The Agreements and the Notes have been duly executed on behalf of the Company.
The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of the Agreements, and the compliance by the Company with the terms of such Agreements and with the terms of the Indenture and the issue and delivery of the Notes by the Company, do not violate the Articles or any applicable law of Luxembourg relating to partnerships limited by shares generally.
No authorisations, approvals or consents of governmental, judicial and public bodies and authorities of or in Luxembourg are required under statute in connection with the entry into, delivery or performance by the Company of the Agreements, with the performance by the Company of its obligations under the Indenture and with the issue and delivery of the Notes by the Company.
4.6 | Application of governing law |
The choice of laws of the State of New York as the governing law of the Agreements, the Indenture and the Notes would be upheld as a valid choice of law by the courts of Luxembourg and applied by those courts in proceedings in relation to the Agreements, the Indenture and the Notes as the governing law thereof.
4.7 | Submission to jurisdiction |
The submission to the jurisdiction of New York state or federal court by the Company contained in the Agreements, the Indenture and the Notes constitutes an effective submission by the Company to the jurisdiction of such courts.
4.8 | Enforcement of judgments |
| (a) | A final and conclusive judgment in respect of the Agreements, the Indenture and the Notes obtained against the Company in a New York court would be recognised and enforced by the Luxembourg courts subject to the applicable enforcement procedure (as set out in the relevant provisions of the Luxembourg New Civil Procedure Code). |
Pursuant to Luxembourg case law, the enforcement of such judgment is subject to the following requirements:
| • | | the foreign judgment must be enforceable in the country of origin, |
| • | | the court of origin must have had jurisdiction both according to its own laws and to the Luxembourg conflict of jurisdictions rules, |
| • | | the foreign proceedings must have been regular in light of the laws of the country of origin, |
| • | | the rights of defence must not have been violated, |
| • | | the foreign court must have applied the law which is designated by the Luxembourg conflict of laws rules, or, at least, the judgment must not contravene the principles underlying these rules, |