Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2016 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation MAM Software Group, Inc. ("MAM" or the "Company") is a leading provider of integrated information management solutions and services and a leading provider of cloud-based software solutions for the automotive aftermarket sector. The Company conducts its businesses through wholly owned subsidiaries with operations in Europe and North America. MAM Software Ltd. (“MAM Ltd.”) is based in Tankersley, Barnsley, United Kingdom (“UK”), Origin Software Solutions, Ltd. (“Origin”) is based in the UK (MAM Ltd. and Origin are collectively referred to as “MAM UK”), and MAM Software, Inc. (“MAM NA”) is based in the United States of America ("US") in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant i ntercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, option s contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and Cash Equivalents In the US, the Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At times deposits held with financial institutions in the US may exceed the $250,000 limit. In the UK, the Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions that are insured by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme up to 85,000GBP. At times deposits held with financial institutions in the UK may exceed the 85,000GBP limit. The Company maintains its cash accounts at financial institutions which it believes to be credit worthy. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes. |
Major Customers, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Customers The Company performs periodic evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses as deemed necessary. The Company generally does not require collateral to secure its accounts receivable. Credit risk is managed by discontinuing sales to customers who are delinquent. The Company estimates credit losses and returns based on management ’s evaluation of historical experience and current industry trends. Although the Company expects to collect amounts due, actual collections may differ from the estimated amounts. No customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues for each of the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. No customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable at June 30, 2016 and 2015. |
Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Segment Reporting The Company o perates in one reportable segment. Though the Company has two operational segments (MAM UK and MAM NA) , the Company evaluated in accordance with ASC 280-10-50, Segment Reporting, 1. The products and services are software and professional services 2. The products are produced through professional services 3. The customers for these products are primarily for the automotive aftermarket 4. The method to distribute these products are via software that the customer can host locally or the Company will host 5. They both operate in a non-regulatory environment |
Geographic Concentrations [Policy Text Block] | Geographic Concentrations The Company conducts business in the US, Canada, the UK and Ireland (UK and Ireland are collectively referred to as the “UK Market”). For customers headquartered in their respective countries, the Company derived approximately 70% of its revenues from the UK, 28% from the US, 1% from Ireland, and 1% from Canada during the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to 74% of its revenues from the UK, 25% from the US and 1% from Canada during the year ended June 30, 2015. At June 30, 2016, the Company maintained 79% of its net property and equipment in the UK and th e remaining 21% in the US. At June 30, 2015, the Company maintained 83% of its net property and equipment in the UK and the remaining 17% in the US. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accountin g principles generally accepted in the US requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by the Company’s management include, but are not limited to, the collectability of accounts receivable, the realizability of inventories, the determination of the fair value of acquired intangible assets, the recoverability of goodwill and other long-lived assets, valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and the estimated fair value of stock options, warrants and shares issued for non-cash consideration. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company ’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities, and long-term debt. Financial assets and liabilities that are remeasured and reported at fair value at each reporting period are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories: • Level 1 – Fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 – Fair value based on significant directly observable data (other than Level 1 quoted prices) or significant indirectly observable data through corroboration with observable market data. Inputs would normally be (i) quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, (ii) quoted prices in inactive markets for identical or similar assets or liabilities or (iii) information derived from or corroborated by observable market data. • Level 3 – Fair value based on prices or valuation techniques that require significant unobservable data inputs. Inputs would normally be a reporting entity’s own data and judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy may require significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter. The Company believes that the carrying values of all financial instruments, except long-term debt, approximate their values due to their nature and respective durations. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates fair value based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company. |
Receivables, Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on specific identification of customer accounts and its best estimate of the likelihood of potential loss, taking into account such factors as the financial condition and payment history of major customers. The Company evaluates the collectability of its receivables at least quarterly. The allowance for doubtful accounts is subject to estimates based on the historical actual costs of bad debt experienced, total accounts receivable amounts, age of accounts receivable and any knowledge of the customers’ ability or inability to pay outstanding balances. If the financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The differences could be material and could significantly impact cash flows from operating activities. |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or current estimated market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventories consist primarily of hardware that will be sold to customers. The Company peri odically reviews its inventories and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product demand. Once established, write-downs of inventories are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the obsolete or excess inventories. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost, and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, rangi ng from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the related lease terms. Equipment under capital lease obligations is depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the related assets or the term of the lease. Maintenance and routine repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time of retirement or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. |
Research, Development, and Computer Software, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Software Development Costs Costs incurred to develop computer software products to be sold or otherwise marketed are charged to expense until technological feasibility of the product has been established. Once technological feasibility has been established, computer software development costs (consisting primarily of internal labor costs) are capitalized and reported at the lower of amortized cost or estimated realizable value. Purchased software development cost is capitalized and recorded at its estimated fair market value. When a product is ready for general release, its capitalized costs are amortized on a product-by-product basis. The annual amortization is the greater of the amounts of: the ratio that current gross revenues for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product; and, the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life (a period of three to ten years) of the product including the period being reported on. Amortization of capitalized software development costs are included in the cost of revenues line on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. If the future market viability of a software product is less than anticipated, impairment of the related unamortized development costs could occur, which could significantly impact the Company’s results of operations. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Amortizable Intangible Assets Amortizable intangible assets consist of completed software technology, custome r contracts/relationships, automotive data services and acquired intellectual property and are recorded at cost. Completed software technology and customer contracts/relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 9 to 10 years, automotive data services are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 20 years and acquired intellectual property is amortized over the estimated useful life of 10 years. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Goodwill Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is tested at least annually for impairment. Goodwill is subject to impairment r eviews by applying a fair-value-based test at the reporting unit level, which generally represents operations one level below the segments reported by the Company. As of June 30, 2016, the Company does not believe there is an impairment of its goodwill. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products and services will continue, which could result in impairment of goodwill in the future. Goodwill activity for the years ended June 30 , 2016 and 2015 was as follows: Balance, July 1, 2014 $ 9,767,000 Effect of exchange rate changes (565,000 ) Balance, June 30, 2015 $ 9,202,000 Acquisition of Origin (see Note 2) 202,000 Effect of exchange rate changes (1,041,000 ) Balance, June 30, 2016 $ 8,363,000 |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Long-Lived Assets The Company ’s management assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets (other than goodwill discussed above) upon the occurrence of a triggering event by determining whether the carrying value of long-lived assets over their remaining lives can be recovered through projected undiscounted future cash flows over their remaining useful lives. The amount of long-lived asset impairment, if any, is measured based on fair value and is charged to operations in the period in which long-lived asset impairment is determined by management. At June 30, 2016, management believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products and services will continue, which could result in impairment of long-lived assets in the future. |
Debt, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs represent costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt. Debt issuance costs are amortized over the term of the financing instrument using the effective interest method. Debt issuance costs are included in other long-term assets. |
Issuance of Equity Instruments to Non-employees [Policy Text Block] | Issuance of Equity Instruments to Non-Employees All issuances of the Company ’s equity instruments to non-employees are measured at fair value based upon either the fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of stock issuances for non-cash consideration pertains to services rendered by consultants and others and has been valued at the fair value of the equity instruments on the dates issued. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. Assets acquired in exchange for the issuance of fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are not presented or classified as an offset to equity on the grantor’s balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes. |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of ASC No. 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation . For the expected term, the Company uses a simple average of the vesting period and the contractual term of the option. Volatility is a measure of the amount by which the Company’s stock price is expected to fluctuate during the expected term of the option. For volatility the Company considers its own volatility as applicable for valuing its options and warrants. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The risk-free interest rate is based on the relevant US Treasury Bill Rate at the time of each grant. The dividend yield represents the dividend rate expected to be paid over the option’s expected term; the Company currently has no plans to pay dividends. The fair value of stock-based awards is amortized over the vesting period of the award or expected vesting date of the market-based restricted shares and the Company elected to use the straight-line method for awards granted. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue R ecognition Software license revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product component has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. If any of these criteria are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the criteria are met. The Company accounts for delivered elements in accordance with the selling price when arrangements include multiple product components or other elements and vendor-specific o bjective evidence exists for the value of all undelivered elements. Revenues on undelivered elements are recognized once delivery is complete. In those instances, in which arrangements include significant customization, contractual milestones, acceptance criteria or other contingencies (which represents the majority of the Company’s arrangements), the Company accounts for the arrangements using contract accounting, as follows: 1) When customer acceptance can be estimated, but reliable estimated costs to complete cannot be determined, expenditures are capitalized as work-in process and deferred until completion of the contract at which time the costs and revenues are recognized. 2) When customer acceptance cannot be estimated based on historical evi dence, costs are expensed as incurred and revenue is recognized at the completion of the contract when customer acceptance is obtained. The Company records amounts collected from customers in excess of recognizable revenue as deferred revenue in the acc ompanying consolidated balance sheets. Revenues for maintenance agreements, software support, on-line services and information products are recognized ratably over the term of the service agreement. The Company recognizes revenue on a net basis, which excludes sales tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities. |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Advertising Expense The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. For the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, advertising expense totaled $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively. |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign Currency Management has determined that the functional currency of its subsidiaries is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of the UK subsidiaries are translated into US dollars at the year-end exchange rates. Income and expenses are translated at an average exchange rate for the year and the resulting translation gain (loss) adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The translation (loss) gain adjustment totaled $(1.7) million and $(1.2) million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Foreign currency gains and losses from transactions denomin ated in other than respective local currencies are included in income. The Company had no foreign currency transaction gain (loss) for all periods presented. |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. For the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the components of comprehensive income consist of foreign currency translation gain (loss). |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax c onsequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. Deferred taxation is provided in full in respect of timing differences between the treatment of certain items for taxation and accounting purposes. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had no accrual for interest or penalties on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2016 and 2015, and has not recognized interest and/or penalties in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share (“BEPS”) is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share (“DEPS”) is computed giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants using the “treasury stock” method. The computation of DEPS does not assume conversion, exercise or contingent exercise of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings. For the year ended June 30, 2016 there were 175,863 common share equivalents included in the computation of the DEPS. For the year ended June 30, 2016, 691,505 shares of common stock vest based on the market price of the Company ’s common stock and were excluded from the computation of DEPS because the shares have not vested, but no stock options were excluded from the computation of DEPS. For the year ended June 30, 2015, there were 94,305 common share equivalents included in the computation of the DEPS. The following is a reconciliation of the numerat ors and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation for the years ended June 30: 2016 2015 Numerator: Net income $ 3,552,000 $ 3,005,000 Denominator: Basic weighted-average shares outstanding 12,314,071 13,403,877 Effect of dilutive securities 175,863 94,305 Diluted weighted-average diluted shares 12,489,934 13,498,182 Basic earnings per common share $ 0.29 $ 0.22 Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.28 $ 0.22 |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Reclassification Certain expenses were reclassified from depreciation and amortization to cost of revenues in the accompanying consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended June 30, 2015 in order to conform to the current period presentation. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The update provides guidance on simplifying various aspects of the accounting for shared-based compensation. The standard is effective for the annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The update provides guidance on simplifying the presentation for debt issuance costs and debt discount and premium. The standard is effective for the annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a significant impact on the disclosure or balance sheet presentation in its consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 , Revenue from Contracts with Customers In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern . Currently, there is no guidance in accounting principles generally accepted in the US about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in US auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for the reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will have on its consolidated financial statements. |