HOUSTON — July 28, 2011 —Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) today announced financial results for its second quarter ended June 30, 2011. Net income (a) for the quarter was $237 million, or $0.50 per diluted share, compared with $246 million, or $0.51 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2010. Revenues for the second quarter of 2011 were $3.35 billion compared with $3.16 billion for the same 2010 period, an increase of 6.0%.
The Company noted that results in the second quarter of 2011 included a number of unexpected items, including a decrease of $0.02 per diluted share from increased repair and maintenance expenses, a decrease of $0.01 per diluted share from risk management, and $0.01 per diluted share from litigation settlement costs.
David P. Steiner, Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, commented, “Our revenue continued the recent trend of year-over-year growth, increasing 6% compared with the second quarter of 2010, primarily because of higher commodity prices, improving recycling volumes, and collection and disposal yield.
“Recycling remained a significant contributor to earnings, and we continued to generate robust cash from operations, with $478 million of cash from operations in the quarter. In the first half of the year we made significant investments in our growth initiatives and cost reduction programs. These initiatives are largely performing according to our plans, and we expect to see the associated benefits in the third quarter and accelerating in future quarters.
“Internal revenue growth from volume declined by 1.7% in the second quarter of 2011. We expected to see stronger improvement during the second quarter, and we did see improved volumes in the first weeks of the quarter; but volumes hit a soft patch in May and June. Volumes look to be improving slightly in July, but given our first half volumes, we now expect to see volumes in the negative 1.5% to negative 2.5% range for the year.”
Steiner continued, “Our internal revenue growth from yield for our collection and disposal operations was 1.6%. It would have been close to 2.0% if not for weakness in two areas, Florida and the Gulf Coast. Both areas saw weakness in residential pricing related to large municipal contracts, and the Gulf Coast had a negative year-over-year comparison primarily related to last year’s oil spill project. In Florida we also had a shift in the mix of our roll-off volumes that negatively affected yield.”