UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from ______ to ______ |
Commission file number 1-14279
____________________________________
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Delaware | 06-1209561 |
(State of Incorporation of Registrant) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
21839 Atlantic Boulevard
Dulles, Virginia 20166
(Address of principal executive offices)
(703) 406-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of April 21, 2010, 57,617,490 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
| | | Page |
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 1 |
| | | |
| | | 2 |
| | | |
| | | 3 |
| | | |
| | | 4 |
| | | |
| | | 17 |
| | | |
| | | 26 |
| | | |
| | | 27 |
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | 28 |
| | | |
| | | 28 |
| | | |
| | | 28 |
| | | |
| | | 28 |
| | | |
| | | 28 |
| | | |
| | | 28 |
| | | |
| | | 28 |
| | | |
| | |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited, in thousands, except share data)
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 372,065 | | | $ | 372,986 | |
Receivables, net | | | 225,441 | | | | 199,482 | |
Inventories, net | | | 39,960 | | | | 38,662 | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | 39,430 | | | | 37,902 | |
Other current assets | | | 31,987 | | | | 14,258 | |
Total current assets | | | 708,883 | | | | 663,290 | |
Investments | | | 12,600 | | | | 13,100 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 142,818 | | | | 133,275 | |
Goodwill | | | 55,551 | | | | 55,551 | |
Deferred income taxes, net | | | 44,642 | | | | 50,326 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 13,948 | | | | 13,939 | |
Total assets | | $ | 978,442 | | | $ | 929,481 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 190,386 | | | $ | 171,805 | |
Deferred revenues and customer advances | | | 136,453 | | | | 127,056 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 326,839 | | | | 298,861 | |
Long-term obligations | | | 121,566 | | | | 120,274 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | 7,588 | | | | 7,886 | |
Total liabilities | | | 455,993 | | | | 427,021 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stock, par value $.01; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common Stock, par value $.01; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 57,562,870 and | | | | | | | | |
56,879,528 shares outstanding, respectively | | | 576 | | | | 569 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 550,284 | | | | 539,235 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (2,241 | ) | | | (1,906 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (26,170 | ) | | | (35,438 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 522,449 | | | | 502,460 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 978,442 | | | $ | 929,481 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
| | Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 296,190 | | | $ | 295,741 | |
Cost of revenues | | | 227,902 | | | | 246,348 | |
Research and development expenses | | | 30,163 | | | | 18,971 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 20,760 | | | | 19,258 | |
Income from operations | | | 17,365 | | | | 11,164 | |
Interest income and other | | | 338 | | | | 5,663 | |
Interest expense | | | (2,361 | ) | | | (2,257 | ) |
Investment impairment charge | | | — | | | | (700 | ) |
Income before income taxes | | | 15,342 | | | | 13,870 | |
Income tax provision | | | (6,074 | ) | | | (4,668 | ) |
Net income | | $ | 9,268 | | | $ | 9,202 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic income per share | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted income per share | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
| | Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Operating Activities: | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 9,268 | | | $ | 9,202 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense | | | 5,243 | | | | 4,876 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 4,053 | | | | 4,046 | |
Investment impairment charge | | | — | | | | 700 | |
Stock-based compensation and other | | | 3,020 | | | | 3,837 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | | (16,834 | ) | | | (6,595 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 4,750 | | | | 16,066 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (15,097 | ) | | | (5,897 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (15,097 | ) | | | (5,897 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds from issuances of common stock | | | 7,899 | | | | 529 | |
Repurchase of common stock | | | — | | | | (14,580 | ) |
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation | | | 1,527 | | | | 70 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 9,426 | | | | (13,981 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (921 | ) | | | (3,812 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 372,986 | | | | 328,307 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 372,065 | | | $ | 324,495 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS March 31, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
Orbital Sciences Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, “Orbital” or the “company”), a Delaware corporation, develops and manufactures small- and medium-class rockets and space systems for commercial, military and civil government customers.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation on a going concern basis. Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to instructions, rules and regulations prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The company believes that the disclosures provided herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future contract costs and earnings. Such estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and earnings during the current reporting period. Management periodically assesses and evaluates the adequacy and/or deficiency of liabilities recorded for various reserves, contract risks and other uncertainties. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.
All financial amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.
The company has evaluated subsequent events in accordance with U.S. GAAP (See Note 13). Operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.
(2) Industry Segment Information
Orbital’s products and services are grouped into three reportable business segments: (i) launch vehicles; (ii) satellites and space systems; and (iii) advanced space programs. Reportable segments are generally organized based upon product lines. Corporate office transactions that have not been attributed to a particular segment, as well as consolidating eliminations and adjustments, are reported in corporate and other. The primary products and services from which the company’s reportable segments derive revenues are:
· | Launch Vehicles. Rockets that are used as interceptor and target vehicles for missile defense systems, small- and medium-class space launch vehicles that place satellites into Earth orbit and escape trajectories, and suborbital launch vehicles that place payloads into a variety of high-altitude trajectories. |
· | Satellites and Space Systems. Small- and medium-class spacecraft that are used to enable global and regional communications and broadcasting, to conduct space-related scientific research, to carry out interplanetary and other deep-space exploration missions, to enable national security applications, to collect imagery and other remotely-sensed data about the Earth and to demonstrate new space technologies. |
· | Advanced Space Programs. Human-rated space systems for Earth-orbit and lunar exploration, and small- and medium-class satellites and satellite subsystems primarily used for national security space programs and to demonstrate new space technologies. |
Intersegment sales are generally negotiated and accounted for under terms and conditions that are similar to other commercial and government contracts. Substantially all of the company’s assets and operations are located within the United States.
The following table presents operating information and identifiable assets by reportable segment (in thousands):
| | Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Launch Vehicles: | | | | | | |
Revenues(1) | | $ | 100,342 | | | $ | 119,240 | |
Operating income | | | 4,531 | | | | 4,286 | |
Identifiable assets | | | 182,780 | | | | 151,249 | (2) |
Capital expenditures | | | 10,216 | | | | 1,460 | |
Depreciation | | | 1,806 | | | | 1,611 | |
Satellites and Space Systems: | | | | | | | | |
Revenues(1) | | $ | 100,521 | | | $ | 110,157 | |
Operating income | | | 7,707 | | | | 7,800 | |
Identifiable assets | | | 192,166 | | | | 178,233 | (2) |
Capital expenditures | | | 1,530 | | | | 3,524 | |
Depreciation | | | 2,265 | | | | 2,176 | |
Advanced Space Programs: | | | | | | | | |
Revenues(1) | | $ | 107,543 | | | $ | 68,346 | |
Operating income | | | 5,127 | | | | (922 | ) |
Identifiable assets | | | 101,962 | | | | 91,981 | (2) |
Capital expenditures | | | 2,510 | | | | 578 | |
Depreciation | | | 3 | | | | 3 | |
Corporate and Other: | | | | | | | | |
Revenues(1) | | $ | (12,216 | ) | | $ | (2,002 | ) |
Operating income | | | — | | | | — | |
Identifiable assets | | | 501,534 | | | | 508,018 | (2) |
Capital expenditures | | | 841 | | | | 335 | |
Depreciation | | | 1,169 | | | | 1,086 | |
Consolidated: | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 296,190 | | | $ | 295,741 | |
Operating income | | | 17,365 | | | | 11,164 | |
Identifiable assets | | | 978,442 | | | | 929,481 | (2) |
Capital expenditures | | | 15,097 | | | | 5,897 | |
Depreciation | | | 5,243 | | | | 4,876 | |
______________
| (1) Corporate and other revenues are comprised solely of the elimination of intersegment sales. Launch vehicles segment revenues include $10.5 million and $0.9 million of intersegment sales in the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Satellites and space systems segment revenues include $1.3 million and $1.0 million of intersegment sales in the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Advanced space programs segment revenues include $0.4 million and $0.1 million of intersegment sales in the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
| (2) As of December 31, 2009. |
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for income from continuing operations is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| | | | Quarters Ended March 31, | |
Numerator | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | Net income | | $ | 9,268 | | | $ | 9,202 | |
| | Percentage allocated to shareholders (1) | | | 99.2 | % | | | 98.5 | % |
| | Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share | | $ | 9,193 | | | $ | 9,064 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator | | | | | | | | |
| | Denominator for basic earnings per share - | | | | | | | | |
| | weighted-average shares outstanding | | | 57,060 | | | | 57,189 | |
| | Dilutive effect of stock options | | | 796 | | | | 664 | |
| | Denominator for diluted earnings per share | | | 57,856 | | | | 57,853 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Per share income | | | | | | | | |
| | Basic | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | |
| | Diluted | | | 0.16 | | | | 0.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
_________________________ | | | | | | | | |
| | (1) | Basic weighted-average shares outstanding | | | 57,060 | | | | 57,189 | |
| | | Basic weighted-average shares outstanding and | | | | | | | | |
| | | unvested restricted stock units expected to vest | | | 57,536 | | | | 58,063 | |
| | | Percentage allocated to shareholders | | | 99.2 | % | | | 98.5 | % |
The calculation of EPS shown above excludes the income attributable to the company’s unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) from the numerator and excludes the impact of those units from the denominator.
In the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, diluted weighted-average shares outstanding excluded the effect of less than 0.1 million and approximately 0.1 million, respectively, of stock options that were anti-dilutive. Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding also excluded the effect of the RSUs and the company’s $143.8 million of 2.4375% convertible senior subordinated notes that were anti-dilutive.
(4) Receivables
Receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Billed | | $ | 47,822 | | | $ | 53,157 | |
Unbilled | | | 177,619 | | | | 146,325 | |
Total | | $ | 225,441 | | | $ | 199,482 | |
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, unbilled receivables included approximately $17 million of incentive fees on certain completed satellite contracts that become due incrementally over periods of up to 15 years, subject to the achievement of performance criteria. In addition, certain satellite contracts require the company to refund cash to the customer if performance criteria, which cover periods of up to 15 years, are not satisfied. As of March 31, 2010, the company could be required to refund up to approximately $20 million to customers if certain completed satellites were to fail to satisfy performance criteria. The company generally procures insurance policies that the company believes would indemnify the company for satellite incentive fees that are not earned and for performance refund obligations. See Note 13, “Subsequent Events.”
Through March 31, 2010, the company has recognized approximately $30 million of estimated award fees on the Orion contract that are subject to a final assessment at the conclusion of the contract. If the final award fee assessment is different than the company’s estimate of such assessment, the company will be required to record a revenue and profit adjustment in future periods.
(5) Inventories
Total inventories were $40.0 million at March 31, 2010 and $38.7 million at December 31, 2009. Substantially all of the company’s inventory consisted of component parts, raw materials and milestone payments for future delivery of component parts.
(6) Investments
As of March 31, 2010, the company held investments consisting of four auction-rate debt securities (three life insurance company capital reserve funds and one credit derivative products company reserve fund), an auction-rate equity security (financial guarantee company capital reserve fund) and two preferred stock investments. These investments are classified as available for sale securities and as non-current assets on the company’s balance sheet. Contractual maturities for the debt securities are 15 years or greater and the remaining securities have no fixed maturity. The amortized cost and fair value of these investments were as follows (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | Cost or Amortized Cost | | | Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | Fair Value | | | Cost or Amortized Cost | | | Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | Fair Value | |
Debt | | $ | 11,400 | | | $ | (900 | ) | | $ | 10,500 | | | $ | 11,400 | | | $ | (500 | ) | | $ | 10,900 | |
Equity(1) | | | 2,000 | | | | 100 | | | | 2,100 | | | | 2,000 | | | | 200 | | | | 2,200 | |
Total | | $ | 13,400 | | | $ | (800 | ) | | $ | 12,600 | | | $ | 13,400 | | | $ | (300 | ) | | $ | 13,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, cost and fair value of the two preferred stock investments was $0.
The changes in fair value of the investments were recorded as follows (in thousands):
| | Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Debt Securities | | | | | | |
Fair value at beginning of period | | $ | 10,900 | | | $ | 12,900 | |
Temporary impairment charges | | | (400 | ) | | | (100 | ) |
Fair value at end of period | | $ | 10,500 | | | $ | 12,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Equity Securities | | | | | | | | |
Fair value at beginning of period | | $ | 2,200 | | | $ | 3,800 | |
Temporary impairment charges | | | (100 | ) | | | (1,200 | ) |
Other-than-temporary impairment charges | | | — | | | | (700 | ) |
Net change in fair value | | | (100 | ) | | | (1,900 | ) |
Fair value at end of period | | $ | 2,100 | | | $ | 1,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | | |
Fair value at beginning of period | | $ | 13,100 | | | $ | 16,700 | |
Temporary impairment charges | | | (500 | ) | | | (1,300 | ) |
Other-than-temporary impairment charges | | | — | | | | (700 | ) |
Net change in fair value | | | (500 | ) | | | (2,000 | ) |
Fair value at end of period | | $ | 12,600 | | | $ | 14,700 | |
There was no sale, purchase, issuance, settlement or transfer activity related to these investments during the periods presented.
Auction-rate securities are intended to be structured to provide liquidity through an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at predetermined calendar intervals. This mechanism allows existing investors either to roll over or liquidate their holdings by selling such securities at par. Since the third quarter of 2007 and through March 31, 2010, the auctions, which occur approximately every 28 days for the auction-rate securities held by the company, have not had sufficient buyers to cover investors’ sell orders, resulting in unsuccessful auctions. These unsuccessful auctions result in a resetting of the interest rate paid on the securities until the next auction date, at which time the process is repeated.
The company has estimated the fair value of these securities based on an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis which considered the following key inputs: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current market conditions and the relevant risk associated with each security; and (iii) the time horizon until each security will be sold. The discount rates used in the present value calculations are based on yields on U.S. Treasury securities with similar time horizons plus interest rate risk premiums that are intended to compensate for general market risk and the risk specific to each security. The risk premiums are based upon current credit default swap pricing market data for similar or related securities or credit spreads for corporate bonds with similar credit ratings and similar maturities. The discounted cash flow analysis is a Level 3 valuation.
The company records other-than-temporary impairment charges with respect to equity securities based on the company’s assessment that it is likely that the fair value of the investment will not fully recover in the foreseeable future given the duration, severity and continuing declining trend of the fair value of the security, as well as the uncertain financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. The company determines other-than-temporary impairment charges for its debt securities based on credit losses.
At this time it is uncertain if or when the liquidity issues relating to these investments will improve, and there can be no assurance that the market for auction-rate securities will stabilize. The fair value of the auction-rate securities could change significantly in the future and the company may be required to record additional temporary or other-than-temporary impairment charges if there are further reductions in fair value in future periods.
On January 1, 2010, the company adopted new accounting guidance that is included in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This guidance clarifies certain existing disclosure requirements. This standard did not have a material impact on the company’s disclosures.
(7) Debt
Convertible Notes
In December 2006, the company issued $143.8 million of 2.4375% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2027 with interest payable semi-annually each January 15 and July 15. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the net carrying amount of the convertible notes was $121.6 million and $120.3 million, respectively, and the related unamortized debt discount was $22.2 million and $23.5 million, respectively.
Under certain circumstances, the convertible notes are convertible into cash, or a combination of cash and common stock at the company’s election, based on an initial conversion rate of 40.8513 shares of the company’s common stock per $1,000 in principal amount of the convertible notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $24.48 per share).
At any time on or after January 21, 2014, the convertible notes are subject to redemption at the option of the company, in whole or in part, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes, plus unpaid interest, if any, accrued to the redemption date.
Holders of the convertible notes may require the company to repurchase the convertible notes, in whole or in part, on January 15, 2014, January 15, 2017 or January 15, 2022, or, if a “fundamental change” (as such term is defined in the indenture governing the convertible notes) occurs, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes, plus any unpaid interest, if any, accrued to the redemption date.
The fair value of the company’s convertible notes at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was estimated at $147.8 million and $136.5 million, respectively. The fair value was determined based on market prices quoted by a broker-dealer.
Credit Facility
In August 2007, the company entered into a $100 million revolving secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), with the option to increase the amount of the Credit Facility up to $175 million to the extent that any one or more lenders commit to be a lender for such additional amount. At the election of the company, loans under the Credit Facility bear interest at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.25%, with the applicable margin varying according to the company’s total leverage ratio, or (ii) at a prime rate. The Credit Facility expires in 2012 and is secured by substantially all of the company’s assets. Up to $75 million of the Credit Facility may be reserved for letters of credit. As of March 31, 2010, there were no borrowings under the Credit Facility, although $6.5 million of letters of credit were issued under the Credit Facility. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2010, $93.5 million of the Credit Facility was available for borrowings.
Debt Covenants
Orbital’s Credit Facility contains covenants limiting its ability to, among other things, pay cash dividends, incur debt or liens, redeem or repurchase company stock, enter into transactions with affiliates, make investments, merge or consolidate with others or dispose of assets. In addition, the Credit Facility contains financial covenants with respect to leverage and interest coverage.
(8) Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 9,268 | | | $ | 9,202 | |
Unrealized loss on investments | | | (500 | ) | | | (1,300 | ) |
Defined benefit plans, net of tax | | | 166 | | | | (318 | ) |
Total comprehensive income | | $ | 8,934 | | | $ | 7,584 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $2.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
(9) Stock-Based Compensation
The following tables summarize information related to stock-based compensation transactions:
| Restricted Stock Units | Stock Options |
| | | Weighted Average | | | Weighted Average |
| Number of | | Measurement | Number of | | Exercise |
| Units | | Date Fair Value | Options | | Price |
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | 473,615 | | $22.88 | 2,301,305 | | | $ 8.29 | |
Granted (1) | 24,970 | | 16.02 | — | | | — | |
Exercised | — | | — | (636,990 | ) | | 11.65 | |
Vested | (21,677 | ) | 19.05 | — | | | — | |
Forfeited | (1,032 | ) | 24.88 | (1,466 | ) | | 5.79 | |
Expired | — | | — | (21,000 | ) | | 18.50 | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 | 475,876 | | $22.67 | 1,641,849 | (2) | | $ 6.86 | |
(1) | The fair value of restricted stock unit grants is determined based on the closing market price of Orbital’s common stock on the date of grant. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures. |
(2) | The weighted average remaining contractual term is 2.40 years. |
| | Quarters Ended March 31, |
(in millions) | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Stock-based compensation expense | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 2.5 | |
Income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense | | | 0.7 | | | | 0.8 | |
Intrinsic value of options exercised computed as the market | | | | | | | | |
price on the exercise date less the price paid to exercise the options | | | 4.3 | | | | 0.2 | |
Cash received from exercise of options | | | 7.4 | | | | 0.2 | |
Tax benefit recorded as credits to additional paid-in capital related | | | | | | | | |
to stock-based compensation transactions | | | 1.5 | | | | 0.1 | |
| | As of | |
(in millions) | | March 31, 2010 | |
Shares of common stock available for grant under stock-based incentive plans | | | 1.6 | |
Aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock units that are expected to vest | | $ | 8.1 | |
Unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock units, expected to | | | | |
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.16 years | | | 5.9 | |
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding, all fully vested | | | 19.9 | |
(10) Research and Development
In the first quarter of 2008, the company entered into an agreement with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) to design, build and demonstrate a new space transportation system under a program called Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (“COTS”), for delivering cargo and supplies to the International Space Station. Under the agreement, NASA has agreed to pay the company $170 million in cash milestone payments, partially funding Orbital’s project costs which are currently estimated to be approximately $285 million.
The COTS agreement is being accounted for as a best-efforts research and development cost-sharing arrangement. As such, the amounts funded by NASA are recognized proportionally as an offset to the company’s COTS project research and development expenses, including associated general and administrative expenses. In the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, $28.2 million and $14.8 million, respectively, of costs, including associated general and administrative expenses, were incurred on the COTS program, of which $14.9 million and $11.9 million, respectively, were offset by NASA funding, resulting in net research and development expenses of $13.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, recorded by the company. Through March 31, 2010, $150.8 million of total costs, including associated general and administrative expenses, have been incurred on the COTS program, $98.1 million of which were offset by NASA funding, resulting in net research and development expenses to date of $52.7 million. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, deferred revenue and customer advances on the accompanying balance sheet included $42.0 million and $46.8 million, respectively, of cash received from NASA that had not yet been recorded as an offset to research and development expenses.
(11) Income Taxes
The company’s effective tax rates were 39.6% and 33.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the expiration of the research and development tax credit at the end of 2009.
(12) Commitments and Contingencies
U.S. Government Contracts
The accuracy and appropriateness of costs charged to U.S. Government contracts are subject to regulation, audit and possible disallowance by the Defense Contract Audit Agency or other government agencies. Accordingly, costs billed or billable to U.S. Government customers are subject to potential adjustment upon audit by such agencies.
Most of the company’s U.S. Government contracts are funded incrementally on a year-to-year basis. Changes in government policies, priorities or funding levels through agency or program budget reductions by the U.S. Congress or executive agencies could materially adversely affect the company’s financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, contracts with the U.S. Government may be terminated or suspended by the U.S. Government at any time, with or without cause. Such contract suspensions or terminations could result in unreimbursable expenses or charges or otherwise adversely affect the company’s financial condition and/or results of operations.
The company is engaged in a major product development program of a medium-capacity rocket, Taurus II, that could substantially increase the payload capacity of the company’s space launch vehicle platforms. The company is marketing the launch vehicle to U.S. Government and commercial customers. The company expects the Taurus II launch vehicle to be ready for its inaugural launch in 2011. Approximately $15.2 million and $14.5 million of the research and development expenses in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, were attributable to the Taurus II program. Since the inception of the program through March 31, 2010, the company has recorded $124.9 million of costs on the Taurus II research and development program. The company believes that it will continue to incur significant research and development expenses during the remainder of 2010 and to a lesser extent in 2011 on the Taurus II development effort.
The majority of the company’s revenues are attributable to contracts with the U.S. Government and the company believes that a majority of the company’s research and development expenses are recoverable and billable under such contracts. Charging practices relating to research and development and other costs that may be charged directly or indirectly to government contracts are subject to audit by U.S. Government agencies to determine if such costs are reasonable and allowable under government contracting regulations and accounting practices. The company is currently engaged in discussions with the Defense Contract Audit Agency regarding the allowability of research and development costs incurred in connection with the company’s Taurus II development program. The company believes that such costs are allowable, although the U.S. Government has not yet made a determination. If such costs were determined to be unallowable, the company could be required to record revenue and profit reductions in future periods.
During 2009, the Kinetic Energy Interceptor program was terminated by the U.S. Government for convenience. The company has recognized its best estimate of the termination settlement. However, because of the inherent judgment associated with termination costs and fee assessments, it is possible that the company could recognize a material adjustment to earnings upon resolution of this matter.
Litigation
From time to time the company is party to certain litigation or other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Because of the uncertainties inherent in litigation, the company cannot predict whether the outcome of such litigation or other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the company’s results of operations or financial condition.
(13) Subsequent Events
On April 2, 2010, the company acquired certain assets and liabilities of the spacecraft development and manufacturing business of General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, a subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation for $55 million in cash, subject to a potential working capital adjustment that will be determined at a later date. The acquisition is expected to further strengthen the company’s competitive position in defense and intelligence, civil government and commercial satellite markets. The initial accounting for this business combination was incomplete as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q as the acquisition was completed after the company’s reporting date of March 31, 2010. Accordingly, the financial information contained herein does not include pro forma disclosures, acquisition-date fair values, or purchase price allocation information.
On April 5, 2010, the Galaxy 15 satellite that was manufactured by Orbital and placed into orbit in 2005 for Intelsat, Ltd. experienced an anomaly. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, a technical investigation into the anomaly is ongoing. If it is ultimately determined that the satellite cannot perform its mission, then the remaining incentive fees payable to the company under the Galaxy 15 contract may become uncollectible and a customer refund obligation could be triggered. Such an outcome could result in a reduction in operating income of up to approximately $7 million in the quarter that such determination is made. The company believes that it would be entitled to recover substantially all of this amount under its insurance policy and such proceeds would be recorded in “other income.” Management currently believes that the incentive fees payable to the company will be realized and that no refund obligation will be triggered.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed within this Item 2 and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Readers should be cautioned that a number of important factors, including those identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, may affect actual results and may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or expected in any forward-looking statement. Historical results of operations may not be indicative of future operating results. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
We develop and manufacture small- and medium-class rockets and space systems for commercial, military and civil government customers. Our primary products and services include the following:
· | Launch Vehicles. Rockets that are used as interceptor and target vehicles for missile defense systems, small- and medium-class space launch vehicles that place satellites into Earth orbit and escape trajectories, and suborbital launch vehicles that place payloads into a variety of high-altitude trajectories. |
· | Satellites and Space Systems. Small- and medium-class spacecraft that are used to enable global and regional communications and broadcasting, to conduct space-related scientific research, to carry out interplanetary and other deep-space exploration missions, to enable national security applications, to collect imagery and other remotely-sensed data about the Earth and demonstrate new space technologies. |
· | Advanced Space Programs. Human-rated space systems for Earth-orbit and lunar exploration, and small- and medium-class satellites and satellite subsystems primarily used for national security space programs and to demonstrate new space technologies. |
As discussed in Note 13 to the accompanying financial statements, on April 2, 2010, we acquired certain assets and liabilities of the spacecraft development and manufacturing business of General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, a subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation for $55 million in cash, subject to a potential working capital adjustment that will be determined at a later date.
The following discussion should be read along with our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Consolidated Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Revenues - Our consolidated revenues were $296.2 million in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $0.5 million, or less than 1%, compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to higher revenues in the advanced space programs segment, partially offset by lower revenues in the launch vehicles and satellites and space systems segments. Advanced space programs segment revenues increased $39.2 million, or 57%, due to increased activity on the International Space Station Commercial Resupply Services (“CRS”) contract and national security satellite programs, partly offset by decreased activity on the Orion human spacecraft program. Launch vehicles segment revenues declined $18.9 million, or 16%, primarily due to decreased activity on the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (“GMD”) missile defense program and the termination of the Kinetic Energy Interceptor (“KEI”) program by the Missile Defense Agency (“MDA”) in the second quarter of 2009, partially offset by increased production work on Taurus II launch vehicles for the CRS contract. Satellites and space systems segment revenues declined $9.6 million, or 9%, principally due to decreased activity on certain communications satellite contracts, partially offset by activity on three new communications satellite contracts awarded in the fourth quarter of 2009. The elimination of intercompany revenues also reduced consolidated revenues in the first quarter of 2010 by $12.2 million, compared to $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2009.
Cost of Revenues - Our cost of revenues was $227.9 million in the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $18.4 million, or 7%, compared to the first quarter of 2009. Cost of revenues includes the costs of personnel, materials, subcontractors and overhead. Our cost of revenues decreased, despite the increase in consolidated revenues, largely due to certain contract losses recorded in the first quarter of 2009 in the advanced space programs segment partially offset by improved contract execution resulting in higher overall profit margins in all three of our business segments. Cost of revenues in the advanced space programs segment increased $23.1 million, or 39%, in the first quarter of 2010, whereas advanced space programs segment revenues increased 57%. Cost of revenues in the launch vehicles segment decreased $22.2 million, or 23%, in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009. Cost of revenues in the satellites and space systems segment decreased $9.2 million, or 10%, in the first quarter of 2010.
Research and Development Expenses - Our research and development expenses totaled $30.2 million, or 10% of revenues, in the first quarter of 2010, an $11.2 million increase compared to $19.0 million, or 6% of revenues, in the first quarter of 2009. This increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to a $10.4 million increase on the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (“COTS”) demonstration mission and a $0.7 million increase in our Taurus II launch vehicle development program. In the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, approximately $15.2 million and $14.5 million, respectively, of our research and development expenses were attributable to the Taurus II program.
Under the COTS agreement, NASA has agreed to pay us $170 million in cash milestone payments, partially funding our COTS project costs which are currently estimated to be approximately $285 million. The COTS agreement is being accounted for as a best-efforts research and development cost-sharing arrangement. As such, the amounts funded by NASA are recognized as an offset to our COTS project research and development expenses,
including associated general and administrative expenses. In the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, $28.2 million and $14.8 million, respectively, of costs, including associated general and administrative expenses, were incurred on the COTS program, of which $14.9 million and $11.9 million, respectively, were offset by NASA funding, resulting in net research and development expenses of $13.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, recorded by us. Through March 31, 2010, $150.8 million of total costs, including associated general and administrative expenses, have been incurred on the COTS program, $98.1 million of which were offset by NASA funding, resulting in net research and development expenses to date of $52.7 million. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 deferred revenues and customer advances on our accompanying balance sheet included $42.0 million and $46.8 million, respectively, of cash received from NASA that had not yet been recorded as an offset to research and development expenses. We believe that we will continue to incur significant research and development expenses on the Taurus II and COTS development programs during the remainder of 2010 and to a lesser extent in 2011.
We believe that the majority of our research and development expenses are recoverable and billable under our contracts with the U.S. Government. Charging practices relating to research and development and other costs that may be charged directly or indirectly to government contracts are subject to audit by U.S. Government agencies to determine if such costs are reasonable and allowable under government contracting regulations and accounting practices. We are currently engaged in discussions with the Defense Contract Audit Agency regarding the allowability of research and development costs incurred in connection with our Taurus II development program. We believe that such costs are allowable, although the U.S. Government has not yet made a determination. During the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, we incurred $12.1 million and $8.3 million, respectively, of expenses that have been recorded as allowable costs. Since the inception of the program through March 31, 2010, the company has recorded $88.1 million as allowable costs on the Taurus II research and development program. If such costs were determined to be unallowable, we could be required to record revenue and profit reductions in future periods.
For competitive reasons, we have established self-imposed ceilings on the amount of research and development costs that we would recover under our U.S. Government contracts. Although we believe that such costs would otherwise be allowable and recoverable, in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, we incurred $5.3 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of research and development costs in excess of our self-imposed ceilings.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses - Selling, general and administrative expenses were $20.8 million and $19.3 million, or 7% percent of revenues, in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses include the costs of our finance, legal, administrative and general management functions, as well as bid, proposal and marketing costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.5 million, or 8%, in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to an increase in bid, proposal and marketing costs in connection with new business prospects.
Operating Income - Operating income was $17.4 million in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of $6.2 million, or 55%, compared to the first quarter of 2009. This increase was primarily due to higher operating income in our advanced space programs segment. Advanced space programs segment operating income increased $6.0 million primarily as a result of
increased activity on the CRS contract and national security satellite programs, and the absence of certain contract losses recorded in the advanced space programs segment in the first quarter of 2009.
Interest Income and Other - Interest income and other decreased to $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared to $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2009. This decrease is primarily attributable to a $5.3 million insurance recovery recorded in the first quarter of 2009.
Interest Expense - Interest expense was $2.4 million and $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, attributable to interest on our $143.8 million of long-term convertible debt.
Investment Impairment Charge - - In the first quarter of 2009 we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $0.7 million to record the reduction in fair value of our investments.
Income Tax Provision - We recorded an income tax provision of $6.1 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared to $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2009. The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009 was 39.6% and 33.7%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the expiration of the research and development tax credit at the end of 2009.
Net Income - Our net income for the first quarter of 2010 was $9.3 million, or $0.16 diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $9.2 million, or $0.16 diluted earnings per share in the first quarter of 2009.
Segment Results for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Our products and services are grouped into three reportable segments: (i) launch vehicles; (ii) satellites and space systems; and (iii) advanced space programs. Corporate office transactions that have not been attributed to a particular segment, as well as consolidating eliminations and adjustments, are reported in corporate and other.
The following tables of financial information and related discussion of the results of operations of our business segments are consistent with the presentation of segment information in Note 2 to the financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
Launch Vehicles
Launch vehicles segment operating results were as follows:
| | First Quarter | | | | |
(in thousands, except percentages) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | % Change | |
Revenues | | $ | 100,342 | | | $ | 119,240 | | | | (16% | ) |
Operating income | | | 4,531 | | | | 4,286 | | | | 6% | |
Operating margin | | | 4.5 | % | | | 3.6 | % | | | | |
Segment Revenues - Launch vehicles segment revenues decreased $18.9 million, or 16%, in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to decreased activity
on missile defense interceptor launch vehicle and target launch vehicle programs, partially offset by an increase in activity on certain space launch vehicle contracts. Interceptor launch vehicle revenues decreased $37.5 million due to decreased activity on our GMD program and lower KEI program revenues as a result of termination of the program in the second quarter of 2009. Interceptor launch vehicle contracts accounted for 28% and 55% of total launch vehicles segment revenues in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Target launch vehicle revenues decreased $3.9 million primarily due to a decline in contract activity on certain programs. Space launch vehicle program revenues increased $20.9 million primarily due to an increase in production work on Taurus II launch vehicles for the CRS and COTS programs partially offset by lower Taurus and Minotaur space launch program revenues. The Taurus II production work for the CRS and COTS programs included $10.5 million of intersegment sales.
Segment Operating Income - Operating income in the launch vehicles segment increased $0.2 million, or 6%, in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, despite the reduction in segment revenues, mainly due to a $2.9 million reduction in unrecovered Taurus II research and development expenses in the first quarter of 2010 and $1.4 million net favorable changes in contract estimates, offset by a $4.6 million reduction in operating income attributable to lower GMD and KEI program activity. In the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, segment operating income was reduced by $3.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of unrecovered research and development expenses that exceeded our self-imposed ceiling on such costs. Operating income from interceptor launch vehicle programs was $3.5 million and $8.1 million in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Segment operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) was 4.5% and 3.6% in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The most significant drivers of this increase in operating margin were the reduction in unrecovered Taurus II research and development expenses and net favorable adjustment for changes in contract estimates discussed above.
Satellites and Space Systems
Satellites and space systems segment operating results were as follows:
| | First Quarter | | | | |
(in thousands, except percentages) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | % Change | |
Revenues | | $ | 100,521 | | | $ | 110,157 | | | | (9% | ) |
Operating income | | | 7,707 | | | | 7,800 | | | | (1% | ) |
Operating margin | | | 7.7 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | | |
Segment Revenues - Satellites and space systems segment revenues decreased $9.6 million, or 9%, in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to a $8.1 million decrease in communications satellite revenues principally attributable to a lower level of activity on certain communications satellite contracts, partially offset by activity on three new communications satellite contracts awarded in the fourth quarter of 2009. Communications satellite program revenues accounted for 76% of total segment revenues in the first quarters of both 2010 and 2009.
Segment Operating Income - Operating income in the satellites and space systems segment decreased marginally, despite the more significant decrease in segment revenues, in the first
quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to improved overall contract performance on communications satellite contracts. Communications satellite contracts accounted for 72% and 69% of total segment operating income in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Segment operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) also increased in the first quarter of 2010 primarily due to the improved overall profit margins on communications satellite contracts.
Subsequent Event - On April 5, 2010, the Galaxy 15 satellite that was manufactured by us and placed into orbit in 2005 for Intelsat, Ltd. experienced an anomaly. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, a technical investigation into the anomaly is ongoing. If it is ultimately determined that the satellite cannot perform its mission, then the remaining incentive fees payable to us under the Galaxy 15 contract may become uncollectible and a customer refund obligation could be triggered. Such an outcome could result in a reduction in operating income of up to approximately $7 million in the quarter that such determination is made. We believe that we would be entitled to recover substantially all of this amount under our insurance policy and such proceeds would be recorded in “other income.” Management currently believes that the incentive fees payable to us will be realized and that no refund obligation will be triggered.
Advanced Space Programs
Advanced space programs segment operating results were as follows:
| | First Quarter | | | | |
(in thousands, except percentages) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | % Change | |
Revenues | | $ | 107,543 | | | $ | 68,346 | | | | 57% | |
Operating income | | | 5,127 | | | | (922 | ) | | | — | |
Operating margin | | | 4.8 | % | | | (1.3 | %) | | | | |
Segment Revenues - Advanced space programs segment revenues increased $39.2 million, or 57%, in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to a $39.6 million increase in CRS contract revenues and a $12.0 million increase in national security satellite program revenues, partially offset by a $12.7 million reduction in revenues due to decreased activity on the Orion human spacecraft program. In the first quarter of 2010, this segment’s national security satellite programs, CRS contract, and Orion program accounted for 43%, 37% and 19%, respectively, of total segment revenues. In the first quarter of 2009, national security satellite programs and the Orion program accounted for 50% and 49%, respectively, of total segment revenues.
Segment Operating Income - Operating income in the advanced space programs segment increased $6.0 million in the first quarter of 2010 primarily as a result of increased activity on the CRS contract and national security satellite programs, in addition to the absence in 2010 of a $3.5 million loss recorded on certain contracts in the first quarter of 2009. Segment operating income was reduced in the first quarter of 2010 by $2.1 million of unrecovered research and development expenses that exceeded a self-imposed ceiling on such costs. There were no unrecovered research and development expenses in the first quarter of 2009.
This segment’s operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) increased significantly in the first quarter of 2010 primarily due to the absence in 2010 of the $3.5 million loss recorded on
certain contracts in the first quarter of 2009 mentioned above and improved profit margins on other contracts in this segment, principally within national security satellite programs.
Corporate and Other
Corporate and other revenues were comprised solely of the elimination of intercompany revenues.
Backlog
Our firm backlog was approximately $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. While there can be no assurance, we expect to convert approximately $860 million of the March 31, 2010 firm backlog into revenue during the remainder of 2010. Firm backlog consists of aggregate contract values for firm product orders, excluding the portion previously included in revenues, and including government contract orders not yet funded and our estimate of potential award fees.
Total backlog was approximately $4.7 billion at March 31, 2010 and $4.9 billion at December 31, 2009. Total backlog includes firm backlog in addition to unexercised options, indefinite-quantity contracts and undefinitized orders and contract award selections.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Cash flow from operating activities in the first quarter of 2010 was $4.8 million, as compared to $16.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. The decrease in operating cash flow was primarily due to a $10.2 million decrease in the net effect of changes in working capital and certain other assets and liabilities. During the first quarter of 2010, changes in working capital and certain other assets and liabilities were a net use of cash of $16.8 million, compared to a net use of cash of $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2009. The net use of cash in the first quarter of 2010 included a $26.0 million increase in receivables, partially offset by a $9.4 million increase in deferred revenues and customer advances.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
In the first quarter of 2010, we spent $15.1 million for capital expenditures, as compared to $5.9 million in the first quarter of 2009. The increase in capital expenditures is primarily related to the acquisition of facilities and equipment to support our Taurus II, COTS and CRS programs.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities in the first quarter of 2010 was $9.4 million, as compared to cash used of $14.0 million in the first quarter of 2009. During the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, we received $7.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively, from the issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises and employee stock plan purchases. During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased and retired 1.0 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $14.6 million.
Convertible Notes - In December 2006, we issued $143.8 million of 2.4375% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2027 with interest payable semi-annually each January 15 and July 15. The convertible notes are convertible into cash, or a combination of cash and common stock at our election, based on an initial conversion rate of 40.8513 shares of our common stock per $1,000 in principal amount of the convertible notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $24.48 per share) under certain circumstances.
At any time on or after January 21, 2014, the convertible notes are subject to redemption at our option, in whole or in part, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes, plus unpaid interest, if any, accrued to the redemption date.
Holders of the convertible notes may require us to repurchase the convertible notes, in whole or in part, on January 15, 2014, January 15, 2017 or January 15, 2022, or, if a “fundamental change” (as such term is defined in the indenture governing the convertible notes) occurs, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes, plus any unpaid interest, if any, accrued to the redemption date.
Credit Facility - We have a $100 million revolving secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), with the option to increase the amount of the Credit Facility up to $175 million to the extent that any one or more lenders commit to be a lender for such additional amount. At our election, loans under the Credit Facility bear interest at either (i) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.25%, with the applicable margin varying according to our total leverage ratio, or (ii) at a prime rate. The Credit Facility expires in 2012 and is secured by substantially all of our assets. Up to $75 million of the Credit Facility may be reserved for letters of credit. As of March 31, 2010, there were no borrowings under the Credit Facility, although $6.5 million of letters of credit were issued under the Credit Facility. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2010, $93.5 million of the Credit Facility was available for borrowings.
Debt Covenants - Our Credit Facility contains covenants limiting our ability to, among other things, pay cash dividends, incur debt or liens, redeem or repurchase company stock, enter into transactions with affiliates, make investments, merge or consolidate with others or dispose of assets. In addition, the Credit Facility contains financial covenants with respect to leverage and interest coverage. As of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.
Available Cash and Future Funding
At March 31, 2010, we had $372.1 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. As discussed in Note 13 to the accompanying financial statements, in April 2010 we used $55 million of our cash to acquire certain assets and liabilities of the spacecraft development and manufacturing business of General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, a subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation.
We believe that we will continue to incur significant research and development costs as well as capital expenditures during the remainder of 2010 and to a lesser extent in 2011 on the Taurus II and COTS research and development programs. Management currently believes that available cash, cash expected to be generated from operations and borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund our operating and capital expenditure requirements, including research and development expenditures, over the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. Our ability to borrow additional funds is limited by the terms of our Credit Facility. Additionally, significant unforeseen events such as termination of major orders or late delivery or failure of launch vehicle or satellite products could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations.
As indicated in Note 13 to the accompanying financial statements, it is possible we may be required to refund cash to one of our customers if it is determined that a satellite anomaly currently under investigation results in a contractual performance refund obligation. However, we believe that such an obligation, if any, would be offset by insurance proceeds. Accordingly, management does not believe that such obligation, if any, would have a significant impact on our liquidity.
As discussed in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements, we currently hold investments in auction-rate securities and preferred stock that have experienced a significant decline in fair value. Given the sufficiency of our available cash and other funding sources as discussed above, we believe that we will not need, nor do we intend, to liquidate these investments in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, we do not believe that any fluctuations in the fair values of these securities will have a significant impact on our liquidity.
In April 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a plan for the purchase of up to $50 million of our outstanding common stock over a 12-month period. No purchases have been made under this program as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q. Accordingly, up to $50 million may be used for future purchases of outstanding common stock.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We believe that our market risk exposure is primarily related to the market value of certain investments that we hold as of March 31, 2010, changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rate risk. We manage these market risks through our normal financing and operating activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do not enter into derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes, nor do we use leveraged financial instruments.
Investments
As discussed in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements, we currently hold investments in auction-rate securities and preferred stock that have experienced a significant decline in fair value resulting in our recording certain other-than-temporary impairment charges. As a result of ongoing liquidity issues impacting these securities, we may be required to record additional impairment charges if there are further reductions in the fair value of these investments in future periods.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We believe that the potential change in foreign currency exchange rates is not a substantial risk to us because the large majority of our business transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. At March 31, 2010, we had $2.2 million of receivables and $2.9 million of payables denominated in Japanese yen.
From time to time, we enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge against foreign currency fluctuations on receivables or expected payments denominated in foreign currency. At March 31, 2010, we had approximately $3.1 million of forward exchange contracts outstanding to purchase Japanese yen with April 2010 payment dates. The fair value of these forward exchange contracts was less than $0.1 million as of March 31, 2010.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to changes in interest rates in the normal course of our business operations as a result of our ongoing investing and financing activities, which include debt as well as cash and cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2010, we had $143.8 million of convertible senior subordinated notes with a fixed interest rate of 2.4375%. Generally, the fair market value of our fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. In addition, the fair value of our convertible notes is affected by our stock price. The total estimated fair value of our convertible debt at March 31, 2010 was $147.8 million. The fair value was determined based on market prices quoted by a broker-dealer.
We believe that exposure to market risk related to interest rate fluctuations for cash and cash equivalents is not significant. As of March 31, 2010, a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates would result in an annual change of approximately $3.6 million in interest income earned.
We assess our interest rate risks on a regular basis and do not currently use financial instruments to mitigate these risks.
Deferred Compensation Plan
We have an unfunded deferred compensation plan for senior managers and executive officers with a total liability balance of $8.3 million at March 31, 2010. This liability is subject to fluctuation based upon the market value of the investment options selected by participants.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
OTHER INFORMATION
From time to time we are party to certain litigation or other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Because of the uncertainties inherent in litigation, we
cannot predict whether the outcome of such litigation or other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
There are no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
| (a) | None. |
| (b) | None. |
| (c) | None. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
| (a) | Exhibits – A complete listing of exhibits required is given in the Exhibit Index. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION |
| | |
| | |
DATED: April 23, 2010 | By: | /s/ David W. Thompson |
| | David W. Thompson |
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| | |
DATED: April 23, 2010 | By: | /s/ Garrett E. Pierce |
| | Garrett E. Pierce |
| | Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed with this report unless otherwise indicated.
Exhibit No. | Description |
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File Number 333-08769) filed and effective on July 25, 1996). |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005). |
3.3 | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated April 29, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998). |
3.4 | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated April 30, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003). |
4.1 | Form of Certificate of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-33453) filed on February 9, 1990 and effective on April 24, 1990). |
4.2 | Indenture dated as of December 13, 2006, by and between Orbital Sciences Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2006). |
4.3 | Form of 2.4375% Convertible Senior Subordinated Note due 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2006). |
31.1 | Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (transmitted herewith). |
31.2 | Certification of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (transmitted herewith). |
32.1 | Written Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (transmitted herewith). |
32.2 | Written Statement of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (transmitted herewith). |