UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
Investment Company Act file number: 811-05385
Deutsche Value Series, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154-0004
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 250-3220
Paul Schubert
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154-0004
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Date of fiscal year end: | 11/30 |
| |
Date of reporting period: | 11/30/2017 |
ITEM 1. | REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS |
November 30, 2017
Annual Report
to Shareholders
Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund
Contents
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain a summary prospectus, if available, or prospectus for any of our funds, refer to the Account Management Resources information provided in the back of this booklet. We advise you to consider the fund’s objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The summary prospectus and prospectus contain this and other important information about the fund. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
The fund will be managed using the CROCI® Investment Process which is based on portfolio management’s belief that, over time, stocks which display more favorable financial metrics (for example, the CROCI® Economic P/E Ratio) as generated by this process may outperform stocks which display less favorable metrics. This premise may not prove to be correct and prospective investors should evaluate this assumption prior to investing in the fund. Investing in derivatives entails special risks relating to liquidity, leverage and credit that may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Dividends are not guaranteed. If the dividend-paying stocks held by the fund reduce or stop paying dividends, the fund’s ability to generate income may be adversely affected. Preferred stocks, a type of dividend-paying stock, present certain additional risks. The fund may lend securities to approved institutions. Stocks may decline in value. See the prospectus for details.
Deutsche Asset Management represents the asset management activities conducted by Deutsche Bank AG or any of its subsidiaries.
NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE NOT A DEPOSIT NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
| | | | |
2 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
Letter to Shareholders
Dear Shareholder:
“Synchronous growth” is the catchphrase for the current market environment — positive momentum in the U.S. as well as for most of the major economies of the globe.
Overseas, both developed and emerging markets continue to improve, marked by low inflation rates, growing corporate earnings and attractive valuations. Here in the U.S., activity remains solid with only limited signs of overheating. Given the notable gains of the past year, a short-term pull-back would not be a surprise. Nevertheless, strong fundamentals remain supportive of this expansion, making it the second longest run in history this spring.
Solid income growth, improvements in net worth, manageable debt, elevated confidence and firm labor markets should continue to support consumer spending. Business investment is also showing signs of picking up, supported by improved confidence, favorable financial conditions and the recent tax reform bill.
The full effect of the new tax policy remains to be seen. While markets can respond almost instantly, and seem to have done so, the economy itself takes time to respond. Our economists believe that the net benefit may be fairly modest with the main beneficiaries being consumption and business investment.
All told, we believe this environment favors a long-term approach, with a focus on thoughtful asset, geographic and sector allocation, rather than market timing calls.
As always, we invite you to visit our website — deutschefunds.com — where you will find the most current insights from our CIO, economists and investment specialists.
Thank you for allowing us to help you address your investment needs.
Best regards,
| | |
| | Hepsen Uzcan President, Deutsche Funds |
Assumptions, estimates and opinions contained in this document constitute our judgment as of the date of the document and are subject to change without notice. Any projections are based on a number of assumptions as to market conditions and there can be no guarantee that any projected results will be achieved. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 3 | |
| | |
Portfolio Management Review | | (Unaudited) |
Market Overview and Fund Performance
All performance information below is historical and does not guarantee future results. Returns shown are for Class A shares, unadjusted for sales charges. Investment return and principal fluctuate, so your shares may be worth more or less when redeemed. Current performance may differ from performance data shown. Please visit deutschefunds.com for the most recent month-end performance of all share classes. Fund performance includes reinvestment of all distributions. Unadjusted returns do not reflect sales charges and would have been lower if they had. Please refer to pages 9 through 11 for more complete performance information.
Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund returned 21.04% in the 12-month period ended November 30, 2017, underperforming the 22.87% gain of the S&P 500® Index but outpacing the 16.55% average return for the funds in its Morningstar peer group, Large Value.
Investment Process
Portfolio management selects stocks that it believes offer economic value utilizing the CROCI® strategy as the primary factor, among other factors, and will seek above average dividend yield. The CROCI® strategy is an investment process based on a proprietary valuation technique that attempts to understand the value of a company by converting financial statement data into a set of economic inputs that are used to calculate a valuation metric called the CROCI® Economic Price Earnings Ratio which is comparable across markets, sectors and stocks. The CROCI® Economic Price Earnings Ratio seeks to measure the “real” economic value rather than the “accounting” value of a company’s invested capital, and the economic returns thereof. Portfolio management believes that, over time, companies with more favorable financial metrics, including CROCI® Economic Price Earnings Ratios, will outperform other companies. Portfolio Management employs a U.S.-specific strategy seeking to select approximately the forty best value companies under CROCI® coverage with additional screening on high dividend yield, dividend sustainability and price volatility.
The U.S. stock market performed very well in the past year, with steady gains, low volatility and a remarkable lack of any meaningful sell-offs. When the period began, the market was still in the midst of the rally brought about by the surprising results of the U.S. election and investors’ expectation for improving economic growth. The momentum carried into the first calendar quarter of 2017, due largely to positive investor sentiment stemming from the prospects for reduced regulation and lower taxes. While ongoing gridlock in Washington caused these hopes to wane
| | | | |
4 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
in the spring and summer, stocks nevertheless continued to rally as economic growth picked up steam and corporate earnings came in well above expectations. The annual period closed on a high note, with the revived outlook for tax cuts fueling a fresh upleg in stock prices from September onward.
Dividend stocks, as a group, trailed the broader market. Investors’ hearty appetite for risk fueled strong demand for the stocks of faster-growing and higher-risk companies, which worked to the benefit of the growth style. Conversely, value stocks and more conservative market segments — such as dividend payers — generally underperformed. The U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision to increase interest rates several times also pressured the relative performance of dividend stocks, as investors grew wary about the potential for bond yields to become more competitive over time.
Fund Performance
Although the underperformance of value-oriented dividend payers would ordinarily be expected to act as a headwind to the fund due to the nature of our approach, we nonetheless posted competitive results versus the S&P 500 Index and the Morningstar peer group. We believe a key reason for this favorable outcome is that even though value as a whole lagged, many of the stocks identified by the CROCI® process in fact performed quite well.
This trend was most evident in the consumer staples sector, where the fund’s investments outpaced the corresponding benchmark holdings by a comfortable margin. Phillip Morris International, Inc.*, which benefited from larger-than-expected cost reductions and an increase in its earnings guidance, was a key contributor in the sector. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. also performed very well as the retailer was well positioned to weather competition from Amazon.com, Inc.
The energy sector was an additional area of strength for the fund. We held a substantial underweight in energy, which was a significant positive given that it was the only sector to post a loss on the year. Further, our single holding in the category — Valero Energy Corp.* — gained ground due to its consistent operational performance. We sold the stock from the portfolio in July and the fund closed the period with a zero weighting in energy.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 5 | |
We added further value in the utilities sector, where we benefited from both an overweight position and favorable stock selection. NextEra Energy, Inc., an electricity producer that capitalized on the rising demand for renewables, made the largest contribution.
Outside of these areas, the biopharmaceutical company AbbVie, Inc.* —which rallied after reporting positive data for a new dermatitis treatment in Phase IIb clinical trials — was the leading contributor to performance. Hasbro Inc.*, which rose on the strength of better-than-expected profits, and McDonalds Corp., which continued to report gains in both earnings and top-line revenues, were also among the fund’s top performers in the annual period.
“We believe that focusing on individual stock picking, rather than trying to assess transitory economic factors or short-term market movements, is the most effective way to add value over the long term.“
On the negative side, our positioning in the information technology sector was the largest detractor from relative performance. The fund’s underweight position in tech stocks acted as a headwind by preventing us from fully participating in the gains for the market’s strongest-performing sector. In addition, we lost some ground through stock selection. The primary factor in our shortfall on this front was our zero weightings in the various large-cap growth companies that were the most important drivers of the tech sector’s robust gain, such as Facebook, Inc.* and Alphabet, Inc.*, among others. Positions in International Business Machines, Inc. and QUALCOMM Inc.*, which lagged due to weaker-than-expected revenues and legal uncertainties, respectively, were additional detractors. However, we made up for some of the shortfall through our positions in several strong-performing semiconductor stocks, including KLA-Tencor Corp. and Intel Corp.
Outside of technology, the retailer Target Corp. — which suffered from a combination of slowing sales and rising costs — was a notable detractor.
Investments in General Electric Co. and the pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. Inc. also cost the fund some relative performance.
| | | | |
6 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
Outlook and Positioning
We believe our unique approach, which looks beyond traditional metrics to assess companies’ true economic valuations, has created an element of “pent-up value” in the portfolio. According to Factset, the fund had a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 16.9 (based on one-year forward earnings estimates) as of November 30, 2017 versus 18.7 for the benchmark. The portfolio also compared favorably to the index in terms of its fundamentals, as shown by its higher return on equity (24.7% vs. 19.1%). We think these traits can help the fund generate competitive results if stocks continue to post gains, while also providing an element of defensiveness in the event of a market downturn.
At the end of November 2017, our bottom-up stock selection process led us to hold the largest overweight positions (vs. the S&P 500 Index) in the industrials, consumer staples and utilities sectors. Conversely, the fund’s most significant underweights were in financials, information technology, energy and real estate. The fund’s holdings typically vary widely from the broader market, as we strive to generate long-term outperformance through stock selection instead of attempting to match the return of the index.
While the market appears unlikely to maintain its pace of the past 12 months in the coming year, we think the backdrop for U.S. equities remains favorable due to continued strength in both economic growth and corporate profits. At the same time, however, geopolitical issues and uncertainty regarding U.S. Federal Reserve policy have the potential to create market disruptions. In this environment, we think our disciplined, systematic approach can add value. We believe that focusing on individual stock picking, rather than trying to assess transitory economic factors or short-term market movements, is the most effective way to generate outperformance over the long term. Additionally, we think the benefit of higher dividend yields may become more apparent in stocks’ total returns if market returns begin to cool somewhat from the unusually strong gains of the past year.
* | Not held in the portfolio as of November 30, 2017. |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 7 | |
Portfolio Manager
Di Kumble, CFA, Managing Director
Portfolio Manager of the fund. Began managing the fund in 2014.
– | Joined Deutsche Asset Management in 2003 with seven years of industry experience. Prior to joining, she served as a Portfolio Manager at Graham Capital Management. Previously, she worked as a Quantitative Strategist at ITG Inc. and Morgan Stanley. |
– | Portfolio Manager: New York. |
– | BS, Beijing University; PhD in Chemistry, Princeton University. |
The views expressed reflect those of the portfolio management team only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. The management team’s views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Terms to Know
The Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Index returns do not reflect fees or expenses and it is not possible to invest directly into an index.
Morningstar Large Value category portfolios invest primarily in big U.S. companies that are less expensive or growing more slowly than other large-cap stocks. Stocks in the top 70% of the capitalization of the U.S. equity market are defined as large cap. The average category returns for the one-, five- and 10-year periods ended 11/30/17 were 16.55%, 13.33% and 6.59%, respectively.
Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not reflect fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or category.
The consumer staples sector represents companies that produce essential items such as food, beverages and household products.
Overweight means the fund holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. Underweight means the fund holds a lower weighting.
Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio compares a company’s current share price to its per-share earnings. The CROCI® Economic P/E Ratio is a proprietary measure of company valuation calculated by the CROCI process via the adjustments to and normalizations of reported financial statements, conducted by CROCI’s team of company analysts.
Return on equity is the amount of net income returned as a percentage of shareholders’ equity.
| | | | |
8 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | |
Performance Summary | | November 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unadjusted for Sales Charge | | | 21.04% | | | | 12.87% | | | | 4.12% | |
Adjusted for the Maximum Sales Charge (max 5.75% load) | | | 14.08% | | | | 11.54% | | | | 3.50% | |
S&P 500® Index† | | | 22.87% | | | | 15.74% | | | | 8.30% | |
| | | |
Class T | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unadjusted for Sales Charge | | | 21.10% | | | | 12.93% | | | | 4.22% | |
Adjusted for the Maximum Sales Charge (max 2.50% load) | | | 18.07% | | | | 12.36% | | | | 3.96% | |
S&P 500® Index† | | | 22.87% | | | | 15.74% | | | | 8.30% | |
| | | |
Class C | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unadjusted for Sales Charge | | | 20.13% | | | | 12.02% | | | | 3.33% | |
Adjusted for the Maximum Sales Charge (max 1.00% CDSC) | | | 20.13% | | | | 12.02% | | | | 3.33% | |
S&P 500® Index† | | | 22.87% | | | | 15.74% | | | | 8.30% | |
| | | |
Class R | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No Sales Charges | | | 20.75% | | | | 12.59% | | | | 3.82% | |
S&P 500® Index† | | | 22.87% | | | | 15.74% | | | | 8.30% | |
| | | |
Class R6 | | | | | 1-Year | | | Life of Class* | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No Sales Charges | | | | | | | 21.49% | | | | 9.24% | |
S&P 500® Index† | | | | | | | 22.87% | | | | 11.02% | |
| | | |
Class S | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No Sales Charges | | | 21.36% | | | | 13.15% | | | | 4.34% | |
S&P 500® Index† | | | 22.87% | | | | 15.74% | | | | 8.30% | |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Institutional Class | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No Sales Charges | | | 21.38% | | | | 13.17% | | | | 4.45% | |
S&P 500® Index† | | | 22.87% | | | | 15.74% | | | | 8.30% | |
Performance in the Average Annual Total Returns table(s) above and the Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment line graph that follows is historical and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal fluctuate, so your shares may be worth more or less when redeemed. Current performance may differ from performance data shown. Please visit deutschefunds.com for the Fund’s most recent month-end performance. Fund performance includes reinvestment of all distributions. Unadjusted returns do not reflect sales charges and would have been lower if they had.
The gross expense ratios of the Fund, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated March 16, 2017 are 1.05%, 1.07%, 1.81%, 1.40%, 0.72%, 0.83% and 0.79% for Class A, Class T, Class C, Class R, Class R6, Class S and Institutional Class shares, respectively, and may differ from the expense ratios disclosed in the Financial Highlights tables in this report.
Index returns do not reflect any fees or expenses and it is not possible to invest directly into an index.
Performance figures do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
Returns shown for Class T shares for the period prior to its inception on June 5, 2017 are derived from the historical performance of Institutional Class shares of Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund during such periods and have been adjusted to reflect the higher total annual operating expenses. Any difference in expenses will affect performance.
Prior to April 1, 2014, the Fund had a different investment management team that operated with a different investment strategy. Performance prior to April 1, 2014 would have been different if the Fund’s current strategy had been in effect.
Generally accepted accounting principles require adjustments to be made to the net assets of the Fund at period end for financial reporting purposes only, and as such, the total return based on the unadjusted net asset value per share may differ from the total return reported in the financial highlights.
| | | | |
10 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
|
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment (Adjusted for Maximum Sales Charge) |
The Fund’s growth of an assumed $10,000 investment is adjusted for the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. This results in a net initial investment of $9,425.
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Performance of other share classes will vary based on the sales charges and the fee structure of those classes.
* | Class R6 shares commenced operations on March 2, 2015. |
† | The Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A | | | Class T | | | Class C | | | Class R | | | Class R6 | | | Class S | | | Institutional Class | |
Net Asset Value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11/30/17 | | $ | 57.53 | | | $ | 57.52 | | | $ | 57.31 | | | $ | 57.39 | | | $ | 57.60 | | | $ | 57.55 | | | $ | 57.57 | |
6/5/17 (commencement of operations of Class T) | | $ | — | | | $ | 53.26 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
11/30/16 | | $ | 48.38 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 48.20 | | | $ | 48.26 | | | $ | 48.40 | | | $ | 48.39 | | | $ | 48.40 | |
Distribution Information as of 11/30/17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Dividends, Twelve Months | | $ | .93 | | | $ | .48 | | | $ | .53 | | | $ | .80 | | | $ | 1.08 | | | $ | 1.06 | | | $ | 1.06 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Portfolio Summary | | | (Unaudited) | |
| | |
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio) | | 11/30/17 | | | 11/30/16 | |
Common Stocks | | | 100% | | | | 99% | |
Cash Equivalents | | | 0% | | | | 1% | |
| | | 100% | | | | 100% | |
| | |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Cash Equivalents) | | 11/30/17 | | | 11/30/16 | |
Consumer Staples | | | 21% | | | | 14% | |
Industrials | | | 17% | | | | 26% | |
Utilities | | | 15% | | | | 14% | |
Health Care | | | 14% | | | | 12% | |
Consumer Discretionary | | | 13% | | | | 8% | |
Information Technology | | | 12% | | | | 15% | |
Financials | | | 5% | | | | 3% | |
Materials | | | 3% | | | | — | |
Telecommunication Services | | | — | | | | 5% | |
Energy | | | — | | | | 3% | |
| | | 100% | | | | 100% | |
| | | | | | | | |
Ten Largest Equity Holdings at November 30, 2017 (26.4% of Net Assets) | | Percent | |
| 1 | | | The JM Smucker Co. | | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | Manufactures and markets food products worldwide | | | | |
| 2 | | | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | Operator of discount stores and super centers | | | | |
| 3 | | | Garmin Ltd. | | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | Provides navigation, communications and information devices | | | | |
| 4 | | | Intel Corp. | | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | Designer, manufacturer and seller of computer components and related products | | | | |
| 5 | | | Apple, Inc. | | | 2.6 | % |
| | | | Designs, manufactures and markets personal computers and related computing and mobile communication devices | | | | |
| 6 | | | Cisco Systems, Inc. | | | 2.6 | % |
| | | | Developer of computer network products | | | | |
| 7 | | | Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | | | 2.6 | % |
| | | | Operates retail drugstores | | | | |
| 8 | | | Home Depot, Inc. | | | 2.6 | % |
| | | | Home improvement products retailer | | | | |
| 9 | | | Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | | | 2.6 | % |
| | | | Designs and manufactures fasteners and components, equipment and consumable systems | | | | |
| 10 | | | Kimberly-Clark Corp. | | | 2.6 | % |
| | | | Global health and hygiene company, a manufacturer and provider of consumer products | | | | |
Portfolio holdings and characteristics are subject to change.
For more complete details about the fund’s investment portfolio, see page 13. A quarterly Fact Sheet is available on deutschefunds.com or upon request. Please see the Account Management Resources section on page 52 for contact information.
| | | | |
12 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | |
Investment Portfolio | | as of November 30, 2017 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks 99.6% | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary 12.7% | | | | | | | | |
Distributors 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
Genuine Parts Co. | | | 309,806 | | | | 28,802,664 | |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 167,269 | | | | 28,765,250 | |
Household Durables 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Garmin Ltd. | | | 485,928 | | | | 30,166,410 | |
Multiline Retail 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Target Corp. | | | 442,796 | | | | 26,523,480 | |
Specialty Retail 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
Home Depot, Inc. | | | 164,783 | | | | 29,631,279 | |
| | |
Consumer Staples 20.6% | | | | | | | | |
Beverages 7.5% | | | | | | | | |
Coca-Cola Co. | | | 594,205 | | | | 27,196,763 | |
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. | | | 322,579 | | | | 29,093,400 | |
PepsiCo, Inc. | | | 249,949 | | | | 29,124,057 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 85,414,220 | |
Food & Staples Retailing 5.3% | | | | | | | | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 311,584 | | | | 30,295,312 | |
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | | | 407,543 | | | | 29,652,829 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 59,948,141 | |
Food Products 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
The JM Smucker Co. | | | 266,280 | | | | 31,066,888 | |
Household Products 5.1% | | | | | | | | |
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | | | 243,439 | | | | 29,154,255 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. | | | 315,696 | | | | 28,409,483 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 57,563,738 | |
| | |
Financials 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Banks | | | | | | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 271,453 | | | | 28,372,267 | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 495,153 | | | | 27,961,290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 56,333,557 | |
Health Care 14.1% | | | | | | | | |
Biotechnology 4.7% | | | | | | | | |
Amgen, Inc. | | | 154,693 | | | | 27,173,372 | |
Gilead Sciences, Inc. | | | 346,934 | | | | 25,943,725 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 53,117,097 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Value ($) | |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Medtronic PLC | | | 348,700 | | | | 28,638,731 | |
Pharmaceuticals 6.9% | | | | | | | | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 192,135 | | | | 26,770,169 | |
Merck & Co., Inc. | | | 437,980 | | | | 24,207,155 | |
Pfizer, Inc. | | | 759,060 | | | | 27,523,516 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 78,500,840 | |
| | |
Industrials 16.9% | | | | | | | | |
Aerospace & Defense 7.4% | | | | | | | | |
Lockheed Martin Corp. | | | 86,981 | | | | 27,757,377 | |
Raytheon Co. | | | 144,758 | | | | 27,670,492 | |
United Technologies Corp. | | | 228,949 | | | | 27,805,856 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 83,233,725 | |
Electrical Equipment 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
Eaton Corp. PLC | | | 347,109 | | | | 26,998,138 | |
Industrial Conglomerates 4.5% | | | | | | | | |
3M Co. | | | 116,046 | | | | 28,215,424 | |
General Electric Co. | | | 1,270,895 | | | | 23,244,670 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 51,460,094 | |
Machinery 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | | | 174,484 | | | | 29,531,417 | |
| | |
Information Technology 12.7% | | | | | | | | |
Communications Equipment 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | | | 796,015 | | | | 29,691,360 | |
IT Services 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 178,185 | | | | 27,435,144 | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Intel Corp. | | | 672,015 | | | | 30,133,153 | |
KLA-Tencor Corp. | | | 258,172 | | | | 26,395,505 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 56,528,658 | |
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Apple, Inc. | | | 175,187 | | | | 30,105,886 | |
| | |
Materials 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Chemicals | | | | | | | | |
LyondellBasell Industries NV “A” | | | 274,997 | | | | 28,792,186 | |
| | |
Utilities 15.1% | | | | | | | | |
Electric Utilities 10.0% | | | | | | | | |
American Electric Power Co., Inc. | | | 375,163 | | | | 29,123,904 | |
Eversource Energy | | | 441,582 | | | | 28,636,593 | |
NextEra Energy, Inc. | | | 179,351 | | | | 28,344,632 | |
PPL Corp. | | | 733,447 | | | | 26,895,501 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 113,000,630 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
| | | | |
14 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Value ($) | |
Multi-Utilities 5.1% | | | | | | | | |
DTE Energy Co. | | | 248,475 | | | | 28,716,256 | |
Sempra Energy | | | 239,857 | | | | 29,020,298 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 57,736,554 | |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $960,435,264) | | | | | | | 1,128,986,087 | |
| | |
Cash Equivalents 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Deutsche Central Cash Management Government Fund, 1.12% (a) (Cost $3,633,610) | | | 3,633,610 | | | | 3,633,610 | |
| | |
| | % of Net Assets | | | Value ($) | |
Total Investments Portfolio (Cost $964,068,874) | | | 99.9 | | | | 1,132,619,697 | |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | | | 0.1 | | | | 1,413,562 | |
| |
Net Assets | | | 100.0 | | | | 1,134,033,259 | |
(a) | Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end. |
Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The level assigned to the securities valuations may not be an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of November 30, 2017 in valuing the Fund’s investments. For information on the Fund’s policy regarding the valuation of investments, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Common Stocks (b) | | $ | 1,128,986,087 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,128,986,087 | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 3,633,610 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,633,610 | |
Total | | $ | 1,132,619,697 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,132,619,697 | |
There have been no transfers between fair value measurement levels during the year ended November 30, 2017.
(b) | See Investment Portfolio for additional detailed categorizations. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 15 | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | |
as of November 30, 2017 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Assets | | | | |
Investments in non-affiliated securities, at value (cost $960,435,264) | | $ | 1,128,986,087 | |
Investment in Deutsche Central Cash Management Government Fund (cost $3,633,610) | | | 3,633,610 | |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $62) | | | 53 | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 346,144 | |
Dividends receivable | | | 3,648,495 | |
Interest receivable | | | 5,272 | |
Other assets | | | 53,951 | |
Total assets | | | 1,136,673,612 | |
| |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 777,561 | |
Accrued management fee | | | 563,839 | |
Accrued Directors’ fees | | | 9,338 | |
Other accrued expenses and payables | | | 1,289,615 | |
Total liabilities | | | 2,640,353 | |
Net assets, at value | | $ | 1,134,033,259 | |
| |
Net Assets Consist of | | | | |
Undistributed net investment income | | | 14,552,280 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | | | | |
Investments | | | 168,550,823 | |
Foreign currency | | | (9 | ) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) | | | (51,760 | ) |
Paid-in capital | | | 950,981,925 | |
Net assets, at value | | $ | 1,134,033,259 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
| | | | |
16 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of November 30, 2017 (continued) | | |
| | | | |
| |
Net Asset Value | | | | |
| | | | |
Class A | | | | |
Net Asset Value and redemption price per share ($909,690,879 ÷ 15,812,436 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.01 par value, 560,000,000 shares authorized) | | $ | 57.53 | |
Maximum offering price per share (100 ÷ 94.25 of $57.53) | | $ | 61.04 | |
Class T | | | | |
Net Asset Value offering and redemption price per share ($10,896 ÷ 189.43 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized) | | $ | 57.52 | |
Maximum offering price per share (100 ÷ 97.50 of $57.52) | | $ | 58.99 | |
Class C | | | | |
Net Asset Value offering and redemption price per share ($123,755,788 ÷ 2,159,318 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.01 par value, 140,000,000 shares authorized) | | $ | 57.31 | |
Class R | | | | |
Net Asset Value offering and redemption price per share ($2,056,866 ÷ 35,842 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized) | | $ | 57.39 | |
Class R6 | | | | |
Net Asset Value offering and redemption price per share ($176,928 ÷ 3,071.93 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized) | | $ | 57.60 | |
Class S | | | | |
Net Asset Value offering and redemption price per share ($60,544,950 ÷ 1,052,050 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized) | | $ | 57.55 | |
Institutional Class | | | | |
Net Asset Value offering and redemption price per share ($37,796,952 ÷ 656,594 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.01 par value, 240,000,000 shares authorized) | | $ | 57.57 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 17 | |
Statement of Operations
| | | | |
for the year ended November 30, 2017 | | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Investment Income | | | | |
Income: | | | | |
Dividends | | $ | 31,007,940 | |
Income distributions — Deutsche Central Cash Management Government Fund | | | 51,810 | |
Securities lending income, net of borrower rebates | | | 661 | |
Total income | | | 31,060,411 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fee | | | 6,606,480 | |
Services to shareholders | | | 1,629,891 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 3,381,977 | |
Custodian fee | | | 10,494 | |
Professional fees | | | 114,298 | |
Reports to shareholders | | | 84,493 | |
Registration fees | | | 105,025 | |
Directors’ fees and expenses | | | 58,529 | |
Other | | | 64,204 | |
Total expenses before expense reductions | | | 12,055,391 | |
Expense reductions | | | (27,700 | ) |
Total expenses after expense reductions | | | 12,027,691 | |
Net investment income | | | 19,032,720 | |
| |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investments | | | 101,488,084 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | | | | |
Investments | | | 87,263,704 | |
Foreign currency | | | 2 | |
| | | 87,263,706 | |
Net gain (loss) | | | 188,751,790 | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | $ | 207,784,510 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
| | | | |
18 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | $ | 19,032,720 | | | $ | 19,639,861 | |
Net realized gain (loss) | | | 101,488,084 | | | | (14,181,462 | ) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 87,263,706 | | | | 119,275,102 | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | 207,784,510 | | | | 124,733,501 | |
Distributions to shareholders from: | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (15,567,026 | ) | | | (16,099,512 | ) |
Class T* | | | (90 | ) | | | — | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (1,720 | )** |
Class C | | | (1,314,701 | ) | | | (1,565,426 | ) |
Class R | | | (31,600 | ) | | | (42,475 | ) |
Class R6 | | | (3,491 | ) | | | (232 | ) |
Class S | | | (1,061,673 | ) | | | (727,401 | ) |
Institutional Class | | | (671,271 | ) | | | (588,286 | ) |
Total distributions | | | (18,649,852 | ) | | | (19,025,052 | ) |
Fund share transactions: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 99,195,123 | | | | 100,738,862 | |
Reinvestment of distributions | | | 17,595,853 | | | | 17,897,555 | |
Payments for shares redeemed | | | (225,598,605 | ) | | | (189,757,023 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | | (108,807,629 | ) | | | (71,120,606 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | | | 80,327,029 | | | | 34,587,843 | |
Net assets at beginning of year | | | 1,053,706,230 | | | | 1,019,118,387 | |
Net assets at end of year (including undistributed net investment income of $14,552,280 and $14,169,412, respectively) | | $ | 1,134,033,259 | | | $ | 1,053,706,230 | |
* | For the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations of Class T) to November 30, 2017. |
** | For the period from December 1, 2015 to February 10, 2016 (see Note A). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 19 | |
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | |
Class A | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
Selected Per Share Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 48.38 | | | $ | 43.59 | | | $ | 46.79 | | | $ | 42.20 | | | $ | 34.83 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment incomea | | | .95 | | | | .91 | | | | .79 | | | | .90 | | | | .75 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 9.13 | | | | 4.76 | | | | (3.02 | ) | | | 4.50 | | | | 7.59 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 10.08 | | | | 5.67 | | | | (2.23 | ) | | | 5.40 | | | | 8.34 | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (.93 | ) | | | (.88 | ) | | | (.97 | ) | | | (.81 | ) | | | (.97 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 57.53 | | | $ | 48.38 | | | $ | 43.59 | | | $ | 46.79 | | | $ | 42.20 | |
Total Return (%)b | | | 21.04 | | | | 13.17 | c | | | (4.79 | )c | | | 12.94 | c | | | 24.36 | c |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data | |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions) | | | 910 | | | | 847 | | | | 829 | | | | 1,007 | | | | 1,013 | |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%) | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.18 | |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%) | | | 1.03 | | | | 1.07 | | | | 1.11 | | | | 1.09 | | | | 1.17 | |
Ratio of net investment income (%) | | | 1.82 | | | | 2.01 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 2.03 | | | | 1.96 | |
Portfolio turnover rate (%) | | | 58 | | | | 55 | | | | 64 | | | | 132 | | | | 75 | |
a | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
b | Total return does not reflect the effect of any sales charges. |
c | Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. |
| | | | |
20 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | | | |
| | Period Ended | |
Class T | | 11/30/17a | |
| |
Selected Per Share Data | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 53.26 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | |
Net investment incomeb | | | .48 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 4.26 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 4.74 | |
Less distributions from: | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (.48 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 57.52 | |
Total Return (%)c,d | | | 8.96 | ** |
| |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data | | | | |
Net assets, end of period ($ thousands) | | | 11 | |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%) | | | 1.15 | * |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%) | | | 1.04 | * |
Ratio of net investment income (%) | | | 1.80 | * |
Portfolio turnover rate (%) | | | 58 | e |
a | For the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations) to November 30, 2017. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
c | Total return does not reflect the effect of any sales charges. |
d | Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. |
e | Represents the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate for the year ended November 30, 2017. |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | |
Class C | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
Selected Per Share Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 48.20 | | | $ | 43.42 | | | $ | 46.61 | | | $ | 42.03 | | | $ | 34.70 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment incomea | | | .55 | | | | .57 | | | | .45 | | | | .56 | | | | .46 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 9.09 | | | | 4.75 | | | | (3.01 | ) | | | 4.49 | | | | 7.56 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 9.64 | | | | 5.32 | | | | (2.56 | ) | | | 5.05 | | | | 8.02 | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (.53 | ) | | | (.54 | ) | | | (.63 | ) | | | (.47 | ) | | | (.69 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 57.31 | | | $ | 48.20 | | | $ | 43.42 | | | $ | 46.61 | | | $ | 42.03 | |
Total Return (%)b,c | | | 20.13 | | | | 12.34 | | | | (5.51 | ) | | | 12.10 | | | | 23.39 | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data | |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions) | | | 124 | | | | 132 | | | | 132 | | | | 158 | | | | 158 | |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%) | | | 1.81 | | | | 1.93 | | | | 1.92 | | | | 1.93 | | | | 1.96 | |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%) | | | 1.79 | | | | 1.82 | | | | 1.86 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 1.94 | |
Ratio of net investment income (%) | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.26 | | | | .99 | | | | 1.29 | | | | 1.19 | |
Portfolio turnover rate (%) | | | 58 | | | | 55 | | | | 64 | | | | 132 | | | | 75 | |
a | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
b | Total return does not reflect the effect of any sales charges. |
c | Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. |
| | | | |
22 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | |
Class R | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
Selected Per Share Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 48.26 | | | $ | 43.48 | | | $ | 46.67 | | | $ | 42.09 | | | $ | 34.73 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment incomea | | | .81 | | | | .79 | | | | .67 | | | | .73 | | | | .66 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 9.12 | | | | 4.75 | | | | (3.00 | ) | | | 4.55 | | | | 7.57 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 9.93 | | | | 5.54 | | | | (2.33 | ) | | | 5.28 | | | | 8.23 | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (.80 | ) | | | (.76 | ) | | | (.86 | ) | | | (.70 | ) | | | (.87 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 57.39 | | | $ | 48.26 | | | $ | 43.48 | | | $ | 46.67 | | | $ | 42.09 | |
Total Return (%)b | | | 20.75 | | | | 12.89 | | | | (5.03 | ) | | | 12.67 | | | | 24.06 | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data | |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions) | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 4 | | | | 5 | |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%) | | | 1.46 | | | | 1.52 | | | | 1.56 | | | | 1.54 | | | | 1.53 | |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%) | | | 1.29 | | | | 1.32 | | | | 1.36 | | | | 1.34 | | | | 1.42 | |
Ratio of net investment income (%) | | | 1.54 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.66 | | | | 1.71 | |
Portfolio turnover rate (%) | | | 58 | | | | 55 | | | | 64 | | | | 132 | | | | 75 | |
a | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
b | Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 23 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | | | Period Ended | |
Class R6 | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 11/30/15a | |
| | | |
Selected Per Share Data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 48.40 | | | $ | 43.62 | | | $ | 48.04 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment incomeb | | | 1.15 | | | | 1.46 | | | | .73 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 9.13 | | | | 4.32 | | | | (4.31 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | 10.28 | | | | 5.78 | | | | (3.58 | ) |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (1.08 | ) | | | (1.00 | ) | | | (.84 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 57.60 | | | $ | 48.40 | | | $ | 43.62 | |
Total Return (%) | | | 21.49 | | | | 13.43 | c | | | (7.48 | )c** |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data | |
Net assets, end of period ($ thousands) | | | 177 | | | | 152 | | | | 9 | |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%) | | | .68 | | | | .84 | | | | 1.18 | * |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%) | | | .68 | | | | .80 | | | | .85 | * |
Ratio of net investment income (%) | | | 2.19 | | | | 3.12 | | | | 2.14 | * |
Portfolio turnover rate (%) | | | 58 | | | | 55 | | | | 64 | d |
a | For the period from March 2, 2015 (commencement of operations) to November 30, 2015. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
c | Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. |
d | Represents the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate for the year ended November 30, 2015. |
| | | | |
24 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | |
Class S | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
Selected Per Share Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 48.39 | | | $ | 43.60 | | | $ | 46.80 | | | $ | 42.21 | | | $ | 34.84 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment incomea | | | 1.09 | | | | 1.04 | | | | .88 | | | | 1.12 | | | | .84 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 9.13 | | | | 4.74 | | | | (3.00 | ) | | | 4.38 | | | | 7.59 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 10.22 | | | | 5.78 | | | | (2.12 | ) | | | 5.50 | | | | 8.43 | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (1.06 | ) | | | (.99 | ) | | | (1.08 | ) | | | (.91 | ) | | | (1.06 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 57.55 | | | $ | 48.39 | | | $ | 43.60 | | | $ | 46.80 | | | $ | 42.21 | |
Total Return (%)b | | | 21.36 | | | | 13.45 | | | | (4.55 | ) | | | 13.21 | | | | 24.65 | |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data | |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions) | | | 61 | | | | 43 | | | | 28 | | | | 44 | | | | 27 | |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%) | | | .80 | | | | .95 | | | | .94 | | | | .92 | | | | .95 | |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%) | | | .79 | | | | .82 | | | | .86 | | | | .84 | | | | .94 | |
Ratio of net investment income (%) | | | 2.06 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 1.95 | | | | 2.55 | | | | 2.19 | |
Portfolio turnover rate (%) | | | 58 | | | | 55 | | | | 64 | | | | 132 | | | | 75 | |
a | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
b | Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | |
Institutional Class | | 2017 | | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | | | |
Selected Per Share Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 48.40 | | | $ | 43.61 | | | $ | 46.81 | | | $ | 42.25 | | | $ | 34.89 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment incomea | | | 1.09 | | | | 1.03 | | | | .94 | | | | 1.06 | | | | .88 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 9.14 | | | | 4.75 | | | | (3.06 | ) | | | 4.45 | | | | 7.59 | |
Total from investment operations | | | 10.23 | | | | 5.78 | | | | (2.12 | ) | | | 5.51 | | | | 8.47 | |
Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | (1.06 | ) | | | (.99 | ) | | | (1.08 | ) | | | (.95 | ) | | | (1.11 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 57.57 | | | $ | 48.40 | | | $ | 43.61 | | | $ | 46.81 | | | $ | 42.25 | |
Total Return (%) | | | 21.38 | | | | 13.45 | b | | | (4.55 | )b | | | 13.20 | b | | | 24.76 | b |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data | |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions) | | | 38 | | | | 30 | | | | 25 | | | | 22 | | | | 17 | |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%) | | | .78 | | | | .91 | | | | .89 | | | | .89 | | | | .86 | |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%) | | | .78 | | | | .82 | | | | .86 | | | | .84 | | | | .86 | |
Ratio of net investment income (%) | | | 2.08 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.07 | | | | 2.41 | | | | 2.30 | |
Portfolio turnover rate (%) | | | 58 | | | | 55 | | | | 64 | | | | 132 | | | | 75 | |
a | Based on average shares outstanding during the period. |
b | Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. |
| | | | |
26 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | |
Notes to Financial Statements | | |
A. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of Deutsche Value Series, Inc. (the “Corporation”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company and is organized as a Maryland corporation.
The Fund offers multiple classes of shares which provide investors with different purchase options. Class A shares are subject to an initial sales charge. Class B shares automatically converted to Class A shares on February 10, 2016 and are no longer offered. Class B shares were not subject to an initial sales charge and were subject to higher ongoing expenses than Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge payable upon certain redemptions. Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge but are subject to higher ongoing expenses than Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge payable upon certain redemptions within one year of purchase. Class R shares and Class R6 shares are not subject to initial or contingent deferred sales charges and are generally available only to certain retirement plans. Class S shares are not subject to initial or contingent deferred sales charges and are only available to a limited group of investors. Institutional Class shares are not subject to initial or contingent deferred sales charges and are generally available only to qualified investors. Class T shares commenced operations on June 5, 2017. Class T shares are subject to an initial sales charge and are only available through certain financial intermediaries.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses and expense reductions, if any, are borne pro rata on the basis of relative net assets by the holders of all classes of shares, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as distribution and service fees, services to shareholders and certain other class-specific expenses. Differences in class-level expenses may result in payment of different per share dividends by class. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting subject to class-specific arrangements.
The Fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) which require the use of management estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Fund qualifies as an investment company under Topic 946 of Accounting Standards Codification of U.S. GAAP. The policies described below are followed consistently by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 27 | |
Security Valuation. Investments are stated at value determined as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The level assigned to the securities valuations may not be an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investing in those securities.
Equity securities are valued at the most recent sale price or official closing price reported on the exchange (U.S. or foreign) or over-the-counter market on which they trade. Securities for which no sales are reported are valued at the calculated mean between the most recent bid and asked quotations on the relevant market or, if a mean cannot be determined, at the most recent bid quotation. Equity securities are generally categorized as Level 1. For certain international equity securities, in order to adjust for events which may occur between the close of the foreign exchanges and the close of the New York Stock Exchange, a fair valuation model may be used. This fair valuation model takes into account comparisons to the valuation of American Depository Receipts (ADRs), exchange-traded funds, futures contracts and certain indices and these securities are categorized as Level 2.
Investments in open-end investment companies are valued at their net asset value each business day and are categorized as Level 1.
Securities and other assets for which market quotations are not readily available or for which the above valuation procedures are deemed not to reflect fair value are valued in a manner that is intended to reflect their fair value as determined in accordance with procedures approved by the Board and are generally categorized as Level 3. In accordance with the Fund’s valuation procedures, factors considered in determining value may include, but are not limited to, the type of the security; the size of the holding; the initial cost of the security; the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition; the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies; quotations or evaluated prices from broker-dealers and/or pricing services; information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities); an analysis of the company’s or issuer’s financial statements; an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold; and with
| | | | |
28 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
respect to debt securities, the maturity, coupon, creditworthiness, currency denomination and the movement of the market in which the security is normally traded. The value determined under these procedures may differ from published values for the same securities.
Disclosure about the classification of fair value measurements is included in a table following the Fund’s Investment Portfolio.
Foreign Currency Translations. The books and records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rates at period end. Purchases and sales of investment securities, income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of the transactions.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions represent net gains and losses between trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, the acquisition and disposition of foreign currencies, and the difference between the amount of net investment income accrued and the U.S. dollar amount actually received. The portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed but is included with net realized and unrealized gain/appreciation and loss/depreciation on investments.
Securities Lending. Deutsche Bank AG, as lending agent, lends securities of the Fund to certain financial institutions under the terms of its securities lending agreement. During the term of the loans, the Fund continues to receive interest and dividends generated by the securities and to participate in any changes in their market value. The Fund requires the borrowers of the securities to maintain collateral with the Fund consisting of either cash or liquid, unencumbered assets having a value at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. When the collateral falls below specified amounts, the lending agent will use its best effort to obtain additional collateral on the next business day to meet required amounts under the securities lending agreement. During the year ended November 30, 2017, the Fund invested the cash collateral into a joint trading account in affiliated money market funds including Deutsche Government & Agency Securities Portfolio, managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. receives a management/administration fee (0.13% annualized effective rate as of November 30, 2017) on the cash collateral invested in Deutsche Government & Agency Securities Portfolio. The Fund receives compensation for lending its securities either in the form of fees or by earning interest on invested cash collateral net of borrower rebates and fees paid to a lending agent. Either the Fund or the
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 29 | |
borrower may terminate the loan at any time, and the borrower after notice, is required to return borrowed securities within a standard time period. There may be risks of delay and costs in recovery of securities or even loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower of the securities fail financially. If the Fund is not able to recover securities lent, the Fund may sell the collateral and purchase a replacement investment in the market, incurring the risk that the value of the replacement security is greater than the value of the collateral. The Fund is also subject to all investment risks associated with the reinvestment of any cash collateral received, including, but not limited to, interest rate, credit and liquidity risk associated with such investments.
As of November 30, 2017, the Fund had no securities on loan.
Federal Income Taxes. The Fund’s policy is to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which are applicable to regulated investment companies, and to distribute all of its taxable income to its shareholders.
The Fund has reviewed the tax positions for the open tax years as of November 30, 2017 and has determined that no provision for income tax and/or uncertain tax positions is required in the Fund’s financial statements. The Fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain open subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Distribution of Income and Gains. Distributions from net investment income of the Fund are declared and distributed to shareholders quarterly. Net realized gains from investment transactions, in excess of available capital loss carryforwards, would be taxable to the Fund if not distributed, and, therefore, will be distributed to shareholders at least annually. The Fund may also make additional distributions for tax purposes if necessary.
The timing and characterization of certain income and capital gain distributions are determined annually in accordance with federal tax regulations, which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences primarily relate to expired capital loss carryforwards. As a result, net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions for a reporting period may differ significantly from distributions during such period. Accordingly, the Fund may periodically make reclassifications among certain of its capital accounts without impacting the net asset value of the Fund.
At November 30, 2017, the Fund’s components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income* | | $ | 14,552,280 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | | $ | 168,499,063 | |
| | | | |
30 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
At November 30, 2017, the aggregate cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $964,120,634. The net unrealized appreciation for all investments based on tax cost was $168,499,063. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $188,811,247 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $20,312,184.
In addition, the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders by the Fund is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended November 30, | |
| | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
Distributions from ordinary income* | | $ | 18,649,852 | | | $ | 19,025,052 | |
* | For tax purposes, short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions. |
Expenses. Expenses of the Corporation arising in connection with a specific fund are allocated to that fund. Other Corporation expenses which cannot be directly attributed to a fund are apportioned among the funds in the Corporation based upon the relative net assets or other appropriate measures.
Contingencies. In the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet been made. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
Other. Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are reported on trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date net of foreign withholding taxes. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis. Proceeds from litigation payments, if any, are included in net realized gain (loss) from investments.
B. Purchases and Sales of Securities
During the year ended November 30, 2017, purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) aggregated $629,649,747 and $733,242,095, respectively.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 31 | |
C. Related Parties
Management Agreement. Under the Investment Management Agreement with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (“DIMA” or the “Advisor”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, the Advisor directs the investments of the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives, policies and restrictions. The Advisor determines the securities, instruments and other contracts relating to investments to be purchased, sold or entered into by the Fund. In addition to portfolio management services, the Advisor provides certain administrative services in accordance with the Investment Management Agreement.
Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement with the Advisor, the Fund paid a monthly management fee based on the Fund’s average daily net assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly, at the following annual rates:
| | | | |
First $250 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets | | | .63% | |
Next $750 million of such net assets | | | .60% | |
Next $1.5 billion of such net assets | | | .58% | |
Next $2.5 billion of such net assets | | | .56% | |
Next $2.5 billion of such net assets | | | .53% | |
Next $2.5 billion of such net assets | | | .52% | |
Next $2.5 billion of such net assets | | | .51% | |
Over $12.5 billion of such net assets | | | .50% | |
Accordingly, for the year ended November 30, 2017, the fee pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement was equivalent to an annual rate (exclusive of any applicable waivers/reimbursements) of 0.61% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
For the period from December 1, 2016 and for the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations) for Class T shares to March 15, 2018, the Advisor has contractually agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund to the extent necessary to maintain the total annual operating expenses (excluding certain
| | | | |
32 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest) of each class as follows:
| | | | |
Class A | | | 1.04% | |
Class T | | | 1.04% | |
Class C | | | 1.79% | |
Class R | | | 1.29% | |
Class R6 | | | .79% | |
Class S | | | .79% | |
Institutional Class | | | .79% | |
For the year ended November 30, 2017 and for the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations) to November 30, 2017 for Class T shares, fees waived and/or expenses reimbursed for each class are as follows:
| | | | |
Class T | | $ | 5 | |
Class C | | | 19,330 | |
Class R | | | 3,595 | |
Class S | | | 4,770 | |
| | $ | 27,700 | |
Service Provider Fees. Deutsche AM Service Company (“DSC”), an affiliate of the Advisor, is the transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent for the Fund. Pursuant to a sub-transfer agency agreement between DSC and DST Systems, Inc. (“DST”), DSC has delegated certain transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent functions to DST. DSC compensates DST out of the shareholder servicing fee it receives from the Fund. For the year ended November 30, 2017 and for the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations) to November 30, 2017 for Class T shares, the amounts charged to the Fund by DSC were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Services to Shareholders | | Total Aggregated | | | Unpaid at November 30, 2017 | |
Class A | | $ | 411,012 | | | $ | 116,072 | |
Class T | | | 12 | | | | 9 | |
Class C | | | 31,786 | | | | 8,688 | |
Class R | | | 1,141 | | | | 370 | |
Class R6 | | | 36 | | | | 6 | |
Class S | | | 13,422 | | | | 3,827 | |
Institutional Class | | | 1,871 | | | | 462 | |
| | $ | 459,280 | | | $ | 129,434 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 33 | |
Pursuant to a fund accounting agreement, DIMA is responsible for computing the daily net asset value per share and maintaining the portfolio and general accounting records of the Fund. DIMA has delegated certain fund accounting and record-keeping services to State Street Bank and Trust Company. The costs and expenses of such delegation are paid by DIMA. The Fund paid no fee to DIMA for fund accounting and record-keeping services provided under the fund accounting agreement during the period.
Distribution and Service Fees. Under the Fund’s Class C and Class R 12b-1 Plans, Deutsche AM Distributors, Inc. (“DDI”), an affiliate of the Advisor, receives a fee (“Distribution Fee”) of 0.75% of average daily net assets of Class C shares and 0.25% of average daily net assets of Class R shares. In accordance with the Fund’s Underwriting and Distribution Service Agreement, DDI enters into related selling group agreements with various firms at various rates for sales of Class C and R shares, respectively. For the year ended November 30, 2017, the Distribution Fee was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Distribution Fee | | Total Aggregated | | | Unpaid at November 30, 2017 | |
Class C | | $ | 956,040 | | | $ | 74,785 | |
Class R | | | 5,197 | | | | 412 | |
| | $ | 961,237 | | | $ | 75,197 | |
In addition, DDI provides information and administrative services for a fee (“Service Fee”) to Class A, T, C and R shareholders at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of average daily net assets for each such class. DDI in turn has various agreements with financial services firms that provide these services and pays these fees based upon the assets of shareholder accounts the firms service. For the year ended November 30, 2017 and for the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations) to November 30, 2017 for Class T shares, the Service Fee was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service Fee | | Total Aggregated | | | Unpaid at November 30, 2017 | | | Annual Rate | |
Class A | | $ | 2,099,634 | | | $ | 539,691 | | | | .24 | % |
Class T | | | 12 | | | | 10 | | | | .25 | % |
Class C | | | 316,100 | | | | 74,478 | | | | .25 | % |
Class R | | | 4,994 | | | | 1,222 | | | | .24 | % |
| | $ | 2,420,740 | | | $ | 615,401 | | | | | |
Underwriting and Contingent Deferred Sales Charge. DDI is the principal underwriter for the Fund. Underwriting commissions paid by shareholders in connection with the distribution of Class A shares for the year ended November 30, 2017 aggregated $37,598.
| | | | |
34 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
In addition, DDI receives any contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) from Class C share redemptions occurring within one year of purchase. There is no such charge upon redemption of any share appreciation or reinvested dividends. The CDSC is 1% of the value of the shares redeemed for Class C. For the year ended November 30, 2017, the CDSC for Class C shares aggregated $2,258. A deferred sales charge of up to 1% is assessed on certain redemptions of Class A shares. For the year ended November 30, 2017, DDI received $1,056 for Class A shares.
Typesetting and Filing Service Fees. Under an agreement with DIMA, DIMA is compensated for providing pre-press and certain regulatory filing services to the Fund. For the year ended November 30, 2017, the amount charged to the Fund by DIMA included in the Statement of Operations under “Reports to shareholders” aggregated $17,649, of which $8,300 is unpaid.
Directors’ Fees and Expenses. The Fund paid retainer fees to each Director not affiliated with the Advisor, plus specified amounts to the Board Chairperson and Vice Chairperson and to each committee Chairperson.
Affiliated Cash Management Vehicles. The Fund may invest uninvested cash balances in Deutsche Central Cash Management Government Fund and Deutsche Variable NAV Money Fund, affiliated money market funds which are managed by the Advisor. Each affiliated money market fund is managed in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, which governs the quality, maturity, diversity and liquidity of instruments in which a money market fund may invest. Deutsche Central Cash Management Government Fund seeks to maintain a stable net asset value, and Deutsche Variable NAV Money Fund maintains a floating net asset value. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of each affiliated money market fund in which it invests. Deutsche Central Cash Management Government Fund does not pay the Advisor an investment management fee. To the extent that Deutsche Variable NAV Money Fund pays an investment management fee to the Advisor, the Advisor will waive an amount of the investment management fee payable to the Advisor by the Fund equal to the amount of the investment management fee payable on the Fund’s assets invested in Deutsche Variable NAV Money Fund.
Securities Lending Agent Fees. Deutsche Bank AG serves as securities lending agent for the Fund. For the year ended November 30, 2017, the Fund incurred securities lending agent fees to Deutsche Bank AG in the amount of $50.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 35 | |
D. Line of Credit
The Fund and other affiliated funds (the “Participants”) share in a $400 million revolving credit facility provided by a syndication of banks. The Fund may borrow for temporary or emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The Participants are charged an annual commitment fee which is allocated based on net assets, among each of the Participants. Interest is calculated at a rate per annum equal to the sum of the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.25 percent plus if the one-month LIBOR exceeds the Federal Funds Rate, the amount of such excess. The Fund may borrow up to a maximum of 33 percent of its net assets under the agreement. The Fund had no outstanding loans at November 30, 2017.
E. Fund Share Transactions
The following table summarizes share and dollar activity in the Fund:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended November 30, 2017 | | | Year Ended November 30, 2016 | |
| | | | | Shares | | | Dollars | | | | | | | | | Shares | | | Dollars | | | | |
|
Shares sold | |
Class A | | | | | | | 999,255 | | | $ | 52,289,451 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,205,286 | | | $ | 55,159,910 | | | | | |
Class T* | | | | | | | 187.94 | | | | 10,011 | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 | ** | | | 44 | ** | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | 99,066 | | | | 5,111,006 | | | | | | | | | | | | 184,930 | | | | 8,330,462 | | | | | |
Class R | | | | | | | 8,362 | | | | 434,302 | | | | | | | | | | | | 13,496 | | | | 628,955 | | | | | |
Class R6 | | | | | | | 393 | | | | 20,603 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,929.1 | | | | 137,338 | | | | | |
Class S | | | | | | | 525,435 | | | | 27,467,211 | | | | | | | | | | | | 545,435 | | | | 25,221,401 | | | | | |
Institutional Class | | | | | | | 263,055 | | | | 13,862,539 | | | | | | | | | | | | 245,653 | | | | 11,260,752 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 99,195,123 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 100,738,862 | | | | | |
|
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | |
Class A | | | | | | | 282,530 | | | $ | 14,738,587 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 339,796 | | | $ | 15,310,332 | | | | | |
Class T* | | | | | | | 1.67 | | | | 90 | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | 40 | ** | | | 1,680 | ** | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | 23,433 | | | | 1,218,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 30,638 | | | | 1,375,030 | | | | | |
Class R | | | | | | | 610 | | | | 31,600 | | | | | | | | | | | | 950 | | | | 42,475 | | | | | |
Class R6 | | | | | | | 66.73 | | | | 3,491 | | | | | | | | | | | | 5.1 | | | | 232 | | | | | |
Class S | | | | | | | 20,077 | | | | 1,050,920 | | | | | | | | | | | | 15,655 | | | | 711,189 | | | | | |
Institutional Class | | | | | | | 10,587 | | | | 553,165 | | | | | | | | | | | | 10,104 | | | | 456,617 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 17,595,853 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 17,897,555 | | | | | |
| | | | |
36 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended November 30, 2017 | | | Year Ended November 30, 2016 | |
| | | | | Shares | | | Dollars | | | | | | | | | Shares | | | Dollars | | | | |
|
Shares redeemed | |
Class A | | | | | | | (2,968,686 | ) | | $ | (155,671,801 | ) | | | | | | | | | | $ | (3,071,226 | ) | | $ | (138,891,837 | ) | | | | |
Class T* | | | | | | | (.18 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | (17,077 | )** | | | (693,297 | )** | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | (694,069 | ) | | | (36,356,092 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (535,808 | ) | | | (24,033,643 | ) | | | | |
Class R | | | | | | | (26,839 | ) | | | (1,388,711 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (38,881 | ) | | | (1,672,591 | ) | | | | |
Class R6 | | | | | | | (534 | ) | | | (29,344 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Class S | | | | | | | (378,566 | ) | | | (19,751,410 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (319,853 | ) | | | (14,649,025 | ) | | | | |
Institutional Class | | | | | | | (236,332 | ) | | | (12,401,237 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (213,276 | ) | | | (9,816,630 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | (225,598,605 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (189,757,023 | ) | | | | |
|
Net increase (decrease) | |
Class A | | | | | | | (1,686,901 | ) | | $ | (88,643,763 | ) | | | | | | | | | | $ | (1,526,144 | ) | | $ | (68,421,595 | ) | | | | |
Class T* | | | | | | | 189.43 | | | | 10,091 | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | (17,035 | )** | | | (691,573 | )** | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | (571,570 | ) | | | (30,027,086 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (320,240 | ) | | | (14,328,151 | ) | | | | |
Class R | | | | | | | (17,867 | ) | | | (922,809 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (24,435 | ) | | | (1,001,161 | ) | | | | |
Class R6 | | | | | | | (74.27 | ) | | | (5,250 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | 2,934.2 | | | | 137,570 | | | | | |
Class S | | | | | | | 166,946 | | | | 8,766,721 | | | | | | | | | | | | 241,237 | | | | 11,283,565 | | | | | |
Institutional Class | | | | | | | 37,310 | | | | 2,014,467 | | | | | | | | | | | | 42,481 | | | | 1,900,739 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | (108,807,629 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (71,120,606 | ) | | | | |
* | For the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations of Class T) to November 30, 2017. |
** | For the period from December 1, 2015 to February 10, 2016 (see Note A). |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 37 | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors of Deutsche Value Series, Inc. and the Shareholders of Deutsche CROCI Equity Dividend Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the investment portfolio, of Deutsche CROCI Equity Dividend Fund (one of the funds constituting the Deutsche Value Series, Inc.) (the Fund) as of November 30, 2017, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2017, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Deutsche Mid Cap Value Fund (one of the funds constituting the Deutsche Value Series, Inc.) at November 30, 2017, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
| | |
Boston, Massachusetts | | |
January 24, 2018 | | |
| | | | |
38 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
Information About Your Fund’s Expenses
As an investor of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses. Examples of transaction costs include sales charges (loads) and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, Class T, C, R and S shares limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (June 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017).
The tables illustrate your Fund’s expenses in two ways:
– | Actual Fund Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Fund using the Fund’s actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Expenses Paid per $1,000” line under the share class you hold. |
– | Hypothetical 5% Fund Return. This helps you to compare your Fund’s ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Fund’s actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical fund return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. |
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The “Expenses Paid per $1,000” line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. Subject to certain exceptions, an account maintenance fee of $20.00 assessed once per calendar year for Classes A, C and S shares may apply for accounts with balances less than $10,000. This fee is not included in these tables. If it was, the estimate of expenses paid for Classes A, C and S shares during the period would be higher, and account value during the period would be lower, by this amount.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 39 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended November 30, 2017 (Unaudited) | |
| | | | | | | |
Actual Fund Return | | Class A | | | Class T* | | | Class C | | | Class R | | | Class R6 | | | Class S | | | Institutional Class | |
Beginning Account Value 6/1/17 | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 11/30/17 | | $ | 1,099.70 | | | $ | 1,089.60 | | | $ | 1,095.30 | | | $ | 1,098.20 | | | $ | 1,101.60 | | | $ | 1,100.90 | | | $ | 1,101.00 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000** | | $ | 5.42 | | | $ | 5.30 | | | $ | 9.40 | | | $ | 6.79 | | | $ | 3.58 | | | $ | 4.16 | | | $ | 4.16 | |
| | | | | | | |
Hypothetical 5% Fund Return | | Class A | | | Class T | | | Class C | | | Class R | | | Class R6 | | | Class S | | | Institutional Class | |
Beginning Account Value 6/1/17 | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 11/30/17 | | $ | 1,019.90 | | | $ | 1,019.85 | | | $ | 1,016.09 | | | $ | 1,018.60 | | | $ | 1,021.66 | | | $ | 1,021.11 | | | $ | 1,021.11 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000** | | $ | 5.22 | | | $ | 5.27 | | | $ | 9.05 | | | $ | 6.53 | | | $ | 3.45 | | | $ | 4.00 | | | $ | 4.00 | |
* | For the period from June 5, 2017 (commencement of operations of Class T) to November 30, 2017. |
** | Expenses (hypothetical expenses if Class T had been in existence from June 1, 2017) are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183 (the number of days in the most recent six-month period), then divided by 365. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annualized Expense Ratios | | Class A | | | Class T | | | Class C | | | Class R | | | Class R6 | | | Class S | | | Institutional Class | |
Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 1.03 | % | | | 1.04 | % | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.29 | % | | | .68 | % | | | .79 | % | | | .79 | % |
For more information, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
For an analysis of the fees associated with an investment in the Fund or similar funds, please refer to http://apps.finra.org/fundanalyzer/1/fa.aspx.
| | | | |
40 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | |
Tax Information | | (Unaudited) |
For corporate shareholders, 100% of the income dividends (i.e income dividends plus short-term capital gains) paid during the Fund’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2017, qualified for the dividends received deduction.
For federal income tax purposes, the Fund designates approximately $35,044,000, or the maximum amount allowable under tax law, as qualified dividend income.
Please consult a tax advisor if you have questions about federal or state income tax laws, or on how to prepare your tax returns. If you have specific questions about your account, please call (800) 728-3337.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 41 | |
Advisory Agreement Board Considerations and Fee Evaluation
The Board of Directors (hereinafter referred to as the “Board” or “Directors”) approved the renewal of Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund’s (the “Fund”) investment management agreement (the “Agreement”) with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (“DIMA”) in September 2017.
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreement, shareholders should know that:
– | During the entire process, all of the Fund’s Directors were independent of DIMA and its affiliates (the “Independent Directors”). |
– | The Board met frequently during the past year to discuss fund matters and dedicated a substantial amount of time to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board’s Contract Committee reviewed extensive materials received from DIMA, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund’s performance, fees and expenses, and profitability from a fee consultant retained by the Fund’s Independent Directors (the “Fee Consultant”). Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Board. The Board then reviewed the Contract Committee’s findings and recommendations. |
– | The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund. |
– | The Independent Directors regularly met privately with counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Independent Directors were advised by the Fee Consultant in the course of their review of the Fund’s contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the Fee Consultant in connection with their deliberations. |
– | In connection with reviewing the Agreement, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund’s Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements. |
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DIMA and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DIMA managed the
| | | | |
42 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
Fund. DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank AG’s (“Deutsche Bank”) Asset Management (“Deutsche AM”) division. Deutsche AM is a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
As part of the contract review process, the Board carefully considered the fees and expenses of each Deutsche fund overseen by the Board in light of the fund’s performance. In many cases, this led to the negotiation and implementation of expense caps. As part of these negotiations, the Board indicated that it would consider relaxing these caps in future years following sustained improvements in performance, among other considerations.
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund’s Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA’s personnel and administrative support services provided by DIMA, such as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, DIMA provides portfolio management services and administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel and the resources made available to such personnel. The Board reviewed the Fund’s performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market index(es) and a peer universe compiled using information supplied by Morningstar Direct (“Morningstar”), an independent fund data service. The Board also noted that it has put into place a process of identifying “Funds in Review” (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to a peer universe), and receives additional reporting from DIMA regarding such funds and, where appropriate, DIMA’s plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that, for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2016, the Fund’s performance (Class A shares) was in the 1st quartile, 3rd quartile and 4th quartile, respectively, of the applicable Morningstar universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has outperformed its benchmark in the one-year period and has underperformed its benchmark in the three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2016.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 43 | |
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund’s investment management fee schedule, operating expenses and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) and the Fee Consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Broadridge peer group (based on Broadridge data provided as of December 31, 2016). The Board considered that, effective December 1, 2016, DIMA agreed to reduce the Fund’s contractual management fee rate by 0.12% at all breakpoint levels. The Board noted that the Fund’s Class A shares total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be lower than the median (2nd quartile) of the applicable Broadridge expense universe (based on Broadridge data provided as of December 31, 2016, and analyzing Broadridge expense universe Class A (net) expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) (“Broadridge Universe Expenses”). The Board also reviewed data comparing each share class’s total (net) operating expenses to the applicable Broadridge Universe Expenses. The Board noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA were expected to help the Fund’s total (net) operating expenses remain competitive. The Board considered the Fund’s management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DIMA to comparable Deutsche U.S. registered funds (“Deutsche Funds”) and considered differences between the Fund and the comparable Deutsche Funds. The information requested by the Board as part of its review of fees and expenses also included information about institutional accounts (including any sub-advised funds and accounts) and funds offered primarily to European investors (“Deutsche Europe funds”) managed by Deutsche AM. The Board noted that DIMA indicated that Deutsche AM manages Deutsche Europe funds comparable to the Fund, but does not manage any comparable institutional accounts. The Board took note of the differences in services provided to Deutsche Funds as compared to Deutsche Europe funds and that such differences made comparison difficult.
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DIMA under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to DIMA, and pre-tax profits realized by DIMA, from advising the Deutsche Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received
| | | | |
44 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed DIMA’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DIMA in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the Deutsche Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Other Benefits to DIMA and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DIMA and its affiliates, including any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for transfer agency services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for distribution services. The Board noted that DIMA pays a licensing fee to an affiliate related to the Fund’s use of the CROCI® strategy. The Board also considered benefits to DIMA related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities. In addition, the Board considered the incidental public relations benefits to DIMA related to Deutsche Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DIMA products and services. The Board considered these benefits in reaching its conclusion that the Fund’s management fees were reasonable.
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience, seniority and time commitment of the individuals serving as DIMA’s and the Fund’s chief compliance officers; (ii) the large number of DIMA compliance personnel; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 45 | |
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board unanimously determined that the continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination, the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Directors and counsel present. It is possible that individual Independent Directors may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreement.
| | | | |
46 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
Board Members and Officers
The following table presents certain information regarding the Board Members and Officers of the fund. Each Board Member’s year of birth is set forth in parentheses after his or her name. Unless otherwise noted, (i) each Board Member has engaged in the principal occupation(s) noted in the table for at least the most recent five years, although not necessarily in the same capacity; and (ii) the address of each Independent Board Member is c/o Keith R. Fox, Deutsche Funds Board Chair, c/o Thomas R. Hiller, Ropes & Gray LLP, Prudential Tower, 800 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02199-3600. Except as otherwise noted below, the term of office for each Board Member is until the election and qualification of a successor, or until such Board Member sooner dies, resigns, is removed or as otherwise provided in the governing documents of the fund. Because the fund does not hold an annual meeting of shareholders, each Board Member will hold office for an indeterminate period. The Board Members may also serve in similar capacities with other funds in the fund complex.
| | | | | | | | |
Independent Board Members |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served1 | | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | | Number of Funds in Deutsche Fund Complex Overseen | | | Other Directorships Held by Board Member |
Keith R. Fox, CFA (1954)
Chairperson since 2017, and Board Member since 1996 | | Managing General Partner, Exeter Capital Partners (a series of private investment funds) (since 1986). Directorships: Progressive International Corporation (kitchen goods importer and distributor); The Kennel Shop (retailer); former Chairman, National Association of Small Business Investment Companies; former Directorships: BoxTop Media Inc. (advertising); Sun Capital Advisers Trust (mutual funds) (2011–2012) | | | 89 | | | — |
Kenneth C. Froewiss (1945) Vice Chairperson since 2017, and Board Member since 2001 | | Retired Clinical Professor of Finance, NYU Stern School of Business (1997–2014); Member, Finance Committee, Association for Asian Studies (2002–present); Director, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group (US) (2004–present); prior thereto, Managing Director, J.P. Morgan (investment banking firm) (until 1996) | | | 92 | | | — |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 47 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served1 | | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | | Number of Funds in Deutsche Fund Complex Overseen | | | Other Directorships Held by Board Member |
John W. Ballantine (1946) Board Member since 1999 | | Retired; formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Management Officer, First Chicago NBD Corporation/The First National Bank of Chicago (1996–1998); Executive Vice President and Head of International Banking (1995–1996); former Directorships: Director and former Chairman of the Board, Healthways, Inc.2 (population well-being and wellness services) (2003–2014); Stockwell Capital Investments PLC (private equity); Enron Corporation; FNB Corporation; Tokheim Corporation; First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. and Oak Brook Bank; Prisma Energy International. Not-for-Profit Director, Trustee: Palm Beach Civic Association; Public Radio International; Window to the World Communications (public media); Harris Theater for Music and Dance (Chicago) | | | 89 | | | Portland General Electric2 (utility company) (2003–present) |
Henry P. Becton, Jr. (1943) Board Member since 1990 | | Vice Chair and former President, WGBH Educational Foundation. Directorships: Public Radio International; Public Radio Exchange (PRX); The Pew Charitable Trusts (charitable organization); former Directorships: Becton Dickinson and Company2 (medical technology company); Belo Corporation2 (media company); The PBS Foundation; Association of Public Television Stations; Boston Museum of Science; American Public Television; Concord Academy; New England Aquarium; Mass. Corporation for Educational Telecommunications; Committee for Economic Development; Public Broadcasting Service; Connecticut College; North Bennett Street School (Boston) | | | 89 | | | — |
Dawn-Marie Driscoll (1946) Board Member since 1987 | | Emeritus Executive Fellow, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; formerly: President, Driscoll Associates (consulting firm); Partner, Palmer & Dodge (law firm) (1988–1990); Vice President of Corporate Affairs and General Counsel, Filene’s (retail) (1978–1988). Directorships: Advisory Board, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; Trustee and former Chairman of the Board, Southwest Florida Community Foundation (charitable organization); former Directorships: ICI Mutual Insurance Company (2007–2015); Sun Capital Advisers Trust (mutual funds) (2007–2012), Investment Company Institute (audit, executive, nominating committees) and Independent Directors Council (governance, executive committees) | | | 89 | | | — |
| | | | |
48 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served1 | | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | | Number of Funds in Deutsche Fund Complex Overseen | | | Other Directorships Held by Board Member |
Paul K. Freeman (1950) Board Member since 1993 | | Consultant, World Bank/Inter-American Development Bank; Independent Directors Council (former chair); Investment Company Institute (executive and nominating committees); formerly: Chairman of Education Committee of Independent Directors Council; Project Leader, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (1998–2001); Chief Executive Officer, The Eric Group, Inc. (environmental insurance) (1986–1998); Directorships: Denver Zoo Foundation (December 2012–present); Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver (2017–present); former Directorships: Prisma Energy International | | | 89 | | | — |
Richard J. Herring (1946) Board Member since 1990 | | Jacob Safra Professor of International Banking and Professor, Finance Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (since July 1972); Co-Director, Wharton Financial Institutions Center; formerly: Vice Dean and Director, Wharton Undergraduate Division (July 1995–June 2000); Director, Lauder Institute of International Management Studies (July 2000–June 2006) | | | 89 | | | Director, Aberdeen Singapore and Japan Funds (since 2007); Independent Director of Barclays Bank Delaware (since September 2010) |
William McClayton (1944) Board Member since 2004 | | Private equity investor (since October 2009); previously, Managing Director, Diamond Management & Technology Consultants, Inc. (global consulting firm) (2001–2009); Directorship: Board of Managers, YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago; formerly: Senior Partner, Arthur Andersen LLP (accounting) (1966–2001); Trustee, Ravinia Festival | | | 89 | | | — |
Rebecca W. Rimel (1951) Board Member since 1995 | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, The Pew Charitable Trusts (charitable organization) (1994–present); formerly: Executive Vice President, The Glenmede Trust Company (investment trust and wealth management) (1983–2004); Board Member, Investor Education (charitable organization) (2004–2005); Trustee, Executive Committee, Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce (2001–2007); Director, Viasys Health Care2 (January 2007–June 2007); Trustee, Thomas Jefferson Foundation (charitable organization) (1994–2012) | | | 89 | | | Director, Becton Dickinson and Company2 (medical technology company) (2012–present); Director, BioTelemetry Inc.2 (health care) (2009–present) |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 49 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served1 | | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | | Number of Funds in Deutsche Fund Complex Overseen | | | Other Directorships Held by Board Member |
William N. Searcy, Jr. (1946) Board Member since 1993 | | Private investor since October 2003; formerly: Pension & Savings Trust Officer, Sprint Corporation2 (telecommunications) (November 1989–September 2003); Trustee, Sun Capital Advisers Trust (mutual funds) (1998–2012) | | | 89 | | | — |
Jean Gleason Stromberg (1943) Board Member since 1997 | | Retired. Formerly, Consultant (1997–2001); Director, Financial Markets U.S. Government Accountability Office (1996–1997); Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright, L.L.P. (law firm) (1978–1996); former Directorships: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (charitable organization) (2000–2015); Service Source, Inc. (nonprofit), Mutual Fund Directors Forum (2002–2004), American Bar Retirement Association (funding vehicle for retirement plans) (1987–1990 and 1994–1996) | | | 89 | | | — |
| | |
Officers4 |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served5 | | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years |
Hepsen Uzcan6,9 (1974)
President and Chief Executive Officer, 2017–present Assistant Secretary, 2013–present | | Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management; formerly: Vice President for the Deutsche funds (2016–2017) |
John Millette8 (1962)
Vice President and Secretary, 1999–present | | Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management; Chief Legal Officer, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (2015–present); and Director and Vice President, Deutsche AM Trust Company (since 2016); formerly, Secretary, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (2015–2017) |
Paul H. Schubert6 (1963)
Chief Financial Officer, 2004–present Treasurer, 2005–present | | Managing Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management, and Chairman, Director and President, Deutsche AM Trust Distributors, Inc. (since 2016); Director, Deutsche AM Company (since 2013); Vice President, Deutsche AM Service Company (since 2017); Director and President, DB Investment Managers, Inc. (since 2017); formerly, Director, Deutsche AM Trust Company (2004–2013) |
Caroline Pearson8 (1962)
Chief Legal Officer, 2010–present | | Managing Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management; formerly, Secretary, Deutsche AM Distributors, Inc.; Secretary, Deutsche AM Service Company |
Scott D. Hogan8 (1970)
Chief Compliance Officer, since 2016 | | Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management |
| | | | |
50 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served5 | | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years |
Wayne Salit7 (1967)
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, 2014–present | | Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management; formerly: Managing Director, AML Compliance Officer at BNY Mellon (2011–2014); and Director, AML Compliance Officer at Deutsche Bank (2004–2011) |
Sheila Cadogan8 (1966)
Assistant Treasurer, since July 12, 2017 | | Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management |
Paul Antosca8 (1957)
Assistant Treasurer, 2007–present | | Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management |
Diane Kenneally8 (1966)
Assistant Treasurer, 2007–present | | Director,3 Deutsche Asset Management |
1 | The length of time served represents the year in which the Board Member joined the board of one or more Deutsche funds currently overseen by the Board. |
2 | A publicly held company with securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
3 | Executive title, not a board directorship. |
4 | As a result of their respective positions held with the Advisor, these individuals are considered “interested persons” of the Advisor within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Interested persons receive no compensation from the fund. |
5 | The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected in such capacity for one or more Deutsche funds. |
6 | Address: 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154. |
7 | Address: 60 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005. |
8 | Address: One International Place, Boston, MA 02110. |
9 | Appointed President and Chief Executive Officer effective December 1, 2017. |
The fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) includes additional information about the Board Members. The SAI is available, without charge, upon request. If you would like to request a copy of the SAI, you may do so by calling the following toll-free number: (800) 728-3337.
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 51 | |
Account Management Resources
| | |
For More Information | | The automated telephone system allows you to access personalized account information and obtain information on other Deutsche funds using either your voice or your telephone keypad. Certain account types within Classes A, T, C and S also have the ability to purchase, exchange or redeem shares using this system. For more information, contact your financial advisor. You may also access our automated telephone system or speak with a Shareholder Service representative by calling: (800) 728-3337 |
Web Site | | deutschefunds.com View your account transactions and balances, trade shares, monitor your asset allocation, subscribe to fund and account updates by e-mail, and change your address, 24 hours a day. Obtain prospectuses and applications, blank forms, interactive worksheets, news about Deutsche funds, retirement planning information, and more. |
Written Correspondence | | Deutsche Asset Management PO Box 219151 Kansas City, MO 64121-9151 |
Proxy Voting | | The fund’s policies and procedures for voting proxies for portfolio securities and information about how the fund voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 are available on our Web site — deutschefunds.com (click on “proxy voting”at the bottom of the page) — or on the SEC’s Web site — sec.gov. To obtain a written copy of the fund’s policies and procedures without charge, upon request, call us toll free at (800) 728-3337. |
Portfolio Holdings | | Following the fund’s fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. This form will be available on the SEC’s Web site at sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. The fund’s portfolio holdings are also posted on deutschefunds.com from time to time. Please see the fund’s current prospectus for more information. |
Principal Underwriter | | If you have questions, comments or complaints, contact: Deutsche AM Distributors, Inc. 222 South Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606-5808 (800) 621-1148 |
| | | | |
52 | | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Management | | Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (“DIMA” or the “Advisor”), which is part of Deutsche Asset Management, is the investment advisor for the fund. DIMA and it predecessors have more than 90 years of experience managing mutual funds and DIMA provides a full range of investment advisory services to both institutional and retail clients. DIMA is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG. Deutsche Bank AG is a major global banking institution engaged in a wide variety of financial services, including investment management, retail, private and commercial banking, investment banking and insurance. |
| | | | | |
| | Class A | | Class T | | Class C | | Class S | | Institutional Class |
Nasdaq Symbol | | KDHAX | | KDHUX | | KDHCX | | KDHSX | | KDHIX |
CUSIP Number | | 25159G 811 | | 25159G 688 | | 25159G 746 | | 25159G 761 | | 25159G 779 |
Fund Number | | 087 | | 1704 | | 387 | | 2387 | | 539 |
| | |
For shareholders of Class R and R6 | | | | |
Automated Information Line | | Deutsche AM Flex Plan Access (800) 728-3337 24-hour access to your retirement plan account. |
Web Site | | deutschefunds.com Click “Retirement Plans“ to reallocate assets, process transactions, review your funds, and subscribe to fund updates by e-mail through our secure online account access. Obtain prospectuses and applications, blank forms, interactive worksheets, news about Deutsche funds, retirement planning information, and more. |
For More Information | | (800) 728-3337 To speak with a service representative. |
Written Correspondence | | Deutsche AM Service Company 222 South Riverside Plaza Chicago, IL 60606-5806 |
| | | | | |
| | Class R | | | | Class R6 | | | | |
Nasdaq Symbol | | KDHRX | | | | KDHTX | | | | |
CUSIP Number | | 25159G 753 | | | | 25159G 696 | | | | |
Fund Number | | 1506 | | | | 1602 | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund | | | 53 | |
| |
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS |
| |
| As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. There have been no amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report that would require disclosure under Item 2. A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. |
| |
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT |
| |
| The fund’s audit committee is comprised solely of trustees who are "independent" (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Regulations")). The fund’s Board of Trustees has determined that there are several "audit committee financial experts" (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) serving on the fund’s audit committee including Mr. Paul K. Freeman, the chair of the fund’s audit committee. An “audit committee financial expert” is not an “expert” for any purpose, including for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and the designation or identification of a person as an “audit committee financial expert” does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification. |
| |
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
| |
deutsche CROCI EQUITY dividend fund
form n-csr disclosure re: AUDIT FEES
The following table shows the amount of fees that Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, billed to the Fund during the Fund’s last two fiscal years. The Audit Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that EY provided to the Fund.
Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Fund
Fiscal Year Ended November 30, | Audit Fees Billed to Fund | Audit-Related Fees Billed to Fund | Tax Fees Billed to Fund | All Other Fees Billed to Fund |
2017 | $73,951 | $0 | $7,350 | $0 |
2016 | $75,460 | $0 | $7,500 | $0 |
The above “Tax Fees” were billed for professional services rendered for tax return preparation.
Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers
The following table shows the amount of fees billed by EY to Deutsche Investment Management Americas, Inc. (“DIMA” or the “Adviser”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with DIMA (“Control Affiliate”) that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”), for engagements directly related to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting, during the Fund’s last two fiscal years.
Fiscal Year Ended November 30, | Audit-Related Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers | Tax Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers | All Other Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers |
2017 | $0 | $502,238 | $0 |
2016 | $0 | $449,529 | $0 |
The above “Tax Fees” were billed in connection with tax compliance services and agreed upon procedures. All other engagement fees were billed for services in connection with agreed upon procedures for DIMA and other related entities.
Non-Audit Services
The following table shows the amount of fees that EY billed during the Fund’s last two fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services that EY provided to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider that related directly to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting. The Audit Committee requested and received information from EY about any non-audit services that EY rendered during the Fund’s last fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider. The Committee considered this information in evaluating EY’s independence.
Fiscal Year Ended November 30, | Total Non-Audit Fees Billed to Fund (A) | Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (engagements related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund) (B) | Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (all other engagements) (C) | Total of (A), (B) and (C) |
2017 | $7,350 | $502,238 | $606,585 | $1,116,173 |
2016 | $7,500 | $449,529 | $595,469 | $1,052,498 |
All other engagement fees were billed for services in connection with agreed upon procedures and tax compliance for DIMA and other related entities.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. Generally, each Fund’s Audit Committee must pre approve (i) all services to be performed for a Fund by a Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and (ii) all non-audit services to be performed by a Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the DIMA Entities with respect to operations and financial reporting of the Fund, except that the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson of each Fund’s Audit Committee may grant the pre-approval for non-audit services described in items (i) and (ii) above for non-prohibited services for engagements of less than $100,000. All such delegated pre approvals shall be presented to each Fund’s Audit Committee no later than the next Audit Committee meeting.
There were no amounts that were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
According to the registrant’s principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, substantially all of the principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's hours spent on auditing the registrant's financial statements were attributed to work performed by full-time permanent employees of the principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
***
In connection with the audit of the 2016 financial statements, the Fund entered into an engagement letter with EY. The terms of the engagement letter required by EY, and agreed to by the Audit Committee, included provisions in which the parties consent to the sole jurisdiction of federal courts in New York, Boston or the Northern District of Illinois, as well as a waiver of right to a trial by jury.
In connection with the audit of the 2017 financial statements, the Fund entered into an engagement letter with EY. The terms of the engagement letter required by EY, and agreed to by the Audit Committee, include a provision mandating the use of mediation and arbitration to resolve any controversy or claim between the parties arising out of or relating to the engagement letter or services provided thereunder.
***
1.) In various communications beginning on April 20, 2016, EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that EY had identified the following matters that it determined to be inconsistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules.
| · | EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee of financial relationships held by covered persons within EY and its affiliates that were in violation of the Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. EY advised the Audit Committee that after consideration of the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY concluded that the independence breaches did not and do not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements of the Fund and that a reasonable investor would reach the same conclusion. In assessing this matter, EY indicated that upon detection the breaches were corrected promptly and that none of the breaches (i) related to financial relationships directly in the Fund, (ii) involved professionals who were part of the audit engagement team for the Fund or in a position to influence the audit engagement team, or (iii) were for services directly for the Fund. |
| · | EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that, in 2016, a pension plan for the Ernst & Young Global Limited (“EYG”) member firm in Germany (“EY Germany”), through one of its investment advisors, purchased an investment in an entity that may be deemed to be under common control with the Fund. EY informed the Audit Committee that this investment was inconsistent with Rule 2-01(c)(1)(i) of Regulation S-X. EY advised the Audit Committee that in assessing the impact of the independence breach, in fact and appearance, EY considered all relevant facts and circumstances to assess whether a reasonable investor would conclude that EY was and is capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within the audit engagement. EY advised the Audit Committee that after consideration of the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY concluded that the independence breach did not and does not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audit of the financial statements of the Fund and that a reasonable investor would reach the same conclusion. In reaching this conclusion, EY noted a number of factors, including that the purchase was by EY Germany’s investment advisor without EY Germany’s permission, authorization or knowledge and EY Germany instructed its investment advisor to sell the shares of the entity that may be deemed to be under common control with the Fund immediately upon detection of the purchase and the breach did not involve any professionals who were part of the audit engagement team for the Fund or in a position to influence the audit engagement team. In addition, EY noted that the independence breach did not (i) create a mutual or conflicting interest with the Fund, (ii) place EY in the position of auditing its own work, (iii) result in EY acting as management or an employee of the Fund, or (iv) place EY in a position of being an advocate of the Fund. |
| · | EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that, in 2014, the EYG member firm in Spain (“EY Spain”) completed an acquisition of a small consulting firm that had a deposit account with an overdraft line of credit at the time of the acquisition with Deutsche Bank SA Espanola, which EY Spain acquired. EY informed the Audit Committee that having this line of credit with an entity that may be deemed to be under common control with the Fund was inconsistent with Rule 2-01(c)(1)(ii) of Regulation S-X. EY advised the Audit Committee that in assessing the impact of the independence breach, in fact and appearance, EY considered all relevant facts and circumstances to assess whether a reasonable investor would conclude that EY was and is capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within the audit engagements. EY advised the Audit Committee that after consideration of the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY concluded that the independence breach did not and does not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements of the Fund and that a reasonable investor would reach the same conclusion. In reaching this conclusion, EY noted a number of factors, including that that the credit line was terminated and the breach did not involve any professionals who were part of the audit engagement team for the Fund or in a position to influence the audit engagement team. In addition, EY noted that the independence breach did not (i) create a mutual or conflicting interest with the Fund, (ii) place EY in the position of auditing its own work, (iii) result in EY acting as management or an employee of the Fund, or (iv) place EY in a position of being an advocate of the Fund. |
EY advised the Audit Committee that the above described matters, individually and in the aggregate, do not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements, and that EY can continue to act as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Management and the Audit Committee considered these matters and, based solely upon EY’s description of the facts and the representations made by EY, believe that (1) these matters did not impact EY’s application of objective and impartial judgment with respect to all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements; and (2) a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would reach the same conclusion.
2.) In various communications beginning on June 27, 2016, EY also informed the Audit Committee that EY had identified independence breaches where EY and covered persons maintain lending relationships with owners of greater than 10% of the shares of certain investment companies within the “investment company complex” as defined under Rule 2-01(f)(14) of Regulation S-X. EY informed the Audit Committee that these lending relationships are inconsistent with Rule 2-01(c)(l)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (referred to as the “Loan Rule”).
The Loan Rule specifically provides that an accounting firm would not be independent if it receives a loan from a lender that is a record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of an audit client’s equity securities. For purposes of the Loan Rule, audit clients include the Fund as well as all registered investment companies advised by the Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser, and its affiliates, including other subsidiaries of the Adviser’s parent company, Deutsche Bank AG (collectively, the “Deutsche Funds Complex”). EY’s lending relationships affect EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to all investment companies in the Deutsche Funds Complex.
EY informed the Audit Committee that, after evaluating the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY has concluded that the lending relationships described above do not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements. EY informed the Audit Committee that its conclusion was based on a number of factors, including, among others, EY’s belief that the lenders are not able to impact the impartiality of EY or assert any influence over the investment companies in the Deutsche Funds Complex whose shares the lenders own or the applicable investment company’s investment adviser. In addition, the individuals at EY who arranged EY’s lending relationships have no oversight of, or ability to influence, the individuals at EY who conducted the audits of the Fund’s financial statements.
On June 20, 2016, the SEC Staff issued a “no-action” letter to another mutual fund complex (see Fidelity Management & Research Company et al., No-Action Letter) related to similar Loan Rule issues as those described above. In that letter, the SEC Staff confirmed that it would not recommend enforcement action against an investment company that relied on the audit services performed by an audit firm that was not in compliance with the Loan Rule in certain specified circumstances. The circumstances described in the no-action letter appear to be substantially similar to the circumstances that effected EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to the Fund. EY confirmed to the Audit Committee that it meets the conditions of the no-action letter.
3.) In various communications beginning on January 25, 2017, EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that EY had identified the following matters that it determined to be inconsistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules.
| · | EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee of financial relationships held by covered persons within EY and its affiliates that were in violation of the Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. EY advised the Audit Committee that after consideration of the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY concluded that the independence breaches do not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements of the Fund and that a reasonable investor would reach the same conclusion. In assessing this matter, EY indicated that upon detection the breaches were corrected promptly and that none of the breaches (i) related to financial relationships directly in the Fund, (ii) involved professionals who were part of the audit engagement team for the Fund or in a position to influence the audit engagement team, or (iii) were for services directly for the Fund. |
| · | EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that, in 2015, the Ernst & Young Global Limited (“EYG”) member firm in Spain (“EY Spain”) provided a loaned staff service to Deutsche Bank AG, where a manager from EY Spain analyzed investment opportunities in Spain under the supervision of Deutsche Bank AG personnel. EY informed the Audit Committee that this loaned staff service where the EY professional temporarily acted as an employee of Deutsche Bank AG was inconsistent with Rule 2-01(c)(4)(vi) of Regulation S-X. EY advised the Audit Committee that in assessing the impact of the independence breach, in fact and appearance, EY considered all relevant facts and circumstances to assess whether a reasonable investor would conclude that EY was and is capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within the audit engagements. EY advised the Audit Committee that after consideration of the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY concluded that the independence breach did not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements of the Fund and that a reasonable investor would reach the same conclusion. In reaching this conclusion, EY noted a number of factors, including that the breach did not involve any professionals who were part of the audit engagement team for the Fund or in a position to influence the audit engagement team and did not involve services provided directly for the Fund. In addition, EY noted that the independence breach did not (i) create a mutual or conflicting interest with the Fund, (ii) place EY in the position of auditing its own work, (iii) result in EY acting as management or an employee of the Fund, or (iv) place EY in a position of being an advocate of the Fund. |
EY advised the Audit Committee that the above described matters, individually and in the aggregate, do not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements, and that EY can continue to act as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
4.) In various communications beginning on January 25, 2017, EY informed the Audit Committee that EY had identified an independence breach where a covered person maintains a lending relationship with an owner of greater than 10% of the shares of certain investment companies within the “investment company complex” as defined under Rule 2-01(f)(14) of Regulation S-X. EY informed the Audit Committee that this lending relationship is inconsistent with Rule 2-01(c)(l)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (referred to as the “Loan Rule”).
The Loan Rule specifically provides that an accounting firm would not be independent if it receives a loan from a lender that is a record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of an audit client’s equity securities. For purposes of the Loan Rule, audit clients include the Fund as well as all registered investment companies advised by the Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser, and its affiliates, including other subsidiaries of the Adviser’s parent company, Deutsche Bank AG (collectively, the “Deutsche Funds Complex”). The covered person’s lending relationship affects EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to all investment companies in the Deutsche Funds Complex.
EY informed the Audit Committee that, after evaluating the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY has concluded that the lending relationship described above does not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements. EY informed the Audit Committee that its conclusion was based on a number of factors, including, among others, EY’s belief that the lender is not able to impact the impartiality of EY or assert any influence over the investment companies in the Deutsche Funds Complex whose shares the lenders own or the applicable investment company’s investment adviser.
On June 20, 2016, the SEC Staff issued a “no-action” letter to another mutual fund complex (see Fidelity Management & Research Company et al., No-Action Letter) related to similar Loan Rule issues as those described above. In that letter, the SEC Staff confirmed that it would not recommend enforcement action against an investment company that relied on the audit services performed by an audit firm that was not in compliance with the Loan Rule in certain specified circumstances. The circumstances described in the no-action letter appear to be substantially similar to the circumstances that effected EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to the Fund. EY confirmed to the Audit Committee that it meets the conditions of the no-action letter.
5.) On July 11, 2017, EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that EY had identified the following matters that it determined to be inconsistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules.
| · | EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee of financial relationships held by covered persons within EY and its affiliates that were in violation of Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. EY advised the Audit Committee that after consideration of the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY concluded that the independence breaches do not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements of the Fund and that a reasonable investor would reach the same conclusion. In assessing this matter, EY indicated that upon detection the breaches were corrected promptly and that none of the breaches (i) related to financial relationships directly in the Fund, (ii) involved professionals who were part of the audit engagement team for the Fund or in a position to influence the audit engagement team, or (iii) were for services directly for the Fund. |
EY advised the Audit Committee that the above described matters, individually and in the aggregate, do not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements, and that EY can continue to act as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
6.) On July 11, 2017, EY informed the Audit Committee that EY had identified an independence breach where EY maintains a lending relationship with an entity that owned for a period of time greater than 10% of the shares of an investment company within the “investment company complex” as defined under Rule 2-01(f)(14) of Regulation S-X. EY informed the Audit Committee that this lending relationship was inconsistent with Rule 2-01(c)(l)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (referred to as the “Loan Rule”).
The Loan Rule specifically provides that an accounting firm would not be independent if it receives a loan from a lender that is a record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of an audit client’s equity securities. For purposes of the Loan Rule, audit clients include the Fund as well as all registered investment companies advised by the Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser, and its affiliates, including other subsidiaries of the Adviser’s parent company, Deutsche Bank AG (collectively, the “Deutsche Funds Complex”). EY’s lending relationship affects EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to all investment companies in the Deutsche Funds Complex.
EY informed the Audit Committee that, after evaluating the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY has concluded that the lending relationship described above did not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements. EY informed the Audit Committee that its conclusion was based on a number of factors, including, among others, EY’s belief that the lender is not able to impact the impartiality of EY and was not able to assert any influence over the investment company in the Deutsche Funds Complex whose shares the lender owned or the applicable investment company’s investment adviser.
On June 20, 2016, the SEC Staff issued a “no-action” letter to another mutual fund complex (see Fidelity Management & Research Company et al., No-Action Letter) related to similar Loan Rule issues as those described above. In that letter, the SEC Staff confirmed that it would not recommend enforcement action against an investment company that relied on the audit services performed by an audit firm that was not in compliance with the Loan Rule in certain specified circumstances. The circumstances described in the no-action letter appear to be substantially similar to the circumstances that effected EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to the Fund. EY confirmed to the Audit Committee that it meets the conditions of the no-action letter.
7.) On October 24, 2017, EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee that EY had identified the following matter that it determined to be inconsistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules.
| · | EY advised the Fund’s Audit Committee of a financial relationship held by a covered person within EY and its affiliates that was in violation of Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. EY advised the Audit Committee that after consideration of the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY concluded that the independence breach did not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements of the Fund and that a reasonable investor would reach the same conclusion. In assessing this matter, EY indicated that upon detection the breach was corrected promptly and that the breach (i) did not relate to financial relationships directly in the Fund, (ii) did not involve professionals who were part of the audit engagement team for the Fund or in a position to influence the audit engagement team, and (iii) were not for services directly for the Fund. |
EY advised the Audit Committee that the above described matter did not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements, and that EY can continue to act as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
8.) On October 24, 2017, EY informed the Audit Committee that EY had identified independence breaches where EY maintains lending relationships with entities that own greater than 10% of the shares of certain investment companies within the “investment company complex” as defined under Rule 2-01(f)(14) of Regulation S-X. EY informed the Audit Committee that these lending relationships were inconsistent with Rule 2-01(c)(l)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (referred to as the “Loan Rule”).
The Loan Rule specifically provides that an accounting firm would not be independent if it receives a loan from a lender that is a record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of an audit client’s equity securities. For purposes of the Loan Rule, audit clients include the Fund as well as all registered investment companies advised by the Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser, and its affiliates, including other subsidiaries of the Adviser’s parent company, Deutsche Bank AG (collectively, the “Deutsche Funds Complex”). EY’s lending relationships affect EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to all investment companies in the Deutsche Funds Complex.
EY informed the Audit Committee that, after evaluating the facts and circumstances and the applicable independence rules, EY has concluded that the lending relationships described above do not and will not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of the financial statements for the Fund and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit engagements. EY informed the Audit Committee that its conclusion was based on a number of factors, including, among others, EY’s belief that the lenders are not able to impact the impartiality of EY or assert any influence over the investment company in the Deutsche Funds Complex whose shares the lender owned or the applicable investment company’s investment adviser.
On June 20, 2016, the SEC Staff issued a “no-action” letter to another mutual fund complex (see Fidelity Management & Research Company et al., No-Action Letter) related to similar Loan Rule issues as those described above. In that letter, the SEC Staff confirmed that it would not recommend enforcement action against an investment company that relied on the audit services performed by an audit firm that was not in compliance with the Loan Rule in certain specified circumstances. The circumstances described in the no-action letter appear to be substantially similar to the circumstances that effected EY’s independence under the Loan Rule with respect to the Fund. EY confirmed to the Audit Committee that it meets the conditions of the no-action letter.
| |
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS |
| |
| Not applicable |
| |
ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
| |
| Not applicable |
| |
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
| Not applicable |
| |
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
| Not applicable |
| |
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS |
| |
| Not applicable |
| |
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
| |
| There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board. The primary function of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to identify and recommend individuals for membership on the Board and oversee the administration of the Board Governance Guidelines. Shareholders may recommend candidates for Board positions by forwarding their correspondence by U.S. mail or courier service to Keith R. Fox, Deutsche Funds Board Chair, c/o Thomas R. Hiller, Ropes & Gray LLP, Prudential Tower, 800 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02199-3600. |
| |
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
| |
| (a) | The Chief Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on the evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report. |
| |
| (b) | There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. |
| |
ITEM 12. | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies |
| |
| Not applicable |
| |
ITEM 13. | EXHIBITS |
| |
| (a)(1) | Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CODE ETH. |
| |
| (a)(2) | Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) is filed and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT. |
| |
| (b) | Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) is furnished and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant: | Deutsche CROCI® Equity Dividend Fund, a series of Deutsche Value Series, Inc. |
| |
| |
By: | /s/Hepsen Uzcan Hepsen Uzcan President |
| |
Date: | 1/29/2018 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/Hepsen Uzcan Hepsen Uzcan President |
| |
Date: | 1/29/2018 |
| |
| |
| |
By: | /s/Paul Schubert Paul Schubert Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| |
Date: | 1/29/2018 |
| |