LOC if (i) all of the Securities were sold or otherwise disposed of without the Portfolio realizing a loss or the Portfolio had drawn on the LOC in an aggregate amount equal to such losses; (ii) all of the Securities have been restructured into new debt rated or at least A-1 or P-1 (or the equivalent) by S&P or Moody’s and that were eligible to be held under Rule 2a-7; (iii) the Portfolio had been repaid in full in respect of all of the Securities or (iv) the Securities were rated at least A-1 or P-1 (or the equivalent) by S&P or Moody’s. The Letter Agreement also provided that: the Portfolio must pay to LM the excess of amounts received by the Portfolio above amounts due to the Portfolio on the Securities, net of draws, either from a cash payment or a restructuring if, after the LOC was drawn and on or after termination of the LOC; and during the term of the LOC, LM has the option to purchase the securities from the Portfolio under various circumstances at a price that is the greater of amortized cost or marker value. Another provision provided for transfer of the Securities to LM if the amounts drawn on the LOC equal or exceeded the amortized cost the Securities then outstanding at the end of the LOC term.
(b) On March 31, 2008, the Portfolio entered into five Capital Support Agreements (“CSAs”) with LM, each CSA having been with one of its wholly owned subsidiaries LM Capital Company, LLC, LM Capital Support I, LLC, LM Capital Support II, LLC, LM Capital Support III, LLC and LM Capital Support IV, LLC, (collectively, LM). Three of the CSAs provided support in the maximum amounts of $100,000,000, $100,000,000 and $50,000,000, respectively, for the Portfolio’s holdings of Axon Financial Funding LLC. Two of the CSAs provided support in the maximum amounts of $75,000,000 each, for the Portfolio’s holding of Issuer Entity LLC. Each of the five LM subsidiaries established a segregated account at the Portfolio’s custodian bank to secure LM’s obligations under the respective CSAs.
Under the terms of each CSA the Portfolio would have been paid a capital contribution, up to the maximum amount committed in the CSA, if (i) a loss was realized from a sale of the subject securities (collectively with any securities received in exchange therefore, or as replacements thereof that did not qualify as “Eligible Securities” under Rule 2a-7(a)(10), “Eligible Notes”); (ii) a loss results upon final payment on the Eligible Notes; (iii) a court ordered a discharge of the Eligible Notes issuer from liability that provided for payments that would have resulted in a loss; or (iv) a loss occurred in connection with an exchange for or replacement with Eligible Securities as defined in Rule 2a-7(a)(10).
The CSAs were to terminate no later than March 31, 2009 and required the Portfolio to promptly sell any Eligible Notes it held on the immediately preceding business day. The CSAs also permitted LM to purchase the Eligible Notes under certain circumstances at a price which was the greater of amortized cost or market value.
Notes to financial statements continued
On July 17, 2008, a restructuring of Cheyne Finance LLC occurred, in which the Portfolio realized a loss of $147,514,403. This loss was offset by the CSAs, and was a non-cash event.
On September 18, 2008, the CSAs described above in connection with the Portfolio’s holdings of Axon Financial Funding LLC and Issuer Entity LLC were amended to $500,000,000 and $250,000,000 increasing the amounts of support available to the Portfolio.
On December 1, 2008, the Letter Agreement and CSAs described above in connection with the Portfolio’s holdings of Gryphon Funding Ltd. (formerly known as Cheyne Finance LLC), Axon Financial Funding LLC and Issuer Entity LLC were amended to increase the amount of support available to the Portfolio to $285,000,000, $650,000,000 and $275,000,000, respectively.
On December 11, 2008, subsequent to Board approval, LM purchased $1,030,468,704 of Axon Financial Funding LLC from the Portfolio at amortized cost (a price in excess of the securities’ current fair value on that date). The excess of sale price over the current fair market value amounted to $552,743,413. On December 11, 2008, the three CSAs that provide support for the Portfolio’s holdings of Axon Financial Funding LLC dated March 31, 2008, as amended, were terminated in accordance with their terms.
On March 4, 2009, subsequent to Board approval, LM purchased par value of $2,948,127 of Cheyne Finance LLC, $424,061,136 of Gryphon Funding LLC and $332,757,577 of Issuer Entity LLC from the Portfolio at amortized cost of $2,948,127, $246,464,332 and $321,463,942 for Cheyne Finance LLC, Gryphon Funding LLC and Issuer Entity LLC, respectively (a price in excess of the securities’ current fair value of $152,492,384 for Gryphon Funding LLC and $79,096,476 for Issuer Entity LLC on that date). The excess of sales price over the current fair market value amounted to $93,971,948 for Gryphon Funding LLC and $242,367,466 for Issuer Entity LLC and is reflected in the Statement of Operations as a component of realized loss on investments and as a net increase from payment by affiliates under the Capital Support Agreements.
On March 9, 2009, the Letter of Credit and the Letter Agreement dated March 4, 2008, as amended, and the two CSA’s dated March 31, 2008, as amended, were terminated in accordance with their terms without exercising or drawing down on the credit arrangements.
Additionally, on March 4, 2009, subsequent to Board approval, LM purchased $164,420,793 of Atlantic East Funding LLC and $59,155,709 of White Pine Finance LLC at the fair market value of the securities as determined by the Board of Trustees.
42 | Liquid Reserves Portfolio 2009 Annual Report
4. Derivative instruments and hedging activities
Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” requires enhanced disclosure about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities.
During the year ended August 31, 2009, the Portfolio did not invest in Swaps, Options or Futures and does not have any intention to do so in the future.
5. Legal matters
Beginning in May 2004, class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed against Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”), a former distributor of the Fund and other affiliated funds (collectively, the “Funds”) and a number of its then affiliates, including Smith Barney Fund Management, LLC (“SBFM”) and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc (“SBAM”), which were then investment adviser or manager to certain of the Funds (the “Managers”), substantially all of the mutual funds then managed by the Managers (the “Defendant Funds”), and Board members of the Defendant Funds (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaints alleged, among other things, that CGM created various undisclosed incentives for its brokers to sell Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers funds. In addition, according to the complaints, the Managers caused the Defendant Funds to pay excessive brokerage commissions to CGM for steering clients towards proprietary funds. The complaints also alleged that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the Defendant Funds by improperly charging Rule 12b-1 fees and by drawing on fund assets to make undisclosed payments of soft dollars and excessive brokerage commissions. The complaints also alleged that the Defendant Funds failed to adequately disclose certain of the allegedly wrongful conduct. The complaints sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the Defendant Funds’ contracts with the Managers, recovery of all fees paid to the Managers pursuant to such contracts and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.
On December 15, 2004, a consolidated amended complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed alleging substantially similar causes of action. On May 27, 2005, all of the Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint. On July 26, 2006, the court issued a decision and order (1) finding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue on behalf of the shareholders of the Funds in which none of the plaintiffs had invested and dismissing those Funds from the case (although stating that they could be brought back into the case if standing as to them could be established), and (2) other than one stayed claim, dismissing all of the causes of action against the remaining Defendants, with prejudice, except for the cause of action under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, which the court granted plaintiffs leave to replead as a derivative claim.
On October 16, 2006, plaintiffs filed their Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Second Amended Complaint”) which alleges derivative claims on behalf of nine funds identified in the Second Amended Complaint, under Section 36(b) of the 1940
Liquid Reserves Portfolio 2009 Annual Report | 43
Notes to financial statements continued
Act, against CAM, SBAM and SBFM as investment advisers to the identified funds, as well as CGM as a distributor for the identified funds (collectively, the “Second Amended Complaint Defendants”). The Funds were not identified in the Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint alleges no claims against any of the funds or any of their Board Members. Under Section 36(b), the Second Amended Complaint alleges similar facts and seeks similar relief against the Second Amended Complaint Defendants as the Complaint.
On December 3, 2007, the court granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss, with prejudice. On January 2, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal was fully briefed and oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit took place on March 5, 2009. The parties currently are awaiting a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed in the future.
* * *
Beginning in August 2005, five class action lawsuits alleging violations of federal securities laws and state law were filed against CGM and SBFM, (collectively, the “Defendants”) based on the May 31, 2005 settlement order issued against the Defendants by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as described in previous reports. The complaints seek injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, removal of SBFM as the investment manager for the Smith Barney family of funds, rescission of the funds’ management and other contracts with SBFM, recovery of all fees paid to SBFM pursuant to such contracts, and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. The five actions were subsequently consolidated, and a consolidated complaint was filed.
On September 26, 2007, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order dismissing the consolidated complaint and judgment was later entered. An appeal was filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. After full briefing, oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit took place on March 4, 2009. The parties currently are awaiting a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
6. Other matters
On or about May 30, 2006, John Halebian, a purported shareholder of Western Asset / CitiSM New York Tax Free Reserves (formerly known as CitiSM New York Tax Free Reserves), a series of Legg Mason Partners Money Market Trust, formerly a series of CitiFunds Trust III (the “Subject Trust”), filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the independent trustees of the Subject Trust (Elliott J. Berv, Donald M. Carlton, A. Benton Cocanougher, Mark T. Finn, Stephen Randolph Gross, Diana R. Harrington, Susan B. Kerley, Alan G. Merten and R. Richardson Pettit).
44 | Liquid Reserves Portfolio 2009 Annual Report
The Subject Trust is also named in the complaint as a nominal defendant. The complaint alleges both derivative claims on behalf of the Subject Trust and class claims on behalf of a putative class of shareholders of the Subject Trust in connection with the 2005 sale of Citigroup’s asset management business to Legg Mason and the related approval of new investment advisory agreements by the trustees and shareholders. In the derivative claim, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the independent trustees breached their fiduciary duty to the Subject Trust and its shareholders by failing to negotiate lower fees or seek competing bids from other qualified investment advisers in connection with Citigroup’s sale to Legg Mason. In the claims brought on behalf of the putative class of shareholders, the plaintiff alleges that the independent trustees violated the proxy solicitation requirements of the 1940 Act, and breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders, by virtue of the voting procedures, including “echo voting,” used to obtain approval of the new investment advisory agreements and statements made in a proxy statement regarding those voting procedures. The plaintiff alleges that the proxy statement was misleading because it failed to disclose that the voting procedures violated the 1940 Act. The relief sought includes an award of damages, rescission of the advisory agreement, and an award of costs and attorney fees.
In advance of filing the complaint, Mr. Halebian’s lawyers made written demand for relief on the Board of the Subject Trust, and the Board’s independent trustees formed a demand review committee to investigate the matters raised in the demand, and subsequently in the complaint, and recommend a course of action to the Board. The committee, after a thorough review, determined that the independent trustees did not breach their fiduciary duties as alleged by Mr. Halebian, and that the action demanded by Mr. Halebian would not be in the best interests of the Subject Trust. The Board of the Subject Trust (the trustee who is an “interested person” of the Subject Trust, within the meaning of the 1940 Act, having recused himself from the matter), after receiving and considering the committee’s report and based upon the findings of the committee, subsequently also determined and, adopting the recommendation of the committee, directed counsel to move to dismiss Mr. Halebian’s complaint. A motion to dismiss was filed on October 23, 2006. Opposition papers were filed on or about December 7, 2006. The complaint was dismissed on July 31, 2007. Mr. Halebian filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeal was fully briefed and oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit took place on February 5, 2009. The parties currently are awaiting a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Liquid Reserves Portfolio 2009 Annual Report | 45
Report of independent registered public
accounting firm
The Board of Trustees and Investors
Master Portfolio Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of Liquid Reserves Portfolio, a series of Master Portfolio Trust, as of August 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and broker. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Liquid Reserves Portfolio as of August 31, 2009, and the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
| |
| |
| 
|
New York, New York | |
October 26, 2009 | |
46 | Liquid Reserves Portfolio 2009 Annual Report
Additional information (unaudited)
The Trustees and Officers of the Fund also serve as the Trustees and Officers of the Portfolio. Information about the Trustees and Officers of the Fund can be found on pages 20 through 26 of this report.
Liquid Reserves Portfolio | 47
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| |
Western Asset / CitiSM Premium
Liquid Reserves
| | |
| |
Trustees
Elliott J. Berv
A. Benton Cocanougher
Jane F. Dasher
Mark T. Finn
R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman
Rainer Greeven
Stephen R. Gross
Richard E. Hanson, Jr.
Diana R. Harrington
Susan M. Heilbron
Susan B. Kerley
Alan G. Merten
R. Richardson Pettit
Investment manager
Legg Mason Partners Fund
Advisor, LLC
Subadviser
Western Asset Management
Company
| |
Distributor
Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust
Company
Transfer agent
Boston Financial Data Services, Inc.
2 Heritage Drive
Quincy, Massachusetts 02171
Independent registered
public accounting firm
KPMG LLP
345 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10154
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
| Western Asset / CitiSM Premium Liquid Reserves | |
| | |
| The Fund is a separate investment series of Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust, a Maryland business trust. | |
| | |
| WESTERN ASSET / CITISM PREMIUM LIQUID RESERVES
55 Water Street
New York, New York 10041 | |
| | |
| The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C., and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. To obtain information on Form N-Q from the Fund, shareholders can call 1-800-331-1792. | |
| | |
| Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the prior 12-month period ending June 30th of each year and a description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies related to portfolio transactions are available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-331-1792, (2) on the Fund’s website at www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors and (3) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. | |
| | |
| This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of Western Asset / CitiSM Premium Liquid Reserves. This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. | |
| | |
| Investors should consider the Fund’s investment objective, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the Fund. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. | |
| | |
| | |
| www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors
© 2009 Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC
Member FINRA, SIPC | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |
BUILT TO WINSM
| | 
| |
| | | | |
| | At Legg Mason, we’ve assembled a collection of experienced investment management firms and empowered each of them with the tools, the resources and, most importantly, the independence to pursue the strategies they know best. | | | |
| | | | |
| | • Each was purposefully chosen for their commitment to investment excellence. | | | |
| | | | | |
| | • Each is focused on specific investment styles and asset classes. | | | |
| | | | | |
| | • Each exhibits thought leadership in their chosen area of focus. | | | |
| | | | | |
| | Together, we’ve built a powerful portfolio of solutions for financial advisors and their clients. And it has made us a world leader in money management.* | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | * Ranked eleventh-largest money manager in the world, according to Pensions & Investments, May 18, 2009, based on 12/31/08 worldwide assets under management. | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | © 2009 Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC Member FINRA, SIPC
FDXX010348 10/09 SR09-928 | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | NOT PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
| |
| The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller. |
| |
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
| |
| The Board of Trustees of the registrant has determined that Stephen R. Gross the Chairman of the Board’s Audit Committee and Jane F. Dasher, possess the technical attributes identified in Instruction 2(b) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR to qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” and have designated Mr. Gross and Ms. Dasher as the Audit Committee’s financial experts. Mr. Gross and Ms. Dasher are “independent” Trustees pursuant to paragraph (a) (2) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR. |
| |
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
| |
| a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the last two fiscal years ending August 31, 2008 and August 31, 2009 (the “Reporting Periods”) for professional services rendered by the Registrant’s principal accountant (the “Auditor”) for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $31,600 in 2008 and $34,200 in 2009. |
| | |
| b) Audit-Related Fees. There were no fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 for the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust. |
| | |
| In addition, there were no Audit-Related Fees billed in the Reporting Period for assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust (“service affiliates”), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the service affiliates. Accordingly, there were no such fees that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee for the Reporting Periods (prior to May 6, 2003 services provided by the Auditor were not required to be pre-approved). |
| |
| (c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (“Tax Services”) were $4,800 in 2008 and $5,200 in 2009. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, and (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held. |
| | |
| There were no fees billed for tax services by the Auditors to service affiliates during the Reporting Periods that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee. |
| |
| d) All Other Fees. There were no other fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item for the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust. |
| | |
| All Other Fees. There were no other non-audit services rendered by the Auditor to Legg Mason Fund Advisor, LLC (“LMPFA”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with LMPFA that provided ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Premium |
| | |
| Money Market Trust requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee in the Reporting Period. |
| |
| (e) Audit Committee’s pre–approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c) (7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. |
| | |
| (1) The Charter for the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of each registered investment company (the “Fund”) advised by LMPFA or one of their affiliates (each, an “Adviser”) requires that the Committee shall approve (a) all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to the Fund and (b) all permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Fund’s independent auditors to the Adviser and any Covered Service Providers if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The Committee may implement policies and procedures by which such services are approved other than by the full Committee. |
| |
| The Committee shall not approve non-audit services that the Committee believes may impair the independence of the auditors. As of the date of the approval of this Audit Committee Charter, permissible non-audit services include any professional services (including tax services), that are not prohibited services as described below, provided to the Fund by the independent auditors, other than those provided to the Fund in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of the Fund. Permissible non-audit services may not include: (i) bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Fund; (ii) financial information systems design and implementation; (iii) appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports; (iv) actuarial services; (v) internal audit outsourcing services; (vi) management functions or human resources; (vii) broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services; (viii) legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and (ix) any other service the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible. |
| |
| Pre-approval by the Committee of any permissible non-audit services is not required so long as: (i) the aggregate amount of all such permissible non-audit services provided to the Fund, the Adviser and any service providers controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“Covered Service Providers”) constitutes not more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid to the independent auditors during the fiscal year in which the permissible non-audit services are provided to (a) the Fund, (b) the Adviser and (c) any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that would have to be approved by the Committee; (ii) the permissible non-audit services were not recognized by the Fund at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved by the Committee (or its delegate(s)) prior to the completion of the audit. |
| |
| (2) For the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust, the percentage of fees that were approved by the audit committee, with respect to: Audit-Related Fees were 100% and 0% for 2008 and 2009; Tax Fees were 100% and 0% for 2008 and 2009; and Other Fees were 100% and 0% for 2008 and 2009. |
| |
| (f) N/A |
| | |
| (g) Non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust, LMPFA and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with LMPFA that provides ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust during the reporting period were $0 in 2009. |
| | |
| (h) Yes. Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Accountant’s independence. All services provided by the Auditor to the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money |
| | |
| Market Trust or to Service Affiliates, which were required to be pre-approved, were pre-approved as required. |
| |
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
| |
| a) | The independent board members are acting as the registrant’s audit committee as specified in Section 3(a)(58)(B) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee consists of the following Board members: |
| | |
| Elliott J. Berv
A. Benton Cocanougher
Jane F. Dasher
Mark T. Finn
Rainer Greeven
Stephen R. Gross
Richard E. Hanson, Jr.
Diana R. Harrington
Susan M. Heilbron
Susan B. Kerley
Alan G. Merten
R. Richardson Pettit |
| |
| b) | Not applicable. |
| | |
ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. |
| |
| Included herein under Item 1. |
| |
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
| |
| Not applicable. |
| |
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
| |
| Not applicable. |
| |
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
| |
| Not applicable. |
| |
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
| |
| Not applicable. |
| |
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
| |
| (a) | The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a- 3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of |
| | |
| | the disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
| | |
| (b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the registrant’s last fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
| | |
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS. |
| |
| (a)(1) Code of Ethics attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CODE ETH
(a) (2) Certifications pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CERT |
| (b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.906CERT |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust
| |
By: | /s/ R. Jay Gerken
R. Jay Gerken
Chief Executive Officer of |
| Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust |
Date: November 4, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| |
By: | /s/ R. Jay Gerken
R. Jay Gerken
Chief Executive Officer of |
| Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust |
Date: November 4, 2009
| |
By: | /s/ Frances M. Guggino
Frances M. Guggino
Chief Financial Officer of
Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust |
Date: November 4, 2009
