BBJ Environmental 10QSB 2004 Q3 Quarterly report (small business)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 0-24016

BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in it charter)


Nevada		65-1148155
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

6802 Lakeview Center Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, Florida 33619

(Address of principal executive offices)

(813) 622-8550

(issuer’s telephone number)

6802 Citicorp Drive, Suite 500, Tampa, Florida 33619

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

As of October 31, 2004, there were 58,599,578 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, issued and outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes ¨ No x

BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

INDEX


			Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements

		Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2003	3

		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003	4

		Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003	5-6

		Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements	7-8

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	8-12

	Item 3.	Controls and Procedures	12

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	13

	Item 2.	Changes in Securities	13-14

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	14

	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	14

	Item 5.	Other Information	14

	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	15

SIGNATURES			16

BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)


	(Unaudited) Sept. 30, 2004			Dec. 31, 2003
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash	$	(8	)	$	60
Accounts receivable, net		120			132
Inventory		128			91
Loans to related parties		69			—

Total current assets		309			283

Property and equipment, net		177			124
Security deposits		29			42

	$	515		$	449

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	662		$	503
Line of Credit		25			0
Bridge loan from officer, director or shareholder		696			—

Total current liabilities		1,383			503

Stockholders’ deficit:
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 58,599,578 and 50,614,578 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		58			51
Additional paid-in capital		9,660			8,640
Accumulated deficit		(10,113	)		(8,272	)
Stock subscriptions		52			52
Stock subscriptions receivable		(525	)		(525	)

Net stockholders’ deficit		(868	)		(54	)

	$	515		$	449

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except shares and per share amount)


	Three Months Ended Sept. 30,						Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Sales, net	$	218		$	208		$	676		$	724

Cost of sales		97			74			248			262

Gross margin		121			134			428			462

Operating Expenses:
Sales and marketing		235			446			1,060			1,026
General and administrative		284			306			1,059			928
Research and development		46			32			165			109

Total operating expenses		565			784			2,284			2,063

Net loss	$	(444	)	$	(650	)	$	(1,857	)	$	(1,601	)

Net loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)

Weighted average shares outstanding		59,435,000			43,414,000			57,597,000			41,630,000

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated condensed statement of Operations.

BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,
	2004			2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,843	)	$	(1,602	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		33			20
Allowance for doubtful accounts		—			15
Compensation due to grant of common stock		—			48
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		12			(57	)
Inventory		(37	)		(26	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		161			3

Net cash used in operating activities		(1,674	)		(1,605	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(87	)		(74	)
Security deposits		13			-—

Net cash used in investing activities		(74	)		(74	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Loan to related parties		(69	)		150
Line of Credit		25			0
Proceeds from bridge loans		696			(25	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,027			1,007

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,679			1,132

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

(continued)

BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS- Continued (Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,
	2004			2003
Net decrease in cash		(68	)		(611	)

Cash, beginning of period		60			651

Cash, end of period	$	(8	)	$	40

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	2		$	1

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash financing activities:

Issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock for consulting services	$	8		$	—

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(all amounts in thousands, except shares, options and price per share)

September 30, 2004

(Unaudited)

NOTE A – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements at September 30, 2004 include the accounts of BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), its subsidiary BBJ Environmental Solutions, Inc. (acquired in June 2000) and those of BBJ Environmental Solutions Ltd. (established in October 2003), a wholly owned subsidiary of BBJ Environmental Solutions; and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of financial position as of September 30, 2004 and results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year. For further information and a current discussion of the Company’s financial condition as of December 31, 2003, references should be made to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as amended. The consolidated companies are collectively referred to herein as “BBJ” or the “Company”. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Such reclassifications had no effect on reported net loss.

NOTE B – Organization and Description of Business

BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Omega Development, Inc., was a development stage enterprise formed under the laws of the State of Nevada to evaluate, structure and complete a business combination in the form of a merger with, or acquisition of, prospects consisting of private companies, partnerships or sole proprietorships. In June 2000, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of BBJ Environmental Solutions, Inc., a Florida corporation organized in 1993 (“BBJ Environmental Solutions”). In October 2003, we formed BBJ Environmental Solutions Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of BBJ Environmental Solutions, to establish an Asian sales distribution company in Hong Kong. As a result, BBJ Environmental Technologies is a holding company for BBJ Environmental Solutions, its primary operating subsidiary.

BBJ Environmental Solutions is an early stage development company that develops, manufactures, and markets products and devices that control and remove mold bacteria and other microbial and organic contaminations in indoor environments. We have developed technologies that are especially effective in preventing air pollution originating from heating, ventilation, air-conditioning, and refrigeration systems of homes, offices, health care facilities, schools, industrial plants and public buildings. Consequently, our products are effective in promoting good indoor air quality and indoor environment quality. Our leading technology is the BBJ MicroBiocide^{^®} product family. These products are registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for controlling and inhibiting bacterial and fungal growth in both building interiors and air-conditioning and air duct systems.

BBJ Environmental Solutions, Inc has submitted to the EPA for registration two new antimicrobials. These products, Maintain C-1 and BBJ Mold Control, are variations of BBJ MicroBiocide^{^®} , and are in final stages of approval by the EPA. On July 16, 2004, the EPA indicated approval on six of seven studies that had been submitted. The EPA has asked for clarification of one study, which has been submitted and is now under review for final approval. These two new antimicrobial products will establish a boarder market allowing for direct sale to retail consumers.

In addition, BBJ Environmental Solutions Inc., has purchased an aerosol-filling machine and is planning to offer all of its consumers products in aerosol form, using environmentally safe propellants. This line has excess capacity and we anticipate this product line will possibly offset manufacturing labor and overhead.

NOTE C – Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share

Loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 respectively.

NOTE D – Issuance of Common Stock

Since December 31, 2003, we completed the following private financings:

On January 7, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 320,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $80. Warrants to purchase an additional 106,667 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share until its expiration date of January 31, 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

On January 16, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 120,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $30. Warrants to purchase an additional 40,000 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share until its expiration date of January 31, 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

On February 11, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to an overseas bank whose investments are controlled by Olivier d’Auriol, one of our directors. We issued 4,545,500 shares of additional common stock at $0.11 per share and received gross proceeds of $500.

On February 19, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 60,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $15. Warrants to purchase an additional 20,000 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share until its expiration date of February 28, 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

On March 30, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to an overseas bank whose investments are controlled by Olivier d’Auriol, one of our directors. We issued 1,800,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.11 per share and received gross proceeds of $198.

On April 27, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 40,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $10. Warrants to purchase an additional 13,333 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share until its expiration date of April 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

On May 12, 2004 we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 48,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $12. Warrants to purchase an additional 16,000 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $.025 per share until its expiration date of May, 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

On July 14, 2004 we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 400,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $100. Warrants to purchase an additional 133,333 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $.025 per share until its expiration date of July 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

On September 9, 2004 we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 454,500 shares of additional common stock at $0.11 per share and received gross proceeds of $50. Warrants to purchase an additional 151,500 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $.011 per share until its expiration date of September 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

On September 23, 2004 we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 97,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $24. Warrants to purchase an additional 32,333 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $.025 per share until its expiration date of September 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

Since December 31, 2003, we issued the following shares in exchange for services rendered to the company:

On January 1, 2004, we issued 100,000 shares of stock to our current Chief Executive Officer, Jean Caillet under the terms of a consulting agreement approved by our Board of Directors during January 2003.

NOTE E—Employee Stock Options

During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, 1,144,125 options were granted to employees.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (in thousands)

Introduction

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 15, 1988 under the name Lewison Enterprises, Inc. On January 19, 1994, our name changed to Omega Development, Inc. and to BBJ Environmental Technologies, Inc. on June 1, 2000. Effective June 1, 2000, we acquired 100% of the then outstanding common stock and preferred stock of BBJ Environmental Solutions, Inc. In October 2003, we formed BBJ Environmental Solutions Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of BBJ Environmental Solutions, to establish an

Asian sales distribution company in Hong Kong. As a result, BBJ Environmental Technologies is a holding company for BBJ Environmental Solutions, its primary operating subsidiary.

During the last quarter of 2003, and continuing through 2004, the BBJ Board of Directors made a number of major decisions regarding the marketing and sales organization and strategies of the company in an effort to take advantage of a rapidly increasing awareness of indoor and environmental quality both in the US and Asia, including:

•

Creation of a fully owned subsidiary BBJ Environmental Solutions Ltd. in Hong Kong;

•

Obtaining GSA (US General Services Administration) registration for BBJ products;

•

Adoption of an aggressive direct approach to sales of products for use in governmental buildings; and

•

Adoption of an end-user strategy rather than basing our approach to the market totally on distributors who in turn sell to end users. Under this strategy, we still utilize distributors to move products through the channels and sell to HVAC contractors and small customers but in addition, we have changed the role of our sales force to call on very large key accounts;

•

Reorganization of the sales team to bring more highly qualified individuals in placing their focus on strategic key accounts;

•

Eliminating independent factory representatives. These organizations contribute little, if any to our sales revenue as most sales are driven by our internal staff. These representatives were given 10% of the gross sales in their respective territory. Thus, this move will lead to significant savings in commissions while having little if any negative impact on total revenue; and

•

Drastically cut the US administrative expenses by combining the CFO and accounting positions and eliminating the position of Senior Vice President of Operations. These changes were implemented beginning in June and the full impact of these savings will phase in throughout the third quarter.

The above strategies are expected to have a positive impact on performance beginning in 2004 and drive sales volume during the balance of the year. Implementation of these strategies required a dramatic reorganization of our sales team, which resulted in lower sales during the nine months of 2004.

Nevertheless, we have started to realize some important results, including:

•

We have obtained GSA registration no. GS-07F-5777P;

•

We have signed our first major governmental building contracts;

•

We have received a very positive response from the Hong Kong market, including 60 % success on our sales calls;

•

We have received approval for import of products to Thailand;

•

Major chains of hotels in the Far East have tested and now use our products;

•

We are in negotiation with potential partners in China, Korea, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore. Although we cannot guarantee that we will be successful in the Far East, we believe that sales in the Far East will become significant by the end of 2004, in part because this area of the world is very receptive to indoor air quality mainly due to the SARS crisis.

Although we believe that our new sales strategies provide us with the greatest opportunities in the marketplace and to achieve an increase in sales, there can be no guarantee that our new sales strategy will be successful.

Forward – Looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) such as statements relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business operations. These statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical fact. Accordingly, forward-looking statements are based on management’s projections, estimates, judgments and assumptions (some of which are beyond the control of the Company) and are typically identified by reference to a future period or periods, or by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “approximately,” “intend,” and other similar words and phrases, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “could,” and “may.” These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates, judgments and projections about our business and our industry, and they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although we believe our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, judgments and estimates, such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those discussed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to those related to following:

• general economic and market conditions, either nationally or in the markets where we conduct our business, may be less favorable than expected;

• our business plan or its implementation may not be successful in attracting sufficient consumer demand to operate the Company profitably;

• we may be unable to find suitable equity or debt financing when needed on terms commercially reasonable to us;

• there may be changes in the cost or pricing of, or consumer demand for, our or our industry’s products, including the possible obsolesce of our products;

• we may be unable to collect our accounts or notes receivables when due or within a reasonable period of time after they become due and payable;

• there may be a significant increase in competitive pressures; and

• there may be changes in environmental laws, policies and practices that may adversely affect our products.

Many of these factors are beyond our control and you should read carefully the more detailed description of potential risks, uncertainties, and other factors which could cause our financial performance or results of operations to differ materially from current expectations or such forward- looking statements set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including Part 1, Item 1 of our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as amended, under the heading “Risk Factors”). These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this document. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Results of Operations

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, we generated sales of $218 and $676, respectively, an increase of $10 or 5% and a decrease of $48 or 6%, respectively, from the comparable periods of the prior year. We are still recovering from the significant reverse drop we experienced in the first quarter and have continued the favorable trend compared to the prior year that we established in the second quarter. The third quarter revenue increase, although modest, continues this trend. This further reflects the positive impact of the new strategic sales structure and its favorable impact on revenue.

The significant focus we placed on reorganizing our sales organization in connection with implementation of our new sales strategy has shown some positive results. Our continued efforts utilizing the new sales approach, allows us to be comparable to the same period of the prior year.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, our gross margin remained the same at 63% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the comparable year ago period. Although year to date gross profits deceased $34, or 8% to $428 from $462 in the comparable year ago period, we believe with our continued efforts and new sales strategy, future periods will continue to show signs of positive growth.

Sales Strategy

In August 2003, after positive results from a thorough market test, we modified our sales approach to focus on the end-customer. Targeted end-customers include schools, hospitals, state and federal government buildings, manufacturing plants and hotels and motels.

We believe our company can provide its customers with improved indoor air quality at no incremental long-term cost; internal studies suggest that utility savings will offset all incremental product and labor costs required to implement our program within twelve months. As a result of this change in strategy, we experienced higher-than-typical attrition of our sales force; new hires have been screened and selected specifically for the current sales approach.

We recently launched a private label product, sold as part of a chemical manufacturers product line, which will allow us to indirectly penetrate a greater number of distributors.

We are dedicated to increasing sales and gross profit and will continue to monitor and re-evaluate our sales strategy in order to maximize performance. Our market analysis also indicates additional opportunities in duct cleaning, mold remediation, and mold prevention markets. Efforts will be made in the current year to better understand and exploit these opportunities. We have also launched efforts during the current quarter to sell our products in international markets and to sell certain products to consumers via the Internet.

While we believe that these efforts will ultimately result in increased sales and profitable operations, we can provide no assurances in this regard.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The net cash used in our operating activities was $1,674 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $1,605 for the same period in 2003. Net cash used in investing activities was $74 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $74 the same period in 2003. Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,679 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1,132 for the same period in 2003. The increase from financing sources was due primarily to $1,027 in offshore private placements, $25 line of credit and $696 in bridge loans provided by our officers, directors and shareholders, partially offset by $69 in advances on travel expense for BBJ Environmental Solutions, Inc made to officers.

Financing Efforts

Since December 31, 2003 we completed the following private financings:

On February 11, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 4,545,500 shares of additional common stock at $0.11 per share and received gross proceeds of $500.

On March 30, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 1,800,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.11 per share and received gross proceeds of $198.

On May 12, 2004, we secured equity funding through a Regulation S sale of restricted securities to offshore investors. We issued 48,000 shares of additional common stock at $0.25 per share and received gross proceeds of $12. Warrants to purchase an additional 16,000 shares of our Common Stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share until its expiration date of May 2006 were issued in conjunction with the Common Stock.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we received bridge loans from our officers and investors of $696 of which $60 was repaid during the period. We received $229 from Jean Caillet, an officer, director and shareholder of the company as a bridge loans of which $20 was repaid during the period; we received $392 from Olivier d’Auriol a director and shareholder of the company as a bridge loans of which $25 was repaid during the period; we received $75 from Robert Baker a bridge loan of which $15 was repaid during the period.

On June 5, 2002, we issued 1.4 million shares of our common stock upon the exercise of options at a cash purchase price of $0.375 per share. Payment was made through the issuance of full recourse promissory notes due September 30, 2002, together with interest at the rate of 5% per annum. These options were granted to Michael Nole, our then director of sales, and his assistant, Nicholas Salerno. In July, 2004 a settlement agreement was reached, stock was returned for cancellation and promissory notes were cancelled. In addition as part of the settlement agreement Mr. Nole and Mr. Salerno both agreed to release the company from any and all claims that each of them may have had against the company for any reason through date of settlement.

As described herein and in our Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as amended, we have relied principally on external financing to provide liquidity and capital resources for our operations. Management believes that we will support our anticipated liquidity and capital resource needs in the near term from cashflows from operations, but that additional financing will be required in order for the Company to meet its short term and long-term objectives. No assurances can be given that our efforts to raise this financing and additional financing for our short term (and long term) needs will be successful or, if successful, that such financing will be on terms satisfactory to us. The inability to obtain additional financing, when needed, or on terms reasonably satisfactory to us, would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and could lead us to curtail or cease operations. As a result of our operating losses and capital needs, our auditors have added a going concern qualification (explanatory paragraph) as described in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as contained in our Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as amended.

Recent Developments

The Board of Directors of the Company is reassessing the Company’s future prospects and anticipated needs for continued growth. In this regard, it is reviewing the Company’s capital structure, various financing alternatives available to the Company, including potential sources of equity financings, the Company’s current stockholder base, and the costs of complying with the Company’s reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act. In particular, the Board of Directors is considering the potential benefits and other implications of effecting a reverse stock split and/or reincorporating the Company in Delaware, although no definitive decision has been made with respect to either of these actions. The Company believes that a reverse stock split would permit the Company to eliminate the shareholdings of a significant number of small shareholders who acquired their shares prior to the time the Company was engaged in its current business in exchange for a cash payment. This would permit the Company to avoid the relatively high cost of communication with those holders and would likely permit the Company to deregister under the Exchange Act, if it so chose. A reincorporation in Delaware would have the benefits of transferring the Company’s domicile to a jurisdiction with a more established body of law. The Board may determine to effect some, all or none of these actions and, if it does more than one, may seek to effect them simultaneously or at different times. A reincorporation would, and reverse stock split may, require approval by shareholders, and would in any event be preceded by further disclosure to shareholders. In addition, a reincorporation would, under Nevada law, trigger appraisal rights for the shareholders of the Company. If shareholders elected to exercise such appraisal rights, the Company would be required to use funds to buy out these shareholders at the fair market value of their shares. The Company may decide to proceed with the reverse stock split for the reasons stated above but may or may not then seek to deregister under the Exchange Act at that time (although it might chose to do so at a later date).

Item 3. Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Interim Principal Financial Officer (our principal executive officer), management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Executive Chairman and Interim Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings: None

Item 2.Changes in Securities.

(a) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.

(c)Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we made the following sales of unregistered securities (dollars in thousands):


Date of Sale	Title of Security	Number Sold	Consideration Received and Description of Underwriting or Other Discounts to Market Price or Convertible Security, Afforded to Purchasers	Exemption from Registration Claimed	If Option, Warrant or Convertible Security, terms of exercise or conversion
1/7/04	Common Stock	320,000	Received $80 no commission paid; shares sold at $0.25 per share assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants	Regulation S offshore offering to an unaffiliated overseas investor; Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)	Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share at any time until January 31, 2006
	Warrants	106,667

1/16/04	Common Stock	120,000	Received $30 no commission paid; shares sold at $0.25 per share assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants	Regulation S offshore offering to an unaffiliated overseas investor; Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)	Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share at any time until January 31, 2006
	Warrants	40,000

2/11/04	Common Stock	4,545,500	Received $500 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.11 per share	Regulation S offshore offering to an unaffiliated overseas investor; Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)

2/19/04	Common Stock	60,000	Received $15 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.25 per share assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants	Regulation S offshore offering to an unaffiliated overseas investor; Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)	Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share at any time until February 28, 2006
	Warrants	20,000

3/30/04	Common Stock	1,800,000	Received $198 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.11 per share assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants	Regulation S offshore offering to an unaffiliated overseas investor; Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)

04/27/04	Common Stock	40,000	Received $10 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.25 per share	Regulation S offshore offering is an unaffiliated overseas investor; Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)	Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share at any time until April, 2006
	Warrants	13,333

05/12/04	Common Stock	48,000	Received $12 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.25 per share	Regulation S offshore offering is an unaffiliated overseas investor; Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)	Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share at anytime until May, 2006
	Warrants	16,000

07/14/04	Common Stock	400,000	Received $100 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.25 per share	Regulation S offshore offering is an unaffiliated overseas investor, Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)	Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share at anytime until July, 2006
	Warrants	133,333

09/09/04	Common Stock	454,500	Received $50 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.11 per share	Regulation S offshore offering is an unaffiliated overseas investor, Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)	Warrants are exercisable at $0.11 per share at anytime until September, 2006
	Warrants	151,500

09/23/04

Common Stock

Warrants

97,000

32,333

Received $24,250 no commissions paid; shares sold at $0.25 per share

Regulation S offshore offering is an unaffiliated overseas investor, Regulation D, Rule 506; and/or Section 4(2)

Warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share at anytime until September, 2006

(d) Not applicable.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities: None

Item 4.Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders: None

Item 5.Other Information: None

Item 6.Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K:

(a) Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on June 19, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB for its quarter ended June 30, 2001).

3.2		By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-1, file Number 33-34200).

31.1		Certification of Executive Chairman pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Executive Chairman pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.

None

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		BBJ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Dated: November 18, 2004		/s/ Jean Caillet
		Jean Caillet, Chief Executive Officer

		/s/ Robert G. Baker
		Interim Principal Financial Officer

BBJ Environmental (BBJE) Inactive 10QSB2004 Q3 Quarterly report (small business)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents