UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-05554
Morgan Stanley California Tax Free Daily Income Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
| | |
|
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York | | 10036 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip code) |
Kevin Klingert
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 212-296-6990
Date of fiscal year end: December 31, 2011
Date of reporting period: June 30, 2011
Item 1 - Report to Shareholders
| | |
| | |
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT | | ![[MORGAN STANLEY LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000950123-11-083398/y92146msk50l1.gif) |
Welcome, Shareholder:
In this report, you’ll learn about how your investment in Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust performed during the semiannual period. We will provide an overview of the market conditions, and discuss some of the factors that affected performance during the reporting period. In addition, this report includes the Fund’s financial statements and a list of Fund investments.
This material must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus for the fund being offered.
Market forecasts provided in this report may not necessarily come to pass. There is no assurance that a mutual fund will achieve its investment objective. An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of an investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. Please see the prospectus for more complete information on investment risks.
Fund Report
(unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
Market Conditions
State and local tax collections rose in the first half of 2011 as an expanding economy and tax increases passed during the recession eased city and state budget woes. State governments collect most of their revenue from sales and income taxes, which can fall fast in response to recessions but also snap back quickly. By contrast, local governments continue to struggle in large part because falling property values have depressed property taxes, their primary source of tax revenue.
June 30 marked the end of most state and local governments’ fiscal years. Almost all state and local governments are required by their constitutions or charters to pass balanced budgets. All but one state (Minnesota) passed their budgets before the start of fiscal year 2012. Furthermore, state tax revenues have grown in each of the past five quarters, and some states have made progress on the pension reform front. Given the improving credit picture for states and the lack of a significant default in the first half of 2011, the number of headlines about municipal credit risk has declined.
In response to budget pressures, most states have shown both an ability and willingness to raise taxes and cut expenditures. There have been various solutions so far including $23.9 billion of tax increases for fiscal year 2010. Spending cuts, as measured by the Rockefeller Institute, can be hard to quantify but have shown to be both widespread and deep. The Center on Budget Practice and Policies counted cuts in health care across 31 states, services to elderly and disabled across 29 states, K-12 education cuts in 33 states and cuts to higher education in 33 states. In addition, employee furloughs have been widespread and municipalities have employed temporary solutions to bridge gaps.
In keeping with the political shift toward fiscal tightening, municipal bond issuance remains about half of what it was last year, with volume for the first six months of 2011 down almost 44% relative to the same period in 2010. Variable rate demand note (VRDN) issuance so far in 2011 has totaled $4.6 billion through June, more than 45 percent below the total sales for the same period last year.
The California legislature passed an on-time fiscal 2012 budget that relies on one-time measures and includes up to $2.5 billion of “trigger cuts” if actual revenues fall short of estimates. Having an enacted budget and better-than-expected revenues in recent months should allow the state to avoid near-term shortfalls. Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s recently revised its outlook on California’s rating (A-) from Negative to Stable. California’s ratings (A1/A-/A-) now have Stable outlooks from each of the major rating agencies (Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch).
Performance Analysis
As of June 30, 2011, Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust had net assets of approximately $597 million and an average portfolio maturity of 34 days. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the Fund provided a total return of 0.00 percent. For the seven-day period ended June 30, 2011, the Fund provided an effective annualized yield of 0.01 percent (subsidized) and –0.54 percent (non-subsidized) and a current yield of 0.01 percent (subsidized) and –0.54 percent (non-
2
subsidized), while its 30-day moving average yield for June was 0.01 percent (subsidized) and –0.50 percent (non-subsidized). Yield quotations more closely reflect the current earnings of the Fund. The non-subsidized yield reflects what the yield would have been had a fee and/or expense waiver not been in place during the period shown. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Despite much improved market liquidity and strong demand for bonds, it is clearly a time for careful diligence and diversification of investment portfolios. Protecting the safety and liquidity of the Portfolio’s assets remained our first priority. In the recent uncertain markets, our emphasis has been on managing exposure to institutions under stress.
Recent economic data has been sending mixed signals and many investors are likely to continue to tread cautiously. Barring any unexpected shocks to the market, we believe that rates are likely to remain low through 2011. Moreover, while it may be difficult politically, simply practicing fiscal austerity should be enough for states to overcome near-term fiscal challenges. Raising taxes and cutting services should prove to be enough, budgets will likely be passed and state finances will likely improve as the economy continues to recover. During this period of ongoing uncertainty, we continue to maintain a watchful eye on state and local economies.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future.
| | | | |
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION as of 06/30/11 |
Weekly Variable Rate Bonds | | | 64 | .8% |
Daily Variable Rate Bonds | | | 15 | .6 |
Commercial Paper | | | 7 | .3 |
Municipal Bonds & Notes | | | 6 | .8 |
Put Option Bonds | | | 3 | .4 |
Closed-End Investment Companies | | | 2 | .1 |
| | | | |
MATURITY SCHEDULE as of 06/30/11 | | |
1 – 30 Days | | | 84.4 | % |
31 – 60 Days | | | 4.6 | |
61 – 90 Days | | | 1.6 | |
91 – 120 Days | | | 0.1 | |
121+ Days | | | 9.3 | |
Subject to change daily. Provided for informational purposes only and should not be deemed as a recommendation to buy or sell the securities mentioned above. Portfolio composition and maturity schedule are as a percentage of total investments. Morgan Stanley is a full-service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities, investment banking, research and analysis, financing and financial advisory services.
3
Investment Strategy
The Fund will normally invest at least 80 percent of its net assets in high quality, short-term securities that are municipal obligations that pay interest exempt from federal and California income taxes. The Investment Adviser seeks to maintain the Fund’s share price at $1.00. The share price remaining stable at $1.00 means that the Fund would preserve the principal value of your investment.
An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.
For More Information About Portfolio Holdings
Each Morgan Stanley fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the fund’s second and fourth fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form N-CSRS and Form N-CSR, respectively. Morgan Stanley also delivers the semiannual and annual reports to fund shareholders and makes these reports available on its public web site, www.morganstanley.com. Each Morgan Stanley fund also files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the fund’s first and third fiscal quarters on Form N-Q and monthly holdings for each money market fund on form N-MFP. Morgan Stanley does not deliver these reports to shareholders, nor are the first and third fiscal quarter reports posted to the Morgan Stanley public web site. However, the holdings for each money market fund are posted to the Morgan Stanley public web site. You may obtain the Form N-Q filings (as well as the Form N-CSR, N-CSRS and N-MFP filings) by accessing the SEC’s web site, http://www.sec.gov. You may also review and copy them at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the SEC’s public reference room may be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. You can also request copies of these materials, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the SEC’s e-mail address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the public reference section of the SEC, Washington, DC 20549-1520.
Householding Notice
To reduce printing and mailing costs, the Fund attempts to eliminate duplicate mailings to the same address. The Fund delivers a single copy of certain shareholder documents, including shareholder reports, prospectuses and proxy materials, to investors with the same last name who reside at the same address. Your participation in this program will continue for an unlimited period of time unless you instruct us otherwise. You can request multiple copies of these documents by calling (800) 869-NEWS, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., ET. Once our Customer Service Center has received your instructions, we will begin sending individual copies for each account within 30 days.
4
Expense Example
(unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including advisory fees; shareholder servicing fees; and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period 01/01/11 – 06/30/11.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line of the table below provides information about hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing cost of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs, and will not help you determine the relative total cost of owning different funds that have transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or exchange fees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning
| | Ending
| | Expenses Paid
|
| | Account Value | | Account Value | | During Period@ |
| | | | | | 01/01/11–
|
| | 01/01/11 | | 06/30/11 | | 06/30/11 |
Actual (0.00% return) | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 0.84 | |
Hypothetical (5% annual return before expenses) | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,023.95 | | | $ | 0.85 | |
| | |
@ | | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.17% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). If the fund had borne all of its expenses, the annualized expense ratio would have been 0.67%. |
5
Investment Advisory Agreement Approval
(unaudited)
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Board reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the investment advisory services provided by the Investment Adviser (as defined herein) under the advisory agreement, including portfolio management, investment research and equity and fixed income securities trading. The Board also reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the non-advisory, administrative services provided by the Fund’s Administrator (as defined herein) under the administration agreement, including accounting, clerical, bookkeeping, compliance, business management and planning, and the provision of supplies, office space and utilities at the Investment Adviser’s expense. (The Investment Adviser and the Administrator together are referred to as the “Adviser” and the advisory and administration agreements together are referred to as the “Management Agreement.”) The Board also compared the nature of the services provided by the Adviser with similar services provided by non-affiliated advisers as reported to the Board by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”).
The Board reviewed and considered the qualifications of the portfolio managers, the senior administrative managers and other key personnel of the Adviser who provide the administrative and advisory services to the Fund. The Board determined that the Adviser’s portfolio managers and key personnel are well qualified by education and/or training and experience to perform the services in an efficient and professional manner. The Board concluded that the nature and extent of the advisory and administrative services provided were necessary and appropriate for the conduct of the business and investment activities of the Fund and supported its decision to approve the Management Agreement.
Performance, Fees and Expenses of the Fund
The Board reviewed the performance, fees and expenses of the Fund compared to its peers, as determined by Lipper, and to appropriate benchmarks where applicable. The Board discussed with the Adviser the performance goals and the actual results achieved in managing the Fund. When considering a fund’s performance, the Board and the Adviser place emphasis on trends and longer-term returns (focusing on one-year, three-year and five-year performance, as of December 31, 2010, or since inception, as applicable). When a fund underperforms its benchmark and/or its peer group average, the Board and the Adviser discuss the causes of such underperformance and, where necessary, they discuss specific changes to investment strategy or investment personnel. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance was below its peer group average for the one-, three- and five-year periods. The Board discussed with the Adviser the level of the advisory and administration fees (together, the “management fee”) for this Fund relative to comparable funds and/or other accounts advised by the Adviser and/or compared to its peers as determined by Lipper. In addition to the management fee, the Board also reviewed the Fund’s total expense ratio. The Board noted that the Fund’s management fee and total expense ratio were lower than its peer group average. After
6
discussion, the Board concluded that (i) the Fund’s performance was acceptable, and (ii) the management fee and total expense ratio were competitive with its peer group average.
Economies of Scale
The Board considered the size and growth prospects of the Fund and how that relates to the Fund’s total expense ratio and particularly the Fund’s management fee rate, which includes breakpoints. In conjunction with its review of the Adviser’s profitability, the Board discussed with the Adviser how a change in assets can affect the efficiency or effectiveness of managing the Fund and whether the management fee level is appropriate relative to current and projected asset levels and/or whether the management fee structure reflects economies of scale as asset levels change. The Board has determined that its review of the actual and potential economies of scale of the Fund supports its decision to approve the Management Agreement.
Profitability of the Adviser and Affiliates
The Board considered information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates during the last year from their relationship with the Fund and during the last two years from their relationship with the Morgan Stanley Fund Complex and reviewed with the Adviser the cost allocation methodology used to determine the profitability of the Adviser and affiliates. The Board has determined that its review of the analysis of the Adviser’s expenses and profitability supports its decision to approve the Management Agreement.
Other Benefits of the Relationship
The Board considered other benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates derived from their relationship with the Fund and other funds advised by the Adviser. These benefits may include, among other things, “float” benefits derived from handling of checks for purchases and sales, research received by the Adviser generated from commission dollars spent on funds’ portfolio trading and fees for distribution and/or shareholder servicing. The Board reviewed with the Adviser each of these arrangements and the reasonableness of the Adviser’s costs relative to the services performed. The Board has determined that its review of the other benefits received by the Adviser or its affiliates supports its decision to approve the Management Agreement.
Resources of the Adviser and Historical Relationship Between the Fund and the Adviser
The Board considered whether the Adviser is financially sound and has the resources necessary to perform its obligations under the Management Agreement. The Board also reviewed and considered the historical relationship between the Fund and the Adviser, including the organizational structure of the Adviser, the policies and procedures formulated and adopted by the Adviser for managing the Fund’s operations and the
7
Board’s confidence in the competence and integrity of the senior managers and key personnel of the Adviser. The Board concluded that the Adviser has the financial resources necessary to fulfill its obligations under the Management Agreement and that it is beneficial for the Fund to continue its relationship with the Adviser.
Other Factors and Current Trends
The Board considered the controls and procedures adopted and implemented by the Adviser and monitored by the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer and concluded that the conduct of business by the Adviser indicates a good faith effort on its part to adhere to high ethical standards in the conduct of the Fund’s business.
General Conclusion
After considering and weighing all of the above factors, the Board concluded that it would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders to approve renewal of the Management Agreement for another year. In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor referenced above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, some of which were in executive session with only the independent Board members and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Board members may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the Management Agreement.
8
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Portfolio of Investments - June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRINCIPAL
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMOUNT IN
| | | | COUPON
| | DEMAND
| | MATURITY
| | | | |
THOUSANDS | | | | RATE (a) | | DATE (b) | | DATE | | | | VALUE |
| | | | Weekly Variable Rate Bonds (68.3%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 4,900 | | | Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Ser 2008 A-2 COPs | | | 0 | .05 | % | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/37 | | | | $ | 4,900,000 | |
| 4,375 | | | Austin Trust, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Waterworks Ser 2007 A Custody Receipts Ser 2008-1087 | | | 0 | .15 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/37 | | | | | 4,375,000 | |
| | | | Bay Area Toll Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 9,000 | | | San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge 2008 Ser D-1 | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/01/45 | | | | | 9,000,000 | |
| 1,000 | | | San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge 2009 Ser F-1 ROCs II-R Ser 11901 | | | 0 | .09 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/01/17 | | | | | 1,000,000 | |
| 1,000 | | | BB&T Municipal Trust, California Department of Water Resources 2008 Subser AE Floater Certificates Ser 28 | | | 0 | .08 | | | 07/07/11 | | 12/01/15 | | | | | 1,000,000 | |
| | | | California, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Ser 2003 C-2 | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 05/01/33 | | | | | 4,000,000 | |
| 4,225 | | | Ser 2005 A Subser A-1-1 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 05/01/40 | | | | | 4,225,000 | |
| 20,000 | | | Ser 2005 A Subser A-2-1 | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 05/01/40 | | | | | 20,000,000 | |
| | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 11,200 | | | California Institute of Technology 2006 Ser A | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/36 | | | | | 11,200,000 | |
| 2,600 | | | California Institute of Technology 2006 Ser B | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/36 | | | | | 2,600,000 | |
| 5,900 | | | University of San Francisco Ser 2003 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 05/01/33 | | | | | 5,900,000 | |
| 1,000 | | | California Enterprise Development Authority, Robert Louis Stevenson School Ser 2011 | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 01/01/41 | | | | | 1,000,000 | |
| | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5,400 | | | Catholic Healthcare West Ser 2009 H | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/33 | | | | | 5,400,000 | |
| 3,735 | | | Kaiser Permanente Ser 2006 C | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/41 | | | | | 3,735,000 | |
| 2,100 | | | Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford Ser 2008 A | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/15/33 | | | | | 2,100,000 | |
| 2,500 | | | Scripps Health Ser 2008 F | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/31 | | | | | 2,500,000 | |
| 2,720 | | | Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System Ser 2003 | | | 0 | .08 | | | 07/07/11 | | 12/01/17 | | | | | 2,720,000 | |
| 3,240 | | | Sutter Health Ser 2011 B ROCs II-R Ser 11952 | | | 0 | .10 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/15/18 | | | | | 3,240,000 | |
| | | | California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 11,600 | | | American National Red Cross Ser 2008 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 09/01/34 | | | | | 11,600,000 | |
| 2,500 | | | Los Angeles SPCA Ser 2002 A | | | 0 | .09 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/33 | | | | | 2,500,000 | |
| | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Gas Supply Sacramento Municipal Utility District Ser 2010 | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 11/01/40 | | | | | 1,000,000 | |
| 12,960 | | | Kaiser Permanente Ser 2003 C | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/15/25 | | | | | 12,960,000 | |
| 3,500 | | | University of San Diego Ser 2005 | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/45 | | | | | 3,500,000 | |
| 4,135 | | | Calleguas-Las Virgenes Public Financing Authority, Municipal Water District Ser 2008 A | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/37 | | | | | 4,135,000 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
9
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Portfolio of Investments - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRINCIPAL
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMOUNT IN
| | | | COUPON
| | DEMAND
| | MATURITY
| | | | |
THOUSANDS | | | | RATE (a) | | DATE (b) | | DATE | | | | VALUE |
| | | | East Bay Municipal Utility District, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 8,970 | | | Water System Sub Refg Ser 2008 A-1 | | | 0 | .04 | % | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/38 | | | | $ | 8,970,000 | |
| 995 | | | Water System Sub Refg Ser 2008 A-2 | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/38 | | | | | 995,000 | |
| 3,980 | | | Water System Sub Refg Ser 2008 A-3 | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/38 | | | | | 3,980,000 | |
| 14,930 | | | Water System Sub Refg Ser 2008 A-4 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/38 | | | | | 14,930,000 | |
| 1,500 | | | Water System Sub Ser 2007 A Eagle #20080018 Class A (AGM) | | | 0 | .09 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/37 | | | | | 1,500,000 | |
| | | | Eastern Municipal Water District, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 7,500 | | | Water & Sewer Ser 2008 B COPs | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/35 | | | | | 7,500,000 | |
| 1,620 | | | Water & Sewer Ser 2008 E COPs | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/33 | | | | | 1,620,000 | |
| 10,450 | | | Water & Sewer Ser 2008 G COPs | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/38 | | | | | 10,450,000 | |
| 20,785 | | | Fresno, Trinity Health Credit Group Ser 2000 C | | | 0 | .10 | | | 07/07/11 | | 12/01/30 | | | | | 20,785,000 | |
| 975 | | | Hillsborough, Water & Sewer System Ser 2003 A COPs | | | 0 | .10 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/33 | | | | | 975,000 | |
| 1,300 | | | Long Beach, Memorial Health Services Ser 1991 | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/16 | | | | | 1,300,000 | |
| 1,195 | | | Los Angeles, Wastewater System Sub Ser 2008 C | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/28 | | | | | 1,195,000 | |
| 9,000 | | | Los Angeles Community College District, Ser 2009 A ROCs II-R Ser 11773 | | | 0 | .09 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/01/33 | | | | | 9,000,000 | |
| 2,000 | | | Los Angeles County Housing Authority, Multifamily Malibu Meadows 1998 Ser B | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/15/28 | | | | | 2,000,000 | |
| 1,375 | | | Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Prop A First Tier Senior Sales Tax Ser 2008-A1 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/31 | | | | | 1,375,000 | |
| | | | Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Power System 2001 Ser B Subser B-2 | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/34 | | | | | 3,000,000 | |
| 7,525 | | | Power System 2002 Ser A Subser A-3 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/35 | | | | | 7,525,000 | |
| 2,300 | | | Power System 2002 Ser A Subser A-6 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/35 | | | | | 2,300,000 | |
| 2,100 | | | Water System 2001 Ser B Subser B-1 | | | 0 | .02 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/35 | | | | | 2,100,000 | |
| 8,100 | | | Water System 2001 Ser B Subser B-3 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/35 | | | | | 8,100,000 | |
| | | | Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 10,165 | | | Water 2008 Ser A-2 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/37 | | | | | 10,165,000 | |
| 5,705 | | | Water 2010 Ser A | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/29 | | | | | 5,705,000 | |
| 2,000 | | | Modesto, Multifamily Housing Shadowbrook Apartments Ser 2001 A | | | 0 | .11 | | | 07/07/11 | | 05/15/31 | | | | | 2,000,000 | |
| 3,290 | | | Morgan Hill Redevelopment Agency, Ojo de Agua Tax Allocation Ser 2008 A | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 09/01/33 | | | | | 3,290,000 | |
| 7,000 | | | Murrieta Valley Unified School District, School Facility Bridge Funding Ser 2009 COPs | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 05/01/41 | | | | | 7,000,000 | |
| | | | Newport Beach, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5,100 | | | Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Ser 2008 C | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 12/01/40 | | | | | 5,100,000 | |
| 3,500 | | | Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Ser 2008 E | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 12/01/40 | | | | | 3,500,000 | |
| 7,100 | | | Orange County, WLCO LF Partners Issue G of 1998 Ser 3 | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 11/15/28 | | | | | 7,100,000 | |
| 14,340 | | | Orange County Housing Authority, Oasis Martinique Refg 1998 Issue I | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/15/28 | | | | | 14,340,000 | |
| 1,900 | | | Pasadena, Ser 2008 COPs | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 02/01/35 | | | | | 1,900,000 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
10
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Portfolio of Investments - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRINCIPAL
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMOUNT IN
| | | | COUPON
| | DEMAND
| | MATURITY
| | | | |
THOUSANDS | | | | RATE (a) | | DATE (b) | | DATE | | | | VALUE |
$ | 975 | | | Pittsburg Public Financing Authority, Water Ser 2008 | | | 0 | .07 | % | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/35 | | | | $ | 975,000 | |
| 9,000 | | | Rancho Water District Financing Authority, Ser 2008 B | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/15/31 | | | | | 9,000,000 | |
| 2,000 | | | RBC Municipal Products Trust Inc, Contra Costa Transportation Authority Sales Tax Ser 2010 Floater Certificates Ser E-17 | | | 0 | .09 | | | 07/07/11 | | 03/01/34 | | | | | 2,000,000 | |
| 900 | | | Riverside County, 1985 Ser D COPs | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 12/01/15 | | | | | 900,000 | |
| 15,000 | | | Sacramento County Housing Authority, Seasons at Winter 2004 Ser C-1 (AMT) | | | 0 | .09 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/01/34 | | | | | 15,000,000 | |
| 7,620 | | | Sacramento Suburban Water District, Ser 2008 A-2 COPs | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 11/01/28 | | | | | 7,620,000 | |
| 10,950 | | | Sacramento Transportation Authority, Measure A Sales Tax Ser 2009 A | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/38 | | | | | 10,950,000 | |
| 2,800 | | | San Bernardino County Flood Control District, Judgment Ser 2008 | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/01/37 | | | | | 2,800,000 | |
| | | | San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5,300 | | | Sales Tax 2008 Ser A | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/01/38 | | | | | 5,300,000 | |
| 1,625 | | | Sales Tax 2008 Ser B | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/01/38 | | | | | 1,625,000 | |
| 9,900 | | | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Ser 2007 B Eagle #20070100 Class A | | | 0 | .08 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/01/35 | | | | | 9,900,000 | |
| 6,250 | | | San Francisco City & County Airport Commission, 2009 Second Ser 36-A | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 05/01/26 | | | | | 6,250,000 | |
| 11,655 | | | San Francisco City & County Finance Corporation, Moscone Center Ser 2008-2 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/01/30 | | | | | 11,655,000 | |
| | | | Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1,200 | | | Measure A Sales Tax Ser 2008 A | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/01/36 | | | | | 1,200,000 | |
| 3,000 | | | Measure A Sales Tax Ser 2008 B | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 04/01/36 | | | | | 3,000,000 | |
| 4,400 | | | Sales Tax Ser 2008 A | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/26 | | | | | 4,400,000 | |
| 7,940 | | | Sales Tax Ser 2008 C | | | 0 | .05 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/26 | | | | | 7,940,000 | |
| 10 | | | Southern California Public Power Authority, Magnolia Power Project A Ser 2009-1 | | | 0 | .07 | | | 07/07/11 | | 07/01/36 | | | | | 10,000 | |
| 1,810 | | | Torrance, Torrance Memorial Medical Center Ser 2010 B | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 09/01/45 | | | | | 1,810,000 | |
| 6,050 | | | West Basin Municipal Water District, Ser 2008 A-1 COPs | | | 0 | .06 | | | 07/07/11 | | 08/01/27 | | | | | 6,050,000 | |
| 1,000 | | | Western Municipal Water District Facilities Authority, Ser 2009 A | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/07/11 | | 10/01/32 | | | | | 1,000,000 | |
| 4,300 | | | Whittier, Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital Ser 2009 C | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/07/11 | | 06/01/36 | | | | | 4,300,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Weekly Variable Rate Bonds (Cost $407,975,000) | | | | | 407,975,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Daily Variable Rate Bonds (16.5%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 4,400 | | | Adventist Health System/West 1998 Ser B | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/01/11 | | 09/01/28 | | | | | 4,400,000 | |
| 5,365 | | | Adventist Health System/West Ser 2009 B | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/01/11 | | 09/01/38 | | | | | 5,365,000 | |
| | | | California Municipal Finance Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5,450 | | | Chevron USA, Inc. Ser 2005 | | | 0 | .02 | | | 07/01/11 | | 06/01/25 | | | | | 5,450,000 | |
| 7,300 | | | Chevron USA, Inc. Ser 2010 A | | | 0 | .02 | | | 07/01/11 | | 11/01/35 | | | | | 7,300,000 | |
| 2,850 | | | ExxonMobil Corp Ser 2007 (AMT) | | | 0 | .01 | | | 07/01/11 | | 12/01/29 | | | | | 2,850,000 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
11
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Portfolio of Investments - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRINCIPAL
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMOUNT IN
| | | | COUPON
| | DEMAND
| | MATURITY
| | | | |
THOUSANDS | | | | RATE (a) | | DATE (b) | | DATE | | | | VALUE |
| | | | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 1,000 | | | Exxon Corp Ser 1989 | | | 0 | .01 | % | | 07/01/11 | | 12/01/12 | | | | $ | 1,000,000 | |
| 1,100 | | | ExxonMobil Ser 2000 | | | 0 | .01 | | | 07/01/11 | | 04/01/17 | | | | | 1,100,000 | |
| 6,900 | | | Pacific Gas & Electric Co 1996 Ser F | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/01/11 | | 11/01/26 | | | | | 6,900,000 | |
| | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3,600 | | | Chevron USA, Inc. Ser 2002 | | | 0 | .02 | | | 07/01/11 | | 05/15/24 | | | | | 3,600,000 | |
| 6,050 | | | Rady Childrens Hospital Ser 2008 B | | | 0 | .02 | | | 07/01/11 | | 08/15/47 | | | | | 6,050,000 | |
| 4,100 | | | Irvine Assessment District No 94-13, Improvement Bond Act 1915 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/01/11 | | 09/02/22 | | | | | 4,100,000 | |
| 1,500 | | | Irvine Assessment District No 94-15, Improvement Bond Act 1915 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/01/11 | | 09/02/20 | | | | | 1,500,000 | |
| 4,300 | | | Irvine Ranch Water District, Cons Ser 1993 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/01/11 | | 04/01/33 | | | | | 4,300,000 | |
| 3,400 | | | Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, Water System 2001 Ser B Subser B-2 | | | 0 | .04 | | | 07/01/11 | | 07/01/35 | | | | | 3,400,000 | |
| | | | Orange County Sanitation District, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 6,200 | | | Ser 2000 A COPs | | | 0 | .02 | | | 07/01/11 | | 08/01/29 | | | | | 6,200,000 | |
| 13,250 | | | Ser 2000 B COPs | | | 0 | .02 | | | 07/01/11 | | 08/01/30 | | | | | 13,250,000 | |
| | | | Southern California Public Power Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 8,165 | | | Mead-Adelanto Ser 2008 A | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/01/11 | | 07/01/20 | | | | | 8,165,000 | |
| 5,050 | | | Mead-Phoenix Ser 2008 A | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/01/11 | | 07/01/20 | | | | | 5,050,000 | |
| 8,475 | | | University of California Regents, Medical Center Pooled Ser 2007 B-2 | | | 0 | .03 | | | 07/01/11 | | 05/15/32 | | | | | 8,475,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Daily Variable Rate Bonds (Cost $98,455,000) | | | | | 98,455,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | YIELD TO
| | | | |
| | | | | | MATURITY
| | | | |
| | | | COUPON
| | ON DATE OF
| | | | |
| | | | RATE | | PURCHASE | | | | |
|
| | | | Commercial Paper (7.7%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 6,000 | | | Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District, Ser B | | | 0 | .12 | % | | | 0.12 | % | | 07/20/11 | | | 6,000,000 | |
| 4,921 | | | Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2nd Sub Sales Tax Ser A | | | 0 | .26 | | | | 0.26 | | | 08/09/11 | | | 4,921,000 | |
| | | | San Diego County Water Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 9,000 | | | Ser 1 | | | 0 | .15 | | | | 0.15 | | | 08/10/11 | | | 9,000,000 | |
| 4,900 | | | Ser 1 | | | 0 | .16 | | | | 0.16 | | | 09/07/11 | | | 4,900,000 | |
| 4,000 | | | Ser 5 | | | 0 | .09 | | | | 0.09 | | | 07/07/11 | | | 4,000,000 | |
| 2,500 | | | Ser 5 | | | 0 | .10 | | | | 0.10 | | | 08/11/11 | | | 2,500,000 | |
| 3,000 | | | Ser 5 | | | 0 | .12 | | | | 0.12 | | | 08/03/11 | | | 3,000,000 | |
| | | | San Francisco County Transportation Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2,075 | | | 2004 Ser A | | | 0 | .20 | | | | 0.20 | | | 07/06/11 | | | 2,075,000 | |
| 5,000 | | | 2004 Ser A | | | 0 | .28 | | | | 0.28 | | | 08/08/11 | | | 5,000,000 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
12
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Portfolio of Investments - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | YIELD TO
| | | | |
PRINCIPAL
| | | | | | MATURITY
| | | | |
AMOUNT IN
| | | | COUPON
| | ON DATE OF
| | MATURITY
| | |
THOUSANDS | | | | RATE | | PURCHASE | | DATE | | VALUE |
$ | 4,500 | | | 2004 Ser B | | | 0 | .16 | % | | | 0.16 | % | | 08/04/11 | | $ | 4,500,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Commercial Paper (Cost $45,896,000) | | | 45,896,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Municipal Bonds & Notes (7.1%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | California School Cash Reserve Program Authority, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1,500 | | | 2010-2011 Ser N, dtd 04/14/11 | | | 2 | .50 | | | | 0.83 | | | 12/30/11 | | | 1,512,390 | |
| 2,000 | | | 2011-2012 Ser A, dtd 07/01/11 (c) | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.38 | | | 03/01/12 | | | 2,021,540 | |
| 3,690 | | | 2011-2012 Ser B, dtd 07/01/11 (c) | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.48 | | | 06/01/12 | | | 3,741,181 | |
| 7,500 | | | 2011-2012 Ser F, dtd 07/01/11 (c) | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.43 | | | 06/01/12 | | | 7,607,475 | |
| 2,375 | | | Imperial Community College District, Ser 2011 BANs, dtd 05/24/11 | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.60 | | | 12/29/11 | | | 2,391,351 | |
| 2,500 | | | Los Angeles, Ser 2011 TRANs, dtd 07/12/11 (c) | | | 2 | .50 | | | | 0.31 | | | 03/30/12 | | | 2,539,150 | |
| 1,500 | | | Los Angeles County, 2011-2012 Ser A TRANs, dtd 07/01/11 (c) | | | 2 | .50 | | | | 0.32 | | | 02/29/12 | | | 1,521,570 | |
| 2,000 | | | Los Angeles County Schools Pooled Financing Program, Pooled 2010-2011 Ser F-1 TRANs, dtd 03/31/11 | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.85 | | | 02/01/12 | | | 2,013,362 | |
| | | | Oakland, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1,800 | | | Ser 2011 TRANs dtd 07/08/11 (c) | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.31 | | | 03/30/12 | | | 1,822,086 | |
| 2,000 | | | Ser 2011 TRANs dtd 07/08/11 (c) | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.38 | | | 06/29/12 | | | 2,031,460 | |
| | | | San Diego County & School Districts, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Ser 2011 B-1 TRANs dtd 07/01/11 (c) | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.47 | | | 01/31/12 | | | 2,522,250 | |
| 7,000 | | | Ser 2011 B-2 TRANs dtd 07/01/11 (c) | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.57 | | | 04/30/12 | | | 7,082,740 | |
| 5,000 | | | San Juan Unified School District, Ser 2011 TRANs, dtd 05/03/11 | | | 1 | .25 | | | | 0.63 | | | 10/31/11 | | | 5,010,279 | |
| 1,000 | | | Val Verde Unified School District, Ser 2011 B TRANs, dtd 03/31/11 | | | 2 | .00 | | | | 0.75 | | | 10/03/11 | | | 1,003,199 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Municipal Bonds & Notes (Cost $42,820,033) | | | 42,820,033 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | COUPON
| | DEMAND
| | | | |
| | | | RATE (a) | | DATE (b) | | | | |
|
| | | | Put Option Bonds (3.6%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 10,000 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Kaiser Permanente Ser 2009 E | | | 0 | .48 | % | | | 06/01/12 | | | 04/01/44 | | | 10,000,000 | |
| 5,000 | | | City of Riverside, Series A | | | 0 | .16 | | | | 06/01/12 | | | 10/01/35 | | | 5,000,000 | |
| 975 | | | East Bay Municipal Utility District, Wastewater System Ser 2011 A | | | 0 | .11 | | | | 02/01/12 | | | 06/01/38 | | | 975,000 | |
| 690 | | | East Bay Municipal Utility District, Water System Sub Refg SIFMA Ser 2010 A-2 | | | 0 | .14 | | | | 03/01/12 | | | 06/01/26 | | | 690,000 | |
| 5,000 | | | RBC Municipal Products Trust Inc, Kaiser Permanente Ser 2011 Floater Certificates Ser E-21 | | | 0 | .13 | | | | 09/01/11 | | | 10/01/31 | | | 5,000,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Put Option Bonds (Cost $21,665,000) | | | 21,665,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
13
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Portfolio of Investments - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRINCIPAL
| | | | | | | | | | |
AMOUNT IN
| | | | COUPON
| | DEMAND
| | MATURITY
| | |
THOUSANDS | | | | RATE (a) | | DATE (b) | | DATE | | VALUE |
| | | | Closed-End Investment Companies (2.2%) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 6,000 | | | BlackRock MuniYield California Fund, Inc., VRDP Ser W-7 (AMT) | | | 0 | .29 | % | | | 07/07/11 | | | 06/01/41 | | $ | 6,000,000 | |
| 5,000 | | | BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc., VRDP Ser W-7 (AMT) | | | 0 | .29 | | | | 07/07/11 | | | 04/01/41 | | | 5,000,000 | |
| 2,000 | | | Nuveen California Performance Plus Municipal Fund, Inc., VRDP Ser 1-810 (AMT) | | | 0 | .29 | | | | 07/07/11 | | | 12/01/40 | | | 2,000,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Closed-End Investment Companies (Cost $13,000,000) | | | 13,000,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Total Investments (Cost $629,811,033) (d) | | 105.4% | | | 629,811,033 | |
| | | | Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets | | (5.4) | | | (32,486,851 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Net Assets | | 100.0% | | $ | 597,324,182 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
AMT | | Alternative Minimum Tax. |
BANs | | Bond Anticipation Notes. |
COPs | | Certificates of Participation. |
ROCs | | Reset Option Certificates. |
TRANs | | Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes. |
VRDP | | Variable Rate Demand Preferred. |
(a) | | Rate shown is the rate in effect at June 30, 2011. |
(b) | | Date on which the principal amount can be recovered through demand. |
(c) | | Security purchased on a when-issued basis. |
(d) | | Cost is the same for federal income tax purposes. |
| | |
| | |
Bond Insurance: |
AGM | | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
14
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
| | | | |
Assets: | | | | |
Investments in securities, at value (cost $629,811,033) | | $ | 629,811,033 | |
Cash | | | 17,046,478 | |
Receivable for: | | | | |
Shares of beneficial interest sold | | | 14,191,251 | |
Interest | | | 116,300 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 12,123 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | | 661,177,185 | |
| | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | |
Payable for: | | | | |
Investments purchased | | | 52,774,673 | |
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | | | 10,916,001 | |
Shareholder servicing fee | | | 24,215 | |
Transfer agent fee | | | 22,631 | |
Administration fee | | | 9,263 | |
Accrued expenses and other payables | | | 106,220 | |
| | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | 63,853,003 | |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 597,324,182 | |
| | | | |
Composition of Net Assets: | | | | |
Paid-in-capital | | $ | 597,385,501 | |
Dividends in excess of net investment income | | | (60,793 | ) |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (526 | ) |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 597,324,182 | |
| | | | |
Net Asset Value Per Shares 597,305,638 shares outstanding (unlimited shares authorized of $.01 par value) | | | $1.00 | |
| | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
15
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Financial Statements continued
Statement of Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
| | | | |
Net Investment Income: | | | | |
Income | | | | |
Interest Income | | $ | 244,819 | |
Dividends from affiliate | | | 40 | |
| | | | |
Total Income | | | 244,859 | |
| | | | |
Expenses | | | | |
Investment advisory fee (Note 3) | | | 617,589 | |
Shareholder servicing fee (Note 4) | | | 139,981 | |
Administration fee (Note 3) | | | 69,990 | |
Professional fees | | | 40,735 | |
Transfer agent fees and expenses | | | 21,772 | |
Registration fees | | | 18,185 | |
Shareholder reports and notices | | | 8,113 | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 3,642 | |
Custodian fees | | | 2,290 | |
Other | | | 15,223 | |
| | | | |
Total Expenses | | | 937,520 | |
Less: amounts waived/reimbursed | | | (702,867 | ) |
| | | | |
Net Expenses | | | 234,653 | |
| | | | |
Net Investment Income | | $ | 10,206 | |
| | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
16
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Financial Statements continued
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | FOR THE SIX
| | FOR THE YEAR
|
| | MONTHS ENDED
| | ENDED
|
| | JUNE 30, 2011 | | DECEMBER 31, 2010 |
| | (unaudited) | | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 10,206 | | | $ | 9,597 | |
Dividends to shareholders from net investment income | | | (13,972 | ) | | | (9,576 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) from transactions in shares of beneficial interest | | | 512,822,562 | | | | (21,784,196 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Increase (Decrease) | | | 512,818,796 | | | | (21,784,175 | ) |
Net Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 84,505,386 | | | | 106,289,561 | |
| | | | | | | | |
End of Period | | | | | | | | |
(Including dividends in excess of net investment income of $60,793 and $57,027, respectively) | | $ | 597,324,182 | | | $ | 84,505,386 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
17
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Notes to Financial Statements - June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
1. Organization and Accounting Policies
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust (the “Fund”), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek to provide as high a level of daily income exempt from federal and California income tax as is consistent with stability of principal and liquidity. The Fund was organized as a Massachusetts business trust on April 25, 1988 and commenced operations on July 22, 1988.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
A. Valuation of Investments — Portfolio securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value, in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act. Investments in mutual funds, including the Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds, are valued at the net asset value as of the close of each business day.
B. Accounting for Investments — Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed). Realized gains and losses on security transactions are determined by the identified cost method. Dividend income and other distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized over the life of the respective securities and are included in interest income. Interest income is accrued daily as earned.
C. Federal Income Tax Policy — It is the Fund’s policy to comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable and non-taxable income to its shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. The Fund files tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, New York State and New York City. The Fund recognizes the tax effects of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return only if it is more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each reporting period to support continued recognition of the benefit. The difference between the tax benefit recognized in the financial statements for a tax position taken and the tax benefit claimed in the income tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit. There are no unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying financial statements. If applicable, the Fund recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in “other expenses” in the Statement of Operations. Each of the tax years in the four-year period ended December 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by taxing authorities.
D. Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders — The Fund records dividends and distributions to shareholders as of the close of each business day.
E. When-Issued/Delayed Delivery Securities — The Fund may purchase or sell when-issued and delayed delivery securities. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are purchased for
18
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Notes to Financial Statements - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
delivery beyond the normal settlement date at a stated price and yield, and no income accrues to the Fund on such securities prior to delivery. Payment and delivery for when-issued and delayed delivery securities can take place up to 120 days after the date of the transaction. When a Fund enters into a purchase transaction on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, it establishes either a segregated account in which it maintains liquid assets in an amount at least equal in value to the Fund’s commitments to purchase such securities or designates such assets as segregated on a Fund’s records. Purchasing securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis may involve a risk that the market price at the time of delivery may be lower than the agreed upon purchase price, in which case there could be an unrealized loss at the time of delivery. Purchasing investments on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis may be considered a form of leverage which may increase the impact that gains (losses) may have on the Fund.
F. Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G. Indemnifications — The Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
2. Fair Valuation Measurements
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value as the value that the Fund would receive to sell an investment or pay to transfer a liability in a timely transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market, or in the absence of a principal market the most advantageous market for the investment or liability. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier hierarchy to distinguish between (1) inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in valuing an asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs); and (2) inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in valuing an asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs) and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. The inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
19
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Notes to Financial Statements - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
| | |
| • | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Factors considered in making this determination may include, but are not limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents and, if necessary, available information concerning other securities in similar circumstances |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities and the determination of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to each security.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2011 in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT JUNE 30, 2011 USING |
| | | | UNADJUSTED
| | OTHER
| | |
| | | | QUOTED PRICES IN
| | SIGNIFICANT
| | SIGNIFICANT
|
| | | | ACTIVE MARKETS FOR
| | OBSERVABLE
| | UNOBSERVABLE
|
| | | | IDENTICAL INVESTMENTS
| | INPUTS
| | INPUTS
|
INVESTMENT TYPE | | TOTAL | | (LEVEL 1) | | (LEVEL 2) | | (LEVEL 3) |
|
Short-Term Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weekly Variable Rate Bonds | | $ | 407,975,000 | | | | — | | | $ | 407,975,000 | | | | — | |
Daily Variable Rate Bonds | | | 98,455,000 | | | | — | | | | 98,455,000 | | | | — | |
Commercial Paper | | | 45,896,000 | | | | — | | | | 45,896,000 | | | | — | |
Municipal Bonds & Notes | | | 42,820,033 | | | | — | | | | 42,820,033 | | | | — | |
Put Option Bonds | | | 21,665,000 | | | | — | | | | 21,665,000 | | | | — | |
Closed-End Investment Companies | | | 13,000,000 | | | | — | | | | 13,000,000 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 629,811,033 | | | | — | | | $ | 629,811,033 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Transfers between investment levels may occur as the markets fluctuate and/or the availability of data used in an investment’s valuation changes. The Fund recognizes transfers between the Levels as of the end of the period. As of June 30, 2011, the Fund did not have any investments transfer between investment levels.
3. Investment Advisory/Administration Agreements
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. (the “Investment Adviser”), the Fund pays the Investment Adviser an advisory fee, accrued daily and payable monthly, by applying the following annual rates to the net assets of the Fund determined as of the close of each business day: 0.45% to the portion of the daily net assets not exceeding $500 million; 0.375% to the portion of the daily net assets exceeding $500 million but not exceeding $750 million; 0.325% to the portion of the daily net assets exceeding $750 million but not exceeding $1 billion; 0.30% to the portion of the daily net assets exceeding $1 billion but not exceeding $1.5 billion; 0.275% to the portion of the daily net assets exceeding
20
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Notes to Financial Statements - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
$1.5 billion but not exceeding $2 billion; 0.25% to the portion of the daily net assets exceeding $2 billion but not exceeding $2.5 billion; 0.225% to the portion of the daily net assets exceeding $2.5 billion but not exceeding $3 billion; and 0.20% to the portion of the daily net assets exceeding $3 billion.
Pursuant to an Administration Agreement with Morgan Stanley Services Company Inc. (the “Administrator”), an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, the Fund pays an administration fee, accrued daily and payable monthly, by applying the annual rate of 0.05% to the Fund’s daily net assets.
Under a Sub-Administration Agreement between the Administrator and State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”), State Street provides certain administrative services to the Fund. For such services, the Administrator pays State Street a portion of the fee the Administrator receives from the Fund.
The Investment Adviser has agreed to cap the Fund’s operating expenses by assuming the Fund’s “other expenses” and/or waiving the Fund’s advisory fees, and the Administrator has agreed to waive the Fund’s administrative fees, to the extent that such operating expenses exceed 0.60% of the average daily net assets of the Fund on an annualized basis. These fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements are expected to continue for at least one year or until such time that the Board of Trustees acts to discontinue all or a portion of such waivers and/or expense reimbursements when it deems such action is appropriate.
4. Shareholder Services Plan
Pursuant to a Shareholder Services Plan (the “Plan”), the Fund may pay Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc. (the “Distributor”) as compensation for the provision of services to shareholders a service fee up to the rate of 0.15% on an annualized basis of the average daily net assets of the Fund.
Reimbursements for these expenses are made in monthly payments by the Fund to the Distributor, which will in no event exceed an amount equal to a payment at the annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets during the month. Expenses incurred by the Distributor pursuant to the Plan in any fiscal year will not be reimbursed by the Fund through payments accrued in any subsequent fiscal year. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the distribution fee was accrued at the annual rate of 0.10%.
The Distributor, Investment Adviser and Administrator have agreed to waive/reimburse all or a portion of the Fund’s shareholder servicing fee, investment advisory fee and administration fee, respectively, to the extent that total expenses exceed total income of the Fund on a daily basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Distributor waived $75,047, the Investment Adviser waived $612,050 and the Administrator waived $15,770. These fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements are expected to continue for one year or until such time that the Board of Trustees acts to discontinue all or a portion of such waivers and/or expense reimbursements when it deems such action is appropriate.
21
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Notes to Financial Statements - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
5. Security Transactions and Transactions with Affiliates
The Fund invests in the Institutional Class of the Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds Government Portfolio (the “Liquidity Funds”), an open-end management investment company managed by the Adviser. Investment advisory fees paid by the Fund are reduced by an amount equal to its pro-rata share of the advisory and administration fees paid by the Fund due to its investment in the Liquidity Funds.
A summary of the Fund’s transactions in shares of the Liquidity Funds during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value
| | Purchases
| | Sales
| | Dividend
| | Value
|
December 31, 2010 | | at cost | | Proceeds | | Income | | June 30, 2011 |
|
$ | 0 | | | $ | 57,800,000 | | | $ | 57,800,000 | | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Morgan Stanley Services Company Inc., an affiliate of the Investment Adviser and Distributor, is the Fund’s transfer agent.
The Fund has an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain independent Trustees of the Fund who will have served as independent Trustees for at least five years at the time of retirement. Benefits under this plan are based on factors which include years of service and compensation. The Trustees voted to close the plan to new participants and eliminate the future benefits growth due to increases to compensation after July 31, 2003. Aggregate pension costs for the six months ended June 30, 2011, included in “trustees’ fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations amounted to $2,114. At June 30, 2011, the Fund had an accrued pension liability of $60,282, which is included in “accrued expenses and other payables” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The Fund has an unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Compensation Plan”), which allows each independent Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or she receives for serving on the Board of Trustees. Each eligible Trustee generally may elect to have the deferred amounts credited with a return equal to the total return on one or more of the Morgan Stanley funds that are offered as investment options under the Compensation Plan. Appreciation/depreciation and distributions received from these investments are recorded with an offsetting increase/decrease in the deferred compensation obligation and do not affect the net asset value of the Fund.
22
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Notes to Financial Statements - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest, at $1.00 per share, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | FOR THE SIX
| | FOR THE YEAR
|
| | MONTHS ENDED
| | ENDED
|
| | JUNE 30, 2011 | | DECEMBER 31, 2010 |
| | (unaudited) | | |
|
Shares sold | | | 1,015,020,668 | | | | 93,453,301 | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 13,847 | | | | 9,605 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,015,034,515 | | | | 93,462,906 | |
Shares Redeemed | | | (502,211,953 | ) | | | (115,247,102 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding | | | 512,822,562 | | | | (21,784,196 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
7. Federal Income Tax Status
The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment income and net realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ from GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. Dividends and distributions which exceed net investment income and net realized capital gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of paid-in-capital.
As of December 31, 2010, the Fund had temporary book/tax differences primarily attributable to nondeductible expenses.
8. Expense Offset
The Fund has entered into an arrangement with State Street (“Custodian”), whereby credits realized on uninvested cash balances were used to offset a portion of the Fund’s expenses. If applicable, these custodian credits are shown as “expense offset” in the Statement of Operations.
9. Accounting Pronouncement
In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04. The amendments in this update are the results of the work of FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to develop common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, which are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Consequently, these amendments improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in the financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.
23
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Notes to Financial Statements - June 30, 2011 (unaudited) continued
10. Subsequent Event
Effective July 31, 2011, the Board of Trustees of the Fund has approved (i) changing the investment adviser of the Fund from Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. to Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., and (ii) changing the distributor of the Fund from Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc. to Morgan Stanley Distribution, Inc. In connection with this approval, there will be no change in the nature of the services currently provided to the Fund through their existing advisory and distribution relationships.
24
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Financial Highlights
Selected ratios and per share data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each period:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | FOR THE SIX
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | MONTHS ENDED
| | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| | JUNE 30, 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | (unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected Per Share Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income from investment operations | | | 0.000 | (1) | | | 0.000 | (1) | | | 0.000 | (1) | | | 0.015 | | | | 0.030 | | | | 0.028 | | |
Less dividends from net investment income | | | (0.000 | )(1) | | | (0.000 | )(1) | | | (0.000 | )(1) | | | (0.015 | )(2) | | | (0.030 | ) | | | (0.028 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | | | $1.00 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return | | | 0.00 | %(6)(7) | | | 0.01 | % | | | 0.01 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 3.05 | % | | | 2.80 | | % |
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses(3) | | | 0.17 | %(8) | | | 0.27 | % | | | 0.33 | %(4)(5) | | | 0.61 | %(4)(5) | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.61 | | % |
Net investment income(3) | | | 0.01 | %(8) | | | 0.01 | % | | | 0.02 | %(4)(5) | | | 1.48 | %(4)(5) | | | 2.99 | % | | | 2.77 | | % |
Rebate from Morgan Stanley affiliate | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.00 | %(6) | | | 0.00 | %(6) | | | — | | | | — | | |
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period, in thousands | | | $597,324 | | | | $84,505 | | | | $106,290 | | | | $168,991 | | | | $196,411 | | | | $199,525 | | |
| | |
(1) | | Amount is less than $0.001. |
(2) | | Includes capital gain distribution of less than $0.001. |
(3) | | If the Fund had borne all of its expenses that were reimbursed or waived by the Distributor, Investment Adviser, and Administrator, the annualized expense and net investment income (loss) ratios, would have been as follows: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | EXPENSE
| | NET INVESTMENT
|
PERIOD ENDED | | RATIO | | INCOME (LOSS) RATIO |
June 30, 2011 | | | 0.67 | % | | | (0.49 | )% |
December 31,2010 | | | 0.81 | | | | (0.53 | ) |
December 31,2009 | | | 0.85 | | | | (0.50 | ) |
December 31,2008 | | | 0.73 | | | | 1.36 | |
December 31,2007 | | | 0.73 | | | | 2.87 | |
December 31,2006 | | | 0.73 | | | | 2.65 | |
| | |
(4) | | The ratios reflect the rebate of certain Fund expenses in connection with investments in a Morgan Stanley affiliate during the period. The effect of the rebate on the ratios is disclosed in the above table as “Rebate from Morgan Stanley affiliate.” |
(5) | | Reflects fees paid in connection with the U.S. Treasury’s Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds. This fee had an effect of 0.04% and 0.01% for the years ended 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
(6) | | Amount is less than 0.005%. |
(7) | | Not annualized. |
(8) | | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (unaudited)
On June 7, 2011, Deloitte & Touche LLP were dismissed as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Fund.
The reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP on the financial statements of the Fund for the past two fiscal years contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.
In connection with its audits for the two most recent fiscal years, there have been no disagreements with Deloitte & Touche LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte & Touche LLP, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the financial statements for such years.
On June 7, 2011, the Fund, with the approval of its Board of Trustees and its Audit Committee, engaged Ernst & Young LLP as its new Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
26
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
An Important Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy (unaudited)
We are required by federal law to provide you with a copy of our privacy policy (“Policy”) annually.
This Policy applies to current and former individual clients of Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc., as well as current and former individual investors in Morgan Stanley mutual funds and related companies.
This Policy is not applicable to partnerships, corporations, trusts or other non-individual clients or account holders, nor is this Policy applicable to individuals who are either beneficiaries of a trust for which we serve as trustee or participants in an employee benefit plan administered or advised by us. This Policy is, however, applicable to individuals who select us to be a custodian of securities or assets in individual retirement accounts, 401(k) accounts, 529 Educational Savings Accounts, accounts subject to the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, or similar accounts. We may amend this Policy at any time, and will inform you of any changes to this Policy as required by law.
We Respect Your Privacy
We appreciate that you have provided us with your personal financial information and understand your concerns about safeguarding such information. We strive to maintain the privacy of such information while we help you achieve your financial objectives. This Policy describes what nonpublic personal information we collect about you, how we collect it, when we may share it with others, and how others may use it. It discusses the steps you may take to limit our sharing of information about you with affiliated Morgan Stanley companies (“affiliated companies”). It also discloses how you may limit our affiliates’ use of shared information for marketing purposes. Throughout this Policy, we refer to the nonpublic information that personally identifies you or your accounts as “personal information.”
1. What Personal Information Do We Collect About You?
To better serve you and manage our business, it is important that we collect and maintain accurate information about you. We obtain this information from applications and other forms you submit to us, from your dealings with us, from consumer reporting agencies, from our websites and from third parties and other sources.
For example:
| |
• | We collect information such as your name, address, e-mail address, telephone/fax numbers, assets, income and investment objectives through application forms you submit to us. |
|
• | We may obtain information about account balances, your use of account(s) and the types of products and services you prefer to receive from us through your dealings and transactions with us and other sources. |
|
• | We may obtain information about your creditworthiness and credit history from consumer reporting agencies. |
27
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
An Important Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy (unaudited) continued
| |
• | We may collect background information from and through third-party vendors to verify representations you have made and to comply with various regulatory requirements. |
|
• | If you interact with us through our public and private Web sites, we may collect information that you provide directly through online communications (such as an e-mail address). We may also collect information about your Internet service provider, your domain name, your computer’s operating system and Web browser, your use of our Web sites and your product and service preferences, through the use of ”cookies.” ”Cookies” recognize your computer each time you return to one of our sites, and help to improve our sites’ content and personalize your experience on our sites by, for example, suggesting offerings that may interest you. Please consult the Terms of Use of these sites for more details on our use of cookies. |
2. When Do We Disclose Personal Information We Collect About You?
To provide you with the products and services you request, to better serve you, to manage our business and as otherwise required or permitted by law, we may disclose personal information we collect about you to other affiliated companies and to nonaffiliated third parties.
a. Information We Disclose to Our Affiliated Companies. In order to manage your account(s) effectively, including servicing and processing your transactions, to let you know about products and services offered by us and affiliated companies, to manage our business, and as otherwise required or permitted by law, we may disclose personal information about you to other affiliated companies. Offers for products and services from affiliated companies are developed under conditions designed to safeguard your personal information.
b. Information We Disclose to Third Parties. We do not disclose personal information that we collect about you to nonaffiliated third parties except to enable them to provide marketing services on our behalf, to perform joint marketing agreements with other financial institutions, and as otherwise required or permitted by law. For example, some instances where we may disclose information about you to third parties include: for servicing and processing transactions, to offer our own products and services, to protect against fraud, for institutional risk control, to respond to judicial process or to perform services on our behalf. When we share personal information with a nonaffiliated third party, they are required to limit their use of personal information about you to the particular purpose for which it was shared and they are not allowed to share personal information about you with others except to fulfill that limited purpose or as may be required by law.
3. How Do We Protect The Security and Confidentiality Of Personal Information We Collect About You?
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural security measures to help safeguard the personal information we collect about you. We have internal policies governing the proper handling of client information. Third parties that provide support or marketing services on our behalf may also receive personal
28
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
An Important Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy (unaudited) continued
information about you, and we require them to adhere to confidentiality standards with respect to such information.
| |
4. | How Can You Limit Our Sharing Of Certain Personal Information About You With Our Affiliated Companies For Eligibility Determination? |
We respect your privacy and offer you choices as to whether we share with our affiliated companies personal information that was collected to determine your eligibility for products and services such as credit reports and other information that you have provided to us or that we may obtain from third parties (“eligibility information”). Please note that, even if you direct us not to share certain eligibility information with our affiliated companies, we may still share your personal information, including eligibility information, with those companies under circumstances that are permitted under applicable law, such as to process transactions or to service your account. We may also share certain other types of personal information with affiliated companies — such as your name, address, telephone number, e-mail address and account number(s), and information about your transactions and experiences with us.
| |
5. | How Can You Limit the Use of Certain Personal Information About You by our Affiliated Companies for Marketing? |
You may limit our affiliated companies from using certain personal information about you that we may share with them for marketing their products or services to you. This information includes our transactions and other experiences with you such as your assets and account history. Please note that, even if you choose to limit our affiliated companies from using certain personal information about you that we may share with them for marketing their products and services to you, we may still share such personal information about you with them, including our transactions and experiences with you, for other purposes as permitted under applicable law.
6. How Can You Send Us an Opt-Out Instruction?
If you wish to limit our sharing of certain personal information about you with our affiliated companies for “eligibility purposes” and for our affiliated companies’ use in marketing products and services to you as described in this notice, you may do so by:
| |
• | Calling us at (800) 869-6397 |
Monday – Friday between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. (EST)
| |
• | Writing to us at the following address: |
Morgan Stanley Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center
201 Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
29
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
An Important Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy (unaudited) continued
If you choose to write to us, your written request should include: your name, address, telephone number and account number(s) to which the opt-out applies and should not be sent with any other correspondence. In order to process your request, we require that the request be provided by you directly and not through a third party. Once you have informed us about your privacy preferences, your opt-out preference will remain in effect with respect to this Policy (as it may be amended) until you notify us otherwise. If you are a joint account owner, we will accept instructions from any one of you and apply those instructions to the entire account. Please allow approximately 30 days from our receipt of your opt-out for your instructions to become effective.
Please understand that if you opt-out, you and any joint account holders may not receive certain Morgan Stanley or our affiliated companies’ products and services that could help you manage your financial resources and achieve your investment objectives.
If you have more than one account with us or our affiliates, you may receive multiple privacy policies from us, and would need to follow the directions stated in each particular policy for each account you have with us.
7. What if an affiliated company becomes a nonaffiliated third party?
If, at any time in the future, an affiliated company becomes a nonaffiliated third party, further disclosures of personal information made to the former affiliated company will be limited to those described in Section 2(b) above relating to nonaffiliated third parties. If you elected under Section 6 to limit disclosures we make to affiliated companies, or use of personal information by affiliated companies, your election will not apply to use by any former affiliated company of your personal information in their possession once it becomes a nonaffiliated third party.
Special Notice to Residents of Vermont
This section supplements our Policy with respect to our individual clients who have a Vermont address and supersedes anything to the contrary in the above Policy with respect to those clients only.
The State of Vermont requires financial institutions to obtain your consent prior to sharing personal information that they collect about you with affiliated companies and nonaffiliated third parties other than in certain limited circumstances. Except as permitted by law, we will not share personal information we collect about you with nonaffiliated third parties or other affiliated companies unless you provide us with your written consent to share such information (“opt-in”).
30
Morgan Stanley California Tax-Free Daily Income Trust
An Important Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy (unaudited) continued
If you wish to receive offers for investment products and services offered by or through other affiliated companies, please notify us in writing at the following address:
Morgan Stanley Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center
201 Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
Your authorization should include: your name, address, telephone number and account number(s) to which the opt-in applies and should not be sent with any other correspondence. In order to process your authorization, we require that the authorization be provided by you directly and not through a third-party.
Special Notice to Residents of California
The following section supplements our Policy with respect to our individual clients who have a California address and supersedes anything to the contrary in the above Policy with respect to those clients only.
In response to a California law, if your account has a California home address, your personal information will not be disclosed to nonaffiliated third parties except as permitted by applicable California law, and we will limit sharing such personal information with our affiliates to comply with California privacy laws that apply to us.
31
Trustees
Michael Bozic
Kathleen A. Dennis
James F. Higgins
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson
Joseph J. Kearns
Michael F. Klein
Michael E. Nugent
W. Allen Reed
Fergus Reid
Officers
Chairperson of the Board
Kevin Klingert
President and Principal Executive Officer
Mary Ann Picciotto
Chief Compliance Officer
Stefanie V. Chang Yu
Vice President
Francis J. Smith
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
Mary E. Mullin
Secretary
Transfer Agent
Morgan Stanley Services Company, Inc.P.O. Box 219886
Kansas City, Missouri 64121
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust CompanyOne Lincoln Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
Legal Counsel
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Counsel to the Independent Trustees
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Investment Adviser
Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.522 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10036
The financial statements included herein have been taken from the records of the Fund without examination by the independent auditors and accordingly they do not express an opinion thereon.
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. For more detailed information about the Fund, its fees and expenses and other pertinent information, please read its Prospectus. The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the Fund, including its trustees. It is available, without charge, by calling (800) 869-NEWS.
This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective Prospectus. Read the Prospectus carefully before investing.
Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc., member FINRA.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Morgan Stanley
California Tax-Free Daily
Income Trust
Semiannual
Report
June 30, 2011
DSCSAN
IU11-01640P-Y06/11
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 6.
(a) Refer to Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Applicable only to reports filed by closed-end funds.
Item 9. Closed-End Fund Repurchases
Applicable to reports filed by closed-end funds.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Fund’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Fund’s disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Fund in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, based upon such officers’ evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a) Code of Ethics — Not applicable for semiannual reports.
(b) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant are attached hereto as part of EX-99.CERT.
2
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Morgan Stanley California Tax Free Daily Income Trust
/s/ Kevin Klingert
Kevin Klingert
Principal Executive Officer
August 25, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Kevin Klingert
Kevin Klingert
Principal Executive Officer
August 25, 2011
/s/ Francis Smith
Francis Smith
Principal Financial Officer
August 25, 2011
3