UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 |
|
| | For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002 |
|
or |
|
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 |
|
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-10093
Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Maryland | | 13-6908486 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
27600 Northwestern Highway, Suite 200, Southfield, Michigan (Address of principal executive offices) | | 48034 (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
248-350-9900
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Number of common shares of beneficial interest ($.01 par value) of the Registrant outstanding as of March 31, 2002: 7,095,841
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX
| | | | | | |
| | | | Page No. | |
| | | |
| |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1. | | Financial Statements | | | | |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets — March 31, 2002 (unaudited) and December 31, 2001 | | | 2 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) — Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 | | | 3 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) — Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 | | | 4 | |
| | Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited) — Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 | | | 5 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) — Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 | | | 6 | |
| | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) | | | 7 | |
Item 2. | | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | | 12 | |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 6. | | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | | | 17 | |
1
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, |
| | 2002 | | 2001 |
| |
| |
|
| | (unaudited) | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Investment in real estate — net | | $ | 497,370 | | | $ | 496,269 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 5,062 | | | | 5,542 | |
Accounts receivable — net | | | 17,287 | | | | 17,627 | |
Equity investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities | | | 12,986 | | | | 12,977 | |
Other assets — net | | | 20,394 | | | | 20,314 | |
Property held for sale | | | 7,210 | | | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total Assets | | $ | 560,309 | | | $ | 552,729 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Mortgages and notes payable | | $ | 355,488 | | | $ | 347,275 | |
Distributions payable | | | 5,043 | | | | 5,062 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 18,985 | | | | 18,830 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total Liabilities | | | 379,516 | | | | 371,167 | |
Minority Interest | | | 47,853 | | | | 48,157 | |
Commitments and Contingencies | | | — | | | | — | |
Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred Shares, par value $.01, 10,000 shares authorized; 1,400 Series A convertible shares issued and outstanding, liquidation values of $35,000 | | | 33,829 | | | | 33,829 | |
| Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $.01, 30,000 shares authorized; 7,096 and 7,128 issued and outstanding, respectively | | | 71 | | | | 71 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | | 150,257 | | | | 150,186 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (2,347 | ) | | | (3,179 | ) |
| Cumulative distributions in excess of net income | | | (48,870 | ) | | | (47,502 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Total Shareholders’ Equity | | | 132,940 | | | | 133,405 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | $ | 560,309 | | | $ | 552,729 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | For the Three Months | |
| | Ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2002 | | | 2001 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | |
| Minimum rents | | $ | 13,868 | | | $ | 15,032 | |
| Percentage rents | | | 522 | | | | 921 | |
| Recoveries from tenants | | | 5,948 | | | | 5,639 | |
| Fees and management income | | | 651 | | | | 658 | |
| Interest and other income | | | 750 | | | | 934 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | Total revenues | | | 21,739 | | | | 23,184 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate taxes | | | 2,572 | | | | 2,093 | |
| Recoverable operating expenses | | | 3,384 | | | | 3,724 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | 4,010 | | | | 3,926 | |
| Other operating | | | 312 | | | | 332 | |
| General and administrative | | | 2,051 | | | | 2,495 | |
| Interest expense | | | 6,310 | | | | 6,957 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | Total expenses | | | 18,639 | | | | 19,527 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Operating income | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,657 | |
Earnings from unconsolidated entities | | | 169 | | | | 75 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Income from continuing operations before gain on sale of real estate and minority interest | | | 3,269 | | | | 3,732 | |
Gain on sale of real estate | | | — | | | | 5,006 | |
Minority interest | | | (1,046 | ) | | | (2,657 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Income from continuing operations | | | 2,223 | | | | 6,081 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 214 | | | | 255 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net income | | | 2,437 | | | | 6,336 | |
Preferred dividends | | | 828 | | | | 828 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net income available to common shareholders | | $ | 1,609 | | | $ | 5,508 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.74 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| Income from discontinued operations | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | 0.03 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| Net income | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | 0.77 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| Income from discontinued operations | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | 0.02 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| Net income | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | 0.69 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | | 7,089 | | | | 7,121 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| Diluted | | | 7,146 | | | | 9,124 | |
| |
| | |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | For the Three |
| | Months Ended |
| | March 31, |
| |
|
| | 2002 | | 2001 |
| |
| |
|
Net Income | | $ | 2,437 | | | $ | 6,336 | |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | | — | | | | (348 | ) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps | | | 832 | | | | (867 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 3,269 | | | $ | 5,121 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | |
| | | | Common | | | Additional | | | Other | | | Cumulative | | | Total | |
| | Preferred | | | Stock | | | Paid-In | | | Comprehensive | | | Earnings/ | | | Shareholders’ | |
| | Stock | | | Par Value | | | Capital | | | Loss | | | Distribution | | | Equity | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Balance, January 1, 2002 | | $ | 33,829 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 150,186 | | | $ | (3,179 | ) | | $ | (47,502 | ) | | $ | 133,405 | |
| Cash distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (2,977 | ) | | | (2,977 | ) |
| Preferred Shares dividends declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (828 | ) | | | (828 | ) |
| Conversion of Operating Partnership Units to Common Shares (6,915 Shares) | | | | | | | | | | | 113 | | | | | | | | | | | | 113 | |
| Purchase and retirement of common shares | | | | | | | | | | | (42 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (42 | ) |
| Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 832 | | | | | | | | 832 | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,437 | | | | 2,437 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Balance, March 31, 2002 | | $ | 33,829 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 150,257 | | | $ | (2,347 | ) | | $ | (48,870 | ) | | $ | 132,940 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | For the Three Months | |
| | Ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2002 | | | 2001 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | | $ | 2,437 | | | $ | 6,336 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
| | Depreciation and amortization | | | 4,095 | | | | 3,978 | |
| | Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 241 | | | | 77 | |
| | Gain on sale of real estate | | | — | | | | (5,006 | ) |
| | Earnings from unconsolidated entities | | | (169 | ) | | | (75 | ) |
| | Minority interest | | | 1,046 | | | | 2,657 | |
| | Changes in assets and liabilities that provided (used) cash: | | | | | | | | |
| | | Accounts receivable | | | 340 | | | | 556 | |
| | | Other assets | | | 988 | | | | (814 | ) |
| | | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (819 | ) | | | (3,598 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities | | | 8,159 | | | | 4,111 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | | | (11,718 | ) | | | (3,669 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of real estate | | | — | | | | 28,288 | |
| Repayment of advances to unconsolidated entities | | | (127 | ) | | | 8 | |
| Investment in unconsolidated entities | | | — | | | | (48 | ) |
| Distributions received from unconsolidated entities | | | 287 | | | | 164 | |
| Other | | | — | | | | 179 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| Cash Flows (Used In) Provided By Investing Activities | | | (11,558 | ) | | | 24,922 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Cash distributions to shareholders | | | (2,978 | ) | | | (2,994 | ) |
| Cash distributions to operating partnership unit holders | | | (1,237 | ) | | | (1,237 | ) |
| Cash dividends paid on preferred shares | | | (847 | ) | | | (845 | ) |
| Repayment of Credit Facility | | | (1,200 | ) | | | (12,450 | ) |
| Repayment of construction loan | | | — | | | | (13,575 | ) |
| Principal repayments on unsecured term loan | | | (875 | ) | | | (1,000 | ) |
| Principal repayments on mortgages payable | | | (1,132 | ) | | | (950 | ) |
| Purchase and retirement of common shares | | | (42 | ) | | | (348 | ) |
| Payment of deferred financing costs | | | (190 | ) | | | (75 | ) |
| Borrowings on Credit Facility | | | 6,420 | | | | 5,420 | |
| Borrowings on unsecured term loan | | | 5,000 | | | | — | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities | | | 2,919 | | | | (28,054 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | (480 | ) | | | 979 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period | | | 5,542 | | | | 2,939 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period | | $ | 5,062 | | | $ | 3,918 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest during the period | | $ | 5,978 | | | $ | 5,889 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Items: | | | | | | | | |
| Consolidation of Ramco-Gershenson, Inc., net of cash | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,081 | |
| Increase (Decrease) in fair value of interest rate swaps | | | 832 | | | | (1,215 | ) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands)
| |
1. | Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim financial statements and related notes of the Company are unaudited; however, they have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting, the instructions to Form 10-Q and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules. The unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods have been made. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2001 financial statements to conform to the 2002 presentation.
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144). This statement requires that we account for shopping centers that have been disposed of, or that have been classified as property held for sale, as discontinued operations for all years presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income. On April 11, 2002, we sold Hickory Corners shopping center for cash of approximately $10,640, and the sale resulted in a gain of approximately $3,200. At March 31, 2002, this shopping center was included in property held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and Hickory Corners’ results of operations have been included in income from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001.
| |
3. | Accounts Receivable — Net |
Accounts receivable include $10,917 and $10,560 of unbilled straight-line rent receivables at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. Straight line rent receivable at March 31, 2002 includes approximately $3,005 due from Kmart Corporation.
| |
4. | Investment in Real Estate |
Investment in real estate consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2002 | | December 31, 2001 |
| |
| |
|
| | (Unaudited) | | |
Land | | $ | 79,041 | | | $ | 77,546 | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 462,180 | | | | 471,317 | |
Construction in progress | | | 19,696 | | | | 8,486 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | 560,917 | | | | 557,349 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (63,547 | ) | | | (61,080 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Investment in real estate — net | | $ | 497,370 | | | $ | 496,269 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
7
Other assets consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2002 | | | December 31, 2001 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
Leasing costs | | $ | 15,468 | | | $ | 14,908 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 6,633 | | | | 6,765 | |
Deferred financing costs | | | 6,062 | | | | 5,872 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | | 28,163 | | | | 27,545 | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | (11,159 | ) | | | (10,485 | ) |
| |
| | |
| |
| | | 17,004 | | | | 17,060 | |
Proposed development and acquisition costs | | | 3,390 | | | | 3,254 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Other assets — net | | $ | 20,394 | | | $ | 20,314 | |
| |
| | |
| |
6. Mortgages and Notes Payable
Mortgages and notes payable consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2002 | | | December 31, 2001 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
Fixed rate mortgages with interest rates ranging from 6.83% to 8.81% due at various dates through 2011 | | $ | 194,248 | | | $ | 195,290 | |
Floating rate mortgages at 75% of the rate of long-term Capital A rated utility bonds, due January 1, 2010, plus supplemental interest to equal LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The effective rate at March 31, 2002, was 6.43% and at December 31, 2001, was 6.41% | | | 6,490 | | | | 6,560 | |
Floating rate mortgage with interest rate at prime or LIBOR plus 200 basis points, due September 2005. The effective rate at March 31, 2002, was 3.88% and at December 31, 2001 was 4.75% | | | 21,000 | | | | 21,000 | |
Unsecured term loan, with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 400 basis points, due September 2003. The effective rate at March 31, 2002, was 5.79% and at December 31, 2001, was 6.03% | | | 26,250 | | | | 22,125 | |
Credit Facility, with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 200 basis points, due September 2003, maximum available borrowings of $110,000. The effective rate at March 31, 2002, was 6.54% and at December 31, 2001, was 6.64% | | | 107,500 | | | | 102,300 | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | $ | 355,488 | | | $ | 347,275 | |
| |
| | |
| |
The mortgage notes and construction loans are secured by mortgages on properties that have an approximate net book value of $337,439 as of March 31, 2002. The Credit Facility is secured by mortgages on various properties that have an approximate net book value of $166,691 as of March 31, 2002.
The $110,000 Credit Facility bears interest between 162.5 and 225 basis points over LIBOR depending on certain debt ratios (using 200 basis points over LIBOR at March 31, 2002, the effective interest rate was 6.6%) and is secured by mortgages on various properties.
At March 31, 2002, outstanding letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility, not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, total approximately $818.
8
The Credit Facility and the unsecured term loan contain financial covenants relating to loan to asset value, minimum operating coverage ratios, and a minimum equity value. As of March 31, 2002, we were in compliance with the covenant terms.
The mortgage loans (other than our Credit Facility) encumbering our properties, including properties held by our unconsolidated joint ventures, are generally non-recourse, subject to certain exceptions for which we would be liable for any resulting losses incurred by the lender. These exceptions vary from loan to loan but generally include fraud or a material misrepresentation, misstatement or omission by the borrower, intentional or grossly negligent conduct by the borrower that harms the property or results in a loss to the lender, filing of a bankruptcy petition by the borrower, either directly or indirectly, and certain environmental liabilities. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain of such events, such as fraud or filing of a bankruptcy petition by the borrower, we would be liable for the entire outstanding balance of the loan, all interest accrued thereon and certain other costs, penalties and expenses.
The following table presents scheduled principal payments on mortgages and notes payable as of March 31, 2002:
| | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | |
2002 (April 1 — December 31) | | $ | 11,300 | |
2003 | | | 130,710 | |
2004 | | | 17,322 | |
2005 | | | 14,362 | |
2006 | | | 108,988 | |
Thereafter | | | 72,806 | |
| | |
| |
| Total | | $ | 355,488 | |
| | |
| |
7. Leases
Approximate future minimum rentals under noncancelable operating leases in effect at March 31, 2002, assuming no new or renegotiated leases nor option extensions on lease agreements, are as follows:
| | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | |
2002 (April 1 — December 31) | | $ | 40,153 | |
2003 | | | 50,967 | |
2004 | | | 45,955 | |
2005 | | | 39,968 | |
2006 | | | 35,603 | |
Thereafter | | | 242,562 | |
| | |
| |
| Total | | $ | 455,208 | |
| | |
| |
8. Earnings Per Share
Basic average earnings per share were computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 7,089,013 for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 7,120,599 for the three months ended March 31, 2001. Diluted average earnings per share assume the conversion of 2,000,000 shares of Preferred Shares into common shares during the three months ended March 31, 2001. As a result of Preferred Shares being antidilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2002, no conversion was required.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
During the third quarter of 1994, we held more than 25% of the value of our total assets in short-term Treasury Bill reverse repurchase agreements, which could be viewed as non-qualifying assets for purposes of determining whether we qualify to be taxed as a REIT. We requested that the IRS enter into a closing
9
agreement with us that our ownership of the short-term Treasury Bill reverse repurchase agreements will not adversely affect our status as a REIT. The IRS deferred any action relating to this issue pending the further examination of our taxable years ended December 31, 1991, through 1994. As discussed below, the field examination has since been completed and the IRS has proposed to disqualify us as a REIT for our taxable year ended December 31, 1994, based on our ownership of the short-term Treasury Bill reverse repurchase agreements. Our former tax counsel, Battle Fowler LLP, had rendered an opinion on March 6, 1996, that our investment in the short-term Treasury Bill reverse repurchase agreements would not adversely affect our REIT status. This opinion, however, is not binding upon the IRS or any court.
In connection with the incorporation and distribution of all of the shares of Atlantic Realty Trust in May 1996, we entered into a tax agreement with Atlantic under which Atlantic assumed all our tax liability arising out of the IRS’ then ongoing examination, excluding any tax liability relating to any actions or events occurring, or any tax return position taken after May 10, 1996, but including liabilities for additions to tax, interest, penalties and costs relating to covered taxes. Under the tax agreement, a group of our Trustees consisting of Stephen R. Blank, Arthur Goldberg and Joel Pashcow has the right to control, conduct and effect the settlement of any claims for taxes for which Atlantic assumed liability. Accordingly, Atlantic does not have any control as to the timing of the resolution or disposition of any such claims. In addition, the tax agreement provides that, to the extent any tax which Atlantic is obligated to pay under the tax agreement can be avoided through the declaration of a “deficiency dividend” (that is, our declaration and payment of a distribution that is permitted to relate back to the year for which the IRS determines a deficiency in order to satisfy the requirement for REIT qualification that we distribute a certain minimum amount of our “REIT taxable income” for such year), we will make, and Atlantic will reimburse us for the amount of, such deficiency dividend.
In addition to examining our taxable years ended December 31, 1991, through 1994, the IRS examined our taxable year ended December 31, 1995. The IRS revenue agent issued an examination report on March 1, 1999 (which is hereinafter referred to as the “First Report”). As previously noted, the First Report proposes to disqualify us as a REIT for our taxable year ended December 31, 1994, based on our ownership of the short-term Treasury Bill reverse repurchase agreements. In addition, the First Report proposes to adjust our “REIT taxable income” for our taxable years ended December 31, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1995. In this regard, we and Atlantic received an opinion from special tax counsel, Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, on March 25, 1996, that, to the extent there is a deficiency in our “REIT taxable income” for our taxable years ended December 31, 1991, through 1994, and provided we timely make a deficiency dividend, our status as a REIT for those taxable years would not be affected. The First Report acknowledges that we may avoid disqualification for failure to meet the distribution requirement with respect to a year for which our income is increased can be avoided by payment of a deficiency dividend. However, the First Report notes that the payment of a deficiency dividend cannot cure our disqualification as a REIT for the taxable year ended December 31, 1994, based on our ownership of the short-term Treasury Bill reverse repurchase agreements.
We believe that most of the positions set forth in the First Report are unsupported by the facts and applicable law. Accordingly, on April 30, 1999, we filed a protest with the Appeals Office of the IRS to contest most of the positions set forth in the First Report. The Appeals Officer returned the case file to the revenue agent for further development. On October 29, 2001, the revenue agent issued a new examination report (which is hereinafter referred to as the “Second Report”) that arrived at very much the same conclusions as the First Report. We filed a protest of the Second Report with the IRS on November 29, 2001, and expect to have a meeting with the appellate conferee in the near future. If a satisfactory result cannot be obtained through the administrative appeals process, judicial review of the determination is available to us. In addition, the IRS is currently conducting an examination of us for the taxable years ended December 31, 1996, and 1997, and of one of our subsidiary partnerships for the taxable years ended December 31, 1997, and 1998, and may shortly begin examination of us and/or the subsidiary partnership for subsequent taxable years.
Based on the Second Report, we could be liable for up to $54.9 million in combined taxes, penalties and interest through March 31, 2002. However, the Second Report acknowledges (as does the First Report as noted above) that we can avoid disqualification as a REIT for certain of our examined tax years if we distribute a deficiency dividend to our shareholders. The distribution of a deficiency dividend would be
10
deductible by us, thereby reducing our liability for federal income tax. Based on the Second Report, the proposed adjustments to our “REIT taxable income” would require us to pay a deficiency dividend to our current shareholders resulting in combined taxes, penalties, interest and deficiency dividends of approximately $57.1 million as of March 31, 2002.
If, notwithstanding the above-described opinions of legal counsel, the IRS successfully challenges our status as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be able to re-elect REIT status commencing with the fifth succeeding taxable year (or possibly an earlier taxable year if we meet certain relief provisions under the Internal Revenue Code).
�� In the notes to the consolidated financial statements made part of Atlantic’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, Atlantic has disclosed its liability for the tax deficiencies (and interest and penalties on the tax deficiencies) proposed to be assessed against us by the IRS for the taxable years ended December 31, 1991, through 1995, as reflected in each of the First Report and Second Report. We believe, but can provide no assurance, that Atlantic currently has sufficient assets to pay such tax deficiencies, interest and penalties. According to the annual report on Form 10-K filed by Atlantic for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, Atlantic had net assets on December 31, 2001, of approximately $57.9 million (as determined pursuant to the liquidation basis of accounting). If the amount of tax, interest and penalties assessed against us ultimately exceeds the amounts proposed in each of the First Report and Second Report, however, because interest continues to accrue on the proposed tax deficiencies, or if additional tax deficiencies are proposed or for any other reason, then Atlantic may not have sufficient assets to reimburse us for all amounts we must pay to the IRS, and we would be required to pay the difference out of our own funds. Accordingly, the ultimate resolution of any controversy over tax liabilities covered by the above-described tax agreement may have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, including if we are required to distribute deficiency dividends to our shareholders and/or pay additional taxes, interest and penalties to the IRS in amounts that exceed the value of Atlantic’s net assets. Moreover, the IRS may assess us with taxes that Atlantic is not required under the above-described tax agreement to pay, such as taxes arising from the recently-commenced examination of us for the taxable years ended December 31, 1996, and 1997, and of our subsidiary partnership for the taxable years ended December 31, 1997, and 1998. There can be no assurance, therefore, that the IRS will not assess us with substantial taxes, interest and penalties which Atlantic cannot, is not required to, or otherwise does not pay.
In connection with the development and expansion of various shopping centers as of March 31, 2002, we have entered into agreements for the construction of shopping centers of approximately $7,590.
On April 29, 2002 we issued 4,200,000 common shares of beneficial interest at a price to the public of $17.50 per share, and we received net proceeds of approximately $67,800. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering to redeem 1,200,000 of our Series A Preferred Shares at a cost of $26,571, purchase the equity interest of our joint venture partner in RPT/ INVEST, LLC, an unconsolidated entity, for approximately $9,100 and reduce our outstanding debt.
In connection with the offering, we granted the underwriters an option, exercisable not later than May 23, 2002, to purchase up to 630,000 additional common shares at $17.50 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions.
As a result of this offering of our common shares, the remaining 200,000 of our Series A Preferred Shares automatically converted into 286,537 common shares on April 29, 2002.
11
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(Dollars in Thousands, except per Share and per Unit amounts)
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the respective notes thereto which are included in this Form 10-Q.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
We generated $8,074 in cash flows from operating activities and $2,919 from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2002. Redevelopment of three shopping centers and improvements to existing properties used $11,633 during the quarter. Borrowings under our Credit Facility provided $5,220, net of repayments of $1,200, and borrowings under our unsecured term loan provided $4,125. During the three months ended March 31, 2002, we repaid $1,132 of mortgage obligations and paid $5,062 for cash distributions to shareholders, holders of operating partnership units and preferred shareholders.
Our mortgage and notes payable amounted to $355,488 at March 31, 2002, with a weighted average interest rate of 7.03%. The debt consists of twelve loans secured by various properties, one unsecured term loan and the Credit Facility, as described below. Ten of the mortgage loans amounting to $194,248 have maturities ranging from 2006 to 2011, monthly payments that include regularly scheduled amortization, and fixed interest rates ranging between 6.83% to 8.81%. One of the mortgage loans, evidenced by tax free bonds, amounting to $6,490 and secured by Oak Brook Square Shopping Center, matures in 2010 and carries a floating interest rate equal to 75% of the new issue long term Capital A rated utility bonds, plus interest to the lender sufficient to cause the lender’s overall yield on its investment in the bonds to be equal to 200 basis points over their applicable LIBOR rate (6.43% at March 31, 2002).
The Credit Facility bears interest between 162.5 and 225 basis points over LIBOR depending on certain debt ratios (effective interest rate of 6.5% at March 31, 2002) and matures in September 2003. The Credit Facility is secured by mortgages on various properties and contains financial covenants relating to liabilities-to-assets ratios, minimum operating coverage ratios and a minimum equity value. As of March 31, 2002, we were in compliance with the covenant terms.
Outstanding letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility amounted to $818 at March 31, 2002.
Under terms of the Credit Facility, we are required to maintain interest rate swap agreements to reduce the impact of changes in interest rate on our floating rate debt. We have interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $75,000 at March 31, 2002. Based on rates in effect at March 31, 2002, the agreements provide for fixed rates ranging from 7.0% to 8.3% and expire at various dates through March 2004. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counter party to the interest rate swap agreements, however we do not anticipate non-performance by the counter party.
After taking into account the impact of converting our variable rate debt into fixed rate debt by use of the interest rate swap agreements, at March 31, 2002, our variable rate debt accounted for approximately $86,240 of outstanding debt with a weighted average interest rate of 4.81%. Variable rate debt accounted for approximately 24.3% of our total debt and 15.2% of our total capitalization.
Our debt to total market capitalization (our debt plus the market value of our equity) ratio was 62.5% at March 31, 2002.
The properties in which Ramco-Gershenson Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), owns an interest and which are accounted for on the equity method of accounting are subject to non-recourse mortgage indebtedness. At March 31, 2002, our pro rata share of non-recourse mortgage debt on the unconsolidated properties (accounted for on the equity method) was $25,962 with a weighted average interest rate of 6.6%.
The mortgage loans (other than our Credit Facility) encumbering our properties, including properties held by our unconsolidated joint ventures, are generally non-recourse, subject to certain exceptions for which we would be liable for any resulting losses incurred by the lender. These exceptions vary from loan to loan but generally include fraud or a material misrepresentation, misstatement or omission by the borrower, intentional
12
or grossly negligent conduct by the borrower that harms the property or results in a loss to the lender, filing of a bankruptcy petition by the borrower, either directly or indirectly, and certain environmental liabilities. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain of such events, such as fraud or filing of a bankruptcy petition by the borrower, we would be liable for the entire outstanding balance of the loan, all interest accrued thereon and certain other costs, penalties and expenses.
With respect to the Crossroads Centre shopping center, which is owned by a joint venture in which we have a 10% interest, we have guaranteed to the joint venture the completion of the center by October 17, 2002, and we have entered into a master lease with the joint venture under which we are obligated to provide net operating income sufficient to provide a 1.2 to 1.0 debt service coverage ratio. In the event that the center is not completed by the scheduled completion date, we would be obligated to the joint venture for any damages it incurs due to such failure. We believe that the construction of the center has been substantially completed in accordance with the terms of our agreement. We have the option to purchase the Crossroads Centre shopping center from the joint venture, exercisable by notice on or before July 16, 2002, and if we do not exercise this option, we will be obligated to make an option payment of $3.3 million to the 90% owner of this joint venture on July 17, 2002.
Our capital structure at March 31, 2002, includes property specific mortgages, an unsecured term loan, the Credit Facility, our Series A Preferred Shares, our Common Shares and the minority interest in the Operating Partnership. At March 31, 2002, the minority interest in the Operating Partnership represented a 29.3% ownership in the Operating Partnership which, may under certain conditions, be exchanged for an aggregate of 2,938,062 Common Shares.
As of March 31, 2002 the units in the Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”) were exchangeable for Common Shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis. We, as sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, have the option, but not the obligation, to settle exchanged OP Units in cash based on the current trading price of our Common Shares. Assuming the exchange of all limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, there would have been 10,034,000 of our common shares outstanding at March 31, 2002, with a market value of approximately $178,202 (based on the closing price of $17.76 per share on March 31, 2002).
The principal uses of our liquidity and capital resources are for acquisitions, development, redevelopment, including expansion and renovation programs, and debt repayment. To maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our “Real Estate Investment Trust Taxable Income” as defined in the Code.
As part of our business plan to improve our capital structure and reduce debt, we will continue to pursue the strategy of selling fully-valued properties and to dispose of shopping centers that no longer meet the criteria established for our portfolio. Our ability to obtain acceptable selling prices and satisfactory terms will impact the timing of future sales. Net proceeds from the sale of properties are expected to reduce outstanding debt.
On April 29, 2002 we issued 4,200,000 common shares of beneficial interest at a price to the public of $17.50 per share, and we received net proceeds of approximately $67,800. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering to redeem 1,200,000 of our Series A Preferred Shares at a cost of $26,571, purchase the equity interest of our joint venture partner in RPT/ INVEST, LLC, an unconsolidated entity for approximately $9,100, and to reduce our outstanding debt.
In connection with the offering, we granted the underwriters an option, exercisable not later than May 23, 2002, to purchase up to 630,000 additional common shares at $17.50 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions.
As a result of this offering of our common shares, the remaining 200,000 of our Series A Preferred Shares automatically converted into 286,537 common shares on April 29, 2002.
13
The conversion of our Tel-Twelve shopping center from an enclosed regional mall to an open-air center is currently in process along with the proposed redevelopment at our Shoppes of Lakeland. These redevelopments will include demolition and rebuilding of a portion of Tel-Twelve, as well as retenanting of the Shoppes of Lakeland. As a result of reduced rental income during the redevelopment period, it is our estimate that net income will decrease by approximately $3,400 for these two centers for the year ended December 31, 2002, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2001.
We anticipate that the combination of the availability under the Credit Facility, the offering of our common shares, the sale of existing properties, and potential new debt will satisfy our expected working capital requirements through at least the next 12 months. We anticipate adequate liquidity for the foreseeable future to fund future developments, expansions, repositionings, and to continue currently planned capital programs, and to make distributions to our shareholders in accordance with the Code’s requirements applicable to REITs. Although we believe that the combination of factors discussed above will provide sufficient liquidity, no such assurance can be given.
Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 to Three Months Ended March 31, 2001.
Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2002 were $21,739, a $1,445 decrease over the comparable period in 2001. Of the $1,445 decrease, $1,164 was the result of decreased minimum rents. The conversion of our Tel-Twelve shopping center from an enclosed regional mall to an open-air center reduced minimum rents during the redevelopment period by approximately $592 when compared to the three months ended March 2001 The sale of White Lake MarketPlace and Athens Town Center during the first quarter 2001 resulted in a reduction of $292 in minimum rents.
Recoveries from tenants increased $309, or 5.5%, to $5,948 as compared to $5,639 for the same three months in 2001. The increase is primarily due to a higher level of recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes associated with the Auburn Mile development. The overall recovery ratio was 99.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2002, compared to 96.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2001.
For the three months ended March 31, 2002, percentage rents decreased $399 to $522, as compared to $921 for the three months ended March 31, 2001. The decrease is the result of tenant changes associated with redevelopment projects and our efforts to convert percentage rent to higher minimum rent when renewing leases. Interest and other income decreased $184 to $750 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, and the decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in lease termination fees and temporary tenant income when compared to the same quarter in 2001.
Total expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2002 decreased $888, or 4.5%, to $18,639 as compared to $19,527 for the three months ended March 31, 2001. The decrease was due to a $444 decrease in general and administrative expenses and a $647 decrease in interest expense, offset by a $139 increase in total recoverable expenses, including recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes.
Total recoverable expenses, including recoverable operating expenses and real estate taxes, increased by $139, to $5,956 as compared to $5,817 for the three months ended March 31, 2001. Real estate taxes increased $479 for the three months ended March 31, 2002 when compared to the same period in 2001. The increase in real estate taxes was primarily due to the completion of the development of the Auburn Mile shopping center in 2001, resulting in higher assessed valuation.
General and administrative expenses decreased $444 to $2,051, as compared to $2,495 for the three months ended March 31, 2001. This decrease is principally attributable to a $271 decrease in salaries, bonuses and other fringe benefits and a $125 decrease in consulting and other professional fees for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Interest expense decreased $647, from $6,957 to $6,310 during the first quarter of 2002. The 9.3% decrease is the result of a reduction of our average interest rate to 7.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2002 from 8.1% for the same period in 2001. The net decrease was offset by an increase in borrowings during the three months ended March 31, 2002 when compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2001.
14
Capitalized interest, related to redevelopment projects, amounted to $229 during the three months ended March 31, 2002, as compared to $36 of capitalized interest for the same period in 2001.
We sold White Lake MarketPlace and Athens Town Center during the first quarter of 2001 for cash of $28,600, resulting in a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $5,300. The proceeds from the sales of the properties were used to reduce debt.
The decrease in minority interest is the result of lower income before minority interest for the three months ended March 31, 2002 when compared to 2001. Minority interest represents a 29.3% share of income before minority interest of the operating partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and the three months ended March 31, 2001.
Income from discontinued operations, which consists of operating income for the Hickory Corners shopping center which was sold on April 10, 2002, decreased $41, or 16.1%. Minimum rents decreased $22 and operating expenses at the Hickory Corners shopping center increased $33 offset by a $14 increase in lease termination income and other revenue when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2001.
Economic Conditions
Substantially all of the leases at our properties provide for tenants to pay their pro rata share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance and real estate taxes, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in operating expenses resulting from inflation. Many of the tenants’ leases contain provisions designed to lessen the impact of inflation. Such provisions include the ability to receive percentage rentals based on a tenant’s gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise, and/or escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases. In addition, many of the leases are for terms of less than ten years, which may enable us to replace existing leases with new leases at a higher base and/or percentage rentals if rents of the existing leases are below the then existing market rate.
The retail industry has experienced some financial difficulties during the past few years and certain local, regional and national retailers have filed for protection under bankruptcy laws. If this trend should continue, our future earnings performance could be negatively impacted.
Sensitivity Analysis
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our variable rate debt obligations. Based on our debt and interest rates and the interest rate swap agreements in effect at March 31, 2002, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would affect our earnings and cash flows by approximately $862.
Funds from Operations
We generally consider funds from operations, also known as “FFO,” an appropriate supplemental measure of our financial performance because it is predicated on cash flow analyses. We have adopted the most recent National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of FFO, which was amended on April 4, 2002. Under the NAREIT definition, FFO represents income before minority interest, excluding extraordinary items, as defined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, gains on sales of depreciable property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of financing costs), and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our computation of FFO may, however, differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other real estate companies, and therefore, may not be comparable to these other real estate companies. FFO should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or our ability to pay distributions.
FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or our ability to pay distributions. Furthermore, while net income and cash generated from operating, investing and financing activities, determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
15
States of America, consider capital expenditures which have been and will be incurred in the future, the calculations of FFO does not.
The following table illustrates the calculation of FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2002, and 2001:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, |
| |
|
| | 2002 | | 2001 |
| |
| |
|
Net Income | | $ | 2,437 | | | $ | 6,336 | |
Add: | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 3,971 | | | | 3,982 | |
| Minority interest in partnership | | | 1,046 | | | | 2,657 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | |
| Gain on sale of property | | | — | | | | (5,017 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Funds from operations — diluted | | | 7,454 | | | | 7,958 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred share dividends | | | (828 | ) | | | (828 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Funds from operations — basic | | $ | 6,626 | | | $ | 7,130 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Weighted average equivalent shares outstanding (1) | | | | | | | | |
| | Basic | | | 10,034 | | | | 10,066 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Diluted | | | 12,091 | | | | 12,069 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Supplemental disclosure: | | | | | | | | |
| | Straight-line rental income | | $ | 357 | | | $ | 627 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Amortization of management contracts | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 56 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| |
(1) | For basic FFO, represents the weighted average total shares outstanding, assuming the redemption of all Operating Partnership Units for Common Shares. For diluted FFO, represents the weighted average total shares outstanding, assuming the redemption of all Operating Partnership Units for Common Shares, the Series A Preferred Shares converted to Common Shares, and the Common Shares issuable under the treasury stock method upon exercise of stock options. |
Capital Expenditures
During the three months ended March 31, 2002, we spent approximately $1,497 on revenue-generating capital expenditures including tenant allowances, leasing commissions paid to third-party brokers, legal costs relative to lease documents, and capitalized leasing and construction costs. These types of costs generate a return through rents from tenants over the term of their leases. Revenue-enhancing capital expenditures, including expansions, renovations or repositionings, were approximately $10,828.
Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements with respect to the operation of certain of our properties. We believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements made in this document are based on reasonable assumptions. Certain factors could occur that might cause actual results to vary. These include general economic conditions, the strength of key industries in the cities in which our properties are located, the performance of tenants at our properties and elsewhere, and other factors discussed in this report and other reports we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
16
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
| |
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) Exhibits
See Exhibit Index.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed April 19, 2002, reporting under Item 5, Other Events, the sale of the Hickory Corners Shopping Center and the announcement of financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.
A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed April 24, 2002, reporting under Item 5, Other Events, a Tax Agreement with Atlantic Realty Trust and a Certificate of Correction to the Company’s Articles Supplementary.
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed in its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| | | | RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST |
|
Date: May 3, 2002 | | By: | | /s/ DENNIS E. GERSHENSON
Dennis E. Gershenson President and Trustee (Chief Executive Officer) |
|
Date: May 3, 2002 | | By: | | /s/ RICHARD J. SMITH
Richard J. Smith Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
18
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
|
| 10.42 | | | First Amendment to First Amended and Restated Unsecured Term Loan Agreement dated February 15, 2002 among the Operating Partnership, as Borrower and Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust, as Guarantor, and Fleet National Bank and other Banks which may become parties to this agreement, and Fleet National Bank, as Agent, incorporated by reference. |
19