Citigroup (C) 10-Q 2017 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

Commission file number 1-9924

Citigroup Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	52-1568099 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY (Address of principal executive offices)	10013 (Zip code)
(212) 559-1000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Yes o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No x

Number of shares of Citigroup Inc. common stock outstanding on June 30, 2017: 2,724,556,095

Available on the web at www.citigroup.com

CITIGROUP’S SECOND QUARTER 2017—FORM 10-Q

OVERVIEW	2
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND   ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND   RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	4
Executive Summary	4
Summary of Selected Financial Data	7
SEGMENT AND BUSINESS—INCOME (LOSS)   AND REVENUES	9
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET	11
Global Consumer Banking (GCB)	13
North America GCB	15
Latin America GCB	17
Asia GCB	19
Institutional Clients Group	21
Corporate/Other	26
OFF-BALANCE SHEET   ARRANGEMENTS	27
CAPITAL RESOURCES	28
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK TABLE OF   CONTENTS	47
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK	48
INCOME TAXES	89
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND   PROCEDURES	90
DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT	90
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	91
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES   TABLE OF CONTENTS	94
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	95
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)	103
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND DIVIDENDS	213

1

OVERVIEW

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, including the historical audited consolidated financial statements of Citigroup reflecting certain reclassifications set forth in Citigroup’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2017 (2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K), and Citigroup’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (First Quarter of 2017 Form 10-Q).

Additional information about Citigroup is available on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com. Citigroup’s recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and proxy statements, as well as other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), are available free of charge through Citi’s website by clicking on the “Investors” page and selecting “All SEC Filings.” The SEC’s website also contains current reports on Form 8-K, and other information regarding Citi at www.sec.gov.

Certain reclassifications, including a realignment of certain businesses, have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements and disclosures to conform to the current period’s presentation. For additional information on certain recent reclassifications, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Throughout this report, “Citigroup,” “Citi” and “the Company” refer to Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

2

Citigroup is managed pursuant to the following segments:

The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results above.

(1) Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

(2) North America includes the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, Latin America includes Mexico and Asia includes Japan.

3

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Second Quarter of 2017—Solid Performance Across Citi’s Businesses

As described further throughout this Executive Summary, Citi reported solid operating results in the second quarter of 2017, reflecting continued momentum across its businesses, notably those where Citi has been making investments. During the quarter, Citi had loan and revenue growth in both Global Consumer Banking (GCB) and the Institutional Clients Group (ICG) compared to the prior-year quarter, while continuing to wind-down the legacy assets in Corporate/Other.

In North AmericaGCB, retail banking showed significant growth outside of mortgage operations, while Citi-branded cards continued to benefit from the acquisition of the Costco portfolio. International GCB generated positive operating leverage driven by year-over-year revenue growth in both, Latin America and Asia, excluding the impact of foreign currency translation into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes (FX translation). ICG had a strong quarter with revenue growth across all Banking businesses, particularly in investment banking, partially offset by declines in fixed income and equity markets revenues. These increases in revenues were partially offset by lower revenues in Corporate/Other,reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy non-core assets.

Citi also continued to generate significant regulatory capital during the quarter driven mostly by earnings. Citi generated approximately $4.7 billion in regulatory capital during the quarter, before returning approximately $2.2 billion to its common shareholders in the form of common stock repurchases and dividends. Citi repurchased approximately 29 million common shares, as outstanding common shares declined 1% from the prior quarter and 6% from the prior-year period. Despite this capital return, each of Citigroup’s key regulatory capital metrics remained strong as of the end of the second quarter of 2017 (see “Capital” below). Citi utilized approximately $100 million of deferred tax assets (DTAs) during the quarter and $900 million of its DTAs during the first half of 2017.

The Federal Reserve Board did not object to the capital plan Citi submitted as part of the 2017 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Accordingly, as previously disclosed, Citi intends to return $18.9 billion of capital to its common shareholders over the next four quarters beginning with the third quarter of 2017 (for additional information, see “Equity Security Repurchases” and “Dividends” below).

While economic sentiment has improved, there continues to be various economic and political uncertainties and changes that could impact Citi’s businesses. For a more detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see each respective business’s results of operations and “Forward-Looking Statements” below, as well as each respective business’s results of operations and the “Managing Global Risk” and “Risk Factors” sections in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Second Quarter of 2017 Summary Results

Citigroup

Citigroup reported net income of $3.9 billion, or $1.28 per share, compared to $4.0 billion, or $1.24 per share, in the prior-year period. The 3% decrease in net income from the prior-year period was primarily driven by higher credit costs and operating expenses, as well as a higher effective tax rate, partially offset by higher revenues. Earnings per share increased 3% largely due to a 6% reduction in average shares outstanding.

Citigroup revenues of $17.9 billion in the second quarter of 2017 increased 2%, driven by a 6% increase in ICG, as well as a 5% increase in GCB, partially offset by a 45% decrease in Corporate/Other due primarily to the continued wind-down of legacy non-core assets.

Citigroup’s end-of-period loans increased 2% to $645 billion versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citigroup’s end-of-period loans also grew 2%, as 4% growth in both GCB and ICG was partially offset by the continued wind-down of legacy assets in Corporate/Other. (Citi’s results of operations excluding the impact of FX translation are non-GAAP financial measures.) Citigroup’s end-of-period deposits increased 2% to $959 billion versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citigroup’s deposits were also up 2%, driven by a 3% increase in both GCB and ICG deposits, slightly offset by a decline in Corporate/Other deposits.

Expenses

Citigroup’s operating expenses were up slightly at $10.5 billion versus the prior-year period, as the impact of higher volume-related expenses, performance-based compensation and ongoing investments were partially offset by efficiency savings and the wind-down of legacy assets. Year-over-year, GCB and ICG operating expenses were up each 5% while Corporate/Other operating expenses declined 24%.

Cost of Credit

Citi’s total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims of $1.7 billion increased 22% from the prior-year period. The increase was driven by an increase in net credit losses of $94 million and a net loan loss reserve release of $16 million, compared to a net release of $256 million mostly related to legacy assets in the prior-year period.

Net credit losses of $1.7 billion increased 6% versus the prior-year period. Consumer net credit losses of $1.6 billion increased 11%, primarily driven by the Costco portfolio acquisition, organic volume growth and seasoning, and the impact of changes in collections processes in the North America cards businesses, partially offset by the continued wind-down of legacy assets in Corporate/Other. Corporate net credit losses decreased 45% from the prior-year period to $77 million, driven by improvement in the energy sector. Citi

4

expects consumer cost of credit to increase in the near term due to continued volume growth.

For additional information on Citi’s consumer and corporate credit costs and allowance for loan losses, see “Credit Risk” below.

Capital

Citigroup’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios , on a fully implemented basis, were 13.1% and 14.7% as of June 30, 2017 (based on Basel III Standardized Approach for determining risk-weighted assets), respectively, compared to 12.5% and 14.1% as of June 30, 2016 (based on the Basel III Advanced Approaches for determining risk-weighted assets). Citigroup’s Supplementary Leverage ratio as of June 30, 2017, on a fully implemented basis, was 7.2%, compared to 7.5% as of June 30, 2016. For additional information on Citi’s capital ratios and related components, including the impact of Citi’s DTAs on its capital ratios, see “Capital Resources” below.

Global Consumer Banking

GCB net income decreased 12% to $1.1 billion, as higher revenues were more than offset by higher cost of credit and higher operating expenses. Operating expenses were $4.5 billion, an increase of 5% on both a reported basis and excluding the impact of FX, driven by the addition of the Costco portfolio, volume growth and continued investments, partially offset by ongoing efficiency savings.

GCB revenues of $8.0 billion increased 5% versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, GCB revenues also increased 5%, driven by a 5% increase in both North America GCB and international GCB. North America GCB revenues increased 5% to $4.9 billion, as higher revenues in Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services were partially offset by lower revenues in retail banking, driven by lower mortgage revenues. Citi-branded cards revenues of $2.1 billion were up 10% versus the prior-year period, reflecting the impact of the Costco portfolio acquisition as well as modest organic growth in core portfolios, partially offset by the run-off of non-core portfolios. Citi retail services revenues of $1.6 billion increased 4% versus the prior-year period, reflecting continued loan growth and a favorable prior period comparison. Retail banking revenues decreased 2% from the prior-year period, mainly driven by the lower mortgage revenues. Excluding mortgage revenues, retail banking revenues were up 7% from the prior-year period, driven by continued growth in average loans, deposits and assets under management, as well as a benefit from higher interest rates.

North America GCB average deposits of $185 billion were up 2% versus the prior-year period, average retail loans of $56 billion grew 2%, and assets under management of $57 billion grew 10%. Average branded card loans of $83 billion increased 25%, while branded card purchase sales of $81 billion increased 52% versus the prior-year period, both driven by the Costco portfolio acquisition as well as organic growth. Average retail services loans of $45 billion were up 4%, while retail services purchase sales of $21 billion were up 2%. For additional information on the results of operations of North

America GCB for the second quarter of 2017, see “Global Consumer Banking—North America GCB” below.

International GCB revenues (consisting of Latin America GCB and Asia GCB (which includes the results of operations in certain EMEA countries)) increased 4% to $3.1 billion versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, international GCB revenues increased 5% versus the prior-year period. Latin America GCB revenues increased 8% versus the prior-year period,driven by growth in retail loans and deposits, as well as improved deposit spreads, partially offset by a modest decline in cards revenues. Asia GCB revenues increased 3% versus the prior-year period, driven by improvement in cards and wealth management revenues, partially offset by lower retail lending revenues. For additional information on the results of operations of Latin America GCB and Asia GCB for the second quarter of 2017, including the impact of FX translation,see “Global Consumer Banking—Latin America GCB” and “—Asia GCB” below.

Year-over-year, international GCB average deposits of $122 billion increased 7%, average retail loans of $87 billion were roughly flat, assets under management of $96 billion increased 7%, average card loans of $24 billion increased 6% and card purchase sales of $24 billion increased 7%, all excluding the impact of FX translation.

Institutional Clients Group

ICG net income of $2.8 billion increased 6%, driven by higher revenues, partially offset by higher operating expenses. ICG operating expenses increased 5% to $5.0 billion, as higher incentive compensation, investments and volume-related expenses were partially offset by efficiency savings.

ICG revenues were $9.2 billion in the second quarter of 2017, up 6% from the prior-year period, driven by a 19% increase in Banking revenues partially offset by a 5% decrease in Markets and securities services revenues. The increase in Banking revenues included the impact of $9 million of mark-to-market gains on loan hedges related to accrual loans within corporate lending compared to losses of $203 million in the prior-year period.

Banking revenues of $4.8 billion (excluding the impact of mark-to-market losses on hedges related to accrual loans within corporate lending) increased 13% compared to the prior-year period, driven by significant growth in investment banking as well as solid performance in treasury and trade solutions and the private bank. Investment banking revenues of $1.5 billion increased 22% versus the prior-year period. Advisory revenues increased 32% to $314 million, equity underwriting revenues increased 70% to $295 million and debt underwriting revenues increased 9% to $877 million, all versus the prior-year period.

Private bank revenues increased 17% versus the prior-year period to $788 million, driven by loan and deposit growth, improved spreads and increased investment activity. Corporate lending revenues increased $306 million to $486 million. Excluding the mark-to-market impact of loan hedges, corporate lending revenues increased 25% to $477 million versus the prior-year period reflecting lower hedging costs as well as the absence of a prior period adjustment to the residual value of a lease financing. Treasury and trade solutions

5

revenues increased 3% to $2.1 billion versus the prior-year period, reflecting continued volume growth and improved deposit spreads.

Markets and securities services revenues decreased 5% to $4.4 billion versus the prior-year period. Fixed income markets revenues decreased 6% to $3.2 billion versus the prior-year period, primarily reflecting lower G10 currencies revenue, given low volatility in the current quarter and the comparison to higher Brexit-related activity a year ago. Equity markets revenues decreased 11% to $691 million versus the prior-year period, reflecting episodic activity in the prior-year period, as well as low volatility in the current quarter. Securities services revenues increased 10% to $584 million versus the prior-year period, driven by growth in client volumes across the global custody business. For additional information on the results of operations of ICG for the second quarter of 2017, see “Institutional Clients Group” below.

Corporate/Other

Corporate/Other net loss was $15 million in the second quarter of 2017, compared to net income of $116 million in the prior-year period, reflecting lower revenues, partially offset by lower operating expenses and lower cost of credit. Expenses of $990 million declined 24% from the prior-year period, reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets.

Corporate/Other revenues were $653 million, down 45% from the prior-year period, reflecting the wind-down of legacy assets, divestiture activity and the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in the prior-year period.

Corporate/Other end-of-period assets decreased 21% to $92 billion from the prior-year period as Citi continued to wind-down legacy assets. For additional information on the results of operations of Corporate/Other for the second quarter of 2017, see “Corporate/Other” below.

6

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—PAGE 1

Citigroup Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries

	Second Quarter							Six Months
In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts and ratios	2017		2016			% Change		2017		2016			% Change
Net interest revenue	$	11,165	$	11,236		(1	)%	$	22,022	$	22,463		(2	)%
Non-interest revenue	6,736		6,312			7		13,999		12,640			11
Revenues, net of interest expense	$	17,901	$	17,548		2	%	$	36,021	$	35,103		3	%
Operating expenses	10,506		10,369			1		20,983		20,892			—
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	1,717		1,409			22		3,379		3,454			(2	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	5,678	$	5,770		(2	)%	$	11,659	$	10,757		8	%
Income taxes	1,795		1,723			4		3,658		3,202			14
Income from continuing operations	$	3,883	$	4,047		(4	)%	$	8,001	$	7,555		6	%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,   net of taxes(1)	21		(23		)	NM		3		(25		)	NM
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling   interests	$	3,904	$	4,024		(3	)%	$	8,004	$	7,530		6	%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	32		26			23		42		31			35
Citigroup’s net income	$	3,872	$	3,998		(3	)%	$	7,962	$	7,499		6	%
Less:
Preferred dividends—Basic	$	320	$	322		(1	)%	$	621	$	532		17	%
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to employee restricted and deferred shares that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends, applicable to basic EPS	48		53			(9	)	103		93			11
Income allocated to unrestricted common shareholders   for basic and diluted EPS	$	3,504	$	3,623		(3	)%	$	7,238	$	6,874		5	%
Earnings per share
Basic
Income from continuing operations	$	1.27	1.25			2		$	2.63	2.36			11
Net income	1.28		1.24			3		2.63		2.35			12
Diluted
Income from continuing operations	$	1.27	$	1.25		2	%	$	2.63	$	2.36		11	%
Net income	1.28		1.24			3		2.63		2.35			12
Dividends declared per common share	0.16		0.05			NM		0.32		0.10			NM

Statement continues on the next page, including notes to the table.

7

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—PAGE 2

Citigroup Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries
	Second Quarter								Six Months
In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts, ratios and   direct staff	2017			2016			% Change		2017		2016		% Change
At June 30:
Total assets	$	1,864,063		$	1,818,771		2	%
Total deposits	958,743			937,852			2
Long-term debt	225,179			207,448			9
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity	210,766			212,635			(1	)
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity	230,019			231,888			(1	)
Direct staff (in thousands)	214			220			(3	)
Performance metrics
Return on average assets	0.83		%	0.89		%			0.87	%	0.84	%
Return on average common stockholders’ equity(2)	6.8			7.0					7.1		6.7
Return on average total stockholders’ equity(2)	6.8			7.0					7.1		6.7
Efficiency ratio (Total operating expenses/Total revenues)	59			59					58		60
Basel III ratios—full implementation
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital(3)	13.06		%	12.53		%
Tier 1 Capital(3)	14.74			14.12
Total Capital(3)	16.93			16.13
Supplementary Leverage ratio(4)	7.24			7.48
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity to assets	11.31		%	11.69		%
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity to assets	12.34			12.75
Dividend payout ratio(5)	12.5			4.0					12.2	%	4.3	%
Total payout ratio(6)	63			40					61		42
Book value per common share	$	77.36		$	73.19		6	%
Tangible book value (TBV) per share(7)	67.32			63.53			6
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends	2.28x			2.63x					2.39x		2.59x

(1) See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Citi’s discontinued operations.

(2) The return on average common stockholders’ equity is calculated using net income less preferred stock dividends divided by average common stockholders’ equity. The return on average total Citigroup stockholders’ equity is calculated using net income divided by average Citigroup stockholders’ equity.

(3) Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the U.S. Basel III Standardized Approach at June 30, 2017, and U.S. Basel III Advanced Approaches at June 30, 2016. Citi’s reportable Total Capital ratios were derived under the U.S. Basel III Advanced Approaches for both periods presented. This reflects the U.S. Basel III requirement to report the lower of risk-based capital ratios under both the Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches in accordance with the Collins Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act.

(4) Citi’s Supplementary Leverage ratio reflects full implementation of the U.S. Basel III rules.

(5) Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of net income per diluted share.

(6) Total common dividends declared plus common stock repurchases as a percentage of net income available to common shareholders. See “Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity,” Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Equity Security Repurchases” below for the component details.

(7) For information on TBV, see “Capital Resources—Tangible Common Equity, Book Value Per Share, Tangible Book Value Per Share and Returns on Equity” below.

NM Not Meaningful

8

SEGMENT AND BUSINESS—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

CITIGROUP INCOME

	Second Quarter								Six Months
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			% Change		2017		2016			% Change
Income from continuing operations
Global Consumer Banking
North America	$	670		$	815		(18	)%	$	1,297	$	1,648		(21	)%
Latin America	136			173			(21	)	266		319			(17	)
Asia(1)	323			297			9		569		512			11
Total	$	1,129		$	1,285		(12	)%	$	2,132	$	2,479		(14	)%
Institutional Clients Group
North America	$	1,112		$	1,005		11	%	$	2,212	$	1,551		43	%
EMEA	779			695			12		1,634		1,069			53
Latin America	333			392			(15	)	808		722			12
Asia	556			523			6		1,137		1,142			—
Total	$	2,780		$	2,615		6	%	$	5,791	$	4,484		29	%
Corporate/Other	(26		)	147			NM		78		592			(87	)
Income from continuing operations	$	3,883		$	4,047		(4	)%	$	8,001	$	7,555		6	%
Discontinued operations	$	21		$	(23	)	NM		$	3	$	(25	)	NM
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	32			26			23		42		31			35
Citigroup’s net income	$	3,872		$	3,998		(3	)%	$	7,962	$	7,499		6	%

(1) Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

9

CITIGROUP REVENUES

	Second Quarter						Six Months
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		% Change		2017		2016		% Change
Global Consumer Banking
North America	$	4,944	$	4,709	5	%	$	9,888	$	9,539	4	%
Latin America	1,290		1,236		4		2,441		2,465		(1	)
Asia(1)	1,801		1,729		4		3,523		3,384		4
Total	$	8,035	$	7,674	5	%	$	15,852	$	15,388	3	%
Institutional Clients Group
North America	$	3,568	$	3,393	5	%	$	7,023	$	6,373	10	%
EMEA	2,837		2,577		10		5,644		4,744		19
Latin America	1,042		1,022		2		2,169		1,984		9
Asia	1,766		1,697		4		3,503		3,483		1
Total	$	9,213	$	8,689	6	%	$	18,339	$	16,584	11	%
Corporate/Other	653		1,185		(45	)	1,830		3,131		(42	)
Total Citigroup net revenues	$	17,901	$	17,548	2	%	$	36,021	$	35,103	3	%

(1) Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

10

SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET⁽¹⁾ 

In millions of dollars	Global Consumer Banking		Institutional Clients Group		Corporate/Other and consolidating eliminations(2)			Citigroup Parent company- issued long-term debt and stockholders’ equity(3)			Total Citigroup consolidated
Assets
Cash and deposits with banks	$	9,260	$	65,850	$	110,972		$	—		$	186,082
Federal funds sold and securities   borrowed or purchased under   agreements to resell	358		233,076		631			—			234,065
Trading account assets	6,414		251,170		2,022			—			259,606
Investments	10,255		113,078		228,377			—			351,710
Loans, net of unearned income and   allowance for loan losses	290,001		316,842		25,827			—			632,670
Other assets	38,143		103,046		58,741			—			199,930
Liquidity assets(4)	64,378		269,709		(334,087		)	—			—
Total assets	$	418,809	$	1,352,771	$	92,483		$	—		$	1,864,063
Liabilities and equity
Total deposits	$	309,320	$	623,533	$	25,890		$	—		$	958,743
Federal funds purchased and   securities loaned or sold under   agreements to repurchase	4,061		150,711		8			—			154,780
Trading account liabilities	13		136,273		459			—			136,745
Short-term borrowings	602		20,455		15,462			—			36,519
Long-term debt(3)	1,178		34,179		42,565			147,257			225,179
Other liabilities	17,999		83,118		19,873			—			120,990
Net inter-segment funding (lending)(3)	85,636		304,502		(12,862		)	(377,276		)	—
Total liabilities	$	418,809	$	1,352,771	$	91,395		$	(230,019	)	$	1,632,956
Total equity(5)	—		—		1,088			230,019			231,107
Total liabilities and equity	$	418,809	$	1,352,771	$	92,483		$	—		$	1,864,063

(1) The supplemental information presented in the table above reflects Citigroup’s consolidated GAAP balance sheet by reporting segment as of June 30, 2017. The respective segment information depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment as of such date.

(2) Consolidating eliminations for total Citigroup and Citigroup parent company assets and liabilities are recorded within Corporate/Other.

(3) The total stockholders’ equity and the majority of long-term debt of Citigroup reside in the Citigroup parent company Consolidated Balance Sheet. Citigroup allocates stockholders’ equity and long-term debt to its businesses through inter-segment allocations as shown above.

(4) Represents the attribution of Citigroup’s liquidity assets (primarily consisting of cash and available-for-sale securities) to the various businesses based on Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) assumptions.

(5) Corporate/Other equity represents noncontrolling interests.

11

This page intentionally left blank.

12

GLOBAL CONSUMER BANKING

Global Consumer Banking (GCB) consists of consumer banking businesses in North America, Latin America (consisting of Citi’s consumer banking business in Mexico) and Asia. GCB provides traditional banking services to retail customers through retail banking, including commercial banking, and Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services (for additional information on these businesses, see “Citigroup Segments” above). GCB is focused on its priority markets in the U.S., Mexico and Asia with 2,570 branches in 19 countries and jurisdictions as of June 30, 2017. At June 30, 2017, GCB had approximately $419 billion in assets and $309 billion in deposits.

GCB’s overall strategy is to leverage Citi’s global footprint and be the preeminent bank for the emerging affluent and affluent consumers in large urban centers. In credit cards and in certain retail markets, Citi serves customers in a somewhat broader set of segments and geographies.

	Second Quarter								Six Months
In millions of dollars except as otherwise noted	2017			2016			% Change		2017			2016			% Change
Net interest revenue	$	6,699		$	6,308		6	%	$	13,221		$	12,660		4	%
Non-interest revenue	1,336			1,366			(2	)%	2,631			2,728			(4	)%
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	8,035		$	7,674		5	%	$	15,852		$	15,388		3	%
Total operating expenses	$	4,497		$	4,297		5	%	$	8,912		$	8,698		2	%
Net credit losses	$	1,615		$	1,374		18	%	$	3,218		$	2,745		17	%
Credit reserve build (release)	125			23			NM		302			108			NM
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments	(1		)	8			NM		5			9			(44	)%
Provision for benefits and claims	23			20			15	%	52			48			8	%
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	1,762		$	1,425		24	%	$	3,577		$	2,910		23	%
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	1,776		$	1,952		(9	)%	$	3,363		$	3,780		(11	)%
Income taxes	647			667			(3	)	1,231			1,301			(5	)
Income from continuing operations	$	1,129		$	1,285		(12	)%	$	2,132		$	2,479		(14	)%
Noncontrolling interests	4			1			NM		5			3			67
Net income	$	1,125		$	1,284		(12	)%	$	2,127		$	2,476		(14	)%
Balance Sheet data (in billions of dollars)
Total EOP assets	$	419		$	399		5	%
Average assets	414			387			7		$	413		$	382		8	%
Return on average assets	1.09		%	1.33		%			1.04		%	1.30		%
Efficiency ratio	56		%	56		%			56		%	57		%
Average deposits	$	307		$	297		3	%	$	305		$	296		3	%
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans	2.20		%	2.02		%			2.22		%	2.03		%
Revenue by business
Retail banking	$	3,299		$	3,242		2	%	$	6,454		$	6,429		—	%
Cards(1)	4,736			4,432			7		9,398			8,959			5
Total	$	8,035		$	7,674		5	%	$	15,852		$	15,388		3	%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking	$	420		$	472		(11	)%	$	759		$	770		(1	)%
Cards(1)	709			813			(13	)	1,373			1,709			(20	)
Total	$	1,129		$	1,285		(12	)%	$	2,132		$	2,479		(14	)%

Table continues on the next page.

13

Foreign currency (FX) translation impact
Total revenue—as reported	$	8,035	$	7,674		5	%	$	15,852	$	15,388		3	%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		(23		)			—		(126		)
Total revenues—ex-FX(3)	$	8,035	$	7,651		5	%	$	15,852	$	15,262		4	%
Total operating expenses—as reported	$	4,497	$	4,297		5	%	$	8,912	$	8,698		2	%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		(9		)			—		(50		)
Total operating expenses—ex-FX(3)	$	4,497	$	4,288		5	%	$	8,912	$	8,648		3	%
Total provisions for LLR & PBC—as reported	$	1,762	$	1,425		24	%	$	3,577	$	2,910		23	%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		(7		)			—		(37		)
Total provisions for LLR & PBC—ex-FX(3)	$	1,762	$	1,418		24	%	$	3,577	$	2,873		25	%
Net income—as reported	$	1,125	$	1,284		(12	)%	$	2,127	$	2,476		(14	)%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		(6		)			—		(30		)
Net income—ex-FX(3)	$	1,125	$	1,278		(12	)%	$	2,127	$	2,446		(13	)%

(1) Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services.

(2) Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the second quarter of 2017 and year-to-date 2017 average exchange rates for all periods presented.

(3) Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.

14

NORTH AMERICA GCB

North America GCB provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses, as applicable, in the U.S. North America GCB’s U.S. cards product portfolio includes its proprietary portfolio (including the Citi Double Cash, Thank You and Value cards) and co-branded cards (including, among others, American Airlines and Costco) within Citi-branded cards as well as its co-brand and private label relationships (including, among others, Sears, The Home Depot, Macy’s and Best Buy) within Citi retail services. As previously announced, the Hilton Honors co-brand credit card partnership with Citi will terminate as of year-end 2017.  The termination is not expected to have a material impact to North America GCB’s results of operations or financial condition. 

As of June 30, 2017, North America GCB’s 695 retail bank branches are concentrated in the six key metropolitan areas of New York, Chicago, Miami, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and San Francisco. Also as of June 30, 2017, North America GCB had approximately 9.5 million retail banking customer accounts, $55.6 billion in retail banking loans and $185.2 billion in deposits. In addition, North America GCB had approximately 120 million Citi-branded and Citi retail services credit card accounts with $130.8 billion in outstanding card loan balances.

	Second Quarter								Six Months
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted	2017			2016			% Change		2017			2016			% Change
Net interest revenue	$	4,633		$	4,331		7	%	$	9,250		$	8,729		6	%
Non-interest revenue	311			378			(18	)	638			810			(21	)
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	4,944		$	4,709		5	%	$	9,888		$	9,539		4	%
Total operating expenses	$	2,577		$	2,426		6	%	$	5,153		$	4,926		5	%
Net credit losses	$	1,181		$	954		24	%	$	2,371		$	1,887		26	%
Credit reserve build (release)	101			49			NM		253			128			98
Provision for unfunded lending commitments	2			7			(71	)	9			7			29
Provisions for benefits and claims	8			8			—	%	14			17			(18	)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	1,292		$	1,018		27	%	$	2,647		$	2,039		30	%
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	1,075		$	1,265		(15	)%	$	2,088		$	2,574		(19	)%
Income taxes	405			450			(10	)	791			926			(15	)
Income from continuing operations	$	670		$	815		(18	)%	$	1,297		$	1,648		(21	)%
Noncontrolling interests	—			(1		)	NM		—			(1		)	NM
Net income	$	670		$	816		(18	)%	$	1,297		$	1,649		(21	)%
Balance Sheet data (in billions of dollars)
Average assets	$	243		$	218		11	%	$	244		$	215		13	%
Return on average assets	1.11		%	1.51		%			1.07		%	1.54		%
Efficiency ratio	52		%	52		%			52		%	52		%
Average deposits	$	185.1		$	182.1		2	%	$	185.3		$	181.4		2	%
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans	2.58		%	2.34		%			2.61		%	2.33		%
Revenue by business
Retail banking	$	1,291		$	1,313		(2	)%	$	2,547		$	2,603		(2	)%
Citi-branded cards	2,079			1,886			10		4,175			3,746			11
Citi retail services	1,574			1,510			4		3,166			3,190			(1	)
Total	$	4,944		$	4,709		5	%	$	9,888		$	9,539		4	%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking	$	140		$	172		(19	)%	$	223		$	261		(15	)%
Citi-branded cards	305			320			(5	)	553			673			(18	)
Citi retail services	225			323			(30	)	521			714			(27	)
Total	$	670		$	815		(18	)%	$	1,297		$	1,648		(21	)%

NM Not meaningful

15

2Q17 vs. 2Q16

Net income decreased 18% due to significantly higher cost of credit, driven by the impact of the Costco portfolio acquisition (completed June 17, 2016), and higher expenses, partially offset by higher revenues.

Revenues increased 5%, reflecting higher revenues in Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services, partially offset by lower revenues in retail banking.

Retail banking revenues declined 2%, reflecting lower mortgage revenues. The decline in mortgage revenues was driven by lower origination activity and higher cost of funds, as well as the impact of the previously announced sale of a portion of Citi’s mortgage servicing rights (MSR). Excluding mortgage revenues, retail banking revenues were up 7%, driven by continued growth in average loans (6%), deposits (2%), and asset under management (10%), as well as a benefit from higher interest rates. Citi expects higher interest rates and the impact of the MSR sale to continue to negatively impact mortgage revenues during the remainder of 2017.

Cards revenues increased 8%. In Citi-branded cards, revenues increased 10%, largely reflecting the impact of the Costco portfolio acquisition and modest organic growth in Citi’s core portfolios. This increase in revenues was partially offset by the runoff of non-core portfolios, which is expected to be an ongoing headwind during the remainder of 2017. Average loans grew 25% (3% excluding Costco) and purchase sales grew 52% (3% excluding Costco).

Citi retail services revenues increased 4%, primarily driven by continued loan growth and a favorable prior-period comparison, partially offset by the continued impact of the previously disclosed renewal and extension of certain partnerships within the portfolio. Average loans were up 4% and purchase sales were up 2%.

Expenses increased 6%, primarily driven by the addition of the Costco portfolio, volume growth and continued investments, partially offset by efficiency savings.

Provisions increased 27% from the prior-year period, driven by higher net credit losses and a higher net loan loss reserve build.

Net credit losses increased 24%, primarily driven by higher losses in Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. In Citi-branded cards, net credit losses increased 31% to $611 million, primarily due to the Costco portfolio acquisition, organic volume growth and seasoning. In Citi retail services, net credit losses increased 20% to $531 million, primarily due to volume growth and seasoning and the impact of changes in collection processes. The net loan loss reserve build in the second quarter of 2017 was $103 million, compared to a build of $56 million in the prior-year period, largely supporting volume growth and the impact of changes in collections processes in Citi retail services.

For additional information on North America GCB’s retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services portfolios, see “Credit Risk—Consumer Credit” below.

2017 YTD vs. 2016 YTD

Year-to-date, North America GCB has experienced similar trends to those described above. Net income decreased 21% due to higher cost of credit and higher expenses, partially offset by higher revenues.

Revenues increased 4%, reflecting higher revenues in cards, partially offset by lower revenues in retail banking. Retail banking revenues decreased 2%, driven by the same factors described above. Cards revenues increased 6%. In Citi-branded cards, revenues increased 11%, driven by the same factors described above. Citi retail services revenues were down 1%, driven by the continued impact of the renewal and extension of certain partnerships, as well as the absence of gains on sales of two cards portfolios in the first quarter of 2016, partially offset by loan growth.

Expenses increased 5%, driven by the same factors described above.

Provisions increased 30%, driven by the same factors described above. Net credit losses increased 26% and the net loan loss reserve build of $262 million increased $127 million.

16

LATIN AMERICA GCB

Latin America GCB provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses in Mexico through Citibanamex, one of Mexico’s largest banks.

At June 30, 2017, Latin America GCB had 1,496 retail branches in Mexico, with approximately 28.0 million retail banking customer accounts, $21.0 billion in retail banking loans and $28.7 billion in deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 5.7 million Citi-branded card accounts with $5.5 billion in outstanding loan balances.

	Second Quarter								Six Months						% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted	2017			2016			% Change		2017			2016
Net interest revenue	$	917		$	861		7	%	$	1,717		$	1,714		—	%
Non-interest revenue	373			375			(1	)%	724			751			(4	)%
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	1,290		$	1,236		4	%	$	2,441		$	2,465		(1	)%
Total operating expenses	$	735		$	725		1	%	$	1,394		$	1,443		(3	)%
Net credit losses	$	277		$	260		7	%	$	530		$	538		(1	)%
Credit reserve build (release)	50			(2		)	NM		62			15			NM
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments	(1		)	1			NM		(1		)	2			NM
Provision for benefits and claims	15			12			25	%	38			31			23	%
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims (LLR & PBC)	$	341		$	271		26	%	$	629		$	586		7	%
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	214		$	240		(11	)%	$	418		$	436		(4	)%
Income taxes	78			67			16		152			117			30
Income from continuing operations	$	136		$	173		(21	)%	$	266		$	319		(17	)%
Noncontrolling interests	2			1			100		3			2			50
Net income	$	134		$	172		(22	)%	$	263		$	317		(17	)%
Balance Sheet data(in billions of dollars)
Average assets	$	46		$	50		(8	)%	$	45		$	50		(10	)%
Return on average assets	1.17		%	1.38		%			1.18		%	1.27		%
Efficiency ratio	57		%	59		%			57		%	59		%
Average deposits	$	27.8		$	25.9		7	%	$	26.6		$	26.0		2	%
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans	4.36		%	4.30		%			4.38		%	4.43		%
Revenue by business
Retail banking	$	923		$	853		8	%	$	1,759		$	1,709		3	%
Citi-branded cards	367			383			(4	)	682			756			(10	)
Total	$	1,290		$	1,236		4	%	$	2,441		$	2,465		(1	)%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking	$	87		$	96		(9	)%	$	173		$	186		(7	)%
Citi-branded cards	49			77			(36	)	93			133			(30	)
Total	$	136		$	173		(21	)%	$	266		$	319		(17	)%

17

FX translation impact
Total revenues—as reported	$	1,290	$	1,236		4	%	$	2,441	$	2,465		(1	)%
Impact of FX translation(1)	—		(37		)			—		(160		)
Total revenues—ex-FX(2)	$	1,290	$	1,199		8	%	$	2,441	$	2,305		6	%
Total operating expenses—as reported	$	735	$	725		1	%	$	1,394	$	1,443		(3	)%
Impact of FX translation(1)	—		(18		)			—		(73		)
Total operating expenses—ex-FX(2)	$	735	$	707		4	%	$	1,394	$	1,370		2	%
Provisions for LLR & PBC—as reported	$	341	$	271		26	%	$	629	$	586		7	%
Impact of FX translation(1)	—		(8		)			—		(39		)
Provisions for LLR & PBC—ex-FX(2)	$	341	$	263		30	%	$	629	$	547		15	%
Net income—as reported	$	134	$	172		(22	)%	$	263	$	317		(17	)%
Impact of FX translation(1)	—		(9		)			—		(37		)
Net income—ex-FX(2)	$	134	$	163		(18	)%	$	263	$	280		(6	)%

(1) Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the second quarter of 2017 and year-to-date 2017 average exchange rates for all periods presented.

(2) Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.

The discussion of the results of operations for Latin America GCB below excludes the impact of FX translation for all periods presented. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of FX translation, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of certain of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.

2Q17 vs. 2Q16

Net income decreased 18%, primarily driven by higher credit costs and expenses, partially offset by higher revenues.

Revenues increased 8%, driven by higher revenues in

retail banking, partially offset by modestly lower revenues in

cards.

Retail banking revenues grew by 12%, reflecting continued growth in volumes, including an increase in average loans (8%), largely driven by the commercial and small business portfolios, and an increase in average deposits (10%), as well as improved deposit spreads. Cards revenues decreased 1%, reflecting continued higher cost to fund non-revolving loans, largely offset by increased purchase sales (10%). Average card loans grew 6%. While revolving card loan balance trends continued to improve during the quarter, Latin America GCB expects cards revenues to remain under pressure in the near term.

Expenses increased 4%, as ongoing investment spending and business growth were partially offset by efficiency savings.

Provisions increased 30%, primarily driven by a higher net loan loss reserve build (increase of $51 million) and higher net credit losses (10%), largely reflecting volume growth and seasonality.

For additional information on LatinAmerica GCB’s retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded

cards portfolios, see “Credit Risk—Consumer Credit” below.

2017 YTD vs. 2016 YTD

Year-to-date, Latin America GCB has experienced similar trends to those described above. Net income decreased 6%, driven by the same factors described above.

Revenues increased 6%, primarily due to higher revenues in retail banking, partially offset by lower revenues in cards. Retail banking revenues increased 10%, driven by the same factors described above as well as the impact of business divestitures. Cards revenues decreased 3%, driven by the same factors described above.

Expenses increased 2%, as ongoing investment spending was partially offset by efficiency savings.

Provisions increased 15% largely driven by the same factors described above.

18

ASIA GCB

Asia GCB provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses, as applicable. During the second quarter of 2017, Citi’s most significant revenues in the region were from Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, Australia, India, Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Malaysia. Included within Asia GCB, traditional retail banking and Citi-branded card products are also provided to retail customers in certain EMEA countries, primarily in Poland, Russia and the United Arab Emirates.

At June 30, 2017, on a combined basis, the businesses had 379 retail branches, approximately 16.3 million retail banking customer accounts, $66.8 billion in retail banking loans and $95.4 billion in deposits. In addition, the businesses had approximately 16.7 million Citi-branded card accounts with $18.8 billion in outstanding loan balances.

	Second Quarter								Six Months						% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted (1)	2017			2016			% Change		2017			2016
Net interest revenue	$	1,149		$	1,116		3	%	$	2,254		$	2,217		2	%
Non-interest revenue	652			613			6		1,269			1,167			9
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	1,801		$	1,729		4	%	$	3,523		$	3,384		4	%
Total operating expenses	$	1,185		$	1,146		3	%	$	2,365		$	2,329		2	%
Net credit losses	$	157		$	160		(2	)%	$	317		$	320		(1	)%
Credit reserve build (release)	(26		)	(24		)	(8	)	(13		)	(35		)	63
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments	(2		)	—			NM		(3		)	—			NM
Provisions for credit losses	$	129		$	136		(5	)%	$	301		$	285		6	%
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	487		$	447		9	%	$	857		$	770		11	%
Income taxes	164			150			9		288			258			12
Income from continuing operations	$	323		$	297		9	%	$	569		$	512		11	%
Noncontrolling interests	2			1			100		2			2			—
Net income	$	321		$	296		8	%	$	567		$	510		11	%
Balance Sheet data (in billions of dollars)
Average assets	$	125		$	119		5	%	$	124		$	118		5	%
Return on average assets	1.03		%	1.00		%			0.92		%	0.87		%
Efficiency ratio	66		%	66		%			67		%	69		%
Average deposits	$	94.3		$	89.4		5	%	$	93.5		$	88.3		6	%
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans	0.74		%	0.76		%			0.76		%	0.76		%
Revenue by business
Retail banking	$	1,085		$	1,076		1	%	$	2,148		$	2,117		1	%
Citi-branded cards	716			653			10		1,375			1,267			9
Total	$	1,801		$	1,729		4	%	$	3,523		$	3,384		4	%
Income from continuing operations by business
Retail banking	$	193		$	204		(5	)%	$	363		$	323		12	%
Citi-branded cards	130			93			40		206			189			9
Total	$	323		$	297		9	%	$	569		$	512		11	%

19

FX translation impact
Total revenues—as reported	$	1,801	$	1,729	4	%	$	3,523	$	3,384	4	%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		14				—		34
Total revenues—ex-FX(3)	$	1,801	$	1,743	3	%	$	3,523	$	3,418	3	%
Total operating expenses—as reported	$	1,185	$	1,146	3	%	$	2,365	$	2,329	2	%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		9				—		23
Total operating expenses—ex-FX(3)	$	1,185	$	1,155	3	%	$	2,365	$	2,352	1	%
Provisions for loan losses—as reported	$	129	$	136	(5	)%	$	301	$	285	6	%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		1				—		2
Provisions for loan losses—ex-FX(3)	$	129	$	137	(6	)%	$	301	$	287	5	%
Net income—as reported	$	321	$	296	8	%	$	567	$	510	11	%
Impact of FX translation(2)	—		3				—		7
Net income—ex-FX(3)	$	321	$	299	7	%	$	567	$	517	10	%

(1) Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

(2) Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the second quarter of 2017 and year-to-date 2017 average exchange rates for all periods presented.

(3) Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.

The discussion of the results of operations for Asia GCB below excludes the impact of FX translation for all periods presented. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of FX translation, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of certain of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.

2Q17 vs. 2Q16

Net income increased 7%, reflecting higher revenues and lower cost of credit, partially offset by higher expenses.

Revenues increased 3%, driven by improvement in cards and wealth management revenues, partially offset by lower retail lending revenues.

Retail banking revenues were largely unchanged, primarily due to an increase in wealth management revenues, offset by the repositioning of the retail loan portfolio. Wealth management revenues increased due to improvement in investor sentiment, stronger equity markets and an increase in assets under management (9%) and investment sales (27%). These increases were offset by continued lower lending revenues (down 3%), reflecting continued lower average loans (decrease of 2%) due to the optimization of this portfolio away from lower-yielding mortgage loans to focus on growing higher-return personal loans.

Cards revenues increased 9%, reflecting 6% growth in average loans and 7% growth in purchase sales, both of which benefited from the previously disclosed portfolio acquisition in Australia in the first quarter of 2017. Cards revenues also benefitted from a modest gain from the sale of merchant acquiring businesses in certain countries.

Expenses increased 3%, resulting from volume growth and ongoing investment spending, partially offset by efficiency savings.

Provisions decreased 6%, driven by an increase in net loan loss reserve releases and lower net credit losses. Overall credit quality continued to remain stable in the region.

For additional information on AsiaGCB’s retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards portfolios, see “Credit Risk—Consumer Credit” below.

2017 YTD vs. 2016 YTD

Year-to-date, Asia GCB has experienced similar trends to

those described above. Net income increased 10% due to higher revenues, partially offset by higher expenses and cost of credit.

Revenues increased 3%, primarily due to an increase in cards revenues. Retail banking revenues were largely unchanged, driven by the same factors described above. Cards revenues increased 8%, driven by the same factors described above.

Expenses increased 1%, driven by business volumes.

Provisions increased 5%, primarily due to a higher net loan loss reserve build in the first quarter of 2017 related to the card portfolio acquisition in Australia, partially offset by lower net credit losses.

20

INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP

Institutional Clients Group (ICG) includes Banking and Markets and securities services (for additional information on these businesses, see “Citigroup Segments” above). ICG provides corporate, institutional, public sector and high-net-worth clients around the world with a full range of wholesale banking products and services, including fixed income and equity sales and trading, foreign exchange, prime brokerage, derivative services, equity and fixed income research, corporate lending, investment banking and advisory services, private banking, cash management, trade finance and securities services. ICG transacts with clients in both cash instruments and derivatives, including fixed income, foreign currency, equity and commodity products.

ICG revenue is generated primarily from fees and spreads associated with these activities. ICG earns fee income for assisting clients in clearing transactions, providing brokerage and investment banking services and other such activities. Revenue generated from these activities is recorded in Commissions and fees and Investment banking. Revenue is also generated from transaction processing and assets under custody and administration. Revenue generated from these activities is primarily recorded in Administration and other fiduciary fees. In addition, as a market maker, ICG facilitates transactions, including holding product inventory to meet client demand, and earns the differential between the price at which it buys and sells the products. These price differentials and the unrealized gains and losses on the inventory are recorded in Principal transactions(for additional information on Principal transactions revenue, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Other primarily includes mark-to-market gains and losses on certain credit derivatives, gains and losses on available-for-sale (AFS) securities and other non-recurring gains and losses. Interest income earned on assets held less interest paid to customers on deposits and long- and short-term debt is recorded as Net interest revenue.

The amount and types of Markets revenues are impacted by a variety of interrelated factors, including market liquidity; changes in market variables such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, commodity prices and credit spreads, as well as their implied volatilities; investor confidence; and other macroeconomic conditions. Assuming all other market conditions do not change, increases in client activity levels or bid/offer spreads generally result in increases in revenues. However, changes in market conditions can significantly impact client activity levels, bid/offer spreads and the fair value of product inventory. For example, a decrease in market liquidity may increase bid/offer spreads, decrease client activity levels and widen credit spreads on product inventory positions.

ICG’s management of the Markets businesses involves daily monitoring and evaluating of the above factors at the trading desk as well as the country level. ICG does not separately track the impact on total Markets revenues of the volume of transactions, bid/offer spreads, fair value changes of product inventory positions and economic hedges because, as noted above, these components are interrelated and are not deemed useful or necessary individually to manage the Markets businesses at an aggregatelevel.

In the Markets businesses, client revenues are those revenues directly attributable to client transactions at the time of inception, including commissions, interest or fees earned. Client revenues do not include the results of client facilitation activities (for example, holding product inventory in anticipation of client demand) or the results of certain economic hedging activities.

ICG’s international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 80 countries and a proprietary network in 98 countries and jurisdictions. At June 30, 2017, ICG had approximately $1.4 trillion of assets and $624 billion of deposits, while two of its businesses—securities services and issuer services—managed approximately $16.5 trillion of assets under custody compared to $15.3 trillion at the end of the prior-year period.

21

	Second Quarter								Six Months						% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted	2017			2016			% Change		2017			2016
Commissions and fees	$	1,020		$	956		7	%	$	2,005		$	1,960		2	%
Administration and other fiduciary fees	719			638			13		1,363			1,235			10
Investment banking	1,180			1,029			15		2,224			1,769			26
Principal transactions	2,079			1,912			9		4,747			3,488			36
Other(1)	240			46			NM		235			39			NM
Total non-interest revenue	$	5,238		$	4,581		14	%	$	10,574		$	8,491		25	%
Net interest revenue (including dividends)	3,975			4,108			(3	)	7,765			8,093			(4	)
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	9,213		$	8,689		6	%	$	18,339		$	16,584		11	%
Total operating expenses	$	5,019		$	4,763		5	%	$	9,964		$	9,635		3	%
Net credit losses	$	71		$	141		(50	)%	$	96		$	352		(73	)%
Credit reserve build (release)	(15		)	(26		)	42		(191		)	82			NM
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments	31			(33		)	NM		(23		)	38			NM
Provisions for credit losses	$	87		$	82		6	%	$	(118	)	$	472		NM
Income from continuing operations before taxes	$	4,107		$	3,844		7	%	$	8,493		$	6,477		31	%
Income taxes	1,327			1,229			8		2,702			1,993			36
Income from continuing operations	$	2,780		$	2,615		6	%	$	5,791		$	4,484		29	%
Noncontrolling interests	18			17			6		33			27			22
Net income	$	2,762		$	2,598		6	%	$	5,758		$	4,457		29	%
EOP assets (in billions of dollars)	$	1,353		$	1,303		4	%
Average assets (in billions of dollars)	1,360			1,300			5		$	1,339		$	1,286		4	%
Return on average assets	0.81		%	0.80		%			0.87		%	0.70		%
Efficiency ratio	54			55					54			58
Revenues by region
North America	$	3,568		$	3,393		5	%	$	7,023		$	6,373		10	%
EMEA	2,837			2,577			10		5,644			4,744			19
Latin America	1,042			1,022			2		2,169			1,984			9
Asia	1,766			1,697			4		3,503			3,483			1
Total	$	9,213		$	8,689		6	%	$	18,339		$	16,584		11	%
Income from continuing operations by region
North America	$	1,112		$	1,005		11	%	$	2,212		$	1,551		43	%
EMEA	779			695			12		1,634			1,069			53
Latin America	333			392			(15	)	808			722			12
Asia	556			523			6		1,137			1,142			—
Total	$	2,780		$	2,615		6	%	$	5,791		$	4,484		29	%
Average loans by region (in billions of dollars)
North America	$	146		$	138		6	%	$	143		$	135		6	%
EMEA	67			67			—		66			65			2
Latin America	37			38			(3	)	37			39			(5	)
Asia	62			61			2		61			61			—
Total	$	312		$	304		3	%	$	307		$	300		2	%
EOP deposits by business (in billions of dollars)
Treasury and trade solutions	$	421		$	407		3	%
All other ICG businesses	203			202			—
Total	$	624		$	609		2	%

(1) First quarter of 2016 includes a previously disclosed charge of approximately $180 million, primarily reflecting the write-down of Citi’s net investment in Venezuela as a result of changes in the exchange rate during the quarter.

NM Not meaningful

22

ICG Revenue Details—Excluding Gain (Loss) on Loan Hedges

	Second Quarter								Six Months						% Change
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			% Change		2017			2016
Investment bankingrevenue details
Advisory	$	314		$	238		32	%	$	560		$	465		20	%
Equity underwriting	295			174			70		530			292			82
Debt underwriting	877			803			9		1,610			1,331			21
Total investment banking	$	1,486		$	1,215		22	%	$	2,700		$	2,088		29	%
Treasury and trade solutions	2,065			1,999			3		4,140			3,902			6
Corporate lending—excluding (loss) on loan hedges(1)	477			383			25		911			831			10
Private bank	788			674			17		1,532			1,358			13
Total banking revenues (ex-gain/(loss) on loan hedges)	$	4,816		$	4,271		13	%	$	9,283		$	8,179		13	%
Corporate lending—gain/(loss) on loan hedges(1)	$	9		$	(203	)	NM		$	(106	)	$	(269	)	61	%
Total banking revenues (including gain/(loss) on loan hedges)	$	4,825		$	4,068		19	%	$	9,177		$	7,910		16	%
Fixed income markets	$	3,215		$	3,432		(6	)%	$	6,837		$	6,483		5	%
Equity markets	691			776			(11	)	1,460			1,473			(1	)
Securities services	584			529			10		1,127			1,090			3
Other(2)	(102		)	(116		)	12		(262		)	(372		)	30
Total markets and securities services revenues	$	4,388		$	4,621		(5	)%	$	9,162		$	8,674		6	%
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	9,213		$	8,689		6	%	$	18,339		$	16,584		11	%
Commissions and fees	$	154		$	113		36	%	$	294		$	237		24	%
Principal transactions(3)	1,890			1,765			7		4,208			3,109			35
Other	181			213			(15	)	330			429			(23	)
Total non-interest revenue	$	2,225		$	2,091		6	%	$	4,832		$	3,775		28	%
Net interest revenue	990			1,341			(26	)	2,005			2,708			(26	)
Total fixed income markets	$	3,215		$	3,432		(6	)%	$	6,837		$	6,483		5	%
Rates and currencies	$	2,227		$	2,461		(10	)%	$	4,730		$	4,697		1	%
Spread products / other fixed income	988			971			2		2,107			1,786			18
Total fixed income markets	$	3,215		$	3,432		(6	)%	$	6,837		$	6,483		5	%
Commissions and fees	$	313		$	319		(2	)%	$	629		$	676		(7	)%
Principal transactions(3)	(25		)	(48		)	48		141			3			NM
Other	(7		)	127			NM		1			129			(99	)
Total non-interest revenue	$	281		$	398		(29	)%	$	771		$	808		(5	)%
Net interest revenue	410			378			8		689			665			4
Total equity markets	$	691		$	776		(11	)%	$	1,460		$	1,473		(1	)%

(1) Hedges on accrual loans reflect the mark-to-market on credit derivatives used to economically hedge the corporate loan accrual portfolio. The fixed premium costs of these hedges are netted against the corporate lending revenues to reflect the cost of credit protection. Citigroup's results of operations excluding the impact of gain/(loss) on loan hedges are non-GAAP financial measures.

(2) First quarter of 2016 includes the previously disclosed charge of approximately $180 million, primarily reflecting the write-down of Citi’s net investment in Venezuela as a result of changes in the exchange rate during the quarter.

(3) Excludes principal transactions revenues of ICG businesses other than Markets, primarily treasury and trade solutions and the private bank.

NM Not meaningful

23

2Q17 vs. 2Q16

Net income increased 6%, primarily driven by higher revenues, partially offset by higher operating expenses.

• Revenues increased 6%, reflecting higher revenues in Banking (increase of 19%; increase of 13% excluding gains and losses on hedges on accrual loans), offset by lower revenues in Markets and securities services (decrease of 5%), primarily due to fixed income and equity markets. Banking revenues were driven by strong performance in equity capital markets and M&A advisory as well as improved performance in corporate lending and the private bank. Citi expects revenues in ICG, particularly in its Markets and securities services businesses, will likely continue to reflect the overall market environment, including normal seasonal trends during the remainder of 2017, although ICG revenues may also be impacted by uncertainty around interest rates and tax reform legislation along with continued low market volatility.

Within Banking:

• Investment banking revenues increased 22%, reflecting strength across all products and regions, particularly in North America and EMEA, despite a slight decline in overall market wallet from the prior-year period. Debt underwriting revenues increased 9%, reflecting continued momentum driven by wallet share gains. Equity underwriting revenues increased 70%, reflecting an increase in wallet share and higher overall market activity. Advisory revenues increased 32%, largely reflecting an increase in wallet share.

• Treasury and trade solutions revenues increased 3%. Excluding the impact of FX translation, revenues increased 4%, reflecting strength in North America, Asia and EMEA. The increase in revenues was driven by fee growth reflecting continued volume growth as well as improved deposit spreads, partially offset by lower trade revenues. End-of-period deposit balances increased 3% (4% excluding the impact of FX translation), driven by North America, while average trade loans increased 4% (3% excluding the impact of FX translation).

• Corporate lending revenues increased $306 million to $486 million. Excluding the mark-to-market impact of loan hedges, revenues increased 25%, driven by North America. The increase in revenues was driven by lower hedging costs and the absence of a prior-period adjustment to the residual value of a lease financing transaction, while average loans declined modestly (1%).

• Private bank revenues increased 17%, reflecting strength across all products and regions. The increase in revenues was driven by higher loan and deposit growth, improved deposit spreads, higher managed investments revenues and increased capital markets activity.

Within Markets and securities services:

• Fixed income markets revenues decreased 6%, primarily due to lower revenues in North America, Asia and Latin America, as client activity was impacted by low volatility in the current quarter. Net interest revenues were lower (down 26%), largely due to a change in the mix of trading positions in support of client activity, which was partially offset by higher principal transactions revenues (up 7%). Rates and currencies revenues decreased 10%, reflecting weaker performance across all regions. The decrease was driven mainly by lower G10 currencies revenues due to the low volatility in the current quarter and higher revenues in the prior-year period following the vote in the U.K. in favor of its withdrawal from the European Union. G10 rates and local markets revenues were broadly stable. Spread products and other fixed income revenues increased 2%, primarily driven by higher client activity in securitized products in North America and EMEA,as higher commodities and other fixed income revenues were offset by lower credit products and municipals revenues.

• Equity markets revenues decreased by 11%, driven by the absence of episodic activity in the prior-year period, partially offset by strength in investor client activity, particularly in EMEA and Asia. Equity derivatives revenues declined from the prior-year period due to the absence of episodic activity and the impact of low volatility in the current quarter. This was partially offset by higher prime finance and delta one revenues due to continued growth in client balances, as well as higher cash equities revenues. Commissions revenues declined slightly, reflecting the ongoing shift to electronic trading by clients across the industry.

• Securities services revenues increased by 10%. Excluding the impact of FX translation, revenues increased 12%, reflecting strength in North America, Asia and Latin America. The increase was driven by growth in deposit balances and higher net interest revenues that benefited from the rising interest rate environment. Fee revenues continued to increase, driven by growth in assets under custody and the increased client volumes.

Expenses increased 5% as higher incentive compensation, investments and volume-related expenses were partially offset by a benefit from FX translation and efficiency savings.

Provisions increased 6% to $87 million, reflecting a net loan loss reserve build of $16 million (compared to a $59 million release in the prior-year period, largely related to energy and energy-related exposures) and lower net credit losses of $71 million ($141 million in the prior-year period). The decline in net credit losses reflected improvement in the energy sector.

24

2017 YTD vs. 2016 YTD

Net income increased 29%, primarily driven by higher revenues and lower credit costs, partially offset by higher expenses.

• Revenues increased 11%, reflecting higher revenues in Markets and securities services (increase of 6%) and higher revenues in Banking (increase of 16%; increase of 13% excluding the losses on hedges on accrual loans).

Within Banking:

• Investment banking revenues increased 29%, largely reflecting year-over-year gains in wallet share and an improvement from the industry-wide slowdown in activity levels during the first half of 2016. Advisory revenues increased 20%, reflecting a strong performance in the first half of 2017. Equity underwriting revenues increased 82%, while debt underwriting revenues increased 21%, both primarily due to increased wallet share, as well as higher market activity.

• Treasury and trade solutions revenues increased 6% primarily driven by continued growth in deposit and loan volumes, improved spreads and strong fee growth across most cash products.

• Corporate lending revenues increased 43%. Excluding the impact of losses on hedges on accrual loans, revenues increased 10%, driven by lower hedging costs in the current period and the absence of a prior-period adjustment to the residual value of a lease financing transaction.

• Private bank revenues increased 13%, reflecting increasing deposit spreads and volume growth, growth in loans and higher managed investments revenues.

Within Markets and securities services:

• Fixed income markets revenues increased by 5%, due to higher revenues in North America and EMEA. Rates and currencies revenues increased 1% due to higher rates revenues in EMEA, partially offset by a decrease in G10 currencies revenues reflecting the low volatility and lower client activity in all regions. Spread products and other fixed income revenues increased 18%, primarily due to a recovery from the challenging trading environment in the prior-year period, particularly in securitized products.

• Equity markets revenues declined 1%, as continued growth in client balances and higher client activity, particularly in EMEA and Asia, were more than offset by the absence of episodic activity in the prior-year period in North America. Equity derivatives revenues declined, driven by the same factors described above. Cash equities revenues decreased primarily due to lower commissions in the first quarter of 2017. These declines were partially offset by higher revenues due to the continued growth in client balances in prime finance and delta one.

• Securities services revenues increased 3%. Excluding the impact of prior-period divestitures, revenues grew 10%, primarily driven by higher deposit balances and higher net interest revenue, primarily in North America, Asia and

Latin America, and higher fee revenue from growth in assets under custody and client volumes.

Expenses increased 3% from the prior-year period, driven by the same factors described above, partially offset by lower repositioning costs.

Provisions decreased $590 million, primarily reflecting a decline in net credit losses from $352 million in the prior-year period to $96 million and a net loan loss reserve release of $214 million ($120 million build in the period-year period). This lower cost of credit was driven largely by improvement in the energy sector.

25

CORPORATE/OTHER

Corporate/Other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions (including finance, risk, human resources, legal and compliance), other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses, Corporate Treasury, certain North America and international legacy consumer loan portfolios, other legacy assets and discontinued operations (for additional information on Corporate/Other, see “Citigroup Segments” above). At June 30, 2017, Corporate/Other had $92 billion in assets, a decrease of 21% year-over-year and 11% from December 31, 2016.

	Second Quarter								Six Months						% Change
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			% Change		2017			2016
Net interest revenue	$	491		$	820		(40	)%	$	1,036		$	1,710		(39	)%
Non-interest revenue	162			365			(56	)	794			1,421			(44	)
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	653		$	1,185		(45	)%	$	1,830		$	3,131		(42	)%
Total operating expenses	$	990		$	1,309		(24	)%	$	2,107		$	2,559		(18	)%
Net credit losses	$	24		$	101		(76	)%	$	105		$	243		(57	)%
Credit reserve build (release)	(154		)	(223		)	31		(189		)	(254		)	26
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments	(2		)	(5		)	60		3			(6		)	NM
Provision for benefits and claims	—			29			(100	)	1			89			(99	)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	(132	)	(98		)	(35	)%	$	(80	)	72			NM
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	$	(205	)	$	(26	)	NM		$	(197	)	$	500		NM
Income taxes (benefits)	(179		)	(173		)	(3	)%	(275		)	(92		)	NM
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(26	)	$	147		NM		$	78		$	592		(87	)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	21			(23		)	NM		3			(25		)	NM
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	(5	)	$	124		NM		$	81		$	567		(86	)%
Noncontrolling interests	10			8			25	%	4			1			NM
Net income (loss)	$	(15	)	$	116		NM		$	77		$	566		(86	)%

2Q17 vs. 2Q16

The net loss was $15 million, compared to net income of $116 million in the prior-year period, due to lower revenues, partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit.

Revenues decreased 45%, driven by legacy asset run-off and divestiture activity, as well as the absence of gains related to debt buybacks in the prior-year period.

Expenses decreased 24%, primarily driven by the wind-down of legacy assets.

Provisions decreased 35% to a net benefit of $132 million, primarily due to lower net credit losses, partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release. Net credit losses declined 76% to $24 million, reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity. The provision for benefits and claims declined by $29 million to $0, reflecting continued legacy divestitures. The net reserve release declined 32%, reflecting the continued wind-down of legacy activities, primarily in the North America mortgage portfolio. Citi expects that cost of credit in Corporate/Other should be moderately higher in the near term due to normalization of credit costs.

2017 YTD vs. 2016 YTD

Year-to-date, Corporate/Other has experienced similar trends to those described above. Net income declined 86% to $77 million, reflecting lower revenues, partially offset by lower expenses and lower cost of credit.

Revenues decreased 42%, primarily driven by the same factors described above and lower revenue from treasury hedging activity. Revenues in the current period included approximately $750 million in gains on asset sales, which more than offset a roughly $300 million charge related to the exit of Citi’s U.S. mortgage servicing operations.

Expenses decreased 18%, driven by the same factors described above, partially offset by approximately $100 million in episodic expenses primarily related to the exit of the U.S. mortgage servicing operations.

Provisions decreased by $152 million, driven by the same factors described above. Net credit losses declined 57% to $105 million, reflecting the impact of ongoing divestiture activity as well as continued wind-down in the legacy North America mortgage portfolio. The provision for benefits and claims declined by $88 million, reflecting continued legacy divestitures. The net reserve release declined 28%, driven by the same factors described above.

26

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The table below shows the location of a discussion of Citi’s various off-balance sheet arrangements in this Form 10-Q. For additional information on Citi’s off-balance sheet arrangements, see “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and Notes 1, 21 and 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Types of Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Disclosures in this Form 10-Q

Variable interests and other obligations, including contingent obligations, arising from variable interests in nonconsolidated VIEs	See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Letters of credit, and lending and other commitments	See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Guarantees	See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

27

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

Capital is used principally to support assets in Citi’s businesses and to absorb credit, market and operational losses. Citi primarily generates capital through earnings from its operating businesses. Citi may augment its capital through issuances of common stock, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans, among other issuances.

Further, Citi’s capital levels may also be affected by changes in accounting and regulatory standards, as well as U.S. corporate tax laws and the impact of future events on Citi’s business results, such as changes in interest and foreign exchange rates, as well as business and asset dispositions.

During the second quarter of 2017, Citi returned a total of approximately $2.2 billion of capital to common shareholders in the form of share repurchases (approximately 29 million common shares) and dividends.

Capital Management

Citi’s capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with each entity’s respective risk profile, management targets and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines. For additional information regarding Citi’s capital management, see “Capital Resources—Capital Management” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Capital Planning and Stress Testing

Citi is subject to an annual assessment by the Federal Reserve Board as to whether Citigroup has effective capital planning processes as well as sufficient regulatory capital to absorb losses during stressful economic and financial conditions, while also meeting obligations to creditors and counterparties and continuing to serve as a credit intermediary. This annual assessment includes two related programs: the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST). For additional information regarding Citi’s capital planning and stress testing, including potential changes in Citi’s regulatory capital requirements and future CCAR processes, see “Forward-Looking Statements” below and “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Capital Planning and Stress Testing” and “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In June 2017, the Federal Reserve Board expressed no objection to Citi’s capital plan, including requested capital actions, in conjunction with the 2017 CCAR. For additional information, see “Equity Security Repurchases” and “Dividends” below.

Current Regulatory Capital Standards

Citi is subject to regulatory capital standards issued by the Federal Reserve Board which constitute the U.S. Basel III rules. These rules establish an integrated capital adequacy framework, encompassing both risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios. For additional information regarding the risk-based capital ratios, Tier 1 Leverage ratio and Supplementary Leverage ratio, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

GSIB Surcharge

The Federal Reserve Board also adopted a rule that imposes a risk-based capital surcharge upon U.S. bank holding companies that are identified as global systemically important bank holding companies (GSIBs), including Citi. GSIB surcharges under the rule initially range from 1% to 4.5% of total risk-weighted assets. Citi’s initial GSIB surcharge effective January 1, 2016 was 3.5%. However, ongoing efforts in addressing quantitative measures of systemic importance have resulted in a reduction of Citi’s GSIB surcharge to 3%, effective January 1, 2017. For additional information regarding the identification of a GSIB and the methodology for annually determining the GSIB surcharge, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—GSIB Surcharge” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Transition Provisions

The U.S. Basel III rules contain several differing, largely multi-year transition provisions (i.e., “phase-ins” and “phase-outs”). Citi considers all of these transition provisions as being fully implemented on January 1, 2019 (full implementation). For additional information regarding the transition provisions under the U.S. Basel III rules, including with respect to the GSIB surcharge, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Transition Provisions” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

28

Citigroup’s Capital Resources Under Current Regulatory Standards

Citi is required to maintain stated minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios of 4.5%, 6% and 8%, respectively.

Citi’s effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2017, inclusive of the 50% phase-in of both the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and the 3% GSIB surcharge (all of which is to be composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital), are 7.25%, 8.75% and 10.75%, respectively. Citi’s effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2016, inclusive of the 25% phase-in of both the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and the 3.5% GSIB surcharge (all of which is to be

composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital), were 6%, 7.5% and 9.5%, respectively.

Furthermore, to be “well capitalized” under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding

company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels.

The following tables set forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios under current regulatory standards (reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements) for Citi as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Citigroup Capital Components and Ratios Under Current Regulatory Standards (Basel III Transition Arrangements)

	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars, except ratios	Advanced Approaches			Standardized Approach			Advanced Approaches			Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	$	163,786		$	163,786		$	167,378		$	167,378
Tier 1 Capital	179,544			179,544			178,387			178,387
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)	204,790			216,927			202,146			214,938
Total Risk-Weighted Assets	1,157,670			1,163,894			1,166,764			1,126,314
Credit Risk(1)	$	755,530		$	1,086,259		$	773,483		$	1,061,786
Market Risk	77,140			77,635			64,006			64,528
Operational Risk	325,000			—			329,275			—
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)	14.15		%	14.07		%	14.35		%	14.86		%
Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)	15.51			15.43			15.29			15.84
Total Capital ratio(2)	17.69			18.64			17.33			19.08

In millions of dollars, except ratios	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets(3)		$	1,815,196			$	1,768,415
Total Leverage Exposure(4)		2,421,852				2,351,883
Tier 1 Leverage ratio		9.89		%		10.09		%
Supplementary Leverage ratio		7.41				7.58

(1) Under the U.S. Basel III rules, credit risk-weighted assets during the transition period reflect the effects of transitional arrangements related to regulatory capital adjustments and deductions and, as a result, will differ from credit risk-weighted assets derived under full implementation of the rules.

(2) As of June 30, 2017, Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach, whereas the reportable Total Capital ratio was the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework. As of December 31, 2016, Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework.

(3) Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.

(4) Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.

As indicated in the table above, Citigroup’s risk-based capital ratios at June 30, 2017 were in excess of the stated and effective minimum requirements under the U.S. Basel III rules. In addition, Citi was also “well capitalized” under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of June 30, 2017.

29

Components of Citigroup Capital Under Current Regulatory Standards (Basel III Transition Arrangements)

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity(1)	$	210,950		$	206,051
Add: Qualifying noncontrolling interests	212			259
Regulatory Capital Adjustments and Deductions:
Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale (AFS), net of tax(2)(3)	(20		)	(320		)
Less: Defined benefit plans liability adjustment, net of tax(3)	(1,062		)	(2,066		)
Less: Accumulated net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax(4)	(445		)	(560		)
Less: Cumulative unrealized net loss related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities    attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax(3)(5)	(233		)	(37		)
Less: Intangible assets:
Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)(6)	21,589			20,858
Identifiable intangible assets other than mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), net of related    DTLs(3)	3,670			2,926
Less: Defined benefit pension plan net assets(3)	637			514
Less: Deferred tax assets (DTAs) arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and    general business credit carry-forwards(3)(7)	16,666			12,802
Less: Excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common stock investments,   and MSRs(3)(7)(8)	6,574			4,815
Total Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	163,786		$	167,378
Additional Tier 1 Capital
Qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock(1)	$	19,069		$	19,069
Qualifying trust preferred securities(9)	1,374			1,371
Qualifying noncontrolling interests	134			17
Regulatory Capital Adjustment and Deductions:
Less: Cumulative unrealized net loss related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities    attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax(3)(5)	(58		)	(24		)
Less: Defined benefit pension plan net assets(3)	159			343
Less: DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and    general business credit carry-forwards(3)(7)	4,166			8,535
Less: Permitted ownership interests in covered funds(10)	495			533
Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(11)	57			61
Total Additional Tier 1 Capital (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	15,758		$	11,009
Total Tier 1 Capital (Common Equity Tier 1 Capital + Additional Tier 1 Capital)    (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	179,544		$	178,387
Tier 2 Capital
Qualifying subordinated debt	$	23,642		$	22,818
Qualifying trust preferred securities(12)	324			317
Qualifying noncontrolling interests	39			22
Eligible allowance for credit losses(13)	13,433			13,452
Regulatory Capital Adjustment and Deduction:
Add: Unrealized gains on AFS equity exposures includable in Tier 2 Capital	2			3
Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(11)	57			61
Total Tier 2 Capital (Standardized Approach)	$	37,383		$	36,551
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) (Standardized Approach)	$	216,927		$	214,938
Adjustment for excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses(13)	$	(12,137	)	$	(12,792	)
Total Tier 2 Capital (Advanced Approaches)	$	25,246		$	23,759
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) (Advanced Approaches)	$	204,790		$	202,146

Footnotes are presented on the following page.

30

(1) Issuance costs of $184 million related to noncumulative perpetual preferred stock outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are excluded from common stockholders’ equity and netted against such preferred stock in accordance with Federal Reserve Board regulatory reporting requirements, which differ from those under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

(2) In addition, includes the net amount of unamortized loss on held-to-maturity (HTM) securities. This amount relates to securities that were previously transferred from AFS to HTM, and non-credit-related factors such as changes in interest rates and liquidity spreads for HTM securities with other-than-temporary impairment.

(3) The transition arrangements for significant regulatory capital adjustments and deductions impacting Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Additional Tier 1 Capital are set forth in the chart entitled “Basel III Transition Arrangements: Significant Regulatory Capital Adjustments and Deductions,” as presented in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(4) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital is adjusted for accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) that relate to the hedging of items not recognized at fair value on the balance sheet.

(5) The cumulative impact of changes in Citigroup’s own creditworthiness in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected, and own-credit valuation adjustments on derivatives, are excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Additional Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with the U.S. Basel III rules.

(6) Includes goodwill “embedded” in the valuation of significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions.

(7) Of Citi’s approximately $45.8 billion of net DTAs at June 30, 2017, approximately $19.8 billion were includable in regulatory capital pursuant to the U.S. Basel III rules, while approximately $26.0 billion were excluded. Excluded from Citi’s regulatory capital at June 30, 2017 was approximately $27.4 billion of net DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards as well as temporary differences, of which approximately $23.2 billion were deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and approximately $4.2 billion were deducted from Additional Tier 1 Capital, reduced by approximately $1.4 billion of net DTLs primarily associated with goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Separately, under the U.S. Basel III rules, goodwill and these other intangible assets are deducted net of associated DTLs in arriving at Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards are required to be deducted from both Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Additional Tier 1 Capital under the transition arrangements of the U.S. Basel III rules; whereas DTAs arising from temporary differences are deducted in full from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital under these rules, if in excess of 10%/15% limitations.

(8) Assets subject to 10%/15% limitations include MSRs, DTAs arising from temporary differences and significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, this deduction related only to DTAs arising from temporary differences that exceeded the 10% limitation. Accordingly, approximately $6.6 billion of DTAs arising from temporary differences were excluded from Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital at June 30, 2017. Changes to the U.S. corporate tax regime that impact the value of Citi’s DTAs arising from temporary differences, which exceed the then current amount deducted from Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, would further reduce Citi’s regulatory capital to the extent of such excess after tax. For additional information regarding potential U.S. corporate tax reform, see “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(9) Represents Citigroup Capital XIII trust preferred securities, which are permanently grandfathered as Tier 1 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules.

(10) Banking entities are required to be in compliance with the Volcker Rule of the Dodd-Frank Act that prohibits conducting certain proprietary investment activities and limits their ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. Accordingly, Citi is required by the Volcker Rule to deduct from Tier 1 Capital all permitted ownership interests in covered funds that were acquired after December 31, 2013.

(11) 50% of the minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries must be deducted from each of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital.

(12) Effective January 1, 2016, non-grandfathered trust preferred securities are not eligible for inclusion in Tier 1 Capital, but are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital subject to full phase-out by January 1, 2022. Non-grandfathered trust preferred securities are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital in an amount up to 50% and 60% during 2017 and 2016, respectively, of the aggregate outstanding principal amounts of such issuances as of January 1, 2014, in accordance with the transition arrangements for non-qualifying capital instruments under the U.S. Basel III rules.

(13) Under the Standardized Approach, the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Advanced Approaches framework, in which eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets. The total amount of eligible credit reserves in excess of expected credit losses that were eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital, subject to limitation, under the Advanced Approaches framework was $1.3 billion and $0.7 billion at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

31

Citigroup Capital Rollforward Under Current Regulatory Standards (Basel III Transition Arrangements)

In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended     June 30, 2017
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, beginning of period(1)	$	161,388		$	167,378
Net income	3,872			7,962
Common and preferred stock dividends declared	(765		)	(1,511		)
Net increase in treasury stock	(1,762		)	(3,699		)
Net change in common stock and additional paid-in capital	184			(245		)
Net decrease in foreign currency translation adjustment net of hedges, net of tax	643			1,961
Net change in unrealized losses on securities AFS, net of tax	(22		)	397
Net increase in defined benefit plans liability adjustment, net of tax	(108		)	(1,151		)
Net change in adjustment related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities     attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax	11			52
Net increase in goodwill, net of related DTLs	(141		)	(731		)
Net change in identifiable intangible assets other than MSRs, net of related DTLs	120			(744		)
Net change in defined benefit pension plan net assets	32			(123		)
Net change in DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and     general business credit carry-forwards	196			(3,864		)
Net change in excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common     stock investments and MSRs	123			(1,759		)
Other	15			(137		)
Net change in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	$	2,398		$	(3,592	)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, end of period     (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	163,786		$	163,786
Additional Tier 1 Capital, beginning of period	$	15,439		$	11,009
Net increase in qualifying trust preferred securities	2			3
Net change in adjustment related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities     attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax	23			34
Net decrease in defined benefit pension plan net assets	8			184
Net decrease in DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and     general business credit carry-forwards	49			4,369
Net decrease in permitted ownership interests in covered funds	123			38
Other	114			121
Net increase in Additional Tier 1 Capital	$	319		$	4,749
Tier 1 Capital, end of period     (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	179,544		$	179,544
Tier 2 Capital, beginning of period (Standardized Approach)	$	36,976		$	36,551
Net increase in qualifying subordinated debt	364			824
Net increase in qualifying trust preferred securities	5			7
Net change in eligible allowance for credit losses	26			(19		)
Other	12			20
Net increase in Tier 2 Capital (Standardized Approach)	$	407		$	832
Tier 2 Capital, end of period (Standardized Approach)	$	37,383		$	37,383
Total Capital, end of period (Standardized Approach)	$	216,927		$	216,927
Tier 2 Capital, beginning of period (Advanced Approaches)	$	24,396		$	23,759
Net increase in qualifying subordinated debt	364			824
Net increase in qualifying trust preferred securities	5			7
Net increase in excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses	469			636
Other	12			20
Net increase in Tier 2 Capital (Advanced Approaches)	$	850		$	1,487
Tier 2 Capital, end of period (Advanced Approaches)	$	25,246		$	25,246
Total Capital, end of period (Advanced Approaches)	$	204,790		$	204,790

Footnote is presented on the following page.

32

(1) The beginning balance of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital for the three months ended June 30, 2017 has been restated to reflect the modified retrospective adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. For additional information regarding ASU 2017-08, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward Under Current Regulatory Standards

(Basel III Standardized Approach with Transition Arrangements)

In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended     June 30, 2017
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period	$	1,142,559		$	1,126,314
Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in general credit risk exposures(1)	20,345			13,643
Net increase in repo-style transactions	418			6,988
Net decrease in securitization exposures	(2,096		)	(2,054		)
Net increase in equity exposures	212			747
Net change in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives	2,277			(1,080		)
Net increase in other exposures(2)	7			2,907
Net change in off-balance sheet exposures(3)	(4,937		)	3,322
Net increase in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets	$	16,226		$	24,473
Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in risk levels(4)	$	5,138		$	15,890
Net decrease due to model and methodology updates(5)	(29		)	(2,783		)
Net increase in Market Risk-Weighted Assets	$	5,109		$	13,107
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period	$	1,163,894		$	1,163,894

(1) General credit risk exposures include cash and balances due from depository institutions, securities, and loans and leases. General credit risk exposures increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to corporate loan growth.

(2) Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions, and other assets.

(3) Off-balance sheet exposures decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to the change in risk-weighting treatment applicable to certain corporate card commitments. Off-balance sheet exposures increased during the six months ended June 30, 2017, as the growth in corporate exposures and reduced hedging benefits during the first quarter of 2017 more than offset the decline in off-balance sheet exposures during the second quarter of 2017.

(4) Risk levels increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to an increase in exposure levels subject to Stressed Value at Risk and comprehensive risk, as well as an increase in positions subject to securitization charges.

(5) Risk-weighted assets declined during the six months ended June 30, 2017 due to changes in model inputs regarding volatility, as well as methodology changes for standard specific risk charges.

33

Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward Under Current Regulatory Standards

(Basel III Advanced Approaches with Transition Arrangements)

In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended     June 30, 2017
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period	$	1,166,181		$	1,166,764
Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
Net decrease in retail exposures(1)	(4,343		)	(8,655		)
Net change in wholesale exposures(2)	(4,029		)	416
Net increase in repo-style transactions	199			2
Net decrease in securitization exposures	(1,880		)	(2,115		)
Net increase in equity exposures	134			599
Net decrease in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives	(1,898		)	(6,097		)
Net decrease in derivatives CVA	(39		)	(1,100		)
Net change in other exposures(3)	1,636			(49		)
Net decrease in supervisory 6% multiplier(4)	(611		)	(954		)
Net decrease in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets	$	(10,831	)	$	(17,953	)
Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in risk levels(5)	$	4,922		$	15,917
Net decrease due to model and methodology updates(6)	(29		)	(2,783		)
Net increase in Market Risk-Weighted Assets	$	4,893		$	13,134
Net decrease in Operational Risk-Weighted Assets(7)	$	(2,573	)	$	(4,275	)
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period	$	1,157,670		$	1,157,670

(1) Retail exposures decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to residential mortgage loan sales and repayments, divestitures of certain legacy assets and reductions in qualifying revolving (cards) exposures, partially offset by the impact of FX translation.

(2) Wholesale exposures decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to annual updates to model parameters. Wholesale exposures increased during the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to increases in commercial loans and loan commitments, as well as the impact of FX translation.

(3) Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions, assets other than those reportable in specific exposure categories, and non-material portfolios.

(4) Supervisory 6% multiplier does not apply to derivatives CVA.

(5) Risk levels increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to an increase in exposure levels subject to Stressed Value at Risk and comprehensive risk, as well as an increase in positions subject to securitization charges.

(6) Risk-weighted assets declined during the six months ended June 30, 2017 due to changes in model inputs regarding volatility, as well as methodology changes for standard specific risk charges.

(7) Operational risk-weighted assets decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 due to quarterly updates to model parameters.

34

Capital Resources of Citigroup’s Subsidiary U.S. Depository Institutions Under Current Regulatory Standards

Citigroup’s subsidiary U.S. depository institutions are also subject to regulatory capital standards issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the standards of the Federal Reserve Board.

During 2017, Citi’s primary subsidiary U.S. depository institution, Citibank, N.A. (Citibank), is subject to effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios, inclusive of the 50% phase-in of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer, of 5.75%, 7.25% and 9.25%, respectively. Citibank’s effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total

Capital ratios during 2016, inclusive of the 25% phase-in of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer, were 5.125%, 6.625% and 8.625%, respectively. Citibank is required to maintain stated minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios of 4.5%, 6% and 8%, respectively.

The following tables set forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios under current regulatory standards (reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements) for Citibank, Citi’s primary subsidiary U.S. depository institution, as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Citibank Capital Components and Ratios Under Current Regulatory Standards (Basel III Transition Arrangements)

	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars, except ratios	Advanced Approaches			Standardized Approach			Advanced Approaches			Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	$	127,728		$	127,728		$	126,220		$	126,220
Tier 1 Capital	129,099			129,099			126,465			126,465
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)(1)	142,010			152,802			138,821			150,291
Total Risk-Weighted Assets	963,668			1,029,517			973,933			1,001,016
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)(3)	13.25		%	12.41		%	12.96		%	12.61		%
Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)(3)	13.40			12.54			12.99			12.63
Total Capital ratio(2)(3)	14.74			14.84			14.25			15.01

In millions of dollars, except ratios	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets(4)		$	1,376,154			$	1,333,161
Total Leverage Exposure(5)		1,917,020				1,859,394
Tier 1 Leverage ratio(3)		9.38		%		9.49		%
Supplementary Leverage ratio		6.73				6.80

(1) Under the Advanced Approaches framework, eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Standardized Approach in which the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets.

(2) As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Citibank’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Citibank’s reportable Total Capital ratio was the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework.

(3) Citibank must maintain minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital and Tier 1 Leverage ratios of 6.5%, 8%, 10% and 5%, respectively, to be considered “well capitalized” under the revised Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) regulations applicable to insured depository institutions as established by the U.S. Basel III rules. For additional information, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Prompt Corrective Action Framework” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(4) Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.

(5) Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.

As indicated in the table above, Citibank’s risk-based capital ratios at June 30, 2017 were in excess of the stated and effective minimum requirements under the U.S. Basel III rules. In addition, Citibank was also “well capitalized” as of June 30, 2017 under the revised PCA regulations, which became effective January 1, 2015.

35

Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Capital Ratios Under Current Regulatory Capital Standards

The following tables present the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup’s and Citibank’s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (numerator), and changes of $1 billion in

Advanced Approaches and Standardized Approach risk-weighted assets and quarterly adjusted average total assets, as well as Total Leverage Exposure (denominator), under current regulatory capital standards (reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements), as of June 30, 2017.

This information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup’s or Citibank’s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, quarterly adjusted average total assets or Total Leverage Exposure. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is reflected in these tables.

Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Risk-Based Capital Ratios (Basel III Transition Arrangements)

	Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio		Tier 1 Capital ratio		Total Capital ratio
In basis points	Impact of $100 million change in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	Impact of $1 billion change in risk- weighted assets	Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital	Impact of $1 billion change in risk- weighted assets	Impact of $100 million change in Total Capital	Impact of $1 billion change in risk- weighted assets
Citigroup
Advanced Approaches	0.9	1.2	0.9	1.3	0.9	1.5
Standardized Approach	0.9	1.2	0.9	1.3	0.9	1.6
Citibank
Advanced Approaches	1.0	1.4	1.0	1.4	1.0	1.5
Standardized Approach	1.0	1.2	1.0	1.2	1.0	1.4

Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Leverage Ratios (Basel III Transition Arrangements)

	Tier 1 Leverage ratio		Supplementary Leverage ratio
In basis points	Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital	Impact of $1 billion change in quarterly adjusted average total assets	Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital	Impact of $1 billion change in Total Leverage Exposure
Citigroup	0.6	0.5	0.4	0.3
Citibank	0.7	0.7	0.5	0.4

Citigroup Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries

At June 30, 2017, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a U.S. broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC’s net capital rule, of approximately $10.7 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by approximately $8.8 billion.

Moreover, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, a broker-dealer registered with the United Kingdom’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) that is also an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, had total capital of approximately $17.5 billion at June 30, 2017, which exceeded the PRA's minimum regulatory capital requirements.

In addition, certain of Citi’s other broker-dealer

subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. Citigroup’s other broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with

their regulatory capital requirements at June 30, 2017.

36

Basel III (Full Implementation)

Citigroup’s Capital Resources Under Basel III

(Full Implementation)

Citi currently estimates that its effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratio requirements under the U.S. Basel III rules, on a fully implemented basis, inclusive of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and the Countercyclical Capital Buffer at its current level of 0%, as well as an expected 3% GSIB surcharge, may be 10%, 11.5% and 13.5%, respectively.

Further, under the U.S. Basel III rules, Citi must also comply with a 4% minimum Tier 1 Leverage ratio requirement and an effective 5% minimum Supplementary Leverage ratio requirement.

The following tables set forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios, assuming full implementation under the U.S. Basel III rules, for Citi as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

At June 30, 2017, Citi’s constraining Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were those derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach, whereas Citi’s binding Total Capital ratio was that resulting from application of the Basel III Advanced Approaches. Further, each of Citi’s risk-based capital ratios was constrained by the Basel III Advanced Approaches for all prior periods.

Citigroup Capital Components and Ratios Under Basel III (Full Implementation)

	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars, except ratios	Advanced Approaches			Standardized Approach			Advanced Approaches			Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	$	155,174		$	155,174		$	149,516		$	149,516
Tier 1 Capital	175,129			175,129			169,390			169,390
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)	200,382			212,519			193,160			205,975
Total Risk-Weighted Assets	1,183,399			1,188,167			1,189,680			1,147,956
Credit Risk	$	781,259		$	1,110,532		$	796,399		$	1,083,428
Market Risk	77,140			77,635			64,006			64,528
Operational Risk	325,000			—			329,275			—
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio(1)(2)	13.11		%	13.06		%	12.57		%	13.02		%
Tier 1 Capital ratio(1)(2)	14.80			14.74			14.24			14.76
Total Capital ratio(1)(2)	16.93			17.89			16.24			17.94

In millions of dollars, except ratios	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets(3)		$	1,812,001			$	1,761,923
Total Leverage Exposure(4)		2,418,658				2,345,391
Tier 1 Leverage ratio(2)		9.66		%		9.61		%
Supplementary Leverage ratio(2)		7.24				7.22

(1) As of June 30, 2017, Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach, whereas the reportable Total Capital ratio was the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework. As of December 31, 2016, Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework.

(2) Citi’s Basel III capital ratios and related components, on a fully implemented basis, are non-GAAP financial measures.

(3) Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.

(4) Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.

37

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio

Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio was 13.1% at June 30, 2017, compared to 12.8% at March 31, 2017 and 12.6% at December 31, 2016. The quarter-over-quarter increase in the ratio was primarily due to quarterly net income of $3.9 billion and beneficial net movements in AOCI, offset in part by the return of approximately $2.2 billion of capital to common shareholders. The growth in Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio from year-end 2016 reflected continued growth in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital resulting from year-to-date net income of $8 billion and beneficial net movements in AOCI, offset in part by the return of approximately $4.5 billion of capital to common shareholders.

38

Components of Citigroup Capital Under Basel III (Full Implementation)

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity(1)	$	210,950		$	206,051
Add: Qualifying noncontrolling interests	143			129
Regulatory Capital Adjustments and Deductions:
Less: Accumulated net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax(2)	(445		)	(560		)
Less: Cumulative unrealized net loss related to changes in fair value of    financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax(3)	(291		)	(61		)
Less: Intangible assets:
Goodwill, net of related DTLs(4)	21,589			20,858
Identifiable intangible assets other than MSRs, net of related DTLs	4,587			4,876
Less: Defined benefit pension plan net assets	796			857
Less: DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general    business credit carry-forwards(5)	20,832			21,337
Less: Excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common stock investments,   and MSRs(5)(6)	8,851			9,357
Total Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	155,174		$	149,516
Additional Tier 1 Capital
Qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock(1)	$	19,069		$	19,069
Qualifying trust preferred securities(7)	1,374			1,371
Qualifying noncontrolling interests	64			28
Regulatory Capital Deductions:
Less: Permitted ownership interests in covered funds(8)	495			533
Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(9)	57			61
Total Additional Tier 1 Capital (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	19,955		$	19,874
Total Tier 1 Capital (Common Equity Tier 1 Capital + Additional Tier 1 Capital)    (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	175,129		$	169,390
Tier 2 Capital
Qualifying subordinated debt	$	23,642		$	22,818
Qualifying trust preferred securities(10)	324			317
Qualifying noncontrolling interests	48			36
Eligible allowance for credit losses(11)	13,433			13,475
Regulatory Capital Deduction:
Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(9)	57			61
Total Tier 2 Capital (Standardized Approach)	$	37,390		$	36,585
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) (Standardized Approach)	$	212,519		$	205,975
Adjustment for excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses(11)	$	(12,137	)	$	(12,815	)
Total Tier 2 Capital (Advanced Approaches)	$	25,253		$	23,770
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) (Advanced Approaches)	$	200,382		$	193,160

(1) Issuance costs of $184 million related to noncumulative perpetual preferred stock outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are excluded from common stockholders’ equity and netted against such preferred stock in accordance with Federal Reserve Board regulatory reporting requirements, which differ from those under U.S. GAAP.

(2) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital is adjusted for accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges included in AOCI that relate to the hedging of items not recognized at fair value on the balance sheet.

(3) The cumulative impact of changes in Citigroup’s own creditworthiness in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and own-credit valuation adjustments on derivatives are excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with the U.S. Basel III rules.

(4) Includes goodwill “embedded” in the valuation of significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions.

Footnotes continue on the following page.

39

(5) Of Citi’s approximately $45.8 billion of net DTAs at June 30, 2017, approximately $17.6 billion were includable in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital pursuant to the U.S. Basel III rules, while approximately $28.2 billion were excluded. Excluded from Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital at June 30, 2017 was a total of approximately $29.7 billion of net DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards as well as temporary differences, reduced by approximately $1.5 billion of net DTLs primarily associated with goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Separately, under the U.S. Basel III rules, goodwill and these other intangible assets are deducted net of associated DTLs in arriving at Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards are required to be fully deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital under full implementation of the U.S. Basel III rules; whereas DTAs arising from temporary differences are deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, if in excess of 10%/15% limitations.

(6) Assets subject to 10%/15% limitations include MSRs, DTAs arising from temporary differences and significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, this deduction related only to DTAs arising from temporary differences that exceeded the 10% limitation. Accordingly, approximately $8.9 billion of DTAs arising from temporary differences were excluded from Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital at June 30, 2017. Changes to the U.S. corporate tax regime that impact the value of Citi’s DTAs arising from temporary differences, which exceed the then current amount deducted from Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, would further reduce Citi’s regulatory capital to the extent of such excess after tax. For additional information regarding potential U.S. corporate tax reform, see “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(7) Represents Citigroup Capital XIII trust preferred securities, which are permanently grandfathered as Tier 1 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules.

(8) Banking entities are required to be in compliance with the Volcker Rule of the Dodd-Frank Act that prohibits conducting certain proprietary investment activities and limits their ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. Accordingly, Citi is required by the Volcker Rule to deduct from Tier 1 Capital all permitted ownership interests in covered funds that were acquired after December 31, 2013.

(9) 50% of the minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries must be deducted from each of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital.

(10) Represents the amount of non-grandfathered trust preferred securities eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules, which will be fully phased-out of Tier 2 Capital by January 1, 2022.

(11) Under the Standardized Approach, the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Advanced Approaches framework, in which eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets. The total amount of eligible credit reserves in excess of expected credit losses that were eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital, subject to limitation, under the Advanced Approaches framework was $1.3 billion and $0.7 billion at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

40

Citigroup Capital Rollforward Under Basel III (Full Implementation)

In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended     June 30, 2017
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, beginning of period(1)	$	152,664		$	149,516
Net income	3,872			7,962
Common and preferred stock dividends declared	(765		)	(1,511		)
Net increase in treasury stock	(1,762		)	(3,699		)
Net change in common stock and additional paid-in capital	184			(245		)
Net decrease in foreign currency translation adjustment net of hedges, net of tax	643			1,961
Net change in unrealized losses on securities AFS, net of tax	(27		)	697
Net increase in defined benefit plans liability adjustment, net of tax	(135		)	(147		)
Net change in adjustment related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities     attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax	34			86
Net increase in goodwill, net of related DTLs	(141		)	(731		)
Net decrease in identifiable intangible assets other than MSRs, net of related DTLs	151			289
Net decrease in defined benefit pension plan net assets	40			61
Net decrease in DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general     business credit carry-forwards	245			505
Net decrease in excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common stock     investments and MSRs	161			506
Other	10			(76		)
Net increase in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	$	2,510		$	5,658
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, end of period     (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	155,174		$	155,174
Additional Tier 1 Capital, beginning of period	$	19,791		$	19,874
Net increase in qualifying trust preferred securities	2			3
Net decrease in permitted ownership interests in covered funds	123			38
Other	39			$	40
Net increase in Additional Tier 1 Capital	$	164		$	81
Tier 1 Capital, end of period     (Standardized Approach and Advanced Approaches)	$	175,129		$	175,129
Tier 2 Capital, beginning of period (Standardized Approach)	$	36,981		$	36,585
Net increase in qualifying subordinated debt	364			824
Net change in eligible allowance for credit losses	26			(42		)
Other	19			23
Net increase in Tier 2 Capital (Standardized Approach)	$	409		$	805
Tier 2 Capital, end of period (Standardized Approach)	$	37,390		$	37,390
Total Capital, end of period (Standardized Approach)	$	212,519		$	212,519
Tier 2 Capital, beginning of period (Advanced Approaches)	$	24,401		$	23,770
Net increase in qualifying subordinated debt	364			824
Net increase in excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses	469			636
Other	19			23
Net increase in Tier 2 Capital (Advanced Approaches)	$	852		$	1,483
Tier 2 Capital, end of period (Advanced Approaches)	$	25,253		$	25,253
Total Capital, end of period (Advanced Approaches)	$	200,382		$	200,382

(1) The beginning balance of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital for the three months ended June 30, 2017 has been restated to reflect the modified retrospective adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. For additional information regarding ASU 2017-08, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

41

Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward (Basel III Standardized Approach with Full Implementation)

In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended     June 30, 2017
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period	$	1,166,409		$	1,147,956
Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in general credit risk exposures(1)	20,345			13,643
Net increase in repo-style transactions	418			6,988
Net decrease in securitization exposures	(2,096		)	(2,054		)
Net increase in equity exposures	225			836
Net change in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives	2,277			(1,080		)
Net increase in other exposures(2)	417			5,449
Net change in off-balance sheet exposures	(4,937		)	3,322
Net increase in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets	$	16,649		$	27,104
Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in risk levels	$	5,138		$	15,890
Net decrease due to model and methodology updates	(29		)	(2,783		)
Net increase in Market Risk-Weighted Assets	$	5,109		$	13,107
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period	$	1,188,167		$	1,188,167

(1) General credit risk exposures include cash and balances due from depository institutions, securities, and loans and leases.

(2) Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions, and other assets.

Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward (Basel III Advanced Approaches with Full Implementation)

In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended     June 30, 2017
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period	$	1,191,463		$	1,189,680
Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
Net decrease in retail exposures	(4,343		)	(8,655		)
Net change in wholesale exposures	(4,029		)	416
Net increase in repo-style transactions	199			2
Net decrease in securitization exposures	(1,880		)	(2,115		)
Net increase in equity exposures	146			688
Net decrease in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives	(1,898		)	(6,097		)
Net decrease in derivatives CVA	(39		)	(1,100		)
Net increase in other exposures(1)	2,047			2,516
Net decrease in supervisory 6% multiplier(2)	(587		)	(795		)
Net decrease in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets	$	(10,384	)	$	(15,140	)
Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
Net increase in risk levels	$	4,922		$	15,917
Net decrease due to model and methodology updates	(29		)	(2,783		)
Net increase in Market Risk-Weighted Assets	$	4,893		$	13,134
Net decrease in Operational Risk-Weighted Assets	$	(2,573	)	$	(4,275	)
Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period	$	1,183,399		$	1,183,399

(1) Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions, assets other than those reportable in specific exposure categories, and non-material portfolios.

(2) Supervisory 6% multiplier does not apply to derivatives CVA.

42

Total risk-weighted assets under the Basel III Standardized Approach increased from year-end 2016 due to substantially higher credit and market risk-weighted assets. The increase in credit risk-weighted assets under the Basel III Standardized Approach was primarily due to corporate loan growth and increased repo-style transaction activity.

Total risk-weighted assets under the Basel III Advanced Approaches decreased from year-end 2016, as lower credit and operational risk-weighted assets were partially offset by an increase in market risk-weighted assets. The decrease in credit risk-weighted assets under the Basel III Advanced Approaches was primarily due to residential mortgage loan sales and repayments, divestitures of certain legacy assets, and reductions in qualifying revolving (cards) exposures attributable to seasonal holiday spending repayments, as well as a decrease in OTC derivatives due to model enhancements. Operational risk-weighted assets decreased from year-end 2016 due to quarterly updates to model parameters.

The increase in market risk-weighted assets under both approaches over this period was primarily due to increases in exposure levels subject to Stressed Value at Risk and comprehensive risk, as well as an increase in positions subject to securitization charges.

43

Supplementary Leverage Ratio

Citigroup’s Supplementary Leverage ratio was 7.2% for the second quarter of 2017, compared to 7.3% for the first quarter of 2017 and 7.2% for the fourth quarter of 2016. The decline in the ratio quarter-over-quarter was principally driven by the return of capital to common shareholders and an increase in Total Leverage Exposure primarily due to growth in average on-balance sheet assets, partially offset by quarterly net income of $3.9 billion and beneficial net movements in AOCI. The ratio remained unchanged from the fourth quarter of 2016, as net income of $8 billion and beneficial net movements in AOCI were offset by the return

of capital to common shareholders and an increase in Total Leverage Exposure primarily due to growth in average on-balance sheet assets, as well as, although to a lesser extent, an increase in certain off-balance sheet exposures.

The following table sets forth Citi’s Supplementary Leverage ratio and related components, assuming full implementation under the U.S. Basel III rules, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Citigroup Basel III Supplementary Leverage Ratio and Related Components (Full Implementation)

In millions of dollars, except ratios	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Tier 1 Capital	$	175,129		$	169,390
Total Leverage Exposure (TLE)
On-balance sheet assets(1)	$	1,869,208		$	1,819,802
Certain off-balance sheet exposures:(2)
Potential future exposure on derivative contracts	225,090			211,009
Effective notional of sold credit derivatives, net(3)	69,727			64,366
Counterparty credit risk for repo-style transactions(4)	23,174			22,002
Unconditionally cancellable commitments	67,571			66,663
Other off-balance sheet exposures	221,095			219,428
Total of certain off-balance sheet exposures	$	606,657		$	583,468
Less: Tier 1 Capital deductions	57,207			57,879
Total Leverage Exposure	$	2,418,658		$	2,345,391
Supplementary Leverage ratio	7.24		%	7.22		%

(1) Represents the daily average of on-balance sheet assets for the quarter.

(2) Represents the average of certain off-balance sheet exposures calculated as of the last day of each month in the quarter.

(3) Under the U.S. Basel III rules, banking organizations are required to include in TLE the effective notional amount of sold credit derivatives, with netting of exposures permitted if certain conditions are met.

(4) Repo-style transactions include repurchase or reverse repurchase transactions and securities borrowing or securities lending transactions.

Citibank’s Supplementary Leverage ratio, assuming full implementation under the U.S. Basel III rules, was 6.6% for the second quarter of 2017, compared to 6.7% for the first quarter of 2017 and 6.6% for the fourth quarter of 2016. The decline in the ratio quarter-over-quarter was principally driven by cash dividends paid by Citibank to its parent, Citicorp, and which were subsequently remitted to Citigroup, as well as an increase in Total Leverage Exposure primarily due to growth in average on-balance sheet assets, partially offset by quarterly net income and the favorable effects associated with DTA utilization. The ratio remained unchanged from the fourth quarter of 2016, as the Tier 1 Capital benefits associated with net income and beneficial net movements in AOCI were offset by an increase in Total Leverage Exposure and cash dividends paid by Citibank to its parent, Citicorp, and which were subsequently remitted to Citigroup.

44

Regulatory Capital Standards Developments

Revisions to the Securitization Framework

In July 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) issued two consultative documents: one which establishes criteria for identifying “simple, transparent, and comparable” (STC) short-term securitizations, and another which provides for an alternative, and potentially preferential, regulatory capital treatment for short-term securitizations identified as STC. The Basel Committee had previously issued criteria solely for identifying STC securitizations in July 2015, and also previously issued an alternative regulatory capital treatment for STC securitizations in July 2016. The July 2017 consultative documents, however, introduce identification criteria and regulatory capital treatments that are uniquely tailored to short-term securitizations, with a focus on exposures related to asset-backed commercial paper conduits.

The U.S. banking agencies may revise the regulatory capital treatment of STC short-term securitizations in the future, based upon any revisions adopted by the Basel Committee.

45

Tangible Common Equity, Book Value Per Share, Tangible Book Value Per Share and Returns on Equity

Tangible common equity (TCE), as defined by Citi, represents common stockholders’ equity less goodwill and identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs). Other companies may calculate TCE in a different manner. TCE, tangible book value per share and returns on average TCE are non-GAAP financial measures.

In millions of dollars or shares, except per share amounts	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity	$	230,019		$	225,120
Less: Preferred stock	19,253			19,253
Common stockholders’ equity	$	210,766		$	205,867
Less:
Goodwill	22,349			21,659
Identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs)	4,887			5,114
Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) related to       assets held-for-sale	120			72
Tangible common equity (TCE)	$	183,410		$	179,022
Common shares outstanding (CSO)	2,724.6			2,772.4
Book value per share (common equity/CSO)	$	77.36		$	74.26
Tangible book value per share (TCE/CSO)	67.32			64.57
In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017			Three Months Ended June 30, 2016			Six Months Ended June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Net income available to common shareholders	$	3,552		$	3,676		$	7,341		$	6,967
Average common stockholders’ equity	$	209,693		$	210,146		$	208,298		$	208,615
Average TCE	$	182,404		$	184,130		$	181,276		$	182,420
Less: Average net DTAs excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital(1)	28,448			28,503			28,714			29,333
Average TCE, excluding average net DTAs excluded from   Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	$	153,956		$	155,627		$	152,562		$	153,087
Return on average common stockholders’ equity	6.8		%	7.0		%	7.1		%	6.7		%
Return on average TCE (ROTCE)(2)	7.8			8.0			8.2			7.7
Return on average TCE, excluding average net DTAs excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital	9.3			9.5			9.7			9.2

(1) Represents average net DTAs excluded in arriving at Common Equity Tier 1 Capital under full implementation of the U.S. Basel III rules.

(2) ROTCE represents annualized net income available to common shareholders as a percentage of average TCE.

46

Managing Global Risk Table of Contents

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK	48
CREDIT RISK(1)	49
Consumer Credit	49
Corporate Credit	56
Additional Consumer and Corporate Credit Details	58
Loans Outstanding	58
Details of Credit Loss Experience	60
Allowance for Loan Losses	61
Non-Accrual Loans and Assets and Renegotiated Loans	62
LIQUIDITY RISK	66
High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA)	66
Loans	67
Deposits	67
Long-Term Debt	68
Secured Funding Transactions and Short-Term Borrowings	70
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)	71
Credit Ratings	72
MARKET RISK(1)	74
Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios	74
Market Risk of Trading Portfolios	85
COUNTRY RISK	87

(1) For additional information regarding certain credit risk, market risk and other quantitative and qualitative information, refer to Citi’s Pillar 3 Basel III Advanced Approaches Disclosures, as required by the rules of the Federal Reserve Board, on Citi’s Investor Relations website.

47

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

For Citi, effective risk management is of primary importance to its overall operations. Accordingly, Citi’s risk management process has been designed to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks it assumes in conducting its activities. Specifically, the activities that Citi engages in, and the risks those activities generate, must be consistent with Citi’s mission and value proposition, the key principles that guide it, and Citi's risk appetite.

For more information on Citi’s management of global risk, including its three lines of defense, see “Managing Global Risk” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

48

CREDIT RISK

For additional information on credit risk, including Citi’s credit risk management, measurement and stress testing, see “Credit Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CONSUMER CREDIT

Citi provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and credit card products in 19 countries and jurisdictions through North America GCB, Latin America GCB and Asia GCB. The retail banking products include consumer mortgages, home equity, personal, commercial loans and lines of credit, and similar related products with a focus on lending to prime customers. Citi uses its risk appetite

framework to define its lending parameters. In addition, Citi uses proprietary scoring models for new customer approvals. As stated in “Global Consumer Banking” above, GCB’s overall strategy is to leverage Citi’s global footprint and be the preeminent bank for the affluent and emerging affluent consumers in large urban centers. In credit cards and in certain retail markets, Citi serves customers in a somewhat broader set of segments and geographies. GCB’s commercial banking business focuses on small to mid-sized businesses.

Consumer Credit Portfolio

The following tables show Citi’s quarterly end-of-period consumer loans:⁽¹⁾ 

In billions of dollars	2Q’16			3Q’16			4Q’16			1Q’17			2Q’17
Retail banking:
Mortgages	$	81.6		$	81.4		$	79.4		$	81.2		$	81.4
Commercial banking	32.6			33.2			32.0			33.9			34.8
Personal and other	27.2			27.0			24.9			26.3			27.2
Total retail banking	$	141.4		$	141.6		$	136.3		$	141.4		$	143.4
Cards:
Citi-branded cards	$	100.1		$	103.9		$	108.3		$	105.7		$	109.9
Citi retail services	43.3			43.9			47.3			44.2			45.2
Total cards	$	143.4		$	147.8		$	155.6		$	149.9		$	155.1
Total GCB	$	284.8		$	289.4		$	291.9		$	291.3		$	298.5
GCB regional distribution:
North America	62		%	62		%	64		%	62		%	62		%
Latin America	8			8			8			9			9
Asia(2)	30			30			28			29			29
Total GCB	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%
Corporate/Other(3)	$	41.3		$	39.0		$	33.2		$	29.3		$	26.8
Total consumer loans	$	326.1		$	328.4		$	325.1		$	320.6		$	325.3

(1) End-of-period loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

(2) Asia includes loans and leases in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

(3) Primarily consists of legacy assets, principally North America consumer mortgages.

For information on changes to Citi’s end-of-period consumer loans, see “Liquidity Risk—Loans” below.

49

Overall Consumer Credit Trends

The following charts show the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses across both retail banking, including commercial banking, and cards for total GCB and by region.

Global Consumer Banking

North America

Latin America

Asia⁽¹⁾

(1) Asia includes GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

North America GCB provides mortgages, home equity loans, personal loans and commercial banking products through Citi’s retail banking network, and card products through Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services businesses. The retail bank is concentrated in six major metropolitan cities in the United States (for additional information on the U.S. retail bank, see “North America GCB” above).

As of June 30, 2017, approximately 70% of North America GCB consumer loans consisted of Citi-branded and Citi retail services cards, which drove the overall credit performance of North America GCB (for additional information on North America GCB’s cards portfolios, including delinquencies and net credit losses, see “Credit Card Trends” below).

Latin America GCB operates in Mexico through Citibanamex, one of Mexico’s largest banks, and provides credit cards, consumer mortgages, personal loans and commercial banking products. Latin America GCB serves a more mass market segment in Mexico and focuses on developing multi-product relationships with customers.

As set forth in the chart above, 90+ days past due

delinquencies modestly improved and net credit loss rates slightly increased in Latin America GCB year-over-year as of the second quarter of 2017, while the delinquency rate increased and the net credit loss rate decreased quarter-over-quarter. The sequential improvement in the net credit loss rate and increase in the delinquency rate were mostly driven by seasonality.

Asia GCB operates in 17 countries in Asia and EMEA and provides credit cards, consumer mortgages, personal loans and commercial banking products.

As shown in the chart above, 90+ days past due delinquency and net credit loss rates were largely stable in Asia GCB year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter as of the second quarter of 2017. This stability reflects the strong credit profiles in Asia GCB’s target customer segments. In addition, regulatory changes in many markets in Asia over the past few years have resulted in stable or improved portfolio credit quality, despite weaker macroeconomic conditions in several countries.

For additional information on cost of credit, loan delinquency and other information for Citi’s consumer loan portfolios, see each respective business’s results of operations above and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

50

Credit Card Trends

The following charts show the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for total GCB cards, Citi’s North America Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services portfolios as well as for Citi’s Latin America and Asia Citi-branded cards portfolios.

Total Cards

North America Citi-Branded Cards

North America Citi Retail Services

Latin America Citi-Branded Cards

Asia Citi-Branded Cards⁽¹⁾

(1) Asia includes loans and leases in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

51

North America GCB’s Citi-branded cards portfolio issues proprietary and co-branded cards. As shown in the chart above, 90+ days past due delinquency rates in Citi-branded cards increased year-over-year as of the second quarter of 2017 primarily due to the impact of the Costco portfolio,

organic volume growth and seasoning, and decreased quarter-over-quarter, due to the flow-through of delinquencies to credit losses related to the Costco conversion and seasonality. Net credit loss rates increased year-over-year primarily due to

the Costco portfolio acquisition, organic volume growth and

seasoning, and decreased quarter-over-quarter due to the flow-through of delinquencies to credit losses related to the Costco conversion in the first quarter of 2017 and seasonality.

Citi retail services partners directly with more than 20 retailers and dealers to offer private-label and co-branded consumer and commercial cards. Citi retail services’ target market is focused on select industry segments such as home improvement, specialty retail, consumer electronics and fuel. Citi retail services continually evaluates opportunities to add partners within target industries that have strong loyalty, lending or payment programs and growth potential.

Citi retail services’ delinquency and net credit loss rates increased year-over-year, primarily due to seasoning and the impact of changes in collection processes. The net credit loss rate also increased quarter-over-quarter due to the softness in the collections rates experienced once an account reaches mid-stage delinquency. The delinquency rate decreased quarter-over-quarter due to seasonality.

Latin America GCB issues proprietary and co-branded cards. As set forth in the chart above, 90+ days past due delinquency rates and net credit loss rates have continued to improve or remained stable year-over-year as of the second quarter of 2017. The net credit loss rate decreased and delinquency rate increased quarter-over-quarter, both primarily driven by seasonality.

Asia GCB issues proprietary and co-branded cards. As set forth in the chart above, 90+ days past due delinquency and net credit loss rates have remained broadly stable, driven by mature and well-diversified cards portfolios. 

For additional information on cost of credit, delinquency and other information for Citi’s cards portfolios, see each respective business’s results of operations above and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

North America Cards FICO Distribution

The following tables show the current FICO score distributions for Citi’s North America Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services portfolios based on end-of-period receivables. FICO scores are updated monthly for substantially all of the portfolio and on a quarterly basis for the remaining portfolio.

Citi-Branded

FICO distribution	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
> 720	63	%	64	%
660 - 720	26		26
620 - 660	7		6
< 620	4		4
Total	100	%	100	%

Citi Retail Services

FICO distribution	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
> 720	41	%	42	%
660 - 720	35		35
620 - 660	13		13
< 620	11		10
Total	100	%	100	%

As indicated by the tables above, the FICO distributions for Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services cards portfolios were largely unchanged versus year-end 2016. For additional information on FICO scores, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

52

North America Consumer Mortgage Lending

Citi’s NorthAmerica consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both residential first mortgages and home equity loans. The following table shows the outstanding quarterly end-of-period loans for Citi’s North America residential first mortgage and home equity loan portfolios:

In billions of dollars	2Q’16		3Q’16		4Q’16		1Q’17		2Q’17
GCB:
Residential firsts	$	40.1	$	40.1	$	40.2	$	40.3	$	40.2
Home equity	3.8		3.9		4.0		4.0		4.1
Total GCB	$	43.9	$	44.0	$	44.2	$	44.3	$	44.3
Corporate/Other:
Residential firsts	$	15.8	$	14.8	$	13.4	$	12.3	$	11.0
Home equity	17.3		16.1		15.0		13.4		12.4
Total Corporate/   Other	$	33.1	$	30.9	$	28.4	$	25.7	$	23.4
Total Citigroup—   North America	$	77.0	$	74.9	$	72.6	$	70.0	$	67.7

For additional information on delinquency and net credit loss trends in Citi’s consumer mortgage portfolio, see “Additional Consumer Credit Details” below.

Home Equity Loans—Revolving HELOCs

As set forth in the table above, Citi had $16.5 billion of home equity loans as of June 30, 2017, of which $3.9 billion are fixed-rate home equity loans and $12.6 billion are extended under home equity lines of credit (Revolving HELOCs). Fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing. Revolving HELOCs allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only until the end of the draw period, when the outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan, or “reset” (the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry). Upon reset, these borrowers will be required to pay both interest, usually at a variable rate, and principal that amortizes typically over 20 years, rather than the standard 30-year amortization.

Of the Revolving HELOCs at June 30, 2017, $6.6 billion had reset (compared to $6.4 billion at March 31, 2017) and $6.0 billion were still within their revolving period that had not reset (compared to $6.8 billion at March 31, 2017). The following chart indicates the FICO and combined loan-to-value (CLTV) characteristics of Citi’s Revolving HELOCs portfolio and the year in which they reset:

North America Home Equity Lines of Credit Amortization – Citigroup

Total ENR by Reset Year

In billions of dollars as of June 30, 2017

Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Approximately 53% of Citi’s total Revolving HELOCs portfolio had reset as of June 30, 2017 (compared to 49% as of March 31, 2017). Of the remaining Revolving HELOCs portfolio, approximately 22% will commence amortization during the remainder of 2017. Citi’s customers with Revolving HELOCs that reset could experience “payment shock” due to the higher required payments on the loans. Citi currently estimates that the monthly loan payment for its Revolving HELOCs that reset during the remainder of 2017 could increase on average by approximately $356, or 115%. Increases in interest rates could further increase these payments given the variable nature of the interest rates on these loans post-reset. Borrowers’ high loan-to-value positions, as well as the cost and availability of refinancing options, could limit borrowers’ ability to refinance their Revolving HELOCs as these loans begin to reset.

Approximately 5.9% of the Revolving HELOCs that have reset as of June 30, 2017 were 30+ days past due, compared to 3.7% of the total outstanding home equity loan portfolio (amortizing and non-amortizing). This compared to 6.4% and 3.9%, respectively, as of March 31, 2017. As newly amortizing loans continue to season, the delinquency rate of Citi’s total home equity loan portfolio could increase. In addition, resets to date have generally occurred during a period of historically low interest rates, which Citi believes has likely reduced the overall “payment shock” to the borrower.

Citi monitors this reset risk closely and will continue to consider any potential impact in determining its allowance for loan loss reserves. In addition, management continues to review and take additional actions to offset potential reset risk, such as a borrower outreach program to provide reset risk education and proactively working with high-risk borrowers through a specialized single point of contact unit.

53

Additional Consumer Credit Details

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios

	EOP loans(1)		90+ days past due(2)									30–89 days past due(2)
In millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billions	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017			June 30, 2016
Global Consumer Banking(3)(4)
Total	$	298.5	$	2,183		$	2,241		$	1,965		$	2,498		$	2,516		$	2,318
Ratio			0.73		%	0.77		%	0.69		%	0.84		%	0.87		%	0.82		%
Retail banking
Total	$	143.4	$	477		$	488		$	515		$	747		$	777		$	735
Ratio			0.33		%	0.35		%	0.37		%	0.52		%	0.55		%	0.52		%
North America	55.6		155			182			180			191			189			192
Ratio			0.28		%	0.33		%	0.33		%	0.35		%	0.35		%	0.36		%
Latin America	21.0		150			141			157			216			246			197
Ratio			0.71		%	0.72		%	0.82		%	1.03		%	1.25		%	1.03		%
Asia(5)	66.8		172			165			178			340			342			346
Ratio			0.26		%	0.25		%	0.26		%	0.51		%	0.52		%	0.51		%
Cards
Total	$	155.1	$	1,706		$	1,753		$	1,450		$	1,751		$	1,739		$	1,583
Ratio			1.10		%	1.17		%	1.01		%	1.13		%	1.16		%	1.10		%
North America—Citi-branded	85.6		659			698			510			619			632			550
Ratio			0.77		%	0.85		%	0.66		%	0.72		%	0.77		%	0.71		%
North America—Citi retail services	45.2		693			735			619			730			730			669
Ratio			1.53		%	1.66		%	1.43		%	1.62		%	1.65		%	1.55		%
Latin America	5.5		161			137			145			151			145			137
Ratio			2.93		%	2.63		%	2.90		%	2.75		%	2.79		%	2.74		%
Asia(5)	18.8		193			183			176			251			232			227
Ratio			1.03		%	1.00		%	1.00		%	1.34		%	1.27		%	1.29		%
Corporate/Other—Consumer(6)(7)
Total	$	26.8	$	601		$	684		$	878		$	554		$	615		$	858
Ratio			2.37		%	2.45		%	2.23		%	2.18		%	2.20		%	2.18		%
International	1.8		63			77			170			44			60			138
Ratio			3.50		%	3.67		%	3.09		%	2.44		%	2.86		%	2.51		%
North America	25.0		538			607			708			510			555			720
Ratio			2.28		%	2.35		%	2.09		%	2.16		%	2.15		%	2.12		%
Total Citigroup	325.3		$	2,784		$	2,925		$	2,843		$	3,052		$	3,131		$	3,176
Ratio			0.86		%	0.92		%	0.88		%	0.94		%	0.98		%	0.98		%

(1) End-of-period (EOP) loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

(2) The ratios of 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due are calculated based on EOP loans, net of unearned income.

(3) The 90+ days past due balances for North America—Citi-branded and North America—Citi retail services are generally still accruing interest. Citigroup’s policy is generally to accrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of bankruptcy filing has been received earlier.

(4) The 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due and related ratios for GCB North America exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. government-sponsored entities. The amounts excluded for loans 90+ days past due and (EOP loans) were $295 million ($0.8 billion), $313 million ($0.8 billion) and $408 million ($0.9 billion) at June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017, and June 30, 2016, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30–89 days past due (EOP loans have the same adjustment as above) were $84 million, $84 million and $91 million at June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017, and June 30, 2016, respectively.

(5) Asia includes delinquencies and loans in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

(6) The 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due and related ratios for Corporate/Other—North America consumer exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. government-sponsored entities. The amounts excluded for loans 90+ days past due (and EOP loans) were $0.7 billion ($1.3 billion), $0.8 billion ($1.4 billion) and $1.2 billion ($1.8 billion) at June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017, and June 30, 2016, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30–89 days past due (EOP loans have the same adjustment as above) for each period were $0.2 billion, $0.1 billion and $0.2 billion at June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017, and June 30, 2016, respectively.

54

(7) The June 30, 2017, March 31, 2016, and June 30, 2016 loans 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due and related ratios for North America exclude $6 million, $7 million and $9 million, respectively, of loans that are carried at fair value.

Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios

	Average loans(1)		Net credit losses(2)(3)
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions	2Q17		2Q17			1Q17			2Q16
Global Consumer Banking
Total	$	293.8	$	1,615		$	1,603		$	1,374
Ratio			2.20		%	2.24		%	2.02		%
Retail banking
Total	$	142.3	$	244		$	236		$	243
Ratio			0.69		%	0.69		%	0.69		%
North America	55.6		39			37			45
Ratio			0.28		%	0.27		%	0.33		%
Latin America	20.2		151			137			137
Ratio			3.00		%	3.04		%	2.87		%
Asia(4)	66.5		54			62			61
Ratio			0.33		%	0.39		%	0.36		%
Cards
Total	$	151.5	$	1,371		$	1,367		$	1,131
Ratio			3.63		%	3.68		%	3.45		%
North America—Citi-branded	83.3		611			633			467
Ratio			2.94		%	3.11		%	2.82		%
North America—Retail services	44.5		531			520			442
Ratio			4.79		%	4.66		%	4.16		%
Latin America	5.3		126			116			123
Ratio			9.54		%	9.80		%	9.70		%
Asia(4)	18.4		103			98			99
Ratio			2.25		%	2.20		%	2.29		%
Corporate/Other—Consumer(3)
Total	$	27.8	$	18		$	69		$	101
Ratio			0.26		%	0.88		%	0.94		%
International	1.9		24			26			77
Ratio			5.07		%	5.02		%	5.08		%
North America	25.9		(6		)	43			24
Ratio			(0.09		)%	0.59		%	0.26		%
Other	0.1		—			—			—
Total Citigroup	$	321.7	$	1,633		$	1,672		$	1,475
Ratio			2.04		%	2.11		%	1.87		%

(1) Average loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

(2) The ratios of net credit losses are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income.

(3) In October 2016, Citi entered into agreements to sell Citi’s Brazil and Argentina consumer banking businesses and classified these businesses as held-for-sale (HFS). The sale of the Argentina consumer banking business was completed at the end of the first quarter 2017. As a result of HFS accounting treatment, approximately $42 million, $41 million and $38 million of net credit losses (NCLs) were recorded as a reduction in revenue (Other revenue) during the fourth quarter of 2016, the first quarter of 2017 and the second quarter of 2017, respectively. Accordingly, these NCLs are not included in this table. Loans classified as HFS are excluded from this table as they are recorded in Other assets.

(4) Asia includes NCLs and average loans in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

55

CORPORATE CREDIT

Consistent with its overall strategy, Citi’s corporate clients are typically large, multi-national corporations that value Citi’s global network. Citi aims to establish relationships with these clients that encompass multiple products, consistent with client needs, including cash management and trade services, foreign exchange, lending, capital markets and M&A advisory.

Corporate Credit Portfolio

The following table sets forth Citi’s corporate credit portfolio within ICG (excluding private bank), before consideration of collateral or hedges, by remaining tenor for the periods indicated:

	At June 30, 2017								At March 31, 2017								At December 31, 2016
In billions of dollars	Due within 1 year		Greater than 1 year but within 5 years		Greater than 5 years		Total exposure		Due within 1 year		Greater than 1 year but within 5 years		Greater than 5 years		Total exposure		Due within 1 year		Greater than 1 year but within 5 years		Greater than 5 years		Total exposure
Direct outstandings (on-balance sheet)(1)	$	122	$	94	$	23	$	239	$	129	$	82	$	20	$	231	$	109	$	94	$	22	$	225
Unfunded lending commitments (off-balance sheet)(2)	103		222		22		347		113		221		23		357		103		218		23		344
Total exposure	$	225	$	316	$	45	$	586	$	242	$	303	$	43	$	588	$	212	$	312	$	45	$	569

(1) Includes drawn loans, overdrafts, bankers’ acceptances and leases.

(2) Includes unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.

Portfolio Mix—Geography, Counterparty and Industry

Citi’s corporate credit portfolio is diverse across geography and counterparty. The following table shows the percentage by region based on Citi’s internal management geography:

	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
North America	55	%	53	%	55	%
EMEA	26		26		26
Asia	12		13		12
Latin America	7		8		7
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%

The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products. Counterparty risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for a counterparty and are derived primarily through the use of validated statistical models, scorecard models and external agency ratings (under defined circumstances), in combination with consideration of factors specific to the obligor or market, such as management experience, competitive position, regulatory environment and commodity prices. Facility risk ratings are assigned that reflect the probability of default of

the obligor and factors that affect the loss-given-default of the facility, such as support or collateral. Internal obligor ratings that generally correspond to BBB and above are

considered investment grade, while those below are considered non-investment grade.

Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment and reporting criteria for certain obligors, as necessary. Factors evaluated include consideration of climate risk to an

obligor’s business and physical assets and, when relevant, consideration of cost-effective options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating as a percentage of the total corporate credit portfolio:

	Total exposure
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
AAA/AA/A	49	%	48	%	48	%
BBB	34		34		34
BB/B	16		16		16
CCC or below	1		2		2
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%

Note: Total exposure includes direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments.

56

Citi’s corporate credit portfolio is also diversified by industry. The following table shows the allocation of Citi’s total corporate credit portfolio by industry:

	Total exposure
	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Transportation and industrial	21	%	21	%	22	%
Consumer retail and health	17		16		16
Technology, media and telecom	11		12		12
Power, chemicals, metals and mining	10		11		11
Energy and commodities(1)	9		8		9
Real estate	8		7		7
Banks/broker-dealers/finance companies	7		6		6
Hedge funds	5		5		5
Insurance and special purpose entities	5		5		5
Public sector	5		5		5
Other industries	2		4		2
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%

Note: Total exposure includes direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments.

(1) In addition to this exposure, Citi has energy-related exposure within the “Public sector” (e.g., energy-related state-owned entities) and “Transportation and industrial” sector (e.g., off-shore drilling entities) included in the table above. As of June 30, 2017, Citi’s total exposure to these energy-related entities remained largely consistent with the prior quarter, at approximately $6 billion, of which approximately $4 billion consisted of direct outstanding funded loans.

Credit Risk Mitigation

As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its corporate credit portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected primarily in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

At June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017, December 31, 2016,$23.7 billion, $27.6 billion and $29.5 billion, respectively, of the corporate credit portfolio was economically hedged. Citigroup’s expected loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other mitigants that are marked-to-market. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments in the tables above do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following risk rating distribution:

Rating of Hedged Exposure

	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
AAA/AA/A	16	%	16	%	16	%
BBB	47		49		49
BB/B	34		31		31
CCC or below	3		4		4
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%

The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following industry distribution:

Industry of Hedged Exposure

	June 30, 2017		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Transportation and industrial	27	%	28	%	29	%
Energy and commodities	20		19		20
Consumer retail and health	11		13		10
Technology, media and telecom	13		13		13
Power, chemicals, metals and mining	13		12		12
Public sector	6		6		5
Banks/broker-dealers	5		4		4
Insurance and special purpose entities	2		3		3
Other industries	3		2		4
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%

57

ADDITIONAL CONSUMER AND CORPORATE CREDIT DETAILS

Loans Outstanding

	2nd Qtr.			1st Qtr.			4th Qtr.			3rd Qtr.			2nd Qtr.
In millions of dollars	2017			2017			2016			2016			2016
Consumer loans
In U.S. offices
Mortgage and real estate(1)	$	69,022		$	71,170		$	72,957		$	75,057		$	77,242
Installment, revolving credit, and other	3,190			3,252			3,395			3,465			3,486
Cards	130,181			125,799			132,654			124,637			120,113
Commercial and industrial	7,404			7,434			7,159			6,989			7,041
Total	$	209,797		$	207,655		$	216,165		$	210,148		$	207,882
In offices outside the U.S.
Mortgage and real estate(1)	$	43,821		$	43,822		$	42,803		$	45,751		$	46,049
Installment, revolving credit, and other	26,480			26,014			24,887			28,217			27,830
Cards	25,376			24,497			23,783			25,833			25,844
Commercial and industrial	18,956			17,728			16,568			17,498			17,520
Lease financing	81			83			81			113			140
Total	$	114,714		$	112,144		$	108,122		$	117,412		$	117,383
Total consumer loans	$	324,511		$	319,799		$	324,287		$	327,560		$	325,265
Unearned income(2)	750			757			776			812			817
Consumer loans, net of unearned income	$	325,261		$	320,556		$	325,063		$	328,372		$	326,082
Corporate loans
In U.S. offices
Commercial and industrial	$	50,341		$	49,845		$	49,586		$	50,156		$	50,286
Loans to financial institutions	36,953			35,734			35,517			35,801			32,001
Mortgage and real estate(1)	42,041			40,052			38,691			41,078			40,175
Installment, revolving credit, and other	31,611			32,212			34,501			32,571			32,491
Lease financing	1,467			1,511			1,518			1,532			1,546
Total	$	162,413		$	159,354		$	159,813		$	161,138		$	156,499
In offices outside the U.S.
Commercial and industrial	$	91,131		$	87,258		$	81,882		$	84,492		$	87,432
Loans to financial institutions	34,844			33,763			26,886			27,305			27,856
Mortgage and real estate(1)	6,783			5,527			5,363			5,595			5,455
Installment, revolving credit, and other	19,200			16,576			19,965			25,462			24,855
Lease financing	234			253			251			243			255
Governments and official institutions	5,518			5,970			5,850			6,506			5,757
Total	$	157,710		$	149,347		$	140,197		$	149,603		$	151,610
Total corporate loans	$	320,123		$	308,701		$	300,010		$	310,741		$	308,109
Unearned income(3)	(689		)	(662		)	(704		)	(678		)	(676		)
Corporate loans, net of unearned income	$	319,434		$	308,039		$	299,306		$	310,063		$	307,433
Total loans—net of unearned income	$	644,695		$	628,595		$	624,369		$	638,435		$	633,515
Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures	(12,025		)	(12,030		)	(12,060		)	(12,439		)	(12,304		)
Total loans—net of unearned income  and allowance for credit losses	$	632,670		$	616,565		$	612,309		$	625,996		$	621,211
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans— net of unearned income(4)	1.88		%	1.93		%	1.94		%	1.97		%	1.96		%
Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(4)	2.93		%	2.96		%	2.88		%	2.95		%	2.89		%
Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(4)	0.80		%	0.83		%	0.91		%	0.90		%	0.95		%

58

(1) Loans secured primarily by real estate.

(2) Unearned income on consumer loans primarily represents unamortized origination fees, costs, premiums and discounts.

(3) Unearned income on corporate loans primarily represents interest received in advance but not yet earned on loans originated on a discounted basis.

(4) All periods exclude loans that are carried at fair value.

59

Details of Credit Loss Experience

	2nd Qtr.			1st Qtr.			4th Qtr.			3rd Qtr.			2nd Qtr.
In millions of dollars	2017			2017			2016			2016			2016
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	12,030		$	12,060		$	12,439		$	12,304		$	12,712
Provision for loan losses
Consumer	$	1,620		$	1,816		$	1,659		$	1,815		$	1,276
Corporate	46			(141		)	68			(69		)	114
Total	$	1,666		$	1,675		$	1,727		$	1,746		$	1,390
Gross credit losses
Consumer
In U.S. offices	$	1,437		$	1,444		$	1,343		$	1,181		$	1,213
In offices outside the U.S.	597			597			605			702			678
Corporate
In U.S. offices	72			48			32			29			62
In offices outside the U.S.	24			55			103			36			95
Total	$	2,130		$	2,144		$	2,083		$	1,948		$	2,048
Credit recoveries(1)
Consumer
In U.S. offices	$	266		$	242		$	235		$	227		$	262
In offices outside the U.S.	135			127			137			173			154
Corporate
In U.S. offices	15			2			2			16			3
In offices outside the U.S.	4			64			13			7			13
Total	$	420		$	435		$	387		$	423		$	432
Net credit losses
In U.S. offices	$	1,228		$	1,248		$	1,138		$	967		$	1,010
In offices outside the U.S.	482			461			558			558			606
Total	$	1,710		$	1,709		$	1,696		$	1,525		$	1,616
Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)	$	39		$	4		$	(410	)	$	(86	)	$	(182	)
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	12,025		$	12,030		$	12,060		$	12,439		$	12,304
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans(8)	1.88		%	1.93		%	1.94		%	1.97		%	1.96		%
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(9)	$	1,406		$	1,377		$	1,418		$	1,388		$	1,432
Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments	$	13,431		$	13,407		$	13,478		$	13,827		$	13,736
Net consumer credit losses	$	1,633		$	1,672		$	1,576		$	1,483		$	1,475
As a percentage of average consumer loans	2.04		%	2.11		%	1.95		%	1.80		%	1.87		%
Net corporate credit losses	$	77		$	37		$	120		$	42		$	141
As a percentage of average corporate loans	0.10		%	0.05		%	0.16		%	0.05		%	0.19		%
Allowance by type at end of period(10)
Consumer	$	9,515		$	9,495		$	9,358		$	9,673		$	9,432
Corporate	2,510			2,535			2,702			2,766			2,872
Total	$	12,025		$	12,030		$	12,060		$	12,439		$	12,304

(1) Recoveries have been reduced by certain collection costs that are incurred only if collection efforts are successful.

(2) Includes all adjustments to the allowance for credit losses, such as changes in the allowance from acquisitions, dispositions, securitizations, FX translation, purchase accounting adjustments, etc.

(3) The second quarter of 2017 includes a reduction of approximately $19 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale (HFS) of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $19 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the second quarter includes an increase of approximately $50 million related to FX translation.

(4) The first quarter of 2017 includes a reduction of approximately $161 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $37 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the first quarter includes an increase of approximately $164 million related to FX translation.

(5) The fourth quarter of 2016 includes a reduction of approximately $267 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $3 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the fourth quarter includes a reduction of approximately $141 million related to FX translation.

60

(6) The third quarter of 2016 includes a reduction of approximately $58 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $50 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the third quarter includes a reduction of approximately $46 million related to FX translation.

(7) The second quarter of 2016 includes a reduction of approximately $101 million related to the sale or transfer to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $24 million related to the transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the second quarter includes a reduction of approximately $75 million related to FX translation.

(8) June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 exclude $4.2 billion, $4.0 billion, $3.5 billion, $4.0 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, of loans which are carried at fair value.

(9) Represents additional credit reserves recorded as Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(10) Allowance for loan losses represents management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. See “Significant Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates” and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The following tables detail information on Citi’s allowance for loan losses, loans and coverage ratios:

	June 30, 2017
In billions of dollars	Allowance for loan losses		Loans, net of unearned income		Allowance as a percentage of loans(1)
North America cards(2)	$	5.4	$	130.9	4.1	%
North America mortgages(3)	0.9		67.7		1.3
North America other	0.4		12.7		3.1
International cards	1.3		24.8		5.2
International other(4)	1.5		89.2		1.7
Total consumer	$	9.5	$	325.3	2.9	%
Total corporate	2.5		319.4		0.8
Total Citigroup	$	12.0	$	644.7	1.9	%

(1) Allowance as a percentage of loans excludes loans that are carried at fair value.

(2) Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. The $5.4 billion of loan loss reserves represented approximately 14 months of coincident net credit loss coverage.

(3) Of the $0.9 billion, approximately $0.8 billion was allocated to North America mortgages in Corporate/Other. Of the $0.9 billion, approximately $0.3 billion and $0.6 billion are determined in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. Of the $67.7 billion in loans, approximately $63.6 billion and $4.1 billion of the loans are evaluated in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. For additional information, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4) Includes mortgages and other retail loans.

	December 31, 2016
In billions of dollars	Allowance for loan losses		Loans, net of unearned income		Allowance as a percentage of loans(1)
North America cards(2)	$	5.2	$	133.3	3.9	%
North America mortgages(3)	1.1		72.6		1.5
North America other	0.5		13.6		3.7
International cards	1.2		23.1		5.2
International other(4)	1.4		82.8		1.7
Total consumer	$	9.4	$	325.4	2.9	%
Total corporate	2.7		299.0		0.9
Total Citigroup	$	12.1	$	624.4	1.9	%

(1) Allowance as a percentage of loans excludes loans that are carried at fair value.

(2) Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. The $5.2 billion of loan loss reserves represented approximately 15 months of coincident net credit loss coverage.

(3) Of the $1.1 billion, approximately $1.0 billion was allocated to North America mortgages in Corporate/Other. Of the $1.1 billion, approximately $0.4 billion and $0.7 billion are determined in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. Of the $72.6 billion in loans, approximately $67.7 billion and $4.8 billion of the loans are evaluated in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. For additional information, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4) Includes mortgages and other retail loans.

61

Non-Accrual Loans and Assets and Renegotiated Loans

There is a certain amount of overlap among non-accrual loans and assets and renegotiated loans. The following summary provides a general description of each category:

Non-Accrual Loans and Assets:

• Corporate and consumer (commercial banking) non-accrual status is based on the determination that payment of interest or principal is doubtful.

• A corporate loan may be classified as non-accrual and still be performing under the terms of the loan structure. Payments received on corporate non-accrual loans are generally applied to loan principal and not reflected as interest income. Approximately 67% and 65% of Citi’s corporate non-accrual loans were performing at June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively.

• Consumer non-accrual status is generally based on aging, i.e., the borrower has fallen behind on payments.

• Mortgage loans in regulated bank entities discharged through Chapter 7 bankruptcy, other than FHA insured loans, are classified as non-accrual. Non-bank mortgage loans discharged through Chapter 7 bankruptcy are classified as non-accrual at 90 days or more past due. In addition, home equity loans in regulated bank entities are classified as non-accrual if the related residential first mortgage loan is 90 days or more past due.

• North America Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services are not included because, under industry standards, credit card loans accrue interest until such loans are charged off, which typically occurs at 180 days contractual delinquency.

Renegotiated Loans:

• Includes both corporate and consumer loans whose terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR).

• Includes both accrual and non-accrual TDRs.

62

Non-Accrual Loans and Assets

The table below summarizes Citigroup’s non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments. In situations where Citi reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. For all other non-accrual loans, cash interest receipts are generally recorded as revenue.

	Jun. 30,		Mar. 31,		Dec. 31,		Sept. 30,		Jun. 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2017		2016		2016		2016
Corporate non-accrual loans(1)
North America	$	944	$	993	$	984	$	1,057	$	1,280
EMEA	727		828		904		857		762
Latin America	281		342		379		380		267
Asia	146		176		154		121		151
Total corporate non-accrual loans	$	2,098	$	2,339	$	2,421	$	2,415	$	2,460
Consumer non-accrual loans(1)
North America	$	1,754	$	1,926	$	2,160	$	2,429	$	2,520
Latin America	793		737		711		841		884
Asia(2)	301		292		287		282		301
Total consumer non-accrual loans	$	2,848	$	2,955	$	3,158	$	3,552	$	3,705
Total non-accrual loans	$	4,946	$	5,294	$	5,579	$	5,967	$	6,165

(1) Excludes purchased distressed loans, as they are generally accreting interest. The carrying value of these loans was $183 million at June 30, 2017, $194 million at March 31, 2017, $187 million at December 31, 2016, $194 million at September 30, 2016 and $212 million at June 30, 2016.

(2) Asia GCB includes balances in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

The changes in Citigroup’s non-accrual loans were as follows:

	Three months ended									Three months ended
	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	Corporate			Consumer			Total			Corporate			Consumer			Total
Non-accrual loans at beginning of period	$	2,339		$	2,955		$	5,294		$	2,327		$	3,601		$	5,928
Additions	311			697			1,008			830			1,326			2,156
Sales and transfers to held-for-sale	(46		)	(82		)	(128		)	(1		)	(209		)	(210		)
Returned to performing	(3		)	(166		)	(169		)	(68		)	(143		)	(211		)
Paydowns/settlements	(464		)	(285		)	(749		)	(491		)	(396		)	(887		)
Charge-offs	(15		)	(318		)	(333		)	(113		)	(462		)	(575		)
Other	(24		)	47			23			(24		)	(12		)	(36		)
Ending balance	$	2,098		$	2,848		$	4,946		$	2,460		$	3,705		$	6,165

63

	Six Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	Corporate			Consumer			Total			Corporate			Consumer			Total
Non-accrual loans at beginning of period	$	2,421		$	3,158		$	5,579		$	1,596		$	3,658		$	5,254
Additions	564			1,521			2,085			1,877			2,240			4,117
Sales and transfers to held-for-sale	(82		)	(216		)	(298		)	(9		)	(371		)	(380		)
Returned to performing	(40		)	(329		)	(369		)	(83		)	(284		)	(367		)
Paydowns/settlements	(647		)	(565		)	(1,212		)	(589		)	(641		)	(1,230		)
Charge-offs	(69		)	(842		)	(911		)	(253		)	(898		)	(1,151		)
Other	(49		)	121			72			(79		)	1			(78		)
Ending balance	$	2,098		$	2,848		$	4,946		$	2,460		$	3,705		$	6,165

The tables below summarize Citigroup’s other real estate owned (OREO) assets as of the periods indicated. This represents the carrying value of all real estate property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when Citi has taken possession of the collateral:

	Jun. 30,			Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,			Sept. 30,			Jun. 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2017			2016			2016			2016
OREO
North America	$	128		$	136		$	161		$	132		$	151
EMEA	1			1			—			1			—
Latin America	31			31			18			18			19
Asia	8			5			7			10			5
Total OREO	$	168		$	173		$	186		$	161		$	175
Non-accrual assets
Corporate non-accrual loans	$	2,098		$	2,339		$	2,421		$	2,415		$	2,460
Consumer non-accrual loans	2,848			2,955			3,158			3,552			3,705
Non-accrual loans (NAL)	$	4,946		$	5,294		$	5,579		$	5,967		$	6,165
OREO	$	168		$	173		$	186		$	161		$	175
Non-accrual assets (NAA)	$	5,114		$	5,467		$	5,765		$	6,128		$	6,340
NAL as a percentage of total loans	0.77		%	0.84		%	0.89		%	0.93		%	0.97		%
NAA as a percentage of total assets	0.27			0.30			0.32			0.34			0.35
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)	243			227			216			208			200

(1) The allowance for loan losses includes the allowance for Citi’s credit card portfolios and purchased distressed loans, while the non-accrual loans exclude credit card balances (with the exception of certain international portfolios) and purchased distressed loans as these continue to accrue interest until charge-off.

64

Renegotiated Loans

The following table presents Citi’s loans modified in TDRs:

In millions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017		Dec. 31, 2016
Corporate renegotiated loans(1)
In U.S. offices
Commercial and industrial(2)	$	211	$	89
Mortgage and real estate	70		84
Loans to financial institutions	9		9
Other	166		228
	$	456	$	410
In offices outside the U.S.
Commercial and industrial(2)	$	380	$	319
Mortgage and real estate	4		3
Loans to financial institutions	15		—
	$	399	$	322
Total corporate renegotiated loans	$	855	$	732
Consumer renegotiated loans(3)(4)(5)
In U.S. offices
Mortgage and real estate(6)	$	4,030	$	4,695
Cards	1,270		1,313
Installment and other	192		117
	$	5,492	$	6,125
In offices outside the U.S.
Mortgage and real estate	$	375	$	447
Cards	512		435
Installment and other	396		443
	$	1,283	$	1,325
Total consumer renegotiated loans	$	6,775	$	7,450

(1) Includes $678 million and $445 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual loans table above at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.

(2) In addition to modifications reflected as TDRs at June 30, 2017, Citi also modified $85 million of commercial loans risk rated “Substandard Non-Performing” or worse (asset category defined by banking regulators) all within offices in the U.S. These modifications were not considered TDRs because the modifications did not involve a concession.

(3) Includes $1,416 million and $1,502 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual loans table above at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.

(4) Includes $47 million and $58 million of commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

(5) Includes $179 million and $105 million of other commercial loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

(6) Reduction in the six months ended June 30, 2017 includes $517 million related to TDRs sold or transferred to held-for-sale.

65

LIQUIDITY RISK

For additional information on funding and liquidity at Citigroup, including its objectives, management and measurement, see “Liquidity Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA)

	Citibank						Non-Bank and Other(1)						Total
In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017		Jun. 30, 2016		Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017		Jun. 30, 2016		Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017		Jun. 30, 2016
Available cash	$	78.5	$	83.8	$	61.3	$	35.0	$	24.5	$	23.2	$	113.5	$	108.3	$	84.5
U.S. sovereign	110.6		113.8		115.0		23.2		22.7		19.6		133.8		136.5		134.6
U.S. agency/agency MBS	63.2		59.2		69.2		1.1		0.8		0.3		64.3		60.0		69.5
Foreign government debt(2)	102.4		84.5		86.7		17.7		17.2		16.8		120.1		101.7		103.6
Other investment grade	0.4		0.3		1.2		1.2		1.5		1.5		1.6		1.8		2.7
Total HQLA (EOP)	$	355.1	$	341.6	$	333.3	$	78.1	$	66.7	$	61.5	$	433.2	$	408.3	$	394.8
Total HQLA (AVG)	$	354.0	$	353.5	$	342.5	$	70.4	$	59.3	$	68.5	$	424.4	$	412.8	$	411.0

Note: Except as indicated, amounts set forth in the table above are as of period end and may increase or decrease intra-period in the ordinary course of business. For securities, the amounts represent the liquidity value that potentially could be realized, and therefore exclude any securities that are encumbered, and incorporate any haircuts that would be required for secured funding transactions. The Federal Reserve Board adopted final rules requiring disclosure of HQLA, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and related components on an average basis each quarter, as compared to end-of-period, starting on April 1, 2017 (for additional information, see “Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)” below). Citi has presented in this form 10-Q the average information on these metrics currently available, which includes average total HQLA, average LCR and average net outflows under the LCR; other component information is not currently available.

(1) Citibanamex and Citibank (Switzerland) AG account for approximately $6 billion of the “Non-Bank and Other” HQLA balance as of June 30, 2017.

(2) Foreign government debt includes securities issued or guaranteed by foreign sovereigns, agencies and multilateral development banks. Foreign government debt securities are held largely to support local liquidity requirements and Citi’s local franchises, and principally include government bonds from Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, India, Brazil and Mexico.

As set forth in the table above, sequentially, Citi’s total HQLA increased both on an end-of-period and an average basis, due primarily to an increase in cash related to resolution planning, as well as an increase in foreign government debt.

Citi’s HQLA as set forth above does not include Citi’s available borrowing capacity from the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) of which Citi is a member, which was approximately $23 billion as of June 30, 2017 (compared to $28 billion as of March 31, 2017 and $37 billion as of June 30, 2016) and maintained by eligible collateral pledged to such banks. The HQLA also does not include Citi’s borrowing capacity at the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank discount window or other central banks, which would be in addition to the resources noted above.

In general, Citi’s liquidity is fungible across legal entities within its bank group. Citi’s bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, can lend to the Citi parent and broker-dealer entities in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of June 30, 2017, the capacity available for lending to these entities under Section 23A was approximately $15 billion, unchanged from both March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, subject to certain eligible non-cash collateral requirements.

66

Loans

The table below sets forth the average loans, by business and/or segment, and the total end-of-period loans for each of the periods indicated:

In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017		Jun. 30, 2016
Global Consumer Banking
North America	$	183.4	$	183.3	$	163.8
Latin America	25.5		23.1		24.3
Asia(1)	84.9		83.2		84.9
Total	$	293.8	$	289.6	$	273.0
Institutional Clients Group
Corporate lending	121.5		118.1		124.2
Treasury and trade solutions (TTS)	73.7		71.4		70.9
Private bank, Markets and   securities services and other	117.2		112.2		108.9
Total	$	312.4	$	301.8	$	304.0
Total Corporate/Other	28.2		31.8		43.6
Total Citigroup loans (AVG)	$	634.3	$	623.2	$	620.6
Total Citigroup loans (EOP)	$	644.7	$	628.6	$	633.5

(1) Includes loans in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

As set forth in the table above, end-of-period loans increased 2% year-over-year and 3% quarter-over-quarter. On an average basis, loans increased 2% both year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter.

Excluding the impact of FX translation, average loans increased 3% year-over-year and 1% quarter-over-quarter. On this basis, average GCB loans grew 8% year-over-year, driven by 12% growth in North America. Within North America,Citi-branded cards increased 25% year-over-year, primarily due to the acquisition of the Costco portfolio, as well as modest organic growth. International GCB loans increased 1%, as 7% growth in Mexico was partially offset by a 1% decline in Asia, reflecting Citi’s optimization of its portfolio in this region.

Average ICG loans increased 3% year-over-year, primarily driven by the private bank. Corporate lending decreased 1%, primarily driven by a lower level of episodic funding compared to the prior-year period. Sequentially, corporate lending increased 2%, as Citi supported core business activity among its global subsidiary clients. TTS loans increased 4%, driven by growth in EMEA and Asia.

Average Corporate/Other loans decreased 36% year-over-

year, driven by the continued wind down of legacy assets.

Deposits

The table below sets forth the average deposits, by business and/or segment, and the total end-of-period deposits for each of the periods indicated:

In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017		Jun. 30, 2016
Global Consumer Banking
North America	$	185.1	$	185.5	$	182.1
Latin America	27.8		25.3		25.9
Asia(1)	94.3		92.7		89.4
Total	$	307.2	$	303.5	$	297.4
Institutional Clients Group
Treasury and trade solutions (TTS)	423.9		416.2		415.0
Banking ex-TTS	122.1		120.8		116.3
Markets and securities services	84.3		80.1		82.7
Total	$	630.3	$	617.1	$	614.0
Corporate/Other	22.5		20.3		24.2
Total Citigroup deposits (AVG)	$	960.0	$	940.9	$	935.6
Total Citigroup deposits (EOP)	$	958.7	$	950.0	$	937.9

(1) Includes deposits in certain EMEA countriesfor all periods presented.

End-of-period deposits increased 2% year-over-year and 1% quarter-over-quarter. On an average basis, deposits increased 3% year-over-year and 2% sequentially.

Excluding the impact of FX translation, average deposits grew 3% from the prior-year period, as Citi experienced strong customer engagement across all major businesses and regions.

67

Long-Term Debt

The weighted-average maturities of unsecured long-term debt issued by Citigroup and its affiliates (including Citibank) with a remaining life greater than one year (excluding remaining trust preferred securities outstanding) was approximately 6.9 years as of June 30, 2017, a slight decline from the prior-year period and unchanged sequentially.

Citi’s long-term debt outstanding at the parent includes senior and subordinated debt and a portion of what Citi refers to as customer-related debt, consisting of structured notes, such as equity- and credit-linked notes, as well as non-structured notes. Citi’s issuance of customer-related debt is generally driven by customer demand and supplements benchmark debt issuance as a source of funding for Citi’s parent and non-bank entities. Citi’s long-term debt at the bank

also includes FHLB advances and securitizations.

Long-Term Debt Outstanding

The following table sets forth Citi’s end-of-period total long-term debt outstanding for each of the periods indicated:

In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017		Jun. 30, 2016
Parent and other(1)
Benchmark debt:
Senior debt	$	105.9	$	100.2	$	96.1
Subordinated debt	26.8		26.3		28.8
Trust preferred	1.7		1.7		1.7
Customer-related debt:
Structured debt	25.3		24.3		22.5
Non-structured debt	3.1		2.9		3.3
Local country and other(2)	2.1		2.0		2.3
Total parent and other	$	164.9	$	157.4	$	154.8
Bank
FHLB borrowings	$	20.3	$	20.3	$	19.6
Securitizations(3)	28.2		24.0		27.3
CBNA benchmark debt	7.2		2.5		—
Local country and other(2)	4.5		4.3		5.8
Total bank	$	60.2	$	51.1	$	52.6
Total long-term debt	$	225.2	$	208.5	$	207.4

Note: Amounts represent the current value of long-term debt on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet which, for certain debt instruments, includes consideration of fair value, hedging impacts and unamortized discounts and premiums.

(1) “Parent and other” includes long-term debt issued to third parties by the parent holding company (Citigroup) and Citi’s non-bank subsidiaries (including broker-dealer subsidiaries) that are consolidated into Citigroup. As of June 30, 2017, “parent and other” included $17.7 billion of long-term debt issued by Citi’s broker-dealer subsidiaries.

(2) Local country debt includes debt issued by Citi’s affiliates in support of their local operations.

(3) Predominantly credit card securitizations, primarily backed by Citi-branded credit card receivables.

Year-over-year, Citi’s total long-term debt outstanding increased, primarily driven by the issuance of senior debt at the parent, as well as the issuance of benchmark debt at the bank. Sequentially, Citi’s total long-term debt outstanding increased, primarily driven by an increase in credit card securitizations, as well as the issuance of benchmark debt at both the bank and parent.

As part of its liability management, Citi has considered, and may continue to consider, opportunities to repurchase its long-term debt pursuant to open market purchases, tender offers or other means. Such repurchases help reduce Citi’s overall funding costs (and assist it in meeting regulatory changes and requirements). During the second quarter of 2017, Citi repurchased an aggregate of approximately $0.2billion of its outstanding long-term debt.

68

Long-Term Debt Issuances and Maturities

The table below details Citi’s long-term debt issuances and maturities (including repurchases and redemptions) during the periods presented:

	2Q17				1Q17				2Q16
In billions of dollars	Maturities		Issuances		Maturities		Issuances		Maturities		Issuances
Parent and other
Benchmark debt:
Senior debt	$	2.0	$	6.3	$	5.3	$	5.2	$	5.1	$	6.6
Subordinated debt	—		0.2		1.2		0.7		1.7		1.0
Trust preferred	—		—		—		—		—		—
Customer-related debt:
Structured debt	2.0		3.6		1.8		3.5		3.4		2.0
Non-structured debt	0.3		—		0.1		—		0.1		0.1
Local country and other	0.1		—		0.5		0.1		1.9		—
Total parent and other	$	4.3	$	10.2	$	9.0	$	9.6	$	12.2	$	9.7
Bank
FHLB borrowings	$	1.5	$	1.5	$	1.8	$	0.5	$	1.0	$	2.5
Securitizations	0.9		5.1		2.0		2.5		1.3		—
CBNA benchmark debt	—		4.7		—		2.5		—		—
Local country and other	0.7		0.3		1.2		0.9		1.1		1.0
Total bank	$	3.0	$	11.6	$	5.0	$	6.3	$	3.4	$	3.5
Total	$	7.4	$	21.8	$	13.9	$	15.9	$	15.6	$	13.2

The table below shows Citi’s aggregate long-term debt maturities (including repurchases and redemptions) year-to-date in 2017, as well as its aggregate expected annual long-term debt maturities as of June 30, 2017:

	Maturities 2017 YTD		Maturities
In billions of dollars			2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Total
Parent and other
Benchmark debt:
Senior debt	$	7.2	$	6.9	$	18.3	$	14.5	$	8.9	$	14.2	$	6.0	$	37.1	$	105.9
Subordinated debt	1.2		—		0.9		1.4		—		—		1.1		23.3		26.8
Trust preferred	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		1.7		1.7
Customer-related debt:
Structured debt	3.8		0.6		3.9		2.3		2.9		2.2		1.2		12.2		25.3
Non-structured debt	0.4		0.1		0.6		0.2		0.3		0.1		0.2		1.6		3.1
Local country and other	0.6		0.3		0.5		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.8		2.1
Total parent and other	$	13.3	$	7.9	$	24.2	$	18.4	$	12.3	$	16.7	$	8.6	$	76.8	$	164.9
Bank
FHLB borrowings	$	3.3	$	4.5	$	14.3	$	1.6	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	20.3
Securitizations	2.9		2.4		9.4		6.5		3.3		3.8		0.1		2.8		28.2
CBNA benchmark debt	—		—		2.2		2.5		2.5		—		—		—		7.2
Local country and other	1.9		1.1		1.7		0.6		0.5		0.1		0.1		0.4		4.5
Total bank	$	8.0	$	7.9	$	27.7	$	11.1	$	6.3	$	3.9	$	0.2	$	3.2	$	60.2
Total long-term debt	$	21.3	$	15.9	$	51.9	$	29.5	$	18.5	$	20.6	$	8.8	$	80.0	$	225.2

69

Resolution Plan

Under Title I of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), Citigroup has developed a “single point of entry” resolution strategy and plan under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Resolution Plan). In July 2017, Citi submitted its 2017 Resolution Plan to the Federal Reserve and FDIC (the Agencies). Under Citi’s Resolution Plan, only Citigroup, the parent holding company, would enter into bankruptcy, while Citigroup’s material legal entities (as defined in the public section of its 2017 Resolution Plan, which can be found on the Agencies’ websites) would remain operational and outside of any resolution or insolvency proceedings. Citigroup believes its Resolution Plan has been designed to minimize the risk of systemic impact to the U.S. and global financial systems, while maximizing the value of the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of Citigroup’s creditors, including its unsecured long-term debt holders. In addition, in line with the Federal Reserve’s final TLAC rule, Citigroup believes it has developed the Resolution Plan so that Citigroup’s shareholders and unsecured creditors—including its unsecured long-term debt holders—bear any losses resulting from Citigroup’s bankruptcy.

In response to feedback received from the Agencies on Citigroup’s 2015 Resolution Plan, Citigroup took the following actions in connection with its 2017 Resolution Plan submission:

(i) Citicorp LLC (Citicorp), an existing wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, was established as an intermediate holding company (an IHC) for certain of Citigroup’s operating material legal entities;

(ii) Citigroup executed an inter-affiliate agreement with Citicorp, Citigroup’s operating material legal entities and certain other affiliated entities pursuant to which Citicorp is required to provide liquidity and capital support to Citigroup’s operating material legal entities in the event Citigroup were to enter bankruptcy proceedings (Citi Support Agreement);

(iii) pursuant to the Citi Support Agreement:

• Citigroup made an initial contribution of assets, including certain high-quality liquid assets and inter-affiliate loans (Contributable Assets), to Citicorp, and Citicorp became the business as usual funding vehicle for Citigroup’s operating material legal entities;

• Citigroup will be obligated to continue to transfer Contributable Assets to Citicorp over time, subject to certain amounts retained by Citigroup to, among other things, meet Citigroup’s near-term cash needs;

• in the event of a Citigroup bankruptcy, Citigroup will be required to contribute most of its remaining assets to Citicorp; and

(iv) the obligations of both Citigroup and Citicorp under the Citi Support Agreement, as well as the Contributable Assets, are secured pursuant to a security agreement.

The Citi Support Agreement provides two mechanisms, besides Citicorp’s issuing of dividends to Citigroup, pursuant to which Citicorp will be required to transfer cash to Citigroup

during business as usual so that Citigroup can fund its debt service as well as other operating needs: (i) one or more funding notes issued by Citicorp to Citigroup; and (ii) a committed line of credit under which Citicorp may make loans to Citigroup.

Secured Funding Transactions and Short-Term Borrowings

Citi supplements its primary sources of funding with short-term borrowings. Short-term borrowings generally include (i) secured funding transactions (securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, or repos) and (ii) to a lesser extent, short-term borrowings consisting of commercial paper and borrowings from the FHLB and other market participants (see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on Citigroup’s and its affiliates’ outstanding short-term borrowings).

Outside of secured funding transactions, Citi’s short-term borrowings increased 98% year-over-year and 40% sequentially.The increase both year-over-year and sequentially was driven by an increase in FHLB borrowings, as Citi continued to optimize liquidity across its legal vehicles.

Secured Funding

Secured funding is primarily accessed through Citi’s broker-dealer subsidiaries to fund efficiently both secured lending activity and a portion of securities inventory held in the context of market making and customer activities. Citi also executes a smaller portion of its secured funding transactions through its bank entities, which is typically collateralized by foreign government debt securities. Generally, daily changes in the level of Citi’s secured funding are primarily due to fluctuations in secured lending activity in the matched book (as described below) and securities inventory.

Secured funding of $155 billion as of June 30, 2017 declined 2% from the prior-year period and increased 4% sequentially. Excluding the impact of FX translation, secured funding decreased 2% from the prior-year period and increased 2% sequentially, both driven by normal business activity. Average balances for secured funding were approximately $161 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2017.

The portion of secured funding in the broker-dealer subsidiaries that funds secured lending is commonly referred to as “matched book” activity. The majority of this activity is secured by high-quality liquid securities such as U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. agency securities and foreign government debt securities. Other secured funding is secured by less liquid securities, including equity securities, corporate bonds and asset-backed securities. The tenor of Citi’s matched book liabilities is generally equal to or longer than the tenor of the corresponding matched book assets.

The remainder of the secured funding activity in the broker-dealer subsidiaries serves to fund securities inventory held in the context of market making and customer activities. To maintain reliable funding under a wide range of market conditions, including under periods of stress, Citi manages these activities by taking into consideration the quality of the underlying collateral and stipulating financing tenor. The weighted average maturity of Citi’s secured funding of less

70

liquid securities inventory was greater than 110 days as of June 30, 2017.

Citi manages the risks in its secured funding by conducting daily stress tests to account for changes in capacity, tenors, haircut, collateral profile and client actions. Additionally, Citi maintains counterparty diversification by establishing concentration triggers and assessing counterparty reliability and stability under stress. Citi generally sources secured funding from more than 150 counterparties.

Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)

In addition to internal measures that Citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario, Citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the LCR, as calculated pursuant to the U.S. LCR rules (for additional information, see “Liquidity Risk” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K). The table below sets forth the components of Citi’s LCR calculation and HQLA in excess of net outflows as of the periods indicated:

In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017			Mar. 31, 2017			Jun. 30, 2016
HQLA	$	424.4		$	412.8		$	411.0
Net outflows	338.2			334.4			339.8
LCR	125		%	123		%	121		%
HQLA in excess of net outflows	$	86.2		$	78.4		$	71.2

Note: The amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis.

As set forth in the table above, Citi’s average LCR increased both year-over-year and sequentially driven by an increase in HQLA, reflecting the increase in cash related to resolution planning, partially offset by an increase in net outflows.

71

Credit Ratings

The table below sets forth the ratings for Citigroup and Citibank as of June 30, 2017. While not included in the table below, the long-term and short-term ratings of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI) were “A2/P-1” at Moody’s, “A+/A-1” at Standard & Poor’s and “A+/F1” at Fitch as of June 30, 2017. The long-term and short-term ratings of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) were BBB+/A-2 at

Standard & Poor’s and A/F1 at Fitch as of June 30, 2017.

	Citigroup Inc.			Citibank, N.A.
	Senior debt	Commercial paper	Outlook	Long- term	Short- term	Outlook
Fitch Ratings (Fitch)	A	F1	Stable	A+	F1	Stable
Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s)	Baa1	P-2	Stable	A1	P-1	Stable
Standard & Poor’s (S&P)	BBB+	A-2	Stable	A+	A-1	Stable

Potential Impacts of Ratings Downgrades

Ratings downgrades by Moody’s, Fitch or S&P could negatively impact Citigroup’s and/or Citibank’s funding and liquidity due to reduced funding capacity, including derivative triggers, which could take the form of cash obligations and collateral requirements.

The following information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the potential funding and liquidity impact to Citigroup and Citibank of a hypothetical, simultaneous

ratings downgrade across all three major rating agencies. This analysis is subject to certain estimates, estimation methodologies, judgments and uncertainties. Uncertainties include potential ratings limitations that certain entities may have with respect to permissible counterparties, as well as general subjective counterparty behavior. For example, certain corporate customers and markets counterparties could re-evaluate their business relationships with Citi and limit transactions in certain contracts or market instruments with Citi. Changes in counterparty behavior could impact Citi’s funding and liquidity, as well as the results of operations of certain of its businesses. The actual impact to Citigroup or Citibank is unpredictable and may differ materially from the potential funding and liquidity impacts described below. For additional information on the impact of credit rating changes on Citi and its applicable subsidiaries, see “Risk Factors—

Liquidity Risks” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Citigroup Inc. and Citibank—Potential Derivative Triggers

As of June 30, 2017, Citi estimates that a hypothetical one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. across all three major rating agencies could impact Citigroup’s funding and liquidity due to derivative triggers by approximately $0.7 billion, compared to $0.6 billion as of March 31, 2017. Other funding sources, such as secured funding and other margin requirements, for which there are no explicit triggers, could also be adversely affected.

As of June 30, 2017, Citi estimates that a hypothetical one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citibank across all three major rating agencies could impact Citibank’s funding and liquidity by approximately $0.3 billion, compared to $0.8 billion as of March 31, 2017, due to derivative triggers.

In total, Citi estimates that a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup and Citibank, across all three major rating agencies, could result in increased aggregate cash obligations and collateral requirements of approximately $1.0 billion, compared to $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2017 (see also Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). As set forth under “High-Quality Liquid Assets” above, the liquidity resources of Citibank were approximately $354 billion and the liquidity resources of Citi’s non-bank and other entities were approximately $70 billion, for a total of approximately $424 billion as of June 30, 2017. These liquidity resources are available in part as a contingency for the potential events described above.

In addition, a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in Citigroup’s and Citibank’s contingency funding plans. For Citigroup, these mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing surplus funding capacity from existing clients, tailoring levels of secured lending, and adjusting the size of select trading books and collateralized borrowings from certain Citibank subsidiaries. Mitigating actions available to Citibank include, but are not limited to, selling or financing highly liquid government securities, tailoring levels of secured lending, adjusting the size of select trading assets, reducing loan originations and renewals, raising additional deposits, or borrowing from the FHLB or central

72

banks. Citi believes these mitigating actions could substantially reduce the funding and liquidity risk, if any, of the potential downgrades described above.

Citibank—Additional Potential Impacts

In addition to the above derivative triggers, Citi believes that a potential one-notch downgrade of Citibank’s senior debt/long-term rating by S&P could also have an adverse impact on the commercial paper/short-term rating of Citibank. As of June 30, 2017, Citibank had liquidity commitments of approximately $10.0billion to consolidated asset-backed commercial paper conduits, compared to $10.1 billion at March 31, 2017 (as referenced in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

In addition to the above-referenced liquidity resources of certain Citibank and Citibanamex entities, Citibank could reduce the funding and liquidity risk, if any, of the potential downgrades described above through mitigating actions, including repricing or reducing certain commitments to commercial paper conduits. In the event of the potential downgrades described above, Citi believes that certain corporate customers could re-evaluate their deposit relationships with Citibank. This re-evaluation could result in clients adjusting their discretionary deposit levels or changing their depository institution, which could potentially reduce certain deposit levels at Citibank. However, Citi could choose to adjust pricing, offer alternative deposit products to its existing customers or seek to attract deposits from new customers, in addition to the mitigating actions referenced above.

73

MARKET RISK

Market risk emanates from both Citi’s trading and non-trading portfolios. Trading portfolios comprise all assets and liabilities marked-to-market, with results reflected in earnings. Non-trading portfolios include all other assets and liabilities.

For additional information on market risk and market risk management at Citi, see “Market Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios

For additional information on Citi’s net interest revenue (for interest rate exposure purposes), interest rate risk and interest rate risk measurement, see “Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table sets forth the estimated impact to Citi’s net interest revenue, AOCI and the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis), each assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis point increase in interest rates:

In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)	Jun. 30, 2017			Mar. 31, 2017			Jun. 30, 2016
Estimated annualized impact to net interest revenue
U.S. dollar(1)	$	1,435		$	1,644		$	1,394
All other currencies	589			581			590
Total	$	2,024		$	2,225		$	1,984
As a percentage of average interest-earning assets	0.12		%	0.14		%	0.12		%
Estimated initial impact to AOCI (after-tax)(2)	$	(4,258	)	$	(3,830	)	$	(4,628	)
Estimated initial impact on Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (bps)(3)	(49		)	(43		)	(52		)

(1) Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions that are excluded from the estimated impact to net interest revenue in the table, since these exposures are managed economically in combination with mark-to-market positions. The U.S. dollar interest rate exposure associated with these businesses was $(164) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates as of June 30, 2017.

(2) Includes the effect of changes in interest rates on AOCI related to investment securities, cash flow hedges and pension liability adjustments.

(3) The estimated initial impact to the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio considers the effect of Citi’s DTA position and is based on only the estimated initial AOCI impact above.

The sequential decrease in the estimated impact to net interest revenue primarily reflected an increase in the assumed deposit re-pricing sensitivity to further increases in interest rates and changes in balance sheet composition. The sequential increase in the estimated impact to AOCI primarily reflected changes to the positioning of Citi Treasury’s investment securities and related interest rate derivatives portfolio.

In the event of an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis point increase in interest rates, Citi expects the negative impact to AOCI would be offset in stockholders’ equity through the combination of expected incremental net interest revenue and the expected recovery of the impact on AOCI through accretion of Citi’s investment portfolio over a period of time. As of June 30, 2017, Citi expects that the negative

$4.2 billion impact to AOCI in such a scenario could potentially be offset over approximately 21 months.

The following table sets forth the estimated impact to Citi’s net interest revenue, AOCI and the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis) under four different changes in interest rate scenarios for the U.S. dollar and Citi’s other currencies. While Citi also monitors the impact of a parallel decrease in interest rates, a 100 basis point decrease in short-term rates is not meaningful, as it would imply negative interest rates in many of Citi's markets.

In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)	Scenario 1			Scenario 2			Scenario 3			Scenario 4
Overnight rate change (bps)	100			100			—			—
10-year rate change (bps)	100			—			100			(100		)
Estimated annualized impact to net interest revenue
U.S. dollar	$	1,435		$	1,363		$	87		$	(116	)
All other currencies	589			549			34			(34		)
Total	$	2,024		$	1,912		$	121		$	(150	)
Estimated initial impact to AOCI (after-tax)(1)	$	(4,258	)	$	(2,609	)	$	(1,833	)	$	(1,329	)
Estimated initial impact to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (bps)(2)	(49		)	(30		)	(21		)	(15		)

Note: Each scenario in the table above assumes that the rate change will occur instantaneously. Changes in interest rates for maturities between the overnight rate and the 10-year rate are interpolated.

(1) Includes the effect of changes in interest rates on AOCI related to investment securities, cash flow hedges and pension liability adjustments.

74

(2) The estimated initial impact to the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio considers the effect of Citi’s deferred tax asset position and is based on only the estimated AOCI impact above.

As shown in the table above, the magnitude of the impact to Citi’s net interest revenue and AOCI is greater under scenario 2 as compared to scenario 3. This is because the combination of changes to Citi’s investment portfolio, partially offset by changes related to Citi’s pension liabilities, results in a net position that is more sensitive to rates at shorter- and intermediate-term maturities.

In recent years, a number of central banks, including the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the Swiss National Bank, have implemented negative interest rates, and additional governmental entities could do so in the future. While negative interest rates can adversely impact net interest revenue (as well as net interest margin), Citi has, to date, been able to partially offset the impact of negative rates in these jurisdictions through a combination of business and Citi Treasury interest rate risk mitigation activities, including applying negative rates to client accounts (for additional information on Citi Treasury’s ongoing interest rate mitigation activities, see “Market Risk—Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Reporting on Form 10-K).

Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates—Impacts on AOCI and Capital

As of June 30, 2017, Citi estimates that an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 5% appreciation of the U.S. dollar against all of the other currencies in which Citi has invested capital could reduce Citi’s tangible common equity (TCE) by approximately $1.4 billion, or 0.8%, as a result of changes to Citi’s foreign currency translation adjustment in AOCI, net of hedges. This impact would be primarily due to changes in the value of the Mexican peso, the Euro and the Australian dollar.

This impact is also before any mitigating actions Citi may take, including ongoing management of its foreign currency translation exposure. Specifically, as currency movements change the value of Citi’s net investments in foreign-currency-denominated capital, these movements also change the value of Citi’s risk-weighted assets denominated in those currencies. This, coupled with Citi’s foreign currency hedging strategies, such as foreign currency borrowings, foreign currency forwards and other currency hedging instruments, lessens the impact of foreign currency movements on Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio. Changes in these hedging strategies, as well as hedging costs, divestitures and tax impacts, can further impact the actual impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on Citi’s capital as compared to an unanticipated parallel shock, as described above.

The effect of Citi’s ongoing management strategies with respect to changes in foreign exchange rates and the impact of these changes on Citi’s TCE and Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio are shown in the table below. For additional information on the changes in AOCI, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

	For the quarter ended
In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)	Jun. 30, 2017			Mar. 31, 2017			Jun. 30, 2016
Change in FX spot rate(1)	1.9		%	4.5		%	(0.9		)%
Change in TCE due to FX translation, net of hedges	$	478		$	654		$	(441	)
As a percentage of TCE	0.3		%	0.4		%	(0.2		)%
Estimated impact to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis) due   to changes in FX translation, net of hedges (bps)	(3		)	(2		)	2

(1) FX spot rate change is a weighted average based upon Citi’s quarterly average GAAP capital exposure to foreign countries.

75

Interest Revenue/Expense and Net Interest Margin

	2nd Qtr.				1st Qtr.				2nd Qtr.				Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted	2017				2017				2016				2Q17 vs. 2Q16
Interest revenue(1)	$	15,323			$	14,546			$	14,473			6	%
Interest expense(2)	4,036				3,566				3,120				29
Net interest revenue	$	11,287			$	10,980			$	11,353			(1	)%
Interest revenue—average rate	3.70		%		3.63		%		3.65		%		5		bps
Interest expense—average rate	1.26				1.16				1.04				22		bps
Net interest margin	2.72				2.74				2.86				(14	)	bps
Interest-rate benchmarks
Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate	1.30		%		1.24		%		0.77		%		53		bps
10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate	2.26				2.45				1.75				51		bps
10-year vs. two-year spread	96			bps	121			bps	98			bps

Note: All interest expense amounts include FDIC deposit insurance assessments.

(1) Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $122 million, $123 million, and $117 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively.

(2) Interest expense associated with certain hybrid financial instruments, which are classified as Long-term debt and accounted for at fair value, is reported together with any changes in fair value as part of Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statements of Income and is therefore not reflected in Interest expense in the table above.

Citi’s net interest revenue declined 1% to $11.2 billion ($11.3 billion on a taxable equivalent basis) versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citi’s net interest revenue was largely unchanged at $11.2 billion ($11.3 billion on a taxable equivalent basis) versus the prior-year period, due to lower trading-related net interest revenue ($0.9 billion, down approximately 29% or $0.4 billion), and lower net interest revenue associated with legacy assets in Corporate/Other ($0.3 billion, down approximately 49% or $0.3 billion), offset by higher net interest revenue in the remaining accrual businesses (core accrual net interest revenue). Core accrual net interest revenue increased 7% to $10.0 billion versus the prior-year period, driven by the addition of the Costco portfolio, other volume growth and the

impact of the December 2016 and March 2017 interest rate increases, partially offset by an increase in the FDIC assessment and higher long-term debt.

Citi’s net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest-earning assets. Citi’s NIM was 2.72% on a taxable equivalent basis in the second quarter of 2017, a decrease of 14 bps from the prior-year period. Citi’s core accrual NIM was 3.44%, a decline of 1 bps, as the higher core accrual net interest revenue was more than offset by balance sheet growth, particularly in cash balances. (Citi’s core accrual net interest revenue and core accrual NIM are non-GAAP financial measures. Citi believes these measures provide a more meaningful depiction for investors of the underlying fundamentals of its business results.)

76

Additional Interest Rate Details

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets^(1)(2)(3) 

Taxable Equivalent Basis

	Average volume						Interest revenue						% Average rate
	2nd Qtr.		1st Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		1st Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		1st Qtr.		2nd Qtr.
In millions of dollars, except rates	2017		2017		2016		2017		2017		2016		2017		2017		2016
Assets
Deposits with banks(4)	$	166,023	$	154,765	$	135,245	$	375	$	295	$	237	0.91	%	0.77	%	0.70	%
Federal funds sold and securities   borrowed or purchased under   agreements to resell(5)
In U.S. offices	$	144,483	$	144,003	$	148,511	$	472	$	368	$	362	1.31	%	1.04	%	0.98	%
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	104,780		103,032		84,018		356		293		302		1.36		1.15		1.45
Total	$	249,263	$	247,035	$	232,529	$	828	$	661	$	664	1.33	%	1.09	%	1.15	%
Trading account assets(6)(7)
In U.S. offices	$	100,080	$	101,836	$	108,602	$	877	$	884	$	970	3.51	%	3.52	%	3.59	%
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	103,581		94,015		92,656		646		423		603		2.50		1.82		2.62
Total	$	203,661	$	195,851	$	201,258	$	1,523	$	1,307	$	1,573	3.00	%	2.71	%	3.14	%
Investments
In U.S. offices
Taxable	$	224,021	$	221,450	$	225,279	$	1,086	$	1,034	$	991	1.94	%	1.89	%	1.77	%
Exempt from U.S. income tax	18,466		18,680		19,010		197		196		170		4.28		4.26		3.60
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	106,758		107,225		107,235		830		789		837		3.12		2.98		3.14
Total	$	349,245	$	347,355	$	351,524	$	2,113	$	2,019	$	1,998	2.43	%	2.36	%	2.29	%
Loans (net of unearned income)(8)
In U.S. offices	$	369,342	$	367,397	$	353,422	$	6,392	$	6,273	$	5,793	6.94	%	6.92	%	6.59	%
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	264,986		255,941		267,226		3,832		3,697		3,972		5.80		5.86		5.98
Total	$	634,328	$	623,338	$	620,648	$	10,224	$	9,970	$	9,765	6.46	%	6.49	%	6.33	%
Other interest-earning assets(9)	$	60,107	$	56,733	$	54,058	$	260	$	294	$	236	1.74	%	2.10	%	1.76	%
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,662,627	$	1,625,077	$	1,595,262	$	15,323	$	14,546	$	14,473	3.70	%	3.63	%	3.65	%
Non-interest-earning assets(6)	$	206,581	$	205,477	$	212,050
Total assets	$	1,869,208	$	1,830,554	$	1,807,312

(1) Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $122 million, $123 million, and $117 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively.

(2) Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset categories.

(3) Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4) Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5) Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45. However, Interest revenue excludes the impact of ASC 210-20-45.

(6) The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported net, pursuant to ASC 815-10-45, in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(7) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(8) Includes cash-basis loans.

(9) Includes brokerage receivables.

77

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue^(1)(2)(3) 

Taxable Equivalent Basis

	Average volume						Interest expense						% Average rate
	2nd Qtr.		1st Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		1st Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		2nd Qtr.		1st Qtr.		2nd Qtr.
In millions of dollars, except rates	2017		2017		2016		2017		2017		2016		2017		2017		2016
Liabilities
Deposits
In U.S. offices(4)	$	311,758	$	302,294	$	286,653	$	593	$	507	$	371	0.76	%	0.68	%	0.52	%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	439,807		428,743		435,242		1,010		908		935		0.92		0.86		0.86
Total	$	751,565	$	731,037	$	721,895	$	1,603	$	1,415	$	1,306	0.86	%	0.78	%	0.73	%
Federal funds purchased and   securities loaned or sold under   agreements to repurchase(6)
In U.S. offices	$	101,623	$	94,461	$	103,517	$	396	$	282	$	260	1.56	%	1.21	%	1.01	%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	59,354		54,425		57,685		280		211		267		1.89		1.57		1.86
Total	$	160,977	$	148,886	$	161,202	$	676	$	493	$	527	1.68	%	1.34	%	1.31
Trading account liabilities(7)(8)
In U.S. offices	$	34,287	$	32,215	$	27,420	$	81	$	84	$	64	0.95	%	1.06	%	0.94	%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	56,731		59,667		45,960		65		63		32		0.46		0.43		0.28
Total	$	91,018	$	91,882	$	73,380	$	146	$	147	$	96	0.64	%	0.65	%	0.53	%
Short-term borrowings(9)
In U.S. offices	$	68,486	$	71,607	$	54,825	$	103	$	85	$	43	0.60	%	0.48	%	0.32	%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	23,070		24,006		10,253		99		114		66		1.72		1.93		2.59
Total	$	91,556	$	95,613	$	65,078	$	202	$	199	$	109	0.88	%	0.84	%	0.67	%
Long-term debt(10)
In U.S. offices	$	187,610	$	178,656	$	175,506	$	1,361	$	1,255	$	1,009	2.91	%	2.85	%	2.31	%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	4,534		5,313		6,714		48		57		73		4.25		4.35		4.37
Total	$	192,144	$	183,969	$	182,220	$	1,409	$	1,312	$	1,082	2.94	%	2.89	%	2.39	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,287,260	$	1,251,387	$	1,203,775	$	4,036	$	3,566	$	3,120	1.26	%	1.16	%	1.04	%
Demand deposits in U.S. offices	$	38,772	$	37,748	$	38,979
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(7)	313,229		314,106		335,243
Total liabilities	$	1,639,261	$	1,603,241	$	1,577,997
Citigroup stockholders’ equity(11)	$	228,946	$	226,312	$	228,149
Noncontrolling interest	1,001		1,001		1,166
Total equity(11)	$	229,947	$	227,313	$	229,315
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,869,208	$	1,830,554	$	1,807,312
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)
In U.S. offices	$	956,968	$	948,366	$	942,538	$	6,777	$	6,763	$	6,816	2.84	%	2.89	%	2.91	%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)	705,659		676,711		652,724		4,510		4,217		4,537		2.56		2.53		2.80
Total	$	1,662,627	$	1,625,077	$	1,595,262	$	11,287	$	10,980	$	11,353	2.72	%	2.74	%	2.86	%

(1) Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $122 million, $123 million, and $117 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively.

(2) Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective liability categories.

(3) Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4) Consists of other time deposits and savings deposits. Savings deposits are made up of insured money market accounts, NOW accounts and other savings deposits. The interest expense on savings deposits includes FDIC deposit insurance assessments.

(5) Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(6) Average volumes of securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45. However, Interest expense excludes the impact of ASC 210-20-45.

(7) The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported net, pursuant to ASC 815-10-45, in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

78

(8) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(9) Includes brokerage payables.

(10) Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as Long-term debt, as these obligations are accounted for in changes in fair value recorded in Principal transactions.

(11) Includes stockholders’ equity from discontinued operations.

(12) Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets^(1)(2)(3)(4) 

Taxable Equivalent Basis

	Average volume				Interest revenue				% Average rate
	Six Months		Six Months		Six Months		Six Months		Six Months		Six Months
In millions of dollars, except rates	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
Assets
Deposits with banks(5)	$	160,394	$	126,505	$	670	$	456	0.84	%	0.72	%
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)
In U.S. offices	$	144,243	$	149,278	$	840	$	736	1.17		0.99
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	103,906		81,295		649		575		1.26		1.42
Total	$	248,149	$	230,573	$	1,489	$	1,311	1.21	%	1.14	%
Trading account assets(7)(8)
In U.S. offices	$	100,958	$	106,792	$	1,761	$	1,923	3.52	%	3.62	%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	98,798		91,640		1,069		1,121		2.18		2.46
Total	$	199,756	$	198,432	$	2,830	$	3,044	2.86	%	3.08	%
Investments
In U.S. offices
Taxable	$	222,736	$	227,130	$	2,120	$	1,991	1.92	%	1.76	%
Exempt from U.S. income tax	18,573		19,205		393		339		4.27		3.55
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	106,992		105,499		1,619		1,591		3.05		3.03
Total	$	348,301	$	351,834	$	4,132	$	3,921	2.39	%	2.24	%
Loans (net of unearned income)(9)
In U.S. offices	$	368,370	$	351,765	$	12,665	$	11,666	6.93	%	6.67	%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)	260,464		264,680		7,529		7,873		5.83		5.98
Total	$	628,834	$	616,445	$	20,194	$	19,539	6.48	%	6.37	%
Other interest-earning assets(10)	$	58,418	$	55,159	$	554	$	488	1.91	%	1.78	%
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,643,852	$	1,578,948	$	29,869	$	28,759	3.66	%	3.66	%
Non-interest-earning assets(7)	$	206,029	$	213,496
Total assets	$	1,849,881	$	1,792,444

(1) Net interestrevenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $245 million and $236 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(2) Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3) Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4) Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(5) Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(6) Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45). However, Interest revenue excludes the impact of FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45).

(7) The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(8) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(9) Includes cash-basis loans.

(10) Includes brokerage receivables.

79

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue^(1)(2)(3)(4) 

Taxable Equivalent Basis

	Average volume				Interest expense				% Average rate
	Six Months		Six Months		Six Months		Six Months		Six Months		Six Months
In millions of dollars, except rates	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
Liabilities
Deposits
In U.S. offices(5)	$	307,026	$	282,151	$	1,100	$	687	0.72	%	0.49	%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)	434,275		429,649		1,918		1,823		0.89		0.85
Total	$	741,301	$	711,800	$	3,018	$	2,510	0.82	%	0.71	%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned   or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)
In U.S. offices	$	98,042	$	103,520	$	678	$	520	1.39	%	1.01	%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)	56,890		58,539		491		509		1.74		1.75
Total	$	154,932	$	162,059	$	1,169	$	1,029	1.52	%	1.28	%
Trading account liabilities(8)(9)
In U.S. offices	$	33,251	$	25,528	$	165	$	116	1.00	%	0.91	%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)	58,199		43,818		128		68		0.44		0.31
Total	$	91,450	$	69,346	$	293	$	184	0.65	%	0.53	%
Short-term borrowings(10)
In U.S. offices	$	70,047	$	55,830	$	188	$	72	0.54	%	0.26	%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)	23,538		16,448		213		138		1.82		1.69
Total	$	93,585	$	72,278	$	401	$	210	0.86	%	0.58	%
Long-term debt(11)
In U.S. offices	$	183,133	$	173,968	$	2,616	$	2,003	2.88	%	2.32	%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)	4,924		6,784		105		124		4.30		3.68
Total	$	188,057	$	180,752	$	2,721	$	2,127	2.92	%	2.37	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,269,325	$	1,196,235	$	7,602	$	6,060	1.21	%	1.02	%
Demand deposits in U.S. offices	$	38,260	$	35,158
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)	311,877		333,652
Total liabilities	$	1,619,462	$	1,565,045
Citigroup stockholders’ equity(12)	$	229,418	$	226,235
Noncontrolling interest	1,001		1,164
Total equity(12)	$	230,419	$	227,399
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,849,881	$	1,792,444
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets
In U.S. offices	$	952,667	$	936,046	$	13,540	$	13,802	2.87	%	2.97	%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)	691,185		642,902		8,727		8,897		2.55		2.78
Total	$	1,643,852	$	1,578,948	$	22,267	$	22,699	2.73	%	2.89	%

(1) Net interestrevenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $245 million and $236 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(2) Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3) Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4) Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(5) Consists of other time deposits and savings deposits. Savings deposits are made up of insured money market accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense on savings deposits includes FDIC deposit insurance fees and charges.

(6) Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7) Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45). However, Interest expense excludes the impact of FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45).

(8) The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(9) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(10) Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as Long-term debt, as these obligations are accounted for in changes in fair value recorded in Principal transactions.

(11) Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12) Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

80

Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue^(1)(2)(3) 

	2nd Qtr. 2017 vs. 1st Qtr. 2017									2nd Qtr. 2017 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2016
	Increase (decrease) due to change in:									Increase (decrease) due to change in:
In millions of dollars	Average volume			Average rate			Net change			Average volume			Average rate			Net change
Deposits with banks(4)	$	23		$	57		$	80		$	61		$	77		$	138
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or   purchased under agreements to resell
In U.S. offices	$	1		$	103		$	104		$	(10	)	$	120		$	110
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	5			58			63			71			(17		)	54
Total	$	6		$	161		$	167		$	61		$	103		$	164
Trading account assets(5)
In U.S. offices	$	(15	)	$	8		$	(7	)	$	(75	)	$	(18	)	$	(93	)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	47			176			223			69			(26		)	43
Total	$	32		$	184		$	216		$	(6	)	$	(44	)	$	(50	)
Investments(1)
In U.S. offices	$	12		$	41		$	53		$	(9	)	$	131		$	122
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	(3		)	44			41			(4		)	(3		)	(7		)
Total	$	9		$	85		$	94		$	(13	)	$	128		$	115
Loans (net of unearned income)(6)
In U.S. offices	$	33		$	86		$	119		$	267		$	332		$	599
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	131			4			135			(33		)	(107		)	(140		)
Total	$	164		$	90		$	254		$	234		$	225		$	459
Other interest-earning assets(7)	$	17		$	(51	)	$	(34	)	$	26		$	(2	)	$	24
Total interest revenue	$	251		$	526		$	777		$	363		$	487		$	850

(1) The taxable equivalent adjustment is related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is included in this presentation.

(2) Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3) Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4) Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(6) Includes cash-basis loans.

(7) Includes brokerage receivables.

81

Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue^(1)(2)(3) 

	2nd Qtr. 2017 vs. 1st Qtr. 2017									2nd Qtr. 2017 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2016
	Increase (decrease) due to change in:									Increase (decrease) due to change in:
In millions of dollars	Average volume			Average rate			Net change			Average volume			Average rate			Net change
Deposits
In U.S. offices	$	16		$	70		$	86		$	35		$	187		$	222
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	24			78			102			10			65			75
Total	$	40		$	148		$	188		$	45		$	252		$	297
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
In U.S. offices	$	23		$	91		$	114		$	(5	)	$	141		$	136
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	20			49			69			8			5			13
Total	$	43		$	140		$	183		$	3		$	146		$	149
Trading account liabilities(5)
In U.S. offices	$	5		$	(8	)	$	(3	)	$	16		$	1		$	17
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	(3		)	5			2			9			24			33
Total	$	2		$	(3	)	$	(1	)	$	25		$	25		$	50
Short-term borrowings(6)
In U.S. offices	$	(4	)	$	22		$	18		$	13		$	47		$	60
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	(4		)	(11		)	(15		)	61			(28		)	33
Total	$	(8	)	$	11		$	3		$	74		$	19		$	93
Long-term debt
In U.S. offices	$	64		$	42		$	106		$	73		$	279		$	352
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	(8		)	(1		)	(9		)	(23		)	(2		)	(25		)
Total	$	56		$	41		$	97		$	50		$	277		$	327
Total interest expense	$	133		$	337		$	470		$	197		$	719		$	916
Net interest revenue	$	118		$	189		$	307		$	166		$	(232	)	$	(66	)

(1) The taxable equivalent adjustment is related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is included in this presentation.

(2) Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3) Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4) Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(6) Includes brokerage payables.

82

Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Revenue^(1)(2)(3) 

	Six Months 2017 vs. Six Months 2016
	Increase (decrease) due to change in:
In millions of dollars	Average volume			Average rate			Net change(2)
Deposits with banks(4)	$	134		$	80		$	214
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
In U.S. offices	$	(26	)	$	130		$	104
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	147			(73		)	74
Total	$	121		$	57		$	178
Trading account assets(5)
In U.S. offices	$	(103	)	$	(59	)	$	(162	)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	83			(135		)	(52		)
Total	$	(20	)	$	(194	)	$	(214	)
Investments(1)
In U.S. offices	$	(48	)	$	231		$	183
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	23			5			28
Total	$	(25	)	$	236		$	211
Loans (net of unearned income)(6)
In U.S. offices	$	562		$	437		$	999
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	(124		)	(220		)	(344		)
Total	$	438		$	217		$	655
Other interest-earning assets	$	30		$	36		$	66
Total interest revenue	$	678		$	432		$	1,110
Deposits(7)
In U.S. offices	$	65		$	348		$	413
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	20			75			95
Total	$	85		$	423		$	508
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
In U.S. offices	$	(29	)	$	187		$	158
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	(14		)	(4		)	(18		)
Total	$	(43	)	$	183		$	140
Trading account liabilities(5)
In U.S. offices	$	38		$	11		$	49
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	26			34			60
Total	$	64		$	45		$	109
Short-term borrowings
In U.S. offices	$	22		$	94		$	116
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	63			13			76
Total	$	85		$	107		$	192
Long-term debt
In U.S. offices	$	110		$	502		$	612
In offices outside the U.S.(4)	(38		)	19			(19		)
Total	$	72		$	521		$	593
Total interest expense	$	263		$	1,279		$	1,542
Net interest revenue	$	415		$	(847	)	$	(432	)

(1) The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is included in this presentation.

(2) Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3) Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations.

(4) Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

83

(5) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.

(6) Includes cash-basis loans.

(7) The interest expense on deposits includes the FDIC assessment and deposit insurance fees and charges of $502 million and $585 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

84

Market Risk of Trading Portfolios

For additional information on Citi’s market risk of trading portfolios, see “Market Risk—Market Risk of Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Value at Risk

As of June 30, 2017, Citi estimates that the conservative features of its VAR calibration contribute an approximate 22% add-on (unchanged from March 31, 2017) to what would be a VAR estimated under the assumption of stable and perfectly normal distributed markets.

As set forth in the table below, Citi's average trading VAR as of June 30, 2017 was substantially unchanged compared to March 31, 2017, with changes in interest rate exposures offset by changes in credit spread exposures. Average trading and credit portfolio VAR as of June 30, 2017 slightly decreased mainly due to a reduction of the hedges to the lending portfolio.

Quarter-end and Average Trading VAR and Trading and Credit Portfolio VAR

				Second Quarter						First Quarter						Second Quarter
In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017			2017 Average			March 31, 2017			2017 Average			June 30, 2016			2016 Average
Interest rate	$	48		$	52		$	52		$	48		$	32		$	32
Credit spread	52			49			54			56			61			$	60
Covariance adjustment(1)	(15		)	(15		)	(17		)	(17		)	(30		)	(26		)
Fully diversified interest rate and credit spread(2)	$	85		$	86		$	89		$	87		$	63		$	66
Foreign exchange	23			23			16			24			26			20
Equity	15			15			17			15			11			15
Commodity	20			21			23			23			23			20
Covariance adjustment(1)	(53		)	(59		)	(53		)	(63		)	(59		)	(56		)
Total trading VAR—all market risk factors, including general   and specific risk (excluding credit portfolios)(3)	$	90		$	86		$	92		$	86		$	64		$	65
Specific risk-only component(4)	$	1		$	1		$	—		$	2		$	9		$	9
Total trading VAR—general market risk factors only   (excluding credit portfolios)(3)	$	89		$	85		$	92		$	84		$	55		$	56
Incremental impact of the credit portfolio(5)(6)	$	5		$	10		$	15		$	14		$	22		$	23
Total trading and credit portfolio VAR	$	95		$	96		$	107		$	100		$	86		$	88

(1) Covariance adjustment (also known as diversification benefit) equals the difference between the total VAR and the sum of the VARs tied to each individual risk type. The benefit reflects the fact that the risks within each and across risk types are not perfectly correlated and, consequently, the total VAR on a given day will be lower than the sum of the VARs relating to each individual risk type. The determination of the primary drivers of changes to the covariance adjustment is made by an examination of the impact of both model parameter and position changes.

(2) The increase in the second quarter of 2017 end of period and average VaR attributable to fully diversified interest rate and credit spread year-over-year was primarily due to lower trading volumes in the prior-year period.

(3) The total trading VAR includes mark-to-market and certain fair value option trading positions in ICG,with the exception of hedges to the loan portfolio, fair value option loans and all CVA exposures. Available-for-sale and accrual exposures are not included.

(4) The specific risk-only component represents the level of equity and fixed income issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR.

(5) The credit portfolio is composed of mark-to-market positions associated with non-trading business units including Citi Treasury, the CVA relating to derivative counterparties and all associated CVA hedges. FVA and DVA are not included. The credit portfolio also includes hedges to the loan portfolio, fair value option loans and hedges to the leveraged finance pipeline within capital markets origination in ICG.

(6) The decrease in the second quarter of 2017 end of period and average VaR attributable to the incremental impact of the credit portfolio year-over-year and sequentially was primarily related to a reduction in the use of credit default swaps used to hedge the corporate loan portfolio.

85

The table below provides the range of market factor VARs associated with Citi’s total trading VAR, inclusive of specific risk:

	Second Quarter				First Quarter				Second Quarter
	2017				2017				2016
In millions of dollars	Low		High		Low		High		Low		High
Interest rate	$	33	$	72	$	29	$	70	$	26	$	40
Credit spread	47		53		51		63		56		64
Fully diversified interest rate and credit spread	$	67	$	107	$	59	$	109	$	60	$	74
Foreign exchange	17		28		16		35		14		29
Equity	10		24		6		25		10		26
Commodity	14		30		18		30		16		25
Total trading	$	67	$	116	$	61	$	107	$	55	$	76
Total trading and credit portfolio	78		123		75		123		79		98

Note: No covariance adjustment can be inferred from the above table as the high and low for each market factor will be from different close-of-business dates.

The following table provides the VAR for ICG, excluding the CVA relating to derivative counterparties, hedges of CVA, fair value option loans and hedges to the loan portfolio:

In millions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017
Total—all market risk factors, including   general and specific risk	$	89
Average—during quarter	$	86
High—during quarter	115
Low—during quarter	65

Regulatory VAR Back-testing

In accordance with Basel III, Citi is required to perform back-testing to evaluate the effectiveness of its Regulatory VAR model. Regulatory VAR back-testing is the process in which the daily one-day VAR, at a 99% confidence interval, is compared to the buy-and-hold profit and loss (i.e., the profit and loss impact if the portfolio is held constant at the end of the day and re-priced the following day). Buy-and-hold profit and loss represents the daily mark-to-market profit and loss attributable to price movements in covered positions from the close of the previous business day. Buy-and-hold profit and loss excludes realized trading revenue, net interest, fees and commissions, intra-day trading profit and loss and changes in reserves.

Based on a 99% confidence level, Citi would expect two to three days in any one year where buy-and-hold losses exceeded the Regulatory VAR. Given the conservative calibration of Citi’s VAR model (as a result of taking the greater of short- and long-term volatilities and fat-tail scaling of volatilities), Citi would expect fewer exceptions under normal and stable market conditions. Periods of unstable market conditions could increase the number of back-testing exceptions.

As of June 30, 2017, there was one back-testing exception observed for Citi’s Regulatory VAR for the prior 12 months. As previously disclosed, trading losses on November 14, 2016 exceeded the VAR estimate at the Citigroup level, driven by the widening of municipal bond

yields following the election results in the United States.

86

COUNTRY RISK

For additional information on country risk at Citi, see “Country Risk” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Top 25 Country Exposures

The following table presents Citi’s top 25 exposures by

country (excluding the U.S.) as of June 30, 2017. For

purposes of the table, loan amounts are reflected in the country

where the loan is booked, which is generally based on the

domicile of the borrower. For example, a loan to a Chinese

subsidiary of a Switzerland-based corporation will generally

be categorized as a loan in China. In addition, Citi has

developed regional booking centers in certain countries, most

significantly in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and Ireland, in

order to more efficiently serve its corporate customers. As an

example, with respect to the U.K., only 25% of corporate

loans presented in the table below are to U.K. domiciled

entities (27% for unfunded commitments), with the balance of

the loans predominately to European domiciled counterparties.

Approximately 81% of the total U.K. funded loans and 91% of

the total U.K. unfunded commitments were investment grade

as of June 30, 2017. Trading account assets and investment securities are generally categorized based on the domicile of the issuer of the security of the underlying reference entity. For additional information on the assets included in the table, see the footnotes to the table below.

For a discussion of uncertainties arising as a result of the vote in the U.K. to withdraw from the EU, see “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks” in Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In billions of dollars	ICG loans(1)		GCB loans(2)		Other funded(3)		Unfunded(4)		Net MTM on derivatives/repos(5)		Total hedges (on loans and CVA)			Investment securities(6)		Trading account assets(7)			Total as of 2Q17		Total as of 1Q17		Total as of 4Q16
United Kingdom	$	34.3	$	—	$	3.3	$	56.5	$	11.0	$	(2.1	)	$	8.0	$	0.8		$	111.8	$	108.6	$	107.5
Mexico	8.4		26.6		0.4		6.1		0.7		(0.6		)	13.5		6.2			61.3		59.1		52.4
Singapore	12.8		12.2		0.1		6.6		0.9		(0.3		)	8.4		0.5			41.2		39.8		36.4
Hong Kong	14.5		10.5		0.9		6.0		0.5		(0.5		)	6.0		1.8			39.7		40.3		35.9
Korea	2.5		19.0		0.4		3.6		1.3		(0.8		)	7.5		1.6			35.1		36.0		34.0
India	7.9		6.5		0.7		5.2		2.3		(1.1		)	9.8		2.1			33.4		36.2		30.9
Ireland	11.3		—		0.9		15.8		0.3		—			—		0.6			28.9		25.3		24.8
Brazil(2)	13.3		1.8		0.2		3.5		4.8		(2.8		)	3.2		3.3			27.3		28.9		28.5
Australia	4.0		10.9		—		5.8		0.9		(0.9		)	4.1		(1.1		)	23.7		23.9		22.4
Germany	0.1		—		—		4.2		4.2		(2.3		)	9.6		3.7			19.5		18.0		16.0
China	6.9		4.4		0.2		1.6		1.9		(1.0		)	3.4		2.0			19.4		17.4		17.2
Japan	2.7		—		0.2		7.3		3.7		(1.0		)	4.2		1.5			18.6		18.3		18.3
Taiwan	4.6		8.6		0.1		1.1		0.8		(0.2		)	1.7		1.7			18.4		18.5		16.6
Canada	1.8		0.6		0.5		6.6		1.8		(0.5		)	4.5		1.0			16.3		15.0		17.0
Poland	3.3		1.8		—		3.0		0.2		(0.3		)	4.9		0.2			13.1		12.2		11.8
Malaysia	1.3		4.5		0.3		1.5		0.1		(0.2		)	0.7		0.8			9.0		9.1		9.3
Thailand	0.9		2.0		0.1		1.9		0.3		—			1.6		0.2			7.0		6.2		5.8
United Arab Emirates	2.9		1.4		0.1		2.1		0.3		(0.4		)	—		(0.2		)	6.2		5.9		6.0
Luxembourg	—		—		—		—		0.4		(0.3		)	5.3		0.4			5.8		5.7		5.4
Indonesia	1.9		1.1		0.1		1.2		—		(0.2		)	1.3		0.3			5.7		5.5		5.2
Colombia(2)	2.1		1.6		—		1.0		0.2		(0.1		)	0.4		0.1			5.3		5.8		5.6
Netherlands	—		—		—		—		1.4		(0.7		)	3.7		0.5			4.9		6.8		5.1
Russia	1.9		1.0		—		1.0		0.2		(0.2		)	0.8		—			4.7		6.0		5.3
Jersey	2.8		—		—		1.3		—		—			—		—			4.1		3.8		3.7
South Africa	1.5		—		—		1.1		0.1		(0.3		)	1.3		0.2			3.9		3.5		3.9

(1) ICG loans reflect funded corporate loans and private bank loans, net of unearned income. As of June 30, 2017, private bank loans in the table above totaled $21.7 billion, concentrated in Singapore ($6.9 billion), Hong Kong ($5.8 billion) and the U.K. ($4.9 billion).                     

(2) GCB loans include loans in Brazil and Colombia related to businesses that were transferred to Corporate/Other as of January 1, 2016 (Brazil GCB loans are recorded as HFS in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet).    

(3) Other funded includes other direct exposure such as accounts receivable, loans held-for-sale, other loans in Corporate/Other and investments accounted for under the equity method.                                        

87

(4) Unfunded exposure includes unfunded corporate lending commitments, letters of credit and other contingencies.            

(5) Net mark-to-market (MTM) on derivatives and securities lending / borrowing transactions (repos). Exposures are shown net of collateral and inclusive of CVA. Includes margin loans.                                        

(6) Investment securities include securities available-for-sale, recorded at fair market value, and securities held-to-maturity, recorded at historical cost.                                        

(7) Trading account assets are shown on a net basis and include derivative exposure where the underlying reference entity is located in that country.    

88

INCOME TAXES

Deferred Tax Assets

For additional information on Citi’s deferred tax assets (DTAs), see “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks,” “Significant Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates—Income Taxes” and Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

At June 30, 2017, Citigroup had recorded net DTAs of approximately $45.8 billion, a decrease of $0.1 billion from March 31, 2017 and $0.9 billion from December 31, 2016. The DTA reductions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were primarily driven by the generation of earnings.

The following table summarizes Citi’s net DTAs balance as of the periods presented. Of Citi’s net DTAs as of June 30, 2017, those arising from net operating losses, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards are 100% deducted in calculating Citi’s regulatory capital, while DTAs arising from temporary differences are deducted from regulatory capital if in excess of the 10%/15% limitations (see “Capital Resources” above). Approximately $17.6 billion of the net DTA was not deducted in calculating regulatory capital pursuant to full Basel III implementation standards as of June 30, 2017.

Jurisdiction/Component	DTAs balance
In billions of dollars	Jun. 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Total U.S.	$	43.5	$	44.6
Total foreign	2.3		2.1
Total	$	45.8	$	46.7

Effective Tax Rate

Citi’s effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2017 was 31.6%, as compared with 29.9% in the second quarter of 2016. The prior-year rate was lower because of certain nonrecurring items.

89

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Citi’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including without limitation that information required to be disclosed by Citi in its SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Citi’s Disclosure Committee assists the CEO and CFO in their responsibilities to design, establish, maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of Citi’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Disclosure Committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight, maintenance and implementation of the disclosure controls and procedures, subject to the supervision and oversight of the CEO and CFO.

Citi’s management, with the participation of its CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of Citigroup’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2017 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date, Citigroup’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Citi is required to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with individuals or entities that are subject to sanctions under U.S. law. Disclosure is generally required even where the activities, transactions or dealings were conducted in compliance with applicable law. Citi disclosed reportable activities pursuant to Section 219 in the first quarter of 2017 in the First Quarter of 2017 Form 10-Q.

In addition to Citi’s prior disclosure, during the second quarter of 2017 a branch of Citibank, N.A. located in London processed a funds transfer involving the Iranian Embassy in South Africa.  The value of the funds transfer was EUR 100 (approximately $112.00).  In addition, a branch of Citibank, N.A. located in the United Arab Emirates processed a funds transfer involving Bank Melli, Iran.  The value of the funds transfer was AED 2,975 (approximately $810.00).  These payments were for passport-related fees and Iran-related travel respectively, both of which are permissible under the travel exemption in the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations. 

90

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, Citigroup also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished with the SEC, and its management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.

Generally, forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent Citigroup’s and its management’s beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase, may fluctuate, target, illustrative, and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would and could.

Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Actual results and capital and other financial conditions may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including without limitation (i) the precautionary statements included within each individual business’s discussion and analysis of its results of operations above and in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K; (ii) the factors listed and described under “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and (iii) the risks and uncertainties summarized below:

• Citi’s ability to address (i) the shortcomings identified by the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC as a result of their review of Citi’s 2015 annual resolution plan submission as well as (ii) the 2017 resolution plan guidance in Citi’s recent 2017 resolution plan submission;

• the potential impact on Citi’s ability to return capital to shareholders due to any changes to the stress testing and CCAR requirements or process, such as the introduction of a firm-specific “stress capital buffer” or incorporation of Citi’s then-effective GSIB surcharge into its post-stress test minimum capital requirements or the introduction of additional macroprudential considerations such as funding and liquidity shocks in the stress testing process;

• the ongoing regulatory uncertainties and changes faced by financial institutions, including Citi, in the U.S. and globally, including, among others, uncertainties and potential changes arising from the U.S. presidential administration and Congress, potential changes to various aspects of the regulatory capital framework and the terms of and other uncertainties resulting from the U.K.’s initiation of the process to withdraw from the European Union, and the potential impact these uncertainties and changes could have on Citi’s businesses, results of operations, financial condition, strategy or organizational structure and compliance risks and costs;

• the numerous uncertainties arising as a result of the initiation of the process in the U.K. to withdraw from the European Union, including the terms of the withdrawal, and the potential impact to macroeconomic conditions as well as Citi’s legal entity structure and overall results of operations or financial condition;

• the potential impact to financial institutions, including Citi, as a result of the uncertainties associated with any potential balance sheet normalization program by the Federal Reserve Board or other central banks;

• the impact on the value of Citi’s DTAs and on Citi’s net income or regulatory capital if corporate tax rates in the U.S. or certain state, local or foreign jurisdictions are reduced, or if other changes are made to the U.S. corporate tax system, including a potential change to a territorial system or a one-time mandatory deemed repatriation of all untaxed non-U.S. earnings at a significantly lower rate;

• Citi’s ability to continue to utilize its DTAs (including the foreign tax credit component of its DTAs) and thus reduce the negative impact of the DTAs on Citi’s regulatory capital, including as a result of movements in Citi’s AOCI, which can be impacted by changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates;

• the potential impact to Citi if its interpretation or application of the extensive tax laws to which it is subject, such as withholding tax obligations and stamp and other transactional taxes, differs from those of the relevant governmental authorities;

• Citi’s ability to achieve the expected returns on its ongoing investments in its businesses or meet its operational or financial objectives or targets, including as a result of factors that Citi cannot control;

• the potential negative impact to Citi’s co-branding and private label credit card relationships as well as Citi’s results of operations or financial condition, including as a result of loss of revenues, impairment of purchased credit card relationships and contract related intangibles or other losses, due to, among other things, operational difficulties of a particular retailer or merchant or early termination of a particular relationship, or external factors, including bankruptcies, liquidations, consolidations and other similar events;

• the potential impact to Citi’s businesses, credit costs, deposits and overall results of operations and financial condition as a result of macroeconomic and geopolitical challenges and uncertainties, including those relating to potential outcomes of elections in the EU, potential fiscal or monetary actions or the pursuit of protectionist trade and other policies by the U.S.;

• the various risks faced by Citi as a result of its presence in the emerging markets, including, among others, foreign exchange controls, sociopolitical instability (including from hyper-inflation), fraud, nationalization or loss of licenses, business restrictions, sanctions or asset freezes, potential criminal charges, closure of branches or subsidiaries and confiscation of assets as well as the increased compliance and regulatory risks and costs;

91

• the uncertainties regarding the consequences of noncompliance and the potential impact on Citi’s estimates of its eligible debt arising from the Federal Reserve Board’s final total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) rules;

• the potential impact of concentrations of risk, such as market risk arising from Citi’s volume of transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, on Citi’s hedging strategies and results of operations;

• the potential impacts on Citi’s liquidity and/or costs of funding as a result of external factors, including, among others, market disruptions and governmental fiscal and monetary policies as well as regulatory changes or negative investor perceptions of Citi’s creditworthiness;

• the impact of ratings downgrades of Citi or one or more of its more significant subsidiaries or issuing entities on Citi’s funding and liquidity as well as the results of operations of certain of its businesses;

• the potential impact to Citi from a disruption of its operational systems, including as a result of, among other things, human error, fraud or malice, accidental technological failure, electrical or telecommunication outages or failure of computer servers;

• the potential impact to Citi from an increasing risk of continually evolving cybersecurity risks (including theft of funds or theft, loss, misuse or disclosure of confidential client, customer, corporate or network information or assets), damage to Citi’s reputation, additional costs (including credit costs) to Citi, regulatory penalties, legal exposure and financial losses;

• the potential impact of incorrect assumptions or estimates in Citi’s financial statements or the impact of ongoing changes to financial accounting and reporting standards or interpretations, such as the FASB’s new accounting standard on credit losses, on how Citi records and reports its financial condition and results of operations;

• the potential impact to Citi of ongoing implementation and interpretation of regulatory changes and requirements in the U.S. and globally, such as on Citi’s compliance risks and costs, including reputational and legal risks as well as remediation and other financial costs, such as penalties and fines;

• the potential outcomes of the extensive legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations and other inquiries to which Citi is or may be subject at any given time, particularly given the increased focus on conduct risk and the severity of the remedies sought and potential collateral consequences to Citi arising from such outcomes;

• the potential impact to Citi’s results of operations and/or regulatory capital and capital ratios if Citi’s risk models, including its Basel III risk-weighted asset models, are ineffective, require refinement, modification or enhancement or approval is withdrawn by Citi’s U.S. banking regulators; and

• the potential impact on Citi’s performance, including its competitive position and ability to effectively manage its businesses and continue to execute its strategy, if Citi is unable to hire and retain highly qualified employees for any reason.

Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Citigroup speak only as to the date they are made, and Citi does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements were made.

92

This page intentionally left blank.

93

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)— For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	95
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income(Unaudited)—For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	96
Consolidated Balance Sheet—June 30, 2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2016	97
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity(Unaudited)—For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	99
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)— For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	101

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Accounting Changes	103
Note 2—Discontinued Operations and Significant Disposals	106
Note 3—Business Segments	108
Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense	109
Note 5—Commissions and Fees	110
Note 6—Principal Transactions	110
Note 7—Incentive Plans	111
Note 8—Retirement Benefits	111
Note 9—Earnings per Share	116
Note 10—Federal Funds, Securities Borrowed, Loaned and Subject to Repurchase Agreements	117
Note 11—Brokerage Receivables and Brokerage Payables	120
Note 12—Investments	121

Note 13—Loans	133
Note 14—Allowance for Credit Losses	146
Note 15—Goodwill and Intangible Assets	148
Note 16—Debt	150
Note 17—Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (AOCI)	151
Note 18—Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities	157
Note 19—Derivatives Activities	165
Note 20—Fair Value Measurement	175
Note 21—Fair Value Elections	194
Note 22—Guarantees and Commitments	198
Note 23—Contingencies	202
Note 24—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements	204

94

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts	2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenues
Interest revenue	$	15,201		$	14,356		$	29,624		$	28,523
Interest expense	4,036			3,120			7,602			6,060
Net interest revenue	$	11,165		$	11,236		$	22,022		$	22,463
Commissions and fees	$	2,937		$	2,725		$	5,696		$	5,188
Principal transactions	2,562			1,816			5,584			3,656
Administration and other fiduciary fees	1,003			878			1,896			1,689
Realized gains on sales of investments, net	221			200			413			386
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments
Gross impairment losses	(20		)	(118		)	(32		)	(583		)
Less: Impairments recognized in AOCI	—			—			—			—
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	$	(20	)	$	(118	)	$	(32	)	$	(583	)
Insurance premiums	$	156		$	217		$	325		$	481
Other revenue	(123		)	594			117			1,823
Total non-interest revenues	$	6,736		$	6,312		$	13,999		$	12,640
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	17,901		$	17,548		$	36,021		$	35,103
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
Provision for loan losses	$	1,666		$	1,390		$	3,341		$	3,276
Policyholder benefits and claims	23			49			53			137
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments	28			(30		)	(15		)	41
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	1,717		$	1,409		$	3,379		$	3,454
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits	$	5,463		$	5,229		$	10,997		$	10,785
Premises and equipment	604			642			1,224			1,293
Technology/communication	1,690			1,657			3,349			3,306
Advertising and marketing	432			433			805			823
Other operating	2,317			2,408			4,608			4,685
Total operating expenses	$	10,506		$	10,369		$	20,983		$	20,892
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	5,678		$	5,770		$	11,659		$	10,757
Provision for income taxes	1,795			1,723			3,658			3,202
Income from continuing operations	$	3,883		$	4,047		$	8,001		$	7,555
Discontinued operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	33		$	(36	)	$	5		$	(39	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	12			(13		)	2			(14		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	21		$	(23	)	$	3		$	(25	)
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	3,904		$	4,024		$	8,004		$	7,530
Noncontrolling interests	32			26			42			31
Citigroup’s net income	$	3,872		$	3,998		$	7,962		$	7,499
Basic earnings per share(1)
Income from continuing operations	$	1.27		$	1.25		$	2.63		$	2.36
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	0.01			(0.01		)	—			(0.01		)
Net income	$	1.28		$	1.24		$	2.63		$	2.35
Weighted average common shares outstanding	2,739.1			2,915.8			2,752.2			2,929.4

95

Diluted earnings per share(1)
Income from continuing operations	$	1.27	$	1.25		$	2.63	$	2.36
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	0.01		(0.01		)	—		(0.01		)
Net income	$	1.28	$	1.24		$	2.63	$	2.35
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding	2,739.2		2,915.9			2,752.3		2,929.5

(1) Due to rounding, earnings per share on continuing operations and discontinued operations may not sum to earnings per share on net income.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Citigroup’s net income	$	3,872		$	3,998		$	7,962		$	7,499
Add: Citigroup's other comprehensive income
Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities,   net of taxes(1)	$	(27	)	$	927		$	193		$	2,961
Net change in debt valuation adjustment (DVA), net of taxes(1)	(84		)	12			(144		)	205
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes	117			151			115			468
Benefit plans liability adjustment, net of taxes	(135		)	(27		)	(147		)	(492		)
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes and hedges	643			(552		)	1,961			102
Citigroup’s total other comprehensive income	$	514		$	511		$	1,978		$	3,244
Citigroup’s total comprehensive income	$	4,386		$	4,509		$	9,940		$	10,743
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	39		$	(50	)	70			(23		)
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	32			26			$	42		$	31
Total comprehensive income	$	4,457		$	4,485		$	10,052		$	10,751

(1) See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

96

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

	June 30,
	2017			December 31,
In millions of dollars	(Unaudited)			2016
Assets
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)	$	20,940		$	23,043
Deposits with banks	165,142			137,451
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $142,831 and $133,204 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	234,065			236,813
Brokerage receivables	40,487			28,887
Trading account assets (including $98,974 and $80,986 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	259,606			243,925
Investments:
Available for sale (including $8,512 and $8,239 pledged to creditors as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	293,629			299,424
Held to maturity (including $311 and $843 pledged to creditors as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	50,175			45,667
Non-marketable equity securities (including $1,384 and $1,774 at fair value as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	7,906			8,213
Total investments	$	351,710		$	353,304
Loans:
Consumer (including $27 and $29 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	325,261			325,063
Corporate (including $4,189 and $3,457 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	319,434			299,306
Loans, net of unearned income	$	644,695		$	624,369
Allowance for loan losses	(12,025		)	(12,060		)
Total loans, net	$	632,670		$	612,309
Goodwill	22,349			21,659
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)	4,887			5,114
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)	560			1,564
Other assets (including $18,993 and $15,729 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	131,647			128,008
Total assets	$	1,864,063		$	1,792,077

The following table presents certain assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include those assets that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs, presented on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations. Additionally, the assets in the table below include third-party assets of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation.

	June 30,
	2017			December 31,
In millions of dollars	(Unaudited)			2016
Assets of consolidated VIEs to be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs
Cash and due from banks	$	86		$	142
Trading account assets	1,236			602
Investments	2,932			3,636
Loans, net of unearned income
Consumer	53,816			53,401
Corporate	19,241			20,121
Loans, net of unearned income	$	73,057		$	73,522
Allowance for loan losses	(1,863		)	(1,769		)
Total loans, net	$	71,194		$	71,753
Other assets	154			158
Total assets of consolidated VIEs to be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs	$	75,602		$	76,291

Statement continues on the next page.

97

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETCitigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

(Continued)

	June 30,
	2017			December 31,
In millions of dollars, except shares and per share amounts	(Unaudited)			2016
Liabilities
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices	$	126,253		$	136,698
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $334 and $434 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	311,361			300,972
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.	83,046			77,616
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $1,006 and $778 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	438,083			414,120
Total deposits	$	958,743		$	929,406
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $44,881 and $33,663 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	154,780			141,821
Brokerage payables	62,947			57,152
Trading account liabilities	136,745			139,045
Short-term borrowings (including $4,833 and $2,700 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	36,519			30,701
Long-term debt (including $29,001 and $26,254 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	225,179			206,178
Other liabilities (including $14,335 and $10,796 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at fair value)	58,043			61,631
Total liabilities	$	1,632,956		$	1,565,934
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares: 770,120 as of June 30, 2017 and as of December 31, 2016, at aggregate liquidation value	$	19,253		$	19,253
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 6 billion), issued shares: 3,099,523,273 and3,099,482,042 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	31			31
Additional paid-in capital	107,798			108,042
Retained earnings	152,178			146,477
Treasury stock, at cost: June 30, 2017—374,967,178 shares and December 31, 2016—327,090,192 shares	(19,342		)	(16,302		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI)	(29,899		)	(32,381		)
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity	$	230,019		$	225,120
Noncontrolling interest	1,088			1,023
Total equity	$	231,107		$	226,143
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,864,063		$	1,792,077

The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.

	June 30,
	2017		December 31,
In millions of dollars	(Unaudited)		2016
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders   do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup
Short-term borrowings	$	10,317	$	10,697
Long-term debt	28,265		23,919
Other liabilities	456		1,275
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest   holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup	$	39,038	$	35,891

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

98

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands	2017			2016
Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value
Balance, beginning of period	$	19,253		$	16,718
Issuance of new preferred stock	—			2,535
Balance, end of period	$	19,253		$	19,253
Common stock and additional paid-in capital
Balance, beginning of period	$	108,073		$	108,319
Employee benefit plans	(239		)	(516		)
Preferred stock issuance expense	—			(37		)
Other	(5		)	(5		)
Balance, end of period	$	107,829		$	107,761
Retained earnings
Balance, beginning of period	$	146,477		$	133,841
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)	(660		)	15
Adjusted balance, beginning of period	$	145,817		$	133,856
Citigroup’s net income	7,962			7,499
Common dividends(2)	(890		)	(296		)
Preferred dividends	(621		)	(532		)
Other(3)	(90		)	—
Balance, end of period	$	152,178		$	140,527
Treasury stock, at cost
Balance, beginning of period	$	(16,302	)	$	(7,677	)
Employee benefit plans(4)	523			773
Treasury stock acquired(5)	(3,563		)	(2,634		)
Balance, end of period	$	(19,342	)	$	(9,538	)
Citigroup’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, beginning of period	$	(32,381	)	$	(29,344	)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)	504			(15		)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period	$	(31,877	)	$	(29,359	)
Citigroup’s total other comprehensive income (loss)	1,978			3,244
Balance, end of period	$	(29,899	)	$	(26,115	)
Total Citigroup common stockholders’ equity	$	210,766		$	212,635
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity	$	230,019		$	231,888
Noncontrolling interests
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,023		$	1,235
Transactions between noncontrolling-interest shareholders and the related consolidated subsidiary	—			(11		)
Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling-interest shareholders	6			(73		)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders	42			31
Dividends paid to noncontrolling-interest shareholders	—			(1		)
Other comprehensive income (loss)attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders	70			(23		)
Other	(53		)	(25		)
Net change in noncontrolling interests	$	65		$	(102	)
Balance, end of period	$	1,088		$	1,133
Total equity	$	231,107		$	233,021

(1) See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

(2) Common dividends declared were $0.16 per share in the first and second quarter of 2017 and $0.05 per share in the first and second quarter of 2016.

(3) Includes the impact of ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4) Includes treasury stock related to (i) certain activity on employee stock option program exercises where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or (ii) under Citi’s employee restricted or deferred stock programs where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.

99

(5) For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, primarily consists of open market purchases under Citi’s Board of Directors-approved common stock repurchase program.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

100

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS	Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	8,004		$	7,530
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	42			31
Citigroup’s net income	$	7,962		$	7,499
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	3			(25		)
Income from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests	$	7,959		$	7,524
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
Net gains on significant disposals(1)	(19		)	(422		)
Depreciation and amortization	1,797			1,776
Provision for loan losses	3,341			3,276
Realized gains from sales of investments	(413		)	(386		)
Net impairment losses on investments, goodwill and intangible assets	60			583
Change in trading account assets	(15,776		)	(21,808		)
Change in trading account liabilities	(2,300		)	18,795
Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables	(5,805		)	(836		)
Change in loans held-for-sale (HFS)	(515		)	1,786
Change in other assets	(3,343		)	(4,345		)
Change in other liabilities	(3,522		)	7,175
Other, net	(2,975		)	7,949
Total adjustments	$	(29,470	)	$	13,543
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	$	(21,511	)	$	21,067
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
Change in deposits with banks	$	(27,691	)	$	(15,796	)
Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	2,748			(9,008		)
Change in loans	(29,952		)	(30,170		)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans	6,256			7,021
Purchases of investments	(96,925		)	(108,359		)
Proceeds from sales of investments	56,728			66,138
Proceeds from maturities of investments	47,785			33,383
Proceeds from significant disposals(1)	2,732			265
Capital expenditures on premises and equipment and capitalized software	(1,647		)	(1,377		)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates,       and repossessed assets	215			390
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations	$	(39,751	)	$	(57,513	)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
Dividends paid	$	(1,504	)	$	(828	)
Issuance of preferred stock	—			2,498
Treasury stock acquired	(3,635		)	(2,634		)
Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes	(401		)	(312		)
Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	12,959			11,505
Issuance of long-term debt	37,679			27,142
Payments and redemptions of long-term debt	(21,317		)	(26,855		)
Change in deposits	29,337			29,965
Change in short-term borrowings	5,818			(2,671		)

101

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS	Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)	Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations	$	58,936		$	37,810
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	$	223		$	(124	)
Change in cash and due from banks	$	(2,103	)	$	1,240
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period	23,043			20,900
Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	20,940		$	22,140
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	1,975		$	2,045
Cash paid during the period for interest	7,329			5,726
Non-cash investing activities
Transfers to loans HFS from loans	3,300			6,000
Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets	58			97

(1)    See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on significant disposals.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

102

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 2017 and for the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected. The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, including the historical audited consolidated financial statements of Citigroup reflecting the certain realignments and reclassifications set forth in Citigroup’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2017 (2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K), and Citigroup’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (First Quarter of 2017 Form 10-Q).

Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.

Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management uses its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates.

As noted above, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited.

Throughout these Notes, “Citigroup,” “Citi” and the “Company” refer to Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements and notes to conform to the current period’s presentation.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. 

The ASU requires entities to amortize premiums on debt securities by the first call date when the securities have fixed and determinable call dates and prices.  The scope of the ASU includes all accounting premiums, such as purchase premiums and cumulative fair value hedge adjustments.  The ASU does not change the accounting for discounts, which

continue to be recognized over the contractual life of a security. 

For calendar-year-end entities, the ASU is effective as of January 1, 2019, but it may be early adopted in any interim or year-end period after issuance.  Adoption of the ASU is on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption.  Citi has early-adopted the ASU in the second quarter of 2017, with an effective date of January 1, 2017.  Adoption of the ASU primarily affects Citi’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios of callable state and municipal securities.  The ASU adoption resulted in a net reduction to total stockholders’ equity of $156 million (after tax), effective as of January 1, 2017.  This amount is composed of a reduction of approximately $660 million to retained earnings for the incremental amortization of purchase premiums and cumulative hedge adjustments generated under fair value hedges of these callable debt securities.  This amount was offset by an increase to AOCI of $504 million related to the cumulative fair value hedge adjustments reclassified to retained earnings.

Financial statements for periods prior to 2017 were not subject to restatement under the provisions of this ASU.  The amount of amortization for the first quarter and the first half of 2017 under the provisions of the ASU is not materially different than the amount that was recorded during the first quarter or would have been recorded for the first half of 2017 if the ASU had not been adopted. For additional information, see Note 12 and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.

This ASU requires entities to present separately in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. It also requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, thus eliminating eligibility for the current available-for-sale category. However, Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock as well as certain exchange seats will continue to be presented at cost.

Citi early adopted only the provisions of this ASU related to presentation of the change in fair value of liabilities for which the fair value option was elected, related

103

to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads in AOCI effective January 1, 2016. Accordingly, as of the first quarter of 2016, these amounts are reflected as a component of AOCI, whereas these amounts were previously recognized in Citigroup’s revenues and net income. The impact of adopting this amendment resulted in a cumulative catch-up reclassification from retained earnings to AOCI of an accumulated after-tax loss of approximately $15 million at January 1, 2016. Financial statements for periods prior to 2016 were not subject to restatement under the provisions of this ASU. For additional information, see Note 17, Note 20and Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company is evaluating the effects that the other provisions of ASU 2016-01, which are effective January 1, 2018, will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Accounting for Financial Instruments—Credit Losses

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses(Topic 326). The ASU introduces a new credit loss model, the Current Expected Credit Losses model (CECL), which requires earlier recognition of credit losses, while also providing additional transparency about credit risk.

The CECL model utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for loans, held-to-maturity securities and other receivables at the time the financial asset is originated or acquired. The expected credit losses are adjusted each period for changes in expected lifetime credit losses. For available-for-sale securities where fair value is less than cost, credit-related impairment, if any, will be recognized in an allowance for credit losses and adjusted each period for changes in expected credit risk. This model replaces the multiple existing impairment models in current GAAP, which generally require that a loss be incurred before it is recognized.

The CECL model represents a significant change from existing GAAP and may result in material changes to the Company’s accounting for financial instruments. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-13 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. The impact of the ASU will depend upon the state of the economy and the nature of Citi’s portfolios at the date of adoption. In the current environment, the overall impact is estimated to be an approximately 10-20% increase in credit reserves. Moreover, there are still some implementation questions that will need to be resolved that could affect the estimated impact. The ASU will be effective for Citi as of January 1, 2020. Early application is permitted for annual periods beginning January 1, 2019.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be

entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The Company will adopt the guidance as of January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective method with a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings. While the guidance will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP, the ASU is not applicable to financial instruments and, therefore, will not impact a majority of the Company’s revenues, including net interest income.

While in scope of the new guidance, the Company does not expect a material change in the timing or measurement of revenues related to deposit fees. Citi’s credit cardholder fees and mortgage servicing fees have been concluded to be out of scope of the standard and therefore will not be impacted by the issuance of this guidance. The Company expects the presentation of expenses associated with underwriting activity to change from the current reporting where underwriting revenue is recorded net of the related expenses to a gross presentation where the expenses are recorded in Other operating expenses. This change to a gross presentation will result in an equivalent increase in underwriting revenue recorded in Commissions and fees and associated underwriting expenses recorded in Other operating expenses; however, this change in presentation will not have an impact on Income from continuing operations. The Company continues to evaluate the effect that the guidance will have on other revenue streams within its scope, including the presentation of certain contract costs, as well as changes in disclosures required by the new guidance. Based on the Company’s current interpretations of the new guidance, the overall impact to net income is expected to be immaterial.

Lease Accounting

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842),which is intended to increase transparency and comparability of accounting for lease transactions. The ASU will require lessees to recognize leases on the balance sheet as lease assets and lease liabilities and will require both quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding key information about leasing arrangements. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged. The guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2019 with an option to early adopt. The Company does not plan to early adopt the ASU. The Company estimates that upon adoption, its Consolidated Balance Sheet will have an approximately $5 billion increase in assets and liabilities. Additionally, the Company estimates an approximately $200 million increase in retained earnings due to the cumulative effect of recognizing previously deferred gains on sale/leaseback transactions.

Income Tax Impact of Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes-Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which will require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective January 1, 2018. The Company continues

104

to evaluate the impact of this standard, which is expected to increase DTAs, with an associated decrease in prepaid taxes of approximately $500 million. 

Subsequent Measurement of Goodwill

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., the current Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the ASU, the impairment test is simply the comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount (the current Step 1), with the impairment charge being the deficit in fair value but not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The simplified one-step impairment test applies to all reporting units (including those with zero or negative carrying amounts).

The ASU is effective for Citi as of January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The impact of the ASU will depend upon the performance of the reporting units and the market conditions impacting the fair value of each reporting unit going forward.

Clarifying the Definition of a Business

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The definition of a business directly and indirectly affects many areas of accounting (e.g., acquisitions, disposals, goodwill and consolidation). The ASU narrows the definition of a business by introducing a quantitative screen as the first step, such that if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If the set is not scoped out from the quantitative screen, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs.

The ASU is effective for Citi as of January 1, 2018. The ASU will be applied prospectively, with early adoption permitted. The impact of the ASU will depend upon the acquisition and disposal activities of Citi. If fewer transactions qualify as a business, there could be less initial recognition of goodwill, but also less goodwill allocated to disposals.

Changes in Accounting for Pension and Postretirement (Benefit) Expense

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which changes the income statement presentation of net benefit expense and requires restating the Company’s financial statements for

each of the earlier periods presented in Citi’s annual and interim financial statements. The change in presentation is effective for annual and interim periods starting January 1, 2018. The ASU requires that only the service cost component of net benefit expense be included in the Compensation and benefits line on the income statement.  The other components of net benefit expense will be required to be presented outside of the Compensation and benefits line and will be presented in Other operating expense.  Since both these income statement line items are part of Operating expenses, total Operating expenses will not change, nor will there be any change in Net income. This change in presentation is not expected to have a material effect on the Compensation and benefits and on Other operating lines in the income statement. The components of the net benefit expense are currently disclosed in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 The new standard also changes the components of net benefit expense that are eligible for capitalization when employee costs are capitalized in connection with various activities, such as internally developed software, construction-in-progress, and loan origination costs. Prospectively from January 1, 2018, only the service cost component of net benefit expense may be capitalized.  Existing capitalized balances are not affected. The Company is currently evaluating the portion of net benefits cost that continues to be eligible for capitalization and the portion that is not eligible.

Other Potential Amendments to Current Accounting Standards

The FASB has issued a proposed ASU that will provide targeted improvements to the accounting guidance for hedging activities.  The exposure draft contains many proposals for improving how the economic results of risk management are reflected in financial reporting. Specifically, among other improvements, the ASU is expected to expand the list of benchmark interest rates and also increase the ability for entities to construct hedges of interest rate risk that hedge only certain cash flows of a hedged item.  If issued in its current form, the ASU is also expected to modify existing guidance related to the timing and income statement line recognition of ineffectiveness and components excluded from hedge relationships and add incremental disclosures regarding hedging activities.

105

2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT DISPOSALS

Discontinued Operations

The following sales are reported as Discontinued operations within Corporate/Other.

Sale of Egg Banking plc Credit Card Business

Citi sold the Egg Banking plc credit card business in 2011. Residual items from the disposal resulted in Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $21 million and $(20) million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $3 million and $(22) million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The income recognized during the current period was related to the release of certain reserves associated with expirations of certain warranties and indemnifications.

Combined Results for Discontinued Operations

The following summarizes financial information for all Discontinued operations for which Citi continues to have minimal residual impact associated with the sold operations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016			2017		2016
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	33	$	(36	)	$	5	$	(39	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	12		(13		)	2		(14		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	21	$	(23	)	$	3	$	(25	)

Cash flows for Discontinued operations were not material for the periods presented.

Significant Disposals

The following transactions during 2017 and 2016 were identified as significant disposals. The major classes of assets and liabilities that are derecognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheet at closing and the income related to each business until the disposal date are presented below.

Novation of the 80% Primerica Coinsurance Agreement

Effective January 1, 2016, Citi completed a novation (an arrangement that extinguishes Citi’s rights and obligations under a contract) of the Primerica 80% coinsurance agreement, which was part of Corporate/Other, to a third-party re-insurer. The novation resulted in revenues of $404 million recorded in Other revenue ($263 million after-tax) during the first quarter of 2016. Furthermore, the novation resulted in derecognition of $1.5 billion of available-for-sale securities and cash, $0.95 billion of deferred acquisition costs and $2.7 billion of insurance liabilities.

Exit of U.S. Mortgage Service Operations

As previously disclosed, Citigroup signed agreements during the first quarter of 2017 to effectively exit its direct U.S. mortgage servicing operations by the end of 2018 to intensify focus on originations. The exit of the mortgage servicing operations included the sale of mortgage servicing rights and execution of a subservicing agreement for the remaining Citi-owned loans and certain other mortgage servicing rights. As part of this transaction, Citi will also transfer certain employees.

This transaction, which was part of Corporate/Other, resulted in a pretax loss of $331 million ($207 million after-tax) recorded in Other revenue during the first quarter of 2017. The loss on sale does not include certain other costs and charges related to the disposed operation recorded primarily in Operating expenses in the first quarter of 2017, resulting in a total pretax loss of $382 million. As part of the completed sale, during the first quarter of 2017, Citi derecognized a total of $1,162 million of servicing-related assets, including $1,046 million of mortgage servicing rights, related to approximately 750,000 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac held loans with outstanding balances of approximately $93 billion. Excluding the loss on sale and the additional charges, income before taxes for the disposed operation was immaterial for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Sale of CitiFinancial Canada Consumer Finance Business

On March 31, 2017, Citi completed the sale of CitiFinancial Canada (CitiFinancial), which was part of Corporate/Other, and included 220 retail branches and approximately 1,400 employees. As part of the sale, Citi derecognized total assets of approximately $1.9 billion, including $1.7 billion consumer loans (net of allowance), and total liabilities of approximately $1.5 billion related to intercompany borrowings, which were settled at closing of the transaction. Separately, during the first quarter of 2017, CitiFinancial settled $0.4 billion of debt issued through loan securitizations. The sale of CitiFinancial generated a pretax gain on sale of $350 million recorded in Other revenue ($178 million after-tax) during the first quarter of 2017.

Income before taxes, excluding the pretax gain on sale, was as follows:

	Three Months Ended   June 30,				Six Months Ended   June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
Income before taxes	$	—	$	41	$	41	$	78

106

Sale of Fixed Income Analytics and Index Businesses

On May 30, 2017, Citi entered into an agreement to sell its fixed income analytics (Yield Book) and index businesses that are part of Markets and Securities Services within Institutional Clients Group (ICG). The closing, which is subject to regulatory clearance and other customary closing conditions, is expected to occur in the second half of 2017 and result in a gain, recognized at the closing of the transaction. As of June 30, 2017, the total assets of the businesses were approximately $100 million, including $72 million of goodwill, while the liabilities were not material. These assets and liabilities were classified as HFS within Other assets and Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, respectively, at June 30, 2017. Income before taxes for these businesses is as follows:

	Three Months Ended   June 30,				Six Months Ended   June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
Income before taxes	$	9	$	17	$	19	$	31

107

3. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Citigroup’s activities are conducted through the Global Consumer Banking (GCB) and ICG business segments. In addition, Corporate/Other includes activities not assigned to a specific business segment, as well as certain North America and international loan portfolios, discontinued operations and other legacy assets.

The prior-period balances reflect reclassifications to conform the presentation for all periods to the current period’s presentation. Effective January 1, 2017, financial data was reclassified to reflect:

• the reporting of the remaining businesses and portfolios of assets of Citi Holdings as part of Corporate/Other which, prior to the first quarter of 2017, was a separately reported business segment;

• the re-attribution of certain treasury-related costs between Corporate/Other, GCB and ICG;

• the re-attribution of regional revenues within ICG;and

• certain other immaterial reclassifications.

Citi’s consolidated results remain unchanged for all periods presented as a result of the changes and reclassifications discussed above.

For additional information regarding Citigroup’s business segments, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table presents certain information regarding the Company’s continuing operations by segment:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Revenues, net of interest expense(1)				Provision (benefits) for income taxes						Income (loss) from continuing operations(2)					Identifiable assets
In millions of dollars, except identifiable assets in billions	2017		2016		2017			2016			2017			2016		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Global Consumer Banking	$	8,035	$	7,674	$	647		$	667		$	1,129		$	1,285	$	419	$	412
Institutional Clients Group	9,213		8,689		1,327			1,229			2,780			2,615		1,353		1,277
Corporate/Other	653		1,185		(179		)	(173		)	(26		)	147		92		103
Total	$	17,901	$	17,548	$	1,795		$	1,723		$	3,883		$	4,047	$	1,864	$	1,792

(1) Includes total revenues, net of interest expense (excluding Corporate/Other), in North America of $8.5 billion and $8.1 billion; in EMEA of $2.8 billion and $2.6 billion; in Latin America of $2.3 billion and $2.3 billion; and in Asia of $3.6 billion and $3.4 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These regional numbers exclude Corporate/Other, which largely operates within the U.S.

(2) Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the GCB results of $1.8 billion and $1.4 billion; in the ICG results of $87 million and $82 million; and in the Corporate/Other results of $(132) million and $(98) million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Revenues, net of interest expense(1)				Provision (benefits) for income taxes						Income (loss) from continuing operations(2)
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017			2016			2017		2016
Global Consumer Banking	$	15,852	$	15,388	$	1,231		$	1,301		$	2,132	$	2,479
Institutional Clients Group	18,339		16,584		2,702			1,993			5,791		4,484
Corporate/Other	1,830		3,131		(275		)	(92		)	78		592
Total	$	36,021	$	35,103	$	3,658		$	3,202		$	8,001	$	7,555

(1) Includes total revenues, net of interest expense, in North America of $17.0 billion and $16.0 billion; in EMEA of $5.6 billion and $4.7 billion; in Latin America of $4.6 billion and $4.4 billion; and in Asia of $7.0 billion and $6.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Regional numbers exclude Corporate/Other, which largely operates within the U.S.

(2) Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the GCB results of $3.6 billion and $2.9 billion; in the ICG results of $(118) million and $472 million; and in Corporate/Other results of $(80) million and $72 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

108

4.  INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE

Interest revenue and Interest expense consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
Interest revenue
Loan interest, including fees	$	10,199	$	9,750	$	20,146	$	19,510
Deposits with banks	375		237		670		456
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	828		664		1,489		1,311
Investments, including dividends	2,058		1,937		4,018		3,792
Trading account assets(1)	1,481		1,532		2,747		2,966
Other interest (2)	260		236		554		488
Total interest revenue	$	15,201	$	14,356	$	29,624	$	28,523
Interest expense
Deposits(1)	$	1,603	$	1,306	$	3,018	$	2,510
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	676		527		1,169		1,029
Trading account liabilities(2)	146		96		293		184
Short-term borrowings	202		109		401		210
Long-term debt	1,409		1,082		2,721		2,127
Total interest expense	$	4,036	$	3,120	$	7,602	$	6,060
Net interest revenue	$	11,165	$	11,236	$	22,022	$	22,463
Provision for loan losses	1,666		1,390		3,341		3,276
Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses	$	9,499	$	9,846	$	18,681	$	19,187

(1) Includes deposit insurance fees and charges of $329 million and $267 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $634 million and $502 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(2) Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of interest revenue from Trading account assets.

109

5.  COMMISSIONS AND FEES

The primary components of Citi’s Commissions and fees revenue are investment banking fees, trading-related fees, fees related to trade and securities services in ICG and credit card and bank card fees. For additional information regarding

certain components of Commissions and fees revenue, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table presents Commissions and fees revenue:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
Investment banking	$	916	$	753	$	1,778	$	1,327
Trading-related	542		544		1,114		1,145
Trade and securities services	422		386		812		792
Credit cards and bank cards	364		344		675		615
Corporate finance(1)	238		241		407		364
Other consumer(2)	169		166		333		324
Checking-related	122		104		242		220
Loan servicing	88		68		174		164
Other	76		119		161		237
Total commissions and fees	$	2,937	$	2,725	$	5,696	$	5,188

(1) Consists primarily of fees earned from structuring and underwriting loan syndications.

(2) Primarily consists of fees for investment fund administration and management, third-party collections, commercial demand deposit accounts and certain credit card services.

6. PRINCIPAL TRANSACTIONS

Citi’s Principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities. For additional information regarding Principal transactions revenue, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table presents Principal transactions revenue:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016			2017		2016
Global Consumer Banking(1)	$	142	$	165		$	291	$	308
Institutional Clients Group	2,079		1,911			4,747		3,487
Corporate/Other (1)	341		(260		)	546		(139		)
Total Citigroup	$	2,562	$	1,816		$	5,584	$	3,656
Interest rate risks(2)	$	1,411	$	1,140		$	3,177	$	1,947
Foreign exchange risks(3)	802		402			1,390		1,015
Equity risks(4)	58		(55		)	246		(5		)
Commodity and other risks(5)	148		121			238		265
Credit products and risks(6)	143		208			533		434
Total	$	2,562	$	1,816		$	5,584	$	3,656

(1) Primarily relates to foreign exchange risks.

(2) Includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt, municipal securities, mortgage securities and other debt instruments. Also includes spot and forward trading of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) currency options, options on fixed income securities, interest rate swaps, currency swaps, swap options, caps and floors, financial futures, OTC options and forward contracts on fixed income securities.

(3) Includes revenues from foreign exchange spot, forward, option and swap contracts, as well as foreign currency translation (FX translation) gains and losses.

(4) Includes revenues from common, preferred and convertible preferred stock, convertible corporate debt, equity-linked notes and exchange-traded and OTC equity options and warrants.

(5) Primarily includes revenues from crude oil, refined oil products, natural gas and other commodities trades.

(6) Includes revenues from structured credit products.

110

7. INCENTIVE PLANS

 For additional information on Citi’s incentive plans, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

8. RETIREMENT BENEFITS

For additional information on Citi’s retirement benefits, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Net (Benefit) Expense

The following table summarizes the components of net (benefit) expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company’s pension and postretirement plans for Significant Plans and All Other Plans:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Pension plans												Postretirement benefit plans
	U.S. plans						Non-U.S. plans						U.S. plans						Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016
Qualified plans
Benefits earned during the period	$	—		$	—		$	38		$	39		$	—		$	—		$	2		$	3
Interest cost on benefit obligation	128			132			74			73			8			5			25			24
Expected return on plan assets	(217		)	(218		)	(76		)	(74		)	(2		)	(3		)	(22		)	(22		)
Amortization of unrecognized
Prior service benefit	—			—			(1		)	(1		)	—			—			(3		)	(3		)
Net actuarial loss (gain)	38			39			15			20			1			(1		)	9			8
Curtailment loss (1)	3			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Settlement loss(1)	—			—			4			3			—			—			—			—
Net qualified plans (benefit) expense	$	(48	)	$	(47	)	$	54		$	60		$	7		$	1		$	11		$	10
Nonqualified plans expense	$	11		$	9		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Total net (benefit) expense	$	(37	)	$	(38	)	$	54		$	60		$	7		$	1		$	11		$	10

(1) Losses due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Pension plans												Postretirement benefit plans
	U.S. plans						Non-U.S. plans						U.S. plans						Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016
Qualified plans
Benefits earned during the period	$	1		$	1		$	74		$	77		$	—		$	—		$	4		$	6
Interest cost on benefit obligation	260			273			145			146			14			13			49			48
Expected return on plan assets	(433		)	(436		)	(146		)	(146		)	(3		)	(5		)	(43		)	(43		)
Amortization of unrecognized
Prior service benefit	—			—			(2		)	(1		)	—			—			(5		)	(6		)
Net actuarial loss (gain)	79			75			31			39			—			(1		)	17			16
Curtailment loss (gain) (1)	3			—			—			(3		)	—			—			—			—
Settlement loss(1)	—			—			4			4			—			—			—			—
Net qualified plans (benefit) expense	$	(90	)	$	(87	)	$	106		$	116		$	11		$	7		$	22		$	21
Nonqualified plans expense	$	21		$	19		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Total net (benefit) expense	$	(69	)	$	(68	)	$	106		$	116		$	11		$	7		$	22		$	21

(1) (Gains) losses due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.

111

Funded Status and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)

The following tables summarize the funded status and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the Company’s

Significant Plans.

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Pension plans						Postretirement benefit plans
In millions of dollars	U.S. plans			Non-U.S. plans			U.S. plans			Non-U.S. plans
Change in projected benefit obligation
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	14,000		$	6,522		$	686		$	1,141
Plans measured annually	(28		)	(1,784		)	—			(303		)
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year—Significant Plans	$	13,972		$	4,738		$	686		$	838
First quarter activity	25			802			(7		)	134
Projected benefit obligation at March 31, 2017—Significant Plans	$	13,997		$	5,540		$	679		$	972
Benefits earned during the period	—			22			—			2
Interest cost on benefit obligation	135			62			7			22
Actuarial gain (loss)	214			(58		)	71			22
Benefits paid, net of participants’ contributions	(191		)	(79		)	(15		)	(14		)
Curtailment loss(1)	3			—			—			—
Foreign exchange impact and other	—			62			—			40
Projected benefit obligation at June 30, 2017—Significant Plans	$	14,158		$	5,549		$	742		$	1,044

(1) Loss due to curtailment relates to repositioning activities.

112

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Pension plans						Postretirement benefit plans
In millions of dollars	U.S. plans			Non-U.S. plans			U.S. plans			Non-U.S. plans
Change in plan assets
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year	$	12,363		$	6,149		$	129		$	1,015
Plans measured annually	—			(1,167		)	—			(11		)
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year—Significant Plans	$	12,363		$	4,982		$	129		$	1,004
First quarter activity	159			903			$	—		124
Plan assets at fair value at March 31, 2017—Significant Plans	$	12,522		$	5,885		$	129		$	1,128
Actual return on plan assets	364			(45		)	4			23
Company contributions, net of reimbursements	13			13			8			—
Plan participants’ contributions	—			1			—			—
Benefits paid, net of government subsidy	(191		)	(80		)	(15		)	(14		)
Foreign exchange impact and other	—			72			—			46
Plan assets at fair value at June 30, 2017—Significant Plans	$	12,708		$	5,846		$	126		$	1,183
Funded status of the Significant Plans
Qualified plans(1)	$	(720	)	$	297		$	(616	)	$	139
Nonqualified plans	(730		)	—			—			—
Funded status of the plans at June 30, 2017—Significant Plans	$	(1,450	)	$	297		$	(616	)	$	139
Net amount recognized
Benefit asset	$	—		$	758		$	—		$	139
Benefit liability	(1,450		)	(461		)	(616		)	—
Net amount recognized on the balance sheet—Significant Plans	$	(1,450	)	$	297		$	(616	)	$	139
Amounts recognized in AOCI
Prior service benefit	$	—		$	32		$	—		$	94
Net actuarial gain (loss)	(6,821		)	(984		)	39			(403		)
Net amount recognized in equity (pretax)—Significant Plans	$	(6,821	)	$	(952	)	$	39		$	(309	)
Accumulated benefit obligation at June 30, 2017—Significant Plans	$	14,151		$	5,280		$	742		$	1,044

(1) The U.S. qualified pension plan is fully funded under specified Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), funding rules as of January 1, 2017 and no minimum required funding is expected for 2017.

The following table shows the change in AOCI related to the Company’s pension, postretirement and post employment plans:

In millions of dollars	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Beginning of period balance, net of tax(1)(2)	$	(5,176	)	$	(5,164	)
Actuarial assumptions changes and plan experience	(260		)	(508		)
Net asset gain due to difference between actual and expected returns	43			296
Net amortization	56			112
Prior service cost	—			(5		)
Curtailment/settlement gain(3)	7			7
Foreign exchange impact and other	(64		)	(122		)
Change in deferred taxes, net	83			73
Change, net of tax	$	(135	)	$	(147	)
End of period balance, net of tax(1)(2)	$	(5,311	)	$	(5,311	)

(1) See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of net AOCI balance.

(2) Includes net-of-tax amounts for certain profit sharing plans outside the U.S.

(3) Gains due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.

113

Plan Assumptions

The discount rates utilized during the period in determining the pension and postretirement net (benefit) expense for the Significant Plans are as follows:

Net benefit (expense) assumed discount rates during the period	Three months ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017
U.S. plans
Qualified pension	4.05%	4.10%
Nonqualified pension	3.95	4.00
Postretirement	3.85	3.90
Non-U.S. plans
Pension	0.55-10.45	0.60-11.00
Weighted average	4.83	5.08
Postretirement	9.25	9.65

The discount rates utilized at period-end in determining the pension and postretirement benefit obligations for the Significant Plans are as follows:

Plan obligations assumed discount rates at period ended	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
U.S. plans
Qualified pension	3.80%	4.05%	4.10%
Nonqualified pension	3.75	3.95	4.00
Postretirement	3.60	3.85	3.90
Non-U.S. plans
Pension	0.65-10.90	0.55-10.45	0.60-11.00
Weighted average	4.87	4.83	5.08
Postretirement	9.05	9.25	9.65

Sensitivities of Certain Key Assumptions

The following table summarizes the estimated effect on the Company’s Significant Plans quarterly expense of a one-percentage-point change in the discount rate:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	One-percentage-point increase			One-percentage-point decrease
Pension
U.S. plans	$	7		$	(10	)
Non-U.S. plans	(4		)	7
Postretirement
U.S. plans	—			(1		)
Non-U.S. plans	(2		)	2

Contributions

For the U.S. pension plans, there were no required minimum cash contributions during the first six months of 2017.

The following table summarizes the Company’s actual contributions for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, as well as estimated expected Company contributions for the remainder of 2017 and the actual contributions made in the third and fourth quarters of 2016.

	Pension plans								Postretirement plans
	U.S. plans(1)				Non-U.S. plans				U.S. plans				Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016
Company contributions(2) for the six months ended June 30	$	26	$	28	$	70	$	58	$	19	$	6	$	4	$	3
Company contributions made or expected to be made during the remainder of the year	29		528		70		68		—		—		4		6

(1) The U.S. pension plans include benefits paid directly by the Company for the nonqualified pension plans.

(2) Company contributions are composed of cash contributions made to the plans and benefits paid directly by the Company.

114

Defined Contribution Plans

The following table summarizes the Company’s contributions for the defined contribution plans:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended   June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
U.S. plans	$	100	$	97	$	198	$	193
Non-U.S. plans	66		72		135		140

Post Employment Plans

The following table summarizes the components of net expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company’s U.S. post employment plans:

	Three Months Ended   June 30,						Six Months Ended   June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Service-related expense	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Interest cost on benefit obligation	1			1			1			2
Amortization of unrecognized
Prior service benefit	(7		)	(8		)	(15		)	(16		)
Net actuarial loss	—			1			1			2
Total service-related benefit	$	(6	)	$	(6	)	$	(13	)	$	(12	)
Non-service-related expense	$	4		$	5		$	12		$	13
Total net (benefit) expense	$	(2	)	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	1

115

9.     EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table reconciles the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions, except per-share amounts	2017		2016			2017		2016
Income from continuing operations before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	3,883	$	4,047		$	8,001	$	7,555
Less: Noncontrolling interests from continuing operations	32		26			42		31
Net income from continuing operations (for EPS purposes)	$	3,851	$	4,021		$	7,959	$	7,524
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	21		(23		)	3		(25		)
Citigroup's net income	$	3,872	$	3,998		$	7,962	$	7,499
Less: Preferred dividends(1)	320		322			621		532
Net income available to common shareholders	$	3,552	$	3,676		$	7,341	$	6,967
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to employee restricted and deferred shares with nonforfeitable rights to dividends, applicable to basic EPS	48		53			103		93
Net income allocated to common shareholders for basic EPS	$	3,504	$	3,623		$	7,238	$	6,874
Net income allocated to common shareholders for diluted EPS	3,504		3,623			$	7,238	$	6,874
Weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS	2,739.1		2,915.8			2,752.2		2,929.4
Effect of dilutive securities(2)
Options(3)	0.1		0.1			0.1		0.1
Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS(4)	2,739.2		2,915.9			2,752.3		2,929.5
Basic earnings per share(5)
Income from continuing operations	$	1.27	$	1.25		$	2.63	$	2.36
Discontinued operations	0.01		(0.01		)	—		(0.01		)
Net income	$	1.28	$	1.24		$	2.63	$	2.35
Diluted earnings per share(5)
Income from continuing operations	$	1.27	$	1.25		$	2.63	$	2.36
Discontinued operations	0.01		(0.01		)	—		(0.01		)
Net income	$	1.28	$	1.24		$	2.63	$	2.35

(1) As of June 30, 2017, Citi estimates it will distribute preferred dividends of approximately $592 million during the remainder of 2017, in each case assuming such dividends are declared by the Citi Board of Directors.

(2) Warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the loss-sharing agreement (all of which were subsequently sold to the public in January 2011), with exercise prices of $178.50 and $105.61 per share for approximately 21.0 million and 25.5 million shares of Citigroup common stock, respectively. Both warrants were not included in the computation of earnings per share in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 because they were anti-dilutive.

(3) During the second quarters of 2017 and 2016, weighted-average options to purchase 0.8 million and 5.3 million shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding, but not included in the computation of earnings per share because the weighted-average exercise prices of $204.80 and $75.43 per share, respectively, were anti-dilutive.

(4) Due to rounding, common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS and the effect of dilutive securities may not sum to common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS.

(5) Due to rounding, earnings per share on continuing operations and discontinued operations may not sum to earnings per share on net income.

116

10. FEDERAL FUNDS, SECURITIES BORROWED, LOANED AND SUBJECT TO REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

For additional information on the Company’s resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending agreements, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell, at their respective carrying values, consisted of the following:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Federal funds sold	$	—	$	—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	128,546		131,473
Deposits paid for securities borrowed	105,519		105,340
Total(1)	$	234,065	$	236,813

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, at their respective carrying values, consisted of the following:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Federal funds purchased	$	303	$	178
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	141,304		125,685
Deposits received for securities loaned	13,173		15,958
Total(1)	$	154,780	$	141,821

(1) The above tables do not include securities-for-securities lending transactions of $13.4 billion and $9.3 billion at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, where the Company acts as lender and receives securities that can be sold or pledged as collateral. In these transactions, the Company recognizes the securities received at fair value within Other assets and the obligation to return those securities as a liability within Brokerage payables.

It is the Company’s policy to take possession of the underlying collateral, monitor its market value relative to the amounts due under the agreements and, when necessary, require prompt transfer of additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection. For resale and repurchase agreements, when necessary, the Company posts additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection.

A substantial portion of the resale and repurchase agreements is recorded at fair value, as described in Notes 20 and 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The remaining portion is carried at the amount of cash initially advanced or received, plus accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements.

A substantial portion of securities borrowing and lending agreements is recorded at the amount of cash advanced or received. The remaining portion is recorded at fair value as the Company elected the fair value option for certain securities borrowed and loaned portfolios, as described in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. With respect to securities loaned, the Company receives cash collateral in an amount generally in excess of the market value of the securities loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and securities loaned on a daily basis and obtains or posts additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection.

The following tables present the gross and net resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending

agreements and the related offsetting amount permitted under ASC-210-20-45. The tables also include amounts related to financial instruments that are not permitted to be offset under ASC-210-20-45, but would be eligible for offsetting to the extent that an event of default occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the offsetting rights has been obtained. Remaining exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the Company may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.

	As of June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Gross amounts of recognized assets		Gross amounts offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1)		Net amounts of assets included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(2)		Amounts not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but eligible for offsetting upon counterparty default(3)		Net amounts(4)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	$	186,108	$	57,562	$	128,546	$	106,230	$	22,316
Deposits paid for securities borrowed	105,519		—		105,519		22,633		82,886
Total	$	291,627	$	57,562	$	234,065	$	128,863	$	105,202

117

In millions of dollars	Gross amounts of recognized liabilities		Gross amounts offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1)		Net amounts of liabilities included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(2)		Amounts not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but eligible for offsetting upon counterparty default(3)		Net amounts(4)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	198,866	$	57,562	$	141,304	$	64,748	$	76,556
Deposits received for securities loaned	13,173		—		13,173		2,936		10,237
Total	$	212,039	$	57,562	$	154,477	$	67,684	$	86,793

	As of December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Gross amounts of recognized assets		Gross amounts offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1)		Net amounts of assets included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(2)		Amounts not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but eligible for offsetting upon counterparty default(3)		Net amounts(4)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	$	176,284	$	44,811	$	131,473	$	102,874	$	28,599
Deposits paid for securities borrowed	105,340		—		105,340		16,200		89,140
Total	$	281,624	$	44,811	$	236,813	$	119,074	$	117,739

In millions of dollars	Gross amounts of recognized liabilities		Gross amounts offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(1)		Net amounts of liabilities included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(2)		Amounts not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet but eligible for offsetting upon counterparty default(3)		Net amounts(4)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	170,496	$	44,811	$	125,685	$	63,517	$	62,168
Deposits received for securities loaned	15,958		—		15,958		3,529		12,429
Total	$	186,454	$	44,811	$	141,643	$	67,046	$	74,597

(1) Includes financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting agreements that are permitted to be offset under ASC 210-20-45.

(2) The total of this column for each period excludes Federal funds sold/purchased. See tables above.

(3) Includes financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting agreements that are not permitted to be offset under ASC 210-20-45, but would be eligible for offsetting to the extent that an event of default has occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the offsetting right has been obtained.

(4) Remaining exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the Company may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.

The following tables present the gross amount of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, by remaining contractual maturity:

	As of June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Open and overnight		Up to 30 days		31–90 days		Greater than 90 days		Total
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	91,133	$	56,163	$	24,255	$	27,315	$	198,866
Deposits received for securities loaned	9,948		644		1,709		872		13,173
Total	$	101,081	$	56,807	$	25,964	$	28,187	$	212,039

	As of December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Open and overnight		Up to 30 days		31–90 days		Greater than 90 days		Total
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	79,740	$	50,399	$	19,396	$	20,961	$	170,496
Deposits received for securities loaned	10,813		2,169		2,044		932		15,958
Total	$	90,553	$	52,568	$	21,440	$	21,893	$	186,454

118

The following tables present the gross amount of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, by class of underlying collateral:

	As of June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Repurchase agreements		Securities lending agreements		Total
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	66,171	$	—	$	66,171
State and municipal securities	1,054		—		1,054
Foreign government securities	77,916		611		78,527
Corporate bonds	18,799		586		19,385
Equity securities	11,419		11,330		22,749
Mortgage-backed securities	14,980		—		14,980
Asset-backed securities	5,321		—		5,321
Other	3,206		646		3,852
Total	$	198,866	$	13,173	$	212,039

	As of December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Repurchase agreements		Securities lending agreements		Total
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	66,263	$	—	$	66,263
State and municipal securities	334		—		334
Foreign government securities	52,988		1,390		54,378
Corporate bonds	17,164		630		17,794
Equity securities	12,206		13,913		26,119
Mortgage-backed securities	11,421		—		11,421
Asset-backed securities	5,428		—		5,428
Other	4,692		25		4,717
Total	$	170,496	$	15,958	$	186,454

119

11. BROKERAGE RECEIVABLES AND BROKERAGE

PAYABLES

The Company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers, dealers and customers, which arise in the ordinary course of business.

For additional information on these receivables and payables, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Brokerage receivables and Brokerage payables consisted of the following:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Receivables from customers	$	12,851	$	10,374
Receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations	27,636		18,513
Total brokerage receivables(1)	$	40,487	$	28,887
Payables to customers	$	38,588	$	37,237
Payables to brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations	24,359		19,915
Total brokerage payables(1)	$	62,947	$	57,152

(1) Includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by Citi broker-dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the AICPA Accounting Guide for Brokers and Dealers in Securities as codified in ASC 940-320.

120

12.   INVESTMENTS

For additional information regarding Citi’s investment portfolios, including evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI), see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

The following table presents Citi’s investments by category:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Securities available-for-sale (AFS)	$	293,629	$	299,424
Debt securities held-to-maturity (HTM)(1)	50,175		45,667
Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2)	1,384		1,774
Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3)	6,522		6,439
Total investments	$	351,710	$	353,304

(1) Carried at adjusted amortized cost basis, net of any credit-related impairment.

(2) Unrealized gains and losses for non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value are recognized in earnings.

(3) Primarily consists of shares issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Banks and various clearing houses of which Citigroup is a member.

The following table presents interest and dividend income on investments:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
Taxable interest	$	1,859	$	1,759	$	3,623	$	3,436
Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax	141		133		283		276
Dividend income	58		45		112		80
Total interest and dividend income	$	2,058	$	1,937	$	4,018	$	3,792

The following table presents realized gains and losses on the sales of investments, which excludes OTTI losses:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Gross realized investment gains	$	258		$	244		$	546		$	623
Gross realized investment losses	(37		)	(44		)	(133		)	(237		)
Net realized gains on sale of investments	$	221		$	200		$	413		$	386

121

Securities Available-for-Sale

The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities were as follows:

	June 30, 2017								December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
Securities AFS
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	43,351	$	246	$	399	$	43,198	$	38,663	$	248	$	506	$	38,405
Prime	1		—		—		1		2		—		—		2
Alt-A	—		—		—		—		43		7		—		50
Non-U.S. residential	3,154		14		5		3,163		3,852		13		7		3,858
Commercial	357		1		1		357		357		2		1		358
Total mortgage-backed securities	$	46,863	$	261	$	405	$	46,719	$	42,917	$	270	$	514	$	42,673
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
U.S. Treasury	$	102,340	$	414	$	359	$	102,395	$	113,606	$	629	$	452	$	113,783
Agency obligations	10,240		24		61		10,203		9,952		21		85		9,888
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	112,580	$	438	$	420	$	112,598	$	123,558	$	650	$	537	$	123,671
State and municipal(2)	$	9,700	$	142	$	303	$	9,539	$	10,797	$	80	$	757	$	10,120
Foreign government	101,669		514		401		101,782		98,112		590		554		98,148
Corporate	16,111		93		101		16,103		17,195		105		176		17,124
Asset-backed securities(1)	6,020		10		6		6,024		6,810		6		22		6,794
Other debt securities	431		—		—		431		503		—		—		503
Total debt securities AFS	$	293,374	$	1,458	$	1,636	$	293,196	$	299,892	$	1,701	$	2,560	$	299,033
Marketable equity securities AFS	$	414	$	25	$	6	$	433	$	377	$	20	$	6	$	391
Total securities AFS	$	293,788	$	1,483	$	1,642	$	293,629	$	300,269	$	1,721	$	2,566	$	299,424

(1) The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2) In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.  Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce retained earnings, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of purchase premiums and cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities.  For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

122

The following shows the fair value of AFS securities that have been in an unrealized loss position:

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
In millions of dollars	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
June 30, 2017
Securities AFS
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	26,236	$	332	$	2,253	$	67	$	28,489	$	399
Non-U.S. residential	1,243		4		36		1		1,279		5
Commercial	84		1		37		—		121		1
Total mortgage-backed securities	$	27,563	$	337	$	2,326	$	68	$	29,889	$	405
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
U.S. Treasury	$	37,721	$	250	$	4,592	$	109	$	42,313	$	359
Agency obligations	6,345		60		106		1		6,451		61
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	44,066	$	310	$	4,698	$	110	$	48,764	$	420
State and municipal	$	506	$	17	$	1,735	$	286	$	2,241	$	303
Foreign government	37,764		172		11,189		229		48,953		401
Corporate	5,965		87		553		14		6,518		101
Asset-backed securities	1,045		1		938		5		1,983		6
Other debt securities	29		—		—		—		29		—
Marketable equity securities AFS	16		2		54		4		70		6
Total securities AFS	$	116,954	$	926	$	21,493	$	716	$	138,447	$	1,642
December 31, 2016
Securities AFS
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	23,534	$	436	$	2,236	$	70	$	25,770	$	506
Prime	1		—		—		—		1		—
Non-U.S. residential	486		—		1,276		7		1,762		7
Commercial	75		1		58		—		133		1
Total mortgage-backed securities	$	24,096	$	437	$	3,570	$	77	$	27,666	$	514
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
U.S. Treasury	$	44,342	$	445	$	1,335	$	7	$	45,677	$	452
Agency obligations	6,552		83		250		2		6,802		85
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	50,894	$	528	$	1,585	$	9	$	52,479	$	537
State and municipal	$	1,616	$	55	$	3,116	$	702	$	4,732	$	757
Foreign government	38,226		243		8,973		311		47,199		554
Corporate	7,011		129		1,877		47		8,888		176
Asset-backed securities	411		—		3,213		22		3,624		22
Other debt securities	5		—		—		—		5		—
Marketable equity securities AFS	19		2		24		4		43		6
Total securities AFS	$	122,278	$	1,394	$	22,358	$	1,172	$	144,636	$	2,566

123

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of AFS debt securities by contractual maturity dates:

	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Amortized cost		Fair value		Amortized cost		Fair value
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
Due within 1 year	$	96	$	96	$	132	$	132
After 1 but within 5 years	812		814		736		738
After 5 but within 10 years	1,733		1,730		2,279		2,265
After 10 years(2)	44,222		44,079		39,770		39,538
Total	$	46,863	$	46,719	$	42,917	$	42,673
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
Due within 1 year	$	3,183	$	3,165	$	4,945	$	4,945
After 1 but within 5 years	103,151		103,156		101,369		101,323
After 5 but within 10 years	6,211		6,240		17,153		17,314
After 10 years(2)	35		37		91		89
Total	$	112,580	$	112,598	$	123,558	$	123,671
State and municipal
Due within 1 year	$	2,217	$	2,217	$	2,093	$	2,092
After 1 but within 5 years	2,393		2,396		2,668		2,662
After 5 but within 10 years	464		478		335		334
After 10 years(2)	4,626		4,448		5,701		5,032
Total	$	9,700	$	9,539	$	10,797	$	10,120
Foreign government
Due within 1 year	$	31,792	$	31,800	$	32,540	$	32,547
After 1 but within 5 years	54,028		53,507		51,008		50,881
After 5 but within 10 years	13,457		13,944		12,388		12,440
After 10 years(2)	2,392		2,531		2,176		2,280
Total	$	101,669	$	101,782	$	98,112	$	98,148
All other(3)
Due within 1 year	$	3,794	$	3,688	$	2,629	$	2,628
After 1 but within 5 years	10,380		10,396		12,339		12,334
After 5 but within 10 years	5,760		5,865		6,566		6,528
After 10 years(2)	2,628		2,609		2,974		2,931
Total	$	22,562	$	22,558	$	24,508	$	24,421
Total debt securities AFS	$	293,374	$	293,196	$	299,892	$	299,033

(1) Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government-sponsored agencies.

(2) Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

(3) Includes corporate, asset-backed and other debt securities.

124

Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

The carrying value and fair value of debt securities HTM were as follows:

In millions of dollars	Amortized cost basis(1)		Net unrealized gains (losses) recognized in AOCI			Carrying value(2)		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized (losses)			Fair value
June 30, 2017
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities(3)
U.S. government agency guaranteed	$	24,044	$	25		$	24,069	$	77	$	(113	)	$	24,033
Prime	15		—			15		3		—			18
Alt-A	279		(18		)	261		94		(1		)	354
Non-U.S. residential	1,940		(47		)	1,893		64		—			1,957
Commercial	104		—			104		—		—			104
Total mortgage-backed securities	$	26,382	$	(40	)	$	26,342	$	238	$	(114	)	$	26,466
State and municipal(4)	$	8,830	$	(31	)	$	8,799	$	310	$	(132	)	$	8,977
Foreign government	588		—			588		—		(16		)	572
Asset-backed securities(3)	14,451		(5		)	14,446		67		(5		)	14,508
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	50,251	$	(76	)	$	50,175	$	615	$	(267	)	$	50,523
December 31, 2016
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities(3)
U.S. government agency guaranteed	$	22,462	$	33		$	22,495	$	47	$	(186	)	$	22,356
Prime	31		(7		)	24		10		(1		)	33
Alt-A	314		(27		)	287		69		(1		)	355
Non-U.S. residential	1,871		(47		)	1,824		49		—			1,873
Commercial	14		—			14		—		—			14
Total mortgage-backed securities	$	24,692	$	(48	)	$	24,644	$	175	$	(188	)	$	24,631
State and municipal	$	9,025	$	(442	)	$	8,583	$	129	$	(238	)	$	8,474
Foreign government	1,339		—			1,339		—		(26		)	1,313
Asset-backed securities(3)	11,107		(6		)	11,101		41		(5		)	11,137
Total debt securities held-to-maturity(5)	$	46,163	$	(496	)	$	45,667	$	345	$	(457	)	$	45,555

(1) For securities transferred to HTM from Trading account assets, amortized cost basis is defined as the fair value of the securities at the date of transfer plus any accretion income and less any impairments recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, adjusted for the cumulative accretion or amortization of any purchase discount or premium, plus or minus any cumulative fair value hedge adjustments, net of accretion or amortization, and less any other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings.

(2) HTM securities are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at amortized cost basis, plus or minus any unamortized unrealized gains and losses and fair value hedge adjustments recognized in AOCI prior to reclassifying the securities from AFS to HTM. Changes in the values of these securities are not reported in the financial statements, except for the amortization of any difference between the carrying value at the transfer date and par value of the securities, and the recognition of any non-credit fair value adjustments in AOCI in connection with the recognition of any credit impairment in earnings related to securities the Company continues to intend to hold until maturity.

(3) The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4) In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.  Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce retained earnings, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of purchase premiums and cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities.  For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(5) During the fourth quarter of 2016, securities with a total fair value of approximately $5.8 billion were transferred from AFS to HTM, composed of $5 billion of U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities and $830 million of municipal securities. The transfer reflects the Company’s intent to hold these securities to maturity or to issuer call, in part, in order to reduce the impact of price volatility on AOCI and certain capital measures under Basel III. While these securities were transferred to HTM at fair value as of the transfer date, no subsequent changes in value may be recorded, other than in connection with the recognition of any subsequent other-than-temporary impairment and the amortization of differences between the carrying values at the transfer date and the par values of each security as an adjustment of yield over the remaining contractual life of each security. Any net unrealized holding losses within AOCI related to the respective securities at the date of transfer, inclusive of any cumulative fair value hedge adjustments, will be amortized over the remaining contractual life of each security as an adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the amortization of any premium or discount.

125

The table below shows the fair value of debt securities HTM that have been in an unrecognized loss position:

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
In millions of dollars	Fair value		Gross unrecognized losses		Fair value		Gross unrecognized losses		Fair value		Gross unrecognized losses
June 30, 2017
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities	$	35	$	1	$	11,533	$	113	$	11,568	$	114
State and municipal	629		43		735		89		1,364		132
Foreign government	572		16		—		—		572		16
Asset-backed securities	54		1		2,810		4		2,864		5
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	1,290	$	61	$	15,078	$	206	$	16,368	$	267
December 31, 2016
Debt securities held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities	$	17	$	—	$	17,176	$	188	$	17,193	$	188
State and municipal	2,200		58		1,210		180		3,410		238
Foreign government	1,313		26		—		—		1,313		26
Asset-backed securities	2		—		2,503		5		2,505		5
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	3,532	$	84	$	20,889	$	373	$	24,421	$	457

Note: Excluded from the gross unrecognized losses presented in the table above are $(76) million and $(496) million of net unrealized losses recorded in AOCI as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, primarily related to the difference between the amortized cost and carrying value of HTM securities that were reclassified from AFS. Substantially all of these net unrecognized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or longer at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

126

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of HTM debt securities by contractual maturity dates:

	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value
Mortgage-backed securities
Due within 1 year	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
After 1 but within 5 years	735		743		760		766
After 5 but within 10 years	51		52		54		55
After 10 years(1)	25,556		25,671		23,830		23,810
Total	$	26,342	$	26,466	$	24,644	$	24,631
State and municipal
Due within 1 year	$	463	$	472	$	406	$	406
After 1 but within 5 years	145		152		112		110
After 5 but within 10 years	372		385		363		367
After 10 years(1)	7,819		7,968		7,702		7,591
Total	$	8,799	$	8,977	$	8,583	$	8,474
Foreign government
Due within 1 year	$	138	$	138	$	824	$	818
After 1 but within 5 years	450		434		515		495
After 5 but within 10 years	—		—		—		—
After 10 years(1)	—		—		—		—
Total	$	588	$	572	$	1,339	$	1,313
All other(2)
Due within 1 year	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
After 1 but within 5 years	—		—		—		—
After 5 but within 10 years	468		469		513		514
After 10 years(1)	13,978		14,039		10,588		10,623
Total	$	14,446	$	14,508	$	11,101	$	11,137
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	50,175	$	50,523	$	45,667	$	45,555

(1) Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

(2) Includes corporate and asset-backed securities.

127

Evaluating Investments for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

Overview

The Company conducts periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other-than-temporary.

An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities. Losses related to HTM securities generally are not recorded, as these investments are carried at adjusted amortized cost basis. However, for HTM securities with credit-related impairment, the credit loss is recognized in earnings as OTTI and any difference between the cost basis adjusted for the OTTI and fair value is recognized in AOCI and amortized as an adjustment of yield over the remaining contractual life of the security. For securities transferred to HTM from Trading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value of the securities at the date of transfer, plus any accretion income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, adjusted for the cumulative accretion or amortization of any purchase discount or premium, plus or minus any cumulative fair value hedge adjustments, net of accretion or amortization, and less any impairment recognized in earnings.

Regardless of the classification of the securities as AFS or HTM, the Company assesses each position with an unrealized loss for OTTI. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:

• the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been below cost;

• the severity of the impairment;

• the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;

• activity in the market of the issuer that may indicate adverse credit conditions; and

• the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.

The Company’s review for impairment generally entails:

• identification and evaluation of impaired investments;

• analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period;

• consideration of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment; and

• documentation of the results of these analyses, as required under business policies.

Debt Securities

The entire difference between amortized cost basis and fair value is recognized in earnings as OTTI for impaired debt securities that the Company has an intent to sell or for which the Company believes it will more-likely-than-not be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. However, for those securities that the Company does not intend to sell and is not likely to be required to sell, only the credit-related impairment is recognized in earnings and any non-credit-related impairment is recorded in AOCI.

For debt securities, credit impairment exists where management does not expect to receive contractual principal and interest cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a security.

Equity Securities

For equity securities, management considers the various factors described above, including its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery to cost or whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its cost basis. Where management lacks that intent or ability, the security’s decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and is recorded in earnings. AFS equity securities deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and cost recognized in earnings.

Management assesses equity method investments that have fair values that are less than their respective carrying values for OTTI. Fair value is measured as price multiplied by quantity if the investee has publicly listed securities. If the investee is not publicly listed, other methods are used (see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

For impaired equity method investments that Citi plans to sell prior to recovery of value or would likely be required to sell, with no expectation that the fair value will recover prior to the expected sale date, the full impairment is recognized in earnings as OTTI regardless of severity and duration. The measurement of the OTTI does not include partial projected recoveries subsequent to the balance sheet date.

For impaired equity method investments that management does not plan to sell and is not likely to be required to sell prior to recovery of value, the evaluation of whether an impairment is other-than-temporary is based on (i) whether and when an equity method investment will recover in value and (ii) whether the investor has the intent and ability to hold that investment for a period of time sufficient to recover the value. The determination of whether the impairment is considered other-than-temporary considers the following indicators, regardless of the time and extent of impairment:

• the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events that may influence the operations of the issuer;

• the intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value; and

• the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the carrying value.

128

The sections below describe the Company’s process for identifying credit-related impairments for security types that have the most significant unrealized losses as of June 30, 2017.

Mortgage-Backed Securities

For U.S. mortgage-backed securities (and in particular for Alt-A and other mortgage-backed securities that have significant unrealized losses as a percentage of amortized cost), credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the principal and interest cash flows on the underlying mortgages using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model distributes the estimated cash flows to the various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then estimates the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, recovery rates (on foreclosed properties) and loss severity rates (on non-agency mortgage-backed securities).

Management develops specific assumptions using market data, internal estimates and estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. Default rates are projected by considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming the default of (i) 10% of current loans, (ii) 25% of 30–59 day delinquent loans, (iii) 70% of 60–90 day delinquent loans and (iv) 100% of 91+ day delinquent loans. These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total lifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions contemplate the actual collateral

attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating actions and current market prices.

Cash flow projections are developed using different stress test scenarios. Management evaluates the results of those stress tests (including the severity of any cash shortfall indicated and the likelihood of the stress scenarios actually occurring based on the underlying pool’s characteristics and performance) to assess whether management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. If cash flow projections indicate that the Company does not expect to recover its amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes the estimated credit loss in earnings.

State and Municipal Securities

The process for identifying credit impairments in Citigroup’s AFS and HTM state and municipal bonds is primarily based on a credit analysis that incorporates third-party credit ratings.  Citigroup monitors the bond issuers and any insurers providing default protection in the form of financial guarantee insurance.  The average external credit rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-.  In the event of an external rating downgrade or other indicator of credit impairment (i.e., based on instrument-specific estimates of cash flows or probability of issuer default), the subject bond is specifically reviewed for adverse changes in the amount or timing of expected contractual principal and interest payments.

For state and municipal bonds with unrealized losses that Citigroup plans to sell, or would be more-likely-than-not required to sell, the full impairment is recognized in earnings.

Recognition and Measurement of OTTI

The following tables present total OTTI recognized in earnings:

OTTI on Investments and Other assets	Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017								Six Months Ended     June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	AFS(1)		HTM		Other assets		Total		AFS(1)(2)		HTM		Other Assets		Total
Impairment losses related to securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:
Total OTTI losses recognized during the period	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Less: portion of impairment loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell, would be more likely than not required to sell or will be subject to an issuer call deemed probable of exercise	20		—		—		20		31		1		—		32
Total impairment losses recognized in earnings	$	20	$	—	$	—	$	20	$	31	$	1	$	—	$	32

(1) Includes OTTI on non-marketable equity securities.

129

OTTI on Investments and Other assets	Three months ended    June 30, 2016								Six Months Ended    June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	AFS(1)		HTM		Other assets		Total		AFS(1)(2)		HTM		Other assets(3)		Total
Impairment losses related to securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:
Total OTTI losses recognized during the period	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	3	$	3	$	1	$	—	$	4
Less: portion of impairment loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	3	$	3	$	1	$	—	$	4
Impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell, would be more likely than not required to sell or will be subject to an issuer call deemed probable of exercise and FX losses	28		17		70		115		223		24		332		579
Total impairment losses recognized in earnings	$	30	$	18	$	70	$	118	$	226	$	25	$	332	$	583

(1) Includes OTTI on non-marketable equity securities.

(2) Includes a $160 million impairment related to AFS securities affected by changes in the Venezuela exchange rate during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

(3) The impairment charge is related to the carrying value of an equity investment.

The following are three-month rollforwards of the credit-related impairments recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held that the Company does not intend to sell nor likely will be required to sell:

	Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars	Mar. 31, 2017 balance		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities that have been previously impaired		Reductions due to credit-impaired securities sold, transferred or matured			June 30, 2017 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
State and municipal	4		—		—		—			4
Foreign government securities	—		—		—		—			—
Corporate	4		—		—		—			4
All other debt securities	22		—		—		(22		)	—
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities	$	30	$	—	$	—	$	(22	)	$	8
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities(1)	$	97	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	97
State and municipal	3		—		—		—			3
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	100

(1) Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.

130

	Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars	Mar. 31, 2016 balance		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities that have been previously impaired		Reductions due to credit-impaired securities sold, transferred or matured			June 30, 2016 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	(1	)	$	—
State and municipal	4		—		—		—			4
Foreign government securities	5		—		—		—			5
Corporate	7		—		2		(2		)	7
All other debt securities	43		—		—		—			43
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities	$	59	$	1	$	2	$	(3	)	$	59
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities(1)	$	132	$	—	$	—	$	(24	)	$	108
State and municipal	4		1		—		(1		)	4
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities	$	136	$	1	$	—	$	(25	)	$	112

(1) Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.

The following are six-month rollforwards of the credit-related impairments recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held that the Company does not intend to sell nor likely will be required to sell:

	Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars	Dec. 31, 2016 balance		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities that have been previously impaired		Reductions due to credit-impaired securities sold, transferred or matured			June 30, 2017 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
State and municipal	4		—		—		—			4
Foreign government securities	—		—		—		—			—
Corporate	5		—		—		(1		)	4
All other debt securities	22		—		—		(22		)	—
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities	$	31	$	—	$	—	$	(23	)	$	8
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities(1)	$	101	$	—	$	—	$	(4	)	$	97
State and municipal	3		—		—		—			3
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities	$	104	$	—	$	—	$	(4	)	$	100

(1) Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.

131

	Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars	Dec. 31, 2015 balance		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired		Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities that have been previously impaired		Reductions due to credit-impaired securities sold, transferred or matured			Jun. 30, 2016 balance
AFS debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	(1	)	$	—
State and municipal	12		—		—		(8		)	4
Foreign government securities	5		—		—		—			5
Corporate	9		1		—		(3		)	7
All other debt securities	47		—		—		(4		)	43
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities	$	73	$	2	$	—	$	(16	)	$	59
HTM debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities(1)	$	132	$	—	$	—	$	(24	)	$	108
State and municipal	4		1		—		(1		)	4
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities	$	136	$	1	$	—	$	(25	)	$	112

(1) Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.

Investments in Alternative Investment Funds That Calculate Net Asset Value

The Company holds investments in certain alternative investment funds that calculate net asset value (NAV), or its equivalent, including hedge funds, private equity funds, funds of funds and real estate funds, as provided by third-party asset managers. Investments in such funds are generally classified as non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value. The fair values of these investments are estimated using the NAV of the Company’s ownership interest in the funds. Some of these investments are in “covered funds” for purposes of the Volcker

Rule, which prohibits certain proprietary investment activities and limits the ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. On April 21, 2017, Citi’s request for extension of the permitted holding period under the Volcker Rule for certain of its investments in illiquid funds was approved, allowing the Company to hold such investments until the earlier of 5 years from the July 21, 2017 expiration date of the general conformance period, or the date such investments mature or are otherwise conformed with the Volcker Rule.

	Fair value				Unfunded commitments				Redemption frequency (if currently eligible) monthly, quarterly, annually	Redemption  notice period
In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Hedge funds	$	1	$	4	$	—	$	—	Generally quarterly	10–95 days
Private equity funds(1)(2)	374		348		82		82		—	—
Real estate funds (2)(3)	41		56		21		20		—	—
Total	$	416	$	408	$	103	$	102	—	—

(1) Private equity funds include funds that invest in infrastructure, emerging markets and venture capital.

(2) With respect to the Company’s investments in private equity funds and real estate funds, distributions from each fund will be received as the underlying assets held by these funds are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be liquidated over a period of several years as market conditions allow. Private equity and real estate funds do not allow redemption of investments by their investors. Investors are permitted to sell or transfer their investments, subject to the approval of the general partner or investment manager of these funds, which generally may not be unreasonably withheld.

(3) Includes several real estate funds that invest primarily in commercial real estate in the U.S., Europe and Asia.

132

13.   LOANS

Citigroup loans are reported in two categories—consumer and corporate. These categories are classified primarily according to the segment and subsegment that manage the loans. For additional information regarding Citi’s consumer and corporate loans, including related accounting policies, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Consumer Loans

Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by GCB and Corporate/Other. The following table provides Citi’s consumer loans by loan type:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
In U.S. offices
Mortgage and real estate(1)	$	69,022	$	72,957
Installment, revolving credit and other	3,190		3,395
Cards	130,181		132,654
Commercial and industrial	7,404		7,159
	$	209,797	$	216,165
In offices outside the U.S.
Mortgage and real estate(1)	$	43,821	$	42,803
Installment, revolving credit and other	26,480		24,887
Cards	25,376		23,783
Commercial and industrial	18,956		16,568
Lease financing	81		81
	$	114,714	$	108,122
Total consumer loans	$	324,511	$	324,287
Net unearned income	$	750	$	776
Consumer loans, net of unearned income	$	325,261	$	325,063

(1) Loans secured primarily by real estate.

The Company sold and/or reclassified to held-for-sale $0.6 billion and $2.8 billion, $2.1 billion and $4.7 billion of consumer loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

133

Consumer Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at June 30, 2017

In millions of dollars	Total current(1)(2)		30–89 days past due(3)		≥ 90 days past due(3)		Past due government guaranteed(4)		Total loans(2)		Total non-accrual		90 days past due and accruing
In North America offices
Residential first mortgages(5)	$	49,255	$	438	$	260	$	1,301	$	51,254	$	654	$	1,035
Home equity loans(6)(7)	15,862		213		373		—		16,448		796		—
Credit cards	128,173		1,349		1,352		—		130,874		—		1,352
Installment and other	3,475		42		14		—		3,531		19		—
Commercial banking	9,149		8		46		—		9,203		285		11
Total	$	205,914	$	2,050	$	2,045	$	1,301	$	211,310	$	1,754	$	2,398
In offices outside North America
Residential first mortgages(5)	$	36,813	$	227	$	157	$	—	$	37,197	$	412	$	—
Credit cards	23,985		418		370		—		24,773		313		254
Installment and other	24,760		281		128		—		25,169		165		—
Commercial banking	26,650		76		84		—		26,810		204		—
Total	$	112,208	$	1,002	$	739	$	—	$	113,949	$	1,094	$	254
Total GCB and Corporate/Other consumer	$	318,122	$	3,052	$	2,784	$	1,301	$	325,259	$	2,848	$	2,652
Other(8)	2		—		—		—		2		—		—
Total Citigroup	$	318,124	$	3,052	$	2,784	$	1,301	$	325,261	$	2,848	$	2,652

(1) Loans less than 30 days past due are presented as current.

(2) Includes $27 million of residential first mortgages recorded at fair value.

(3) Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities.

(4) Consists of residential first mortgages that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities that are 30–89 days past due of $0.3 billion and 90 days or more past due of $1.0 billion.

(5) Includes approximately $0.1 billion of residential first mortgage loans in process of foreclosure.

(6) Includes approximately $0.1 billion of home equity loans in process of foreclosure.

(7) Fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit, which are typically in junior lien positions.

(8) Represents loans classified as consumer loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are not included in the Corporate/Other consumer credit metrics.

134

Consumer Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at December 31, 2016

In millions of dollars	Total current(1)(2)		30–89 days past due(3)		≥ 90 days past due(3)		Past due government guaranteed(4)		Total loans(2)		Total non-accrual		90 days past due and accruing
In North America offices
Residential first mortgages(5)	$	50,766	$	522	$	371	$	1,474	$	53,133	$	848	$	1,227
Home equity loans(6)(7)	18,767		249		438		—		19,454		914		—
Credit cards	130,327		1,465		1,509		—		133,301		—		1,509
Installment and other	4,486		106		38		—		4,630		70		2
Commercial banking	8,876		23		74		—		8,973		328		14
Total	$	213,222	$	2,365	$	2,430	$	1,474	$	219,491	$	2,160	$	2,752
In offices outside North America
Residential first mortgages(5)	$	35,862	$	206	$	135	$	—	$	36,203	$	360	$	—
Credit cards	22,363		368		324		—		23,055		258		239
Installment and other	22,683		264		126		—		23,073		163		—
Commercial banking	23,054		72		112		—		23,238		217		—
Total	$	103,962	$	910	$	697	$	—	$	105,569	$	998	$	239
Total GCB and Corporate/Other consumer	$	317,184	$	3,275	$	3,127	$	1,474	$	325,060	$	3,158	$	2,991
Other(8)	3		—		—		—		3		—		—
Total Citigroup	$	317,187	$	3,275	$	3,127	$	1,474	$	325,063	$	3,158	$	2,991

(1) Loans less than 30 days past due are presented as current.

(2) Includes $29 million of residential first mortgages recorded at fair value.

(3) Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities.

(4) Consists of residential first mortgages that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities that are 30–89 days past due of $0.2 billion and 90 days or more past due of $1.3 billion.

(5) Includes approximately $0.1 billion of residential first mortgage loans in process of foreclosure.

(6) Includes approximately $0.1 billion of home equity loans in process of foreclosure.

(7) Fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit, which are typically in junior lien positions.

(8) Represents loans classified as consumer loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are not included in the Corporate/Other consumer credit metrics.

Consumer Credit Scores (FICO)

The following tables provide details on the FICO scores for Citi’s U.S. consumer loan portfolio based on end-of-period receivables (commercial banking loans are excluded from the table since they are business based and FICO scores are not a primary driver in their credit evaluation). FICO scores are updated monthly for substantially all of the portfolio or, otherwise, on a quarterly basis for the remaining portfolio.

FICO score distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)	June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Less than 620		≥ 620 but less than 660		Equal to or greater than 660
Residential first mortgages	$	2,392	$	2,195	$	43,056
Home equity loans	1,542		1,248		13,263
Credit cards	8,227		11,120		108,311
Installment and other	261		253		2,448
Total	$	12,422	$	14,816	$	167,078

FICO score distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)	December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Less than 620		≥ 620 but less than 660		Equal to or greater than 660
Residential first mortgages	$	2,744	$	2,422	$	44,279
Home equity loans	1,750		1,418		14,743
Credit cards	8,310		11,320		110,522
Installment and other	284		271		2,601
Total	$	13,088	$	15,431	$	172,145

(1) Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government entities, loans subject to long-term standby commitments (LTSC) with U.S. government-sponsored entities and loans recorded at fair value.

(2) Excludes balances where FICO was not available. Such amounts are not material.

135

Loan to Value (LTV) Ratios

The following tables provide details on the LTV ratios for Citi’s U.S. consumer mortgage portfolios. LTV ratios are updated monthly using the most recent Core Logic Home Price Index data available for substantially all of the portfolio applied at the Metropolitan Statistical Area level, if available, or the state level if not. The remainder of the portfolio is updated in a similar manner using the Federal Housing Finance Agency indices.

LTV distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)	June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Less than or equal to 80%		> 80% but less than or equal to 100%		Greater than 100%
Residential first mortgages	$	44,740	$	2,820	$	262
Home equity loans	12,177		2,856		937
Total	$	56,917	$	5,676	$	1,199

LTV distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)	December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Less than or equal to 80%		> 80% but less than or equal to 100%		Greater than 100%
Residential first mortgages	$	45,849	$	3,467	$	324
Home equity loans	12,869		3,653		1,305
Total	$	58,718	$	7,120	$	1,629

(1) Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government entities, loans subject to LTSCs with U.S. government-sponsored entities and loans recorded at fair value.

(2) Excludes balances where LTV was not available. Such amounts are not material.

136

Impaired Consumer Loans

The following tables present information about impaired consumer loans and interest income recognized on impaired consumer loans:

									Three Months Ended   June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	Balance at June 30, 2017								2017		2016		2017		2016
In millions of dollars	Recorded investment(1)(2)		Unpaid principal balance		Related specific allowance(3)		Average carrying value (4)		Interest income recognized(5)		Interest income recognized(5)		Interest income recognized(5)		Interest income recognized(5)
Mortgage and real estate
Residential first mortgages	$	3,174	$	3,468	$	341	$	3,727	$	32	$	43	$	68	$	104
Home equity loans	1,183		1,666		235		1,253		7		9		15		18
Credit cards	1,782		1,816		570		1,796		36		39		73		80
Installment and other
Individual installment and other	410		431		180		434		5		7		13		14
Commercial banking	473		700		115		521		8		2		14		4
Total	$	7,022	$	8,081	$	1,441	$	7,731	$	88	$	100	$	183	$	220

(1) Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount and direct write-downs and includes accrued interest only on credit card loans.

(2) $648 million of residential first mortgages, $382 million of home equity loans and $83 million of commercial market loans do not have a specific allowance.

(3) Included in the Allowance for loan losses.

(4) Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment ending balance for the last four quarters and does not include the related specific allowance.

(5) Includes amounts recognized on both an accrual and cash basis.

	Balance, December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Recorded investment(1)(2)		Unpaid principal balance		Related specific allowance(3)		Average carrying value(4)
Mortgage and real estate
Residential first mortgages	$	3,786	$	4,157	$	540	$	4,632
Home equity loans	1,298		1,824		189		1,326
Credit cards	1,747		1,781		566		1,831
Installment and other
Individual installment and other	455		481		215		475
Commercial banking	513		744		98		538
Total	$	7,799	$	8,987	$	1,608	$	8,802

(1) Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount and direct write-downs and includes accrued interest only on credit card loans.

(2) $740 million of residential first mortgages, $406 million of home equity loans and $97 million of commercial market loans do not have a specific allowance.

(3) Included in the Allowance for loan losses.

(4) Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment ending balance for the last four quarters and does not include the related specific allowance.

137

Consumer Troubled Debt Restructurings

	At and for the three months ended June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified	Number of loans modified	Post- modification recorded investment(1)(2)		Deferred principal(3)		Contingent principal forgiveness(4)		Principal forgiveness(5)		Average interest rate reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages	806	$	116	$	1	$	—	$	1	1	%
Home equity loans	677	58		5		—		—		2
Credit cards	53,080	203		—		—		—		17
Installment and other revolving	250	2		—		—		—		5
Commercial banking(6)	30	43		—		—		—		—
Total(8)	54,843	$	422	$	6	$	—	$	1
International
Residential first mortgages	755	$	28	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	%
Credit cards	28,551	98		—		—		2		12
Installment and other revolving	11,622	64		—		—		2		9
Commercial banking(6)	53	6		—		—		—		—
Total(8)	40,981	$	196	$	—	$	—	$	4

	At and for the three months ended June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified	Number of loans modified	Post- modification recorded investment(1)(7)		Deferred principal(3)		Contingent principal forgiveness(4)		Principal forgiveness(5)		Average interest rate reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages	1,346	$	205	$	1	$	—	$	1	1	%
Home equity loans	814	30		—		—		—		3
Credit cards	42,792	164		—		—		—		17
Installment and other revolving	1,381	12		—		—		—		14
Commercial banking(6)	41	6		—		—		—		—
Total(8)	46,374	$	417	$	1	$	—	$	1
International
Residential first mortgages	613	$	23	$	—	$	—	$	—	1	%
Credit cards	28,628	90		—		—		2		12
Installment and other revolving	11,198	58		—		—		2		7
Commercial banking(6)	42	20		—		—		—		—
Total(8)	40,481	$	191	$	—	$	—	$	4

(1) Post-modification balances include past due amounts that are capitalized at the modification date.

(2) Post-modification balances in North America include $15 million of residential first mortgages and $5 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the three months ended June 30, 2017. These amounts include $11 million of residential first mortgages and $4 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the three months ended June 30, 2017, based on previously received OCC guidance.

(3) Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing, but still due from the borrower. Such deferred principal is charged off at the time of permanent modification to the extent that the related loan balance exceeds the underlying collateral value.

(4) Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing and, depending upon borrower performance, eligible for forgiveness.

(5) Represents portion of contractual loan principal that was forgiven at the time of permanent modification.

(6) Commercial banking loans are generally borrower-specific modifications and incorporate changes in the amount and/or timing of principal and/or interest.

(7) Post-modification balances in North America include $21 million of residential first mortgages and $4 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the three months ended June 30, 2016. These amounts include $13 million of residential first mortgages and $4 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the three months ended June 30, 2016, based on previously received OCC guidance.

(8) The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding as of the end of the reporting period that were considered TDRs.

138

	At and for the six months ended June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified	Number of loans modified	Post- modification recorded investment(1)(2)		Deferred principal(3)		Contingent principal forgiveness(4)		Principal forgiveness(5)		Average interest rate reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages	1,772	$	246	$	4	$	—	$	1	1	%
Home equity loans	1,356	114		8		—		—		1
Credit cards	112,417	433		—		—		—		17
Installment and other revolving	471	4		—		—		—		5
Commercial banking(6)	56	48		—		—		—		—
Total(8)	116,072	$	845	$	12	$	—	$	1
International
Residential first mortgages	1,368	$	54	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	%
Credit cards	53,788	183		—		—		4		13
Installment and other revolving	22,929	124		—		—		6		7
Commercial banking(6)	85	19		—		—		—		(1	)
Total(8)	78,170	$	380	$	—	$	—	$	10

	At and for the six months ended June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified	Number of loans modified	Post- modification recorded investment(1)(7)		Deferred principal(3)		Contingent principal forgiveness(4)		Principal forgiveness(5)		Average interest rate reduction
North America
Residential first mortgages	2,814	$	417	$	3	$	—	$	2	1	%
Home equity loans	1,672	60		—		—		—		3
Credit cards	91,901	353		—		—		—		17
Installment and other revolving	2,766	24		—		—		—		14
Commercial banking(6)	64	11		—		—		—		—
Total(8)	99,217	$	865	$	3	$	—	$	2
International
Residential first mortgages	1,032	$	38	$	—	$	—	$	—	1	%
Credit cards	80,835	213		—		—		4		12
Installment and other revolving	32,842	140		—		—		4		7
Commercial banking(6)	73	52		—		—		—		—
Total(8)	114,782	$	443	$	—	$	—	$	8

(1) Post-modification balances include past due amounts that are capitalized at the modification date.

(2) Post-modification balances in North America include $30 million of residential first mortgages and $11 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the six months ended June 30, 2017. These amounts include $21 million of residential first mortgages and $10 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the six months ended June 30, 2017, based on previously received OCC guidance.

(3) Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing but still due from the borrower. Such deferred principal is charged off at the time of permanent modification to the extent that the related loan balance exceeds the underlying collateral value.

(4) Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing and, depending upon borrower performance, eligible for forgiveness.

(5) Represents portion of contractual loan principal that was forgiven at the time of permanent modification.

(6) Commercial banking loans are generally borrower-specific modifications and incorporate changes in the amount and/or timing of principal and/or interest.

(7) Post-modification balances in North America include $41 million of residential first mortgages and $10 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the six months ended June 30, 2016. These amounts include $26 million of residential first mortgages and $9 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the six months ended June 30, 2016, based on previously received OCC guidance.

(8) The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding as of the end of the reporting period that were considered TDRs.

139

The following table presents consumer TDRs that defaulted for which the payment default occurred within one year of a permanent modification. Default is defined as 60 days past due, except for classifiably managed commercial banking loans, where default is defined as 90 days past due.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
North America
Residential first mortgages	$	48	$	52	$	99	$	139
Home equity loans	8		6		17		14
Credit cards	57		46		109		95
Installment and other revolving	1		2		1		4
Commercial banking	1		1		2		2
Total	$	115	$	107	$	228	$	254
International
Residential first mortgages	$	3	$	3	$	5	$	6
Credit cards	46		37		88		73
Installment and other revolving	23		24		46		47
Commercial banking	—		6		—		15
Total	$	72	$	70	$	139	$	141

Corporate Loans

Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed by ICG. The following table presents information by corporate loan type:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
In U.S. offices
Commercial and industrial	$	50,341		$	49,586
Financial institutions	36,953			35,517
Mortgage and real estate(1)	42,041			38,691
Installment, revolving credit and other	31,611			34,501
Lease financing	1,467			1,518
	$	162,413		$	159,813
In offices outside the U.S.
Commercial and industrial	$	91,131		$	81,882
Financial institutions	34,844			26,886
Mortgage and real estate(1)	6,783			5,363
Installment, revolving credit and other	19,200			19,965
Lease financing	234			251
Governments and official institutions	5,518			5,850
	$	157,710		$	140,197
Total corporate loans	$	320,123		$	300,010
Net unearned income	$	(689	)	$	(704	)
Corporate loans, net of unearned income	$	319,434		$	299,306

(1) Loans secured primarily by real estate.

The Company sold and/or reclassified to held-for-sale $0 billion and $0.5 billion of corporate loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and $0.8 billion and $1.3 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The Company did not have significant purchases of corporate loans classified as held-for-investment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

140

Corporate Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at June 30, 2017

In millions of dollars	30–89 days past due and accruing(1)		≥ 90 days past due and accruing(1)		Total past due and accruing		Total non-accrual(2)		Total current(3)		Total loans (4)
Commercial and industrial	$	233	$	78	$	311	$	1,521	$	136,229	$	138,061
Financial institutions	438		39		477		232		70,355		71,064
Mortgage and real estate	146		12		158		186		48,462		48,806
Leases	59		8		67		63		1,571		1,701
Other	87		15		102		96		55,415		55,613
Loans at fair value											4,189
Purchased distressed loans											—
Total	$	963	$	152	$	1,115	$	2,098	$	312,032	$	319,434

Corporate Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at December 31, 2016

In millions of dollars	30–89 days past due and accruing(1)		≥ 90 days past due and accruing(1)		Total past due and accruing		Total non-accrual(2)		Total current(3)		Total loans (4)
Commercial and industrial	$	143	$	52	$	195	$	1,909	$	127,012	$	129,116
Financial institutions	119		2		121		185		61,254		61,560
Mortgage and real estate	148		137		285		139		43,607		44,031
Leases	27		8		35		56		1,678		1,769
Other	349		12		361		132		58,880		59,373
Loans at fair value											3,457
Purchased distressed loans											—
Total	$	786	$	211	$	997	$	2,421	$	292,431	$	299,306

(1) Corporate loans that are 90 days past due are generally classified as non-accrual. Corporate loans are considered past due when principal or interest is contractually due but unpaid.

(2) Non-accrual loans generally include those loans that are ≥ 90 days past due or those loans for which Citi believes, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful.

(3) Corporate loans are past due when principal or interest is contractually due but unpaid. Loans less than 30 days past due are presented as current.

(4) Total loans include loans at fair value, which are not included in the various delinquency columns.

141

Corporate Loans Credit Quality Indicators

	Recorded investment in loans(1)
In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Investment grade(2)
Commercial and industrial	$	94,073	$	85,369
Financial institutions	56,572		49,915
Mortgage and real estate	22,413		18,718
Leases	1,104		1,303
Other	48,691		51,930
Total investment grade	$	222,853	$	207,235
Non-investment grade(2)
Accrual
Commercial and industrial	$	42,463	$	41,838
Financial institutions	14,260		11,459
Mortgage and real estate	1,952		1,821
Leases	534		410
Other	6,827		7,312
Non-accrual
Commercial and industrial	1,521		1,909
Financial institutions	232		185
Mortgage and real estate	186		139
Leases	63		56
Other	96		132
Total non-investment grade	$	68,134	$	65,261
Non-rated private bank loans managed on a delinquency basis(2)	$	24,258	$	23,353
Loans at fair value	4,189		3,457
Corporate loans, net of unearned income	$	319,434	$	299,306

(1) Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.

(2) Held-for-investment loans are accounted for on an amortized cost basis.

142

Non-Accrual Corporate Loans

The following tables present non-accrual loan information by corporate loan type and interest income recognized on non-accrual corporate loans:

	June 30, 2017								Three Months Ended   June 30, 2017		Six Months Ended   June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Recorded investment(1)		Unpaid principal balance		Related specific allowance		Average carrying  value(2)		Interest  income recognized(3)		Interest income recognized(3)
Non-accrual corporate loans
Commercial and industrial	$	1,521	$	1,739	$	300	$	1,766	$	8	$	10
Financial institutions	232		238		36		227		—		—
Mortgage and real estate	186		304		9		169		9		9
Lease financing	63		63		4		61		—		—
Other	96		248		5		96		—		—
Total non-accrual corporate loans	$	2,098	$	2,592	$	354	$	2,319	$	17	$	19

	December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Recorded investment(1)		Unpaid principal balance		Related specific allowance		Average carrying  value(2)
Non-accrual corporate loans
Commercial and industrial	$	1,909	$	2,259	$	362	$	1,919
Financial institutions	185		192		16		183
Mortgage and real estate	139		250		10		174
Lease financing	56		56		4		44
Other	132		197		—		87
Total non-accrual corporate loans	$	2,421	$	2,954	$	392	$	2,407

	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Recorded investment(1)		Related specific allowance		Recorded investment(1)		Related specific allowance
Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances
Commercial and industrial	$	979	$	300	$	1,343	$	362
Financial institutions	83		36		45		16
Mortgage and real estate	39		9		41		10
Lease financing	50		4		55		4
Other	4		5		1		—
Total non-accrual corporate loans with specific allowance	$	1,155	$	354	$	1,485	$	392
Non-accrual corporate loans without specific allowance
Commercial and industrial	$	542			$	566
Financial institutions	149				140
Mortgage and real estate	147				98
Lease financing	13				1
Other	92				131
Total non-accrual corporate loans without specific allowance	$	943	N/A		$	936	N/A

(1) Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.

(2) Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment balance and does not include related specific allowance.

(3) Interest income recognized for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 was $12 million and $25 million.

143

Corporate Troubled Debt Restructurings

At and for the three months ended June 30, 2017:

In millions of dollars	Carrying Value		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of principal payments(1)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of interest payments(2)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of both principal and interest payments
Commercial and industrial	$	233	$	32	$	—	$	201
Mortgage and real estate	3		—		—		3
Total	$	236	$	32	$	—	$	204

At and for the three months ended June 30, 2016:

In millions of dollars	Carrying Value		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of principal payments(1)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of interest payments(2)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of both principal and interest payments
Commercial and industrial	$	105	$	73	$	32	$	—
Mortgage and real estate	1		—		—		1
Other	142		—		142		—
Total	$	248	$	73	$	174	$	1

At and for the six months ended June 30, 2017:

In millions of dollars	Carrying Value		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of principal payments(1)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of interest payments(2)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of both principal and interest payments
Commercial and industrial	$	288	$	32	$	—	$	256
Financial institutions	15		—		—		15
Mortgage and real estate	4		—		—		4
Total	$	307	$	32	$	—	$	275

At and for the six months ended June 30, 2016:

In millions of dollars	Carrying Value		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of principal payments(1)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of interest payments(2)		TDRs involving changes in the amount and/or timing of both principal and interest payments
Commercial and industrial	$	203	$	73	$	32	$	98
Mortgage and real estate	5		—		—		5
Other	142		—		142		—
Total	$	350	$	73	$	174	$	103

(1) TDRs involving changes in the amount or timing of principal payments may involve principal forgiveness or deferral of periodic and/or final principal payments. Because forgiveness of principal is rare for corporate loans, modifications typically have little to no impact on the loans’ projected cash flows and thus little to no impact on the allowance established for the loans.  Charge-offs for amounts deemed uncollectable may be recorded at the time of the restructuring or may have already been recorded in prior periods such that no charge-off is required at the time of the modification.

(2) TDRs involving changes in the amount or timing of interest payments may involve a below-market interest rate.

144

The following table presents total corporate loans modified in a TDR as well as those TDRs that defaulted and for which the payment default occurred within one year of a permanent modification. Default is defined as 60 days past due, except for classifiably managed commercial banking loans, where default is defined as 90 days past due.

In millions of dollars	TDR balances at June 30, 2017		TDR loans in payment default during the three months ended June 30, 2017		TDR loans in payment default six months ended June 30, 2017		TDR balances at June 30, 2016		TDR loans in payment default during the three months ended June 30, 2016		TDR loans in payment default during the six months ended June 30, 2016
Commercial and industrial	$	591	$	3	$	12	$	323	$	7	$	7
Loans to financial institutions	24		—		3		—		—		—
Mortgage and real estate	74		—		—		130		—		—
Other	166		—		—		288		—		—
Total(1)	$	855	$	3	$	15	$	741	$	7	$	7

(1) The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding as of the end of the reporting period that were considered TDRs.

145

14. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended   June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	12,030		$	12,712		$	12,060		$	12,626
Gross credit losses	(2,130		)	(2,048		)	(4,274		)	(4,191		)
Gross recoveries(1)	420			432			855			851
Net credit losses (NCLs)	$	(1,710	)	$	(1,616	)	$	(3,419	)	$	(3,340	)
NCLs	$	1,710		$	1,616		$	3,419		$	3,340
Net reserve builds (releases)	67			(90		)	47			(48		)
Net specific reserve releases	(111		)	(136		)	(125		)	(16		)
Total provision for loan losses	$	1,666		$	1,390		$	3,341		$	3,276
Other, net (see table below)	39			(182		)	43			(258		)
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	12,025		$	12,304		$	12,025		$	12,304
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at beginning of period	$	1,377		$	1,473		$	1,418		$	1,402
Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments	28			(30		)	(15		)	41
Other, net	1			(11		)	3			(11		)
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at end of period(2)	$	1,406		$	1,432		$	1,406		$	1,432
Total allowance for loans, leases and unfunded lending commitments	$	13,431		$	13,736		$	13,431		$	13,736

(1) Recoveries have been reduced by certain collection costs that are incurred only if collection efforts are successful.

(2) Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded lending commitments and letters of credit recorded in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Other, net details	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended   June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Sales or transfers of various consumer loan portfolios to held-for-sale
Transfer of real estate loan portfolios	$	(19	)	$	(24	)	$	(56	)	$	(53	)
Transfer of other loan portfolios	—			(77		)	(124		)	(196		)
Sales or transfers of various consumer loan portfolios to held-for-sale	$	(19	)	$	(101	)	$	(180	)	$	(249	)
FX translation, consumer	50			(75		)	214			(12		)
Other	8			(6		)	9			3
Other, net	$	39		$	(182	)	$	43		$	(258	)

Allowance for Credit Losses and Investment in Loans

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	Corporate			Consumer			Total			Corporate			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	2,535		$	9,495		$	12,030		$	2,905		$	9,807		$	12,712
Charge-offs	(96		)	(2,034		)	(2,130		)	(157		)	(1,891		)	(2,048		)
Recoveries	19			401			420			16			416			432
Replenishment of net charge-offs	77			1,633			1,710			141			1,475			1,616
Net reserve builds (releases)	(4		)	71			67			(16		)	(74		)	(90		)
Net specific reserve releases	(27		)	(84		)	(111		)	(11		)	(125		)	(136		)
Other	6			33			39			(6		)	(176		)	(182		)
Ending balance	$	2,510		$	9,515		$	12,025		$	2,872		$	9,432		$	12,304

146

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	Corporate			Consumer			Total			Corporate			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	2,702		$	9,358		$	12,060		$	2,791		$	9,835		$	12,626
Charge-offs	(199		)	(4,075		)	(4,274		)	(381		)	(3,810		)	(4,191		)
Recoveries	85			770			855			30			821			851
Replenishment of net charge-offs	114			3,305			3,419			351			2,989			3,340
Net reserve builds (releases)	(170		)	217			47			(12		)	(36		)	(48		)
Net specific reserve builds (releases)	(39		)	(86		)	(125		)	90			(106		)	(16		)
Other	17			26			43			3			(261		)	(258		)
Ending balance	$	2,510		$	9,515		$	12,025		$	2,872		$	9,432		$	12,304

	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Corporate		Consumer		Total		Corporate		Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses
Collectively evaluated in accordance with ASC 450	$	2,156	$	8,069	$	10,225	$	2,310	$	7,744	$	10,054
Individually evaluated in accordance with ASC 310-10-35	354		1,441		1,795		392		1,608		2,000
Purchased credit-impaired in accordance with ASC 310-30	—		5		5		—		6		6
Total allowance for loan losses	$	2,510	$	9,515	$	12,025	$	2,702	$	9,358	$	12,060
Loans, net of unearned income
Collectively evaluated in accordance with ASC 450	$	313,092	$	318,029	$	631,121	$	293,294	$	317,048	$	610,342
Individually evaluated in accordance with ASC 310-10-35	2,153		7,022		9,175		2,555		7,799		10,354
Purchased credit-impaired in accordance with ASC 310-30	—		183		183		—		187		187
Held at fair value	4,189		27		4,216		3,457		29		3,486
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	319,434	$	325,261	$	644,695	$	299,306	$	325,063	$	624,369

147

15.   GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

For additional information regarding Citi’s goodwill impairment testing process, see Notes 1 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Goodwill

The changes in Goodwill were as follows:

In millions of dollars
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	21,659
Foreign exchange translation and other	$	634
Impairment of goodwill	(28		)
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	22,265
Foreign exchange translation and other	$	156
Impairment of goodwill	—
Divestitures (1)	(72		)
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	22,349

(1) Goodwill allocated to the sale of the Fixed Income Analytics and Index businesses. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Citi performs its annual impairment test every third quarter and between annual tests (referred to as interim tests) if there are certain triggering events. Results of interim testing performed during the first half of 2017 are summarized below.

Effective January 1, 2017, the mortgage servicing business in North America GCB was reorganized and is now reported as part of Corporate/Other. Goodwill was allocated to the transferred business based on its relative fair value to the legacy North America GCB reporting unit. An interim test was performed under both the legacy and new reporting structures, which resulted in full impairment of the $28 million of allocated goodwill upon transfer to Citi Holdings—REL. The impairment was recorded as an operating expense in the first quarter of 2017.

Further, due to prior period indications that the fair value of the Citi Holdings—Consumer Latin America reporting unit only marginally exceeded its carrying value, updated interim tests were performed during the first and second quarters of 2017, with a minimal change in results. While there was no indication of impairment, the $16 million of goodwill present in Citi Holdings—Consumer Latin America may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration in economic conditions. The fair value as a percentage of allocated book value as of June 30, 2017 was 103%.

There were no other triggering events identified during the second quarter of 2017. The fair values of all other reporting units with goodwill balances exceeded their carrying values and did not indicate a risk of impairment based on the most recent valuations.

The following table shows reporting units with goodwill balances as of June 30, 2017 and the fair value as a percentage of allocated book value as of the latest impairment test⁽¹⁾:

In millions of dollars
Reporting unit	Goodwill		Fair value as a % of allocated book value
North America Global Consumer Banking	$	6,732	148	%
Asia Global Consumer Banking	4,900		157
Latin America Global Consumer Banking	1,178		180
ICG—Banking	2,998		194
ICG—Markets and Securities Services	6,525		115
Citi Holdings—Consumer Latin America(2)	16		103
Total as of June 30, 2017	$	22,349

(1) As of July 1, 2016 for all reporting units, except for Citi Holdings—Consumer Latin America which is as of June 30, 2017.

(2) All Citi Holdings reporting units are presented in the Corporate/Other segment beginning in the first quarter of 2017.

148

Intangible Assets

The components of intangible assets were as follows:

	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Gross carrying amount		Accumulated amortization		Net carrying amount		Gross carrying amount		Accumulated amortization		Net carrying amount
Purchased credit card relationships	$	5,376	$	3,757	$	1,619	$	8,215	$	6,549	$	1,666
Credit card contract related intangibles(1)	5,043		2,258		2,785		5,149		2,177		2,972
Core deposit intangibles	671		651		20		801		771		30
Other customer relationships	464		265		199		474		272		202
Present value of future profits	35		31		4		31		27		4
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	235		—		235		210		—		210
Other	150		125		25		504		474		30
Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)	$	11,974	$	7,087	$	4,887	$	15,384	$	10,270	$	5,114
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)(2)	560		—		560		1,564		—		1,564
Total intangible assets	$	12,534	$	7,087	$	5,447	$	16,948	$	10,270	$	6,678

The changes in intangible assets were as follows:

	Net carrying amount at										Net carrying amount at
In millions of dollars	December 31, 2016		Acquisitions/ divestitures			Amortization			FX translation and other		June 30, 2017
Purchased credit card relationships	$	1,666	$	20		$	(68	)	$	1	$	1,619
Credit card contract related intangibles(1)	2,972		9			(196		)	—		2,785
Core deposit intangibles	30		—			(12		)	2		20
Other customer relationships	202		—			(12		)	9		199
Present value of future profits	4		—			—			—		4
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	210		—			—			25		235
Other	30		(14		)	(5		)	14		25
Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)	$	5,114	$	15		$	(293	)	$	51	$	4,887
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)(2)	1,564										560
Total intangible assets	$	6,678									$	5,447

(1) Primarily reflects contract-related intangibles associated with the American Airlines, Sears, The Home Depot, Costco and AT&T credit card program agreements, which represented 97% of the aggregate net carrying amount at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

(2) For additional information on Citi’s MSRs, including the rollforward for the six months ended June 30, 2017, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

149

16.   DEBT

For additional information regarding Citi’s short-term borrowings and long-term debt, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Short-Term Borrowings

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Commercial paper	$	9,977	$	9,989
Other borrowings(1)	26,542		20,712
Total	$	36,519	$	30,701

(1) Includes borrowings from Federal Home Loan Banks and other market participants. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, collateralized short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks were $15.3 billion and $12.0 billion, respectively.

Long-Term Debt

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Citigroup Inc.(1)	$	147,257	$	147,333
Bank(2)	60,234		49,454
Broker-dealer(3)	17,688		9,391
Total	$	225,179	$	206,178

(1) Represents the parent holding company.

(2) Represents Citibank entities as well as other bank entities. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, collateralized long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks were $20.3 billion and $21.6 billion, respectively.

(3) Represents broker-dealer subsidiaries that are consolidated into Citigroup Inc., the parent holding company.

Long-term debt outstanding includes trust preferred securities with a balance sheet carrying value of $1.7 billion at both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The following table summarizes Citi’s outstanding trust preferred securities at June 30, 2017:

								Junior subordinated debentures owned by trust
Trust	Issuance date	Securities issued	Liquidation value(1)		Coupon rate(2)		Common shares issued to parent	Amount		Maturity	Redeemable by issuer beginning
In millions of dollars, except share amounts
Citigroup Capital III	Dec. 1996	194,053	$	194	7.625	%	6,003	$	200	Dec. 1, 2036	Not redeemable
Citigroup Capital XIII	Sept. 2010	89,840,000	2,246		3 mo LIBOR + 637 bps		1,000	2,246		Oct. 30, 2040	Oct. 30, 2015
Citigroup Capital XVIII	June 2007	99,901	130		3 mo LIBOR + 88.75 bps		50	130		June 28, 2067	June 28, 2017
Total obligated			$	2,570				$	2,576

Note: Distributions on the trust preferred securities and interest on the subordinated debentures are payable semiannually for Citigroup Capital III and Citigroup Capital XVIII and quarterly for Citigroup Capital XIII.

(1) Represents the notional value received by investors from the trusts at the time of issuance.

(2) In each case, the coupon rate on the subordinated debentures is the same as that on the trust preferred securities.

150

17.   CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (AOCI)

Changes in each component of Citigroup’s Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

In millions of dollars	Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities			Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)			Cash flow hedges(1)			Benefit plans(2)			Foreign currency translation adjustment (CTA), net of hedges(3)			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, March 31, 2017	$	(75	)	$	(412	)	$	(562	)	$	(5,176	)	$	(24,188	)	$	(30,413	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	101			(79		)	62			(173		)	643			554
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI	(128		)	(5		)	55			38			—			(40		)
Change, net of taxes	$	(27	)	$	(84	)	$	117		$	(135	)	$	643		$	514
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	(102	)	$	(496	)	$	(445	)	$	(5,311	)	$	(23,545	)	$	(29,899	)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

In millions of dollars	Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities			Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)			Cash flow hedges(1)			Benefit plans(2)			Foreign currency translation adjustment (CTA), net of hedges(3)			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	(799	)	$	(352	)	$	(560	)	$	(5,164	)	$	(25,506	)	$	(32,381	)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(4)	504			—			—			—			—			504
Adjusted balance, beginning of period	$	(295	)	$	(352	)	$	(560	)	$	(5,164	)	$	(25,506	)	$	(31,877	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	435			(134		)	86			(222		)	2,108			2,273
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI	(242		)	(10		)	29			75			(147		)	(295		)
Change, net of taxes	$	193		$	(144	)	$	115		$	(147	)	$	1,961		$	1,978
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	(102	)	$	(496	)	$	(445	)	$	(5,311	)	$	(23,545	)	$	(29,899	)

151

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

In millions of dollars	Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities			Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)			Cash flow hedges(1)			Benefit plans(2)			Foreign currency translation adjustment (CTA), net of hedges(3)			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, March 31, 2016	$	1,127		$	178		$	(300	)	$	(5,581	)	$	(22,050	)	$	(26,626	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	1,025			16			115			(66		)	(552		)	538
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI	(98		)	(4		)	36			39			—			(27		)
Change, net of taxes	$	927		$	12		$	151		$	(27	)	$	(552	)	$	511
Balance, June 30, 2016	$	2,054		$	190		$	(149	)	$	(5,608	)	$	(22,602	)	$	(26,115	)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

In millions of dollars	Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities			Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)			Cash flow hedges(1)			Benefit plans(2)			Foreign currency translation adjustment (CTA), net of hedges(3)			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	(907	)	$	—		$	(617	)	$	(5,116	)	$	(22,704	)	$	(29,344	)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes (5)	—			(15		)	—			—			—			(15		)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period	$	(907	)	$	(15	)	$	(617	)	$	(5,116	)	$	(22,704	)	$	(29,359	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	3,051			208			406			(566		)	102			3,201
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI	(90		)	(3		)	62			74			—			43
Change, net of taxes	$	2,961		$	205		$	468		$	(492	)	$	102		$	3,244
Balance, June 30, 2016	$	2,054		$	190		$	(149	)	$	(5,608	)	$	(22,602	)	$	(26,115	)

(1) Primarily driven by Citigroup’s pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swap programs that hedge the floating rates on liabilities.

(2) Primarily reflects adjustments based on the quarterly actuarial valuations of the Company’s Significant pension and postretirement plans, annual actuarial valuations of all other plans, and amortization of amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income.

(3) Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Mexican peso, Euro, and Polish zloty against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the quarter ended June 30, 2017. Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Japanese yen, euro, and Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

(4) In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.  Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce retained earnings, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities.  For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(5) Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, changes in DVA are reflected as a component of AOCI, pursuant to the early adoption of only the provisions of ASU 2016-01 relating to the presentation of DVA on fair value option liabilities. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding this change.

152

The pretax and after-tax changes in each component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

In millions of dollars	Pretax			Tax effect			After-tax
Balance, March 31, 2017	$	(39,514	)	$	9,101		$	(30,413	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities	(45		)	18			(27		)
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)	(132		)	48			(84		)
Cash flow hedges	185			(68		)	117
Benefit plans	(219		)	84			(135		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	619			24			643
Change	$	408		$	106		$	514
Balance, June 30, 2017	$	(39,106	)	$	9,207		$	(29,899	)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

In millions of dollars	Pretax			Tax effect			After-tax
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	(42,035	)	$	9,654		$	(32,381	)
Adjustment to opening balance (1)	803			(299		)	504
Adjusted balance, beginning of period	$	(41,232	)	$	9,355		$	(31,877	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities	301			(108		)	193
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)	(227		)	83			(144		)
Cash flow hedges	186			(71		)	115
Benefit plans	(221		)	74			(147		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	2,087			(126		)	1,961
Change	$	2,126		$	(148	)	$	1,978
Balance, June 30, 2017	$	(39,106	)	$	9,207		$	(29,899	)

(1) In the second quarter of 2017, Citi early adopted ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.  Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment was recorded to reduce retained earnings, effective January 1, 2017, for the incremental amortization of cumulative fair value hedge adjustments on callable state and municipal debt securities.  For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

153

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

In millions of dollars	Pretax			Tax effect			After-tax
Balance, March 31, 2016	$	(34,668	)	$	8,042		$	(26,626	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities	1,482			(555		)	927
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)	20			(8		)	12
Cash flow hedges	257			(106		)	151
Benefit plans	(31		)	4			(27		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(774		)	222			(552		)
Change	$	954		$	(443	)	$	511
Balance, June 30, 2016	$	(33,714	)	$	7,599		$	(26,115	)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

In millions of dollars	Pretax			Tax effect			After-tax
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	(38,440	)	$	9,096		$	(29,344	)
Adjustment to opening balance (1)	(26		)	11			(15		)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period	$	(38,466	)	$	9,107		$	(29,359	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities	4,706			(1,745		)	2,961
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)	327			(122		)	205
Cash flow hedges	739			(271		)	468
Benefit plans	(758		)	266			(492		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(262		)	364			102
Change	$	4,752		$	(1,508	)	$	3,244
Balance, June 30, 2016	$	(33,714	)	$	7,599		$	(26,115	)

(1) Represents the $15 million adjustment related to the initial adoption of ASU 2016-01. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

154

The Company recognized pretax gain (loss) related to amounts in AOCI reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income as follows:

	Increase (decrease) in AOCI due to amounts reclassified to Consolidated Statement of Income
	Three Months Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2017
Realized (gains) losses on sales of investments	$	(221	)	$	(413	)
OTTI gross impairment losses	20			32
Subtotal, pretax	$	(201	)	$	(381	)
Tax effect	73			139
Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities, after-tax(1)	$	(128	)	$	(242	)
Realized DVA (gains) losses on fair value option liabilities	$	(8	)	$	(16	)
Subtotal, pretax	$	(8	)	$	(16	)
Tax effect	3			6
Net realized debt valuation adjustment, after-tax	$	(5	)	$	(10	)
Interest rate contracts	$	90		$	46
Foreign exchange contracts	(2		)	1
Subtotal, pretax	$	88		$	47
Tax effect	(33		)	(18		)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, after-tax(2)	$	55		$	29
Amortization of unrecognized
Prior service cost (benefit)	$	(12	)	$	(22	)
Net actuarial loss	66			133
Curtailment/settlement impact(3)	7			7
Subtotal, pretax	$	61		$	118
Tax effect	(23		)	(43		)
Amortization of benefit plans, after-tax(3)	$	38		$	75
Foreign currency translation adjustment	$	—		$	(232	)
Tax effect	—			85
Foreign currency translation adjustment	$	—		$	(147	)
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, pretax	$	(60	)	$	(464	)
Total tax effect	20			169
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, after-tax	$	(40	)	$	(295	)

(1) The pretax amount is reclassified to Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments, net and Gross impairment losses on the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

(2) See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

(3) See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

155

The Company recognized pretax gain (loss) related to amounts in AOCI reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income as follows:

	Increase (decrease) in AOCI due to amounts reclassified to Consolidated Statement of Income
	Three Months Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2016			2016
Realized (gains) losses on sales of investments	$	(200	)	$	(386	)
OTTI gross impairment losses	48			251
Subtotal, pretax	$	(152	)	$	(135	)
Tax effect	54			45
Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities, after-tax(1)	$	(98	)	$	(90	)
Realized DVA (gains) losses on fair value option liabilities	$	(6	)	$	(5	)
Subtotal, pretax	$	(6	)	$	(5	)
Tax effect	$	2		$	2
Net realized debt valuation adjustment, after-tax	$	(4	)	$	(3	)
Interest rate contracts	$	41		$	57
Foreign exchange contracts	17			43
Subtotal, pretax	$	58		$	100
Tax effect	(22		)	(38		)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, after-tax(2)	$	36		$	62
Amortization of unrecognized
Prior service cost (benefit)	$	(11	)	$	(21	)
Net actuarial loss	69			135
Curtailment/settlement impact(3)	3			1
Subtotal, pretax	$	61		$	115
Tax effect	(22		)	(41		)
Amortization of benefit plans, after-tax(3)	$	39		$	74
Foreign currency translation adjustment	$	—		$	—
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, pretax	$	(39	)	$	75
Total tax effect	12			(32		)
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, after-tax	$	(27	)	$	43

(1) The pretax amount is reclassified to Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments, net and Gross impairment losses on the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

(2) See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

(3) See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

156

18. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

For additional information regarding Citi’s use of special purpose entities (SPEs) and variable interest entities (VIEs), see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Citigroup’s involvement with consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests or has continuing involvement through servicing a majority of the assets in a VIE is presented below:

	As of June 30, 2017
							Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1)
							Funded exposures(2)				Unfunded exposures
In millions of dollars	Total involvement with SPE assets		Consolidated VIE / SPE assets		Significant unconsolidated VIE assets(3)		Debt investments		Equity investments		Funding commitments		Guarantees and derivatives		Total
Credit card securitizations	$	51,092	$	51,092	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Mortgage securitizations(4)
U.S. agency-sponsored(5)	117,756		—		117,756		2,983		—		—		25		3,008
Non-agency-sponsored	23,432		976		22,456		228		38		—		1		267
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)	18,762		18,762		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)	18,464		—		18,464		5,206		—		—		38		5,244
Asset-based financing	50,601		689		49,912		15,993		618		4,881		—		21,492
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)	6,695		2,290		4,405		—		—		2,939		—		2,939
Municipal investments	18,644		13		18,631		2,572		3,835		2,554		—		8,961
Client intermediation	2,697		929		1,768		1,020		—		484		2		1,506
Investment funds	2,158		815		1,343		32		8		15		4		59
Other	908		36		872		120		9		67		44		240
Total	$	311,209	$	75,602	$	235,607	$	28,154	$	4,508	$	10,940	$	114	$	43,716

	As of December 31, 2016
							Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1)
							Funded exposures(2)				Unfunded exposures
In millions of dollars	Total involvement with SPE assets		Consolidated VIE / SPE assets		Significant unconsolidated VIE assets(3)		Debt investments		Equity investments		Funding commitments		Guarantees and derivatives		Total
Credit card securitizations	$	50,171	$	50,171	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Mortgage securitizations(4)
U.S. agency-sponsored	214,458		—		214,458		3,852		—		—		78		3,930
Non-agency-sponsored	15,965		1,092		14,873		312		35		—		1		348
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)	19,693		19,693		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)	18,886		—		18,886		5,128		—		—		62		5,190
Asset-based financing	53,168		733		52,435		16,553		475		4,915		—		21,943
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)	7,070		2,843		4,227		40		—		2,842		—		2,882
Municipal investments	17,679		14		17,665		2,441		3,578		2,580		—		8,599
Client intermediation	515		371		144		49		—		—		3		52
Investment funds	2,788		767		2,021		32		120		27		3		182
Other	1,429		607		822		116		11		58		43		228
Total	$	401,822	$	76,291	$	325,531	$	28,523	$	4,219	$	10,422	$	190	$	43,354

(1)    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows this table.

(2) Included on Citigroup’s June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3) A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest or continuing involvement considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss.

(4) Citigroup mortgage securitizations also include agency and non-agency (private-label) re-securitization activities. These SPEs are not consolidated. See “Re-securitizations” below for further discussion.

(5) See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the exit of the U.S. mortgage servicing operations and sale of MSRs.

157

The previous tables do not include:

• certain venture capital investments made by some of the Company’s private equity subsidiaries, as the Company accounts for these investments in accordance with the Investment Company Audit Guide (codified in ASC 946);

• certain investment funds for which the Company provides investment management services and personal estate trusts for which the Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services;

• certain VIEs structured by third parties where the Company holds securities in inventory, as these investments are made on arm’s-length terms;

• certain positions in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities held by the Company, which are classified as Trading account assets or Investments, where the Company has no other involvement with the related securitization entity deemed to be significant (for more information on these positions, see Notes 12 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);

• certain representations and warranties exposures in legacy ICG-sponsored mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations, where the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer. The outstanding balance of mortgage loans securitized during 2005 to 2008 where the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer was approximately $9 billion and $10 billion at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively;

• certain representations and warranties exposures in Citigroup residential mortgage securitizations, where the original mortgage loan balances are no longer outstanding; and

• VIEs such as trust preferred securities trusts used in connection with the Company’s funding activities. The Company does not have a variable interest in these trusts.

The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., loan or security) and the Company’s standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.

The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company.

The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company’s investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE adjusted for any accrued interest and cash principal payments received. The carrying amount may also be adjusted for increases or declines in fair value or any impairment in value recognized in earnings. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.

158

Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments

The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the VIE tables above:

	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Liquidity facilities		Loan/equity commitments		Liquidity facilities		Loan/equity commitments
Asset-based financing	$	—	$	4,881	$	5	$	4,910
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)	2,939		—		2,842		—
Municipal investments	—		2,554		—		2,580
Client intermediation	—		484		—		—
Investment funds	—		15		—		27
Other	—		67		—		58
Total funding commitments	$	2,939	$	8,001	$	2,847	$	7,575

Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant variable interests in unconsolidated VIEs:

In billions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Cash	$	0.1	$	0.1
Trading account assets	8.9		8.0
Investments	4.6		4.4
Total loans, net of allowance	18.7		18.8
Other	0.5		1.5
Total assets	$	32.8	$	32.8

Credit Card Securitizations

Substantially all of the Company’s credit card securitization activity is through two trusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust (Master Trust) and Citibank Omni Master Trust (Omni

Trust), with the substantial majority through the Master Trust. These trusts are consolidated entities.

The following table reflects amounts related to the Company’s securitized credit card receivables:

In billions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities	$	27.5	$	22.7
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities	9.0		7.4
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests	14.5		20.6
Total	$	51.0	$	50.7

The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citigroup’s credit card securitizations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
In billions of dollars	2017			2016
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	5.1		$	—
Pay down of maturing notes	(0.8		)	(1.3		)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
In billions of dollars	2017			2016
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	7.6		$	—
Pay down of maturing notes	(2.8		)	(3.5		)

Master Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)

The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Master Trust was 2.8 years as of June 30, 2017 and 2.6 years as of December 31, 2016.

In billions of dollars	June 30, 2017		Dec. 31, 2016
Term notes issued to third parties	$	26.5	$	21.7
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates	7.1		5.5
Total Master Trust liabilities	$	33.6	$	27.2

Omni Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)

The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was 1.4 years as of June 30, 2017 and 1.9 years as of December 31, 2016.

In billions of dollars	June 30, 2017		Dec. 31, 2016
Term notes issued to third parties	$	1.0	$	1.0
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates	1.9		1.9
Total Omni Trust liabilities	$	2.9	$	2.9

159

Mortgage Securitizations

The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citigroup mortgage securitizations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
In billions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages		U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages(1)
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	7.0	$	1.4	$	10.3	$	2.3
Contractual servicing fees received	0.1		—		0.1		—

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017				2016
In billions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages		U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Non-agency- sponsored mortgages(1)
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	14.2	$	2.8	$	20.9	$	6.5
Contractual servicing fees received	0.1		—		0.2		—

(1) The proceeds from new securitizations in 2016 include $0.5 billion related to personal loan securitizations.

Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $18 million and $47 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were $26 million and $46 million, respectively.

Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $20 million and $45 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were $19 million and $28 million, respectively.

Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
	U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages		Seniorinterests	Subordinatedinterests
Discount rate	2.5% to 14.0%		—	—
Weighted average discount rate	7.6	%	—	—
Constant prepayment rate	6.5% to 16.1%		—	—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	10.6	%	—	—
Anticipated net credit losses(2)	NM		—	—
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		—	—
Weighted average life	4.9 to 14.5 years		—	—

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests	Subordinated interests
Discount rate	0.8% to 11.5%		—	—
Weighted average discount rate	9.1	%	—	—
Constant prepayment rate	8.6% to 26.8%		—	—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	13.3	%	—	—
Anticipated net credit losses(2)	NM		—	—
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		—	—
Weighted average life	0.5 to 11.4 years		—	—

160

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests	Subordinated interests
Discount rate	2.4% to 19.9%		—	—
Weighted average discount rate	9.5	%	—	—
Constant prepayment rate	3.8% to 16.1%		—	—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	9.1	%	—	—
Anticipated net credit losses(2)	NM		—	—
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		—	—
Weighted average life	4.9 to 14.5 years		—	—

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests	Subordinated interests
Discount rate	0.8% to 11.5%		—	—
Weighted average discount rate	8.7	%	—	—
Constant prepayment rate	8.6% to 26.8%		—	—
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	12.5	%	—	—
Anticipated net credit losses(2)	NM		—	—
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		—	—
Weighted average life	0.5 to 17.5 years		—	—

Note: Citi held no retained interests in non-agency-sponsored mortgages securitized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

(1) Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.

(2) Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.

NM Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

The interests retained by the Company range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

The key assumptions used to value retained interests, and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions, are set forth in the tables

below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

	June 30, 2017
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	0.1% to 60.3%		0.0% to 11.6%		5.6% to 20.9%
Weighted average discount rate	6.9	%	1.6	%	11.8	%
Constant prepayment rate	7.0% to 21.0%		8.9% to 13.8%		0.5% to 20.1%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	11.6	%	12.3	%	9.6	%
Anticipated net credit losses(2)	NM		0.4% to 50.2%		35.7% to 60.3%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		17.0	%	46.6	%
Weighted average life	0.1 to 28.3 years		5.2 to 17.4 years		0.7 to 10.8 years

161

	December 31, 2016
			Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages		Senior interests		Subordinated interests
Discount rate	0.7% to 28.2%		0.0% to 8.1%		5.1% to 26.4%
Weighted average discount rate	9.0	%	2.1	%	13.1	%
Constant prepayment rate	6.8% to 22.8%		4.2% to 14.7%		0.5% to 37.5%
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	10.2	%	11.0	%	10.8	%
Anticipated net credit losses(2)	NM		0.5% to 85.6%		8.0% to 63.7%
Weighted average anticipated net credit losses	NM		31.4	%	48.3	%
Weighted average life	0.2 to 28.8 years		5.0 to 8.5 years		1.2 to 12.1 years

(1) Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.

(2) Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.

NM Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

	June 30, 2017
				Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
In millions of dollars	U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages			Seniorinterests			Subordinatedinterests
Carrying value of retained interests	$	1,895		$	13		$	153
Discount rates
Adverse change of 10%	$	(52	)	$	(3	)	$	(6	)
Adverse change of 20%	(102		)	(7		)	(12		)
Constant prepayment rate
Adverse change of 10%	(39		)	(1		)	(3		)
Adverse change of 20%	(80		)	(2		)	(6		)
Anticipated net credit losses
Adverse change of 10%	NM			(4		)	(1		)
Adverse change of 20%	NM			(9		)	(1		)

	December 31, 2016
				Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
In millions of dollars	U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages			Senior interests			Subordinated interests
Carrying value of retained interests	$	2,258		$	26		$	161
Discount rates
Adverse change of 10%	$	(71	)	$	(7	)	$	(8	)
Adverse change of 20%	(138		)	(14		)	(16		)
Constant prepayment rate
Adverse change of 10%	(80		)	(2		)	(4		)
Adverse change of 20%	(160		)	(3		)	(8		)
Anticipated net credit losses
Adverse change of 10%	NM			(7		)	(1		)
Adverse change of 20%	NM			(14		)	(2		)

(1) Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.

NM Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

162

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)

The fair value of Citi’s capitalized MSRs was $560 million and $1.3 billion at June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $135 billion and $186 billion as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in capitalized MSRs:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016
Balance, as of March 31	$	567		$	1,524
Originations	21			35
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions	(11		)	(137		)
Other changes(1)	(17		)	(98		)
Sale of MSRs(2)	—			—
Balance, as of June 30	$	560		$	1,324

	Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of year	$	1,564		$	1,781
Originations	56			68
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions	56			(362		)
Other changes(1)	(70		)	(177		)
Sale of MSRs(2)	(1,046		)	14
Balance, as of June 30	$	560		$	1,324

(1) Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.

(2) See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the exit of the U.S. mortgage servicing operations and sale of MSRs. 2016 amount includes sales of credit challenged MSRs for which Citi paid the new servicer.

The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amounts of these fees were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017		2016		2017		2016
Servicing fees	$	65	$	126	$	171	$	254
Late fees	3		4		6		8
Ancillary fees	4		4		8		9
Total MSR fees	$	72	$	134	$	185	$	271

In the Consolidated Statement of Income these fees are primarily classified as Commissions and fees and changes in MSR fair values are classified as Other revenue.

Re-securitizations

The Company engages in re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. Citi did not transfer non-agency (private-label) securities to re-securitization entities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. These securities are backed by either residential or commercial mortgages and are often structured on behalf of clients.

As of June 30, 2017, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $112 million (all related to re-securitization transactions executed prior to 2017), which has been recorded in Trading account assets. Of this amount, substantially all was related to subordinated beneficial interests. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $126 million (all related to re-securitization transactions executed prior to 2016). Of this amount, substantially all was related to subordinated beneficial interests. The original par value of private-label re-securitization transactions in which Citi holds a retained interest as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was approximately $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively.

The Company also re-securitizes U.S. government-agency guaranteed mortgage-backed (agency) securities. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, Citi transferred agency securities with a fair value of approximately $5.6 billion and $10.1 billion, respectively, to re-securitization entities compared to approximately $6.9 billion and $14.2 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

As of June 30, 2017, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in agency re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $2.5 billion (including $1.0 billion related to re-securitization transactions executed in 2017) compared to $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2016 (including $741 million related to re-securitization transactions executed in 2016), which is recorded in Trading account assets. The original fair value of agency re-securitization transactions in which Citi holds a retained interest as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was approximately $68.9 billion and $71.8 billion, respectively.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company did not consolidate any private-label or agency re-securitization entities.

163

Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the commercial paper conduits administered by Citi had approximately $18.8 billion and $19.7 billion of purchased assets outstanding, respectively, and had incremental funding commitments with clients of approximately $14.2 billion and $12.8 billion, respectively.

Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the weighted average remaining lives of the commercial paper issued by the conduits were approximately 55 days.

The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancements described above. In addition to the transaction-specific credit enhancements, the conduits, other than the government guaranteed loan conduit, have obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is equal to at least 8% to 10% of the conduit’s assets with a minimum of $200 million. The letters of credit provided by the Company to the conduits total approximately $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The net result across multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancements described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated first to the Company and then the commercial paper investors.

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owned $9.0 billion and $9.7 billion, respectively, of the commercial paper issued by its administered conduits. The Company's investments were not driven by market illiquidity and the Company is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the conduits.

Collateralized Loan Obligations

The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citigroup CLOs:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
In billions of dollars	2017		2016
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	1.1	$	2.0

	Six Months Ended June 30,
In billions of dollars	2017		2016
Proceeds from new securitizations	$	1.4	$	2.0

The key assumptions used to value retained interests in CLOs, and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% are set forth in the tables below:

	June 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Discount rate	1.1% to 1.7%	1.3% to 1.7%

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017			Dec. 31, 2016
Carrying value of retained interests	$	3,969		$	4,261
Discount rates
Adverse change of 10%	$	(27	)	$	(30	)
Adverse change of 20%	(53		)	(62		)

Asset-Based Financing

The primary types of Citi’s asset-based financings, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement, and Citi’s maximum exposure to loss are shown below. For Citi to realize the maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

	June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	TotalunconsolidatedVIE assets		Maximumexposure tounconsolidated VIEs
Type
Commercial and other real estate	$	9,084	$	2,953
Corporate loans	3,242		1,872
Hedge funds and equities	419		58
Airplanes, ships and other assets	37,167		16,609
Total	$	49,912	$	21,492

	December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	TotalunconsolidatedVIE assets		Maximumexposure tounconsolidated VIEs
Type
Commercial and other real estate	$	8,784	$	2,368
Corporate loans	4,051		2,684
Hedge funds and equities	370		54
Airplanes, ships and other assets	39,230		16,837
Total	$	52,435	$	21,943

Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts

At June 30, 2017, none of the municipal bonds owned by non-customer TOB trusts were subject to a credit guarantee provided by the Company. At December 31, 2016, approximately $82 million of the municipal bonds owned by non-customer TOB trusts were subject to a credit guarantee provided by the Company.

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $2.9 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, of which $2.0 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, were offset by reimbursement agreements. For the remaining exposure related to TOB transactions, where the residual owned by the customer was at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction, no reimbursement agreement was executed.

The Company also provides other liquidity agreements or letters of credit to customer-sponsored municipal investment funds, which are not variable interest entities, and municipality-related issuers that totaled $6.0 billion and $7.4 billion as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. These liquidity agreements and letters of credit are offset by reimbursement agreements with various term-out provisions.

Client Intermediation

The proceeds from new securitizations related to the Company’s client intermediation transactions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 totaled approximately $0.2 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively, compared to $0.8 billion and $1.4 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

164

19.   DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES

In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. For additional information regarding Citi’s use of and accounting for derivatives, see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Information pertaining to Citigroup’s derivative activities, based on notional amounts is presented in the table below. Derivative notional amounts, are reference amounts from which contractual payments are derived and do not represent a complete and accurate measure of Citi’s exposure to derivative transactions. Rather, Citi’s derivative exposure arises primarily from market fluctuations (i.e., market risk), counterparty failure (i.e., credit risk) and/or periods of high volatility or financial stress (i.e., liquidity risk), as well as any market valuation adjustments that may be required on the transactions. Moreover, notional amounts do not reflect the netting of offsetting trades. For example, if Citi enters into a receive-fixed interest rate swap with $100 million notional, and offsets this risk with an identical but opposite pay-fixed position with a different counterparty, $200 million in derivative notionals is reported, although these offsetting positions may result in de minimis overall market risk. Aggregate derivative notional amounts can fluctuate from period to period in the normal course of business based on Citi’s market share, levels of client activity and other factors.

165

Derivative Notionals

	Hedging instruments under ASC 815(1)(2)				Other derivative instruments
					Trading derivatives				Management hedges(3)
In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Interest rate contracts
Swaps	$	185,341	$	151,331	$	22,079,797	$	19,145,250	$	53,242	$	47,324
Futures and forwards	15		97		8,025,915		6,864,276		14,447		30,834
Written options	—				3,433,889		2,921,070		1,822		4,759
Purchased options	—		—		3,329,915		2,768,528		2,330		7,320
Total interest rate contract notionals	$	185,356	$	151,428	$	36,869,516	$	31,699,124	$	71,841	$	90,237
Foreign exchange contracts
Swaps	$	37,395	$	19,042	$	6,407,798	$	5,492,145	$	26,221	$	22,676
Futures, forwards and spot	35,815		56,964		4,302,684		3,251,132		5,730		3,419
Written options	1,447		—		1,375,250		1,194,325		—		—
Purchased options	6,672		—		1,383,864		1,215,961		—		—
Total foreign exchange contract notionals	$	81,329	$	76,006	$	13,469,596	$	11,153,563	$	31,951	$	26,095
Equity contracts
Swaps	$	—	$	—	$	197,046	$	192,366	$	—	$	—
Futures and forwards	—		—		46,582		37,557		—		—
Written options	—		—		370,016		304,579		—		—
Purchased options	—		—		324,314		266,070		—		—
Total equity contract notionals	$	—	$	—	$	937,958	$	800,572	$	—	$	—
Commodity and other contracts
Swaps	$	—	$	—	$	68,690	$	70,774	$	—	$	—
Futures and forwards	156		182		153,554		142,530		—		—
Written options	—		—		69,294		74,627		—		—
Purchased options	—		—		68,098		69,629		—		—
Total commodity and other contract notionals	$	156	$	182	$	359,636	$	357,560	$	—	$	—
Credit derivatives(4)
Protection sold	$	—	$	—	$	845,028	$	859,420	$	64	$	—
Protection purchased	—		—		856,947		883,003		14,103		19,470
Total credit derivatives	$	—	$	—	$	1,701,975	$	1,742,423	$	14,167	$	19,470
Total derivative notionals	$	266,841	$	227,616	$	53,338,681	$	45,753,242	$	117,959	$	135,802

(1) The notional amounts presented in this table do not include hedge accounting relationships under ASC 815 where Citigroup is hedging the foreign currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation by issuing a foreign-currency-denominated debt instrument. The notional amount of such debt was $1,297 million and $1,825 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

(2) Derivatives in hedge accounting relationships accounted for under ASC 815 are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3) Management hedges represent derivative instruments used to mitigate certain economic risks, but for which hedge accounting is not applied. These derivatives are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(4) Credit derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (protection buyer) to transfer the credit risk of a “reference asset” to another party (protection seller). These arrangements allow a protection seller to assume the credit risk associated with the reference asset without directly purchasing that asset. The Company enters into credit derivative positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations and diversification of overall risk.

166

The following tables present the gross and net fair values of the Company’s derivative transactions and the related offsetting amounts as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Gross positive fair values are offset against gross negative fair values by counterparty pursuant to enforceable master netting agreements. Under ASC 815-10-45, payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty pursuant to a credit support annex are included in the offsetting amount if a legal opinion supporting the enforceability of netting and collateral rights has been obtained. GAAP does not permit similar offsetting for security collateral.

The tables also present amounts that are not permitted to be offset, such as security collateral or cash collateral posted at third-party custodians, but which would be eligible for offsetting to the extent an event of default occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the netting and collateral rights has been obtained.

167

Derivative Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables

In millions of dollars at June 30, 2017	Derivatives classified in Trading account assets / liabilities(1)(2)(3)						Derivatives classified in Other assets / liabilities(2)(3)
Derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges	Assets			Liabilities			Assets			Liabilities
Over-the-counter	$	4,089		$	271		$	1,270		$	20
Cleared	330			1,757			34			73
Interest rate contracts	$	4,419		$	2,028		$	1,304		$	93
Over-the-counter	$	1,058		$	795		$	411		$	384
Foreign exchange contracts	$	1,058		$	795		$	411		$	384
Total derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges	$	5,477		$	2,823		$	1,715		$	477
Derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
Over-the-counter	$	212,052		$	193,609		$	38		$	1
Cleared	88,092			94,441			101			138
Exchange traded	137			116			—			—
Interest rate contracts	$	300,281		$	288,166		$	139		$	139
Over-the-counter	$	142,009		$	143,455		$	—		$	—
Cleared	2,667			2,611			—			—
Exchange traded	81			76			—			—
Foreign exchange contracts	$	144,757		$	146,142		$	—		$	—
Over-the-counter	$	16,262		$	20,994		$	—		$	—
Cleared	21			12			—			—
Exchange traded	7,885			7,998			—			—
Equity contracts	$	24,168		$	29,004		$	—		$	—
Over-the-counter	$	9,506		$	11,894		$	—		$	—
Exchange traded	642			647			—			—
Commodity and other contracts	$	10,148		$	12,541		$	—		$	—
Over-the-counter	$	16,325		$	17,190		$	49		$	58
Cleared	7,575			7,906			32			292
Credit derivatives(4)	$	23,900		$	25,096		$	81		$	350
Total derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges	$	503,254		$	500,949		$	220		$	489
Total derivatives	$	508,731		$	503,772		$	1,935		$	966
Cash collateral paid/received(5)(6)	$	12,540		$	14,227		$	—		$	43
Less: Netting agreements(7)	(424,492		)	(424,492		)	—			—
Less: Netting cash collateral received/paid(8)	(38,743		)	(42,570		)	(993		)	(56		)
Net receivables/payables included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(9)	$	58,036		$	50,937		$	942		$	953
Additional amounts subject to an enforceable master netting agreement, but not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
Less: Cash collateral received/paid	$	(657	)	$	(55	)	$	—		$	—
Less: Non-cash collateral received/paid	(11,359		)	(8,039		)	(295		)	—
Total net receivables/payables(9)	$	46,020		$	42,843		$	647		$	953

(1) The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2) Derivative mark-to-market receivables/payables related to management hedges are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities.

(3) Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are derivatives executed and settled bilaterally with counterparties without the use of an organized exchange or central clearing house. Cleared derivatives include derivatives executed bilaterally with a counterparty in the OTC market, but then novated to a central clearing house, whereby the central clearing house becomes the counterparty to both of the original counterparties. Exchange traded derivatives include derivatives executed directly on an organized exchange that provides pre-trade price transparency.

(4) The credit derivatives trading assets comprise $5,801 million related to protection purchased and $18,099 million related to protection sold as of June 30, 2017. The credit derivatives trading liabilities comprise $19,400 million related to protection purchased and $5,696 million related to protection sold as of June 30, 2017.

(5) For the trading account assets/liabilities, reflects the net amount of the $55,110 million and $52,970 million of gross cash collateral paid and received, respectively. Of the gross cash collateral paid, $42,570 million was used to offset trading derivative liabilities and, of the gross cash collateral received, $38,743 million was used to offset trading derivative assets.

168

(6) For cash collateral paid with respect to non-trading derivative assets, reflects the net amount of $56 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $56 million is netted against non-trading derivative positions within Other liabilities. For cash collateral received with respect to non-trading derivative liabilities, reflects the net amount of $1,036 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $993 million is netted against non-trading derivative positions within Other assets.

(7) Represents the netting of derivative receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty under enforceable netting agreements. Approximately $321 billion, $95 billion and $8 billion of the netting against trading account asset/liability balances is attributable to each of the OTC, cleared and exchange-traded derivatives, respectively.

(8) Represents the netting of cash collateral paid and received by counterparty under enforceable credit support agreements. Substantially all cash collateral received and paid is netted against OTC derivative assets and liabilities, respectively.

(9) The net receivables/payables include approximately $4 billion of derivative asset and $7 billion of derivative liability fair values not subject to enforceable master netting agreements, respectively.

In millions of dollars at December 31, 2016	Derivatives classified in Trading account assets / liabilities(1)(2)(3)						Derivatives classified in Other assets / liabilities(2)(3)
Derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges	Assets			Liabilities			Assets			Liabilities
Over-the-counter	$	716		$	171		$	1,927		$	22
Cleared	3,530			2,154			47			82
Interest rate contracts	$	4,246		$	2,325		$	1,974		$	104
Over-the-counter	$	2,494		$	393		$	747		$	645
Foreign exchange contracts	$	2,494		$	393		$	747		$	645
Total derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges	$	6,740		$	2,718		$	2,721		$	749
Derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
Over-the-counter	$	244,072		$	221,534		$	225		$	5
Cleared	120,920			130,855			240			349
Exchange traded	87			47			—			—
Interest rate contracts	$	365,079		$	352,436		$	465		$	354
Over-the-counter	$	182,659		$	186,867		$	—		$	60
Cleared	482			470			—			—
Exchange traded	27			31			—			—
Foreign exchange contracts	$	183,168		$	187,368		$	—		$	60
Over-the-counter	$	15,625		$	19,119		$	—		$	—
Cleared	1			21			—			—
Exchange traded	8,484			7,376			—			—
Equity contracts	$	24,110		$	26,516		$	—		$	—
Over-the-counter	$	13,046		$	14,234		$	—		$	—
Exchange traded	719			798			—			—
Commodity and other contracts	$	13,765		$	15,032		$	—		$	—
Over-the-counter	$	19,033		$	19,563		$	159		$	78
Cleared	5,582			5,874			47			310
Credit derivatives(4)	$	24,615		$	25,437		$	206		$	388
Total derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges	$	610,737		$	606,789		$	671		$	802
Total derivatives	$	617,477		$	609,507		$	3,392		$	1,551
Cash collateral paid/received(5)(6)	$	11,188		$	15,731		$	8		$	1
Less: Netting agreements(7)	(519,000		)	(519,000		)	—			—
Less: Netting cash collateral received/paid(8)	(45,912		)	(49,811		)	(1,345		)	(53		)
Net receivables/payables included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(9)	$	63,753		$	56,427		$	2,055		$	1,499
Additional amounts subject to an enforceable master netting agreement, but not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
Less: Cash collateral received/paid	$	(819	)	$	(19	)	$	—		$	—
Less: Non-cash collateral received/paid	(11,767		)	(5,883		)	(530		)	—
Total net receivables/payables(9)	$	51,167		$	50,525		$	1,525		$	1,499

(1) The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2) Derivative mark-to-market receivables/payables related to management hedges are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities.

(3) Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are derivatives executed and settled bilaterally with counterparties without the use of an organized exchange or central clearing house. Cleared derivatives include derivatives executed bilaterally with a counterparty in the OTC market, but then novated to a central clearing house,

169

whereby the central clearing house becomes the counterparty to both of the original counterparties. Exchange traded derivatives include derivatives executed directly on an organized exchange that provides pre-trade price transparency.

(4) The credit derivatives trading assets comprise $8,871 million related to protection purchased and $15,744 million related to protection sold as of December 31, 2016. The credit derivatives trading liabilities comprise $16,722 million related to protection purchased and $8,715 million related to protection sold as of December 31, 2016.

(5) For the trading account assets/liabilities, reflects the net amount of the $60,999 million and $61,643 million of gross cash collateral paid and received, respectively. Of the gross cash collateral paid, $49,811 million was used to offset trading derivative liabilities and, of the gross cash collateral received, $45,912 million was used to offset trading derivative assets.

(6) For cash collateral paid with respect to non-trading derivative assets, reflects the net amount of $61 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $53 million is netted against non-trading derivative positions within Other liabilities. For cash collateral received with respect to non-trading derivative liabilities, reflects the net amount of $1,346 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $1,345 million is netted against OTC non-trading derivative positions within Other assets.

(7) Represents the netting of derivative receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty under enforceable netting agreements. Approximately $383 billion, $128 billion and $8 billion of the netting against trading account asset/liability balances is attributable to each of the OTC, cleared and exchange-traded derivatives, respectively.

(8) Represents the netting of cash collateral paid and received by counterparty under enforceable credit support agreements. Substantially all cash collateral received and paid is netted against OTC derivative assets and liabilities, respectively.

(9) The net receivables/payables include approximately $7 billion of derivative asset and $9 billion of derivative liability fair values not subject to enforceable master netting agreements, respectively.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the amounts recognized in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship, as well as the underlying non-derivative instruments, are presented in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Citigroup presents this disclosure by business classification, showing derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with gains and losses related to non-derivative instruments within the same trading portfolios, as this represents how these portfolios are risk managed.

The amounts recognized in Other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship are shown below. The table below does not include any offsetting gains/losses on the economically hedged items to the extent such amounts are also recorded in Other revenue.

	Gains (losses) included in Other revenue
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Interest rate contracts	$	11		$	11		$	(34	)	$	26
Foreign exchange	23			11			26			15
Credit derivatives	(80		)	(348		)	(343		)	(562		)
Total Citigroup	$	(46	)	$	(326	)	$	(351	)	$	(521	)

170

The following table summarizes the gains (losses) on the Company’s fair value hedges:

	Gains (losses) on fair value hedges(1)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Gain (loss) on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
Interest rate contracts	$	(71	)	$	1,082		$	(376	)	$	3,197
Foreign exchange contracts	(555		)	(397		)	(637		)	(1,758		)
Commodity contracts	(11		)	89			(9		)	438
Total gain (loss) on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges	$	(637	)	$	774		$	(1,022	)	$	1,877
Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
Interest rate hedges	$	47		$	(1,053	)	$	343		$	(3,143	)
Foreign exchange hedges	570			454			766			1,761
Commodity hedges	11			(89		)	10			(433		)
Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges	$	628		$	(688	)	$	1,119		$	(1,815	)
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges
Interest rate hedges	$	(16	)	$	32		$	(26	)	$	59
Foreign exchange hedges	(13		)	25			49			(50		)
Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges	$	(29	)	$	57		$	23		$	9
Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges
Interest rate contracts	$	(8	)	$	(3	)	$	(7	)	$	(5	)
Foreign exchange contracts(2)	28			32			80			53
Commodity hedges	—			—			1			5
Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges	$	20		$	29		$	74		$	53

(1) Amounts are included in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The accrued interest income on fair value hedges is recorded in Net interest revenue and is excluded from this table.

(2) Amounts relate to the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates). These amounts are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are reflected directly in earnings.

171

Cash Flow Hedges

The amount of hedge ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 is not significant. The pretax change in AOCI from cash flow hedges is presented below:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI
Interest rate contracts	$	97		$	220		$	139		$	635
Foreign exchange contracts	—			(21		)	—			3
Total effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI	$	97		$	199		$	139		$	638
Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings
Interest rate contracts	$	(90	)	$	(41	)	$	(46	)	$	(57	)
Foreign exchange contracts	2			(17		)	(1		)	(43		)
Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings(1)	$	(88	)	$	(58	)	$	(47	)	$	(100	)

(1) Included primarily in Other revenue and Net interest revenue on the Consolidated Income Statement.

For cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative remain in AOCI on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be included in the earnings of future periods to offset the variability of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affect earnings. The net gain (loss) associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified from AOCIwithin 12 months of June 30, 2017 is approximately $(199) million. The maximum length of time over which forecasted cash flows are hedged is 10 years.

The after-tax impact of cash flow hedges on AOCI is shown in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net Investment Hedges

The pretax gain (loss) recorded in the Foreign currency translation adjustment account within AOCI, related to the effective portion of the net investment hedges, is $(32) million and $(1,748) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and $(47) million and $(1,420) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

172

The following tables summarize the key characteristics of Citi’s credit derivatives portfolio by counterparty and derivative form:

	Fair values				Notionals
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2017	Receivable(1)		Payable(2)		Protection purchased		Protection sold
By industry/counterparty
Banks	$	10,015	$	9,077	$	336,802	$	352,533
Broker-dealers	3,030		3,252		91,096		100,526
Non-financial	68		78		3,798		1,561
Insurance and other financial institutions	10,868		13,039		439,354		390,472
Total by industry/counterparty	$	23,981	$	25,446	$	871,050	$	845,092
By instrument
Credit default swaps and options	$	23,582	$	23,970	$	844,661	$	835,627
Total return swaps and other	399		1,476		26,389		9,465
Total by instrument	$	23,981	$	25,446	$	871,050	$	845,092
By rating
Investment grade	$	10,740	$	10,839	$	654,355	$	642,096
Non-investment grade	13,241		14,607		216,695		202,996
Total by rating	$	23,981	$	25,446	$	871,050	$	845,092
By maturity
Within 1 year	$	3,234	$	4,172	$	282,692	$	281,166
From 1 to 5 years	18,284		18,452		539,944		522,198
After 5 years	2,463		2,822		48,414		41,728
Total by maturity	$	23,981	$	25,446	$	871,050	$	845,092

(1) The fair value amount receivable is composed of $5,882 million under protection purchased and $18,099 million under protection sold.

(2) The fair value amount payable is composed of $19,750 million under protection purchased and $5,696 million under protection sold.

	Fair values				Notionals
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2016	Receivable(1)		Payable(2)		Protection purchased		Protection sold
By industry/counterparty
Banks	$	11,895	$	10,930	$	407,992	$	414,720
Broker-dealers	3,536		3,952		115,013		119,810
Non-financial	82		99		4,014		2,061
Insurance and other financial institutions	9,308		10,844		375,454		322,829
Total by industry/counterparty	$	24,821	$	25,825	$	902,473	$	859,420
By instrument
Credit default swaps and options	$	24,502	$	24,631	$	883,719	$	852,900
Total return swaps and other	319		1,194		18,754		6,520
Total by instrument	$	24,821	$	25,825	$	902,473	$	859,420
By rating
Investment grade	$	9,605	$	9,995	$	675,138	$	648,247
Non-investment grade	15,216		15,830		227,335		211,173
Total by rating	$	24,821	$	25,825	$	902,473	$	859,420
By maturity
Within 1 year	$	4,113	$	4,841	$	293,059	$	287,262
From 1 to 5 years	17,735		17,986		551,155		523,371
After 5 years	2,973		2,998		58,259		48,787
Total by maturity	$	24,821	$	25,825	$	902,473	$	859,420

173

(1) The fair value amount receivable is composed of $9,077 million under protection purchased and $15,744 million under protection sold.

(2) The fair value amount payable is composed of $17,110 million under protection purchased and $8,715 million under protection sold.

Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives

Certain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified event related to the credit risk of the Company. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and its affiliates. The fair value (excluding CVA) of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position at both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $32 billion and $26 billion, respectively. The Company posted $28 billion and $26 billion as collateral for this exposure in the normal course of business as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

A downgrade could trigger additional collateral or cash settlement requirements for the Company and certain affiliates. In the event that Citigroup and Citibank were downgraded a single notch by all three major rating agencies as of June 30, 2017, the Company could be required to post an additional $0.7 billion as either collateral or settlement of the derivative transactions. Additionally, the Company could be required to segregate with third-party custodians collateral previously received from existing derivative counterparties in the amount of $0.3 billion upon the single notch downgrade, resulting in aggregate cash obligations and collateral requirements of approximately $1.0 billion.

Derivatives Accompanied by Financial Asset Transfers

For transfers of financial assets accounted for as a sale by the Company, where the Company has retained substantially all of the economic exposure to the transferred asset through a total return swap executed in contemplation of the initial sale with the same counterparty and still outstanding as of June 30, 2017, both the asset carrying amounts derecognized and gross cash proceeds received as of the date of derecognition were $2.1 billion. At June 30, 2017, the fair value of these previously derecognized assets was $2.3 billion. The fair value of the total return swaps was $14 million, recorded as gross derivative assets, and $28 million, recorded as gross derivative liabilities. The balances for the total return swaps are on a gross basis, before the application of counterparty and cash collateral netting, and are included primarily as equity derivatives in the tabular disclosures in this Note.

174

20.   FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

For additional information regarding fair value measurement at Citi, see Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Market Valuation Adjustments

The table below summarizes the credit valuation adjustments (CVA) and funding valuation adjustments (FVA) applied to the fair value of derivative instruments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

	Credit and funding valuation adjustments contra-liability (contra-asset)
In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Counterparty CVA	$	(1,128	)	$	(1,488	)
Asset FVA	(457		)	(536		)
Citigroup (own-credit) CVA	322			459
Liability FVA	68			62
Total CVA—derivative instruments(1)	$	(1,195	)	$	(1,503	)

(1) FVA is included with CVA for presentation purposes.

The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVA on derivative instruments, net of hedges, FVA on derivatives and debt valuation adjustments (DVA) on Citi’s own fair value option (FVO) liabilities for the periods indicated:

	Credit/funding/debt valuation adjustments gain (loss)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended   June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Counterparty CVA	$	80		$	15		$	170		$	(93	)
Asset FVA	(13		)	(15		)	79			(95		)
Own-credit CVA	(53		)	(10		)	(125		)	124
Liability FVA	16			18			6			48
Total CVA—derivative instruments	$	30		$	8		$	130		$	(16	)
DVA related to own FVO liabilities (1)	$	(132	)	$	20		$	(227	)	$	327
Total CVA and DVA(2)	$	(102	)	$	28		$	(97	)	$	311

(1) See Note 1 and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2) FVA is included with CVA for presentation purposes.

175

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present for each of the fair value hierarchy levels the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company may hedge positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with other financial instruments (hedging instruments) that may be

classified as Level 3, but also with financial instruments classified as Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables:

Fair Value Levels

In millions of dollars at June 30, 2017	Level 1(1)		Level 2(1)		Level 3		Gross inventory		Netting(2)			Net balance
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	$	—	$	177,380	$	1,002	$	178,382	$	(35,551	)	$	142,831
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	—		24,863		204		25,067		—			25,067
Residential	—		408		327		735		—			735
Commercial	—		1,053		318		1,371		—			1,371
Total trading mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	26,324	$	849	$	27,173	$	—		$	27,173
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	20,339	$	2,843	$	—	$	23,182	$	—		$	23,182
State and municipal	—		3,297		284		3,581		—			3,581
Foreign government	45,450		21,855		108		67,413		—			67,413
Corporate	481		14,848		401		15,730		—			15,730
Equity securities	42,333		6,133		240		48,706		—			48,706
Asset-backed securities	—		2,098		1,570		3,668		—			3,668
Other trading assets(3)	9		10,305		1,803		12,117		—			12,117
Total trading non-derivative assets	$	108,612	$	87,703	$	5,255	$	201,570	$	—		$	201,570
Trading derivatives
Interest rate contracts	$	149	$	302,851	$	1,700	$	304,700
Foreign exchange contracts	38		145,190		587		145,815
Equity contracts	1,735		21,748		685		24,168
Commodity contracts	192		9,456		500		10,148
Credit derivatives	—		22,457		1,443		23,900
Total trading derivatives	$	2,114	$	501,702	$	4,915	$	508,731
Cash collateral paid(4)							$	12,540
Netting agreements									$	(424,492	)
Netting of cash collateral received									(38,743		)
Total trading derivatives	$	2,114	$	501,702	$	4,915	$	521,271	$	(463,235	)	$	58,036
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	—	$	43,148	$	50	$	43,198	$	—		$	43,198
Residential	—		3,164		—		3,164		—			3,164
Commercial	—		357		—		357		—			357
Total investment mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	46,669	$	50	$	46,719	$	—		$	46,719
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	101,118	$	11,479	$	1	$	112,598	$	—		$	112,598
State and municipal	—		8,254		1,285		9,539		—			9,539
Foreign government	56,320		45,104		358		101,782		—			101,782
Corporate	2,045		13,902		156		16,103		—			16,103
Equity securities	357		67		9		433		—			433
Asset-backed securities	—		4,996		1,028		6,024		—			6,024
Other debt securities	—		421		10		431		—			431
Non-marketable equity securities(5)	—		29		939		968		—			968
Total investments	$	159,840	$	130,921	$	3,836	$	294,597	$	—		$	294,597

Table continues on the next page.

176

In millions of dollars at June 30, 2017	Level 1(1)			Level 2(1)			Level 3			Gross inventory		Netting(2)			Net balance
Loans	$	—		$	3,639		$	577		$	4,216	$	—		$	4,216
Mortgage servicing rights	—			—			560			560		—			560
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis, gross	$	13,382		$	6,587		$	17		$	19,986
Cash collateral paid(6)										—
Netting of cash collateral received												$	(993	)
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis	$	13,382		$	6,587		$	17		$	19,986	$	(993	)	$	18,993
Total assets	$	283,948		$	907,932		$	16,162		$	1,220,582	$	(499,779	)	$	720,803
Total as a percentage of gross assets(7)	23.5		%	75.2		%	1.3		%
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	—		$	1,040		$	300		$	1,340	$	—		$	1,340
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	—			79,625			807			80,432		(35,551		)	44,881
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	72,044			10,339			1,143			83,526		—			83,526
Other trading liabilities	—			2,282			—			2,282		—			2,282
Total trading liabilities	$	72,044		$	12,621		$	1,143		$	85,808	$	—		$	85,808
Trading derivatives
Interest rate contracts	$	161		$	288,045		$	1,988		$	290,194
Foreign exchange contracts	15			146,519			403			146,937
Equity contracts	1,725			24,947			2,332			29,004
Commodity contracts	120			9,897			2,524			12,541
Credit derivatives	—			22,314			2,782			25,096
Total trading derivatives	$	2,021		$	491,722		$	10,029		$	503,772
Cash collateral received(8)										$	14,227
Netting agreements												$	(424,492	)
Netting of cash collateral paid												(42,570		)
Total trading derivatives	$	2,021		$	491,722		$	10,029		$	517,999	$	(467,062	)	$	50,937
Short-term borrowings	$	—		$	4,804		$	29		$	4,833	$	—		$	4,833
Long-term debt	—			17,170			11,831			29,001		—			29,001
Non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis, gross	$	13,382		$	964		$	2		$	14,348
Cash collateral received(9)										43
Netting of cash collateral paid												$	(56	)
Total non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis	$	13,382		$	964		$	2		$	14,391	$	(56	)	$	14,335
Total liabilities	$	87,447		$	607,946		$	24,141		$	733,804	$	(502,669	)	$	231,135
Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(7)	12.2		%	84.5		%	3.4		%

(1) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company transferred assets of approximately $1.9 billion and $2.9 billion from Level 1 to Level 2, primarily related to foreign government securities and equity securities not traded in active markets. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company transferred assets of approximately $0.9 billion and $2.3 billion from Level 2 to Level 1, primarily related to foreign government bonds traded with sufficient frequency to constitute an active market. There were no material transfers of liabilities from Level 1 to 2 during the three months ended June 30, 2017. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately $0.1 billion from Level 1 to Level 2. There were no material transfers of liabilities from Level 2 to Level 1 during the three months ended June 30, 2017. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately $0.1 billion from Level 2 to Level 1.

(2) Represents netting of (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase; and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement and cash collateral offsetting.

(3) Includes positions related to investments in unallocated precious metals, as discussed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also includes physical commodities accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value and unfunded credit products.

(4) Reflects the net amount of $55,110 million gross cash collateral paid, of which $42,570 million was used to offset trading derivative liabilities.

(5) Amounts exclude $0.4 billion investments measured at Net Asset Value (NAV) in accordance with ASU No. 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).

(6) Reflects the net amount of $56 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $56 million was used to offset non-trading derivative liabilities.

177

(7) Because the amount of the cash collateral paid/received has not been allocated to the Level 1, 2 and 3 subtotals, these percentages are calculated based on total assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding the cash collateral paid/received on derivatives.

(8) Reflects the net amount $52,970 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $38,743 million was used to offset trading derivative assets.

(9) Reflects the net amount of $1,036 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $993 million was used to offset non-trading derivative assets.

Fair Value Levels

In millions of dollars at December 31, 2016	Level 1(1)		Level 2(1)		Level 3		Gross inventory		Netting(2)			Net balance
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	$	—	$	172,394	$	1,496	$	173,890	$	(40,686	)	$	133,204
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	—		22,718		176		22,894		—			22,894
Residential	—		291		399		690		—			690
Commercial	—		1,000		206		1,206		—			1,206
Total trading mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	24,009	$	781	$	24,790	$	—		$	24,790
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	16,368	$	4,811	$	1	$	21,180	$	—		$	21,180
State and municipal	—		3,780		296		4,076		—			4,076
Foreign government	32,164		17,492		40		49,696		—			49,696
Corporate	424		14,199		324		14,947		—			14,947
Equity securities	45,056		5,260		127		50,443		—			50,443
Asset-backed securities	—		892		1,868		2,760		—			2,760
Other trading assets(3)	—		9,466		2,814		12,280		—			12,280
Total trading non-derivative assets	$	94,012	$	79,909	$	6,251	$	180,172	$	—		$	180,172
Trading derivatives
Interest rate contracts	$	105	$	366,995	$	2,225	$	369,325
Foreign exchange contracts	53		184,776		833		185,662
Equity contracts	2,306		21,209		595		24,110
Commodity contracts	261		12,999		505		13,765
Credit derivatives	—		23,021		1,594		24,615
Total trading derivatives	$	2,725	$	609,000	$	5,752	$	617,477
Cash collateral paid(4)							$	11,188
Netting agreements									$	(519,000	)
Netting of cash collateral received									(45,912		)
Total trading derivatives	$	2,725	$	609,000	$	5,752	$	628,665	$	(564,912	)	$	63,753
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	—	$	38,304	$	101	$	38,405	$	—		$	38,405
Residential	—		3,860		50		3,910		—			3,910
Commercial	—		358		—		358		—			358
Total investment mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	42,522	$	151	$	42,673	$	—		$	42,673
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	112,916	$	10,753	$	2	$	123,671	$	—		$	123,671
State and municipal	—		8,909		1,211		10,120		—			10,120
Foreign government	54,028		43,934		186		98,148		—			98,148
Corporate	3,215		13,598		311		17,124		—			17,124
Equity securities	336		46		9		391		—			391
Asset-backed securities	—		6,134		660		6,794		—			6,794
Other debt securities	—		503		—		503		—			503
Non-marketable equity securities(5)	—		35		1,331		1,366		—			1,366
Total investments	$	170,495	$	126,434	$	3,861	$	300,790	$	—		$	300,790

Table continues on the next page.

178

In millions of dollars at December 31, 2016	Level 1(1)			Level 2(1)			Level 3			Gross inventory		Netting(2)			Net balance
Loans	$	—		$	2,918		$	568		$	3,486	$	—		$	3,486
Mortgage servicing rights	—			—			1,564			1,564		—			1,564
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis, gross	$	9,300		$	7,732		$	34		$	17,066
Cash collateral paid(6)										8
Netting of cash collateral received												$	(1,345	)
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis	$	9,300		$	7,732		$	34		$	17,074	$	(1,345	)	$	15,729
Total assets	$	276,532		$	998,387		$	19,526		$	1,305,641	$	(606,943	)	$	698,698
Total as a percentage of gross assets(7)	21.4		%	77.1		%	1.5		%
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	—		$	919		$	293		$	1,212	$	—		$	1,212
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	—			73,500			849			74,349		(40,686		)	33,663
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	67,429			12,184			1,177			80,790		—			80,790
Other trading liabilities	—			1,827			1			1,828		—			1,828
Total trading liabilities	$	67,429		$	14,011		$	1,178		$	82,618	$	—		$	82,618
Trading account derivatives
Interest rate contracts	$	107		$	351,766		$	2,888		$	354,761
Foreign exchange contracts	13			187,328			420			187,761
Equity contracts	2,245			22,119			2,152			26,516
Commodity contracts	196			12,386			2,450			15,032
Credit derivatives	—			22,842			2,595			25,437
Total trading derivatives	$	2,561		$	596,441		$	10,505		$	609,507
Cash collateral received(8)										$	15,731
Netting agreements												$	(519,000	)
Netting of cash collateral paid												(49,811		)
Total trading derivatives	$	2,561		$	596,441		$	10,505		$	625,238	$	(568,811	)	$	56,427
Short-term borrowings	$	—		$	2,658		$	42		$	2,700	$	—		$	2,700
Long-term debt	—			16,510			9,744			26,254		—			26,254
Non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis, gross	$	9,300		$	1,540		$	8		$	10,848
Cash collateral received(9)										1
Netting of cash collateral paid												$	(53	)
Non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis	$	9,300		$	1,540		$	8		$	10,849	$	(53	)	$	10,796
Total liabilities	$	79,290		$	705,579		$	22,619		$	823,220	$	(609,550	)	$	213,670
Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(7)	9.8		%	87.4		%	2.8		%

(1) In 2016, the Company transferred assets of approximately $2.6 billion from Level 1 to Level 2, primarily related to foreign government securities and equity securities not traded in active markets. In 2016, the Company transferred assets of approximately $4.0 billion from Level 2 to Level 1, primarily related to foreign government bonds and equity securities traded with sufficient frequency to constitute a liquid market. In 2016, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately $0.4 billion from Level 2 to Level 1. In 2016, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately $0.3 billion from Level 1 to Level 2.

(2) Represents netting of (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase; and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement and cash collateral offsetting.

(3) Includes positions related to investments in unallocated precious metals, as discussed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also includes physical commodities accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value and unfunded credit products.

(4) Reflects the net amount of $60,999 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $49,811 million was used to offset trading derivative liabilities.

(5) Amounts exclude $0.4 billion investments measured at Net Asset Value (NAV) in accordance with ASU No. 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).

(6) Reflects the net amount of $61 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $53 million was used to offset non-trading derivative liabilities.

(7) Because the amount of the cash collateral paid/received has not been allocated to the Level 1, 2 and 3 subtotals, these percentages are calculated based on total assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding the cash collateral paid/received on derivatives.

(8) Reflects the net amount of $61,643 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $45,912 million was used to offset trading derivative assets.

(9) Reflects the net amount of $1,346 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $1,345 million was used to offset non-trading derivative assets.

179

Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Category

The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair value category for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. The gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.

The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example, the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3

category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that may be classified in the Level 1 or Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The hedged items and related hedges are presented gross in the following tables:

Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward

				Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in					Transfers																				Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Mar. 31, 2017			Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)		into Level 3			out of Level 3			Purchases			Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2017
Assets
Federal funds sold and   securities borrowed or   purchased under   agreements to resell	$	1,187		$	54		$	—	$	—		$	(239	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	1,002		$	—
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-   backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	271			(1		)	—		29			(48		)	103			—		(150		)	—			204			—
Residential	368			22			—		30			(20		)	16			—		(89		)	—			327			19
Commercial	266			5			—		27			(16		)	244			—		(208		)	—			318			(3		)
Total trading mortgage-   backed securities	$	905		$	26		$	—	$	86		$	(84	)	$	363		$	—	$	(447	)	$	—		$	849		$	16
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	1		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	(1	)	$	—		$	—		$	—
State and municipal	270			3			—		22			(1		)	7			—		(17		)	—			284			(1		)
Foreign government	126			3			—		6			(77		)	83			—		(33		)	—			108			1
Corporate	296			124			—		89			(21		)	158			—		(245		)	—			401			132
Equity securities	110			14			—		130			(1		)	2			—		(15		)	—			240			13
Asset-backed securities	1,941			(23		)	—		3			(65		)	313			—		(599		)	—			1,570			(19		)
Other trading assets	1,888			(43		)	—		222			(243		)	366			—		(383		)	(4		)	1,803			(17		)
Total trading non-   derivative assets	$	5,537		$	104		$	—	$	558		$	(492	)	$	1,292		$	—	$	(1,740	)	$	(4	)	$	5,255		$	125
Trading derivatives, net(4)
Interest rate contracts	$	(773	)	$	(155	)	$	—	$	10		$	632		$	59		$	—	$	(92	)	$	31		$	(288	)	$	(60	)
Foreign exchange contracts	48			93			—		(2		)	(39		)	4			—		(2		)	82			184			88
Equity contracts	(1,524		)	(101		)	—		18			42			64			—		(113		)	(33		)	(1,647		)	(158		)
Commodity contracts	(2,074		)	(153		)	—		12			51			—			—		—			140			(2,024		)	(152		)
Credit derivatives	(1,123		)	(293		)	—		(44		)	(16		)	(2		)	—		2			137			(1,339		)	(325		)
Total trading derivatives,   net(4)	$	(5,446	)	$	(609	)	$	—	$	(6	)	$	670		$	125		$	—	$	(205	)	$	357		$	(5,114	)	$	(607	)

Table continues on the next page.

180

			Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in						Transfers																	Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Mar.31, 2017		Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)			into Level 3		out of Level 3			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2017
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	55	$	—		$	1		$	—	$	(6	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	50	$	—
Residential	—		—			—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—		—
Commercial	—		—			—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—		—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities	$	55	$	—		$	1		$	—	$	(6	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	50	$	—
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	1	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	1	$	—
State and municipal	1,233		—			27			12		(3		)	22		—		(6		)	—			1,285		28
Foreign government	235		—			10			—		(1		)	191		—		(77		)	—			358		7
Corporate	339		—			(137		)	5		—			92		—		(143		)	—			156		9
Equity securities	9		—			—			—		—			—		—		—			—			9		—
Asset-backed securities	712		—			173			4		(13		)	334		—		(182		)	—			1,028		171
Other debt securities	—		—			—			—		—			10		—		—			—			10		—
Non-marketable equity securities	1,082		—			31			2		—			1		—		(154		)	(23		)	939		66
Total investments	$	3,666	$	—		$	105		$	23	$	(23	)	$	650	$	—	$	(562	)	$	(23	)	$	3,836	$	281
Loans	$	580	$	—		$	(12	)	$	15	$	—		$	30	$	—	$	(33	)	$	(3	)	$	577	$	42
Mortgage servicing rights	$	567	$	—		$	(11	)	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	21	$	—		$	(17	)	$	560	$	3
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis	$	27	$	—		$	29		$	—	$	(7	)	$	—	$	27	$	(4	)	$	(55	)	$	17	$	26
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	302	$	—		$	—		$	20	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(22	)	$	300	$	5
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	809		2			—			—		—			—		—		—			—			807		2
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	1,151		(60		)	—			2		(29		)	—		—		76			(117		)	1,143		5
Short-term borrowings	60		40			—			1		—			—		8		—			—			29		11
Long-term debt	10,176		(618		)	—			321		(558		)	—		1,353		—			(79		)	11,831		(73		)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis	4		—			2			—		—			—		1		—			(1		)	2		2

(1) Changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2) Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(3) Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at June 30, 2017.

(4) Total Level 3 trading derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.

181

				Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in						Transfers																				Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Dec. 31, 2016			Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)			into Level 3			out of Level 3			Purchases			Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2017
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	$	1,496		$	(2	)	$	—		$	—		$	(491	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(1	)	$	1,002		$	—
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	176			4			—			79			(65		)	264			—		(254		)	—			204			1
Residential	399			37			—			47			(49		)	66			—		(173		)	—			327			29
Commercial	206			(3		)	—			44			(29		)	434			—		(334		)	—			318			(10		)
Total trading mortgage-backed securities	$	781		$	38		$	—		$	170		$	(143	)	$	764		$	—	$	(761	)	$	—		$	849		$	20
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	1		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	(1	)	$	—		$	—		$	—
State and municipal	296			5			—			24			(48		)	88			—		(81		)	—			284			2
Foreign government	40			7			—			84			(90		)	127			—		(60		)	—			108			8
Corporate	324			215			—			116			(73		)	276			—		(457		)	—			401			177
Equity securities	127			29			—			132			(13		)	9			—		(44		)	—			240			21
Asset-backed securities	1,868			137			—			23			(81		)	704			—		(1,081		)	—			1,570			52
Other trading assets	2,814			(50		)	—			432			(774		)	653			1		(1,258		)	(15		)	1,803			(38		)
Total trading non-derivative assets	$	6,251		$	381		$	—		$	981		$	(1,222	)	$	2,621		$	1	$	(3,743	)	$	(15	)	$	5,255		$	242
Trading derivatives, net(4)
Interest rate contracts	$	(663	)	$	(192	)	$	—		$	(28	)	$	651		$	65		$	—	$	(205	)	$	84		$	(288	)	$	(12	)
Foreign exchange contracts	413			(297		)	—			53			(59		)	38			—		(34		)	70			184			43
Equity contracts	(1,557		)	(103		)	—			18			26			149			—		(137		)	(43		)	(1,647		)	(139		)
Commodity contracts	(1,945		)	(328		)	—			58			49			—			—		—			142			(2,024		)	(358		)
Credit derivatives	(1,001		)	(385		)	—			(68		)	(24		)	(2		)	—		2			139			(1,339		)	(745		)
Total trading derivatives, net(4)	$	(4,753	)	$	(1,305	)	$	—		$	33		$	643		$	250		$	—	$	(374	)	$	392		$	(5,114	)	$	(1,211	)
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	101		$	—		$	3		$	1		$	(55	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	50		$	2
Residential	50			—			2			—			(47		)	—			—		(5		)	—			—			—
Commercial	—			—			—			—			—			8			—		(8		)	—			—			—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities	$	151		$	—		$	5		$	1		$	(102	)	$	8		$	—	$	(13	)	$	—		$	50		$	2
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	2		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	(1	)	$	—		$	1		$	—
State and municipal	1,211			—			39			49			(33		)	76			—		(57		)	—			1,285			35
Foreign government	186			—			11			2			(19		)	333			—		(155		)	—			358			7
Corporate	311			—			(135		)	64			(4		)	183			—		(263		)	—			156			9
Equity securities	9			—			—			—			—			—			—		—			—			9			—
Asset-backed securities	660			—			182			21			(13		)	360			—		(182		)	—			1,028			171
Other debt securities	—			—			—			—			—			21			—		(11		)	—			10			—
Non-marketable equity securities	1,331			—			(63		)	2			—			9			—		(227		)	(113		)	939			79
Total investments	$	3,861		$	—		$	39		$	139		$	(171	)	$	990		$	—	$	(909	)	$	(113	)	$	3,836		$	303

Table continues on the next page.

182

			Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in						Transfers																		Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Dec. 31, 2016		Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)			into Level 3		out of Level 3			Purchases			Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2017
Loans	$	568	$	—		$	(16	)	$	80	$	(16	)	$	42		$	—	$	(76	)	$	(5	)	$	577	$	58
Mortgage servicing rights	1,564		—			56			—		—			—			56		(1,046		)	(70		)	560		(40		)
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis	34		—			(160		)	3		(8		)	—			260		(4		)	(108		)	17		(184		)
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	293	$	—		$	11		$	40	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(22	)	$	300	$	31
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	849		8			—			—		—			—			—		—			(34		)	807		8
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	1,177		(6		)	—			13		(43		)	—			—		177			(187		)	1,143		(3		)
Short-term borrowings	42		31			—			1		—			—			19		—			(2		)	29		5
Long-term debt	9,744		(601		)	—			521		(967		)	—			2,282		—			(350		)	11,831		(747		)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis	8		—			—			—		—			(1		)	2		—			(7		)	2		—

(1) Changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2) Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(3) Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at June 30, 2016.

(4) Total Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.

183

				Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in					Transfers																				Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Mar. 31, 2016			Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)		into Level 3			out of Level 3			Purchases		Issuances			Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2016
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	$	1,909		$	(62	)	$	—	$	—		$	(28	)	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,819		$	(54	)
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	1,039			—			—		83			(362		)	405		—			(443		)	8			730			—
Residential	1,192			(61		)	—		25			(44		)	46		—			(351		)	(6		)	801			(72		)
Commercial	581			4			—		123			(75		)	107		—			(350		)	—			390			(5		)
Total trading mortgage-backed securities	$	2,812		$	(57	)	$	—	$	231		$	(481	)	$	558	$	—		$	(1,144	)	$	2		$	1,921		$	(77	)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	3		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	3		$	—
State and municipal	209			1			—		5			(57		)	65		—			(106		)	—			117			(2		)
Foreign government	219			(7		)	—		—			(13		)	34		—			(152		)	—			81			(2		)
Corporate	477			272			—		35			(60		)	165		—			(479		)	(5		)	405			77
Equity securities	3,755			(491		)	—		174			(26		)	670		—			(112		)	—			3,970			(438		)
Asset-backed securities	2,814			6			—		40			(181		)	694		—			(703		)	—			2,670			5
Other trading assets	2,574			(89		)	—		680			(869		)	1,074		(13		)	(509		)	(9		)	2,839			(125		)
Total trading non-derivative assets	$	12,863		$	(365	)	$	—	$	1,165		$	(1,687	)	$	3,260	$	(13	)	$	(3,205	)	$	(12	)	$	12,006		$	(562	)
Trading derivatives, net(4)
Interest rate contracts	$	(755	)	$	182		$	—	$	144		$	(51	)	$	137	$	(18	)	$	(100	)	$	87		$	(374	)	$	136
Foreign exchange contracts	295			(324		)	—		1			(90		)	89		—			(52		)	52			(29		)	(428		)
Equity contracts	(876		)	76			—		(11		)	(284		)	22		38			(12		)	(24		)	(1,071		)	108
Commodity contracts	(1,949		)	(139		)	—		3			(36		)	356		—			(352		)	100			(2,017		)	(122		)
Credit derivatives	(321		)	(637		)	—		(33		)	(52		)	41		—			—			248			(754		)	(603		)
Total trading derivatives, net(4)	$	(3,606	)	$	(842	)	$	—	$	104		$	(513	)	$	645	$	20		$	(516	)	$	463		$	(4,245	)	$	(909	)
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	111		$	—		$	6	$	5		$	(23	)	$	1	$	—		$	(6	)	$	—		$	94		$	1
Residential	—			—			—		—			—			25		—			—			—			25			—
Commercial	3			—			—		3			(1		)	—		—			—			—			5			—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities	$	114		$	—		$	6	$	8		$	(24	)	$	26	$	—		$	(6	)	$	—		$	124		$	1
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	3		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	3		$	—
State and municipal	2,098			—			127		130			(374		)	89		—			(54		)	—			2,016			99
Foreign government	175			—			17		—			—			41		—			(89		)	(3		)	141			—
Corporate	498			—			31		—			(8		)	93		—			(154		)	—			460			(5		)
Equity securities	126			—			—		2			—			—		—			—			—			128			—
Asset-backed securities	701			—			61		—			(22		)	72		—			(215		)	—			597			51
Other debt securities	—			—			—		—			—			5		—			—			—			5			—
Non-marketable equity securities	1,165			—			26		13			—			6		—			—			(71		)	1,139			26
Total investments	$	4,880		$	—		$	268	$	153		$	(428	)	$	332	$	—		$	(518	)	$	(74	)	$	4,613		$	172

184

			Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in						Transfers																			Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Mar. 31, 2016		Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)			into Level 3		out of Level 3			Purchases			Issuances			Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2016
Loans	$	1,723	$	—		$	19		$	—	$	—		$	211		$	58		$	(297	)	$	(480	)	$	1,234	$	(34	)
Mortgage servicing rights	1,524		—			(137		)	—		—			—			35			—			(98		)	1,324		(154		)
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis	57		—			16			37		(2		)	—			67			(4		)	(60		)	111		(61		)
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	191	$	—		$	39		$	318	$	—		$	—		$	1		$	—		$	(38	)	$	433	$	39
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	1,238		4			—			—		—			—			—			—			(127		)	1,107		4
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	118		(11		)	—			38		(18		)	(61		)	(41		)	34			(69		)	12		(30		)
Short-term borrowings	46		(24		)	—			12		—			—			7			—			(36		)	53		(15		)
Long-term debt	8,736		(48		)	—			712		(756		)	—			990			61			(653		)	9,138		(48		)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis	14		—			1			—		(6		)	(2		)	1			—			(1		)	5		(1		)

185

				Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in						Transfers																				Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Dec. 31, 2015			Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)			into Level 3			out of Level 3			Purchases		Issuances			Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2016
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	$	1,337		$	8		$	—		$	—		$	(28	)	$	503	$	—		$	—		$	(1	)	$	1,819		$	(55	)
Trading non-derivative assets
Trading mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	744			12			—			418			(582		)	761		—			(634		)	11			730			(3		)
Residential	1,326			(12		)	—			129			(87		)	257		—			(806		)	(6		)	801			(40		)
Commercial	517			13			—			179			(102		)	352		—			(569		)	—			390			(13		)
Total trading mortgage-backed securities	$	2,587		$	13		$	—		$	726		$	(771	)	$	1,370	$	—		$	(2,009	)	$	5		$	1,921		$	(56	)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	1		$	—		$	—		$	2		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	3		$	(1	)
State and municipal	351			8			—			18			(216		)	168		—			(212		)	—			117			(1		)
Foreign government	197			(8		)	—			2			(17		)	75		—			(168		)	—			81			1
Corporate	376			284			—			80			(76		)	334		—			(588		)	(5		)	405			89
Equity securities	3,684			(535		)	—			267			(60		)	749		—			(135		)	—			3,970			(474		)
Asset-backed securities	2,739			134			—			157			(195		)	1,186		—			(1,351		)	—			2,670			29
Other trading assets	2,483			(116		)	—			1,458			(1,482		)	1,357		(2		)	(840		)	(19		)	2,839			(223		)
Total trading non-derivative assets	$	12,418		$	(220	)	$	—		$	2,710		$	(2,817	)	$	5,239	$	(2	)	$	(5,303	)	$	(19	)	$	12,006		$	(636	)
Trading derivatives, net(4)
Interest rate contracts	$	(495	)	$	(326	)	$	—		$	309		$	39		$	142	$	(18	)	$	(103	)	$	78		$	(374	)	$	(154	)
Foreign exchange contracts	620			(677		)	—			4			(60		)	106		—			(91		)	69			(29		)	(572		)
Equity contracts	(800		)	108			—			64			(428		)	46		38			(71		)	(28		)	(1,071		)	107
Commodity contracts	(1,861		)	(281		)	—			(49		)	(26		)	356		—			(352		)	196			(2,017		)	(288		)
Credit derivatives	307			(1,152		)	—			(114		)	(23		)	42		—			—			186			(754		)	(1,086		)
Total trading derivatives, net(4)	$	(2,229	)	$	(2,328	)	$	—		$	214		$	(498	)	$	692	$	20		$	(617	)	$	501		$	(4,245	)	$	(1,993	)
Investments
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed	$	139		$	—		$	(25	)	$	12		$	(62	)	$	40	$	—		$	(9	)	$	(1	)	$	94		$	41
Residential	4			—			1			—			—			25		—			(5		)	—			25			—
Commercial	2			—			—			6			(3		)	—		—			—			—			5			—
Total investment mortgage-backed securities	$	145		$	—		$	(24	)	$	18		$	(65	)	$	65	$	—		$	(14	)	$	(1	)	$	124		$	41
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	4		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(1	)	$	—		$	3		$	—
State and municipal	2,192			—			162			391			(783		)	240		—			(186		)	—			2,016			118
Foreign government	260			—			19			33			—			103		—			(271		)	(3		)	141			(106		)
Corporate	603			—			45			5			(45		)	94		—			(242		)	—			460			(1		)
Equity securities	124			—			—			4			—			—		—			—			—			128			—
Asset-backed securities	596			—			35			—			(23		)	204		—			(215		)	—			597			24
Other debt securities	—			—			—			—			—			5		—			—			—			5			—
Non-marketable equity securities	1,135			—			24			51			—			18		—			—			(89		)	1,139			20
Total investments	$	5,059		$	—		$	261		$	502		$	(916	)	$	729	$	—		$	(929	)	$	(93	)	$	4,613		$	96

186

			Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) incl. in						Transfers																			Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3)
In millions of dollars	Dec. 31, 2015		Principal transactions			Other(1)(2)			into Level 3		out of Level 3			Purchases			Issuances			Sales			Settlements			Jun. 30, 2016
Loans	$	2,166	$	—		$	(58	)	$	89	$	(538	)	$	570		$	219		$	(675	)	$	(539	)	$	1,234	$	(63	)
Mortgage servicing rights	1,781		—			(362		)	—		—			—			68			14			(177		)	1,324		(154		)
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis	180		—			33			40		(5		)	—			130			(124		)	(143		)	111		(277		)
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	434	$	—		$	35		$	322	$	(209	)	$	—		$	5		$	—		$	(84	)	$	433	$	39
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	1,247		(21		)	—			—		—			—			—			16			(177		)	1,107		(25		)
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	199		14			—			97		(43		)	(61		)	(41		)	70			(195		)	12		(29		)
Short-term borrowings	9		(27		)	—			17		(4		)	—			41			—			(37		)	53		(19		)
Long-term debt	7,543		(26		)	—			1,221		(1,843		)	—			2,872			61			(742		)	9,138		(86		)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis	14		—			(7		)	—		(10		)	(6		)	2			—			(2		)	5		(3		)

(1) Changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2) Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(3) Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at June 30, 2016.

(4) Total Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.

Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward

The were no significant Level 3 transfers for the period March 31, 2017 to June 30, 2017:

The following were the significant Level 3 transfers for the period December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017:

• Transfers of Long-term debt of $0.5 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $1.0 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to structured debt, reflecting changes in the significance of unobservable inputs as well as certain underlying market inputs becoming less or more observable.

There were no significant Level 3 transfers for the period from March 31, 2016 to June 30, 2016.

The following were the significant Level 3 transfers for the period from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016:

• Transfers of Other trading assets of $1.5 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $1.5 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, related to trading loans, reflecting changes in the volume of market quotations.

• Transfers of Long-term debt of $1.2 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $1.8 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to structured debt, reflecting changes in the significance of unobservable inputs as well as certain underlying market inputs becoming less or more observable.

187

Valuation Techniques and Inputs for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present the valuation techniques covering the majority of Level 3 inventory and the most significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements. Differences between this table and amounts presented in the Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward table represent individually immaterial items that have been measured using a variety of valuation techniques other than those listed.

As of June 30, 2017	Fair value(1) (in millions)		Methodology	Input	Low(2)(3)			High(2)(3)			Weighted average(4)
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	$	1,002	Model-based	IR Normal Volatility	24.54		%	80.07		%	66.85		%
Mortgage-backed securities	$	496	Yield analysis	Yield	0.88		%	11.81		%	4.13		%
	402		Price based	Price	$	6.02		$	105.10		$	70.52
Non-mortgage debt securities	$	2,417	Price-based	Price	$	15.00		$	118.96		$	94.36
	1,725		Model-based	Credit Spread	35 bps			600 bps			242 bps
Equity securities(5)	$	119	Model-based	Price	$	2.50		$	1,355.65		$	656.24
	115		Price-based	Forward Price	69.86			134.52			92.90
				Equity Volatility	3.00		%	47.73		%	26.01		%
Asset-backed securities	$	2,406	Price-based	Price	$	8.19		$	100.00		$	77.97
Non-marketable equity	$	495	Comparables analysis	EBITDA Multiples	6.30		x	12.10		x	8.73		x
	400		Price-based	Discount to price	—		%	100.00		%	7.52		%
				Price to book ratio	0.23		x	1.03		x	0.78		x
Derivatives—gross(6)
Interest rate contracts (gross)	$	3,579	Model-based	IR Normal Volatility	0.11		%	67.64		%	55.31		%
				Mean Reversion	1.00		%	20.00		%	10.50		%
Foreign exchange contracts (gross)	$	894	Model-based	Yield	5.62		%	14.50		%	9.30		%
	96		Cash flow	FX Volatility	2.99		%	24.51		%	12.77		%
				IR-FX Correlation	(4.01		)%	60.00		%	49.09		%
				IR-IR Correlation	(7.79		)%	69.65		%	39.74		%
				Credit Spread	22 bps			481 bps			204 bps
Equity contracts (gross)	$	2,946	Model-based	Equity Volatility	3.00		%	54.46		%	24.65		%
				Forward Price	51.91		%	134.52		%	95.49		%
				Equity-Equity Correlation	(88.92		)%	92.42		%	69.78		%
				Yield Volatility	3.25		%	12.68		%	6.41		%
				Equity-IR Correlation	(35.00		)%	41.00		%	33.25		%
Commodity and other contracts (gross)	$	3,024	Model-based	Forward Price	28.61		%	303.76		%	112.86		%
Credit derivatives (gross)	$	2,840	Model-based	Recovery Rate	6.50		%	65.00		%	34.50		%
	1,384		Price-based	Credit Correlation	5.00		%	95.00		%	35.11		%
				Upfront Points	5.00		%	98.97		%	57.17		%
				Price	$	0.01		$	239.25		$	81.58
				Credit Spread	5 bps			10,381 bps			401 bps

188

As of June 30, 2017	Fair value(1) (in millions)		Methodology	Input	Low(2)(3)		High(2)(3)		Weighted average(4)
Nontrading derivatives and other financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (Gross)	$	18	Model-based	Redemption Rate	13.22	%	99.50	%	73.22	%
				Recovery Rate	40.00	%	40.00	%	40.00	%
Loans and leases	$	260	Model-based	Credit Spread	45 bps		500 bps		71 bps
	214		Yield analysis	Yield	3.04	%	4.54	%	3.66	%
	92		Price-based
Mortgage servicing rights	$	470	Cash flow	Yield	8.00	%	19.93	%	12.59	%
	90		Model-based	WAL	3.97 years		7.52 years		6.11 years
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	300	Model-based	Mean Reversion	1.00	%	20.00	%	10.50	%
				Yield Volatility	3.64	%	9.31	%	7.46	%
				Equity-IR Correlation	27.00	%	41.00	%	31.44	%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	$	807	Model-based	Interest Rate	0.93	%	2.22	%	2.00	%
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	$	1,105	Model-based	IR Normal Volatility	24.54	%	80.07	%	66.85	%
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt	$	11,856	Model-based	Mean Reversion	1.00	%	20.00	%	10.50	%
				Forward Price	28.61	%	196.94	%	99.83	%
				IR Normal Volatility	15.32	%	80.07	%	62.20	%
				Equity Volatility	3.00	%	47.73	%	23.47	%

As of December 31, 2016	Fair value(1) (in millions)		Methodology	Input	Low(2)(3)			High(2)(3)			Weighted average(4)
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	$	1,496	Model-based	IR Log-Normal Volatility	12.86		%	75.50		%	61.73		%
				Interest Rate	(0.51		)%	5.76		%	2.80		%
Mortgage-backed securities	$	509	Price-based	Price	$	5.50		$	113.48		$	61.74
	368		Yield analysis	Yield	1.90		%	14.54		%	4.34		%
State and municipal, foreign government, corporate and other debt securities	$	3,308	Price-based	Price	$	15.00		$	103.60		$	89.93
	1,513		Cash flow	Credit Spread	35 bps			600 bps			230 bps
Equity securities(5)	$	69	Model-based	Price	$	0.48		$	104.00		$	22.19
	58		Price-based
Asset-backed securities	$	2,454	Price-based	Price	$	4.00		$	100.00		$	71.51
Non-marketable equity	$	726	Price-based	Discount to Price	—		%	90.00		%	13.36		%
	565		Comparables analysis	EBITDA Multiples	6.80		x	10.10		x	8.62		x
				Price-to-Book Ratio	0.32		x	1.03		x	0.87		x
				Price	$	—		$	113.23		$	54.40
Derivatives—gross(6)
Interest rate contracts (gross)	$	4,897	Model-based	IR Log-Normal Volatility	1.00		%	93.97		%	62.72		%
				Mean Reversion	1.00		%	20.00		%	10.50		%
Foreign exchange contracts (gross)	$	1,110	Model-based	Foreign Exchange (FX) Volatility	1.39		%	26.85		%	15.18		%
	134		Cash flow	IR Basis	(0.85		)%	(0.49		)%	(0.84		)%
				Credit Spread	4 bps			657 bps			266 bps

189

As of December 31, 2016	Fair value(1) (in millions)		Methodology	Input	Low(2)(3)			High(2)(3)			Weighted average(4)
				IR-IR Correlation	40.00		%	50.00		%	41.27		%
				IR-FX Correlation	16.41		%	60.00		%	49.52		%
Equity contracts (gross)(7)	$	2,701	Model-based	Equity Volatility	3.00		%	97.78		%	29.52		%
				Forward Price	69.05		%	144.61		%	94.28		%
				Equity-FX Correlation	(60.70		)%	28.20		%	(26.28		)%
				Equity-IR Correlation	(35.00		)%	41.00		%	(15.65		)%
				Yield Volatility	3.55		%	14.77		%	9.29		%
				Equity-Equity Correlation	(87.70		)%	96.50		%	67.45		%
Commodity contracts (gross)	$	2,955	Model-based	Forward Price	35.74		%	235.35		%	119.99		%
				Commodity Volatility	2.00		%	32.19		%	17.07		%
				Commodity Correlation	(41.61		)%	90.42		%	52.85		%
Credit derivatives (gross)	$	2,786	Model-based	Recovery Rate	20.00		%	75.00		%	39.75		%
	1,403		Price-based	Credit Correlation	5.00		%	90.00		%	34.27		%
				Upfront Points	6.00		%	99.90		%	72.89		%
				Price	$	1.00		$	167.00		$	77.35
				Credit Spread	3 bps			1,515 bps			256 bps
Nontrading derivatives and other financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (gross)(6)	$	42	Model-based	Recovery Rate	40.00		%	40.00		%	40.00		%
				Redemption Rate	3.92		%	99.58		%	74.69		%
				Upfront Points	16.00		%	20.50		%	18.78		%
Loans	$	258	Price-based	Price	$	31.55		$	105.74		$	56.46
	221		Yield analysis	Yield	2.75		%	20.00		%	11.09		%
	79		Model-based
Mortgage servicing rights	$	1,473	Cash flow	Yield	4.20		%	20.56		%	9.32		%
				WAL	3.53 years			7.24 years			5.83 years
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	293	Model-based	Mean Reversion	1.00		%	20.00		%	10.50		%
				Forward Price	98.79		%	104.07		%	100.19		%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	$	849	Model-based	Interest Rate	0.62		%	2.19		%	1.99		%
Trading account liabilities
Securities sold, not yet purchased	$	1,056	Model-based	IR Normal Volatility	12.86		%	75.50		%	61.73		%
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt	$	9,774	Model-based	Mean Reversion	1.00		%	20.00		%	10.50		%
				Commodity Correlation	(41.61		)%	90.42		%	52.85		%
				Commodity Volatility	2.00		%	32.19		%	17.07		%
				Forward Price	69.05		%	235.35		%	103.28		%

(1) The fair value amounts presented in these tables represent the primary valuation technique or techniques for each class of assets or liabilities.

(2) Some inputs are shown as zero due to rounding.

(3) When the low and high inputs are the same, there is either a constant input applied to all positions, or the methodology involving the input applies to only one large position.

(4) Weighted averages are calculated based on the fair values of the instruments.

(5) For equity securities, the price inputs are expressed on an absolute basis, not as a percentage of the notional amount.

(6) Both trading and nontrading account derivatives—assets and liabilities—are presented on a gross absolute value basis.

(7) Includes hybrid products.

190

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above. These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, these assets include loans held-for-sale and other real estate owned that are measured at the lower of cost or market.

The following table presents the carrying amounts of all assets that were still held for which a nonrecurring fair value measurement was recorded:

In millions of dollars	Fair value		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2017
Loans held-for-sale(1)	$	3,398	$	1,814	$	1,584
Other real estate owned	63		12		51
Loans(2)	863		308		555
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	4,324	$	2,134	$	2,190

In millions of dollars	Fair value		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2016
Loans held-for-sale(1)	$	5,802	$	3,389	$	2,413
Other real estate owned	75		15		60
Loans(2)	1,376		586		790
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	7,253	$	3,990	$	3,263

(1) Net of fair value amounts on the unfunded portion of loans held-for-sale, recognized as other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(2) Represents impaired loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate.

191

Valuation Techniques and Inputs for Level 3 Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present the valuation techniques covering the majority of Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements and the most significant unobservable inputs used in those measurements:

As of June 30, 2017	Fair value(1) (in millions)		Methodology	Input	Low(2)			High			Weighted average(3)
Loans held-for-sale	$	1,510	Price-based	Price	$	0.88		$	100.00		$	93.68
Other real estate owned	$	50	Price-based	Discount to price(4)	0.34		%	0.34		%	0.34		%
				Appraised value	$	20,372		$	4,491,044		$	2,018,801
				Price	$	54.61		$	85.81		$	58.74
Loans(5)	$	237	Price-based	Price	$	2.85		$	58.00		$	48.70
	181		Recovery Analysis	Appraised Value	$	39.47		$	89.20		$	76.84

As of December 31, 2016	Fair value(1) (in millions)		Methodology	Input	Low(2)			High			Weighted average(3)
Loans held-for-sale	$	2,413	Price-based	Price	$	—		$	100.00		$	93.08
Other real estate owned	$	59	Price-based	Discount to price(4)	0.34		%	13.00		%	3.10		%
				Price	$	64.65		$	74.39		$	66.21
Loans(5)	$	431	Cash flow	Price	$	3.25		$	105.00		$	59.61
	197		Recovery analysis	Forward price	$	2.90		$	210.00		$	156.78
	135		Price-based	Discount to price(4)	0.25		%	13.00		%	8.34		%
				Appraised value	$	25.80		$	26,400,000		$	6,462,735

(1) The fair value amounts presented in this table represent the primary valuation technique or techniques for each class of assets or liabilities.

(2) Some inputs are shown as zero due to rounding.

(3) Weighted averages are calculated based on the fair values of the instruments.

(4) Includes estimated costs to sell.

(5) Represents impaired loans held for investment whose carrying amounts are based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Changes

The following table presents total nonrecurring fair value measurements for the period, included in earnings, attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets that were still held:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016
Loans held-for-sale	$	(5	)	$	(35	)
Other real estate owned	(3		)	(4		)
Loans(1)	(30		)	(48		)
Other assets(2)	—			(23		)
Total nonrecurring fair value gains (losses)	$	(38	)	$	(110	)

(1) Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate.

(2) Represents net impairment losses related to an equity investment.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016
Loans held-for-sale	$	(5	)	$	(32	)
Other real estate owned	(3		)	(5		)
Loans(1)	(48		)	(105		)
Other assets(2)	—			(211		)
Total nonrecurring fair value gains (losses)	$	(56	)	$	(353	)

(1) Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate.

(2) Represents net impairment losses related to an equity investment.

192

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup’s financial instruments that are not carried at fair value. The table therefore excludes items measured at fair value on a recurring basis presented in the tables above.

	June 30, 2017				Estimated fair value
	Carrying value		Estimated fair value
In billions of dollars					Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investments	$	56.7	$	57.0	$	0.3	$	55.1	$	1.6
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	91.2		91.2		—		86.1		5.1
Loans(1)(2)	626.7		622.0		—		5.8		616.2
Other financial assets(2)(3)	256.0		256.5		6.7		179.6		70.2
Liabilities
Deposits	$	957.4	$	955.1	$	—	$	811.6	$	143.5
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	109.9		109.9		—		109.9		—
Long-term debt(4)	196.2		203.7		—		175.1		28.6
Other financial liabilities(5)	124.5		124.5		—		15.4		109.1

	December 31, 2016				Estimated fair value
	Carrying value		Estimated fair value
In billions of dollars					Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investments	$	52.1	$	52.0	$	0.8	$	48.6	$	2.6
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell	103.6		103.6		—		98.5		5.1
Loans(1)(2)	607.0		607.3		—		7.0		600.3
Other financial assets(2)(3)	215.2		215.9		8.2		153.6		54.1
Liabilities
Deposits	$	928.2	$	927.6	$	—	$	789.7	$	137.9
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase	108.2		108.2		—		107.8		0.4
Long-term debt(4)	179.9		185.5		—		156.5		29.0
Other financial liabilities(5)	115.3		115.3		—		16.2		99.1

(1) The carrying value of loans is net of the Allowance for loan losses of $12.0 billion for June 30, 2017 and $12.1 billion for December 31, 2016. In addition, the carrying values exclude $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion of lease finance receivables at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

(2) Includes items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

(3) Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverables and other financial instruments included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

(4) The carrying value includes long-term debt balances under qualifying fair value hedges.

(5) Includes brokerage payables, separate and variable accounts, short-term borrowings (carried at cost) and other financial instruments included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s corporate unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were liabilities of $2.4 billion and $5.2 billion, respectively, substantially all of which are classified as Level 3. The Company does not estimate the fair values of consumer unfunded lending commitments, which are generally cancellable by providing notice to the borrower.

193

21.   FAIR VALUE ELECTIONS

The Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings, other than DVA (see below). The election is made upon the initial recognition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election

may not be revoked once an election is made. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings, other than DVA, which from January 1, 2016 is reported in AOCI.

The Company has elected fair value accounting for its mortgage servicing rights. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

The following table presents the changes in fair value of those items for which the fair value option has been elected:

	Changes in fair value—gains (losses)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In millions of dollars	2017			2016			2017			2016
Assets
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell—selected portfolios	$	(58	)	$	19		$	(91	)	$	47
Trading account assets	232			(320		)	662			(62		)
Investments	(3		)	(22		)	(3		)	(21		)
Loans
Certain corporate loans(1)	(5		)	36			19			60
Certain consumer loans(1)	2			—			2			(1		)
Total loans	$	(3	)	$	36		$	21		$	59
Other assets
MSRs	$	(11	)	$	(137	)	$	56		$	(362	)
Certain mortgage loans held-for-sale(2)	44			91			81			171
Other assets	—			—			—			370
Total other assets	$	33		$	(46	)	$	137		$	179
Total assets	$	201		$	(333	)	$	726		$	202
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits	$	(30	)	$	(18	)	$	(44	)	$	(68	)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase—selected portfolios	(527		)	(2		)	86			(8		)
Trading account liabilities	25			3			51			97
Short-term borrowings	(99		)	(114		)	(80		)	(34		)
Long-term debt	(139		)	(117		)	(471		)	(540		)
Total liabilities	$	(770	)	$	(248	)	$	(458	)	$	(553	)

(1) Includes mortgage loans held by consolidated mortgage loan securitization VIEs.

(2) Includes gains (losses) associated with interest rate lock commitments for those loans that have been originated and elected under the fair value option.

194

Own Debt Valuation Adjustments (DVA)

Own debt valuation adjustments are recognized on Citi’s liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected using Citi’s credit spreads observed in the bond market. Among other variables, the fair value of liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) is impacted by the narrowing or widening of the Company’s credit spreads.

The estimated change in the fair value of these liabilities due to such changes in the Company’s own credit spread (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a loss of $132 million and a gain of $20 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and a loss of $227 million and a gain of $327 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company’s current credit spreads observable in the bond market into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above. Effective January 1, 2016, changes in fair value of fair value option liabilities related to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) are reflected as a component of AOCI; previously these amounts were recognized in Citigroup’s Revenues and Net income along with all other changes in fair value. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

Selected Portfolios of Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell, Securities Borrowed, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, Securities Loaned and Certain Non-Collateralized Short-Term Borrowings

The Company elected the fair value option for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities borrowed, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings held primarily by broker-dealer entities in the United States, United Kingdom and Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with offsetting derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings.

Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded in Principal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain Loans and Other Credit Products

Citigroup has also elected the fair value option for certain other originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup’s lending and trading businesses. None of these credit products are highly leveraged financing commitments. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments, such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company.

The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:

	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Trading assets		Loans		Trading assets		Loans
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	9,009	$	4,216	$	9,824	$	3,486
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	402		3		758		18
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	—		1		—		1
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	—		—		—		1

In addition to the amounts reported above, $1,203 million and $1,828 million of unfunded commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair value accounting were

outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

195

Changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest revenue on Trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products. The changes in fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a gain of $25 million and $56 million, respectively.

Certain Investments in Unallocated Precious Metals

Citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts (gold, silver, platinum and palladium) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities. Under ASC 815, the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument. Citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract, and reports the debt host contract within Trading account assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $0.8 billion and $0.6 billion at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods.

As part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities, Citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties. When Citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment, Citi’s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and Citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal. The forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative, at fair value through earnings. As of June 30, 2017, there were approximately $16.8 billion and $13.9 billion notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding, respectively.

Certain Investments in Private Equity and Real Estate Ventures and Certain Equity Method and Other Investments

Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in Citi’s investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments. All investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified as Investments on Citigroup’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in Other revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

Citigroup also elects the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. These securities are classified as Trading account assets on Citigroup’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in Principal transactions.

Certain Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale (HFS)

Citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans HFS. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications.

The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans HFS carried at fair value:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	468	$	915
Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance	17		8
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	—		—
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	—		—

The changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in Other revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. There was no net change in fair value during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 due to instrument-specific credit risk. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

196

Certain Structured Liabilities

The Company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation, currency, equity, referenced credit or commodity risks. The Company elected the fair value option because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

The following table provides information about the carrying value of structured notes, disaggregated by type of embedded derivative instrument:

In billions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Interest rate linked	$	12.1	$	10.6
Foreign exchange linked	0.2		0.2
Equity linked	12.0		12.3
Commodity linked	0.9		0.3
Credit linked	2.0		0.9
Total	$	27.2	$	24.3

Prior to 2016, the total change in the fair value of these structured liabilities was reported in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the portion of the changes in fair value attributable to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) is reflected as a component of AOCI while all other changes in fair value will continue to be reported in Principal transactions. Changes in the fair value of these structured liabilities include accrued interest, which is also included in the change in fair value reported in Principal transactions.

Certain Non-Structured Liabilities

The Company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates. The Company has elected the fair value option where the interest rate risk of such liabilities may be economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The elections have been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported in Short-term borrowings and Long-term debt on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior to 2016, the total change in the fair value of these non-structured liabilities was reported in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the portion of the changes in fair value attributable to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) is reflected as a component of AOCI while all other changes in fair value will continue to be reported in Principal transactions.

Interest expense on non-structured liabilities is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The following table provides information about long-term debt carried at fair value:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	29,001	$	26,254
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of (less than) fair value	866		(128		)

The following table provides information about short-term borrowings carried at fair value:

In millions of dollars	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$	4,833		$	2,700
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of (less than) fair value	(71		)	(61		)

197

22.   GUARANTEES AND COMMITMENTS

Citi provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to its customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. For

certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.

In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments that the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total

default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible

recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. As such, Citi believes such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

For additional information regarding Citi’s guarantees and indemnifications included in the tables below, as well as its other guarantees and indemnifications excluded from the tables below, see Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following tables present information about Citi’s guarantees at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

	Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at June 30, 2017 except carrying value in millions	Expire within 1 year		Expire after 1 year		Total amount outstanding		Carrying value (in millions of dollars)
Financial standby letters of credit	$	36.8	$	56.4	$	93.2	$	162
Performance guarantees	7.5		3.0		10.5		20
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees	14.1		83.6		97.7		806
Loans sold with recourse	—		0.2		0.2		10
Securities lending indemnifications(1)	97.0		—		97.0		—
Credit card merchant processing(1)(2)	83.8		—		83.8		—
Credit card arrangements with partners	0.1		1.3		1.4		206
Custody indemnifications and other	—		52.0		52.0		59
Total	$	239.3	$	196.5	$	435.8	$	1,263

	Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2016 except carrying value in millions	Expire within 1 year		Expire after 1 year		Total amount outstanding		Carrying value (in millions of dollars)
Financial standby letters of credit	$	26.0	$	67.1	$	93.1	$	141
Performance guarantees	7.5		3.6		11.1		19
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees	7.2		80.0		87.2		747
Loans sold with recourse	—		0.2		0.2		12
Securities lending indemnifications(1)	80.3		—		80.3		—
Credit card merchant processing(1)(2)	86.4		—		86.4		—
Credit card arrangements with partners	—		1.5		1.5		206
Custody indemnifications and other	—		45.4		45.4		58
Total	$	207.4	$	197.8	$	405.2	$	1,183

(1) The carrying values of securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing were not material for either period presented, as the probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees is minimal.

(2) At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $84 billion and $86 billion, respectively. However, Citi believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on its historical experience. This contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants.

198

Loans sold with recourse

Loans sold with recourse represent Citi’s obligations to

reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain

circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales

agreement under which a seller/lender will fully reimburse

the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the

purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller

taking back any loans that become delinquent.

In addition to the amounts shown in the tables above,

Citi has recorded a repurchase reserve for its potential

repurchases or make-whole liability regarding residential

mortgage representation and warranty claims related to its

whole loan sales to the U.S. government-sponsored

enterprises (GSEs) and, to a lesser extent, private investors.

The repurchase reserve was approximately $75 million and

$107 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,

respectively, and these amounts are included in Other

liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Credit card arrangements with partners

Citi, in certain of its credit card partner arrangements,

provides guarantees to the partner regarding the volume of

certain customer originations during the term of the

agreement. To the extent such origination targets are not met,

the guarantees serve to compensate the partner for certain

payments that otherwise would have been generated in

connection with such originations.

Other guarantees and indemnifications

Credit Card Protection Programs

Citi, through its credit card businesses, provides various

cardholder protection programs on several of its card

products, including programs that provide insurance

coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses

associated with purchased products, price protection for

certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These

guarantees are not included in the table, since the total

outstanding amount of the guarantees and Citi’s maximum

exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is

limited to certain types of purchases and losses, and it is not

possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for

these benefits at any given time. Citi assesses the probability

and amount of its potential liability related to these programs

based on the extent and nature of its historical loss

experience. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of Citi’s obligations related to these programs were

immaterial.

Value-Transfer Networks

Citi is a member of, or shareholder in, hundreds of value transfer networks (VTNs) (payment, clearing and settlement

systems as well as exchanges) around the world. As a

condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that

members stand ready to pay a pro rata share of the losses

incurred by the organization due to another member’s default

on its obligations. Citi’s potential obligations may be limited

to its membership interests in the VTNs, contributions to the

VTN’s funds, or, in limited cases, the obligation may be unlimited. The maximum exposure cannot be estimated as

this would require an assessment of future claims that have

not yet occurred. Citi believes the risk of loss is remote

given historical experience with the VTNs. Accordingly,

Citi’s participation in VTNs is not reported in the guarantees

tables above, and there are no amounts reflected on the

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2017 or

December 31, 2016 for potential obligations that could arise

from Citi’s involvement with VTN associations.

Long-Term Care Insurance Indemnification

In connection with the 2005 sale of certain insurance and annuity subsidiaries to MetLife Inc. (MetLife), the Company provided an indemnification for policyholder claims and other liabilities relating to a book of long-term care (LTC) business (for the entire term of the LTC policies) that is fully reinsured by subsidiaries of Genworth Financial Inc. (Genworth). In turn, Genworth has offsetting reinsurance agreements with MetLife and the Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company (UFLIC), a subsidiary of the General Electric Company. Genworth has funded two trusts with securities whose fair value (approximately $7.3 billion at June 30, 2017, compared to $7.0 billion at December 31, 2016) is designed to cover Genworth’s statutory liabilities for the LTC policies. The trusts serve as collateral for Genworth's reinsurance obligations related to the MetLife LTC policies and MetLife Insurance Company USA is the sole beneficiary of the trusts. The assets in these trusts are evaluated and adjusted periodically to ensure that the fair value of the assets continues to cover the estimated statutory liabilities related to the LTC policies, as those statutory liabilities change over time.

If Genworth fails to perform under the reinsurance agreement for any reason, including insolvency, and the assets in the two trusts are insufficient or unavailable to MetLife, then Citi must reimburse MetLife for any losses actually incurred in connection with the LTC policies. Since both events would have to occur before Citi would become responsible for any payment to MetLife pursuant to its indemnification obligation, and the likelihood of such events occurring is currently not probable, there is no liability reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 related to this indemnification. Citi continues to closely monitor its potential exposure under this indemnification obligation.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, MetLife announced it was pursuing spinning off the entity involved in the long-term care reinsurance obligations as part of a broader separation of its retail and group/corporate insurance operations. Separately, Genworth announced that it had agreed to be purchased by China Oceanwide Holdings Co., Ltd, subject to a series of conditions and regulatory approvals. Citi is monitoring these developments.

199

Futures and over-the-counter derivatives clearing

Citi provides clearing services on central clearing parties (CCP) for clients that need to clear exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts with CCPs. Based on all relevant facts and circumstances, Citi has concluded that it acts as an agent for accounting purposes in its role as clearing member for these client transactions. As such, Citi does not reflect the underlying exchange-traded or OTC derivatives contracts in its Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 19 for a discussion of Citi’s derivatives activities that are reflected in its Consolidated Financial Statements.

As a clearing member, Citi collects and remits cash and securities collateral (margin) between its clients and the

respective CCP. In certain circumstances, Citi collects a higher amount of cash (or securities) from its clients than it needs to remit to the CCPs. This excess cash is then held at depository institutions such as banks or carry brokers.

There are two types of margin: initial margin and variation margin. Where Citi obtains benefits from or controls cash initial margin (e.g., retains an interest

spread), cash initial margin collected from clients and

remitted to the CCP, or depository institutions, is reflected within Brokerage payables (payables to customers) and Brokerage receivables (receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations) or Cash and due from banks, respectively.

However, for exchange-traded and OTC-cleared derivatives contracts where Citi does not obtain benefits from or control the client cash balances, the client cash initial margin collected from clients and remitted to the CCP or depository institutions is not reflected on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. These conditions are met when Citi has contractually agreed with the client that (i) Citi will pass through to the client all interest paid by the CCP or depository institutions on the cash initial margin; (ii) Citi will not utilize its right as a clearing member to transform cash margin into other assets; (iii) Citi does not guarantee and is not liable to the client for the performance of the CCP or the depository institution and (iv) the client cash balances are legally isolated from Citi’s bankruptcy estate. The total amount of cash initial margin collected and remitted in this manner was approximately $10.2 billion and $9.4 billion as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Variation margin due from clients to the respective CCP, or from the CCP to clients, reflects changes in the value of the client’s derivative contracts for each trading day. As a clearing member, Citi is exposed to the risk of nonperformance by clients (e.g., failure of a client to post

variation margin to the CCP for negative changes in the

value of the client’s derivative contracts). In the event of

non-performance by a client, Citi would move to close out

the client’s positions. The CCP would typically utilize initial

margin posted by the client and held by the CCP, with any

remaining shortfalls required to be paid by Citi as clearing

member. Citi generally holds incremental cash or securities

margin posted by the client, which would typically be

expected to be sufficient to mitigate Citi’s credit risk in the

event the client fails to perform.

As required by ASC 860-30-25-5, securities collateral posted by clients is not recognized on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Carrying Value—Guarantees and Indemnifications

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the tables above amounted

to approximately $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included in Other liabilities. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included in Other liabilities.

Collateral

Cash collateral available to Citi to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $57 billion and $45 billion at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $43 billion and $38 billion at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The majority of collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of Citi held as collateral amounted to $5.4 billion at both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Other property may also be available to Citi to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.

Performance risk

Presented in the tables below are the maximum potential amounts of future payments that are classified based upon internal and external credit ratings. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. As such, Citi believes such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

200

	Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at June 30, 2017	Investment grade		Non-investment grade		Not rated		Total
Financial standby letters of credit	$	67.0	$	12.3	$	13.9	$	93.2
Performance guarantees	6.8		2.9		0.8		10.5
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees	—		—		97.7		97.7
Loans sold with recourse	—		—		0.2		0.2
Securities lending indemnifications	—		—		97.0		97.0
Credit card merchant processing	—		—		83.8		83.8
Credit card arrangements with partners	—		—		1.4		1.4
Custody indemnifications and other	51.5		0.3		0.2		52.0
Total	$	125.3	$	15.5	$	295.0	$	435.8

	Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2016	Investment grade		Non-investment grade		Not rated		Total
Financial standby letters of credit	$	66.8	$	13.4	$	12.9	$	93.1
Performance guarantees	6.3		4.0		0.8		11.1
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees	—		—		87.2		87.2
Loans sold with recourse	—		—		0.2		0.2
Securities lending indemnifications	—		—		80.3		80.3
Credit card merchant processing	—		—		86.4		86.4
Credit card arrangements with partners	—		—		1.5		1.5
Custody indemnifications and other	45.3		0.1		—		45.4
Total	$	118.4	$	17.5	$	269.3	$	405.2

Credit Commitments and Lines of Credit

The table below summarizes Citigroup’s credit commitments:

In millions of dollars	U.S.		Outside of  U.S.		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Commercial and similar letters of credit	$	913	$	4,275	$	5,188	$	5,736
One- to four-family residential mortgages	1,589		1,681		3,270		2,838
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties	11,487		1,551		13,038		13,405
Commercial real estate, construction and land development	10,816		1,394		12,210		10,781
Credit card lines	577,326		98,938		676,264		664,335
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments	168,318		95,569		263,887		259,934
Other commitments and contingencies	2,163		9,371		11,534		11,267
Total	$	772,612	$	212,779	$	985,391	$	968,296

The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards.

Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.

201

23.   CONTINGENCIES

The following information supplements and amends, as applicable, the disclosures in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s First Quarter of 2017 Form 10-Q and Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For purposes of this Note, Citigroup, its affiliates and subsidiaries and current and former officers, directors and employees, are sometimes collectively referred to as Citigroup and Related Parties.

In accordance with ASC 450, Citigroup establishes accruals for contingencies, including the litigation and regulatory matters disclosed herein, when Citigroup believes it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to those matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.

If Citigroup has not accrued for a matter because the matter does not meet the criteria for accrual (as set forth above), or Citigroup believes an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued for a particular matter, in each case assuming a material loss is reasonably possible, Citigroup discloses the matter. In addition, for such matters, Citigroup discloses an estimate of the aggregate reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amounts accrued for those matters as to which an estimate can be made. At June 30, 2017, Citigroup’s estimate of the reasonably possible unaccrued loss for these matters ranges up to approximately $1.5 billion in the aggregate.

As available information changes, the matters for which Citigroup is able to estimate will change, and the estimates themselves will change. In addition, while many estimates presented in financial statements and other financial disclosures involve significant judgment and may be subject to significant uncertainty, estimates of the range of reasonably possible loss arising from litigation and regulatory proceedings are subject to particular uncertainties. For example, at the time of making an estimate, Citigroup may have only preliminary, incomplete or inaccurate information about the facts underlying the claim; its assumptions about the future rulings of the court or other tribunal on significant issues, or the behavior and incentives of adverse parties or regulators, may prove to be wrong; and the outcomes it is attempting to predict are often not amenable to the use of statistical or other quantitative analytical tools. In addition, from time to time an outcome may occur that Citigroup had not accounted for in its estimates because it had deemed such an outcome to be remote. For all these reasons, the amount of loss in excess of accruals ultimately incurred for the matters as to which an estimate has been made could be substantially higher or lower than the range of loss included in the estimate.

Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account its current legal accruals, that the eventual outcome of all matters described in this Note would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition

of Citigroup. Nonetheless, given the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of such matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on Citigroup’s consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.

For further information on ASC 450 and Citigroup's accounting and disclosure framework for contingencies, including for litigation and regulatory matters disclosed herein, see Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Credit Crisis-Related Litigation and Other Matters

Mortgage-Related Litigation and Other Matters

Mortgage Backed Securities Trustee Actions:

On May 23, 2017, the plaintiffs cross-moved for partial summary judgment in FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M ET AL. v. CITIBANK N.A. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 14-cv-9373 (S.D.N.Y.) (Furman, J.).

On June 27, 2017, the court granted in part and denied in part Citibank’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint in FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M ET AL. v. CITIBANK N.A., pending in New York State Supreme Court. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 653891/2015 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) (Ramos, J.).

On July 11, 2017, in FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR GUARANTY BANK v. CITIBANK N.A., the court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration but granted the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint within 90 days to establish its standing to sue. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 15-cv-6574 (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter, J.).

Credit Default Swaps Matters

Antitrust and Other Litigation: On June 8, 2017, a complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against numerous credit default swap (CDS) market participants, including Citigroup, Citibank, CGMI and CGML, under the caption TERA GROUP, INC., ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. The complaint alleges that defendants colluded to prevent plaintiffs’ electronic CDS trading platform, TeraExchange, from entering the market, resulting in lost profits to plaintiffs.  The complaint asserts federal and state antitrust claims, and claims for unjust enrichment and tortious interference with business relations.  Plaintiffs are seeking a finding of joint and several liability, treble damages, attorneys’ fees, pre and post judgment interest and a permanent injunction. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 17-cv-04302 (S.D.N.Y.) (Sullivan, J.).

202

Foreign Exchange Matters

Antitrust and Other Litigation: On May 5, 2017, in NYPL v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., plaintiffs moved for leave to amend their previously dismissed complaint, which defendants opposed on June 14, 2017. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 15 Civ. 2290 (N.D. Cal.) (Chhabria, J.) and 15 Civ. 9300 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).

On April 28, 2017, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their amended complaint in BAKER ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION ET AL. On April 28 and June 10, 2017, plaintiffs (including certain of the Baker plaintiffs) filed two new putative class action suits, captioned CONTANT ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION ET AL. and LAVENDER ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION ET AL; respectively, against various financial institutions, including Citigroup, Citibank, Citicorp, and CGMI. The suits were filed on behalf of purported classes of indirect purchasers of FX instruments sold by the defendants. Plaintiffs in each case allege that defendants engaged in a conspiracy to fix currency prices in violation of the Sherman Act and various state antitrust laws, and seek unspecified money damages (including treble damages), as well as equitable and injunctive relief. On June 30, 2017, the CONTANT and LAVENDER plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint in CONTANT. Additional information concerning these actions is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 16 Civ. 7512 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.), 17 Civ. 4392 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.), and 17 Civ. 3139 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).

On July 11, 2017, in NEGRETE v. CITIBANK, N.A., the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for entry of final judgment as to the claims dismissed in the court’s February 27, 2017 order. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 15 Civ. 7250 (S.D.N.Y.) (Sweet, J.).

On July 12, 2017, a putative class action captioned ALPARI (US), LLC v. CITIGROUP, INC. AND CITIBANK, N.A. was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff asserts claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment arising out of alleged cancellation of electronic FX transactions and seeks damages, restitution, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees.  Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 17 Civ. 5269 (S.D.N.Y.).

Interbank Offered Rates-Related Litigation and Other

Matters

Antitrust and Other Litigation: In May 2017, plaintiffs in IN RE LIBOR-BASED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION (the LIBOR MDL) filed motions to certify proposed classes in the over-the-counter (OTC), exchange-based, and lender class actions. On June 8, 2017, Judge Buchwald entered partial final judgment for the OTC plaintiffs, allowing them to appeal parts of the court’s December 20, 2016 decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  Additional information concerning these actions is publicly available in court filings

under the docket number 11 MD 2262 (S.D.N.Y.) (Buchwald, J.).

The Schwab plaintiffs, whose claims were dismissed in their entirety in December 2016, filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit on May 12, 2017. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 17-1569 (2d Cir.).

On April 27, 2017, in FRONTPOINT ASIAN EVENT DRIVEN FUND, LTD ET AL. v. CITIBANK, N.A. ET AL., the court held oral argument on defendants’ motions to dismiss. The court indicated at argument that it intends to dismiss most of the plaintiffs’ claims with leave to replead some claims. Additional information is available in court filings under the docket number 16 Civ. 5263 (S.D.N.Y.) (Hellerstein, J.).

Interest Rate Swaps Matters

Antitrust and Other Litigation: On July 28, 2017, in IN RE INTEREST RATE SWAPS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, the court ruled on defendants’ motions to dismiss, granting them in part and denying them in part. Additional information is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16 MD 2704 (S.D.N.Y.) (Engelmayer, J.).

Money Laundering Inquiries

Regulatory Actions: As previously announced, on May 22, 2017, the United States Department of Justice, Citigroup, and Citigroup’s subsidiary, Banamex, USA (BUSA), announced a settlement of all remaining open inquiries conducted jointly by the Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts concerning the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering compliance of Citigroup and related entities, including BUSA. The settlement includes a non-prosecution agreement and forfeiture amount of approximately $97 million.

Sovereign Securities Matters

Antitrust and Other Litigation: On July 14, 2017, defendants, including Citigroup and Related Parties, moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint in IN RE SSA BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16 Civ. 03711 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.).

Settlement Payments

Payments required in settlement agreements described above have been made or are covered by existing litigation accruals.

203

24.   CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Citigroup amended its Registration Statement on Form S-3 on file with the SEC (File No. 33-192302) to add its wholly owned subsidiary, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), as a co-registrant. Any securities issued by CGMHI under the Form S-3 will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

The following are the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 for Citigroup Inc., the parent holding company (Citigroup parent company), CGMHI, other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations and total consolidating adjustments. “Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations” includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations and income (loss) from discontinued operations. “Consolidating adjustments” includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries and investment in subsidiaries.

These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements have been prepared and presented in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.”

These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis, but should be considered in relation to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.

204

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company			CGMHI			Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments			Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries	$	2,515		$	—		$	—		$	(2,515	)	$	—
Interest revenue	(1		)	1,404			13,798			—			15,201
Interest revenue—intercompany	1,076			377			(1,453		)	—			—
Interest expense	1,136			546			2,354			—			4,036
Interest expense—intercompany	263			653			(916		)	—			—
Net interest revenue	$	(324	)	$	582		$	10,907		$	—		$	11,165
Commissions and fees	$	—		$	1,279		$	1,658		$	—		$	2,937
Commissions and fees—intercompany	(1		)	108			(107		)	—			—
Principal transactions	1,122			398			1,042			—			2,562
Principal transactions—intercompany	396			290			(686		)	—			—
Other income	(1,601		)	87			2,751			—			1,237
Other income—intercompany	161			(7		)	(154		)	—			—
Total non-interest revenues	$	77		$	2,155		$	4,504		$	—		$	6,736
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	2,268		$	2,737		$	15,411		$	(2,515	)	$	17,901
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	—		$	1		$	1,716		$	—		$	1,717
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits	$	(1	)	$	1,212		$	4,252		$	—		$	5,463
Compensation and benefits—intercompany	20			—			(20		)	—			—
Other operating	(344		)	443			4,944			—			5,043
Other operating—intercompany	10			502			(512		)	—			—
Total operating expenses	$	(315	)	$	2,157		$	8,664		$	—		$	10,506
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries	$	1,183		$	—		$	—		$	(1,183	)	$	—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	3,766		$	579		$	5,031		$	(3,698	)	$	5,678
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	(106		)	261			1,640			—			1,795
Income from continuing operations	$	3,872		$	318		$	3,391		$	(3,698	)	$	3,883
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes	—			—			21			—			21
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	3,872		$	318		$	3,412		$	(3,698	)	$	3,904
Noncontrolling interests	—			—			32			—			32
Net income	$	3,872		$	318		$	3,380		$	(3,698	)	$	3,872
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	514		$	(38	)	$	(155	)	$	193		$	514
Total Citigroup comprehensive income	$	4,386		$	280		$	3,225		$	(3,505	)	$	4,386
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	—		$	—		$	39		$	—		$	39
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			—			32			—			32
Total comprehensive income	$	4,386		$	280		$	3,296		$	(3,505	)	$	4,457

205

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company			CGMHI				Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments			Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries	$	2,900		$	—			$	—		$	(2,900	)	$	—
Interest revenue	1			1,251				13,104			—			14,356
Interest revenue—intercompany	668			139				(807		)	—			—
Interest expense	1,094			401				1,625			—			3,120
Interest expense—intercompany	38			416				(454		)	—			—
Net interest revenue	$	(463	)	$	573			$	11,126		$	—		$	11,236
Commissions and fees	$	—		$	1,119			$	1,606		$	—		$	2,725
Commissions and fees—intercompany	(17		)	(24		)		41			—			—
Principal transactions	(186		)	2,394				(392		)	—			1,816
Principal transactions—intercompany	(217		)	(1,791		)		2,008			—			—
Other income	(585		)	51				2,305			—			1,771
Other income—intercompany	736			339				(1,075		)	—			—
Total non-interest revenues	$	(269	)	$	2,088			$	4,493		$	—		$	6,312
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	2,168		$	2,661			$	15,619		$	(2,900	)	$	17,548
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	—		$	—			$	1,409		$	—		$	1,409
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits	$	(16	)	$	1,202			$	4,043		$	—		$	5,229
Compensation and benefits—intercompany	23			—				(23		)	—			—
Other operating	213			412				4,515			—			5,140
Other operating—intercompany	79			322				(401		)	—			—
Total operating expenses	$	299		$	1,936			$	8,134		$	—		$	10,369
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries	$	1,709		$	—			$	—		$	(1,709	)	$	—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	3,578		$	725			$	6,076		$	(4,609	)	$	5,770
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	(420		)	157				1,986			—			1,723
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	3,998		$	568			$	4,090		$	(4,609	)	$	4,047
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	—			—				(23		)	—			(23		)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	3,998		$	568			$	4,067		$	(4,609	)	$	4,024
Noncontrolling interests	—			(3		)		29			—			26
Net income (loss)	$	3,998		$	571			$	4,038		$	(4,609	)	$	3,998
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	511		$	58			$	1,708		$	(1,766	)	$	511
Total Citigroup comprehensive income (loss)	$	4,509		$	629			$	5,746		$	(6,375	)	$	4,509
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	—		$	—		—	$	(50	)	$	—		$	(50	)
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			(3		)		29			—			26
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	4,509		$	626			$	5,725		$	(6,375	)	$	4,485

206

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company			CGMHI			Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments			Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries	$	6,265		$	—		$	—		$	(6,265	)	$	—
Interest revenue	—			2,431			27,193			—			29,624
Interest revenue—intercompany	1,869			534			(2,403		)	—			—
Interest expense	2,354			942			4,306			—			7,602
Interest expense—intercompany	353			1,079			(1,432		)	—			—
Net interest revenue	$	(838	)	$	944		$	21,916		$	—		$	22,022
Commissions and fees	$	—		$	2,534		$	3,162		$	—		$	5,696
Commissions and fees—intercompany	(1		)	110			(109		)	—			—
Principal transactions	959			2,004			2,621			—			5,584
Principal transactions—intercompany	600			(392		)	(208		)	—			—
Other income	(1,640		)	161			4,198			—			2,719
Other income—intercompany	38			27			(65		)	—			—
Total non-interest revenues	$	(44	)	$	4,444		$	9,599		$	—		$	13,999
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	5,383		$	5,388		$	31,515		$	(6,265	)	$	36,021
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	—		$	1		$	3,378		$	—		$	3,379
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits	$	(15	)	$	2,474		$	8,538		$	—		$	10,997
Compensation and benefits—intercompany	51			—			(51		)	—			—
Other operating	(316		)	849			9,453			—			9,986
Other operating—intercompany	(49		)	970			(921		)	—			—
Total operating expenses	$	(329	)	$	4,293		$	17,019		$	—		$	20,983
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries	$	1,770		$	—		$	—		$	(1,770	)	$	—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	7,482		$	1,094		$	11,118		$	(8,035	)	$	11,659
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	(480		)	476			3,662			—			3,658
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	7,962		$	618		$	7,456		$	(8,035	)	$	8,001
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes	—			—			3			—			3
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	7,962		$	618		$	7,459		$	(8,035	)	$	8,004
Noncontrolling interests	—			—			42			—			42
Net income (loss)	$	7,962		$	618		$	7,417		$	(8,035	)	$	7,962
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,978		$	(58	)	$	(3,876	)	$	3,934		$	1,978
Total Citigroup comprehensive income (loss)	$	9,940		$	560		$	3,541		$	(4,101	)	$	9,940
Add: other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	—		$	—		$	70		$	—		$	70
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			—			42			—			42
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	9,940		$	560		$	3,653		$	(4,101	)	$	10,052

207

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company			CGMHI			Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments			Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
Dividends from subsidiaries	$	5,700		$	—		$	—		$	(5,700	)	$	—
Interest revenue	3			2,397			26,123			—			28,523
Interest revenue—intercompany	1,540			275			(1,815		)	—			—
Interest expense	2,164			765			3,131			—			6,060
Interest expense—intercompany	79			845			(924		)	—			—
Net interest revenue	$	(700	)	$	1,062		$	22,101		$	—		$	22,463
Commissions and fees	$	—		$	2,079		$	3,109		$	—		$	5,188
Commissions and fees—intercompany	(19		)	(30		)	49			—			—
Principal transactions	(395		)	2,257			1,794			—			3,656
Principal transactions—intercompany	41			(1,043		)	1,002			—			—
Other income	(3,679		)	127			7,348			—			3,796
Other income—intercompany	3,996			199			(4,195		)	—			—
Total non-interest revenues	$	(56	)	$	3,589		$	9,107		$	—		$	12,640
Total revenues, net of interest expense	$	4,944		$	4,651		$	31,208		$	(5,700	)	$	35,103
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims	$	—		$	—		$	3,454		$	—		$	3,454
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits	$	(8	)	$	2,491		$	8,302		$	—		$	10,785
Compensation and benefits—intercompany	26			—			(26		)	—			—
Other operating	480			798			8,829			—			10,107
Other operating—intercompany	80			629			(709		)	—			—
Total operating expenses	$	578		$	3,918		$	16,396		$	—		$	20,892
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries	$	2,653		$	—		$	—		$	(2,653	)	$	—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	7,019		$	733		$	11,358		$	(8,353	)	$	10,757
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	(480		)	194			3,488			—			3,202
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	7,499		$	539		$	7,870		$	(8,353	)	$	7,555
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	—			—			(25		)	—			(25		)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	7,499		$	539		$	7,845		$	(8,353	)	$	7,530
Noncontrolling interests	—			(1		)	32			—			31
Net income (loss)	$	7,499		$	540		$	7,813		$	(8,353	)	$	7,499
Comprehensive income
Add: Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	3,244		$	105		$	1,173		$	(1,278	)	$	3,244
Total Citigroup comprehensive income (loss)	$	10,743		$	645		$	8,986		$	(9,631	)	$	10,743
Add: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	—		$	—		$	(23	)	$	—		$	(23	)
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			(1		)	32			—			31
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	10,743		$	644		$	8,995		$	(9,631	)	$	10,751

208

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

	June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company		CGMHI		Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments			Citigroup consolidated
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	—	$	793	$	20,147		$	—		$	20,940
Cash and due from banks—intercompany	160		2,843		(3,003		)	—			—
Federal funds sold and resale agreements	—		188,379		45,686			—			234,065
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany	—		15,478		(15,478		)	—			—
Trading account assets	11		136,853		122,742			—			259,606
Trading account assets—intercompany	1		1,544		(1,545		)	—			—
Investments	26		167		351,517			—			351,710
Loans, net of unearned income	—		891		643,804			—			644,695
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany	—		—		—			—			—
Allowance for loan losses	—		—		(12,025		)	—			(12,025		)
Total loans, net	$	—	$	891	$	631,779		$	—		$	632,670
Advances to subsidiaries	$	132,366	$	—	$	(132,366	)	$	—		$	—
Investments in subsidiaries	230,077		—		—			(230,077		)	—
Other assets (1)	23,712		55,983		285,377			—			365,072
Other assets—intercompany	15,650		48,567		(64,217		)	—			—
Total assets	$	402,003	$	451,498	$	1,240,639		$	(230,077	)	$	1,864,063
Liabilities and equity
Deposits	$	—	$	—	$	958,743		$	—		$	958,743
Deposits—intercompany	—		—		—			—			—
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold	—		133,308		21,472			—			154,780
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany	—		18,993		(18,993		)	—			—
Trading account liabilities	—		87,137		49,608			—			136,745
Trading account liabilities—intercompany	67		1,629		(1,696		)	—			—
Short-term borrowings	201		3,217		33,101			—			36,519
Short-term borrowings—intercompany	—		57,532		(57,532		)	—			—
Long-term debt	147,257		16,710		61,212			—			225,179
Long-term debt—intercompany	—		28,795		(28,795		)	—			—
Advances from subsidiaries	20,761		—		(20,761		)	—			—
Other liabilities	2,998		60,092		57,900			—			120,990
Other liabilities—intercompany	700		10,733		(11,433		)	—			—
Stockholders’ equity	230,019		33,352		197,813			(230,077		)	231,107
Total liabilities and equity	$	402,003	$	451,498	$	1,240,639		$	(230,077	)	$	1,864,063

(1) Other assets for Citigroup parent company at June 30, 2017 included $26.3 billion of placements to Citibank and its branches, of which $23.4 billion had a remaining term of less than 30 days.

209

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

	December 31, 2016
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company		CGMHI		Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments			Citigroup consolidated
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	—	$	870	$	22,173		$	—		$	23,043
Cash and due from banks—intercompany	142		3,820		(3,962		)	—			—
Federal funds sold and resale agreements	—		196,236		40,577			—			236,813
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany	—		12,270		(12,270		)	—			—
Trading account assets	6		121,484		122,435			—			243,925
Trading account assets—intercompany	1,173		907		(2,080		)	—			—
Investments	173		335		352,796			—			353,304
Loans, net of unearned income	—		575		623,794			—			624,369
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany	—		—		—			—			—
Allowance for loan losses	—		—		(12,060		)	—			(12,060		)
Total loans, net	$	—	$	575	$	611,734		$	—		$	612,309
Advances to subsidiaries	$	143,154	$	—	$	(143,154	)	$	—		$	—
Investments in subsidiaries	226,279		—		—			(226,279		)	—
Other assets(1)	23,734		46,095		252,854			—			322,683
Other assets—intercompany	27,845		38,207		(66,052		)	—			—
Total assets	$	422,506	$	420,799	$	1,175,051		$	(226,279	)	$	1,792,077
Liabilities and equity
Deposits	$	—	$	—	$	929,406		$	—		$	929,406
Deposits—intercompany	—		—		—			—			—
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold	—		122,320		19,501			—			141,821
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany	—		25,417		(25,417		)	—			—
Trading account liabilities	—		87,714		51,331			—			139,045
Trading account liabilities—intercompany	1,006		868		(1,874		)	—			—
Short-term borrowings	—		1,356		29,345			—			30,701
Short-term borrowings—intercompany	—		35,596		(35,596		)	—			—
Long-term debt	147,333		8,128		50,717			—			206,178
Long-term debt—intercompany	—		41,287		(41,287		)	—			—
Advances from subsidiaries	41,258		—		(41,258		)	—			—
Other liabilities	3,466		57,430		57,887			—			118,783
Other liabilities—intercompany	4,323		7,894		(12,217		)	—			—
Stockholders’ equity	225,120		32,789		194,513			(226,279		)	226,143
Total liabilities and equity	$	422,506	$	420,799	$	1,175,051		$	(226,279	)	$	1,792,077

(1) Other assets for Citigroup parent company at December 31, 2016 included $20.7 billion of placements to Citibank and its branches, of which $6.8 billion had a remaining term of less than 30 days.

210

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company			CGMHI			Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments		Citigroup consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	$	10,626		$	(18,060	)	$	(14,077	)	$	—	$	(21,511	)
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
Purchases of investments	$	—		$	—		$	(96,925	)	$	—	$	(96,925	)
Proceeds from sales of investments	132			—			56,596			—		56,728
Proceeds from maturities of investments	—			—			47,785			—		47,785
Change in deposits with banks	—			10,108			(37,799		)	—		(27,691		)
Change in loans	—			—			(29,952		)	—		(29,952		)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans	—			—			6,256			—		6,256
Proceeds from significant disposals	—			—			2,732			—		2,732
Change in federal funds sold and resales	—			4,649			(1,901		)	—		2,748
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany	12,132			(5,870		)	(6,262		)	—		—
Other investing activities	—			—			(1,432		)	—		(1,432		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations	$	12,264		$	8,887		$	(60,902	)	$	—	$	(39,751	)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
Dividends paid	$	(1,504	)	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	(1,504	)
Treasury stock acquired	(3,635		)	—			—			—		(3,635		)
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt, net	2,964			3,887			9,511			—		16,362
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net	—			(3,100		)	3,100			—		—
Change in deposits	—			—			29,337			—		29,337
Change in federal funds purchased and repos	—			4,564			8,395			—		12,959
Change in short-term borrowings	201			1,861			3,756			—		5,818
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany	(20,497		)	907			19,590			—		—
Other financing activities	(401		)	—			—			—		(401		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations	$	(22,872	)	$	8,119		$	73,689		$	—	$	58,936
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks	$	—		$	—		$	223		$	—	$	223
Change in cash and due from banks	$	18		$	(1,054	)	$	(1,067	)	$	—	$	(2,103	)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period	142			4,690			18,211			—		23,043
Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	160		$	3,636		$	17,144		$	—	$	20,940
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations
Cash paid (refund) during the year for income taxes	$	679		$	152		$	1,144		$	—	$	1,975
Cash paid during the year for interest	119			1,924			5,286			—		7,329
Non-cash investing activities
Transfers to loans HFS from loans	$	—		$	—		$	3,300		$	—	$	3,300
Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets	—			—			58			—		58

211

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
In millions of dollars	Citigroup parent company			CGMHI			Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations			Consolidating adjustments		Citigroup consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	$	13,794		$	2,380		$	4,893		$	—	$	21,067
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
Purchases of investments	$	—		$	—		$	(108,359	)	$	—	$	(108,359	)
Proceeds from sales of investments	—			—			66,138			—		66,138
Proceeds from maturities of investments	46			—			33,337			—		33,383
Change in deposits with banks	—			(5,390		)	(10,406		)	—		(15,796		)
Change in loans	—			—			(30,170		)	—		(30,170		)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans	—			—			7,021			—		7,021
Proceeds from significant disposals	—			—			265			—		265
Change in federal funds sold and resales	—			(4,256		)	(4,752		)	—		(9,008		)
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany	(16,412		)	(5,125		)	21,537			—		—
Other investing activities	—			—			(987		)	—		(987		)
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations	$	(16,366	)	$	(14,771	)	$	(26,376	)	$	—	$	(57,513	)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
Dividends paid	$	(828	)	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	(828	)
Issuance of preferred stock	2,498			—			—			—		2,498
Treasury stock acquired	(2,634		)	—			—			—		(2,634		)
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt, net	890			2,512			(3,115		)	—		287
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net	—			(10,112		)	10,112			—		—
Change in deposits	—			—			29,965			—		29,965
Change in federal funds purchased and repos	—			13,550			(2,045		)	—		11,505
Change in short-term borrowings	(160		)	583			(3,094		)	—		(2,671		)
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany	3,127			1,855			(4,982		)	—		—
Capital contributions from parent	—			5,000			(5,000		)	—		—
Other financing activities	(312		)	—			—			—		(312		)
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations	$	2,581		$	13,388		$	21,841		$	—	$	37,810
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks	$	—		$	—		$	(124	)	$	—	$	(124	)
Change in cash and due from banks	$	9		$	997		$	234		$	—	$	1,240
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period	124			1,995			18,781			—		20,900
Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	133		$	2,992		$	19,015		$	—	$	22,140
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations
Cash paid (refund) during the year for income taxes	$	(323	)	$	40		$	2,328		$	—	$	2,045
Cash paid during the year for interest	2,040			1,666			2,020			—		5,726
Non-cash investing activities
Transfers to loans HFS from loans	$	—		$	—		$	6,000		$	—	$	6,000
Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets	—			—			97			—		97

212

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND DIVIDENDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Equity Security Repurchases

The following table summarizes Citi’s equity security repurchases, which consisted entirely of common stock repurchases:

In millions, except per share amounts	Total shares purchased	Average price paid per share		Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or programs
April 2017
Open market repurchases(1)	8.9	$	59.01	$	1,260
Employee transactions(2)	—	—		N/A
May 2017
Open market repurchases(1)	9.8	60.80		661
Employee transactions(2)	—	—		N/A
June 2017
Open market repurchases(1)	10.3	63.72		—
Employee transactions(2)	—	—		N/A
Total for 2Q17 and remaining program balance as of June 30, 2017	29.0	$	61.29	$	—

(1) Represents repurchases under the $10.4 billion 2016 common stock repurchase program (2016 Repurchase Program) that was approved by Citigroup’s Board of Directors and announced on June 29, 2016. The 2016 Repurchase Program included the additional $1.75 billion increase in the program that was approved by Citigroup’s Board of Directors and announced on November 21, 2016. The 2016 Repurchase Program was part of the planned capital actions included by Citi in its 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Shares repurchased under the 2016 Repurchase Program were added to treasury stock. The 2016 Repurchase Program expired on June 30, 2017. On June 28, 2017, Citigroup announced a $15.6 billion common stock repurchase program during the four quarters beginning in the third quarter of 2017 (2017 Repurchase Program), which was part of the planned capital actions included by Citi as part of its 2017 CCAR. The 2017 Repurchase Program expires on June 30, 2018. Shares repurchased under the 2017 Repurchase Program will be added to treasury stock.

(2) Consisted of shares added to treasury stock related to (i) certain activity on employee stock option program exercises where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or (ii) under Citi’s employee restricted or deferred stock programs where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.

N/A Not applicable

Dividends

In addition to Board of Directors’ approval, Citi’s ability to pay common stock dividends substantially depends on regulatory approval, including an annual regulatory review of the results of the CCAR process required by the Federal Reserve Board and the supervisory stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act. For additional information regarding Citi’s capital planning and stress testing, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Capital Planning and Stress Testing” and “Risk Factors—Strategic Risks” in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any dividend on Citi’s outstanding common stock would also need to be made in compliance with Citi’s obligations to its outstanding preferred stock.

On June 28, 2017, Citi announced the Federal Reserve Board did not object to its planned capital actions as part of the 2017 CCAR, which included an increase of Citi’s quarterly common stock dividend to $0.32 per share over the four quarters beginning with the third quarter of 2017 (subject to quarterly approval by the Board of Directors). Any dividend on Citi’s outstanding common stock would also need to be made in compliance with Citi’s obligations to its outstanding preferred stock.

For information on the ability of Citigroup’s subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, see Note 18 to the

Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

213

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 1st day of August, 2017.

CITIGROUP INC.

(Registrant)

By    /s/ John C. Gerspach

John C. Gerspach

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

By    /s/ Jeffrey R. Walsh

Jeffrey R. Walsh

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

214

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number	Description of Exhibit
3.01	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as in effect on the date hereof, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 (File No. 1-9924).
4.01+	Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 26, 2017 among Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to Indenture dated as of November 13, 2013.
12.01+	Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges.
12.02+	Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges Including Preferred Stock Dividends.
31.01+	Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.02+	Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.01+	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.01+	Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, filed on August 1, 2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.

+ Filed herewith.    

215