SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 33-27312
LAKELAND BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
New Jersey | | 22-2953275 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No. |
| | |
250 Oak Ridge Road, Oak Ridge, New Jersey | | 07438 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(973) 697-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of July 31, 2005 there were 21,430,624 outstanding shares of Common Stock, no par value.
LAKELAND BANCORP, INC.
Form 10-Q Index
| The | Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a web site which contains reports, proxy and information statements and |
other information relating to registrants that file electronically at the address: http:/ / www.sec.gov.
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2005 (unaudited)
| | | December 31, 2004
| |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 51,972 | | | $ | 47,981 | |
Interest-bearing deposits due from banks | | | 27,818 | | | | 7,365 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents | | | 79,790 | | | | 55,346 | |
| | |
Investment securities available for sale | | | 490,913 | | | | 582,106 | |
Investment securities held to maturity; fair value of $146,958 in 2005 and $162,926 in 2004 | | | 147,484 | | | | 162,922 | |
Loans, net of deferred fees | | | 1,216,395 | | | | 1,176,005 | |
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses | | | 16,542 | | | | 16,638 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net loans | | | 1,199,853 | | | | 1,159,367 | |
Premises and equipment - net | | | 31,626 | | | | 31,749 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 7,525 | | | | 8,002 | |
Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets | | | 93,973 | | | | 94,119 | |
Bank owned life insurance | | | 34,836 | | | | 34,240 | |
Other assets | | | 13,244 | | | | 13,170 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 2,099,244 | | | $ | 2,141,021 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest bearing | | $ | 313,648 | | | $ | 319,359 | |
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts | | | 986,384 | | | | 1,041,621 | |
Time deposits under $100 thousand | | | 281,325 | | | | 269,820 | |
Time deposits $100 thousand and over | | | 108,623 | | | | 96,004 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total deposits | | | 1,689,980 | | | | 1,726,804 | |
| | |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 103,083 | | | | 110,830 | |
Long-term debt | | | 45,056 | | | | 42,288 | |
Subordinated debentures | | | 56,703 | | | | 56,703 | |
Other liabilities | | | 10,566 | | | | 9,848 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 1,905,388 | | | | 1,946,473 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, no par value; authorized shares, 40,000,000; issued shares, 22,443,298 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004; outstanding shares, 21,430,624 at June 30, 2005 and 21,714,968 at December 31, 2004 | | | 226,188 | | | | 208,933 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (15,855 | ) | | | (3,847 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,012,674 shares in 2005 and 728,330 shares in 2004 | | | (15,307 | ) | | | (10,878 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (1,170 | ) | | | 340 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 193,856 | | | | 194,548 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 2,099,244 | | | $ | 2,141,021 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
1
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended June 30,
| | | For the six months ended June 30,
| |
| | 2005
| | 2004
| | | 2005
| | | 2004
| |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) | | | (In thousands, except per share data) | |
INTEREST INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and fees | | $ | 18,424 | | $ | 12,812 | | | $ | 35,973 | | | $ | 25,481 | |
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks | | | 89 | | | 38 | | | | 220 | | | | 48 | |
Taxable investment securities | | | 5,686 | | | 4,728 | | | | 11,735 | | | | 9,741 | |
Tax-exempt investment securities | | | 865 | | | 735 | | | | 1,776 | | | | 1,499 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME | | | 25,064 | | | 18,313 | | | | 49,704 | | | | 36,769 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 5,368 | | | 3,274 | | | | 10,449 | | | | 6,661 | |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 851 | | | 56 | | | | 1,386 | | | | 167 | |
Long-term debt | | | 1,418 | | | 1,387 | | | | 2,835 | | | | 2,787 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE | | | 7,637 | | | 4,717 | | | | 14,670 | | | | 9,615 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME | | | 17,427 | | | 13,596 | | | | 35,034 | | | | 27,154 | |
Provision for loan and lease losses | | | 327 | | | 875 | | | | 1,110 | | | | 1,750 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES | | | 17,100 | | | 12,721 | | | | 33,924 | | | | 25,404 | |
NONINTEREST INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | | 2,357 | | | 1,839 | | | | 4,241 | | | | 3,703 | |
Commissions and fees | | | 731 | | | 729 | | | | 1,466 | | | | 1,358 | |
Gains on the sales of investment securities | | | 100 | | | 413 | | | | 128 | | | | 416 | |
Income on bank owned life insurance | | | 305 | | | 251 | | | | 602 | | | | 530 | |
Leasing income | | | 159 | | | 12 | | | | 660 | | | | 55 | |
Other income | | | 72 | | | 84 | | | | 156 | | | | 142 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME | | | 3,724 | | | 3,328 | | | | 7,253 | | | | 6,204 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 7,142 | | | 5,562 | | | | 14,247 | | | | 11,109 | |
Net occupancy expense | | | 1,212 | | | 1,004 | | | | 2,759 | | | | 2,025 | |
Furniture and equipment | | | 1,115 | | | 907 | | | | 2,210 | | | | 1,752 | |
Stationery, supplies and postage | | | 476 | | | 341 | | | | 906 | | | | 689 | |
Legal fees | | | 224 | | | 505 | | | | 447 | | | | 989 | |
Marketing expense | | | 534 | | | 376 | | | | 875 | | | | 691 | |
Core deposit intangible amortization | | | 303 | | | 102 | | | | 606 | | | | 204 | |
Other expenses | | | 2,227 | | | 1,781 | | | | 4,854 | | | | 3,430 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSE | | | 13,233 | | | 10,578 | | | | 26,904 | | | | 20,889 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes | | | 7,591 | | | 5,471 | | | | 14,273 | | | | 10,719 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | 2,454 | | | 1,753 | | | | 4,568 | | | | 3,432 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NET INCOME | | $ | 5,137 | | $ | 3,718 | | | $ | 9,705 | | | $ | 7,287 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 0.43 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Diluted | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 0.43 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | |
| | |
| | For the three months ended June 30,
| | | For the six months ended June 30,
| |
| | 2005
| | 2004
| | | 2005
| | | 2004
| |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 5,137 | | $ | 3,718 | | | $ | 9,705 | | | $ | 7,287 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME NET OF TAX: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized securities gains (losses) arising during period | | | 3,420 | | | (9,525 | ) | | | (1,427 | ) | | | (4,875 | ) |
Less: reclassification for gains included in net income | | | 65 | | | 268 | | | | 83 | | | | 270 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | 3,355 | | | (9,793 | ) | | | (1,510 | ) | | | (5,145 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | 8,492 | | $ | (6,075 | ) | | $ | 8,195 | | | $ | 2,142 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
2
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common stock
| | | Accumulated Deficit
| | | Treasury Stock
| | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
| | | Total
| |
| | Number of Shares
| | Amount
| | | | | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | 16,483,551 | | $ | 131,116 | | | $ | (12,980 | ) | | $ | (7,283 | ) | | $ | 98 | | | $ | 110,951 | |
Net Income, 2004 | | — | | | — | | | | 16,495 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16,495 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 242 | | | | 242 | |
Exercise of stock options | | — | | | 264 | | | | — | | | | 818 | | | | — | | | | 1,082 | |
Shares issued for the purchase of Newton Financial Corp. | | 4,891,019 | | | 77,553 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 77,553 | |
Cash dividends | | — | | | — | | | | (7,362 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7,362 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,413 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,413 | ) |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2004 | | 21,374,570 | | $ | 208,933 | | | $ | (3,847 | ) | | $ | (10,878 | ) | | $ | 340 | | | $ | 194,548 | |
Net Income, first six months 2005 | | — | | | — | | | | 9,705 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,705 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,510 | ) | | | (1,510 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | — | | | (326 | ) | | | — | | | | 766 | | | | — | | | | 440 | |
Stock Dividend | | 1,068,728 | | | 17,581 | | | | (17,581 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash dividends | | — | | | — | | | | (4,132 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,132 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,195 | ) | | | — | | | | (5,195 | ) |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BALANCE JUNE 30, 2005 (UNAUDITED) | | 22,443,298 | | $ | 226,188 | | | $ | (15,855 | ) | | $ | (15,307 | ) | | $ | (1,170 | ) | | $ | 193,856 | |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS-(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended June 30,
| |
| | 2005
| | | 2004
| |
| | (in thousands) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 9,705 | | | $ | 7,287 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net amortization of premiums, discounts and deferred loan fees and costs | | | 1,262 | | | | 2,005 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 2,354 | | | | 1,561 | |
Provision for loan and lease losses | | | 1,110 | | | | 1,750 | |
Gain on sales and calls of securities | | | (128 | ) | | | (416 | ) |
Loss on disposition of equipment | | | — | | | | 40 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | — | | | | 1,334 | |
Increase in other assets | | | 192 | | | | 1,244 | |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | | | 718 | | | | (1,872 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | 15,213 | | | | 12,933 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from repayments on and maturity of securities: | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale | | | 73,564 | | | | 80,885 | |
Held for maturity | | | 18,308 | | | | 9,234 | |
Proceeds from sales of securities: | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale | | | 46,366 | | | | — | |
Held for maturity | | | 715 | | | | — | |
Purchase of securities: | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale | | | (31,686 | ) | | | (56,273 | ) |
Held for maturity | | | (3,808 | ) | | | (28,404 | ) |
Net increase in loans | | | (41,913 | ) | | | (41,433 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | | (1,625 | ) | | | (1,520 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | 59,921 | | | | (37,511 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | | | (36,824 | ) | | | 91,076 | |
Decrease in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | (7,747 | ) | | | (32,129 | ) |
Advances (repayments) of long-term debt | | | 2,768 | | | | (1,000 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | (5,195 | ) | | | (180 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | | 440 | | | | 601 | |
Dividends paid | | | (4,132 | ) | | | (3,195 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | (50,690 | ) | | | 55,173 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 24,444 | | | | 30,595 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | | | 55,346 | | | | 46,084 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 79,790 | | | $ | 76,679 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation.
This quarterly report presents the consolidated financial statements of Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) and its subsidiaries, Lakeland Bank (Lakeland) and Newton Trust Company (Newton).
The Company’s financial statements reflect all adjustments and disclosures which management believes are necessary for a fair presentation of interim results. The results of operations for the quarter and six months presented do not necessarily indicate the results that the Company will achieve for all of 2005. You should read these interim financial statements in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes that are presented in the Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The financial information in this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with the Company’s customary accounting practices; these financial statements have not been audited. Certain information and footnote disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted, as permitted by rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” which contains a fair value-based method for valuing stock-based compensation that entities may use, which measures compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award. Compensation is then recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. Alternatively, the standard permits entities to continue accounting for employee stock options and similar equity instruments under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Entities that continue to account for stock options using APB Opinion No. 25 are required to make pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share, as if the fair value-based method of accounting defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied.
At June 30, 2005, the Company had stock-based employee compensation plans, which are more fully described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company accounts for these plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. Stock-based employee compensation costs are not reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
In December 2004, the Company granted options to purchase 158,162 shares of common stock to key employees at an exercise price of $16.39. Included in this grant were 61,561 options which were subject to shareholder approval of an increase in authorized shares. Such shareholder approval was received at the Company’s annual meeting on May 10, 2005.
On May 13, 2005, the Company accelerated the vesting of 460,774 stock options, representing all unvested stock options on such date which had exercise prices in excess of the market value of the Company’s common stock on May 13, 2005. The Company’s decision to accelerate the vesting of these options was part of a review by the Board of Directors of the Company’s incentive compensation program and upcoming changes in the accounting for stock options. The acceleration of the stock options had the effect of reducing pro forma earnings by $1.8 million, and pro forma earnings per share by $0.08 for the quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2005.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share amounts).
5
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended June 30,
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
| | 2005
| | 2004
| | 2005
| | 2004
|
Net income, as reported | | $ | 5,137 | | $ | 3,718 | | $ | 9,705 | | $ | 7,287 |
Deduct: Stock-based compensation costs determined under fair value based method for all awards | | | 1,984 | | | 197 | | | 2,176 | | | 394 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Pro forma net income | | $ | 3,153 | | $ | 3,521 | | $ | 7,529 | | $ | 6,893 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic, as reported | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.45 | | $ | 0.43 |
Basic, pro forma | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.21 | | $ | 0.35 | | $ | 0.41 |
| | | | |
Diluted, as reported | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.45 | | $ | 0.43 |
Diluted, pro forma | | $ | 0.14 | | $ | 0.21 | | $ | 0.34 | | $ | 0.41 |
Stock Options outstanding were 1,046,049 and 820,669 at June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2004: dividend rate of 2%, expected volatility of 35%, risk-free interest rate of 3.98% and expected lives of 7 years. The Company granted no stock options during the first half of 2005.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” that addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. Under SFAS No. 123(R), all forms of share-based payments to employees, including employee stock options, would be treated the same as other forms of compensation by recognizing the related cost in the income statement. The expense of the award would generally be measured at fair value at the grant date. Current accounting guidance requires that the expense relating to employee stock options only be disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements. SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for public companies as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. All public companies that used the fair-value-based method for either recognition or disclosure under SFAS No. 123 will apply SFAS No. 123(R) using a modified method of prospective application. Under this transition method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the required effective date for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered based on the grant-date fair value of those awards calculated under SFAS No. 123 for either recognition or pro forma disclosures. The impact of this new standard, if it had been in effect, on the net earnings and related per share amounts for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is disclosed in the table above.
On March 29, 2005, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin 107, “Share Based Payments” (SAB 107). The interpretations in SAB 107 express views of the SEC staff regarding the application of SFAS No. 123(R). Among other things, SAB 107 provides interpretive guidance related to the interaction between Statement 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations, as well as provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. The Company is evaluating the impact that the implementation of SAB 107 and SFAS No. 123 (R) will have on future option grants.
6
Note 2. Statement of Cash Flow Information.
| | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended June 30,
|
| | 2005
| | 2004
|
| | (in thousands) |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for income taxes | | $ | 3,553 | | $ | 4,290 |
Cash paid during the period for interest | | | 14,270 | | | 9,674 |
Note 3. Earnings Per Share.
Basic earnings per share for a particular period of time is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during that period.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares and common share equivalents. The Company’s only outstanding “common share equivalents” are options to purchase its common stock.
All weighted average, actual shares and per share information set forth in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been adjusted retroactively for the effects of stock dividends including the stock dividend declared on June 15, 2005, payable on August 16, 2005 to shareholders of record on July 29, 2005. The following schedule shows the Company’s earnings per share for the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended June 30,
| | For the six months ended June 30,
|
(In thousands except per share data) | | 2005
| | 2004
| | 2005
| | 2004
|
Income applicable to common stock | | $ | 5,137 | | $ | 3,718 | | $ | 9,705 | | $ | 7,287 |
| | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | | | 21,572 | | | 16,804 | | | 21,636 | | | 16,779 |
Stock options | | | 154 | | | 185 | | | 165 | | | 198 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents - diluted | | | 21,726 | | | 16,989 | | | 21,801 | | | 16,977 |
| | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.45 | | $ | 0.43 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.45 | | $ | 0.43 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Options to purchase 682,055 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $15.59 per share were outstanding and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share in second quarter 2005 because the option price was greater than the average market price. Options to purchase 392,282 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $16.30 per share were outstanding and were not included in the year-to-date 2005 computation of diluted earnings per share because the option price was greater than the average market price. Options to purchase 132,052 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $16.96 per share were outstanding and were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share in second quarter 2004 and year-to-date 2004 because the option price was greater than the average market prices.
7
Note 4. Investment Securities
AVAILABLE FOR SALE
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2005
| | December 31, 2004
|
(in thousands)
| | Amortized Cost
| | Gross Unrealized Gains
| | Gross Unrealized Losses
| | | Fair Value
| | Amortized Cost
| | Gross Unrealized Gains
| | Gross Unrealized Losses
| | | Fair Value
|
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies | | $ | 138,594 | | $ | 20 | | $ | (2,028 | ) | | $ | 136,586 | | $ | 156,250 | | $ | 46 | | $ | (1,867 | ) | | $ | 154,429 |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 286,915 | | | 100 | | | (3,008 | ) | | | 284,007 | | | 342,022 | | | 831 | | | (2,383 | ) | | | 340,470 |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 39,748 | | | 995 | | | (22 | ) | | | 40,721 | | | 44,418 | | | 1,513 | | | (10 | ) | | | 45,921 |
Other debt securities | | | 9,086 | | | 11 | | | (99 | ) | | | 8,998 | | | 22,891 | | | 53 | | | (10 | ) | | | 22,934 |
Other equity securities | | | 18,412 | | | 2,256 | | | (67 | ) | | | 20,601 | | | 16,013 | | | 2,354 | | | (15 | ) | | | 18,352 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | $ | 492,755 | | $ | 3,382 | | $ | (5,224 | ) | | $ | 490,913 | | $ | 581,594 | | $ | 4,797 | | $ | (4,285 | ) | | $ | 582,106 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
HELD TO MATURITY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2005
| | December 31, 2004
|
(in thousands)
| | Amortized Cost
| | Gross Unrealized Gains
| | Gross Unrealized Losses
| | | Fair Value
| | Amortized Cost
| | Gross Unrealized Gains
| | Gross Unrealized Losses
| | | Fair Value
|
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies | | $ | 35,539 | | $ | 4 | | $ | (272 | ) | | $ | 35,271 | | $ | 39,949 | | $ | 41 | | $ | (144 | ) | | $ | 39,846 |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 56,143 | | | 122 | | | (336 | ) | | | 55,929 | | | 62,680 | | | 276 | | | (287 | ) | | | 62,669 |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 52,173 | | | 162 | | | (261 | ) | | | 52,074 | | | 55,102 | | | 305 | | | (178 | ) | | | 55,229 |
Other | | | 3,629 | | | 55 | | | — | | | | 3,684 | | | 5,191 | | | 4 | | | (13 | ) | | | 5,182 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | $ | 147,484 | | $ | 343 | | $ | (869 | ) | | $ | 146,958 | | $ | 162,922 | | $ | 626 | | $ | (622 | ) | | $ | 162,926 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2005
|
| | Available for Sale
| | Held to Maturity
|
| | Amortized Cost
| | Fair Value
| | Amortized Cost
| | Fair Value
|
| | | | (in thousands) | | |
Due in one year or less | | $ | 9,095 | | $ | 9,108 | | $ | 12,429 | | $ | 12,453 |
Due after one year through five years | | | 106,565 | | | 105,819 | | | 36,324 | | | 36,029 |
Due after five years through ten years | | | 58,294 | | | 58,018 | | | 28,960 | | | 28,854 |
Due after ten years | | | 13,474 | | | 13,360 | | | 13,628 | | | 13,693 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| | | 187,428 | | | 186,305 | | | 91,341 | | | 91,029 |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 286,915 | | | 284,007 | | | 56,143 | | | 55,929 |
Other investments | | | 18,412 | | | 20,601 | | | — | | | — |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total securities | | $ | 492,755 | | $ | 490,913 | | $ | 147,484 | | $ | 146,958 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
In the first half of 2005 the Company sold $715,000 of held to maturity securities because over 85% of the original principal acquired on these securities had been paid by the sale date. The Company recorded a gain of $23,000 on the sale of these securities.
FSP 115-1 will replace the guidance in paragraphs 10–18 of EITF Issue 03-1 (which had been deferred by FSP EITF 03-1-1, “Effective Date of Paragraphs 10–20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, ‘The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments’”) with references to existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance, such as Statement 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, Staff Accounting Bulletin 59, Accounting
8
for Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities, and Opinion 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. FSP FAS 115-1 will codify the guidance set forth in EITF Topic D-44 and clarify that an investor should recognize an impairment loss no later than when the impairment is considered other than temporary, even if a decision to sell has not been made.
FSP FAS 115-1 will be effective for other-than-temporary impairment analysis conducted in periods beginning after September 15, 2005. The FASB approved the proposed FSP subject to a vote on the final draft. The Company will evaluate the impact that FSP 115-1 will have on its financial statements when the final FSP is issued.
Note 5. Loans.
| | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2005
| | December 31, 2004
|
| | (in thousands) |
Commercial | | $ | 612,505 | | $ | 602,062 |
Real estate-construction | | | 66,253 | | | 62,687 |
Real estate-mortgage | | | 239,673 | | | 223,936 |
Installment | | | 300,880 | | | 289,920 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total loans | | | 1,219,311 | | | 1,178,605 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Less: deferred fees | | | 2,916 | | | 2,600 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Loans net of deferred fees | | | 1,216,395 | | | 1,176,005 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (known as “SFAS No. 114”), and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, Income Recognition and Disclosures.” Impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, a creditor may measure impairment based on a loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Regardless of the measurement method, a creditor must measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral when the creditor determines that foreclosure is probable.
The following table shows the Company’s recorded investment in impaired loans and the related valuation allowance calculated under SFAS No. 114 as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the average recorded investment in impaired loans during the three months preceding those dates:
| | | | | | |
Date
| | Investment
| | Valuation Allowance
| | Average Recorded Investment (over preceding three months)
|
June 30, 2005 | | $10.9 million | | $4.5 million | | $11.4 million |
June 30, 2004 | | $15.1 million | | $6.8 million | | $15.5 million |
Interest received on impaired loans may be recorded as interest income. However, if management is not reasonably certain that an impaired loan will be repaid in full, or if a specific timeframe to resolve full collection cannot yet be reasonably determined, all payments received are recorded as reductions of principal. The Company recognized interest on impaired loans of $124,000 in the first six months of 2005. Interest that would have accrued had the loans performed under original terms would have been $526,000 for the first six months of 2005.
9
Note 6. Postretirement Health Care Benefits
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended June 30,
| | | For the six months ended June 30,
| |
| | 2005
| | | 2004
| | | 2005
| | | 2004
| |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | |
Service cost | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 33 | |
Interest cost | | | 10 | | | | 9 | | | | 20 | | | | 18 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Amortization of prior service cost | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss | | | 12 | | | | 12 | | | | 24 | | | | 24 | |
Amortization of transition obligation | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 2 | | | | 3 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense | | $ | 36 | | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 74 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Company currently expects to contribute approximately $20,000 to our post retirement benefit plan in 2005. The Company made contributions of $10,000 to the plan in the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Note 7. Directors’ Retirement Plan
The components of net periodic plan costs for the directors’ retirement plan are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended June 30,
| | For the six months ended June 30,
|
| | 2005
| | 2004
| | 2005
| | 2004
|
| | (in thousands) | | (in thousands) |
Service cost | | $ | 5 | | $ | 2 | | $ | 10 | | $ | 3 |
Interest cost | | | 12 | | | 9 | | | 24 | | | 18 |
Amortization of prior service cost | | | 12 | | | 8 | | | 24 | | | 16 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense | | $ | 29 | | $ | 19 | | $ | 58 | | $ | 37 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The Company made contributions of $37,000 to the plan in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and does not expect to make any more contributions in 2005.
Note 8. Acquisitions
On July 1, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Newton Financial Corp. (“NFC”) pursuant to which NFC was merged into the Company. NFC shareholders had the right to elect stock and/or cash in the merger subject to certain allocation provisions. NFC shareholders who received stock received 4.5 shares (4.725 restated*) of the Company’s stock for each of their NFC shares. NFC shareholders who received cash received $72.08 per share. Under the terms of the merger, 1,086,922 shares of NFC stock were exchanged for a total issuance of 4,891,119 shares (5,135,674 restated*) of Lakeland Bancorp stock. The remaining 270,526 shares of NFC stock were exchanged for a total of $19.5 million. NFC stock options of 13,591 were exchanged for Company stock options of 61,160 (64,218 restated*) and were fully vested at the time of the merger. As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded $67.0 million in goodwill and other intangible assets. In 2005, an unasserted legal claim was identified related to loan payments previously made to Newton prior to Lakeland’s acquisition. The unasserted legal claim of approximately $460,000 was recorded in goodwill during the first quarter of 2005. The transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The results of operations include Newton’s results of operations from July 1, 2004 forward.
* | Restated for the 5% stock dividend payable August 16, 2005 to shareholders of record July 29, 2005. |
The following represents the unaudited pro forma financial information of Lakeland Bancorp as if the acquisition occurred on the first date of the period indicated. The pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with the related historical information and is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been attained had the transaction actually taken place on that date.
10
| | | |
| | For the six months ended June 30, 2004
|
| | (in thousands) |
Interest income | | $ | 44,276 |
Interest expense | | | 11,098 |
| |
|
|
Net interest income | | | 33,178 |
Provision for loan losses | | | 2,186 |
Non-interest income | | | 6,870 |
Non-interest expense | | | 25,663 |
Net Income | | $ | 8,384 |
In second quarter 2005, the Board of Directors of Lakeland Bancorp voted to merge Lakeland and Newton in November 2005. The Company expects to close three branches (two of Newton and one of Lakeland) after the merger; the deposits and loans of these branches will be moved to nearby locations.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
As the Company has disclosed in its periodic reports filed with the SEC, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “10-K”), the Company is involved in legal proceedings concerning four separate portfolios of predominately commercial leases which Lakeland purchased from Commercial Money Center, Inc. (“CMC”). CMC obtained surety bonds from three surety companies to guarantee each lessee’s performance. Relying on these bonds, the Company and other investors purchased the leases and CMC’s right to payment under the various surety bonds. CMC (and a related entity, Commercial Servicing Corp. (“CSC”)) eventually stopped forwarding to the Company the required amounts.
On July 20, 2005, Lakeland entered into a settlement agreement with RLI Insurance Company and one remaining party in Lakeland’s claims related to the CMC matter. Pursuant to the settlement agreements Lakeland was paid an aggregate of $3,315,000 and the parties executed mutual releases. As a result of the settlements, Lakeland’s nonperforming assets were reduced by $6.4 million and no additional loan loss provision will be required. The charged-off portion of the lease portfolio was fully reserved for as of June 30, 2005.
Reference is made to the 10-K for a description of a case captioned Ronnie Clayton dba Clayton Trucking, et al v. Ronald Fisher, et al.
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in legal proceedings relating to their respective businesses. While the ultimate outcome of the above mentioned matter cannot be determined at this time, management does not believe that the outcome of any pending legal proceeding will materially affect the consolidated financial position of the Company, but could possibly be material to the results of operations of any one period.
Note 10. Common Stock
On June 15, 2005, the Board of Directors declared a 5% stock dividend, payable on August 16, 2005 to shareholders of record on July 29, 2005. On June 10, 2005, the Company completed purchasing the shares purchasable under the 2004 stock buyback plan. On June 16, 2005, the Company announced a stock buyback plan for the purchase of up to 787,500 shares over the following year. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had purchased 83,708 shares under this plan.
11
PART I — ITEM 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read this section in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. All weighted average, actual shares and per share information set forth in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been adjusted retroactively for the effects of stock dividends including the stock dividend declared on June 15, 2005, payable on August 16, 2005 to shareholders of record on July 29, 2005.
Statements Regarding Forward Looking Information
The information disclosed in this document includes various forward-looking statements that are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to credit quality (including delinquency trends and the allowance for loan and lease losses), corporate objectives, and other financial and business matters. The words “anticipates,” “projects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. The Company cautions that these forward-looking statements are necessarily speculative and speak only as of the date made, and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, all of which may change over time. Actual results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements.
In addition to the factors disclosed by the Company elsewhere in this document, the following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially and adversely from such forward-looking statements: pricing pressures on loan and deposit products; competition; changes in economic conditions nationally, regionally and in the Company’s markets; the extent and timing of actions of the Federal Reserve Board; changes in levels of market interest rates; clients’ acceptance of the Company’s products and services; credit risks of lending activities and competitive factors; changes in the conditions of the capital markets in general and in the capital markets for financial institutions in particular and the impact of the war in Iraq on such markets; the ability of the Company to fully integrate Newton into the Company’s overall business and plans; and the extent and timing of legislative and regulatory actions and reforms.
The above-listed risk factors are not necessarily exhaustive, particularly as to possible future events, and new risk factors may emerge from time to time. Certain events may occur that could cause the Company’s actual results to be materially different than those described in the Company’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any statements made by the Company that are not historical facts should be considered to be forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update and does not undertake to update any of its forward-looking statements made herein.
Significant Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and predominant practices within the banking industry. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, Lakeland, Newton, Lakeland Investment Corp., Lakeland NJ Investment Corp. and Newton Investment Corp. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also affect reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates implicit in these financial statements are as follows:
The principal estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the allowance for loan and lease losses, the analysis of goodwill impairment and the Company’s deferred tax asset. The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses includes, among other factors, an analysis of historical loss rates, by category, applied to current loan totals. However, actual losses may be higher or lower than historical trends, which vary. Actual losses on specified problem loans, which also are provided for in the evaluation, may vary from estimated loss percentages.
The allowance for loan and lease losses is established through a provision for loan and lease losses charged to expense.
12
Loan principal considered to be uncollectible by management is charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. The evaluation takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, specific problem loans, and current economic conditions which may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay. The evaluation also details historical losses by loan category, the resulting loss rates for which are projected at current loan total amounts. Loss estimates for specified problem loans are also detailed. All of the factors considered in the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses may be subject to change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan and lease losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods.
Interest income is accrued as earned on a simple interest basis. Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. When a loan is placed on such non-accrual status, all accumulated accrued interest receivable is reversed out of current period income. Commercial loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest must have both principal and accruing interest adequately secured and must be in the process of collection. Residential mortgage loans are placed on non-accrual status at the time when foreclosure proceedings are commenced except where there exists sufficient collateral to cover the defaulted principal and interest payments, and management’s knowledge of the specific circumstances warrant continued accrual. Consumer loans are generally charged off when principal and interest payments are four months in arrears unless the obligations are well secured and in the process of collection. Interest thereafter on such charged-off consumer loans is taken into income when received only after full recovery of principal.
The Company accounts for impaired loans in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” as amended by SFAS No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan—Income Recognition and Disclosures.” Impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, a creditor may measure impairment based on a loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Regardless of the measurement method, a creditor must measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral when the creditor determines that foreclosure is probable.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences reverse. Deferred tax expense is the result of changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The principal types of differences between assets and liabilities for financial statement and tax return purposes are the allowance for loan and lease losses, deferred loan fees, deferred compensation and securities available for sale.
The Company accounts for goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 includes requirements to test goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment rather than amortize them. The Company has tested its goodwill as of December 31, 2004 and determined that it is not impaired.
Results of Operations
(Second Quarter 2005 Compared to Second Quarter 2004)
Net Income
Net income for the second quarter of 2005 was $5.1 million, compared to $3.7 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $1.4 million or 38%. Diluted earnings per share were $0.24 in second quarter 2005, a $0.02 or 9% increase over what was reported for the same period last year. Return on Average Assets was 0.97% and Return on Average Equity was 10.73% for the second quarter 2005.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for second quarter 2005 was $17.9 million, representing a $3.9 million or 28% increase from the $14.0 million earned in 2004. The increase in net interest income results from an increase in the volume of interest earning assets of $420.6 million. The net interest margin declined from 3.80% in second quarter of 2004 to 3.77% in 2005 because the yield on interest earning assets did not increase as much as the cost of interest bearing liabilities. The components of net interest income will be discussed in greater detail below.
13
The following table reflects the components of the Company’s net interest income, setting forth for the periods presented, (1) average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, (2) interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (3) average yields earned on interest-earning assets and average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (4) the Company’s net interest spread (i.e., the average yield on interest-earning assets less the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities) and (5) the Company’s net interest margin. Rates are computed on a tax equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35%.
CONSOLIDATED STATISTICS ON A TAX EQUIVALENT BASIS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended, June 30, 2005
| | | For the three months ended, June 30, 2004
| |
| | Average Balance
| | | Interest Income/ Expense
| | Average rates earned/ paid
| | | Average Balance
| | | Interest Income/ Expense
| | Average rates earned/ paid
| |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans (A) | | $ | 1,200,439 | | | $ | 18,424 | | 6.16 | % | | $ | 872,408 | | | $ | 12,812 | | 5.91 | % |
Taxable investment securities | | | 596,078 | | | | 5,686 | | 3.82 | % | | | 512,778 | | | | 4,728 | | 3.69 | % |
Tax-exempt securities | | | 93,209 | | | | 1,331 | | 5.71 | % | | | 77,931 | | | | 1,131 | | 5.81 | % |
Federal funds sold (B) | | | 13,637 | | | | 89 | | 2.61 | % | | | 19,626 | | | | 38 | | 0.77 | % |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total interest-earning assets | | | 1,903,363 | | | | 25,530 | | 5.38 | % | | | 1,482,743 | | | | 18,709 | | 5.07 | % |
| | | | | | |
Noninterest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan and lease losses | | | (16,876 | ) | | | | | | | | | (17,247 | ) | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 228,747 | | | | | | | | | | 144,147 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 2,115,234 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,609,643 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings accounts | | $ | 351,297 | | | $ | 473 | | 0.54 | % | | $ | 296,045 | | | $ | 393 | | 0.53 | % |
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | | | 657,618 | | | | 2,453 | | 1.50 | % | | | 546,902 | | | | 1,452 | | 1.07 | % |
Time deposits | | | 393,751 | | | | 2,442 | | 2.48 | % | | | 278,248 | | | | 1,429 | | 2.05 | % |
Borrowings | | | 205,135 | | | | 2,269 | | 4.42 | % | | | 112,654 | | | | 1,443 | | 5.12 | % |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1,607,801 | | | | 7,637 | | 1.90 | % | | | 1,233,849 | | | | 4,717 | | 1.53 | % |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits | | | 304,304 | | | | | | | | | | 256,457 | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 11,022 | | | | | | | | | | 6,723 | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 192,107 | | | | | | | | | | 112,614 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | $ | 2,115,234 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,609,643 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net interest income/spread | | | | | | | 17,893 | | 3.47 | % | | | | | | | 13,992 | | 3.53 | % |
Tax equivalent basis adjustment | | | | | | | 466 | | | | | | | | | | 396 | | | |
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
NET INTEREST INCOME | | | | | | $ | 17,427 | | | | | | | | | $ | 13,596 | | | |
| | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |
|
|
Net interest margin (C) | | | | | | | | | 3.77 | % | | | | | | | | | 3.80 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
(A) | Includes non-accrual loans, the effect of which is to reduce the yield earned on loans, and deferred loan fees. |
(B) | Includes interest-bearing cash accounts. |
(C) | Net interest income divided by interest-earning assets. |
Interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased from $18.7 million in second quarter 2004 to $25.5 million in 2005, an increase of $6.8 million or 36%. The increase in interest income was due to an increase in average earning assets of $420.6 million or 28% from $1.48 billion in second quarter 2004 to $1.90 billion in second quarter 2005. The increase in earning assets included $279.2 million in earning assets acquired in the purchase of Newton. The yield on earning assets increased from 5.07% in second quarter 2004 to 5.38% in second quarter 2005 as a result of the increasing rate environment and because of a change in mix in earning assets. Loans as a percent of earning assets increased from 59% in second quarter 2004 to 63% in 2005 while investment securities as a percent of earning assets decreased from 40% in second quarter 2004 to 36% in second quarter 2005.
14
Total interest expense increased from $4.7 million in second quarter 2004 to $7.6 million in second quarter 2005, an increase of $2.9 million. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $374.0 million (including $211.7 million from the Newton acquisition), and the cost of funds increased 37 basis points to 1.90% due to the increasing rate environment and due to a change in the mix of interest bearing liabilities. Total borrowings increased from $112.7 million, or 9% of interest bearing liabilities, in second quarter 2004 to $205.1 million, or 13% of interest bearing liabilities, in second quarter 2005. The Company borrowed term repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank debt to fund loan growth. These borrowings typically pay a higher rate than the Company’s deposits. Time deposits as a percent of total interest bearing liabilities increased from 23% to 24% during the same time period. Time deposits generally pay a higher rate than core deposits.
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
In determining the provision for loan and lease losses, management considers historical loan loss experience, changes in composition and volume of the portfolio, the level and composition of non-performing loans, the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, and prevailing economic conditions.
The provision for loan losses decreased to $327,000 for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $875,000 for the same period last year as a result of management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The lower provision reflects lower net charge-offs during second quarter 2005 and an improvement in asset quality. During the second quarter of 2005, the Company charged off loans of $635,000 and recovered $379,000 in previously charged off loans compared to $868,000 and $124,000, respectively, during the same period in 2004. For more information regarding the determination of the provision, see “Risk Elements” under “Financial Condition.”
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income increased $396,000 or 12% from second quarter 2004 to second quarter 2005, including $400,000 from the newly acquired Newton branches. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $518,000 or 28% from second quarter 2004 to second quarter 2005 as a result of fee income received from implementing a new overdraft protection product. Gains on sales of investment securities decreased from $413,000 in second quarter 2004 to $100,000 in 2005. Income on bank owned life insurance increased $54,000 or 22% from 2004 as a result of bank owned life insurance acquired in the Newton acquisition. Leasing income increased from $12,000 in second quarter 2004 to $159,000 in 2005 primarily as a result of broker fees received related to our leasing operations.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased from $10.6 million in the second quarter of 2004 to $13.2 million in 2005, an increase of $2.6 million or 25%.Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.6 million from $5.6 million in the second quarter 2004 to $7.1 million in 2005 as a result of additional salaries incurred from the 119 additional employees from the Newton acquisition in the beginning of third quarter 2004, and normal salary and benefit increases. Net occupancy expense and furniture and equipment expense increased from second quarter 2004 to second quarter 2005 by $208,000 and $208,000, respectively, primarily as a result of costs related to the ten branches and administration building acquired in the Newton acquisition. Equipment expense included costs of depreciation and service contracts related to an upgraded computer system installed in fourth quarter 2004 to accommodate the growing organization. Legal fees decreased from $505,000 in the second quarter of 2004 to $224,000 in the second quarter of 2005 resulting from a decline in litigation costs related to the purchased lease pools previously discussed in Note 9. Marketing expense increased from $376,000 in second quarter 2004 to $534,000 in 2005 resulting from expenses related to cable advertising and the Newton acquisition. Core deposit intangible amortization increased from $102,000 in second quarter 2004 to $303,000 in second quarter 2005 as a result of the Newton acquisition. Other expenses increased from $1.8 million in second quarter 2004 to $2.2 million in second quarter 2005, an increase of $446,000. The increase in other expenses includes expenses incurred by the Newton offices and increased telephone expense.
15
(First Six Months of 2005 Compared to First Six Months of 2004)
Net Income
Net income for the first half of 2005 was $9.7 million, compared to $7.3 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $2.4 million or 33%. Diluted earnings per share increased from $0.43 per share in 2004 to $0.45 per share in 2005. Return on Average Assets was 0.92% and Return on Average Equity was 10.15% for the first six months of 2005.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the first six months of 2005 was $36.0 million, representing an $8.0 million or 29% increase from the $28.0 million earned in 2004. The increase in net interest income results from an increase in the volume of interest earning assets of $436.4 million. The net interest margin declined from 3.83% in the first six months of 2004 to 3.81% in 2005. The components of net interest income will be discussed in greater detail below.
The following table reflects the components of the Company’s net interest income, setting forth for the periods presented, (1) average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, (2) interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (3) average yields earned on interest-earning assets and average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (4) the Company’s net interest spread (i.e., the average yield on interest-earning assets less the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities) and (5) the Company’s net interest margin. Rates are computed on a tax equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35%.
16
CONSOLIDATED STATISTICS ON A TAX EQUIVALENT BASIS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended, June 30, 2005
| | | For the six months ended, June 30, 2004
| |
| | Average Balance
| | | Interest Income/ Expense
| | Average rates earned/ paid
| | | Average Balance
| | | Interest Income/ Expense
| | Average rates earned/ paid
| |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans (A) | | $ | 1,186,434 | | | $ | 35,973 | | 6.11 | % | | $ | 861,393 | | | $ | 25,481 | | 5.95 | % |
Taxable investment securities | | | 609,817 | | | | 11,735 | | 3.85 | % | | | 513,010 | | | | 9,741 | | 3.80 | % |
Tax-exempt securities | | | 95,245 | | | | 2,732 | | 5.74 | % | | | 78,907 | | | | 2,307 | | 5.85 | % |
Federal funds sold (B) | | | 13,200 | | | | 220 | | 3.33 | % | | | 14,955 | | | | 48 | | 0.64 | % |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total interest-earning assets | | | 1,904,696 | | | | 50,660 | | 5.35 | % | | | 1,468,265 | | | | 37,577 | | 5.14 | % |
| | | | | | |
Noninterest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan and lease losses | | | (16,809 | ) | | | | | | | | | (17,224 | ) | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 236,959 | | | | | | | | | | 144,613 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 2,124,846 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,595,654 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings accounts | | $ | 353,905 | | | $ | 937 | | 0.53 | % | | $ | 293,194 | | | $ | 778 | | 0.53 | % |
Interest-bearing transaction accounts | | | 675,506 | | | | 4,866 | | 1.45 | % | | | 529,103 | | | | 2,829 | | 1.08 | % |
Time deposits | | | 390,752 | | | | 4,646 | | 2.38 | % | | | 281,783 | | | | 3,054 | | 2.17 | % |
Borrowings | | | 196,098 | | | | 4,221 | | 4.30 | % | | | 121,940 | | | | 2,954 | | 4.85 | % |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1,616,261 | | | | 14,670 | | 1.82 | % | | | 1,226,020 | | | | 9,615 | | 1.57 | % |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits | | | 305,024 | | | | | | | | | | 249,460 | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 10,754 | | | | | | | | | | 7,489 | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 192,807 | | | | | | | | | | 112,685 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 2,124,846 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,595,654 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net interest income/spread | | | | | | | 35,990 | | 3.53 | % | | | | | | | 27,962 | | 3.57 | % |
Tax equivalent basis adjustment | | | | | | | 956 | | | | | | | | | | 808 | | | |
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
NET INTEREST INCOME | | | | | | $ | 35,034 | | | | | | | | | $ | 27,154 | | | |
| | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |
|
|
Net interest margin (C) | | | | | | | | | 3.81 | % | | | | | | | | | 3.83 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
(A) | Includes non-accrual loans, the effect of which is to reduce the yield earned on loans, and deferred loan fees. |
(B) | Includes interest-bearing cash accounts. |
(C) | Net interest income divided by interest-earning assets. |
Interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased from $37.6 million in the first half of 2004 to $50.7 million in 2005, an increase of $13.1 million or 35%. The increase in interest income was due to an increase in average earning assets of $436.4 million or 30% from $1.47 billion in the first six months of 2004 to $1.90 billion in the first six months of 2005. The increase in earning assets included $276.6 million in earning assets acquired in the purchase of Newton. The yield on earning assets increased from 5.14% in the first six months of 2004 to 5.35% in the first six months of 2005 as a result of the increasing rate environment and because of a change in mix in earning assets similar to the change in mix described above in the comparison of the results of operations between second quarter 2005 and 2004.
Total interest expense increased from $9.6 million in the first half of 2004 to $14.7 million in 2005, an increase of $5.1 million. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $390.2 million (including $214.0 million from the Newton acquisition), and the cost of funds increased 25 basis points to 1.82% due to the increasing rate environment and to a change in the mix of interest bearing liabilities. Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts as a percent of interest-bearing liabilities declined while time deposits and borrowings as a percent of interest-bearing liabilities increased.
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan losses decreased to $1.1 million for the first six months of 2005 compared to $1.7 million for the same period last year as a result of management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. During the first six months of 2005, the Company charged off loans of $1.8 million and recovered $582,000 in previously charged off loans compared to $1.6 million and $252,000, respectively, during the same period in 2004. For more information regarding the determination of the provision, see “Risk Elements” under “Financial Condition.”
17
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income increased $1.0 million or 17% from the first half of 2004 to 2005, including $695,000 from the newly acquired Newton branches. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $538,000 or 15% from the first six months of 2004 to the first six months of 2005 resulting from fee income from the overdraft protection program. Commissions and fees increased $108,000 or 8% to $1.5 million from the first six months of 2004 to the first six months of 2005, primarily due to increased loan fees collected and fee income collected at the Newton branches. Increases in income on bank owned life insurance, leasing income and other income resulted from the same factors noted in the comparison of non-interest income between second quarter 2005 and second quarter 2004.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased from $20.9 million in the first six months of 2004 to $26.9 million in 2005, an increase of $6.0 million or 29%.The same factors noted in the comparison of second quarter 2005 interest expenses to those of second quarter 2004 contributed to the increase in non-interest expenses from the first half of 2004 to 2005.
Financial Condition
The Company’s total assets decreased $41.8 million or 2% from $2.141 billion at December 31, 2004, to $2.099 billion at June 30, 2005. Assets decreased as proceeds from maturities and sales of investment securities were used to pay down federal funds purchased and declines in deposits. Total deposits decreased from $1.727 billion on December 31, 2004 to $1.690 billion on June 30, 2005, a decrease of $36.8 million or 2%.
Loans
Gross loans increased from $1.179 billion on December 31, 2004 to $1.219 billion on June 30, 2005, an increase of $40.7 million, or 3%. For more information on the loan portfolio, see Note 5 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Risk Elements
The following schedule sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s non-accrual, past due and renegotiated loans and other real estate owned on the dates presented:
| | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | June 30, 2005
| | December 31, 2004
| | June 30, 2004
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-performing loans: | | | | | | | | | |
Non-accrual loans | | $ | 11,690 | | $ | 13,017 | | $ | 15,748 |
Renegotiated loans | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
TOTAL NON-PERFORMING LOANS | | | 11,690 | | | 13,017 | | | 15,748 |
Other real estate owned | | | 650 | | | 650 | | | — |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
TOTAL NON-PERFORMING ASSETS | | $ | 12,340 | | $ | 13,667 | | $ | 15,748 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing | | $ | 169 | | $ | 2,347 | | $ | 408 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Non-accrual loans decreased from $13.0 million on December 31, 2004 to $11.7 million, or 0.56% of total assets, on June 30, 2005. Of the overall total of loans on non-accrual, $6.4 million or 0.30% of total assets represent the purchased leases that were placed on a non-accrual status in 2002. On July 20, 2005, Lakeland settled with the remaining parties in Lakeland’s claim on the purchased leases. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, Lakeland was paid $3.3 million. As a result
18
of the settlements, Lakeland’s non-performing assets will be reduced by $6.4 million, and no additional loan loss provision will be required. For more information see Note 9—Commitments and Contingencies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing at June 30, 2005 decreased $2.2 million to $169,000. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing are those loans that are both well-secured and in process of collection.
On June 30, 2005, the Company had $10.9 million in impaired loans (including $10.6 million in non-accrual loans) compared to $12.2 million at year-end 2004. For more information on these loans see Note 5 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The impairment of the loans is measured using the present value of future cash flows on certain impaired loans and is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral for the remaining loans. Based on such evaluation, $4.5 million has been allocated to the allowance for loan and lease losses for impairment at June 30, 2005. Impaired loans and the valuation allowance on impaired loans will decline by $6.4 million and by $3.2 million, respectively, resulting from the settlement of the purchased leases discussed above. At June 30, 2005, the Company also had $6.9 million in loans that were rated substandard and not classified as non-performing or impaired.
There were no loans at June 30, 2005, other than those designated non-performing, impaired or substandard, where the Company was aware of any credit conditions of any borrowers or obligors that would indicate a strong possibility of the borrowers not complying with present terms and conditions of repayment and which may result in such loans being included as non-accrual, past due or renegotiated at a future date.
The following table sets forth for the periods presented, the historical relationships among the allowance for loan and lease losses, the provision for loan losses, the amount of loans charged-off and the amount of loan recoveries:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2005
| | | December 31, 2004
| | | June 30, 2004
| |
(dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance of the allowance at the beginning of the year | | $ | 16,638 | | | $ | 16,899 | | | $ | 16,899 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Loans charged off: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 960 | | | | 4,964 | | | | 711 | |
Home Equity and consumer | | | 828 | | | | 1,718 | | | | 861 | |
Real estate—mortgage | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total loans charged off | | | 1,788 | | | | 6,682 | | | | 1,572 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Recoveries: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 384 | | | | 145 | | | | 77 | |
Home Equity and consumer | | | 197 | | | | 363 | | | | 175 | |
Real estate—mortgage | | | 1 | | | | 10 | | | | — | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total Recoveries | | | 582 | | | | 518 | | | | 252 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net charge-offs: | | | 1,206 | | | | 6,164 | | | | 1,320 | |
Addition related to acquisition of Newton | | | — | | | | 2,301 | | | | — | |
Provision for loan and lease losses charged to operations | | | 1,110 | | | | 3,602 | | | | 1,750 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ending balance | | $ | 16,542 | | | $ | 16,638 | | | $ | 17,329 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average loans outstanding | | | 0.20 | % | | | 0.62 | % | | | 0.31 | % |
Ratio of allowance at end of period as a percentage of period end total loans | | | 1.36 | % | | | 1.41 | % | | | 1.94 | % |
The ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to loans outstanding reflects management’s evaluation of the underlying credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses and periodic provisioning for estimated losses included in the consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of management and the Board of Directors. The evaluation process is undertaken on a quarterly basis.
19
Methodology employed for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses consists of the following criteria:
| • | | The establishment of reserve amounts for all specifically identified criticized loans that have been designated as requiring attention by the Company or its external loan review consultant. |
| • | | The establishment of reserves for pools of homogeneous types of loans not subject to specific review, including 1 – 4 family residential mortgages and consumer loans. |
| • | | The establishment of reserve amounts for the non-criticized loans in each portfolio based upon the historical average loss experience of these portfolios. |
Consideration is given to the results of ongoing credit quality monitoring processes, the adequacy and expertise of the Company’s lending staff, underwriting policies, loss histories, delinquency trends, and the cyclical nature of economic and business conditions. Since many of the Company’s loans depend on the sufficiency of collateral as a secondary means of repayment, any adverse trend in the real estate markets could affect underlying values available to protect the Company against loss.
Based upon the process employed and giving recognition to all accompanying factors related to the loan portfolio, management considers the allowance for loan and lease losses to be adequate at June 30, 2005. The preceding statement constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Investment Securities
For detailed information on the composition and maturity distribution of the Company’s investment security portfolio, see Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q. Total investment securities decreased from $745.0 million on December 31, 2004 to $638.4 million on June 30, 2005, a decrease of $106.6 million, or 14% which included sales and maturities of securities used to pay down the Company’s federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, to fund loan growth and to fund a decline in the Company’s municipal deposits. Investment securities available for sale decreased from $582.1 million on December 31, 2004 to $490.9 million on June 30, 2005, a decrease of $91.2 million, or 16%. Investment securities held to maturity decreased from $162.9 million on December 31, 2004 to $147.5 million on June 30, 2005, a decrease of $15.4 million, or 9%.
Deposits
Total deposits decreased from $1.727 billion on December 31, 2004 to $1.690 billion on June 30, 2005, a decrease of $36.8 million, or 2%. Savings and interest bearing transaction accounts decreased from $1.042 billion on December 31, 2004 to $986.4 million on June 30, 2005, a decrease of $55.2 million resulting from a fluctuation in municipal deposits. Total core deposits, which consist of non-interest bearing deposits and savings and interest bearing transaction accounts, decreased by $60.9 million or 4% to $1.300 billion. Core deposits are 77% of total deposits compared to 79% at year-end. Time deposits under $100,000 increased $11.5 million to $281.3 million, while time deposits $100,000 and over increased $12.6 million to $108.6 million. The increase in time deposits resulted from a special certificate of deposit promotion and from increases in municipal certificates of deposits.
Liquidity
Cash and cash equivalents, totaling $79.8 million on June 30, 2005, increased $24.4 million as a result of an increase in interest bearing deposits due from banks. Operating activities, principally the result of the Company’s net income, provided $15.2 million in net cash. Investing activities provided $59.9 million in net cash, primarily reflecting the maturity, repayments and sales of securities exceeding the purchase of securities and the origination of loans. Financing activities used $50.7 million in net cash, reflecting paydowns of federal funds purchased and long-term debt and a decrease in deposits. The Company anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current loan commitments and deposit maturities. This constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. At June 30, 2005, the Company had outstanding loan origination commitments of $328.3 million. These commitments include $288.5 million
20
that mature within one year; $16.9 million that mature after one but within three years; $2.4 million that mature after three but within five years and $20.5 million that mature after five years. The Company also had $12.0 million in letters of credit outstanding at June 30, 2005. This included $11.6 million that are maturing within one year and $421,000 that mature after one but within three years. Time deposits issued in amounts of $100,000 or more maturing within one year total $86.6 million.
Capital Resources
Stockholders’ equity decreased from $194.5 million on December 31, 2004 to $193.9 million on June 30, 2005. Book value per common share increased to $9.05 on June 30, 2005 from $8.96 on December 31, 2004. The decrease in stockholders’ equity from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005 was primarily due to an increase in treasury stock from $10.9 million on December 31, 2004 to $15.3 million on June 30, 2005, resulting from purchasing shares under the Company’s stock buyback program. Also contributing to a decline in equity is the decline in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from $340,000 on December 31, 2004 to ($1.2) million on June 30, 2005 resulting from a decline in the market value of the Company’s available for sale portfolio. Also contributing to the change in stockholders equity was net income, which was partially offset by dividends paid to shareholders.
The Company, Lakeland and Newton are subject to various regulatory capital requirements that are monitored by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can lead to certain supervisory actions by regulators; any supervisory action could have a direct material effect on the Company or its subsidiaries’ financial statements. Management believes, as of June 30, 2005, that the Company, Lakeland and Newton meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The capital ratios for the Company, Lakeland and Newton at June 30, 2005, and the minimum regulatory guidelines for such capital ratios for qualification as a well-capitalized institution are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Tier 1 Capital to Total Average Assets Ratio June 30, 2005
| | | Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio June 30, 2005
| | | Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio June 30, 2005
| |
| | |
Capital Ratios: | | | | | | | | | |
The Company | | 7.70 | % | | 12.12 | % | | 13.37 | % |
Lakeland Bank | | 6.16 | % | | 9.91 | % | | 11.16 | % |
Newton Trust Company | | 11.25 | % | | 15.89 | % | | 16.77 | % |
“Well capitalized” institution under FDIC Regulations | | 5.00 | % | | 6.00 | % | | 10.00 | % |
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company manages interest rate risk and market risk by identifying and quantifying interest rate risk exposures using simulation analysis, economic value at risk models and gap analysis. At June 30, 2005, the cumulative one-year gap was ($56.8) million or (2.7%) of total assets compared to a ($61.4) million or (2.9%) of assets at December 31, 2004.
The Company uses net interest income simulation because the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee believes that the interest rate sensitivity modeling more accurately reflects the effects and exposure to changes in interest rates. Net interest income simulation considers the relative sensitivities of the balance sheet including the effects of interest rate caps on adjustable rate mortgages and the relatively stable aspects of core deposits. As such, net interest simulation is designed to address the probability of interest rate changes and the behavioral response of the balance sheet to those changes. Market Value of Portfolio Equity represents the fair value of the net present value of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items. The Company’s Market Value of Portfolio Equity at June 30, 2005 was $326.2 million.
21
Based on its simulation models, the Company estimates that for a 200 basis point rate shock increase, the Company’s Market Value of Portfolio Equity would decline (8.3%) and would decline (4.0%) for a 200 basis point rate shock decrease. The simulation model also shows that for a 200 basis point rate shock increase, the Company’s projected net interest income for the next 12 months would decrease (2.3%), and would decline (2.1%) for a 200 basis point rate shock decrease. The above information is based on significant estimates and assumptions and constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. For more information regarding the Company’s market risk and assumptions used in the Company’s simulation models, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
ITEM | 4. Controls and Procedures |
(a)Disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
(b)Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As the Company has disclosed in its periodic reports filed with the SEC, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “10-K”), the Company is involved in legal proceedings concerning four separate portfolios of predominately commercial leases which Lakeland purchased from Commercial Money Center, Inc. (“CMC”). CMC obtained surety bonds from three surety companies to guarantee each lessee’s performance. Relying on these bonds, the Company and other investors purchased the leases and CMC’s right to payment under the various surety bonds. CMC (and a related entity, Commercial Servicing Corp. (“CSC”)) eventually stopped forwarding to the Company the required amounts.
On July 20, 2005, Lakeland entered into a settlement agreement with RLI Insurance Company and one remaining party in Lakeland’s claims related to the CMC matter. Pursuant to the settlement agreements Lakeland was paid an aggregate of $3,315,000 and the parties executed mutual releases. As a result of the settlements, Lakeland’s nonperforming assets were reduced by $6.4 million and no additional loan loss provision will be required. The charged-off portion of the lease portfolio was fully reserved for as of June 30, 2005.
Reference is made to the 10-K for a description of a case captioned Ronnie Clayton dba Clayton Trucking, et al v. Ronald Fisher, et al.
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in legal proceedings relating to their respective businesses. While the ultimate outcome of the above mentioned matter cannot be determined at this time, management does not believe that the outcome of any pending legal proceeding will materially affect the consolidated financial position of the Company, but could possibly be material to the results of operations of any one period.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In January 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock buyback plan for the purchase of up to 262,500 shares of the Company’s currently issued and outstanding common stock in 2004. Purchases under the stock buyback program may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. On July 15, 2004, the amount of shares purchasable in the stock buyback plan was increased to 525,000 to be purchased over the following year. On June 10, 2005, the Company completed purchasing the shares purchasable under the 2004 stock buyback plan. On June 16, 2005, the Company announced a stock buyback plan for the purchase of up to 787,500 shares over the following year. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had purchased 83,708 shares under this plan.
Information concerning the 2005 stock repurchases is set forth below.
| | | | | | | | | |
Period | | (a) Total number of Shares (or Units) Purchased
| | (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)
| | (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
| | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
Month 4: April 1 through 30, 2005 | | 63,000 | | $ | 14.19 | | 63,000 | | 105,198 |
Month 5: May 1 through 31, 2005 | | 66,150 | | $ | 15.00 | | 66,150 | | 39,048 |
Month 6: June 1 through 30, 2005 | | 122,756 | | $ | 14.19 | | 122,756 | | 703,791 |
23
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities Not Applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The following table shows the persons who were elected to the board of directors at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders held May 10, 2005. Also shown are their terms of office and the results of voting for each respective director.
| | | | | | |
Name
| | Term
| | Shares for:
| | Authority Withheld
|
Robert B. Nicholson, III | | 3 years | | 16,668,145 | | 696,420 |
Roger Bosma | | 3 years | | 16,724,334 | | 640,232 |
Mark J. Fredericks | | 3 years | | 16,623,999 | | 740,566 |
George H. Guptill, Jr. | | 3 years | | 16,662,042 | | 702,524 |
Janeth D. Hendershot | | 3 years | | 16,696,795 | | 667,770 |
Robert E. McCracken | | 2 years | | 16,690,026 | | 674,540 |
Paul G. Viall | | 2 years | | 16,658,031 | | 706,534 |
The second proposal, to adopt Lakeland Bancorp, Inc.’s Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Compensation Program, was approved. The vote was as follows:
| | | | | | |
For:
| | Against:
| | Abstain:
| | Broker Non-Vote
|
11,636,001 | | 1,290,356 | | 585,577 | | 3,852,031 |
The third proposal, to amend Lakeland Bancorp, Inc.’s Certificate of Incorporation to limit the personal liability of officers for monetary damages under the circumstances permitted by law and to clarify that the Company may pay expenses incurred by an officer in advance of a final disposition of a legal proceeding as permitted by New Jersey law, was approved. The vote was as follows:
| | | | |
For:
| | Against:
| | Abstain:
|
16,569,638 | | 573,601 | | 221,325 |
There were no Broker Non-Votes on the third proposal.
Item 5. Other Information Not Applicable
Item 6. Exhibits
| 31.1 Certification | by Roger Bosma pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. |
| 31.2 Certification | by Joseph F. Hurley pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. |
| 32.1 Certification | by Roger Bosma and Joseph F. Hurley pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Lakeland Bancorp, Inc. |
(Registrant) |
|
/s/ Roger Bosma
|
Roger Bosma |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
/s/ Joseph F. Hurley
|
Joseph F. Hurley |
Executive Vice President and |
Chief Financial Officer |
August 8, 2005
Date
25