UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-05812
Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Robert I. Frenkel, Esq.
Legg Mason & Co., LLC
100 First Stamford Place
Stamford, CT 06902
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-877-721-1926
Date of fiscal year end: August 31
Date of reporting period: August 31, 2011
| ITEM 1. | REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
The Annual Report to Stockholders is filed herewith.
August 31, 2011
Annual
Repor t
Western Asset
Premium
U.S. Treasury
Reserves
INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED • NO BANK GUARANTEE • MAY LOSE VALUE
| II | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves |
Fund objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to provide shareholders with liquidity and as high a level of current income from U.S. government obligations as is consistent with preservation of capital.
Dear Shareholder,
We are pleased to provide the annual report of Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves for the twelve-month reporting period ended August 31, 2011. Please read on for a detailed look at prevailing economic and market conditions during the Fund’s reporting period and to learn how those conditions have affected Fund performance.
As always, we remain committed to providing you with excellent service and a full spectrum of investment choices. We also remain committed to supplementing the support you receive from your financial advisor. One way we accomplish this is through our website, www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors. Here you can gain immediate access to market and investment information, including:
| Ÿ | Fund prices and performance, |
| Ÿ | Market insights and commentaries from our portfolio managers, and |
| Ÿ | A host of educational resources. |
We look forward to helping you meet your financial goals.
Sincerely,
R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2011
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves | III |
Economic review
Although the U.S. economy continued to grow over the twelve months ended August 31, 2011, the pace of the expansion was disappointing, which resulted in a significant shift in investor sentiment. Looking back, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010, fears regarding moderating economic growth were replaced with optimism for a strengthening economy in 2011. However, as the reporting period progressed, weakening economic data, concerns related to the raising of the U.S. debt ceiling and the downgrading of U.S. government securities resulted in increased investor risk aversion. However, overall, investors who took on additional risk in their portfolios during the reporting period were generally rewarded.
U.S. gross domestic product (“GDP”)i growth, as reported by the U.S. Department of Commerce, has been less robust than during most other periods exiting a severe recession. Revised GDP growth was 2.3% during the fourth quarter of 2010 and 3.0% for calendar 2010 as a whole. The Commerce Department then reported that first and second quarter 2011 GDP growth were 0.4% and 1.3%, respectively. This moderation in growth during the first half of the calendar year was due to a variety of factors, including less robust export activity and a deceleration in consumer spending given higher oil and food prices.
Turning to the job market, while there was some improvement in early 2011, unemployment again moved higher from April through June. After being 9.0% or higher since April 2009, the unemployment rate fell to 8.9% in February and 8.8% in March 2011. The job market then weakened, as unemployment rose to 9.0% in April, 9.1% in May and 9.2% in June. The news was slightly better in July, with the unemployment rate easing back to 9.1%. While the rate held steady in August, the U.S. Department of Labor reported that there was zero net job growth during the
month, the worst monthly result since September 2010. Additionally, as of the end of the reporting period, approximately fourteen million Americans looking for work had yet to find a job, and nearly 43% of these individuals have been out of work for more than six months.
The housing market continued to experience challenges during the reporting period. While existing-home sales moved somewhat higher toward the end of 2010 and in January 2011, according to the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”), existing-home sales declined a sharp 8.9% in February. After a 3.5% increase in March, existing-home sales fell 1.8% and 4.0% in April and May, respectively. Following a modest 0.6% increase in June, sales then fell 3.5% in July and moved 7.7% higher in August. At the end of August, the inventory of unsold homes was an 8.5 month supply at the current sales level, versus a 9.5 month supply in July. Existing-home prices were weak versus a year ago, with the NAR reporting that the median existing-home price for all housing types was $168,300 in August 2011, down 5.1% from August 2010.
Even the manufacturing sector, one of the stalwarts of the economy in recent years, softened toward the end of the reporting period. Based on the Institute for Supply Management’s PMIii, the manufacturing sector grew twenty-five consecutive months since it began expanding in August 2009 (a reading below 50 indicates a contraction, whereas a reading above 50 indicates an expansion). In January 2011, the manufacturing sector expanded at its fastest pace since May 2004, with a reading of 60.8 versus 58.5 for the previous month. Manufacturing activity remained strong during the next three months and was 60.4 in April. However, May’s reading fell to 53.5, partially attributed to supply disruptions triggered by the March earthquake
| IV | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves |
Investment commentary (cont’d)
and tsunami in Japan. Manufacturing activity then moved modestly higher in June to 55.3, before falling to 50.9 in July and 50.6 in August — the latter being the worst reading in two years. In addition, only ten of the eighteen industries tracked by the Institute for Supply Management expanded in August.
Financial market overview
While stocks and lower-quality bonds generated strong results during the reporting period, there were several periods of heightened volatility and periodic sell-offs. These were triggered by a variety of factors, including concerns regarding the global economy, geopolitical unrest, the natural disasters in Japan and the ongoing European sovereign debt crisis. During those periods, investors tended to favor the relative safety of U.S. Treasury securities. However, in most cases these setbacks were only temporary and risk aversion was generally replaced with solid demand for riskier assets. One key exception was in July and August 2011, when concerns as to whether Congress would come to an agreement regarding the raising of the debt ceiling and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) downgrade of U.S. Treasuries from AAA to AA+ negatively impacted investor sentiment.
The Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)iii took a number of actions as it sought to meet its dual mandate of fostering maximum employment and price stability. In November 2010, the Fed announced a second round of quantitative easing (often referred to as “QE2”) to help stimulate the economy, entailing the purchase of $600 billion of long-term U.S. Treasury securities by the end of the second quarter of 2011.
In June, the Fed announced that QE2 would end on schedule at the end of the month. However, given ongoing strains in the economy, it made no overtures toward reversing any of its accommodative policies, and stated it would “maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings” rather than seeking to reduce the size of its balance sheet.
Also, as has been the case since December 2008, the Fed kept the federal funds rateiv at a historically low range between zero and 0.25%. In addition, in August 2011, the Fed declared its intention to keep the federal funds rate between zero and 0.25% until mid-2013.
At its meeting in September 2011, after the end of the reporting period, the Fed announced its intention to purchase $400 billion of longer-term Treasury securities and to sell an equal amount of shorter-term Treasury securities by June 2012. The Fed said, “This program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help make broader financial conditions more accommodative.”
Fixed-income market review
The spread sectors (non-Treasuries) began the reporting period on a positive note, as they rallied in September and October. Following a brief setback in the middle of November, triggered by the European sovereign debt crisis, most spread sectors then rallied through the end of April 2011. While the spread sectors generally posted positive results in May, they underperformed equal-durationv Treasuries. Risk aversion then increased from June through August given a host of disappointing economic data, a further escalation of the European sovereign debt crisis and the S&P rating downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt.
Both short- and long-term Treasury yields fluctuated but, overall, moved lower during the twelve months ended August 31, 2011. When the period began, two- and ten-year Treasury yields were 0.47% and 2.47%, respectively. In the beginning of the
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves | V |
reporting period, yields initially moved higher given expectations for stronger growth in 2011 and the potential for rising inflation, with two- and ten-year Treasury yields peaking at 0.87% and 3.75%, respectively, in February 2011. Yields then declined during much of the remainder of the period due to disappointing economic data and several flights to quality. Two-year Treasuries hit their low for the reporting period of 0.19% on several occasions in August 2011. Ten-year Treasuries reached their reporting period trough of 2.07% on August 19, 2011. When the period ended on August 31, 2011, two-year Treasury yields were 0.20% and ten-year Treasury yields were 2.23%.
The yields available from money market securities remained extremely low during the reporting period given continued historically low short-term interest rates.
As always, thank you for your confidence in our stewardship of your assets.
Sincerely,
R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2011
All investments are subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
| i | Gross domestic product (“GDP”) is the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time. |
| ii | The Institute for Supply Management’s PMI is based on a survey of purchasing executives who buy the raw materials for manufacturing at more than 350 companies. It offers an early reading on the health of the manufacturing sector. |
| iii | The Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”) is responsible for the formulation of policies designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
| iv | The federal funds rate is the rate charged by one depository institution on an overnight sale of immediately available funds (balances at the Federal Reserve) to another depository institution; the rate may vary from depository institution to depository institution and from day to day. |
| v | Duration is the measure of the price sensitivity of a fixed-income security to an interest rate change of 100 basis points. Calculation is based on the weighted average of the present values for all cash flows. |
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 1 |
Q. What is the Fund’s investment strategy?
A. The Fund seeks to provide shareholders with liquidity and as high a level of current income from U.S. government obligations as is consistent with preservation of capital. The Fund invests in securities through an underlying mutual fund, U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), which has the same investment objective and strategies as the Fund. Under normal circumstances, the Portfolio invests all of its assets in direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury, including U.S. Treasury bills, notes and bonds. Although the Portfolio invests in U.S. government obligations, an investment in the Fund is neither insured nor guaranteed by the U.S. government.
At Western Asset Management Company (“Western Asset”), the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s subadviser, we utilize a fixed-income team approach, with decisions derived from interaction among various investment management sector specialists. The sector teams are comprised of Western Asset’s senior portfolio managers, research analysts and an in-house economist. Under this team approach, management of client fixed-income portfolios will reflect a consensus of interdisciplinary views within the Western Asset organization.
Q. What were the overall market conditions during the Fund’s reporting period?
A. While the fixed-income market experienced periods of volatility during the twelve months ended August 31, 2011, investors who assumed greater risk were rewarded, as the spread sectors (non-Treasuries) generally outperformed U.S. Treasuries. Even though growth moderated as the reporting period progressed, the economy continued to expand and corporate profits were often better-than-expected. Also supporting the spread sectors was overall solid demand from investors seeking incremental yields given the low rates available from short-term fixed-income securities.
While the spread sectors rallied during most of the reporting period, there were several occasions when investor risk aversion increased. These flights to quality were triggered by a number of events, including the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, concerns regarding the economy and inflation, geopolitical issues in the Middle East and Northern Africa and the tragedy in Japan. However, in most cases, risk aversion was fairly quickly replaced with a resumption of demand for riskier assets. One notable exception was toward the end of the period, as concerns regarding the raising of the U.S. debt ceiling and the subsequent Standard & Poor’s downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt caused investors to gravitate to the relative safety of U.S. Treasury securities.
The yields on two- and ten-year Treasuries began the fiscal year at 0.47% and 2.47%, respectively. Treasury yields fluctuated during the twelve-month reporting period given the aforementioned flights to quality, as well as uncertainties regarding Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)i monetary policy. During the fiscal year, two-year Treasury yields moved as high as 0.87% and as low as 0.19%, while ten-year Treasury yields rose as high as 3.75% and fell as low as 2.07%. On August 31, 2011, yields on two- and ten-year Treasuries were 0.20% and 2.23%, respectively.
Continued historically low short-term interest rates and the Fed’s intention to keep the federal funds rateii between zero and 0.25% until mid-2013 resulted in the yields available from money market securities remaining very low during the fiscal year.
Q. How did we respond to these changing market conditions?
A. Throughout the reporting period, we maintained a long average maturity to help lock in somewhat higher yields. By
| 2 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
Fund overview (cont’d)
implementing a barbell strategy, we allocated most of the portfolio in shorter-maturing U.S. Treasury bills and longer-term U.S. Treasury coupon securities, which often offered a slightly higher yield than U.S. Treasury bills with the same or comparable maturities.
Performance review
As of August 31, 2011, the seven-day current yield for Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves was 0.01% and the seven-day effective yield, which reflects compounding, was 0.01%.1
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves Yields as of August 31, 2011 (unaudited) | ||||
| Seven-Day Current Yield1 | 0.01 | % | ||
| Seven-Day Effective Yield1 | 0.01 | % | ||
The performance shown represents past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown above. Yields will fluctuate. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month-end, please visit our website at www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors.
Absent fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the seven-day current yield and the seven-day effective yield would have been -0.43%.
The manager has voluntarily undertaken to limit Fund expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield. Such expense limitations may fluctuate daily and are voluntary and temporary and may be terminated by the manager at any time without notice.
An investment in the Fund is neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.
Q. What were the most significant factors affecting Fund performance?
A. Over the reporting period, the U.S. economic recovery remained modest and the exceptionally low interest rate environment helped to make conditions more challenging. Increased volatility and fragile financial conditions, at times, put pressure on funding costs and liquidity conditions. Furthermore, Treasury bill supply remained limited due, in part, to constraints related to the raising of the U.S. debt ceiling. Despite a rating downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt by Standard & Poor’s, U.S. Treasuries remained highly liquid and in strong demand toward the end of the reporting period given a flight to quality. Against this backdrop, Treasury yields fell sharply and impacted the Fund’s ability to generate incremental yield.
Thank you for your investment in Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves. As always, we appreciate that you have chosen us to manage your assets and we remain focused on seeking to achieve the Fund’s investment goals.
Sincerely,
Western Asset Management Company
September 20, 2011
RISKS: An investment in a money market fund is neither insured nor guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at one dollar per share, it is still possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. Please see the Fund’s prospectus for a more complete discussion of these and other risks, and the Fund’s investment strategies.
| 1 | The seven-day current yield reflects the amount of income generated by the investment during that seven-day period and assumes that the income is generated each week over a 365-day period. The yield is shown as a percentage of the investment. The seven-day effective yield is calculated similarly to the seven-day current yield but, when annualized, the income earned by an investment in the Fund is assumed to be reinvested. The effective yield typically will be slightly higher than the current yield because of the compounding effect of the assumed reinvestment. |
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 3 |
All investments are subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.
| i | The Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”) is responsible for the formulation of policies designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
| ii | The federal funds rate is the rate charged by one depository institution on an overnight sale of immediately available funds (balances at the Federal Reserve) to another depository institution; the rate may vary from depository institution to depository institution and from day to day. |
| 4 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
Portfolio at a glance† (unaudited)
U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio
The Fund invests all of its investable assets in U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio, the investment breakdown of which is shown below.
Investment breakdown (%) as a percent of total investments
| † | The bar graph above represents the composition of the Portfolio’s investments as of August 31, 2011 and August 31, 2010. The Portfolio is actively managed. As a result, the composition of the Portfolio’s investments is subject to change at any time. |
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 5 |
Example
As a shareholder of the Fund, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, service and/or distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
This example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested on March 1, 2011 and held for the six months ended August 31, 2011.
Actual expenses
The table below titled “Based on Actual Total Return” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information provided in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. To estimate the expenses you paid on your account, divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 ending account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During the Period”.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The table below titled “Based on Hypothetical Total Return” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use the information provided in this table to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare the 5.00% hypothetical example relating to the Fund with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table below are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| Based on actual total return1 | Based on hypothetical total return1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Actual Total Return2 | Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Annualized Expense Ratio3,4 | Expenses Paid During the Period5 | Hypothetical Annualized Total Return | Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Annualized Expense Ratio3,4 | Expenses Paid During the Period5 | |||||||||||
| 0.01% | $1,000.00 | $1,000.10 | 0.09% | $0.45 | 5.00% | $1,000.00 | $1,024.75 | 0.09% | $0.46 | |||||||||||
| 1 | For the six months ended August 31, 2011. |
| 2 | Assumes the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. Total return is not annualized, as it may not be representative of the total return for the year. Performance figures may reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements the total return would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| 3 | In order to maintain a minimum yield, additional waivers were implemented. |
| 4 | Includes the Fund’s share of U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
| 5 | Expenses (net of fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements) are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year (184), then divided by 365. |
| 6 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
Statement of assets and liabilities
August 31, 2011
| Assets: | ||||
Investment in U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio, at value | $ | 369,885,381 | ||
Receivable from investment manager | 54,530 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 21,571 | |||
Total Assets | 369,961,482 | |||
| Liabilities: | ||||
Service and/or distribution fees payable | 31,275 | |||
Distributions payable | 2,630 | |||
Accrued expenses | 22,471 | |||
Total Liabilities | 56,376 | |||
| Total Net Assets | $ | 369,905,106 | ||
| Net Assets: | ||||
Par value (Note 3) | $ | 3,699 | ||
Paid-in capital in excess of par value | 369,900,674 | |||
Overdistributed net investment income | (2,297) | |||
Accumulated net realized gain on investments | 3,030 | |||
| Total Net Assets | $ | 369,905,106 | ||
| Shares Outstanding | 369,896,226 | |||
| Net Asset Value | $1.00 | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 7 |
For the Year Ended August 31, 2011
| Investment Income: | ||||
Income from U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio | $ | 451,450 | ||
Allocated expenses from U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio | (372,812) | |||
Allocated waiver from U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio | 29,674 | |||
Total Investment Income | 108,312 | |||
| Expenses: | ||||
Investment management fee (Note 2) | 857,804 | |||
Service and/or distribution fees (Note 2) | 343,122 | |||
Shareholder reports | 37,420 | |||
Registration fees | 28,151 | |||
Legal fees | 22,599 | |||
Audit and tax | 20,800 | |||
Transfer agent fees | 13,613 | |||
Insurance | 7,517 | |||
Trustees’ fees | 4,754 | |||
Fund accounting fees | 4,200 | |||
Miscellaneous expenses | 586 | |||
Total Expenses | 1,340,566 | |||
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements (Note 2) | (1,266,567) | |||
Net Expenses | 73,999 | |||
| Net Investment Income | 34,313 | |||
| Net Realized Gain on Investments from U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio | 8,880 | |||
| Increase in Net Assets from Operations | $ | 43,193 | ||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| 8 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
Statements of changes in net assets
| For the Years Ended August 31, | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 34,313 | $ | 34,836 | ||||
Net realized gain | 8,880 | 3,401 | ||||||
Increase in Net Assets From Operations | 43,193 | 38,237 | ||||||
| Distributions to Shareholders From (Note 1): | ||||||||
Net investment income | (28,462) | (34,836) | ||||||
Net realized gains | (7,188) | — | ||||||
Decrease in Net Assets From Distributions to Shareholders | (35,650) | (34,836) | ||||||
| Fund Share Transactions (Note 3): | ||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of shares | 1,125,203,025 | 834,045,863 | ||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 11,130 | 12,236 | ||||||
Cost of shares repurchased | (1,083,712,919) | (887,940,307) | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Fund Share Transactions | 41,501,236 | (53,882,208) | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 41,508,779 | (53,878,807) | ||||||
| Net Assets: | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 328,396,327 | 382,275,134 | ||||||
End of year* | $ | 369,905,106 | $ | 328,396,327 | ||||
* Includes overdistributed net investment income of: | $(2,297) | $(8,148) | ||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 9 |
| For a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended August 31: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net asset value, beginning of year | $ 1.000 | $ 1.000 | $ 1.000 | $ 1.000 | $ 1.000 | |||||||||||||||
| Income from operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.022 | 0.045 | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||||||||||||
Total income from operations | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.022 | 0.045 | |||||||||||||
| Less distributions from: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | (0.000) | 1 | (0.000) | 1 | (0.002) | (0.022) | (0.045) | |||||||||||||
Net realized gains | (0.000) | 1 | — | (0.000) | 1 | (0.000) | 1 | (0.000) | 1 | |||||||||||
Total distributions | (0.000) | 1 | (0.000) | 1 | (0.002) | (0.022) | (0.045) | |||||||||||||
| Net asset value, end of year | $1.000 | $1.000 | $1.000 | $1.000 | $1.000 | |||||||||||||||
Total return2 | 0.01 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.23 | % | 2.23 | % | 4.60 | % | ||||||||||
| Net assets, end of year (000s) | $369,905 | $328,396 | $382,275 | $209,163 | $203,974 | |||||||||||||||
| Ratios to average net assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross expenses3 | 0.50 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.48 | %4 | 0.53 | % | 0.55 | %5 | ||||||||||
Net expenses3,6,7 | 0.12 | 8 | 0.15 | 8 | 0.39 | 4,8 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 5 | |||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 2.05 | 4.50 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | Amount represents less than $0.0005 per share. |
| 2 | Performance figures may reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| 3 | Includes the Fund’s share of U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
| 4 | Included in the expense ratios is the Treasury Guarantee Program fees incurred by the Fund during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would have been 0.47% and 0.38%, respectively. |
| 5 | Included in the expense ratios are certain non-recurring restructuring (and reorganization, if applicable) fees that were incurred by the Fund during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would have been 0.54% and 0.44%, respectively. |
| 6 | Reflects fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. |
| 7 | As a result of an expense limitation arrangement, the ratio of expenses, other than brokerage, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses and acquired fund fees and expenses, to average net assets of the Fund did not exceed 0.45%. This expense limitation arrangement cannot be terminated prior to December 31, 2012 without the Board of Trustees’ consent. |
| 8 | In order to maintain a minimum yield, additional waivers were implemented. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| 10 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
1. Organization and significant accounting policies
Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves (the “Fund”) is a separate diversified investment series of Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust, a Maryland statutory trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), a separate investment series of Master Portfolio Trust, that has the same investment objective as the Fund.
The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the schedule of investments, are contained elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Estimates and assumptions are required to be made regarding assets, liabilities and changes in net assets resulting from operations when financial statements are prepared. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.
(a) Investment valuation. The Fund records its investment in the Portfolio at value. The value of such investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest (2.1% at August 31, 2011) in the net assets of the Portfolio.
The Fund has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 820 (“ASC Topic 820”). ASC Topic 820 disclosure and valuation of securities held by the Portfolio are discussed in Note 1(a) of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
(b) Investment income. The Fund earns income, net of Portfolio expenses, daily based on its investment in the Portfolio.
(c) Expenses. The Fund bears all costs of its operations other than expenses specifically assumed by the manager. Expenses incurred by the Trust with respect to any two or more funds in the series are allocated in proportion to the net assets of each fund, except when allocations of direct expenses to each fund can otherwise be made fairly. Expenses directly attributable to a fund are charged to that fund. The Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s expenses is charged against and reduces the amount of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio.
(d) Distributions to shareholders. Distributions from net investment income of the Fund are declared each business day and are paid monthly. Distributions of net realized gains, if any, are declared at least annually. Distributions to shareholders of the Fund are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal and other taxes. It is the Fund’s policy to comply with the federal income and excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 11 |
amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. Accordingly, the Fund intends to distribute its taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders in accordance with timing requirements imposed by the Code. Therefore, no federal or state income tax provision is required in the Fund’s financial statements.
Management has analyzed the Fund’s uncertain tax positions taken on income tax returns for all open tax years and has concluded that as of August 31, 2011, no provision for income tax is required in the Fund’s financial statements. The Fund’s federal and state income and federal excise tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue.
(f) Reclassification. GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be reclassified to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. During the current year, the Fund had no reclassifications.
2. Investment management agreement and other transactions with affiliates
Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (“LMPFA”) is the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investment manager. Western Asset Management Company (“Western Asset”) is the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s subadviser. LMPFA and Western Asset are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”).
Under the investment management agreements, the Fund and the Portfolio pay investment management fees, calculated daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of 0.25% and 0.10% of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s average daily net assets, respectively.
LMPFA provides administrative and certain oversight services to the Fund. LMPFA delegates to the subadviser the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. For its services, LMPFA pays Western Asset 70% of the net management fee it receives from the Fund.
As a result of an expense limitation arrangement between the Fund and LMPFA, the ratio of expenses, other than brokerage, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses and acquired fund fees and expenses, to average net assets of the Fund did not exceed 0.45%. This expense limitation arrangement cannot be terminated prior to December 31, 2012 without the Board of Trustees’ consent.
The manager has voluntarily undertaken to limit fund expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield. Such expense limitations may fluctuate daily and are voluntary and temporary and may be terminated by the manager at any time without notice.
During the year ended August 31, 2011, fees waived and/or expenses reimbursed amounted to $1,266,567.
| 12 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
The manager is permitted to recapture amounts previously waived or reimbursed to the Fund during the same fiscal year if the Fund’s total annual operating expenses have fallen to a level below the expense limitation (“expense cap”) in effect at the time the fees were earned or the expense incurred. In no case will the manager recapture any amount that would result, on any particular business day of the Fund, in the Fund’s total annual operating expenses exceeding the expense cap or any other lower limit then in effect.
Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC, a wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Legg Mason, serves as the Fund’s sole and exclusive distributor.
The Fund has adopted a Rule 12b-1 distribution and service plan under the 1940 Act, and under that plan, the Fund pays a fee calculated at an annual rate not to exceed 0.10% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is calculated daily and paid monthly.
All officers and one Trustee of the Trust are employees of Legg Mason or its affiliates and do not receive compensation from the Trust.
3. Shares of beneficial interest
At August 31, 2011, the Trust had an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized with a par value of $0.00001 per share.
Because the Fund has maintained a $1.00 net asset value per share from inception, the number of shares sold, shares issued in reinvestment of dividends declared, and share repurchased, is equal to the dollar amount shown in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the corresponding capital share transactions.
4. Income tax information and distributions to shareholders
Subsequent to the fiscal year end, the Fund has made the following distributions:
| Record Date Payable Date | ||||
Daily 9/30/2011 | $ | 0.000009 | ||
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended August 31, were as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Distributions Paid From: | ||||||||
| Ordinary income | $ | 35,650 | $ | 34,836 | ||||
As of August 31, 2011, there were no significant differences between the book and tax components of net assets.
5. Legal matters
Beginning in May 2004, class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed against Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”), a former distributor of the Fund, and other affiliated funds (collectively, the “Funds”) and a
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 13 |
number of its then affiliates, including Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”) and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc. (“SBAM”), which were then investment adviser or manager to certain of the Funds (the “Managers”), substantially all of the mutual funds then managed by the Managers (the “Defendant Funds”), and Board members of the Defendant Funds (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaints alleged, among other things, that CGM created various undisclosed incentives for its brokers to sell Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers funds. In addition, according to the complaints, the Managers caused the Defendant Funds to pay excessive brokerage commissions to CGM for steering clients towards proprietary funds. The complaints also alleged that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the Defendant Funds by improperly charging Rule 12b-1 fees and by drawing on fund assets to make undisclosed payments of soft dollars and excessive brokerage commissions. The complaints also alleged that the Defendant Funds failed to adequately disclose certain of the allegedly wrongful conduct. The complaints sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the Defendant Funds’ contracts with the Managers, recovery of all fees paid to the Managers pursuant to such contracts and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.
On December 15, 2004, a consolidated amended complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed alleging substantially similar causes of action. On May 27, 2005, all of the Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint. On July 26, 2006, the court issued a decision and order (1) finding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue on behalf of the shareholders of the Funds in which none of the plaintiffs had invested and dismissing those Funds from the case (although stating that they could be brought back into the case if standing as to them could be established), and (2) other than one stayed claim, dismissing all of the causes of action against the remaining Defendants, with prejudice, except for the cause of action under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, which the court granted plaintiffs leave to replead as a derivative claim.
On October 16, 2006, plaintiffs filed their Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Second Amended Complaint”) which alleges derivative claims on behalf of nine funds identified in the Second Amended Complaint, under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, against Citigroup Asset Management, SBAM and SBFM as investment advisers to the identified funds, as well as CGM as a distributor for the identified funds (collectively, the “Second Amended Complaint Defendants”). The Fund was not identified in the Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint alleges no claims against any of the funds or any of their Board Members. Under Section 36(b), the Second Amended Complaint alleges similar facts and seeks similar relief against the Second Amended Complaint Defendants as the Complaint.
On December 3, 2007, the court granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss, with prejudice. On January 2, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal was fully briefed and oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit took place on March 5, 2009. On June 9, 2011, the Court of Appeals issued a Summary Order affirming the District Court’s dismissal of all claims with the exception of Plaintiffs’ Section 36(b) claim as it relates
| 14 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
to Transfer Agent fees paid to an affiliate of the Managers. The case has been remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the Summary Order.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed in the future.
6. Other matters
On or about May 30, 2006, John Halebian, a purported shareholder of Western Asset New York Tax Free Money Market Fund (prior to May 31, 2010, the Fund was known as Western Asset / CitiSM New York Tax Free Reserves, and prior to June 1, 2009, as CitiSM New York Tax Free Reserves), a series of Legg Mason Partners Money Market Trust, formerly a series of CitiFunds Trust III (the “Subject Trust”), filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the independent trustees of the Subject Trust (Elliott J. Berv, Donald M. Carlton, A. Benton Cocanougher, Mark T. Finn, Stephen Randolph Gross, Diana R. Harrington, Susan B. Kerley, Alan G. Merten and R. Richardson Pettit).
The Subject Trust is also named in the complaint as a nominal defendant. The complaint alleges both a derivative claim on behalf of the Subject Trust and class claims on behalf of a putative class of shareholders of the Subject Trust in connection with the 2005 sale of Citigroup’s asset management business to Legg Mason and the related approval of new investment advisory agreements by the trustees and shareholders. In the derivative claim, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the independent trustees breached their fiduciary duty to the Subject Trust and its shareholders by failing to negotiate lower fees or seek competing bids from other qualified investment advisers in connection with Citigroup’s sale to Legg Mason (the “Derivative Claim”). In the claims brought on behalf of the putative class of shareholders, the plaintiff alleges that the independent trustees violated the proxy solicitation requirements of the 1940 Act, and breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders, by virtue of the voting procedures, including “echo voting,” used to obtain approval of the new investment advisory agreements and statements made in a proxy statement regarding those voting procedures (the “Putative Class Claims”). The plaintiff alleges that the proxy statement was misleading because it failed to disclose that the voting procedures violated the 1940 Act. The relief sought includes an award of damages, rescission of the advisory agreement, and an award of costs and attorney fees.
In advance of filing the complaint, Mr. Halebian’s lawyers made written demand for relief on the Board of the Subject Trust, and the Board’s independent trustees formed a demand review committee to investigate the matters raised in the demand, and subsequently in the complaint, and recommend a course of action to the Board.
The committee, after a thorough review, determined that the independent trustees did not breach their fiduciary duties as alleged by Mr. Halebian, and that the action demanded by Mr. Halebian would not be in the best interests of the Subject Trust. The Board of the Subject Trust (the trustee who is an “interested person” of the
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report | 15 |
Subject Trust, within the meaning of the 1940 Act, having recused himself from the matter), after receiving and considering the committee’s report and based upon the findings of the committee, subsequently also determined and, adopting the recommendation of the committee, directed counsel to move to dismiss Mr. Halebian’s complaint. A motion to dismiss was filed on October 23, 2006. Opposition papers were filed on or about December 7, 2006. The complaint was dismissed on July 31, 2007. Mr. Halebian filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On December 29, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reserved judgment after determining that the propriety of the district court’s dismissal depended upon an unsettled question of Massachusetts state law regarding the statute governing derivative proceedings was better addressed by a Massachusetts court and certified the question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
On August 23, 2010, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court answered the certified question, concluding that a derivative action must be dismissed under applicable state law following a corporation’s independent determination, made in good faith and after reasonable inquiry, that maintenance of the derivative proceeding is not in the best interests of the corporation, regardless whether the derivative complaint has been filed before or after the corporation’s rejection of the shareholder’s demand.
On May 6, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the Putative Class Claims. With regard to the Derivative Claim, to which the certified question related and as to which the district court granted a motion to dismiss, the Second Circuit vacated the district court’s judgment and remanded with instructions to the court to convert the motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment, and to rule on that motion, after further discovery should the court determine that such further discovery is warranted.
7. Other tax information
On December 22, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”). The Act updates certain tax rules applicable to regulated investment companies (“RICs”). The various provisions of the Act will generally be effective for RICs with taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010. Additional information regarding the impact of the Act on the Fund, if any, will be contained within the relevant sections of the notes to the financial statements for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2012.
| 16 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves 2011 Annual Report |
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves, a series of Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust, as of August 31, 2011, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included verification of investments owned as of August 31, 2011, by examination of the underlying U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves as of August 31, 2011, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
New York, New York
October 17, 2011
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves | 17 |
Additional information (unaudited)
Information about Trustees and Officers
The business and affairs of Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves (the “Fund”) are conducted by management under the supervision and subject to the direction of its Board of Trustees. The business address of each Trustee is c/o R. Jay Gerken, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10018. Information pertaining to the Trustees and officers of the Fund is set forth below.
The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request by calling the Fund at 1-877-721-1926 or 1-212-857-8181.
| Independent Trustees†: | ||
| Elliott J. Berv | ||
| Year of birth | 1943 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1989 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | President and Chief Executive Officer, Catalyst (consulting) (since 1984); formerly, Chief Executive Officer, Rocket City Enterprises (media) (2000 to 2005) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | World Affairs Council (since 2009); formerly, Board Member, American Identity Corp. (doing business as Morpheus Technologies) (biometric information management) (2001 to 2008); formerly, Director, Lapoint Industries (industrial filter company) (2002 to 2007); formerly, Director, Alzheimer’s Association (New England Chapter) (1998 to 2008) | |
| A. Benton Cocanougher | ||
| Year of birth | 1938 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1991 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Retired; Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus, Texas A&M University (since 2008); Interim Dean, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University (2009 to 2010); A.P. Wiley Professor, Texas A&M University (2001 to 2008); Interim Chancellor, Texas A&M University System (2003 to 2004); Dean of the Mays Business School, Texas A&M University (1987 to 2001) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | Formerly, Director, First American Bank, Texas (1994 to 1999); formerly, Director, Randle Foods, Inc. (1991 to 1999); formerly, Director, Petrolon, Inc. (engine lubrication products) (1991 to 1994) |
| 18 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves |
Additional information (unaudited) (cont’d)
Information about Trustees and Officers
| Independent Trustees cont’d | ||
| Jane F. Dasher | ||
| Year of birth | 1949 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1999 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Chief Financial Officer, Korsant Partners, LLC (a family investment company) (since 1997) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | None | |
| Mark T. Finn | ||
| Year of birth | 1943 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1989 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Adjunct Professor, College of William & Mary (since 2002); Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Owner, Vantage Consulting Group, Inc. (investment management) (since 1988); Principal/Member, Balvan Partners (investment management) (2002 to 2009) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | None | |
| Rainer Greeven | ||
| Year of birth | 1936 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1994 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Attorney, Rainer Greeven PC (since 1998); President and Director, 62nd Street East Corporation (real estate) (since 2002) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | Avica, Ltd (industrial and real estate holding) (since 2002) | |
| Stephen R. Gross | ||
| Year of birth | 1947 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1986 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Chairman, HLB Gross Collins, P.C. (accounting and consulting firm) (since 1974); Executive Director of Business Builders Team, LLC (since 2005); formerly, Managing Director, Fountainhead Ventures, L.L.C. (technology accelerator) (1998 to 2003) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | Director, Andersen Calhoun (assisted living) (since 1987); formerly, Director, United Telesis, Inc. (telecommunications) (1997 to 2002); formerly, Director, ebank Financial Services, Inc. (1997 to 2004) |
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves | 19 |
| Independent Trustees cont’d | ||
| Richard E. Hanson, Jr. | ||
| Year of birth | 1941 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1985 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Retired; formerly Headmaster, The New Atlanta Jewish Community High School, Atlanta, Georgia (1996 to 2000) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | None | |
| Diana R. Harrington | ||
| Year of birth | 1940 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1992 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Babson Distinguished Professor of Finance, Babson College (since 1992) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | None | |
| Susan M. Heilbron | ||
| Year of birth | 1945 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1994 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Retired; formerly, President, Lacey & Heilbron (communications consulting) (1990 to 2002); formerly, General Counsel and Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization (1986 to 1990); formerly, Senior Vice President, New York State Urban Development Corporation (1984 to 1986) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | Formerly, Director, Lincoln Savings Bank, FSB (1991 to 1994); formerly, Director, Trump Shuttle, Inc. (air transportation) (1989 to 1990); formerly, Director, Alexander’s Inc. (department store) (1987 to 1990) | |
| Susan B. Kerley | ||
| Year of birth | 1951 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1992 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Investment Consulting Partner, Strategic Management Advisors, LLC (investment consulting) (since 1990) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | Director and Trustee (since 1990) and Chairman (since 2005) of various series of MainStay Family of Funds (66 funds) |
| 20 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves |
Additional information (unaudited) (cont’d)
Information about Trustees and Officers
| Independent Trustees cont’d | ||
| Alan G. Merten | ||
| Year of birth | 1941 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1990 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | President, George Mason University (since 1996) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | Director, Cardinal Financial Corporation (since 2006); Trustee, First Potomac Realty Trust (since 2005); formerly, Director, Xybernaut Corporation (information technology) (2004 to 2006); formerly, Director, Digital Net Holdings, Inc. (2003 to 2004); formerly, Director, Comshare, Inc. (information technology) (1985 to 2003) | |
| R. Richardson Pettit | ||
| Year of birth | 1942 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 1990 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Retired; formerly, Duncan Professor of Finance, University of Houston (1977 to 2006); previous academic or management positions include: University of Washington, University of Pennsylvania and Purdue University | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 58 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | None | |
| Interested Trustee and Officer: | ||
| R. Jay Gerken3 | ||
| Year of birth | 1951 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Trustee, President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 2002 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Managing Director of Legg Mason & Co., LLC (“Legg Mason & Co.”) (since 2005); Officer and Trustee/Director of 159 funds associated with Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (“LMPFA”) or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006); President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of LMPFA (since 2006); President and CEO of Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”) and Citi Fund Management, Inc. (“CFM”) (formerly registered investment advisers) (since 2002); formerly, Chairman, President and CEO, Travelers Investment Adviser Inc. (prior to 2005) | |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | 159 | |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | Former Trustee, Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds (11 funds) (prior to 2006) |
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves | 21 |
| Additional Officers: | ||
Ted P. Becker 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 | ||
| Year of birth | 1951 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Chief Compliance Officer | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 2007 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Director of Global Compliance at Legg Mason (since 2006); Chief Compliance Officer of LMPFA (since 2006); Managing Director of Compliance of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005); Chief Compliance Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006) | |
Vanessa A. Williams 100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 | ||
| Year of birth | 1979 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Identity Theft Prevention Officer | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 2011 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Identity Theft Prevention Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2011); Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2011); formerly, Assistant Vice President and Senior Compliance Officer Legg Mason & Co. (2008 to 2011); formerly, Compliance Analyst of Legg Mason & Co. (2006 to 2008) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006) | |
Robert I. Frenkel 100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 | ||
| Year of birth | 1954 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 2007 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Legg Mason (since 2006); Managing Director and General Counsel of Global Mutual Funds for Legg Mason & Co. (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (since 1994); Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006) |
| 22 | Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves |
Additional information (unaudited) (cont’d)
Information about Trustees and Officers
| Additional Officers cont’d | ||
Thomas C. Mandia 100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 | ||
| Year of birth | 1962 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Assistant Secretary | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 2007 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Managing Director and Deputy General Counsel of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005); Secretary of LMPFA (since 2006); Assistant Secretary of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006); Secretary to SBFM and CFM (since 2002) | |
Kaprel Ozsolak Legg Mason 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041 | ||
| Year of birth | 1965 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Chief Financial Officer | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 2010 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Director of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005); Chief Financial Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2010) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005); formerly, Treasurer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (prior to 2010) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005); formerly, Controller of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2004) | |
Jeanne M. Kelly 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 | ||
| Year of birth | 1951 | |
| Position(s) with Trust | Senior Vice President | |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | Since 2007 | |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | Senior Vice President of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2007); Senior Vice President of LMPFA (since 2006); Managing Director of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005) |
| † | Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund within the meaning of section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. |
| 1 | Each Trustee and officer serves until his or her respective successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal. |
| 2 | Indicates the earliest year in which the Trustee became a board member for a fund in the Legg Mason fund complex or the officer took such office. |
| 3 | Mr. Gerken is an “interested person” of the Fund, as defined in the 1940 Act, because of his position with LMPFA and/or certain of its affiliates. |
| Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves | 23 |
Important tax information (unaudited)
The following information is provided with respect to the distributions paid during the taxable year ended August 31, 2011:
| Record date: | Daily | Daily | ||
| Payable date: | September 2010 - December 2010 | January 2011 - August 2011 | ||
| Interest from federal obligations | 67.12% | 99.07% |
The law varies in each state as to whether and what percentage of dividend income attributable to Federal obligations is exempt from state income tax. We recommend that you consult with your tax adviser to determine if any portion of the dividends you received is exempt from state income taxes.
The following information is applicable to non-U.S. resident shareholders:
All of the ordinary income distributions paid monthly by the Fund represent Qualified Net Interest Income and Qualified Short-Term eligible for exemption from U.S. withholding tax for nonresident aliens and foreign corporations.
Please retain this information for your records.
| 24 | U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report |
August 31, 2011
U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio
| Security | Rate | Maturity Date | Face Amount | Value | ||||||||||
| Short-Term Investments — 122.7% | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills — 107.5% | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.001-0.170 | % | 9/1/11 | $ | 3,073,227,000 | $ | 3,073,227,000 | (a) | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.015-0.155 | % | 9/8/11 | 2,818,350,000 | 2,818,328,823 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.001-0.161 | % | 9/15/11 | 4,167,183,000 | 4,167,148,074 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.001-0.173 | % | 9/22/11 | 3,573,720,000 | 3,573,708,120 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.002-0.170 | % | 9/29/11 | 4,338,669,000 | 4,338,613,900 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.115-0.120 | % | 10/13/11 | 150,000,000 | 149,979,525 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.100 | % | 12/22/11 | 7,760,000 | 7,757,586 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.110 | % | 1/12/12 | 100,000,000 | 99,959,361 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.100-0.130 | % | 1/26/12 | 424,305,000 | 424,107,241 | (a) | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills | 0.125 | % | 2/2/12 | 200,000,000 | 199,893,056 | (a) | ||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury Bills | 18,852,722,686 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes — 15.2% | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.000 | % | 9/30/11 | 340,000,000 | 340,226,316 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.000 | % | 10/31/11 | 100,000,000 | 100,138,058 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 4.500 | % | 11/30/11 | 178,000,000 | 179,888,473 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.125 | % | 12/15/11 | 154,000,000 | 154,439,767 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 0.875 | % | 1/31/12 | 240,000,000 | 240,656,057 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 4.750 | % | 1/31/12 | 25,000,000 | 25,470,625 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.375 | % | 2/15/12 | 90,000,000 | 90,421,851 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 4.875 | % | 2/15/12 | 50,000,000 | 51,033,520 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.000 | % | 3/31/12 | 252,000,000 | 253,243,364 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.000 | % | 4/30/12 | 310,000,000 | 311,633,384 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 4.500 | % | 4/30/12 | 225,000,000 | 231,388,708 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.375 | % | 5/15/12 | 155,000,000 | 156,296,643 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 0.750 | % | 5/31/12 | 150,000,000 | 150,591,837 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 4.750 | % | 5/31/12 | 175,000,000 | 180,935,469 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 1.875 | % | 6/15/12 | 200,000,000 | 202,651,311 | |||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury Notes | 2,669,015,383 | |||||||||||||
Total Investments — 122.7 % (Cost — $21,521,738,069#) | 21,521,738,069 | |||||||||||||
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (22.7)% | (3,987,581,742 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 17,534,156,327 | ||||||||||||
| (a) | Rate shown represents yield-to-maturity. |
| # | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is substantially the same. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report | 25 |
Statement of assets and liabilities
August 31, 2011
| Assets: | ||||
Investments, at value | $ | 21,521,738,069 | ||
Cash | 414 | |||
Interest receivable | 13,972,824 | |||
Total Assets | 21,535,711,307 | |||
| Liabilities: | ||||
Payable for securities purchased | 3,999,983,475 | |||
Investment management fee payable | 1,203,872 | |||
Accrued expenses | 367,633 | |||
Total Liabilities | 4,001,554,980 | |||
| Total Net Assets | $ | 17,534,156,327 | ||
| Represented By: | ||||
| Paid-in-capital | $ | 17,534,156,327 | ||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| 26 | U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report |
For the Year Ended August 31, 2011
| Investment Income: | ||||
Interest | $ | 21,179,139 | ||
| Expenses: | ||||
Investment management fee (Note 2) | 16,131,796 | |||
Fund accounting fees | 638,509 | |||
Legal fees | 285,158 | |||
Trustees’ fees | 243,518 | |||
Custody fees | 70,537 | |||
Audit and tax | 29,400 | |||
Miscellaneous expenses | 83,444 | |||
Total Expenses | 17,482,362 | |||
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements (Note 2) | (1,350,567) | |||
Net Expenses | 16,131,795 | |||
| Net Investment Income | 5,047,344 | |||
| Net Realized Gain on Investments | 399,195 | |||
| Increase in Net Assets from Operations | $ | 5,446,539 | ||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report | 27 |
Statements of changes in net assets
| For the Years Ended August 31, | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 5,047,344 | $ | 13,498,330 | ||||
Net realized gain | 399,195 | 217,951 | ||||||
Increase in Net Assets From Operations | 5,446,539 | 13,716,281 | ||||||
| Capital Transactions: | ||||||||
Proceeds from contributions | 29,966,149,284 | 26,083,922,616 | ||||||
Value of withdrawals | (29,110,047,986) | (34,591,981,228) | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Capital Transactions | 856,101,298 | (8,508,058,612) | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 861,547,837 | (8,494,342,331) | ||||||
| Net Assets: | ||||||||
Beginning of year | 16,672,608,490 | 25,166,950,821 | ||||||
End of year | $ | 17,534,156,327 | $ | 16,672,608,490 | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| 28 | U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report |
| For the years ended August 31: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net assets, end of year (000s) | $17,534,156 | $16,672,608 | $25,166,951 | $14,409,712 | $4,425,997 | |||||||||||||||
Total return1 | 0.03 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.53 | % | 2.59 | % | 4.96 | % | ||||||||||
| Ratios to average net assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross expenses | 0.11 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.12 | %2 | ||||||||||
Net expenses3,4,5 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.53 | 2.18 | 4.76 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | Performance figures may reflect compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| 2 | Included in the expense ratios are certain non-recurring restructuring (and reorganization, if applicable) fees that were incurred by the Portfolio during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would not have changed. |
| 3 | Reflects fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. |
| 4 | The impact of compensating balance arrangements, if any, was less than 0.01%. |
| 5 | As a result of a voluntary expense limitation, the ratio of expenses, other than brokerage, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses and acquired portfolio fees and expenses, to average net assets of the Portfolio did not exceed 0.10%. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report | 29 |
1. Organization and significant accounting policies
U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a diversified investment series of Master Portfolio Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust, a Maryland statutory trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue beneficial interests in the Portfolio. At August 31, 2011, all investors in the Portfolio were funds advised or administered by the manager of the Portfolio and/or its affiliates.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Portfolio and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Estimates and assumptions are required to be made regarding assets, liabilities and changes in net assets resulting from operations when financial statements are prepared. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.
(a) Investment valuation. In accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, money market instruments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. This method involves valuing portfolio securities at their cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. The Portfolio’s use of amortized cost is subject to its compliance with certain conditions as specified by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act.
The Portfolio has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 820 (“ASC Topic 820”). ASC Topic 820 establishes a single definition of fair value, creates a three-tier hierarchy as a framework for measuring fair value based on inputs used to value the Portfolio’s investments, and requires additional disclosure about fair value. The hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
| Ÿ | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
| Ÿ | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
| Ÿ | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The Portfolio uses valuation techniques to measure fair value that are consistent with the market approach and/or income approach, depending on the type of security and the particular circumstance. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable securities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to discount estimated future cash flows to present value.
| 30 | U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets carried at fair value:
| ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||
| Description | Quoted Prices (Level 1) | Other Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant (Level 3) | Total | ||||||||||||
| Short-term investments† | — | $ | 21,521,738,069 | — | $ | 21,521,738,069 | ||||||||||
| † | See Schedule of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
(b) Interest income and expenses. Interest income consists of interest accrued and discount earned (including both original issue and market discount adjusted for amortization of premium) on the investments of the Portfolio. Expenses of the Portfolio are accrued daily. The Portfolio bears all costs of its operations other than expenses specifically assumed by the manager.
(c) Method of allocation. Net investment income of the Portfolio is allocated pro rata, based on respective ownership interests, among the Fund and other investors in the Portfolio (the “Holders”) at the time of such determination. Gross realized gains and/or losses of the Portfolio are allocated to the Holders in a manner such that, the net asset values per share of each Holder, after each such allocation is closer to the total of all Holders’ net asset values divided by the aggregate number of shares outstanding for all Holders.
(d) Compensating balance arrangements. The Portfolio has an arrangement with its custodian bank whereby a portion of the custodian’s fees is paid indirectly by credits earned on the Portfolio’s cash on deposit with the bank.
(e) Income taxes. The Portfolio is classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As such, each investor in the Portfolio is treated as owner of its proportionate share of the net assets, income, expenses and realized gains and losses of the Portfolio. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. It is intended that the Portfolio’s assets will be managed so an investor in the Portfolio can satisfy the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code.
Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s uncertain tax positions taken on income tax returns for all open tax years and has concluded that as of August 31, 2011, no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio’s federal and state income tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue.
(f) Other. Purchases, maturities and sales of money market instruments are accounted for on the date of the transaction. Realized gains and losses are calculated on the identified cost basis.
2. Investment management agreement and other transactions with affiliates
Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (“LMPFA”) is the Portfolio’s investment manager and Western Asset Management Company (“Western Asset”) is the Portfolio’s subadviser. LMPFA and Western Asset are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”).
| U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report | 31 |
Under the investment management agreement, the Portfolio pays an investment management fee, calculated daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of 0.10% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
LMPFA provides administrative and certain oversight services to the Portfolio. LMPFA delegates to the subadviser the day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. For its services, LMPFA pays Western Asset 70% of the net management fee it receives from the Portfolio.
During the year ended August 31, 2011, the Portfolio had a voluntary expense limitation in place of 0.10% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets. This arrangement may be reduced or terminated under certain circumstances.
During the year ended August 31, 2011, fees waived and/or expenses reimbursed amounted to $1,350,567.
The manager is permitted to recapture amounts previously waived or reimbursed to the Portfolio during the same fiscal year if the Portfolio’s total annual operating expenses have fallen to a level below the expense limitation (“expense cap”) in effect at the time the fees were earned or the expense incurred. In no case will the manager recapture any amount that would result, on any particular business day of the Portfolio, in the Portfolio’s total annual operating expenses exceeding the expense cap or any other lower limit then in effect.
All officers and one Trustee of the Trust are employees of Legg Mason or its affiliates and do not receive compensation from the Trust.
3. Derivative instruments and hedging activities
Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 815 requires enhanced disclosure about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities.
During the year ended August 31, 2011, the Portfolio did not invest in derivative instruments and does not have any intention to do so in the future.
4. Legal matters
Beginning in May 2004, class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed against Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”), a former distributor of the Portfolio, and other affiliated funds (collectively, the “Funds”) and a number of its then affiliates, including Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”) and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc. (“SBAM”), which were then investment adviser or manager to certain of the Funds (the “Managers”), substantially all of the mutual funds then managed by the Managers (the “Defendant Funds”), and Board members of the Defendant Funds (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaints alleged, among other things, that CGM created various undisclosed incentives for its brokers to sell Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers funds. In addition, according to the complaints, the Managers caused the Defendant Funds to pay excessive brokerage commissions to CGM for steering clients towards proprietary funds. The complaints also alleged that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the Defendant Funds by improperly charging Rule 12b-1 fees and by drawing on fund assets to make undisclosed payments of soft
| 32 | U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
dollars and excessive brokerage commissions. The complaints also alleged that the Defendant Funds failed to adequately disclose certain of the allegedly wrongful conduct. The complaints sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the Defendant Funds’ contracts with the Managers, recovery of all fees paid to the Managers pursuant to such contracts and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.
On December 15, 2004, a consolidated amended complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed alleging substantially similar causes of action. On May 27, 2005, all of the Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint. On July 26, 2006, the court issued a decision and order (1) finding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue on behalf of the shareholders of the Funds in which none of the plaintiffs had invested and dismissing those Funds from the case (although stating that they could be brought back into the case if standing as to them could be established), and (2) other than one stayed claim, dismissing all of the causes of action against the remaining Defendants, with prejudice, except for the cause of action under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, which the court granted plaintiffs leave to replead as a derivative claim.
On October 16, 2006, plaintiffs filed their Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Second Amended Complaint”) which alleges derivative claims on behalf of nine funds identified in the Second Amended Complaint, under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, against Citigroup Asset Management, SBAM and SBFM as investment advisers to the identified funds, as well as CGM as a distributor for the identified funds (collectively, the “Second Amended Complaint Defendants”). The Portfolio was not identified in the Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint alleges no claims against any of the funds or any of their Board Members. Under Section 36(b), the Second Amended Complaint alleges similar facts and seeks similar relief against the Second Amended Complaint Defendants as the Complaint.
On December 3, 2007, the court granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss, with prejudice. On January 2, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal was fully briefed and oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit took place on March 5, 2009. On June 9, 2011, the Court of Appeals issued a Summary Order affirming the District Court’s dismissal of all claims with the exception of Plaintiffs’ Section 36(b) claim as it relates to Transfer Agent fees paid to an affiliate of the Managers. The case has been remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the Summary Order.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed in the future.
5. Other matters
On or about May 30, 2006, John Halebian, a purported shareholder of Western Asset New York Tax Free Money Market Fund (prior to May 31, 2010, the Fund was known as Western Asset / CitiSM New York Tax Free Reserves, and prior to June 1, 2009, as CitiSM New York Tax Free Reserves), a series of Legg Mason Partners Money Market Trust, formerly a series of CitiFunds Trust III (the “Subject Trust”), filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the
| U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report | 33 |
independent trustees of the Subject Trust (Elliott J. Berv, Donald M. Carlton, A. Benton Cocanougher, Mark T. Finn, Stephen Randolph Gross, Diana R. Harrington, Susan B. Kerley, Alan G. Merten and R. Richardson Pettit).
The Subject Trust is also named in the complaint as a nominal defendant. The complaint alleges both a derivative claim on behalf of the Subject Trust and class claims on behalf of a putative class of shareholders of the Subject Trust in connection with the 2005 sale of Citigroup’s asset management business to Legg Mason and the related approval of new investment advisory agreements by the trustees and shareholders. In the derivative claim, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the independent trustees breached their fiduciary duty to the Subject Trust and its shareholders by failing to negotiate lower fees or seek competing bids from other qualified investment advisers in connection with Citigroup’s sale to Legg Mason (the “Derivative Claim”). In the claims brought on behalf of the putative class of shareholders, the plaintiff alleges that the independent trustees violated the proxy solicitation requirements of the 1940 Act, and breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders, by virtue of the voting procedures, including “echo voting,” used to obtain approval of the new investment advisory agreements and statements made in a proxy statement regarding those voting procedures (the “Putative Class Claims”). The plaintiff alleges that the proxy statement was misleading because it failed to disclose that the voting procedures violated the 1940 Act. The relief sought includes an award of damages, rescission of the advisory agreement, and an award of costs and attorney fees.
In advance of filing the complaint, Mr. Halebian’s lawyers made written demand for relief on the Board of the Subject Trust, and the Board’s independent trustees formed a demand review committee to investigate the matters raised in the demand, and subsequently in the complaint, and recommend a course of action to the Board.
The committee, after a thorough review, determined that the independent trustees did not breach their fiduciary duties as alleged by Mr. Halebian, and that the action demanded by Mr. Halebian would not be in the best interests of the Subject Trust. The Board of the Subject Trust (the trustee who is an “interested person” of the Subject Trust, within the meaning of the 1940 Act, having recused himself from the matter), after receiving and considering the committee’s report and based upon the findings of the committee, subsequently also determined and, adopting the recommendation of the committee, directed counsel to move to dismiss Mr. Halebian’s complaint. A motion to dismiss was filed on October 23, 2006. Opposition papers were filed on or about December 7, 2006. The complaint was dismissed on July 31, 2007. Mr. Halebian filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On December 29, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reserved judgment after determining that the propriety of the district court’s dismissal depended upon an unsettled question of Massachusetts state law regarding the statute governing derivative proceedings was better addressed by a Massachusetts court and certified the question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
| 34 | U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
On August 23, 2010, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court answered the certified question, concluding that a derivative action must be dismissed under applicable state law following a corporation’s independent determination, made in good faith and after reasonable inquiry, that maintenance of the derivative proceeding is not in the best interests of the corporation, regardless whether the derivative complaint has been filed before or after the corporation’s rejection of the shareholder’s demand.
On May 6, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the Putative Class Claims. With regard to the Derivative Claim, to which the certified question related and as to which the district court granted a motion to dismiss, the Second Circuit vacated the district court’s judgment and remanded with instructions to the court to convert the motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment, and to rule on that motion, after further discovery should the court determine that such further discovery is warranted.
| U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio 2011 Annual Report | 35 |
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
The Board of Trustees and Investors
Master Portfolio Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio, a series of Master Portfolio Trust, including the schedule of investments, as of August 31, 2011, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2011, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio as of August 31, 2011, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
New York, New York
October 17, 2011
| 36 | U.S. Treasury Reserves Portfolio |
Additional information (unaudited)
The Trustees and Officers of the Fund also serve as the Trustees and Officers of the Portfolio. Information about the Trustees and Officers of the Fund can be found on pages 17 through 22 of this report.
Western Asset
Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves
Trustees
Elliott J. Berv
A. Benton Cocanougher
Jane F. Dasher
Mark T. Finn
R. Jay Gerken Chairman
Rainer Greeven
Stephen R. Gross
Richard E. Hanson Jr.
Diana R. Harrington
Susan M. Heilbron
Susan B. Kerley
Alan G. Merten
R. Richardson Pettit
Investment manager
Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC
Subadviser
Western Asset Management Company
Distributor
Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Transfer agent
Boston Financial Data Services, Inc.
2000 Crown Colony Drive
Quincy, MA 02169
Independent registered public accounting firm
KPMG LLP
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154
Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves
The Fund is a separate investment series of Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust, a Maryland statutory trust.
Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves
Legg Mason Funds
55 Water Street
New York, NY 10041
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C., and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. To obtain information on Form N-Q, shareholders can call the Fund at 1-877-721-1926 or 212-857-8181.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the prior 12-month period ended June 30th of each year and a description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio transactions are available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund at 1-877-721-1926 or 212-857-8181, (2) on the Fund’s website at www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors and (3) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of Western Asset Premium U.S. Treasury Reserves. This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
Investors should consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the Fund. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.
www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors
©2011 Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC
Member FINRA, SIPC
Legg Mason Funds Privacy and Security Notice
Your Privacy and the Security of Your Personal Information is Very Important to the Legg Mason Funds
This Privacy and Security Notice (the “Privacy Notice”) addresses the Legg Mason Funds’ privacy and data protection practices with respect to nonpublic personal information the Funds receive. The Legg Mason Funds include any funds sold by the Funds’ distributor, Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC, as well as Legg Mason-sponsored closed-end funds and certain closed-end funds managed or sub-advised by Legg Mason or its affiliates. The provisions of this Privacy Notice apply to your information both while you are a shareholder and after you are no longer invested with the Funds.
The Type of Nonpublic Personal Information the Funds Collect About You
The Funds collect and maintain nonpublic personal information about you in connection with your shareholder account. Such information may include, but is not limited to:
| Ÿ | Personal information included on applications or other forms; |
| Ÿ | Account balances, transactions, and mutual fund holdings and positions; |
| Ÿ | Online account access user IDs, passwords, security challenge question responses; and |
| Ÿ | Information received from consumer reporting agencies regarding credit history and creditworthiness (such as the amount of an individual’s total debt, payment history, etc.). |
How the Funds Use Nonpublic Personal Information About You
The Funds do not sell or share your nonpublic personal information with third parties or with affiliates for their marketing purposes, or with other financial institutions or affiliates for joint marketing purposes, unless you have authorized the Funds to do so. The Funds do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about you except as may be required to perform transactions or services you have authorized or as permitted or required by law. The Funds may disclose information about you to:
| Ÿ | Employees, agents, and affiliates on a “need to know” basis to enable the Funds to conduct ordinary business or comply with obligations to government regulators; |
| Ÿ | Service providers, including the Funds’ affiliates, who assist the Funds as part of the ordinary course of business (such as printing, mailing services, or processing or servicing your account with us) or otherwise perform services on the Funds’ behalf, including companies that may perform marketing services solely for the Funds; |
| Ÿ | The Funds’ representatives such as legal counsel, accountants and auditors; and |
| Ÿ | Fiduciaries or representatives acting on your behalf, such as an IRA custodian or trustee of a grantor trust. |
| NOT PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT |
Legg Mason Funds Privacy and Security Notice (cont’d)
Except as otherwise permitted by applicable law, companies acting on the Funds’ behalf are contractually obligated to keep nonpublic personal information the Funds provide to them confidential and to use the information the Funds share only to provide the services the Funds ask them to perform.
The Funds may disclose nonpublic personal information about you when necessary to enforce their rights or protect against fraud, or as permitted or required by applicable law, such as in connection with a law enforcement or regulatory request, subpoena, or similar legal process. In the event of a corporate action or in the event a Fund service provider changes, the Funds may be required to disclose your nonpublic personal information to third parties. While it is the Funds’ practice to obtain protections for disclosed information in these types of transactions, the Funds cannot guarantee their privacy policy will remain unchanged.
Keeping You Informed of the Funds’ Privacy and Security Practices
The Funds will notify you annually of their privacy policy as required by federal law. While the Funds reserve the right to modify this policy at any time they will notify you promptly if this privacy policy changes.
The Funds’ Security Practices
The Funds maintain appropriate physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to guard your nonpublic personal information. The Funds’ internal data security policies restrict access to your nonpublic personal information to authorized employees, who may use your nonpublic personal information for Fund business purposes only.
Although the Funds strive to protect your nonpublic personal information, they cannot ensure or warrant the security of any information you provide or transmit to them, and you do so at your own risk. In the event of a breach of the confidentiality or security of your nonpublic personal information, the Funds will attempt to notify you as necessary so you can take appropriate protective steps. If you have consented to the Funds using electronic communications or electronic delivery of statements, they may notify you under such circumstances using the most current email address you have on record with them.
In order for the Funds to provide effective service to you, keeping your account information accurate is very important. If you believe that your account information is incomplete, not accurate or not current, or if you have questions about the Funds’ privacy practices, write the Funds using the contact information on your account statements, email the Funds by clicking on the Contact Us section of the Funds’ website at www.leggmason.com, or contact the Fund at 1-877-721-1926.
Revised April 2011
| NOT PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT |
www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors
©2011 Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC Member FINRA, SIPC
FDXX010351 10/11 SR11-1482
| ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller.
| ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
The Board of Trustees of the registrant has determined that Stephen R. Gross the Chairman of the Board’s Audit Committee and Jane F. Dasher, possess the technical attributes identified in Instruction 2(b) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR to qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” and have designated Mr. Gross and Ms. Dasher as the Audit Committee’s financial experts. Mr. Gross and Ms. Dasher are “independent” Trustees pursuant to paragraph (a) (2) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR.
| ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
| a) | Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the last two fiscal years ending August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Periods”) for professional services rendered by the Registrant’s principal accountant (the “Auditor”) for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $34,900 in 2010 and $70,400 in 2011. |
| b) | Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Period for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the Registrant’s financial statements were $10,000 in 2010 and $0 in 2011. These services consisted of procedures performed in connection with the Re-domiciliation of the various reviews of Prospectus supplements, and consent issuances related to the N-1A filings for the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust. |
In addition, there were no Audit-Related Fees billed in the Reporting Period for assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust (“service affiliates”), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the service affiliates. Accordingly, there were no such fees that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee for the Reporting Periods.
| c) | Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (“Tax Services”) were $5,600 in 2010 and $5,600 in 2011. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, and (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held. |
There were no fees billed for tax services by the Auditors to service affiliates during the Reporting Periods that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
| d) | All Other Fees. There were no other fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item for the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust. |
All Other Fees. There were no other non-audit services rendered by the Auditor to Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisors, LLC (“LMPFA”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with LMPFA that provided ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee in the Reporting Period.
| (e) | Audit Committee’s pre–approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c) (7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. |
| (1) | The Charter for the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of each registered investment company (the “Fund”) advised by LMPFA or one of their affiliates (each, an “Adviser”) requires that the Committee shall approve (a) all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to the Fund and (b) all permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Fund’s independent auditors to the Adviser and any Covered Service Providers if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The Committee may implement policies and procedures by which such services are approved other than by the full Committee. |
The Committee shall not approve non-audit services that the Committee believes may impair the independence of the auditors. As of the date of the approval of this Audit Committee Charter, permissible non-audit services include any professional services (including tax services), that are not prohibited services as described below, provided to the Fund by the independent auditors, other than those provided to the Fund in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of the Fund. Permissible non-audit services may not include: (i) bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Fund; (ii) financial information systems design and implementation; (iii) appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports; (iv) actuarial services; (v) internal audit outsourcing services; (vi) management functions or human resources; (vii) broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services; (viii) legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and (ix) any other service the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible.
Pre-approval by the Committee of any permissible non-audit services is not required so long as: (i) the aggregate amount of all such permissible non-audit services provided to the Fund, the Adviser and any service providers controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“Covered Service Providers”) constitutes not more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid to the independent auditors during the fiscal year in which the permissible non-audit services are provided to (a) the Fund, (b) the Adviser and (c) any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that would have to be approved by the Committee; (ii) the permissible non-audit services were not recognized by the Fund at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved by the Committee (or its delegate(s)) prior to the completion of the audit.
| (2) | For the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust, the percentage of fees that were approved by the audit committee, with respect to: Audit-Related Fees were 100% and 100% for 2010 and 2011; Tax Fees were 100% and 100% for 2010 and 2011; and Other Fees were 100% and 100% for 2010 and 2011. |
| (f) | N/A |
| (g) | Non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust, LMPFA and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with LMPFA that provides ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust during the reporting period were $0 in 2011. |
| (h) | Yes. Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Accountant’s independence. All services provided by the Auditor to the Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust or to Service Affiliates, which were required to be pre-approved, were pre-approved as required. |
| ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
| a) | The independent board members are acting as the registrant’s audit committee as specified in Section 3(a)(58)(B) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee consists of the following Board members: |
Elliott J. Berv
A. Benton Cocanougher
Jane F. Dasher
Mark T. Finn
Rainer Greeven
Stephen R. Gross
Richard E. Hanson, Jr.
Diana R. Harrington
Susan M. Heilbron
Susan B. Kerley
Alan G. Merten
R. Richardson Pettit
| b) | Not applicable. |
| ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. |
Included herein under Item 1.
| ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
| (a) | The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a- 3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
| (b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the registrant’s last fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
| ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS. |
(a) (1) Code of Ethics attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CODE ETH
(a) (2) Certifications pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CERT
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.906CERT
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust
By: | /s/ R. Jay Gerken | |
| (R. Jay Gerken) | ||
| Chief Executive Officer of | ||
| Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust |
Date: October 24, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/ R. Jay Gerken | |
| (R. Jay Gerken) | ||
| Chief Executive Officer of | ||
| Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust | ||
Date: | October 24, 2011 | |
By: | /s/ Kaprel Ozsolk | |
| (Kaprel Ozsolak) | ||
| Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Legg Mason Partners Premium Money Market Trust | ||
Date: | October 24, 2011 | |