As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September __, 2006
Registration No. 333-123159
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
FORM SB-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
IMAGENETIX, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Nevada | 2833 | 87-0463772 |
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | (I.R.S. Employer I.D. Number) |
10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105
San Diego, California 92127
(858) 674-8455
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105
San Diego, California 92127
(858) 674-8455
(Address of principal place of business or intended principal place of business)
William P. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer
10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105
San Diego, California 92127
(858) 674-8455
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
Copies to:
Gary A. Agron, Esquire
5445 DTC Parkway, Suite 520
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
(303) 770-7254 (Telephone)
(303) 770-7257 (Facsimile)
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.
If any securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, check the following box: x
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. x 333-123159
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. ¨
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered | | Amount To Be Registered | | Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price | | Amount of Registration Fee | |
Common Stock, $.001 par value | | | 1,672,500 Shares | | $ | 1.77 | (1) | $ | 2,960,325 | | $ | 349 | |
Common Stock, $.001 par value, underlying Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Stock Options | | | 4,844,351 Shares | | $ | 2.00 | (2) | $ | 9,688,702 | | $ | 1,140 | |
Total | | | 6,516,851 Shares | | | | | | | | $ | 1,489 | (3) |
(1) | Based upon the closing price of our common stock on the Electronic Bulletin Board on March 3, 2005. |
(2) | Based on the highest exercise price under the warrants and options. |
In addition to the number of shares set forth above, the amount registered includes any shares of common stock issued as a result of stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions in accordance with Rule 416.
The Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share and the Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price in the table above were estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.
The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until it shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject to change | | | Dated September 18, 2006 |
1,672,500 Shares of Common Stock and
4,844,351 Shares of Common Stock
Underlying Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Stock Options
IMAGENETIX, INC.
This prospectus covers the resale of 1,672,500 shares of our common stock and 4,844,351 shares of our common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants and stock options. The shares of common stock and shares underlying the common stock purchase warrants and stock options may be offered by our selling stockholders from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices.
Our common stock trades on the Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol “IAGX.” On September 12, 2006 the closing price of the common stock was $0.93 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves substantial risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 4.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus is _______________.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
About this Prospectus | | 1 |
Summary | | 1 |
Risk Factors | | 4 |
Forward-Looking Statements | | 7 |
Price Range of Common Stock | | 7 |
Use of Proceeds | | 8 |
Capitalization | | 8 |
Selected Financial Data | | 8 |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation | | 9 |
Business | | 18 |
Management | | 27 |
Security Ownership of Executive Officers, Directors and Beneficial Owners of Greater than 5% of Our Common Stock | | 31 |
Selling Stockholders | | 32 |
Related Party and Other Material Transactions | | 39 |
Description of Capital Stock | | 39 |
Shares Eligible for Future Sale | | 41 |
Experts | | 41 |
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | | 42 |
Legal Matters | | 43 |
Where You Can Find More Information | | 43 |
Financial Statements | | F-1 |
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus as we have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where such an offer or sale is not permitted.
SUMMARY
This summary highlights material information regarding our company and the offering contained in this prospectus. However, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the financial information and related notes, before making an investment decision.
Business
We develop, formulate and market on a private label basis over-the-counter, natural-based nutritional supplements and skin care products. Our products are proprietary, often supported by scientific studies which we request and are offered through multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, also known as network marketing or multi-level marketing companies, and chain store retailers. Our primary product is Celadrin® which we have historically offered as a part of product formulations which we sold on a private label basis to our customers. We also offer Celadrin® as an ingredient which our customers may use in their own products and we are in the process of implementing a direct mass marketing strategy for our own proprietary product, Inflame Away, that will be identified with Celadrin® as its marquee ingredient.
A key part of our marketing strategy is our ability to provide to customers that distribute our products a “turnkey” approach to the marketing and distribution of our products. This turnkey approach provides our customers with all the services necessary to market our products, including developing specific product formulations, providing supporting scientific studies regarding the effectiveness of the product and arranging for the manufacture and marketing of the product.
We have developed and sold over 60 products and formulations to businesses and organizations that market these products through multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, mass marketing companies, medical, health and nutritional professionals, medical newsletters and direct response radio and television. Also, we have recently initiated a program to sell Inflame Away directly to retail stores and outlets through mass marketers. We have also begun to offer Celadrin® products through customers that in turn offer their products containing Celadrin® to mass market retailers.
Our four largest customers accounted for 22%, 16%, 13% and 11%, respectively, of our net sales for the year ended March 31, 2006.
Our management and key personnel have many years experience in developing and selling nutritional products to direct marketers, health food stores and mass market merchandisers.
History
We were organized as a Nevada corporation in March 1988 under the name Capital Growth, Inc. and completed an initial public offering of our securities in 1989. Imagenetix, Inc. was incorporated in Colorado in July 1996 under the name Internet International Business Management, Inc. and changed its name to Imagenetix, Inc. in April 1999. In October 2000 we merged with Imagenetix, Inc. Under the terms of the merger, we issued 6,550,000 shares of our common stock and 3,315,000 common stock purchase warrants and stock options to the Imagenetix security holders to acquire all 6,550,000 shares of Imagenetix Inc.’s outstanding common stock, along with all of its stock options and common stock purchase warrants. Our principal executive offices are located at 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California 92127, and our telephone number is (858) 674-8455.
The Offering
Securities offered by our Selling stockholders | 1,672,500 shares of common stock and 4,844,351 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants and stock options. |
| |
Securities outstanding prior to and after the offering | 10,721,400 shares of common stock, which does not include shares issuable upon exercise of the 4,844,351 outstanding common stock purchase warrants and stock options. |
| |
Use of proceeds | We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock registered hereby. Any proceeds we receive from the exercise of common stock purchase warrants and stock options will be added to our working capital. |
| |
Electronic Bulletin Board symbol | IAGX |
Description of Selling Stockholders
Through this prospectus, we are registering the resale of up to 1,672,500 shares of common stock and 4,844,351 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants and stock options. The 1,672,500 shares being registered hereby were purchased in a private placement of our common stock completed on January 19, 2005 and registered for resale by our prospectus dated March 18, 2005 and post effective amendment dated November 14, 2005. The shares underlying 4,661,568 warrants and stock options were registered for resale by our prospectuses dated July 26, 2002 and March 18, 2005 and our post effective amendments dated August 25, 2003 and November 14, 2005 and were issued by us in 2000 and 2001 in consideration of loans granted to us. The remaining 182,783 stock options were registered for resale by our prospectus dated March 18, 2005 and post effective amendment dated November 14, 2005 and were issued by us to our placement agent in connection with the private placement.
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” and our audited financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:
| | | | (Unaudited) | |
| | Years Ended March 31, | | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 7,649,941 | | $ | 7,574,194 | | $ | 931,569 | | $ | 2,869,745 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (593,378 | ) | $ | 753,936 | | $ | (377,837 | ) | $ | 304,011 | |
Net income (loss) per basic share | | $ | (.06 | ) | $ | .08 | | $ | (.04 | ) | $ | .03 | |
Balance Sheet Data:
| | | | (Unaudited) | |
| | March 31, 2006 | | June 30, 2006 | |
| | | | | |
Working capital | | $ | 4,423,095 | | $ | 4,047,505 | |
Total assets | | $ | 5,894,074 | | $ | 5,393,533 | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 938,977 | | $ | 816,273 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | $ | 4,955,097 | | $ | 4,577,260 | |
RISK FACTORS
The shares of common stock offered by this prospectus involve a high degree of risk and represent a highly speculative investment. You should not purchase these shares if you cannot afford the loss of your entire investment. In addition to the other information contained in this prospectus, you should carefully consider the following risk factors in evaluating our company, our business prospects and an investment in our shares of common stock.
There Is Only One Supplier for Celadrin®. If We Are Unable to Purchase Celadrin® from This Supplier, Our Business Would Be Harmed.
There is only one supplier for Celadrin®, which we use in over 67% of our products and which represented approximately 84% of our sales for the year ended March 31, 2006. We rely upon Celadrin® to expand our product lines and revenue in the future. If our Celadrin® supplier goes out of business or elects for any reason not to supply us with Celadrin®, we would have to find another Celadrin® supplier or suffer a significant reduction in our revenue.
We Rely upon a Limited Number of Customers the Loss of Which Would Reduce Our Revenue and Any Earnings.
Our four largest customers accounted for 22%, 16%, 13% and 11% of our sales for the year ended March 31, 2006 and 19%, 13%, 12% and 10%, respectively, of our net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The loss of any of these customers would significantly reduce our revenue and adversely affect our cash flow and earnings, if any.
We Rely upon Other Outside Suppliers and Manufacturers to Produce Our Products Which Could Delay Our Product Deliveries.
All of our products are produced by outside manufacturers who process ingredients provided to them by our suppliers and with whom we have contracts. Our profit margins and our ability to deliver products on a timely basis are dependent upon these manufacturers and suppliers. Should any of these manufacturers or suppliers fail to provide us with product, we would be required to obtain new manufacturers and suppliers, which would be costly and time consuming and could delay our product deliveries.
Product Liability Claims Against Us Could Be Costly.
Some of our nutritional supplements contain newly-introduced ingredients or combinations of ingredients, and we have little long-term health information about individuals consuming those ingredients. If any of these products were thought or proved to be harmful, we could be subject to litigation. Although we carry product liability insurance in the face amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate and require our suppliers and manufacturers to include us as insured parties on their product liability insurance policies, our coverage may not be adequate to protect us from potential product liability claims and costs of defense.
We Are Subject to Intense Competition from Other Nutritional Supplement Marketers Which Could Reduce Our Revenue and Profit Margins.
Competition in the nutritional supplement market is intense. We compete with numerous companies that have longer operating histories, more products and greater name recognition and financial resources than we do. In order to compete, we could be forced to lower our product prices, which would reduce our revenue and profit margins.
We Are Highly Regulated, Which Increases Our Costs of Doing Business.
We are subject to laws and regulations which cover:
| | the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, importation, sale and storage of our products; |
| | the health and safety of food and drugs; |
| | trade practice and direct selling laws; and |
| | product claims and advertising by us; or for which we may be held responsible. |
Compliance with these laws and regulations is time consuming and expensive. Moreover, new regulations could be adopted that would severely restrict the products we sell or our ability to continue our business.
There Are Limitations on the Liability of Our Officers and Directors Which May Restrict Our Stockholders from Bringing Claims.
Our Bylaws substantially limit the liability of our officers and directors to us and our stockholders for negligence and breach of fiduciary or other duties to us. This limitation may prevent stockholders from bringing claims against our officers and directors in the future.
Shares of Our Common Stock Which Are Eligible for Sale by Our Stockholders May Decrease the Price of Our Common Stock.
We have 10,721,400 common shares outstanding, all of which are freely tradeable or saleable under Rule 144 except for the 1,672,500 shares which we are registering hereby for resale. We also may have outstanding up to 4,844,351 free trading shares which we are also registering for resale hereby, following exercise of warrants and stock options. If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, the market price of our common stock could decrease.
There is a Limited but Potentially Volatile Trading Market in Our Common Stock, Which May Adversely Affect Our Stock Price.
Our common stock trades on the Electronic Bulletin Board. The Bulletin Board tends to be highly illiquid, in part because there is no national quotation system by which potential investors can track the market price of shares except through information received or generated by a limited number of broker-dealers that make a market in particular stocks. There is a greater chance of market volatility for securities that trade on the Bulletin Board as opposed to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including:
| · | The lack of readily available price quotations; |
| · | The absence of consistent administrative supervision of “bid” and “ask” quotations; |
| · | Lower trading volume; and |
There could be wide fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. These fluctuations may have an extremely negative effect on the market price of our securities and may prevent you from obtaining a market price equal to your purchase price when you attempt to sell our securities in the open market. In these situations, you may be required to either sell our securities at a market price which is lower than your purchase price, or to hold our securities for a longer period of time than you planned.
Because Our Common Stock May Be Classified as “Penny Stock,” Trading in it Could Be Limited, and Our Stock Price Could Decline.
In the future, our common stock may fall under the definition of “penny stock” if our net tangible assets decline below $2,000,000. In such event, trading in our common stock would be limited because broker-dealers will be required to provide their customers with disclosure documents prior to allowing them to participate in transactions involving our common stock. These disclosure requirements are burdensome to broker-dealers and may discourage them from allowing their customers to participate in transactions involving our common stock.
“Penny stocks” are equity securities with a market price below $5.00 per share, other than a security that is registered on a national exchange or included for quotation on the Nasdaq system, unless, as in our case, the issuer has net tangible assets of more than $2,000,000 and has been in continuous operation for greater than three years. Issuers who have been in operation for less than three years must have net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000.
Rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act require broker-dealers engaging in transactions in penny stocks, to first provide to their customers a series of disclosures and documents, including:
| | A standardized risk disclosure document identifying the risks inherent in investment in penny stocks; |
| | All compensation received by the broker-dealer in connection with the transaction; |
| | Current quotation prices and other relevant market data; and |
| | Monthly account statements reflecting the fair market value of the securities. In addition, these rules require that a broker-dealer obtain financial and other information from a customer, determine that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for such customer and deliver a written statement to such customer setting forth the basis for this determination. |
In addition, under the Exchange Act and its regulations, any person engaged in a distribution of shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock during the applicable “cooling off” periods prior to the commencement of this distribution.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains statements that plan for or anticipate the future. These forward-looking statements include statements about the future of nutritional products, statements about our future business plans and strategies, and other statements that are not historical in nature. In this prospectus forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words “anticipate,” “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” and the like. Although we believe that the forward-looking statements made in this prospectus are reasonable, because forward-looking statements involve future risks and uncertainties, there are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. For example, uncertainties that could affect the accuracy of forward-looking statements, besides the specific factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus, including the following:
| | Changes in general economic and business conditions affecting the nutritional supplement and personal care industries; |
| | Changes in our business strategies; and |
| | Market acceptance of our products. |
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock trades on the over-the-counter Electronic Bulletin Board of the NASD under the symbol “IAGX.” The range of high and low closing prices for our common stock during the quarters indicated is shown below. Prices are inter-dealer quotations as reported by the NASD and do not necessarily reflect transactions, retail markups, mark downs or commissions.
Quarter Ended:
| | Closing Price | |
| | High | | Low | |
September 30, 2006 (through September 12, 2006) | | $ | 1.13 | | $ | .80 | |
June 30, 2006 | | $ | 1.25 | | $ | .85 | |
| | | | | | | |
March 31, 2006 | | $ | 2.25 | | $ | 1.14 | |
December 31, 2005 | | $ | 2.90 | | $ | 2.30 | |
September 30, 2005 | | $ | 2.75 | | $ | 2.00 | |
June 30, 2005 | | $ | 2.40 | | $ | 1.80 | |
| | | | | | | |
March 31, 2005 | | $ | 2.15 | | $ | 1.45 | |
December 31, 2004 | | $ | 1.65 | | $ | 1.15 | |
September 30, 2004 | | $ | 1.34 | | $ | .86 | |
June 30, 2004 | | $ | 1.40 | | $ | .85 | |
| | | | | | | |
We have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to use our available funds for the development of our business. There are no material restrictions limiting, or likely to limit, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.
As of June 30, 2006, we had approximately 350 stockholders of record.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock being offered by the selling stockholders. Any proceeds we receive from the exercise of the 4,844,351 common stock purchase warrants and stock options will be added to our working capital.
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of June 30, 2006.
| | June 30, 2006 | |
Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding | | $ | — | |
Common Stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 10,721,400 shares outstanding | | $ | 10,721 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | $ | 10,344,741 | |
Accumulated deficit | | $ | (5,778,202 | ) |
| | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | $ | 4,577,260 | |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:
| | | | (Unaudited) | |
| | Years Ended March 31, | | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 7,649,941 | | $ | 7,574,194 | | $ | 931,569 | | $ | 2,869,745 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (593,378 | ) | $ | 753,936 | | $ | (377,837 | ) | $ | 304,011 | |
Net income (loss) per basic share | | $ | (.06 | ) | $ | .08 | | $ | (.04 | ) | $ | .03 | |
Balance Sheet Data:
| | | | (Unaudited) | |
| | March 31, 2006 | | June 30, 2006 | |
| | | | | |
Working capital | | $ | 4,423,095 | | $ | 4,047,505 | |
Total assets | | $ | 5,894,074 | | $ | 5,393,533 | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 938,977 | | $ | 816,273 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | $ | 4,955,097 | | $ | 4,577,260 | |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR
PLAN OF OPERATION
Preliminary Notes Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Investors should understand that several factors govern whether any forward-looking statement contained herein will be or can be achieved. Any one of those factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected herein. These forward-looking statements include plans and objectives of management for future operations, including plans and objectives relating to our products and future economic performance. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, future business decisions, and the time and money required to successfully complete development projects, all of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the results contemplated in any of the forward-looking statements contained herein will be realized. Based on actual experience and business developments, the impact of which may cause us to alter our marketing, capital expenditure plans or other budgets, which may in turn affect our results of operations in light of the other significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of any such statement should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved.
Overview
We develop, formulate and market on a private label basis over-the-counter, natural-based nutritional supplements and skin care products. Our products are proprietary, often supported by scientific studies which we request and are offered through multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, also known as network marketing or multi-level marketing companies, and chain store retailers. Our primary product is Celadrin® which we have historically offered as a part of product formulations which we sold on a private label basis to our customers. We offer Celadrin® as an ingredient which our customers may use in their own products and we are in the process of implementing a direct mass market strategy with our own product, Inflame Away, that will be identified to Celadrin® as its marquee ingredient.
A key part of our marketing strategy is our ability to provide to customers that distribute our products a “turnkey” approach to the marketing and distribution of our products. This turnkey approach provides our customers with all the services necessary to market our products, including developing specific product formulations, providing supporting scientific studies regarding the effectiveness of the product and arranging for the manufacture and marketing of the product.
We have developed and sold over 60 products and formulations to businesses and organizations that market these products through multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, mass marketing companies, medical, health and nutritional professionals, medical newsletters and direct response radio and television. Also, we have recently initiated a program to sell directly to the retail market. We have also begun to offer Celadrin® products through customers that in turn offer their products containing Celadrin® to mass market retailers.
Our four largest customers accounted for 22%, 16%, 13% and 11%, respectively, of our net sales for the year ended March 31, 2006 and 19%, 13%, 12% and 10%, respectively, of our net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Our management and key personnel have many years experience in developing and selling nutritional products to direct marketers, health food stores and mass market merchandisers.
Management's discussion and analysis or plan of operation are based upon our financial statements. These statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified eight accounting principles that we believe are key to an understanding of our financial statements. These important accounting policies require management's most difficult, subjective judgments.
1. Cash and Cash Equivalents.
For purposes of the financial statements, the Company considers all highly liquid debt investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
2. Accounts receivable.
Accounts receivable are carried at the expected net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessment of the collectibility of specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there were a deterioration of a major customer’s creditworthiness, or actual defaults were higher than historical experience, our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could be overstated, which could have a negative impact on operations.
3. Inventory
Inventory is carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in first-out method.
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized, upon being placed in service. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful life of three to seven years, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the lessor of the remaining lease life or the life of the asset, using the straight-line method. The Company follows the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets." Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company continuously evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated fair value of such long-lived assets, and provides for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.
5. Trademarks and Patents
Patents and trademarks are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and are amortized over their estimated useful lives of from 8 to 17 years for patents and 10 years for trademarks. The carrying value of patents and trademarks is periodically reviewed and impairments, if any, are recognized when the expected future benefit to be derived from individual intangible assets is less than its carrying value determined based on the provisions of SFAS No. 144 as discussed above.
6. Stock Based Compensation
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations in accounting for all stock option plans. Under APB Opinion 25, compensation cost has been recognized for stock options granted to employees when the option price is less than the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Through December 31, 2005, SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," required the Company to provide pro forma information regarding net income as if compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans had been determined in accordance with the fair value based method prescribed in SFAS No. 123. To provide the required pro forma information, the Company estimated the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. SFAS No. 148 also provides for alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The Company has elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation under APB No. 25.
The Company applies SFAS No. 123 in valuing options granted to consultants and estimates the fair value of such options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value is recorded as consulting expense as services are provided. Options granted to consultants for which vesting is contingent based on future performance are measured at their then current fair value at each period end, until vested.
7. Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the product is shipped. The Company evaluates whether an allowance for estimated returns is required based on historical returns. The Company has not had significant returns and accordingly, has not established an estimated allowance for returns at March 31, 2006.
8. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This statement requires an asset and liability approach for accounting for income taxes.
Results of Operations
Selected Financial Information
| | Three Months Ended | | | | | |
| | | | | | Increase | | | |
| | 6/30/06 | | 6/30/05 | | (Decrease) | | % | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Statements of Operations: | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 931,569 | | $ | 2,869,745 | | $ | (1,938,176 | ) | | -67.5 | % |
Cost of goods sold | | | 503,800 | | | 1,596,807 | | | (1,093,007 | ) | | -68.4 | % |
% of net sales | | | 54 | % | | 56 | % | | -2 | % | | -2.8 | % |
Gross profit | | | 427,769 | | | 1,272,938 | | | (845,169 | ) | | -66.4 | % |
% of net sales | | | 46 | % | | 44 | % | | 2 | % | | 3.5 | % |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | | 378,268 | | | 291,409 | | | 86,859 | | | 29.8 | % |
Payroll expense | | | 160,483 | | | 177,732 | | | (17,249 | ) | | -9.7 | % |
Consulting expense | | | 323,550 | | | 261,417 | | | 62,133 | | | 23.8 | % |
Total operating expenses | | | 862,301 | | | 730,558 | | | 131,743 | | | 18.0 | % |
Interest expense | | | (1,915 | ) | | (12,981 | ) | | (11,066 | ) | | -85.2 | % |
Other income | | | 9,889 | | | 8,912 | | | 977 | | | NM | |
Provision for (benefit from) taxes | | | (48,721 | ) | | 234,300 | | | 283,021 | | | -120.8 | % |
Net income (loss) | | | (377,837 | ) | | 304,011 | | | (681,848 | ) | | -224.3 | % |
Net income (loss) per share basic | | | (0.04 | ) | | 0.03 | | | (0.07 | ) | | -233.3 | % |
Net income (loss) per share diluted | | | (0.04 | ) | | 0.02 | | | (0.06 | ) | | -300.0 | % |
Net Sales
Net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 decreased $1,938,176, 67.5%, to $931,569 compared to $2,869,745 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The primary reason for the sales decrease was that, during the quarter ended June 30, 2005, sales to a single distributor of Celadrinâ as an ingredient and sales of our bulk topical cream product containing Celadrinâ did not repeat during the quarter ended June 30, 2006. During the last quarter, we started to address this reduction in sales by embarking on a direct mass market strategy with our own product, Inflame Away, that will be identified to Celadrinâ as its marquee ingredient. The strategy consists of a nationwide launch supported by a commensurate advertising campaign. Although we anticipate our second fiscal quarter, which will end September 30, 2006, to continue to reflect the slow down in distributor sales, we do anticipate, if the new marketing program begins to successfully penetrate the market, that the Inflame Away product launch will result in improved sales during the second half of our fiscal year.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales decreased from 56% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 to 54% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to the lower cost of goods sold associated with ingredient sales compared to private label finished goods. As discussed above, we began selling Celadrinâ under a distribution agreement as an ingredient starting in October 2004. We anticipate the cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales will decrease proportionately to the increase in sales of Inflame Away to the mass markets.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased by $86,859, a 29.8% increase, to $378,268 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $291,409 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The primary reason for the increase was an approximate $155,000 increase to clinical research studies. This increase was offset by reductions in rent, $23,000, and travel and related expenses, $34,000. We anticipate increases in general and administrative expenses as a result of our advertising campaign for our Inflame Away product and continued clinical research studies.
Payroll Expense
Payroll expense decreased to $160,483 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of 9.7% or $17,249, compared to $177,732 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was a result of a reduction of one sales person during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. We anticipate future increases relative to increased net sales.
Consulting Expenses
Consulting expenses increased to $323,550 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an increase of 23.8% or $62,133, compared to $261,417 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. This increase was a result of an approximate $70,000 increase related to preparing to sell directly to the mass markets with our own product, Inflame Away. We anticipate additional increases as we continue with clinical testing and selling into the mass market directly.
Provision for Income Taxes
As a result of the loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, an income tax benefit of $48,721 was recognized during the current quarter compared to $234,300 of tax expense being recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The quarter ended June 30, 2005, reflects tax loss carry-forwards. We have used up our previous federal and state tax loss carry-forwards and we will be able to carry back to previous years the entire amount of the income tax benefit for federal tax purposes and carry forward as a deferred tax asset the amount of the tax benefit for state tax purposes.
Capital Resources
| | | | | | Increase | |
| | 6/30/06 | | 3/31/06 | | (Decrease) | |
| | | | | | | |
Current assets | | $ | 4,802,579 | | $ | 5,293,199 | | $ | (490,620 | ) |
Current liabilities | | | 755,074 | | | 870,104 | | | (115,030 | ) |
Working capital | | $ | 4,047,505 | | $ | 4,423,095 | | $ | (375,590 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | $ | 61,199 | | $ | 68,873 | | $ | (7,674 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | $ | 4,577,260 | | $ | 4,955,097 | | $ | (377,837 | ) |
Statements of Cash Flows Select Information |
| | | | Three Months Ended | | Increase | |
| | | | 6/30/06 | | 6/30/05 | | (Decrease) | |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | | | $ | (720,993 | ) | $ | (527,718 | ) | $ | (193,275 | ) |
Investing activities | | | | $ | - | | $ | (41,296 | ) | $ | 41,296 | |
Financing activities | | | | $ | (7,086 | ) | $ | 47,152 | | $ | (54,238 | ) |
Balance Sheet Select Information |
| | | | | | Increase | |
| | 6/30/06 | | 3/31/06 | | (Decrease) | |
| | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalients | | $ | 1,079,937 | | $ | 1,808,016 | | $ | (728,079 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 729,884 | | $ | 811,198 | | $ | (81,314 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory, net | | $ | 2,059,924 | | $ | 1,741,468 | | $ | 318,456 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 653,978 | | $ | 792,410 | | $ | (138,432 | ) |
Liquidity
We have historically financed our operations internally and through debt and equity financings. At June 30, 2006, we had cash holdings of $1,079,937, a decrease of $728,079 compared to March 31, 2006. Our net working capital position at June 30, 2006, was $4,047,505 compared to $4,423,095 as of March 31, 2006. We have a single source and exclusive supplier arrangement with our Celadrinâ supplier. We use Celadrinâ in approximately 67% of our products representing approximately 84% of our sales for the year ended March 31, 2006. The interruption of raw material from this supplier would adversely affect our business and financial condition. Although our client base is growing, the loss of any of our four largest customers would have a material adverse effect on our revenue and earnings. We are embarking on a direct mass market strategy with our own product, Inflame Away. A significant portion of our working capital may be needed to implement this strategy. We believe that our cash position is sufficient to implement the mass market strategy and fund our operating activities for at least the next 12 months.
Year Ended March 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2005
Selected Financial Information
| | Year Ended | | | | | |
| | | | | | Increase | | | |
| | 3/31/06 | | 3/31/05 | | (Decrease) | | % | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Statements of Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 7,649,941 | | $ | 7,574,194 | | $ | 75,747 | | | 1.0 | % |
Cost of goods sold | | | 4,134,645 | | | 4,293,880 | | | (159,235 | ) | | -3.7 | % |
% of net sales | | | 54 | % | | 57 | % | | -3 | % | | -4.7 | % |
Gross profit | | | 3,515,296 | | | 3,280,314 | | | 234,982 | | | 7.2 | % |
% of net sales | | | 46 | % | | 43 | % | | 3 | % | | 6.1 | % |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | | 2,995,917 | | | 1,145,102 | | | 1,850,815 | | | 161.6 | % |
Payroll expense | | | 674,344 | | | 579,043 | | | 95,301 | | | 16.5 | % |
Consulting expense | | | 1,072,391 | | | 516,729 | | | 555,662 | | | 107.5 | % |
Total operating expenses | | | 4,742,652 | | | 2,240,874 | | | 2,501,778 | | | 111.6 | % |
Interest expense | | | (25,728 | ) | | (23,572 | ) | | 2,156 | | | 9.1 | % |
Other income | | | 35,906 | | | 5,523 | | | 30,383 | | | NM | |
Provision for taxes | | | 623,800 | | | (267,455 | ) | | (891,255 | ) | | -333.2 | % |
Net income (loss) | | | (593,378 | ) | | 753,936 | | | (1,347,314 | ) | | -178.7 | % |
Net income (loss) per share basic | | | (0.06 | ) | | 0.08 | | | (0.14 | ) | | -169.9 | % |
Net income (loss) per share diluted | | | (0.06 | ) | | 0.08 | | | (0.14 | ) | | -169.9 | % |
Net Sales
Net sales for the year ended March 31, 2006 increased $75,747, 1%, to $7,649,941 compared to $7,574,194 for the year ended March 31, 2005. We began selling Celadrinâ as an ingredient into the mass market during 2004, and since, products containing Celadrinâ have been placed in over 10,000 stores throughout the country, including Wal-Mart, Albertsons, and GNC Health Stores. We anticipate that the level of Celadrinâ sales will continue to increase.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales decreased from 57% for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 54% for the year ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to the higher selling margins associated with the sales of Celadrinâ products. We were able to purchase Celadrinâ at a reduced price due to early payments against our quarterly purchase commitment.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased by $1,850,815, a 162% increase, to $2,995,917 for the year ended March 31, 2006 from $1,145,102 for the year ended March 31, 2005. The primary reasons for the increase were approximately $1,055,000 related to the issuance and extension of stock options and the issuance of warrants, approximately $286,000 increase in commissions associated with a media campaign to brand Celadrinâ, approximately $258,000 write off of costs on the initial airing of the Puricell infomercial, approximately $166,000 increase in costs associated with clinical research, and approximately $66,000 increase in travel costs. We anticipate a reduction in future general and administrative expense as a result of a decrease in commission expense and infomercial costs discussed above.
Payroll Expense
Payroll expense increased to $674,344 for the year ended March 31, 2006, an increase of 16.5% or $95,301, compared to $579,043 for the year ended March 31, 2005. This increase was a result of additional personnel hired to support the increased selling and clinical research activities.
Consulting Expenses
Consulting expenses increased to $1,072,391 for the year ended March 31, 2006, an increase of 107.5% or $555,662, compared to $516,729 for the year ended March 31, 2005. This increase was a result of an approximate $117,000 increase in clinical research and selling activities, an approximate $155,000 increase in accounting expenses inclusive of the costs of changing twice to new auditing firms, an approximate $127,000 increase in litigation expenses, and an approximate $80,000 increase in public relation expenses. We anticipate a reduction in consulting expenses as a result of more efficient audits and the reduction of legal expenses.
Provision for Income Taxes
As a result of the loss during the year ended March 31, 2006, we reflected an income tax benefit of $623,800 compared to income tax expense of $267,455 for the year ended March 31, 2005. Since we have used up our federal and state tax loss carry-forwards, we anticipate income tax expense to increase in the future relative to income before taxes.
Capital Resources
| | Year Ended | | | |
| | | | | | Increase | |
| | 3/31/06 | | 3/31/05 | | (Decrease) | |
| | | | | | | |
Working Capital | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | $ | 5,293,199 | | $ | 5,546,470 | | $ | (253,271 | ) |
Current liabilities | | | 870,104 | | | 1,600,221 | | | (730,117 | ) |
Working capital | | $ | 4,423,095 | | $ | 3,946,249 | | $ | 476,846 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | $ | 68,873 | | $ | - | | $ | 68,873 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | $ | 4,955,097 | | $ | 4,172,290 | | $ | 782,807 | |
Statements of Cash Flows Select Information |
Net cash provided (used) by: | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 3,758 | | $ | (107,858 | ) | $ | 111,616 | |
Investing activities | | $ | (290,172 | ) | $ | (86,660 | ) | $ | (203,512 | ) |
Financing activities | | $ | 62,944 | | $ | 1,771,627 | | $ | (1,708,683 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet Select Information | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,808,016 | | $ | 2,031,486 | | $ | (223,470 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 811,198 | | $ | 2,064,089 | | $ | (1,252,891 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory, net | | $ | 1,741,468 | | $ | 1,382,495 | | $ | 358,973 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 792,410 | | $ | 862,046 | | $ | (69,636 | ) |
Liquidity
We have historically financed our operations internally and through debt and equity financings. At March 31, 2006, we had cash holdings of $1,808,016, a decrease of $223,470 compared to March 31, 2005. Our net working capital position at March 31, 2006, was $4,423,095 compared to $3,946,249 as of March 31, 2005. We believe that our cash position is sufficient to fund our operating activities for at least the next 12 months.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS 123R, which requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, based on their fair values. Accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method supplemented by pro forma disclosures will no longer be permissible. The new statement is effective for public entities no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted the new statement on April 1, 2006. The adoption of this new statement did not affect the Company's historical results of operations or net income per share through March 31, 2006, but may have a significant future effect as the Company will be required to expense the fair value of all share-based payments.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections", a replacement of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes", and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements" ("SFAS 154"). SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for, and reporting of, a change in accounting principle. Previously, voluntary changes in accounting principles were generally required to be recognized by way of a cumulative effect adjustment within net income during the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, the statement does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements. The Company does not believe adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material effect on its financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
BUSINESS
Our Business
We develop, formulate and market on a private label basis over-the-counter, natural-based nutritional supplements and skin care products. Our products are proprietary, often supported by scientific studies which we request and are offered through multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, also known as network marketing or multi-level marketing companies, and chain store retailers. Our primary product is Celadrin® which we have historically offered as a part of product formulations which we sold on a private label basis to our customers. We offer Celadrin® as an ingredient which our customers may use in their own products and we are in the process of implementing a direct mass market strategy with our own product, Inflame Away, that will be identified to Celadrin® as its marquee ingredient.
A key part of our marketing strategy is our ability to provide to customers that distribute our products a “turnkey” approach to the marketing and distribution of our products. Our “turnkey” approach provides:
| | Specific product formulations requested by our customers; |
| | Scientific studies to support claims made for our products; |
| | Assistance in complying with U.S. laws and regulations; |
| | Assistance in obtaining foreign country regulatory approval for sale of our products; |
| | Marketing materials and marketing assistance to support product sales; and |
| | Manufacture of products with delivery directly to the customer. |
Following development of a new product, and on behalf of our customers, we:
| | Conduct and complete any scientific studies necessary for regulatory compliance; |
| | Arrange for the manufacture of finished products to our specifications; and |
| | Develop marketing tools and plans to promote product sales, including labels and graphic designs, promotional brochures and providing speakers to promote the products. |
We have developed and sold over 60 products and formulations to businesses and organizations that market these products through multiple channels of distribution, including direct marketing companies, mass marketing companies, medical, health and nutritional professionals, medical newsletters and direct response radio and television. Also, we have recently initiated a program to sell Inflame Away directly to retail stores and outlets through mass marketers. We have also begun to offer Celadrin® products through customers that in turn offer their products containing Celadrin® to mass market retailers.
Our four largest customers accounted for 22%, 16%, 13% and 11%, respectively, of our net sales for the year ended March 31, 2006 and 19%, 13%, 12% and 10%, respectively, of our net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Our management and key personnel have many years experience in developing and selling nutritional products to direct marketers, health food stores and mass market merchandisers.
Our Strategy
We are a developer, formulator and supplier of natural-based products, designed to enhance human and animal health. We develop, formulate and private label over-the-counter topical creams, nutritional and skin care products marketed globally through multiple channels of distribution. Our strategy involves:
| · | Continuing to develop innovative and proprietary nutritional and skin care products; |
| · | Continuing to offer “turnkey” services, including product development, regulatory compliance, manufacturing and marketing services, to assist our customers in quickly bringing new products to market; |
| · | Marketing our products internationally by assisting our customers in registering their products for sale in foreign countries. |
To date, we have completed the registration of over 25 products in foreign countries, including Japan, Australia, Norway, Venezuela, Germany, India and Canada. Most of the products registered contain our proprietary Celadrin® compound.
Industry Overview
The dietary supplement industry is highly diversified and intensely competitive. It includes companies that manufacture, distribute and sell products that are generally intended to supplement our daily diets with nutrients that may enhance the body’s performance and well-being. Dietary supplements include vitamins, minerals, herbs, botanicals, amino acids and compounds. Specific statutory provisions governing the dietary supplement industry were codified in the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act. This act provides new statutory protections for dietary supplements and allows for statements that inform consumers of the effect dietary supplements have upon the structure or functions of the body.
We expect that the following factors will contribute to the ongoing growth of the domestic nutritional supplement industry:
| · | The aging of the American population, which is likely to cause increased consumption of nutritional supplements; |
| · | New product introductions in response to new research supporting the positive health effects of certain nutrients; |
| · | The nationwide trend toward preventative medicine resulting from rising health care costs; |
| · | Increased consumer interest in alternative health products such as herb-based nutritional supplements; |
| · | A heightened awareness of the connection between diet and health. |
Nutritional supplements are sold primarily through:
| · | Mass market retailers, including mass merchandisers, drug stores, supermarkets and discount stores; |
| · | Mail order companies; and |
| · | Direct sales organizations, including network marketing companies. |
Products
We offer a variety of specialized proprietary nutritional formulations, over-the-counter topical creams, and skin care products. Since beginning operations in February 1999, we have developed and sold over 60 products and formulations to businesses and organizations that market these private labeled products through multiple channels of distribution, including direct selling, sales to mass market retailers, direct response radio, nutritional newsletters and medical care professionals. Our product formulations may be developed by our customers, co-developed by us and our customers or developed exclusively by us for the customer.
Our leading product is Celadrin®, a nutritional supplement compound comprised of a complex of fatty acid esters which plays a role in human and animal joint health and scientifically supported by our clinical studies. For the year ended March 31, 2006, approximately 84% of our revenue, was generated from the sale of various formulations containing Celadrin®. Historically, we have offered Celadrin® as part of a formulated branded or private label product. However, starting in June 2004, we began to offer Celadrin® as a branded ingredient to be used by our customers in their own product formulations.
A number of safety and efficacy studies have been conducted on Celadrin®'s principal composition, cetylated fatty acids. Studies have been presented at international scientific conferences, with two studies having been published in the Journal of Rheumatology and one study published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. We are continuing research to determine Celadrin®'s effects on the body, including any role it may play in providing support for the normal functioning of muscles and joints. We produce a wide range of formulas using the Celadrin® compounds and market these formulations through multiple distribution channels. Many of our customers resell Celadrin® and other formulated products under their own labels and trade names. We do not own or have any ownership interest in the labels or trade names under which these products are sold. Using multiple manufacturing processes to produce Celadrin®, we offer the product to our customers in soft gel capsule, tablet, two-piece capsules and topical cream forms.
In January 2005 our Celadrin® compound was approved by the government of India as a prescription drug for treating joint pain. Previously, in August 2002 we entered into an exclusive purchase and supply agreement with Cymbiotics to distribute Celadrin® to hospitals and clinics in India and certain other countries. The agreement expired on December 31, 2005 and was replaced by a letter agreement in February 2006.
In June 2004 we entered into an agreement with Proprietary Nutritionals Inc. to globally promote and market our Celadrin® compound on a non-exclusive basis throughout the world, except India and China. The agreement includes a marketing and branding program supported by media and other advertising.
In January 2005 we entered into a two-year spokesperson agreement with Tony and Alicia Gwynn whereby they will actively promote Celadrinâ. Tony Gwynn is known for his achievements as a major league baseball player for the San Diego Padres and an eight time National League batting champion.
We use paid consultants who are medical doctors, scientific research consultants, independent scientific researchers and laboratories and universities to assist us in the development and testing of our products. We believe Celadrin® will continue to be our principal compound. We intend to expand the number of customers who use this compound in formulas and to develop other formulas for new customers.
In addition to Celadrin®, which we sell in many formulations including an oral product, a cream, and as a pet product, we have also developed other natural based products designed to address specific health issues, including compounds and formulations involving a proprietary blend of fruit and vegetable extracts which represented approximately 16% of our sales for the year ended March 31, 2006.
We also are at the early stage of developing therapies for the treatment of inflammatory conditions, such as periodontal disease. We have conducted in-vivo and in-vitro efficacy and safety studies on our drug compound for the treatment of gum disease including periodontitis.
Raw Materials and Manufacturing
We develop and formulate proprietary, natural based, nutritional supplements, over-the-counter topical creams and skin care products but do not manufacture any of these products. We currently purchase ingredients from suppliers for delivery to manufacturers chosen by us. We have an agreement with our sole supplier of Celadrin® to purchase sufficient quantities of the compound to meet our anticipated needs through January 2012. We believe this agreement can be extended although we can give no such assurance. All other ingredients can be obtained from a number of suppliers, although the loss of any supplier could adversely affect our business.
We use a number of manufacturers to combine ingredients furnished by our suppliers into our nutritional and skin care products. By outsourcing product manufacture, we eliminate the capital required to manufacture our own products and increase the flexibility of our manufacturing resources. We have written confidentiality and exclusivity agreements with key manufacturers and believe suitable replacement manufacturers are available. However, the loss of a manufacturer could adversely affect our business.
Marketing and Distribution.
Since inception, we have marketed our products to clients in multiple channels of distribution with initial emphasis placed upon direct selling companies. Our marketing strategy consists of:
| · | Continuing to offer our proprietary products to existing customers while seeking new customers, emphasizing those engaged in the direct selling and mass marketing of nutraceutical supplements and other nutraceutical products; |
| · | Continuing to assist our customers in designing new nutritional, topical, and skin care products using our formulations; |
| · | Continuing to design marketing materials, provide marketing spokespersons and offering other value added services to assist customers in expanding their sales of our product; |
| · | Developing and offering new products to direct marketing and mass marketing companies; |
| · | Offering products for distribution through medical and nutritional oriented professionals; |
| · | Offering products for distribution through direct response radio and television. |
We will continue to offer our customers a turn key approach to their product needs. This approach emphasizes providing the customer with the support necessary to allow them to sell our products, including providing the scientific studies required by U.S. and foreign regulators, tailoring our product formulations specifically for each customer, obtaining approvals in foreign countries for our customers to market there, providing full marketing support for the products, including product information, product descriptions and speakers to discuss products at customer conventions and seminars and arranging for manufacture and shipment of the products according to customer instructions. We currently sell to ten direct selling distribution companies and national distributors.
Approximate sales by principal geographic area (as a percentage of sales) for fiscal years ended March 31 were as follows:
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Domestic sales | | | 96.6 | % | | 98.0 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Foreign sales: | | | | | | | |
India | | | 1.8 | | | 1.2 | |
Canada | | | 0.7 | | | 0.5 | |
Australia | | | 0.6 | | | 0.2 | |
United Kingdom | | | - | | | 0.1 | |
Korea | | | 0.1 | | | - | |
Taiwan | | | 0.2 | | | - | |
Total foreign sales | | | 3.4 | | | 2.0 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total sales | | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
All of our operating assets are located within the United States. While sales to certain geographic areas generally vary from year to year, we do not expect that changes in the geographic composition of sales will have a material adverse effect on operations.
Competition
The nutritional supplement and skin care industries are large and intensely competitive. We compete generally with companies that manufacture and market competitive nutritional products in each of our product lines, including companies such as Twin Labs, Weider Nutrition, IVC Industries and Perrigo. We also compete with companies that supply nutritional products to direct distribution companies, such as Leiner Health, Natural Alternatives and Vitatech. We also compete with companies that develop and sell skin care products, such as West Coast Cosmetics, CA Botana and Cosmetic Products International.
Competitive factors in the nutritional supplement and skin care markets include product effectiveness, scientific validation, proprietary formulations, price, quality of products, reliability of product delivery and marketing services offered to customers. We believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. Nevertheless, most of our competitors have longer operating histories, wider product offerings, greater name recognition and financial resources than do we. However, we believe our turnkey approach of offering our customers significant regulatory and marketing support, as well as unique, scientifically validated products, improves our competitive position.
Government Regulation
In both the United States and foreign markets, we are subject to extensive laws and governmental regulations at the federal, state and local levels. For example, we are subject, directly or indirectly, to regulations pertaining to:
| · | The manufacturing, packaging, labeling, promotion, distribution, importation, sale and storage of our products; |
| · | Product claims, labeling and advertising (including direct claims and advertising by us as well as claims in labeling and advertising by others, for which we may be held responsible); |
| · | Transfer pricing and similar regulations that affect the level of foreign taxable income and customs duties; and |
| · | Taxation, which in some instances may impose an obligation on us to collect taxes and maintain appropriate records. |
The dietary ingredients, manufacturing, packaging, storing, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution and sale of our products are subject to regulation by one or more governmental agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Customs, the Patent and Trademark Office, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Our activities are, or may be, regulated by various agencies of the states, localities and foreign countries in which our products are manufactured, distributed and/or sold. The FDA, in particular, regulates the ingredients, manufacture, packaging, storage, labeling, promotion, distribution and sale of foods, dietary supplements and over-the-counter drugs, such as those we distribute. We and our suppliers are required by FDA regulations to meet relevant current good manufacturing practice guidelines for the preparation, packing and storage of foods and drugs. The FDA has also published proposed rules for the establishment of good manufacturing practices for dietary supplements, but it has not yet issued a proposal rule. The FDA conducts unannounced inspections of companies that manufacture, distribute and sell dietary supplements, issues warning letters for rule violations found during these inspections and refers matters to the U.S. Attorney and Justice Department for prosecution under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. There can be no assurance that the FDA will not question our labeling or other operations in the future.
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act revised the provisions governing dietary ingredients and labeling of dietary supplements. The legislation created a new statutory class of "dietary supplements." This new class includes vitamins, minerals, herbs, botanicals, other dietary substances to supplement the daily diet, and concentrates, metabolites, constituents, extracts and combinations thereof. The legislation requires no federal pre-market approval for the sale of dietary ingredients that were on the market before October 15, 1994. Since cetylated fatty acids, the primary ingredient in Celadrin®, was on the market prior to October 15, 1994, we have not been required to provide the FDA with any proof as to safety or efficacy of Celadrin®. Dietary ingredients first marketed after October 15, 1994 may not be distributed or marketed in interstate commerce unless:
| · | The manufacturer has proof that the dietary ingredient has been present in the food supply as an article used for food and in a form in which the food has not been chemically altered, or |
| · | The manufacturer supplies the FDA with proof to the FDA's satisfaction of the dietary ingredient's safety. |
Manufacturers and distributors of dietary supplements may include statements of nutritional support, including structure and function claims, on labels and in advertising if:
| · | The claims are corroborated by "competent and reliable scientific evidence" consistent with FTC standards for advertising review; |
| · | The claims for labels and labeling are filed in a certified notice with the FDA no later than 30 days after first market use of the claims; |
| · | The manufacturer retains substantiation that the claims are truthful and non-misleading; |
| · | Each claim on labels and in labeling is cross-referenced by an asterisk to a mandatory FDA disclaimer. |
The majority of the products marketed, or proposed to be marketed, by us are classified as dietary supplements. In September 1997, the FDA issued regulations governing the labeling and marketing of dietary supplement products. The regulations cover:
| · | The identification of dietary supplements and their nutrition and ingredient labeling; |
| · | The terminology to be used for nutrient content claims, health claims and statements of nutritional support, including structure and function claims; |
| · | Labeling requirements for dietary supplements for which "high potency" and "antioxidant" claims are made; |
| · | Notification procedures for statements of nutritional support, including structure and function claims, on dietary supplement labels and in their labeling; |
| · | Pre-market notification procedures for new dietary ingredients in dietary supplements. |
Dietary supplements are subject to federal laws dealing with drugs and regulations imposed by the FDA. Those laws regulate, among other things, health claims, ingredient labeling and nutrition content claims characterizing the level of nutrient in the product. They also prohibit the use of any health claim for dietary supplements, unless the health claim is supported by significant scientific agreement and is pre-approved by the FDA. A federal court has ruled that the FDA must authorize health claims presented to the agency in health claims petitions unless they are inherently misleading and must rely on disclaimers to eliminate any potentially misleading connotation conveyed by a claim. The court also held that even claims not supported by significant scientific agreement must be allowed if disclaimers can correct misleading connotations.
Prior to permitting sales of our products in foreign markets, we may be required to obtain an approval, license or certification from the country's ministry of health or comparable agency. The approval process generally would require us to present each product and product ingredient to appropriate regulators and, in some instances, arrange for testing of products by local technicians for ingredient analysis. These approvals may be conditioned on reformulation of our products or may be unavailable with respect to certain products or certain ingredients. We must also comply with product labeling and packaging regulations that vary from country to country.
The Federal Trade Commission, which exercises jurisdiction over the marketing practices and advertising of products similar to those we offer, has in the past several years instituted enforcement actions against several dietary supplement companies for deceptive marketing and advertising practices. These enforcement actions have frequently resulted in consent orders and agreements. In certain instances, these actions have resulted in the imposition of monetary redress requirements. Importantly, the commission requires that "competent and reliable scientific evidence" corroborate each claim of health benefit made in advertising before the advertising is first made. A failure to have that evidence on hand at the time an advertisement is first made violates federal law. While we have not been the subject to enforcement action for the advertising of its products, there can be no assurance that this agency will not question our advertising or other operations in the future.
We believe we are in compliance with all material government regulations which apply to our products. However, we are unable to predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we predict what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future. These future changes could, however, require the reformulation or elimination of certain products; imposition of additional record keeping and documentation requirements; imposition of new federal reporting and application requirements; modified methods of importing, manufacturing, storing or distributing certain products; and expanded or different labeling and substantiation requirements for certain products and ingredients. Any or all of these requirements could harm our business.
Trademarks and Patents
We received a trademark for " Celadrin®" in February 2002.
In March 2003 we filed a patent application for Genepril, seeking approval of claims for the prevention and treatment of various types of arthritis and other inflammatory joint diseases, as well as periodontal, psoriasis, lupus and cardiovascular conditions. In June 2005 we received notification that the application has been approved and that a patent will be issued. Subsequent to the notification, we requested additional claims be added to the application. Accordingly, the patent office is continuing its review of our application. There can be no assurance that others may not develop compounds superior to Genepril.
Employees
At March 31, 2006, we had 8 full-time employees, including our executive officers.
Facilities
We conduct our corporate functions and manufacturing, product development, sales and marketing activities in San Diego, California. We rent 5,426 square feet of office space at 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California 92127 under a seven-year lease ending December 2012 for a monthly rent ranging from $10,309 for the first year increasing annually to $12,673 for the seventh year. The average monthly rent for the seven-year period is $11,212. We believe this space is adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.
Litigation
None.
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table and biographical summaries set forth information, including principal occupations and business experience, about our directors and executive officers at March 31, 2006:
Name | | Age | | Position |
William P. Spencer | | 53 | | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
Debra L. Spencer | | 54 | | Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
Lowell W. Giffhorn | | 59 | | Chief Financial Officer |
Derek C. Boosey | | 63 | | Vice President—International |
Jeffrey G. McGonegal | | 54 | | Director |
Robert Burg | | 49 | | Director |
Barry S. King | | 60 | | Director |
Biographical Information
William P. Spencer has served as a director and has been our president since January 1999. From January 1986 to December 1996 he served as chief operating officer, chief financial officer and executive vice-president of Natural Alternatives International, Inc., a company engaged in the formulation and production of encapsulated vitamins and nutrients. He was president of NAI from December 1996 to October 1998 and was a director from January 1986 to October 1998. From 1976 to 1988 he was a regional vice president for San Diego Trust and Savings Bank. Mr. Spencer earned a B.S. degree in finance and an MBA degree from San Diego State University.
Debra L. Spencer has served as a director and has been our secretary since March 1999 and served as our treasurer from March 1999 to July 2005. Her responsibilities also include product label copy and graphic design in compliance with FDA regulations as well as developing marketing materials for our private label products. From 1970 to 1981 she was an Executive Assistant to the Vice President of a local San Diego bank. She was a homemaker from 1981 to 1987. From 1987 to 1993 she served as vice president, secretary and treasurer for Vitamin Direct, Inc., a consumer mail order vitamin company.
Derek C. Boosey has served as our vice-president—international since September 1999. From 1994 to September 1999, he was new business manager for National Alternatives International, Inc., and from 1990 to 1994 was director of marketing for Atheletics Canada. From 1984 to 1990, Mr. Boosey was a technical advisor to the Korean Ministry of Sports and a sports and marketing consultant for MKC International. He earned degrees in physical education from Keele University (England) and Opu University (England) and is the Senior Olympics world record holder in the triple jump in the age 55 to 60 class.
Barry S. King joined our Board in 2003. He was the Director of Marketing for the United States Olympic Committee from 1987 to 2002. Since 2002, Mr. King has been the Vice President and General Manager of Triactive America. Mr. King graduated with a B.A. degree from the University of Colorado in 1969.
Lowell W. Giffhorn has served as our Chief Financial Officer since July 2005. Since October 2005, Mr. Giffhorn also has served as the Chief Financial Officer and, since December 2005, has served on the board of directors of Omni U.S.A., Inc., a publicly held company that provides computer software to the pharmaceutical and life science industries. From May 1997 to June 2005, Mr. Giffhorn was the Chief Financial Officer of Patriot Scientific Corp., a publicly held semiconductor and intellectual property company. From June 1992 to August 1996 and from September 1987 to June 1990 he was the CFO of Sym-Tek Systems, Inc. and Vice President of Finance for its successor, Sym-Tek Inc., a supplier of capital equipment to the semiconductor industry. Mr. Giffhorn obtained a M.B.A. degree from National University in 1975 and he obtained a B.S. in Accountancy from the University of Illinois in 1969. Mr. Giffhorn is also a director and chairman of the audit committee of DND Technologies, Inc., a publicly held company. Mr. Giffhorn devotes approximately 50% of his time to our affairs.
Jeffrey G. McGonegal joined our board in 2005. Since June 2003, Mr. McGonegal has served as Chief Financial Officer of AspenBio Pharma, Inc., a publicly traded emerging biotechnology company engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture, and licensing or marketing of products primarily for animal healthcare. Mr. McGonegal also serves as Senior Vice President — Finance of Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc., a publicly held company engaged in manufacturing and marketing of vitamins and nutritional supplements and Cambridge Holdings, Ltd., a small publicly held real estate company. Since 1997, Mr. McGonegal has served as Managing Director of McGonegal and Co., a company engaged in providing accounting and business consulting services. From 1974 to 1997, Mr. McGonegal was an accountant with BDO Seidman LLP. While at BDO Seidman LLP, Mr. McGonegal served as managing partner of the Denver, Colorado office. Mr. McGonegal is also a member of the board of directors of Applied Medical Devices, Inc. and The Rockies Venture Club, Inc. He received a B.A. degree in accounting from Florida State University.
Robert Burg joined our board in 2005. Since 1998, Mr. Burg has been the owner of The Burg Group, a business development company based in the sports industry. From 1992 to 1998, Mr. Burg held several executive level positions, including President from 1995 to 1998, with Royal Grip, Inc., a publicly traded company that designed and distributed golf club grips and athletic headwear. He received a B.A. degree in Business from the Great Western States University in 1977.
William P. Spencer and Debra L. Spencer are married to each other.
Significant Employees and Consultants
Robert L. Hesslink, Jr. Sc.D., Director of Research and Development, coordinates and evaluates clinical research conducted on our products. Dr. Hesslink received his Doctorate of Science from the Department of Health Sciences at Boston University in 1987. Following his 1986 commission into the U.S. Navy Medical Services Corp., he was stationed at the Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda, MD from 1986 to 1990. During his tenure, Dr. Hesslink published research pertaining to cold water immersion and cold habituation in the Journal of Applied Physiology and the American Journal of Physiology. Dr. Hesslink has consulted for national and international companies on research projects directed at applied nutrition and physiology since 1990. He has coordinated over 20 studies in the last three years for academic institutions, including the University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, Department of Animal Sciences, Ball State University, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Utah, Division of Food Sciences and Nutrition and the Uniform Services University of Health Sciences, Department of Military Medicine.
Kenneth Cole serves as a speaker and marketing consultant to us. He is a dual Olympian in basketball, and as a coach, his teams won 13 national Australian titles. In 2000 Mr. Cole carried the Olympic torch in the Sydney torch relay and was awarded the Australian Sports Medal of Honor. Mr. Cole was appointed Secretary for the Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation in 1975. He is also an internationally recognized motivational speaker.
In January 2005 we retained Tony and Alicia Gwynn for a two-year period to promote our Celadrin® products. Tony Gwynn is known for his achievements as a Major League baseball player for the San Diego Padres. He is also a national sports broadcaster for ESPN. He is the head baseball coach for the San Diego State Aztecs, as well as an eight time National League batting champion. Tony and Alicia Gwynn have used our Celadrin® products and will be actively promoting their benefits. We have agreed to pay a total of $282,000 under the agreement.
Employment Contracts
The Company does not have employment contracts with any of its executive officers.
Executive Compensation
There is shown below information concerning the compensation of our chief executive officer and the most highly compensated executive officers whose salaries and bonus exceeded $100,000 (each a “Named Officer”) for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
| | Annual Cash Compensation | | Long-Term Compensation | |
| | Fiscal | | | | | | | | All Other | |
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary | | Bonus | | (# of Shares) | | Compensation | |
William P. Spencer | | | 2006 | | $ | 165,969 | | $ | - | | | 60,000 | | | None | |
President and CEO | | | 2005 | | $ | 95,417 | | $ | 70,000 | | | None | | | None | |
| | | 2004 | | $ | 90,000 | | $ | - | | | None | | | None | |
Aggregated Option Exercise and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
There were no exercises of stock options for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 by any of the officers reflected in the Summary Compensation Table shown above. Shown below is information on fiscal year-end values under the Company's Stock Option Plan to the officers reflected in the Summary Compensation Table shown above.
| | | | | | Number of Unexercised | | Value of Unexercised | |
| | Shares | | | | Options Held At | | In-The-Money Options At | |
| | Acquired on | | Value | | March 31, 2006 | | March 31, 2006 | |
Name | | Exercise (#) | | Realized | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | |
William P. Spencer | | | - | | | - | | | 210,000 | | | - | | $ | 32,500 | | $ | - | |
The fair market value of the unexercised in-the-money options at March 31, 2006 was determined by subtracting the option exercise price from the last sale price as reported on the over the counter bulletin board on March 31, 2006, $1.26. The Company has not awarded stock appreciation rights to any of its employees. The Company has no long-term incentive plans.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| | | | | | Number of securities | |
| | | | | | remaining available | |
| | Number of securities | | | | for issuance under | |
| | to be issued upon | | Weighted average | | equity compensaton | |
| | exercise of | | exercise price of | | plans (excluding | |
| | outstanding options, | | outstanding options, | | securities reflected in | |
| | warrants and rights | | warrants and rights | | column (a)) | |
Plan Category | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | |
Equity compensation | | | | | | | | | | |
plans approved by | | | | | | | | | | |
security holders | | | 1,129,000 | | $ | 1.74 | | | 586,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Equity compensation | | | | | | | | | | |
plans not approved | | | | | | | | | | |
by security holders | | | 4,107,100 | | $ | 1.28 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 5,236,100 | | $ | 1.38 | | | 586,000 | |
Common shares issuable on the exercise of common stock warrants have not been approved by the security holders and, accordingly, have been segregated in the above table.
Stock Option Plan
In August 2000 we adopted a Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the “Plan,” which provides for the grant of stock options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” and “nonqualified stock options” (collectively “stock options”) within the meaning of Section 422 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Stock options may be issued to any of our officers, directors, key employees or consultants.
Under the Plan, we have reserved 1.5 million shares underlying stock options for issuance, of which 670,000 options have been granted to executive officers, employees and consultants at prices ranging from $.86 to $2.00 per share. The Plan is administered by the full Board of Directors, who determine which individuals shall received stock options, the time period during which the stock options may be exercised, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased under each stock option and the stock option price.
The per share exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date the stock option is granted) of the common stock that any person may purchase under an incentive stock option in any calendar year pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options will not exceed $100,000. No person who owns, directly or indirectly, at the time of the granting of an incentive stock option, more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock is eligible to receive incentive stock options under the Plan unless the stock option price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the stock option on the date of grant.
No incentive stock options may be transferred by an optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and, during the lifetime of an optionee, the stock option may only be exercisable by the optionee. Except as otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, stock options may be exercised only if the stock option holder remains continuously associated with us from the date of grant to the date of exercise. The exercise date of a stock option granted under the Plan may not be later than ten years from the date of grant. Any stock options that expire unexercised or that terminate upon an optionee’s ceasing to be employed by us will become available once again for issuance. Shares issued upon exercise of a stock option will rank equally with other shares then outstanding. No stock options will be granted by us at an exercise price less than 85% of the fair market value of the stock underlying the option on the date the option is granted.
Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our Articles of Incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duty as directors, other than the liability of a director for:
| · | A breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to our company or our stockholders; |
| · | Acts or omissions by the director not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; |
| · | Willful or negligent declaration of an unlawful dividend, stock purchase or redemption; or |
| · | Transactions from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. |
Our Articles of Incorporation require us to indemnify all persons whom we may indemnify pursuant to Nevada law to the full extent permitted by Nevada law.
Our bylaws require us to indemnify our officers and directors and other persons against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts incurred or paid in settlement in connection with civil or criminal claims, actions, suits or proceedings against such persons by reason of serving or having served as officers, directors, or in other capacities, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests and, in a criminal action or proceeding, if he had no reasonable cause to believe that his/her conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of no contest or its equivalent shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests or that he or she had reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Indemnification as provided in our bylaws shall be made only as authorized in a specific case and upon a determination that the person met the applicable standards of conduct. Insofar as the limitation of, or indemnification for, liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing, or otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such limitation or indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF GREATER THAN 5% OF OUR COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth certain information concerning our common stock ownership as of June 16, 2006, by (1) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock; (2) each of our executive officers and directors; and (3) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The address of each such stockholder is in care of us at 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California 92127.
| | Amount of Benefical | | Percent of | |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Ownership (1)(2) | | Ownership | |
William P.and Debra L. Spencer (3) | | | 2,993,000 | | | 27.3 | % |
Gary J. McAdam (4) | | | 2,741,483 | | | 22.8 | % |
James Scibelli (5) | | | 1,069,750 | | | 9.4 | % |
Barry S. King (6) | | | 19,000 | | | * | |
Robert Burg (7) | | | 50,000 | | | * | |
Jeffrey G. McGonegal (7) | | | 50,000 | | | * | |
Lowell W. Giffhorn (8) | | | 23,500 | | | * | |
Derek C. Boosey (9) | | | 195,000 | | | 1.8 | % |
All officers and directors as a group (6 persons) (10) | | | 3,330,500 | | | 29.6 | % |
* Represents less than 1%
(1) Reflects amounts as to which the beneficial owner has sole voting power and sole investment power.
(2) Includes stock options and common stock purchase warrants exercisable within 60 days from the date hereof.
(3) | Comprised of 2,740,000 shares and 253,000 stock options. William P. and Debra Spencer are husband and wife and are deemed to share beneficial ownership of these shares and options. |
(4) | Comprised of 1,435,557 shares and 1,305,926 common stock purchase warrants, all of which are owned by entities controlled by Mr. McAdam. |
(5) | Includes 370,000 shares and 699,750 common stock purchase warrants, all of which are owned by entities controlled by Mr. Scibelli. |
(6) Comprised of 19,000 stock options.
(7) Comprised of 50,000 stock options.
(8) Comprised of 8,500 shares and 15,000 stock options.
(9) Comprised of 50,000 shares and 145,000 stock options.
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
We have outstanding and are registering by this prospectus 1,672,500 shares of our common stock and an aggregate of 4,844,351 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants and stock options. The warrants and options are comprised of the following:
| | 997,625 Class A warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share issued as consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000; |
| · | 1,570,000 Class B warrants exercisable at $1.10 per share issued as consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000; |
| · | 750,000 Class C warrants exercisable at $2.00 per share, issued as a part of a private placement of our securities in October 2000; |
| · | 125,000 Class D warrants exercisable at $1.75 per share issued for consulting services; |
| · | 617,250 Class E warrants exercisable at $.70 per share issued as additional consideration for a $1,000,000 credit facility; |
| · | 660,000 stock options issued to employees, executive officers and consultants; and |
| · | 318,976 warrants exercisable at $1.00 issued to our stockholders of record as of September 14, 2000; and |
| · | 167,250 stock options exercisable at $1.20 per share. |
We are registering for resale the common stock underlying all of the above warrants and options. The Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E warrants expire in October 2007. The 318,976 warrants expire in October 2007 and the 167,250 stock options expire in January 2009. The Class A warrants may be called upon 30 days’ notice to the warrant holders if our common stock trades at $3.00 per share or more for ten consecutive trading days. The Class B and Class E warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis but may not be called. The Class C and Class D warrants may be called on 30 days’ notice to the warrant holders if our common stock trades at $6.00 per share or more for ten consecutive trading days. In order to call any of the warrants, we must have a current registration statement on file with the SEC covering the shares underlying the warrants.
The following table sets forth the names of the selling stockholders and the number of shares of our common stock underlying the common stock purchase warrants and stock options held by each selling stockholder. We have not listed the names of our over 100 holders who were issued the 318,976 warrants as a pro rata dividend to our stockholders of record on September 14, 2000. None of these persons are officers, directors or 5% or greater stockholders.
The following shares underlying the warrants and stock options may be offered from time to time by the selling stockholders named below. The selling stockholders are under no obligation to sell all or any portion of these shares of our common stock. Since the selling stockholders may sell all or part of the shares of common stock offered in this prospectus, we cannot estimate the number of shares of our common stock that will be held by the selling stockholders upon termination of this offering.
We have footnoted below any material relationship between the stockholder and us over the last three years. The address of each selling stockholder is in care of our company at 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 105, San Diego, California 92127. Asterisks (*) indicate ownership of less than 1%.
Class A Warrant Holders
Name | | Number of Shares Underlying Warrants | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
Great Expectations Family Limited Partnership(1) | | | 25,000 | | | 395,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 370,000 | | | 3.4 | % |
JMW Fund LLC | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Barry C. Loder | | | 11,250 | | | 73,125 | | | 11,250 | | | 61,875 | | | * | |
David Nemelka(2) | | | 25,000 | | | 62,500 | | | 25,000 | | | 37,500 | | | * | |
Greg Pusey | | | 11,750 | | | 170,625 | | | 11,750 | | | 158,875 | | | 1.5 | % |
Gulfstream 1998 Irrevocable Trust | | | 37,500 | | | 75,000 | | | 37,500 | | | 37,500 | | | * | |
GJM Trading Partners, LTD(1) | | | 380,000 | | | 1,815,557 | | | 380,000 | | | 1,435,557 | | | 12.9 | % |
Mathis Family Partners, Ltd. | | | 10,500 | | | 250,500 | | | 10,500 | | | 240,000 | | | 2.2 | % |
Jeffrey B. McAdam | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Patricia West Willox | | | 10,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 5,000 | | | * | |
Name | | Number of Shares Underlying Warrants | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
J Paul Consulting Corp.(3) | | | 175,000 | | | 175,000 | | | 175,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
GM/CM Family Partners, LTD(1) | | | 50,000 | | | 1,485,557 | | | 50,000 | | | 1,435,557 | | | 12.8 | % |
James Scibelli (1) | | | 15,500 | | | 385,500 | | | 15,500 | | | 370,000 | | | 3.4 | % |
MDB Capital | | | 2,500 | | | 2,500 | | | 2,500 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Pan American Capital Group | | | 100 | | | 100 | | | 100 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Lisa Kirby | | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Total Class A Warrants | | | 899,100 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Warrant Holders
Name | | Number of Shares Underlying Warrants | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
GJM Trading Partners, LTD(1) | | | 520,000 | | | 1,955,557 | | | 520,000 | | | 1,435,557 | | | 12.8 | % |
James Scibelli(1) | | | 130,000 | | | 500,000 | | | 130,000 | | | 370,000 | | | 3.4 | % |
USA Ventures | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Patricia West Willox | | | 10,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 5,000 | | | * | |
Rae Smolowitz | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Robert McAdam | | | 90,000 | | | 90,000 | | | 90,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Milagro Investments, Inc. | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
J Paul Consulting Corp. | | | 155,000 | | | 155,000 | | | 155,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
John LeFebvre | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Thomas Weinburger (1) | | | 600,000 | | | 600,000 | | | 600,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Total Class B Warrants | | | 1,560,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Warrant Holders
Name | | Number of Shares Underlying Warrants | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
Gary A. Agron(3) | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Zahra Abdollahi | | | 10,000 | | | 30,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 20,000 | | | * | |
Multi-National Consultants Grp- C/P Pan American Cap Grp., Inc. | | | 25,000 | | | 75,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 50,000 | | | * | |
Brasel Family Partners, Ltd. | | | 22,500 | | | 67,500 | | | 22,500 | | | 45,000 | | | * | |
Business Development Corp. | | | 12,500 | | | 37,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 25,000 | | | * | |
Benedetto Casale | | | 15,000 | | | 45,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 30,000 | | | * | |
Paul Dragul | | | 10,000 | | | 30,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 20,000 | | | * | |
Clifford Enten | | | 5,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 10,000 | | | * | |
Paul Ernst | | | 5,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 10,000 | | | * | |
Fairway Capital Partners, LLC | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Jeffrey W. Felton | | | 7,500 | | | 22,500 | | | 7,500 | | | 15,000 | | | * | |
Robert A. Germiquet | | | 5,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 10,000 | | | * | |
Great Expectations Family Ltd. Partnership(1) | | | 75,000 | | | 445,000 | | | 75,000 | | | 370,000 | | | 3.4 | % |
Aaron A. Grunfeld | | | 10,000 | | | 30,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 20,000 | | | * | |
Heritage Oil Company | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Arthur Kassoff Rev. Trust | | | 10,000 | | | 30,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 20,000 | | | * | |
Charles F. Kirby | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Cynthia and Michael Kirby | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Lisa Kirby | | | 10,000 | | | 110,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 100,000 | | | * | |
Mark E. or Constance Massa | | | 2,500 | | | 7,500 | | | 2,500 | | | 5,000 | | | * | |
Mathis Family Partners, Ltd. | | | 50,000 | | | 290,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 240,000 | | | 2.2 | % |
Sharon McDonald | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Michael O’Hare | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
J. J. Peirce | | | 12,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 0 | | | * | |
LTC David R. Plaza | | | 2,500 | | | 2,500 | | | 2,500 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Jeff P. Ploen(3) | | | 25,000 | | | 75,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 50,000 | | | * | |
Carol and Paul Rivello | | | 22,500 | | | 22,500 | | | 22,500 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Steven Schultz | | | 10,000 | | | 30,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 20,000 | | | * | |
R.A. Strahl | | | 5,000 | | | 13,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 8,000 | | | * | |
James W. Toot | | | 25,000 | | | 75,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 50,000 | | | * | |
Bonnie and Len Turano | | | 7,500 | | | 7,500 | | | 7,500 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Lawrence Underwood | | | 12,500 | | | 37,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 25,000 | | | * | |
James Scibelli(1) | | | 77,500 | | | 447,500 | | | 77,500 | | | 370,000 | | | 3.4 | % |
Andrew Benavides | | | 2,500 | | | 7,500 | | | 2,500 | | | 5,000 | | | * | |
GJM Trading Partners, LTD(1) | | | 90,000 | | | 1,525,557 | | | 90,000 | | | 1,435,557 | | | 13.3 | % |
USA Ventures | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Patricia West Willox | | | 10,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 5,000 | | | * | |
Susan Santage | | | 5,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 20,000 | | | * | |
The Bailey Family Trust | | | 12,500 | | | 37,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 25,000 | | | * | |
Total Class C Warrants | | | 710,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class D Warrant Holders
Name | | Number of Shares Underlying Warrants | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
James Scibelli(1) | | | 100,000 | | | 470,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 370,000 | | | 3.4 | % |
The Kabot Group, LLC | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Total Class D Warrants | | | 125,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class E Warrant Holders
Name | | Number of Shares Underlying Warrants | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
GJM Trading Partners, Ltd.(1) | | | 125,000 | | | 1,560,557 | | | 125,000 | | | 1,435,557 | | | 13.2 | % |
Roberts & Green, Inc.(1) | | | 125,000 | | | 125,000 | | | 125,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Total Class E Warrants | | | 250,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock Option Holders
Name | | Number of Shares Underlying Options | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
William and Debra Spencer(4)(5) | | | 175,000 | | | 3,175,000 | | | 175,000 | | | 3,000,000 | | | 28.8 | % |
Derek Boosey(4) | | | 115,000 | | | 165,000 | | | 115,000 | | | 50,000 | | | * | |
Patrick Millsap | | | 30,000 | | | 285,000 | | | 30,000 | | | 255,000 | | | 3.0 | % |
Yue Ling Chen | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Jandra Thomas | | | 40,000 | | | 65,000 | | | 40,000 | | | 25,000 | | | * | |
Robert Hesslink | | | 25,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | * | |
Michelle Posey | | | 15,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 5,000 | | | * | |
James Scibelli(1) | | | 100,000 | | | 470,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 370,000 | | | 3.4 | % |
Tony and Alicia Gwynn | | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Gary McAdams.(1) | | | 83,625 | | | 1,519,182 | | | 83,625 | | | 1,435,557 | | | 13.3 | % |
Carol Scibelli | | | 83,625 | | | 83,625 | | | 83,625 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Maurile C. Tremblay | | | 25,000 | | | 55,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 30,000 | | | * | |
Barry S. King(5) | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 10,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Total Stock Options | | | 827,250 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock Holders
Name | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Number of Shares Offered for Sale | | Number of Shares To Be Owned Following The Offering | | Percentage To Be Owned Following The Offering | |
Dianne Borden | | | 110,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 10,000 | | | * | |
Heather Evans | | | 17,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 5,000 | | | * | |
David Fine | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Fiserv IRA FBO Thomas A. Forti | | | 12,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Thomas A. Forti | | | 16,500 | | | 12,500 | | | 4,000 | | | * | |
Patrick Glenn | | | 30,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 10,000 | | | * | |
Robert Holmes | | | 123,700 | | | 100,000 | | | 23,700 | | | * | |
JMW Fund LLC | | | 125,000 | | | 125,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
J. Paul Consulting | | | 50,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 25,000 | | | * | |
Helaine Kaplan | | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Charles Kirby | | | 42,000 | | | 42,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Barry O. Moores | | | 264,750 | | | 75,000 | | | 189,750 | | | 1.8 | % |
Oppenheimer & Co Inc. Custodian fbo Lawrence Kaplan RLVR IRA | | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Pan American Capital Group, Inc. | | | 162,000 | | | 145,000 | | | 17,000 | | | * | |
Terry Phillips | | | 249,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 149,000 | | | 1.4 | % |
Gregory Pusey | | | 180,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 130,000 | | | 1.2 | % |
James Scoroposki | | | 170,000 | | | 100,000 | | | 70,000 | | | * | |
Robert A. Strahl Charitable Remainder Trust dtd 8/10/94 | | | 75,500 | | | 25,000 | | | 50,500 | | | * | |
West Hampton Special Situations Fund | | | 83,000 | | | 83,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Charitable Remainder Trust of Timothy J. Brasel | | | 112,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 62,000 | | | * | |
Debra Jakalow | | | 25,500 | | | 20,000 | | | 5,500 | | | * | |
Michael Neider IRA | | | 60,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 10,000 | | | * | |
Debbie Vanderlinden | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Woodland Partners | | | 125,000 | | | 125,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
He Zhang | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Jyll Rosenfeld | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 0 | | | * | |
Total Stock | | | | | | 1,672,500 | | | | | | | |
(1) | 5% or greater stockholder |
(3) | Our securities counsel |
Plan of Distribution
The shares of our common stock which the selling stockholders or their pledgees, donees, transferees or other successors in interest may offer for resale will be sold from time to time in one or more of the following transactions:
| · | Transactions on the Bulletin Board or on such other market on which our common stock may from time to time be trading; |
| · | Privately negotiated transactions; |
| · | Through the writing of options on the shares; |
| · | Any combination of these transactions. |
The sale price to the public in these transactions may be:
| · | The market price prevailing at the time of sale; |
| · | A price related to the prevailing market price; |
| · | Such other price as the selling stockholders determine from time to time. |
In the event that we permit or cause this prospectus to lapse, the selling stockholders may only sell shares of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. The selling stockholders will have the sole and absolute discretion not to accept any purchase offer or make any sale of these shares of our common stock if they deem the purchase price to be unsatisfactory at any particular time.
The selling stockholders or their pledges, donees, transferees or other successors in interest, may also sell these shares of our common stock directly to market makers acting as principals and/or broker-dealers acting as agents for themselves or their customers. These broker-dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders and/or the purchasers of these shares of our common stock for whom such broker-dealers may act as agents or to whom they sell as principal, or both. As to a particular broker-dealer, this compensation might be in excess of customary commissions. Market makers and block purchasers purchasing these shares of our common stock will do so for their own account and at their own risk. It is possible that a selling stockholder will attempt to sell shares of our common stock in block transactions to market makers or other purchasers at a price per share which may be below the prevailing market price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that all or any of these shares of our common stock offered hereby will be issued to, or sold by, the selling stockholders. Upon effecting the sale of any of these shares of our common stock offered under this prospectus, the selling stockholders and any brokers, dealers or agents, hereby, may be deemed “underwriters” as that term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Alternatively, the selling stockholders may sell all or any part of the shares of our common stock offered hereby through an underwriter. No selling stockholder has entered into any agreement with a prospective underwriter and there is no assurance that any such agreement will be entered into. If a selling stockholder enters into an agreement or agreements with an underwriter, then the relevant details will be set forth in a post effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. A post effective amendment is a supplement or revision to this prospectus.
The selling stockholders and any other persons participating in the sale or distribution of these shares of our common stock will be subject to applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations thereunder including, without limitation, Regulation M. These provisions may restrict activities of, and limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of these shares of our common stock by, the selling stockholders. Furthermore, pursuant to Regulation M, a person engaged in a distribution of securities is prohibited from bidding for, purchasing or attempting to induce any person to bid for or purchase our securities for a period beginning five business days prior to the date of this prospectus until such person is no longer a selling stockholder. These regulations may affect the marketability of these shares of our common stock.
We will pay substantially all of the expenses incident to the registration and offering of our common stock, other than commissions or discounts of underwriters, broker-dealers or agents.
RELATED PARTY AND OTHER MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
We believe that the above transaction was fair, reasonable and upon terms at least as favorable to us as those we might have obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
We are authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share.
Common Stock
We have 10,721,400 shares of common stock outstanding. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. There is no right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. The holders of common stock are entitled to any dividends that may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor subject to the prior rights of holders of preferred stock and any contractual restrictions we have against the payment of dividends on common stock. In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and the liquidation preferences of any outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights and have no right to convert their common stock into any other securities. All of the outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
Preferred Stock
We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series with such designations, voting powers, if any, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and such qualifications, limitations and restrictions, as are determined by resolution of our Board of Directors. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company without further action by stockholders and could adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders of common stock. In certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock could depress the market price of the common stock. There are no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.
Warrants and Stock Options
We have an aggregate of 5,236,100 common stock purchase warrants and stock options outstanding, comprised of the following:
| · | 899,100 Class A warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share issued as consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000; |
| · | 1,560,000 Class B warrants exercisable at $1.10 per share issued as consideration for loans advanced to us in 2000; |
| · | 710,000 Class C warrants exercisable at $2.00 per share, issued as a part of a private placement of our securities in October 2000; |
| · | 125,000 Class D warrants exercisable at $1.75 per share issued for consulting services; |
| · | 617,250 Class E warrants exercisable at $.70 to $3.45 per share issued as additional consideration for a $1,000,000 credit facility and for services rendered from 2001-2005; |
| · | 1,129,000 stock options issued to employees, executive officers and consultants; |
| · | 195,750 warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share to be issued to our over 100 stockholders of record as of September 14, 2000; and |
We are registering for resale the common stock underlying only the warrants and options which were outstanding as of the original filing of this prospectus. The Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E warrants expire in October 2007. The 195,750 warrants expire in September 2007 and the 367,250 warrants options expire in January 2009. The Class A warrants may be called upon 30 days’ notice to the warrant holders if our common stock trades at $3.00 per share or more for ten consecutive trading days. The Class B and Class E warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis but may not be called. The Class C and Class D warrants may be called on 30 days’ notice to the warrant holders if our common stock trades at $6.00 per share or more for ten consecutive trading days. In order to call any of the warrants, we must have a current registration statement on file with the SEC covering the shares underlying the warrants.
Limitation on Liability
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that a director shall not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for any action taken or any failure to act to the full extent permitted under Nevada law. The effect of this provision is to eliminate our rights and the rights of our stockholders, through stockholders’ derivative suits on our behalf, to recover monetary damages from a director for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director, including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior. This provision does not limit or eliminate any stockholder or us from seeking non-monetary relief such as an injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a director’s duty of care or to seek monetary damages for (i) a violation of criminal law, (ii) unlawful payment of dividends or other distribution under Nevada law, (iii) a transaction in which a director derived an improper personal benefit, (iv) willful misconduct, or (v) reckless, malicious or wanton acts.
Dividends
We have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to use our available funds for the development of our business. There are no material restrictions limiting, or likely to limit, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.
Transfer Agent
Interwest Transfer Co., Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, is our transfer and warrant agent.
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
We have 10,721,400 common shares outstanding, all of which are freely tradeable or saleable under Rule 144 including the 1,672,500 shares which we are registering hereby for resale. We also may have up to 4,844,351 shares outstanding which have been registered by this prospectus and may be issued upon exercise of our common stock purchase warrants and stock options.
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person, or persons whose shares are aggregated, who owns shares that were purchased from us, or any affiliate, at least one year previously, including a person who may be deemed our affiliate, is entitled to sell within any three month period, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
| · | 1% of the then outstanding shares of our common stock; or |
| · | The average weekly trading volume of our common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the date on which notice of the sale is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about us. Any person who is not deemed to have been our affiliate at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale, and who owns shares within the definition of “restricted securities” under Rule 144 under the Securities Act that were purchased from us, or any affiliate, at least two years previously, is entitled to sell such shares under Rule 144(k) without regard to the volume limitations, manner of sale provisions, public information requirements or notice requirements.
Future sales of restricted common stock under Rule 144 or otherwise or of the shares which we are registering under this prospectus could negatively impact the market price of our common stock. We are unable to estimate the number of shares that may be sold in the future by our existing stockholders or the effect, if any, that sales of shares by such stockholders will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock by existing stockholders could adversely affect prevailing market prices.
EXPERTS
Our financial statements included in this prospectus as of and for the year ended March 31, 2006 have been included in reliance on the report of HJ Associates & Consultants LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of this firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
Our financial statements included in this prospectus as of and for the year ended March 31, 2005 have been included in reliance on the report of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of this firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
On January 9, 2006, we notified Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. ("MHM"), that they were being dismissed effective January 6, 2006, as the Company's independent registered accounting firm. MHM's report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
On January 6, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company, upon the recommendation of its Audit Committee, elected to engage HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP (“HJ Associates”) to serve as the Company's independent registered accounting firm.
On January 10, 2006, the Company was informed that it had been accepted as a client of HJ Associates.
Since March 31, 2005, (the date we retained MHM as principal accountants) and for the subsequent interim period through January 6, 2006, there were no disagreements between the Company and MHM on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to MHM's satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their report on the financial statements for such year. We reported the change in accountants on Form 8-K on January 11, 2006. The Form 8-K contained a letter from MHM, addressed to the SEC, stating that it agreed with the statements concerning MHM in such Form 8-K.
As previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005, MHM did not report on our internal control structure as follows:
As of March 31, 2005, management carried out an assessment under the supervision of and with the participation of our principal executive officer (who also served as our principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. As of the date of that assessment, the principal executive officer concluded that certain of our disclosure controls and procedures were performed externally and, therefore, our internal controls were not deemed effective. We did not have an inside certified public accountant to provide effective oversight and review of financial transactions. As a result, management had identified the following internal control deficiencies which, when accumulated, represented a material weakness at March 31, 2005:
· | Lack of an inside certified public accountant; |
· | Preparation of periodic income tax provisions; |
· | Review and recording of equity transactions, including warrant and option valuations; |
· | Certain end of period financial reconciliations; and |
· | Financial statement preparation and disclosures. |
We retained an external expert who reviewed all significant account balances and transactions reflected in the financial statements contained in this report and otherwise analyzed the transactions underlying our financial statements to verify the accuracy of the financial statements contained in this report. In addition, we have recruited a chief financial officer who will establish, design and implement systems and procedures over our internal control over financial reporting as well as add internal control expertise. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
The Company authorized MHM to respond fully to the inquiries of HJ Associates concerning the subject matter of the reportable event and has provided MHM with a copy of the foregoing disclosures.
Subsequent to January 6, 2006, the Company restated the quarterly reports for the six and nine months ended September 30 and December 31, 2005. We determined that the extension of the expiration date on warrants to certain shareholders should have been accounted for as a dividend to the warrant holders rather than as an expense. MHM disagrees with management's current position and continue to believe that the extension of the warrants was related to the settlement of an existing or unasserted contractual obligation and, therefore, should be reflected as an expense.
During the Company's two fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, and the subsequent interim period through January 6, 2006, the Company did not consult HJ Associates with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or contemplated, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's consolidated financial statements, or any other matters of reportable events as set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-B.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of our common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by the Law Office of Gary A. Agron, Greenwood Village, Colorado. Mr. Agron owns 50,000 Class C warrants.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549, a post-effective amendment to our registration statement on Form SB-2 under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to our common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits to the registration statement. For further information with respect to Imagenetix, Inc., and our common stock offered hereby, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits filed as part of the registration statement. We are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including quarterly reports, annual reports which include our audited financial statements and proxy statements. The registration statement, including exhibits thereto, and all of our periodic reports may be inspected without charge at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s principal office in Washington, D.C., and copies of all or any part thereof may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, after payment of fees prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may obtain additional information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Section by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a World Wide Web site which provides online access to reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the address: http://www.sec.gov.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms | | F-2-F-3 |
| | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets, March 31, 2006 and 2005 | | F-4 |
| | |
Consolidated Statements of Operation, | | |
for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 | | F-5 |
| | |
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity, | | |
for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 | | F-6 |
| | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, for the | | |
years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 | | F-7 |
| | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-8-F-25 |
| | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets, June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and | | |
March 31, 2006 | | F-26 |
| | |
Consolidated Statements of Operation (unaudited), | | |
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 | | F-27 |
| | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), for the | | |
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 | | F-28 |
| | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-29 -F-39 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
Imagenetix, Inc.
San Diego, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Imagenetix, Inc. as of March 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Imagenetix, Inc. as of March 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2006, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
June 15, 2006
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
IMAGENETIX, INC.
San Diego, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Imagenetix, Inc. as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the 2005 financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Imagenetix, Inc. as of March 31, 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C
San Diego, CA
July 5, 2005
Imagenetix, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,808,016 | | $ | 2,031,486 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 811,198 | | | 2,064,089 | |
Inventories, net | | | 1,741,468 | | | 1,382,495 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 220,747 | | | 26,700 | |
Income tax receivable | | | 617,570 | | | - | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 94,200 | | | 41,700 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 5,293,199 | | | 5,546,470 | |
| | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 97,574 | | | 42,987 | |
| | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 503,301 | | | 183,054 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,894,074 | | $ | 5,772,511 | |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 740,461 | | $ | 841,801 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 51,949 | | | 20,245 | |
Customer deposits | | | 48,485 | | | 75,391 | |
Income tax payable | | | - | | | 437,784 | |
Short term license payable | | | 29,209 | | | - | |
Line of credit with related party | | | - | | | 225,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 870,104 | | | 1,600,221 | |
| | | | | | | |
Long term license payable | | | 68,873 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares | | | | | | | |
authorized: none outstanding | | | - | | | - | |
Common stock, $.001par value; 50,000,000 shares | | | | | | | |
authorized: 10,721,400 and 10,404,652 issued and | | | | | | | |
outstanding at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively | | | 10,721 | | | 10,405 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 10,342,395 | | | 4,267,707 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (5,398,019 | ) | | (105,822 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 4,955,097 | | | 4,172,290 | |
| | $ | 5,894,074 | | $ | 5,772,511 | |
See accompanying reports of independent registered public accounting firms, summary of accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Operation
Years Ended March 31, | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 7,649,941 | | $ | 7,574,194 | |
| | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | 4,134,645 | | | 4,293,880 | |
| | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 3,515,296 | | | 3,280,314 | |
| | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | | 2,995,917 | | | 1,145,102 | |
Payroll expense | | | 674,344 | | | 579,043 | |
Consulting expense | | | 1,072,391 | | | 516,729 | |
Operating expenses | | | 4,742,652 | | | 2,240,874 | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (1,227,356 | ) | | 1,039,440 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | |
Other income | | | 35,906 | | | 5,523 | |
Interest expense (Note 6) | | | (25,728 | ) | | (23,572 | ) |
Other income (expense) | | | 10,178 | | | (18,049 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (1,217,178 | ) | | 1,021,391 | |
| | | | | | | |
Provision for (benefits from) taxes (Note 10) | | | (623,800 | ) | | 267,455 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (593,378 | ) | $ | 753,936 | |
| | | | | | | |
Basic income (loss) per share | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |
| | | | | | | |
Diluted income (loss) per share | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |
See accompanying reports of independent registered public accounting firms, summary of accounting polices and notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
Years Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Capital in excess | | Retained Earnings | | Stockholders' | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | of Par Value | | (Deficit) | | Equity | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, April 1, 2004 | | | 8,722,152 | | $ | 8,722 | | $ | 2,440,720 | | $ | (859,758 | ) | $ | 1,589,684 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock at $1.20 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per share | | | 1,672,500 | | | 1,673 | | | 2,005,327 | | | - | | | 2,007,000 | |
Stock offering costs | | | | | | | | | (442,542 | ) | | - | | | (442,542 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
at $0.88 per share | | | 10,000 | | | 10 | | | 8,790 | | | - | | | 8,800 | |
Value of warrants and options issued | | | - | | | - | | | 255,412 | | | - | | | 255,412 | |
Net income for the year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2005 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 753,936 | | | 753,936 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2005 | | | 10,404,652 | | $ | 10,405 | | $ | 4,267,707 | | $ | (105,822 | ) | $ | 4,172,290 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock for services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
at $1.95 per share | | | 45,000 | | | 45 | | | 87,705 | | | - | | | 87,750 | |
Exercise of warrants at $1.00 to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$2.00 per share | | | 271,748 | | | 271 | | | 312,477 | | | - | | | 312,748 | |
Value of warrants and options issued | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and extended | | | - | | | - | | | 5,674,506 | | | - | | | 5,674,506 | |
Non-cash dividend issued to certain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
warrant holders | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (4,698,819 | ) | | (4,698,819 | ) |
Net (loss) for the year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2006 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (593,378 | ) | | (593,378 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2006 | | | 10,721,400 | | $ | 10,721 | | $ | 10,342,395 | | $ | (5,398,019 | ) | $ | 4,955,097 | |
See accompanying reports of independent registered public accounting firms, summary of accounting policies and notes to consolidated finacial statements.
Imagenetix, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended May 31, | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (593,378 | ) | $ | 753,936 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) | | | | | | | |
to cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Amortization and depreciation | | | 61,001 | | | 27,647 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 17,930 | | | (106,677 | ) |
Provision for inventory obsolescence | | | 123,794 | | | (36,887 | ) |
Non cash expense related to issuance of warrants | | | | | | | |
and stock options | | | 975,687 | | | 57,043 | |
Stock issued for services | | | 87,750 | | | - | |
Change in deferred taxes | | | (358,200 | ) | | (66,200 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | | | 1,234,961 | | | (1,153,580 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in employee receivable | | | 1,544 | | | (5,000 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in inventory | | | (482,767 | ) | | (359,556 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | | | 87,332 | | | (3,751 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | | | (101,340 | ) | | 485,408 | |
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities | | | 31,704 | | | (20,195 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in customer deposits | | | (26,906 | ) | | (13,701 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable | | | (1,055,354 | ) | | 333,655 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | 3,758 | | | (107,858 | ) |
Investing activities: | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of office equipment and leasehold improvements | | | (100,193 | ) | | (3,000 | ) |
Trademarks, patents and infomercial | | | (189,979 | ) | | (83,660 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (290,172 | ) | | (86,660 | ) |
Financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | - | | | 2,007,000 | |
Stock offering costs | | | - | | | (244,173 | ) |
Payments on notes payable to related party | | | (225,000 | ) | | - | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants | | | 312,748 | | | 8,800 | |
Payments on patent license financed | | | (24,804 | ) | | - | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 62,944 | | | 1,771,627 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | | | (223,470 | ) | | 1,577,109 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | | | 2,031,486 | | | 454,377 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | | $ | 1,808,016 | | $ | 2,031,486 | |
| | | | | | | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 25,728 | | $ | 27,000 | |
Income taxes | | $ | 789,754 | | $ | - | |
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | | | | | | | |
Patent license financed | | $ | 122,886 | | $ | - | |
Non-cash dividend issued to certain warrant holders | | $ | 4,698,819 | | $ | - | |
See accompanying reports of independent registered public accounting firms, summary of accounting policies
and notes to consolidated financial statements.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
The accompanying consolidated financial statements represent the accounts of Imagenetix, Inc. [“Parent”] organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 28, 1988; and its subsidiary Imagenetix, Inc [“Subsidiary”] organized under the laws of the state of Colorado on July 26, 1996 and its subsidiary Imagenetix [“Imagenetix CA”] organized under the laws of the State of California on January 7, 1999, [“The Company”]. The Company is engaged in the business of developing and marketing nutritional supplements and skin care products primarily in domestic markets.
On March 23, 1999, Subsidiary completed an exchange agreement with Imagenetix CA wherein Subsidiary issued 3,900,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding common stock of Imagenetix CA. The Acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization of Imagenetix CA as the shareholders of the Imagenetix CA controlled the combined entity after the acquisition. There was no adjustment to the carrying values of the assets or liabilities of the Subsidiary or Imagenetix CA as a result of the recapitalization.
During October 2000, the Subsidiary entered into a definitive merger agreement and plan of reorganization with Parent. The transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization of the Subsidiary, wherein the Subsidiary became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Parent. After giving effect to the preceding transaction, the parent had 8,550,000 shares of common stock, 3,183,750 warrants, and 525,000 options outstanding. In connection with the reverse acquisition, the Parent changed its name to Imagenetix, Inc.
The Company has, at the present time, not paid any dividends, and any dividends that may be paid in the future will depend upon the financial requirements of the Company and other relevant factors.
Consolidation
All significant intercompany transactions between the Parent, Subsidiary, and Imagenetix CA have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain items included in the year ended March 31, 2005 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that effect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimated by management.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the financial statements, the Company considers all highly liquid debt investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At various times throughout the year, the Company has exceeded federally insured limits.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable are carried at the expected net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessment of the collectibility of specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there were a deterioration of a major customer’s creditworthiness, or actual defaults were higher than historical experience, our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could be overstated, which could have a negative impact on operations.
Inventory
Inventory is carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in first-out method.
Property and Equipment
| Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized, upon being placed in service. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful life of three to seven years, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the lessor of the remaining lease life or the life of the asset, using the straight-line method. The Company follows the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets." Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company continuously evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated fair value of such long-lived assets, and provides for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. |
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
Trademarks and Patents
Patents and trademarks are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and are amortized over their estimated useful lives of from 8 to 17 years for patents and 10 years for trademarks. The carrying value of patents and trademarks is periodically reviewed and impairments, if any, are recognized when the expected future benefit to be derived from individual intangible assets is less than its carrying value determined based on the provisions of SFAS No. 144 as discussed above.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations in accounting for all stock option plans. Under APB Opinion 25, compensation cost has been recognized for stock options granted to employees when the option price is less than the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Through December 31, 2005, SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," required the Company to provide pro forma information regarding net income as if compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans had been determined in accordance with the fair value based method prescribed in SFAS No. 123. To provide the required pro forma information, the Company estimated the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. SFAS No. 148 also provides for alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The Company has elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation under APB No. 25.
On December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors accelerated the vesting of 309,000 unvested stock options held by our employees with exercise prices ranging from $1.39 to $1.68 per share. The options would have otherwise vested over various periods through September 2008. Our Board of Directors determined that the acceleration of the vesting of the stock options described above was in the best interests of the company to enhance the incentive of the affected options and to provide us with greater flexibility for future grants of share-based incentives as SFAS 123(R) became effective. We adopted SFAS 123(R) as of April 1, 2006.
Under the accounting provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss per share would have been increased by the pro forma amounts indicated below:
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
| | Year Ended March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Net income (loss), as reported | | $ | (593,378 | ) | $ | 753,936 | |
Stock-based employee compensation, | | | | | | | |
net of tax effects, included in reported net loss | | | 217,200 | | | - | |
Stock-based employee compensation, | | | | | | | |
net of tax effects | | | (770,365 | ) | | - | |
Proforma net income (loss) | | $ | (1,146,543 | ) | $ | 753,936 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | |
Basic- as reported | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |
Basic- proforma | | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |
Diluted- as reported | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |
Diluted- proforma | | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |
For purposes of computing the pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option granted to employees and directors is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for the year ended March 31, 2006: dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of from 90% to 94%; risk-free interest rates of 3.64% to 4.02%, and expected lives of from 2 to 5 years.
The Company applies SFAS No. 123 in valuing options granted to consultants and estimates the fair value of such options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value is recorded as consulting expense as services are provided. Options granted to consultants for which vesting is contingent based on future performance are measured at their then current fair value at each period end, until vested.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the product is shipped. The Company evaluates whether an allowance for estimated returns is required based on historical returns. The Company has not had significant returns and accordingly, has not established an estimated allowance for returns at March 31, 2006 or 2005.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This statement requires an asset and liability approach for accounting for income taxes (See Note 10).
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
Earnings Per Share
The computation of earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (See Note 11).
Recently Enacted Accounting Standards
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections" ("SFAS 154") which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 20 "Accounting Changes" and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements-An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28." SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective application, or the latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and a correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 154 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
NOTE 2 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are carried at the expected realizable value. Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Accounts receivable - trade | | $ | 861,198 | | $ | 2,096,159 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (50,000 | ) | | (32,070 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 811,198 | | $ | 2,064,089 | |
NOTE 3 - INVENTORY
Inventory consists of the following at:
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 1,554,417 | | $ | 1,250,049 | |
Finished products | | | 168,228 | | | 57,120 | |
Boxes, labels, tubes & bottles | | | 215,291 | | | 148,000 | |
| | | 1,937,936 | | | 1,455,169 | |
Reserve for obsolescence | | | (196,468 | ) | | (72,674 | ) |
| | $ | 1,741,468 | | $ | 1,382,495 | |
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation:
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Office equipment | | $ | 40,922 | | $ | 45,807 | |
Lease-hold improvements | | | 87,708 | | | 113,598 | |
Leased equipment | | | 12,341 | | | 12,341 | |
| | | 140,971 | | | 171,746 | |
| | | | | | | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | 43,397 | | | 128,759 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 97,574 | | $ | 42,987 | |
Depreciation expense for the year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $45,606 and $24,652, respectively.
NOTE 5 - OTHER ASSETS
The following is a summary of intangible assets which are included in “Other Assets” on the face of the balance sheet:
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Trademarks | | $ | 13,032 | | $ | 11,736 | |
Deposit on infomercial | | | - | | | 79,240 | |
Promotional | | | 18,750 | | | 43,750 | |
Patent | | | 161,353 | | | 28,468 | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 330,200 | | | 24,500 | |
Globestar | | | - | | | 3,674 | |
| | | 523,335 | | | 191,368 | |
| | | | | | | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | 20,034 | | | 8,314 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 503,301 | | $ | 183,054 | |
For the year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 amortization expense was $15,395 and $2,995, respectively.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE 6 - LINE OF CREDIT - RELATED PARTY
In October 2001, the Company entered into a line of credit agreement with two principal shareholders. The shareholders agreed to provide a line of credit in the amount of $1,000,000. The balance on the line of credit accrued interest at a rate of 12% per annum. The line of credit was for working capital needs and was secured with the Company’s assets. The line of credit expired on September 30, 2002. The Company verbally negotiated extension of terms on the line of credit. The verbal agreement changed the terms on the line of credit to a month to month basis.
As of March 31, 2006, the line of credit had been paid in full. During the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company recorded interest expense of approximately $16,000 and $27,000, respectively, related to the line of credit.
NOTE 7 - LICENSE AND ROYALTY PAYABLE
In May, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with EHP Products, Inc. acquiring a non-exclusive world-wide license to make, use and sell products relating to Cetyl Myristoleate covered under U.S. Patent No. 5,569,676. The agreement provides for payments of $3,000 per month from May, 2005 through April, 2009, at which time EHP Products, Inc. has agreed to convey ownership in the product to the Company.
As of March 31, 2006 the following obligations were outstanding related to this license:
| | As of March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Patent License and Royalty Payable | | $ | 98,082 | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Less current portion | | | 29,209 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Long term license payable | | $ | 68,873 | | $ | - | |
NOTE 8 - LEASES OBLIGATIONS
Operating Lease
The Company has entered into a seven-year building lease for its office commencing in January 2006 and expiring in December 2012. Lease expense for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 amounted to $219,336 and $197,090, respectively. The following is a schedule of minimum annual rental payments for the next five years.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
Years ending March 31, | | | |
| | | |
2007 | | $ | 132,986 | |
2008 | | | 134,608 | |
2009 | | | 135,579 | |
2010 | | | 138,363 | |
2011 | | | 143,206 | |
Thereafter | | | 262,274 | |
| | | | |
Total minimum lease payments | | $ | 947,016 | |
NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGINCIES
Contingencies
The Company is involved in litigation from time to time in the normal course of business. Management believes there are no such claims, which would have a material effect on the financial position of the Company.
Other agreements
The Company routinely enters into contracts and agreements with suppliers, manufacturers, consultants, product marketing, and sales representatives in the normal course of doing business. These agreements can be either short or long term and are normally limited to specific products and marketing opportunities. The Company is committed to purchase a minimum of $1,680,000 each year through 2012 of the major ingredient in its current products. However, we have entered into a waiver, which can be exercised solely at our option, which, if necessary, will eliminate $840,000 of the purchase commitment for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006.
In June 2004, the Company entered into a marketing and promotion agreement which contained certain milestones which, if met, require the Company to issue warrants exercisable into up to 125,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to 150% of the market price on the date the milestone is met. The Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock during the year ended March 31, 2005, as the result of two of the milestones being met. The warrants were valued using the Black-Sholes pricing model and resulted in additional expense of approximately $57,000 as of March 31, 2005. The Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock during the year ended March 31, 2006, as a result of the third milestone being met. The warrant was valued using the Black-Sholes pricing model and resulted in additional expense of approximately $39,000 for the year ended March 31, 2006.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE 10 –CAPITAL STOCK
Preferred Stock
The Company has authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value, with such rights, preferences and designations and to be issued in such series as determined by the Board of Directors. No shares are issued and outstanding at March 31, 2006.
Common Stock
The Company has authorized 50,000,000 shares of common stock at $.001 par value. At March 31, 2006, the Company had 10,721,400 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued 271,748 shares of common stock for proceeds of $312,748. The shares were issued upon shareholders exercising warrants with exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $2.00 per share.
Also, during the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued 45,000 shares of common stock to three individuals in exchange for services they provided to the company. The services performed were valued based on the price of the common stock on the date of issuance, $1.95 per share or $87,750 in the aggregate. This amount was reflected as non-cash expense during the year ended March 31, 2006.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants to purchase common stock at $0.88 per share.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company sold 1,672,500 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $2,007,000. Stock offering costs of $442,542 were recorded as part of the sale. The stock offering costs include the fair value, as determined by the Black-Scholes pricing model, of warrants issued to the private placement agent. Per the agreement, the private placement agent received 10% of the total shares issued in the form of a warrant with an exercise price equal to the share price of the issuance. The warrants were valued at approximately $198,000.
Stock Bonus Plan
During the year ended March 31, 2000, the board of directors of the Company adopted a stock bonus plan. The plan provides for the granting of awards of up to 724,500 shares of common stock to officers, directors, consultants and employees. Awards under the plan will be granted as determined by the board of directors. At present, 499,500 shares have been granted under the plan.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
Warrants
A summary of the status of the warrants granted under various agreements at March 31, 2006 and 2005, and changes during the years then ended is presented below:
| | | | | |
| | Warrants | |
| | | | Weighted | |
| | | | Average | |
| | | | Exercise | |
| | Shares | | Price | |
| | | | | |
Outstanding, April 1, 2004 | | | 4,011,598 | | $ | 1.18 | |
Granted | | | 217,250 | | | 1.51 | |
Cancelled | | | - | | | - | |
Exercised | | | - | | | - | |
Outstanding, March 31, 2005 | | | 4,228,848 | | | 1.25 | |
Granted | | | 150,000 | | | 1.96 | |
Cancelled | | | - | | | - | |
Exercised | | | (271,748 | ) | | 1.20 | |
Outstanding, March 31, 2006 | | | 4,107,100 | | | 1.28 | |
| | | | | | | |
Exercisable, March 31, 2005 | | | 4,228,848 | | $ | 1.25 | |
Exercisable, March 31, 2006 | | | 4,107,100 | | $ | 1.28 | |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average fair value of warrants | | | | | | | |
granted during the year ended March 31, 2006 | | | 150,000 | | $ | 1.46 | |
The Company estimates the fair value of each warrant at the issuance date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for the year ended March 31, 2006: dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 90% to 94%, risk-free interest rates of 3.64% to 3.83%; and expected lives of 5 years.
In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company extended the expiration date on warrants exercisable for up to 2,757,782 shares of common stock to October 23, 2007. These warrants were issued in 2000 and 2001 as part of an equity unit sale. By the terms of the warrants, the Company was to use its best efforts to maintain a registration statement under which the holders could resell the common shares on the exercise of the warrants. Since the Company failed to maintain a timely registration statement, it decided to extend the expiration date of the warrants. Due to this modification, the Company recorded a non-cash dividend of $4,698,819 for the year ended March 31, 2006. The Company estimated the fair value of the dividend at the modification date by using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 90%; risk free interest rate of 3.64%; and expected lives of 25 months.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
A summary of the status of the warrants granted under the various agreements at March 31, 2006, are presented in the table below:
| | Outstanding | | Exercisable | |
| | | | Weighted | | | | | | | |
| | | | Average | | Weighted | | | | Weighted | |
Range of | | | | Remaining | | Average | | | | Average | |
Exercise | | Number | | Contractual | | Exercise | | Number | | Exercise | |
Prices | | Outstanding | | Life | | Price | | Exercisable | | Price | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 0.70-1.00 | | | 1,344,853 | | | 1.56 | | $ | 0.94 | | | 1,344,853 | | $ | 0.94 | |
$ | 1.10-1.95 | | | 1,977,250 | | | 1.92 | | $ | 1.19 | | | 1,977,250 | | $ | 1.19 | |
$ | 2.00 | | | 710,000 | | | 1.56 | | $ | 2.00 | | | 710,000 | | $ | 2.00 | |
$ | 2.33-3.45 | | | 74,997 | | | 4.17 | | $ | 2.85 | | | 74,997 | | $ | 2.85 | |
| | | | 4,107,100 | | | | | | | | | 4,107,100 | | | | |
Warrants to purchase 1,316,598 shares at $1.00 per share, 750,000 shares at $2.00 per share and 125,000 shares at $1.75 per share are redeemable at $.01 per warrant at the option of the Company if there is an effective registration of the securities and the closing bid or selling price of the Company’s common stock for 10 consecutive trading days equal three times the exercise price of the warrants.
Stock Option Plan
In August 2000 we adopted a Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the "Plan," which provides for the grant of stock options intended to qualify as "incentive stock options" and "nonqualified stock options" (collectively "stock options") within the meaning of Section 422 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). Stock options may be issued to any of our officers, directors, key employees or consultants.
Under the Plan, we have reserved 1.5 million shares underlying stock options for issuance, of which 1,139,000 options have been granted to executive officers, employees and consultants at prices ranging from $.86 to $2.00 per share. The Plan is administered by the full Board of Directors, who determine which individuals shall received stock options, the time period during which the stock options may be exercised, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased under each stock option and the stock option price.
The per share exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date the stock option is granted) of the common stock that any person may purchase under an incentive stock option in any calendar year pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options will not exceed $100,000. No person who owns, directly or indirectly, at the time of the granting of an incentive stock option, more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock is eligible to receive incentive stock options under the Plan unless the stock option price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the stock option on the date of grant.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
No incentive stock options may be transferred by an optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and, during the lifetime of an optionee, the stock option may only be exercisable by the optionee. Except as otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, stock options may be exercised only if the stock option holder remains continuously associated with us from the date of grant to the date of exercise. The exercise date of a stock option granted under the Plan may not be later than ten years from the date of grant. Any stock options that expire unexercised or that terminate upon an optionee's ceasing to be employed by us will become available once again for issuance. Shares issued upon exercise of a stock option will rank equally with other shares then outstanding. No stock options will be granted by us at an exercise price less than 85% of the fair market value of the stock underlying the option on the date the option is granted. During the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, there were options granted to purchase up to 20,000 and 469,000 shares of common stock, respectively. During the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, there were options exercised to purchase 20,000 and 0 shares of common stock, respectively.
A summary of the status of the options granted under the Company’s 2000 stock option plan and other agreements at March 31, 2006 and 2005, and changes during the years then ended is presented below:
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
| | Options | |
| | | | Weighted | |
| | | | Average | |
| | | | Exercise | |
| | Shares | | Price | |
| | | | | |
Outstanding, April 1, 2004 | | | 650,000 | | $ | 1.44 | |
Granted | | | 20,000 | | | 0.88 | |
Cancelled | | | - | | | - | |
Exercised | | | (10,000 | ) | | 0.88 | |
Outstanding, March 31, 2005 | | | 660,000 | | | 1.44 | |
Granted | | | 469,000 | | | 2.18 | |
Cancelled | | | - | | | - | |
Exercised | | | - | | | - | |
Outstanding, March 31, 2006 | | | 1,129,000 | | | 1.74 | |
| | | | | | | |
Exercisable, March 31, 2005 | | | 660,000 | | $ | 1.44 | |
Exercisable, March 31, 2006 | | | 1,129,000 | | $ | 1.74 | |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average fair value of options | | | | | | | |
granted during the year ended March 31, 2006 | | | 469,000 | | $ | 1.55 | |
A summary of the status of the options granted under the stock option plan and other agreements at March 31, 2006, are presented in the table below:
| | Outstanding | | Exercisable | |
| | | | Weighted | | | | | | | |
| | | | Average | | Weighted | | | | Weighted | |
Range of | | | | Remaining | | Average | | | | Average | |
Exercise | | Number | | Contractual | | Exercise | | Number | | Exercise | |
Prices | | Outstanding | | Life | | Price | | Exercisable | | Price | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Options | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 0.86-1.00 | | | 360,000 | | | 1.56 | | $ | 0.96 | | | 360,000 | | $ | 0.96 | |
$ | 1.95 | | | 249,000 | | | 4.25 | | $ | 1.95 | | | 249,000 | | $ | 1.95 | |
$ | 2.00 | | | 300,000 | | | 4.39 | | $ | 2.00 | | | 300,000 | | $ | 2.00 | |
$ | 2.35-2.50 | | | 220,000 | | | 4.49 | | $ | 2.43 | | | 220,000 | | $ | 2.43 | |
| | | | 1,129,000 | | | | | | | | | 1,129,000 | | | | |
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109. SFAS No. 109 requires the Company to provide a net deferred tax asset or liability equal to the expected future tax benefit or expense of temporary reporting differences between book and tax accounting and any available operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. The Company has no federal or state net operating loss carryovers at March 31, 2006.
At March 31, 2006 and 2005, the total of all deferred tax assets was approximately $424,400 and $66,200, respectively. There are no deferred tax liabilities for either year. The amount of and ultimate realization of the benefits from the deferred tax assets for income tax purposes is dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, the Company’s future earnings, and other future events, the effects of which cannot be determined.
The temporary differences gave rise to the following deferred tax asset (liability):
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Excess of financial accounting | | | | | | | |
over tax depreciation | | $ | 6,000 | | $ | 24,500 | |
State income tax benefits | | | (11,300 | ) | | - | |
Allowance for obsolete inventory | | | 78,300 | | | 29,000 | |
Allowance for bad debts | | | 19,900 | | | 12,700 | |
Valuation of stock options and warrants | | | 324,200 | | | - | |
Vacation accrual | | | 7,300 | | | - | |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | 424,400 | | $ | 66,200 | |
The reconciliation of income tax from continuing operations computed at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective rate is as follows for the year ended:
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
March 31, | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | | |
Federal income tax expense computed at the Federal statutory rate | | $ | (413,800 | ) | $ | 347,273 | |
State income tax expense net of Federal benefit | | | (76,000 | ) | | 23,140 | |
Other- permanent differences | | | (29,200 | ) | | 66,200 | |
Change in valuation allowance | | | - | | | (169,158 | ) |
Other | | | (104,800 | ) | | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | (623,800 | ) | $ | 267,455 | |
| | | | | | | |
The components of federal income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations consisted of the following for the year ended:
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Current income tax expense: | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | (177,000 | ) | $ | 296,099 | |
State | | | (88,600 | ) | | 37,556 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net current tax expense | | $ | (265,600 | ) | $ | 333,655 | |
| | | | | | | |
Deferred tax expense (benefit) resulted from: | | | | | | | |
Excess of financial accounting over | | | | | | | |
tax depreciation | | $ | 18,500 | | $ | (4,300 | ) |
State income tax benefits | | | 11,300 | | | - | |
Valuation of stock options and warrants | | | (324,200 | ) | | - | |
Net operating loss | | | - | | | 42,583 | |
Valuation allowance | | | - | | | (169,158 | ) |
Allowance for obsolete inventory | | | (49,300 | ) | | 17,936 | |
Vacation accrual | | | (7,300 | ) | | - | |
Allowance for bad debts | | | (7,200 | ) | | 46,739 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax expense (benefit) | | $ | (358,200 | ) | $ | (66,200 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | (623,800 | ) | $ | 267,455 | |
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) results primarily from the reversal of temporary timing differences between tax and financial statement income.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE 12 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per share of common stock for the period presented:
| | For the Year Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) available to common | | | | | | | |
shareholders (Numerator) | | $ | (593,378 | ) | $ | 753,936 | |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common | | | | | | | |
shares outstanding used in basic income | | | | | | | |
per share during the period | | | | | | | |
(Denominator) | | | 10,611,358 | | | 9,104,912 | |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common | | | | | | | |
shares outstanding used in diluted income | | | | | | | |
per share during the period | | | | | | | |
(Denominator) | | | 10,611,358 | | | 9,808,251 | |
At March 31, 2006, the Company had options to purchase 1,129,000 shares of common stock at a prices ranging from $0.86 to $2.00 per share and warrants to purchase 4,107,100 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.70 to $3.45 per share that were not included in the computation of earnings per share because their effects are anti-dilutive due to a loss being recognized for the year then ended.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had options to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at a price of $2.00 per share and warrants to purchase 925,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $1.75 to $2.78 per share that were not included in the computation of earnings per share because their effects are anti-dilutive.
NOTE 13 –RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Line of credit
Two shareholders of the Company agreed to provide the Company with a $1,000,000 line of credit. The balance of the line of credit accrued interest at a rate of 12% per annum and expired in September 2002. As of March 31, 2006, the line of credit had been paid in full. During the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company expensed approximately $16,000 and $27,000, respectively, in interest related to the line of credit.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE 14 -CONCENTRATIONS
Sales
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company had four significant customers which accounted for 22%, 16%, 13%, and 11% of sales.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company had four significant customers which accounted for 31%, 13%, 13% and 13% of sales.
Supplier
The Company also has a single source and exclusive supplier arrangement with the supplier of a specific raw material, which is used as part of products which accounts for approximately 84% of the Company’s sales. The interruption of raw materials provided by this supplier or the loss of a significant customer would adversely affect the Company’s business and financial condition.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company had two significant vendors which accounted for 36% and 13% of cost of sales.
During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Company had three significant vendors which accounted for 36%, 11%, and 11% of cost of sales.
Accounts Receivable
At March 31, 2006, the Company had three customers which accounted for 22%, 20%, and 14% of the Company’s accounts receivable balances.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had three customers which accounted for 56%, 15%, and 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable balances.
Imagenetix, Inc. |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| | June 30, | | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,079,937 | | $ | 1,808,016 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 729,884 | | | 811,198 | |
Inventories, net | | | 2,059,924 | | | 1,741,468 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 176,858 | | | 220,747 | |
Income tax receivable | | | 604,617 | | | 617,570 | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 151,359 | | | 94,200 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 4,802,579 | | | 5,293,199 | |
| | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 92,866 | | | 97,574 | |
| | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 498,088 | | | 503,301 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,393,533 | | $ | 5,894,074 | |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 593,688 | | $ | 740,461 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 60,290 | | | 51,949 | |
Customer deposits | | | 71,299 | | | 48,485 | |
Short term license payable | | | 29,797 | | | 29,209 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 755,074 | | | 870,104 | |
| | | | | | | |
Long term license payable | | | 61,199 | | | 68,873 | |
| | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares | | | | | | | |
authorized: none outstanding | | | - | | | - | |
Common stock, $.001par value; 50,000,000 shares | | | | | | | |
authorized: 10,721,400 issued and outstanding at | | | | | | | |
June 30 and March 31, 2006 | | | 10,721 | | | 10,721 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 10,344,741 | | | 10,342,395 | |
Accumulated earnings (deficit) | | | (5,778,202 | ) | | (5,398,019 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 4,577,260 | | | 4,955,097 | |
| | $ | 5,393,533 | | $ | 5,894,074 | |
|
See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. |
Imagenetix, Inc. |
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
(Unaudited) |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | | June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 931,569 | | $ | 2,869,745 | |
| | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | 503,800 | | | 1,596,807 | |
| | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 427,769 | | | 1,272,938 | |
| | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | | 378,268 | | | 291,409 | |
Payroll expense | | | 160,483 | | | 177,732 | |
Consulting expense | | | 323,550 | | | 261,417 | |
Operating expenses | | | 862,301 | | | 730,558 | |
Operating income | | | (434,532 | ) | | 542,380 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | |
Other income | | | 9,889 | | | 8,912 | |
Interest expense | | | (1,915 | ) | | (12,981 | ) |
Other income (expense) | | | 7,974 | | | (4,069 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (426,558 | ) | | 538,311 | |
| | | | | | | |
Provision for (benefits from) taxes | | | (48,721 | ) | | 234,300 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (377,837 | ) | $ | 304,011 | |
| | | | | | | |
Basic income (loss) per share | | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.03 | |
| | | | | | | |
Diluted income (loss) per share | | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |
| | | | | | | |
See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. |
Imagenetix, Inc. |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
(Unaudited) |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | June 30, 2005 | |
Operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (377,837 | ) | $ | 304,011 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income | | | | | | | |
to cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Amortization and depreciation | | | 9,071 | | | 6,797 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | - | | | (22,070 | ) |
Provision for inventory obsolescence | | | 32,412 | | | 81,096 | |
Non cash expense related to issuance of warrants | | | - | | | 38,607 | |
Change in deferred taxes | | | (62,559 | ) | | (19,000 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | | | 81,314 | | | (632,284 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in employee receivable | | | (11,982 | ) | | - | |
(Increase) decrease in inventory | | | (350,868 | ) | | (82,527 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | | | 62,121 | | | (24,481 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | | | (146,773 | ) | | 130,264 | |
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities | | | 8,341 | | | 9,868 | |
Increase (decrease) in customer deposits | | | 22,814 | | | (75,391 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable | | | 12,953 | | | (242,608 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | (720,993 | ) | | (527,718 | ) |
Investing activities: | | | | | | | |
Trademarks, patents and infomercial | | | - | | | (41,296 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | - | | | (41,296 | ) |
Financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Payments on notes payable to related party | | | - | | | (100,000 | ) |
Payments on patent license financed | | | (7,086 | ) | | - | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants | | | - | | | 147,152 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (7,086 | ) | | 47,152 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | | | (728,079 | ) | | (521,862 | ) |
Cash, beginning of period | | | 1,808,016 | | | 2,031,486 | |
Cash, end of period | | $ | 1,079,937 | | $ | 1,509,624 | |
| | | | | | | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 1,915 | | $ | 12,981 | |
Income taxes | | $ | 885 | | $ | 495,908 | |
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities: | | | | | | | |
Non-cash dividend issued to certain warrant holders | | $ | 2,346 | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | |
See accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. |
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of Imagenetix, Inc. ("Imagenetix") presented herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006.
In the opinion of management, the interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the results for interim periods. Operating results for the three month period is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year.
Earnings Per Share
We follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Under SFAS No. 128, basic earnings per share is calculated as earnings available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net income divided by the diluted weighted average number of common shares. The diluted weighted average number of common shares is calculated using the treasury stock method for common stock issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options and common stock warrants. See Note 8 for discussion of commitments to issue additional shares of common stock and warrants.
Stock Options
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations in accounting for all stock option plans. Under APB Opinion 25, compensation cost has been recognized for stock options granted to employees when the option price is less than the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Through March 31, 2006, SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," required the Company to provide pro forma information regarding net income as if compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans had been determined in accordance with the fair value based method prescribed in SFAS No. 123. To provide the required pro forma information, the Company estimated the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Sholes option-pricing model. SFAS No. 148 also provides for alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The Company has elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation under APB No. 25.
The Company applies SFAS No. 123 in valuing options granted to consultants and estimates the fair value of such options using the Black-Sholes option-pricing model. The fair value is recorded as consulting expense as services are provided. Options granted to consultants for which vesting is contingent based on future performance are measured at their then current fair value at each period end, until vested.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS 123R, which requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, based on their fair values. Accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method supplemented by pro forma disclosures will no longer be permissible. The new statement is effective for public entities no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted the new statement on April 1, 2006. The adoption of this new statement did not affect the Company's results of operations or net income per share, but may have a significant future effect as the Company will be required to expense the fair value of all share-based payments.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections", a replacement of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes", and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements" ("SFAS 154"). SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for, and reporting of, a change in accounting principle. Previously, voluntary changes in accounting principles were generally required to be recognized by way of a cumulative effect adjustment within net income during the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, the statement does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements. The Company does not believe adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material effect on its financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are carried at the expected realizable value. Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
| | | | June 30, | | March 31, | |
| | | | 2006 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable - trade | | | | | $ | 779,884 | | $ | 861,198 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | | | | (50,000 | ) | | (50,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | | | $ | 729,884 | | $ | 811,198 | |
4. INVENTORY
Inventory consists of the following:
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | June 30, | | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 1,905,285 | | $ | 1,554,417 | |
Finished products | | | 168,228 | | | 168,228 | |
Boxes, labels, tubes & bottles | | | 215,291 | | | 215,291 | |
| | | 2,288,804 | | | 1,937,936 | |
Reserve for obsolescence | | | (228,880 | ) | | (196,468 | ) |
| | $ | 2,059,924 | | $ | 1,741,468 | |
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation:
| | June 30, | | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
Office equipment | | $ | 40,922 | | $ | 40,922 | |
Lease-hold improvements | | | 87,708 | | | 87,708 | |
Leased equipment | | | 12,341 | | | 12,341 | |
| | | 140,971 | | | 140,971 | |
| | | | | | | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | 48,105 | | | 43,397 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 92,866 | | $ | 97,574 | |
Depreciation expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $4,708 and $6,051, respectively.
6. OTHER ASSETS
The following is a summary of intangible assets which are included in “Other Assets” on the face of the balance sheet:
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | June 30, | | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
Trademarks | | $ | 13,032 | | $ | 13,032 | |
Promotional | | | 12,500 | | | 18,750 | |
Patent | | | 161,353 | | | 161,353 | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 335,600 | | | 330,200 | |
| | | 522,485 | | | 523,335 | |
| | | | | | | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | 24,397 | | | 20,034 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 498,088 | | $ | 503,301 | |
For the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 amortization expense was $4,363 and $746, respectively.
In May 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with EHP Products, Inc. acquiring a non-exclusive world-wide license to make, use and sell products relating to Cetyl Myristoleate covered under U.S. Patent No. 5,569,676. The agreement provides for payments of $3,000 per month from May 2005 through April 2009, at which time EHP Products, Inc. has agreed to convey ownership in the product to the Company.
As of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 the following obligations were outstanding related to this license:
| | June 30, | | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
Patent License and Royalty Payable | | $ | 90,996 | | $ | 98,082 | |
| | | | | | | |
Less current portion | | | 29,797 | | | 29,209 | |
| | | | | | | |
Long term license payable | | $ | 61,199 | | $ | 68,873 | |
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contingencies
The Company is involved in litigation from time to time in the normal course of business. Management believes there are no such claims, which would have a material effect on the financial position of the Company.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Other agreements
The Company routinely enters into contracts and agreements with suppliers, manufacturers, consultants, product marketing, and sales representatives in the normal course of doing business. These agreements can be either short or long term and are normally limited to specific products and marketing opportunities.
In June 2004, the Company entered into a marketing and promotion agreement which contained certain milestones which, if met, require the Company to issue warrants exercisable for up to 125,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to 150% of the market price on the date the milestone is met. The Company issued a warrant exercisable for up to 50,000 shares of common stock during the year ended March 31, 2004 and a warrant exercisable for up to 25,000 shares of common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as the result of three of the milestones being met. The warrants were valued using the Black-Sholes pricing model and resulted in additional expense of approximately $57,000 during the year ended March 31, 2004 and $39,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The Company estimated the fair value of each warrant at the issuance date by using the Black-Sholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for the quarter ended June 30, 2005: dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 94%, risk-free interest rate of 3.64%; and expected live of 5 years.
9. CAPITAL STOCK
Preferred Stock
The Company has authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value, with such rights, preferences and designations, and to be issued in such series as determined by the Board of Directors. No shares are issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006.
Common Stock
The Company has authorized 50,000,000 shares of common stock at $.001 par value. At June 30, 2006, the Company had 10,721,400 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company issued 133,652 shares of common stock for proceeds of $147,152. The shares were issued upon shareholders exercising warrants with exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $2.00 per share.
Stock Bonus Plan
During the year ended March 31, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a stock bonus plan. The plan provides for the granting of awards of up to 724,500 shares of common stock to officers, directors, consultants and employees. Awards under the plan will be granted as determined by the Board of Directors. At present, 499,500 shares have been granted under the plan.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Warrants
At June 30, 2006, there were outstanding warrants exercisable for up to 4,107,100 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $0.70 to $3.45 per share expiring in 2006 through 2010. There were no grants or exercises of warrants during the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Warrants to purchase 1,316,598 shares at $1.00 per share, 750,000 shares at $2.00 per share and 125,000 shares at $1.75 per share are redeemable at $.01 per warrant, at the option of the Company, if there is an
effective registration of the securities and the closing bid or selling price of the Company’s common stock for 10 consecutive trading days is equal to three times the exercise price of the warrants.
Stock Option Plan
In August 2000 the Company adopted a Stock Option Plan, which is referred to as the "Plan," which provides for the grant of stock options intended to qualify as "incentive stock options" and "nonqualified stock options" (collectively "stock options") within the meaning of Section 422 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). Stock options may be issued to any of our officers, directors, key employees or consultants.
Under the Plan, we have reserved 1.5 million shares underlying stock options for issuance, of which 1,129,000 options are outstanding as of June 30, 2006. The options have been granted to executive officers, employees and consultants at prices ranging from $.86 to $2.50 per share. The Plan is administered by the full Board of Directors, who determine which individuals shall receive stock options, the time period during which the stock options may be exercised, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased under each stock option and the stock option price.
10. INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109. SFAS No. 109 requires the Company to provide a net deferred tax asset or liability equal to the expected future tax benefit or expense of temporary reporting differences between book and tax accounting and any available operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. The Company used up its previous federal and state tax loss carry-forwards and it will be able to carry back to previous years the entire amount of the income tax benefit for federal tax purposes and carry forward as a deferred tax asset the amount of the tax benefit for state tax purposes.
At June 30 and March 31, 2006, the total of all deferred tax assets was $486,959 and $424,400, respectively. There are no deferred tax liabilities for either period. The amount of and ultimate realization of the benefits from the deferred tax assets for income tax purposes is dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, the Company’s future earnings, and other future events, the effects of which cannot be determined.
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The temporary differences gave rise to the following deferred tax asset (liability):
| | June 30, | | March 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
Excess of financial accounting | | | | | | | |
over tax depreciation | | $ | 600 | | $ | 6,000 | |
State income tax benefits | | | 33,959 | | | (11,300 | ) |
Allowance for obsolete inventory | | | 91,100 | | | 78,300 | |
Allowance for bad debts | | | 19,900 | | | 19,900 | |
Valuation of stock options and warrants | | | 335,000 | | | 324,200 | |
Vacation accrual | | | 6,400 | | | 7,300 | |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | 486,959 | | $ | 424,400 | |
The reconciliation of income tax from continuing operations computed at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective rate is as follows for the periods ended:
| | June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Federal income tax expense computed at the Federal statutory rate | | $ | (145,000 | ) | $ | 183,000 | |
State income tax expense net of Federal benefit | | | (24,900 | ) | | 34,300 | |
Other | | | 121,179 | | | 17,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | $ | (48,721 | ) | $ | 234,300 | |
The components of federal income tax expense from continuing operations consisted of the following for the periods ended:
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Current income tax expense: | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | (43,359 | ) | $ | 205,200 | |
State | | | 438 | | | 58,500 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net current tax expense | | $ | (42,921 | ) | $ | 263,700 | |
| | | | | | | |
Deferred tax expense (benefit) resulted from: | | | | | | | |
Excess of financial accounting over | | | | | | | |
tax depreciation | | $ | 5,400 | | $ | (900 | ) |
State income tax benefits | | | 11,500 | | | - | |
Other | | | 900 | | | 400 | |
Valuation of stock options and warrants | | | (10,700 | ) | | - | |
Allowance for obsolete inventory | | | (12,900 | ) | | (39,700 | ) |
Allowance for bad debts | | | - | | | 10,800 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax benefit | | $ | (5,800 | ) | $ | (29,400 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net | | $ | (48,721 | ) | $ | 234,300 | |
Deferred income tax expense results primarily from the reversal of temporary timing differences between tax and financial statement income.
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following data shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share of common stock for the period presented:
IMAGENETIX, INC.
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | For the Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) available to common | | | | | | | |
shareholders (Numerator) | | $ | (377,837 | ) | $ | 304,011 | |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common | | | | | | | |
shares outstanding used in basic income | | | | | | | |
per share during the period | | | | | | | |
(Denominator) | | | 10,721,400 | | | 10,459,800 | |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common | | | | | | | |
shares outstanding used in diluted income | | | | | | | |
per share during the period | | | | | | | |
(Denominator) | | | 10,721,400 | | | 12,333,978 | |
At June 30, 2006, the Company had warrants to purchase 4,107,100 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.70 to $3.45 per share and stock options to purchase 1,129,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.86 to $2.50 that were not included in the computation of earnings per share because their effects are anti-dilutive due to the Company reporting a loss for the quarter.
At June 30, 2005, the Company had warrants to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $2.33 to $3.45 per share that were not included in the computation of earnings per share because their effects are anti-dilutive due to the exercise price being higher than the average market price.
Until the completion of the resale of the Common stock included in this prospectus, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
| |
Table of Contents |
| |
About this Prospectus | 1 |
Summary | 1 |
Risk Factors | 4 |
Forward Looking Statements | 7 |
Price Range of Common Stock | 7 |
Use of Proceeds | 8 |
Capitalization | 8 |
Selected Financial Data | 8 |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or | |
Plan ofOperation | 9 |
Business | 18 |
Management | 27 |
Security Ownership of Executive Officers,Directors and Beneficial Owners of Greater than 5% of Our Common Stock | 31 |
Selling Stockholders | 32 |
Related Party and Other Material Transactions | 39 |
Description of Capital Stock | 39 |
Shares Eligible for Future Sale | 41 |
Experts | 41 |
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 42 |
Legal Matters | 43 |
Where You Can Find More Information | 43 |
Financial Statements | F-1 |
The Resale of 6,516,851 Shares Of Common Stock Offered by Selling Shareholders IMAGENETIX, INC. PROSPECTUS Subject to Completion, September 18, 2006 |
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 24. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Our bylaws require us to indemnify our officers and directors and other persons against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts incurred or paid in settlement in connection with civil or criminal claims, actions, suits or proceedings against such persons by reason of serving or having served as officers, directors, or in other capacities, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests and, in a criminal action or proceeding, if he had no reasonable cause to believe that his/her conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of no contest or its equivalent shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests or that he or she had reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. Indemnification as provided in our bylaws shall be made only as authorized in a specific case and upon a determination that the person met the applicable standards of conduct. Insofar as the limitation of, or indemnification for, liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing, or otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such limitation or indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.
ITEM 25. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION(1)
SEC Registration Fee | | $ | -0- | |
Blue Sky Filing Fees | | $ | -0- | |
Blue Sky Legal Fees | | $ | -0- | |
Printing Expenses | | $ | 2,000 | |
Legal Fees | | $ | 20,000 | |
Accounting Fees | | $ | 5,000 | |
Miscellaneous Expenses | | $ | 10,000 | |
Total | | $ | 37,000 | |
(1) | All expenses are estimated. |
ITEM 26. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During the last three years, we sold the following securities which were not registered under the Securities Act, as amended:
(i) Between December 2004 and January 2005 we completed a private placement of our securities under which we issued an aggregate of 1,672,500 shares of our common stock to the following individuals for $1.20 per share.
Name | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Address |
Dianne Borden | | 100,000 | | | 19 Canterbury Place Cranford, NJ 07016 |
| | | | | |
Heather Evans | | 12,500 | | | 12906 North Fourth St. Parker, CO 80134 |
| | | | | |
David Fine | | 50,000 | | | 50 Dickenson Place Great Neck, NY 11073 |
| | | | | |
Fiserv IRA FBO Thomas A. Forti | | 12,500 | | | 7270 South Logan Street Centennial, CO 80122 |
| | | | | |
Thomas A. Forti | | 12,500 | | | 7270 South Logan Street Centennial, CO 80122 |
| | | | | |
Patrick Glenn | | 20,000 | | | 23770 Golden Ridge Dr. Volcano, CA 95689 |
| | | | | |
Robert Holmes | | 100,000 | | | 205 Asharokan Avenue Northport, NY 11768 |
| | | | | |
JMW Fund LLC | | 125,000 | | | 233 S. Orange Grove Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91105 |
| | | | | |
J. Paul Consulting | | 25,000 | | | 6590 E. Lake Place Englewood, CO 80111 |
| | | | | |
Helaine Kaplan | | 100,000 | | | 17 Riverview Terrace Smithtown, NY 11787 |
| | | | | |
Charles Kirby | | 42,000 | | | 4656 S. Ogden Street Cherry Hills, CO 80113 |
| | | | | |
Barry O. Moores | | 75,000 | | | P.O. Box 491 5041 El Secreto Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 |
| | | | | |
Oppenheimer & Co Inc. Custodian fbo Lawrence Kaplan RLVR IRA | | 100,000 | | | 300 River Place Suite 4000 Detroit, MI 48207 |
| | | | | |
Pan American Capital Group, Inc. | | 145,000 | | | World Trade Center 12th Floor Panama Republic of Panama |
| | | | | |
Terry Phillips | | 100,000 | | | 2711 Royenwood Road Midlothian, VA 23113 |
| | | | | |
Gregory Pusey | | 50,000 | | | 106 S. University Blvd., #4 Denver, CO 80209 |
| | | | | |
James Scoroposki | | 100,000 | | | 237 Centre Island Road Centre Island, NY 11771 |
| | | | | |
Robert A. Strahl Charitable Remainder Trust dtd 8/10/94 | | 25,000 | | | 132 N. El Camino Real Suite 365 Encinitas, CA 92024 |
Name | | Total Number of Shares Owned | | Address |
| | | | |
West Hampton Special Situations Fund | | 83,000 | | | 4656 S. Ogden Street Cherry Hills, CO 80113 |
| | | | | |
Charitable Remainder Trust of Timothy J. Brasel | | 50,000 | | | 5770 S. Beach Court Greenwood Village, CO 80121 |
| | | | | |
Debra Jakalow | | 20,000 | | | 107 Brewery Road New City, NY 10956 |
| | | | | |
Michael Neider IRA | | 50,000 | | | 6434 N.W. 31st Way Boca Raton, FL 33496 |
| | | | | |
Debbie Vanderlinden | | 50,000 | | | 125 Queens Road East North Vancouver British Columbia, Canada V7N 1G5 |
| | | | | |
Woodland Partners | | 125,000 | | | 68 Wheatley Road Brookville, NY 11545 |
| | | | | |
He Zhang | | 50,000 | | | 21220 Sundance Street Walnut, CA 91789 |
| | | | | |
Jyll Rosenfeld | | 50,000 | | | 146 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019 |
| | | | | |
Total Shares | | 1,672,500 | | | |
With respect to the above securities issuances, the Registrant relied on exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 506 under the Securities Act. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The securities were issued to a limited number of persons all of whom were accredited investors as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act. All were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment, acknowledged in writing that they were acquiring the securities for investment and not with a view toward distribution or resale, and understood the speculative nature of their investment. All securities issued contained a restrictive legend prohibiting transfer of the shares except in accordance with federal securities laws.
(ii) In connection with our private placement set forth in (i) above, we also issued 167,250 stock options to R.G. Securities LLC, a licensed broker-dealer, as compensation for its assistance with the private placement. The options were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 thereunder.
(iii) Stock Issued for Services:
| | Date | | Per Share | | Number of Shares | |
John Turner | | | 07/01/05 | | $ | 1.95 | | | 25,000 | |
William Fleet | | | 07/01/05 | | $ | 1.95 | | | 5,000 | |
He Zhang | | | 07/01/05 | | $ | 1.95 | | | 15,000 | |
| | Number of Shares | | Grant Date | | Expire Date | | Exercise Price |
Dean Mosca (PNI) | | 25,000 | | 01/21/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 2.33 |
Dean Mosca (PNI) | | 25,000 | | 03/24/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 2.78 |
Dean Mosca (PNI) | | 25,000 | | 06/02/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 3.45 |
Herman Zhang | | 35,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 1.50 |
William Fleet | | 15,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 1.50 |
John Turner | | 30,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 1.50 |
Jonathan Greenhut | | 10,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 1.95 |
Maurile Tremblay | | 25,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 1.95 |
Gordon Ross | | 10,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 05/31/10 | | 1.95 |
(v) Options Issued | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Grant Date | | Expire Date | | Exercise Price |
William Spencer | | 60,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Debra Spencer | | 18,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Barry King | | 9,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Jandra Thomas | | 30,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Robert Hesslink | | 75,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Derek Boosey | | 30,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Michelle Posey | | 12,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Lowell Giffhorn | | 15,000 | | 07/01/05 | | 07/01/10 | | 1.95 |
Robert Burg | | 50,000 | | 09/19/05 | | 09/19/10 | | 2.35 |
Jeffrey McGonegal | | 50,000 | | 09/19/05 | | 09/19/10 | | 2.35 |
Eisenberg Comm | | 120,000 | | 10/01/05 | | 10/01/10 | | 2.50 |
With respect to the above securities issuances, the Registrant relied on exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 506 under the Securities Act. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The securities were issued to a limited number of persons all of whom were accredited investors as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act. All were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment, acknowledged in writing that they were acquiring the securities for investment and not with a view toward distribution or resale, and understood the speculative nature of their investment. All securities issued contained a restrictive legend prohibiting transfer of the shares except in accordance with federal securities laws.
ITEM 27. EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | | Title |
| | | |
3.01 | | | Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1) |
| | | |
3.02 | | | Bylaws of the Registrant (1) |
| | | |
3.03 | | | Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Name change) (2) |
| | | |
5.01 | | | Opinion of Gary A. Agron regarding legality (7) |
| | | |
10.01 | | | Celadrin® Supply Agreement with Organic Technologies (2) |
| | | |
10.02 | | | Agreement with Natrol (2) |
| | | |
10.03 | | | Supply and Distribution Agreement with The Enrich Corporation (Unicity) (2) |
| | | |
10.04 | | | Office Lease (2) |
| | | |
10.05 | | | Security Agreement (2) |
| | | |
10.06 | | | Exchange Agreement dated March 23, 1999 (1) |
| | | |
10.09 | | | Line of Credit Agreement (2) |
| | | |
10.10 | | | Modification to Enrich (Unicity) Agreement (2) |
| | | |
10.11 | | | Exclusive Supply and Distribution Agreement (Sanavive) (3) |
| | | |
10.11 | (a) | | Agreement with Newport Bioceuticals, LLC (2) |
| | | |
10.12 | | | Exclusive Supply and Distribution Agreement (Newport Bioceuticals) (3) |
| | | |
10.13 | | | Exclusive Supply and Distribution Agreement (ChiRx, Inc.) (3) |
| | | |
10.14 | | | American China Technology Systems, LLC Agreement (4) |
| | | |
10.15 | | | Not Used |
| | | |
10.16 | | | Cymbiotics Distribution Agreement (5) |
| | | |
10.17 | | | Proprietary Nutritionals Inc. Agreement (5) |
| | | |
10.18 | | | Tony Gwynn Spokesperson Agreement (5) |
| | | |
10.19 | | | Business Partners Operations Agreement (5) |
10.20 | | | Office Lease Agreement with Bernardo Gateway Partners (6) |
| | | |
10.21 | | | Patent License with University of Minnesota (6) |
10.22 | | | Patent License with EHP Products, Inc. (6) |
14 | | | Code of Ethics (4) |
| | | |
23.01 | | | Consent of Gary A. Agron (see 5.01 above) (7) |
| | | |
23.02 | | | Consent of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.—Independent Registered Public Accountants |
| | | |
23.03 | | | Consent of HJ Associates & Consultants LLP—Independent Registered Public Accountants |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-1, file number 333-87535, filed on September 22, 1999. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File Number 333-71756, declared effective on July 26, 2002 and post-effective amendment No. 1 thereto declared effective on August 25, 2003. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2003. |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, file number 333-123159 declared effective on March 18, 2005. |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006 |
ITEM 28. UNDERTAKINGS
| The Registrant hereby undertakes: |
(a) That insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registration of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person to the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(b) That subject to the terms and conditions of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, it will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission such supplementary and periodic information, documents and reports as may be prescribed by any rule or regulation of the Commission heretofore or hereafter duly adopted pursuant to authority conferred in that section.
(c) That any post-effective amendment filed will comply with the applicable forms, rules and regulations of the Commission in effect at the time such post-effective amendment is filed.
(d) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
| | (i) | To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act; |
| | (ii) | To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post- effective amendment thereof), which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement; |
| | (iii) | To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement. |
(e) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(f) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the Offering.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, as amended, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements of filing Form SB-2 and has caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in San Diego, California, on September 18, 2006.
| | |
| IMAGENETIX, INC. |
| | |
| By: | /s/ WILLIAM P. SPENCER |
|
William P. Spencer Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, as amended, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons on September 18, 2006.
Signature | | Title |
| | |
/s/ William P. Spencer | | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
William P. Spencer | | |
| | |
/s/ Debra L. Spencer | | Secretary, Treasurer and Director |
Debra L. Spencer | | |
| | |
/s/ Lowell W. Giffhorn | | Chief Financial Officer |
Lowell W. Giffhorn | | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | |
/s/ Barry S. King | | Director |
Barry S. King | | |
| | |
/s/ Robert Burg | | Director |
Robert Burg | | |
| | |
/s/ Jeffrey McGonegal | | Director |
Jeffrey McGonegal | | |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | | Title |
| | |
3.01 | | | Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1) |
| | | |
3.02 | | | Bylaws of the Registrant (1) |
| | | |
3.03 | | | Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Name change) (2) |
| | | |
5.01 | | | Opinion of Gary A. Agron regarding legality (7) |
| | | |
10.01 | | | Celadrin® Supply Agreement with Organic Technologies (2) |
| | | |
10.02 | | | Agreement with Natrol (2) |
| | | |
10.03 | | | Supply and Distribution Agreement with The Enrich Corporation (Unicity) (2) |
| | | |
10.04 | | | Office Lease (2) |
| | | |
10.05 | | | Security Agreement (2) |
| | | |
10.06 | | | Exchange Agreement dated March 23, 1999 (1) |
| | | |
10.09 | | | Line of Credit Agreement (2) |
| | | |
10.10 | | | Modification to Enrich (Unicity) Agreement (2) |
| | | |
10.11 | | | Exclusive Supply and Distribution Agreement (Sanavive) (3) |
| | | |
10.11 | (a) | | Agreement with Newport Bioceuticals, LLC (2) |
| | | |
10.12 | | | Exclusive Supply and Distribution Agreement (Newport Bioceuticals) (3) |
| | | |
10.13 | | | Exclusive Supply and Distribution Agreement (ChiRx, Inc.) (3) |
| | | |
10.14 | | | American China Technology Systems, LLC Agreement (4) |
| | | |
10.15 | | | Not Used |
| | | |
10.16 | | | Cymbiotics Distribution Agreement (5) |
| | | |
10.17 | | | Proprietary Nutritionals Inc. Agreement (5) |
| �� | | |
10.18 | | | Tony Gwynn Spokesperson Agreement (5) |
| | | |
10.19 | | | Business Partners Operations Agreement (5) |
10.20 | | | Office Lease Agreement with Bernardo Gateway Partners (6) |
10.21 | | | Patent License with University of Minnesota (6) |
10.22 | | | Patent License with EHP Products, Inc. (6) |
14 | | | Code of Ethics (4) |
| | | |
23.01 | | | Consent of Gary A. Agron (see 5.01 above) (7) |
| | | |
23.02 | | | Consent of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.—Independent Registered Public Accountants |
| | | |
23.03 | | | Consent of HJ Associates & Consultants LLP—Independent Registered Public Accountants |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-1, file number 333-87535, filed on September 22, 1999. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File Number 333-71756, declared effective on July 26, 2002 and post-effective amendment No. 1 thereto declared effective on August 25, 2003. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2003. |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, file number 333-123159 declared effective on March 18, 2005. |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006 |