Fuel Tech (FTEK) 10-Q 2010 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission file number: 001-33059

FUEL TECH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	20-5657551
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Fuel Tech, Inc.
27601 Bella Vista Parkway
Warrenville, IL 60555-1617
630-845-4500

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filero	Accelerated filerþ	Non-accelerated filero	Smaller reporting companyo
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ

On November 1, 2010 there were outstanding 24,213,467 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant.

FUEL TECH, INC.
Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010

INDEX

	Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three- and Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine- Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		3
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		17
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		17
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		18
Item 1A. Risk Factors		18
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		18
Item 6. Exhibits		18
SIGNATURES		19
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

FUEL TECH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Note B)
Assets
Current assets:
Restricted cash	$	—		$	200
Cash and cash equivalents		23,895			20,965
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $72 and $70, respectively		22,312			17,877
Inventories		901			450
Deferred income taxes		636			636
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,377			2,294
Total current assets		50,121			42,422
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $16,498 and $14,562, respectively		14,290			15,549
Goodwill		21,051			21,051
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $3,481 and $2,817, respectively		6,225			6,749
Deferred income taxes		5,482			4,183
Other assets		2,557			2,308
Total assets	$	99,726		$	92,262
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	$	2,239		$	2,925
Accounts payable		6,657			5,824
Accrued liabilities:
Employee compensation		2,090			671
Other accrued liabilities		3,688			2,424
Total current liabilities		14,674			11,844
Other liabilities		2,348			2,196
Total liabilities		17,022			14,040
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 24,213,467 and 24,211,967 shares issued, respectively		242			242
Additional paid-in capital		129,238			125,458
Accumulated deficit		(47,109	)		(47,828	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		257			269
Nil coupon perpetual loan notes		76			81
Total shareholders’ equity		82,704			78,222
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	99,726		$	92,262

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

FUEL TECH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per-share data)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30						September 30
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Revenues	$	20,279		$	16,475		$	56,798		$	52,714
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		11,496			10,034			32,063			31,786
Selling, general and administrative		7,808			8,000			23,306			25,130
(Gain) from revaluation of contingent performance obligation		(768	)		(781	)		(768	)		(781	)
Research and development		264			160			575			391
		18,800			17,413			55,176			56,526
Operating income (loss)		1,479			(938	)		1,622			(3,812	)
Interest expense		(33	)		(27	)		(110	)		(83	)
Interest income		4			7			6			30
Other income (expense)		89			(4	)		(169	)		(166	)
Income (loss) before taxes		1,539			(962	)		1,349			(4,031	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(722	)		264			(627	)		1,493
Net income (loss)	$	817		$	(698	)		722		$	(2,538	)
Net income (loss) per Common Share:
Basic	$	0.03		$	(0.03	)	$	0.03		$	(0.11	)
Diluted	$	0.03		$	(0.03	)	$	0.03		$	(0.11	)
Weighted-average number of Common Shares outstanding:
Basic		24,213,000			24,142,000			24,213,000			24,127,000
Diluted		24,381,000			24,142,000			24,401,000			24,127,000

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

FUEL TECH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)
(in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30
	2010			2009
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	4,654		$	7,502
Investing activities
Acquisition of business		—			(20,186	)
Decrease (Increase) in restricted cash		200			(881	)
Purchases of property, equipment and intangible assets		(1,305	)		(1,774	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,105	)		(22,841	)
Financing activities
(Repayment of) proceeds from short-term borrowings		(686	)		5
Issuance of deferred shares		74			63
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants		10			251
Redemption of nil coupon loan note		(5	)		—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(607	)		319
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash		(12	)		74
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,930			(14,946	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		20,965			28,149
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	23,895		$	13,203

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

FUEL TECH, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)

Note A: Nature of Business

Fuel Tech, Inc. (Fuel Tech or the Company or “we”, “us”, or “our”) is a fully integrated company that uses a suite of advanced technologies to provide boiler optimization, efficiency improvement and air pollution reduction and control solutions to utility and industrial customers worldwide. Originally incorporated in 1987 under the laws of the Netherlands Antilles as Fuel-Tech N.V., Fuel Tech became domesticated in the United States on September 30, 2006, and continues as a Delaware corporation with its corporate headquarters at 27601 Bella Vista Parkway, Warrenville, Illinois, 60555-1617. Fuel Tech maintains an Internet website at www.ftek.com. Fuel Tech’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (Exchange Act), are made available through our website as soon as reasonably practical after electronically filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also available on Fuel Tech’s website are the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, as well as the charters of the Audit and Compensation & Nominating committees of the Board of Directors. All of these documents are available in print without charge to stockholders who request them. Information on our website is not incorporated into this report.

Fuel Tech’s special focus is the worldwide marketing of its nitrogen oxide (NOx) reduction and FUEL CHEM^® processes. The Air Pollution Control (APC) technology segment reduces NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers, incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources by utilizing combustion optimization techniques and Low NOx and Ultra low NOx burners; over-fire air systems, NOxOUT^®and HERT^™ High Energy Reagent Technology™ SNCR systems; systems that incorporate ASCR^™ (Advanced Selective Catalytic Reduction) technology including CASCADE^™; ULTRA^™and NOxOUT-SCR^®processes; and Ammonia Injection Grids (AIG) and the Graduated Straightening Grid (GSG™). The FUEL CHEM^® technology segment improves the efficiency, reliability and environmental status of combustion units by controlling slagging, fouling and corrosion, as well as the formation of sulfur trioxide, ammonium bisulfate, particulate matter (PM_2.5), carbon dioxide, NOx and unburned carbon in fly ash through the addition of chemicals into the fuel or via TIFI^® Targeted In-Furnace Injection™ programs. Fuel Tech has other technologies, both commercially available and in the development stage, all of which are related to APC and FUEL CHEM technology segments or are similar in their technological base. Fuel Tech’s business is materially dependent on the continued existence and enforcement of worldwide air quality regulations.

Note B: Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the balance sheet and results of operations for the periods covered have been included and all significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The results of operations of all acquired businesses have been consolidated for all periods subsequent to the date of acquisition.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Fuel Tech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

4

Note C: Revenue Recognition Policy

Revenues from the sales of chemical products are recorded when title transfers, either at the point of shipment or at the point of destination, depending on the contract with the customer.

Fuel Tech uses the percentage of completion method of accounting for equipment construction and license contracts that are sold within the APC technology segment. Under the percentage of completion method, revenues are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual construction costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. Revisions in completion estimates and contract values in the period in which the facts giving rise to the revisions become known can influence the timing of when revenues are recognized under the percentage of completion method of accounting. Provisions are made for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in the period in which such losses are determined. As of September 30, 2010 the Company had one construction contract in progress that was identified as a loss contract in the amount of $499.

Fuel Tech’s APC contracts are typically six to twelve months in length. A typical contract will have three or four critical operational measurements that, when achieved, serve as the basis for us to invoice the customer via progress billings. At a minimum, these measurements will include the generation of engineering drawings, the shipment of equipment and the completion of a system performance test.

As part of a majority of its contractual APC project agreements, Fuel Tech will agree to customer-specific acceptance criteria that relate to the operational performance of the system that is being sold. These criteria are determined based on mathematical modeling that is performed by Fuel Tech personnel, which is based on operational inputs that are provided by the customer. The customer will warrant that these operational inputs are accurate as they are specified in the binding contractual agreement. Further, the customer is solely responsible for the accuracy of the operating condition information; all performance guarantees and equipment warranties granted by us are void if the operating condition information is inaccurate or is not met.

Fuel Tech has installed over 580 units with APC technology. As part of the project implementation process, we perform system start-up and optimization services that effectively serve as a test of actual project performance. We believe that this test, combined with the accuracy of the modeling that is performed, enables revenue to be recognized prior to the receipt of formal customer acceptance.

Accounts receivable includes unbilled receivables, representing revenues recognized in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts under the percentage of completion method of accounting. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, unbilled receivables were approximately $10,417 and $7,814, respectively. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts were $302 and $316, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Such amounts are included in other accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

Note D: Cost of Sales

Cost of sales includes all internal and external engineering costs, equipment and chemical charges, inbound and outbound freight expenses, internal and site transfer costs, installation charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, project personnel travel expenses and other direct and indirect expenses specifically identified as project- or product line-related, as appropriate (e.g., test equipment depreciation and certain insurance expenses). Certain depreciation and amortization expenses related to tangible and intangible assets, respectively, are also allocated to cost of sales.

Note E: Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include the following categories except where an allocation to the cost of sales line item is warranted due to the project- or product-line nature of a portion of the expense category: salaries and wages, employee benefits, non-project travel, insurance, legal, rent, accounting and auditing, recruiting, telephony, employee training, Board of Directors’ fees, auto rental, office supplies, dues and subscriptions, utilities, real estate taxes, commissions and bonuses, marketing materials, postage and business taxes. Departments comprising the selling, general and administrative line item primarily include the functions of executive management, finance and accounting, investor relations, regulatory affairs, marketing, business development, information technology, human resources, sales, legal and general administration.

5

Note F: Earnings per Share Data

Basic earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options and warrants and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. The following table sets forth the weighted-average shares used in calculating the earnings per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30				September 30
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Basic weighted-average shares		24,213		24,142		24,213		24,127
Conversion of unsecured loan notes		7		—		7		—
Unexercised options and warrants		161		—		181		—
Diluted weighted-average shares		24,381		24,142		24,401		24,127

Note G: Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Total comprehensive income (loss) for Fuel Tech is comprised of net income (loss) and the impact of foreign currency translation as follows:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30					September 30
	2010		2009			2010			2009
Comprehensive income ( loss):
Net income (loss)	$	817	$	(698	)	$	722		$	(2,538	)
Foreign currency translation		105		39			(12	)		74
	$	922	$	(659	)	$	710		$	(2,464	)

6

Note H: Stock-Based Compensation

Fuel Tech has a stock-based employee compensation plan, referred to as the Fuel Tech, Inc. Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan), under which awards may be granted to participants in the form of Non-Qualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Performance Awards, Bonuses or other forms of share-based or non-share-based awards or combinations thereof. Participants in the Incentive Plan may be Fuel Tech’s directors, officers, employees, consultants or advisors (except consultants or advisors in capital-raising transactions) as the directors determine are key to the success of Fuel Tech’s business. The amount of shares that may be issued or reserved for awards to participants under a 2004 amendment to the Incentive Plan is 12.5% of outstanding shares calculated on a diluted basis. At September 30, 2010, Fuel Tech has 493,000 stock options available for issuance under the Incentive Plan.

Fuel Tech utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock option grants. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 of $1,176 and $3,695, respectively. Fuel Tech recorded $1,462 and $4,628 in stock-based compensation expense for the comparable periods in 2009.

The awards granted under the Incentive Plan have a 10-year life and they vest as follows: 50% after the second anniversary of the award date, 25% after the third anniversary, and the final 25% after the fourth anniversary of the award date. Fuel Tech calculates stock compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the award and recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the four-year service period of the award.

The principal variable assumptions utilized in valuing options and the methodology for estimating such model inputs include: (1) risk-free interest rate – an estimate based on the yield of zero–coupon treasury securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option; (2) expected volatility – an estimate based on the historical volatility of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock for a period equal to the expected life of the option; and (3) expected life of the option – an estimate based on historical experience including the effect of employee terminations.

Based on the results of the model, the weighted-average fair value of the stock options granted during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 was $3.30 per share using the following assumptions:

	2010
Expected dividend yield		0.00	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.74	%
Expected volatility		63.27	%
Expected life of option	5.9 years

7

Stock option activity for Fuel Tech’s Incentive Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as follows:

	Number			Weighted-		Weighted-Average
	of			Average		Remaining	Aggregate Intrinsic
	Options			Exercise Price		Contractual Term	Value
Outstanding on January 1, 2010		3,051,125		$	15.28
Granted		110,000			5.71
Exercised		(1,500	)		6.35
Expired or forfeited		(263,500	)		17.00
Outstanding on September 30, 2010		2,896,125			14.77	6.2 years	$	999
Exercisable on September 30, 2010		2,146,875			14.50	5.6 years	$	987

Non-vested stock award activity for all plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as follows:

	Non-vested Stock Outstanding
Outstanding on January 1, 2010		1,267,125
Granted		110,000
Released		(394,625	)
Expired or forfeited		(233,250	)
Outstanding on September 30, 2010		749,250

As of September 30, 2010, there was $4,434 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Incentive Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of four years.

In addition to the Incentive Plan, Fuel Tech has a Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Deferred Plan). This Deferred Plan, as originally approved, provided for deferral of directors’ fees in the form of either cash with interest or as “phantom stock” units, in either case, however, to be paid out only as cash and not as stock at the elected time of payout. In the second quarter of 2007, Fuel Tech obtained stockholder approval for an amendment to the Deferred Plan to provide that instead of phantom stock units paid out only in cash, the deferred stock unit compensation may be paid out in shares of Fuel Tech Common Stock. Under the guidance of ASC 718-10, this plan modification required that Fuel Tech account for awards under the plan for the receipt of Fuel Tech Common Stock as equity awards as opposed to liability awards. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, Fuel Tech recorded stock-based compensation expense of $73 and $63, respectively, with a credit of the same amount to additional paid-in capital representing the fair value of the stock awards granted.

At September 30, 2010, Fuel Tech had 2,310,738 stock options with exercise prices per share that were not dilutive for the purpose of inclusion in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

Note I: Debt

On June 30, 2009, Fuel Tech entered into a $25,000 revolving credit facility (the Facility) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (JPM Chase). The Facility has a term of two years through June 30, 2011, is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread range of 250 basis points to 375 basis points, as determined under a formula related to the Company’s leverage ratio, and

8

has the Company’s Italian subsidiary, Fuel Tech S.r.l., as a guarantor. Fuel Tech can use this Facility for cash advances and standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings on this Facility.

At its inception, the Facility contained several debt covenants with which the Company must comply on a quarterly or annual basis, including: an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000 and a minimum net income for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 of $750. For subsequent periods, the Facility covenants included an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000, a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.75:1.0 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 and a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.5:1.0 for all succeeding quarterly periods until the facility expires. Maximum funded debt is defined as all borrowed funds, outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees. EBITDA includes after tax earnings with add backs for interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expenses. In addition, the Company must maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $42,000, adjusted upward for 50% of net income generated and 100% of all capital issuances.

As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants of the Facility, including a year-to-date capital expenditure amount of $1,305 and a tangible net worth amount of $55,428 which was above the required amount of $51,869 by $3,560.

Beijing Fuel Tech Environmental Technologies Company, Ltd. (Beijing Fuel Tech), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fuel Tech, has a revolving credit facility (the China Facility) agreement with JPM Chase for RMB 45 million (approximately $6,700), which expires on June 30, 2011. The facility is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 120% of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) Base Rate (approximately 5.83% at September 30, 2010) and does not contain any material debt covenants. Beijing Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances and bank guarantees. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Beijing Fuel Tech has borrowings outstanding in the amounts of $2,239 and $2,925, respectively.

At September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees, predominantly to customers, totaling approximately $1,218 in connection with contracts in process. Fuel Tech is committed to reimbursing the issuing bank for any payments made by the bank under these instruments. At September 30, 2010, there were no cash borrowings under the revolving credit facility and approximately $23,781 was available.

In the event of default on either the Facility or the China Facility, the cross default feature in each allows the lending bank to accelerate the payment of any amounts outstanding and may, under certain circumstances, allow the bank to cancel the facility. If the Company were unable to obtain a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts, such acceleration may cause the Company’s cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were insufficient to satisfy the payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to satisfy the accelerated payment.

Note J: Business Segment and Geographic Disclosures

Fuel Tech segregates its financial results into two reportable segments representing two broad technology segments as follows:

• The Air Pollution Control technology segment, which includes the Low-and Ultra Low NOx Burners, Over-Fire Air systems, HERT system, NOxOUT^®, CASCADE^™, AIG, GSG^™, ULTRA^™ and NOxOUT-SCR^® processes for the reduction of NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers, incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources; and

• The FUEL CHEM^® technology segment, which uses chemical processes for the control of slagging, fouling, corrosion, opacity, acid plume and sulfur trioxide-related issues in furnaces and boilers through the addition of chemicals into the fuel using TIFI^® Targeted In-Furnace Injection^™ technology.

The “Other” classification includes those profit and loss items not allocated by Fuel Tech to each reportable segment. Further, there are no intersegment sales that require elimination.

Fuel Tech evaluates performance and allocates resources based on reviewing gross margin by reportable segment. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Fuel Tech does not review assets by reportable segment, but rather, in aggregate for Fuel Tech as a whole.

9

Three months ended	Air Pollution
September 30, 2010	Control Segment		FUEL CHEM Segment		Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	10,252	$	10,027	$	—		$	20,279
Cost of sales		6,735		4,761		—			11,496
Gross margin		3,517		5,266		—			8,783
Selling, general and administrative		—		—		7,808			7,808
(Gain) from revaluation of contingent performance obligation		—		—		(768	)		(768	)
Research and development		—		—		264			264
Operating income (loss)	$	3,517	$	5,266	$	(7,304	)	$	1,479

Three months ended	Air Pollution
September 30, 2009	Control Segment		FUEL CHEM Segment		Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	6,182	$	10,293	$	—		$	16,475
Cost of sales		4,089		5,945		—			10,034
Gross margin		2,093		4,348		—			6,441
Selling, general and administrative		—		—		8,000			8,000
(Gain) from revaluation of contingent performance obligation		—		—		(781	)		(781	)
Research and development		—		—		160			160
Operating income (loss)	$	2,093	$	4,348	$	(7,379	)	$	(938	)

Nine months ended	Air Pollution
September 30, 2010	Control Segment		FUEL CHEM Segment		Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	27,757	$	29,041	$	—		$	56,798
Cost of sales		18,039		14,024		—			32,063
Gross margin		9,718		15,017		—			24,735
Selling, general and administrative		—		—		23,306			23,306
(Gain) from revaluation of contingent performance obligation		—		—		(768	)		(768	)
Research and development		—		—		575			575
Operating income (loss)	$	9,718	$	15,017	$	(23,113	)	$	1,622

Nine months ended	Air Pollution
September 30, 2009	Control Segment		FUEL CHEM Segment		Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	24,179	$	28,535	$	—		$	52,714
Cost of sales		15,096		16,690		—			31,786
Gross margin		9,083		11,845		—			20,928
Selling, general and administrative		—		—		25,130			25,130
(Gain) from revaluation of contingent performance obligation		—		—		(781	)		(781	)
Research and development		—		—		391			391
Operating income (loss)	$	9,083	$	11,845	$	(24,740	)	$	(3,812	)

10

Information concerning Fuel Tech’s operations by geographic area is provided below. Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer. Assets are those directly associated with operations of the geographic area.

	Three months ended September 30				Nine months ended September 30
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Revenues:
United States	$	17,015	$	14,054	$	46,517	$	43,114
Foreign		3,264		2,421		10,281		9,600
	$	20,279	$	16,475	$	56,798	$	52,714
					September 30,		December 31,
					2010		2009
Assets:
United States					$	88,425	$	82,261
Foreign						11,301		10,001
					$	99,726	$	92,262

Note K: Contingencies

Fuel Tech issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers. Fuel Tech’s recognition of warranty liability is based, generally, on analyses of warranty claims experience in the preceding years. Our recognition of warranty liability is based primarily on analyses of warranty claims experienced in the preceding years as the nature of our historical product sales for which we offer a warranty are substantially unchanged. This approach provides an aggregate warranty accrual that is historically aligned with actual warranty claims experienced.

Changes in the warranty liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are summarized below:

Aggregate product warranty liability at January 1, 2010	$	199
Aggregate accruals related to product warranties		100
Aggregate reductions for payments		97
Aggregate product warranty liability at September 30, 2010	$	202

Note L: Income Tax

Fuel Tech had unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 in the amount of $870. This amount included $840 of unrecognized tax benefits which, if ultimately recognized, will reduce Fuel Tech’s annual effective tax rate. There have been no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

11

Note M: Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that expands the required disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance provides for new disclosures requiring the Company to (i) disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and (ii) present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. This guidance also provides clarification of existing disclosures requiring the Company to (i) determine each class of assets and liabilities based on the nature and risks of the investments rather than by major security type and (ii) for each class of assets and liabilities, disclose the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. This guidance became effective for Fuel Tech on January 1, 2010, except for the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements, which is effective for Fuel Tech on January 1, 2011, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The guidance pertaining to the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note N: Business Acquisitions

Fuel Tech accounts for its acquisitions as purchases in accordance with ASC 805. Accordingly, in connection with each acquisition, the purchase price is allocated to the estimated fair values of all acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities as of the date of the acquisition.

Advanced Combustion Technology, Inc.

On January 5, 2009, Fuel Tech completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Advanced Combustion Technology, Inc. (ACT or the ACT Acquisition) for approximately $22,500 in cash, including transaction costs, plus future consideration if certain financial performance is achieved. In connection with the final determination of the Adjustment Calculation (as defined in the asset purchase agreement) related to the net working capital amount, Fuel Tech paid ACT an additional $1,523 on July 23, 2009. All of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. Operating results related to the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of ACT and all of the related goodwill are reported as part of the APC Technology segment. Acquisition related costs, including out-of-pocket expenses related to the transaction, were insignificant.

Below is a breakdown of amounts recognized as of the acquisition date for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of the Company’s acquisition of ACT:

Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Accounts receivable	$	5,928
Identifiable intangible assets		5,817
Other assets		247
Contingent consideration		2,307
Accounts payable		(2,673	)
Other current liabilities		(402	)
Total identifiable net assets		8,917
Goodwill		15,880
Total net assets recorded	$	24,797

At March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a contingent consideration accrual representing the fair value of future consideration expected to be paid in connection with the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of ACT of $2,307. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay ACT a pro rata amount of up to $4,000 annually for the achievement of

12

a minimum annual gross margin dollar level (the Hurdle) of $10,000, $11,000 and $12,000 in fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. In addition, the Company is required to pay ACT thirty-five percent (35%) of all qualifying gross margin dollars above the annual Hurdle rate for each of the three years. The potential undiscounted amount of all future payments that the Company could be required to make under the contingent consideration arrangement is between $0 and $4,000 in any one year, and $0 and $12,000 in total, not including the amount related to the thirty-five percent (35%) sharing of qualifying gross margin dollars above the pre-determined Hurdle. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement of $2,307 was calculated using a probability of payout for each of the three years and included only twenty-five percent (25%) of the weighted-average, probable three-year aggregate payout as up to seventy-five percent (75%) of the contingent consideration is subject to forfeiture.

The Company periodically evaluates the probability that payment of the contingent consideration accrual is probable based on a range of outcomes and assumptions used to develop the estimates. Based upon this analysis, management concluded during the September 30, 2010 quarter that the payout for 2010 was not probable of being made. Thus, the Company recorded a gain of $768 from the revaluation of the contingent liability. A similar adjustment was made in the corresponding period during 2009 for $781.

Note O: Goodwill

Goodwill is allocated to each of Fuel Tech’s reporting units after considering the nature of the net assets giving rise to the goodwill and how each reporting unit would enjoy the benefits and synergies of the net assets acquired. Fuel Tech has two reporting units which are reported in the FUEL CHEM segment and the APC technology segment. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, goodwill allocated to the FUEL CHEM technology segment was $1,723 and $1,723, respectively, while goodwill allocated to the APC Technology segment was $19,328 and $19,328, respectively.

13

FUEL TECH, INC.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

Consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased by $3,804 (23%) to $20,279 from $16,475. Consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased by $4,084 (8%) to $56,798 from $52,714. Domestic revenues for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 increased by $2,961 (21%) and $3,403 (8%), respectively, while our foreign revenues for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 also increased by $843 (35%) and $681 (7%), respectively.

The Air Pollution Control (APC) technology segment revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased $4,070 (66%) to $10,252 from $6,182. The APC technology segment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased by 3,579 (15%) to $27,757 from $24,179. The APC technology segment revenue is reflective of the timing of recognition of prior period bookings and work progress on construction projects. This segment remains uniquely positioned to capitalize on the next phase of increasingly stringent U.S. air quality standards, specifically on NOx control. Interest in Fuel Tech’s suite of pollution control technologies, on both a new and retrofit basis, remains strong, both domestically and abroad.

Consolidated APC technology segment backlog at September 30, 2010 was $20,305 versus backlog at September 30, 2009 of approximately $11,149. We currently anticipate that a large portion of the backlog as of September 30, 2010 will be recognized as revenue in fiscal 2010, although the timing of such revenue recognition in 2010 is subject to the timing of the expenses incurred on existing projects and customer scheduling.

The FUEL CHEM technology segment revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 decreased $266 (3%) to $10,027 from $10,293. The FUEL CHEM technology segment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased by $506 (2%) to $29,041 from $28,535. Our nine-month revenue total includes a one-time risk share payment relating to a successful demonstration performed in the prior year. We believe the marketplace acceptance for Fuel Tech’s patented TIFI^® Targeted In-Furnace Injection™ technology remains strong, particularly on coal-fired units which represents the largest market opportunity for the technology.

Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 decreased by 4% to 57% from 61%. The cost of sales percentage for the APC technology segment of 66% did not change from the prior year. Our APC technology segment cost of sales remains slightly above our historical cost of sales percentages due to a large system installation that has a significant construction component that will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2010 for which the Company will receive lower profit margins than a typical APC equipment sale. For the FUEL CHEM technology segment, the cost of sales percentage decreased by 11% to 47% from 58%. This decrease was primarily due to international demonstration costs that were incurred in the second quarter of 2009 and the one-time risk share payment mentioned above.

Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 decreased by 4% to 56% from 60%. The cost of sales percentage for the APC technology segment increased to 65% from 62%. For the FUEL CHEM technology segment, the cost of sales percentage decreased to 48% from 58%. This decrease was primarily due to recognition of the one-time risk share payment mentioned above.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 decreased by $192 (2%) to $7,808 from $8,000. SG&A for the nine-month periods ending September 30, 2010 and 2009 decreased by $1,824 (7%) to $23,306 from $25,130. The $1,824 decrease for the nine month period is comprised of $1,250 relating to the reallocation of corporate resources, $912 for stock compensation expense, $325 for costs relating to the administration of foreign offices, $341 for fees to outside service providers, and $146 for depreciation relating to a fully capitalized leasehold improvement. Partially offsetting this amount is $844 of additional expense related to corporate incentive plans and $287 in additional recruiting fees for executive officer positions.

The Company recorded a one-time gain of $768 from the revaluation of the contingent liability recorded in connection with the ACT Acquisition in January 2009. The $768 had been recorded in the first quarter of 2009 as part of a $2,307 contingent consideration accrual representing the fair value, weighted-average probability of future consideration expected to be paid in

14

connection with the ACT Acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2010, management has concluded that an earnout payment related to the ACT Acquisition for fiscal 2009 is not probable, thus the $768 portion of the total contingent liability that related to 2010 was reversed.

Research and development (R&D) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased to $264 from $160, while R&D expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 also increased to $575 from $391. The Company’s increased R&D costs are due primarily to expenditures made relating to new FUEL CHEM product offerings.

Interest expense for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 totaled $33 and $110, respectively, and relates to borrowings for the Beijing Fuel Tech Facility. A portion of the borrowings was repaid during the second quarter of 2010.

The income tax expense (benefit) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled $722 and ($264), while the income tax expense (benefit) for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled 627 and ($1,493), respectively. We are projecting a consolidated effective tax rate of 46.5% for 2010.

Liquidity and Sources of Capital

At September 30, 2010, Fuel Tech had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments on hand of $23,895 and working capital of $35,447 versus $20,965 and $30,578 at December 31, 2009, respectively.

Operating activities provided $4,654 of cash during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the add back of non-cash items including stock compensation expense of $3,695, depreciation expense of $2,440, amortization expense of $665, and an increase in other noncurrent liabilities of $3,602. Partially offsetting these items was a decrease in income tax provision of $1,298, a decrease of $4,435 in accounts receivable, and the reduction of a contingent consideration accrual of $768 related to the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of ACT.

Investing activities used cash of $1,105 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This amount is comprised of two items: capital expenditures of $1,305, primarily to support and enhance the operations of the FUEL CHEM technology segment, and a decrease of restricted cash of $200.

On June 30, 2009, Fuel Tech entered into a $25,000 revolving credit facility (the Facility) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (JPM Chase). The Facility has a term of two years through June 30, 2011, is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread range of 250 basis points to 375 basis points, as determined under a formula related to the Company’s leverage ratio, and has the Company’s Italian subsidiary, Fuel Tech S.r.l., as a guarantor. Fuel Tech can use this Facility for cash advances and standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings on this Facility.

At its inception, the Facility contained several debt covenants with which the Company must comply on a quarterly or annual basis, including: an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000 and a minimum net income for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 of $750. For subsequent periods, the Facility covenants included an annual capital expenditure limited of $10,000, a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.75:1.0 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 and a maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.5:1.0 for all succeeding quarterly periods until the facility expires. Maximum funded debt is defined as all borrowed funds, outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees. EBITDA includes after tax earnings with add backs for interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expenses. In addition, the Company must maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $42,000, adjusted upward for 50% of net income generated and 100% of all capital issuances.

As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants of the Facility, including a year-to-date capital expenditure amount of $663 and a tangible net worth amount of $55,428 which was above the required amount of $51,869 by $3,560.

Beijing Fuel Tech Environmental Technologies Company, Ltd. (Beijing Fuel Tech), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fuel Tech, has a revolving credit facility (the China Facility) agreement with JPM Chase for RMB 45 million (approximately $6,600), which expires on June 30, 2011. The facility is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 120% of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) Base Rate and does not contain any material debt covenants. Beijing Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances and bank guarantees. As of September 30, 2010, Beijing Fuel Tech has borrowings outstanding in the amount $2,239, which bears interest at 5.83% .

15

At September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees, predominantly to customers, totaling approximately $1,218 in connection with contracts in process. Fuel Tech is committed to reimbursing the issuing bank for any payments made by the bank under these instruments. At September 30, 2010, there were no cash borrowings under the revolving credit facility and approximately $23,782 was available.

In the event of default on either the Facility or the China Facility, the cross default feature in each allows the lending bank to accelerate the payment of any amounts outstanding and may, under certain circumstances, allow the bank to cancel the facility. If the Company were unable to obtain a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts, such acceleration may cause the Company’s cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were insufficient to satisfy the payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to satisfy the accelerated payment.

The Company utilized cash from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $607, primarily from the repayment of a portion of the debt outstanding for the China facility. Partially offsetting this amount was $74 from non-cash stock-based compensation from the issuance of directors’ deferred shares of stock.

In the opinion of management, Fuel Tech’s expected near-term revenue growth will be driven by the timing of penetration of the utility marketplace via utilization of its TIFI technology, by utility and industrial entities’ adherence to the NOx reduction requirements of the various domestic environmental regulations, and by the expansion of both business segments in non-U.S. geographies. Fuel Tech expects its liquidity requirements to be met by the operating results generated from these activities.

Contingencies and Contractual Obligations

Fuel Tech issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers as discussed in Note K. The change in the warranty liability balance during the three months ended September 30, 2010 was not material.

16

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and reflect Fuel Tech’s current expectations regarding future growth, results of operations, cash flows, performance and business prospects, and opportunities, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. Fuel Tech has tried to identify forward-looking statements by using words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “will,” and similar expressions, but these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements. These statements are based on information currently available to Fuel Tech and are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in Fuel Tech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in Item 1A under the caption “Risk Factors,” which could cause Fuel Tech’s actual growth, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, performance and business prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Fuel Tech undertakes no obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, or changed circumstances or for any other reason. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Fuel Tech’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Foreign Currency Risk Management

Fuel Tech’s earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not enter into foreign currency forward contracts nor into foreign currency option contracts to manage this risk due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.

Fuel Tech is also exposed to changes in interest rates primarily due to its long-term debt arrangement (refer to Note I to the consolidated financial statements). A hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not have a materially adverse effect on interest expense during the upcoming year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Fuel Tech maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed to ensure (a) that information required to be disclosed in Fuel Tech’s filings under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (b) that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Fuel Tech’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a — 15(e) and 15d -15(e) of the Exchange Act,, as of the end of the period covered by this report, and they have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

17

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	None

Item 1A. Risk Factors
	The risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 have not materially changed.

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	None

Item 6. Exhibits

a. Exhibits (all filed herewith)

31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

18

FUEL TECH, INC.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 4, 2010	By:	/s/ Douglas G. Bailey
		Douglas G. Bailey
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 4, 2010	By:	/s/ David S. Collins
		David S. Collins
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

19