UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-05833
| T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
| 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |
| David Oestreicher |
| 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
| (Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: April 30, 2019
 |
| Institutional Global Focused Growth Equity Fund | April 30, 2019 |
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by SEC regulations, paper copies of the T. Rowe Price funds’ annual and semiannual shareholder reports will no longer be mailed, unless you specifically request them. Instead, shareholder reports will be made available on the funds’ website (troweprice.com/prospectus), and you will be notified by mail with a website link to access the reports each time a report is posted to the site.
If you already elected to receive reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and need not take any action. At any time, shareholders who invest directly in T. Rowe Price funds may generally elect to receive reports or other communications electronically by enrolling attroweprice.com/paperlessor, if you are a retirement plan sponsor or invest in the funds through a financial intermediary (such as an investment advisor, broker-dealer, insurance company, or bank), by contacting your representative or your financial intermediary.
You may elect to continue receiving paper copies of future shareholder reports free of charge. To do so, if you invest directly with T. Rowe Price, please call T. Rowe Price as follows: IRA, nonretirement account holders, and institutional investors,1-800-225-5132; small business retirement accounts,1-800-492-7670. If you are a retirement plan sponsor or invest in the T. Rowe Price funds through a financial intermediary, please contact your representative or financial intermediary or follow additional instructions if included with this document. Your election to receive paper copies of reports will apply to all funds held in your account with your financial intermediary or, if you invest directly in the T. Rowe Price funds, with T. Rowe Price. Your election can be changed at any time in the future.
| T. ROWE PRICE INSTITUTIONAL GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY FUND |
HIGHLIGHTS
| ■ | Global equities posted solid gains for the period, recovering meaningfully from a heavy sell-off in the final months of 2018, as increasingly dovish central banks and renewed optimism around U.S.-China trade negotiations boosted markets. |
| ■ | The Institutional Global Focused Growth Equity Fund returned 15.47% during the period and widely outperformed both its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index Net, and its Lipper peer group average. |
| ■ | Many of the portfolio’s top absolute and relative contributors were in the communication services and information technology sectors. |
| ■ | We continue to favor companies that are disrupting industries and gaining market share. Such companies are especially attractive in a low-growth environment. |
Log in to your account attroweprice.comfor more information.
*Certain mutual fund accounts that are assessed an annual account service fee can also save money by switching to e-delivery.
CIO Market Commentary
Dear Investor
Global markets performed well in the six months ended April 30, 2019, the first half of your fund’s fiscal year. The gains were broad-based, with nearly all developed and emerging markets recording positive returns. The U.S. dollar was mixed against major currencies during the period, helping insulate U.S. investors from last year’s headwind of falling currency-adjusted returns.
Such an outcome was hardly clear at the start of the period, when many global stock indexes tumbled briefly into bear market territory. In the U.S., investors initially seemed concerned about rising U.S. interest rates, with the Federal Reserve ostensibly on course to keep raising the federal funds rate through 2019. Worries soon shifted to an economic slowdown, as disappointing data accumulated on housing, manufacturing, business investment, and consumer spending.
Signs of weakness in European and Asian economies were even starker. The contraction in the massive Chinese manufacturing sector, often viewed as a barometer of global demand, was especially worrisome in light of the ongoing U.S.-China trade dispute. The export-focused economies of Japan and Germany also struggled as businesses cut back investment in anticipation of new trade barriers.
Political concerns weighed on sentiment as well. In Europe, the new populist Italian government appeared to be headed for a standoff with the European Union (EU) over Italy’s rising fiscal deficit, uncertainty over Brexit continued, and the French government sought to quell its own populist uprising in the form of the “yellow vest” protests. In the U.S., the partial government shutdown was seen as another threat to growth as it wore on.
The turnaround that began around the new year stemmed from improvements on many of these fronts. Most important, perhaps, was a pivot in Fed policy. In early January, Fed Chair Jerome Powell offered assurances that the central bank was prepared to counter any slowdown in the U.S. economy, and policymakers soon signaled that they did not expect any further rate increases in 2019. By April, many investors had even come to expect the Fed’s next move to be a rate cut.
The global economic picture also brightened somewhat. U.S. consumer spending picked up after the government shutdown ended in late January, and the job market remained strong. Signs that the Chinese economy was responding to new government stimulus emerged in April, and rising oil prices suggested healthy global demand.
Europe remained the outlier, with growth continuing to stall in the core economies of France and Germany. In response, the European Central Bank announced that it would keep short-term interest rates near 0% through at least year-end, while also providing a new round of subsidized loans to banks to spur credit growth. Some calming in the region’s political turbulence also helped restore confidence, particularly after the EU granted the UK a prolonged extension to come up with a revised Brexit plan.
Growing hopes for a resolution to the U.S.-China trade dispute further boosted global sentiment. In January, President Donald Trump declared that he was pleased with the progress in the negotiations, and he later canceled a March deadline for reaching a deal. In April, global markets rose after the president declared that an “epic” deal was near, and reports surfaced that an agreement might be signed as early as May.
As of this writing, no trade deal has been inked, and markets have again become volatile as the two sides seem to be hardening their positions once again. I have no special insight into whether an agreement will be reached, but a deepening of the conflict into an all-out trade war would surely be negative for markets.
That said, I am encouraged by much of the feedback I am getting from our managers, analysts, and economists, who continue to see considerable potential in pockets of the global economy. Within Asia, for example, our team in Hong Kong sees opportunities in the Chinese auto and property markets, while our Tokyo team thinks changes in Japan’s corporate governance will continue to benefit investors.
We think our emphasis on collaboration across offices and investment teams helps improve results for all our shareholders, and your fund’s manager is a key part of that process. I am confident that our combined efforts will continue to help you achieve your long-term investment goals.
Thank you for your continued confidence in T. Rowe Price.
Sincerely,
Robert Sharps
Group Chief Investment Officer
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
The fund seeks long-term growth of capital through investments primarily in the common stocks of established companies throughout the world, including the U.S.
FUND COMMENTARY
How did the fund perform in the past six months?
The Institutional Global Focused Growth Equity Fund returned 15.47% in the six months ended April 30, 2019. The fund widely outperformed both the MSCI All Country World Index Net benchmark and the Lipper Global Multi-Cap Growth Funds Average. Effective July 1, 2018, the MSCI All Country World Index Net replaced the MSCI All Country World Index as the fund’s primary benchmark. The new index assumes the reinvestment of dividends after the deduction of withholding taxes applicable to the country where the dividend is paid; as such, the returns of the new benchmark are more representative of the returns experienced by investors in foreign issuers. (Past performance cannot guarantee future results.)
What factors influenced the fund’s performance?
Many of the portfolio’s top absolute and relative contributors were in the communication services and information technology sectors. Conversely, an underweight position in real estate, which was one of the best-performing sectors for the benchmark, detracted from relative returns. Our emerging markets investments were among our top relative contributors.
Stock selection in communication services was one of the largest contributors to our outperformance, led by positions inTencent HoldingsandFacebook, which did well on an absolute basis. Tencent Holdings showed resiliency despite regulatory challenges and worries about slowing growth and U.S.-China trade tensions and remains one of China’s best-positioned mobile internet companies while also benefiting from its popular social media and gaming platforms. Shares of Facebook were volatile during the period, as the stock traded lower in the latter part of 2018 amid the broader equity market sell-off but rapidly recovered on the back of broad-based user growth and robust ad revenue growth, driven in part by advertisers’ accelerating adoption of the stories feature, whichprovides users a more visual means of sharing. (Please refer to the portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)
Information technology boosted relative returns due to our stock choices and an overweight.Largan Precision,Workday, andPayPal Holdingswere strong absolute and relative contributors. Optimism regarding a reacceleration in sales during 2019 lifted shares of Largan Precision, a Taiwanese manufacturer of high-precision camera lenses. We think the company is poised to benefit from the rising adoption of dual-camera smartphones and multi-camera augmented reality phones.Workday, a provider of subscription-based human resources and financial planning software, has experienced rapid growth in recent years and added value in relative terms. Shares were fueled by strong growth in subscriptions revenue and billings. PayPal has benefited from its advantageous position as the leading pure-play digital wallet in an environment where digital online payments are growing massively on a global scale.
An underweight position in real estate, which was one of the best-performing sectors for the MSCI benchmark, hindered relative performance. The largest absolute detractors spanned the various sectors and included tech companyNVIDIA, options exchange operatorCboe Global Markets, and oil and gas producerEOG Resources. Disappointing third-quarter results and lowered guidance for the fourth quarter, driven by excess inventory as a result of falling cryptocurrency demand, weighed on NVIDIA. Shares of Cboe Global Markets performed well during the broad market sell-off in the fourth quarter of 2018 but more recently underperformed the broader market as trading volumes of its proprietary products sharply declined. EOG Resources followed its Permian Basin peers in lowering production growth estimates, which displeased investors. Recently merged entitiesCignaandExpress Scriptsalso detracted on an absolute basis, as increased political rhetoric around health care reform proposals weighed on managed care companies. We subsequently eliminated our position in Cigna due to the growing sentiment overhang.
How is the fund positioned?
At the core of the fund’s approach is our belief that innovation is disrupting the global competitive landscape across multiple dimensions, including technology and consumer preferences. One of our key objectives is to position the fund on the right side of these changes. We increased the portfolio’s position in communication services, where, similarly to information technology, we seek innovative companies with the potential to be true market disruptors. We trimmed our exposure to industrials and business services, where we focus largely on high-quality cyclicals that have already priced in a significant economic growth slowdown.
Regionally, our positioning is the result of fundamental, bottom-up stock selection. While we’ve moderated our exposure to North America during the period and are underweight the region, it still makes up the majority of our geographic allocation at approximately 53% of assets. Our largest exposure relative to the MSCI benchmark is to emerging markets, where valuations remain attractive, although not as attractive as they were in early 2018. We are also modestly overweight Europe as we have taken advantage of increasing regional pessimism to add to our exposure.
Information technology remains the fund’s largest sector allocation. We have a high conviction in the sector given the abundance of growth companies arising from rampant market disruption. We have a sizable exposure to semiconductor stocks, which should benefit from content growth in the automotive and industrial end markets, and added new positions inSamsung Electronics,Qualcomm, Infineon Technologies, andMicron Technology. We increased our exposure to communication services, where we focus on highly innovative, secular growth companies such as Google’s parent companyAlphabetand Facebook, both top 10 portfolio holdings. These companies are industry leaders that still have substantial growth runways, in our view.
Other large purchases took place in the financials, real estate, and consumer staples sectors. We took advantage of recent weakness in European financials to add a new position inJulius Baer. We believe this Swiss private bank has attractive structural profitability drivers, with stable recurring fee margins and growing net flows. In real estate, we leaned into Brexit-related weakness to initiate a position inDerwent London, a real estate investment trust with an attractive office portfolio incentral London and ample development opportunity. Although we are underweight consumer staples, we started a position inShiseido, Japan’s largest cosmetics producer, which stands to benefit from secular growth in global cosmetics.
We have an underweight in industrials and business services. We exited aerospace and defense namesNorthrop GrummanandBoeingin the last six months. Increasing concerns regarding the potential political risks associated with the approaching November 2020 election led us to eliminate Northrop Grumman. We chose to move on from Boeing as issues with its new 737 MAX aircraft are likely to weigh on the company for some time. We also eliminatedAlaska Air, given the threat of increasing competition.
Several large sales occurred within the consumer discretionary sector. We exited our positions inTesla,Tapestry, andBooking Holdings. We eliminated Tesla in the first half of the period following strong performance as we felt that near-term growth drivers had become more opaque. We exited Tapestry as we believe the company’s transition to a multi-brand retailer may take longer than anticipated. Online travel and reservation conglomerate Booking Holdings had been a core holding in the portfolio for some time, and it performed well. We now think its valuation has become more full and decided to take profits and reallocate to other names with greater upside potential.
What is portfolio management’s outlook?
We view the economy through a cyclical lens characterized by periods of crisis, response, improvement, and complacency. Global markets have exited a stimulus-driven complacency and entered into the crisis and response phases. While crisis may be too strong a term for the state of the U.S. economy, we’re certainly witnessing decelerating growth. China, on the other hand, has been fully immersed in crisis, driven by falling gross domestic product growth and the effects of U.S. tariffs. China is leading the way into response by supporting growth with government stimulus measures, and the U.S. has followed with the Federal Reserve’s recent pivot to a more dovish stance. If a trade agreement between the U.S. and China is reached, we think Chinese business confidence will improve and the economy should start to stabilize. Such a scenario should also be positive for Europe, as the region benefits disproportionally from Chinese growth. Within the region, we are carefully contrarian on Brexit and continue to find interesting stock-specific ideas on the Continent.
Select emerging markets remain attractive, albeit less so than earlier last year. We believe fundamentals remain robust for many of China’s leading innovative and durable technology platform companies despite generally more pessimistic investor sentiment. We think the outlook for Brazil looks favorable, as the country enters a more pro-business climatethat should translate into improving prospects for economic growth. Our focus on research and analysis has also led us to own several other idiosyncratic ideas within emerging markets.
Innovation is unleashing powerful secular forces that are generating new business models and creating significant disruption. It is getting more and more valuable in a low-growth world to own companies that are disrupting industries and gaining market share, even if they trade at a premium. With disruption occurring across nearly every industry, being on the right side of change will be paramount for investors given the dispersion of outcomes between winners and losers. As such, we continue to search for alpha wherever we can find companies on the right side of change and believe that a fully integrated strategy, designed to produce a portfolio of our highest-conviction investment ideas, provides the best framework for capturing excess returns for our clients.
The views expressed reflect the opinions of T. Rowe Price as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic, or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
RISKS OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTING
Funds that invest overseas generally carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets. Funds investing in a single country or in a limited geographic region tend to be riskier than more diversified funds. Risks can result from varying stages of economic and political development; differing regulatory environments, trading days, and accounting standards; and higher transaction costs of non-U.S. markets.Non-U.S. investments are also subject to currency risk, or a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency.
BENCHMARK INFORMATION
Note: MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI.
GROWTH OF $1 MILLION
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $1 million investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which include a broad-based market index and may also include a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN
FUND EXPENSE EXAMPLE
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
QUARTER-END RETURNS
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
| NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Institutional Global Focused Growth Equity Fund (the fund) is a diversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund seeks long-term growth of capital through investments primarily in the common stocks of established companies throughout the world, including the U.S.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of PreparationThe fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)Accounting Standards CodificationTopic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including, but not limited to, ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity. Certain prior year amounts in the accompanying financial statements and financial highlights have been restated to conform to current year presentation.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and DistributionsInvestment transactions are accounted for on the trade date basis.Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, are recorded as income tax expense. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually. A capital gain distribution may also be declared and paid by the fund annually.
Currency TranslationAssets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the respective date of such transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is not bifurcated from the portion attributable to changes in market prices.
Redemption FeesPrior to April 1, 2019, a 2% fee was assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees were withheld from proceeds that shareholders received from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees were paid to the fund and were recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may have caused the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.
New Accounting GuidanceIn March 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018.Adoption will have no effect on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.
IndemnificationIn the normal course of business, the fund may provide indemnification in connection with its officers and directors, service providers, and/or private company investments. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown; however, the risk of material loss is currently considered to be remote.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The fund’s financial instruments are valued and its net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business. However, the NAV per share may be calculated at a time other than the normal close of the NYSE if trading on the NYSE is restricted, if the NYSE closes earlier, or as may be permitted by the SEC.
Fair ValueThe fund’s financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) is an internal committee that has been delegated certain responsibilities by the fund’s Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and proceduresand approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, risk management, and the fund’s treasurer.
Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date
Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)
Level 3 – unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.
Valuation TechniquesEquity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made. OTC Bulletin Board securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale or closing price for international securities.
For valuation purposes, the last quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted to reflect the fair value of such securities at the close of the NYSE. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund will adjust the previous quoted prices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it is necessary to adjust quoted prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. The fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with quoted prices and information to evaluate or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use quoted prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation process, the fund routinely compares quoted prices, the next day’s opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.
Actively traded equity securities listed on a domestic exchange generally are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Non-U.S. equity securities generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy despite the availability of quoted prices because, as described above, the fund evaluates and determines whether those quoted prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require adjustment. OTC Bulletin Board securities, certain preferred securities, and equity securities traded in inactive markets generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.
Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.
Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of an equity investment with limited market activity, such as a private placement or a thinly traded public company stock, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuer’s business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, new rounds of financing, negotiated transactions of significant size between other investors in the company, relevant market valuations of peer companies, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arm’s length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as market-based valuation multiples; a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation InputsThe following table summarizes the fund’s financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on April 30, 2019 (for further detail by category, please refer to the accompanying Portfolio of Investments):
Following is a reconciliation of the fund’s Level 3 holdings for the six months ended April 30, 2019. Gain (loss) reflects both realized and change in unrealized gain/loss on Level 3 holdings during the period, if any, and is included on the accompanying Statement of Operations. The change in unrealized gain/loss on Level 3 instruments held at April 30, 2019, totaled $13,000 for the six months ended April 30, 2019.
NOTE 3 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Emerging MarketsThe fund may invest, either directly or through investments in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in securities of companies located in, issued by governments of, or denominated in or linked to the currencies of emerging market countries; at period-end, approximately 17% of the fund’s net assets were invested in emerging markets. Emerging markets generally have economic structures that are less diverse and mature, and political systems that are less stable, than developed countries. These markets may be subject to greater political, economic, and social uncertainty and differing regulatory environments that may potentially impact the fund’s ability to buy or sell certain securities or repatriate proceeds to U.S. dollars. Such securities are often subject to greater price volatility, less liquidity, and higher rates of inflation than U.S. securities.
Restricted SecuritiesThe fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.
Securities LendingThe fund may lend its securities to approved borrowers to earn additional income. Its securities lending activities are administered by a lending agent in accordance with a securities lending agreement. Security loans generally do not have stated maturity dates, and the fund may recall a security at any time. The fund receives collateral in the form of cash or U.S. government securities. Collateral is maintained over the life of the loan in an amount not less than the value of loaned securities; any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is delivered to the fund the next business day. Cash collateral is invested in accordance with investment guidelines approved by fund management. Additionally, the lending agent indemnifies the fund against losses resulting from borrower default. Although risk is mitigated by the collateral and indemnification, the fund could experience a delay in recovering its securities and a possible loss of income or value if the borrower fails to return the securities, collateral investments decline in value, and the lending agent fails to perform. Securities lending revenue consists of earnings on invested collateral and borrowing fees, net of any rebates to the borrower, compensation to the lending agent, and other administrative costs. In accordance with GAAP, investments made with cash collateral are reflected in the accompanying financial statements, but collateral received in the form of securities is not. At April 30, 2019, the value of loaned securities was $740,000; the value of cash collateral and related investments was $762,000.
OtherPurchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $25,365,000 and $22,516,000, respectively, for the six months ended April 30, 2019.
NOTE 4 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences. The amount and character of tax-basis distributions and composition of net assets are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax-basis balances have not been determined as of the date of this report.
At April 30, 2019, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $47,399,000. Net unrealized gain aggregated $11,869,000 at period-end, of which $12,920,000 related to appreciated investments and $1,051,000 related to depreciated investments.
NOTE 5 - FOREIGN TAXES
The fund is subject to foreign income taxes imposed by certain countries in which it invests. Additionally, certain foreign currency transactions are subject to tax, and capital gains realized upon disposition of securities issued in or by certain foreign countries are subject to capital gains tax imposed by those countries. All taxes are computed in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law, and, to the extent permitted, capital losses are used to offset capital gains. Taxes attributable to income are accrued by the fund as a reduction of income. Taxes incurred on the purchase of foreign currencies are recorded as realized loss on foreign currency transactions. Current and deferred tax expense attributable to capital gains is reflected as a component of realized or change in unrealized gain/loss on securitiesin the accompanying financial statements. At April 30, 2019, the fund had no deferred tax liability attributable to foreign securities and $880,000 of foreign capital loss carryforwards, including $162,000 that expire in 2020, $24,000 that expire in 2021, $642,000 that expire in 2022, and $52,000 that expire in 2024.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). Price Associates has entered into a sub-advisory agreement(s) with one or more of its wholly owned subsidiaries, to provide investment advisory services to the fund. The investment management agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an annual investment management fee equal to 0.65% of the fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly.
The fund is subject to a contractual expense limitation through the limitation date indicated in the table below. During the limitation period, Price Associates is required to waive its management fee and pay the fund for any expenses (excluding interest, expenses related to borrowings, taxes, brokerage, and other non-recurring expenses permitted by the investment management agreement) that would otherwise cause the fund’s ratio of annualized total expenses to average net assets (net expense ratio) to exceed its expense limitation. The fund is required to repay Price Associates for expenses previously waived/paid to the extent its net assets grow or expenses decline sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the fund’s net expense ratio (after the repayment is taken into account) to exceed the lesser of: (1) the expense limitation in place at the time such amounts were waived; or (2) the fund’s current expense limitation. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of a payment or waiver. Pursuant to this agreement, expenses were waived/paid by and/or repaid to Price Associates during the six months ended April 30, 2019 as indicated in the table below.Including this amount, expenses previously waived/paid by Price Associates in the amount of $639,000 remain subject to repayment by the fund at April 30, 2019. Any repayment of expenses previously waived/paid by Price Associates during the period, if any, would be included in the net investment income and expense ratios presented on the accompanying Financial Highlights.
In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and a wholly owned subsidiary of Price Associates, each an affiliate of the fund (collectively, Price). Price Associates provides certain accounting and administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend-disbursing agent. For the six months ended April 30, 2019, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $34,000 for Price Associates and less than $1,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. All amounts due to and due from Price, exclusive of investment management fees payable, are presented net on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The fund may invest its cash reserves in certain open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund: the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Fund or the T. Rowe Price Treasury Reserve Fund, organized as money market funds, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Fund, a short-term bond fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Funds). The Price Reserve Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. Cash collateral from securities lending is invested in the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Fund. The Price Reserve Funds pay no investment management fees.
The fund may participate in securities purchase and sale transactions with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adopted by the fund’s Board and Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase and sale cross trades be effected at the independent current market price of the security. During the six months ended April 30, 2019, the aggregate value of purchases and sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates was less than 1% of the fund’s net assets as of April 30, 2019.
INFORMATION ON PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RECORDS
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page:
https://www3.troweprice.com/usis/corporate/en/utility/policies.html
Scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Policies.” Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.
Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SEC’s website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Records.” Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.
HOW TO OBTAIN QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
Effective for reporting periods on or after March 1, 2019, the fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Prior to March 1, 2019, the fund filed a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-PORT and N-Q are available electronically on the SEC’s website (sec.gov).
APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT AND SUBADVISORY AGREEMENT
Each year, the fund’s Board of Directors (Board) considers the continuation of the investment management agreement (Advisory Contract) between the fund and its investment advisor, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Advisor), as well as the continuation of the investment subadvisory agreement (Subadvisory Contract) that the Advisor has entered into with T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Limited (Subadvisor) on behalf of the fund. In that regard, at an in-person meeting held on March 11–12, 2019 (Meeting), the Board, including a majority of the fund’s independent directors, approved the continuation of the fund’s Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract. At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of the Advisor and Subadvisor and the approval of the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract. The independent directors were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract by independent legal counsel from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, the Advisor was guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the independent directors. In considering and approving the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract, the Board considered the information it believed was relevant, including, but not limited to, the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with the Advisor and Subadvisor about various topics. The Board meets regularly and, at each of its meetings, covers an extensive agenda of topics and materials and considers factors that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of the T. Rowe Price funds’ advisory contracts, including performance and the services and support provided to the funds and their shareholders.
Services Provided by the Advisor and Subadvisor
The Board considered the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Advisor and Subadvisor. These services included, but were not limited to, directing the fund’s investments in accordance with its investment program and the overall management of the fund’s portfolio, as well as a variety of related activities such as financial, investment operations, and administrative services; compliance; maintaining the fund’s records and registrations; and shareholder communications. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the Advisor’s and Subadvisor’s senior management teams and investment personnel involved in the management of the fund, as well as the Advisor’s compliance record. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided by the Advisor and Subadvisor.
Investment Performance of the Fund
The Board took into account discussions with the Advisor and reports that it receives throughout the year relating to fund performance. In connection with the Meeting, the Board reviewed the fund’s net annualized total returns for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 10-year periods as of September 30, 2018, and compared these returns with the performance of a peer group of funds with similar investment programs and a wide variety of other previously agreed-upon comparable performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Broadridge, which is an independent provider of mutual fund data.
On the basis of this evaluation and the Board’s ongoing review of investment results, and factoring in the relative market conditions during certain of the performance periods, the Board concluded that the fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed information regarding the revenues received by the Advisor under the Advisory Contract and other benefits that the Advisor (and its affiliates, including the Subadvisor) may have realized from its relationship with the fund, including any research received under “soft dollar” agreements and commission-sharing arrangements with broker-dealers. The Board considered that the Advisor and Subadvisor may receive some benefit from soft-dollar arrangements pursuant to which research is received from broker-dealers that execute the fund’s portfolio transactions. The Board received information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized by the Advisor from managing the T. Rowe Price funds. While the Board did not review information regarding profits realized from managing the fund in particular because the fund had either not achieved sufficient portfolio asset size or not recognized sufficient revenues to produce meaningful profit margin percentages, the Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the T. Rowe Price funds.
The Board also considered whether the fund benefits under the fee levels set forth in the Advisory Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Advisor. Under the Advisory Contract, the fund pays a fee to the Advisor for investment management services based on the fund’s average daily net assets and the fund pays its own expenses of operations (subject to an expense limitation agreed to by the Advisor). Assets of the fund are included in the calculation of the group fee rate, which serves as a component of the management fee for many other T. Rowe Price funds and declines at certain asset levels based on the combined average net assets of most of the T. Rowe Price funds (including the fund). Although the fund does not have a group fee component to its management fee, its assets are included in thecalculation because the primary investment resources utilized to manage the fund are shared with other actively managed funds. The fund’s shareholders also benefit from potential economies of scale through a decline in certain operating expenses as the fund grows in size. In addition, the fund has a contractual expense limitation in place to reduce the burden of higher operating costs to shareholders until the fund reaches greater scale. The Board concluded that the advisory fee structure for the fund provided for a reasonable sharing of benefits from any economies of scale and that the advisory fee structure continued to be appropriate.
Fees and Expenses
The Board was provided with information regarding industry trends in management fees and expenses. Among other things, the Board reviewed data for peer groups that were compiled by Broadridge, which compared: (i) contractual management fees, total expenses, actual management fees, and nonmanagement expenses of the fund with a group of competitor funds selected by Broadridge (Expense Group) and (ii) total expenses, actual management fees, and nonmanagement expenses of the fund with a broader set of funds within the Lipper investment classification (Expense Universe). The Board considered the fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management fee rate (which reflects the management fees actually received from the fund by the Advisor after any applicable waivers, reductions, or reimbursements), operating expenses, and total expenses (which reflect the net total expense ratio of the fund after any waivers, reductions, or reimbursements) in comparison with the information for the Broadridge peer groups. Broadridge generally constructed the peer groups by seeking the most comparable funds based on similar investment classifications and objectives, expense structure, asset size, and operating components and attributes and ranked funds into quintiles, with the first quintile representing the funds with the lowest relative expenses and the fifth quintile representing the funds with the highest relative expenses. The information provided to the Board indicated that the fund’s contractual management fee ranked in the first quintile (Expense Group), the fund’s actual management fee rate ranked in the first quintile (Expense Group and Expense Universe), and the fund’s total expenses ranked in the first quintile (Expense Group) and first and second quintiles (Expense Universe).
The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for institutional accounts and private accounts with similar mandates that are advised or subadvised by the Advisor and its affiliates. Management provided the Board with information about the Advisor’s responsibilities and services provided to subadvisory and other institutional account clients, including information about how the requirements and economics of the institutional business are fundamentally different from those of the mutual fund business. The Board considered information showing that the Advisor’s mutual fund business is generally more complex from a business and compliance perspective than its institutional account business and considered various relevant factors, such as the broader scope of operations and oversight, more extensive shareholder communication infrastructure, greater asset flows, heightened business risks, and differences in applicable laws and regulations associated with the Advisor’s proprietary mutual fund business. In assessing the reasonableness of the fund’s management fee rate, the Board considered the differences in the nature of the services required for the Advisor to manage its mutual fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a subadvisor to another institution’s mutual fund or for an institutional account and that the Advisor generally performs significant additional services and assumes greater risk in managing the fund and other T. Rowe Price funds than it does for institutional account clients.
On the basis of the information provided and the factors considered, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Advisory Contract are reasonable.
Approval of the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract
As noted, the Board approved the continuation of the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract. No single factor was considered in isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the Board concluded, in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors considered, that it was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders for the Board to approve the continuation of the Advisory Contract and Subadvisory Contract (including the fees to be charged for services thereunder).
Item 1. (b) Notice pursuant to Rule 30e-3.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
A code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s annual Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Disclosure required in registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Disclosure required in registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc.
| By | /s/ David Oestreicher | |||||
| David Oestreicher | ||||||
| Principal Executive Officer | ||||||
| Date | June 14, 2019 | |||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By | /s/ David Oestreicher | |||||
| David Oestreicher | ||||||
| Principal Executive Officer | ||||||
| Date | June 14, 2019 | |||||
| By | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |||||
| Catherine D. Mathews | ||||||
| Principal Financial Officer | ||||||
| Date | June 14, 2019 | |||||