Westpoint Stevens 10Q 2004 Q1 Quarterly report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-15381

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

36-3498354
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

507 West Tenth Street
West Point, Georgia 31833
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)

(706) 645-4000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No

Common shares outstanding at March 31, 2004: 49,897,409 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes X No

INDEX


		Page No.


PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1. Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: March 31, 2004 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2003	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited); Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited); Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited); Three Months Ended March 31, 2004	6

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7 - 24

	Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25 - 37

	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	38

	Item 4. Controls and Procedures	38

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1. Legal Proceedings	39 - 41

	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	41

	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	42

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)

	March 31,		December 31,
	2004		2003

	(Unaudited)

Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,035	$	3,660
Accounts receivable	247,827		243,507
Inventories	414,255		368,620
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	26,549		32,996

Total current assets	695,666		648,783

Property, Plant and Equipment, net	604,681		616,422

Other Assets
Deferred financing fees	8,933		12,837
Other assets	1,443		1,737

	$	1,310,723	$	1,279,779




Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities
Senior Credit Facility	$	490,689	$	490,689
Second-Lien Facility	165,000		165,000
DIP Credit Agreement	113,137		89,017
Accrued interest payable	5,923		295
Accounts payable	60,203		56,198
Pension and other accrued liabilities	136,782		111,731

Total current liabilities	971,734		912,930

Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	76,586		87,179
Pension and other liabilities	147,210		141,936

Total noncurrent liabilities	223,796		229,115

Liabilities Subject to Compromise	1,086,846		1,086,869

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	(971,653)		(949,135)

	$	1,310,723	$	1,279,779

See accompanying notes.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

		Three Months Ended
		March 31,

		2004		2003


Net sales		$	399,640	$	379,263
Cost of goods sold			331,474		305,868


	Gross earnings	68,166		73,395

Selling, general and administrative expenses		55,785		63,463
Restructuring and impairment charge			4,813		1,378


	Operating earnings	7,568		8,554

Interest expense (contractual interest of $36,635 for
the three months ended March 31, 2004)		17,813		32,465
Other expense-net			2,830		2,505
Chapter 11 expense			8,119		-


	Loss before income tax benefit	(21,194)		(26,416)

Income tax benefit			(6,315)		(9,510)


	Net loss	$	(14,879)	$	(16,906)





Basic and diluted net loss per common share		$	(.30)	$	(.34)





Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding			49,897		49,852

See accompanying notes.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In thousands)


			Three Months Ended
			March 31,

			2004		2003

Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net loss		$	(14,879)	$	(16,906)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization		16,656		18,885
		Deferred income taxes		(6,326)		(9,474)
		Changes in working capital		(21,212)		11,190
		Other-net		10,105		12,330
		Non-cash component of restructuring and impairment charge		-		186


Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities				(15,656)		16,211


Cash flows from investing activities:
	Capital expenditures			(5,127)		(4,454)
	Net proceeds from sale of assets			38		13


Net cash used for investing activities				(5,089)		(4,441)


Cash flows from financing activities:
	Senior Credit Facility:
		Borrowings		-		338,000
		Repayments		-		(321,396)
	DIP Credit Agreement:
		Borrowings		207,120		-
		Repayments		(183,000)		-
	Trade Receivables Program			-		(26,807)


Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities				24,120		(10,203)


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents				3,375		1,567

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				3,660		1,096


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	7,035	$	2,663

See accompanying notes.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited)
(In thousands)


						Common
						Stock
						and Capital
						in											Accumulated
						Excess of											Other
				Common		Par		Treasury Stock						Accumulated			Comprehensive		Unearned

				Shares		Value		Shares			Amount			Deficit			Income (Loss)		Compensation		Total


Balance, January 1, 2004					71,100	$	404,399		(21,202	)	$	(416,133	)	$	(827,042	)	$	(110,359)	$	-	$	(949,135)

	Comprehensive income (loss):
		Net loss			-		-		-			-			(14,879	)		-		-		(14,879)
		Foreign currency translation adjustment			- -		- -		- -			- -			- -			(55)		- -		(55)
		Cash flow hedges:
			Net derivative losses, net of tax benefit of $4,267		- -		- -		- -			- -			- -			(7,584)		- -		(7,584)

	Comprehensive income (loss)																					(22,518)



Balance, March 31, 2004					71,100	$	404,399		(21,202	)	$	(416,133	)	$	(841,921	)	$	(117,998)	$	-	$	(971,653)

See accompanying notes.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the annual report on Form 10-K for We stPoint Stevens Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

2. Chapter 11 Filing

On June 1, 2003 (the "Petition Date"), the Company and several of its subsidiaries (together with the Company, the "Debtors") each commenced a voluntary case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors are authorized to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to section 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. A brief chronology of the circumstances that led to such filing is set forth below.

Despite the restructuring initiatives which the Company undertook in 2000 through 2002, during 2003 the Company continued to experience financial difficulty related primarily to restrictive covenants under its Senior Credit Facility and its debt structure. The Company therefore entered into negotiations with its Senior Credit Facility lenders to amend the Senior Credit Facility to permit certain restructuring, impairment and other charges and to revise certain financial ratios and minimum EBITDA covenants in its Senior Credit Facility. The Company and such lenders were unable to agree to amend the Senior Credit Facility and the Company continued to experience financial difficulties which led to a default under its Senior Credit Facility and Second-Lien Facility. Effective March 31, 2003, the Senior Credit Facility lenders and Second-Lien Facility lenders agreed to refrain from exercising any rights or remedies with respect to the Company's failure to comply with financial and other covenants until June 10, 2003. As the June 10 deadline approached, the Company's Board of Directors determined that, in order to be able to operate successfully in today's market environment and compete with increasing foreign competition, it would be necessary for the Company to reduce its debt burden and de-lever its balance sheet. Thus, on May 16, 2003, the Board of Directors approved the retention of an independent financial advisor to evaluate alternatives aimed at reducing the existing debt structure and strengthening the balance sheet. After negotiations with its Senior Lenders regarding various alternatives, the Company concluded it would be in the best interests of its creditors to effect a consensual restructuring under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and filed its chapter 11 petition on June 1, 2003.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued

On or about the Petition Date, the Company announced that it had reached an agreement in principle with the holders of approximately 52% of the aggregate principal amount of its Senior Notes on the terms of a financial restructuring to be implemented through the chapter 11 process. The agreement in principle was subject to numerous conditions and further agreements, including the entry of an order confirming the plan of reorganization contemplated by the proposal as required by the Bankruptcy Code. On October 17, 2003, the Company announced that it had determined not to implement the previously announced agreement in principle. Instead, the Company intends to negotiate new terms for a chapter 11 plan of reorganization with all of its major creditor constituencies.

On June 2, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered a number of orders enabling the Company to continue regular operations throughout the reorganization proceeding. These orders authorized, among other things, normal payment of employee salaries, wages and benefits; continued participation in workers' compensation insurance programs; payment to vendors for post-petition delivery of goods and services; payment of certain pre-petition obligations to customers; and continued payment of utilities. The Bankruptcy Court also approved, under interim order, access to $175 million in debtor in possession financingand subsequently approved, under final order, access to $300 million of debtor in possession financing for use by the Company, pursuant to a Post-Petition Credit Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2003, among WestPoint Stevens Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, the financi al institutions named therein and Bank of America, N.A. and Wachovia Bank, National Association (the "DIP Credit Agreement").

Initial advances under the DIP Credit Agreement bore interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus a margin of 0.75%. Each margin is subject to quarterly adjustments, commencing November 1, 2003, pursuant to a pricing matrix, based on average availability, having a range of 2.25% to 3.00% for LIBOR based loans and 0.25% to 1.00% for prime-based loans. The DIP Credit Agreement also has an unused line fee of 0.625% per annum, subject to quarterly adjustments as above having a range of 0.375% to 0.75%. Effective November 1, 2003, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement decreased to LIBOR plus 2.50% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.50% and the unused line fee decreased to 0.50%. Effective February 1, 2004, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement i ncreased to LIBOR plus 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.75% and the unused line fee increased to 0.625%.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued

The DIP Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants, including among others, affirmative and negative covenants with respect to certain financial tests and other indebtedness, as well as restrictions against the declaration or payment of dividends, the making of certain intercompany advances and the disposition of assets without consent. The DIP Credit Agreement also contains Events of Default (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement) including among others, a failure to pay the principal and interest of the obligations when due, default with respect to any Debt (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement) and a failure by the Company to comply with any provisions of the Financing Orders (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement).

During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's DIP Credit Agreement was amended primarily to modify the minimum EBITDA covenant, add a minimum availability covenant, permit certain restructuring, impairment and other charges and modify other miscellaneous provisions. At March 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement.

There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to continue to comply with the debt covenants or that, if it fails to do so, it will be able to obtain amendments to or waivers of such covenants. Failure of the Company to comply with covenants contained in its DIP Credit Agreement, if not waived, or to adequately service debt obligations, could result in a default under the DIP Credit Agreement. Any default under the Company's DIP Credit Agreement, particularly any default that results in acceleration of indebtedness or foreclosure on collateral, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Debtors are currently operating their businesses as debtors in possession pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code. Pre-bankruptcy obligations of the Debtors, including obligations under debt instruments, generally may not be enforced against the Debtors, and any actions to collect such indebtedness are automatically stayed, unless relief from the automatic stay is granted by the Bankruptcy Court. The rights of and ultimate payments by the Company under pre-bankruptcy obligations may be substantially altered. This could result in claims being liquidated in the chapter 11 case at less (and possibly substantially less) than 100% of their face value. The Debtors cannot presently determine or reasonably estimate the ultimate liability that may result from rejecting contracts or leases or from the filing of claims for any rejected contracts or leases, and no provisions have yet been made for these items. The amount of the claims to be filed by the creditors could be significant ly different than the amount of the liabilities recorded by the Company.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have conducted business in the ordinary course. Management is in the process of stabilizing the business of the Debtors and evaluating their operations as part of the development of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization. The Debtors intend to seek the requisite acceptance of the plan of reorganization by security holders and confirmation of the plan by the Bankruptcy Court, all in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. During the pendency of the chapter 11 case, the Debtors may, with Bankruptcy Court approval, sell assets and settle liabilities, including for amounts other than those reflected in the financial statements. The

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued

administrative and reorganization expenses resulting from the chapter 11 case will unfavorably affect the Debtors' results of operations. Future results of operations may also be adversely affected by other factors related to the chapter 11 case.

On August 28, 2003, one of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd., commenced an insolvency proceeding in the United Kingdom and is in the process of being closed and liquidated. The losses associated with the closure of the foreign subsidiary are estimated to total approximately $5.3 million consisting of inventory writedowns of $3.9 million and accounts receivable writedowns for claims of $1.4 million. These charges are reflected in restructuring, impairment and other charges as discussed in Note 5.

Basis of Presentation

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States applicable on a going concern basis. Except as otherwise disclosed, these principles assume that assets will be realized and liabilities will be discharged in the ordinary course of business. The Company is currently operating as a debtor in possession under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and its continuation as a going concern is contingent upon, among other things, confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization and its ability to comply with the DIP Credit Agreement, return to profitability, generate sufficient cash flows from operations and obtain financing sources to meet future obligations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve any of these results. The Company's consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments rel ating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

The Company's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report are presented in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7 ("Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code") ("SOP 90-7"). In the chapter 11 case, substantially all unsecured liabilities as of the Petition Date are subject to compromise or other treatment under a plan of reorganization which must be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court after submission to any required vote by affected parties. For financial reporting purposes, the categories of liabilities and obligations whose treatment and satisfaction are dependent on the outcome of the chapter 11 case and classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise in the consolidated balance sheets under SOP 90-7 are identified below (in thousands):

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

2. Chapter 11 Filing--Continued

Basis of Presentation--Continued

			March 31,	December 31,
			2004	2003


Senior Notes due 2005 and 2008:
	Senior Notes outstanding		$1,000,000	$1,000,000
	Related accrued interest		36,130	36,130
	Related deferred financing fees (less accumulated
		amortization of $14,682 and $14,052, respectively)	(6,534)	(7,164)

	Total		1,029,596	1,028,966
Accounts payable			30,163	30,700
Pension liabilities			8,394	8,394
Other accrued liabilities			18,693	18,809

Total			$1,086,846	$1,086,869

The ultimate amount of and settlement terms for the Company's pre-bankruptcy liabilities are subject to the ultimate outcome of its chapter 11 case and, accordingly, are not presently determinable. Pursuant to SOP 90-7, professional fees associated with the chapter 11 case are expensed as incurred and reported as reorganization costs (chapter 11 expenses). Also, interest expense will be reported only to the extent that it will be paid during the pendency of the chapter 11 case or that it is probable that it will be an allowed claim. During 2003, the Company recognized charges of $31.5 million for chapter 11 expenses, consisting of $4.9 million related to the early termination of the Company's Trade Receivables Program, $1.3 million in severance associated with the resignation of the Company's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $7.6 million for performance bonuses under a court approved Key Employee Retention Program, $3.6 million related to the amortization of fees associated with the DI P Credit Agreement and $14.1 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the chapter 11 case. During the first three months of 2004, the Company recognized charges of $8.1 million for chapter 11 expenses, consisting of $0.1 million in severance associated with the resignation of the Company's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $3.1 million for performance bonuses under a court approved Key Employee Retention Program, $1.3 million related to the amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement and $3.6 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the chapter 11 case.

Assets of the Company's subsidiaries currently excluded from the bankruptcy case total $9.4 million and $9.8 million as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, or 0.7% and 0.8% of the Company's consolidated assets, respectively. Revenues of the subsidiaries totaled $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, or 1.3% of the Company's consolidated revenues, and revenues of the subsidiaries totaled $34.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, or 2.1% of the Company's consolidated revenues.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

3. Inventories

The Company uses the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method of accounting for substantially all inventories for financial reporting purposes. Interim determinations of LIFO inventories are necessarily based on management's estimates of year-end inventory levels and costs. Subsequent changes in these estimates, including the final year-end LIFO determination, and the effect of such changes on earnings are recorded in the interim periods in which they occur.

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2004		2003

Finished goods	$	185,222	$	144,613
Work in process		179,275		176,062
Raw materials and supplies		49,758		47,945
LIFO reserve		-		-

	$	414,255	$	368,620

4. Indebtedness and Financial Arrangements

Indebtedness is as follows (in thousands of dollars):

		March 31,		December 31,
		2004		2003

Short-term indebtedness
	Senior Credit Facility	$	490,689	$	490,689
	Second-Lien Facility		165,000		165,000
	DIP Credit Agreement		113,137		89,017

		$	768,826	$	744,706





Short-term indebtedness classified as liabilities subject to compromise
	7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2005	$	525,000	$	525,000
	7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2008		475,000		475,000

		$	1,000,000	$	1,000,000

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

4. Indebtedness and Financial Arrangements--Continued

The DIP Credit Agreement consists of revolving credit loans of up to $300 million (with a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit) with an initial term of one year and maturity date of June 2, 2004. At its option, the Company may extend the term for up to two successive periods of six months each. On April 28, 2004 the Company exercised its first option to extend the DIP Credit Agreement for an additional six month period, revising the maturity date to December 2, 2004. At March 31, 2004, borrowing availability under the DIP Credit Agreement was $133.6 million and consisted of a calculated borrowing base of $313.2 million (limited to the maximum commitment of $300 million) less outstanding loans of $113.1 million, outstanding letters of credit of $48.3 million and other reserves of $5.0 million. (See Note 2 where the DIP Credit Agreement is discussed further.)

At March 31, 2004, the Company's Senior Credit Facility with certain lenders (collectively, the "Banks") consisted of a $599.6 million revolving credit facility ("Revolver") subject to interim facility limitations, with a Revolver maturity date of November 30, 2004. Effective with the chapter 11 filing, additional borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are no longer available to the Company. On February 1, 2004, the revolver commitment decreased $17.5 million as a result of a scheduled commitment reduction. Under the Senior Credit Facility, there was approximately $2.8 million of outstanding letters of credit at March 31, 2004.

Effective March 31, 2003, the Senior Credit Facility was amended primarily to provide for an interim facility limitation and to add an unused commitment fee. At the option of the Company and effective with the March 31, 2003 amendment to the Senior Credit Facility, interest under the Senior Credit Facility was payable monthly, either at the prime rate plus 5.25% or LIBOR plus 7.00%, compared to prime rate plus 2.75%, or LIBOR plus 4.50% in effect at December 31, 2002. Prior to the chapter 11 filing, the Company was obligated to pay a facility fee in an amount equal to 0.50% of each Bank's commitment under the Revolver, and an unused commitment fee in an amount equal to 1.00% of the difference between the revolver commitment and the daily outstanding loans and letters of credit. Effective with the chapter 11 filing, the Company is no longer obligated to pay a facility fee or an unused commitment fee for the Senior Credit Facility. The loans under the Senior Credit Facility are secured by the pledge of all the stock of the Company's material subsidiaries and a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company.

The Company has a $165.0 million Second-Lien Senior Credit Facility ("Second-Lien Facility") with a maturity date of February 28, 2005. Effective with the Company's chapter 11 filing, interest under the Second-Lien Facility is payable monthly, as opposed to quarterly prior to the filing, at an interest rate of prime plus 8% increasing each quarter after June 30, 2002, by .375% but in no event less than 15%. Loans under the Second-Lien Facility are secured by a second priority lien on the assets securing the existing Senior Credit Facility.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

4. Indebtedness and Financial Arrangements--Continued

The 7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2005 and 7-7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (together, the "Senior Notes") are general unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing or future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company and senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The Senior Notes bear interest at the rate of 7-7/8% per annum, and prior to the Company's chapter 11 filing were payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year. Effective with the Company's chapter 11 filing, interest on the Senior Notes is no longer paid or accrued. The Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at the option of the Company at 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the Make-Whole Premium (as defined) plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. In addition, in the event of a Change of Control (as defined), the Company wil l be required to make an offer to purchase the notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. Neither the redemption option nor the Change of Control provisions are relevant in the Company's chapter 11 case.

The Company's credit agreements contain a number of customary covenants including, among others, restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness, transactions with affiliates, and certain asset dispositions as well as limitations on restricted debt and equity payments and capital expenditures. Certain provisions require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios, a minimum interest coverage ratio, a minimum debt to EBITDA ratio, a minimum EBITDA, a minimum consolidated net worth (as defined) and a minimum availability. The Company can no longer make restricted debt and equity payments. At March 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement but was not in compliance with the covenants under its various other credit agreements, primarily as a result of the chapter 11 filing and failure to meet certain financial covenants.

At March 31, 2003, and prior to the petition date, the Company was not in compliance with certain of its covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and Second-Lien Facility during which time the Company engaged in active discussions with its senior lenders to obtain an amendment or waiver of such non-compliance (See Note 2 where the chronology of the circumstances causing the Company to file voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is discussed).

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges

In 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the new Eight-Point Plan, which was created to be the guiding discipline for the Company in a global economy. The Board also approved a pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges to cover the initial cost of implementing the Eight-Point Plan that is designed to streamline operations and improve profitability. The Eight-Point Plan addresses the following points: 1) expand brands; 2) explore new licensing opportunities; 3) rationalize manufacturing; 4) reduce overhead; 5) increase global sourcing; 6) improve inventory utilization; 7) enhance supply chain and logistics; and 8) improve capital structure.

On September 20, 2002, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved additional restructuring initiatives to increase asset utilization, lower manufacturing costs and increase cash flow and profitability through reallocation of production assets from bath products to basic bedding products and through rationalization of its retail stores division. The Company initially expected the restructuring initiatives to result in a $36.5 million pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges, with approximately $20 million of the pretax charge expected to be non-cash items. As a result of modifications to the initial restructuring initiatives, the Company now expects the restructuring initiatives to result in a $47.7 million pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges, with approximately $31.7 million of the pretax charge expected to be non-cash items. All charges have been recorded in accordance with Statement of Fin ancial Accounting Standard No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The charges for the restructuring initiatives began in the third quarter of 2002 and will continue through the second quarter of 2004.

As a result of the restructuring initiatives begun in 2002, the Company announced the closure of its Rosemary (NC) towel finishing facility, the conversion of its Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities to basic bedding facilities and the closure of its Dalton (GA) utility bedding facility. The Company announced on April 25, 2003 that the Rosemary (NC) towel fabrication and distribution facilities that were previously disclosed as being converted to basic bedding facilities would now be closed. The Company also announced the closure of twenty-two retail stores and the closure of its WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd. foreign subsidiary.

The cost of the manufacturing and retail store rationalization and certain overhead reduction costs were reflected in a restructuring and impairment charge of $6.6 million, before taxes, in 2002, a restructuring and impairment charge of $12.6 million, before taxes, in 2003 and a restructuring and impairment charge of $0.2 million, before taxes, in the first three months of 2004. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in 2002 included $4.4 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $2.2 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related primarily to severance benefits. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in 2003 included $7.0 million for the impairment of fixed assets and $5.6 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits of $5.2 million and other exit costs. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in the first three months of 2004 included $0.2 million in reserves to c over cash expenses related to severance benefits.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued

During 2002 and 2003 as a result of restructuring initiatives, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 500 employees.

The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):

				Employee		Other
		Writedown		Termination		Exit		Total
		Assets		Benefits		Costs		Charge

2002 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	Third Quarter	$	4.3	$	1.6	$	-	$	5.9
	Fourth Quarter		0.1		0.5		0.1		0.7

Total 2002 Charge		4.4		2.1		0.1		6.6

2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	First Quarter		0.2		0.8		0.4		1.4
	Second Quarter		6.8		4.3		0.8		11.9
	Third Quarter		0.8		0.2		-		1.0
	Fourth Quarter		(0.8)		(0.1)		(0.8)		(1.7)

Total 2003 Charge			7.0		5.2		0.4		12.6

2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	First Quarter	-		0.2		-		0.2

Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value		(11.4)		-		-		(11.4)
2002 Cash Payments			-		(1.5)		-		(1.5)
2003 Cash Payments			-		(4.6)		(0.4)		(5.0)
2004 Cash Payments			-		(0.5)		-		(0.5)

Balance at March 31, 2004		$	-	$	0.9	$	0.1	$	1.0

During 2002, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $11.6 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $10.5 million primarily related to the rationalization of its retail stores division and other expenses of $1.1 million, consisting primarily of related unabsorbed overhead, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During 2003, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $16.0 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $8.4 million primarily related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and the rationalization of its retail stores division, accounts receivable writedowns for claims of $1.4 million related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and other expenses of $6.2 million, consisting primarily of $4.1 million of related unabsorbed overhead, $1.2 million for the relocation of machinery and other expenses of $0.9 million, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During the first three mon ths of 2004, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $0.2 million, before taxes, were recognized for relocation of machinery, all reflected in cost of goods sold.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued

During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's Board of Directors approved further additional restructuring initiatives to increase asset utilization, lower manufacturing costs and increase cash flow and profitability through a further realignment of manufacturing capacity. The Company expects the restructuring initiatives to result in an $84.3 million pretax charge for restructuring, impairment and other charges. Approximately $55.6 million of the pretax charge is expected to be non-cash items. All charges have been recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The charges for the restructuring initiatives began in the fourth quarter of 2003 and will continue throughout 2004.

As a result of the restructuring initiatives begun in 2003, the Company announced the closure of its Dunson (GA) sheeting facility, its Dixie (GA) towel facility, its Coushatta (LA) utility bedding facility and its Fairfax (AL) towel greige facility. The Company also announced the conversion of its Lanier (AL) sheeting facility to towel production and the conversion of its Greenville (AL) blanket facility to a utility bedding facility. These plant closings and conversions will provide the Company with greater production efficiency and better-aligned capacity to compete more effectively in a global economy.

The cost of the manufacturing rationalization was reflected in a restructuring and impairment charge of $37.0 million, before taxes, in 2003 and a restructuring and impairment charge of $4.6 million, before taxes, in the first three months of 2004. The restructuring and impairment charge in 2003 reflected the impairment of fixed assets. The components of the restructuring and impairment charge in the first three months of 2004 included $4.6 million in reserves to cover cash expenses related to severance benefits.

During 2004 and as a result of restructuring initiatives, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 500 employees.

The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):

				Employee		Other
		Writedown		Termination		Exit		Total
		Assets		Benefits		Costs		Charge

2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	Fourth Quarter	$	37.0	$	-	$	-	$	37.0

2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	First Quarter	-		4.6		-		4.6

Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value		(37.0)		-		-		(37.0)
2004 Cash Payments			-		(0.7)		-		(0.7)

Balance at March 31, 2004		$	-	$	3.9	$	-	$	3.9

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

5. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued

During 2003, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $1.4 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $1.0 million and other expenses of $0.4 million, consisting of related unabsorbed overhead. During the first three months of 2004, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $2.8 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting primarily of $2.6 million of related unabsorbed overhead and $0.2 million for the relocation of machinery.

6. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,

	2004		2003


Net loss	$	(14,879)	$	(16,906)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(55)		776
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of tax:
Net changes in fair value of derivatives	(8,547)		646
Net (gains) losses reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings	963		(1,820)


Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(22,518)	$	(17,304)

7. Deferred Financing Fees

Amendment fees and transaction fees related to the Company's various credit agreements are capitalized in the period incurred and amortized over the remaining term of the facility. Included in Other expense-net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004, is the amortization of deferred financing fees of $3.2 million compared with $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, related to the Company's credit facilities other than the DIP Credit Agreement. Deferred financing fees related to the DIP Credit Agreement are included in chapter 11 expenses and totaled $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

8. Employee Benefit Plans

Pension Plans

The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering essentially all employees. Benefits are based on years of service and compensation, and the Company's practice is to fund amounts that are required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date of its defined benefit pension plans.

The following table sets forth data for the Company's pension plans (in thousands of dollars):

		Three Months Ended March 31,

		2004		2003

Components of net periodic pension cost (benefit):
	Service cost	$	2,329	$	2,116
	Interest cost		5,806		5,927
	Expected return on plan assets		(5,400)		(5,161)
	Net amortization		2,696		2,620


Net periodic pension expense		$	5,431	$	5,502

Based on actuarial information available at December 31, 2003, the Company estimates that contributions to its pension plans in 2004 will total approximately $24.9 million, reflecting both quarterly and annually required contributions.

Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

In addition to sponsoring defined benefit pension plans, the Company sponsors various post-retirement plans that provide health care and life insurance benefits to certain current and future retirees. All such post-retirement benefit plans are unfunded. The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date of its post-retirement plans.

Net periodic post-retirement benefit plans expense is not material during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.

9. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities

Except as stated below, as of the Petition Date, the following actions in which the Company is a defendant have been enjoined from further proceedings pursuant to section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. To the extent parties have filed timely proofs of claim, the Bankruptcy Court will determine the amount of their pre-bankruptcy claims against the Company. In certain instances, the Bankruptcy Court may permit actions to proceed to judgment for the purpose of determining the amount of the pre-bankruptcy claim against the Company. Lawsuits based on facts arising solely after the commencement of the Company's chapter 11 case are not stayed by section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

9. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities--Continued

On October 5, 2001, a purported stockholder class action suit, entitledNorman Geller v. WestPoint Stevens Inc., et al.(the"Geller action"), was filed against the Company and certain of its former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (A subsequent and functionally identical complaint was also filed.) The actions were consolidated by Order dated January 25, 2002. Plaintiffs served a Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") on March 29, 2002. The Amended Complaint asserts claims against all Defendants under section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and against the Company and Defendant Holcombe T. Green, Jr. as "controlling persons" under section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Amended Complaint alleges that, during the putative class period (i.e., February 10, 1999, to October 10, 2000), the Company and c ertain of its officers and directors caused false and misleading statements to be issued regarding, inter alia, alleged overcapacity and excessive inventories of the Company's towel-related products and customer demand for such products and that certain Individual Defendants wrongfully sold or pledged Company stock at inflated prices for their benefit. The Amended Complaint refers to the Company's press releases and quarterly and annual reports on Securities Exchange Commission Forms 10-Q and 10-K, which discuss the Company's results and forecasts for the fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Plaintiffs allege that these press releases and public filings were false and misleading because they failed to disclose that the Company allegedly "knew sales would be adversely affected in future quarters and years." Plaintiffs also allege in general terms that the Company materially overstated revenues by making premature shipments of products.

On June 6, 2002, Defendants filed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. On February 3, 2003, the court denied Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. The Company has been informed by counsel that its insurance carrier has reached an agreement in principle to settle theGeller action at no cost to the Company, subject to definitive documentation and approvals of the court and the Bankruptcy Court.

On March 11, 2002, a shareholder derivative action, entitledGordon Clark v. Holcombe T. Green, Jr., et al.(the"Clark action"), was filed against certain of the Company's former directors and officers in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia. The Complaint alleges that the named individuals breached their fiduciary duties by acting in bad faith and wasting corporate assets. The Complaint also asserts claims under Georgia Code Ann. sections 14-2-740 to 14-2-747 and 14-2-831. The claims are based on the same or similar facts as are alleged in theGeller action.

On July 1, 2002, a shareholder derivative action, entitledJohn Hemmer v. Holcombe T. Green, Jr., et al.(the"Hemmer action"), was filed against Mr. Green and certain of the Company's other current and former directors including Messrs. Hugh M. Chapman, John F. Sorte and Ms. M. Katherine Dwyer in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County. The Complaint alleges that the named individuals breached their fiduciary duties and knowingly or recklessly failed to exercise oversight responsibilities to ensure the integrity of the Company's financial reporting. The Complaint also asserts that certain of the named individuals used proprietary Company information in selling or pledging Company stock at inflated prices for their benefit. The claims are based on the same or similar facts as are alleged in theGeller action.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

9. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities--Continued

By agreements between the parties, theClark andHemmer actions were both stayed pending entry of final judgment by the court in theGeller action. As with theGeller action, theClark andHemmer actions were also stayed due to the Company's bankruptcy filing.

The Company has been informed by counsel that its insurance carrier has reached an agreement in principle to settle theClark andHemmer actions at no cost to the Company, subject to definitive documentation and approvals of the court and the Bankruptcy Court.

On March 21, 2002, an Adversary Complaint of Debtors and Debtors in Possession Against WestPoint Stevens Inc. was filed by Pillowtex, Inc., a Delaware corporation,et al.,and Pillowtex Corporation,et al., against the Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Pillowtex Corporation and its related and affiliated companies ("Pillowtex") as Debtors and Debtors in Possession allege breach of a postpetition contract (the "Sale Agreement") dated January 31, 2001, among Pillowtex, Ralph Lauren Home Collection, Inc. ("RLH") and Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation ("PRLC") collectively referred to as "Ralph Lauren" and the Company. Pillowtex alleges that the Company refused to perform its purchase obligation under the Sales Agreement and is liable to it for $4,800,000 plus potentially significant other consequential damages. The Company believes that the complaint is without merit and intends to contest the action vigorousl y. The case is currently stayed due to the Company's bankruptcy filing.

The Company is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, the discharge, storage, handling and disposal of a variety of hazardous and nonhazardous substances and wastes used in or resulting from its operations and potential remediation obligations thereunder. Certain of the Company's facilities (including certain facilities no longer owned or utilized by the Company) have been cited or are being investigated with respect to alleged violations of such laws and regulations. The Company is cooperating fully with relevant parties and authorities in all such matters. The Company believes that it has adequately provided in its financial statements for any expenses and liabilities that may result from such matters. The Company also is insured with respect to certain of such matters. The Company's operations are governed by laws and regulations relating to employee safety and h ealth which, among other things, establish exposure limitations for cotton dust, formaldehyde, asbestos and noise, and regulate chemical and ergonomic hazards in the workplace.

Although the Company does not expect that compliance with any of such laws and regulations will adversely affect the Company's operations, there can be no assurance such regulatory requirements will not become more stringent in the future or that the Company will not incur significant costs in the future to comply with such requirements.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

9. Litigation and Contingent Liabilities--Continued

The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other legal proceedings, both as plaintiff and as defendant, which are normal to its business. It is the opinion of management that the aforementioned actions and claims, if determined adversely to the Company, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company taken as a whole.

10. Stock Options

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -- Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition to SFAS No. 123's fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 28,Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure of the effects of an entity's accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation, regardless of whether they account for that compensation using the fair value method of SFAS No. 123 or the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 148's amendments of the transition and annual disclosure requirements of SFAS No.&nb sp;123 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 148 through continued application of the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB No. 25, and related interpretations, and enhanced financial statement disclosures of the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if fair value provisions of SFAS No. 148 had been applied.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

10. Stock Options--Continued

At March 31, 2004, the Company had several stock-based compensation plans, which are described in Note 7 -- Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2003. As discussed above, the Company applies APB No. 25, and related interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock incentive plan. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method established in SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company's net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per common share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):

			Three Months Ended
			March 31,

			2004		2003


Net loss as reported			$	(14,879)	$	(16,906)

Total stock-based compensation
	expenses determined under
	fair-value based method for
	all awards, net of tax			(703)	(650)


Pro forma net loss			$	(15,582)	$		(17,556)




Basic and diluted loss per common share:
		As reported	$	(.30)	$		(0.34)
		Pro forma	$	(.31)	$		(0.35)

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)

11. New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") released Interpretation No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 requires that all primary beneficiaries of Variable Interest Entities ("VIE") consolidate that entity. FIN 46 is effective immediately for VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and to VIEs to which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, to VIEs in which an enterprise holds a variable interest it acquired before February 1, 2003. In December 2003, the FASB published a revision to FIN 46 ("FIN 46R") to clarify some of the provisions of the interpretation and defer to the effective date of implementation for certain entities. Under the guidance of FIN 46R, entities that do not have interests in structures that are commonly referred to as special purpose entities are requ ired to apply the provisions of the interpretation in financial statements for periods ending after March 14, 2004. The Company has not identified any interests in special purpose entities applicable to the provisions of this statement in applying the provisions of FIN 46R in the first quarter 2004 financial statements.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations

Chapter 11 Case

As disclosed in Note 2, on June 1, 2003, the Company and several of its subsidiaries each commenced with the Bankruptcy Court a voluntary case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Code prevents creditors and other parties in interest from taking certain actions, including enforcement actions, against the Debtors, without first obtaining prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, the Company has entered into the DIP Credit Agreement, which is more fully described below. On August 28, 2003, one of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, WestPoint Stevens (Europe) Ltd., commenced an insolvency proceeding in the United Kingdom and is in the process of being closed and liquidated.

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States on a going concern basis. Except as otherwise disclosed, these principles assume that assets will be realized and liabilities will be discharged in the ordinary course of business. The Company is currently operating as a debtor in possession under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and its continuation as a going concern is contingent upon, among other things, the confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of a chapter 11 plan of reorganization and its ability to comply with the DIP Credit Agreement, return to profitability, generate sufficient cash flows from operations and obtain financing sources to meet future obligations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve any of these results. The Company's consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the rec overability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Whether as a result of its case under chapter 11 or otherwise, the Company may sell or otherwise dispose of assets, and liquidate or settle liabilities, for amounts other than those reflected in the financial statements. Additionally, the amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets could materially change because of changes in business strategies and the effects of any proposed plan of reorganization.

Basis of Presentation

The Company's consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 90-7 ("Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code") ("SOP 90-7"). In the chapter 11 case, substantially all unsecured liabilities as of the Petition Date are subject to compromise or other treatment under a plan of reorganization which must be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court after submission to any required vote by affected parties. For financial reporting purposes, the categories of liabilities and obligations whose treatment and satisfaction are dependent on the outcome of the chapter 11 case have been classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise in the consolidated balance sheets. The ultimate amount of and settlement terms for the

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Basis of Presentation--Continued

Company's pre-bankruptcy liabilities are subject to the ultimate outcome of its chapter 11 case and, accordingly, are not presently determinable. Pursuant to SOP 90-7, professional fees associated with the chapter 11 case are expensed as incurred and reported as reorganization costs (chapter 11 expenses). Also, interest expense will be reported only to the extent that it will be paid during the pendency of the chapter 11 case or that it is probable that it will be an allowed claim.

Senior Credit Facility and Second-Lien Facility Amendments

Effective March 31, 2003, the Company's Senior Credit Facility was amended primarily to provide for an interim facility limitation and to add an unused commitment fee. At the option of the Company and effective with the March 31, 2003 amendment to the Senior Credit Facility, interest under the Senior Credit Facility was payable monthly, either at the prime rate plus 5.25% or at LIBOR plus 7.00%, compared to prime rate plus 2.75% or LIBOR plus 4.50% in effect at December 31, 2002. Effective with the chapter 11 filing, loans under the Senior Credit Facility are no longer available to the Company. Prior to the Petition Date, the Company was also obligated to pay a facility fee in an amount equal to 0.50% of each Bank's commitment under the Revolver, and an unused commitment fee in an amount equal to 1.00% of the difference between the revolver commitment and the daily outstanding loans and letters of credit. As of the Petition Date, the Company is no longer obligated to pay a facility fee or an unused commitment fee for the Senior Credit Facility.

DIP Credit Agreement

The Company is a party to the DIP Credit Agreement which provides a facility consisting of revolving credit loans of up to $300 million (with a sublimit of $75 million for letters of credit) with an initial term of one year and maturity date of June 2, 2004. At its option, the Company may extend the term for up to two successive periods of six months each. On April 28, 2004 the Company exercised its first option to extend the DIP Credit Agreement for an additional six month period, revising the maturity date to December 2, 2004.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

DIP Credit Agreement--Continued

Initial advances under the DIP Credit Agreement bore interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus a margin of 0.75%. Each margin is subject to quarterly adjustments, commencing November 1, 2003, pursuant to a pricing matrix, based on average availability, having a range of 2.25% to 3.00% for LIBOR based loans and 0.25% to 1.00% for prime based loans. The DIP Credit Agreement also has an unused line fee of 0.625% per annum, subject to quarterly adjustments as above having a range of 0.375% to 0.75%. Effective November 1, 2003, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement decreased to LIBOR plus 2.50% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.50% and the unused line fee decreased to 0.50%. Effective February 1, 2004, as a result of average availability, interest rates under the DIP Credit Agreement increased to LIBOR plus 2.75% or, at the Company's option, prime plus 0.75% and the unused line fee increased to 0.625%.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Restructuring, Impairment, and Other Charges

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued

During 2002 and 2003 as a result of restructuring initiatives, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 500 employees.

The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):

				Employee		Other
		Writedown		Termination		Exit		Total
		Assets		Benefits		Costs		Charge

2002 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	Third Quarter	$	4.3	$	1.6	$	-	$	5.9
	Fourth Quarter		0.1		0.5		0.1		0.7

Total 2002 Charge		4.4		2.1		0.1		6.6

2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	First Quarter		0.2		0.8		0.4		1.4
	Second Quarter		6.8		4.3		0.8		11.9
	Third Quarter		0.8		0.2		-		1.0
	Fourth Quarter		(0.8)		(0.1)		(0.8)		(1.7)

Total 2003 Charge			7.0		5.2		0.4		12.6

2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	First Quarter	-		0.2		-		0.2

Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value		(11.4)		-		-		(11.4)
2002 Cash Payments			-		(1.5)		-		(1.5)
2003 Cash Payments			-		(4.6)		(0.4)		(5.0)
2004 Cash Payments			-		(0.5)		-		(0.5)

Balance at March 31, 2004		$	-	$	0.9	$	0.1	$	1.0

During 2002, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $11.6 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $10.5 million primarily related to the rationalization of its retail stores division and other expenses of $1.1 million, consisting primarily of related unabsorbed overhead, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During 2003, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $16.0 million, before taxes, were recognized consisting of inventory writedowns of $8.4 million primarily related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and the rationalization of its retail stores division, accounts receivable writedowns for claims of $1.4 million related to the closure of its foreign subsidiary and other expenses of $6.2 million, consisting primarily of $4.1 million of related unabsorbed overhead, $1.2 million for the relocation of machinery and other expenses of $0.9 million, all reflected in cost of goods sold. During the first three months of 2004, other costs of the restructuring initiatives of $0.2 million, before taxes, were recognized for relocation of machinery, all reflected in cost of goods sold.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued

During 2004 and as a result of restructuring initiatives, the Company has terminated and agreed to pay severance (including continuing termination benefits) to approximately 500 employees.

The following is a summary of the restructuring and impairment activity in the related reserves (in millions):

				Employee		Other
		Writedown		Termination		Exit		Total
		Assets		Benefits		Costs		Charge

2003 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	Fourth Quarter	$	37.0	$	-	$	-	$	37.0

2004 Restructuring and Impairment Charge:
	First Quarter	-		4.6		-		4.6

Writedown Assets to Net Recoverable Value		(37.0)		-		-		(37.0)
2004 Cash Payments			-		(0.7)		-		(0.7)

Balance at March 31, 2004		$	-	$	3.9	$	-	$	3.9

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges--Continued

Executive Summary

Overview

The Company operates exclusively in the home fashions industry and recognizes revenue primarily through the sale of Home Fashion products to a variety of retail and institutional customers. The Company also operates 37 retail outlets that sell home fashion products including but not limited to WestPoint Stevens' home fashion products. In addition, the Company receives a small portion of its revenues through the licensing of its trade names.

Industry and Company Profile

Cyclicality

The home fashion textile industry has traditionally been a cyclical industry. The latest down cycle began in 2000 and is reported to be showing signs of a turn upward. The practical effect of a down cycle on manufacturing companies, including the Company, is stress on any balance sheet which has a large debt load and pressure on profitability caused by under utilization of plant and equipment.

Growth of Imports

The easing of trade restrictions over time has led to growing competition from low priced imported product. This issue will be amplified by the projected lifting of import quotas in the year 2005. Imported sheets and towels have captured 44% and 54% respectively of the U.S. market according to U.S. Census data for 2003. Domestic suppliers, including the Company, have contributed to the import total by buying product overseas for resale domestically. Approximately 22% of the Company's 2003 sales were of imported goods. The Company has recently closed four domestic manufacturing facilities in favor of importing those products.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Executive Summary--Continued

Retail Consolidation

Retailers of consumer goods have become fewer and more powerful over time. As buying power has become more concentrated, pricing pressure on vendors has grown. With the ability to buy imported product directly from the foreign source, this pricing leverage has increased. The result has been a negative effect on unit pricing and margins earned on domestically produced products. To combat this trend, domestic producers, such as the Company, are aggressively importing competitively priced goods and utilizing domestic distribution capabilities and the ability to deliver large volumes on short notice to maintain their value to the retail customers.

External Events

Sales and availability of consumer goods are directly impacted by external events. The attacks of 9/11 severely impacted retail sales and vendor shipments nationwide. The west coast dock strike kept imported goods from reaching their destinations and was an advantage for domestic suppliers. Snowstorms in 2004 slowed retail sales and closed production facilities.

Raw Material Pricing and Availability

Textile profitability is affected more by raw material pricing than any other single variable. A one-cent per pound change in cotton pricing can have an enormous effect on product profitability. Over the past three years the price of cotton has varied by as much as twenty cents per pound, both up and down. The Company employs a hedging strategy to smooth the volatility of the cotton market and to reduce uncertainty in costing. Other raw materials are down and feathers for pillows and comforters and also polyester for sheeting and pillows. Down and feathers are generally imported from China. Pricing is subject to vacillations in supply caused by any number of things. Polyester prices vary with the price of petroleum.

Working Capital Management

Inventory management is the most critical variable to the success of a textile company. Inventory is produced prospectively based on customer provided forecasts in order to be ready to ship on a quick response basis. Growing sophistication of retail systems has provided the customer with the ability to recognize trends rapidly and to change forecasts on much shorter notice than in the past. This ability presents unique challenges to the manufacturer who produces inventory in advance of anticipated orders. To manage inventory balances, the Company has moved to smaller lot sizes in some cases, but most importantly, the Company has chosen to curtail production where necessary in order not to create unwanted inventory. Curtailment has a negative effect on profitability but preserves cash that would have otherwise been invested in inventory.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations

The table below is a summary of the Company's operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003 (in millions of dollars).

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,


	2004		2003


Net sales	$	399.6	$	379.3

Gross earnings	$	68.2	$		73.4

Restructuring and impairment charge	$	4.8	$		1.4

Operating earnings	$	7.6	$		8.6

Interest expense	$	17.8	$		32.5

Other expense-net	$	2.8	$		2.5

Chapter 11 expenses	$	8.1	-

Loss before taxes	$	(21.2)	$		(26.4)

Net loss	$	(14.9)	$		(16.9)

Gross margin		17.1%	19.4%
Operating margin		1.9%	2.3%

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations: Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 Compared to
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2003

Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2004 increased $20.4 million, or 5.4% to $399.6 million compared with net sales of $379.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. As a result of a strengthening economy, improvement in overall retail sales led to improved sales performance for the Company with increases in sales across all distribution channels, with the exception of department stores, coupled with sales increases in all major product categories. This more than offset sales declines at the Company's retail stores due to store closings, and the absence of European sales due to its impending liquidation.

For the three months ended March 31, 2004, bed products sales were $233.2 million compared with $214.6 million for the same period in 2003; bath products sales were $141.1 million compared with $128.0 million for the same period in 2003; and other sales (consisting primarily of sales from the Company's mill stores and foreign operations) were $25.3 million compared with $36.7 million for the same period in 2003.

Gross Earnings/Margins. Gross earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2004 decreased $5.2 million, or 7.1%, to $68.2 million compared with $73.4 million for the same period of 2003, and reflect gross margins of 17.1% in 2004 versus 19.4% in 2003. Gross earnings and margins decreased primarily as a result of a less profitable mix of revenues, and increased raw material costs that more than offset improved manufacturing efficiencies due to better running schedules and price increases implemented during the quarter. Included in the cost of goods sold in the first quarter of 2004 are charges associated with recent restructuring initiatives of $3.0 million, the majority of which reflects costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and equipment relocation versus $2.9 million in 2003 which reflected costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and inventory write-offs primarily related to the rationalization of the retail stor es division.

Operating Earnings/Margins. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $7.7 million, or 12.1%, in the first quarter of 2004 to $55.8 million compared with $63.5 million in the same period of last year, and as a percentage of net sales represent 14.0% in the 2004 period and 16.7% in the 2003 period. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2004 and as a percentage of sales was due to elimination of expenses as a result of the rationalization of the retail stores division and the elimination of the European operations as well as the absence of fees associated with the Trade Receivables Facility which was terminated in July of 2003.

Operating earnings for the first quarter of 2004 decreased 11.5% to $7.6 million, or 1.9% of sales, compared with operating earnings of $8.6 million, or 2.3% of sales, for the same period in 2003. Operating earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2004, included a separate line item for restructuring and impairment charges to reflect $4.8 million in severance benefits and other exit costs in addition to charges associated with recent restructuring initiatives of $3.0 million, the majority of

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations: Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 Compared to
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2003--Continued

Operating Earnings/Margins--Continued
which reflects costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and equipment relocation. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, operating earnings included a separate line item for restructuring and impairment charges to reflect $1.4 million primarily in severance and other exit costs in addition to charges associated with restructuring initiatives of $2.9 million which reflected costs for unabsorbed overhead at affected facilities and inventory write-offs primarily related to the rationalization of the retail stores division.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004 of $17.8 million decreased $14.7 million compared with interest expense of $32.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Effective with the Company's Chapter 11 filing, interest is no longer accrued on the Senior Notes due 2005 and 2008, the impact of which was $18.8 million in the first quarter of 2004. The decrease in interest expense was partially offset by higher interest rates on the Company's variable rate bank debt for 2004 compared with corresponding 2003 average interest rates and higher debt levels compared with corresponding 2003 outstanding debt.

Other Expense-Net. Other expense-net in the first quarter of 2004 of $2.8 million consisted primarily of the amortization of deferred financing fees of $3.2 million, less certain miscellaneous income items compared with other expense-net in the first quarter of 2003 of $2.5 million, that consisted primarily of amortization of deferred financing fees of $2.6 million, less certain miscellaneous income items.

Chapter 11 Expenses. The Company recognized $8.1 million in bankruptcy reorganization related expenses in the first quarter of 2004 consisting primarily of $1.3 million related to amortization of fees associated with the DIP Credit Agreement, $0.1 million in severance associated with the resignation of the Company's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, $3.1 million for performance bonuses under a court approved Key Employee Retention Plan and $3.6 million related to fees payable to professionals retained to assist with the Chapter 11 proceedings.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). In the first three months of 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $6.3 million and $9.5 million, respectively. The Company's effective tax rate was 29.8% in 2004 and 36% in 2003. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due primarily to non-deductible items related to the Company's chapter 11 expenses.

Net Income. Net income for the first quarter of 2004 was a loss of $14.9 million or a loss of $0.30 per share diluted, compared with a loss of $16.9 million or a loss of $0.34 per share diluted, for the same period in 2003. Included in net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2004 were costs related to restructuring initiatives, net of taxes, of $5.0 million, or $0.10 loss per diluted share, as previously discussed versus costs related to restructuring initiatives, net of taxes, in the year ago period of $2.7 million, or $0.06 loss per diluted share.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Net Income--Continued
Diluted per share amounts are based on 49.9 million average shares outstanding for both 2004 and 2003.

Effects of Inflation

The Company believes that the relatively moderate rate of inflation over the past few years has not had a significant impact on its sales or profitability.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

So long as the Company remains under the protection of chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, its principal sources of liquidity are expected to be cash generated from its operations and funds available under the DIP Credit Agreement. The maximum commitment under the DIP Credit Agreement is $300 million. At March 31, 2004, borrowing availability under the DIP Credit Agreement was $133.6 million and consisted of a calculated borrowing base of $313.2 million (limited to the maximum commitment of $300 million) less outstanding loans of $113.1 million, outstanding letters of credit of $48.3 million and other reserves of $5.0 million. For additional information about the DIP Credit Agreement, see "-- DIP Credit Agreement" above.

During the pendency of its chapter 11 case, the Company's principal uses of cash will be administrative expenses of the chapter 11 case, operating expenses, capital expenditures and debt service (including both interest payments under the DIP Credit Agreement and whatever payments may be made in respect of pre-petition debt in accordance with orders of the Bankruptcy Court).

There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to comply with the debt covenants or that, if it fails to do so, it will be able to obtain amendments to or waivers of such covenants. Failure of the Company to comply with covenants contained in its DIP Credit Agreement, if not waived, or to adequately service debt obligations, could result in a default under the DIP Credit Agreement. Any default under the Company's DIP Credit Agreement, particularly any default that results in acceleration of indebtedness or foreclosure on collateral, could have a material adverse effect on the Company. At March 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the DIP Credit Agreement.

Adequacy of Capital Resources

As a result of the uncertainty surrounding the Company's current circumstances, it is difficult to predict the Company's actual liquidity needs and sources at this time. However, based on current and anticipated levels of operations, and efforts to effectively manage working capital, the Company anticipates that its cash flows from operations, cash generated from asset sales, and amounts available under the DIP Credit Agreement, will be adequate to meet its anticipated cash requirements during the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (Continued)

Adequacy of Capital Resources--Continued

In the event that cash flows and available borrowings under the DIP Credit Agreement are not sufficient to meet future cash requirements, the Company may be required to reduce planned capital expenditures, sell assets or seek additional financing. The Company can provide no assurances that reductions in planned capital expenditures or proceeds from asset sales would be sufficient to cover shortfalls in available cash or that additional financing would be available or, if available, offered on acceptable terms.

As a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company's access to additional financing is, and for the foreseeable future will likely continue to be, very limited. The Company's long-term liquidity requirements and the adequacy of the Company's capital resources are difficult to predict at this time, and ultimately cannot be determined until a plan of reorganization has been developed and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court in connection with the Chapter 11 proceedings.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The Company's exposure to market risk has not materially changed from what was reported on the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15e as of March 31, 2004. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2004, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that all material information required to be filed in this quarterly report has been made known to them in a timely fashion. There have been no significant changes in internal controls, or in factors that could significantly affect internal controls during the period covered by this report.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On October 5, 2001, a purported stockholder class action suit, entitledNorman Geller v. WestPoint Stevens Inc., et al.(the"Geller action"), was filed against the Company and certain of its former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (A subsequent and functionally identical complaint was also filed.) The actions were consolidated by Order dated January 25, 2002. Plaintiffs served a Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") on March 29, 2002. The Amended Complaint asserts claims against all Defendants under section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and against the Company and Defendant Holcombe T. Green, Jr. as "controlling persons" under section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Amended Complaint alleges that, during the putative class period (i.e., February 10, 1999, to October 10, 2000), the Company and certa in of its officers and directors caused false and misleading statements to be issued regarding, inter alia, alleged overcapacity and excessive inventories of the Company's towel-related products and customer demand for such products and that certain Individual Defendants wrongfully sold or pledged Company stock at inflated prices for their benefit. The Amended Complaint refers to the Company's press releases and quarterly and annual reports on Securities Exchange Commission Forms 10-Q and 10-K, which discuss the Company's results and forecasts for the fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Plaintiffs allege that these press releases and public filings were false and misleading because they failed to disclose that the Company allegedly "knew sales would be adversely affected in future quarters and years." Plaintiffs also allege in general terms that the Company materially overstated revenues by making premature shipments of products.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION--Continued

Item 1. Legal Proceedings--Continued

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION--Continued

Item 1. Legal Proceedings--Continued

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

The commencement of the Chapter 11 proceedings constitutes an event of default under the Company's Senior Credit Facility, Second-Lien Facility and indentures governing the Company's senior unsecured notes. On March 31, 2004, the principal amount of indebtedness in default is approximately $1,655.7 million and the amount of accrued interest in default on the senior unsecured notes is approximately $36.1 million. Approximately $65.1 million of interest has not been accrued on the senior unsecured notes as a result of the Chapter 11 filing.

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

a.) Exhibits


Exhibit
Number			Description of Exhibit


31.1			Chief Executive Officer's Section 302 Certification.

31.2			Chief Financial Officer's Section 302 Certification.

32.1			Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as signed by the Chief Executive Officer.

32.2			Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as signed by the Chief Financial Officer.

b.) Reports on Form 8-K

	b.1.)		The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on February 18, 2004. The item reported was "Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure."

	b.2.)		The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on February 20, 2004. The item reported was "Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure."

	b.3.)		The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on March 5, 2004. The item reported was "Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure."

	b.4.)		The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on March 31, 2004. The item reported was "Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure."

WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	WESTPOINT STEVENS INC.

	Registrant



	/s/ L. Dupuy Sears

	L. Dupuy Sears
	Senior Vice President-Finance
	Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 10, 2004

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. sophomore Avg

Westpoint Stevens (WSPTQ) Inactive 10-Q2004 Q1 Quarterly report

Content analysis