UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | |
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 | ||
OR | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | |
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number: 0-6729
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW JERSEY | 22-1737915 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
Parkway 109 Office Center, 328 Newman Springs Road, Red Bank, New Jersey | 07701 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(732) 842-4700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
[None]
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, no par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of June 30, 2007 the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,986,879 based on the closing sale price as reported on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at March 31, 2008 | |
[Common Stock, no par value per share] | 13,257,248 shares |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
Table of Contents
PART I
PAGE
Item 1. | Business | 4 | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 18 | |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 26 | |
Item 2. | Properties | 26 | |
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 26 | |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters on a Vote of Security Holders | 30 |
PART II
Item 5. | Market of and Dividends on Our Common Equity and Related Shareholders Matters | 30 | |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 32 | |
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 34 | |
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 54 | |
Item 8. | Financial Statements | 55 | |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 55 | |
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 55 | |
Item 9B | Other Information | 55 |
PART III
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers | 56 | |
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 60 | |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | 71 | |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 74 | |
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 74 |
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 75 |
3
PART I
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Item 1 (“Business”) and Item 7 (“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”), contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and are not limited to those discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” All statements that do not relate to historical or current facts are forward-looking statements. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to present or anticipated products and markets, future revenues, capital expenditures, expansion plans, future financing and liquidity, personnel, and other statements regarding matters that are not historical facts or statements of current condition. Any or all forward-looking statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make, or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in the discussion below will be important in determining future results. Consequently, we cannot guarantee any forward-looking statements. Actual future results may vary materially. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Item 1. Business
Introduction
First Montauk Financial Corp. (the “Company”) is a New Jersey-based financial services holding company whose principal subsidiary, First Montauk Securities Corp. (“FMSC”), has operated as a full service retail and institutional securities brokerage firm since 1987. Since July 2000, FMSC has operated under the registered trade name “Montauk Financial Group”. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to Montauk Financial Group shall refer solely to our subsidiary FMSC. Montauk Financial Group provides a broad range of securities brokerage and investment services to a diverse retail and institutional clientele, as well as corporate finance and investment banking services to corporations and businesses. First Montauk Financial Corp. also sells insurance products through its subsidiary, Montauk Insurance Services, Inc.
Montauk Financial Group has approximately 185 registered representatives and services over 45,000 retail and institutional customer accounts, which comprise over $3 billion in customer assets. All of Montauk Financial Group’s 88 branch offices and satellite locations in 24 states are owned and operated by affiliates; independent owners who maintain all applicable licenses and are responsible for all office overhead and expenses. Montauk Financial Group also employs registered representatives directly at its corporate headquarters.
4
Montauk Financial Group is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) (formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers), the Municipal Securities Rule Making Board, the National Futures Association, and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), and is licensed to conduct its brokerage activities in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and registered as an International broker-dealer to conduct business with institutional clients in the province of Ontario, Canada. Securities transactions are cleared through National Financial Services, LLC ("NFS"), a Fidelity Investments company and Penson Financial Services, Inc. (“Penson”) with various floor brokerage and specialist firms also providing execution services. These arrangements provide Montauk Financial Group with back office support, transaction processing services on all principal national and international securities exchanges, and access to many other financial services and products which allows Montauk Financial Group to offer products and services comparable to larger brokerage firms.
Our revenues consist primarily of commissions and fee income from individual and institutional securities transactions, mutual fund and annuity sales, fees from managed accounts and investment banking activities, such as private and public securities offerings. The following table represents the percentage of revenues generated in each of these activities during the year ended December 31, 2007:
Equities: | |
Listed and Over-The-Counter Stocks | 30% |
Debt Instruments: | |
Municipal, Government and Corporate Bonds and Unit Investment Trusts | 4% |
Mutual Funds | 15% |
Options: Equity & Index | 2% |
Insurance and Annuities | 11% |
Corporate Finance and Investment Banking | 9% |
Investment Advisory Fees | 11% |
Alternative Investments (1) | 10% |
Proprietary trading | 1% |
Miscellaneous (2) | 7% |
Total | 100% |
(1) Alternative Investments include REITs, 1031 Exchanges and medical receivable notes.
(2) Miscellaneous includes interest income, operations and marketing fees.
5
The following table reflects our various sources of revenue and the percentage of total revenues for 2007. Revenues from agency transactions in securities for customers of Montauk Financial Group are shown as commissions. Montauk Financial Group also executes customer orders on a riskless principal basis, which are reflected as part of “Riskless Principal trades” on the table below.
Year Ended December 31, 2007 | ||||||||
Commissions from equities, options and mutual funds, insurance, investment advisory fees and alternative investments | $ | 31,728,518 | 80 | % | ||||
Riskless Principal trades in equity and fixed income securities on behalf of customers | $ | 1,331,525 | 3 | % | ||||
Proprietary trading | $ | 203,269 | 1 | % | ||||
Interest and other income | $ | 2,712,648 | 7 | % | ||||
Investment banking (1) | $ | 3,579,838 | 9 | % | ||||
Total Revenues | $ | 39,555,798 | 100 | % |
(1) | Investment banking revenues consists of commissions, selling concessions, consulting fees and other income from underwriting and syndicate activities and placement agent fees. |
Affiliated Registered Representative Program
Montauk Financial Group’s primary method of operations is through its affiliated registered representatives, who operate as independent contractors. A registered representative who becomes affiliated with Montauk Financial Group establishes his/her own office and is solely responsible for the payment of all expenses associated with the operation of the branch office, including rent, utilities, furniture, equipment, market data services, and general office supplies. Under this program, the affiliated representative retains a significantly higher percentage of the commissions and fees generated by his/her sales than a registered representative in a traditional brokerage arrangement. The affiliate program is designed to attract experienced brokers with existing clientele who desire to operate their own offices, as well as other professionals in all facets of the financial services industry.
Affiliated representatives must possess a sufficient level of sales and experience to enable the individual to independently support his/her own office. Financial professionals such as insurance agents, real estate brokers, financial planners, and accountants, who already provide financial services to their clients, can become registered with Montauk Financial Group to provide securities products and services to their clients.
6
Montauk Financial Group provides full support services to each of the affiliated representatives, including access to stock and options execution and over-the-counter stock trading; products such as insurance, mutual funds, unit trusts and investment advisory programs; and compliance, supervision, accounting and related services.
Each affiliated representative is required to obtain and maintain in good standing each license required by the SEC and FINRA to conduct the type of securities business in which the affiliate will engage, and to register in the various states in which he/she intends to service customers. Montauk Financial Group is ultimately responsible for supervising each affiliated registered representative. Montauk Financial Group can incur substantial liability from improper actions of any of the affiliated representatives, and therefore it maintains a professional liability errors and omissions insurance policy which provides coverage for certain actions taken and/or omissions made by its registered representatives, employees and other agents in connection with the purchase and sale of securities and other financial products and services.
Revenue Sources
Through our affiliate program we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from customer commissions on brokerage transactions in equity and debt securities for retail and institutional investors such as corporations, partnerships and limited liability companies, investment advisors, hedge funds, and pension and profit sharing plans. In executing customer orders to buy or sell a security in which we make a market, we may sell to, or purchase from, customers at a price that is substantially equal to the current inter-dealer market price plus or minus a mark-up or mark-down. We may also act as agent and execute a customer’s purchase or sale order with another broker-dealer market-maker at the best inter-dealer market price available and charge a commission. We believe our mark-ups, mark-downs and commissions are competitive based on the services we provide to our customers. In executing customer orders to buy or sell listed and over-the-counter securities in which we do not make a market, we generally act as an agent and charges commissions that we believe are competitive, based on the services that we provide to our customers.
In addition, in the regular course of our business, we take limited securities positions as a market maker to facilitate customer transactions and for investment purposes. In trading for our own account, we expose our own capital to the risk of fluctuations in market value. Trading profits (or losses) depend primarily upon the skills of the employees engaged in market making and position taking, the amount of capital allocated to positions in securities and the general trend of prices in the securities markets. We monitor our risk by maintaining our securities positions at or below certain pre-established levels. These levels reduce certain opportunities to realize profits in the event that the value of such securities increases. However, they also reduce the risk of loss in the event of a decrease in such value and minimize interest costs incurred on funds provided to maintain such positions.
7
Montauk Insurance Services
In 1991, we formed Montauk Insurance Services, Inc. for the purpose of offering and selling variable annuities, variable and traditional life, and health insurance products. Currently, Montauk Insurance is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities in all 50 states. Montauk Insurance derives revenue from the sale of insurance-related products and services to the customers of Montauk Financial Group’s registered representatives, who are also licensed to sell certain insurance products. In 2007, we earned gross commissions of $4.39 million from the sale of insurance and annuity products.
Asset Management Advisory Services
Montauk Financial Group is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC, and is registered or eligible to conduct business as an investment adviser in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. As an investment adviser, Montauk Financial Group operates the Portfolio Advisory Strategies Platform (the "Platform") through which we are able to offer clients a choice of various discretionary and non-discretionary investment advisory programs (“Programs”). One such Program, the Unified Managed Asset Allocation and Investment Management Program, is sponsored by Montauk Financial Group and enables affiliated representatives to provide individualized investment management services to clients regarding the purchase and sale of securities. Other Programs available through the Platform are sponsored or administered by third-party investment advisers. Each of the Programs generally requires the client to pay an asset-based fee for portfolio advisory services, brokerage execution and custody, and periodic account performance reporting. During 2007, investment advisory fees represented 11% of the Company's overall revenues, compared to 7% for 2006, and the Company intends to continue to focus efforts on growing this line of business.
Investment Banking
Montauk Financial Group participates in private and public offerings of equity and debt securities and provides general investment banking consulting services to various public and private corporations. We continue to review investment banking opportunities and anticipate that we will engage in additional public and private offerings in the future as business and market conditions warrant. Our investment banking services include bridge and senior loan financing, private placements and public offerings of debt and equity securities, and exclusive banking consultation. Under circumstances where we act as an underwriter, we may assume greater risk than would normally be assumed in our normal trading activity. Under the federal securities laws, an underwriter is subject to substantial potential liability for material misstatements or omissions in prospectuses and other communications with respect to underwritten offerings. Further, underwriting commitments constitute a charge against net capital and our underwriting commitments may be limited by the requirement that we must, at all times, be in compliance with the Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 of the SEC. During 2007, we did not serve as managing underwriter in any public offerings, but participated as a selling group member on numerous occasions. Members of selling groups do not have the same level of capital requirements in an underwritten offering as underwriters under FINRA rules.
8
Competition
We encounter intense competition in all aspects of our business and compete directly with many other securities firms for clients, as well as registered representatives. A significant number of such competitors offer their customers a broader range of financial services and have substantially greater resources. Retail firms such as Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., Smith Barney, Inc. and Morgan Stanley dominate the industry; however, we also compete with numerous regional and local firms. Montauk Financial Group also competes for experienced brokers with other firms offering an independent affiliate program such as Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. and Linsco/Private Ledger Corp.
In addition, a number of firms offer discount brokerage services to individual retail customers and generally effect transactions at substantially lower commission rates on an "execution only" basis, without offering other services such as investment recommendations and research. Moreover, there is substantial commission discounting by full-service broker-dealers competing for institutional and individual brokerage business. In 1997, we entered the discount brokerage arena through our Century Discount Investments division. Additionally, the emergence of online trading has further intensified the competition for brokerage customers. Century Discount Investments maintains a limited customer base and has not grown in revenues or customers over the years.
Other financial institutions, notably commercial and savings banks, offer customers some of the same services and products currently provided by securities firms. In addition, certain large corporations have entered the securities industry by acquiring securities firms. While it is not possible to predict the type and extent of competitive services that banks and other institutions ultimately may offer to customers, we may be adversely affected to the extent those services are offered on a large-scale basis.
Montauk Financial Group competes by recruiting qualified registered representatives to join our affiliate program. Montauk Financial Group may offer incentives to qualified registered representatives to join. These incentives can include transition assistance and cash payments in the form of loans to offset the costs of moving their business to Montauk, incentive stock options and a higher payout for a period of time. Through its clearing relationship, Montauk Financial Group has implemented on-line information systems to service its affiliates and to attract new brokers. These systems enable brokers from any office to instantly access customer accounts, view account positions and histories, buy and sell securities, send and receive electronic mail, and receive product information and compliance memoranda via the firm's intranet component of its website.
Government Regulation
The securities industry in the United States is subject to extensive regulation under various federal and state laws and regulations. The SEC is the federal agency charged with the administration of most of the federal securities laws. Much of the regulation of the securities industry, however, has been assigned to various self-regulatory organizations, principally in our case FINRA. The self-regulatory organizations, among other things, promulgate regulations and provide oversight in areas of:
· | sales practices, |
· | trade practices among broker-dealers, |
· | capital requirements, |
· | record keeping, and |
· | conduct of employees and affiliates of member organizations. |
9
In addition to promulgating regulations and providing oversight, the SEC and the self-regulatory organizations have the authority to conduct administrative proceedings which can result in the censure, fine, suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer, its officers or employees. Furthermore, new legislation, changes in the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the self-regulatory organizations, or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules often directly affect the operation and profitability of broker-dealers. The stated purpose of much of the regulation of broker-dealers is the protection of customers and the securities markets rather than the protection of creditors and shareholders of broker-dealers.
Net Capital Requirements. Every U.S. registered broker-dealer doing business with the public is subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule, which specifies minimum net capital requirements. Although we are not directly subject to the Net Capital Rule, Montauk Financial Group, as a registered broker-dealer is. The Net Capital Rule provides that a broker-dealer doing business with the public shall not permit its aggregate indebtedness to exceed 15 times its adjusted net capital (the “basic method”) or, alternatively, that it not permit its adjusted net capital to be less than 2% of its aggregate debit balances (primarily receivables from customers and broker-dealers) computed in accordance with the Net Capital Rule (the “alternative method”). Montauk Financial Group applies the basic method of calculation.
Compliance with applicable net capital rules could limit our operations, such as underwriting and trading activities, that require the use of significant amounts of capital, and may also restrict loans, advances, dividends and other payments by our subsidiaries to us. As of December 31, 2007, Montauk Financial Group had $849,710 of net capital and $599,710 of excess net capital.
Employees
Currently, we have approximately 185 registered representatives of which 178 are associated with affiliate offices. These affiliated registered representatives are not employees. In addition, we employ approximately 43 support personnel in the areas of operations, compliance, legal, accounting, technology, recruiting and administration. We believe our relationship with our employees is satisfactory.
Fidelity Bond and SIPC Account Protection
As required by the FINRA and certain other regulatory authorities, Montauk Financial Group carries a fidelity bond covering loss or theft of securities, as well as embezzlement and forgery. The bond provides total coverage of $5,000,000 (with a $50,000 deductible provision per incident). In addition, SIPC protects accounts against brokerage firm liquidations for up to $500,000 for each customer, subject to a limitation of $100,000 for claims for cash balances. Customer accounts held at our clearing firm also have “Excess SIPC” net equity protection through CAPCO Insurance Company. Neither SIPC nor Excess SIPC protects client accounts against market losses. SIPC is funded through assessments on registered broker-dealers and charges a flat annual fee of $150.
10
Securities Broker/Dealer Professional Liability Insurance
Montauk Financial Group carries a securities Broker/Dealer professional liability insurance policy covering negligent acts, error or omission by an insured individual acting on behalf of the insured Broker/Dealer in providing securities transactions, investment management services, financial investment advice and the purchase and/or sale of securities. This policy excludes coverage for certain types of business activities, including but not limited to, claims involving the sale of penny stocks and limited partnerships, accounts handled on a discretionary basis and deliberately fraudulent and/or criminal acts. The policy term is from January 31, 2008 to January 31, 2009 with a $1 million limit of liability for each covered event and a $3 million aggregate liability limit. We are responsible for a $100,000 deductible payment per claim. In the event that the cost of this coverage becomes cost prohibitive or otherwise unavailable, the lack of coverage may have an adverse impact on our financial condition in the event of future material claims, which may not be covered by our existing policy.
Executive and Organization Liability Insurance Policy
We carry an executive and organization liability insurance policy (also known as Directors and Officers liability insurance), which covers our executive officers, directors and counsel against any claims for monetary damages arising from the covered individuals actual or alleged breach of duty, neglect, error, misstatement, misleading statement or omission when acting in the capacity of his/her position as an executive officer, director and/or counsel on our behalf. Policy exclusions include, but are not limited to, claims made against covered individuals attributable to the committing of any deliberate criminal or fraudulent acts, illegal or improper payments, and others.
General Business Developments during 2007 and Subsequent Events
Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement
On May 5, 2006, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with FMFG Ownership, Inc. and FMFG AcquisitionCo, Inc. (collectively referred to as the "Okun Purchasers"), which are wholly-owned by Mr. Edward H. Okun, a private investor. Mr. Okun is the controlling person of Investment Properties of America, LLC (“IPofA”), a privately owned, diversified real estate investment and management company. Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Okun Purchasers were to purchase all of our outstanding securities for an aggregate purchase price of $23 million, or $1.00 in cash per common share, $2.00 in cash per share of Series A Preferred Stock (convertible into two shares of common stock), and $10.00 in cash per share of Series B Preferred Stock (convertible into ten shares of common stock).
On December 29, 2006, we received notification from representatives of the Okun Purchasers that they were terminating the merger agreement and not proceeding with the merger. They alleged our failure to satisfy conditions and our alleged breach of various representations, warranties, covenants and agreement in the merger agreement.
11
On January 8, 2007, we filed a lawsuit against the Okun Purchasers, Mr. Okun, IPofA and several other affiliated entities which Mr. Okun controls (collectively, the “Okun Defendants”) seeking to enforce the terms of the merger. Pursuant to the merger agreement, shareholders of our common stock would have received $1.00 in cash for each share of common stock. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that the Okun Purchasers breached the merger agreement by terminating the agreement on December 29, 2006 without cause or justification. Our complaint demanded specific performance of the merger agreement and completion of the merger. In the alternative, we sought compensatory damages for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as payment of $2 million held in escrow to secure the performance of the Okun Purchasers under the merger agreement. The lawsuit also sought to void the lease agreement that we entered into with another Okun affiliate to relocate the Company’s corporate offices to a building purchased by that Okun affiliate in Red Bank, New Jersey.
On February 12, 2007, we received the Okun Defendants' to the lawsuit, which contained several counterclaims against us. In their counterclaims, the Okun Defendants alleged that we breached the merger agreement and failed to disclose certain material facts about us. They also sought the return of $2 million held in escrow as well as compensatory damages, interest and costs. The Okun Defendants filed two additional actions; one on February 2, 2007 in the Circuit Court of the State of Florida against our President and Chief Executive Officer, and the other, a shareholder derivative action in the Federal District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company and certain of our directors and officers, filed on February 16, 2007. We believed these actions were based on the same facts and circumstances as the previous action that we filed against the Okun Defendants for their breach of the merger agreement, and were part of their response to the original lawsuit we filed in the New Jersey Superior Court.
On February 26, 2007, Mr. Okun and certain of his affiliates filed an amendment to their Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing that they beneficially owned 52.8% of our voting securities. According to the amended Schedule 13D, additional shares of our common stock were purchased in privately negotiated transactions for $1.00 per share and the 197,824 shares of Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”) outstanding were purchased for $10.00 per share. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into 10 shares of common stock. The Series B Preferred Stock and certain of the shares of common stock were purchased from two of our former officers and directors.
On May 9, 2007, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“May Settlement Agreement”) to settle the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. However, on May 23, 2007 the Company announced that it and the Okun Defendants had agreed to consent to the entry of a Court Order to vacate and set aside the May Settlement Agreement.
On June 15, 2007, the Company announced that it had reached a new agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“June Settlement Agreement”) to settle the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. The June Settlement Agreement provided that Okun’s affiliated entities would surrender all of their First Montauk preferred stock holdings and 5,272,305 of their common share holdings, such that the Okun’s affiliates would hold less than 25% of the outstanding common shares of stock in First Montauk. These shares have since been surrendered and cancelled. The Company also obtained an exclusive 60 day option (the “Option Period”) to purchase the balance of the shares held by the Okun affiliated entities (the “Option Securities”) for the aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Option”), which expired on August 14, 2007, without the Company exercising its option. The June Settlement Agreement also provided that the lease between an Okun affiliated entity and the Company, with respect to relocating the Company’s corporate offices, shall be deemed void ab initio.
12
In return, the Company agreed to direct the escrow agent, Signature Bank New York, to pay to an Okun affiliated entity the $2 million on deposit by Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants under the Escrow Agreement executed and delivered pursuant to the May 5, 2006 Merger Agreement.
The foregoing description of the June Settlement Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Settlement Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2007.
Shareholder Rights Plan
The Board of Directors of First Montauk declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of our common stock pursuant to a Rights Agreement dated as of August 8, 2007, between us and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agreement”). The dividend was paid on August 8, 2007 to our shareholders of record on that date (“Record Date”). In addition, our Board of Directors authorized the issuance of one preferred share purchase right for each additional share of common stock that becomes outstanding between August 8, 2007 and the earliest of:
· | the “distribution date”, which is the earlier of: (1) the close of business on the tenth (10th) business day (unless further extended by a resolution adopted by a majority of the Continuing Directors of our Board of Directors as of the close of business on August 9, 2007 (the date of our 2007 Annual Meeting)) after a public announcement that (i) a person has acquired beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock (the “Requisite Percentage”) or (ii) in the case of Edward H. Okun, FMFG Ownership Inc., FMFG Ownership II, Inc. and any of their respective Affiliates and Associates (collective, the “Okun Parties”) and their respective successors and assigns acquired additional shares of the common stock and beneficially own more than an aggregate of 3,300,308 shares of common stock after the Record Date (each person specified in (i) and (ii) hereafter referred to as an “Acquiring Person); and (2) a date that the Board of Directors designates following the commencement of, or first public disclosure of an intent to commence, a tender or exchange offer for outstanding shares of common stock that could result in the offeror becoming an Acquiring person; |
· | the date on which the rights expire, which is August 8, 2017; and |
· | the date, if any, on which our Board of Directors redeems the preferred share purchase rights. |
Each preferred share purchase right entitles its registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of a new Series C Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, at a price of $2.00 per one one-hundredth of a preferred share, subject to adjustment as described below.
13
If an Acquiring Person acquires beneficial ownership of the Requisite Percentage or more of the outstanding shares of common stock after August 8, 2007, after the distribution date the preferred share purchase rights will entitle each right holder, other than the Acquiring Person or any affiliate or associate of the Acquiring Person (whose preferred share purchase rights shall be null and void and nontransferable), to purchase, for the purchase price, the number of shares of common stock which at the time of the transaction would have a market value of twice the purchase price.
After an Acquiring Person becomes the beneficial owner of the Requisite Percentage or more of the outstanding shares of common stock but before the Acquiring Person becomes the beneficial owner of more than 50% of the common shares, the Board of Directors may elect to exchange each preferred share purchase right, other than those that have become null and void and nontransferable as described above, for shares of common stock, without payment of the purchase price. The exchange rate in this situation would be one-half of the number of shares of common stock that would otherwise be issuable at that time upon the exercise of one preferred share purchase right.
At any time prior to an Acquiring Person acquiring beneficial ownership of the Requisite Percentage or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, our Board of Directors may redeem the preferred share purchase rights in whole, but not in part. The redemption price of $0.0001 per preferred share purchase right, subject to adjustment as provided in the Rights Agreement, may be paid in cash, shares of common stock or other of our securities deemed by the Board of Directors to be at least equivalent in value. The Board of Directors may also supplement or amend any provision of the Rights Agreement, including the date on which the distribution date or expiration date would occur, the time during which the preferred share purchase rights may be redeemed and the terms of the preferred shares. In the case of a redemption, the preferred share purchase rights are designed to ensure that the Board of Directors has adequate time to consider any proposed acquisition transaction involving us and to protect us and our shareholders against any proposed acquisition transaction in which all shareholders are not treated equitably and do not receive fair value for their shares of common stock. The preferred share purchase rights have certain antitakeover effects and will cause substantial dilution to a person that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors. The preferred share purchase rights should not affect any prospective offeror willing to make an all-cash offer at a full and fair price, or willing to negotiate with the Board of Directors. Similarly, the preferred share purchase rights will not interfere with any merger or other business combination approved by our Board of Directors since our Board of Directors may, at its option, redeem all, but not less than all, of the then outstanding preferred share purchase rights at the redemption price.
The foregoing description of the Shareholder Rights Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Rights Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007.
Management Agreements
In January 2007, FMSC, the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary, entered into an employment agreement with a new Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel which provided him with a base salary of $200,000 per year through December 31, 2008 and bonuses of $100,000 per year through December 31, 2008, provided he is still employed by the Company at the end of each year. He resigned on August 31, 2007, effective September 28, 2007. As part of the negotiation of his existing employment contract he received his 2007 bonus of $100,000.
14
As of May 9, 2007, we and Victor K. Kurylak, our President and Chief Executive Officer, executed an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amended Employment Agreement”). The Amended Employment Agreement was executed in connection with the execution of the May Settlement Agreement with the Okun Defendants (see above-“Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement ). Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Kurylak was to continue his employment with us as President, but resign from the position as our Chief Executive Officer upon appointment of his successor and execution by his successor of an employment agreement with us. However, since the May Settlement Agreement was vacated and set aside, Mr. Kurylak’s resignation as CEO was not accepted and thus cancelled. On June 15, 2007, we and Mr. Kurylak executed an Amendment Number One to the Amended Employment Agreement (“Amendment to Amended Employment Agreement”) to state that Mr. Kurylak would remain employed in the capacity of President and Chief Executive Officer for both us and FMSC. Mr. Kurylak’s employment contract has been subsequently renewed for one year from January 1, 2008 under the terms of the Amended Employment Agreement previously filed.
In the event of the termination of Mr. Kurylak’s employment by us without “cause” or by Mr. Kurylak for “good reason” as these terms are defined in the Amended Employment Agreement, he would be entitled to: (a) all compensation accrued but not paid as of the termination date; (b) base salary for the remainder of the term; (c) a severance payment equal to $300,000 payable in a lump sum payment; (d) continued participation in our benefit plans (or comparable plans); and (e) any applicable bonus. If Mr. Kurylak’s employment is terminated by us for “cause” or by him without “good reason”, he will be entitled only to accrued compensation. If termination of the Amended Employment Agreement occurs as a result of the expiration of such agreement without renewal by the Company at the end of the term, Mr. Kurylak will be entitled to the accrued compensation, any applicable bonus and the severance payment.
In the event Mr. Kurylak is a member of the board of directors of the Company on the termination date, the payment of any and all compensation due under the Amended Employment Agreement, except the accrued compensation, is expressly conditioned on Mr. Kurylak’s resignation from the board of directors of the Company within five (5) business of the termination date.
The Amended Employment Agreement contains confidentiality obligations that survive indefinitely and non-solicitation and non-competition obligations that end on the first anniversary of the date of cessation of Mr. Kurylak’s employment.
15
Financing Agreement
On December 7, 2007 we entered into a note purchase agreement (the "Note Purchase Agreement") with AEFC-FMFK Investment Corp. ("AEFC-IC") pursuant to which we issued to AEFC-IC a 10% Convertible Secured Note due on December 31, 2008 for an aggregate principal amount up to $2,000,000 (the "AEFC-IC Note"). The AEFC-IC Note will accrue interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 10% per annum which will be paid monthly in arrears on or before the 10th day of the month following the interest accrual. The principal of the AEFC-IC Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon will be payable in full on December 31, 2008. The AEFC-IC Note is convertible into shares of Common Stock at $0.35 per share, as adjusted, beginning July 1, 2008 if the AEFC-IC Note is not prepaid prior to such date. The AEFC-IC Note is prepayable at any time prior to July 1, 2008 subject to an escalating prepayment penalty based on the date of prepayment which is payable by us in cash and the issuance of a warrant to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, as adjusted (the "Prepayment Warrant"). In the event we (i) do not draw the full $2,000,000 principal amount available under the AEFC-IC Note and (ii) the AEFC-IC Note has not been prepaid by July 1, 2008, we will issue AEFC-IC a warrant to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, as adjusted, for each one dollar of principal amount available but not drawn upon under the AEFC-IC Note. The parties also executed a registration rights agreement.
In connection with, and concurrent with, the execution of the Note Purchase Agreement, the AEFC-IC Note and the related documents, we entered into the First Amendment, dated as of December 7, 2007 ("First Amendment to the Rights Agreement"), of the Rights Agreement, dated August 1, 2007, between us and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent ("Rights Agreement") as more fully described above. The First Amendment to the Rights Agreement provides that AEFC-IC will not be deemed to be an "Acquiring Person" under the Rights Agreement by reason of (i) the execution of the AEFC-IC Note Purchase Agreement; (ii) the issuance of the AEFC-IC Note; (iii) the issuance of shares of common stock upon the conversion of the AEFC-IC Note into shares of our common stock.; (iv) the issuance of any warrants to AEFC-IC pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement or any shares of common stock upon exercise of such warrants; (v) the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by Edward H. Okun or any affiliates of Mr. Okun (collectively, the "Okun Parties"); (vi) the approval, execution or delivery of any agreement with respect to the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties; (vii) the public or other announcement of the Note Purchase Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated thereby, or the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties; or (viii) the consummation of the Note Purchase Agreement and any other transactions contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement or any agreement to purchase all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties.
Separation Agreements
On August 31, 2007, Mr. Phillip P. D'Ambrisi resigned from his positions as our Chief Operating Officer as well as the Chief Operating Officer of FMSC. Mr. D'Ambrisi also resigned as a member of our board of directors and the FMSC Board effective August 31, 2007. We and Mr. D'Ambrisi entered into a consulting agreement pursuant to which Mr. D'Ambrisi provided certain services to us during the term of such Agreement.
Please see “Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment & Change in Control Agreements” under Item 11 of this Annual Report for further details regarding the employment and termination agreements of our executive officers.
16
Election of Directors
On November 8 and 9, 2006, respectively, Mr. William J. Kurinsky and Mr. Herbert Kurinsky resigned their respective positions as Class I directors on our Board of Directors. One of the Class I director vacancies was filled on January 5, 2007 with the election of Mr. Phillip P. D’Ambrisi. The other Class I director vacancy was filled on February 22, 2007 with the election of Ms. Celeste M. Leonard. Effective August 31, 2007, Mr. D'Ambrisi resigned his position as a Class I director of the Company and FMSC, respectively.
Debenture Redemptions
On December 11, 2007, the remaining convertible debenture came due and was redeemed for $25,000. As of the date of this Annual Report, there are no 6% convertible debentures outstanding.
17
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected due to any of the following risks. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks we are not presently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks. In assessing these risks, you should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, including our financial statements and related notes.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our business is inherently risky and we have suffered losses in previous years
For the year ended December 31, 2007 we reported a net loss of $2,085,000. For the year ended December 31, 2006 we reported a net loss of $837,000 and for the year ended December 31, 2005 we reported net income of $2,424,000. Since our business is subject to significant risk from litigation as well as weakness in the securities markets, we may incur further losses in the future, and such losses would necessarily affect the nature, scope and level of our future operations. Our results of operations to date are not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations. The securities business, by its very nature, is subject to various risks and contingencies, many of which are beyond the ability of our management to control. These contingencies include economic conditions generally and in particular those affecting securities markets, interest rates, discretionary income available for investment; losses which may be incurred from underwriting and trading activities; customer inability to meet commitments, such as margin obligations; customer fraud; and employee misconduct and errors. Further, the nature and extent of underwriting, trading and market making activities, and hence the volume and scope of our business is directly affected by our available net capital.
Fluctuations in securities volume and prices increase the potential for future losses
We, and the securities industry in general, are directly affected by national and international economic and political conditions, broad trends in business and finance, the level and volatility of interest rates, changes in and uncertainty regarding tax laws and substantial fluctuations in the volume and price levels of securities transactions. We and the securities industry in general, are subject to other risks, including risks of loss from the underwriting of securities, counter party (a party to which we have credit or performance exposure) failures to meet commitments, customer fraud, employee errors or misconduct and litigation. In addition, price fluctuations may cause losses on securities positions. As we expand our investment banking activities and more frequently serve as manager or co-manager of public offerings of securities, we can expect to make increased commitments of capital to market-making activities in securities of those issuers. The expected additional concentration of capital in the securities of those issuers held in inventory will increase the risk of loss from reductions in the market price. Low trading volume or declining prices generally result in reduced revenues. Under these conditions, profitability is adversely affected since many costs, other than commission compensation and bonuses, are fixed. Heavy trading volume has caused serious operating problems, including delays in clearing and processing, for many securities firms in the past and may do so in the future. Our revenue and profitability may be adversely affected by declines in the volume of securities transactions and in market liquidity. Additionally, our profitability may be adversely affected by losses from the trading or underwriting of securities or failure of third parties to meet commitments.
18
Principal and brokerage transactions and lending activities expose us to losses
Our trading, market making and underwriting activities involve the purchase, sale or short sale of securities as a principal and, accordingly, involve the risk of changes in the market prices of those securities and the risk of a decrease in the liquidity of markets which would limit our ability to resell securities purchased or to repurchase securities sold in principal transactions. Montauk Financial Group’s brokerage activities and principal transactions are subject to credit risk. For example, a customer may not respond to a margin call, and since the securities being held as collateral have diminished in value, there is a risk that we may not recover the funds loaned to the customer. These parties include trading counterparts, customers, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses, and other financial intermediaries as well as issuers whose securities we hold. These parties may default on their obligations owed to us due to a variety of reasons, including without limitation, bankruptcy, lack of liquidity or operational failure. Significant failures by third parties to perform their obligations owed to us could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
Our risk management policies and procedures may leave us exposed to unidentified risks or an unanticipated level of risk.
The policies and procedures we employ to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective. Some methods of risk management are based on the use of observed historical market behavior. As a result, these methods may not accurately predict future risk exposures, which could be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate. Other risk management methods depend on evaluation of information regarding markets, clients or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible by us. This information may not be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to properly record and verify a large number of transactions and events. We cannot assure that our policies and procedures will effectively and accurately record and verify this information. We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure through a variety of separate but complementary financial, credit, operational and legal reporting systems. We believe that we are able to evaluate and manage the market, credit and other risks to which we are exposed. Nonetheless, our ability to manage risk exposure can never be completely or accurately predicted or fully assured. The consequences of these developments can include losses due to adverse changes in inventory values, decreases in the liquidity of trading positions, higher volatility in earnings, increases in our credit risk to customers as well as to third parties and increases in general systemic risk.
Competition in the brokerage industry may adversely impact our retail business
We encounter intense competition in all aspects of our business and compete directly with many other securities firms, a significant number of which offer their customers a broader range of financial services, have substantially greater resources and may have greater operating efficiencies. In addition, a number of firms offer discount brokerage services to individual retail customers and generally effect transactions at lower commission rates on an "execution only" basis without offering other services such as investment recommendations and research. The further expansion of discount brokerage firms could adversely affect our retail business. Moreover, there is substantial commission discounting by full-service broker-dealers competing for institutional and individual brokerage business. The possible increase of this discounting could adversely affect us. Other financial institutions, notably commercial banks and savings and loan associations, offer customers some of the services and products currently provided by securities firms. In addition, certain large corporations have entered the securities industry by acquiring securities firms. While it is not possible to predict the type and extent of competitive services that banks and other institutions ultimately may offer to customers, we may be adversely affected to the extent those services are offered on a large scale.
19
We are subject to various risks in the securities industry
As a securities broker-dealer, Montauk Financial Group is subject to uncertainties that are common in the securities industry. These uncertainties include:
· | the volatility of capital markets; |
· | governmental regulation; |
· | litigation; |
· | intense competition; |
· | substantial fluctuations in the volume and price level of securities; and |
· | dependence on third parties. |
As a result, revenues and earnings may vary significantly from period to period. In periods of low volume, profitability is impaired because certain expenses remain relatively fixed. Due to our size, we have less capital than many competitors in the securities industry. In the event of a market downturn, our business could be adversely affected in many ways, including those described herein. Our revenues are likely to decline in such circumstances and, if we are unable to reduce expenses accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
We have incurred liability due to securities-related litigation
Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of liability, including exposure to liability under applicable federal and state securities laws in connection with the activity of our associated persons, as well the underwriting and distribution of securities. In recent years, there has been an increasing incidence of litigation involving the securities industry in general, which seek compensatory, rescissionary and punitive damages. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we incurred $1,673,000 in litigation costs and expenses related to various legal claims and settlements, including $400,000 in legal costs (net of insurance reimbursement) associated with the Okun lawsuits, as well as approximately $520,000 in costs associated with the SEC investigation and the resolutions of the settlement with both the SEC and FINRA (See Item 3. Legal Proceedings). As of December 31, 2007, we have accrued for litigation costs that are probable and can be reasonably estimated based on a review of existing claims, arbitrations and unpaid settlements. Management cannot give assurance that this accrual will be adequate to cover actual costs that may be subsequently incurred. It is not possible to predict the outcome of legal and regulatory matters pending against Montauk Financial Group. All such cases are, and will continue to be, vigorously defended. However, litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and some of these actions and proceedings may result in adverse awards or judgments. After considering all relevant facts, available insurance coverage and consultation with litigation counsel, it is possible that our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially affected by unfavorable outcomes or settlements of certain pending litigation.
20
We remain subject to extensive regulation and the failure to comply with these regulations could subject us to penalties or sanctions
The securities industry in general and our business in particular is subject to extensive regulation by the SEC, state securities regulators and other governmental regulatory authorities. The broker-dealer is also regulated by industry self-regulatory organizations, including FINRA and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. Montauk Financial Group is a registered broker-dealer with the SEC and a member firm of FINRA. Broker-dealers are subject to regulations which cover all aspects of the securities business, including:
· | sales practices and supervision; |
· | trading practices among broker-dealers; |
· | use and safekeeping of customers' funds and securities; |
· | capital structure of securities firms; |
· | record keeping; and |
· | the conduct of directors, officers, agents and employees. |
Much of the regulation of broker-dealers has been delegated to self-regulatory organizations, principally FINRA, which is Montauk Financial Group’s primary regulator. FINRA adopts rules, subject to approval by the SEC, that govern its members and conducts periodic examinations of member firms' operations.
Compliance with these regulations involves a number of risks, particularly where the regulations may be subject to varying interpretation. If we are found to have violated an applicable regulation, an administrative or judicial action may be initiated against us that may result in penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, including but not limited to:
· | censure; |
· | fine; |
· | civil damage awards, including treble damages for insider trading violations; |
· | the issuance of cease-and-desist orders; or |
· | the deregistration or suspension of our broker-dealer activities and/or our employees. |
21
We depend upon our registered representatives
Most aspects of our business are dependent on highly skilled and experienced individuals. We have devoted considerable efforts to recruiting and compensating those individuals and provide incentives to encourage them to remain employed by or associated with us. Individuals associated with us may leave our company at any time to pursue other opportunities. The continued loss of a significant number of registered representatives could continue to materially and adversely affect our operating results.
We depend upon our senior management
For the foreseeable future, we will be substantially dependent upon the personal efforts and abilities of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. Victor K. Kurylak, Ms. Mindy A. Horowitz, our acting Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, and Ms. Celeste Leonard, our Chief Compliance Officer, to coordinate, implement and manage our business plans and programs. The loss or unavailability of the services of any of them would likely have a material adverse affect on our business, operations and prospects. In addition, loss of key members of management could require us to invest capital to search for a suitable replacement. Such a search could serve as a distraction to the remaining members of management preventing them from focusing on the ongoing development of our business, which, in turn, could cause us to continue to lose money.
Montauk Financial Group must comply with Net Capital Requirements
The business of our broker-dealer, like that of other securities firms, is capital intensive. The SEC and FINRA have stringent provisions with respect to net capital requirements applicable to the operation of securities firms. A significant operating loss or any charge against net capital could adversely affect our ability to significantly expand or, depending upon the magnitude of the loss or charge, to maintain our present level of business.
We are exposed to risks due to our investment banking activities
Participation in an underwriting syndicate or a selling group involves both economic and regulatory risks. An underwriter may incur losses if it is unable to resell the securities it is committed to purchase, or if it is forced to liquidate its commitment at less than the purchase price. In addition, under federal securities laws, other laws and court decisions with respect to underwriters' liabilities and limitations on the indemnification of underwriters by issuers, an underwriter is subject to substantial potential liability for misstatements or omissions of material facts in prospectuses and other communications with respect to such offerings. Acting as a managing underwriter increases these risks. Underwriting commitments constitute a charge against net capital and our ability to make underwriting commitments may be limited by the requirement that it must at all times be in compliance with the Net Capital Rule.
We rely primarily on one clearing firm and the termination of the clearing agreement with this firm could disrupt Montauk Financial Group’s business
Montauk Financial Group uses two clearing brokers, NFS, as its primary clearing broker, and Penson to which we currently introduce a limited number of customer accounts, to process its securities transactions, maintain customer accounts, control, receive, custody and deliver securities, on a fee basis. We depend on the operational capacity and ability of the clearing broker for the orderly processing of transactions. If the clearing agreements are terminated for any reason, or if the clearing brokers fail to provide its functions for us in the normal course of business, we would be forced to find an alternative clearing broker. There is no assurance that we would be able to find an alternative clearing broker on acceptable terms to us or at all.
22
Our broker-dealer subsidiary faces limitations on trading and market-making activities in our securities
Due to regulatory positions and requirements of both the SEC and FINRA relating to the circumstances and extent to which a registered broker-dealer and FINRA-member may engage in market-making transactions in the securities of its parent company, Montauk Financial Group does not engage in trading or market-making activities relating to our common stock or warrants where Montauk Financial Group would speculate in, purchase or sell our securities for its own account. The purpose and effect of such limitation restricts Montauk Financial Group from being a factor in the determination of the market or price of our securities. Montauk Financial Group does, however, execute transactions for its customers on an "agency basis" where it does not acquire our securities for its own proprietary account. It will, however, earn usual and customary brokerage commissions in connection with the execution of such brokerage transactions. If, under current or future regulations of both the SEC and FINRA, Montauk Financial Group is permitted to participate as a market maker, it may do so on the basis of showing a bid and offer for our securities at specified prices representing customer interest.
We have limited the liability of our directors
We have amended our certificate of incorporation to include provisions eliminating the personal liability of our directors, except for breach of a director's duty of loyalty to the company or to our shareholders, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law, and in respect of any transaction in which a director receives an improper personal benefit. These provisions pertain only to breaches of duty by directors as such, and not in any other corporate capacity, e.g., as an officer. As a result of the inclusion of such provisions, neither the Company nor its shareholders may be able to recover monetary damages against directors for actions taken by them which are ultimately found to have constituted negligence or gross negligence, or which are ultimately found to have been in violation of their fiduciary duties, although it may be possible to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief with respect to such actions. If equitable remedies are found not to be available to shareholders in any particular case, shareholders may not have an effective remedy against the challenged conduct.
We believe that, based upon recent developments in the market for directors' and officers' liability insurance, such provisions are necessary to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors. In addition, such provisions will allow directors to perform their duties in good faith without concern for the application of monetary liability on a retroactive basis in the event that a court determines their conduct to have been negligent or grossly negligent. On the other hand, such provisions significantly limit the potential remedies available to a shareholder, or us, and it is possible that the protection afforded by such provisions may reduce the level of diligence or care demonstrated by such directors.
23
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
We do not pay dividends on our common stock
We do not pay dividends on the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. However, we pay 6% quarterly dividends on the outstanding shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. We previously paid 8% quarterly dividends on the outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred Stock, but as of June 15, 2007 all shares of Series B Preferred Stock were cancelled. Since no shares of Series C Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (authorized in connection with the Shareholder Rights Plan (See Item 1-"Business-Shareholder Rights Plan")), are issued and outstanding, no dividends are paid with respect thereto (See Note 17 to Consolidated Financial Statements-Series C Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock-Preferred Stock Purchase Rights). Applicable laws, rules and regulations under the New Jersey Business Corporation Act and the Securities Act , have affected our ability to declare and pay dividends.
We have sold restricted shares of our common stock which may depress the common stock price
As of March 31, 2008, of the 13,257,248 issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, approximately 4,720,308 shares may be deemed restricted shares and, in the future, may be sold in compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Rule 144 was recently amended to provide, in general, that a person that is not an affiliate of our Company, that holds restricted securities for a period of six (6) months, may sell such shares subject only to our compliance with the current public information requirement until the end of a one-year holding period and after one year, these securities may be freely sold without regard to such requirement. Possible or actual sales of our common stock by certain of our present shareholders under Rule 144 may, in the future, have a depressive effect on the price of the common stock in any market which may develop for such shares. Such sales at that time may have a depressive effect on the price of the common stock in the open market.
There is a limited public market for our securities
Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and reported by the National Daily Quotation Service published by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. and the Electronic Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) maintained by FINRA. Although we may apply for inclusion of our common stock in the Nasdaq Smallcap Market and/or on the American Stock Exchange, we do not currently satisfy the minimum listing requirements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining listing on Nasdaq or on the Amex, or if obtained, that it will be able to maintain a Nasdaq or Amex listing.
There may be significant consequences associated with our stock trading on the OTCBB rather than a national exchange. The effects of not being able to list our securities on a national exchange include:
· | limited release of the market price of our securities; |
· | limited interest by investors in our securities; |
· | volatility of our stock price due to low trading volume; |
· | increased difficulty in selling our securities in certain states due to “blue sky” restrictions; and |
· | limited ability to issue additional securities or to secure additional financing. |
24
Our common stock may be subject to “penny stock” rules, therefore the market for our common stock may be limited.
Since our common stock is subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected. If at any time our common stock has a market price per share of less than $5.00, and we do not have net tangible assets of at least $2,000,000 or average revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the preceding three years, transactions in our common stock may be subject to the “penny stock” rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. Under these rules, broker-dealers who recommend such securities to persons other than institutional accredited investors:
· | must make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser; |
· | receive the purchaser’s written agreement to a transaction prior to sale; |
· | provide the purchaser with risk disclosure documents which identify certain risks associated with investing in “penny stocks” and which describe the market for these “penny stocks” and a purchaser’s legal remedies; and |
· | obtain a signed and dated acknowledgment from the purchaser demonstrating that the purchaser has actually received the required risk disclosure document before a transaction in a “penny stock” can be completed. |
If our common stock becomes subject to these rules, broker-dealers may find it more difficult to effectuate customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected. As a result, the market price of our securities may be depressed, and stockholders may find it more difficult to sell our securities.
The price of our common stock is volatile
The price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially (See Part II, Item 5). This volatility may be caused by factors specific to our Company and the securities markets in general. Factors affecting volatility may include: variations in our annual or quarterly financial results or those of our competitors; conditions in the economy in general; and changes in applicable laws or regulations, or their judicial or administrative interpretations affecting us or the securities industry in general. In addition, volatility of the market price of our common stock is affected by the relatively low trading volume it has experienced and the fact that it is not listed for trading on a national securities exchange.
Our Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws contain provisions which may have an anti-takeover effect
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain provisions, which may discourage certain transactions, which involve an actual or threatened change in control of the company. These provisions include a classified or staggered board of directors. As permitted by the New Jersey Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation provides that a director or officer of our company will not be personally liable to the company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director, except under certain circumstances including a breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the company or our stockholders or any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. The provisions referred to above may make the company a less attractive acquisition candidate. They may also discourage or impede offers to acquire the business not approved by the board of directors, including offers for some or all of the shares of any class or series of capital stock at substantial premiums above the then current market value of such shares.
25
Shareholder Rights Plan
Effective August 8, 2007, our Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan. Under the Rights Agreement, we issued a dividend of one preferred purchase right for each outstanding share of our common stock. The Rights Agreement further provides that under certain limited circumstances following the 10th day after an Acquiring Person announces the acquisition of, or tender offer for, 10% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, each right would instead enable the registered holder (other than those rights beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person which would be null and void and nontransferable) to purchase that number of shares of our common stock, which would have a market value of twice the purchase price thereby diluting the percentage ownership of the Acquiring Person. The Shareholder Rights Plan is designed to guard against partial tender offers and other coercive tactics to gain control of the Company without offering a fair and adequate price and other terms to all shareholders. (See above, Item 1-“Business-Shareholder Rights Plan”; Note 17 to Consolidated Financial Statements - Series C Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock - Preferred Stock Purchase Rights).
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None
Item 2. Properties
Offices and Facilities
The Corporate Headquarters
We maintain our corporate headquarters and executive offices at Parkway 109 Office Center, 328 Newman Springs Road, Red Bank, New Jersey. On September 22, 2004 we entered into a 4th Amendment to our Master Lease dated March 1997 for our corporate headquarters in Red Bank, New Jersey. The amendment provides for a lease term of five (5) years, which commenced on February 1, 2005, for 27,255 square feet. The lease provides for monthly rent payments of $50,762. As additional rent, we are required to pay a proportional share of any increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses above the amount paid during the 2005 calendar year, insurance premiums and all utility charges related to the premises. The amendment contains a five-year option to renew at a rental payment equal to the then-current fair market rate per square foot applicable to the leased premises.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of liability. In recent years, there has been an increasing incidence of litigation and arbitration involving the securities industry.
26
We are a respondent or co-respondent in various legal proceedings, which are related to our securities business. Management is contesting these claims and believes that there are meritorious defenses in each case. However, litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and some of these actions and proceedings may result in adverse judgments. Further, the availability of insurance coverage is determined on a case-by-case basis by the insurance carrier, and is limited to the coverage limits within the policy for any individual claim and in the aggregate. After considering all relevant facts, available insurance coverage and consultation with litigation counsel, management believes that significant judgments or other unfavorable outcomes from pending litigation could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in any particular quarterly or annual period, or in the aggregate, and could impair our ability to meet the statutory net capital requirements of our securities business.
Management has established a reserve for litigation settlements for the suits related to the high-yield bonds and other litigation that are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The reserve is included in accrued liabilities at December 31, 2007. Management cannot give assurance that this reserve will be adequate to absorb actual costs that may be subsequently incurred. Further, it is not possible to predict the outcome of other matters pending against the Company.
27
SEC Investigation
The Company has entered into a settlement as a result of a regulatory investigation by the SEC concerning the Company’s and a former employee’s failure to reasonably supervise the securities trading and research activities of a former institutional analyst. The investigation covered the time period from March through December 2003. The Company has executed an Offer of Settlement, which, if accepted and approved by the Commissioners of the SEC, will result in issuance of an Order Instituting Public Administrative and Cease-And-Desist Proceedings and Impose Remedial Sanctions. The settlement will result in the imposition of a censure and fine of $100,000 against the Company, and a six-month supervisory suspension and fine of $50,000 against our former president and CEO, who is no longer affiliated with us. The settlement should be concluded in early 2008. The monetary fine has been accrued for in 2007 and has been placed in an interest bearing attorney escrow account pending finalization of the settlement by the SEC.
FINRA Settlement
In September 2007 FMSC entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC") with FINRA, the broker-dealer’s primary regulatory authority. The AWC resolved an investigation by FINRA Staff into sales practice activities of certain of our former registered representatives, as well as our supervision of those activities. Without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in the AWC, FMSC accepted FINRA's findings and consented to a censure, paid a fine of $175,000 and agreed to an undertaking requiring a written certification by a senior officer of the firm to review the firm's systems and procedures regarding its supervisory procedures, and training and monitoring of supervisors.
Termination of Merger Agreement, Litigation and Subsequent Purchase of Majority Voting Interest
On May 5, 2006, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with FMFG Ownership, Inc. and FMFG AcquisitionCo, Inc. (collectively referred to as the "Okun Purchasers"), which are wholly-owned by Mr. Edward H. Okun, a private investor. Mr. Okun is the controlling person of Investment Properties of America, LLC (“IPofA”), a privately owned, diversified real estate investment and management company. Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Okun Purchasers were to purchase all of our outstanding securities for an aggregate purchase price of $23 million, or $1.00 in cash per common share, $2.00 in cash per share of Series A Preferred Stock (convertible into two shares of common stock), and $10.00 in cash per share of Series B Preferred Stock (convertible into ten shares of common stock).
On December 29, 2006, we received notification from representatives of the Okun Purchasers that they were terminating the merger agreement and not proceeding with the merger. They alleged our failure to satisfy conditions and our alleged breach of various representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in the merger agreement.
28
On January 8, 2007, we filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County, Chancery Division against the Okun Purchasers, Mr. Okun, IPofA and several other affiliated entities which Mr. Okun controls (collectively, the “Okun Defendants”). The purpose of this lawsuit was to enforce the terms of the merger pursuant to the merger agreement executed on May 5, 2006. Pursuant to the merger agreement our common sock shareholders would have received $1.00 in cash for each share of common stock. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that the Okun Purchasers breached the merger agreement by terminating the agreement on December 29, 2006 without cause or justification. Our complaint demanded specific performance of the merger agreement and completion of the merger. In the alternative, we sought compensatory damages for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as payment of $2 million held in escrow to secure the performance of the Okun Purchasers under the merger agreement. The lawsuit also sought to void the lease agreement that we entered into with another Okun affiliate to relocate our corporate offices to a building purchased by that Okun affiliate in Red Bank, New Jersey. Our complaint claimed that the Okun Defendants fraudulently induced us to execute this new lease by falsely representing that the Okun Purchasers would consummate the merger.
On February 12, 2007 we received the Okun Defendants' answer to the lawsuit, which contained several counterclaims against us. In their counterclaims, the Okun Purchasers alleged that we breached the merger agreement and failed to disclose certain material facts about the Company. They also sought the return of $2 million held in escrow as well as compensatory damages, interest and costs.
The Okun Defendants filed two additional actions; one on February 2, 2007, in the Circuit Court of the State of Florida against our President and Chief Executive Officer, and the other, a shareholder derivative action in the Federal District Court for the District of New Jersey against us and certain of our directors and officers, filed on February 16, 2007. Those lawsuits were based on the same facts and circumstances as the New Jersey state lawsuit that we filed against the Okun Purchasers, Mr. Okun and the other Okun Defendants for their breach of the merger agreement, and are part of their response to the original lawsuit we filed in the New Jersey Superior Court.
On May 9, 2007, we announced a settlement agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“May Settlement Agreement”) to resolve the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. However, on May 23, 2007 we announced that we and the Okun Defendants had agreed to consent to the entry of a Court Order to vacate and set aside the May Settlement Agreement.
On June 15, 2007, we announced a new agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“June Settlement Agreement”) to settle the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. The June Settlement Agreement provided that Okun’s affiliated entities would surrender all of their First Montauk preferred stock holdings and 5,272,305 of their common share holdings, such that the Okun’s affiliates would hold less than 25% of our outstanding common shares. These shares have since been surrendered and cancelled. We also obtained an exclusive 60 day option (the “Option Period”) to purchase the balance of the shares held by the Okun affiliated entities (the “Option Securities”) for the aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Option”), which expired on August 14, 2007, without the Company exercising its option. The June Settlement Agreement also provided that the lease between an Okun affiliated entity and the Company, with respect to relocating the Company’s corporate offices, shall be deemed void ab initio.
29
In return, we agreed to direct the escrow agent, Signature Bank New York, to pay to an Okun affiliated entity the $2 million on deposit by Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants under the Escrow Agreement executed and delivered pursuant to the May 5, 2006 Merger Agreement.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company has accrued for potential legal liabilities that are probable and can be reasonably estimated based on a review of existing claims and arbitrations. Management cannot give assurance that this amount will be adequate to cover actual costs that may be subsequently incurred. As of December 31, 2007, it was not possible to predict the outcome of these legal matters pending against the Company.
Item 4. Submission of Matters on a Vote of Security Holders
We did not submit any matters to our shareholders for a vote during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2007.
PART II
Item 5. Market of and Dividends on our Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
A. Principal Market and Market Information
Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market. Trading in our common stock is reported on the FINRA Bulletin Board system and in the pink sheets published by Pink Sheets LLC. We believe that there is an established public trading market for our common stock based on the volume of trading in our common stock and the existence of market makers who regularly publish quotations for our common stock. Our common stock commenced trading in the over-the-counter market in 1987. On March 28, 2008, our common stock had bid and offer prices of $0.15 and $0.20 per share, respectively. At December 31, 2007 our common stock had a closing price of $0.20 per share. Quotations on the OTCBB reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
The following is the range of high and low bid prices for such securities for the periods indicated below:
Common Stock | |||
Calendar Year 2008 | High Bid | Low Bid | |
1st Quarter | $.20 | $.11 | |
Calendar Year 2007 | High Bid | Low Bid | |
1st Quarter | $.61 | $.46 | |
2nd Quarter | $.70 | $.35 | |
3rd Quarter | $.40 | $.28 | |
4th Quarter | $.30 | $.16 |
30
Calendar Year 2006 | High Bid | Low Bid | |
1st Quarter | $1.22 | $.80 | |
2nd Quarter | $1.00 | $.90 | |
3rd Quarter | $.975 | $.79 | |
4th Quarter | $.94 | $.40 |
B. Number of Record Holders
The approximate number of record holders of our common stock as of March 31, 2008 was 448. Such number of record holders was determined from our stockholder records, and does not include beneficial owners of our common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security holders, dealers and clearing agencies. We believe there are in excess of 350 beneficial holders of our common stock.
C. Dividend Policy
We have not paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception, and do not expect to pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future and plan to retain earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business. We pay quarterly dividends on outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock at the rate of 6% per annum, subject to the limitations under the New Jersey Business Corporation Act. There are currently outstanding 22,282 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. We also paid quarterly dividends on our Series B Preferred Stock at the rate of 8% per annum, subject to the limitations under the New Jersey Business Corporation Act. As part of the June 15, 2007 settlement agreement entered into with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants, they agreed to surrender all of their shares of Series A and Series B Preferred Stock, together with 5,272,305 shares of our common stock. Therefore, there are currently no outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
D. Issuance of Unregistered Securities
There were no issuances of unregistered securities during 2007.
E. Stock Repurchases
There were no repurchases of any securities during 2007.
F. Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 11. “Executive Compensation”.
31
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the related notes, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Operations Results: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commissions | $ | 31,728,518 | $ | 39,920,168 | $ | 37,493,733 | $ | 42,732,238 | $ | 41,883,669 | ||||||||||
Principal transactions | 1,534,794 | 4,079,243 | 5,578,820 | 9,058,259 | 9,466,359 | |||||||||||||||
Investment banking | 3,579,838 | 3,420,685 | 6,640,402 | 2,716,042 | 2,439,144 | |||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 2,712,648 | 3,540,324 | 8,370,711 | 4,680,702 | 4,437,510 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 39,555,798 | 50,960,420 | 58,083,666 | 59,187,241 | 58,226,682 | |||||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commissions, employee compensation and benefits | 33,995,993 | 43,137,778 | 44,398,131 | 46,851,474 | 46,218,107 | |||||||||||||||
Executive separation | -- | 1,151,266 | 1,432,937 | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||
Clearing and floor brokerage | 1,477,482 | 1,527,675 | 1,926,005 | 2,466,027 | 2,934,164 | |||||||||||||||
Communications and occupancy | 1,672,992 | 1,797,281 | 2,483,056 | 2,664,256 | 2,659,105 | |||||||||||||||
Legal matters and related costs | 1,672,716 | 1,095,064 | 1,773,604 | 2,714,769 | 5,836,960 | |||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 2,778,928 | 2,982,665 | 3,467,972 | 3,489,425 | 3,393,335 | |||||||||||||||
Interest | 26,420 | 78,248 | 100,123 | 284,093 | 204,054 | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 41,624,531 | 51,769,977 | 55,581,828 | 58,470,044 | 61,245,725 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (2,068,733 | ) | (809,557 | ) | 2,501,838 | 717,197 | (3,019,043 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 16,333 | 26,992 | 77,544 | (13,305 | ) | 499,000 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,085,066 | ) | $ | (836,549 | ) | $ | 2,424,294 | $ | 730,502 | $ | (3,518,043 | ) |
32
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Operations Results: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | (2,209,032 | ) | $ | (1,005,055 | ) | $ | 2,138,954 | $ | 639,813 | $ | (3,542,882 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic: | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.07 | $ | (0.40 | ) | |||||||
Diluted: | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.40 | ) | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding-- Basic | 15,635,136 | 17,004,254 | 14,032,057 | 9,270,350 | 8,784,103 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average common and common share equivalents outstanding – Diluted | 15,635,136 | 17,004,254 | 20,109,178 | 15,629,920 | 8,784,103 | |||||||||||||||
Financial condition: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 5,250,908 | $ | 7,798,917 | $ | 8,719,930 | $ | 9,834,374 | $ | 12,193,101 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 3,615,876 | $ | 3,985,426 | $ | 5,492,079 | $ | 12,932,991 | $ | 16,280,540 | ||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | $ | 1,635,032 | $ | 3,813,491 | $ | 3,227,851 | $ | (3,098,617 | ) | $ | (4,087,439 | ) |
33
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Factors Affecting “Forward Looking Statements”
From time to time, we may publish “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, or make oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance, and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, include, but are not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets, (ii) the volatility of the securities markets, (iii) fluctuations in interest rates, (iv) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost of doing business, (v) fluctuations in currency rates, (vi) general economic and political conditions, both domestic and international, (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and related impact on securities markets, (viii) competition from existing financial institutions and other new participants in competition from existing financial institutions and other new participants in the securities markets, (ix) legal developments affecting the litigation experience of the securities industry, and (x) changes in federal and state tax laws which could affect the popularity of products sold by us. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Overview
Substantially all of our business activities consist of the securities brokerage and investment banking activities of our wholly owned subsidiary, FMSC, a FINRA registered broker-dealer. FMSC conducts operations in four principal categories, all of which are in the financial services industry. These categories are:
· | securities brokerage activities for which FMSC earns commissions or fees; |
· | corporate finance revenues consisting primarily of fees generated from private offerings of securities in which we act as placement agent and new issues of equity and preferred stock offerings in which we participate as a selling group or syndicate member; |
· | proprietary trading for which FMSC records profit or loss, depending on trading results and riskless principal transactions with customers; and |
· | other income, primarily interest earned on customer balances. |
Because we operate in the financial services industry, our revenues and earnings are substantially affected by general financial market conditions. Therefore, the amount of our revenues depends greatly on levels of market activity requiring the services we provide.
34
Results of Operations
2007 Compared to 2006
Overview
The Company’s performance for 2007 resulted in a decrease in revenues of $11 million, to $40 million for 2007, compared to $51 million for 2006. The largest decrease in revenues was in the area of equity commissions and principal transactions, from $23.9 million in 2006 to $14.0 million in 2007. The decrease in revenues is primarily attributable to a decline in the number of producing registered representatives from 2006 to 2007. Included in interest and other income for 2006 is an additional $180,000 of margin interest, a partial allocation of the $1.0 million received from NFS in June 2006. This was a result of an amendment to Exhibit A of the clearing agreement signed by our wholly owned subsidiary, FMSC, on June 29, 2006.
Net loss applicable to common stockholders in 2007 was $2,209,032, or ($0.14) per basic and diluted share compared to a net loss applicable to common stockholders of $1,005,055, or ($0.06) per basic and diluted share for 2006.
Revenues by Source
The following provides a breakdown of total revenues by source for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands of dollars).
December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % of Total Revenues | Amount | % of Total Revenues | Amount | % of Total Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||
Commissions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equities | $ | 12,498 | 32 | % | 19,846 | 39 | % | $ | 20,530 | 35 | % | |||||||||||||
Mutual Funds | 6,042 | 15 | % | 6,179 | 12 | % | 6,348 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||
Insurance | 4,386 | 11 | % | 4,951 | 10 | % | 4,230 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Investment Advisory | 4,314 | 11 | % | 3,879 | 7 | % | 3,235 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Alternative Products | 4,164 | 10 | % | 4,927 | 10 | % | 3,009 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fixed Income | 324 | 1 | % | 138 | <1% | 142 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 31,728 | 80 | % | 39,920 | 78 | % | 37,494 | 64 | % | |||||||||||||||
Principal Transactions | 1,535 | 4 | % | 4,079 | 8 | % | 5,579 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Investment Banking | 3,580 | 9 | % | 3,421 | 7 | % | 6,640 | 12 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest and Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | 2,055 | 5 | % | 2,636 | 5 | % | 2,506 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue | -- | -- | -- | -- | 5,105 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other | 658 | 2 | % | 904 | 2 | % | 760 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total | 2,713 | 7 | % | 3,540 | 7 | % | 8,371 | 14 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 39,556 | 100 | % | $ | 50,960 | 100 | % | $ | 58,084 | 100 | % |
35
Commission Revenue
Commissions are comprised of revenues from the sale of equities, fixed income, mutual funds, insurance, asset management fees and alternative products. Commission revenue for 2007 decreased $8.2 million to $31.7 million from $39.9 million in 2006, related to the reduction in the number of registered representatives from 2006 to 2007. The overall decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in revenue from agency equity and principal transactions of $9.9 million. While commissions generated from equity transactions has declined year over year, revenues from management fees for advisory accounts has been on the rise. In 2007, management fees from advisory accounts accounted for $4.31 million of our revenues, while in 2006 and 2005 revenues were $3.88 million and $3.23 million, an increase of 11% and 33%, respectively.
Principal Transactions
Total revenues from principal transactions, which include mark-ups/mark-downs on transactions in which we act as principal, proprietary trading and the sale of fixed income and equity securities decreased $2.6 million, from $4.1 million for 2006 to $1.5 for 2007. The decrease is primarily due to the reduction in the number of registered representatives who engaged in these types of transactions and the use of our clearing firm to handle more of our fixed income securities transactions. Revenues from all fixed income sources, which include municipal, government, and corporate bonds and unit investment trusts decreased by $1.05 million, from $2.2 million in 2006 to $1.15 million in 2007. Revenues from riskless principal trades of equity securities decreased $306,000 from $671,000 in 2006 to $365,000 in 2007. Riskless principal trades are transacted through the firm’s proprietary account with a customer order in hand, resulting in no market risk to the firm.
Investment Banking
In 2007, investment banking revenues remained relatively constant, increasing $160,000, from $3.42 million in 2006 to $3.58 million in 2007. Investment banking revenue includes fees from private offerings of securities for public companies, which is a function of the number of the Company’s corporate clientele needing financing for capital expansion. The Company is constantly looking to expand the number of banking clients. This category also includes new issues of equity and preferred stock offerings in which we participate as a selling group or syndicate member.
Interest and Other Income
Interest and other income decreased $828,000 in 2007, or 23%, from $3.5 million in 2006 to $2.7 million in 2007. In 2006, an additional $180,000 of margin interest rebate, a partial allocation of the $1.0 million received from NFS in June 2006, was included in interest income. Of the $828,000 total decrease, $581,000 was from the reduction in interest income. Taking into consideration the $180,000 received from NFS in 2006, the actual decrease would have been approximately $400,000. This decrease was directly related to the amount of margin debit carried by customers. In addition to the decrease in interest income, revenues from marketing fees, which are directly related to revenues from alternative investments, decreased $111,000.
36
Expenses
Total expenses decreased by $10.2 million, or 20%, in 2007 to $41.6 million from $51.8 million in 2006. Included in the expenses for 2007 are severance payments for terminated employees of $341,000, consulting agreements for two prior executives of $219,000, litigation costs associated with the Okun affiliates of $400,000 (see Item 3. “Legal Proceedings”), and costs associated with an SEC investigation and the resolution of the settlement with both the SEC and FINRA of approximately $518,000. Included in expenses in 2006 is an $820,000 credit due to a partial allocation of the $1 million received from NFS in June 2006 and executive separation costs of $1,151,000.
The following chart provides a breakdown of total expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands of dollars).
Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % of Total Expenses | Amount | % of Total Expenses | Amount | % of Total Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commissions, employee compensation and benefits | $ | 33,996 | 82 | % | $ | 43,138 | 83 | % | $ | 44,398 | 80 | % | |||||||||||||
Executive separation | -- | -- | 1,151 | 2 | % | 1,433 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Clearing and floor brokerage | 1,478 | 4 | % | 1,528 | 3 | % | 1,926 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Communications and occupancy | 1,673 | 4 | % | 1,797 | 4 | % | 2,483 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Legal matters and related costs | 1,672 | 3 | % | 1,095 | 2 | % | 1,774 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 2,779 | 7 | % | 2,983 | 6 | % | 3,468 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest | 26 | <1% | 78 | <1% | 100 | <1% | |||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 41,624 | 100 | % | $ | 51,770 | 100 | % | $ | 55,582 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 16 | $ | 27 | $ | 78 |
Commissions, Employee Compensation and Benefits
Commission expense, consistently the largest expense category and directly related to commission revenue, decreased 23%, or $8.6 million, from $36.6 million for 2006, to $28.0 million for 2007. Compensation and benefits expense for management, operations and clerical personnel, which include salaries, severance payments, payroll taxes, stock and option compensation, health insurance premiums, and bonus accruals, decreased for 2007, to $6.0 million from $6.5 million, a decrease of approximately $500,000 over 2006. Included in 2007 was approximately $257,000 of severance costs for various personnel and bonus payments associated with employment contracts of $300,000.
Executive Separation
Executive separation costs decreased $1,151,00 for 2007 when compared with 2006 with respect to two separation agreements, one with our former chairman of the Board of Directors and the other with our former general counsel. In 2007, there were no separation agreements entered into with any executives.
37
Clearing and Floor Brokerage
Clearing and floor brokerage costs which are greatly affected by volume and type of transactions decreased approximately $50,000 from 2006 to 2007. In June 2006, we allocated approximately $544,000 of the $1 million received in the settlement from NFS to clearing fees. Excluding the reduction for 2006, clearing and floor brokerage costs would have decreased by $594,000 or 29%.
Communications and Occupancy
Communications and occupancy costs decreased approximately $124,000, from $1.80 million in 2006 to $1.67 million in 2007. In 2006 there was a $135,000 reduction in costs incurred in prior periods related to data aggregation as part of the $1 million received from NFS in June 2006. Excluding this reduction, communications and occupancy costs would have decreased by approximately $259,000. This decrease is primarily due to the termination of our New York City branch office lease in September 2006 and costs related to the operations of that office.
Legal matters and related costs
Legal matters and related settlement costs increased $577,000, from $1.10 million in 2006 to $1.67 million in 2007, most of which was related to legal fees and regulatory fines. Legal fees for 2007 were $1.26 million compared to $970,000 in 2006. In 2006, we incurred $271,000 in legal fees in connections with the anticipated acquisition of the Company by a private investor. In 2007, we incurred approximately $400,000 (net of insurance reimbursement) related to various lawsuits involving the termination of the anticipated acquisition in December 2006 (See Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” -Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement). Other legal fees in 2007 include costs associated with the SEC investigation and the resolution of the settlement with both the SEC and FINRA of approximately $518,000, as well as fees associated with customer claims. The cost of legal settlements for 2007 decreased approximately $27,000 when compared to 2006.
As of December 31, 2007, we have accrued litigation costs that are probable and can be reasonably estimated based on a review of existing claims, arbitrations and unpaid settlements. Management cannot give assurance that this amount will be adequate to cover actual costs that may be subsequently incurred. Further, it is not possible to predict the outcome of other matters pending against us. All such cases will continue to be vigorously defended.
SEC Investigation
The Company has entered into a settlement as a result of a regulatory investigation by the SEC concerning the Company’s and a former employee’s failure to reasonably supervise the securities trading and research activities of a former institutional analyst. The investigation covered the time period from March through December 2003. The Company has executed an Offer of Settlement, which, if accepted and approved by the commissioners of the SEC, will result in issuance of an Order Instituting Public Administrative and Cease-And-Desist Proceedings and Impose Remedial Sanctions. The settlement will result in the imposition of a censure and fine of $100,000 against the Company, and a six-month supervisory suspension and fine of $50,000 against our former president and CEO, who is no longer affiliated with us. The settlement should be concluded in early 2008. The monetary fine has been accrued for in 2007 and has been placed in an interest bearing attorney escrow account pending finalization of the settlement by the SEC.
38
FINRA Settlement
In September 2007 FMSC entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC") with FINRA, the broker-dealer’s primary regulatory authority. The AWC resolved an investigation by FINRA Staff into sales practice activities of certain of our former registered representatives, as well as our supervision of those activities. Without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in the AWC, FMSC accepted FINRA's findings and consented to a censure, paid a fine of $175,000 and agreed to an undertaking requiring a written certification by a senior officer of the firm to review the firm's systems and procedures regarding its supervisory procedures, and training and monitoring of supervisors.
Termination of Merger Agreement, Litigation and Settlement
On May 5, 2006, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with FMFG Ownership, Inc. and FMFG AcquisitionCo, Inc. (collectively referred to as the "Okun Purchasers"), which are wholly owned by Mr. Edward H. Okun, a private investor. Mr. Okun is the controlling person of Investment Properties of America, LLC (“IPofA”), a privately owned, diversified real estate investment and management company. Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Okun Purchasers were to purchase all of our outstanding securities for an aggregate purchase price of $23 million, or $1.00 in cash per common share, $2.00 in cash per share of Series A Preferred Stock (convertible into two shares of common stock), and $10.00 in cash per share of Series B Preferred Stock (convertible into ten shares of common stock).
On December 29, 2006, we received notification from representatives of the Okun Purchasers that they were terminating the merger agreement and not proceeding with the merger. They alleged our failure to satisfy conditions and our alleged breach of various representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in the merger agreement.
On January 8, 2007, we filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County, Chancery Division against the Okun Purchasers, Mr. Okun, IPofA and several other affiliated entities which Mr. Okun controls (collectively, the “Okun Defendants”). The purpose of this lawsuit was to enforce the terms of the merger pursuant to the merger agreement executed on May 5, 2006. Pursuant to the merger agreement our common sock shareholders would have received $1.00 in cash for each share of common stock. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that the Okun Purchasers breached the merger agreement by terminating the agreement on December 29, 2006 without cause or justification. Our complaint demanded specific performance of the merger agreement and completion of the merger. In the alternative, we sought compensatory damages for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as payment of $2 million held in escrow to secure the performance of the Okun Purchasers under the merger agreement. The lawsuit also sought to void the lease agreement that we entered into with another Okun affiliate to relocate our corporate offices to a building purchased by that Okun affiliate in Red Bank, New Jersey. Our complaint claimed that the Okun Defendants fraudulently induced us to execute this new lease by falsely representing that the Okun Purchasers would consummate the merger.
39
On February 12, 2007 we received the Okun Defendants' answer to the lawsuit, which contained several counterclaims against us. In their counterclaims, the Okun Purchasers alleged that we breached the merger agreement and failed to disclose certain material facts about the Company. They also sought the return of $2 million held in escrow as well as compensatory damages, interest and costs.
The Okun Defendants filed two additional actions; one on February 2, 2007, in the Circuit Court of the State of Florida against our President and Chief Executive Officer, and the other, a shareholder derivative action in the Federal District Court for the District of New Jersey against us and certain of our directors and officers, filed on February 16, 2007. Those lawsuits were based on the same facts and circumstances as the New Jersey state lawsuit that we filed against the Okun Defendants, Mr. Okun and the other Okun Defendants for their breach of the merger agreement, and are part of their response to the original lawsuit we filed in the New Jersey Superior Court.
On May 9, 2007, we announced a settlement agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“May Settlement Agreement”) to resolve the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. However, on May 23, 2007 we announced that we and the Okun Defendants had agreed to consent to the entry of a Court Order to vacate and set aside the May Settlement Agreement.
On June 15, 2007, we announced a new agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“June Settlement Agreement”) to settle the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. The June Settlement Agreement provided that Okun’s affiliated entities would surrender all of their First Montauk preferred stock holdings and 5,272,305 of their common share holdings, such that the Okun’s affiliates would hold less than 25% of our outstanding common shares. These shares have since been surrendered and cancelled. We also obtained an exclusive 60 day option (the “Option Period”) to purchase the balance of the shares held by the Okun affiliated entities (the “Option Securities”) for the aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Option”), which expired on August 14, 2007, without the Company exercising its option. The June Settlement Agreement, with respect to relocating the Company’s corporate offices, also provided that the lease between an Okun affiliated entity and the Company shall be deemed void ab initio.
In return, we agreed to direct the escrow agent, Signature Bank New York, to pay to an Okun affiliated entity the $2 million on deposit by Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants under the Escrow Agreement executed and delivered pursuant to the May 5, 2006 Merger Agreement.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating costs decreased by approximately $200,000, to $2.78 million in 2007, from $2.98 million in 2006. Included in the 2007 operating costs are decreases in depreciation expense of $135,000, E&O insurance premiums of $120,000, office expense of $81,000 and travel expenses of $54,000. Increases in operating expenses for 2007 included consulting fees of $176,000 directly related to agreements with two former executives.
40
Income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $16,000, $27,000 and $78,000, respectively. The effective tax rate on pre-tax income (loss) was 0.8%, 3.3% and 3.1%, during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, other future tax benefits have been entirely offset by a valuation allowance because, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods.
2006 Compared to 2005
Overview
The Company’s performance for 2006 resulted in a decrease in revenues of $7.1 million, to $51 million, compared to $58.1 million for 2005. The decrease in revenue is primarily due to the 2005 recognition of $4.9 million of the remaining deferred revenue in connection with the termination of our Financial Agreement with Fiserv Securities, Inc. (“Fiserv”), our prior clearing firm. Included in interest and other income for 2006 is an additional $180,000 of margin interest rebate; a partial allocation of the $1.0 million received from NFS on June 29, 2006 relating to conversion and transition expenses incurred by FMSC in prior periods, as a result of its conversion from Fiserv Inc. to NFS in 2005. In addition, investment banking revenues decreased $3.2 million when compared to 2005. Our 2006 results were also negatively impacted by the loss of several large producing offices during 2006. Excluding the one-time revenue, total revenues decreased by approximately $2.2 million, or 4%, compared to 2005.
Commission Revenue
Commission revenue increased $2.4 million to $39.9 million from $37.5 million in 2005, due mainly to the increased revenue from alternative products of $1.9 million. Alternative products consist mainly of REIT’s, 1031 exchanges and promissory notes. While commissions generated from equity transactions has declined year over year, revenues from the sales of insurance and annuities and management fees from advisory accounts has been on the rise. In 2006, insurance revenues accounted for $4.95 million of our revenues, while in 2005 revenues were $4.23 million, an increase of 15%. Management fees from advisory accounts increased $644,000, or 15%, when compared to 2005.
Principal Transactions
Total revenues from principal transactions, which include mark-ups/mark-downs on transactions in which we act as principal, proprietary trading and the sale of fixed income and equity securities decreased $1.5 million, or 27%, from $5.6 million in 2005 to $4.1 million in 2006. Revenues from all fixed income sources, which include municipal, government, and corporate bonds and unit investment trusts decreased by $943,000, from $4.0 million in 2005 to $3.1 million in 2006. Revenues from riskless principal trades of equity securities decreased $574,000 from $1.2 million in 2005 to $671,000 in 2006. Riskless principal trades are transacted through the firm’s proprietary account with a customer order in hand, resulting in no market risk to the firm. These decreases are primarily attributable to a decline over the last several years in the number of registered representatives conducting more of these types of transactions.
41
Investment Banking
In 2006, investment banking revenues decreased $3.2 million, or 48%, from $6.6 million in 2005, to $3.4 million in 2006. The decrease in the revenue was primarily due to an overall reduction in the number of private offerings in 2006 when compared to 2005. In 2005, however, we reported the highest annual investment banking revenues than in any other year in the Company’s history.
Interest and Other Income
Interest and other income decreased $4.83 million in 2006, or 58%, from $8.4 million in 2005 to $3.6 million in 2006. In 2005, other income included the recognition of the remaining deferred revenue for cash advances received in prior years from our prior clearing firm, Fiserv. During 2005, we terminated our financing agreement with Fiserv and recorded the remaining unamortized balance of $4.9 million to other income. Included in interest income for 2006 is an additional $180,000 of margin interest rebate, a partial allocation of the $1.0 million received from NFS on June 29, 2006. Without the inclusion of the $4.9 million in 2005 and the $180,000 in 2006, interest and other income would have remained relatively constant between the two years.
Expenses
Total expenses decreased by $3.8 million, or 7%, in 2006 to $51.8 million from $55.6 million in 2005. Included in expenses in 2006 is an $820,000 credit due to a partial allocation of the $1 million received from NFS on June 29, 2006. Taking into consideration the $820,000 received from NFS, expenses decreased by $3.2 million. In addition, in February 2005, we recorded additional compensation expense of $1,433,000 in connection with a separation agreement with one of our senior officers, compared to $1,151,000 in 2006 with respect to two separation agreements, one with our former chairman of the Board of Directors and the other with our former general counsel.
Commissions, Employee Compensation and Benefits
Commission expense, consistently the largest expense category and which is directly related to commission revenue, decreased 2%, or $787,000, from $37.4 million for 2005, to $36.6 million for 2006. Compensation and benefits expense for management, operations and clerical personnel decreased by $476,000 in 2006, when compared to 2005. A reduction in the amortization of deferred compensation from $896,000 in 2005 to $272,000 in 2006 accounted for most of the difference.
42
Executive Separation
During the 2006 period, we recorded separation costs of $1,151,000 in connection with the termination of an employment agreement with our former chairman of the Board of Directors and the non-renewal of an employment agreement with our former general counsel. This compares to $1,433,000 in connection with a separation agreement with our former chief executive officer in 2005.
Clearing and Floor Brokerage
Clearing and floor brokerage costs decreased $398,000, from $1.9 million in 2005, to $1.5 million in 2006. In June 2006, we allocated approximately $544,000 of the $1 million received in the settlement from NFS to clearing fees. Included in costs for 2005 is $143,000 of expense rebates provided by Fiserv. Excluding these reductions for 2006 and 2005, clearing and floor brokerage costs would have remained fairly constant.
43
Communications and Occupancy
Communications and occupancy costs decreased $686,000 during 2006, from $2.5 million in 2005 to $1.8 million in 2006. In addition to a $135,000 reduction in expenses as part of the $1 million received from NFS, the decrease in expenses is due to reductions in occupancy and related costs from the elimination of a company leased branch office in New York City in 2006 and reduction in quote services due to a reduction in brokers and discounted market data pricing received from our clearing firm.
Legal matters and related costs
Legal matters and related settlement costs decreased 38%, or $679,000, from $1.8 million in 2005 to $1.1 million in 2006. The reduction in 2006 is attributable to a decline in the number of customer complaints and arbitration claims. In addition, legal costs for 2005 include $269,000 of fees related to the proposed merger with Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation (“Olympic”) which was terminated on October 24, 2005, compared to $325,000 of legal fees related to the proposed merger with the Okun Purchasers.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We maintain a highly liquid balance sheet with approximately 64% for 2007 and 81% for 2006 and 2005, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, securities owned, and receivables from our clearing firm and other broker-dealers. The balances in these accounts can and do fluctuate significantly from day to day, depending on general economic and market conditions, volume of activity, and investment opportunities. These accounts are monitored on a daily basis in order to ensure compliance with regulatory net capital requirements and to preserve liquidity.
Overall, cash and cash equivalents decreased for 2007 by $277,000. Net cash used in operating activities during 2007 was $1,082,000, as a result of a net loss of $2,085,000 adjusted by non-cash charges including depreciation and amortization of $140,000. Cash was further reduced by a net increase in other assets of $561,000 and decreases in commissions payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses of $639,000, $57,000 and $639,000, respectively. These decreases to cash were partially offset by decreases in the amount due from our clearing firm, securities owned, prepaid expenses, and employee and broker receivables of $2,640,000, $39,000, $35,000 and $55,000, respectively.
Net cash used in operating activities in 2006 was $668,000, as a result of net loss of $837,000 adjusted by non-cash charges including depreciation and amortization of $586,000 and payment of the $200,000 note issued in connection with a separation agreement. Cash was further reduced by net increases in the amount due from our clearing firm, employee and broker receivables and other assets of $232,000, $33,000 and $44,000, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in securities owned of $105,000. These increases to cash were offset by decreases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and income taxes payable of $173,000, $178,000 and $28,000, respectively, partially offset by an increase in commissions’ payable of $351,000.
44
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2005 was $995,000, as a result of net income of $2,424,000 adjusted by non-cash charges including depreciation and amortization of $1,449,000 and $1,200,000 from the issuance of stock and a note payable in connection with a separation agreement, offset by non-cash income of $5,105,000 from the amortization of deferred revenues. Cash was increased by a reduction in the amount due from our clearing firm of $1,059,000.
Additions to property and equipment of $46,000 accounted for the use of cash from investing activities for 2007. In 2006 and 2005, investing activities consumed $34,000 and $43,000, respectively, for additions to capital expenditures.
Financing activities in 2007 provided net cash of $851,000 due to the issuance of a convertible secured note in the amount of $1,000,000, partially offset by payments of preferred stock dividends of $124,000. Financing activities in 2006 used net cash of $143,000 due to the payment of preferred stock dividends and capital leases of $169,000 and $7,700, respectively, partially offset by proceeds from option exercises of $34,000. Financing activities in 2005 provided $4,000 in cash due to the receipt of $343,000 in proceeds from the exercise of stock options, offset by payments of preferred stock dividends and capital leases of $285,000 and $54,000, respectively.
Financing Activities
In 1999, we issued 349,511 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in an exchange offering related to a settlement with holders of certain leases. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of common stock and pays a quarterly dividend of 6%. Quarterly dividends were paid through the first quarter of 2003, at which time we suspended the dividend payments in accordance with applicable state law. In the second quarter of 2005, the Board of Directors declared the dividend on the preferred stock in arrears. The Company paid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock in the amount of $67,077 during 2007 and $168,506 during 2006. (See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements).
In October 2002, we commenced a private offering of up to $3,000,000 of 6% convertible debentures to accredited investors. Each debenture is convertible at an initial conversion price of $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment for stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations, and like events. Interest on the debentures accrues at the rate of 6% per annum and is payable in cash on a semi-annual basis on April 1st and October 1st of each year until maturity or conversion. Each debenture is due and payable five (5) years from issuance, unless previously converted into shares of common stock. The offering expired on March 1, 2003. In the offering, we sold an aggregate amount of $1,240,000 of debentures, $1,030,000 in 2002 and $210,000 in 2003. The proceeds of the financing were used to satisfy general working capital needs. Neither the debentures nor the shares underlying the debentures have been registered for offer or sale under the Securities Act; such securities were issued on the basis of the statutory exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D, promulgated thereunder relating to transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.
45
In September 2003, we commenced an additional private offering of up to $3,000,000 of 6% convertible debentures to accredited investors. Each debenture is convertible at an initial conversion price of $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment for stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations, and like events. Interest on the debentures accrues at the rate of 6% per annum and is payable in cash on a semi-annual basis on April 1st and October 1st of each year until maturity or conversion. Each debenture is due and payable five (5) years from issuance, unless previously converted into shares of common stock. The offering was completed on December 31, 2003. In the offering, we sold an aggregate principal amount of $1,895,000 of debentures. The proceeds of the financing were used to satisfy general working capital needs. The debentures have not been registered for offer or sale under the Securities Act; such securities were issued on the basis of the statutory exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D, promulgated there under relating to transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.
Between October 2004 and December 2005 we received notices that holders of $1,885,000 of convertible debentures that were sold through private offerings in 2002 and 2003 elected to convert their debentures into shares of our common stock in accordance with the terms of the debentures. As a result, we issued 3,770,000 shares of our common stock during that time period. The debentures are convertible at $.50 per share.
During 2006, $35,000 of the Company’s convertible debentures was converted into 70,000 shares of common stock. In June 2006, the Okun Purchasers purchased $1,190,000 principal amount of debentures, which were acquired from their holders in privately negotiated transactions. Subsequently, on June 20 and 23, 2006, the Okun Purchasers converted such debentures into 2,380,000 common shares. As of the date of this report, there are no convertible debentures outstanding.
During the second quarter of 2006, FMSC signed a release with NFS for and in consideration of the payment of $1,000,000 by NFS relating to conversion and transition expenses incurred by the broker-dealer as a result of its conversion from Fiserv to NFS in 2005. The payment was received by FMSC on June 29, 2006.
In connection with the separation agreement we entered into with Mr. William Kurinsky in 2005, we issued him an aggregate of 197,824 shares of a newly created class of Series B Preferred Stock. Such shares of Series B Preferred Stock are convertible into common stock on the basis of ten shares of common stock for each share of Series B Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Shares have voting rights along with the common stock based upon the number of shares of common stock into which it would be converted. The Series B Preferred Stock also includes a cumulative dividend of 8% per year. The shares are restricted securities under the Securities Act and the regulations of the SEC and we relied upon the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act to issue the shares of Series B Preferred Stock. (See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements). On February 23, 2007, Mr. Kurinsky sold all 197,824 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to FMFG Ownership II, Inc., an affiliate of Mr. Okun. On June 15, 2007, as part of the settlement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (See Note 12-Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement) an agreement was reached which required the Okun Defendants to surrender all shares of Series B Preferred Stock previously owned by the Okun Defendants, together with all shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 5,272,305 shares of our common stock owned by them. On June 15, 2007, 197,824 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were surrendered and cancelled. The Company paid $56,889 and $80,000 in dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock for 2007 and 2006, respectively. There are currently no shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding.
46
On December 7, 2007 we entered into the Note Purchase Agreement with AEFC-IC pursuant to which we issued to AEFC-IC the AEFC-IC Note which is due on December 31, 2008. The AEFC-IC Note is for an aggregate principal amount up to $2,000,000. The AEFC-IC Note will accrue interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 10% per annum which will be paid monthly in arrears on or before the 10th day of the month following the interest accrual. The principal of the AEFC-IC Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon will be payable in full on December 31, 2008. The AEFC-IC Note is convertible into shares of common stock at $0.35 per share, as adjusted, beginning July 1, 2008 if the AEFC-IC Note is not prepaid prior to such date. The AEFC-IC Note is prepayable at any time prior to July 1, 2008 subject to an escalating prepayment penalty based on the date of prepayment which is payable by us in cash and the issuance of a warrant to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, as adjusted (the "Prepayment Warrant"). In the event we (i) do not draw the full $2,000,000 principal amount available under the AEFC-IC Note and (ii) the AEFC-IC Note has not been prepaid by July 1, 2008, we will issue AEFC-IC a warrant to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, as adjusted, for each one dollar of principal amount available but not drawn upon under the AEFC-IC Note. The parties also executed a registration rights agreement.
In connection with, and concurrent with, the execution of the Note Purchase Agreement, the AEFC-IC Note and the related documents, we entered into the First Amendment, dated as of December 7, 2007 ("First Amendment to the Rights Agreement"), of the Rights Agreement, dated August 1, 2007, between us and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent ("Rights Agreement") as more fully described above. The First Amendment to the Rights Agreement provides that AEFC-IC will not be deemed to be an "Acquiring Person" under the Rights Agreement by reason of (i) the execution of the Note Purchase Agreement; (ii) the issuance of the AEFC-IC Note; (iii) the issuance of shares of common stock upon the conversion of the AEFC-IC Note into shares of our common stock; (iv) the issuance of any warrants to AEFC-IC pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement or any shares of common stock upon exercise of such warrants; (v) the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties; (vi) the approval, execution or delivery of any agreement with respect to the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties; (vii) the public or other announcement of the AEFC-IC Note Purchase Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated thereby, or the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties; or (viii) the consummation of the Note Purchase Agreement and any other transactions contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement or any agreement to purchase all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties.
During 2007, we cut costs by approximately $1.5 million. This was accomplished through reductions in our work force, subletting a portion of our office space and the renegotiation of our outsourced mailroom contract. In addition we initially raised $1 million through the AEFC-IC Note. We believe that our cash resources available will be sufficient to meet our minimum planned operating needs for the next 9 months. Beyond that period, management has other plans for increasing cash flow, including pursuing additional financing and continued reductions in overhead costs. Although we have plans to pursue additional financing, there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure financing when needed or obtain such financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, or that any additional funding we do obtain will be sufficient to meet our needs in the long term. If additional funding cannot be obtained, we will review alternative courses of action to conserve our cash flow.
47
Net Capital
At December 31, 2007, Montauk Financial Group had net capital of $849,710, which was $599,710 in excess of its required net capital of $250,000 and the ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital was 2.91 to 1.
Contractual Obligations
The Company has contractual obligations to make future payments in connection with its short-term debt and non-cancelable lease agreements. The follow table sets forth these contractual obligations by year. This table does not include any projected payment amounts related to our potential exposure to arbitrations and other legal matters.
Maturity Date Expected | ||||||||||||||||||||
Category | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Total | |||||||||||||||
Operating Leases | 1,148,504 | 843,667 | 184,981 | 18,627 | 2,195,779 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt (1) | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,148,504 | $ | 843,667 | $ | 184,981 | $ | 18,627 | $ | 3,195,779 |
(1) Short-term debt includes a 10% convertible secured note in the amount of $1,000,000 maturing on December 31, 2008.
48
Effective November 2006, the Company entered into a master services agreement with an outside vendor for development of certain software, data integration and business processing improvement consulting services. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company made payments totaling $400,000 to the vendor for software development, none of which has been amortized or expensed and has been included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
On March 31, 2008, the Company agreed to amend the master services agreement with the vendor in exchange for a reimbursement of a portion of the system development costs paid by the Company. In addition, the vendor will provide data integration and commission collection services to the Company, which will be amortized over the duration of the amended agreement through December 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We execute securities transactions on behalf of our customers. If either the customer or a counter-party fail to perform, we, by agreement with our clearing broker, may be required to discharge the obligations of the non-performing party. In such circumstances, we may sustain a loss if the market value of the security is different from the contract value of the transaction. We seek to control off-balance-sheet risk by monitoring the market value of securities held or given as collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines. Pursuant to such guidelines, our clearing firm requires additional collateral or reduction of positions, when necessary. We also complete credit evaluations where there is thought to be credit risk.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The following paragraphs include a discussion of some of the significant accounting policies and methods applied to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. (See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of significant accounting policies.)
Use of Estimates
In presenting the consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates regarding the valuation of certain securities owned, the carrying value of investments, the realization of deferred tax assets, the outcome of litigation, and other matters that affect the reported amounts and disclosure of contingencies in the financial statements. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available information. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates and could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and it is possible that such changes could occur in the near term.
49
Revenue Recognition
Securities transactions, commission income, sales concessions from participation in syndicated offerings and related expenses are recorded on a trade date basis. Insurance and mutual fund commissions received from outside vendors are recognized as income when earned. Securities owned and securities sold, but not yet repurchased are stated at quoted market value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Investment account securities not readily marketable are carried at estimated fair value as determined by management with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.
Long-lived Assets
We evaluate impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations, primarily fixed assets, when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets might not be recoverable in accordance with FASB Statement No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets". For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets would be compared to the carrying amounts of those assets. If and when the carrying values of the assets exceed their fair values, the related assets will be written down to fair value.
Clearing Agreement
Montauk Financial Group introduces all of its customer transactions, which are not reflected in the financial statements, to it’s clearing brokers, who maintain the customers’ accounts and clears such transactions. Additionally, the clearing brokers provide the clearing and depository operations for Montauk Financial Group’s proprietary securities transactions. These activities may expose us to off-balance sheet risk in the event that customers do not fulfill their obligations with the clearing brokers, as Montauk Financial Group has agreed to indemnify the clearing brokers for any resulting losses. We will record a loss from a client transaction when information becomes available to management that allows it to estimate its impact on our financial statements.
Income Taxes
Due to significant operating losses from 2001-2003 we have established a valuation allowance against all of our deferred tax benefits as of December 31, 2007, and we intend to maintain it until we determine that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized. Our income tax expense recorded in the future will be reduced to the extent of offsetting decreases in our valuation allowance. The realization of our remaining deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on forecasted future taxable income.
The Company adopted FIN 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” in January 2007 to measure its tax positions in the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. We don’t expect any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows at December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended as a result of implementing FIN 48.
50
New Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which replaces SFAS No 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized in the purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS No 141R will have on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB 51, which changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be reported as a component of equity separate from the parent’s equity, and purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control will be accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS No. 160 would have on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and all interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB released FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-2 – Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157) which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of this statement would have on our financial statements.
On March 19, 2008 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 161 (FAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new standard is intended to help investors better understand how derivative instruments and hedging activities affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows through enhanced disclosure requirements. The enhanced disclosures include, for example:
51
· A tabular summary of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses
· Disclosure of derivative features that are credit-risk-related to provide more information regarding an entity’s liquidity
· Cross-referencing within footnotes to make it easier for financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments
The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
Impact of Inflation
We believe that the impact of inflation has an effect upon the amount of capital generally available for investment purposes and also may affect the attitude or willingness of investors to buy and sell securities. The nature of the business of the broker-dealer subsidiary and the securities industry in general is directly affected by national and international economic and political conditions, broad trends in business and finance and volatility of interest rates, changes in and uncertainty regarding tax laws, and substantial fluctuation in the volume and price levels of securities transactions and the securities markets. To the extent inflation results in higher interest rates, or has other adverse effects on the securities markets and the value of securities held in inventory, it may adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
Risk Management
Risk is an inherent part of our business and activities. The extent to which we properly and effectively identify, assess, monitor and manage the various types of risk involved in our activities is critical to our soundness and profitability. We seek to identify, assess, monitor and manage the following principal risks involved in its business activities: market, credit, operational and legal. Senior management takes an active role in the risk management process and requires specific administrative and business functions to assist in the identification, assessment and control of various risks. Our risk management policies and procedures are subject to ongoing review and modification.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to maintain and increase operating revenues, reduce operating expenses, and raise additional capital. During the year, the Company raised $1,000,000 in the form of a short term secured convertible promissory note and reduced expenses by approximately $1.5 million. This included a reduction in the workforce, subletting of office space, and renegotiating of outsourced office functions. We believe that our cash resources will be sufficient to meet our minimum planned operating needs for the next 9 months. Beyond that period, management has other plans for increasing cash flow, including pursuing additional financing and continued reductions in overhead costs. We cannot make any assurances that we will be successful in these activities, which would therefore have a materially adverse affect on our financial condition.
Our ability to obtain additional financing from other sources depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the state of the capital markets and the uncertainties that are common in the securities industry. The necessary additional financing may not be available to us or may be available only on terms that would result in dilution to the current owners of our common stock. If additional funding cannot be obtained, we will review alternative courses of action to conserve our cash flow.
52
As a securities broker-dealer, we are subject to uncertainties that are common in the securities industry. These uncertainties include:
● | the volatility of capital markets; |
● | governmental regulation; |
● | litigation; |
● | intense competition; |
● | substantial fluctuations in the volume and price level of securities; and |
● | dependence on third parties. |
As a result, revenues and earnings may vary significantly from period to period. In periods of low volume, profitability is impaired because certain expenses remain relatively fixed. In the event of a substantial change in market conditions or a loss of a substantial number of registered representatives from whom our revenues are derived, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk of loss to the Company resulting from changes in interest rates and equity prices. The Company has exposure to market risk primarily through its broker-dealer. The Company’s broker-dealer, FMSC , carries debt obligations on behalf of its customers and acts as a market maker in approximately 15 over-the-counter equity securities. In connection with these activities, the Company maintains inventories to facilitate client transactions. Occasionally, the Company invests for its own proprietary equity investment accounts.
The following table represents the fair value of trading inventories associated with the Company’s broker-dealer client facilitation, market-making activities and proprietary trading activities.
December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Securities Owned | Securities Sold but not yet Purchased | Securities Owned | Securities Sold but not yet Purchased | |||||||||||||
Debt securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Government | $ | 6,756 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,015 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Corporate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Municipal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total debt securities | 6,756 | 0 | 2,015 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities | 58,339 | 0 | 97,941 | 495 | ||||||||||||
Mutual funds | 9,463 | 201 | 6,008 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Options | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Warrants | 85,215 | 0 | 92,483 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 159,773 | $ | 201 | $ | 198,447 | $ | 495 |
Changes in value of the Company’s inventory may result from fluctuations in interest rates, credit ratings of the issuer, equity prices and the correlation among these factors. The Company’s primary method of controlling risk is through the establishment and monitoring of limits on the dollar amount of securities positions that can be entered into. Position limits in inventory accounts are monitored on a daily basis. Management also monitors inventory levels and trading results, as well as inventory aging, pricing, concentration and securities ratings.
53
Since the inventory accounts are used primarily to facilitate customer transactions the number of positions and absolute dollar amounts are maintained well within Company limits and therefore represents minimal market risk to the Company. Our policy is to hold securities pending customer transactions and therefore we generally do not maintain positions longer than one year.
Credit Risk. Credit risk represents the loss that we would incur if a client, counterparty or issuer of securities or other instruments that we hold fails to perform its contractual obligations. Client activities involve the execution, settlement, and financial of various transactions on behalf of its clients. Client activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. Client activities may expose us to off-balance sheet credit risk. We may have to purchase or sell financial instruments at the prevailing market price in the event of the failure of a client to settle a trade on its original terms or in the event that cash and securities in the client margin accounts are not sufficient to fully cover the client losses. We seek to control the risks associated with client activities by requiring clients to maintain collateral in compliance with various regulations and company policies.
Operational Risk. Operational risk generally refers to the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including, but not limited to, improper or unauthorized execution and processing of transactions, deficiencies in our operating systems, business disruptions and inadequacies or breaches in our internal control processes. We operate in diverse markets and rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process high numbers of transactions often within short time frames. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of systems, human error or improper action by employees, we could suffer financial loss, regulatory sanctions or damage to our reputation. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, we have developed and continue to enhance policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels. Included in our operational risk management practice is disaster recovery for our critical systems. We believe that our disaster recovery program, including off-site back-up technology and operational facilities, is adequate to handle a reasonable business disruption. However, there can be no assurances that a disaster directly affecting our headquarters or operations center would not have a material adverse impact. Insurance and other safeguards might only partially reimburse us for our losses.
Legal Risk. Legal risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. We are subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. We have various procedures addressing issues such as regulatory capital requirements, sales and trading practices, use of and safekeeping of customer funds, credit granting, collection activities, anti money-laundering and record keeping.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our activities often involve the purchase, sale or short sale of securities as principal. Such activities subject our capital to significant risks from markets that may be characterized by relative illiquidity or may be particularly susceptible to rapid fluctuation in price or liquidity. Such market conditions could limit our ability to resell securities purchased or to purchase securities sold short. These activities subject our capital to significant risks, including market, credit and liquidity risks. Market risk relates to the risk of fluctuating values based on market prices without action on our part. Our primary credit risk is settlement risk, which relates to whether counterparty will fulfill its contractual obligations, such as delivery of securities or payment of funds. Liquidity risk relates to our inability to liquidate assets or redirect the deployment of assets contained in illiquid investments. Additional information pertaining to the foregoing risks is included under the caption “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management.”
54
Item 8. Financial Statements
See Financial Statements attached hereto at pages F-1 to F-40.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2007, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the evaluation date.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, there were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
55
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers
Our directors and executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2007 are as set forth below. From January 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007 our Board consisted of six individuals. Effective August 31, 2007 Mr. Phillip D’Ambrisi resigned from our Board. His seat currently remains vacant.
Board of Directors
Name | Age | Position |
Victor K. Kurylak | 51 | Class II Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, First Montauk Financial Corp. |
Ward R. Jones, Jr. | 76 | Class III Director, First Montauk Financial Corp. |
Barry D. Shapiro | 66 | Class II Director, First Montauk Financial Corp. |
David I. Portman | 66 | Class III Director, First Montauk Financial Corp. |
Celeste M. Leonard | 52 | Class I Director, First Montauk Financial Corp. |
Executive Officers
Name | Age | Position |
Victor K. Kurylak | 51 | Chief Executive Officer and President, First Montauk Financial Corp. and Montauk Financial Group |
Celeste M. Leonard | 52 | Chief Compliance Officer, Montauk Financial Group |
Mindy A. Horowitz | 50 | Acting Chief Financial Officer -First Montauk Financial Corp., Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Fin.Op.- Montauk Financial Group |
56
Our Certificate of Incorporation provides for the classification of the Board of Directors into three classes of Directors, each class as nearly equal in number as possible but not less than one Director, each Director to serve for a three-year term, staggered by class. The Certificate of Incorporation further provides that a Director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 70% of the combined voting power of our voting stock, with vacancies on the Board being filled only by a majority vote of the remaining Directors then in office. "Cause” is defined as the willful failure of a Director to perform in any substantial respect such Director’s duties to our company (other than any such failure resulting from incapacity due to physical or mental illness), willful malfeasance by a Director in the performance of his duties to the company which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the company, the commission by a Director of an act of fraud in the performance of his duties, the conviction of a Director for a felony punishable by confinement for a period in excess of one year, or the ineligibility of a Director for continuation in office under any applicable rules, regulations or orders of any federal or state regulatory authority. All officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Victor K. Kurylak became our Chief Executive Officer on February 1, 2005, and continues to serve as President, a position he has held since January 1, 2004. Mr. Kurylak was elected to our Board on May 4, 2005. From January 1, 2004 through January 31, 2005, Mr. Kurylak was our President and Chief Operating Officer. From January 2001 through December 2003, Mr. Kurylak was a self-employed business consultant, and was retained by us prior to his becoming our President and Chief Operating Officer. From November 1995 through December 2000 he was the owner and Executive Vice President for Madison Consulting Group/Summit Insurance, an independent insurance brokerage firm. From February 1990 through October 1995, Mr. Kurylak was the Chief Information Officer for Rockefeller Financial Services in New York City. Mr. Kurylak received his Bachelor of Sciences degree in Engineering from Princeton University in 1979. Mr. Kurylak is registered as a general securities representative and registered principal and is licensed as a life, health and property and casualty insurance producer.
Ward R. Jones, Jr. has been a member of our Board of Directors since June 1991. From 1955 through 1990, he was employed by Shearson Lehman Brothers as a registered representative, eventually achieving the position of Vice President. Mr. Jones was a registered representative of Montauk Financial Group from 1991 to 2005 but did not engage in any securities business. Mr. Jones is now retired from the securities business.
Barry D. Shapiro, CPA has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 6, 2000. From October 2000 to the present, Mr. Shapiro is a shareholder of the accounting firm, Withum, Smith + Brown in its Red Bank office. Mr. Shapiro was a partner of Shapiro & Weisman CPAs P.A. from 1976 thru 1996 when he became a partner of Rudolf, Cinnamon & Calafato, P.A. until joining Withum Smith + Brown. Mr. Shapiro was previously employed with the Internal Revenue Service from 1965 through 1971, where he was responsible for audit, review and conference functions. Mr. Shapiro is a member of the New Jersey Society of Certified Public Accountants, where he currently participates on the IRS Co-Op and State Tax Committees. Mr. Shapiro is a past Trustee, Treasurer and Vice President of the NJSCPA. He has been involved and is in many civic and community activities, as well as charitable organizations, including the Monmouth County New Jersey Chapter of the American Cancer Society and the Ronald McDonald House of Long Branch, New Jersey. Mr. Shapiro received a B.S. in accounting from Rider University in 1965.
57
David I. Portman rejoined our Board of Directors on February 24, 2006, and had previously served on our Board from 1993 until December 31, 2002. Mr. Portman is the president of TRIAD Development, a real estate company that has numerous commercial and rental properties in New Jersey, a position that he has held since 1988. In addition, Mr. Portman currently serves as a director of Pacifichealth Laboratories, Inc., a publicly held nutrition technology company, a position he has held since August 1995. Montauk Financial Group underwrote the initial public offering of the common stock of Pacifichealth Laboratories. Mr. Portman has a BS in Pharmacy and an MBA. He worked as a sales representative and marketing manager for Eli Lilly, Beecham-Massengill, Winthrop Laboratories and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals before co-founding M.E.D. Communications in 1974. In 1988, Mr. Portman sold his interest in M.E.D. Communications and became President of TRIAD Development.
Celeste M. Leonard was elected to serve as a Class I member of our Board of Directors on February 22, 2007. Since September 2006, Ms. Leonard has been an Executive Vice President and the Chief Compliance Officer of FMSC. Ms. Leonard has over 28 years of compliance and supervision experience in the financial services industry. Before joining the Company in August 2006, Ms. Leonard had been the Sales Practice Director for Smith Barney Citigroup in New York City, a position she had held since November 2004. She previously worked as a Senior Vice President for Business Control Management for Neuberger Berman, LLC in New York from March 2004 through November 2004. From February 1996 through March 2004, Ms. Leonard was an Executive Director/ National Director of Branch Supervision for CIBC Oppenheimer Corp. and oversaw supervision and risk management for the private client division’s 19 branch locations. From October 1994 through February 1996, he worked as Compliance Director for the Financial Services Division of Lehman Brothers, and held various other positions at that firm and its predecessors since 1978.
Mindy A. Horowitz, was appointed our Acting Chief Financial Officer effective February 1, 2005. In January 2005, she became the Chief Financial Officer and Financial and Operations Principal of Montauk Financial Group. She had previously been Vice President of Finance for Montauk Financial Group since September 1995. Prior to that, Ms. Horowitz was a tax partner with and held other positions at the accounting firm of Broza, Block & Rubino from 1981 through 1995 when she joined FMSC. Ms. Horowitz graduated with a MS in accounting from Monmouth College in 1981.
Significant Employee
Mark D. Lowe, 48, has been President of Montauk Insurance Services, Inc. since October 1998. From 1982 to 1998 Mr. Lowe was a Senior Consultant with Congilose & Associates, a financial services firm specializing in insurance and estate planning. Mr. Lowe became a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) in July 1991, a Chartered Financial Planner (ChFC) in 2001 and a Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) in 2003. Mr. Lowe graduated Ocean County College in Toms River, NJ. Mr. Lowe is the past President of the Estate and Financial Planning Council of Central New Jersey.
58
Certain Reports
No person who, during the year ended December 31, 2007, was a Director, officer or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of our common stock (which is the only class of our securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act ) failed to file on a timely basis, reports required by Section 16 of the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year or prior years. The foregoing is based solely upon our review of Forms 3 and 4 during the most recent fiscal year as furnished us under Rule 16a-3(d) under the Exchange Act, and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to its most recent fiscal year, and any representation received by us from any reporting person that no Form 5 is required.
Meetings of Directors
During 2007, the full Board of Directors met on 19 occasions. No member of the Board of Directors attended less than 75% of the aggregate number of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors or (ii) the total number of meetings held by all Committees of the Board of Directors.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has three committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Special Committee. Our Board of Directors currently consists of five individuals, three of whom are independent directors as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Our independent directors are Ward R. Jones, Jr., Barry D. Shapiro and David I. Portman.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the members of the committees, and a description of the duties of the Committees were as follows:
Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee acts to:
· review with management our finances, financial condition and interim financial statements;
· review with our independent auditors the year-end financial statements; and
· review implementation with the independent auditors and management any action recommended by the independent auditors and the retention and termination of our independent auditors.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Audit Committee met on six occasions. The Audit Committee adopted a written charter governing its actions effective June 23, 2000. During the year, the members of the Audit Committee were Ward R. Jones, Barry D. Shapiro and David I. Portman. Both of the members of our Audit Committee were "independent" within the definition of that term as provided in the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock market. The Board has determined that Mr. Barry D. Shapiro qualified as the Audit Committee financial expert as defined under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules. Mr. Shapiro serves as chairman of this committee. Mr. Portman was appointed to serve on this committee at the time of his election to our Board in February 2006.
59
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee functions include administration of our 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 1996 Senior Management Option Plan and the negotiation and review of all employment and separation agreements with our executive officers. The Compensation Committee's members during 2006 were Ward R. Jones, Barry D. Shapiro and David Portman. Mr. Jones serves as chairman of this committee. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the committee met on two occasions.
Special Committee.The Special Committee of the Board was formed on February 24, 2006 for the purpose of reviewing and evaluating any transactions that may be presented to the Board for the benefit of the shareholders. Mr. David Portman serves as chairman of this committee. The Special Committee, which consists of our three independent members of the Board, did not meet as a separate committee in 2007.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
There are no Compensation Committee interlocks between the members of our Compensation Committee and any other entity. None of the members of the Board's Compensation Committee are executive officers of our company.
Compensation of Directors
We pay our Directors who are not also our employees a retainer of $250 per meeting of the Board of Directors attended and for each meeting of a committee of the Board of Directors not held in conjunction with a Board of Directors meeting. In 2007 the Board authorized an increase in the annual payment from $5,000 to $15,000 payable in advance in quarterly installments. Members of the Audit Committee are also entitled to an additional $5,000 payment per annum payable in advance in quarterly installments.
Code of Ethics
On March 29, 2004, our Board of Directors approved the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for our company. Our Code of Ethics and Conduct covers all our employees and Directors, including our Chief Executive Officer and President and Acting Chief Financial Officer. A copy of our Code of Ethics and Conduct was filed as Exhibit 14 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2003. We did not amend or waive any provisions of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our compensation philosophy and policies for 2007 as applicable to our named executive officers (NEOs). This CD&A explains the structure and rationale associated with each material element of the NEOs’ total compensation, and provides context for the more detailed disclosure tables and specific compensation amounts provided following the CD&A.
60
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, reward and retain talented individuals who are essential to our continued success. In determining the form and amount of compensation payable to our NEOs, our Compensation Committee is guided by the following objectives and principles:
· | Encourage creation of shareholder value and achievement of strategic corporate objectives; |
· | Integrate compensation with our annual and long-term corporate objectives and strategy, and focus executive behavior on the fulfillment of those objectives; |
· | Provide a competitive total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high caliber personnel; and |
· | Hold our NEOs accountable to achieve corporate objectives and offer rewards for successful business results, thereby increasing shareholder value. |
Oversight of Our Executive Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) assists the Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation of the NEOs and oversees and administers our executive compensation program. It evaluates and recommends to the Board appropriate policies and decisions relative to NEOs salaries, benefits, bonuses, incentive compensation, severance, and equity-based or other compensation plans.
Elements of Compensation. Each element of compensation is designed to reward different performance goals, yet have the components work together to satisfy the ultimate goal of enhancing shareholder value. The elements of principal officer compensation are:
1. Base salary. Compensation levels for each of our NEOs, including the Chief Executive Officer, are generally set within the range of salaries that the Compensation Committee believes are paid to executive officers with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at comparably-sized companies. In setting compensation levels, the Compensation Committee takes into account such factors as (i) our past performance and future expectations, (ii) individual performance and experience and (iii) past salary levels. The Compensation Committee does not assign relative weights or ranking to these factors, but instead makes a determination based upon the consideration of all of these factors as well as the progress made with respect to our long-term goals and strategies. Base salary, while reviewed annually, is only adjusted as deemed necessary by the Compensation Committee in determining total compensation for each NEO.
2. Cash bonuses. Cash bonuses reward the NEOs for overall job performance and are approved by the Compensation Committee. These bonuses are discretionary and are not awarded based on a formula or a specific time frame other than the contractual bonuses that are paid pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements for our NEOs, Victor K. Kurylak and Celeste M. Leonard and former NEO’s Philip D’Ambrisi and Jeffrey J. Fahs. (See further discussion below.)
61
3. Corporate finance bonus pool. Pursuant to his employment agreement, our Chief Executive Officer is eligible to purchase from the Company, at his sole discretion, a portion of the securities contributed to the “Corporate Finance Bonus Pool” upon the same price, terms and conditions afforded to Montauk Financial Group. The Corporate Finance Bonus Pool consists of up to 20% of all underwriter’s warrants, placement agent warrants and/or other securities granted to FMSC, in connection with its service as an underwriter, placement agent or investment banker; provided however, such amount shall not exceed 50% of the total securities retained by Montauk Financial Group after any allocations to the registered representatives and the corporate finance staff in accordance with the corporate policies in effect from time to time. The amount our Chief Executive Officer shall be entitled to purchase shall be determined by the Compensation Commmittee on a transaction-by-transaction basis.
4. Long-term incentive equity awards. The purpose of long term equity awards in the form of grants of stock options and restricted stock under our 1996 Senior Management Incentive Plan (described below) is to retain the services of the NEOs and our key employees, and encourage them to improve our operating results and to become shareholders of the Company, all of which is intended to result in increased shareholder value.
In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that equity ownership by NEOs and our other key employees helps to balance the short-term focus of annual incentive compensation with a longer-term view and may help to retain them with the Company. In making stock option and restricted stock grants, the Compensation Committee considers general corporate performance, individual contributions to our financial, operational and strategic objectives, level of seniority and experience, existing levels of stock ownership, previous grants of restricted stock or options, vesting schedules of outstanding restricted stock or options and the current stock price.
After consideration of restricted stock and stock options awarded prior to 2007 to the NEOs and the base salary increases approved in December 2006, no stock options or restricted stock grants were recommended or approved for award to the NEOs during, or for, 2007.
Finally, our 1996 Senior Management Incentive Plan terminated in June 2006; therefore no further grants were eligible to be made under this Plan.
5. 401(k). We have a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, which permits our eligible employees, including the NEOs, to defer up to 15% of their annual compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The employees’ elective deferrals are immediately vested and nonforfeitable upon contribution to the 401(k) plan. In 2006, we did not make a contribution based on our discretionary contribution matching policy.
6. Perquisites and other benefits. We offer various broad-based employee benefit plans. NEOs participate in these plans on the same terms as eligible, non-executive employees. These plans consist of health, pharmacy and dental insurance programs and are intended to provide benefits that support the well-being and overall health of executives, including our NEOs and employees. In addition we provide group term insurance with a maximum coverage of $50,000, as well as long-term disability.
62
We also provide NEOs with reimbursement of automobile and business-related expenses and cellular telephone usage.
7. Sign-on bonuses. In addition to the standard elements of compensation, the Compensation Committee and executive management have the discretionary ability to pay sign-on bonuses in the form of cash and/or stock to executive officers, including our NEOs, as well as other key employees. We utilize these bonuses in order to attract personnel believed to be valuable to the company. The hiring of employees, particularly the hiring of executives, is highly competitive. In order to attract and retain talented senior executives, we believe that this tool is important to the building and retention of a strong qualified workforce.
63
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Agreements
Victor K. Kurylak
Effective February 1, 2005, the Board approved the appointment of Victor K. Kurylak as our Chief Executive Officer and entered into a new employment agreement. Mr. Kurylak was granted 1,000,000 shares of our common stock as a bonus for our performance for the year ended December 31, 2004, and in consideration of his assuming the position of Chief Executive Officer, which shares vest in increments of one third commencing on February 1, 2005, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006. In the event of a change of control of the Company, all unvested shares would vest. Mr. Kurylak agreed to the cancellation of 250,000 of his outstanding stock options with an exercise price of $0.75 per share. His prior agreement entered into effective January 1, 2004 was terminated.
Under the terms of Mr. Kurylak’s employment agreement, which expired December 31, 2007, Mr. Kurylak received a base salary of $275,000 per year; subject to annual increases of 10% provided we have profits of at least $500,000 per annum. In addition, Mr. Kurylak was entitled to receive medical and other benefits that we have in effect for its executives. Mr. Kurylak was entitled to participate in our executive bonus pool, which has been established by the Board to constitute 15% of our net pre tax profit. Further, Mr. Kurylak was also entitled to a portion of the corporate finance bonus pool defined as 20% of all underwriters and/or placement agent warrants or options that are granted to Montauk Financial Group upon the same price, terms and conditions afforded to Montauk Financial Group as the underwriter or placement agent, but not to exceed 50% of what is retained by Montauk Financial Group after issuance to the registered representatives who participated in the placements. In the event of termination without cause, Mr. Kurylak would be entitled to a severance payment consisting of accrued compensation, continuation of his benefits and payment of his base salary for a period of the greater of three months or the unexpired term.
As of May 9, 2007, the Company and Mr. Kurylak executed an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amended Employment Agreement”). The Amended Employment Agreement was executed in connection with the execution of the May Settlement Agreement with the Okun Defendants (See Item 3. “Legal Proceedings”). Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Kurylak is to continue his employment with the Company as President. Mr. Kurylak was to resign, however, from the position of CEO of the Company in connection with the May Settlement Agreement upon appointment of his successor and execution by his successor of an employment agreement with the Company. However, since the May Settlement Agreement was vacated and set aside, Mr. Kurylak’s resignation as CEO was not accepted and thus cancelled. On June 15, 2007, the Company and Mr. Kurylak executed Amendment Number One to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amendment to Amended Employment Agreement”) to correctly state that Mr. Kurylak remains employed in the capacity of President and CEO of both the Company and FMSC. Mr. Kurylak’s employment contract has been renewed for one year under the terms of the Amended Employment Agreement previously filed.
64
In the event of the termination of Mr. Kurylak’s employment by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Kurylak for “good reason” (as these terms are defined in the Amended Employment Agreement), he would be entitled to: (a) all compensation accrued but not paid as of the termination date; (b) base salary for the remainder of the term; (c) a severance payment equal to $300,000 payable in a lump sum payment; (d) continued participation in the Company’s benefit plans (or comparable plans); and (e) any applicable bonus. If Mr. Kurylak’s employment is terminated by the Company for “cause” or by him without “good reason”, he will be entitled only to accrued compensation. If termination of the Amended Employment Agreement occurs as a result of the expiration of such agreement without renewal by the Company at the end of the term, Mr. Kurylak will be entitled to the accrued compensation, any applicable bonus and the severance payment.
In the event Mr. Kurylak is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on the termination date, the payment of any and all compensation due under the Amended Employment Agreement, except the accrued compensation, is expressly conditioned on Mr. Kurylak’s resignation from the Board of Directors of the Company within five (5) business of the termination date.
The Amended Employment Agreement contains confidentiality obligations that survive indefinitely and non-solicitation and non-competition obligations that end on the first anniversary of the date of cessation of Mr. Kurylak’s employment.
Phillip D’Ambrisi
In August 2006, the Company hired Mr. Phillip P. D’Ambrisi as the Company’s new Chief Operating Officer with employment terms, which provided him with an annual base salary of $250,000 and bonuses of $200,000 for 2006 and $100,000 for each subsequent calendar year through December 31, 2008, provided he is still employed by the Company at the end of each such year. The terms of Mr. D’Ambrisi’s employment were reflected in a formal employment agreement, but the Company's intent was to reduce the terms reflected in the letter agreement dated August 1, 2006 to a written employment agreement in similar form and substance to that which was executed by the Company's Chief Compliance Officer, Ms. Leonard.
On August 31, 2007, however, Mr. D'Ambrisi resigned his position as Chief Operating Officer of the Company and FMSC. Mr. D'Ambrisi also resigned effective August 31, 2007 as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Effective September 1, 2007, the Company and Mr. D'Ambrisi entered into a written consulting agreement pursuant to which Mr. D'Ambrisi provided certain services to the Company through December 31, 2007.
Celeste M. Leonard
In August 2006, FMSC entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Celeste M. Leonard with respect to her new position as a Chief Compliance Officer of FMSC. The employment agreement provides her with an annual base salary of $200,000 and bonuses of $200,000 for 2006 and $100,000 for each subsequent calendar year through December 31, 2008, provided she is still employed by the Company at the end of each such year.
Jeffrey J. Fahs, Esq.
In January 2007, FMSC entered into an employment agreement with Jeffrey J. Fahs with respect to his new position as Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel. The employment agreement provided him with a base salary of $200,000 per year through December 31, 2008 and bonuses of $100,000 for each subsequent calendar year through December 31, 2008, provided he is still employed by the Company at the end of each such year.
65
Mr. Fahs resigned on August 31, 2007, effective September 28, 2007. In settlement of his existing employment contract Mr. Fahs received his 2007 bonus of $100,000.
Mindy A. Horowitz
In 2005, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mindy Horowitz who serves as our Acting Chief Financial Officer. The Board also approved a restricted stock award to her of 100,000 shares of common stock as a performance bonus award and as an incentive to continue her employment with us. The agreement had an initial term of one year ending February 1, 2006 and is renewable for successive one-year terms unless we provide 120 days’ prior written notice of our intention not to renew the agreement. This agreement is currently in effect.
Under her agreement, Ms. Horowitz receives a base salary of $140,000 per year, which was increased to $160,000 per year in 2007. She is eligible to participate in our bonus and option plans, receives health and benefits as provided to our executives and is entitled to a car allowance. In the event of termination of her employment without cause, Ms. Horowitz would be entitled to receive a severance payment equal to the sum of (i) one year’s salary, (ii) her portion of the bonus pool payments she would otherwise be entitled to following termination and (iii) payment of the costs of health and other benefits for 12 months following termination.
Robert I. Rabinowitz
On November 14, 2006, the Company entered into a separation agreement with the Company's then Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Mr. Robert I. Rabinowitz. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Rabinowitz's employment contract was not renewed and terminated effective January 31, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement, Mr. Rabinowitz was provided with severance pay of $200,000 and benefits for a period of one year in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, which was accrued for in 2006. Effective February 1, 2007, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Rabinowitz pursuant to which he is being hired as a consultant to the Company for an eleven-month period to provide assistance to the Company in the transition of his responsibilities to new personnel.
66
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION
The following table provides certain information concerning all Plan and Non-Plan (as defined in Item 402 (a)(ii) of Regulation S-K) compensation awarded to, earned by, paid or accrued by us during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 to each of our NEOs.
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensa-tion ($) | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compen- sation ($) | Total ($) |
Victor K. Kurylak, President, | 2007 | 292,500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 292,500 |
Chief Executive Officer, FMFC and Montauk Financial Group | 2006 2005 | 300,000 275,000 | 200,000 200,000 | 0 570,000 (1) | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 500,000 1,045,000 |
Phillip D’Ambrisi, Chief Operating Officer, FMFC and Montauk Financial Group(7) Celeste M. Leonard, Chief Compliance Officer, Montauk Financial Group | 2007 2006 2007 2006 | 166,667 250,000 200,000 200,000 | 100,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 | 0 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 0 | 266,667 450,000 300,000 400,000 |
Robert I. Rabinowitz Former General Counsel – FMFC and Montauk Financial Group(8) | 2007 2006 2005 | 16,667 200,000 190,000 | 0 0 20,000 | 0 0 57,000 (2) | 0 0 66,450 (4) | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 200,000(6) 0 | 16,667 400,000 333,450 |
Jeffrey J. Fahs Former General Counsel-FMFC and Montauk Financial Group(7) | 2007 | 114,488 | 100,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 214,888 |
Mindy A. Horowitz Acting Chief Financial Officer, FMFC, and Chief Financial Officer, Fin.Op Montauk Financial Group | 2007 2006 2005 | 160,000 152,000 140,000 | 0 35,000 20,000 | 0 0 57,000 (3) | 0 0 33,257 (5) | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 160,000 187,000 250,257 |
1) | In February 2005, the Company issued Mr. Kurylak 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stock, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement as discussed above in greater detail, which shares had a market value of $570,000 on the date of issuance. | |
2) | In February 2005, Mr. Rabinowitz was issued an aggregate of 100,000 restricted shares of common stock. Such shares had a market value of $57,000 on the date of issuance. These shares were granted to Mr. Rabinowitz pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement. | |
3) | In February 2005, Ms. Horowitz was issued an aggregate of 100,000 restricted shares of common stock. Such shares had a market value of $57,000 on the date of issuance. These shares were granted to Ms. Horowitz pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement as discussed above in greater detail. | |
4) | In July 2005, the Compensation Committee authorized an option grant to Mr. Rabinowitz to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share for five years. These options were initially valued at $66,450 based on the Black Scholes method of valuation. | |
5) | In July 2005, the Compensation Committee authorized an option grant to Ms. Horowitz to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share for five years. These options were initially valued at $33,257 based on the Black Scholes method of valuation. | |
6) | Pursuant to a separation agreement with Mr. Rabinowitz dated November 14, 2006, he received a severance payment of $200,000, paid at the rate of $16,667 per month beginning February 1, 2007. | |
7) | Mr. D’Ambrisi and Mr. Fahs resigned as NEOs of the Company on August 31, 2007. | |
8) | Mr. Rabinowitz’s employment as a NEO terminated effective January 31, 2007. |
67
2007 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
There were no grants made to any NEOs of options or restricted stock during the year ended December 31, 2007.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2007 YEAR-END
Options Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Equity Incentive Plan Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Options Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | ||||||||||
Victor K. Kurylak | 250,000(1) | 0 | - | 0.50 | 12/31/08 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Celeste M. Leonard | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Mindy A. Horowitz | 100,000(2) | 0 | - | 0.50 | 12/30/08 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Mindy A. Horowitz | 75,000(3) | 0 | - | 1.25 | 07/27/10 | - | - | - | - |
1) | Represents the number of vested stock options as of December 31, 2007. These options vested 33% upon grant in February 2005, and 33% each December 31, 2005 and 2006. Options expire 5 years from the date of grant. | |
2) | Represents the number of vested stock options as of December 31, 2007. These options vested 100% upon grant on December 31, 2003. Options expire 5 years from the date of grant. | |
3) | Represents the number of vested stock options as of December 31, 2007. These options vested 100% upon grant on July 28, 2005. Options expire 5 years from the date of grant. |
2007 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
Option Awards (1) | Stock Awards | ||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)(1) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(2) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(3) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(4) | |||||
Victor K Kurylak | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Mindy A. Horowitz | 0 | 0 | 33,333 | 6,667 |
(1) | Information relates to stock option exercises during 2007. | |
(2) | Represents the amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price. | |
(3) | Information relates to stock acquired on vesting of restricted stock grants during 2007. | |
(4) | Represents the market value of the vested restricted stock grants on date of vesting. |
68
2007 DIRECTOR’S COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows, for the year ended December 31, 2007, the compensation paid to each of our non-executive directors:
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Option Awards ($)(2) | Total ($) | |||||
Barry Shapiro | 27,938(1) | 0 | 27,938 | |||||
Ward R Jones Jr. | 27,938(1) | 0 | 27,938 | |||||
David Portman | 27,938(1) | 0 | 27,938 |
(1) | Represents payments made to each Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Jones and Mr. Portman for a) annual cash payment of $15,000 as a non-executive board member, b) annual cash payment of $5,000 as a member of the Audit Committee, c) cash payment of $6,250 for attendance at Board and Audit Committee meetings in 2007, and d) $1,688 for the 2006 fourth quarter board member payment. | |
(2) | In 2007, Messrs. Shapiro and Jones each received a grant of 40,000 options and Mr. Portman received a grant of 35,000 options under the Non-Executive Director Plan. The exercise price for each grant exceeds the fair market value of the underlying stock as of December 31, 2007. |
Incentive Stock Option Plan
In June 2002, we adopted the 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Incentive Plan”), which provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock by our employees, registered representatives and consultants. Under the terms of the 2002 Incentive Plan, options granted there under may or may not be designated as options which qualify for incentive stock option treatment under Section 422A of the Code.
The 2002 Incentive Plan is administered by our Board of Directors which has the discretion to determine the eligible employees to whom, and the times and the price at which, options will be granted; whether such options shall be Incentive Stock Options or Non-Incentive Stock Options; the periods during which each option will be exercisable; and the number of shares subject to each option. The Board has full authority to interpret the 2002 Incentive Plan and to establish and amend rules and regulations relating thereto.
Under the 2002 Incentive Plan, the exercise price of an option designated as an Incentive Stock Option shall not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. However, in the event an option designated as an Incentive Stock Option is granted to a ten percent stockholder such exercise price shall be at least 110% of such fair market value. Exercise prices of Non-Incentive Stock Options may be less than such fair market value. The aggregate fair market value of shares subject to options granted to a participant that are designated as Incentive Stock Options that become exercisable in any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.
The Board may, in its sole discretion, grant bonuses or authorize loans to or guarantee loans obtained by an optionee to enable such optionee to pay any taxes that may arise in connection with the exercise or cancellation of an option. Unless sooner terminated, the 2002 Incentive Plan will expire in 2012.
69
Effective as of the date of this Annual Report, since the adoption of the 2002 Incentive Plan, we have issued 721,200 options to registered representatives and employees, which have not been exercised or cancelled.
Director Plan
In June 2002, we adopted the Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan"). The Director Plan provides that each Non-Executive Director will automatically be granted an option to purchase 20,000 shares each September 1st, provided such person has served as a director for the 12 months immediately prior to such September 1st. A Non-Executive Director who has not served as a director for an entire year prior to September 1st of each year shall receive a pro rata number of options. Options are granted under the Director Plan until 2012 to Non-Executive Directors who are not our full time employees.
The exercise price for options granted under the Director Plan shall be 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Until otherwise provided in the Director Plan the exercise price of options granted under the Director Plan must be paid at the time of exercise, either in cash, by delivery of shares of our common stock or a combination of both. The term of each option commenced on the date it is granted and unless terminated sooner as provided in the Director Plan, expires five years from the date of grant. The Director Plan is administered by a committee of the Board of Directors composed of not fewer than two persons who are our officers (the "Committee"). The Committee has no discretion to determine which non-executive director will receive options or the number of shares subject to the option, the term of the option or the exercisability of the option. However, the Committee will make all determinations of the interpretation of the Director Plan. Options granted under the Director Plan are not qualified for incentive stock option treatment.
In 2006, due to the then pending merger agreement with the Okun Purchasers, no options were issued to Non-Executive Directors. However, in 2007, following termination of the merger agreement, we issued 55,000 options to the three Non-Executive Directors with respect to the 2006 year, as well as 60,000 options granted for 2007. To date, a total of 235,000 options are outstanding in our Non-Executive Director Plan.
Senior Management Plan
In 1996, we adopted the 1996 Senior Management Incentive Plan (the "1996 Management Plan"). The 1996 Management Plan provides for the issuance of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock either upon issuance of options issued under the 1996 Management Plan or grants of restricted stock or incentive stock rights. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board may grant awards under the 1996 Management Plan to executive management employees, if one is appointed for this purpose. The 1996 Management Plan provides for four types of awards: stock options, incentive stock rights, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock purchase agreements. The stock options granted under the 1996 Management Plan can be either incentive stock options or non-incentive stock options, similar to the options granted under the 2002 Incentive Plan, except that the exercise price of non-incentive stock options shall not be less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Incentive stock rights consist of incentive stock units equivalent to one share of common stock in consideration for services performed for us. If services of the holder terminate prior to the incentive period, the rights become null and void unless termination is caused by death or disability. Stock appreciation rights allow a grantee to receive an amount in cash equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock and the exercise price, payable in cash or shares of common stock. The Board or a committee of the Board may grant limited stock appreciation rights, which become exercisable upon a "change of control" of our Company. A change of control includes the purchase by any person of 25% or more of the voting power of our outstanding securities, or a change in the majority of the Board of Directors.
70
In June 2000, at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a resolution was passed amending the 1996 Management Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance from 2,000,000 to 4,000,000. Options to purchase 915,000 shares of our common stock are currently outstanding under the 1996 Management Plan and to date we have issued an aggregate of 2,300,000 shares of our common stock as restricted stock awards to senior management under this Plan.
Awards granted under the 1996 Management Plan are also entitled to certain acceleration provisions that cause awards granted under this Plan to immediately vest in the event of a change of control or sale of our company. The 1996 Management Plan expired in June 2006 and therefore no additional grants are available to be made under this Plan.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2008 with respect to (i) each director and each executive officer, (ii) all directors and officers as a group, and (iii) the persons (including any “group” as that term is used in Section l3(d)(3) of the Exchange Act ), known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five (5%) percent of our common stock. Shares of common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days from the date of this table are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of such person but are not treated as outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of others.
Directors, Officers and 5% Shareholders (1) | Amount and Percentage Of Beneficial Ownership (1) | |||||||
Number of Shares | Percent | |||||||
Victor K. Kurylak Parkway 109 Office Center 328 Newman Springs Road Red Bank, NJ 07701 | 1,500,000 | (2) | 11.11 | % | ||||
Celeste Leonard Parkway 109 Office Center 328 Newman Springs Road Red Bank, NJ 07701 | 0 | 0 | % |
71
Mindy A. Horowitz Parkway 109 Office Center 328 Newman Springs Road Red Bank, NJ 07701 | 275,000 | (3) | 2.05 | % | ||||
Ward R. Jones 300 West Jersey Road Lehigh Acres, FL 33936 | 120,000 | (4) | * | |||||
David I. Portman 142 Highway 35 Eatontown, NJ 07724 | 85,000 | (5) | * | |||||
Barry D. Shapiro, CPA 331 Newman Springs Road Red Bank, NJ 07701 | 100,000 | (6) | * | |||||
Bankruptcy Estate for Edward H. Okun | 3,300,308 | (7) | 24.89 | % | ||||
All Directors and Officers as a group (6 persons in number) | 2,080,000 | 14.95 | % |
* Indicates less than 1%
(1) | Unless otherwise indicated below, each director, officer and 5% shareholder has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that he beneficially owns. |
(2) | Amounts and percentages indicated for Mr. Kurylak include an aggregate of 1,250,000 shares of common stock and vested options to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock. |
(3) | Includes vested and presently exercisable options of Ms. Horowitz to purchase 175,000 shares of common stock. Amounts and percentages indicated for Ms. Horowitz include an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock. |
(4) | Includes vested and presently exercisable options of Mr. Jones to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock. |
(5) | Includes vested and presently exercisable options of Mr. Portman to purchase 35,000 shares of common stock. |
(6) | Includes vested and presently exercisable options of Mr. Shapiro to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock. |
(7) | As a part of a Settlement Agreement entered into on June 15, 2007 between the Company and the Okun Defendants, the Okun Defendants surrendered to the Company for cancellation, 283,087 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, 197,824 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and an aggregate of 5,272,305 shares of common stock. |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007, including the 2002 Incentive Plan, the Director Plan, the 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the 1996 Management Plan, as amended. Information concerning each of the aforementioned plans is set forth above. Each of the 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the 1992 Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan and 1996 Management Plan has expired and no additional options may be granted under such plans. Unexpired options granted pursuant to such plans prior to their expiration, however, remain exercisable (when vested) until the expiration of the individual option grant.
72
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights (a) | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options (b) | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a) (c) | |
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders | 1,871,2001 | $0.73 | 4,048,6022,3 | |
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Total | 1,871,2001 | $0.73 | 4,048,6022,3 |
1. | Includes 721,200 options issued pursuant to the our 2002 Incentive Plan, 235,000 options issued pursuant to our Director Plan, and 915,000 options and shares issued pursuant to our 1996 Management Plan. |
2. | Includes 3,748,602 options available for issuance under our 2002 Incentive Plan. |
3. | Includes 300,000 options assumed available for issuance under our Director Plan. We expect to have three outside directors, each of whom will receive 20,000 options over the ten years of the plan. |
73
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
For information concerning the terms of the employment agreements entered into between us and Mr. Victor K. Kurylak, Ms. Mindy A. Horowitz, and Ms. Celeste M. Leonard, the employment and separation agreements for Mr. Jeffrey J. Fahs and the separation agreement entered into with Philip D’Ambrisi, see Item 11. "Executive Compensation” above.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Service.
Our Audit Committee has selected Lazar Levine & Felix LLP, Certified Public Accountants, as its independent accountants for the current fiscal year. The audit services provided by Lazar Levine & Felix LLP consist of examination of financial statements, services relative to filings with the SEC, and consultation in regard to various accounting matters. The following table presents the total fees paid for professional audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent auditors for the audit of our annual financial statements to Lazar Levine & Felix LLP for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and fees billed for other services rendered by our independent auditors during those periods.
Year Ended December 31, 2007 | Year Ended December 31, 2006 | ||||
Audit Fees (1) | $184,238 | $169,900 | |||
Audit-Related Fees (2) | $19,000 | $ 15,325 | |||
Tax Fees (3) | $42,290 | $ 29,500 | |||
All Other Fees (4) | $10,000 | $ 0 | |||
Total | $255,528 | $214,725 |
(1) | Audit services consist of audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements for the fiscal year and for the review of financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q during the fiscal year, as well as work that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, including consents for registration statement flings and responding to SEC comment letters on annual and quarterly filings. |
(2) | Audit-related services consist of assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, agreed upon procedures report and accounting and regulatory consultations. |
(3) | Tax services consist of all services performed by the independent auditor's tax personnel, except those services specifically related to the audit of the financial statements, and includes fees in the areas of tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. |
(4) | Other services consist of those service not captured in the other categories. |
Our Audit Committee has determined that the services provided by our independent auditors and the fees paid to them for such services has not compromised the independence of our independent auditors.
74
Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditor. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditor. Prior to engagement of the independent auditor for the next year's audit, management will submit a detailed description of the audit and permissible non-audit services expected to be rendered during that year for each of four categories of services described above to the Audit Committee for approval. In addition, management will also provide to the Audit Committee for its approval a fee proposal for the services proposed to be rendered by the independent auditor. Prior to the engagement of the independent auditor, the Audit Committee will approve both the description of audit and permissible non-audit services proposed to be rendered by the independent auditor and the budget for all such services. The fees are budgeted and the Audit Committee requires the independent auditor and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service.
During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent auditor for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires separate pre-approval before engaging the independent auditor. To ensure prompt handling of unexpected matters, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The four categories of services provided by the independent auditor are as defined in the footnotes to the fee table set forth above.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
1. Financial Statements
See the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, together with the report thereon of Lazar Levine & Felix, LLP dated March 31, 2008 beginning on page F-1 of this report.
2. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Column A | Column B | Column C | Column D | Column E | ||||||||||
Charged | ||||||||||||||
Balance at | (credited) | Charged to | Balance at | |||||||||||
beginning | to costs and | other | end | |||||||||||
Description | of period | expenses | accounts | Deductions | of period | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2007 | $ | 3,581,909 | $ | (784,184 | ) | $ | 2,797,725 | |||||||
Year ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 3,578,522 | $ | 3,387 | $ | 3,581,909 | ||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2005 | $ | 5,120,839 | $ | (1,542,317 | ) | $ | 3,578,522 | |||||||
Broker loan reserves: | ||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2007 | $ | 807,535 | $ | ( 49,020 | ) | $ | 758,515 | |||||||
Year ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 1,085,135 | $ | (277,600 | ) | $ | 807,535 | |||||||
Year ended December 31, 2005 | $ | 1,402,631 | $ | (317,496 | ) | $ | 1,085,135 |
75
3. Exhibits
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit Index at the end of this Report.
76
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. | |||
Dated: March 31, 2008 | By: | /s/ Victor K. Kurylak | |
Victor K. Kurylak | |||
Chief Executive Officer and President | |||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Victor K. Kurylak | March 31, 2008 | ||
Victor K. Kurylak, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | |||
/s/ Celeste M. Leonard | March 31, 2008 | ||
Celeste M. Leonard, Chief Compliance Officer and Director | |||
/s/ Mindy A. Horowitz | March 31, 2008 | ||
Mindy A. Horowitz, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer | |||
/s/ Ward R. Jones, Jr. | March 31, 2008 | ||
Ward R. Jones, Jr., Director | |||
/s/ Barry D. Shapiro | March 31, 2008 | ||
Barry D. Shapiro, Director | |||
/s/ David I. Portman | March 31, 2008 | ||
David I. Portman, Director | |||
77
EXHIBIT INDEX
The exhibits designated with an asterisk (*) are filed herewith. All other exhibits have been previously filed with the Commission and, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. §230.411, are incorporated by reference to the document referenced in brackets following the descriptions of such exhibits.
Exhibit No. | Description | |
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of February 10, 2005 by and among First Montauk Financial Corp., Olympic Cascade Financial Corp. and FMFC Acquisition Corporation (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 11, 2005). | |
2.2 | Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 27, 2005 by and among First Montauk Financial Corp., Olympic Cascade Financial Corp. and FMFC Acquisition Corporation (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 28, 2005). | |
2.3 | Letter Agreement dated as of October 24, 2005 terminating the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 27, 2005, by and among Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation, OLY Acquisition Corporation and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 25, 2005). | |
2.4 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 5, 2006 by and among FMFG Ownership, Inc., FMFG Acquisition Co. Inc. and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2006. | |
2.5 | Settlement Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2007, among First Montauk Financial Corp., Edward H. Okun, Investment Properties of America, LLC, IPofA Waterview, LLC, FMFC Acquisition Co., FMFG Ownership I Co., FMFG Ownership II, Co., Victor K. Kurylak, Ward R. Jones, Jr., Barry Shapiro, David Portman and Mindy Horowitz (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 11, 1007. | |
2.6 | Settlement Agreement dated as of June 15, 2007 among First Montauk Financial Corp., Edward H. Okun, Investment Properties of America, LLC, IPofA Waterview, LLC, FMFG Acquisition Co., FMFG Ownership II, Co., Victor K. Kurylak, Ward R. Jones, Jr., Barry Shapiro, David Portman and Mindy Horowitz (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2007. | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation adopted at 1989 Special Meeting in lieu of Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-l, File No. 33-24696). | |
78
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-l, File No. 33-24696). | |
3.3 | Certificate of Designations of Series A Preferred Stock. (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002). | |
3.4 | Form of Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Designation of Rights and Preferences of Series B Preferred Stock (Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2005). | |
3.5 | Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation adopted at Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 23, 2005 (Previously filed as Exhibit A to Definitive Proxy Statement dated May 19, 2005). | |
4.1 | Form of Common Stock. (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-l, File No. 33-24696). | |
4.2 | Form of Debenture Sold in Private Placement. (Previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to Report on Form 8-K dated March 27, 2003). | |
4.3 | Form of Placement Agent Warrant (Previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to Report on Form 8-K dated March 27, 2003). | |
4.4 | Form of Debenture Sold in Private Placement. (Previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2004). | |
4.5 | Form of Placement Agent Warrant (Previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2004). | |
4.6 | Promissory Note issued to Herbert Kurinsky dated February 1, 2006 (Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2006). | |
4.7 | Rights Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2004, between First Montauk Financial Corp. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2007). | |
4.8 | Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2007, by and between First Montauk Financial Corp. and AEFC FMFK Investment Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2007. | |
4.8.1 * | Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2007, by and between First Montauk Financial Corp. and AEFC FMFK Investment Corp. | |
4.9 | First Amendment to the Rights Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2007, by and between First Montauk Financial Corp. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2007). |
79
10.1 | Office Lease Agreement between First Montauk Securities Corp. and River Office Equities dated March 5, 1997 (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997). | |
10.2 | First Amendment to Office Lease Agreement dated March 5, 1997 between First Montauk Securities Corp. and River Office Equities dated March 3, 1998 (Previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 28.8 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998). | |
10.3‡ | Employment Agreement between First Montauk Securities Corp. and Mark Lowe dated October 15, 1998 (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998). | |
10.4 | Sublease Agreement between Aim net Solutions, Inc. and First Montauk Financial Corp. dated January 15, 2002 (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001). | |
10.5‡ | Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2004 between Herbert Kurinsky and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.6‡ | Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2004 between William J. Kurinsky and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.14 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.7‡ | Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2004 between Victor K. Kurylak and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.8‡ | 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-l, File No. 33-24696). | |
10.9‡ | 1992 Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-l, File No. 33-24696). | |
10.10‡ | Amended and Restated 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Proxy Statement dated May 30, 1996). | |
10.11‡ | Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan – Amended and Restated June 28, 1996 (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Proxy Statement dated May 30, 1996). |
80
10.12‡ | 1996 Senior Management Incentive Stock Option Plan (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Proxy Statement dated May 30, 1996). | |
10.13‡ | Second Amended and Restated 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Proxy Statement dated May 23, 2000). | |
10.14‡ | 1996 Senior Management Incentive Plan Amended as of June 23, 2000 (Previously filed with the Commission as an exhibit to our Proxy Statement dated May 23, 2000). | |
10.15‡ | 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit A to our Proxy Statement dated May 20, 2002). | |
10.16‡ | 2002 Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit B to our Proxy Statement dated May 20, 2002). | |
10.17‡ | Form of Non-Executive Director Stock Option Award. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 2004). | |
10.18‡ | Form of Stock Option Award pursuant to Incentive Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.19‡ | Form of Stock Option Award pursuant to 1996 Senior Management Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.20 | Fourth Amendment to Office Lease Agreement dated September 22, 2004 between First Montauk Securities Corp. and River Office Equities (Previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated September 28, 2004). | |
10.21‡ | Separation Agreement between First Montauk Financial Corp. and William J. Kurinsky, effective as of February 1, 2005. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.29 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.22‡ | Consulting Agreement between First Montauk Financial Corp. and William J. Kurinsky, effective as of February 1, 2005. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.30 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.23‡ | Employment Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 between Victor K. Kurylak and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.31 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). |
81
10.24‡ | Employment Agreement dated as of February 8, 2005 between Robert I. Rabinowitz and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.32 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.25‡ | Employment Agreement dated as of February 8, 2005 between Mindy A. Horowitz and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.33 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). | |
10.26 | Termination of Clearing Agreement between First Montauk Securities Corp. and Fiserv Securities, Inc. dated April 21, 2005 (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2005). | |
10.27 | Termination of Financial and Security Agreement among First Montauk Financial Corp., First Montauk Securities Corp. and Fiserv Securities, Inc. dated April 21, 2005 (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2005). | |
10.28‡ | Separation Agreement between First Montauk Financial Corp. and Herbert Kurinsky dated February 1, 2006 (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2006). | |
10.29‡ | Employment Agreement between First Montauk Securities Corp. and Celeste Leonard dated August 7, 2006 (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 26, 2007). |
82
10.30‡ | Agreement and Release between First Montauk Financial Corp. and Robert I. Rabinowitz dated November 14, 2006 (Previously filed on November 14, 2006 as Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006). | |
10.31‡* | Consulting Agreement between First Montauk Financial Corp. and Robert I. Rabinowitz dated as of January 19, 2007. | |
10.32‡* | Employment Agreement between First Montauk Securities Corp. and Jeffrey J. Fahs dated as of January 24, 2007. | |
10.33‡ | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between First Montauk Financial Corp. and Victor K. Kurylak, dated as of May 9, 2007 (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2007.) | |
10.34‡ | Amendment Number One, dated as of June 15, 2007, to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2007, between Victor K. Kurylak and First Montauk Financial Corp. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007, dated August 14, 2007.) | |
10.35‡ | Consulting Agreement between First Montauk Financial Corp. and Phillip P. D’Ambrisi, dated September 1, 2007 (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 6, 2007.) | |
14 | Code of Ethics (Filed as Exhibit 14 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). | |
21* | Subsidiary Companies | |
23.1* | Consent of Lazar, Levine & Felix. | |
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2* | Certification of Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 * | Certification of Victor K. Kurylak pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 * | Certification of Mindy A. Horowitz pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
‡ Denotes management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements in which directors or executive officers are eligible to participate.
83
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
First Montauk Financial Corp
Red Bank, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Montauk Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, cash flows and the schedule listed in the accompanying index for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the schedule based on our audits
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and the schedule are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and the schedule. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and the schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Montauk Financial Corp. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
Lazar, Levine and Felix LLP
New York, New York
March 27, 2008
F-1
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION | ||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 868,836 | $ | 1,145,751 | ||||
Due from clearing firm | 2,347,946 | 4,988,747 | ||||||
Securities owned, at market value | 159,773 | 198,447 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 250,948 | 285,480 | ||||||
Employee and broker receivables - net of reserve for bad debt | ||||||||
of $758,515 and $807,535 respectively | 288,049 | 343,491 | ||||||
Property and equipment - net | 175,463 | 239,033 | ||||||
Other assets | 1,159,893 | 597,968 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 5,250,908 | $ | 7,798,917 | ||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||
6% convertible debenture | $ | - | $ | 25,000 | ||||
10% convertible note | 1,000,000 | - | ||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased, at market value | 201 | 495 | ||||||
Commissions payable | 1,739,713 | 2,378,935 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 256,549 | 313,427 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 556,527 | 1,195,426 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 11,358 | 4,167 | ||||||
Capital leases payable | - | 820 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 51,528 | 67,156 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 3,615,876 | 3,985,426 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Series B convertible redeemable preferred stock, 445,102 shares authorized, | ||||||||
$.10 par value, 0 and 197,824 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | ||||||||
liquidation preference: $0 and $1,000,000, respectively | - | 1,000,000 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Preferred stock, 3,929,898 shares authorized, $.10 par value, | ||||||||
no shares issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
Series A convertible preferred stock, 625,000 shares authorized, $.10 par value | ||||||||
22,282 and 305,369 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; | ||||||||
liquidation preference: $111,410 and $1,526,845, respectively | 2,228 | 30,537 | ||||||
Series C participating cumulative preferred stock, 200,000 shares authorized, | ||||||||
$.10 par value, no shares issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
Common stock, no par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized, | ||||||||
13,257,248 and 18,526,553 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 9,621,030 | 11,646,620 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 4,035,064 | 950,592 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (12,023,290 | ) | (9,814,258 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 1,635,032 | 2,813,491 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 5,250,908 | $ | 7,798,917 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
F-2
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | ||||||||||||
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||
Commissions | $ | 31,728,518 | $ | 39,920,168 | $ | 37,493,733 | ||||||
Principal transactions | 1,534,794 | 4,079,243 | 5,578,820 | |||||||||
Investment banking | 3,579,838 | 3,420,685 | 6,640,402 | |||||||||
Interest and other income | 2,712,648 | 3,540,324 | 8,370,711 | |||||||||
Total revenue | 39,555,798 | 50,960,420 | 58,083,666 | |||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Commissions, employee compensation and benefits | 33,995,993 | 43,137,778 | 44,398,131 | |||||||||
Executive separation | - | 1,151,266 | 1,432,937 | |||||||||
Clearing and floor brokerage | 1,477,482 | 1,527,675 | 1,926,005 | |||||||||
Communications and occupancy | 1,672,992 | 1,797,281 | 2,483,056 | |||||||||
Legal matters and related costs | 1,672,716 | 1,095,064 | 1,773,604 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses | 2,778,928 | 2,982,665 | 3,467,972 | |||||||||
Interest | 26,420 | 78,248 | 100,123 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 41,624,531 | 51,769,977 | 55,581,828 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (2,068,733 | ) | (809,557 | ) | 2,501,838 | |||||||
Provision for income taxes | 16,333 | 26,992 | 77,544 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,085,066 | ) | $ | (836,549 | ) | $ | 2,424,294 | ||||
Preferred stock dividends | (123,966 | ) | (168,506 | ) | (285,340 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | (2,209,032 | ) | $ | (1,005,055 | ) | $ | 2,138,954 | ||||
Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Diluted | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.12 | ||||
Weighted average number of shares of stock outstanding: | ||||||||||||
Basic | 15,635,136 | 17,004,254 | 14,032,057 | |||||||||
Diluted | 15,635,136 | 17,004,254 | 20,109,178 | |||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
F-3
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2005 TO DECEMBER 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A Convertible | Series B Convertible | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Paid-in Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2005 | 305,369 | $ | 30,537 | - | $ | - | 10,258,509 | $ | 7,257,292 | $ | 950,592 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase in deferred compensation | - | - | - | - | - | 154,464 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued in connection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
with legal settlements | - | - | - | - | 25,000 | 25,000 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock in connection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
with employment agreements | - | - | - | - | 1,300,000 | 741,000 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock in connection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
with separation agreement | - | - | 197,824 | 19,782 | - | - | 980,218 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred stock into | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
common stock | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | - | - | 560,998 | 343,071 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cashless exercise of warrants | - | - | - | - | 262,900 | 158,283 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of bonds into common stock | - | - | - | - | 3,530,000 | 1,765,000 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2005 | 305,369 | 30,537 | 197,824 | 19,782 | 15,937,407 | 10,444,110 | 1,930,810 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2006, as previously reported | 305,369 | 30,537 | 197,824 | 19,782 | 15,937,407 | 10,444,110 | 1,930,810 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of Series B stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as temporary equity | - | - | (197,824 | ) | (19,782 | ) | - | - | (980,218 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2006, as restated | 305,369 | 30,537 | - | - | 15,937,407 | 10,444,110 | 950,592 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in deferred compensation | - | - | - | - | - | (76,266 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reclass to common stock | - | - | - | - | - | (39,546 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | - | - | 68,800 | 33,504 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cashless exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | - | - | 27,586 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cashless exercise of warrants | - | - | - | - | 42,760 | 22,211 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expired warrant obligation | - | - | - | - | - | 37,607 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of bonds into common stock | - | - | - | - | 2,450,000 | 1,225,000 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2006 | 305,369 | 30,537 | - | - | 18,526,553 | 11,646,620 | 950,592 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | - | - | - | - | - | 29,823 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | - | - | 3,000 | 750 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred A stock | (1,629,549 | ) | - | - | - | - | 1,629,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of preferred A stock | (283,087 | ) | 1,601,240 | - | - | - | - | (1,601,240 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of preferred B stock | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of common stock | - | - | - | - | (5,272,305 | ) | (2,056,163 | ) | 2,056,163 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 | 22,282 | $ | 2,228 | - | $ | - | 13,257,248 | $ | 9,621,030 | $ | 4,035,064 | |||||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
F-4
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||||||
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2005 TO DECEMBER 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||
Stockholders' | ||||||||||||
Accumulated | Deferred | Equity | ||||||||||
Deficit | Compensation | (Deficit) | ||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2005 | $ | (10,948,157 | ) | $ | (388,881 | ) | $ | (3,098,617 | ) | |||
Increase in deferred compensation | - | (154,464 | ) | - | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | - | 896,160 | 896,160 | |||||||||
Common stock issued in connection | ||||||||||||
with legal settlements | - | - | - | |||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock in connection | ||||||||||||
with employment agreements | - | (741,000 | ) | 25,000 | ||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock in connection | ||||||||||||
with separation agreement | - | - | 1,000,000 | |||||||||
Conversion of preferred stock into | ||||||||||||
common stock | - | - | - | |||||||||
Exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | 343,071 | |||||||||
Exercise of warrants | - | - | 158,283 | |||||||||
Conversion of bonds into common stock | - | - | 1,765,000 | |||||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | (285,340 | ) | - | (285,340 | ) | |||||||
Net income for the period | 2,424,294 | - | 2,424,294 | |||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2005 | (8,809,203 | ) | (388,185 | ) | 3,227,851 | |||||||
Balances at January 1, 2006, as previously reported | (8,809,203 | ) | (388,185 | ) | 3,227,851 | |||||||
Reclassification of Series B stock | ||||||||||||
as temporary equity | - | - | (1,000,000 | ) | ||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2006, as restated | (8,809,203 | ) | (388,185 | ) | 2,227,851 | |||||||
Increase in deferred compensation | - | 76,266 | - | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | - | 272,373 | 272,373 | |||||||||
Reclass to common stock | - | 39,546 | - | |||||||||
Exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | 33,504 | |||||||||
Cashless exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | - | |||||||||
Cashless exercise of warrants | - | - | 22,211 | |||||||||
Expired warrant obligation | - | - | 37,607 | |||||||||
Conversion of bonds into common stock | - | - | 1,225,000 | |||||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | (168,506 | ) | - | (168,506 | ) | |||||||
Net loss | (836,549 | ) | - | (836,549 | ) | |||||||
Balances at December 31, 2006 | (9,814,258 | ) | - | 2,813,491 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | - | - | 29,823 | |||||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | (123,966 | ) | - | (123,966 | ) | |||||||
Exercise of incentive stock options | - | - | 750 | |||||||||
Redemption of preferred A stock | - | - | - | |||||||||
Cancellation of preferred A stock | - | - | - | |||||||||
Cancellation of preferred B stock | - | - | 1,000,000 | |||||||||
Cancellation of common stock | - | - | - | |||||||||
Net loss | (2,085,066 | ) | - | (2,085,066 | ) | |||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 | $ | (12,023,290 | ) | $ | - | $ | 1,635,032 | |||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
F-5
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||||||||||
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,085,066 | ) | $ | (836,549 | ) | $ | 2,424,294 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) | ||||||||||||
provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | 109,163 | 244,500 | 384,169 | |||||||||
Amortization of stock compensation and deferred costs | 29,823 | 341,228 | 1,064,619 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred income | - | - | (5,105,116 | ) | ||||||||
Common stock issued in legal settlement | - | - | 25,000 | |||||||||
Preferred shares issued in connection with separation agreement | - | - | 1,000,000 | |||||||||
Note payable issued in connection with separation agreement | - | (200,000 | ) | 200,000 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash attributable to changes in assets | ||||||||||||
and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Due from clearing firm | 2,640,801 | (232,100 | ) | 1,059,173 | ||||||||
Securities owned | 38,674 | 105,165 | 67,108 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 34,532 | 1,914 | 53,427 | |||||||||
Employee and broker receivables | 55,442 | (33,202 | ) | 239,041 | ||||||||
Income taxes receivable | - | - | 40,525 | |||||||||
Other assets | (561,925 | ) | (44,020 | ) | 101,395 | |||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | (294 | ) | (3,069 | ) | (170,762 | ) | ||||||
Commissions payable | (639,222 | ) | 351,556 | (472,414 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable | (56,878 | ) | (173,249 | ) | (128,108 | ) | ||||||
Accrued expenses | (638,899 | ) | (177,928 | ) | 295,169 | |||||||
Income taxes payable | 7,191 | (28,000 | ) | (12,379 | ) | |||||||
Other liabilities | (15,628 | ) | 15,500 | (70,113 | ) | |||||||
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | (1,082,286 | ) | (668,254 | ) | 995,028 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (45,593 | ) | (34,073 | ) | (42,720 | ) | ||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | (45,593 | ) | (34,073 | ) | (42,720 | ) | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Payment of capital lease | (820 | ) | (7,735 | ) | (53,905 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of incentive stock option | 750 | 33,504 | 343,071 | |||||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | (123,966 | ) | (168,506 | ) | (285,340 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of convertible note | 1,000,000 | - | - | |||||||||
Payment of convertible debenture | (25,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | 850,964 | (142,737 | ) | 3,826 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (276,915 | ) | (845,064 | ) | 956,134 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 1,145,751 | 1,990,815 | 1,034,681 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | $ | 868,836 | $ | 1,145,751 | $ | 1,990,815 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 19,844 | $ | 106,739 | $ | 133,967 | ||||||
Income taxes | $ | 11,343 | $ | 128,020 | $ | 92,473 | ||||||
Noncash financing activity: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants | $ | - | $ | 22,211 | $ | 158,283 | ||||||
6% convertible debentures converted into common stock | $ | - | $ | 1,225,000 | $ | 1,765,000 | ||||||
Cancellation and Redemption of Preferred A stock | $ | 28,309 | ||||||||||
Cancellation of Preferred B stock | $ | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||
Cancellation of Common stock | $ | 2,056,199 | ||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
F-6
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - | NATURE OF BUSINESS |
First Montauk Financial Corp. (the “Company”) is a holding company whose principal subsidiary, First Montauk Securities Corp. (“FMSC”), operates as a securities broker-dealer and investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Since July 2000, FMSC has operated under the registered trade name “Montauk Financial Group”. Through FMSC, the Company executes principal and agency transactions primarily for retail customers, performs investment banking services, and trades securities on a proprietary basis. FMSC’s registered representatives offer and sell a variety of investment related, insurance based products through Montauk Insurance Services, Inc. (“MISI”), another subsidiary of the Company. The Company operates in one business segment. Customers are located primarily throughout the United States.
FMSC clears all customer transactions on a fully disclosed basis through independent clearing firms. Accordingly, FMSC does not carry securities accounts for customers nor does it perform custodial functions related to those securities. FMSC is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") and the National Futures Association (“NFA”).
NOTE 2 - | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its two subsidiaries, both of which are wholly owned. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Revenue Recognition Policies
Commissions. All customer securities transactions and insurance and mutual fund commissions are reported on the Consolidate Statements of Operations on a trade-date basis. Revenues from alternative products received from outside vendors are recognized as income when earned. Asset management fees include revenues we receive from management fees from third-party managed funds and management and administrative fees we receive for assets managed by our registered representatives who are Series 65 licensed. These fees are based on the value of assets under management and are generally recognized over the period that the related service is provided based upon the beginning or ending Net Asset Value of the relevant period. Our accounting for commissions includes the guidance contained in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 99-19, Reporting Revenues Gross versus Net, and because we are the primary obligor of any such arrangement, accordingly, we do not net expense against the commission revenues.
F-7
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Principal Transactions. Financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold, but not yet purchased (all of which are recorded on a trade-date basis) are valued at quoted market value, with unrealized gains and losses reflected in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a trade-date basis. Market value generally is determined based on listed prices or broker quotes. Securities not readily marketable are carried at fair value based on our management’s best estimate, giving appropriate consideration to reported prices, the extent of public trading in similar securities and the discount from the listed price associated with the cost at the date of acquisition, among other factors.
The Company’s principal transaction revenues, by reporting categories at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||
Equities | 386,361 | 25.17% | 972,397 | 23.84% | 1,555,270 | 27.88% | ||||
Fixed Income | 1,148,433 | 74.83% | 3,106,846 | 76.16% | 4,023,550 | 72.12% | ||||
Total | 1,534,794 | 100.00% | 4,079,243 | 100.00 | 5,578,820 | 100.00% |
Investment Banking. Investment banking revenues are recorded at the time a transaction is completed and the related income is reasonably determined. Investment banking revenues include management fees, net of reimbursable expenses, earned in connection with private placement fees. Revenues from sales concessions from participation in syndicated offerings are recorded on a trade-date basis.
Interest Income. We recognized interest earned from clearing firm rebates when received. Interest on broker loans is recorded on the accrual basis.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $86,944, $52,259 and $68,924 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
F-8
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Property and Equipment
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Betterments are capitalized, while all other items are expensed. Depreciation on furniture and equipment is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from three to ten years. Capitalized leased equipment is amortized over the lease term. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of either the asset’s useful life or the related lease term. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and on an accelerated basis for income tax purposes.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity when purchased of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consisted of money market funds at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Earnings (Loss) per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period adjusted to reflect potentially dilutive securities. In determining basic earnings (loss) per share for the periods presented, dividends paid on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock are added (deducted) to the net income (loss). No dividends were paid on the Series C Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock. For 2007 and 2006, the basic and diluted calculation is the same due to the net losses. Accordingly, the result of including potentially dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive.
F-9
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In accordance with SFAS 128, the following table reconciles basic shares outstanding to fully diluted shares outstanding:
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Numerator – basic: | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,085,066 | ) | $ | (836,549 | ) | $ | 2,424,294 | ||||
Deduct: dividends paid during the year | (123,966 | ) | (168,506 | ) | (285,340 | ) | ||||||
Numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | (2,209,032 | ) | $ | (1,005,055 | ) | $ | 2,138,954 | ||||
Numerator – diluted: | ||||||||||||
Numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | (2,209,032 | ) | $ | (1,005,055 | ) | $ | 2,138,954 | ||||
Add: Preferred stock dividends | -- | -- | 285,340 | |||||||||
Add: Convertible debenture interest | -- | -- | 86,582 | |||||||||
Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | (2,209,032 | ) | $ | (1,005,055 | ) | $ | 2,510,876 | ||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 15,635,136 | 17,004,254 | 14,032,057 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
Stock options and warrants | -- | -- | 1,160,173 | |||||||||
Restricted shares | -- | -- | 438,708 | |||||||||
Convertible preferred stock Series B | -- | -- | 1,978,240 | |||||||||
Convertible debentures | -- | -- | 2,500,000 | |||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share | 15,635,136 | 17,004,254 | 20,109,178 |
The following securities, presented on a common share equivalent basis, have been excluded from the per share computations because they are antidilutive: |
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Stock Options | 1,871,200 | 2,137,402 | 1,934,844 | |||||||||
Warrants | 304,518 | 407,518 | 82,409 | |||||||||
Convertible debt | -- | 25,000 | -- | |||||||||
Restricted Shares | -- | 100,000 | -- | |||||||||
Convertible note | 2,857,143 | -- | -- | |||||||||
Convertible preferred stock | 44,564 | 2,283,609 | 610,738 | |||||||||
TOTAL | 5,077,425 | 4,953,529 | 2,627,991 |
F-10
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Use of Estimates
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Management periodically evaluates estimates used in the preparation of financial statements for continued reasonableness. Appropriate adjustments, if necessary, to the estimates used are made prospectively based upon such periodic evaluation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Long-lived Assets
The Company evaluates impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations, primarily property and equipment, when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets might not be recoverable in accordance with FAS No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets". For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets would be compared to the carrying amounts of those assets. If and when the carrying values of the assets exceed their fair values, the related assets will be written down to fair value. The Company has determined that there was no impairment for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to determine its income tax expense as required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (FAS 109). Under FAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset depends on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the future. The Company files a consolidated tax return for federal purposes and separate state tax returns for the parent and each of its subsidiaries. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company periodically issues stock options to employees, non-employee consultants and non-employee independent registered representatives in accordance with the provisions of its stock option plans (the “Plans”), with the exercise price of the stock options being set at the greater of $ .50 or 120% of the closing market price of the common stock on the date of grant.
F-11
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting for Employee Awards:
Effective January 1, 2006, the Plans are accounted for in accordance with the recognition and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“FAS 123(R)”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“FAS 123”), and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. FAS 123(R) requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions, including employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements. In addition, the Company adheres to the guidance set forth within Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, which provides the Staff’s views regarding the interaction between FAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations with respect to the valuation of share-based payments for public companies.
In adopting FAS 123(R), the Company applied the modified prospective approach to the transition. Under the modified prospective approach, the provisions of FAS 123(R) are to be applied to new employee awards and to employee awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of employee awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of the required effective date shall be recognized as the requisite service is rendered on or after the required effective date. The compensation cost for that portion of employee awards shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for either recognition or pro-forma disclosures under FAS 123.
As a result of the adoption of FAS 123(R), the Company’s results for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 include share-based compensation expense for the employee options and shares totaling approximately $5,375 and $31,000, respectively, and is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations within commissions, employee compensation and benefits. No income tax benefit has been recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operation for share-based compensation arrangements as the Company has provided for 100% valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets.
Employee stock options compensation expense in 2006 and 2007 is the estimated fair value of options granted amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire portion of the awards. The Company has not adjusted the expense by estimated forfeitures, as requited by FAS 123(R) for employee options, since the forfeiture rate based upon historical data was determined to be immaterial.
F-12
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting for Non-Employee Awards:
The Company accounts for options granted to its non-employee consultants and non-employee registered representatives using the fair value in accordance with FAS 123 and EITF Issue No. 96-18 “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees” (“EITF 96-18”). The adoption of FAS 123(R) and SAB 107 (defined below) as of January 1, 2006, had no material impact on the accounting for non-employee awards. The Company continues to consider the additional guidance set forth in EITF 96-18.
Stock compensation expense related to non-employee options was $24,447 for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $36,000 and $129,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These amounts are included in Consolidated Statements of Operations within commissions, employee compensation and benefits.
The weighted average estimated fair value of all stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $0.54, $0.56 and $0.41, respectively. The fair value of options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of our common stock and other contributing factors. The expected term is based upon observation of actual time elapsed between date of grant and exercise of options for all employees.
F-13
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The assumptions made in calculating the fair values of all options are as follows:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
Expected volatility | 64 | % | 72 | % | 68 | % | |||||||
Expected dividend yield | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 3.45%-4.47 | % | 3.71%-4.82 | % | 3.71%-4.35 | % | |||||||
Expected term (in years) | 1-4 years | 1-4 years | 1-5 years |
Pro Forma Information under SFAS No. 123 for Periods Prior to Adoption of FAS 123(R):
The following table illustrates the effect on the net income and earnings per share as if the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123 had been applied to all outstanding and unvested employee awards in the 2005 comparable period:
Year ended | |||||
December 31, 2005 | |||||
Net income applicable to common stockholders, as reported | $ | 2,138,954 | |||
Deduct: total stock based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of tax | (298,682 | ) | |||
Pro forma net income - basic | 1,840,272 | ||||
Add: preferred stock dividends | 285,340 | ||||
Add: convertible debenture interest | 86,582 | ||||
Pro forma net income - diluted | $ | 2,212,194 | |||
Net income per share: | |||||
Basic – as reported | $ | 0.15 | |||
Diluted – as reported | $ | 0.12 | |||
Basic – pro forma | $ | 0.13 | |||
Diluted – pro forma | $ | 0.11 |
F-14
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Affecting the Company
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161 (FAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new standard is intended to help investors better understand how derivative instruments and hedging activities affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows through enhanced disclosure requirements. The enhanced disclosures include, for example:
· A tabular summary of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses
· Disclosure of derivative features that are credit-risk-related to provide more information regarding an entity’s liquidity
· Cross-referencing within footnotes to make it easier for financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments
The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which replaces SFAS No 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized in the purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS No 141R will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB 51, which changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be reported as a component of equity separate from the parent’s equity, and purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control will be accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS No. 160 would have on our consolidated financial statements.
F-15
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and all interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB released FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-2 – Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157) which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of this statement would have on our consolidated financial statements.
Reclassification
A reclassification was made to the 2006 consolidated financial statements to reclass the Series B Redeemable Preferred Stock of $1,000,000 from Stockholders’ Equity to Temporary Equity.
NOTE 3 - | SECURITIES OWNED and SECURITIES SOLD, NOT YET PURCHASED |
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Owned | Sold not yet purchased | Owned | Sold not yet purchased | ||||||||||||||
Corporate stocks | $ | 152,816 | $ | 201 | $ | 97,941 | $ | 495 | |||||||||
U.S. government agency and municipal obligations | 6,756 | -- | 6,621 | -- | |||||||||||||
Other | 201 | -- | 93,885 | -- | |||||||||||||
$ | 159,773 | $ | 201 | $ | 198,447 | $ | 495 |
F-16
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased consist of trading securities at quoted market values. Included in corporate stocks are warrants in various companies, some of which are publicly offered and can be sold and some of which cannot be publicly offered or sold until registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the estimated fair values of these warrants were $85,215 and $92,483, respectively.
NOTE 4 - | EMPLOYEE AND BROKER RECEIVABLES |
December 31, | |||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
Commission advances | $ | 291,364 | $ | 320,329 | |||||
Forgivable loans | 167,083 | 220,425 | |||||||
Other loans | 588,117 | 610,272 | |||||||
1,046,564 | 1,151,026 | ||||||||
Less: reserve for bad debt | (758,515 | ) | (807,535 | ) | |||||
$ | 288,049 | $ | 343,491 |
From time to time, the Company provides forgivable loans to certain registered representatives primarily for recruiting and retention purposes. These loans are recorded at face value at the time the loan is made. If the registered representative does not meet specific requirements or terminates his or her registration with the Company prior to the forgiveness of the loan, management will evaluate the collectability of the remaining loan amount. . The loans are amortized to commission expense for financial reporting purposes over the term of the loan. Loan amortization charged to compensation was $53,343, $187,109 and $122,155 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Other loans to employees and registered representatives are payable in installments generally over periods of one to five years with interest rates ranging up to 8% per annum.
The Company establishes a reserve based on identification on a loan by loan basis and records a bad debt expense at the time a reserve is made. Each loan is evaluated separately; not on a percentage of total loans impaired.
F-17
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 - | PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
December 31, | ||||||||||
Estimated | ||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | Useful Life | ||||||||
Computer and office equipment | $ | 2,947,268 | $ | 2,903,760 | 3 to 7 years | |||||
Furniture and fixtures | 1,699,715 | 1,697,630 | 7 to 10 years | |||||||
Leasehold improvements | 807,227 | 807,227 | Term of lease | |||||||
5,454,210 | 5,408,617 | |||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization expense | (5,278,747 | ) | (5,169,584 | ) | ||||||
$ | 175,463 | $ | 239,033 |
Depreciation and amortization expense was $109,163, $244,500 and $384,169 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
NOTE 6 - | OTHER ASSETS |
December 31, | |||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
Other assets consist of the following: | |||||||||
Commissions and concessions receivable | $ | 531,460 | $ | 425,592 | |||||
Security deposits | 473,092 | 153,592 | |||||||
Insurance recovery receivable | 124,999 | -- | |||||||
Deferred financing costs | 30,000 | 810 | |||||||
Other | 342 | 17,974 | |||||||
$ | 1,159,893 | $ | 597,968 |
Commissions and concessions receivable include amounts earned on mutual fund, insurance transactions and concessions on syndicate offerings. (See Note 13 for explanation of security deposits.)
NOTE 7 - | DEFERRED INCOME |
The Company received cash advances totaling $7,750,000 over the four-year period between 2000 and 2004 in accordance with an agreement with its former clearing firm, Fiserv. All advances were recorded as deferred income and were being amortized to earnings over the term of the 10-year agreement. In April 2005 the agreement with Fiserv was terminated and the remaining unamortized cash advances of $4,886,000 were recognized as income. Amortization of approximately $5,105,000 in 2005 was included in Interest and Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Advances were subject to income taxes in the year of receipt.
F-18
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8 - | 6% CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES |
In 2002 and 2003, the Company raised gross proceeds of $1,030,000 and $2,105,000, respectively, in private placements of 6% convertible debentures with accredited investors. The debentures were convertible into shares of common stock at $.50 per share, subject to adjustment for stock dividends and stock splits, and matured five years from the date of issuance unless previously converted. Interest was payable in cash on a semi-annual basis until maturity or conversion.
In 2004 and 2005, certain holders of the subordinated convertible debentures presented their debentures to the Company for conversion. The Company issued 3,770,000 shares of common stock and retired $1,885,000 of the debentures. |
During 2006, $35,000 of the Company’s subordinated convertible debentures was presented to the Company for conversion. The Company issued 70,000 shares and retired $35,000 of the debentures. In addition, during the second quarter of 2006, FMFG Ownership, Inc., an affiliate of Mr. Edward H. Okun ("Okun"), a private investor, purchased $1,190,000 of the subordinated convertible debentures from holders in privately negotiated transactions and presented them to the Company for conversion. On June 20 and 23, 2006, the Company issued to the Okun affiliate an aggregate of 2,380,000 shares of common stock and retired $1,190,000 of the debentures.
The sole debenture outstanding as of December 31, 2006 of $25,000 was redeemed at maturity on December 11, 2007. In 2007, the Company paid $1,500 in interest to the holder of the remaining outstanding convertible debenture. In 2006 and 2005, the Company paid $35,811 and $111,567, respectively, in interest to holders of the convertible debentures.
NOTE 9 - | NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT |
On December 7, 2007 the Company entered into a note purchase agreement (the "Note Purchase Agreement") with AEFC-FMFK Investment Corp. ("AEFC-IC") pursuant to which AEFC-IC was issued a 10% Convertible Secured Note due on December 31, 2008 for an aggregate principal amount up to $2,000,000 (the "AEFC-IC Note"). The AEFC-IC Note accrues interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 10% per annum, which will be paid monthly in arrears on or before the 10th day of the month following the interest accrual. The principal of the AEFC-IC Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon will be payable in full on December 31, 2008. The AEFC-IC Note is convertible into shares of common stock at $0.35 per share, as adjusted, beginning July 1, 2008 if the AEFC-IC Note is not prepaid prior to such date. The AEFC-IC Note is prepayable at any time prior to July 1, 2008 subject to an escalating prepayment penalty based on the date of prepayment which is payable by us in cash and the issuance of a warrant to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, as adjusted. In the event the Company (i) does not draw the full $2,000,000 principal amount available under the AEFC-IC Note and (ii) the AEFC-IC Note has not been prepaid by July 1, 2008, the Company will issue AEFC-IC a warrant to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, as adjusted, for each one dollar of principal amount available but not drawn upon under the AEFC-IC Note. The parties also executed a registration rights agreement.
F-19
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In connection with, and concurrent with, the execution of the Note Purchase Agreement, the AEFC-IC Note and the related documents, the Company entered into the First Amendment, dated as of December 7, 2007 ("First Amendment to the Rights Agreement"), of the Rights Agreement, dated August 1, 2007, between us and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent ("Rights Agreement") as more fully described above. The First Amendment to the Rights Agreement provides that AEFC-IC will not be deemed to be an "Acquiring Person" under the Rights Agreement by reason of (i) the execution of the AEFC-IC Note Purchase Agreement; (ii) the issuance of the AEFC-IC Note; (iii) the issuance of shares of common stock upon the conversion of the AEFC-IC Note into shares of our common stock. ; (iv) the issuance of any warrants to AEFC-IC pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement or any shares of common stock upon exercise of such warrants; (v) the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Okun or any affiliates of Mr. Okun (collectively, the "Okun Parties"); (vi) the approval, execution or delivery of any agreement with respect to the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties; (vii) the public or other announcement of the Note Purchase Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated thereby, or the purchase by AEFC-IC of all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties; or (viii) the consummation of the Note Purchase Agreement and any other transactions contemplated by the Note Purchase Agreement or any agreement to purchase all or any of the 3,300,308 shares of common stock owned by the Okun Parties (See below Note 17-Series C Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock-Preferred Stock Purchase Rights).
F-20
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 10 - | ACCRUED EXPENSES |
December 31, | |||||||||
Accrued expenses consist of the following: | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Accrued litigation costs | $ | 227,000 | $ | 237,000 | |||||
Accrued payroll | 100,000 | 484,941 | |||||||
Accrued separation costs | 40,801 | 200,000 | |||||||
Accrued professional fees | 151,210 | 167,500 | |||||||
Other accrued expenses | 37,516 | 105,985 | |||||||
$ | 556,527 | $ | 1,195,426 |
NOTE 11 - | INCOME TAXES |
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
Currently payable: | |||||||||||||
Federal | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
State | 16,000 | 27,000 | 78,000 | ||||||||||
16,000 | 27,000 | 78,000 | |||||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||||
Federal | - | - | - | ||||||||||
State | - | - | - | ||||||||||
$ | 16,000 | $ | 27,000 | $ | 78,000 |
F-21
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Following is a reconciliation of the income tax provision with income taxes based on the federal statutory rate:
Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
Expected federal tax benefit at statutory rate | $ | (704,000 | ) | $ | (275,000 | ) | $ | 851,000 | |||||
State taxes, net of federal tax rate | 11,000 | 18,000 | 51,000 | ||||||||||
Non-deductible expenses | 149,000 | 43,000 | 408,000 | ||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance | 543,000 | 3,000 | (1,542,000 | ) | |||||||||
Other reserves not deductible | 17,000 | 238,000 | 310,000 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 16,000 | $ | 27,000 | $ | 78,000 |
The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are:
Years ended December 31, | |||||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||
Reserves and allowances | $ | 286,000 | $ | 351,000 | |||||
Federal tax loss carryforwards | 1,611,000 | 1,050,000 | |||||||
State tax loss carryforwards | 427,000 | 372,000 | |||||||
Accrued and stock-based compensation | 442,000 | 418,000 | |||||||
Other | 20,000 | 52,000 | |||||||
Subtotal | 2,786,000 | 2,243,000 | |||||||
Valuation allowance | (2,786,000 | ) | (2,243,000 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | -- | $ | -- |
The Company has determined that, based upon available information, the probability of utilizing its deferred tax assets does not meet the “more likely than not” test under SFAS 109. As such, a 100% valuation allowance has been provided against deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing in the consolidated financial statements tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, including a decision whether to file or not to file in a particular jurisdiction. There was no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows at December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended as a result of implementing FIN 48. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007 and at December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
F-22
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal tax return and separate state returns. At December 31, 2007, the Company has approximately $4,738,000 and $7,117,000 of federal and state operating loss carryforwards, respectively, available to offset future taxable income. These losses expire at various dates through 2027.
NOTE 12 - | TERMINATION OF MERGER AGREEMENT; LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENT |
On May 5, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement with FMFG Ownership, Inc. and FMFG AcquisitionCo, Inc. (collectively referred to as the "Okun Purchasers") which are wholly owned by Mr. Okun. Mr. Okun is the controlling person of Investment Properties of America, LLC (“IPofA”), a privately owned, diversified real estate investment and management company. Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Okun Purchasers were to purchase all of the Company’s outstanding securities for an aggregate purchase price of $23 million, or $1.00 in cash per common share, $2.00 in cash per Series A Preferred Stock (convertible into two shares of common stock), and $10.00 in cash per share of Series B Preferred Stock (convertible into ten shares of common stock).
In June 2006, the Okun Purchasers purchased in the open market and privately negotiated transactions, 2,159,348 shares of the Company’s common stock, and in privately negotiated transactions, 283,087 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $4.00 per share (convertible into 566,174 shares of the Company’s common stock) and $1,190,000 principal amount of the Company’s convertible debentures (convertible into 2,380,000 shares of the Company’s common stock).
On June 20 and 23, 2006, the Okun Purchasers converted the $1,190,000 principal amount of the convertible debentures into 2,380,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As a result of these purchases and conversions, the Okun Purchasers beneficially owned 24.6% of the Company’s common stock (assuming none of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into common stock).
On August 17, 2006, the Company’s shareholders (including the Okun Purchasers) voted at a special meeting of shareholders to approve the merger agreement and the merger. At the meeting, the Okun Purchasers voted all of the Company’s shares beneficially owned by them in favor of the merger agreement and the merger.
F-23
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Subsequently, the deadline for completing the merger was extended from October 31, 2006 to December 31, 2006 in order to allow the parties to fulfill certain conditions to the merger, including obtaining the necessary consent of the NASD.
On December 29, 2006, the Company received notification from representatives of the Okun Purchasers that they were terminating the merger agreement and not proceeding with the merger. They alleged the Company’s failure to satisfy conditions and the Company’s alleged breach of various representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in the merger agreement
On January 8, 2007, the Company filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County, Chancery Division against the Okun Purchasers, Mr. Okun, IPofA and several other affiliated entities which Mr. Okun controls (collectively, the “Okun Defendants”). The purpose of this lawsuit was to enforce the terms of the merger pursuant to the merger agreement executed on May 5, 2006. Pursuant to the merger agreement shareholders of the Company’s common stock would have received $1.00 in cash for each share of common stock. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that the Okun Purchasers breached the merger agreement by terminating the agreement on December 29, 2006 without cause or justification. The Company’s complaint demanded specific performance of the merger agreement and completion of the merger. In the alternative, the Company sought compensatory damages for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing as well as payment of $2 million held in escrow to secure the performance of the Okun Purchasers under the merger agreement. The lawsuit also sought to void the lease agreement that the Company entered into with another Okun affiliate to relocate the Company’s corporate offices to a building purchased by that Okun affiliate in Red Bank, NJ.
On February 12, 2007, the Company received the Okun Defendants' answer to the lawsuit, which contained several counterclaims against it. In their counterclaims, the Okun Defendants alleged that the Company breached the merger agreement and failed to disclose certain material facts about the Company, and sought the return of $2 million held in escrow as well as compensatory damages, interest and costs. The Okun Defendants filed two additional actions; one on February 2, 2007, in the Circuit Court of the State of Florida against the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and the other, a shareholder derivative action in the Federal District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company and certain of its directors and officers, filed on February 16, 2007.
F-24
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On February 26, 2007, Mr. Okun and certain of his affiliates filed an amendment to their Schedule 13D with the SEC disclosing that they beneficially owned 52.8% of the Company’s voting securities. According to the amended Schedule 13D, additional shares of the Company’s common stock were purchased in privately negotiated transactions for $1.00 per share and the 197,824 shares of Series B outstanding were purchased for $10.00 per share. Each share of Series B was convertible into 10 shares of common stock. The Series B and certain of the shares of common stock were purchased from two of the Company’s former officers and directors.
On May 9, 2007, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“May Settlement Agreement”) to settle the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. However, on May 23, 2007 the Company announced that it and the Okun Defendants had agreed to consent to the entry of a Court Order to vacate and set aside the May Settlement Agreement.
On June 15, 2007, the Company announced that it had reached a new agreement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (“June Settlement Agreement”) to settle the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement. The June Settlement Agreement provided that Okun’s affiliated entities would surrender all of their First Montauk preferred stock holdings and 5,272,305 of their common share holdings, such that the Okun’s affiliates would hold less than 25% of the outstanding common shares of stock in First Montauk. These shares have since been surrendered and cancelled. The Company also obtained an exclusive 60 day option (the “Option Period”) to purchase the balance of the shares held by the Okun affiliated entities (the “Option Securities”) for the aggregate purchase price of $2,500,000 (the “Option”), which expired on August 14, 2007, without the Company exercising its option. The June Settlement Agreement also provided that the lease between an Okun affiliated entity and the Company shall be deemed void ab initio with respect to relocating the Company’s corporate offices.
In return, the Company agreed to direct the escrow agent, Signature Bank New York, to pay to an Okun affiliated entity the $2 million on deposit by Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants under the Escrow Agreement executed and delivered pursuant to the May 5, 2006 Merger Agreement.
NOTE 13 - | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES |
Operating Leases:
The Company leases office facilities and equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through 2011. Certain leases require the Company to pay increases in real estate taxes, operating costs and repairs over certain base year amounts. Operating lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $734,482, $886,880 and $989,000, respectively.
F-25
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Future minimum rental commitments under all non-cancelable leases with terms greater than one year are as follows:
Year ending December 31, | |||||
2008 | $ | 1,148,504 | |||
2009 | 843,667 | ||||
2010 | 184,981 | ||||
2011 | 18,627 | ||||
$ | 2,195,779 |
Master Services Agreement:
Effective November 2006, the Company entered into a master services agreement with an outside vendor for development of certain software, data integration and business processing improvement consulting services. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company made payments totaling $400,000 to the vendor for software development, none of which has been amortized or expensed and has been included as security deposits in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. (See also Note 23-“Subsequent Event”). |
Employment Agreements:
As of May 9, 2007, the Company and Mr. Victor K. Kurylak, its President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company, executed an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amended Employment Agreement”). The Amended Employment Agreement was executed in connection with the execution of the May Settlement Agreement (See Note 12-Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement). Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement, Mr. Kurylak was to continue his employment with the Company as President, However he was to resign from the position of CEO of the Company in connection with the May Settlement Agreement upon appointment of his successor and execution by his successor of an employment agreement with the Company. However, since the May Settlement Agreement was vacated and set aside, his resignation as CEO was not accepted and thus cancelled. On June 15, 2007, the Company and Mr. Kurylak executed Amendment Number One to the Amended Employment Agreement (“Amendment to Amended Employment Agreement”) to correctly state that he remains employed in the capacity of President and CEO of both the Company and FMSC.
F-26
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The CEO’s employment contract has been renewed for one year, through December 31, 2008, under the terms of the Amended Employment Agreement previously filed.
In the event of the termination of the CEO’s employment by the Company without “cause” or by the CEO for “good reason” as these terms are defined in the Amended Employment Agreement, he would be entitled to: (a) all compensation accrued but not paid as of the termination date; (b) base salary for the remainder of the term; (c) a severance payment equal to $300,000 payable in a lump sum payment; (d) continued participation in the Company’s benefit plans (or comparable plans); and (e) any applicable bonus. If the CEO’s employment is terminated by the Company for “cause” or by him without “good reason”, he will be entitled only to accrued compensation. If termination of the Amended Employment Agreement occurs as a result of the expiration of such agreement without renewal by the Company at the end of the term, the CEO will be entitled to the accrued compensation, any applicable bonus and the severance payment.
In the event the CEO is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on the termination date, the payment of any and all compensation due under the Amended Employment Agreement, except the accrued compensation, is expressly conditioned on his resignation from the Board of Directors of the Company within five (5) business of the termination date.
The Amended Employment Agreement contains confidentiality obligations that survive indefinitely and non-solicitation and non-competition obligations that end on the first anniversary of the date of cessation of the CEO’s employment.
Termination Agreements:
On August 31, 2007, Mr. Phillip P. D’Ambrisi, the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) resigned his positions with the Company and FMSC. The COO also resigned effective August 31, 2007 as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and FMSC, respectively. Effective September 1, 2007, the Company and the COO entered into a consulting agreement ("Consulting Agreement") pursuant to which he would provide certain services to the Company through December 31, 2007.
In January 2007, the Company entered into an employment agreement with a new General Counsel, which provided him with a base salary of $200,000 per year and bonuses of $100,000 per year provided he was still employed by the Company at the end of each year through December 31, 2008. He resigned on August 31, 2007, effective September 28, 2007. In settlement of his employment contract he received his 2007 bonus of $100,000.
F-27
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On February 1, 2006, the Company entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Herbert Kurinsky, its Chairman of the Board, which provided for the termination of his employment as of that date. Mr. Kurinsky continued to serve as Chairman of the Board of the Company until he resigned effective November 9, 2006.
Pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement, the Company paid Mr. Kurinsky a cash payment of $300,000 and issued a promissory note in the amount of $550,217 plus interest at the rate of 4.5% per annum for 48 months. Further, the Company continued to provide him and his wife with medical insurance coverage through January 31, 2010 and an automobile allowance of $600 through January 31, 2009. In addition, pursuant to his employment agreement all stock grants were immediately vested. |
Due to the change in control provisions in the separation agreement and promissory note, on July 17, 2006, the Company paid the remaining balances, including accrued interest on the note payable and automobile allowance of $486,000 and $19,000, respectively.
On November 14, 2006 the Company entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Robert I. Rabinowitz, the Company's Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel. Under the terms of the agreement, the General Counsel’s employment contract was not renewed and terminated effective January 31, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement, the General Counsel was provided with severance pay of $200,000, and benefits through January 31, 2008 in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, which was accrued for in 2006. Mr. Rabinowitz and the Company also entered into an eleven month consulting agreement, effective February 1, 2007.
Legal Matters:
FMSC is a respondent or co-respondent in various legal proceedings, which are related to its securities business. Management is contesting these claims and believes that there are meritorious defenses in each case. However, litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and some of these actions and proceedings may result in adverse judgments. Further, the availability of insurance coverage is determined on a case-by-case basis by the insurance carrier, and is limited to the coverage limits within the policy for any individual claim and in the aggregate. After considering all relevant facts, available insurance coverage and consultation with litigation counsel, management believes that significant judgments or other unfavorable outcomes from pending litigation could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in any particular quarterly or annual period, or in the aggregate, and could impair our ability to meet the statutory net capital requirements of its securities business.
F-28
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2007, the Company has accrued litigation costs that are probable and can be reasonably estimated based on a review of existing claims, arbitrations and unpaid settlements. Management cannot give assurance that this amount will be adequate to cover actual costs that may be subsequently incurred. Further, it is not possible to predict the outcome of other matters pending against us. All such cases will continue to be vigorously defended.
SEC Investigation
The Company has entered into a settlement as a result of a regulatory investigation by the SEC concerning the Company’s and a former employee’s failure to reasonably supervise the securities trading and research activities of a former institutional analyst. The investigation covered the time period from March through December 2003. The Company has entered into an Offer of Settlement, which, if accepted and approved by the Commissioners of the SEC, will result in issuance of an Order Instituting Public Administrative and Cease-And-Desist Proceedings and Impose Remedial Sanctions. The settlement will result in the imposition of a censure and fine of $100,000 against the Company, and a six-month supervisory suspension and fine of $50,000 against the Company’s former president and CEO. The settlement should be concluded in early 2008. The Company’s monetary fine has been accrued for in 2007 and has been placed in an interest bearing attorney escrow account pending finalization of the settlement by the SEC.
FINRA Settlement
In September 2007, the Company entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC") with FINRA, formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD"). The AWC resolved an investigation by the FINRA Staff into sales practice activities of certain individuals who were formerly registered representatives of the Company, as well as the supervision of those activities by the Company. Without admitting or denying the allegations set forth in the AWC, the Company accepted FINRA's findings and consented to a censure, paid a $175,000 fine and agreed to an undertaking requiring a written certification by a senior officer of the firm, reviewing the firm's systems and procedures regarding its supervisory procedures, and training and monitoring of supervisors.
F-29
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
New Jersey Bureau of Securities Consent Order
On September 29, 2006, FMSC entered into a Consent Order with the New Jersey Bureau of Securities in connection with an inquiry into FMSC’s sale of certain high-yield bonds to FMSC's clients from 1998 to 2001, and the subsequent resale of those securities to other customers in 2001. The Consent Order required payment of a civil penalty of $475,000, which was paid in September 2006, $400,000 of which was accrued in 2005. The Consent Order also required the retention of an independent consultant to review our business practices and procedures for branch office supervision, suitability standards, and monitoring of agent sales activities.
Merger Agreement, Termination and Subsequent Litigation
See Note 12 for a complete description of the merger agreement, its termination, subsequent litigation and settlement thereof.
NOTE 14 - | CLEARING AGREEMENT |
FMSC has a clearing agreement with National Financial Services, LLC (“NFS”) to act as its primary clearing firm. The clearing agreement includes a termination fee should FMSC terminate the agreement, which reduces each year during the eight-year term of the agreement, through May 2014.
During the second quarter of 2006, FMSC signed a release with NFS for and in consideration of the payment of $1 million by NFS relating to conversion and transition expenses incurred by FMSC in prior periods, as a result of its conversion from Fiserv to NFS in 2005. The payment was received on June 29, 2006 and was recorded by FMSC among various expense and revenue categories.
NOTE 15 - | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK and CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK |
The Company executes securities transactions on behalf of its customers. If either the customer or a counter-party fails to perform, the Company by agreement with its clearing broker may be required to discharge the obligations of the non-performing party. In such circumstances, the Company may sustain a loss if the market value of the security is different from the contract value of the transaction.
F-30
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company seeks to control off-balance-sheet risk by monitoring the market value of securities held or given as collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines. Pursuant to such guidelines, the Company’s clearing firm requires additional collateral or reduction of positions, when necessary. The Company also completes credit evaluations where there is thought to be credit risk.
The Company has sold securities that it does not currently own and will therefore be required to purchase such securities at a future date. The Company has recorded these obligations in the financial statements at market values of the related securities of $201 and $495 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and will incur a loss if the market value of the securities increases subsequent to year-end.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, securities inventories and employee and broker receivables. The Company maintains all inventory positions and a significant portion of its cash balances at its clearing firm. Cash balances held at commercial banks may periodically exceed federal insurance limits.
NOTE 16 - | PENSION PLAN |
The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) pension plan covering substantially all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The Company may elect to contribute up to 100% of each participant’s annual contribution to the plan. There were no employer contributions in 2007, 2006 or 2005.
NOTE 17 - | STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
The Company’s charter authorizes the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. After the issuance of the Series A and Series B Preferred Shares described below, the Company is authorized to issue an additional 3,929,898 of Preferred Stock. The rights and preferences, if any, to be given to these preferred shares would be designated by the board of directors at the time of issuance.
SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK |
Preferred Stock – Series A
In 1999, the Company’s board of directors designated a Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with the following features:
Shares authorized: 625,000
F-31
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Par value: $.10 per share
Dividends: 6% per annum, payable quarterly at the rate of $.075 per share until conversion
Voting rights: None
Liquidation preference: $5.00 per share
Conversion: Convertible at the option of the holder anytime into two shares of Common Stock at $2.50 per share; automatic conversion once the closing price for the Common Stock is $3.50 or above for 20 consecutive trading days, and the shares are registered for public sale.
In 1999, the Company issued 349,511 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in an exchange offering related to a settlement with holders of certain leases. Each share of the Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of Common Stock and pays a quarterly dividend of 6%.
In June 2006, an affiliate of Mr. Okun purchased 283,087 shares of the Company’s then 305,369 outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock in privately negotiated transactions.
On June 15, 2007, as part of the settlement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (See Note 12-Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement) an agreement was reached which required the Okun Defendants to surrender for cancellation effective June 15, 2007, all shares of Series A Preferred Stock (283,087 shares), all shares of Series B Preferred Stock (197,824 shares) and 5,272,305 shares of common stock previously owned by the Okun Defendants.
As of December 31, 2007, a total of 44,142 Series A preferred shares have been converted into 88,284 shares of common stock. The Company has 22,282 Series A preferred shares issued and outstanding with respect to which dividends were paid in the amount of $67,077 and $88,505 during 2007 and 2006, respectively. During 2005, the Company paid dividends of $233,784, including $210,879 dividends in arrears.
COMMON STOCK
During the second quarter of 2005, the Board of Directors adopted and the shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 30,000,000 to 60,000,000.
On June 15, 2007, the Company reached an agreement with the Okun Defendants to settle the three separate lawsuits arising out of the termination of the merger agreement between the Company and the Okun Purchasers. On June 15, 2007, the Okun Defendants surrendered for cancellation by the Company 5,272,305 of their common share holdings, together with all shares of Series A Preferred Stock (283,287 shares) and all shares of Series B Preferred Stock (197,824 shares constituting all Series B Preferred Shares) owned by them. (See Note 12 –Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement).
F-32
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SERIES C PARTICIPATING CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK-PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
The Board of Directors of the Company adopted a shareholder-rights plan in August 2008 and in connection therewith designated a Series C Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, $.10 par value per share (“Series C Stock”). The rights were declared as a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of the common stock of the Company. The dividend distribution was payable on August 8, 2007 to shareholders of record on that date. When exercisable, each right will entitle its holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of the Company’s new Series C Stock, at a price of $2.00 per one one-hundredth of a share of Series C, subject to adjustment. The Company has created a series of 200,000 shares of authorized but not issued preferred stock for the Series C Stock authorized in this shareholder-rights plan. No shares of Series C Stock are currently issued and outstanding.
The rights will become exercisable on the tenth business day (unless further extended by a resolution adopted by a majority of the “continuing directors” of our Board of Directors as of the close of business on August 9, 2007 (the date of our 2007 Annual Meeting) following public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons has acquired or obtained the right to acquire beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the common stock without approval of a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company. The rights expire on August 8, 2017 unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company.
In the event the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after the rights become exercisable, each holder of a right would be entitled to receive that number of shares of the acquiring company’s common stock equal to the result obtained by multiplying the then current purchase price by the number one one-hundredths of a share of Series C Stock for which a right is then exercisable and dividing that product by 50% of the then current market price per share of the acquiring company.
F-33
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 18 - | TEMPORARY EQUITY-SERIES B CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK |
In February 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors designated a Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock with the following features:
Shares authorized: 445,102
Par value: $.10 per share
Dividends: 8% per annum, payable quarterly at the rate of $.10 per share until conversion or redemption.
Voting rights: Holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with common stockholders on all matters in which they are entitled to vote. The number of votes to which holders of Series B Preferred are entitled to cast are ten per each share of Series B Preferred Stock subject to certain adjustments.
Liquidation preference: $5.055 per share
Conversion: Convertible at the option of the holder anytime into ten shares of common stock with automatic conversion once the closing price for the common stock is $1.01 for more than 60 trading days if the average daily trading volume exceeds 20,000 shares, or $1.26 for more than 60 trading days if the average daily trading volume exceeds 10,000 shares, or $1.51 for more than 60 trading days.
Redemption: Optional redemption. The holder may require the Company to redeem all or a portion of Series B Preferred Stock by paying cash equal to the issue price plus all accrued and unpaid dividends within 180 days after a redemption event. A redemption event occurs: if the Company ceases to be a reporting entity under the Securities Act; if the Company’s common stock ceases to be publicly traded for any reason; or, upon liquidation of the Company.
In connection with a Separation Agreement entered into with Mr. William J. Kurinsky in 2005, 197,824 shares of a newly created class of Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series B”), par value $0.10 per share were issued, which had a deemed issue price of $1,000,000, and was convertible into common stock on the basis of ten shares of common stock for each share of Series B. The Series B also provided that the preferred shares have voting rights based upon the number of shares of common stock into which it would be converted. The Series B also included a cumulative dividend of 8% per year. The shares are restricted securities under the Securities Act and the regulations of the SEC and we relied upon the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act to issue the shares of Series B.
F-34
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On February 23, 2007, Mr. Okun purchased all the shares of Series B in a private transaction at a price of $10.00 per share of Series B. On June 15, 2007, as part of the settlement with Mr. Okun and the Okun Defendants (See Note 12-Termination of Merger Agreement; Litigation and Settlement) an agreement was reached which required the parties to surrender all shares of Series B previously owned by the Okun Defendants. On June 15, 2007, 197,824 shares of Series B were surrendered and cancelled. There are currently no shares of Series B outstanding.
The Company paid $56,889, $80,000 and $51,556 of dividends on the shares of Series B preferred stock during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
NOTE 19 - | STOCK OPTION PLANS |
2002 Stock Incentive Plan
In June 2002, the Company adopted, and its stockholders approved, the 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "2002 Plan"), replacing the 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "1992 Plan"), which expired in September 2002. As of December 31, 2007, there were no options remaining under the 1992 Plan.
The Company has reserved up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2002 Plan. The 2002 Plan provides for the grant of options, including incentive stock options (“ISOs”) to employees; non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) to employees; consultants and independent registered representatives; and stock appreciation rights or any combination thereof (collectively, “Awards"). The Board of Directors determines the terms and provisions of each Award granted under the 2002 Plan, including the exercise price, term and vesting schedule. In the case of ISO’s, the per share exercise price must be equal to at least 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant, and no individual will be granted ISOs corresponding to shares with an aggregate fair value in excess of $100,000 in any calendar year. The 2002 Plan will terminate in 2012. As of December 31, 2007, options to purchase a total of 721,200 shares were outstanding and 3,748,602 shares remained available for future issuance under the 2002 Plan.
2002 Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan
In June 2002, the Company adopted and its stockholders approved the 2002 Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan (the "2002 Director Plan"), replacing the 1992 Non-Executive Director Stock Option Plan, which expired in September 2002. Under the 2002 Director Plan, each non-executive director will automatically be granted an option to purchase 20,000 shares, pro rata, on September 1st of each year or partial year of service. The Plan will be administered by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board, which shall at all times consist of not less than two officer/directors of the Company who are ineligible to participate in the 2002 Director Plan. The 2002 Director Plan does not contain a reserve for a specific number of shares available for grant. Each option issued under the 2002 Director Plan will be immediately vested NQSOs, and will have a five-year term and an exercise price equal to the 100% of the fair market value of the shares subject to such option on the date of grant. The 2002 Director Plan will terminate in 2012. As of December 31, 2007, 235,000 options were outstanding under the 2002 Non-Executive Director Stock Plan.
F-35
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1996 Senior Management Plan
In June 2000, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the 1996 Senior Management Plan (the "1996 Plan") to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance to key management employees from 2,000,000 to 4,000,000 shares. Awards can be granted through the issuance of incentive stock rights, stock options, stock appreciation rights, limited stock appreciation rights, and shares of restricted Common Stock. The exercise price of an option designated as an ISO may in no event be less than 100% of the then fair market price of the stock (110% with respect to ten percent stockholders), and not less than 85% of the fair market price in the case of other options. As of December 31, 2007, options to purchase 915,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued and outstanding. The 1996 Plan terminated in June 2006.
F-36
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of the activity in the Company’s stock option plans (excluding restricted common shares) for the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 is presented below:
Weighted | |||||||||
Average | |||||||||
Exercise | |||||||||
Shares | Prices | ||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2004 | 3,656,198 | $ | 1.01 | ||||||
Granted | 1,105,000 | 1.07 | |||||||
Exercised | (566,398 | ) | .61 | ||||||
Canceled | (1,487,498 | ) | .84 | ||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2005 | 2,707,302 | $ | .85 | ||||||
Granted | 3,000 | 1.18 | |||||||
Exercised | (263,400 | ) | .69 | ||||||
Canceled | (309,500 | ) | 1.34 | ||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2006 | 2,137,402 | $ | .79 | ||||||
Granted | 456,000 | .54 | |||||||
Exercised | (3,000 | ) | .25 | ||||||
Canceled | (719,202 | ) | .79 | ||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2007 | 1,871,200 | $ | .73 | ||||||
Shares of common stock available for future grant under Company plans totaled 3,748,602 as of December 31, 2007. This number does not include options that are expected to be issued during the remaining term of the 2002 Director's Plan, but for which no specific reserve has been established.
The weighted-average grant date fair value per option granted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.54 and $0.56, respectively. The intrinsic value of all stock options exercised during the twelve months of 2007 and 2006 was $0.00 and $54,000, respectively. Cash received from the exercise of all stock options for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $750, $33,504 and $343,071, respectively.
F-37
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company has issued nonvested shares (as the term is defined in FAS 123(R)) to its senior officers. The following table summarizes the activity during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007:
Nonvested Shares | Shares | Weighted-Average Grant - Date Fair Value | ||
Nonvested January 1, 2007 | 100,000 | $0.57 | ||
Granted | -- | -- | ||
Vested | (100,000) | $0.57 | ||
Forfeited | -- | -- | ||
Nonvested December 31, 2007 | -- | -- |
The total fair value of shares vested during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $57,000 and $391,000, respectively.
Additional information as of December 31, 2007 with respect to all outstanding options is as follows: |
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||
Remaining | Average | Average | ||||||||||
Number | Contractual | Exercise | Number | Exercise | ||||||||
Range of prices | Outstanding | Life | Prices | Exercisable | Prices | |||||||
$0.20 - $0.30 | 84,200 | 1.19 | $0.26 | 83,360 | $0.26 | |||||||
$0.31 - $0.50 | 818,800 | 1.74 | $0.49 | 665,120 | $0.49 | |||||||
$0.51 - $0.75 | 349,200 | 3.11 | $0.65 | 216,560 | $0.67 | |||||||
$0.76 - $1.25 | 619,000 | 2.44 | $1.17 | 543,400 | $1.18 | |||||||
$0.20 - $1.25 | 1,871,200 | 2.20 | $.73 | 1,508,440 | $0.75 | |||||||
As of December 31, 2007, there was $12,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all unvested stock options and shares, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.9 years. |
NOTE 20 - | FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
Financial instruments reported in the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition consist of cash, securities owned and sold, not yet purchased, loans receivable, warrants subject to put options, 10% convertible notes, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and capital leases payable, the carrying value of which approximated fair value at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The fair value of the financial instruments disclosed is not necessarily representative of the amount that could be realized or settled nor does the fair value amount consider the tax consequences of realization or settlement.
F-38
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 21 - | NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS |
FMSC is subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1), which requires FMSC to maintain minimum net capital, as defined. At December 31, 2007, FMSC had net capital of $849,710, which was $599,710 in excess of its required net capital of $250,000. FMSC's ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital was 2.91 to 1.
NOTE 22 - | UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 12,244,617 | $ | 9,945,065 | $ | 9,521,793 | $ | 7,844,323 | |||||||||
Expenses | 12,751,544 | 10,529,743 | 10,317,435 | 8,025,809 | |||||||||||||
Net loss before income taxes | (506,927 | ) | (584,678 | ) | (795,642 | ) | (181,486 | ) | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 10,621 | 4,978 | 600 | 134 | |||||||||||||
Net loss | (517,548 | ) | (589,656 | ) | (796,242 | ) | (181,620 | ) | |||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (42,903 | ) | (42,900 | ) | (36,490 | ) | (1,673 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders | $ | (560,451 | ) | $ | (632,556 | ) | $ | (832,732 | ) | $ | (183,293 | )(1) | |||||
Loss per common share: | |||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Diluted | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) |
(1) | The net loss in the fourth quarter was down due to reductions in personnel and legal costs. |
F-39
FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 13,312,022 | $ | 13,605,708 | (2) | $ | 11,274,175 | $ | 12,768,515 | |||||||
Expenses | 14,334,955 | (1) | 12,529,761 | (2) | 11,424,899 | 13,480,362 | (3) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) before income taxes | (1,022,933 | ) | 1,075,947 | (150,724 | ) | (711,847 | ) | |||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 20,861 | 24,200 | (30,730 | ) | 12,661 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | (1,043,794 | ) | 1,051,747 | (119,994 | ) | (724,508 | ) | |||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (42,776 | ) | (42,866 | ) | (42,866 | ) | (39,998 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | (1,086,570 | ) | $ | 1,008,881 | $ | (162,860 | ) | $ | (764,506 | ) | |||||
Income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||
Diluted | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) |
(1) | Includes $951,366 of charges related to a separation agreement entered into with the Company’s chairman of the Board of Directors. |
(2) | Includes $820,000 of credits to expenses and $180,000 of income resulting from the payment received from the Company’s clearing agent relating to previously incurred conversion and transition expenses and lost revenue. |
(3) | Included in the expenses for the fourth quarter of 2006 is the accrual of $200,000 related to the separation agreement for the former general counsel and additional legal accruals of $77,000. |
Net income (loss) per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share figures in 2007 and 2006 does not necessarily equal the total computed for the entire year.
NOTE 23- | SUBSEQUENT EVENT |
On March 31, 2008, the Company agreed to amend the master services agreement (See Note 13 “Master Services Agreement”) with the vendor in exchange for a reimbursement of a portion of the system development costs paid by the Company. In addition, the vendor will provide data integration and commission collection services to the Company, which will be amortized over the duration of the amended agreement, through December 2009. |
F-40