American Noble Gas 10Q/A 2005 Q2 Quarterly report (amended)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 2


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 0-17204

INFINITY, INC.

(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in its Charter)


Colorado		84-1070066
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

950 Seventeenth Street, Suite 800, Denver, Colorado 80202

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(720) 932-7800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Common Stock

Check whether the Registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of August 5, 2005, 13,463,039 shares of the Registrant’s $0.0001 par value Common Stock were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906
Calculation of the Maximum Notes Balance

EXPLANATORY PARAGRAPH

This Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 is being filed for the purpose of restating Infinity, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. In connection with the issuance of its senior secured notes (the “Notes”) in January 2005, Infinity recorded a beneficial conversion feature associated with the fixed percentage conversion option in the Notes. However, the conversion option in the Notes is an embedded derivative which should be accounted for as a derivative. In addition, as a result of certain terms of the Notes and the detachable warrants issued with the Notes (the “Warrants”), the Warrants do not qualify as equity instruments, and, therefore, should also be accounted for as derivatives. Further, as a result of the issuance of the Notes in January 2005, the Company was no longer able to conclude that it has sufficient authorized and unissued shares available to settle its previously issued non-employee options and warrants after considering the commitment to potentially issue common stock under terms of the Notes. As such, effective with the issuance of the Notes on January 13, 2005, the fair value of all non-employee options and warrants should have been reclassified out of stockholders’ equity and accounted for as derivatives. Conforming changes have been made to the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in the accompanying Form 10-Q/A. See Note 2 in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for further information relating to this restatement. This Form 10-Q/A has not been updated for events or information subsequent to the date of filing of the original Form 10-Q except in connection with the foregoing. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with the Company’s filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the original Form 10-Q.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets			3
Consolidated Statements of Operations			4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss			5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity			6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			7
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements			9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			18
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			28
PART II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			29
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			29
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			29
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			29
Item 5. Other Information			30
Item 6. Exhibits			30
Signatures			31
Exhibits			32
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Calculation of the Maximum Notes Balance

INFINITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)


ASSETS
	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
	(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,573		$	3,052
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $85 (2005 and 2004)		4,675			3,494
Note receivable		1,200			1,581
Inventories		490			286
Prepaid expenses and other		468			654

Total current assets		11,406			9,067

Property and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation		10,051			8,764

Oil and gas properties, using full cost accounting, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
Proved		45,921			28,792
Unproved		18,259			15,595
Intangible assets, at cost, net of accumulated amortization		2,194			1,497
Other assets, net		334			333


Total assets	$	88,165		$	64,048


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Note payable and current portion of long-term debt	$	118		$	284
Accounts payable		2,485			4,001
Accrued liabilities		5,395			4,274
Accrued interest		775			223
Current portion of asset retirement obligations		208			—

Total current liabilities		8,981			8,782
Long-term liabilities
Production taxes payable		224			469
Asset retirement obligations, less current portion		1,312			635
Long-term debt, less current portion		26,791			11,330
Derivative liabilities		12,706			—
Subordinated convertible notes payable		—			14,010

Total liabilities		50,014			35,226

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, par value $.0001, authorized 300,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 13,330,539 (2005) and 10,628,196 (2004) shares		1			1
Additional paid-in-capital		57,799			43,363
Accumulated deficit		(19,649	)		(14,542	)

Total stockholders’ equity		38,151			28,822


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	88,165		$	64,048

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

INFINITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(As Restated)						(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)						(See Note 2)
Revenue
Oilfield services	$	5,447		$	3,344		$	9,517		$	5,539
Oil and gas		2,204			1,701			3,649			3,073

Total revenue		7,651			5,045			13,166			8,612

Cost of revenue
Oilfield services		2,516			1,857			4,520			3,278
Oil and gas production expenses		1,010			523			1,449			926
Oil and gas production taxes		201			195			370			351

Total cost of revenue		3,727			2,575			6,339			4,555


Gross profit		3,924			2,470			6,827			4,057

General and administrative expenses		1,356			1,516			2,636			2,737

Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion		1,797			1,315			3,384			2,362


Operating income (loss)		771			(361	)		807			(1,042	)


Other income (expense)
Amortization of loan discount and costs		(206	)		(431	)		(449	)		(1,070	)
Early extinguishment of debt		(372	)		—			(1,276	)		(204	)
Interest expense		(418	)		(310	)		(935	)		(589	)
Changes in derivative fair value		5,012			—			(2,901	)		—
Impairment of note receivable		(396	)		—			(396	)		—
Loss on sales of other assets		(91	)		(39	)		(91	)		(39	)
Other		56			39			134			77

Total other income (expense)		3,585			(741	)		(5,914	)		(1,825	)


Net income (loss) before income taxes		4,356			(1,102	)		(5,107	)		(2,867	)
Income tax benefit		—			—			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	4,356		$	(1,102	)	$	(5,107	)	$	(2,867	)

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.33		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.31	)

Diluted	$	0.31		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.31	)

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		13,159,575			9,396,091			12,385,310			9,295,798

Diluted		13,528,198			9,396,091			12,385,310			9,295,798

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

INFINITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,					For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004			2005			2004
	(As Restated)					(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)					(See Note 2)
Net income (loss)	$	4,356	$	(1,102	)	$	(5,107	)	$	(2,867	)
Reclassifications, net of tax expense		—		—			—			98

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	4,356	$	(1,102	)	$	(5,107	)	$	(2,769	)

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

INFINITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share data)


	Common Stock				Additional
					Paid-in			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Equity
Balance, December 31, 2004		10,628,196	$	1	$	43,363		$	(14,542	)	$	28,822

Reclassification of non-employee warrants to derivative liabilities *		—		—		(6,090	)		—			(6,090	)

Reclassification of non-employee warrants from derivative liabilities in connection with exercise *		—		—		2,174			—			2,174

Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of options and warrants		686,107		—		4,179			—			4,179

Conversion of 8% subordinated convertible notes and accrued interest into common stock		517,296		—		2,524			—			2,524

Conversion of 7% subordinated convertible notes and accrued interest into common stock		1,498,940		—		11,656			—			11,656

Costs from previous equity placement financing		—		—		(7	)		—			(7	)

Net loss *		—		—		—			(5,107	)		(5,107	)


Balance, June 30, 2005 *		13,330,539	$	1	$	57,799		$	(19,649	)	$	38,151

• As Restated. See Note 2.

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

INFINITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(5,107	)	$	(2,867	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion		3,384			2,362
Amortization of loan discount and costs		449			1,070
Expense related to early extinguishment of debt		1,052			204
Changes in derivative fair value		2,901			—
Impairment of note receivable		396			—
Loss on sales of other assets		91			39

Change in operating assets and liabilities
Increase in accounts receivable		(1,201	)		(859	)
Increase in inventories		(204	)		(15	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other		186			(67	)
Decrease in accounts payable		(1,472	)		(51	)
Increase in accrued liabilities and accrued interest		1,592			1,053

Net cash provided by operating activities		2,067			869


Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures — exploration and production		(21,342	)		(2,908	)
Capital expenditures — oilfield services		(1,959	)		(235	)
Acquisitions — exploration and production		—			(516	)
Acquisitions — oilfield services, net of cash acquired		—			(1,189	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets — exploration and production		133			147
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets — oilfield services		12			13
Increase in other assets		—			(323	)
Receipts on note receivable		4			8

Net cash used in investing activities		(23,152	)		(5,003	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from notes payable		—			295
Proceeds from borrowings on long-term debt		30,000			2,864
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		4,179			4,060
Debt and equity issuance costs		(2,124	)		(30	)
Repayment of notes payable		(160	)		(194	)
Repayment of long-term debt		(9,289	)		(3,005	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		22,606			3,990


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,521			(144	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		3,052			727


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	4,573		$	583

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

INFINITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004
	(As Restated) (See Note 2)
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:				��
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized	$	—	$	588

Non-cash transactions:
Non-cash costs capitalized in the full cost pool for oil and gas properties		373		241
Property and equipment acquired through seller financed debt, net		—		195
Conversion of subordinated convertible notes and accrued interest to common stock		14,181		132
Issuance of warrants in conjunction with the issuance of debt — recorded as debt discount		5,632		—
Conversion option — recorded as debt discount		257		—
Issuance of common stock to partially repay related party debt		—		500
Issuance of 7% Convertible Subordinated Notes in lieu of cash interest payment		—		391

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

INFINITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Infinity, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Infinity” or the “Company”) are engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of natural gas and crude oil in the United States and the acquisition and exploration of oil and gas properties in Nicaragua. In addition, the Company provides oilfield services in the Mid-Continent region and in Northeast Wyoming.

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Infinity, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which include Infinity Oil & Gas of Wyoming, Inc. (“Infinity-Wyoming”), Infinity Oil and Gas of Texas, Inc. (“Infinity-Texas”), Infinity Oil & Gas of Kansas, Inc. (“Infinity-Kansas”) and Consolidated Oil Well Services, Inc. (“Consolidated”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for interim financial information. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period presentation to conform to the classifications used in the current period. These reclassifications did not have an impact on previously reported consolidated results of operations. The consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Infinity’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.

The preparation of unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates with regard to the unaudited consolidated financial statements include the estimated carrying value of unproved properties, the estimate of proved oil and gas reserve volumes and the related present value of estimated future net cash flows and the ceiling test applied to capitalized oil and gas properties, the estimated cost and timing related to asset retirement obligations and the realization of deferred tax assets.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Accordingly, all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration, and development activities are capitalized. Exploration and development costs include dry hole costs, geological and geophysical costs, direct overhead related to exploration and development activities, estimated future costs of site restoration, dismantlement and abandonment activities, and other costs incurred for the purpose of finding oil and gas reserves. Salaries and benefits paid to employees involved in the acquisition, exploration and development of properties, as well as other internal costs that can be directly identified with acquisition, exploration and development activities, are also capitalized. The Company capitalized internal costs of $305,000 and $173,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $525,000 and $267,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Costs associated with production and general corporate activities are expensed in the period incurred.

Under full cost accounting rules, capitalized costs less accumulated depletion and related deferred income taxes, may not exceed the sum of the present value discounted at ten percent of estimated future net revenue using current prices and costs, including the effects of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges but excluding the future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet, less any related

income tax effects. This is referred to as the “full cost ceiling limitation.” If capitalized costs exceed the limit, the excess must be charged to expense. The expense may not be reversed in future periods. At the end of each quarter, the Company calculates the full cost ceiling limitation.

At June 30, 2005, the carrying amount of oil and gas properties exceeded the full cost ceiling limitation by approximately $8.5 million, based upon a natural gas price of approximately $7.05 per Mcf and an oil price of approximately $56.00 per barrel in effect at that date. However, based on subsequent price increases to approximately $8.50 per Mcf of gas and approximately $61.00 per barrel of oil at the August 4, 2005 measurement date, the full cost ceiling limitation exceeded the carrying amount of the Company’s oil and gas properties. Therefore, the Company was not required to record a ceiling write-down as of June 30, 2005.

A decline in prices received for oil and gas sales or an increase in operating costs subsequent to the measurement date or reductions in estimated economically recoverable quantities could result in the recognition of a ceiling write-down of oil and gas properties in a future period.

Aggregate capitalized costs relating to the Company’s oil and gas producing activities, and related accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and ceiling write-downs are as follows:


	As of
	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
	(in thousands)
	(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)
Proved oil and gas properties	$	61,014		$	41,210
Unproved oil and gas properties		18,259			15,595

Total		79,273			56,805
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization and ceiling write-downs		(15,093	)		(12,418	)

Net capitalized costs	$	64,180		$	44,387

Depletion of proved oil and gas properties is computed on the units-of-production method, with oil and gas being converted to a common unit of measure based on their relative energy content, whereby capitalized costs, as adjusted for future development costs and asset retirement obligations, are amortized over the total estimated proved reserve quantities. The costs of wells in progress and unevaluated properties, including any related capitalized interest, are not amortized. On a quarterly basis, such costs are evaluated for inclusion in the costs to be amortized based on a determination of the existence of proved reserves, impairments, or reductions in value. To the extent the evaluation indicates these properties are impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized costs to be amortized. Abandonment of unevaluated properties are accounted for as an adjustment to capitalized costs to be amortized, with no losses recognized.

Proceeds from the sales of oil and gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in income. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to production expense in the period incurred.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between financial accounting bases and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The tax benefits of tax loss carryforwards and other deferred taxes are recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses the utilization of such assets to be more likely than not. When the future utilization of some portion of the deferred tax asset is determined not to be more likely than not, a valuation allowance is provided to reduce the recorded deferred tax asset. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had recorded a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax asset.

Note 2 — Restatement

As described further in Note 4, on January 13, 2005, the Company sold $30 million of senior secured notes (the “Notes”) in a private placement. In connection with the sale of the Notes, the Company recorded an $8.1 million debt discount resulting from a beneficial conversion feature associated with the Notes. However, the Notes contain an embedded derivative which should be accounted for as a derivative under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In addition, as a result of certain terms of the Notes and the detachable warrants issued with the Notes (the “Warrants”), management determined that the Warrants do not qualify as equity instruments under the provisions of EITF 00-19,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Index to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, and, therefore, should also be accounted for as derivatives under the provisions of SFAS No. 133.

In addition, as a result of the issuance of the Notes in January 2005, under the provisions of EITF 00-19 the Company was no longer able to conclude that it has sufficient authorized and unissued shares available to settle its previously issued non-employee options and warrants after considering the commitment to potentially issue common stock under terms of the Notes if there should ever be an event of default. As such, effective with the issuance of the Notes on January 13, 2005, the fair value of all non-employee options and warrants should have been reclassified out of stockholders’ equity and accounted for as derivatives under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. Changes in the fair value of the non-employee options and warrants will be recorded through earnings, so long as they continue to not qualify for equity classification. Non-employee options and warrants that are ultimately settled in common stock will be remeasured prior to settlement then reclassified back to stockholders’ equity; however, any gains or losses previously recognized on those instruments will remain in earnings.

As a result, the Company has restated the consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2005, to reverse the effects of the beneficial conversion feature originally recorded and record the effects of the derivatives discussed above. The following tables present the effect of the restatements on the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005								Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
	As Previously								As Previously
	Reported			Adjustment		As Restated			Reported			Adjustment			As Restated
Amortization of loan discount and cost	$	(351	)	$	145	$	(206	)	$	(707	)	$	258		$	(449	)

Changes in derivative liabilities	$	—		$	5,012	$	5,012		$	—		$	(2,901	)	$	(2,901	)

Net income (loss)	$	(801	)	$	5,157	$	4,356		$	(2,464	)	$	(2,643	)	$	(5,107	)

Basic net income (loss) per share	$	(0.06	)	$	0.39	$	0.33		$	(0.20	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.41	)

Diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(0.06	)	$	0.37	$	0.31		$	(0.20	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.41	)

The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2005 (in thousands):


	As of June 30, 2005
	As Previously
	Reported		Adjustment			As Restated
Oil and gas properties, unproved	$	18,899	$	(640	)	$	18,259
Total assets	$	88,805	$	(640	)	$	88,165
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	12,706		$	12,706
Long-term debt, less current portion	$	18,941	$	7,850		$	26,791

Additional paid-in-capital	$	76,352		$	(18,553	)	$	57,799
Accumulated deficit	$	(17,006	)	$	(2,643	)	$	(19,649	)
Total stockholders’ equity	$	59,347		$	(21,196	)	$	38,151

Note 3 — Stock Options

The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for options granted to employees under the Company’s stock option plans because the fair value of the stock equaled or was less than the option exercise price at the date of grant. Had compensation costs for employee stock options under the Company’s plans been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards under the plans consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company’s net loss and loss per share would have been as follows:


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(in thousands, except per share data)
	(As Restated)						(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)						(See Note 2)
Net income (loss) as reported	$	4,356		$	(1,102	)	$	(5,107	)	$	(2,867	)
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards		(113	)		(1,528	)		(1,209	)		(1,528	)

Pro forma net income (loss)	$	4,243		$	(2,630	)	$	(6,316	)	$	(4,395	)

Net income (loss) per share as reported:
Basic	$	0.33		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.31	)
Diluted	$	0.31		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.31	)
Pro forma income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.32		$	(0.28	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.47	)
Diluted	$	0.30		$	(0.28	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.47	)

Options on 165,000 shares of common stock were granted during February 2005 at a strike price of $8.50 per share and options on 20,000 shares of common stock were granted during May 2005 at a strike price of $7.80 per share. The estimated fair value of the options granted in February and May utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model was based on weighted average risk-free interest rates of 4.0% and 4.13%, respectively, expected option life of 10 years, expected volatility of approximately 70% and 60%, respectively, and no expected dividends.

Note 4 — Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:


	As of
	June 30,		December 31,
	2005		2004
	(dollars in thousands)
	(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)
Senior secured notes due January 13, 2009, with interest calculated at 3-Month LIBOR plus 6.75% (10.28% as of July 1, 2005) due quarterly. The balance at June 30, 2005 is net of discount of $5,294	$	24,706	$	—
8% subordinated convertible notes payable, due June 13, 2006, which were called for redemption on February 28, 2005		—		2,493
7% subordinated convertible notes payable, due April 22, 2007, which were called for redemption on April 22, 2005		—		11,517
$25,000 development credit facility with U.S. Bank, repaid in full and terminated on January 13, 2005		—		5,000


	As of
	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
	(dollars in thousands)
	(As Restated)
	(See Note 2)
Note payable to seller (for a 50% interest in an airplane), with interest at 7.25% due on a quarterly basis. The Company is required to make annual principal payments equal to 5% of the current outstanding principal until paid in full. The seller can call the note if the seller’s bank calls its note for the original purchase of the airplane. The note is collateralized by the Company’s 50% interest in the airplane with a net book value of $2,107 at June 30, 2005		2,203			2,326
Various revolving credit and term loans with LaSalle Bank with interest at prime plus 1.25%, repaid in full and terminated on January 13, 2005		—			3,582
Various other notes repaid in full and terminated no later than January 31, 2005		—			706

		26,909			25,624
Less current portion		(118	)		(284	)

Long-term debt	$	26,791		$	25,340

Senior Secured Notes Facility

On January 13, 2005, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Senior Secured Notes Facility”) with affiliates of Promethean Asset Management, LLC and Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P. (collectively, the “Buyers”), pursuant to which Infinity sold, and the Buyers purchased, $30 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (the “Notes”) due January 13, 2009 and five-year warrants to purchase 924,194 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $9.09 per share and 732,046 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $11.06 per share (collectively, the “Warrants”). The Notes have an initial maturity of 48 months subject to extension for an additional twelve months upon the mutual agreement of Infinity and the Buyers. The Notes bear interest at 3-month LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 675 basis points, adjusted the first business day of each calendar quarter (10.28% effective July 1, 2005). The Notes are secured by essentially all of the assets of Infinity and its subsidiaries and are guaranteed by each of Infinity’s active subsidiaries. The Notes are redeemable by Infinity for cash at any time during the first year at 105% of par value, declining by 1% per year thereafter (101% during any extended maturity period), together with any accrued and unpaid interest. Under certain circumstances, Infinity has the option to repay the Notes with direct issuances of shares of registered common stock in lieu of cash at a conversion rate equal to 95% of the weighted average trading price of shares of the Company’s common stock on the trading day preceding the conversion (the “Conversion Option”).

Under certain circumstances at quarterly intervals and over a three year period, commencing in the third quarter of 2005, Infinity has the option to sell additional Notes (“Additional Notes”), along with additional Warrants, in amounts up to $15 million in any rolling twelve-month period, up to an additional $45 million. The Additional Notes would have an initial maturity of 42 months (54 months if the maturity of the initial Notes is extended). The issuance of Additional Notes is subject to Infinity’s satisfaction of various closing conditions. The ability to issue Additional Notes or the requirement to prepay Notes prior to maturity will depend upon a maximum Notes balance calculated quarterly based generally upon a combination of financial performance of Consolidated and the SEC after-tax PV-10% value of the Company’s proved reserves. The maximum Notes balance at June 30, 2005 exceeded the Notes outstanding on that date.

Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133 and EITF 00-19,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Index to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, the Conversion Option and the Warrants qualify as derivatives. As a result, effective with the issuance of the Notes, the Company bifurcated the Conversion Option from the Notes and accounted for it and the Warrants as derivatives (see Note 5). The initial fair values of the Conversion Option and the Warrants, which equaled $257,000 and $5,632,000, respectively, were recorded as debt discount. The debt discount is being amortized over the initial maturities of the Notes utilizing the effective interest method.

8% Convertible Subordinated Notes

Effective June 13, 2001, the Company sold $6,475,000 in 8% Subordinated Convertible Notes in a private placement. Interest on the notes accrued at a rate of 8% per annum and was payable in arrears on each December 15 and June 15. The notes were originally convertible to one share of common stock at $5 per share and matured on June 13, 2006.

The Company incurred costs of $502,000 associated with the placement, which were capitalized as loan costs and were being amortized using the effective interest method. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 220,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $5.99. The Company capitalized additional loan costs of $925,000 related to the fair value of the warrants.

On January 13, 2005, the Company called for redemption all of the remaining 8% subordinated convertible notes outstanding on February 28, 2005. The holders of all $2,493,000 of 8% subordinated convertible notes at December 31, 2004 converted the debt and accrued interest into 517,296 shares of the Company’s common stock. The remaining unamortized loan costs of $156,000 were expensed as early extinguishment of debt.

7% Convertible Subordinated Notes

Effective April 22, 2002, the Company sold $12,540,000 in 7% Subordinated Convertible Notes in a private placement. Interest on the notes accrued at a rate of 7% per annum and was payable in arrears on each April 15 and October 15. The Company could elect to pay the accrued interest in cash or in the form of additional notes issued in increments of $1,000 with residual interest due in cash. The notes were convertible to one share of common stock at $8.625 per share and matured on April 22, 2007.

The Company incurred costs of $866,000 associated with the issuance of the 7% subordinated convertible notes, which were capitalized as loan costs and were being amortized using the effective interest method. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $9.058. The Company capitalized additional loan costs of $1,386,044 related to the fair value of the warrants.

On February 25, 2005, the Company called for redemption all of the remaining 7% subordinated convertible notes outstanding on April 22, 2005 at a redemption price of 102.8% plus accrued and unpaid interest. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the holders of $5,951,000 of 7% subordinated convertible notes at December 31, 2004 converted the debt and accrued interest into 783,779 shares of the Company’s common stock. In April 2005, the holders of $5,528,000 of 7% subordinated convertible notes converted the debt and accrued interest into 715,161 shares of the Company’s common stock, and the remaining balance of $38,000 plus accrued interest was paid in full on April 22, 2005. The unamortized loan costs of $372,000 and $753,000 associated with the debt converted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, were expensed as early extinguishment of debt.

$25,000,000 Development Credit Facility

In September 2003, the Company established a Secured Revolving Borrowing Base Credit Facility (“Facility”) with a bank. Interest on the amounts outstanding accrued at prime rate plus 1.0%. The Company incurred $110,000 in loan costs and approximately $57,000 in legal costs to establish the Facility. These costs were capitalized as loan costs and amortized using the effective interest method. The Facility was repaid in full with proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes Facility discussed above and terminated on January 13, 2005.

Revolving Credit and Term Loans

Effective July 9, 2004, Consolidated borrowed $5,400,000 under an amended credit facility with LaSalle Bank. The amended facility required monthly payments of $113,493 plus interest through November 2007, with a final payment of the remaining balance due December 31, 2007. Amounts outstanding accrued interest at the prime rate plus 1.25% per annum. The credit facility was repaid in full with proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes Facility discussed above and terminated on January 13, 2005.

Capitalized Interest

The Company capitalizes interest costs to oil and gas properties on expenditures made in connection with exploration and development projects that are not subject to current depletion. Interest is capitalized only for the period that activities are in progress to bring these projects to their intended use. Interest costs (including amortization of loan discount and costs) capitalized were $638,000 and $184,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $1,192,000 and $522,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Note 5 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company accounts for derivative instruments or hedging activities under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities(“SFAS No. 133”). SFAS No. 133 requires the Company to record derivative instruments at their fair value. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portions of changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized in the statement of

operations when the hedged item affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, if any, are recognized in earnings.

Commodity Derivatives

During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company entered into two costless collar arrangements to manage exposure to oil price volatility on a portion of its oil production. The following table sets forth the terms of the Company’s collar arrangements as of June 30, 2005:


Effective Dates	Bbls per Day		Floor Price		Ceiling Price
May 1, 2005 — December 31, 2005		50	$	50.00	$	65.70
January 1, 2006 — June 30, 2006		50	$	50.00	$	64.40

Subsequent to June 30, 2005, the Company entered into a third costless collar arrangement as detailed in the following table:


Effective Dates	Bbls per Day		Floor Price		Ceiling Price
October 1, 2005 — December 31, 2006		50	$	52.50	$	74.00

All of the Company’s collar arrangements have been designated as cash flow hedges. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had a derivative asset of approximately $23,000. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recognized ineffectiveness of approximately $23,000 under its collar arrangements.

Other Derivatives

As more fully discussed in Note 4 above, in January 2005, the Company issued Notes and Warrants. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133 and EITF 00-19 the Company bifurcated the Conversion Option associated with the Notes and accounted for it and the Warrants as derivatives. The initial fair values of the Conversion Option and the Warrants, which totaled $257,000 and $5,632,000, respectively, were recorded as debt discount. Subsequent changes in the fair value of those derivatives have been recorded as Changes in derivative fair value in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recognized a credit to Changes in derivative fair value of $2,602,000 related to the change in the fair value of the Conversion Option and Warrants. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recognized a charge to Changes in derivative fair value of $1,320,000 related to the change in the fair value of the Conversion Option and Warrants.

In addition as a result of the issuance of the Notes in January 2005, under the provisions of EITF 00-19 the Company was no longer able to conclude that it has sufficient authorized and unissued shares available to settle its previously issued non-employee options and warrants (the “Non-employee Options and Warrants”) after considering the commitment to potentially issue common stock under terms of the Notes. As such, effective with the issuance of the Notes on January 13, 2005, the Company reclassified the Non-employee Options and Warrants out of stockholders’ equity on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet and recognized them as a derivative liability of $6,090,000. Changes in the fair value of the Non-employee Options and Warrants will be recorded as Change in derivative fair value in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations so long as they continue to not qualify for equity classification. Non-employee Options and Warrants that are ultimately settled in common stock will be remeasured prior to settlement and then reclassified back to stockholders’ equity; however, any gains or losses previously recognized on those instruments will remain in earnings. During February and March 2005, in connection with the exercise of 538,850 Non-employee Options and Warrants, the Company reclassified $2,174,000 back to stockholders’ equity. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recognized a credit to Changes in derivative fair value of $2,410,000 related to the change in the fair value of these instruments. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recognized a charge to Changes in derivative fair value of $1,581,000 related to the change in the fair value of these instruments.

Note 6 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company’s cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities represents the fair value of the accounts due to their short-term nature. Long-term debt at June 30, 2005, with a carrying value of approximately $19.1 million is estimated to have a fair value between $29 million and $30 million. See Note 5 for the terms of the long-term debt obligations.

The fair value of the Company’s non-current derivative liabilities, all of which relate to the Conversion Option, Warrants and Non-employee Options and Warrants, is estimated using various models and assumptions related to the estimated term of the instruments, volatility of the price of the Company’s common stock, interest rates and the probability of conversion, redemption or exercise, among other items.

Note 7 — Earnings Per Share

Basic income (loss) per common share is computed as net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed as net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents, if dilutive, using the treasury stock method, outstanding during the period.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005							2004
	(As Restated) (See Note 2)
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
	Net					Per Share		Net					Per Share
	Income			Shares		Amount		Loss			Shares		Amount
Basic EPS:
Net income (loss) and share amounts	$	4,356			13,159,575	$	0.33	$	(1,102	)		9,396,091	$	(0.12	)

Dilutive Securities:
Stock Options and Warrants		(133	)		368,623				—			—

Diluted EPS:
Net income (loss) and share amounts	$	4,223			13,528,198	$	0.31	$	(1,102	)		9,396,091	$	(0.12	)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005								2004
	(As Restated) (See Note 2)
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
	Net					Per Share			Net					Per Share
	Loss			Shares		Amount			Income			Shares		Amount
Basic EPS:
Net loss and share amounts	$	(5,170	)		12,385,310	$	(0.41	)	$	(2,867	)		9,295,798	$	(.31	)

Dilutive Securities:
Stock Options and Warrants		—			—					—			—

Diluted EPS:
Net loss and share amounts	$	(5,170	)		12,385,310	$	(0.41	)	$	(2,867	)		9,295,798	$	(.31	)

The calculation of diluted income (loss) per share excluded 2,859,000 and 2,751,000 common share equivalents for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 4,477,000 and 3,889,000 common share equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The calculation of diluted income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2005 does not include the impact of conversion of any of the Note because to do so would be anti-dilutive as a result of the impact of related debt discount and loan costs that would be expensed under the “as converted” method.

Note 8 — Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company records estimated future asset retirement obligations pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (“SFAS No. 143”). SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Subsequent to initial measurement, the asset retirement liability is required to be accreted each period to present value. Capitalized costs are depleted as a component of the full cost pool using the units of production method. The Company’s asset retirement

obligations consist of costs related to the plugging of wells, the removal of facilities and equipment, and site restoration on oil and gas properties.

The following table summarizes the activity for the Company’s asset retirement obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period	$	635		$	521
Accretion expense		17			10
Liabilities incurred		24			19
Revisions of estimates		844			—

Asset retirement obligations at end of period		1,520			550
Less: current portion of asset retirement obligations		(208	)		(--	)

Asset retirement obligations, less current portion	$	1,312		$	550

Note 9 — Sale of Note Receivable

Effective May 1, 2002, Infinity-Kansas sold its interest in oil and gas properties in Eastern Kansas to West Central Oil, LLC (“West Central”) for $180,000 cash and a $1,620,000 note receivable, secured by the oil and gas leases and real estate sold in the transaction. West Central failed to repay the $1,576,000 principal owed on the note as scheduled on May 1, 2005. In July 2005, the Company sold its interest in the note receivable to a bank for $1.2 million. As such, the Company impaired the value of the note receivable at June 30, 2005 and recognized a loss of $376,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. In addition, the Company wrote off $20,000 of interest receivable recorded as of December 31, 2004 (no interest income was recorded during 2005).

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following information should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes presented elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Infinity follows the full-cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. See “Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” included in Note 1 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. Infinity and its operating subsidiaries (Infinity Oil and Gas of Texas, Inc., Infinity Oil & Gas of Wyoming, Inc., and Consolidated Oil Well Services, Inc.) are engaged in identifying and acquiring oil and gas acreage, exploring and developing acquired acreage, oil and gas production, and providing oilfield services. Infinity’s primary focuses are on: (i) the acquisition, exploration and development of and production from its properties in the Fort Worth Basin of North central Texas and Greater Green River, Sand Wash and Piceance Basins of Southwest Wyoming and Northwest Colorado; and (ii) providing oilfield services in the Mid-Continent region and the Powder River Basin of Northeast Wyoming. Infinity has also been awarded a 1.4 million acre concession offshore Nicaragua in the Caribbean Sea which it intends to explore over the next few years subject to consummation of the long-term development and production contract governing such activity.

On June 16, 2005, the stockholders of Infinity, Inc. authorized the reincorporation of the Company in the State of Delaware. The reincorporation will result in a change in the name of the Company to Infinity Energy Resources, Inc. The reincorporation will not however, result in any change in headquarters, business, jobs, location of any facilities, number of employees, assets, liabilities, or net worth. Management, including all directors and officers, will remain the same in connection with the reincorporation. Upon the effective time, which is anticipated to be prior to August 31, 2005, shares of the Company’s common stock will be converted into an equal number of common shares of Infinity Energy Resources, Inc.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of any statements containing the words “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect,” “plan,” “should” or similar expressions are intended to identify such statement. Forward-looking statements include, among other items:

	•		potential expansion of the oilfield services business through acquisitions;

	•		completion of the negotiation and acquisition of offshore licenses in Nicaragua;

	•		expected capital expenditures and cash flow for the remainder of 2005;

	•		plans to raise external financing to finance a portion of 2005 activities;

	•		increased activity in the oilfield services business;

	•		planned increases in acreage position;

	•		Infinity’s business strategy and anticipated trends in Infinity’s business and its future results of operations;

	•		the ability of Infinity to make and integrate acquisitions and the completion of the Nicaragua acquisition;

	•		planned exploration, drilling and completion activities;

	•		the costs and results of dewatering operations, including drilling water disposal wells;

	•		demand for oilfield services;

	•		the availability of financing on acceptable terms;

	•		the impact of governmental regulation; and

	•		the timing of engineering and environmental impact studies and permitting.

Forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to the following (and the risks described under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K):

	•		fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices and production;

	•		the ability of Infinity to make and integrate acquisitions and the completion of the Nicaragua acquisition;

	•		availability of drilling rigs, completion services and other support equipment;

	•		incorrect estimations of required capital expenditures;

	•		uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of oil and gas reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing thereof;

	•		delays or difficulties in development activities;

	•		increases in the cost of oil and gas drilling, completion and production and in materials, fuel and labor costs;

	•		the availability, conditions and timing of required government approvals and third party financing, including failure to satisfy the maximum notes balance requirements under the senior secured notes facility;


	•		a decline in demand for Infinity’s oil and gas production or oilfield services;

	•		delays in environmental and permitting factors; and

	•		changes in general economic conditions.

Overview of Exploration and Production Activity

Infinity, through Infinity-Texas, continued to expand its exploration and production operations in the Fort Worth Basin of Texas during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Meanwhile, Infinity-Wyoming continues to explore and develop the various projects and prospects in the Rocky Mountains, but continues to be hampered by weather, governmental and environmental restrictions and regulations, as well as various operational issues at the Labarge, Pipeline and Sand Wash Fields. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, Infinity-Wyoming and Infinity-Texas:

	•		Commenced production from the Fort Worth Basin in North central Texas and the Sand Wash Basin in Northwest Colorado;

	•		Made capital expenditures of approximately $22 million, including $7 million in leasehold acquisitions;

	•		Achieved a 46% increase in proved oil and gas reserve quantities to 13,400 MMcfe, including extensions and discoveries of 5,060 MMcfe; and

	•		Achieved a 57% increase to $37.1 million in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow from proved oil and gas properties.

Infinity expects to continue to explore and develop its Fort Worth Basin acreage and its Rocky Mountain projects and prospects. Infinity expects its Rocky Mountain projects to proceed more slowly, due in part to governmental and environmental restrictions and regulations. Infinity raised incremental debt and equity capital to fund its exploration and production operations from the net proceeds of the Senior Secured Notes Facility and from the proceeds of option and warrant exercises during the first half of 2005. In addition to expected increases in cash flows from operating activities, Infinity will require external financing during 2005 and beyond to fund its exploration and production operations, although the type, timing, cost and amounts of such financing, if any, will depend upon general energy and capital markets conditions and the success of Infinity’s operations.

The following table provides statistical information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (due to rounding and the inclusion of other operating expenses the sum of the individual amounts presented may not equal the totals):


	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Production:
Natural gas (MMcf)		219.4		266.7		430.9		470.1
Crude oil (thousands of barrels)		19.5		8.2		28.6		17.5

Total (MMcfe)		336.4		315.9		602.5		575.1
Financial Data (thousands of dollars):
Total revenue	$	2,204	$	1,701	$	3,649	$	3,073
Production expenses		1,010		523		1,449		926
Production taxes		201		195		370		351
Financial Data per Unit ($ per Mcfe):
Total revenue	$	6.55	$	5.38	$	6.05	$	5.34
Production expenses		3.00		1.66		2.40		1.61
Production taxes		0.60		0.62		0.61		0.61

Under full cost accounting rules, Infinity reviews, on a quarterly basis, the carrying value of its oil and gas properties. Under these rules, capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties may not exceed the present value of estimated future revenue at the prices in effect as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and a write-down for accounting purposes is required if the ceiling is exceeded. At June 30, 2005, the carrying amount of the Company’s oil and gas properties exceeded the full cost ceiling limitation by approximately $8.5 million based upon a natural gas price of approximately $7.05 per Mcf and an oil price of approximately $56.00 per barrel in effect at that date. However, based on subsequent price increases to

approximately $8.50 per Mcf of gas and approximately $61.00 per barrel of oil at the August 4, 2005 measurement date, the full cost ceiling limitation exceeded the carrying amount of the Company’s oil and gas properties. Therefore, the Company was not required to record a ceiling write-down as of June 30, 2005.

Overview of Oilfield Service Operations

Consolidated continued to develop its business as the largest oilfield service provider in Eastern Kansas and Northeast Oklahoma. The continued strong price of natural gas and crude oil and the focus on development of the coal bed methane potential of the Cherokee basin in Eastern Kansas and Northeast Oklahoma contributed to an overall increase in activity for Consolidated. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, Consolidated achieved several operational milestones:

	•		record second quarter and six month revenue of $5.4 million and $9.5 million, respectively;

	•		subsidiary level earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of approximately $3.7 million; and

	•		subsidiary level income before taxes of approximately $2.8 million.

Consolidated is actively seeking opportunities, through acquisitions or mergers, to expand its service area or enhance the services it provides to its customers.

The following tables detail the increase in gross revenue, before discounts, for the periods shown, based on the number and type of core service jobs performed (due to rounding the sum of the individual amounts presented may not equal the totals):

Oilfield Service Statistics
($ in thousands, before discounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005					2004					Change
													% Chg.
	Jobs		Revenue			Jobs		Revenue			Jobs		In Jobs			Revenue
Job Type
Cementing		799	$	2,234			772	$	2,058			27		3	%	$	176
Acidizing		471		482			267		274			204		76	%		208
Fracturing		383		2,730			165		1,211			218		132	%		1,519
Other				217					21								196
Discounts				(216	)				(220	)							4

Total			$	5,447				$	3,344							$	2,103


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005					2004					Change
													% Chg.
	Jobs		Revenue			Jobs		Revenue			Jobs		In Jobs			Revenue
Job Type
Cementing		1,520	$	4,120			1,185	$	3,055			335		28	%	$	1,065
Acidizing		927		884			458		517			469		102	%		367
Fracturing		581		4,467			303		2,263			278		92	%		2,204
Other				414					33								381
Discounts				(368	)				(329	)							(39	)

Total			$	9,517				$	5,539							$	3,978

2005 Operational and Financial Objectives

Exploration and Production

Infinity-Wyoming plans to focus on increasing production through development and exploration. Infinity-Wyoming anticipates remaining 2005 capital expenditures will be approximately $5.0 million to drill up to six wells, conduct additional geological and geophysical analysis, and increase its acreage positions.

Infinity-Texas plans to focus on increasing its acreage position and production in the Fort Worth Basin of central Texas. Infinity-Texas anticipates its remaining 2005 capital expenditures will be approximately $17 million to acquire additional acreage, drill approximately ten wells, and conduct additional geological and geophysical analysis on its acreage positions.

Infinity’s ability to complete these activities is dependent on a number of factors including, but not limited to:

	•		The availability of the capital resources required to fund the activity. Infinity expects to generate approximately $3 million in cash flow from operations from oil and gas production activities during the remainder of 2005;

	•		The availability of third party contractors for drilling rigs and completion services (although the Company has one rig under contract in the Fort Worth Basin); and

	•		The approval by regulatory agencies of applications for permits to drill in a timely manner.

Oilfield Services

Consolidated expects to increase its oilfield service revenue during 2005 due to the increase in the number of wells being drilled and completed by property owners in its service areas and possibly through strategic acquisitions. These acquisitions would be done in order to:

	•		expand the services that are provided;

	•		expand the area that is serviced; and

	•		gain market share by providing services complementary to Consolidated’s existing services.

Revenues from oilfield services are expected to be between $9.0 million and $9.5 million during the remainder of 2005. Management believes that if it is able to identify strategic acquisitions during the remainder of 2005, it would expect to fund any such acquisitions, which could individually cost up to $15 million, through external financings, which may include the issuance of subordinated debt or equity securities. Excluding acquisitions and related capital expenditures, Consolidated also expects to have capital expenditures of approximately $1 million related to equipment and facilities during the remainder of 2005. These capital expenditures would be financed through cash flow from operations and cash on hand.

Corporate Activities

Infinity continues to negotiate the final development and production agreement with INE for the Perlas and Tyra blocks offshore Nicaragua. Management expects to complete the negotiations and execute the agreement in the third quarter of 2005. Upon execution, Infinity would be required to post a performance bond of approximately $0.7 million for the initial work on the leases which will include an environmental study and the development of geological information developed from additional evaluation of existing seismic data.

Results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2004

Net Income (Loss)

Infinity reported net income after taxes of $4.4 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net loss after taxes of $1.1 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, in the prior year period. The change between years was the result of the items discussed below.

Revenue

Infinity achieved total revenue of $7.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $5.1 million in the prior year period. The $2.6 million, or 52%, increase in revenue consisted of a $2.1 million increase in oilfield service revenue and a $0.5 million increase in oil and gas revenue. The increase in oilfield service revenue was principally attributable to an increase in the number of fracturing jobs and acidizing jobs completed in the 2005 period compared to the 2004 period. The increase in oil and gas revenue was the result of improved price realizations for both oil and gas combined with higher oil sales volumes, partially offset by lower gas sales volumes. The increase in oil sales volumes was due primarily to successful developmental drilling in the Sand Wash Basin in Northwest Colorado. Declines in gas sales volumes from the Company’s Pipeline field were partially offset by new production from exploratory drilling results in the Fort Worth Basin.

Cost of Revenue

Infinity’s cost of revenue increased to $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $2.6 million in the prior year period. Oilfield service costs increased to $2.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $1.9 million in the prior year period. The increase was principally attributable to increased materials, maintenance, fuel and labor costs in the 2005 period compared to the 2004 period. Oil and gas production expenses increased to $1.0 million, or $3.00 per Mcfe, during the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $0.5 million, or $1.66 per Mcfe, in the prior year period. The increase in production expenses was attributable to costs incurred at the Company’s Sand Wash Basin property, which began producing in March 2005, and Fort Worth Basin properties, which began producing in the second quarter of 2005. Oil and gas production taxes remained constant at $0.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

Gross Profit

Infinity earned a gross profit of $3.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005, a $1.4 million or 59% increase from $2.5 million gross profit in the prior year period. Gross profit from oilfield services was $2.9 million, or 54% of revenue, during the three months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $1.5 million, or 44% of revenue, in the prior year period. The improvement in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was due principally to increased utilization of personnel and equipment. Gross profit from oil and gas operations remained constant at $1.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $1.5 million from the prior year period. The decrease was largely due to an increase in capitalized general and administrative expenses in the 2005 period as a result of increased drilling and acquisition activity, partially offset by increased salaries.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion

Infinity recognized additional depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion (“DD&A”) expense of approximately $0.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase to approximately $1.8 million compared to DD&A expense of approximately $1.3 million for the prior year period. The increase in DD&A expense was due to an increase in oil and gas producing properties as a result of the Company’s exploration and development program and increased investment in Consolidated’s fleet.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income and expense was a net income of $3.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net expense of $0.7 million in the prior year period. The change of $4.3 million was principally due to (i) a $0.1 million increase in interest expense due to an increase in average debt outstanding and higher average interest rates, (ii) the write-off of $0.4 million of unamortized debt and loan issuance costs from debt retired during the three months ended June 30, 2005, and (iii) an impairment of approximately $0.4 million related to the sale of a note receivable, offset by (i) a $5.0 million credit resulting from the decrease in the fair value of derivative liabilities, and (ii) a $0.2 million decrease in loan amortization costs resulting from loan costs written off in connection with debt retirement.

Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004

Net Loss

Infinity incurred a net loss after taxes of $5.1 million, or $0.41 per diluted share, in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net loss after taxes of $2.9 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, in the prior year period. The increase in net loss was the result of the items discussed below.

Revenue

Infinity achieved total revenue of $13.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $8.6 million in the prior year period. The $4.6 million, or 53%, increase in revenue consisted of a $4.0 million increase in oilfield service revenue and a $0.6 million increase in oil and gas revenue. The increase in oilfield service revenue was principally attributable to an increase in the number of fracturing jobs, acidizing jobs and cementing jobs completed in the 2005 period compared to the 2004 period. The increase in oil and gas revenue was the result of improved price realizations for both oil and gas combined with higher oil sales volumes, partially offset by lower gas sales volumes. The increase in oil sales volumes was due primarily to successful developmental drilling in the Sand Wash Basin in Northwest Colorado. Declines in gas sales volumes from the Company’s Pipeline field were partially offset by new production from exploratory drilling results in the Fort Worth Basin.

Cost of Revenue

Infinity’s cost of revenue increased to $6.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $4.6 million in the prior year period. Oilfield service costs increased to $4.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $3.3 million in the prior year period. The increase was principally attributable to increased materials, maintenance, fuel and labor costs in the 2005 period compared to the 2004 period. Oil and gas production expenses increased to $1.4 million, or $2.40 per Mcfe, during the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $0.9 million, or $1.61 per Mcfe, in the prior year period. The increase in production expenses was attributable to costs incurred at the Company’s Sand Wash Basin property, which began producing in March 2005, and Fort Worth Basin properties, which began producing in the second quarter of 2005. Oil and gas production taxes remained constant at $0.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

Gross Profit

Infinity earned a gross profit of $6.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005, a $2.7 million, or 68%, increase from $4.1 million gross profit in the prior year period. Gross profit from oilfield services was $5.0 million, or 53% of revenue, during the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $2.3 million, or 41% of revenue, in the prior year period. The improvement in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was due principally to increased utilization of personnel and equipment. Gross profit from oil and gas operations remained constant at $1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $2.7 million from the prior year period. The decrease was largely due to an increase in capitalized general and administrative expenses in the 2005 period as a result of increased drilling and acquisition activity, partially offset by increased salaries.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion

Infinity recognized additional DD&A expense of approximately $1.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase to approximately $3.4 million compared to DD&A expense of approximately $2.4 million for the prior year period. The increase in DD&A expense was due to an increase in oil and gas producing properties as a result of the Company’s exploration and development program and increased investment in Consolidated’s fleet.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income and expense was a net expense of $5.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to a net expense of $1.8 million in the prior year period. The increase of $4.1 million was principally due to (i) $1.1 million of additional early extinguishment of debt expense resulting from additional debt retired during the six months ended June 30, 2005, (ii) a $0.3 million increase in interest expense due to an increase in average debt outstanding and higher

average interest rates, (iii) an impairment of approximately $0.4 million related to the sale of a note receivable, and (iv) a $2.9 million charge resulting from the increase in the fair value of derivative liabilities, partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in amortization costs resulting from loan costs written off in connection with debt retirement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Infinity’s primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and debt and equity financing. Infinity’s primary needs for cash are for the operation, development, production, exploration and acquisition of oil and gas properties, for fulfillment of working capital obligations, and for the operation and development of the oilfield service business.

As of June 30, 2005, the Company had working capital of $2.4 million, compared to working capital of $0.3 million at December 31, 2004. The $2.1 million increase in working capital is largely the result of cash provided by operations (prior to changes in working capital components) during the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $3.2 million, and cash provided by financing activities of $22.6 million, partially offset by cash used in investing activities of $23.2 million and the satisfaction of $0.2 million of interest through the issuance of common stock upon conversion of convertible notes.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, cash provided by operating activities was $2.1 million, compared to $0.9 million in the prior year period. The increase in cash provided by operating activities of $1.2 million was primarily due to improved gross profit and slightly lower general and administrative expenses, partially offset by increased interest expense, cash expenses paid in connection with early extinguishment of debt and a decrease in net changes in operating assets and liabilities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, Infinity used $23.2 million in investing activities, compared to $5.0 million used in the prior year period. The increase in cash used in investing activities of $18.2 million was primarily attributable to an $18.4 million increase in exploration and production capital expenditures related to the Company’s exploration and development program and a $1.7 million increase in oilfield services capital expenditures, partially offset by a decrease of $1.7 million in oilfield services and exploration and production acquisition costs.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, cash provided by financing activities was $22.6 million, compared to $4.0 million provided by financing activities during the prior year period. The increase in cash provided by financing activities of $18.6 million was principally due to the net cash proceeds provided by the sale of $30 million of Senior Secured Notes, discussed below, partially offset by the payment of issuance costs and debt repayment of $11.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005.

Senior Secured Notes Facility

Under certain circumstances at quarterly intervals and over a three year period, commencing in the third quarter of 2005, Infinity has the option to sell additional notes, along with warrants, in amounts up to $15 million in any rolling twelve-month period and up to a maximum $45 million. The additional Notes would have an initial maturity of 42 months (54 months if the maturity of the initial Notes is extended). The issuance of additional Notes is subject to Infinity’s satisfaction of various closing conditions. The ability to issue additional Notes or the requirement to prepay Notes prior to maturity will depend upon a maximum Notes balance calculated quarterly based generally upon a combination of financial performance of Consolidated and the SEC after-tax PV-10% value of the Company’s proved reserves. The maximum Notes balance at June 30, 2005 exceeded the Notes outstanding on that date.

During the first quarter of 2005, all $2.5 million of the Company’s 8% Subordinated Convertible Notes outstanding as of December 31, 2004, and interest accrued on those notes, were converted in their entirety into 517,296 shares of the Company’s common stock.

During the first and second quarters of 2005, an aggregate of $11.5 million of the Company’s 7% Subordinated Convertible Notes and interest accrued on those notes were converted into an aggregate 1,498,940 shares of the Company’s common stock. The remaining balance of $38,000 plus accrued interest was paid in full on April 22, 2005.

As a result of the closing of the Senior Secured Notes Facility, the $3.6 million outstanding under the LaSalle Bank, N.A. facility at December 31, 2004, was repaid in full on January 13, 2005. Also as a result of the closing of the Senior Secured Notes Facility, the $5.0 million outstanding under the U.S. Bank National Association facility at December 31, 2004, was repaid in full on January 13, 2005.

Outlook for 2005

Depending on the availability of capital resources, the availability of third party contractors for drilling and completion services, and satisfaction of regulatory activities, Infinity could incur capital expenditures in the range of $22 million to $26 million during the remainder of 2005. If capital expenditures are in the middle of the anticipated range, capital expenditures by operating entity would be approximately $17 million by Infinity-Texas; $5 million by Infinity-Wyoming; $1 million by Consolidated and $1 million by Infinity, Inc. The Company could also make capital expenditures for acquisitions in excess of these amounts should appropriate opportunities arise.

At quarterly intervals and over a three year period, commencing in the third quarter of 2005, Infinity has the option under the Senior Secured Notes Facility to sell additional notes, along with warrants, in amounts up to $15 million in any rolling twelve-month period. The ability to issue additional notes will depend upon a maximum notes balance calculated quarterly based generally upon a combination of financial performance of Consolidated and the SEC after-tax PV-10% value of our proved reserves. The maximum Notes balance or Free Cash Flow Amount as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $52.3 million.

Depending on the market price for crude oil and natural gas during 2005, stabilized production levels from wells placed on line during the six months ended June 30, 2005, and continued demand for and acceptance of oilfield service operations in the geographic areas served by Consolidated, Infinity would expect to generate cash flow of at least $7 million from operating activities during the remainder of 2005.

During the third quarter of 2005, through August 4, 2005, Infinity has received approximately $0.5 million in proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants. Management expects to receive proceeds from additional exercises during 2005, but is unable to predict the amount or timing of such proceeds.

In summary, Infinity believes that it may have approximately $25 million available to it in the remainder of 2005 from working capital at June 30, 2005 (approximately $2.4 million), external financing, including the planned sale of additional notes under the Senior Secured Notes Facility ($15 million), cash from operating activities (at least $7 million) and proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants (at least $0.5 million), to fund its planned capital expenditures of between $22 million and $26 million during the remainder of 2005.

Should Infinity identify acquisition opportunities, or if it wishes to accelerate the exploration and development of its oil and gas properties beyond that currently anticipated, or if cash flow from operating activities is not at levels anticipated, or if Infinity is unable to sell additional notes and warrants under the Senior Secured Notes Facility, Infinity may seek the forward sale of oil and gas production, partnerships or strategic alliances for the development of its undeveloped acreage, the public or private offering of common or preferred equity or subordinated debt, asset sales, or other joint interest or joint venture opportunities to fund any cash shortfalls, or Infinity would decrease the level of its planned capital expenditures.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Infinity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, described the accounting policies that we believe are critical to the reporting of our financial position and results of operations and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. The most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are:

•

Remaining proved oil and gas reserves (reserve estimates),

	•		Timing of our future drilling activities,

	•		Accruals of operating costs, capital expenditures in progress, and revenue,

	•		Estimated useful life of equipment utilized in the oilfield service business,

	•		Estimated timing and cost related to asset retirement obligations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005, supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values, beginning with the first annual period after June 15, 2005, with early adoption encouraged. The pro forma disclosures, previously permitted under SFAS No. 123, no longer will be an alternative to financial statement recognition. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the tax benefits in excess of recognized compensation expenses to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement may serve to reduce the Company’s future cash provided by operating activities and increase future cash provided by financing activities, to the extent of associated tax benefits that may be realized in the future.

Under SFAS No. 123(R), Infinity must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost, and the transition method to be used at date of adoption. The transition methods include prospective and retroactive adoption options. Under the retroactive options, prior periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R); the retroactive methods would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with the first period restated. Infinity is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R), and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will not have a material impact on consolidated results of operations and earnings per share as all outstanding options are fully vested.

In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 which expressed the views of the SEC regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations. SAB No. 107 provides guidance related to the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies, including assumptions such as expected volatility and expected term. In April 2005, the SEC approved a rule that delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) for public companies. As a result, SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective for Infinity on January 1, 2006.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (“SFAS 153”). SFAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No.153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have on consolidated results of operations and financial condition but does not expect it to have a material impact.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Commodity Risk

Infinity’s major market risk exposure is in the pricing applicable to its oil and gas production. Realized pricing is primarily driven by the prevailing price for crude oil and spot prices applicable to Infinity’s crude oil and natural gas production. Historically, prices received for gas production have been volatile and unpredictable. Pricing volatility is expected to continue. Excluding sales under a fixed price contract which averaged $4.70 per Mcf, gas price realizations ranged from a low of $5.81 to a high of $6.91 per Mcf during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Oil price realizations ranged from a low of $43.12 per barrel to a high of $56.13 per barrel during that period.

Infinity-Wyoming periodically enters into fixed-price physical contracts and commodity derivative contracts on a portion of its projected natural gas and crude oil production in accordance with its Energy Risk Management Policy. These activities are intended to support cash flow at certain levels by reducing the exposure to oil and gas price fluctuations.

During 2004, Infinity-Wyoming entered into the following fixed price gas delivery contracts:


Delivery Dates	MMBtu Per Day		Fixed Price
April 1, 2004 — March 31, 2005		2,000	$	4.40
April 1, 2005 — March 31, 2006		2,000	$	4.15

Sales under these fixed price contracts are accounted for as normal sales agreements under the exemption in SFAS No. 133. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the effect of Infinity-Wyoming selling a portion of its gas production under a fixed price contract, compared to if it had sold the gas on the spot market, was a decrease in revenue of approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The effect on the six months ended June 30, 2004, was a decrease in revenue of approximately $0.1 million.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Infinity-Wyoming entered into two costless collar arrangements to manage exposure to oil price volatility on a portion of its oil production. The following table sets forth the terms of Infinity-Wyoming’s collar arrangements as of June 30, 2005:


Effective Dates	Bbls Per Day		Floor Price		Ceiling Price
May 1, 2005 — December 31, 2005		50	$	50.00	$	65.70
January 1, 2006 — June 30, 2006		50	$	50.00	$	64.40

Subsequent to June 30, 2005, Infinity-Wyoming entered into a third costless collar arrangement as detailed in the following table:


Effective Dates	Bbls Per Day		Floor Price		Ceiling Price
October 1, 2005 — December 31, 2006		50	$	52.50	$	74.00

All of Infinity-Wyoming’s collar arrangements have been designated as cash flow hedges.

The Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 13, 2005 by and among Infinity and the Buyers of the Notes includes a covenant that at each date that is the end of a quarterly or annual period covered by a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or annual report on Form 10-K (a “Determination Date”), at least 20% of the Company’s estimate of its oil and gas production for the twelve-month period commencing immediately after such Determination Date shall be protected from price fluctuations using derivatives, fixed price agreements and/or volumetric production payments. It is the opinion of management that the Company was in compliance with this hedging requirement at June 30, 2005.

Interest Rate Risk

Infinity’s exposure to changes in interest rates results from our $30 million in floating rate debt. The result of a 10% fluctuation in the 3 month LIBOR would impact our interest expense, before capitalization, by approximately $0.1 million per year.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined as a company’s controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. At the time of the original filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, which is amended by this amendment, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for that purpose.

As a result of the Company’s review in February 2006 of a presentation on “Embedded Conversion Options and Freestanding Warrants” given at the AICPA’s December 2005 33rd National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, management concluded that the accounting for the Company’s Senior Secured Notes, related warrants and previously issued non-employee options and warrants should be corrected to account for certain derivative and embedded derivatives in those instruments. Management also concluded that this error resulted from a material weakness related to the Company’s level of staffing at March 31, 2005.

As a result of this conclusion and subsequent re-evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2005. In addition, management has identified certain deficiencies in its reconciliation procedures, and inherent limitations in its electronic data processing software. The Company has added additional accounting staff during the first and second quarters of 2005 to address these deficiencies and remediate the material weakness discussed above. The Company will also assess the viability of replacing or enhancing its electronic data processing software in 2006.

The certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A include, in paragraph 4 of such certifications, information concerning the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Such certifications should be read in conjunction with the information contained in this Item 4 for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by such certifications.

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are currently no pending material legal proceedings to which we are a party.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES

There were no changes in securities during the second quarter of 2005.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the second quarter of 2005.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On June 16, 2005, Infinity held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) at its office in Chanute, Kansas. The matters voted upon at the Annual Meeting consisted of five proposals set forth in Infinity’s Proxy Statement dated May 16, 2005. The five proposals submitted to a vote of Stockholders are set forth below:

	(a)		The election of five Directors of the Company to serve until the next Annual Meeting and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

	(b)		The reincorporation of Infinity, Inc. in the State of Delaware;

	(c)		The establishment of a classified Board of Directors;

	(d)		The approval of the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan;

	(e)		The ratification of the selection of Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman P.C., as Infinity’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The following sets forth the votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of abstentions, as to each of the proposals presented at the meeting:

Election of Directors:


Nominee	For		Withheld
Stanton E. Ross		12,714,870		135,827
James A. Tuell		12,709,754		140,943
Elliot M. Kaplan		12,496,190		354,507
Robert O. Lorenz		12,708,330		142,367
Leroy C. Richie		12,709,154		141,543

Reincorporation of Infinity, Inc. in the State of Delaware:


For	Against		Abstain
7,609,444		482,514		19,474

Establishment of a classified Board of Directors:


For	Against		Abstain
5,379,625		2,414,418		317,389

Approval of the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan:


For	Against		Abstain
6,796,210		979,860		335,362

Ratification of the selection of Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman P.C., as Infinity’s independent registered public accounting firm:


For	Against		Abstain
12,776,755		52,547		21,395

Each of the proposals presented at the Annual Meeting was approved, with the exception of the proposal to establish a classified Board of Directors, which required an affirmative vote of a majority of Infinity’s issued and outstanding common shares.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a)

Exhibits.

	31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

	99.1		Calculation of the Maximum Notes Balance at June 30, 2005 under the Senior Secured Notes Facility dated January 13, 2005

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Signature	Capacity	Date
/s/ James A. Tuell James A. Tuell	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	March 8, 2006
/s/ Timothy A. Ficker Timothy A. Ficker	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 8, 2006

EXHIBITS INDEX

Exhibit No


31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

99.1		Calculation of the Maximum Notes Balance at June 30, 2005 under the Senior Secured Notes Facility dated January 13, 2005

American Noble Gas (AMNI) 10-Q/A2005 Q2 Quarterly report (amended)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents