UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 24, 2006
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-12432
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MASSACHUSETTS | | 04-2722013 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. employer |
incorporation or organization) | | identification no.) |
132 FAIRGROUNDS ROAD, WEST KINGSTON, RHODE ISLAND 02892
401-789-5735
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO x
Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding, $0.01 par value, at October 26, 2006 —189,940,000 shares
FORM 10-Q
September 24, 2006
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION
INDEX
2
FORM 10-Q
September 24, 2006
PART I - CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
In thousands except per share amount
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
| | September 24, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 187,566 | | $ | 262,414 | |
Short term investments (Note 3) | | 323,175 | | 511,181 | |
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,065 in 2006 and $14,995 in 2005 | | 415,469 | | 374,694 | |
Inventories: | | | | | |
Raw materials | | 226,468 | | 215,260 | |
Work-in-process and finished goods | | 410,066 | | 326,563 | |
Total inventories | | 636,534 | | 541,823 | |
| | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 76,561 | | 59,181 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 69,835 | | 60,139 | |
| | | | | |
Total current assets | | 1,709,140 | | 1,809,432 | |
| | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment: | | | | | |
Land, buildings and improvements | | 91,511 | | 75,549 | |
Machinery and equipment | | 248,898 | | 229,768 | |
Office equipment, furniture and fixtures | | 109,711 | | 101,144 | |
Purchased software | | 66,274 | | 53,275 | |
| | 516,394 | | 459,736 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | 320,059 | | 293,692 | |
Net property, plant and equipment | | 196,335 | | 166,044 | |
| | | | | |
Long term investments (Note 3) | | 330 | | 562 | |
Goodwill (Note 4) | | 18,202 | | 15,781 | |
Other intangibles, net (Note 4) | | 26,338 | | 36,115 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 44,535 | | 42,427 | |
Other assets | | 3,954 | | 5,101 | |
| | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,998,834 | | $ | 2,075,462 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
FORM 10-Q
September 24, 2006
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
In thousands except per share amount
(Unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| | September 24, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 175,027 | | $ | 176,345 | |
Accrued compensation | | 56,445 | | 41,798 | |
Accrued sales and marketing programs | | 54,059 | | 47,826 | |
Accrued warranty (Note 5) | | 14,284 | | 13,272 | |
Other accrued expenses | | 74,866 | | 60,013 | |
Deferred revenue | | 49,736 | | 41,793 | |
Income taxes payable | | 12,928 | | 39,755 | |
| | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | 437,345 | | 420,802 | |
| | | | | |
Deferred tax liability | | 11,894 | | 14,911 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities | | 449,239 | | 435,713 | |
| | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity (Notes 6, 7, 8 and 9): | | | | | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value; | | | | | |
authorized 450,000 shares in 2006 and 2005; | | | | | |
issued 189,873 shares in 2006 and 195,778 shares in 2005 | | 1,899 | | 1,958 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 14,134 | | 131,862 | |
Retained earnings | | 1,530,692 | | 1,504,093 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 2,870 | | 1,836 | |
| | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | 1,549,595 | | 1,639,749 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 1,998,834 | | $ | 2,075,462 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
FORM 10-Q
September 24, 2006
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
In thousands except earnings per share
(Unaudited)
| | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | September 24, | | September 25, | | September 24, | | September 25, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net sales (Note 10) | | $ | 1,660,096 | | $ | 1,400,898 | | $ | 621,318 | | $ | 512,289 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of goods sold | | 1,102,911 | | 869,526 | | 410,546 | | 323,633 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 557,185 | | 531,372 | | 210,772 | | 188,656 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Marketing, selling, general and administrative | | 405,113 | | 314,474 | | 147,292 | | 108,276 | |
Research and development | | 75,061 | | 65,175 | | 26,699 | | 22,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | 480,174 | | 379,649 | | 173,991 | | 130,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | 77,011 | | 151,723 | | 36,781 | | 58,180 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other income, net | | 15,148 | | 14,431 | | 4,796 | | 5,448 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Earnings before income taxes | | 92,159 | | 166,154 | | 41,577 | | 63,628 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes (benefit) | | 7,836 | | 39,559 | | (3,545 | ) | 14,953 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 84,323 | | $ | 126,595 | | $ | 45,122 | | $ | 48,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.44 | | $ | 0.65 | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.25 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | | 192,115 | | 193,588 | | 190,064 | | 194,890 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.43 | | $ | 0.63 | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.24 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | 194,755 | | 199,686 | | 191,895 | | 200,740 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
FORM 10-Q
September 24, 2006
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In thousands
(Unaudited)
| | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 84,323 | | $ | 126,595 | | $ | 45,122 | | $ | 48,675 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment | | 31,859 | | 27,808 | | 10,891 | | 9,418 | |
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | | (739 | ) | — | | — | | — | |
Amortization of other intangibles | | 9,918 | | 8,843 | | 3,306 | | 2,948 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | 3,578 | | 1,748 | | 2,223 | | 1,090 | |
Provision for inventories | | 23,925 | | 8,373 | | 8,797 | | 5,052 | |
Share-based compensation expense | | 11,934 | | 6,853 | | 3,811 | | 1,161 | |
Deferred income taxes | | (14,821 | ) | (7,740 | ) | (1,400 | ) | (3,311 | ) |
Other non-cash items, net | | 1,034 | | (652 | ) | 20 | | 253 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | (44,353 | ) | (60,302 | ) | (21,805 | ) | (28,982 | ) |
Inventories | | (118,636 | ) | (29,670 | ) | (37,770 | ) | (21,720 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | (17,380 | ) | (14,523 | ) | (13,860 | ) | (6,052 | ) |
Other assets | | (1,415 | ) | (2,980 | ) | (427 | ) | (806 | ) |
Accounts payable | | (1,318 | ) | 10,618 | | 12,739 | | 7,331 | |
Accrued expenses | | 44,688 | | 15,682 | | 27,323 | | 18,686 | |
Income taxes payable | | (26,827 | ) | 18,136 | | (21,716 | ) | 8,177 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | (14,230 | ) | 108,789 | | 17,254 | | 41,920 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities | | — | | (710,849 | ) | — | | (86,005 | ) |
Maturities of held-to-maturity securities | | 5,000 | | 702,475 | | — | | 54,178 | |
Purchases of available-for-sale securities | | (3,479,146 | ) | (1,525,260 | ) | (913,006 | ) | (599,735 | ) |
Sales of available-for-sale securities | | 3,662,384 | | 1,558,634 | | 926,732 | | 647,604 | |
Capital expenditures | | (62,648 | ) | (27,357 | ) | (14,086 | ) | (12,042 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | | 1,237 | | — | | — | | — | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | 126,827 | | (2,357 | ) | (360 | ) | 4,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of common stock | | (142,328 | ) | — | | (12,835 | ) | — | |
Proceeds from issuances of common stock | | 10,700 | | 40,479 | | 586 | | 12,972 | |
Tax effect of stock options | | 1,907 | | — | | (102 | ) | — | |
Dividends paid on common stock | | (57,724 | ) | (58,131 | ) | (19,055 | ) | (19,510 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (187,445 | ) | (17,652 | ) | (31,406 | ) | (6,538 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | (74,848 | ) | 88,780 | | (14,512 | ) | 39,382 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 262,414 | | 72,721 | | 202,078 | | 122,119 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 187,566 | | $ | 161,501 | | $ | 187,566 | | $ | 161,501 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosure | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes (net of refunds) | | $ | 47,460 | | $ | 23,810 | | $ | 19,621 | | $ | 9,827 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
6
FORM 10-Q
September 24, 2006
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Management Representation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the American Power Conversion Corporation (APC) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
2. Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements include the financial statements of American Power Conversion Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
3. Investments
APC classifies as short term its investments with original maturities greater than three months and less than or equal to one year, and as long term its investments with remaining maturities greater than one year. APC has no investments with maturity dates greater than one year except for auction rate securities and variable rate demand obligations. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with net unrealized gains and losses reported, net of income taxes, in other comprehensive income. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when APC has the positive intent and ability to hold such securities to maturity. APC invests its excess cash principally in auction rate securities and variable rate demand obligations which have long-term underlying maturities, however the market is highly liquid and the interest rates reset frequently.
At September 24, 2006, APC had no held-to-maturity investments. At December 31, 2005, APC’s held-to-maturity investments included $5.0 million with contractual maturities of one year or less; APC had no held-to-maturity investments with contractual maturities longer than one year. At September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005, APC’s available-for-sale auction rate debt securities (ARS’s) included $225.9 million and $364.5 million, respectively, with contractual maturities between approximately eight to 41 years. At September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005, APC’s available-for-sale variable rate demand obligations (VRDN’s) included $97.3 million and $136.7 million, respectively, with contractual maturities between six and 35 years. Both the ARS’s and VRDN’s resemble short-term instruments because they contain features (i.e., interest rate reset and put options, respectively) that allow for the sale of the instrument on a predetermined schedule of one to 49 days depending on the type of instrument and its particular features.
Proceeds from the sales of investment securities available-for-sale were $927 million and $648 million in the third quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and were $3.662 billion and $1.559 billion in the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively.
7
| | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Holding Gains | | Gross Unrealized Holding Losses | | Fair Value | |
| | (In thousands) | |
At September 24, 2006 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | |
Auction rate securities | | $ | 225,875 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 225,875 | |
Variable rate demand obligations | | 97,300 | | — | | — | | 97,300 | |
Equity investments | | 330 | | — | | — | | 330 | |
| | $ | 323,505 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 323,505 | |
At December 31, 2005 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | |
Auction rate securities | | $ | 369,481 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 369,481 | |
Variable rate demand obligations | | 136,700 | | — | | — | | 136,700 | |
Equity investments | | 481 | | 81 | | — | | 562 | |
| | 506,662 | | 81 | | — | | 506,743 | |
Held-to-maturity | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government agency securities | | 5,000 | | — | | (28 | ) | 4,972 | |
| | 5,000 | | — | | (28 | ) | 4,972 | |
| | $ | 511,662 | | $ | 81 | | $ | (28 | ) | $ | 511,715 | |
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
At each of September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005, goodwill of $15.9 million and $15.8 million, respectively, was associated with the Small Systems segment. At September 24, 2006, goodwill of $2.3 million was associated with the Large Systems segment and originated during the first and third quarters of 2006 ($2.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively) from payments of escrowed purchase price consideration. Amortized intangible assets were as follows:
| | | | September 24, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Amortized Intangible Assets | | Weighted Average Amortization Period | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | |
| | | | ($ in thousands) | |
Technology | | 8 years | | $ | 87,460 | | $ | 64,279 | | $ | 87,319 | | $ | 55,958 | |
Customer lists | | 9 years | | 11,100 | | 8,784 | | 11,100 | | 7,610 | |
Tradenames | | 9 years | | 3,957 | | 3,116 | | 3,957 | | 2,693 | |
Total amortized intangible assets | | 8 years | | $ | 102,517 | | $ | 76,179 | | $ | 102,376 | | $ | 66,261 | |
Aggregate amortization expense related to APC’s other intangible assets for the third quarters of 2006 and 2005 was $3.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, and for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 was $9.9 million and $8.8 million, respectively. Estimated aggregated amortization for each of the next five succeeding fiscal years is $13.2 million for 2006, $11.1 million for 2007, $6.6 million for 2008, $2.6 million for 2009, and $1.2 million for 2010. There are no expected residual values related to these intangible assets.
8
5. Warranty Liability
| | Product Warranty Liability at Beginning of Quarter | | Accruals for Product Warranties Issued During the Quarter | | Adjustments to Accruals for Preexisting Warranties | | Warranty Payments | | Product Warranty Liability at End of Quarter | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Third Quarter 2006 | | $ | 13,348 | | $ | 15,481 | | $ | — | | $ | (14,545 | ) | $ | 14,284 | |
Second Quarter 2006 | | $ | 13,229 | | $ | 11,388 | | $ | — | | $ | (11,269 | ) | $ | 13,348 | |
First Quarter 2006 | | $ | 13,272 | | $ | 7,315 | | $ | — | | $ | (7,358 | ) | $ | 13,229 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Third Quarter 2005 | | $ | 11,683 | | $ | 6,895 | | $ | — | | $ | (6,269 | ) | $ | 12,309 | |
Second Quarter 2005 | | $ | 12,012 | | $ | 9,189 | | $ | — | | $ | (9,518 | ) | $ | 11,683 | |
First Quarter 2005 | | $ | 13,092 | | $ | 5,334 | | $ | — | | $ | (6,414 | ) | $ | 12,012 | |
6. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Under the treasury stock method, the unexercised options are assumed to be exercised and the unvested restricted stock units are assumed to be vested at the beginning of the period or at issuance, if later. The assumed proceeds are then used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period. Potential common shares for which inclusion would have the effect of increasing diluted earnings per share (i.e., antidilutive) are excluded from the computation.
| | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | | 192,115 | | 193,588 | | 190,064 | | 194,890 | |
Net effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding based on the treasury stock method using the average market price | | 2,640 | | 6,098 | | 1,831 | | 5,850 | |
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | 194,755 | | 199,686 | | 191,895 | | 200,740 | |
Antidilutive potential common shares excluded from the computation above | | 2,751 | | 515 | | 3,077 | | 131 | |
7. Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock and Paid-in Capital. In February 2006, APC’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorizes up to $200 million to repurchase outstanding shares of APC’s common stock. The purchases would be made on the open market based on market and business factors. The duration of the repurchase program is two years but may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. APC commenced the repurchase of its common stock in February 2006.
The decrease in common stock and paid-in capital during the third quarter of 2006 reflected APC’s third quarter repurchase on the open market of approximately 0.7 million shares of its common stock, at an average price of $17.42 per share, totaling $12.8 million. The decrease in common stock and paid-in capital during the first nine months of 2006 reflected APC’s first nine months repurchase on the open market of approximately 7.1 million shares of its common stock, at an average price of $20.01 per share, totaling $142.3 million. Such shares have been deemed authorized but not issued. These decreases were partially offset by stock issuances relating to stock-based employee benefit programs, as well as to the financial statement recognition of stock-based compensation and the tax benefit afforded to APC as a result of the disposition of option shares by APC employees. Accounting rules require this compensation expense and corporate tax benefit to be recorded as an increase in paid-in capital.
9
Dividends. Dividends of $0.10 per share were declared and paid in each of the first, second, and third quarters of 2006 and 2005. It is the intention of the Board of Directors to pay a comparable quarterly dividend on a going forward basis contingent upon continued capital availability and a determination that cash dividends continue to be in the best interests of APC and its shareholders.
8. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, are as follows:
| | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net income | | $ | 84,323 | | $ | 126,595 | | $ | 45,122 | | $ | 48,675 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | | | | | | | |
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment | | 1,115 | | (652 | ) | 74 | | 253 | |
Net unrealized loss on investments, net of income taxes | | (81 | ) | — | | (54 | ) | — | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | 1,034 | | (652 | ) | 20 | | 253 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 85,357 | | $ | 125,943 | | $ | 45,142 | | $ | 48,928 | |
9. Share-Based Payments
Effective January 1, 2006, APC adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 included compensation cost for all share-based payments granted through January 1, 2006, but for which the requisite service period had not been completed as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair values estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123. Compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 will be based on grant date fair values estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. Compensation cost for grants during the third quarter ended September 24, 2006 and the second quarter ended June 25, 2006 were not material. There were no grants during the first quarter ended March 26, 2006. Results for prior periods have not been restated.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R, APC’s income before income taxes for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 24, 2006 was $1.0 million and $3.0 million lower, respectively, and net income for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 24, 2006 was $0.8 million and $2.3 million lower, respectively, than if APC had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. APC recognized a total of $3.8 million and $11.9 million of share-based compensation cost for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 24, 2006. APC did not record a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle related to forfeitures of stock-based awards since such forfeitures were not material. As of September 24, 2006, there was $19.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding share-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.5 years. APC utilizes a FASB Interpretation No. 28 attribution model for the timing of the recognition of compensation expense.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, APC presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in APC’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows. SFAS 123R requires the cash flows resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those stock options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows.
10
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if APC had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 25, 2005:
| | | | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | | | September 25, 2005 | | September 25, 2005 | |
| | | | (In thousands except per share amounts) | |
Net income | | As reported | | $ | 126,595 | | $ | 48,675 | |
Add: Compensation expense recognized during the period, net of related tax effects | | | | 5,222 | | 888 | |
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | | Pro forma | | (9,656 | ) | (2,516 | ) |
Net income | | Pro forma | | $ | 122,161 | | $ | 47,047 | |
| | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | As reported | | $ | 0.65 | | $ | 0.25 | |
| | Pro forma | | $ | 0.63 | | $ | 0.24 | |
| | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | As reported | | $ | 0.63 | | $ | 0.24 | |
| | Pro forma | | $ | 0.61 | | $ | 0.23 | |
For all of APC’s stock-based compensation plans, the fair value of each grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on the historical volatility of APC’s stock price. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The model incorporates exercise and post-vesting forfeiture assumptions based on an analysis of historical data. The expected life of fiscal 2006 grants has been derived from historical information and other factors.
At September 24, 2006, APC had one active stock-based compensation plan, the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2004 LTI Plan), and an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP), which are described more fully below. At September 24, 2006, there were 9.8 million shares available for future grants under the 2004 LTI Plan.
On June 10, 2004, APC’s shareholders approved APC’s LTI Plan, which replaced APC’s 1997 Stock Option Plan (1997 Plan). The 2004 LTI Plan will enable APC to utilize shares previously not distributed under the 1997 Plan. No further grants will be made from the 1997 Plan. Awards under the 2004 LTI Plan may be in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance restricted stock, performance restricted stock units, or any other equity-based interests as the Compensation Committee of APC’s Board of Directors shall determine. The number of shares of common stock that may be delivered in satisfaction of awards granted under the 2004 LTI Plan shall be equal to (a) the number of shares of common stock that remain available for grant under the 1997 Plan as of June 10, 2004, plus (b) any shares of common stock underlying outstanding awards under the 1997 Plan that after June 10, 2004 expire or terminate without being exercised or that would otherwise again become available for issuance under the 1997 Plan, and in no event shall exceed an aggregate of 15 million shares.
On April 21, 1997, APC’s shareholders approved the 1997 Stock Option Plan and on June 19, 1987 approved the 1987 Stock Option Plan (collectively the 1997 and 1987 Plans). The 1997 and 1987 Plans authorized the grant of options for up to 12.0 million shares and 21.6 million shares, respectively, of common stock. On June 11, 2002 and May 7, 1999, APC’s shareholders authorized an additional 9.5 million shares and 12.0 million shares, respectively, under the 1997 Stock Option Plan, resulting in an aggregate of 33.5 million shares available for grant under the 1997 Stock Option Plan.
11
Options granted under APC’s stock-based compensation plans are either (a) options intended to constitute incentive stock options (ISOs) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code) or (b) non-qualified options. Incentive stock options may be granted under the Plans to employees or officers of APC. Non-qualified options may be granted to consultants, directors (whether or not they are employees), employees or officers of APC.
ISOs granted under APC’s stock-based compensation plans may not be granted at a price less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant (or 110% of fair market value in the case of employees or officers holding 10% or more of the voting stock of APC). The aggregate fair market value of shares, for which ISOs granted to any employee are exercisable for the first time by such employee during any calendar year (under all stock option plans of APC and any related corporation), may not exceed $100,000. Non-qualified options granted under the Plan may not be granted at a price less than the lesser of (a) the book value per share of common stock as of the end of the fiscal year of APC immediately preceding the date of such grant, or (b) 50% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
Options granted under the 1997 and 1987 Plans before December 1, 1995 vested 25% at the end of the first year and 12.5% at the end of each six month period thereafter. Options granted after December 1, 1995 and before February 14, 1997 vested 20% at the end of the second year and 20% at the end of each year thereafter. Options granted after February 14, 1997 vest 25% at the end of the first year and 12.5% at the end of each six month period thereafter. Options granted under the 2004 LTI Plan generally vest 25% at the end of each year.
On April 21, 1997, APC’s shareholders approved the 1997 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan and on May 20, 1993 approved the 1993 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan (collectively the Director Plans). The 1997 and 1993 Director Plans authorized the grant of options for up to 400,000 shares and 80,000 shares of common stock, respectively. In the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, all non-employee directors were entitled to participate in the 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, with each receiving no option grants during those quarters.
Options granted under the 1997 Director Plan, and the options granted on August 9, 2001 under the 1997 Stock Option Plan, vest 25% at the end of the second year and 9.375% at the end of each six month period thereafter. Options granted under the 1993 Director Plan vested 25% at the end of the first year and 25% annually thereafter.
Options granted under all stock-based compensation plans after January 1, 1993 expire not more than ten years from the date of grant (five years in the case of ISOs granted to ten percent shareholders). The outstanding options at September 24, 2006 expire at various dates through 2016. Options granted terminate within a specified period of time following termination of an optionee’s employment or position as a director or consultant with APC.
A summary of the status of stock options outstanding under APC’s stock-based compensation plan as of September 24, 2006, and changes during the first nine months ending on that date is presented below. APC has a policy of issuing new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.
| | Options
| | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
| | (In thousands except years and per share amounts) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 | | 11,757 | | $ | 15.69 | | | | | |
Granted | | 162 | | $ | 18.98 | | | | | |
Exercised | | (877 | ) | $ | 12.55 | | | | $ | 7,542 | |
Terminated | | (315 | ) | $ | 20.00 | | | | | |
Outstanding at September 24, 2006 | | 10,727 | | $ | 15.87 | | 3.7 years | | $ | 55,068 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at September 24, 2006 | | 9,453 | | $ | 15.60 | | 3.2 years | | $ | 46,580 | |
12
Stock Purchase Plan. On April 21, 1997, APC’s shareholders approved an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan) to provide substantially all employees an opportunity to purchase shares of its common stock through payroll deductions, in an aggregate amount up to 10% of eligible compensation. Semiannually, participant account balances are used to purchase shares of stock at the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of shares on the grant date or the exercise date. The aggregate number of shares purchased by an employee may not exceed 3,000 shares annually (subject to limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code). The Plan expires on February 11, 2017. A total of 3.0 million shares are authorized for purchase under the Plan. No shares were issued under the Plan during the first and third quarters of 2006 and 2005. During the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, under the Plan, 72,604 shares were issued at $18.47 per share and 69,214 shares were issued at $16.78 per share, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units. Also under the aforementioned 2004 LTI Plan, APC’s Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors approved the award of restricted stock units (RSU’s). A summary of the status of RSU’s as of September 24, 2006 and changes during the first nine months then ended is presented below:
| | Number of RSU’s | | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |
| | (Shares in thousands) | |
Non-vested at January 1, 2006 | | 1,137 | | $ | 19.82 | |
Granted | | 504 | | $ | 19.01 | |
Vested | | (336 | ) | $ | 19.27 | |
Terminated | | (118 | ) | $ | 20.26 | |
Non-vested at September 24, 2006 | | 1,187 | | $ | 19.59 | |
Under the 2004 LTI Plan, if APC awards a dividend on its common stock prior to the vesting date of an RSU, the holder of the restricted stock unit would be entitled to receive on the vesting date a dividend equivalent payment. Dividend equivalents are recognized as compensation expense when the dividend is declared. The RSU awards will vest, and the underlying common stock will concurrently issue, ratably over four years, whereby the units granted will vest 25% on June 30 in the year following the date approved, and 25% on June 30 of each year thereafter.
10. Operating Segment Information
Basis for presentation. APC operates primarily within one industry consisting of three reportable operating segments by which it manages its business and from which various offerings are commonly combined to develop a total solution for the customer. These efforts primarily incorporate the design, manufacture, and marketing of power protection equipment and related software and accessories for computer, communications, and related equipment. APC’s three segments are: Small Systems, Large Systems, and “Other.” Each of these segments address global markets.
Small Systems. The Small Systems segment develops power devices and accessories for servers and networking equipment commonly used in local area and wide area networks and for personal computers and sensitive electronics. Major product offerings include the Back-UPS®, Smart-UPS®, and Symmetra® Power Array® single-phase family of UPSs. Also included are SurgeArrest® surge suppressors as well as cabling and connectivity products. Additional accessories and software products are offered to enhance the management of these networks, including APC’s PowerChute® software and NetShelter® server enclosures. Products are sold to home and commercial users primarily through an indirect selling model consisting of computer distributors and dealers, value-added resellers, mass merchandisers, catalog merchandisers, E-commerce vendors, and strategic partnerships.
13
Large Systems. The Large Systems segment provides systems, products and services that primarily provide back-up power, power distribution and cooling for data centers, facilities, and communications equipment for both commercial and industrial applications. Product offerings include major components of InfraStruXure® systems, Silcon® UPSs, precision cooling equipment, DC and broadband power systems, Gutor® industrial UPS systems and APC Global Services. Products are sold to commercial users through both a direct and indirect selling model consisting of value-added resellers and strategic partnerships. Additionally, APC utilizes manufacturer representatives to identify and secure projects.
“Other” Segment. The Other segment consists principally of mobile accessories and replacement battery products. The distribution model of products in the Other segment is consistent with that of the Small Systems segment.
APC measures the profitability of its segments based on gross margin. Segment gross margins exclude certain expenses which are managed outside the reportable segments. Costs excluded from segment profit are operating expenses, primarily consisting of R&D, selling and corporate expenses, and income taxes. Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets are not tracked or reported by the operating segments, although depreciation expense is allocated to and reported by the operating segments.
Summary operating segment information is as follows:
| | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Segment net sales | | | | | | | | | |
Small Systems | | $ | 1,210,507 | | $ | 1,053,959 | | $ | 460,027 | | $ | 390,267 | |
Large Systems | | 382,476 | | 285,956 | | 135,886 | | 100,407 | |
Other | | 52,486 | | 52,242 | | 19,395 | | 18,550 | |
Total segment net sales | | 1,645,469 | | 1,392,157 | | 615,308 | | 509,224 | |
Shipping and handling revenues | | 14,627 | | 8,741 | | 6,010 | | 3,065 | |
Total net sales | | $ | 1,660,096 | | $ | 1,400,898 | | $ | 621,318 | | $ | 512,289 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Segment profits | | | | | | | | | |
Small Systems | | $ | 508,235 | | $ | 482,281 | | $ | 197,618 | | $ | 174,785 | |
Large Systems | | 64,877 | | 53,088 | | 21,667 | | 16,453 | |
Other | | 27,913 | | 30,700 | | 9,856 | | 11,190 | |
Total segment profits | | 601,025 | | 566,069 | | 229,141 | | 202,428 | |
Shipping and handling net costs | | 40,456 | | 34,696 | | 14,985 | | 13,772 | |
Workforce reductions and severance | | 3,384 | | — | | 3,384 | | — | |
Other indirect operating expenses | | 480,174 | | 379,650 | | 173,991 | | 130,476 | |
Other income, net | | 15,148 | | 14,431 | | 4,796 | | 5,448 | |
Earnings before income taxes | | $ | 92,159 | | $ | 166,154 | | $ | 41,577 | | $ | 63,628 | |
11. Litigation
APC is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. While management currently believes that resolving all pending legal matters, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on APC’s financial position, litigation and claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, including the risk of an unfavorable outcome, and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. An unfavorable outcome could include monetary damages or, in cases where injunctive relief is sought, an injunction prohibiting certain activities. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on APC’s financial position, cash flows and results of operations for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.
14
12. Subsequent Event
On October 28, 2006, APC and Schneider Electric SA, a leading provider of solutions for electrical distribution, industrial control and automation projects, executed a definitive merger agreement under which Schneider Electric will acquire all outstanding shares of APC for $31.00 per share in cash. The aggregate transaction value is approximately $6.1 billion. The transaction, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2007, is subject to approval by APC shareholders. Approval from Schneider Electric’s shareholders is not required.
In addition, the merger is subject to clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and the European Commission, and other customary closing conditions. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Schneider Electric has agreed to use its best efforts to avoid or eliminate each and every impediment under any antitrust, competition or trade regulation law that may be asserted by the United States Federal Trade Commission, the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, any State Attorney General or any other governmental authority with respect to the merger so as to enable the closing of the merger to occur as soon as reasonably possible.
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both APC and Schneider Electric, and further provides that, upon termination of the merger agreement under certain circumstances, APC may be obligated to pay Schneider Electric a termination fee of $180 million.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We begin Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) with a discussion of our business outlook for the remainder of 2006. We also provide a discussion of our Results of Operations for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 compared to the third quarter and first nine months of 2005. This discussion includes an overview of our operating results and the directions in which our markets, segments, and geographies are moving. We then provide a Liquidity and Financial Resources discussion of the significant changes in our balance sheet during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, and cash flows for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 compared to the third quarter and first nine months of 2005, as well as our contractual obligations and foreign currency activity. This is followed by a discussion of the Critical Accounting Policies that we believe are important to our business operations and understanding of our results of operations.
This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this report, including “Item 1. Financial Statements” and also our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, including “Item 1. Business;” “Item 6. Selected Financial Data;” “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data;” and “Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.”
In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
15
BUSINESS OUTLOOK
Our third quarter performance again highlighted the strong demand for APC’s solutions and continued a trend we have been experiencing throughout 2006. We are pleased with APC’s top line performance during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006. Our performance continues to reflect strong demand across geographies and major operating segments and extended our double digit year-over-year revenue growth streak to thirteen consecutive quarters. We believe that the strong year-over-year revenue growth can be attributed to what we believe is a healthy macro-economic environment for IT spending and is the result of our continued investments in research and development, sales and marketing activities and the growing adoption of APC’s network-critical physical infrastructure, or NCPI, architecture. APC has pioneered integrated systems for NCPI, which is the foundation upon which Information Technology (IT) and telecommunication networks reside. It is the “backbone” of a business, as its elements provide the power, cooling, physical housing, cabling and other elements which allow the IT systems to function. The investments we have continued to make to educate the market and drive adoption of the technology, we believe, are being well received as customers embrace the modular, standardized approach APC has pioneered.
We experienced an improvement in our operating results in the third quarter versus our performance in the first half of 2006. Through the streamlining of operations, supply chain initiatives and pricing actions, we are taking steps to improve our gross margin, while maintaining investments in innovation, sales and marketing programs to drive awareness and adoption of APC’s NCPI solutions globally. Despite continued progress in our operations and supply chain initiatives, the year-over-year trends remain unfavorable although less so than previous quarters. Additionally, year-over-year margins were also negatively impacted in the quarter by segment and product mix.
On September 21, 2006, APC’s management committed to a global plan of termination under which APC’s workforce will be reduced by approximately 330 positions (the “Global Action”). The estimated range of costs to be incurred in connection with the Global Action is approximately $4 million to $5 million, consisting primarily of employee severance costs. APC had previously announced its plan on June 27, 2006 to streamline Irish operations, including the commencement of discussions with employees with the objective of reducing the number of positions in Ireland by approximately 200 to 250 (the “Irish Action”). Based on the current status of these discussions and further identification of affected employees and associated severance costs, the estimated range of costs to be incurred in connection with the Irish Action is now expected to be approximately $6 million to $7 million, consisting primarily of employee severance costs. The costs of both actions will be recognized predominantly in the third and fourth quarters of 2006 as required by generally accepted accounting principles. It is currently anticipated that both actions will be completed in the first quarter of 2007 and that all of the expected costs will result in future cash expenditures.
In the combined Global Action and Irish Action, APC intends to reduce its workforce by an aggregate of approximately 580 positions and expects to incur aggregate costs of approximately $10 million to $12 million, consisting primarily of employee severance costs. In total, APC expects annual pre-tax savings of approximately $32 million from the combined actions, principally in 2007, with pre-tax savings of approximately $5 million anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Developing and managing the internal capabilities necessary to meet the supply and order fulfillment requirements of two distinct business models, that is, a transaction-oriented products business and a customer-focused systems solutions business, is a complicated and difficult task. To support these two businesses, we are working to lower manufacturing costs and improve product delivery to our global customer base. This has included transitioning more Large Systems manufacturing overseas and populating global distribution centers with a broader portfolio of products. During the third quarter we continued to make strides to improve our order fulfillment process and continue to avoid our reliance on expedited shipping methods, particularly related to air freight. We saw our gross margin stabilize and increase slightly from the first half of 2006, however our freight and logistics costs remain at levels higher than they were prior to the recent transitions of Large Systems product manufacturing overseas.
16
As we look forward to the remainder of 2006, our high level objectives remain the same — drive adoption and growth of our InfraStruXure architecture and continue leading the market for server and desktop UPSs. We will also put a greater focus on near term profitable business growth. And while we are reducing costs it does not mean we will cease investing in the business because we must remain significantly invested to be successful. We believe that the changes we are making by realigning resources along key areas can improve productivity, reduce costs and allow for continued growth in the business. We will continue investing in vital areas and functions, including those supporting our data center initiatives, but at a more managed pace with a greater focus on profitability. We have taken these actions with the intent of preserving momentum in our business by helping better align resources against key target areas. We believe we can drive improved productivity and leverage from our teams. We will also need to: (1) optimize operational efficiency, (2) deploy and improve distribution capabilities in all regions globally, (3) accelerate the responsiveness of the supply chain to minimize availability issues for the more complex solutions, (4) improve demand to supply signaling capabilities to support both business models, and (5) build a products and professional services business needed for successfully pursuing datacenter opportunities. Some of these initiatives, during implementation, may result in our incurring incremental costs prior to achieving the desired outcomes. Additionally, these initiatives will take time, some more than others, to implement, but we are committed to making significant, meaningful, and timely progress.
We believe that we are well positioned competitively, financially and strategically. We will continue to be focused on empowering IT professionals with the knowledge, tools and solutions they need to effectively design, build and manage network-critical physical infrastructure. Our objective is for APC to become a trusted, global partner for the long term, committed to solving our customers’ NCPI problems of today and helping them anticipate their challenges of tomorrow, thereby allowing our customers to focus on their core competencies. Experts now predict that powering and cooling the data center will soon become more expensive than purchasing the IT equipment to populate it. The importance of properly managing and maximizing the performance of NCPI has never been higher. APC anticipated this market need and is helping customers prepare for this reality with an entirely new approach to design, build and operate data centers. Today, we are committed to arm data center professionals with a solution that enables them to manage their complex power and cooling challenges. We believe that we can accomplish these objectives by dramatically reducing our customers’ level of complexity and their total cost of ownership involved in designing, building, and managing the network-critical physical infrastructure that is at the very core of maintaining business continuity, application availability, and network reliability.
Additionally, we continue to plan for revenue growth in all three of our reportable segments: Small Systems, Large Systems and “Other.” As in recent quarters, we expect the rate of revenue growth of our Large Systems segment to be greater than the growth expected for Small Systems due to the assumed continued success of our overall strategy and the acceptance of our products in specific market segments.
Overall gross margins for 2006 are currently expected to continue to be impacted on a year-over-year basis by increased operational costs and a shift in product mix toward the faster-growing, lower-margin Large Systems products. Gross margins, particularly for Small Systems products, are expected to continue to be impacted by our response to a competitive pricing environment, but we have made single-digit price increases on select Small Systems products to help offset rising commodity price trends. While we expect to continue to strive for favorable component pricing arrangements with our material suppliers, the recent rising trends of commodity prices, particularly for steel, copper and lead, are expected to put upward pressure on our product materials costs. In addition to price increases in the Small Systems segment, we also expect partial offset from material cost reductions, particularly for Large Systems products, typically seen after transitioning to low-cost factories.
Increased operational costs, including freight and warehousing, are associated with the management of our supply chain. These costs are tied to fulfilling customer orders and reducing overall long-term costs through the stocking of global third-party distribution centers, expediting of product to meet customer demand, and the transition cost of shifting production to lower cost manufacturing locations. We expect this could continue in the near term, however ultimately it is expected these transitions will allow for lower manufacturing costs. In the short-term, each transition is the equivalent of a new product introduction to a facility and comes with a learning curve and initial supply chain inefficiencies. Operational cost improvement initiatives, including redesign of our supply chain processes and elimination of redundant manufacturing costs, are expected to result in long-term gross margin improvement.
17
Gross margin variability could continue to result from changing revenue levels, which are dependent on unit volumes, prices and currency trends as well as the mix of products sold, unit costs and yield issues associated with production at our factories, transfers of production to our low cost facilities, excess manufacturing capacity, costs to comply with new and existing environmental regulations (including, but not limited to, the European Union’s directive on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and directives relating to restriction of hazardous substances (RoHS)), excess inventory, supply chain inefficiencies, inventory obsolescence (including potential exposure from WEEE and RoHS compliance) and variations in inventory valuation.
We have dedicated efforts to optimize our overall manufacturing capacity and locations over recent years and we will continue to plan for future capacity requirements based on the assumed continued acceptance and demand for our products in the specific market segments they were designed to address. We currently expect that capital spending will be between $80 million and $100 million in 2006, compared to $49 million in 2005. Most of our incremental capital spending for 2006 will go toward acquiring and expanding a building for a customer Technology Learning Center, to be based in St. Louis, Missouri, and maintaining, upgrading, and expanding our current manufacturing capacity, as well as investments to upgrade current hardware and software office technologies. We acquired land and an office building in St. Louis for approximately $14 million during the second quarter of 2006 from available cash on-hand. Construction began during the third quarter of 2006 on the Technology Learning Center building which is expected to be completed in 2007.
We are committed to sustaining our R&D efforts to meet the future needs of our customers across all segments and potentially expanding into emerging, high-growth areas. We continue to advance our NCPI systems in addition to ensuring our end-to-end offering is the best in the industry. We will remain focused on aggressively driving the growth of our network-critical physical infrastructure solutions, which will require sustaining and increasing our operating expense investments in sales and marketing, including increased personnel and investments in global customer education initiatives.
In February 2006, APC’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorizes up to $200 million to repurchase outstanding shares of APC’s common stock. The purchases would be made on the open market based on market and business factors. APC commenced the repurchase of its common stock in February 2006 and, as of the end of the third quarter, had repurchased approximately 7.1 million shares on the open market at an average price of approximately $20.01 per share, totaling $142 million. The duration of the repurchase program is two years but may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.
We currently expect our tax rate to be approximately 21 - 23% for the full year 2006, excluding the impact of the net tax benefit recognized during the third quarter of 2006. The estimated effective tax rate is based on current tax law and the current expected income. The tax rate may be affected by the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed, our ability to successfully implement additional tax savings planning opportunities and our ability to realize deferred tax assets.
We are currently a party to various legal proceedings and claims. We currently do not believe that the ultimate outcome of current legal proceedings and claims will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or overall trends in results of operations. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, including the risk of an unfavorable outcome, and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. An unfavorable outcome could include monetary damages or, in cases where injunctive relief is sought, an injunction prohibiting certain activities. If an unfavorable outcome were to occur in any specific period, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations of that period or future periods. We believe that, given our current liquidity and cash and investment balances, even an adverse judgment in current legal proceedings and claims would not have a material impact on cash and investments or liquidity.
On October 28, 2006, APC and Schneider Electric SA, a leading provider of solutions for electrical distribution, industrial control and automation projects, executed a definitive merger agreement under which Schneider Electric will acquire all outstanding shares of APC for $31.00 per share in cash. The aggregate transaction value is approximately $6.1 billion. The transaction, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2007, is subject to approval by APC shareholders. Approval from Schneider Electric’s shareholders is not required.
18
In addition, the merger is subject to clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and the European Commission, and other customary closing conditions. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Schneider Electric has agreed to use its best efforts to avoid or eliminate each and every impediment under any antitrust, competition or trade regulation law that may be asserted by the United States Federal Trade Commission, the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, any State Attorney General or any other governmental authority with respect to the merger so as to enable the closing of the merger to occur as soon as reasonably possible.
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both APC and Schneider Electric, and further provides that, upon termination of the merger agreement under certain circumstances, APC may be obligated to pay Schneider Electric a termination fee of $180 million.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON OF THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 24, 2006 AND SEPTEMBER 25, 2005
Revenues
Net sales were $621.3 million for the third quarter of 2006, an increase of 21.3% compared to $512.3 million for the comparable period in 2005. Net sales for the first nine months of 2006 were $1.660 billion, an increase of 18.5% compared to $1.401 billion for the same period in 2005. Our third quarter performance again highlighted the strong demand for APC’s solutions. Top line growth during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 was again widespread across each of our major geographies and principal operating segments. We are confident that the strong year-over-year growth can be attributed to what we believe continues to be a healthy macro-economic environment for IT spending and is the result of our continued investments in sales and marketing activities and the growing adoption of APC’s network-critical physical infrastructure, or NCPI, architecture.
Each of our operating segments contributed to the strong top line performance. The Large Systems segment, which is a focus of our data center initiatives and incorporates 3-phase UPS products, cooling, services and other related products, again posted the strongest gains for APC. We continued to make investments in supporting our efforts in these network-critical physical infrastructure markets and our top line advances highlight the resulting strong performance. Led by solid growth in our online Smart-UPS products, Back-UPS family and InfraStruXure related products, the Small Systems segment also continues to produce strong results that reflect APC’s position as a preferred partner in the mid-market and consumer power protection markets. For further information about revenues by segment, refer to the Segment Results section below.
Revenues by Geography. The following table summarizes our revenues on a geographic basis for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 24, 2006 and September 25, 2005.
| | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | Sept. 24, 2006 | | % of Total | | Sept. 25, 2005 | | % of Total | | Sept. 24, 2006 | | % of Total | | Sept. 25, 2005 | | % of Total | |
| | (In millions) | |
North and Latin America (the Americas) | | $ | 895.1 | | 53.9 | % | $ | 730.3 | | 52.1 | % | $ | 343.1 | | 55.2 | % | $ | 268.3 | | 52.4 | % |
Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) | | 466.3 | | 28.1 | % | 405.8 | | 29.0 | % | 167.0 | | 26.9 | % | 148.9 | | 29.1 | % |
Asia | | 298.7 | | 18.0 | % | 264.8 | | 18.9 | % | 111.2 | | 17.9 | % | 95.1 | | 18.5 | % |
Total Net Sales | | $ | 1,660.1 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,400.9 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 621.3 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 512.3 | | 100.0 | % |
19
The Americas’ net sales increased 27.9% in the third quarter of 2006 over the third quarter of 2005, and increased 22.6% in the first nine months of 2006 over the first nine months of 2005. EMEA’s net sales increased 12.2% in the third quarter of 2006 over the third quarter of 2005, and increased 14.9% in the first nine months of 2006 over the first nine months of 2005. Asia’s net sales increased 16.9% in the third quarter of 2006 over the third quarter of 2005, and increased 12.8% in the first nine months of 2006 over the first nine months of 2005.
In addition, we believe that constant currency information is useful for an understanding of our operating results. Revenues on a constant currency basis differ from revenues presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Constant Currency Revenues
($ in millions)
| | Three Months Ended September 24, 2006 | | Three Months Ended September 25, 2005 | |
| | Constant $ Revenue | | Constant $ Impact | | Constant $ % Change | | Constant $ Revenue | | Constant $ Impact | | Constant $ % Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | $ | 342.7 | | $ | 0.4 | | 27.7 | % | $ | 267.1 | | $ | 1.3 | | 18.1 | % |
EMEA | | 163.5 | | 3.5 | | 9.9 | % | 149.6 | | (0.7 | ) | 8.7 | % |
Asia | | 114.4 | | (3.2 | ) | 20.3 | % | 94.1 | | 0.9 | | 20.8 | % |
Total Net Sales | | $ | 620.6 | | $ | 0.7 | | 21.1 | % | $ | 510.8 | | $ | 1.5 | | 15.6 | % |
| | Nine Months Ended September 24, 2006 | | Nine Months Ended September 25, 2005 | |
| | Constant $ Revenue | | Constant $ Impact | | Constant $ % Change | | Constant $ Revenue | | Constant $ Impact | | Constant $ % Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | $ | 892.9 | | $ | 2.3 | | 22.2 | % | $ | 728.8 | | $ | 1.6 | | 21.2 | % |
EMEA | | 469.1 | | (2.8 | ) | 15.6 | % | 403.3 | | 2.4 | | 9.8 | % |
Asia | | 308.7 | | (10.1 | ) | 16.6 | % | 262.8 | | 2.0 | | 19.2 | % |
Total Net Sales | | $ | 1,670.7 | | $ | (10.6 | ) | 19.3 | % | $ | 1,394.9 | | $ | 6.0 | | 17.3 | % |
EMEA’s revenues on a constant currency basis principally reflect fluctuations in the Euro and British pound. Asia’s revenues on a constant currency basis principally reflect fluctuations in the Japanese yen and Australian dollar.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold was $410.5 million or 66.1% of net sales in the third quarter of 2006 compared to $323.6 million or 63.2% of net sales in the third quarter of 2005. Cost of goods sold was $1.103 billion or 66.4% of net sales in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $869.5 million or 62.1% of net sales in the first nine months of 2005. Gross margins for the third quarter of 2006 were 33.9% of net sales, approximately 290 basis points lower than in the third quarter of 2005. Gross margins for the first nine months of 2006 were 33.6% of net sales, approximately 430 basis points lower than in the first nine months of 2005. The lower third quarter and first nine months 2006 gross margins were attributable to a segment mix shift toward our Large Systems segment, combined with higher factory and field service costs within our principal segments.
Additionally, gross margins for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 included charges totaling $3.4 million related to the aforementioned workforce reduction actions and severance. These costs have not been allocated to our operating segments, but rather have been classified as indirect operating expenses for segment reporting consistent with our classification for internal financial reporting; also refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Report.
For further information about gross margins by segment, refer to the Segment Results section below.
20
Inventory Reserves. Total inventory reserves at September 24, 2006 were $58.2 million compared to $48.6 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in total inventory reserves reflected routine provisioning that was necessary as a result of applying APC’s inventory reserve methodology throughout the quarter, offset by the physical disposition of inventories covered by APC’s inventory reserves. APC’s reserve estimate methodology involves quantifying the total inventory position having potential loss exposure. Loss exposure generally results from several business factors, including product or component discontinuance, unplanned changes in demand, product design changes, and factory transitions. Quantifying such loss exposure is the result of combining the cost of inventories specifically identified as having little or no opportunity for sale or use (thus available for physical disposition) plus the cost of inventories having a high risk of no future sale or use based upon an analysis of on-hand quantities compared to historical and anticipated future sale or use. APC maintains an on-going business process for the physical disposition of inventories previously identified. Inventory write-offs occur at the time of physical disposition. Inventories, once reserved, are not written back up as such reserve adjustments are considered to be a permanent decrease to the cost basis of the excess or obsolete inventory.
Segment Results (Also refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this report for important information regarding APC’s reportable segments)
Small Systems. Net sales for products in the Small Systems segment, which provides power protection, UPS and management products for the PC, server and networking markets, increased in the third quarter of 2006 by 17.9% over the third quarter of 2005, and increased in the first nine months of 2006 by 14.9% over the first nine months of 2005. Continued strong adoption of our online Smart-UPS, the Smart-UPS RT, healthy growth in Back-UPS desktop UPSs plus growth in InfraStruXure architecture related categories, including racks and power distribution, were the primary drivers of the strong quarterly gains in this segment.
Third quarter and first nine months 2006 gross margins for the Small Systems segment of 43.0% and 42.0%, respectively, declined 180 basis points and 380 basis points, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2005. Higher factory and field service costs contributed to the third quarter 2006 year-over-year decline. In addition, higher freight and logistics costs, and pricing and mix shifts were factors in the year-to-date decline.
Large Systems. Net sales for products in the Large Systems segment, consisting primarily of 3-phase UPS, services, precision cooling and ancillary products for data centers, facilities and communication applications, increased in the third quarter of 2006 by 35.3% over the third quarter of 2005, and increased in the first nine months of 2006 by 33.8% over the first nine months of 2005. Solid growth from products used in the InfraStruXure architecture, including Symmetra 3-Phase UPSs, Power Distribution and Cooling, and services, as well as our broadband products drove the strong top line growth in this segment. Additionally, our new Smart UPS VT, which replaces lower-kVA legacy Silcon products and APC’s broadband products also contributed to the strong top line performance of this segment during the first nine months of 2006.
Third quarter and first nine months 2006 gross margins for the Large Systems segment of 15.9% and 17.0%, respectively, declined 50 basis points and 160 basis points, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2005. The growth of favorable gross margin products within this segment only partially offset increasing costs in our Services business year-over-year. In addition, higher freight and logistics costs contributed to the downward pressure on margins in this segment on a year-to-date basis. Continuing material cost savings partially offset unfavorable factors during the first nine months of 2006.
“Other” Segment. Net sales for products in the Other segment, consisting principally of mobile accessories and replacement batteries, increased in the third quarter of 2006 by 4.6% over the third quarter of 2005, and increased in the first nine months of 2006 by 0.5% over the first nine months of 2005. Third quarter 2006 sales of mobile accessories and replacement batteries were up year-over-year. For the first nine months of 2006, top line growth for this segment was essentially flat as the third quarter increases were substantially offset by declines during the first half of 2006 vs. the same period last year.
Third quarter and first nine months 2006 gross margins for the Other segment of 50.8% and 53.2%, respectively, decreased 950 basis points and 560 basis points, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2005. Pricing and material costs negatively impacted this segment’s gross margins.
21
Operating Expenses
Marketing, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses. SG&A expenses in the third quarter of 2006 were $147.3 million or 23.7% of net sales compared to $108.3 million or 21.1% of net sales in the third quarter of 2005. SG&A expenses in the first nine months of 2006 were $405.1 million or 24.4% of net sales compared to $314.5 million or 22.4% of net sales in the first nine months of 2005. We continue to support our data center initiatives, with a focus on increasing the awareness of our existing and prospective customers, particularly in relation to our InfraStruXure architecture. Our investments remain concentrated on driving InfraStruXure and data center-related initiatives, including sales and service staffing, education, and sales generation. The investments we are making in these areas are essential to branding the data center, and establishing APC as a leader in the network-critical physical infrastructure market. Additionally, SG&A expenses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 included charges totaling $4.2 million related to the aforementioned workforce reduction actions and severance. We also recorded approximately $3 million in incremental costs year-over-year associated with the newly acquired Netbotz business, including amortization of intangibles ($9 million during the first nine months). Additionally, pursuant to our adoption of SFAS 123R, we recorded approximately $1 million in incremental stock-based compensation during the quarter ($3 million during the first nine months) for a total equity compensation expense of $4 million ($12 million during the first nine months) when combined with costs associated with restricted stock units; the majority of these costs were classified in operating expenses.
The allowance for bad debts was 3.5% of gross accounts receivable at September 24, 2006, substantially unchanged from 3.8% at December 31, 2005. Accounts receivable balances outstanding over 60 days represented 11.2% of total receivables at September 24, 2006 compared to 12.7% at December 31, 2005. A majority of U.S. and international customer balances continue to be covered by receivables insurance. We continue to experience strong collection performance. Write-offs of uncollectable accounts represent less than 1% of net sales for both periods.
Research and Development (R&D). R&D expenditures were $26.7 million or 4.3% of net sales in the third quarter of 2006, up from $22.2 million or 4.3% of net sales in the third quarter of 2005. R&D expenditures were $75.1 million or 4.5% of net sales in the first nine months of 2006, up from $65.2 million or 4.7% of net sales in the first nine months of 2005. We are committed to sustaining our R&D efforts to meet the future needs of our customers across all segments and potentially expanding into emerging, high-growth areas. We continue to advance our NCPI systems in addition to ensuring our end-to-end offering is the best in the industry. We believe that continued product innovation through development is necessary for our existing products to remain competitive in our markets, as well as creating opportunities from new product introductions. The increases in total R&D spending primarily reflect increased numbers of software and hardware engineers and costs associated with new product development and engineering support.
Other Income, Net and Income Taxes
Other Income, Net. Other income is comprised principally of interest income which decreased during the third quarter of 2006 due principally to lower average cash balances available for investment during 2006. Interest income increased during the first nine months of 2006 as a result of the favorable impact of rising interest rates compared to the first nine months of 2005.
At September 24, 2006, APC had $511.1 million of total cash and investments, down from $774.2 million at December 31, 2005. We manage APC’s cash and investment balances to preserve principal and liquidity while maximizing our return on the total investment portfolio. We diversify our investment portfolio by investing in multiple types of investment-grade securities with multiple investment brokers. Based on APC’s investment portfolio and interest rates, at September 24, 2006, a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease of approximately $5 million in our annual interest income.
Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate was approximately -8.5% and 23.5% for the third quarters and 8.5% and 23.8% for the first nine months ended September 24, 2006 and September 25, 2005, respectively. The decrease in 2006 from 2005 was principally attributable to a net tax benefit of approximately $12.9 million or $0.07 per share associated with the adjustment of income tax provisioning resulting from recent tax audits. We expect APC’s effective income tax rate to remain considerably lower than the U.S. statutory federal corporate tax
22
rate of 35%, due to the tax savings from an increasing portion of taxable earnings anticipated to be generated from APC’s operations in jurisdictions currently having lower income tax rates than the present U.S. statutory income tax rate. This shift resulted partially from our product transitions to lower cost, lower tax, manufacturing locations. APC has tax holidays in China and India which reduce or eliminate the income taxes paid in those countries.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Working Capital
Working capital at September 24, 2006 was $1.272 billion compared to $1.389 billion at December 31, 2005. Our total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments decreased to $510.7 million at September 24, 2006 from $773.6 million at December 31, 2005.
Stock Repurchase Program. In February 2006, APC’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorizes up to $200 million to repurchase outstanding shares of APC’s common stock. The purchases would be made on the open market based on market and business factors. The duration of the repurchase program is two years but may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. APC commenced the repurchase of its common stock in February 2006. The first nine months 2006 decrease in our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments position reflected APC’s first nine months repurchase on the open market of approximately 7.1 million shares of its common stock, at an average price of $20.01 per share, totaling $142 million.
In addition, APC’s continued positive operating results allowed us to pay a quarterly dividend and continue to internally finance the capital investment, R&D, sales and marketing spending required to expand our operations.
Cash Flows
The table below summarizes our cash flows for the third quarters and first nine months ended September 24, 2006 and September 25, 2005.
| | Nine months ended | | Three months ended | |
| | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | | September 24, 2006 | | September 25, 2005 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | $ | (14,230 | ) | $ | 108,789 | | $ | 17,254 | | $ | 41,920 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | 126,827 | | (2,357 | ) | (360 | ) | 4,000 | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (187,445 | ) | (17,652 | ) | (31,406 | ) | (6,538 | ) |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | (74,848 | ) | 88,780 | | (14,512 | ) | 39,382 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 262,414 | | 72,721 | | 202,078 | | 122,119 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 187,566 | | $ | 161,501 | | $ | 187,566 | | $ | 161,501 | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Our cash flows from operations for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 funded increased inventory as discussed below. Our cash flows from operations for the third quarter of 2005 and first nine months of 2005 reflected higher profit levels. In addition, both years reflected increased accounts receivable balances as a result of higher third quarter and first nine months sales.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Our investing activities cash flows in the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 reflected the impact of the aforementioned share repurchase program. Both periods included the impact of capital spending, principally manufacturing and office equipment, purchased software applications, and building improvements. Our investment approach and the composition of our investment portfolio remained relatively constant overall with no investments having maturity dates greater than one year, except for our auction rate securities and variable rate demand obligations. Capital spending in the third quarters and first nine months of 2006 and 2005 focused on funding additional equipment needs and improving existing factories, principally in the U.S., India, and the Philippines, as well as continuing investment in information technologies.
23
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Our cash flows from financing activities included the afore-mentioned share repurchases in the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, as well as the payment of common stock dividends of approximately $19.1 million and $19.5 million during the third quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $57.7 million and $58.1 million during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. These outflows were partially offset by proceeds from issuances of common stock relating to employee stock plans during each of the periods presented.
Inventories
Worldwide inventories were $636.5 million at September 24, 2006, up from $541.8 million at December 31, 2005. APC’s inventory continued to increase during the third quarter in anticipation of continued revenue growth in the fourth quarter of 2006. Our inventory increased in the first half due to seasonal anticipation of summer demand patterns as a result of power outages and interruptions. Also, higher levels of on-hand finished goods were required to ensure product availability as we navigate our aforementioned supply chain issues, and to meet increasing current and anticipated demand, particularly InfraStruXure demand, as well as to manage the requirements associated with continuing transfers of production of a wide range of Small and Large Systems products to and among our low cost manufacturing regions. In addition, we increased our inventory levels strategically to support in-region lead time initiatives, as well as to support continuing new product introductions. Despite increasing inventory levels, our inventory days on hand improved to 138 days in the third quarter of 2006, down from 147 days in the second quarter of 2006, reflecting our strong third quarter 2006 net sales performance, and approximated 135 days in the third quarter of 2005. There were no inventory charges, other than APC’s standard provisioning, during the third quarters and first nine months of 2006 and 2005.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations at September 24, 2006, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods. This table excludes amounts already recorded on our balance sheet as current liabilities at September 24, 2006.
| | Payments Due By Period | |
| | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years | |
| | (In millions) | |
Operating Lease Obligations | | $ | 25.1 | | $ | 2.4 | | $ | 13.6 | | $ | 6.4 | | $ | 2.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
APC’s non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for warehousing and office space, expire at various dates through 2011. These leases contain renewal options for periods ranging from one to seven years and require APC to pay its proportionate share of utilities, taxes, and insurance. APC is not able to determine the aggregate amount of purchase orders that represent contractual obligations for the purchase of goods and services, as such purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. For the purposes of this disclosure, contractual obligations for the purchase of goods and services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on APC and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; the approximate timing of the transaction, and contain no provisions allowing for cancellation without significant penalty. Our purchase orders for raw materials or purchased finished products are based on our current manufacturing needs and/or demand forecasts and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of raw materials or finished products specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our expected requirements for three months.
Capital Expenditures and Capital Commitments
During the third quarters of 2006 and 2005, our capital expenditures, net of capital grants, amounted to approximately $14.1 million and $12.0 million, respectively. During the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, our capital expenditures, net of capital grants, amounted to approximately $62.6 million and $27.4 million, respectively. Our capital spending during the third quarters and first nine months of 2006 and 2005 consisted primarily of manufacturing and office equipment, purchased software applications, and building improvements, with spending focused on funding additional equipment needs and improving existing factories, principally in the U.S., India, and the Philippines, as well as continuing investment in information technologies. Substantially all of APC’s net capital expenditures were financed from available operating cash.
24
We have dedicated efforts to optimize our overall manufacturing capacity and locations over recent years and we will continue to plan for future capacity requirements based on the assumed continued acceptance and demand for our products in the specific market segments they were designed to address. We currently expect that capital spending will be between $80 million and $100 million in 2006, compared to $49 million in 2005. Most of our incremental capital spending for 2006 will go toward acquiring and expanding a building for a customer Technology Learning Center, to be based in St. Louis, Missouri, and maintaining, upgrading, and expanding our current manufacturing capacity, as well as investments to upgrade current hardware and software office technologies. We acquired land and an office building in St. Louis for approximately $14 million during the second quarter of 2006 from available cash on-hand. Construction began during the third quarter of 2006 on the Technology Learning Center building which is expected to be completed in 2007.
We had no material capital commitments during the third quarters and first nine months of 2006 and 2005, or at September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
APC has an agreement with the Industrial Development Authority of Ireland, otherwise known as the IDA. Under this agreement, we receive grant monies for costs incurred for machinery, equipment, and building improvements for our Galway facility. These grants are equal to 40% of such costs up to a maximum of $13.1 million. Such grant monies are subject to APC meeting certain employment goals and maintaining operations in Ireland until termination of the agreement. By an amendment agreement dated June 26, 2006, APC and the IDA agreed to (1) reduce the aggregate required employment goals for our Galway facility subject to maintaining certain minimum target employment levels in our Galway and Castlebar facilties and the imposition of monetary penalties should aggregate employment levels in the two facilities fall below 405 employees, (ii) reduce by 30% over two years APC’s contingent grant liability in the event that APC breaches the agreement, and (iii) extend the term of the underlying agreement from 2008 to 2012. Under a separate agreement with the IDA, we receive direct reimbursement of training costs at our Galway and Castlebar facilities for up to $3,000 and $12,500, respectively, per new employee hired. Also refer to Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of American Power Conversion Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
APC also has an agreement with the IDA for a research and development grant towards the costs of a project for the development of software products. The availability of the grant is contingent on meeting certain milestones in the progress of the project as well as meeting certain employment goals on the project within the Galway facility. The amount of grant assistance available on satisfaction of all conditions is 28% of the eligible expenditure to a maximum of €714,588. Also refer to Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of American Power Conversion Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Borrowing Facilities and Financial Commitments
APC had no borrowing facilities or significant financial commitments, other than those required in the normal course of business, during the third quarters and first nine months of 2006 and 2005, or at September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
APC had no significant off-balance sheet arrangements during the third quarters and first nine months of 2006 and 2005, or at September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Quarterly Cash Dividends
Dividends of $0.10 per share were declared and paid in each of the first, second, and third quarters of 2006 and 2005. It is the intention of the Board of Directors to pay a comparable quarterly dividend on a going forward basis contingent upon continued capital availability and a determination that cash dividends continue to be in the best interests of APC and its shareholders.
APC has historically generated annual cash flows from operating activities as a result of strong operating results and, at times, improvement in working capital. We believe that current internal cash flows together with available cash, available credit facilities or, if needed, the proceeds from the sale of additional equity, will be sufficient to support anticipated capital spending, dividend payments, and other working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.
25
Foreign Currency Activity
We invoice our customers in various currencies. Realized and unrealized transaction gains or losses are included in the results of operations and are measured based upon the effect of changes in exchange rates on the actual or expected amount of functional currency cash flows. Transaction gains and losses were not material to the results of operations in the third quarters or first nine months of 2006 and 2005.
The table below summarizes information on balances that are sensitive to foreign currency exchange rates and presents such amounts in U.S. dollar equivalents.
| | September 24, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | Accounts Receivable | | Liabilities | | Accounts Receivable | | Liabilities | |
| | (In millions) | |
U.S. dollar functional currency | | $ | 88.6 | | $ | 142.7 | | $ | 98.6 | | $ | 93.8 | |
Swiss franc functional currency | | $ | 22.6 | | $ | 11.4 | | $ | 14.4 | | $ | 5.8 | |
APC also had non-trade receivables denominated in Euros of approximately U.S.$0.9 million and U.S.$1.4 million at September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
We continually review our foreign exchange exposure and consider various risk management techniques, including the netting of foreign currency receipts and disbursements, rate protection agreements with customers/vendors and derivatives arrangements, including foreign exchange contracts. We presently do not utilize rate protection agreements or derivative arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has defined critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and which require our most difficult, complex or subjective judgments or estimates. Based on this definition, we have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For all financial statement periods presented, there have been no material modifications to the application of these critical accounting policies. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, also refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of American Power Conversion Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
On an on-going basis, we evaluate the judgments and estimates underlying all of our accounting policies, including those related to revenue recognition, product returns, bad debts, inventories, impairment of long-lived assets, deferred tax valuation allowances, restructuring reserves and contingencies, and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Materially different results in the amount and timing of our actual results for any period could occur if we made different judgments or utilized different estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
26
Our critical accounting policies are as follows:
Revenue Recognition. We follow very specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue; however, certain judgments affect the application of our revenue policy. Revenue results are difficult to predict, and any shortfall in revenue or delay in recognizing revenue could cause our operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. In general, revenue is recognized when title has passed at the time of delivery of product for all of our operating segments as stipulated by the delivery terms for the sales transactions. In addition, prior to revenue recognition, we require persuasive evidence of the arrangement, that the price is fixed or determinable, and that collectibility is reasonably assured. This requires us to assess at the point of delivery whether these criteria have been met. When management determines that such criteria have been met, revenue is recognized. Installation is not applicable for a majority of Small Systems and all “Other” segment products based on the nature of the products sold. Generally, revenue associated with Large Systems sales is also recognized at the time of delivery and/or installation pursuant to the delivery and/or installation terms. Delivery terms vary, but often include origin-based terms (e.g., FOB Shipping Point and Ex-works) and destination-based terms (e.g., DDU/DDP (delivered duty unpaid/delivered duty paid)). We record estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, co-operative advertising and other volume based discounts at the time of sale.
Revenue from sales of third-party vendor products or services is recorded on a gross basis when APC is a principal to the transaction, and is recorded net of costs should APC act as an agent between the client and vendor. Generally, APC does not act as agent. Several factors are considered to determine whether APC is an agent or principal, most notably whether APC is the primary obligor to the client, has inventory risk or adds meaningful value to the vendor’s products or service. Consideration is also given to whether APC was involved in the selection of the vendor’s product or service, has latitude in establishing the sales price, or has credit risk.
Our arrangements do not generally include acceptance clauses. However, if an arrangement includes a customer specified acceptance provision, acceptance can occur at our factory prior to delivery or at the customers’ site. Revenue recognition will occur upon management’s determination of acceptance by the customer consistent with the agreed-upon delivery terms for the sale. As we continue to introduce new products and enter into new product and service arrangements with customers, we anticipate that installation and customer acceptance provisions may become more common, and therefore increasingly significant for determining delivery and performance and consequently our entitlement to recognize revenue.
Certain Large Systems product lines and, at times, one product line included in the Small Systems segment, require electrical hardwire installation or duct installation which is performed by the customer or their contracted licensed contractor/electrician. Where we do not perform such installation, revenue recognition at the time of delivery is proper as customer acceptance of the unit is not required. Also, payment by the customer is not contingent upon installation of the product.
We offer additional services to customers depending on the type of product the customer has purchased, including product-based and professional services. Revenue is recognized at the time services are provided or is deferred and recognized over the service period (where applicable). The fair value of these services are based upon the rates that we charge customers in separately negotiated transactions and such services are not essential to the functionality of the delivered product.
For all sales, except those completed over the Internet, we use a binding purchase order as evidence of an arrangement. For sales over the Internet, we use a credit card authorization as evidence of an arrangement. Sales through certain customers are evidenced by a master agreement governing the relationship together with binding purchase orders on a transaction by transaction basis.
27
Estimating Valuation Allowances and Accrued Liabilities — Allowances for Sales Returns, Doubtful Accounts, Inventory Obsolescence and Product Recall, and Assessment of the Probability of the Outcome of our Current Litigation. Significant management judgments that affect the application of our revenue policy also include estimates of potential future product returns related to current period product revenue. We analyze historical returns, current economic trends, and channel inventories when evaluating the adequacy of the sales returns and other allowances. Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the sales returns and other allowances in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if management made different judgments or utilized different estimates.
We provide limited rights of return to distributors and retailers for our Small Systems product lines. We provide appropriate reserves for returns at the time that related revenue is recognized, based on historical patterns of returns and contractual provisions in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 48, Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists, and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104. Returns of Large Systems products generally do not occur. Historically, returns have represented approximately 3% of gross sales and have not differed significantly from prior estimates.
Similarly, we must make estimates of the uncollectability of our accounts receivable. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable balances in view of customer credit-worthiness, customer concentrations, historical bad debts, current economic trends, and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. A majority of U.S. and international customer balances continue to be covered by receivables insurance. Historically, write-offs of uncollectable accounts have represented less than 1% of net sales.
Our inventory reserve estimate methodology involves quantifying the total inventory position having potential loss exposure. Loss exposure generally results from several business factors, including product or component discontinuance, unplanned changes in demand, product design changes, and factory transitions. Quantifying such loss exposure is the result of combining the cost of inventories specifically identified as having little or no opportunity for sale or use (thus available for physical disposition) plus the cost of inventories having a high risk of no future sale or use based upon an analysis of on-hand quantities compared to historical and anticipated future sale or use. We maintain an on-going business process for the physical disposition of inventories previously identified. Inventory write-offs occur at the time of physical disposition. Inventories, once reserved, are not written back up as such reserve adjustments are considered to be a permanent decrease to the cost basis of the excess or obsolete inventory. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
We are, and may in the future become, involved in litigation involving our business, products or operations. For pending claims for which there is an estimable range of loss greater than zero, we record the best estimate of liability within the range. If no point within the range is considered the best estimate, we record the minimum estimated liability. Because of uncertainties related to the identifiable range of loss on any pending claims, we may be unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability related to our pending claims and revise our estimates. Such revisions in our estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our results of operation and financial position. The litigation process is inherently uncertain and includes the risk of an unexpected, unfavorable result. We may be materially adversely impacted by any such litigation.
Valuation of Long-lived Tangible and Intangible Assets including Goodwill. We assess the impairment of long-lived tangible and intangible assets on an ongoing basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Should our assessment of long-lived and amortizable intangible assets suggest impairment, we would determine recoverability based on an estimate of future undiscounted cash flows resulting from our use of the asset and its eventual disposition.
28
Factors we consider that could trigger an impairment review include the following:
· significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
· significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;
· significant negative industry or economic trends; and
· significant technological changes, which would render equipment or manufacturing processes obsolete.
We evaluate each of our reporting units with goodwill during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment losses are determined based upon the excess of carrying amounts over discounted expected future cash flows of the underlying business.
Accounting for Income Taxes. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. Expectations about future taxable income incorporate numerous assumptions about actions, elections and strategies to minimize income taxes in future years. Our ability to take such actions, make preferred elections and implement tax-planning strategies may be adversely impacted by enacted changes in tax laws and/or tax rates, as well as successful challenges by tax authorities resulting from differing interpretations of tax laws and regulations.
APC is routinely under audit by federal, foreign, state, or local authorities in the areas of income taxes and the remittance of sales and use taxes. These audits include questioning the timing and amount of deductions, the nexus of income among various tax jurisdictions and compliance with federal, foreign, state, and local tax laws. In evaluating the exposure associated with various tax filing positions, we often accrue for probable exposures. To the extent APC were to prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or were to be required to pay amounts in excess of reserves, APC’s effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected.
To the extent we believe that recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statements of income. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. At September 24, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we provided a valuation allowance on certain of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating losses generated in 2001 through the third quarter of 2006 for the start up and continuing operations of Brazilian operations, because of uncertainty regarding their realizability. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income by jurisdiction in which we operate and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods we may need to establish an additional valuation allowance which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
29
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R. This Statement requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. This Statement also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions. This Statement is effective for APC beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006. It is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for APC beginning with the first quarter of 2007. We are currently reviewing this Interpretation to determine its impact on APC.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We, in the normal course of business, are exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The information required under this section related to such risks is included in the Foreign Currency Activity section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 2 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.
We, in the normal course of business, are also exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in interest rates and the resulting rates of return on investments in marketable securities. The information required under this section related to such risks is included in the Other Income, Net section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 2 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.
30
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(A) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of APC’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, APC’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in APC’s periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
(B) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during APC’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, APC’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations Inherent in all Controls. APC’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, recognize that our disclosure controls and our internal controls (discussed above) cannot prevent all error or all attempts at fraud. Any controls system, no matter how well crafted and operated, can only provide reasonable, and not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in any control system, no evaluation or implementation of a control system can provide complete assurance that all control issues and all possible instances of fraud have been or will be detected.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
APC is involved in claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. While management currently believes that resolving all pending legal matters, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on APC’s financial position, litigation and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, including the risk of an unfavorable outcome, and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. An unfavorable outcome could include monetary damages or, in cases where injunctive relief is sought, an injunction prohibiting certain activities. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on APC’s financial position, cash flows and results of operations for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.
31
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
This document contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, particularly in the Business Outlook section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 2 of this report. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology including “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” “estimates,” or “anticipates” or the negative of these words and phrases or other variations of these words and phrases or comparable terminology. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this document.
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any such statements to reflect any change in our expectations or in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statements may be based, or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following: The ability of APC and Schneider to gain regulatory and shareholder approval for the proposed merger; successful completion of the transaction; ability to achieve expected growth, savings and benefits of merger; potential disruption in business or relationships with customers, vendors, partners and employees as a result of the proposed merger; the pervasive and intensifying competition in all markets where we operate; prolonged adverse economic and employment conditions in the markets we serve; changes in available technology that make our existing technology obsolete or expensive to upgrade; the availability and cost of capital; the impact of any industry consolidation; the outcome of pending or threatened complaints and litigation; the Company’s ability to achieve the targeted job reductions and savings; the Company’s ability to improve the execution of its operations processes and eliminate operational waste and excess expense; depending on market circumstances, the Company may not complete its previously approved stock repurchase program; the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; the impact on demand, component availability and pricing, and logistics, and the disruption of manufacturing operations that result from labor disputes, war, acts of terrorism or political instability; ramp up, expansion, transfer and rationalization of global manufacturing capacity, including successfully consolidating its Irish manufacturing operations in Castlebar, Ireland and redeploying certain customer-facing positions within the Europe, Middle East and Africa region; the Company’s ability to effectively align operating expenses and production capacity with the current demand environment; the potential impact of complying with changing environmental regulations; the discovery of a latent defect in any of the Company’s products; growth rates in the power protection industry and related industries; product mix changes and the potential negative impact on gross margins from such changes; changes in the seasonality of demand patterns; inventory risks due to shifts in market demand; component constraints, shortages, pricing and quality; risk of nonpayment of accounts receivable; and the risks described from time to time in APC’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For a discussion of these and other risk factors, please refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
32
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
The following table summarizes information relating to purchases made by APC of shares of our common stock during the first nine months ended September 24, 2006.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| | (In thousands except per share amounts) | |
January 1, 2006 to January 22, 2006 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | $ | — | |
January 23, 2006 to February 19, 2006 | | 970 | | $ | 20.20 | | 970 | | $ | 180,389 | |
February 20, 2006 to March 26, 2006 | | 2,474 | | $ | 20.46 | | 2,474 | | $ | 129,723 | |
March 27, 2006 to April 23, 2006 | | — | | — | | — | | $ | 129,723 | |
April 24, 2006 to May 21, 2006 | | 1,420 | | $ | 20.80 | | 1,420 | | $ | 100,137 | |
May 22, 2006 to June 25, 2006 | | 1,507 | | $ | 19.64 | | 1,507 | | $ | 70,507 | |
June 26, 2006 to July 23, 2006 | | — | | — | | — | | $ | 70,507 | |
July 24, 2006 to August 20, 2006 | | — | | — | | — | | $ | 70,507 | |
August 21, 2006 to September 24, 2006 | | 736 | | $ | 17.42 | | 736 | | $ | 57,673 | |
Total | | 7,107 | | $ | 20.01 | | 7,107 | | | |
In February 2006, APC’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorizes up to $200 million to repurchase outstanding shares of APC’s common stock. The purchases would be made on the open market based on market and business factors. APC commenced the repurchase of its common stock in February 2006 and as of the end of the first nine months of 2006, had repurchased approximately 7.1 million shares on the open market at an average price of approximately $20.01 per share (compared to a volume weighted average price of $20.01 per share), totaling $142.3 million. The duration of the repurchase program is two years but may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.
33
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. 3.01 | Articles of Organization of APC, as amended, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 3.02 | By-Laws of APC, as amended and restated, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of October 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 4.01 | Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2006, by and between APC and BankBoston, N.A. (as executed by its successor, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.), previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 10.1 | Employment Agreement dated as of August 15, 2006, between APC and Robert J. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 10.2 | Change-in-Control Severance Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2005, between APC and Richard J. Thompson, which is substantially the form of the Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of August 15, 2006 between APC and David R. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 12, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 10.3 | Form of Change-in-Control Severance Agreement, which is substantially the form of the Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of July 5, 2000 between APC and Robert J. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 10.4 | Form of Amendment to Change-in-Control Severance Agreement, which is substantially the form of the Amendment to Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of July 29, 2005 between APC and Robert J. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 10.5 | Agreement, dated as of August 24, 2006, between APC and Rodger B. Dowdell, Jr., previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 10.6 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 28, 2006, by and among APC, Schneider Electric SA and Trianon Inc., previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) |
| |
Exhibit No. 31.1 | Certification of Robert J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| |
Exhibit No. 31.2 | Certification of Richard J. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| |
Exhibit No. 32.1 | Certification of Robert J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
| |
Exhibit No. 32.2 | Certification of Richard J. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION
| Date: November 3, 2006 | |
| /s/ Richard J. Thompson | |
| Richard J. Thompson | |
| Chief Financial Officer | |
| (Principal Accounting And Financial Officer) | |
35
AMERICAN POWER CONVERSION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | | Description | | Page No. | |
| | | | | |
3.01 | | Articles of Organization of APC, as amended, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
3.02 | | By-Laws of APC, as amended and restated, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of October 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
4.01 | | Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2006, by and between APC and BankBoston, N.A. (as executed by its successor, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
10.1 | | Employment Agreement dated as of August 15, 2006, between APC and Robert J. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
10.2 | | Change-in-Control Severance Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2005, between APC and Richard J. Thompson, which is substantially the form of the Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of August 15, 2006 between APC and David R. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 12, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
10.3 | | Form of Change-in-Control Severance Agreement, which is substantially the form of the Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of July 5, 2000 between APC and Robert J. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
10.4 | | Form of Amendment to Change-in-Control Severance Agreement, which is substantially the form of the Amendment to Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of July 29, 2005 between APC and Robert J. Johnson, previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
10.5 | | Agreement, dated as of August 24, 2006, between APC and Rodger B. Dowdell, Jr., previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
10.6 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 28, 2006, by and among APC, Schneider Electric SA and Trianon Inc., previously filed as an exhibit to APC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-12432) | | | |
31.1 | | Certification of Robert J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | 37 | |
31.2 | | Certification of Richard J. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | 38 | |
32.1 | | Certification of Robert J. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | 39 | |
32.2 | | Certification of Richard J. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | | 40 | |
36