Commitments and Contingencies | 10. Commitmen ts and Contingencies Litigation In the normal course of business, the Company may be named as a defendant in one or more lawsuits. Other than as set forth below, the Company is not a party to any outstanding material litigation and management is currently not aware of any legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, are deemed to be material to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. On April 3, 2019, the Company filed two legal actions against, among others, Patrick Soon-Shiong and entities controlled by him, asserting claims for, among other things, fraud and breach of contract, arising out of Dr. Soon-Shiong’s purchase of the drug Cynviloq from the Company in May 2015. The actions allege that Dr. Soon-Shiong and the other defendants, among other things, acquired the drug Cynviloq for the purpose of halting its progression to the market. Specifically, the Company has filed: An arbitration demand with the American Arbitration Association in Los Angeles, California against NantPharma, LLC (“NantPharma”) and Chief Executive Officer Patrick Soon-Shiong, related to alleged fraud and breaches of the Stock Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated May 14, 2015, entered into between NantPharma and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2015. On May 24, 2019, NantCell, Inc., Dr. Soon-Shiong and Immunotherapy NANTibody LLC (“NANTibody”) General Counsel Charles Kim filed a motion in the Los Angeles Superior Court to stay or dismiss the Company’s arbitration demand. On October 9, 2019, the Los Angeles Superior Court denied the motion to stay or dismiss the arbitration demand, and the arbitration is ongoing against NantPharma. On March 5, 2020, the Company filed a legal action against Dr. Soon-Shiong in Los Angeles Superior Court, asserting claims for fraudulent inducement and common law fraud, arising out of Dr. Soon-Shiong’s purchase of the drug Cynviloq from the Company in May 2015. The action alleges that, among other things, Dr. Soon-Shiong acquired the drug Cynviloq for the purpose of halting its progression to the market. In connection with filing this civil action in the Los Angeles Superior Court, where the Company will have the right to a jury trial against Dr. Soon-Shiong, the Company has dismissed Dr. Soon-Shiong from the related, ongoing arbitration against NantPharma; and An action in the Los Angeles Superior Court derivatively on behalf of NANTibody against NantCell, Inc., NANTibody Board Member and NantCell, Inc. Chief Executive Officer Patrick Soon-Shiong, and NANTibody officer Charles Kim, related to several breaches of the June 11, 2015 Limited Liability Company Agreement for NANTibody entered into between the Company and NantCell, Inc. The suit also alleges breaches of fiduciary duties and seeks, inter alia, a declaration that the Assignment Agreement entered into on July 2, 2017, between NantPharma and NANTibody is void and an equitable unwinding of the Assignment Agreement. The suit calls for the restoration of $ 90.05 million to the NANTibody capital account, thereby restoring the Company’s equity method investment in NANTibody to its invested amount as of June 30, 2017 of $ 40.0 million. On May 24, 2019, NantCell, Inc. and Dr. Soon-Shiong filed a cross-complaint against the Company and Dr. Henry Ji, seeking unspecified damages, as well as additional punitive damages and specific performance, related to alleged fraud, alleged breaches of the Exclusive License Agreement for certain antibodies (dated June 11, 2015 and entered into between NANTibody, LLC and the Company), and alleged tortious interference with contract. On May 24, 2019, NANTibody and NantPharma filed a new complaint in the action against the Company and Dr. Henry Ji, seeking unspecified damages, as well as additional punitive damages and specific performance, related to alleged fraud, alleged breaches of the Stock Sale and Purchase Agreement, alleged breaches of the Exclusive License Agreement for certain antibodies (dated April 21, 2015 and entered into between NantCell, Inc. and the Company), and alleged tortious interference with contract. On July 8, 2019, the Company and Dr. Henry Ji filed motions to compel the cross-complaint and new action to arbitration. On October 9, 2019, the Los Angeles Superior Court granted the motions to compel to arbitration all of the claims brought by NANTibody, NantCell, Inc. and NantPharma, and denied the motions to compel as to the claims brought by Dr. Soon-Shiong. Subsequently, NANTibody, NantCell, Inc., and NantPharma have re-filed their claims in arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. On May 4, 2020, the Company filed counterclaims against NANTibody and NantPharma related to breaches of the April 21, 2015 and June 11, 2015 Exclusive License Agreements. With the counterclaims, the Company is seeking money damages in an amount yet to be determined. The claims against Dr. Soon-Shiong have been stayed pending resolution of the claims filed in arbitration. The original derivative action is no longer stayed, and the parties are currently engaged in discovery in the suit. On May 26, 2020, Wasa Medical Holdings filed a putative federal securities class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 3:20-cv-00966-AJB-DEB, against the Company, its President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Henry Ji, Ph.D., and its SVP of Regulatory Affairs, Mark R. Brunswick, Ph.D. The action alleges that the Company, Dr. Ji and Dr. Brunswick made materially false and/or misleading statements to the investing public by publicly issuing false and/or misleading statements regarding STI-1499 and its ability to inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection and that such statements violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The suit seeks to recover damages caused by the alleged violations of federal securities laws, along with the plaintiffs’ reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the lawsuit, including counsel fees and expert fees. On June 11, 2020, Jeannette Calvo filed a second putative federal securities class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 3:20-cv-01066-JAH-WVG, against the same defendants alleging the same claims and seeking the same relief. On February 12, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California issued an order consolidating the cases and appointing a lead plaintiff, Andrew Zenoff (“Plaintiff”), and lead counsel. On April 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint in accordance with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California’s scheduling order. Pursuant to that scheduling order, the defendants filed their motion to dismiss on May 20, 2021 and Plaintiff filed its opposition to the motion on July 2, 2021. The defendants’ reply was filed on August 4, 2021. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California has taken the motion under submission without oral argument. The Company is defending these matters vigorously. On July 26, 2021, Sachin Chaudhari filed a verified stockholder derivative complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 0723211, against Dr. Ji, Mr. Brunswick, and the Company’s Board of Directors as defendants, and against the Company as a nominal defendant. The action alleges, among other things, that defendants breached their fiduciary duties, violated Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, engaged in waste and were unjustly enriched in connection with the alleged false and misleading statements referenced above. The suit seeks to recover on behalf of the Company those damages caused by the alleged breaches of duty and related claims, along with the plaintiffs’ reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the lawsuit, including counsel fees and expert fees. On July 27, 2021, Michael Sabatina filed a verified stockholder derivative complaint in the Delaware Chancery Court, Case No. 2021-0654 against Dr. Ji and Mr. Brunswick as defendants and against the Company as a nominal defendant alleging the same general claims and seeking the same general relief. Both of these derivative cases have been stayed by their respective courts pending resolution of the motion to dismiss the federal securities class action described above. The Company is defending these matters vigorously. Operating Leases As of September 30, 2021, the Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of approximately 0.8 to 17.1 years, some of which include options to extend the lease terms for up to five years , and some of which allow for early termination. Short-term operating lease costs were immaterial. Supplemental quantitative information related to leases includes the following (in thousands, except for years and percentages): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 2020 2021 2020 Operating cash flows used for operating leases $ 3,208 $ 2,531 $ 8,081 $ 7,354 Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new and amended operating lease liabilities $ 39,967 $ 1,083 $ 40,141 $ 1,878 Operating lease expense $ 3,725 $ 2,580 $ 8,623 $ 7,550 Weighted average remaining lease term in years 15.5 8.6 15.5 8.6 Weighted average discount rate 12.8 % 12.2 % 12.8 % 12.2 % Maturities of lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands): Years ending December 31, Operating 2021 (Remaining three months) $ 2,567 2022 10,355 2023 10,534 2024 10,520 2025 34,734 Thereafter 115,831 Total lease payments 184,541 Less imputed interest ( 92,967 ) Total lease liabilities as of September 30, 2021 $ 91,574 On September 23, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement with LLJ Sorrento Industrial LLC (the “9151 Rehco Road Lease”), by which the Company will lease premises located at 9151 Rehco Road, San Diego, California. The 9151 Rehco Road Lease has an initial term of 148 -months. The 9151 Rehco Road lease commenced in September 2021 . On August 1, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement with HCP Life Science REIT, Inc. (the “Landlord”), by which the Company will lease the premises located at 4921 Directors Place, San Diego, California (the "4921 Directors Place Lease"). The 4921 Directors Place Lease has an initial term of 188 -months. The 4921 Directors Place lease commenced in August 2021 . On September 1, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement with the Landlord (the “4930 Directors Place Lease”), by which the Company will lease the premises located at 4930 Directors Place, San Diego, California. The 4930 Directors Place Lease has an initial term of 188 -months and includes approximately 163,205 rentable square feet. The 4930 Directors Place Lease provides for periodic rent increases, and renewal and termination options. The 4930 Directors Place Lease is expected to commence in 2023 . In connection with entry into the lease agreement for the 4930 Directors Place Lease, the Company`s existing lease agreements with the Landlord for 9380 Judicial Drive, 4921 Directors Place, 4955 Directors Place and 4939 Directors Place (the “Other Leases”) were extended to be coterminous with the term of the 4930 Directors Place Lease and the initial rent for the extension period of each of the Other Leases shall be at then current market rates. |