Commonwealth Bankshares (CWBS) 10-Q 2009 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

or

¨ Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number: 000-17377

COMMONWEALTH BANKSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

VIRGINIA	54-1460991
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

403 Boush Street Norfolk, Virginia	23510
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(757) 446-6900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨ Accelerated Filer  x Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨ Smaller Reporting Company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $2.066 Par Value – 6,886,973 shares as of July 29, 2009

Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.

Table of Contents

	Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
June 30, 2009
December 31, 2008
Consolidated Statements of Income	4
Three months ended June 30, 2009
Three months ended June 30, 2008
Six months ended June 30, 2009
Six months ended June 30, 2008
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	5
Six months ended June 30, 2009
Six months ended June 30, 2008
Consolidated Statements of Equity	6
Six months ended June 30, 2009
Year ended December 31, 2008
Year ended December 31, 2007
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7
Six months ended June 30, 2009
Six months ended June 30, 2008
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8 - 14
ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	15 - 24
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	24
ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	24 - 25
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	25
ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS	25
ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	25
ITEM 3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	25
ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	25 - 26
ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION	26
ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS	26
SIGNATURES	27

2

Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	June 30, 2009 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2008 (Audited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	9,068,429		$	10,921,888
Interest bearing deposits in banks		200,627			200,384
Federal funds sold		405,528			550,095
Total cash and cash equivalents		9,674,584			11,672,367
Investment securities:
Available for sale, at fair market value		5,156,107			6,861,311
Held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair market value was $177,119 and $189,836, respectively)		177,151			191,232
Total investment securities		5,333,258			7,052,543
Equity securities, restricted, at cost		9,388,250			10,959,050
Loans		1,056,469,717			1,023,067,597
Allowance for loan losses		(22,259,757	)		(31,120,376	)
Loans, net		1,034,209,960			991,947,221
Premises and equipment, net		36,066,088			36,555,117
Other real estate owned		13,572,902			4,314,290
Deferred tax assets		11,244,580			12,402,798
Accrued interest receivable		4,964,059			5,698,425
Other assets		10,574,273			4,692,346
Total assets	$	1,135,027,954		$	1,085,294,157
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	47,131,641		$	47,258,681
Interest-bearing		833,266,816			715,747,724
Total deposits		880,398,457			763,006,405
Short-term borrowings		67,603,503			129,095,503
Long-term debt		50,000,000			55,295,936
Trust preferred capital notes		20,619,000			20,619,000
Accrued interest payable		2,126,030			2,202,431
Other liabilities		6,864,411			8,297,066
Total liabilities		1,027,611,401			978,516,341
Equity:
Common stock, par value $2.066, 18,150,000 shares authorized; 6,886,975 and 6,851,417 shares issued and outstanding in 2009 and 2008, respectively		14,228,489			14,155,028
Additional paid-in capital		63,836,147			63,757,066
Retained earnings		28,901,040			28,421,313
Accumulated other comprehensive income		18,710			38,839
Total stockholders’ equity		106,984,386			106,372,246
Noncontrolling interests		432,167			405,570
Total equity		107,416,553			106,777,816
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,135,027,954		$	1,085,294,157

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008			June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
Interest and dividend income:
Loans, including fees	$	16,720,550	$	15,323,415		$	33,086,164	$	30,470,620
Investment securities:
Taxable		61,048		87,104			125,716		175,484
Tax exempt		7,908		11,434			16,763		22,807
Dividend income, equity securities, restricted		23,476		132,385			50,867		266,862
Other interest income		1,073		3,797			2,534		9,900
Total interest and dividend income		16,814,055		15,558,135			33,282,044		30,945,673
Interest expense:
Deposits		6,325,072		5,821,727			12,601,411		11,612,782
Short-term borrowings		158,818		442,999			361,719		1,092,887
Long-term debt		483,701		534,783			963,679		1,070,137
Trust preferred capital notes		326,534		326,534			649,479		656,655
Total interest expense		7,294,125		7,126,043			14,576,288		14,432,461
Net interest income		9,519,930		8,432,092			18,705,756		16,513,212
Provision for loan losses		3,496,000		800,000			7,500,400		1,255,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,023,930		7,632,092			11,205,356		15,258,212
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		314,290		363,721			627,465		663,233
Other service charges and fees		238,222		218,391			457,793		404,528
Mortgage brokerage income		243,030		297,067			480,718		593,742
Title insurance income		186,795		210,055			328,399		442,711
Investment service income		45,511		74,881			60,928		185,472
Other		109,676		77,501			462,765		173,898
Total noninterest income		1,137,524		1,241,616			2,418,068		2,463,584
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		2,458,342		2,592,412			4,962,647		5,381,740
Net occupancy expense		996,367		841,824			2,002,306		1,656,894
Furniture and equipment expense		516,270		449,067			1,008,356		870,689
Other operating expense		2,278,718		1,321,568			3,843,158		2,544,336
Total noninterest expense		6,249,697		5,204,871			11,816,467		10,453,659
Income before provision for income taxes		911,757		3,668,837			1,806,957		7,268,137
Provision for income taxes		317,115		1,272,308			614,923		2,519,295
Net income		594,642		2,396,529			1,192,034		4,748,842
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		10,505		(5,995	)		26,597		(9,815	)
Net income attributable to the Company	$	584,137	$	2,402,524		$	1,165,437	$	4,758,657
Basic earnings per share attributable to the Company's common stockholders	$	0.09	$	0.35		$	0.17	$	0.69
Diluted earnings per share attributable to the Company's common stockholders	$	0.09	$	0.35		$	0.17	$	0.68
Dividends paid per common share	$	0.02	$	0.08		$	0.10	$	0.16
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		6,882,437		6,935,206			6,872,198		6,935,192
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		6,882,437		6,953,464			6,872,198		6,961,386

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

	Six months ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Net income	$	1,192,034		$	4,748,842
Other comprehensive income, net of income tax:
Net change in unrealized (loss) on securities available for sale		(20,129	)		(24,680	)
Comprehensive income		1,171,905			4,724,162
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		26,597			(9,815	)
Comprehensive income attributable to the Company	$	1,145,308		$	4,733,977

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Equity

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009, and Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

	Common Shares		Common Amount			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2007	6,844,975		$	14,141,719		$	63,965,840		$	25,123,140		$	(5,320	)	$	61,208		$	103,286,587
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—			—			—			11,166,911			—			11,817			11,178,728
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax effect	—			—			—			—			27,400			—			27,400
Total comprehensive income																			11,206,128
Issuance of common stock	86,012			177,699			1,048,005			—			—			—			1,225,704
Common stock repurchased	(15,400	)		(31,816	)		(293,375	)		—			—			—			(325,191	)
Stock based compensation expense-options issued	—			—			22,050			—			—			—			22,050
																—
Cash dividends - $0.28 per share	—			—			—			(1,928,079	)		—			—			(1,928,079	)
Cash dividends - Noncontrolling interests	—			—			—			—			—			(14,048	)		(14,048	)
Balance, December 31, 2007	6,915,587			14,287,602			64,742,520			34,361,972			22,080			58,977			113,473,151
Comprehensive (loss):
Net loss	—			—			—			(3,739,069	)		—			(34,695	)		(3,773,764	)
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax effect	—			—			—			—			16,759			—			16,759
Total comprehensive (loss)																			(3,757,005	)
Issuance of common stock	77,156			159,406			782,792			—			—			—			942,198
Common stock repurchased	(141,326	)		(291,980	)		(1,768,246	)		—			—			—			(2,060,226	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holder	—			—			—			—			—			390,000			390,000
Cash dividends - $0.32 per share	—			—			—			(2,201,590	)		—			—			(2,201,590	)
Cash dividends - Noncontrolling interests	—			—			—			—			—			(8,712	)		(8,712	)
Balance, December 31, 2008	6,851,417			14,155,028			63,757,066			28,421,313			38,839			405,570			106,777,816
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—			—			—			1,165,437			—			26,597			1,192,034
Change in unrealized (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax effect	—			—			—			—			(20,129	)		—			(20,129	)
Total comprehensive income																			1,171,905
Issuance of common stock	35,558			73,461			79,081			—			—			—			152,542
Cash dividends - $0.10 per share	—			—			—			(685,710	)		—			—			(685,710	)
Balance, June 30, 2009	6,886,975		$	14,228,489		$	63,836,147		$	28,901,040		$	18,710		$	432,167		$	107,416,553

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	Six months ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Operating activities:
Net income	$	1,192,034		$	4,748,842
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		7,500,400			1,255,000
Depreciation and amortization		1,271,661			980,847
Gain on the sale of premises and equipment		—			(3,720	)
Loss on other real estate owned		26,761			59,374
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments securities		2,051			(4,777	)
Gain on the sale of investment securities available for sale		(1,691	)		—
Deferred tax assets		1,168,588			(511,061	)
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable		734,366			161,774
Other assets		(5,881,927	)		(1,281,550	)
Accrued interest payable		(76,401	)		(200,705	)
Other liabilities		(1,432,655	)		(753,988	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,503,187			4,450,036
Investing activities:
Purchase of investment securities available for sale		—			(1,519,719	)
Purchase of equity securities, restricted		(885,900	)		(5,619,900	)
Net purchase of premises and equipment		(782,632	)		(8,324,298	)
Net change in loans		(62,112,959	)		(111,316,898	)
Improvements to other real estate owned		(143,316	)		—
Proceeds from:
Calls and maturities of investment securities held to maturity		13,872			12,563
Sales and maturities of investment securities available for sale		1,674,554			1,570,996
Sales of equity securities, restricted		2,456,700			5,090,000
Sale of premises and equipment		—			4,000
Sale of other real estate owned		3,207,763			896,965
Net cash used in investing activities		(56,571,918	)		(119,206,291	)
Financing activities:
Net change in:
Demand, interest-bearing demand and savings deposits		(6,517,733	)		7,693,599
Time deposits		50,007,785			10,952,441
Brokered time deposits		73,902,000			89,814,000
Short-term borrowings		(61,492,000	)		6,625,200
Long-term debt		(5,000,000	)		—
Principal payments on long-term debt		(295,936	)		(26,112	)
Dividends reinvested and sale of stock		152,542			479,337
Dividends paid to stockholders		(685,710	)		(1,109,892	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—			(5,885	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—			390,000
Common stock repurchased		—			(2,060,226	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		50,070,948			112,752,462
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,997,783	)		(2,003,793	)
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		11,672,367			9,337,398
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	9,674,584		$	7,333,605
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Interest paid during the period	$	14,552,689		$	14,633,166
Income taxes paid during the period	$	1,684,000		$	2,820,000
Supplemental noncash disclosure:
Transfer between loans and other real estate owned	$	12,349,820		$	2,195,585
Sale of other real estate owned financed by bank loans	$	2,291,213		$	910,000

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

June 30, 2009

Note A – Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc. (the “Parent”) and its subsidiaries, Commonwealth Bankshares Capital Trust II (the “Trust”), and Bank of the Commonwealth (the “Bank”) and its subsidiaries, BOC Title of Hampton Roads, Inc., T/A Executive Title Center, BOC Insurance Agencies of Hampton Roads, Inc., Community Home Mortgage of Virginia, Inc., T/A Bank of the Commonwealth Mortgage, Commonwealth Financial Advisors, LLC, Commonwealth Property Associates, LLC and WOV Properties, LLC, are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and conform to accepted practices within the banking industry. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent, the Bank and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “the Company.” All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In addition, the Parent owns the Trust which is an unconsolidated subsidiary. The subordinated debt owed to this Trust is reported as a liability of the Parent.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through August 10, 2009, the date the consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were issued.

On November 27, 2006, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 16,500,000 to 18,150,000 shares, to reduce the par value of each share from $2.273 to $2.066 per share, and effect an eleven-for-ten stock split distributed on December 29, 2006 to stockholders of record on December 18, 2006.

On May 16, 2006, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 15,000,000 to 16,500,000 shares, to reduce the par value of each share from $2.50 to $2.273 per share, and effect an eleven-for-ten stock split distributed on June 30, 2006 to stockholders of record on June 19, 2006.

All share and per share amounts included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes have been restated for all periods presented to reflect the stock splits.

Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation.

8

Note B – Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common and potential dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding, determined as follows:

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
Net income attributable to the Company	$	584,137	$	2,402,524	$	1,165,437	$	4,758,657
Weighted average shares outstanding		6,882,437		6,935,206		6,872,198		6,935,192
Basic earnings per common share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders	$	0.09	$	0.35	$	0.17	$	0.69
Effect of dilutive securities on EPS:
Weighted average shares outstanding		6,882,437		6,935,206		6,872,198		6,935,192
Effect of stock options		—		18,258		—		26,194
Diluted average shares outstanding		6,882,437		6,953,464		6,872,198		6,961,386
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders	$	0.09	$	0.35	$	0.17	$	0.68

Options to acquire 463,732 and 420,474 shares of common stock were not included in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because their effects were anti-dilutive. Options to acquire 463,732 and 296,570 shares of common stock were not included in computing diluted earnings per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because their effects were anti-dilutive.

Note C – Investment Securities

The amortized costs and fair values of investment securities are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2009
Available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	4,000,384	$	19,620	$	—		$	4,020,004
Mortgage-backed securities		482,957		5,945		(2,054	)		486,848
State and municipal securities		644,418		4,837		—			649,255
	$	5,127,759	$	30,402	$	(2,054	)	$	5,156,107
Held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	177,151	$	301	$	(333	)	$	177,119
	$	177,151	$	301	$	(333	)	$	177,119
December 31, 2008
Available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency securities	$	5,500,548	$	60,867	$	—		$	5,561,415
Mortgage-backed securities		527,570		2,883		(9,506	)		520,947
State and municipal securities		774,346		4,603		—			778,949
	$	6,802,464	$	68,353	$	(9,506	)	$	6,861,311
Held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	191,232	$	—	$	(1,396	)	$	189,836
	$	191,232	$	—	$	(1,396	)	$	189,836

9

Note D—Loans

Major classifications of loans are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Construction and development	$	257,268,344		$	294,648,864
Commercial		75,361,832			79,465,321
Commercial mortgage		545,935,774			470,268,305
Residential mortgage		167,716,185			168,056,143
Installment loans to individuals		12,237,063			12,664,740
Other		451,464			627,172
Gross loans		1,058,970,662			1,025,730,545
Unearned income		(2,500,945	)		(2,662,948	)
Allowance for loan losses		(22,259,757	)		(31,120,376	)
Loans, net	$	1,034,209,960		$	991,947,221

Non-performing assets are as follows:

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Non-accrual loans:
Construction and development	$	38,979,681		$	32,369,133
Commercial		2,436,361			1,796,896
Commercial mortgage		5,405,552			3,192,328
Residential mortgage		10,771,220			6,941,885
Installment loans to individuals		183,627			175,670
		57,776,441			44,475,912
Loans contractually past-due 90 days or more:
Construction and development		2,158,480			1,055,561
Commercial		24,477			367,719
Commercial mortgage		869,144			1,464,837
Residential mortgage		1,088,415			258,406
Installment loans to individuals		—			17,446
Other		736			2,968
		4,141,252			3,166,937
Total non-performing loans		61,917,693			47,642,849
Other real estate owned		13,572,902			4,314,290
Total non-performing assets	$	75,490,595		$	51,957,139
Allowance as a percentage of non-performing assets		29.49	%		59.90	%
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		6.65	%		4.79	%

Note E – Allowance for Loan Losses

A summary of transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Balance at beginning of year	$	31,120,376		$	9,423,647
Provision charged to operating expense		7,500,400			1,255,000
Loans charged-off		(16,385,543	)		(496,536	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off		24,524			2,927
Balance at end of period	$	22,259,757		$	10,185,038

10

Note F – Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Land	$	1,753,908		$	1,753,908
Building and improvements		6,435,350			3,443,002
Leasehold improvements		22,932,668			22,712,139
Furniture and equipment		17,107,888			16,527,393
Construction in progress		450,870			3,461,610
		48,680,684			47,898,052
Less accumulated depreciation		(12,614,596	)		(11,342,935	)
	$	36,066,088		$	36,555,117

Note G – Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and financial liabilities. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position (FSP) No. SFAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, the Company delayed application of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, until January 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company in the first six months of 2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The application of SFAS 157 in situations where the market for a financial asset is not active was clarified by the issuance of FSP No. SFAS 157-3,Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, in October 2008. FSP No. SFAS 157-3 became effective immediately and did not significantly impact the methods by which the Company determines the fair values of its financial assets.

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

SFAS 157 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

• Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

11

• Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

• Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value effective January 1, 2008 and to all of the Company’s non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities carried at fair value effective January 1, 2009. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial and non-financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Furthermore, the reported fair value amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following:

Available for Sale Securities. Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow. Level 2 securities would include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset backed and other securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at June 30, 2009
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at June 30, 2009
	(in thousands)
Assets
Available for sale securities	$	—	$	5,156	$	—	$	5,156

Certain financial and non-financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

12

Financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include the following:

Impaired Loans. A loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The measurement of impaired loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the historical effective interest rate, the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. All collateral-dependent loans are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral securing the loan. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data. This valuation would be considered Level 3. An allowance is allocated to an impaired loan if the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. Impaired loans had a carrying amount of $118.9 million, with a valuation allowance of $13.3 million at June 30, 2009.

Other Real Estate Owned.Real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure is held for sale and is stated at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value of the property, less estimated disposal costs, if any. The Company estimates fair value at the asset’s liquidation value less disposal costs using management’s assumptions which are based on current market trends and historical loss severities for similar assets. Any excess of cost over the estimated fair market value at the time of acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. The estimated fair market value is reviewed periodically by management and any write-downs are charged against current earnings in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Other real estate owned had a carrying amount of $13.6 million at June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded no losses due to valuation adjustments on other real estate owned property in its consolidated statements of income.

The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2009, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis at June 30, 2009
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at June 30, 2009
	(in thousands)
Assets
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	105,596	$	105,596
Other real estate owned	$	—	$	—	$	13,573	$	13,573

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include the following:

Goodwill.Goodwill requires an impairment review at least annually and more frequently if certain impairment indicators are evident. Goodwill had a carrying amount of $249.5 thousand at June 30, 2009. Based on the annual testing for impairment of goodwill, there have been no impairment charges to date.

SFAS 107,Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,as amended, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below:

Cash and Cash Equivalents.The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values.

13

Equity Securities.The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Investment Securities. Fair values are based on published market prices or dealer quotes. Available-for-sale securities are carried at their aggregate fair value.

Loans, Net.For loans receivable with short-term and/or variable characteristics, the total receivables outstanding approximate fair value. The fair value of other loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the build up approach to discount rate construction. Components of the discount rate include a risk free rate, credit quality component and a service charge component.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable.The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Deposits.The fair value of noninterest bearing deposits and deposits with no defined maturity, by SFAS No. 107 definition, is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of time deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the build up approach to discount rate construction. Components of the discount rate include a risk free rate, credit quality component and a service charge component.

Short-Term Borrowings.The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values.

Long-Term Debt.The fair values of the Company’s long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Loan Commitments, Standby and Commercial Letters of Credit.Fair values for off-balance sheet lending commitments approximate the contract or notional value taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the counterparties’ credit standings. The fair values of these items are not significant and are not included in the following table.

The estimated fair value and the carrying value of the Company’s recorded financial instruments are as follows:

	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,675	$	9,675	$	11,672	$	11,672
Investment securities		5,333		5,333		7,053		7,051
Equity securities		9,388		9,388		10,959		10,959
Loans, net		1,034,210		1,077,337		991,947		1,042,324
Accrued interest receivable		4,964		4,964		5,698		5,698
Deposits		880,398		901,416		763,006		788,103
Short-term borrowings		67,604		67,604		129,096		129,096
Long-term debt		50,000		54,457		55,296		61,841
Accrued interest payable		2,126		2,126		2,202		2,202

Note H – Subsequent Events

The Company has no events to report subsequent to June 30, 2009.

14

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

The sole business of Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc. is to serve as a holding company for Bank of the Commonwealth. The Company was incorporated as a Virginia Company on June 6, 1988, and on November 7, 1988 it acquired the Bank.

Bank of the Commonwealth was formed on August 28, 1970 under the laws of Virginia. Since the Bank opened for business on April 14, 1971, its main banking and administrative offices have been located in Norfolk, Virginia. The Bank currently operates four branches in Norfolk, six branches in Virginia Beach, four branches in Chesapeake, two branches in Portsmouth, one branch in Suffolk, and four branches in North Carolina, located in Powells Point, Waves, Moyock and Kitty Hawk. Bank of the Commonwealth Mortgage currently operates one mortgage branch office in Virginia Beach, one mortgage branch office in Gloucester and one mortgage branch office in Richmond, Virginia. Executive Title Center currently operates one title insurance branch office in Norfolk and one title insurance branch office in Suffolk, Virginia. Commonwealth Financial Advisors currently has two locations, one in Virginia Beach and one in Norfolk, Virginia.

The Company concentrates its marketing efforts in the cities of Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Portsmouth, Chesapeake and Suffolk, Virginia and Northeastern North Carolina. The Company intends to continue concentrating its banking activities in its current markets, which the Company believes are attractive areas in which to operate.

The following discussion provides information about the important factors affecting the consolidated results of operations, financial condition, capital resources and liquidity of the Company. This report identifies trends and material changes that occurred during the reporting period and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the matters discussed below and elsewhere in this report include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding profitability, liquidity, adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk and financial and other goals. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends” or other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. The forward-looking statements we use in this report are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including among other things, the following important factors that could affect the actual outcome of future events:

• Our dependence on key personnel;

• The high level of competition within the banking industry;

• Our dependence on commercial real estate loans that could be negatively affected by a further downturn in the real estate market;

• Continued unfavorable economic conditions in the overall national economy as well as in our specific market areas within Hampton Roads, Virginia and Northeastern North Carolina;

• Risks inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values;

• The adequacy of our estimate for known and inherent losses in our loan portfolio;

• Changes in interest rates;

• Our ability to manage our growth;

• Our ability to assess and manage our asset quality;

• Our ability to maintain internal control over financial reporting;

• Our ability to raise capital as needed by our business;

• Our reliance on secondary sources, such as Federal Home Loan Bank advances, federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks and out-of-market time deposits, to meet our liquidity needs;

15

• Impacts of implementing various accounting standards;

• Governmental and regulatory changes that may adversely affect our expenses and cost structure; and

• Other factors described from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual results and performance may be materially different from results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

We caution you that the above list of important factors is not all inclusive. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this report, and we may not undertake steps to update these forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of any circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

Critical Accounting Policies

Certain critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s most critical accounting policy relates to the Company’s allowance for loan losses, which reflects the estimated losses resulting from the inability of the Company’s borrowers to make required loan payments. If the financial condition of the Company’s borrowers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, the Company’s estimates would be updated, and additional provisions for loan losses may be required. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, for further information related to the allowance for loan losses.

New Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no developments to recently issued accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, from those disclosed in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on form 10-K, except for the following:

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 replaces SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” and establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative guidance for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is superseded and deemed non-authoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for the Company’s financial statements for periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 amends FIN 46 (Revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” to change how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. SFAS 167 requires additional disclosures about the reporting entity’s involvement with variable-interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement as well as its affect on the entity’s financial statements. SFAS 167 will be effective January 1, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

16

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). SFAS 166 amends SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” to enhance reporting about transfers of financial assets, including securitizations, and where companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. SFAS 166 also requires additional disclosures about all continuing involvements with transferred financial assets including information about gains and losses resulting from transfers during the period. SFAS 166 will be effective January 1, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, it establishes that the Company must evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued, the circumstances under which a subsequent event should be recognized, and the circumstances for which a subsequent event should be disclosed. SFAS 165 requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events. SFAS 165 became effective for the Company’s financial statements for financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions that are Not Orderly” (“SFAS 157-4”). Under SFAS 157-4, if an entity determines that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or the liability in relation to the normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that the transaction for the asset or liability is not orderly, the entity shall place little, if any weight on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. SFAS 157-4 became effective for the Company’s financial statements for financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies”(“SFAS 141(R)-1”), to amend SFAS 141 (revised 2007) “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141(R)-1 addresses the initial recognition, measurement and subsequent accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination, and requires that such assets acquired or liabilities assumed be initially recognized at fair value at the acquisition date if fair value can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value cannot be determined, the asset acquired or liability assumed arising from a contingency is recognized only if certain criteria are met. FAS 141(R)-1 also requires that a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for the assets and liabilities be developed depending on their nature. SFAS 141(R)-1 shall be effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is during or after 2010. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, absent any material business combinations.

In April 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“SFAS 115-2/124-2”). SFAS 115-2/124-2 requires entities to separate an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security into two components when there are credit related losses associated with the impaired debt security for which management asserts that it does not have the intent to sell the security, and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. The amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to a credit loss is recognized in earnings, and the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment related to other factors is recorded in other comprehensive loss. SFAS 115-2/124-2 became effective for the Company’s financial statements for financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

17

In April 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 became effective for the Company’s financial statements for financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Stock Compensation Plans

The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payments,on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. Under this method, stock-based awards that are granted, modified, or settled after December 31, 2005, are measured and accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Also under this method, expense is recognized for unvested awards that were granted prior to January 1, 2006, based upon the fair value determined at the grant date under SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Share-based compensation expense is recorded in salary and employee benefits. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for its share-based compensation under the intrinsic value method as permitted by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations. Accordingly, the Company previously recognized no compensation expense for employee stock options that were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

Stock option compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Substantially, all employee stock options are awarded at the end of the year as part of an employees overall compensation, based on the individual’s performance during the year, and either vest immediately or over a nominal vesting period. There were no options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. There have been no significant changes in the assumptions for the Black-Scholes option-pricing model previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:

	Stock Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Remaining Contractual Life ( in months)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance at December 31, 2008	463,732	$	17.36
Granted	—		—
Forfeited	—		—
Exercised	—		—
Expired	—		—
Balance at June 30, 2009	463,732	$	17.36	66.96	$	(5,674,731	)
Balance exercisable at June 30, 2009	463,732	$	17.36	66.96	$	(5,674,731	)

See Note 19 - Stock Based Compensation Plans, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, for further information related to stock based compensation.

Financial Condition

Total assets at June 30, 2009 were $1.1 billion, up 4.6% or $49.7 million from December 31, 2008. Total loans, the Company’s largest and most profitable asset, ended the quarter at a record $1.0 billion, up $33.4 million or 3.3% from December 31, 2008. The continued loan growth was achieved not only by the high loan demand generated by the low interest rate environment, but also by the presence in new markets as a result of our branch expansion, and by the efforts of the Company’s loan officers to develop new loan relationships combined with the support of existing customers.

18

As of June 30, 2009, 83.0% of the Company’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial loans, which are considered to provide higher yields, but also generally carry a greater risk. It should be noted that 62.1% of these commercial loans are collateralized with real estate, and accordingly do not represent an unfavorable risk. At June 30, 2009, 67.4% of the Bank’s total loan portfolio consisted of loans collateralized with real estate.

Deposits are the most significant source of the Company’s funds for use in lending and general business purposes. The Company’s strong growth in deposits continued into the second quarter of 2009 with deposits at June 30, 2009 reaching a record $880.4 million, an increase of $117.4 million from December 31, 2008. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits decreased by $127.0 thousand or 0.3% and interest-bearing deposits increased by $117.5 million or 16.4%. Time deposits, excluding broker certificates of deposit, increased $50.0 million during the first six months of 2009, with interest-bearing demand and savings accounts decreasing $7.2 million and increasing $832.8 thousand, respectively. Included in time deposits less than $100,000 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are $436.6 million and $362.7 million, respectively in broker certificates of deposits. The interest rates paid on these deposits are consistent, if not lower, than the market rates offered in our local area. Also included in time deposits less than $100,000 are $1.0 million and $4.7 million in CDARS (Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service) deposits at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Management believes the overall growth in deposits is a result of the Company’s competitive interest rates on all deposit products, new branch locations, special promotions and product enhancements, as well as the Company’s continued marketing efforts. The Company’s core deposit base is predominantly provided by individuals and businesses located within communities served.

As of June 30, 2009, short-term borrowings (advances from FHLB and FRB) were $67.6 million, compared to $129.1 million outstanding on December 31, 2008. The decrease in short-term borrowings was due to the $117.4 million or 15.4% increase in deposits for the first six months of 2009. With our deposit growth continuing to outpace our loan growth for the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company was able to pay down our advances with the FHLB and thus reduce our reliance on borrowings from secondary sources.

Results of Operation

During the first six months of 2009, the Company reported earnings of $1.2 million, a decrease of 75.5% over the $4.8 million reported in the first six months of 2008. Due to the prolonged economic downturn and continued economic uncertainties management elected to provide an additional $7.5 million to its allowance for loan losses during the first six months of 2009. This is an increase of $6.2 million over the comparable period in 2008. On a per share basis, diluted earnings decreased 75.0% to $0.17 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $0.68 for the same period in 2008. Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 totaled $584.1 thousand, a decrease of 75.7% or $1.8 million over the amount reported in the second quarter of 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, management elected to provide $3.5 million to its allowance for loan losses. This is an increase of $2.7 million over the same period in 2008. Diluted earnings per share equaled $0.09 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to earnings of $0.35 for the same period in 2008.

Profitability as measured by the Company’s return on average assets (ROA) was 0.21% and 1.08% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. ROA was impacted by the decrease in net income of 75.5% and by the increase in average assets of $220.0 million or 24.7% from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. The return on average equity (ROE) was 2.20% and 8.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in ROE is the result of the decrease in net income and the decline in year-to-date average equity of $8.1 million or 7.0% from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. The decrease in year-to-date average equity is the result of our net loss of $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the $2.1 million in common stock repurchased during the same period. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, ROA was 0.21% and ROE was 2.19%.

A fundamental source of the Company’s earnings, net interest income, is defined as the difference between income on earning assets and the cost of funds supporting those assets. Significant categories of earning assets are loans and securities, while deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt represent the major portion of interest-bearing liabilities. The level of net interest income is impacted primarily by variations in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in interest rates when compared to previous periods of

19

operations. Net interest income was $18.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $2.2 million or 13.3% over the $16.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, net interest income was $9.5 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 12.9% over the comparable period in 2008.

Total interest and dividend income was $33.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $2.3 million or 7.5% over the same period of 2008. Interest income on loans, including fees, increased $2.6 million or 8.6% to $33.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, total interest and dividend income was $16.8 million and interest income on loans, including fees, was $16.7 million, an increase of 8.1% and 9.1%, respectively over the comparable period in 2008.

Interest expense was $14.6 million and $14.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest expense for the second quarter of 2009 was $7.3 million, as compared to $7.1 million for the second quarter of 2008. The slight increase in interest expense can be attributed to the increase in the Company’s average interest bearing liabilities, which was offset by the decrease in the overall rate paid on these liabilities. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $225.3 million or 31.4% from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. This substantial increase was mostly due to the $199.6 million increase in total deposits as of June 30, 2009 as compared to 2008. The overall rate paid on our interest bearing liabilities decreased 92 basis points between June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, which is primarily due to the declining interest rate environment.

The net interest margin, calculated by expressing net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets, is an indicator of the Company’s effectiveness in generating income from earning assets. The net interest margin is affected by the structure of the balance sheet as well as by competition and the economy. The Company’s net interest margin (tax equivalent basis) was 3.53% during the first six months of 2009, as compared to 3.92% for the same period in 2008. The compression of our margins from prior year can be attributed to the Federal Reserve lowering the Federal Funds rate 175 basis points between October 2008 and December 2008, along with the continued pressure on deposit pricing and the pricing of some deposit products which lag the decrease in the prime rate, which has an immediate affect on variable loans. In addition, the competitiveness for deposits from the reduction in liquidity throughout the financial markets has kept rates at a high level relative to loan rates. Also contributing to the compression of our margins was the increase in the balance of non-accruing loans which further lowered interest income. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the net interest margin was 3.52% compared to 3.88% for the second quarter in 2008.

The provision for loan losses is the annual cost of maintaining an allowance for inherent credit losses. The amount of the provision each year and the level of the allowance are matters of judgment and are impacted by many factors, including actual credit losses during the period, the prospective view of credit losses, loan performance measures and trends (such as delinquencies and charge-offs), loan growth, the economic environment and other factors, both internal and external that may affect the quality and future loss experience of the credit portfolio. At June 30, 2009, the Company had total allowance for loan losses of $22.3 million or 2.11% of total loans. As a result of the growth in the loan portfolio as well as the continued economic uncertainties, the Company made provisions for loan losses of $7.5 million for the first six months of 2009, an increase of $6.2 million or 497.6% over the same period of 2008. Loan charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $16.4 million and recoveries for the same period totaled $24.5 thousand. Of the $16.4 million in loan charge-offs as of June 30, 2009, substantially all of the amount was comprised of relationships with specific reserve allocations previously established. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding was 1.56% and 0.06% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Non-performing assets were $75.5 million or 6.65% of total assets at June 30, 2009 compared to $12.2 million or 1.27% of total assets at June 30, 2008. Non-performing loans increased $14.3 million in the first six months of 2009 to $61.9 million. Non-performing loans at June 30, 2009 were comprised of one hundred twenty-four (124) loans, which is reflective of the impact of the weak housing market and slowing economy. $59.3 million or 95.7% of the total non-performing loans are comprised of ninety-seven (97) loans secured by real estate, of which $41.1 million are construction and development loans. The Company has developed a Loan Impairment Committee to monitor non-performing assets, past due loans, identify potential problem credits and develop

20

action plans to work through these loans as promptly as possible. As all non-performing loans are deemed impaired, the Committee has individually reviewed the underlying collateral value (less cost to sell) on each of these loans as a part of its analysis of impaired loans. As a result of this comprehensive analysis, an $8.5 million specific reserve for loan losses has been established for non-performing loans. Based on current collateral values, we believe our reserve is adequate to cover any short falls resulting from the sale of the underlying collateral. Based on current accounting and regulatory guidelines the Company has provided a reserve based on current market values for these impaired loans however, management plans to work with our customers to get through these unprecedented economic times and to minimize any potential credit exposure. Management has taken a proactive approach to monitoring these loans and will continue to actively manage these credits to minimize losses.

Other real estate owned (“OREO”) totaled $13.6 million and $4.3 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The balance at June 30, 2009 was comprised of twenty-six (26) properties of which twenty-two (22) were residential properties. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, new foreclosures included fourteen (14) properties totaling $8.6 million, of which $6.0 million represented eleven (11) residential properties. OREO sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted of ten (10) residential properties and one (1) commercial property and resulted in a net gain of $42.8 thousand. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, there was one (1) residential property under contract for sale. The remaining properties are being actively marketed and management does not anticipate any material losses associated with these properties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded no losses resulting from valuation adjustments on OREO properties. Asset quality remains a top priority for the Company. We continue to allocate significant resources to the expedient disposition of non-performing and other lower quality assets.

Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 equaled $2.4 million, a slight decrease of $45.5 thousand from the amount reported for the same period in 2008. Revenues generated from the Bank’s mortgage, title and investment subsidiaries for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $870.0 thousand as compared to $1.2 million for the same period in 2008. The $351.9 thousand or 28.8% decrease is a result of the continued weakness in the economy, specifically in the housing market. Offsetting the reduction in subsidiary revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was a 5.4% decrease and a 13.2% increase in service charges on deposit accounts and other service charges and fees, respectively. Included in service charges on deposit accounts for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $511.0 thousand and $549.9 thousand, respectively, in non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees. Included in other service charges and fees for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $226.3 thousand and $197.2 thousand, respectively in ATM fee income. The overall increase is the result of the expansion of our branch and ATM networks as well as the record increases in deposits and the corresponding number of deposit accounts. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, noninterest income was $1.1 million, down $104.1 thousand, or 8.4% from the comparable period in 2008. Revenues generated from the Bank’s mortgage, title and investment subsidiaries for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $475.3 thousand as compared to $582.0 thousand for the same period in 2008. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, there was a 13.6% decrease and a 9.1% increase in service charges on deposit accounts and other service charges and fees, respectively. Included in service charges on deposit accounts for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $252.1 thousand and $310.8 thousand, respectively, in non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees. Included in other service charges and fees for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $126.0 thousand and $107.3 thousand, respectively in ATM fee income.

Noninterest expense represents the overhead expenses of the Company. Costs associated with handling our substantial asset and liability growth, including the expansion of our branch network, resulted in increases to almost every component of noninterest expense. Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $11.8 million, an increase of $1.4 million over the $10.5 million recorded during the comparable period in 2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, noninterest expense was $6.2 million, an increase of $1.0 million over the $5.2 million recorded during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. The ratio of annualized noninterest expense to year-to-date average total assets was 2.15% and 2.36% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The ratio of annualized noninterest expense to quarter-to-date average total assets was 2.23% and 2.28% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

21

A key measure of overhead is the operating efficiency ratio. The operating efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by net bank revenue on a tax equivalent basis. Efficiency gains can be achieved by controlling costs and generating more diverse and higher levels of noninterest income along with increasing our margins. The Company’s efficiency ratio (tax equivalent basis) was 55.90% and 58.60% for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to 55.03% and 53.75% for the comparable period in 2008.

Salaries and employee benefits, the largest component of noninterest expense, decreased by $419.1 thousand or 7.8% to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the $5.4 million reported during the first six months of 2008. The decrease was primarily due to reduced accruals related to profit sharing and incentive expense and a reduction in volume-based commission expensed for the mortgage and investment services. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, salaries and employee benefits decreased $134.1 thousand to $2.5 million compared to $2.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Occupancy expense increased $345.4 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, occupancy expense increased $154.5 thousand or 18.4% over the $841.8 thousand reported in the second quarter of 2008. This increase relates to the addition of four new branch locations in 2008, three of which opened subsequent to June 30, 2008. Other noninterest operating expenses, which includes a grouping of numerous transactions relating to normal banking operations, increased $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a 51.0% increase over the comparable period for 2008. The increase was comprised of increases of $98.2 thousand, $635.7 thousand and $595.3 thousand in bank franchise taxes, FDIC insurance and expenses related to OREO properties, respectively, which were offset by a $147.2 thousand reduction in advertising and marketing expense. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, other noninterest operating expenses increased $957.2 thousand or 72.4% over the $1.3 million reported in the second quarter of 2008. The increase was comprised of increases of $30.5 thousand, $567.3 thousand and $329.2 thousand in bank franchise taxes, FDIC insurance and expenses related to OREO properties, respectively, which was offset by a reduction of $70.9 thousand in advertising and marketing expense. During the second quarter of 2009, the FDIC increased deposit insurance costs for all banks and levied a special one time assessment to replenish the Deposit Insurance Fund.

Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009, and 2008 was $614.9 thousand and $2.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, income tax expense was $317.1 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate was 34.0% and 34.8% for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 34.7% for the comparable periods in 2008.

Capital Resources

Total stockholders’ equity for the Company increased $612.1 thousand, or 0.58%, to $107.0 million at June 30, 2009 compared to $106.4 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in total stockholders’ equity for the first six months of 2009 was the result of our earnings of $1.2 million, which was offset by the payment of cash dividends totaling $685.7 thousand.

The Federal Reserve Board, the Office of Controller of the Currency, and the FDIC has issued risk-based capital guidelines for U.S. banking organizations. These guidelines provide a capital framework that is sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banking companies.

Risk-based capital ratios are another measure of capital adequacy. At June 30, 2009, the Bank’s risk-adjusted capital ratios were 11.44% for Tier 1 and 12.70% for total capital, well above the required minimums of 4% and 8%, respectively. These ratios are calculated using regulatory capital (either Tier 1 or total capital) as the numerator and both on and off-balance sheet risk-weighted assets as the denominator. Tier 1 capital consists primarily of common equity less goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Total capital adds certain qualifying debt instruments and a portion of the allowance for loan losses to Tier 1 capital. One of four risk weights, primarily based on credit risk, is applied to both on and off-balance sheet assets to determine the asset denominator. Under Federal Reserve Bank rules, the Bank was considered “well capitalized,” the highest category of capitalization defined by the regulators, as of June 30, 2009. To further bolster the Bank’s capital position, during the first quarter of 2009 Commonwealth Bankshares invested an additional $15.0 million into the Bank.

22

In order to maintain a strong equity capital position and to protect against the risks of loss in the investment and loan portfolios and on other assets, management will continue to monitor the Bank’s capital position. Several measures have been or will be employed to maintain the Bank’s strong capital position, including but not limited to continuing its efforts to return all non-performing assets to performing status, monitoring the Bank’s growth and continued utilization of its formal asset/liability policy.

Cash Dividends

In compliance with the Company’s dividend payout policy, on February 27, 2009, the Company paid a cash dividend of 8.0 cents per share, totaling $548.1 thousand. On May 29, 2009, the Company paid a cash dividend of 2.0 cents per share, totaling $137.6 thousand. Total dividends of 10 cents per share paid during the six months ended June 30, 2009 were down 37.5% from the 16 cents per share paid during the same period in 2008. The Company’s dividend payout ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 58.84% and 23.32%, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the dividend payout ratio was 23.56% and 23.12%, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. For more information on the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Contractual Obligations

The Company’s contractual obligations consist of operating lease obligations, FHLB and FRB borrowings, trust preferred capital notes, standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit. There have been no material changes to the contractual obligations disclosed in the 2008 Form 10-K.

Liquidity

Bank liquidity is a measure of the ability to generate and maintain sufficient cash flows to fund operations and to meet financial obligations to depositors and borrowers promptly and in a cost-effective manner. Asset liquidity is provided primarily by maturing loans and investments, and by cash received from operations. Other sources of asset liquidity include readily marketable assets, especially short-term investments, and long-term investment securities that can serve as collateral for borrowings. On the liability side, liquidity is affected by the timing of maturing liabilities and the ability to generate new deposits or borrowings as needed.

The Company maintains a liquid portfolio of both assets and liabilities and attempts to mitigate the risk inherent in changing rates in this manner. Cash, interest bearing deposits in banks, federal funds sold and investments classified as available for sale totaled $14.8 million as of June 30, 2009. To provide liquidity for current ongoing and unanticipated needs, the Company maintains a portfolio of marketable investment securities, and structures and monitors the flow of funds from these securities and from maturing loans. The Company maintains access to short-term funding sources as well, including a federal funds line of credit with its correspondent banks up to $70.0 million, the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Discount Window up to $100.8 million and from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta up to $193.5 million. As a result of the Company’s management of liquid assets, and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, including the use of broker certificates of deposit, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositor’s requirements and to meet customers’ credit needs.

The Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) is responsible for formulating liquidity strategies, monitoring performance based on established objectives and approving new liquidity initiatives. ALCO’s overall objective is to optimize net interest income within the constraints of prudent capital adequacy, liquidity needs, the interest rate and economic outlook, market opportunities and customer requirements.

23

General strategies to accomplish this objective include maintaining a strong balance sheet, achieving solid core deposit growth, taking on manageable interest rate risk and adhering to conservative financial management on a daily basis. These strategies are monitored regularly by ALCO and reviewed periodically with the Board of Directors.

Inflation

The Company carefully reviews Federal Reserve monetary policy in order to ensure an appropriate position between the cost and utilization of funds.

The effect of changing prices on financial institutions is typically different than on non-banking companies since virtually all of the Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. In particular, interest rates are significantly affected by inflation, but neither the timing nor the magnitude of the changes is directly related to price level indices. Accordingly, management believes the Company can best counter inflation over the long-term by managing net interest income and controlling net increases in noninterest income and expenses.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no significant changes from the quantitative and qualitative disclosures made in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover every situation involving the failure of persons within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s periodic reports.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission inInternal Control – Integrated Framework.Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of June 30, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by Witt Mares, PLC, the independent registered public accounting firm who also audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

24

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.There was no change in the internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal proceedings

As of June 30, 2009, there were no legal proceedings against the Company.

Item 1A. Risk factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds

We announced an open ended program in May 2007 by which we were authorized to repurchase an unlimited number of our own shares of common stock in open market and privately negotiated transactions. During the first six months of 2009, we repurchased no shares of our common stock.

Item 3. Defaults upon senior securities

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the quarter.

Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of security holders

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on July 28, 2009. Of the 6,886,975 shares entitled to vote at the meeting, 6,243,084 voted. The following matters were voted on at the meeting.

Proposal I: The Shareholders of the Company elected three members of the Board of Directors for three year terms as Class III directors until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2012. Votes for each nominee were as follows:

	For	Withheld
Laurence C. Fentriss	5,824,737	418,347
Edward J. Woodard, Jr., CLBB	5,725,959	517,125
Raju V. Uppalapati	5,772,344	470,740

The following Class I and Class II directors whose terms expire in 2010 and 2011 continued in office: E. Carlton Bowyer, Ph.D., Morton Goldmeier, William D. Payne, M.D., Richard J. Tavss, Herbert L. Perlin, Kenneth J. Young and Thomas W. Moss, Jr.

Proposal II: The Shareholders of the Company defeated a shareholder proposal relating to the declassification of the Board of Directors. The vote was as follows:

For	Against	Abstain
1,936,173	3,500,575	19,018

25

Proposal III: The Shareholders of the Company defeated a shareholder proposal relating to advisory shareholder voting on executive compensation. The vote was as follows:

For	Against	Abstain
1,193,840	4,248,125	13,801

Item 5. Other information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

32.1    Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

26

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Commonwealth Bankshares, Inc.
	(Registrant)
Date: August 10, 2009	by:	/s/ Edward J. Woodard, Jr., CLBB
		Edward J. Woodard, Jr., CLBB
		Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 10, 2009	by:	/s/ Cynthia A. Sabol, CPA
		Cynthia A. Sabol, CPA
		Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

27