Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Leases The Company leased certain office facilities and office equipment pursuant to operating leases during the year ended December 31, 2017 . The future minimum payments for office space and office equipment over the next five years are summarized as follows: Lease Commitments Year Ending December 31,: (in thousands) 2018 $ 2,973 2019 949 2020 195 2021 52 2022 25 Thereafter 25 Total $ 4,219 Rent expense pursuant to operating leases was approximately $3.3 million , $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. Other Commitments Amgen Licensing Agreements Metreleptin . In connection with Aegerion's acquisition of MYALEPT in January 2015, Aegerion acquired a license agreement between Amgen Inc. (“Amgen”) and Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated February 7, 2006 (the “Amgen License”) pursuant to which an exclusive worldwide license was obtained from Amgen to certain know-how and patents and patent applications covering the composition of matter and methods of use of metreleptin to develop, manufacture and commercialize a preparation containing metreleptin (the “Amgen Licensed Products”). As part of the Amgen License, an exclusive sublicense of Amgen’s exclusive rights to certain metreleptin-related patents and patent applications owned by the Rockefeller University and exclusively licensed to Amgen under a license agreement dated April 14, 1995, as amended (the “Rockefeller License”) and an exclusive sublicense of Amgen’s non-exclusive rights to certain metreleptin-related patents and patent applications owned by The Regents of the University of California and non-exclusively licensed to Amgen under a license agreement dated July 13, 2005 (the “UCSF License”) were obtained. Amgen retains rights to conduct research, development, manufacturing and commercialization activities with respect to products other than the Amgen Licensed Products. Sublicenses under the licenses are permitted and are subject to certain limitations, including Amgen’s right of first offer for any out-license, partnership, co-development, commercialization, co-promotion or similar agreement related to metreleptin or the Amgen Licensed Products, which expires in February 2021. Under this license agreement, Amgen must notify Aegerion of any potential third-party partnership regarding any intellectual property rights controlled by Amgen in the neurology field and Aegerion will have a right of first negotiation for any license, partnership, co-development, commercialization, co-promotion or similar agreement, which expires in February 2021. Aegerion is required to make royalty payments to Amgen on net sales of each Amgen Licensed Product on a country-by-country basis (i) at a royalty rate in the low double digits where the Amgen Licensed Product has patent protection or market exclusivity granted by a regulatory authority at the time of regulatory approval in the applicable country during the applicable royalty term, which runs on a country-by-country basis until the later of (a) the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim covering an Amgen Licensed Product in the applicable country, (b) expiration of any market exclusivity granted by a regulatory authority, and (c) ten years from the date on which an Amgen Licensed Product is first sold to a third party in a country after regulatory approval for the Amgen Licensed Product has been granted in such country ("Amgen Royalty Term") or (ii) at a royalty rate in the mid-single digits to low double digits where the Amgen Licensed Product receives patent protection or market exclusivity following the time of regulatory approval in the applicable country, in either case subject to a variety of customary reductions. Under the Amgen License, Aegerion is also required to directly meet certain payment obligations under the Rockefeller License and UCSF License. Aegerion is required to make royalty payments to Rockefeller University on net sales of each product with patent rights or know-how in the field of obesity genes, obesity gene products, and molecules that modulate or mediate their action and/or regulation on a country-by-country basis at a range of royalty rates in the low single digits depending on whether the product has an orphan product designation or not until the later to occur of expiration of (i) patent protection, (ii) any market exclusivity period granted in the applicable country, or (iii) any data exclusivity period in the applicable country (with certain limitations related to the number of units sold). In February 2015, Aegerion paid a one-time $5.0 million milestone payment to Rockefeller University, which was due twelve months following the receipt of marketing approval for MYALEPT in the U.S. Aegerion is also required to pay to Rockefeller University a percentage in the low double digits of any upfront license fees or one-time fees Aegerion receives in consideration for any sublicense of the licensed rights. There are no material payment obligations outstanding under the UCSF License. Also, in connection with the acquisition of metreleptin, Aegerion entered into a letter agreement with AstraZeneca pursuant to which Aegerion agreed to make royalty payments payable by AstraZeneca and its affiliates to BMS with respect to net sales of metreleptin in the U.S. The time-based royalty rate ranges from mid-single digits to low double digits, increasing annually in years 2016 to 2019 from rates in the low single digits to low double digits, peaking in years 2019 to 2020 at a rate in the low double digits before decreasing in years 2022 through 2025 to rates in the high single digits to mid-single digits. The royalty obligation to BMS terminates in 2026. The Amgen License will terminate upon the expiration of the last Amgen Royalty Term for any Amgen Licensed Product. Aegerion has the right to terminate the Amgen License for convenience upon 90 days prior written notice to Amgen or for Amgen’s uncured material breach of the Amgen License, or becoming subject to specified bankruptcy or liquidation events. Amgen may terminate the Amgen License for Aegerion’s uncured failure to make payments to Amgen or if Aegerion is the subject of specified bankruptcy or liquidation events. Aegerion made royalty payments to Amgen, Rockefeller University and BMS related to the sales of MYALEPT through November 29, 2016. There were no royalty payments made to these parties from November 30, 2016 to December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , Aegerion made aggregate royalty payments of $9.7 million to Amgen, Rockefeller University and BMS, and had $2.9 million and $2.0 million in aggregate royalties payable as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. University of Pennsylvania Licensing Agreements Lomitapide . In May 2006, Aegerion entered into a license agreement with The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania (“UPenn”) pursuant to which it obtained an exclusive, worldwide license from UPenn to certain know-how and a range of patent rights applicable to lomitapide. In particular, Aegerion obtained a license to certain patent and patent applications owned by UPenn relating to the dosing of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitors, including lomitapide, and certain patents and patent applications and know-how covering the composition of matter of lomitapide that were assigned to UPenn by BMS in the field of monotherapy or in combination with other dyslipidemic therapies, which are therapies for the treatment of patients, with abnormally high or low levels of plasma cholesterol or triglycerides. Aegerion is obligated under this license agreement to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, commercialize, market and sell at least one product covered by the licensed patent rights, such as lomitapide. In addition, Aegerion will be required to make specified royalty payments on net sales of products, at a range of royalty rates in the high single digits on net sales of lomitapide in countries where lomitapide has patent protection, and of any other products covered by the license (subject to a variety of customary reductions), and share with UPenn specified percentages of sublicensing royalties and certain other consideration that Aegerion receives under any sublicenses that Aegerion may grant. During the year ended December 31, 2017 , Aegerion made $3.1 million in royalty payments to UPenn. Aegerion made royalty payments to UPenn through November 29, 2016, and there were no royalty payments made from November 30, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Additionally, Aegerion accrued an additional $0.7 million and $1.3 million in royalties to UPenn as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 . This license agreement will remain in effect on a country-by-country basis until the expiration of the last-to-expire licensed patent right in the applicable country. Aegerion has the right to terminate this license agreement for UPenn’s uncured material breach of the license agreement or for convenience upon 60 days ’ prior written notice to UPenn, subject to certain specific conditions and consequences. UPenn may terminate this license agreement for Aegerion’s uncured material breach of the license agreement, its uncured failure to make payments to UPenn or if Aegerion is the subject of specified bankruptcy or liquidation events. Indemnities In connection with the sale of assets, the Company provided indemnities with respect to certain matters, including product liability, patent infringement, contractual breaches and misrepresentations, and the Company provides other indemnities to third parties under the clinical trial, license, service, supply and other agreements that it enters into in the normal course of its business. If the indemnified party were to make a successful claim pursuant to the terms of the indemnity, the Company would be required to reimburse the loss. These indemnities are generally subject to threshold amounts, specified claims periods and other restrictions and limitations. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , no amounts have been accrued in connection with such indemnities. Development and Post Marketing Regulatory Commitments Novelion and Aegerion have engaged Contract Research Organizations ("CROs") to provide research, safety and project management services (the "Services") in connection with the execution of their potential clinical trials and existing registries. Services would only give rise to liabilities to the extent that services are provided to Novelion or Aegerion, as applicable, and pass through expenses are incurred. As of December 31, 2017 , the Services have not yet been performed and the Company has potential commitments of approximately $47.0 million under these agreements. The amount reflected is based on the existing contracts and does not reflect any inflation, future modification to, or termination of, the existing contracts or anticipated or potential new contracts. Legal Matters As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the insurance proceeds receivable and provision for legal settlements are as follows: December 31, 2017 2016 (in thousands) Insurance Proceeds Receivable Class action lawsuit insurance proceeds $ — $ 22,000 Provision for Legal Settlements Class action lawsuit settlement $ — $ (22,250 ) DOJ and SEC settlement (39,612 ) (40,635 ) Relator legal settlement — (620 ) Relators legal fees — (405 ) Other litigation settlement — (100 ) Total provision for legal settlements (39,612 ) (64,010 ) Less: Provision for legal settlements - current (8,596 ) (64,010 ) Provision for legal settlements - non-current $ (31,016 ) $ — DOJ/SEC Investigations In late 2013, Aegerion received a subpoena from Department of Justice (the "DOJ"), represented by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston, requesting documents regarding its marketing and sale of JUXTAPID in the U.S., as well as related public disclosures. In late 2014, Aegerion received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") requesting certain information related to Aegerion’s sales activities and disclosures related to JUXTAPID. The SEC also requested documents and information on a number of other topics, including documents related to the investigations by government authorities in Brazil into whether Aegerion’s activities in Brazil violated Brazilian anti-corruption laws, and whether Aegerion’s activities in Brazil violated the FCPA. In May 2016, Aegerion reached preliminary agreements in principle with the DOJ and the SEC to resolve their investigations into U.S. commercial activities and disclosures relating to JUXTAPID. On September 22, 2017, Aegerion entered into a series of agreements in an effort to resolve investigations being conducted by the DOJ and the SEC regarding these topics. The terms of these agreements were substantially similar to the preliminary agreements in principle. In connection with the SEC investigation, Aegerion consented to the entry of a final judgment, on September 25, 2017, in connection with a complaint filed by the SEC without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in the complaint (the "SEC Judgment"). The complaint alleged negligent violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, related to certain statements made by Aegerion in 2013 regarding the conversion rate for JUXTAPID prescriptions. The SEC Judgment provides that Aegerion must pay a civil penalty in the amount of $4.1 million , to be paid in installments over three years, plus interest on any unpaid balance at a rate of 1.75% per annum. As of December 31, 2017 , $1.2 million remains due as a current liability and $1.6 million remains due as a non-current liability. Aegerion’s payment of this civil penalty is subject to acceleration in the event of certain change of control transactions or certain transfers of Aegerion’s rights in JUXTAPID or MYALEPT. Aegerion’s payment schedule is also subject to acceleration in the event that Aegerion fails to satisfy its payment obligations under the SEC Judgment. The SEC Judgment was approved by a U.S. District Court judge on September 25, 2017. In connection with the DOJ investigation, Aegerion entered into a Plea Agreement, a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”), a Civil Settlement, certain State Settlement Agreements, and a Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (“FDA Consent Decree”). Under the DOJ Plea Agreement, Aegerion agreed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor misbranding violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA"). On November 20, 2017, the U.S. District Court rejected Aegerion’s Plea Agreement. On January 12, 2018, Aegerion entered into a new Plea Agreement with the DOJ. On January 30, 2018, a U.S. District Court Judge sentenced Aegerion after accepting Aegerion’s guilty criminal plea. The Court did not impose a criminal fine and instead ordered Aegerion to pay restitution, in the amount of $7.2 million payable over three years, plus interest on any unpaid balance at a rate of 1.75% per annum, into a fund managed by an independent claims administrator. Of the total $7.2 million of restitution fund, $2.9 million is recorded as a current liability and $4.3 million is recorded as a non-current liability. As contemplated by the Plea Agreement, Aegerion was further sentenced to a three -year term of probation. Among the terms of probation, Aegerion must (i) comply with federal, state and local laws, (ii) pay restitution in accordance with the payment schedule set by the Court, (iii) notify its probation officer of any prosecution, major civil litigation or administrative proceeding, (iv) seek permission of its probation officer prior to selling, assigning or transferring assets, (v) notify its probation officer of any material change in its economic circumstances, (vi) forbear from disparaging the factual basis of Aegerion’s plea or denying that Aegerion itself is guilty, and (vii) comply with the DPA and CIA. Reports prepared by the independent review organization and FDA Auditor, as discussed below, must be provided to its probation officer. Under the terms of the DPA, Aegerion admitted it engaged in conduct that constituted a conspiracy to violate the HIPAA. The DPA provides that Aegerion must continue to cooperate fully with the DOJ concerning its investigation into other individuals or entities. The DPA provides that Aegerion must maintain a robust Compliance and Ethics Program (as defined in the DPA) that requires, among other things, a designated Compliance Officer and Compliance Committee; written compliance policies and procedures; a training program focused on Aegerion’s compliance policies and procedures; a disclosure program to allow individuals to report potential legal and/or compliance violations, including violations of HIPAA; a non-retaliation policy; and a monitoring and auditing program. Under the DPA, Aegerion, as well as the Board of Directors of the Company (or a designated committee thereof), must also conduct regular reviews of its Compliance and Ethics Program, provide certifications to the DOJ that the program is believed to be effective and notify the DOJ of any probable violations of HIPAA. In the event Aegerion breaches the DPA, there is a risk the government would seek to impose remedies provided for in the DPA, including instituting criminal prosecution against Aegerion and/or seeking to impose stipulated penalties against Aegerion. The DPA is subject to review and supervision by a U.S. District Court judge. Aegerion also entered into the DOJ Civil Settlement Agreement to resolve allegations by the DOJ that false claims for JUXTAPID were submitted to governmental healthcare programs. The DOJ Civil Settlement Agreement requires Aegerion to pay a civil settlement in the amount of $28.8 million , which includes up to $2.7 million designated for certain U.S. states relating to Medicaid expenditures for JUXTAPID, to be paid in installments over three years. In addition, a $0.8 million of interest under the preliminary agreements in principle with the DOJ has been paid subsequent to December 31, 2017. Of the $28.8 million , $3.7 million is recorded as a current liability and $25.1 million is recorded as a non-current liability. Aegerion’s payment of this civil settlement amount is subject to acceleration in the event of certain change of control transactions or certain transfers of Aegerion’s rights in JUXTAPID or MYALEPT. In the event that Aegerion fails to satisfy its obligations under the DOJ Civil Settlement Agreement, Aegerion could be subject to additional penalties or litigation. Aegerion also agreed to enter into the State Settlement Agreements to resolve claims under state law analogues to the federal False Claims Act. The terms of the State Settlement Agreements are substantially similar to those set forth in the DOJ Civil Settlement Agreement. As noted above, participating states will receive up to $2.7 million in the aggregate from the $28.8 million amount to be paid pursuant to the DOJ Civil Settlement Agreement. Aegerion also agreed to the FDA Consent Decree with the DOJ and the FDA to resolve a separate civil complaint alleging that the company violated the FDCA by failing to comply with the JUXTAPID REMS program and the requirement to provide adequate directions for all of the uses for which it distributed JUXTAPID. The FDA Consent Decree requires Aegerion, among other things, to comply with the JUXTAPID REMS program; retain a qualified independent auditor to conduct annual audits of its compliance with the JUXTAPID REMS program; and remediate any noncompliance identified by the auditor within specified timeframes. In the event Aegerion fails to comply with the JUXTAPID REMS program or any other provisions of the FDA Consent Decree, Aegerion could be subject to additional administrative remedies, civil or criminal penalties and/or stipulated damages. Aegerion is required to notify the FDA in advance of certain changes in control, or changes in its business that may affect its operations, assets, rights or liabilities in the United States. The FDA Consent Decree does not take effect until it is approved by the Court and the injunction order is issued. Separately, Aegerion entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (“CIA”) with the Department of Human Services Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”). The CIA requires Aegerion, among other things, to maintain a Compliance Program (as defined in the CIA) that includes: the designation of a Compliance Officer and a Compliance Committee; comprehensive written policies and procedures regarding the operation of the Compliance Program and appropriate conduct related to sales, marketing, reimbursement, incentive compensation and other matters; training and education regarding the Compliance Program and requirements of the CIA; a centralized annual risk assessment and mitigation process; an independent review and analysis of Aegerion’s systems, transactions, risk assessment and mitigation process and other compliance activities; a disclosure program that allows individuals to report issues or questions associated with Aegerion’s policies, conduct, practices or procedures; a field force monitoring program to evaluate and monitor sales personnel’s interactions with healthcare professionals; monitoring of non-promotional activities, including consultants, donations to independent third-party patient assistance programs and other types of grants; certain requirements for the variable compensation programs for its U.S. sales personnel; and an executive financial recoupment program that puts at risk of forfeiture and recoupment performance pay for certain of Aegerion’s and the Company’s executives. Under the CIA, Aegerion, as well as the Board of Directors of the Company (or a designated committee thereof), must also conduct regular reviews of Aegerion’s Compliance Program and provide an annual resolution or certification to OIG that the program is believed to be effective. Additionally, Aegerion must obtain management certifications from certain employees who are expected to monitor and oversee Aegerion’s activities, which must be provided to OIG. Aegerion has reporting obligations under the CIA, including with respect to any ongoing investigation or legal proceeding involving an allegation that Aegerion has engaged in any fraudulent activities or committed a crime, any communications with FDA regarding improper promotion or marketing of Aegerion’s products and any probable violations of criminal, civil or administrative laws applicable to federal healthcare programs. In the event Aegerion breaches the CIA, there is a risk the government would seek to impose remedies provided for in the CIA, including seeking to impose stipulated penalties against Aegerion and/or seeking to exclude Aegerion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Investigations in Brazil Federal and state authorities in Brazil are conducting an investigation to determine whether there have been violations of Brazilian laws related to the sales of JUXTAPID in Brazil. In July 2016, the Ethics Council of Interfarma fined Aegerion's subsidiary in Brazil ("Aegerion Brazil") approximately $0.5 million for violations of the industry association’s Code of Conduct, to which Aegerion Brazil is bound due to its affiliation with Interfarma. Also, the Board of Directors of Interfarma imposed an additional penalty of suspension of Aegerion Brazil’s membership, without suspension of Aegerion Brazil’s membership contribution, for a period of 180 days for Aegerion Brazil to demonstrate the implementation of effective measures to cease alleged irregular conduct, or exclusion of the Company's membership in Interfarma if such measures are not implemented. Aegerion Brazil paid approximately $0.5 million related to this fine during the third quarter of 2016. In March 2017, after the suspension period ended, Interfarma’s Board of Directors decided to reintegrate Aegerion Brazil, enabling it to participate regularly in Interfarma activities, subject to meeting certain obligations. Also, in July 2016, Aegerion Brazil received an inquiry from a Public Prosecutor Office of the Brazilian State of Paraná asking it to respond to questions related to media coverage regarding JUXTAPID and its relationship with a patient association to which Aegerion made donations for patient support. This preliminary inquiry was later reclassified as a civil inquiry, which is a preliminary procedure by the Public Prosecutor's Office that aims to verify if there are enough elements for it to file a formal lawsuit or to dismiss the inquiry. In June 2017, the Federal Public Prosecutor of the City of São José dos Campos, State of São Paulo, requested that a Brazilian federal court provide federal investigators with access to the bank records of certain individuals and entities, including Aegerion Brazil, certain former Aegerion Brazil employees, a Brazilian patient association, and certain Brazilian physicians. The Court has not yet ruled on the Federal Public Prosecutor’s request. The Public Prosecutors in Paraná and São José dos Campos continue to gather information in connection with their respective investigations. At this time, the Company does not know whether the inquiries of the Public Prosecutors in Paraná or São José dos Campos will result in the commencement of any formal proceeding against Aegerion, but if Aegerion’s activities in Brazil are found to violate any laws or governmental regulations, Aegerion may be subject to significant civil lawsuits to be filed by the Public Prosecution office, and administrative penalties imposed by Brazilian regulatory authorities and additional damages and fines. Under certain circumstances, Aegerion could be barred from further sales to federal and/or state governments in Brazil, including sales of JUXTAPID and/or MYALEPT, due to penalties imposed by Brazilian regulatory authorities or through civil actions initiated by federal or state public prosecutors. As of the filing date of this Annual Report, the Company cannot determine if a loss is probable as a result of the investigations and inquiry in Brazil and whether the outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and, as a result, no amounts have been recorded for a loss contingency. Shareholder Class Action Lawsuit In January 2014, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against Aegerion and certain of its former executive officers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging certain misstatements and omissions related to the marketing of JUXTAPID and Aegerion’s financial performance in violation of the federal securities laws. On July 22, 2016, co-lead plaintiffs and defendants filed a joint motion to stay the briefing schedule while they pursued mediation, which the Court granted on August 10, 2016. Through mediation, the co-lead plaintiffs and defendants reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation on November 29, 2016. On January 17, 2017, the co-lead plaintiffs filed a stipulation of settlement with the Court that contained the settlement terms as agreed upon by the parties, including that Aegerion and its insurance carriers would contribute $22.3 million to a settlement fund for the putative class. The insurance carriers agreed to cover $22.0 million of this amount, with Aegerion responsible for the remainder of $0.3 million . On June 29, 2017, the Court entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement. Aegerion and its insurance carriers contributed their respective portions of the settlement fund as of July 14, 2017. Class members had until October 31, 2017, to object to or file objections or postmark requests to opt-out of the settlement. No class members filed objections to the settlement by the October 31 deadline. On November 30, 2017, the Court approved the settlement and dismissed the action in its entirety with prejudice. Qui Tam Litigation In March 2014, an amended qui tam complaint was filed under seal in the District of Massachusetts against Aegerion, two former executive officers and a former employee. United States ex rel Clarke v. Aegerion Pharm. Inc. , No. 13-cv-11785-IT. On September 22, 2017, the U.S. filed a notice of intervention as to Aegerion. On September 27, 2017, the qui tam relators filed a second amended complaint naming additional parties, including a former board member, former executives, and former employees of Aegerion, as well as other third parties. The second amended complaint noted that the relators would file a joint stipulation of dismissal with respect to Aegerion upon the completion of certain conditions set forth in the Civil Settlement Agreement. On October 27, 2017, the court granted Aegerion and relators’ joint motion to stay proceedings until sentencing in the criminal matter is complete. On February 20, 2018, Aegerion was dismissed from the qui tam lawsuit. Contingent Consideration Receivable Related to the Sale of Visudyne® On September 24, 2012, the Company completed the sale of its Visudyne business to Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. ("Valeant"). Subject to the achievement of certain future milestones, the Company was eligible to receive the following additional consideration: (i) a milestone payment of $5.0 million if receipt of the registration required for commercial sale of the Qcellus ™ laser in the U.S. (the Laser Registration) is obtained by December 31, 2013, $2.5 million if the Laser Registration is obtained after December 31, 2013 but before January 1, 2015, and $0 if the Laser Registration is obtained thereafter (the "Laser Earn-Out Payment"); (ii) up to $5.0 million in each calendar year commencing January 1, 2013 (up to a maximum of $15.0 million in the aggregate) for annual net royalties exceeding $8.5 million pursuant to the Amended and Restated PDT Product Development, Manufacturing and Distribution Agreement with Novartis Pharma AG (the "Novartis Agreement") or from other third-party sales of Visudyne outside of the U.S.; and (iii) a royalty on net sales attributable to new indications for Visudyne, if any should be approved by the FDA. On September 26, 2013, the FDA approved the premarket approval application ("PMA") supplement for the Qcellus laser and on October 10, 2013, the Company invoiced Valeant for the $5.0 million Laser Earn-Out Payment. Valeant subsequently disputed payment on the basis that it believes the Laser Earn-Out Payment remains contingent upon receipt of additional governmental authorizations with regard to the Qcellus laser. As a result, on September 22, 2015 the Company commenced an action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia against Valeant for breach of contract. In December 2017, we agreed to a settlement of this litigation in exchange for a settlement payment from Valeant of $0.5 million , and such receivable was recorded as other income in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. Related to the Sale of the PPDS Technology On April 3, 2013, Novelion completed the sale of its punctal plug drug delivery system technology for approximately $1.3 million (the "PPDS Technology") to Mati Therapeutics Inc. ("Mati") pursuant to the terms of Novelion’s asset purchase agreement with Mati (the "Mati Agreement"). Under the terms of the Mati Agreement, Novelion is eligible to receive future potential payments upon completion of certain product development and commercialization milestones that could reach $19.5 million (or exceed that amount if more than two products are commercialized), a low single digit royalty on worldwide net sales of all products using or developed from the PPDS Technology and a fee on payments received by Mati in respect of the PPDS Technology other than net sales revenues. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the Company received no proceeds related to the collection of this contingent consideration. |