Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Policy) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis Of Presentation | ' |
Basis of Presentation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HomeFed Corporation (the “Company”), Otay Land Company, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Otay Land Company”), HomeFed Resources Corporation, CDS Holding Corporation and its majority owned subsidiaries (“CDS”), HomeFed Fanita Rancho, LLC (“Fanita Ranch”), Rampage Vineyard, LLC (“Rampage”) and Ashville Park, LLC (“Ashville Park”). The Company is currently engaged, directly and through its subsidiaries, in the investment in and development of residential real estate properties in California and Virginia. Real estate development is the Company’s only business segment. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
The Company’s business, real estate development, is highly competitive, and there are numerous residential real estate developers and development projects operating in the same geographic area in which the Company operates. In addition, the residential real estate development industry is subject to increasing environmental, building, zoning and real estate regulations that are imposed by various federal, state and local authorities. Timing of the initiation and completion of development projects depends upon receipt of necessary authorizations and approvals. Furthermore, changes in prevailing local circumstances or applicable laws may require additional approvals, or modifications of approvals previously obtained. Delays could adversely affect the Company’s ability to complete its projects, significantly increase the costs of doing so or drive potential customers to purchase competitors’ products. Environmental laws may cause the Company to incur substantial compliance, mitigation and other costs, may restrict or prohibit development in certain areas and may delay completion of the Company’s development projects. Delays arising from compliance with environmental laws and regulations could adversely affect the Company’s ability to complete its projects and significantly increase development costs. The Company’s business may also be adversely affected by inflation and is interest-rate sensitive. |
|
Critical Accounting Estimates | ' |
Critical Accounting Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates all of these estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Profit Recognition On Sales Of Real Estate | ' |
Profit Recognition on Sales of Real Estate – When the Company has an obligation to complete improvements on property subsequent to the date of sale, it utilizes the percentage of completion method of accounting to record revenues and cost of sales. Under percentage of completion accounting, the Company recognizes revenues and cost of sales based upon the ratio of development costs completed as of the date of sale to an estimate of total development costs which will ultimately be incurred, including an estimate for common areas. Revenues which cannot be recognized as of the date of sale are reported as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets. |
The Company believes it can reasonably estimate its future costs and profit allocation in order to determine how much revenue should be deferred. However, such estimates are based on numerous assumptions and require management’s judgment. For example, the estimate of future development costs includes an assumption about the cost of construction services for which the Company has no current contractual arrangement. If the estimate of these future costs proves to be too low, then the Company will have recognized too much profit as of the date of sale resulting in less profit to be reported as the improvements are completed. However, to date the Company’s estimates of future development costs that have been used to determine the amount of revenue to be deferred at the date of sale have subsequently been proven to be reasonably accurate. |
|
|
|
Prior to 2010, the percentage of completion method of accounting was applied for sold properties at the San Elijo Hills project; however, during the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company completed all the required improvements for sold properties at the San Elijo Hills project and all of the remaining deferred revenue was recognized in income. During 2011 and 2010, since all required improvements to sold properties had been completed as of the closing date, the Company applied the full accrual method for those sales. Accordingly, the Company recognized total sales proceeds, net of closing costs, in revenues and all costs in cost of sales on the closing date. Commencing in 2012, revenue is again being deferred until the Company completes required improvements to properties sold. |
|
Income Taxes | ' |
Income Taxes – The Company provides for income taxes using the liability method. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax asset to an amount that the Company expects is more likely than not to be realized. If the Company’s estimate of the realizability of its deferred tax asset changes in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be recorded which would either increase or decrease income tax expense in such period. The valuation allowance is determined after considering all relevant facts and circumstances, and is based, in significant part, on the Company’s projection of taxable income in the future. Since any projection of future profitability is inherently unreliable, changes in the valuation allowance should be expected. |
During 2013, the Company generated profits from lot sales at the San Elijo Hills and Ashville Park projects that were greater than projected as of December 31, 2012. Also, the Company has entered into agreements to sell additional lots at both projects which are expected to close during 2014. The Company considered its recent results and pending lot sale agreements to be positive evidence to be considered when estimating its future taxable income. As a result, the Company was able to conclude that it is more likely than not that it will be able to realize an additional portion of the Company’s net deferred tax asset; accordingly, approximately $1,350,000 of the deferred tax valuation allowance was released as a credit to income tax expense during 2013. |
|
During 2012 the Company acquired the Ashville Park project, profitably sold finished lots during 2012 and entered into an agreement to sell additional lots in 2013, some of which closed during the first quarter of 2013. The Company believed that these sales represented positive evidence to be considered when estimating future taxable income that may be generated at the Ashville Park project. The Company also lowered its estimated liability for environmental remediation costs during 2012, and updated its consolidated projection of future taxable income for this activity and for recent developments at its other projects. As a result, the Company was able to conclude that it is more likely than not that it will be able to realize an additional portion of the Company’s net deferred tax asset; accordingly, approximately $750,000 of the deferred tax valuation allowance was released as a credit to income tax expense during 2012. |
The projection of future taxable income is based upon numerous assumptions about the future, including future market conditions where the Company’s projects are located, regulatory requirements, estimates of future real estate revenues and development costs, future interest expense, operating and overhead costs and other factors. To the extent the Company’s actual taxable income in the future exceeds its estimate, the Company will recognize additional tax benefits and reduce its valuation allowance; conversely, if the actual taxable income is less than the amounts projected, an addition to the valuation allowance would be recorded that would increase tax expense in the future. Adjustments to the valuation allowance in the future should be expected. |
The Company records interest and penalties, if any, with respect to uncertain tax positions as components of income tax expense. Based on the Company’s evaluation of its tax filings at December 31, 2013, the Company did not record any amounts for uncertain tax positions. If any of the Company’s tax filing positions are successfully challenged, payments could be required that might be material. |
|
Provision For Environmental Remediation | ' |
Provision for Environmental Remediation – The Company records environmental liabilities when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount or range of the liability is reasonably estimable. During 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $11,150,000 representing its estimate of the cost (including legal fees) to implement the most likely remediation alternative with respect to approximately 30 acres of undeveloped land owned by a subsidiary of Otay Land Company. The estimated liability was neither discounted nor reduced for claims for recovery from previous owners and users of the land who may be liable, and may increase or decrease based upon the actual extent and nature of the remediation required, the actual cost of the remediation, the expenses of the regulatory process, the costs of post-remediation monitoring requirements, inflation and other items. |
|
The Company has periodically examined, and when appropriate, adjusted its liability for environmental remediation to reflect its current best estimate. A change to the current estimate could result from, among other things, that the cost to implement the remediation is different than the Company’s current estimate, that the cost of future on-going monitoring efforts is different than the Company’s current estimate, and/or requirements imposed by regulatory authorities that the Company did not anticipate but is nevertheless required to implement. During 2004, the Company increased its estimate of remediation costs by approximately $1,300,000, primarily due to increases in site investigation and remediation costs, and during 2003 by approximately $250,000, primarily for consulting costs. During 2012, the Company’s revised its estimate of future remediation costs, including on-going monitoring expenses, which resulted in a reduction in the previously accrued estimate of $1,500,000. Such amount was reflected on the consolidated statement of operations as a reduction to expenses. |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2012, upon receipt of required approvals, the Company commenced remediation activities, which were completed in February 2013. The Company received final approval from the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health in June 2013; as a result, the Company reduced its liability for environmental remediation by $650,000. |
|
Provision For Impairment Losses On Real Estate | ' |
Provision for Impairment Losses on Real Estate – The Company’s real estate is carried at cost. Whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the carrying amount of its real estate in accordance with GAAP and, if impaired, reduces the carrying amount to its estimated fair value. The process involved in evaluating assets for impairment and determining fair value requires estimates as to future events and market conditions. This estimation process may assume that the Company has the ability to complete development and dispose of its real estate properties in the ordinary course of business based on management’s present plans and intentions. If management determines that the carrying value of a specific real estate investment is impaired, a write-down is recorded as a charge to current period operations. The evaluation process is based on estimates and assumptions and the ultimate outcome may be different. |
The Company did not record any provisions for impairment losses during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. |
|
Real Estate | ' |
Real Estate – Real estate includes all expenditures incurred in connection with the acquisition, development and construction of the property, including interest and property taxes. At acquisition, land costs are allocated to individual parcels or lots based on relative fair values. Subsequent to acquisition, substantially all development costs are specifically identifiable to individual parcels or lots, or are considered allocated costs that are allocated principally based on acreage (principally property taxes, legal fees and consulting fees). Capitalized land costs are charged to cost of sales at the time that revenue is recognized. |
|
Cash And Cash Equivalents | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash equivalents are money market accounts and short‑term, highly liquid investments that have maturities of less than three months at the time of acquisition. |
|
Investments | ' |
Investments – Securities with maturities equal to or greater than three months at the time of acquisition are classified as investments available for sale, and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of taxes. The cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. |
|
Recognition Of Fee Income | ' |
Recognition of Fee Income – The Company may be contractually entitled to receive co-op marketing and advertising fees that are due when builders sell homes. These fees are generally based upon a fixed percentage of the homes’ selling price and are recorded as revenue when the home is sold. |
|
Revenue And Profit Sharing Arrangements | ' |
Revenue and Profit Sharing Arrangements – Certain of the Company’s lot purchase agreements with homebuilders include provisions that entitle the Company to a share of the revenues or profits realized by the homebuilders upon their sale of the homes, after certain thresholds are achieved. The actual amount which could be received by the Company is generally based on a formula and other specified criteria contained in the lot purchase agreements, and are generally not payable and cannot be determined with reasonable certainty until the builder has completed the sale of a substantial portion of the homes covered by the lot purchase agreement. The Company’s policy is to accrue revenue earned pursuant to these agreements when amounts are fully earned and payable pursuant to the lot purchase agreements, which is classified as sales of real estate. Any amounts received from homebuilders prior to then are deferred. |
|
The Company has not recognized any income from revenue or profit sharing arrangements during the last three years. |
|
Option Deposits | ' |
Option Deposits – Option payments received from prospective buyers are recognized as liabilities until the title of the real estate is transferred or the option is forfeited, or in the case of refundable deposits, the prospective buyer decides not to purchase the real estate and the deposit is returned. |
|
Capitalization Of Interest And Real Estate Taxes | ' |
Capitalization of Interest and Real Estate Taxes – If applicable, interest and real estate taxes attributable to land and property construction are capitalized and added to the cost of those properties while the properties are being actively developed. |
|
Farming Revenues And Expenses | ' |
Farming Revenues and Expenses – Income from farming related activities at the Rampage property are recognized when grapes are sold, and expenses from farming related activities are recognized when incurred. |
|
Share-Based Compensation | ' |
Share-Based Compensation – The cost of all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and warrants, are recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The cost is recognized as an expense over the vesting period of the award. The fair value of each award is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. |
|