to the Neiman Marcus Credit Card Master Trust (Trust).  At the inception of the Credit Card Facility in September 2000, the Trust issued certificates representing undivided interests in the credit card receivables to third-party investors in the face amount of $225 million (Sold Interests) and to the Company in an aggregate amount equal to the excess of the balance of the credit card portfolio over $225 million (Retained Interests).  In order to maintain the committed level of securitized assets, cash collections on the securitized receivables are used by the Trust to purchase new credit card balances from the Company in accordance with the terms of the Credit Card Facility.

From its inception until December 2003, the Company’s transfers and sales of credit card receivables pursuant to the terms of the Credit Card Facility were accounted for as sales in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (Off-Balance Sheet Accounting).  As a result, $225 million of credit card receivables were removed from the Company’s balance sheet at the inception of the Credit Card Facility and the Company’s $225 million repayment obligation to the holders of the certificates representing the Sold Interests was not required to be shown as a liability on the Company’s balance sheet.  During the period the transfers and sales qualified for Off-Balance Sheet Accounting, the Retained Interests were shown as “Undivided interests in NMG Credit Card Master Trust” on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Beginning in April 2005, cash collections will be used by the Trust to repay the $225 million principal balance of the Class A Certificates in six monthly installments of $37.5 million (Amortization Period).  As a result of certain provisions in the securitization agreement, the Company holds certain rights to repurchase the Class A Certificates (Repurchase Option) subsequent to the commencement of the Amortization Period and, therefore, has the ability to regain effective control over the credit card receivables held by the Trust at the time the Repurchase Option becomes exercisable.  The Company believes that the Repurchase Option will become exercisable in September 2005.

7

Transfers to the Trust ceased to qualify for Off-Balance Sheet Accounting beginning in December 2003 since the contractual life of the receivables transferred after November 2003 is estimated to extend to September 2005 when the Repurchase Option becomes exercisable.  Rather, these transfers are recorded as secured borrowings by the Company (Financing Accounting).  As a consequence, the credit card receivables generated after November 2003 remained on the Company’s balance sheet and the Company recorded a liability for its repayment obligation to the holders of the $225 million of certificates representing the Sold Interests.  The transition period from Off-Balance Sheet Accounting to Financing Accounting (Transition Period) lasted approximately four months (December 2003 to March 2004).  During the Transition Period, cash collections of receivables were allocated to the previous Sold Interests and Retained Interests until such time as those balances were reduced to zero.

A reconciliation of the outstanding balance of the Company’s accounts receivables to the balances recorded by the Company at May 1, 2004, August 2, 2003 and May 3, 2003 is as follows:

(in millions)	May 1, 2004		August 2, 2003			May 3, 2003
Credit card receivables	$	569.5	$	468.1		$	504.6
Other receivables	30.1		22.6			25.1
	599.6		490.7			529.7
Less: Sold Interests originally qualifying for Off-Balance Sheet Accounting	—		(225.0		)	(225.0		)
Net balance	$	599.6	$	265.7		$	304.7
Amounts reflected in the Company’s balance sheet:
Undivided interests in NMG Credit Card Master Trust	$	—	$	243.1		$	279.6
Accounts receivable	599.6		22.6			25.1
	$	599.6	$	265.7		$	304.7
Current portion of borrowings under Credit Card Facility	$	37.5	$	—		$	—
Borrowings under Credit Card Facility	187.5		—			—
	$	225.0	$	—		$	—

Upon completion of the Transition Period, the Company’s entire credit card portfolio was included in accounts receivable in its condensed consolidated balance sheet and the $225 million repayment obligation was shown as a liability.

As of the start of the Transition Period in December 2003, the carrying value of the Retained Interests exceeded face value by approximately $7.6 million as a result of the application of the provisions of current accounting rules related to the calculation of the gains on sale of the previously Sold Interests and the valuation of both Sold and Retained Interests.  During the Transition Period, the $7.6 million premium was amortized as a reduction of the Company’s net earnings from its credit card portfolio (recorded as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings).  Of the $7.6 million premium, $5.3 million was amortized in the second quarter of 2004 and the remaining $2.3 million was amortized in the third quarter of 2004.

8

7.Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan) covering substantially all full-time employees. The Company also sponsors an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP Plan) that provides certain employees additional pension benefits.  Benefits under both plans are based on the employees’ years of service and compensation over defined periods of employment.  Pension Plan assets consist primarily of equity and fixed income securities.

Retirees and active employees hired prior to March 1, 1989 are eligible for certain limited postretirement health care benefits (Postretirement Plan) if they have met certain service and minimum age requirements.

The components of pension expense for the Pension Plan are as follows:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands)	May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003			May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003
Service cost	$	2,366		$	2,701		$	8,469		$	6,563
Interest cost	3,603			4,505			12,894			10,948
Expected return on plan assets	(3,612		)	(4,326		)	(12,928		)	(10,512		)
Net amortization of losses (gains) on prior service costs	698			121			2,498			293
Pension Plan expense	$	3,055		$	3,001		$	10,933		$	7,292

The components of SERP Plan expense are as follows:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands)	May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003		May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003
Service cost	$	342	$	357	$	1,024	$	755
Interest cost	977		1,138		2,930		2,409
Net amortization of losses and prior service costs	367		363		1,099		769
SERP Plan expense	$	1,686	$	1,858	$	5,053	$	3,933

The components of Postretirement Plan expense are as follows:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands)	May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003		May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003
Service cost	$	20	$	24	$	60	$	74
Interest cost	385		430		1,156		1,296
Net amortization and deferral	111		86		331		258
Postretirement Plan expense	$	516	$	540	$	1,547	$	1,628

9

At August 1, 2003, the funded status of the Company’s employee benefit plans was as follows:

(in thousands)	Pension Plan		SERP Plan		Postretirement Plan
Projected benefit obligations	$	244,997	$	57,638	$	24,907
Fair value of assets	183,044		—		—
Underfunded status	$	61,953	$	57,638	$	24,907

The Company had cumulative unrecognized expense for the Pension Plan of $76.5 million at August 1, 2003 primarily related to the delayed recognition of differences between the Company’s actuarial assumptions and actual results, which contributed to the $62.0 million underfunded status of the Pension Plan at August 1, 2003.  In addition, the Company had cumulative unrecognized expense for the SERP Plan and Postretirement Plan aggregating $25.1 million at August 1, 2003.

The Company’s policy is to fund the Pension Plan at or above the minimum required by law.  In the third quarter of 2003, the Company made a required contribution of $11.5 million and a voluntary contribution of $13.5 million to the Pension Plan for the plan year ended July 31, 2002.  In addition, the Company made contributions of $5.8 million in 2003 for the plan year ended July 31, 2003.  In the second quarter of 2004, the Company made a $30 million voluntary contribution to the Pension Plan for the plan year ended July 31, 2003.  Based upon currently available information, the Company will not be required to make any additional contributions to the Pension Plan for the plan years ending July 31, 2003 and July 31, 2004.

8.Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various suits and claims in the ordinary course of business.  Management does not believe that the disposition of any such suits or claims will have a material adverse effect upon the consolidated results of operations, cash flows or the financial position of the Company.

10

9.Change in Accounting Principle – Writedown of Intangible Assets

As of the beginning of the first quarter of 2003, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”  SFAS No. 142 established a new fair value-based accounting model for the valuation of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded in connection with business combinations.  Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 142, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are measured for impairment by applying a fair value-based test at least annually and are not amortized.

In connection with the adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company engaged third-party appraisal experts to assist with the determination of the fair value of its goodwill and intangible assets.  For each of the Company’s operating segments, a summary of the intangible assets recorded by the Company as of the beginning of the first quarter of 2003 in accordance with the cost-based accounting model established by previous accounting principles and the adjustment required to adopt the fair value model of SFAS No. 142 is as follows:

(in thousands)	Carrying Value at August 4, 2002		SFAS No. 142 Adjustment			Adjusted Carrying Value
Direct Marketing
Goodwill	$	23,747	$	—		$	23,747
Indefinite-lived tradenames	60,732		(24,066		)	36,666
Other
Indefinite-lived tradenames	32,945		—			32,945
	$	117,424	$	(24,066	)	$	93,358

The $24.1 million writedown in the carrying value of the indefinite-lived assets of the Company’s Direct Marketing segment is reflected as a change in accounting principle ($14.8 million, net of taxes) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the first quarter of 2003.

10.Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 36.5 percent for 2004 and 38.5 percent for 2003.  In the second quarter of 2004, the Company recognized a net income tax benefit of $7.5 million related to favorable settlements associated with previous state tax filings.  Excluding this benefit, the effective tax rate was 39.0 percent for 2004 and 38.5 percent for 2003.  This increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to higher state income taxes.

11

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

Matters discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations include forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the Company’s objectives and expectations concerning, among other things, its:

•productivity and profitability;

•merchandising and marketing strategies;

•inventory performance;

•store renovation and expansion plans;

•capital expenditures;

•liquidity; and

•development of management information systems.

These forward-looking statements are made based on management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events, as well as on assumptions made by and data currently available to management.  These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance.  A variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated or expected results expressed in these forward-looking statements.  Factors that could affect future performance include, but are not limited, to:

•current political and economic conditions;

•changes in political and economic conditions that may occur in the future;

•terrorist activities in the United States, as well as the potential escalation in the international war on terrorism;

•political, social, economic or other events resulting in the short or long-term disruption in business at the Company’s stores, distribution centers or offices;

•changes in consumer confidence resulting in a reduction of discretionary spending on goods that are, or are perceived to be, “luxuries”;

•changes in demographic or retail environments;

•changes in consumer preferences or fashion trends;

•competitive responses to the Company’s marketing, merchandising and promotional efforts and/or inventory liquidations by vendors or other retailers;

•changes in the Company’s relationships with its key customers;

•delays in the receipt of merchandise ordered by the Company due to work stoppages and/or other causes of delay in connection with either the manufacture or shipment of such merchandise;

•seasonality of the retail business;

•adverse weather conditions, particularly during peak selling seasons;

•delays in anticipated store openings;

•natural disasters;

•significant increases in paper, printing and postage costs;

•litigation that may have an adverse effect on the financial results or reputation of the Company;

•changes in the Company’s relationships with designers, vendors and other sources of merchandise;

•the financial viability of the Company’s designers, vendors and other sources of merchandise;

•the design and implementation of new information systems as well as enhancement of existing systems;

12

•changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

•impact of funding requirements related to the Company’s noncontributory defined benefit pension plan;

•changes in the Company’s relationships with certain of its key sales associates;

•changes in key management personnel;

•changes in the Company’s proprietary credit card arrangement that adversely impact its ability to provide consumer credit; or

•changes in government or regulatory requirements increasing the Company’s costs of operations.

The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise (publicly or otherwise) any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, new information or future circumstances.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of condensed financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events.  These estimates and assumptions affect amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of gain and loss contingencies at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements.  The amounts currently estimated by the Company are subject to change if different assumptions as to the outcome of future events were made.  The Company evaluates its estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicates those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  Management makes adjustments to its assumptions and judgments when facts and circumstances dictate.  Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results may differ from the estimates used by the Company in preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

See Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 for a summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies.  A description of the Company’s critical accounting policies is included in the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2003.

OVERVIEW

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., together with its operating divisions and subsidiaries, is a high-end specialty retailer.  The Company’s operations include the Specialty Retail Stores segment and the Direct Marketing segment.  The Specialty Retail Stores segment consists primarily of Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman stores.  The Direct Marketing segment conducts both print catalog and online operations under the Neiman Marcus, Horchow and Chef’s Catalog brand names.

The following table sets forth certain items expressed as percentages of net sales for the periods indicated.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
	May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003		May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003
Revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs	61.9		64.1		64.2		65.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses	24.5		25.9		24.7		25.8
Operating earnings	13.6		9.9		11.1		8.6
Interest expense, net	0.5		0.6		0.4		0.5
Earnings before income taxes, minority interest and change in accounting principle	13.1		9.3		10.7		8.1
Income taxes	5.1		3.6		3.9		3.1
Earnings before minority interest and change in accounting principle	8.0		5.7		6.8		5.0
Minority interest in net earnings of subsidiaries	(0.1	)	(0.1	)	(0.1	)	(0.1	)
Earnings before change in accounting principle	7.8		5.7		6.7		4.9
Change in accounting principle – writedown of intangible assets, net of taxes	—		—		—		(0.6	)
Net earnings	7.8	%	5.7	%	6.7	%	4.3	%

13

OPERATING RESULTS

Set forth in the following table is certain summary information with respect to the Company’s operations for the periods indicated.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(dollars in millions)	May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003			May 1, 2004			May 3, 2003
REVENUES
Specialty Retail Stores	$	722.0		$	591.2		$	2,230.1		$	1,948.5
Direct Marketing	126.2			112.8			445.7			388.4
Other (1)	29.4			18.9			80.8			58.6
Total	$	877.6		$	722.9		$	2,756.6		$	2,395.5
OPERATING EARNINGS
Specialty Retail Stores	$	115.2		$	68.3		$	279.1		$	186.0
Direct Marketing	9.8			10.4			45.2			35.8
Other (1)	(5.4		)	(6.9		)	(17.4		)	(16.3		)
Total	$	119.6		$	71.8		$	306.9		$	205.5
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN
Specialty Retail Stores	16.0		%	11.6		%	12.5		%	9.5		%
Direct Marketing	7.8		%	9.2		%	10.1		%	9.2		%
Total	13.6		%	9.9		%	11.1		%	8.6		%
COMPARABLE REVENUES (2)
Specialty Retail Stores (3)	22.1		%	(0.3		)%	13.7		%	0.4		%
Direct Marketing	11.9		%	10.8		%	14.8		%	11.6		%
Total	21.4		%	1.5		%	14.4		%	2.3		%
STORE COUNT (3)
Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman stores:
Open at beginning of period	37			37			37			35
Opened during the period	—			—			—			2
Open at end of period	37			37			37			37
Clearance centers:
Open at beginning of period	14			13			14			12
Opened during the period	—			—			—			1
Open at end of period	14			13			14			13

(1)Other includes the operations of the Brand Development Companies and corporate expenses.

(2)Comparable revenues include 1) revenues derived from the Company’s retail stores open for more than 52 weeks, including stores that have been relocated or expanded, 2) revenues from the Company’s Direct Marketing operations and 3) revenues from the Company’s Brand Development Companies.

(3)The Company’s Neiman Marcus Galleries stores have been excluded.  The Company previously opened three Galleries stores in the second quarter of fiscal year 1999 and in the first quarter of fiscal year 2000.  One of these stores was closed in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 and the remaining two stores were closed in the second quarter of 2004.

14

THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MAY 1, 2004 COMPARED TO THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
May 3, 2003

Revenues.  Revenues for the third quarter of 2004 of $877.6 million increased $154.7 million, or 21.4 percent, from $722.9 million in the prior year period.

Comparable revenues in the third quarter of 2004 increased 21.4 percent compared to the prior year period.  Comparable revenues increased 22.1 percent for Specialty Retail Stores and 11.9 percent for Direct Marketing.  The Company believes the increases in its comparable revenues were the result of a higher level of consumer spending, in general, with a higher increase coming from the affluent luxury customer served by the Company.  In addition, the Company believes the increases in its comparable revenues were also driven by various sales events conducted by its Specialty Retail Stores during the third quarter of 2004 and by the growth of internet sales for Direct Marketing.  Comparable revenues in the third quarter of 2003 increased by 1.5 percent.

Comparable revenues for the Brand Development Companies increased in the third quarter of 2004 with increases for both Kate Spade LLC and Gurwitch Products, LLC.

Gross margin.  Gross margin was 38.1 percent of revenues for the third quarter of 2004 compared to 35.9 percent for the third quarter of 2003.  The increase in gross margin was primarily due to higher product margins and a decrease in buying and occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues.

The higher margins realized by the Company in the third quarter of 2004 were primarily due to a lower level of markdowns required to be taken by the Specialty Retail Stores during the third quarter of 2004.  The Company believes the lower level of markdowns was due to 1) an improvement in economic conditions that resulted in higher sales and 2) the Company’s continued emphasis on both inventory management and full-price selling.  Consistent with industry business practice, the Company receives allowances from certain of its vendors in support of the merchandise purchased by the Company for resale.  The Company receives the majority of the allowances at the end of its second and fourth quarters.  The amounts of vendor reimbursements received by the Company did not have a significant impact on the year-over-year change in gross margin in the third quarter of 2004.

A significant portion of the Company’s buying and occupancy costs are fixed in nature.  Buying and occupancy costs decreased as a percentage of revenues during the third quarter of 2004 compared to the third quarter of 2003 primarily due to the Company’s improved leveraging of fixed expenses, including payroll expense and rent and related occupancy expenses.  The decrease in buying and occupancy costs was offset, in part, by an increase in depreciation expense due to higher levels of capital spending in recent years.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) were 24.5 percent of revenues in the third quarter of 2004 compared to 25.9 percent of revenues in the third quarter of 2003.

The net decrease in SG&A as a percentage of revenues in the third quarter of 2004 was primarily due to productivity improvements in various expense categories, including payroll, employee benefits and advertising costs for the Specialty Retail Stores as a result of the higher level of sales during the quarter.  Employee benefit expenses for the third quarter of 2004 were relatively unchanged on a dollar basis from the prior year.

The decreases in SG&A were partially offset by higher costs for incentive compensation as a result of the increased operating profits generated by the Company.  In addition, the net income generated by the Company’s credit card portfolio, as a percentage of revenues, declined compared to the prior year due to 1) a $2.3 million reduction in income due to the required amortization of the premium associated with the carrying value of the Retained Interests during the Transition Period, as more fully described in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and 2) a decrease in the yield earned on the credit card portfolio attributable to a decrease in the average days the receivables are outstanding prior to customer payment offset, in part, by a lower level of bad debts.

Segment operating earnings.  Operating earnings for the Specialty Retail Stores segment were $115.2 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared to $68.3 million in the third quarter of 2003.  This increase was primarily the result of increased sales, reduced markdowns and net decreases in buying and occupancy costs and SG&A expenses as percentages of revenues.

15

Operating earnings for Direct Marketing decreased to $9.8 million in the third quarter of 2004 from $10.4 million in the third quarter of 2003, primarily as a result of increased markdowns and a net increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues.  The increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues is primarily related to an increase in catalog production and circulation costs and web marketing costs during the third quarter of 2004.

Interest expense, net.  Net interest expense was $4.6 million for the third quarter of 2004 compared to $4.2 million for the third quarter of 2003.  The increase in net interest expense for the third quarter of 2004 is primarily due to the interest paid on the borrowings under the Credit Card Facility offset, in part, by an increase in capitalized interest charges associated with store construction and remodeling activities.

Income taxes.  The Company’s effective income tax rate was 39.0 percent for the third quarter of 2004 and 38.5 percent for the third quarter of 2003.

THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED MAY 1, 2004 COMPARED TO THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED MAY 3, 2003

Revenues.  Revenues for 2004 of $2.76 billion increased $361.1 million, or 15.1 percent, from $2.40 billion in the prior year period.

Comparable revenues in 2004 increased 14.4 percent compared to the prior year period.  Comparable revenues increased 13.7 percent for Specialty Retail Stores and 14.8 percent for Direct Marketing.  The Company believes the increases in its comparable revenues were the result of a higher level of consumer spending, in general, with a higher increase coming from the affluent luxury customer served by the Company.  In addition, the Company believes the increases in its comparable revenues were also driven by sales events conducted by its Specialty Retail Stores and by the growth of internet sales for Direct Marketing.  Comparable revenues in 2003 increased by 2.3 percent.

Comparable revenues for the Brand Development Companies increased in 2004 with increases for both Kate Spade LLC and Gurwitch Products, LLC.

Gross margin.  Gross margin was 35.8 percent of revenues for 2004 compared to 34.4 percent for 2003.  The increase in gross margin was primarily due to higher product margins and a decrease in buying and occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues.

The higher product margins realized by the Company were a function of a lower level of markdowns required to be taken by the Specialty Retail Stores during 2004.  The Company believes the lower level of markdowns was due to 1) an improvement in economic conditions that resulted in higher sales, 2) the Company’s continued emphasis on both inventory management and full-price selling and 3) the discontinuance of various promotional sales activities conducted by the Company in the prior year, primarily in the second quarter of 2003.  Consistent with industry business practice, the Company receives allowances from certain of its vendors in support of the merchandise purchased by the Company for resale.  The Company receives the majority of the allowances at the end of its second and fourth quarters.  The amounts of vendor reimbursements received by the Company did not have a significant impact on the year-over-year change in gross margin in 2004.

A significant portion of the Company’s buying and occupancy costs are fixed in nature.  Buying and occupancy decreased as a percentage of revenues during 2004 compared to 2003 primarily due to the Company’s improved leveraging of fixed expenses, including payroll expense and rent and related occupancy expenses.  The decrease in buying and occupancy costs was offset, in part, by an increase in depreciation expense due to higher levels of capital spending in recent years.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) were 24.7 percent of revenues in 2004 compared to 25.8 percent of revenues in 2003.

The net decrease in SG&A as a percentage of revenues in 2004 was primarily due to 1) productivity improvements in various expense categories, including payroll, employee benefits and advertising as a result of the higher level of sales during the period, 2) reduced preopening costs and 3) the $3.7 million favorable impact recorded in the second quarter of 2004 as a result of conclusions on certain sales tax and unclaimed property examinations for which the agreed-on settlements were less than the amounts previously estimated by the Company.  In 2003, the Company incurred preopening expenses of $7.6 million in connection with the opening of two Neiman Marcus stores in Florida in the first quarter of 2003, the opening of a new clearance center store in the second quarter of 2003 and the grand opening of the remodeled and expanded Neiman Marcus store in Las Vegas in the second quarter of 2003.

16

The decreases in SG&A were partially offset by higher costs for incentive compensation as a result of the increased operating profits generated by the Company.  In addition, the net income generated by the Company’s credit card portfolio, as a percentage of revenues, declined compared to the prior year due to 1) a $7.6 million reduction in income due to the required amortization of the premium associated with the carrying value of the Retained Interests during the Transition Period, as more fully described in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and 2) a decrease in the yield earned on the credit card portfolio attributable to a decrease in the average days the receivables are outstanding prior to customer payment offset, in part, by a lower level of bad debts.

Segment operating earnings.  Operating earnings for the Specialty Retail Stores segment were $279.1 million in 2004 compared to $186.0 million in 2003.  This increase was primarily the result of increased sales, reduced markdowns and net decreases in both buying and occupancy expenses and SG&A expenses as percentages of revenues.

Operating earnings for Direct Marketing increased to $45.2 million in 2004 from $35.8 million in 2003, primarily as a result of increased sales and net decreases in both buying and occupancy costs and SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues offset, in part, by higher markdowns.

Interest expense, net.  Net interest expense was $11.8 million for 2004 compared to $12.2 million for 2003.  The decrease in net interest expense is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest charges associated with store construction and remodeling activities and lower interest related to its revolving credit facility, offset by interest paid on the borrowings under the Credit Card Facility.  As a result of a higher level of cash generated by operations, the Company incurred no borrowings on its revolving credit facility to fund seasonal working capital requirements in the second quarter of 2004.  Seasonal borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility reached $80 million in the second quarter of 2003 and were repaid prior to the end of the quarter.

Income taxes.  The Company’s effective income tax rate was 36.5 percent for 2004 and 38.5 percent for 2003.  In the second quarter of 2004, the Company recognized a net income tax benefit of $7.5 million related to favorable settlements associated with previous state tax filings.  Excluding this benefit, the effective tax rate was 39.0 percent for 2004 and 38.5 percent for 2003.  This increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to higher state income taxes.

SEASONALITY

The Company’s business, like that of most retailers, is subject to seasonal influences, with a higher level of revenues and net earnings realized during the fall season, which includes the second quarter holiday selling season.  In light of these patterns, SG&A expenses are typically higher as a percentage of net revenues during the first, third and fourth quarters of each year, and working capital needs are greater in the first and second quarters of each year.  The increases in working capital needs during the first and second quarter have typically been financed with cash flows from operations, borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility and cash provided from the Company’s Credit Card Facility.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s cash requirements consist principally of 1) the funding of its merchandise purchases, 2) capital expenditures for new store growth, store renovations and upgrades of its management information systems, 3) debt service requirements and 4) obligations related to its defined benefit pension plan.  The Company’s working capital requirements fluctuate during the year, increasing substantially during the fall season as a result of higher planned seasonal inventory levels.

The Company generated cash from operations (net earnings as adjusted for non-cash charges) of $281.0 million in 2004 compared to $191.0 million in 2003.  This $90.0 million increase in cash generated was due to the higher sales and earnings levels realized in 2004.  In presenting the net cash flows used for operating activities for 2004 of $291.3 million, the cash impact of the increase in earnings was affected by 1) the voluntary cash contribution of $30 million made to the Company’s defined benefit pension plan in the second quarter of 2004 and 2) the increase in recorded accounts receivable from $22.6 million at August 2, 2003 to $599.6 million at May 1, 2004.  The increase in accounts receivable is attributable to both a higher investment in accounts receivable due to higher sales levels during 2004 and the discontinuance of Off-Balance Sheet Accounting beginning in December 2003, as more fully described in Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

17

The discontinuance of Off-Balance Sheet Accounting for the newly generated accounts receivable had the impact of increasing accounts receivable by $577.0 million for the amount of transfers to the Trust no longer qualifying for Off-Balance Sheet Accounting.  The Company’s total credit card and other accounts receivable portfolio increased from $490.7 million at August 2, 2003 to $599.6 million at May 1, 2004.  This $108.9 million increase is shown in the 2004 condensed consolidated statement of cash flows as follows:

Operating activities:
Increase in accounts receivable	$	(577.0	)
Investing activities:
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities (Retained Interests)	(240.8		)
Maturities of hold-to-maturity securities (Retained Interests)	483.4
Financing activities:
Borrowings under Credit Card Facility	225.0
Change in other comprehensive income	0.5
Net increase in total credit card and other accounts receivable portfolio	$	(108.9	)

As of May 1, 2004, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $312.0 million and no outstanding borrowings under the Company’s $300 million unsecured revolving credit facility.  At May 3, 2003, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $133.7 million and no outstanding borrowings under the $300 million unsecured revolving credit facility.  The amount of cash on hand and borrowings under the revolving credit facility are influenced by a number of factors, including sales, accounts receivable, inventory levels, vendor terms, the level of capital expenditures, cash requirements related to financing instruments, pension plan funding obligations and the Company’s tax obligations, among others.

In the second quarter of 2004, the Company made a $30 million voluntary contribution to the Pension Plan for the plan year ended July 31, 2003.  Based upon currently available information, the Company will not be required to make any additional contributions to the Pension Plan for the plan years ending July 31, 2003 and July 31, 2004.

The Company currently projects capital expenditures for 2004 to be approximately $110 million to $120 million, primarily for store renovations and upgrades to information systems.

FINANCING STRUCTURE

In the second quarter of 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors initiated a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per share.  The Company declared dividends on January 30, 2004 and on April 30, 2004.  As of May 1, 2004, the Company had dividends payable in the amount of $6.3 million included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, which were paid in May 2004.

In prior years, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized various stock repurchase programs and increases in the number of shares subject to repurchase.  During the first quarter of 2004, the Company repurchased 175,600 shares at an average purchase price of $40.01.  As of May 1, 2004, approximately 1.2 million shares remained authorized for repurchase under the Company’s stock repurchase programs.

The Company’s principal commercial obligations are comprised of senior notes, senior debentures, borrowings under the Credit Card Facility, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations, construction commitments, pension plan funding obligations, short-term merchandise purchase commitments, common area maintenance costs, tax and insurance obligations and contingent rent payments.

Management believes that operating cash flows, currently available vendor financing and amounts available pursuant to its revolving credit facility and its Credit Card Facility should be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations, debt service, Pension Plan funding requirements, contractual obligations and currently anticipated capital expenditure requirements through the end of fiscal year 2004.

18

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Pursuant to a revolving credit card securitization program (the Credit Card Facility), the Company transfers substantially all of its credit card receivables to a wholly-owned subsidiary, Neiman Marcus Funding Corporation, which in turn sells such receivables to the Neiman Marcus Credit Card Master Trust (Trust).  At the inception of the Credit Card Facility in September 2000, the Trust issued certificates representing undivided interests in the credit card receivables to third-party investors in the face amount of $225 million (Sold Interests) and to the Company in an aggregate amount equal to the excess of the balance of the credit card portfolio over $225 million (Retained Interests).  In order to maintain the committed level of securitized assets, cash collections on the securitized receivables are used by the Trust to purchase new credit card balances from the Company in accordance with the terms of the Credit Card Facility.

From its inception until December 2003, the Company’s transfers and sales of credit card receivables pursuant to the terms of the Credit Card Facility were accounted for as sales in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (Off-Balance Sheet Accounting).  As a result, $225 million of credit card receivables were removed from the Company’s balance sheet at the inception of the Credit Card Facility and the Company’s $225 million repayment obligation to the holders of the certificates representing the Sold Interests was not required to be shown as a liability on the Company’s balance sheet.  During the period the transfers and sales qualified for Off-Balance Sheet Accounting, the Retained Interests were shown as “Undivided interests in NMG Credit Card Master Trust” on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Beginning in April 2005, cash collections will be used by the Trust to repay the $225 million principal balance of the Class A Certificates in six monthly installments of $37.5 million (Amortization Period).  As a result of certain provisions in the securitization agreement, the Company holds certain rights to repurchase the Class A Certificates (Repurchase Option) subsequent to the commencement of the Amortization Period and, therefore, has the ability to regain effective control over the credit card receivables held by the Trust at the time the Repurchase Option becomes exercisable.  The Company believes that the Repurchase Option will become exercisable in September 2005.

Transfers to the Trust ceased to qualify for Off-Balance Sheet Accounting beginning in December 2003 since the contractual life of the receivables transferred after November 2003 is estimated to extend to September 2005 when the Repurchase Option becomes exercisable.  Rather, these transfers are recorded as secured borrowings by the Company (Financing Accounting).  As a consequence, the credit card receivables generated after November 2003 remained on the Company’s balance sheet and the Company recorded a liability for its repayment obligation to the holders of the $225 million of certificates representing the Sold Interests.  The transition period from Off-Balance Sheet Accounting to Financing Accounting (Transition Period) lasted approximately four months (December 2003 to March 2004).  During the Transition Period, cash collections of receivables were allocated to the previous Sold Interests and Retained Interests until such time as those balances were reduced to zero.

As of May 1, 2004, the Company’s entire credit card portfolio is included in accounts receivable in its condensed consolidated balance sheet and the $225 million repayment obligation is shown as a liability.

OUTLOOK

Based on current estimates, the Company anticipates comparable store revenues to increase in the 8 to 10 percent range for its fourth quarter ending July 31, 2004.  The accuracy of these assumptions and of the resulting forecasts is subject to uncertainties and circumstances beyond the Company’s control.  Consequently, actual results could differ materially from the forecasted results.  See “Factors That May Affect Future Results” for a discussion of items and events that could cause actual results to vary from the Company’s expectations.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

On May 26, 2004, the Company announced that it has decided to explore its strategic alternatives relating to its Chef’s Catalog Direct Marketing brand.  These alternatives may include a sale, merger, joint venture or other business combination. Chef’s Catalog is a multi-channel retailer of professional-quality kitchenware with approximately $75 million in annual revenues.

19

INFLATION AND DEFLATION

The Company believes changes in revenues and net earnings that have resulted from inflation or deflation have not been material during the periods presented.  In recent years, the Company has experienced certain inflationary conditions related to 1) increases in product costs due primarily to changes in foreign currency exchange rates that have reduced the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar and 2) increases in SG&A.  The Company attempts to offset the effects of inflation through control of expenses and price increases, although the Company’s ability to increase prices may be limited by competitive factors.  The Company attempts to offset the effects of merchandise deflation, which has occurred on a limited basis in recent years, through control of expenses.  There is no assurance, however, that inflation or deflation will not materially affect the Company in the future.

20

ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The market risk inherent in the Company’s financial instruments represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.  The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.  The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse interest rate changes through its normal operating and financing activities.  The Company is exposed to interest rate risk through its securitization and borrowing activities, which are described in Notes 2 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2003.

As of May 1, 2004, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit agreement.  Future borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility, to the extent of outstanding borrowings, would be affected by interest rate changes.

The Company’s outstanding long-term debt as of May 1, 2004 is at fixed interest rates and would not be affected by interest rate changes.  Based upon quoted prices, the fair value of the Company’s senior notes and debentures was $270.5 million as of May 1, 2004.

Pursuant to its outstanding Credit Card Facility that begins to expire in September 2005, the Company sold substantially all of its credit card receivables through a subsidiary in exchange for certificates representing undivided interests in such receivables.  The Class A Certificates, which have an aggregate principal value of $225 million, were sold to third-party investors. The holders of the Class A Certificates are entitled to monthly interest distributions from the Trust at the contractually-defined rate of one month LIBOR plus 0.27 percent annually.  The distributions to the Class A Certificate holders are payable from the finance charge income generated by the credit card receivables held by the Trust.  At May 1, 2004, the Company estimates a 100 basis point increase in LIBOR would result in an approximate annual decrease of $2.25 million in pretax income to the Company from its credit card portfolio.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency risk related to the procurement of merchandise inventories from foreign sources.  The Company enters into foreign currency contracts denominated in the euro and British pound. The Company had foreign currency contracts in the form of forward exchange contracts in the amount of approximately $34.1 million as of May 1, 2004.  The market risk inherent in these instruments was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows during the third quarter of 2004.

The effects of changes in the U.S. equity and bond markets serve to increase or decrease the value of pension plan assets, resulting in increased or decreased cash funding by the Company.  The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse equity and bond returns by maintaining diversified investment portfolios and utilizing professional investment managers.

Based on a review of the Company’s financial instruments outstanding at May 1, 2004 that are sensitive to market risks, the Company has determined that there was no material market risk exposure to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as of such date.

21

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In accordance with Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other key members of the Company’s management, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company routinely enhances its information systems by either upgrading its current systems or implementing new systems.  No change occurred in the Company’s internal controls concerning financial reporting during the quarter ended May 1, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

22

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

PART II

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 is incorporated herein by reference as if fully restated herein.  Note 8 contains forward-looking statements that are subject to the risks and uncertainties discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Factors That May Affect Future Results.”

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company during the quarter ended May 1, 2004.

Item 6.Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)	Exhibits.
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. (1)
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. (1)
	32	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

(1) Filed herewith.

(b)	Reports on Form 8-K
	On February 5, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9 to disclose under Regulation FD the Company’s press release dated February 5, 2004 announcing revenue results for the four weeks and quarter ended January 31, 2004.
	On March 3, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9 to disclose under Regulation FD the Company’s press release dated March 3, 2004 announcing revenue results for the four weeks ended February 28, 2004.
	On March 3, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 12 to disclose under Regulation FD the Company’s press release dated March 3, 2004 announcing financial results for the second fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2004.
	On April 8, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9 to disclose under Regulation FD the Company’s press release dated April 8, 2004 announcing revenue results for the five weeks ended April 3, 2004.
	On April 13, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9 to disclose under Regulation FD the Company’s press release dated April 13, 2004 announcing that the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend.

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ T. Dale Stapleton	Vice President and Controller	June 7, 2004
T. Dale Stapleton	(principal accounting officer)

24