UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-18392
AMERIANA BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Indiana | | 35-1782688 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
2118 Bundy Avenue, New Castle, Indiana | | 47362-1048 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (765) 529-2230
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. (See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in rule 12b-2 of the exchange act).
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
At August 7, 2006, the registrant had 3,213,952 shares of its common stock outstanding.
AMERIANA BANCORP
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Ameriana Bancorp
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | | December 31, 2005 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash on hand and in other institutions | | $ | 4,799 | | | $ | 8,318 | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 2,563 | | | | 5,952 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 7,362 | | | | 14,270 | |
Investment securities available for sale | | | 154,861 | | | | 168,686 | |
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,993 and $2,835 | | | 223,451 | | | | 218,291 | |
Premises and equipment | | | 7,574 | | | | 7,676 | |
Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank | | | 6,397 | | | | 7,449 | |
Goodwill | | | 564 | | | | 564 | |
Cash value of life insurance | | | 21,556 | | | | 21,180 | |
Other assets | | | 12,851 | | | | 11,253 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 434,616 | | | $ | 449,369 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing | | $ | 16,370 | | | $ | 18,788 | |
Interest-bearing | | | 318,092 | | | | 320,563 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | | 334,462 | | | | 339,351 | |
Borrowings | | | 58,514 | | | | 66,889 | |
Drafts payable | | | 2,289 | | | | 2,763 | |
Other liabilities | | | 5,278 | | | | 4,709 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 400,543 | | | | 413,712 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock - 5,000,000 shares authorized and unissued | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, $1.00 par value Authorized 15,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding - 3,213,952 and 3,174,397 shares | | | 3,214 | | | | 3,174 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 1,039 | | | | 708 | |
Retained earnings | | | 33,971 | | | | 34,731 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (3,547 | ) | | | (2,956 | ) |
Treasury stock at cost - 43,440 shares | | | (604 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 34,073 | | | | 35,657 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 434,616 | | | $ | 449,369 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
(1)
Ameriana Bancorp
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Interest Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and fees on loans | | $ | 3,892 | | | $ | 3,207 | | | $ | 7,630 | | | $ | 6,325 | |
Interest on mortgage-backed securities | | | 459 | | | | 540 | | | | 927 | | | | 979 | |
Interest on investment securities | | | 934 | | | | 928 | | | | 1,874 | | | | 1,847 | |
Other interest and dividend income | | | 189 | | | | 162 | | | | 376 | | | | 343 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest income | | | 5,474 | | | | 4,837 | | | | 10,807 | | | | 9,494 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest on deposits | | | 2,591 | | | | 1,966 | | | | 5,041 | | | | 3,809 | |
Interest on borrowings | | | 679 | | | | 394 | | | | 1,318 | | | | 782 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | | 3,270 | | | | 2,360 | | | | 6,359 | | | | 4,591 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Interest Income | | | 2,204 | | | | 2,477 | | | | 4,448 | | | | 4,903 | |
Provision (adjustment) for loan losses | | | 75 | | | | (982 | ) | | | 150 | | | | (3,032 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses | | | 2,129 | | | | 3,459 | | | | 4,298 | | | | 7,935 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other fees and service charges | | | 462 | | | | 418 | | | | 870 | | | | 798 | |
Brokerage and insurance commissions | | | 201 | | | | 253 | | | | 483 | | | | 589 | |
Gains on sales of loans and servicing rights | | | 26 | | | | 34 | | | | 41 | | | | 80 | |
Increase in cash value of life insurance | | | 189 | | | | 174 | | | | 376 | | | | 329 | |
Gain on sale of land | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 177 | |
Other | | | 73 | | | | 79 | | | | 166 | | | | 143 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income | | | 951 | | | | 958 | | | | 1,936 | | | | 2,116 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 2,024 | | | | 1,912 | | | | 3,910 | | | | 5,125 | |
Net occupancy expense | | | 195 | | | | 221 | | | | 412 | | | | 418 | |
Furniture and equipment expense | | | 179 | | | | 213 | | | | 354 | | | | 426 | |
Legal and professional fees | | | 178 | | | | 459 | | | | 315 | | | | 784 | |
Data processing expense | | | 144 | | | | 141 | | | | 266 | | | | 271 | |
Printing and office supplies | | | 81 | | | | 87 | | | | 131 | | | | 128 | |
Advertising and marketing expense | | | 50 | | | | 59 | | | | 122 | | | | 105 | |
Other | | | 440 | | | | 445 | | | | 842 | | | | 981 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other expense | | | 3,291 | | | | 3,537 | | | | 6,352 | | | | 8,238 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes | | | (211 | ) | | | 880 | | | | (118 | ) | | | 1,813 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | (216 | ) | | | 150 | | | | (341 | ) | | | 323 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 730 | | | $ | 223 | | | $ | 1,490 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | 0.47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends Declared Per Share | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.16 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 0.32 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
(2)
Ameriana Bancorp
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | | Treasury Stock | | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2005 | | $ | 3,174 | | $ | 708 | | $ | 34,731 | | | $ | (2,956 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | 35,657 | |
Net income | | | — | | | — | | | 223 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 223 | |
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | (591 | ) | | | — | | | | (591 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (368 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | | 40 | | | 331 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 371 | |
Tax benefit related to exercise of non-qualified stock options | | | — | | | — | | | 43 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 43 | |
Dividends declared ($0.32 per share) | | | — | | | — | | | (1,026 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,026 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | (604 | ) | | | (604 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2006 | | $ | 3,214 | | $ | 1,039 | | $ | 33,971 | | | $ | (3,547 | ) | | $ | (604 | ) | | $ | 34,073 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
(3)
Ameriana Bancorp
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Operating Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 223 | | | $ | 1,490 | |
Items not requiring (providing) cash | | | | | | | | |
Provision (adjustment) for loan losses | | | 150 | | | | (3,032 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 634 | | | | 756 | |
Increase in cash value of life insurance | | | (376 | ) | | | (329 | ) |
Mortgage loans originated for sale | | | (2,493 | ) | | | (4,155 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans | | | 2,238 | | | | 4,091 | |
Gains on sale of loans and servicing rights | | | (41 | ) | | | (80 | ) |
Increase in drafts payable | | | (474 | ) | | | 733 | |
Other adjustments | | | (65 | ) | | | (230 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (204 | ) | | | (756 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity | | | — | | | | (14,913 | ) |
Principal collected on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity | | | — | | | | 5,812 | |
Purchase of investment securities available for sale | | | (272 | ) | | | (225 | ) |
Principal collected on mortgage-backed securities available for sale | | | 4,631 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from maturities/calls of securities available for sale | | | 8,250 | | | | — | |
Net change in loans | | | (5,747 | ) | | | 4,352 | |
Net purchases of premises and equipment | | | (501 | ) | | | (67 | ) |
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | | (20 | ) | | | (156 | ) |
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | | 1,072 | | | | — | |
Purchase of investment in Ameriana Capital Trust I | | | (310 | ) | | | — | |
Other investing activities | | | 621 | | | | 497 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | 7,724 | | | | (4,700 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net change in demand and savings deposits | | | (15,411 | ) | | | (7,985 | ) |
Net change in certificates of deposit | | | 10,534 | | | | (193 | ) |
Net change in short-term borrowings | | | (25,000 | ) | | | 4,000 | |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | | | 10,000 | | | | 6,750 | |
Repayment of long-term borrowings | | | (3,685 | ) | | | (3,753 | ) |
Proceeds from junior subordinated debentures | | | 10,310 | | | | — | |
Net change in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance | | | 36 | | | | 68 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 371 | | | | 25 | |
Tax benefit from stock options exercised | | | 43 | | | | — | |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | (604 | ) | | | — | |
Cash dividends paid | | | (1,022 | ) | | | (1,010 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (14,428 | ) | | | (2,098 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | (6,908 | ) | | | (7,554 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year | | | 14,270 | | | | 17,053 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Quarter | | $ | 7,362 | | | $ | 9,499 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental information | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 4,730 | | | $ | 4,435 | |
Income taxes paid | | | — | | | | 300 | |
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
(4)
AMERIANA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ameriana Bancorp (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Ameriana Bank and Trust, SB (the “Bank”). The Bank has three direct wholly owned subsidiaries, Ameriana Insurance Agency, Ameriana Financial Services, Inc., and Ameriana Investment Management, Inc.
The unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments (comprised only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position and results of operations and cash flows. The results of operations for the period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
NOTE B — SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
On May 18, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share. This dividend, totaling $512,000, was accrued for payment to shareholders of record on June 16, 2006, and was paid on July 7, 2006. Stock options totaling 1,500 shares were exercised during the second quarter of 2006.
NOTE C — EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share were computed as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands, except share data) Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | Income | | Weighted Average Shares | | Per Share Amount | | Income | | Weighted Average Shares | | Per Share Amount |
Basic Earnings per Share: Income available to common shareholders | | $ | 5 | | 3,205,070 | | $ | 0.00 | | $ | 730 | | 3,154,765 | | $ | 0.23 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive stock options | | | — | | 4,768 | | | | | | — | | 12,887 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted Earnings Per Share: Income available to common shareholders and assumed conversions | | $ | 5 | | 3,209,838 | | $ | 0.00 | | $ | 730 | | 3,167,652 | | $ | 0.23 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands, except share data) Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | Income | | Weighted Average Shares | | Per Share Amount | | Income | | Weighted Average Shares | | Per Share Amount |
Basic Earnings per Share: Income available to common shareholders | | $ | 223 | | 3,200,441 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 1,490 | | 3,153,892 | | $ | 0.47 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive stock options | | | — | | 4,899 | | | | | | — | | 15,023 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted Earnings Per Share: Income available to common shareholders and assumed conversions | | $ | 223 | | 3,205,340 | | $ | 0.07 | | $ | 1,490 | | 3,168,915 | | $ | 0.47 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options to purchase 276,357 and 200,272 shares of common stock at exercise prices of $14.25 to $18.30 and $14.72 to $18.30 per share were outstanding at June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options were anti-dilutive.
(5)
NOTE D — CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
The Company maintains stock-based employee compensation plans. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) addresses all forms of share based payment awards, including shares under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to be recognized as expense, based upon their fair values, in the financial statements over the vesting period of the awards. The Company has elected the modified prospective application. Since all awards were fully vested at December 31, 2005, no compensation expense has been recorded for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006. Certain disclosures required by SFAS 123(R) have been omitted due to their immaterial nature.
Prior to the adoptions of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for this plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost was reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the grant date. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.
| | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands, except share data) | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 | |
Net income, as reported | | $ | 730 | | | $ | 1,490 | |
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation cost determined under the fair value based method, net of income taxes | | | (24 | ) | | | (58 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Pro-forma net income | | $ | 706 | | | $ | 1,432 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted as reported | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | 0.47 | |
Basic and diluted pro-forma | | | 0.22 | | | | 0.45 | |
(6)
NOTE E — RECENT ACCOUNTING ISSUES
In March 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 156. This Statement amends SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities.
SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to initially recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability at fair value each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract and in other specific situations.
In addition, SFAS No. 156 permits an entity to choose either of the following subsequent measurement methods for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities:
| • | | Amortization method—Amortize servicing assets or servicing liabilities in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss and assess servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on fair value at each reporting date. |
| • | | Fair value measurement method—Measure servicing assets or servicing liabilities at fair value at each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. |
SFAS No. 156 is effective at the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006 and should be applied prospectively for recognition and initial measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities. Earlier adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued financial statements, including interim financial statements, for any period of that fiscal year.
The Company did not early adopt SFAS No. 156 on January 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adoption of this Statement on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE F — TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
During March 2006, the Company completed a private placement of $10 million in trust preferred securities through Ameriana Capital Trust I (the Trust), a statutory business trust formed by the Company. The securities were sold pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company received the proceeds from the sale of the securities in exchange for subordinated debt issued by the Company to the Trust. Because the Trust is not consolidated with the Company, pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 46, the Company’s financial statements reflect the subordinated debt issued to the Trust.
NOTE G — STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On May 2, 2006, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 225,000 shares of its common shares (approximately 7.1% of outstanding shares). The repurchases will be conducted through open-market purchases or privately negotiated transactions and will be made from time to time depending on market conditions and other factors. No time limit was placed on the duration of the share repurchase program. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had repurchased a total of 43,440 shares at an average price of $13.90 per share and had 181,560 shares remaining to be repurchased under this plan. Any repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes.
(7)
ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (the “MD&A”) is designed to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, critical accounting policies, off-balance sheet arrangements and the future impact of accounting standards that have been issued but are not yet effective. We believe it is useful to read our MD&A in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and our reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K and other publicly available information.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) may contain statements, which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include comments regarding the intent, belief, outlook, estimate or expectations of the Company primarily with respect to future events and future financial performance. These statements are generally preceded by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends” and similar expressions. Readers of this Form 10-Q are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future events or performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The accompanying information contained in this Form 10-Q identifies important factors that could cause such differences. These factors include changes in interest rates; loss of deposits and loan demand to other financial institutions; substantial changes in financial markets, economic conditions or interest rates; changes in real estate values and the real estate market; regulatory changes; or changes in related accounting principles and guidelines. Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in the Form 10-K and this Form 10-Q under “Item 1.A. Risk Factors.”
The Company does not undertake – and specifically disclaims any obligation – to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Who We Are
Ameriana Bancorp (the “Company”) is an Indiana chartered bank holding company organized in 1987 by Ameriana Savings Bank, FSB (the “Bank”). The Company is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Bank began banking operations in 1890. On June 29, 2002, the Bank converted to an Indiana savings bank and adopted its present name, Ameriana Bank and Trust, SB. The Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), and the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions (the “DFI”). Its deposits are insured to applicable limits by the FDIC. References in this Form 10-Q to “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Ameriana Bancorp and/or Ameriana Bank and Trust, as appropriate.
We are headquartered in New Castle, Indiana. We conduct business through our main office at 2118 Bundy Avenue, New Castle, Indiana and through nine branch offices located in New Castle, Middletown, Knightstown, Morristown, Greenfield, Anderson, Avon, McCordsville and New Palestine, Indiana.
The Bank has three wholly owned subsidiaries, Ameriana Insurance Agency (“AIA”), Ameriana Financial Services, Inc. (“AFS”) and Ameriana Investment Management, Inc. (“AIMI”). AIA provides insurance sales from offices in New Castle, Greenfield and Avon, Indiana. AFS offers debt protection products through its ownership of an interest in Family Financial Holdings, Incorporated, Columbus, Indiana. In 2002, AFS acquired a 20.94% ownership interest in Indiana Title Insurance Company, LLC (“ITIC”) through which it offers title insurance. AFS also operates a brokerage facility in conjunction with Linsco/Private Ledger. AIMI manages the Bank’s investment portfolio. The Company holds a minority interest in a limited partnership, House Investments, organized to acquire and manage real estate investments which qualify for federal tax credits.
(8)
What We Do
The Bank is a community-oriented financial institution. Our principal business consists of attracting deposits from the general public and originating mortgage loans on single-family residences, multi-family and commercial real estate loans, construction loans, and, to a lesser extent, commercial and industrial loans, small business loans, home improvement loans, and consumer loans. We have from time to time purchased loans and loan participations in the secondary market. We also invest in various federal and government agency obligations and other investment securities permitted by applicable laws and regulations, including mortgage-backed, municipal and equity securities. We offer customers in our market area time deposits with terms from three months to seven years, interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and money market accounts. Our primary source of borrowings is Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. Through our subsidiaries, we engage in insurance and brokerage activities. We also operate a Trust Department, which provides trust, investment and estate planning services. The Company has decided to close the Trust Department effective August 1, 2006.
Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on our loan and investment portfolios and the interest expense incurred on our deposits and borrowing portfolios. Our loan portfolio typically earns more interest than the investment portfolio, and our deposits typically have a lower average rate than FHLB advances. Several factors affect our net interest income. These factors include the loan, investment, deposit, and borrowing portfolio balances, their composition, the length of their maturity, re-pricing characteristics, liquidity, credit, and interest rate risk, as well as market and competitive conditions.
Overview of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
| • | | Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $5,000 compared to $730,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $223,000 compared to $1,490,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. |
| • | | The net interest margin declined 31 and 29 basis points for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively, from the same periods in 2005. The declines were primarily due to the flattening yield curve and rising short-term interest rates. |
| • | | Net income for the second quarter of 2005 included a $1.1 million recovery from a lease previously charged-off. The total recoveries in the first six months of 2005 from leases previously charged off were $3.4 million. |
| • | | The first six months of 2005 included a voluntary payment of $1.1 million to fund a portion of our pension liability. |
| • | | Assets declined by 3.3% during the first six months of 2006 primarily due to a decline in investments. |
| • | | In March 2006, the Company completed a private placement of $10.0 million in trust preferred securities. |
The significant recovery in the second quarter of 2005 was from one of the two equipment lease pools originated by Commercial Money Center, Inc. (“CMC”) and backed by a surety bond issued by RLI Insurance Co. (“RLI”). The total recoveries in the first six months of 2005 from both lease pools previously charged off were $3.4 million.
Financial and Strategic Issues
The Federal Reserve increased the targeted federal funds rate 25 basis points at each of its first four meetings in 2006. The rise in short-term interest rates has an unfavorable impact on our net interest margin. Our net interest margin declined to 2.34% in the first six months of 2006 compared to 2.63% for the first six months of 2005. Our interest-bearing liabilities re-price to current market conditions faster than our interest-earning assets. Most of the variable-rate mortgage loans in our portfolio lag the market 45 days when they are scheduled to re-price. The Federal Reserve’s actions for the remainder of 2006 are unclear. However, a stabilized short-term interest rate environment in the second half of 2006 would provide interest-earning assets an opportunity to catch-up, likely leading to an improvement in the net interest margin. An expected improvement in the mix of interest-earning assets in the second half of the year may further improve the net interest margin.
We have $47.0 million in government agency securities that will mature over the next fifteen months with an average yield of 2.52%, 86 basis points below our average cost of funds for the first six months of 2006. The cash
(9)
flows from these securities will be used to pay down short-term borrowings and fund new loan volume. The redeployment of cash flows from the investment portfolio into higher-yielding assets should also improve the net interest margin.
Reducing non-performing assets is another important aspect of our efforts to improve the net interest margin. Non-performing assets, which include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned, declined $1.5 million to $6.0 million at June 30, 2006 from $7.5 million at June 30, 2005. In addition to non-performing assets, we continue to work out loans that are criticized or classified. We have implemented several changes to continue improving credit quality, such as separation of the lending and credit approval process, the addition of a Chief Credit Officer, and an improved, comprehensive credit analysis and approval process.
As part of the 2006 corporate plan, the Company has adopted a number of short and long-term action plans including:
| • | | Recruiting seasoned commercial lenders, credit analysts and key risk managers. |
| • | | Diversifying the loan portfolio by reducing the concentration in commercial real estate and expanding commercial, residential real estate and consumer lending. |
| • | | Focusing on retail banking activities including emphasizing transactional deposit growth, expanding customer relationships as measured by products per household and creating new customer relationships. |
| • | | Reducing the operating expenses of the Company. |
(10)
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are maintained in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in the Notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, and such estimates and assumptions are integral to the understanding of reported results. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and they require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. We consider the allowance for loan losses and mortgage servicing rights to be our critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses provides coverage for probable losses in the Company’s loan portfolio. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses each quarter based on changes, if any, in underwriting activities, the loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry or customer-specific concentrations), trends in loan performance, regulatory guidance and economic factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires the use of significant management estimates. Many factors can affect management’s estimates of specific and expected losses, including volatility of default probabilities, rating migrations, loss severity and economic and political conditions. The allowance is increased through provisions charged to operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs.
The Company determines the amount of the allowance based on relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance recorded for commercial loans is based on reviews of individual credit relationships and an analysis of the migration of commercial loans and actual loss experience. The allowance recorded for non-commercial loans is based on an analysis of loan mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, fraud loss and bankruptcy experiences and historical losses, adjusted for current trends, for each loan category or group of loans. The allowance for loan losses relating to impaired loans is based on the loan’s observable market price, the collateral for certain collateral-dependent loans, or the discounted cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate.
Regardless of the extent of the Company’s analysis of customer performance, portfolio trends or risk management processes, certain inherent but undetected losses are probable within the loan portfolio. This is due to several factors, including inherent delays in obtaining information regarding a customer’s financial condition or changes in their unique business conditions, the subjective nature of individual loan evaluations, collateral assessments and the interpretation of economic trends. Volatility of economic or customer-specific conditions affecting the identification and estimation of losses for larger, non-homogeneous credits and the sensitivity of assumptions utilized to establish allowances for homogenous groups of loans are among other factors. The Company estimates a range of inherent losses related to the existence of these exposures. The estimates are based upon the Company’s evaluation of imprecision risk associated with the commercial and consumer allowance levels and the estimated impact of the current economic environment.
Mortgage Servicing Rights. Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) associated with loans originated and sold, where servicing is retained, are capitalized and included in other intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The value of the capitalized servicing rights represents the present value of the future servicing fees arising from the right to service loans in the portfolio. Critical accounting policies for MSRs relate to the initial valuation and subsequent impairment tests. The methodology used to determine the valuation of MSRs requires the development and use of a number of estimates, including anticipated principal amortization and prepayments of that principal balance. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. The carrying value of the MSRs is periodically reviewed for impairment based on a determination of fair value. Impairment, if any, is recognized through a valuation allowance and is recorded as amortization of intangible assets.
(11)
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Assets totaled $434.6 million at June 30, 2006 compared to $449.4 million at December 31, 2005. The decrease was primarily due to declines in the investment portfolio.
Cash and cash equivalents declined $6.9 million in the first six months of 2006. Investments available for sale declined $13.8 million during the six month period. The decline was due to lower-yielding government agency securities that matured during the period and principal paydowns on mortgage-backed securities. The proceeds from investment maturities and the decline in cash and cash equivalents were used primarily to fund loans and pay off short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Net loans increased $5.2 million during the period primarily due to an increase in residential real estate loans of $11.3 million partially offset by declines in construction loans, multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, and leases. Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank declined $1.1 million due to redemption of excess stock by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati.
Deposits declined $4.9 million during the first six months of 2006. This decline consisted of $2.4 million of noninterest-bearing accounts and $2.5 million of interest-bearing accounts. The declines were primarily the result of a highly competitive market which resulted in an outflow of deposits. Borrowings declined $8.4 million during the first six months of 2006 primarily due to payment on advances with proceeds from cash and cash equivalents and investments. We completed a private placement of trust preferred securities for $10.0 million in March 2006, the proceeds of which are included in borrowings (see Note F to the Financial Statements contained in Part I, item 1 of this form 10Q).
Equity decreased $1.6 million during the first six months of 2006. Common stock and additional paid-in capital increased $371,000 due to stock options exercised during the period. Retained earnings decreased $760,000 due to the payment of dividends at $0.32 per share totaling $1.0 million partially offset by net income of $223,000 and the tax benefit related to exercise of non-qualified stock options of $43,000. Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased $591,000 during the period due to the change in net unrealized losses on available-for sale-securities. We repurchased 43,440 shares of stock at a cost of $604,000 during the period.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Second Quarter of 2006 compared to the Second Quarter of 2005
Net income for the second quarter of 2006 decreased 99.3% to $5,000, or $0.00 per diluted share, compared to net income of $730,000, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2005. The $725,000 decrease in net income and the $0.23 decrease in diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period a year ago, was the result of the following factors:
| • | | A $273,000 decrease in net interest income, reflecting the cost of funds increasing more than yields on interest-earning assets; |
| • | | A provision of $75,000 in the second quarter of 2006 compared to a credit to the allowance for loan losses of $982,000 in the same period in 2005; |
| • | | A $7,000 decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease of $52,000 in brokerage and insurance commissions. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of $44,000 in other fees and service charges; |
| • | | A $246,000 decrease in other expense primarily due to a decrease of $281,000 in legal and professional fees. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of $112,000 in salaries and employee benefits; and |
| • | | A $366,000 decrease in income taxes. |
(12)
Net Interest Income
Net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis declined $273,000 to $2.3 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared to $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2005. The net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis declined 31 basis points to 2.31% in the second quarter of 2006 from 2.62% in the second quarter of 2005. The declines in net interest income and the net interest margin were primarily due to the flattening yield curve and rising rates. Our interest-bearing liabilities have shorter overall maturities and reprice more frequently to market conditions than our interest-earning assets and, thus, our cost of funds rose quicker than our yield on assets.
Tax-exempt interest was $178,000 for each period in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005. Our tax-exempt interest is from bank-qualified municipal securities. The tax equivalent adjustment was $92,000 for each period in 2006 and 2005. Total interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the second quarter of 2006 increased $637,000 compared to the same period of the prior year. This increase was the result of an increase in yield on interest-earning assets of 57 basis points due to higher market interest rates and a $5.4 million increase in average interest-earning assets. Total interest expense for the second quarter of 2006 increased $910,000 compared to the same period of the prior year. This increase was the result of an increase in cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 91 basis points due to higher market interest rates and an $8.5 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities.
Provision for Loan Losses
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Bank’s aggregate allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Balance at beginning of quarter | | $ | 2,912 | | | $ | 3,350 | |
Transfer to allowance for unfunded commitments | | | — | | | | (116 | ) |
Provision (adjustment) for loan losses | | | 75 | | | | (982 | ) |
Charge-offs | | | (35 | ) | | | (24 | ) |
Recoveries | | | 41 | | | | 1,169 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net recoveries | | | 6 | | | | 1,145 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 2,993 | | | $ | 3,397 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Allowance to total loans | | | 1.32 | % | | | 1.71 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Allowance to non-performing loans | | | 66.82 | % | | | 47.23 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
The 2006 provision of $75,000 was primarily due to an increase in specific reserves for classified loans. The 2005 provision adjustment reflected net recoveries of $1.1 million primarily due to recoveries on the CMC pooled leases. In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we transferred $116,000 from the allowance for loan losses to a new reserve account called the allowance for unfunded commitments. The allowance for unfunded commitments is included in other liabilities on the consolidated condensed balance sheets.
(13)
The following table summarizes the Company’s non-performing assets:
| | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis | | $ | 4,459 | | | $ | 7,050 | |
| | |
Accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or more | | | 20 | | | | 143 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total of non-accrual and 90 days past due loans | | $ | 4,479 | | | $ | 7,193 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Percentage of total net loans | | | 2.00 | % | | | 3.69 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Other non-performing assets(1) | | $ | 1,537 | | | $ | 347 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) | Other non-performing assets represents property acquired through foreclosure or repossession. This property is carried at the lower of its fair market value or the principal balance of the related loan. |
Non-performing loans decreased $2.7 million at June 30, 2006 compared to the previous period. The decrease in loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis was primarily due to two commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2005, one acquired through foreclosure totaling $1.6 million that was transferred to other non-performing assets, and the second for a condominium project totaling $2.5 million of which $750,000 was partially charged-off. A commercial real estate loan for $1.8 million on non-accrual status at June 30, 2005 was later reclassified to performing at September 30, 2005. An additional commercial real estate loan for $1.4 million was added to non-accrual loans in the second quarter of 2006.
Other non-performing assets increased to $1.5 million at June 30, 2006 from $347,000 at June 30, 2005. The previously mentioned commercial real estate loan acquired through foreclosure in the third quarter of 2005 was the main reason for the $1.2 million increase.
Other Income
The decrease in other income in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 resulted primarily from a decrease in brokerage and insurance commissions which was partially offset by an increase in other fees and service charges.
| • | | The decrease in brokerage and insurance commissions was mainly due to lower brokerage commissions as a result of a decline in sales from a temporary vacancy in staff. |
| • | | The increase in other fees and service charges was primarily due to an increase in deposit service charge fees mainly from continued growth in the Overdraft Honors program. |
Other Expense
The decrease in other expense in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the second quarter of 2005 resulted primarily from a decrease in legal and professional fees which was partially offset by an increase in salaries and employee benefits.
| • | | The decrease in legal and professional fees was primarily due to consulting fees paid in 2005 for engagements to improve operational efficiencies and develop marketing strategies. |
| • | | The increase in salaries and employee benefits was primarily due to higher staffing levels, primarily in commercial lending and credit review. |
(14)
Income Tax Expense
The decrease in income taxes in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the second quarter of 2005 resulted primarily from a decline in pretax income. Pretax income declined to a net loss of $211,000 in 2006 from net income of $880,000 recorded in the same period in 2005. We recorded an income tax benefit of $216,000 in the second quarter of 2006, compared to an income tax expense of $150,000 in the second quarter of 2005.
We have a deferred state tax asset that is primarily the result of operating losses sustained since 2003 for state tax purposes. We started recording a valuation allowance against our current period state income tax benefit in 2005 due to our concern that we may not be able to use more than the tax asset already recorded on the books without modifying the use of AIMI, our investment subsidiary. Operating income from AIMI is not subject to state income taxes under current state law, and is the primary reason for the tax asset.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased 85.0% to $223,000, or $0.07 per diluted share, compared to net income of $1,490,000, or $0.47 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The $1.3 million decrease in net income and the $0.40 decrease in diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same period a year ago, was the result of the following factors:
| • | | A $455,000 decrease in net interest income, reflecting the cost of funds increasing more than yields on interest-earning assets. |
| • | | A provision of $150,000 in the first six months of 2006 compared to a credit to the allowance for loan losses of $3.0 million in the same period in 2005. |
| • | | A $180,000 decrease in other income primarily due to decreases of $106,000 in brokerage and insurance commissions, $39,000 in gain on sale of loans and servicing rights, and $177,000 in gain on sale of land. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $72,000 in other fees and service charges, and $47,000 in increase on cash surrender value of life insurance. |
| • | | A $1.9 million decrease in other expense. The major components were decreases of $1.2 million in salaries and employee benefits primarily due to additional pension expense in 2005, $72,000 in furniture and equipment expense, $469,000 in legal and professional fees, and $139,000 in other expenses. |
| • | | A $664,000 decrease in income taxes. |
Net Interest Income
Net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis declined $455,000 to $4.6 million in the first six months of 2006 compared to $5.1 million in the first six months of 2005. The net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis declined 29 basis points to 2.34% from 2.63%. The declines in net interest income and the net interest margin were primarily due to the flattening yield curve and rising rates.
Tax-exempt interest was $356,000 in the first six months of 2006 and 2005. Tax-exempt interest is from bank-qualified municipal securities. The tax equivalent adjustment was $183,000 for each period in 2006 and 2005. Total interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the first six months of 2006 increased $1.3 million compared to the same period of the prior year. This increase was the result of an increase in yield on interest-earning assets of 54 basis points due to higher market interest rates and a $9.6 million increase in average interest-earning assets. Total interest expense for the first six months of 2006 increased $1.8 million compared to the same period in 2005. This increase was the result of an increase in cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 86 basis points due to higher market interest rates and a $11.8 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities.
(15)
Provision for Loan Losses
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Bank’s aggregate allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
Balance at beginning of quarter | | $ | 2,835 | | | $ | 3,128 | |
Transfer to allowance for unfunded commitments | | | — | | | | (116 | ) |
Provision (adjustment) for loan losses | | | 150 | | | | (3,032 | ) |
Charge-offs | | | (81 | ) | | | (101 | ) |
Recoveries | | | 89 | | | | 3,518 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net recoveries | | | 8 | | | | 3,417 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 2,993 | | | $ | 3,397 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The 2006 provision of $150,000 was primarily due to an increase in specific reserves for classified loans offset by a reduction in specific reserves for a classified loan that paid off. The 2005 provision adjustment reflected net recoveries of $3.4 million primarily due to recoveries on the leases.
Other Income
The decrease in other income in the first six months of 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 resulted primarily from decreases in brokerage and insurance commissions, gain on sale of loans and servicing rights, and gain on sale of land, which were partially offset by increases in other fees and service charges, and increase on cash surrender value of life insurance.
| • | | The decrease in brokerage and insurance commissions was mainly due to a lower contingency bonus recorded by the insurance agency and lower brokerage commission in the first six months of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. The lower contingency bonus was based on actual claims experience. The lower brokerage commission was a result of a decline in sales from a temporary vacancy in staff. |
| • | | The decrease in gain on sale of loans and servicing rights was due to a decline in mortgage loans sold during the period. Loans originated for sale were $2.5 million in 2006 compared to $4.2 million in 2005. |
| • | | The decrease in gain on sale of land was from land adjacent to our branch lot in Greenfield, Indiana that was sold in 2005 as it was not needed for expansion purposes. |
| • | | The increase in other fees and service charges was primarily due to an increase in deposit service charge fees mainly from continued growth in the Overdraft Honors program. |
| • | | The increase in cash surrender value of life insurance was due to higher investment rates in 2006. |
Other Expense
The decrease in other expense in the first six months of 2006 as compared to the first six months of 2005 resulted primarily from decreases in salaries and employee benefits, furniture and equipment expense, legal and professional fees, and other expenses.
| • | | The decrease in salaries and employee benefits was primarily due to a decrease in pension expense that resulted from the voluntary payment of $1.1 million towards our pension liability in 2005. |
| • | | The decrease in furniture and equipment expense was primarily due to lower depreciation expense that resulted from computer upgrades made at a lower cost than the equipment they replaced. |
| • | | The decrease in legal and professional fees was due to consulting fees paid in 2005 for engagements to improve operational efficiencies and develop marketing strategies. |
(16)
| • | | The decrease in other expenses was in part due to a donation of $70,000 in 2005 to the city of Anderson, Indiana for its downtown revitalization project. The donation was part of an agreement between the city and a group of banks, including us, where the city paid off loans secured by commercial buildings in downtown Anderson. We also incurred recruiting fees of $60,000 paid in 2005 for the recruitment firm used to locate the Company’s new CEO. |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with GAAP, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
(17)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future obligations of a short-term nature. Historically, funds provided by operations, loan repayments and new deposits have been our principal sources of liquid funds. In addition, we have the ability to obtain funds through the sale of mortgage loans, through borrowings from the FHLB system, through the brokered certificates market, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. We regularly adjust the investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability program.
At June 30, 2006, we had $18.3 million in loan commitments outstanding and $33.6 million of additional commitments for line of credit receivables. Retail certificates of deposit (excluding brokered CDs) due within one year of June 30, 2006 totaled $123.0 million, or 37.9% of total deposits. If these maturing certificates of deposit do not remain with us, other sources of funds must be used, including other certificates of deposit, brokered CDs, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and other borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than currently paid on the certificates of deposit due on or before June 30, 2007. However, based on past experiences we believe that a significant portion of the certificates of deposit will remain. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.
Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and purchase of securities. In the first six months of 2006, we originated $37.9 million of loans and purchased $272,000 in securities. In the first six months of 2005, we originated $47.8 million of loans and purchased $15.1 million of securities. In the second quarter of 2006, we redeemed $1.1 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock that exceeded the amount of stock required by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati.
Financing activities consist primarily of activity in retail deposit accounts, brokered certificates, and FHLB advances. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products we offer, and our local competitors and other factors. Retail deposits decreased $4.9 million in the first six months of 2006. We had FHLB advances of $48.2 million and $66.6 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. We held a brokered CD for $10.0 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. In March 2006, the Company completed a private placement of $10.0 million in trust preferred securities. The proceeds from the private placement are included in Borrowings on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. The proceeds were used initially for paying down short-term borrowings. We paid $1.0 million in cash dividends to our shareholders in the six month period ended June 30, 2006 and the six month period ended June 30, 2005.
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements set by the FDIC including a risk-based capital measure. The Company is also subject to similar capital requirements set by the Federal Reserve Bank. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At June 30, 2006, both the Company and the Bank exceeded all of regulatory capital requirements and are considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are made available free of charge on our website,www.ameriana.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information on our website should not be considered a part of this Form 10-Q.
(18)
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk (“IRR”) is the risk to earnings and capital arising from movements in interest rates. IRR can result from:
| • | | timing differences in the maturity/repricing of an institution’s assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet contracts; |
| • | | the effect of embedded options, such as call or convertible options, loan prepayments, interest rate caps, and deposit withdrawals; |
| • | | unexpected shifts of the yield curve that affect both the slope and shape of the yield curve; and |
| • | | differences in the behavior of lending and funding rates, sometimes referred to as basis risk. An example would occur if floating rate assets and liabilities, with otherwise identical repricing characteristics, were based on market indexes that were imperfectly correlated. |
The Asset-Liability Committee and the Board of Directors review our exposure to interest rate changes and market risk quarterly. This review is accomplished by the use of a cash flow simulation model using detailed securities, loan, deposit, borrowings and market information to estimate fair values of assets and liabilities using discounted cash flows. We monitor IRR from two perspectives:
| • | | Economic value at risk – long term exposure |
The difference between the Bank’s estimated fair value of assets and the estimated fair value of liabilities is the fair value of equity, also referred to as net present value of equity (“NPV”). The change in the NPV is calculated at different interest rate intervals. This measures our IRR exposure from movements in interest rates and the resulting change in the NPV.
| • | | Earnings at risk – near term exposure |
The model also tests the impact various interest rate scenarios have on net interest income over a stated period of time (one year, for example).
We recognize that effective management of IRR includes an understanding of when potential adverse changes in interest rates will flow through the profit and loss statement. Accordingly, we manage our position so that exposure to net interest income is monitored over both a one year planning horizon (accounting perspective) and a longer term strategic horizon (economic perspective).
Our objective is to manage our exposure to interest rate risk, bearing in mind that we will always be in the business of taking on rate risk and that rate risk immunization is not possible. Also, it is recognized that as exposure to interest rate risk is reduced, so too may the net interest margin be reduced.
Interest Rate Scenarios
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of change in net interest income for Year 1 and Year 2 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
| | Projected Net Interest Income | | % Change From Year 1 Base | |
| | Down 200 bp | | Base | | Up 200 bp | | Down 200 bp | | | Up 200 bp | |
June 30, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year 1 | | $ | 9,949 | | $ | 9,860 | | $ | 9,696 | | 0. 90 | | | (1.66 | ) |
Year 2 | | $ | 11,420 | | $ | 11,483 | | $ | 11,233 | | 15.82 | | | 13.92 | |
December 31, 2005 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year 1 | | $ | 9,776 | | $ | 9,821 | | $ | 9,606 | | (0.46 | ) | | (2.19 | ) |
Year 2 | | $ | 10,383 | | $ | 11,207 | | $ | 11,103 | | 5.72 | | | 13.05 | |
(19)
Our overall interest rate risk exposure did not change materially from December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006. Projected net interest income improved slightly in all rate scenarios at June 30, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005. The improvement was primarily due to the significant yield pick-up of redirecting low coupon investment cash flow to loans and the positive effect of two Prime rate bumps on variable rate loans.
ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers as appropriate to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosures. It should be noted that the design of our disclosure controls and procedures is based in part upon certain reasonable assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no reasonable assurance that any design of disclosure controls and procedures will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote, but our principal executive and financial officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at a reasonable assurance level. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
(20)
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 -Legal Proceedings
As previously reported, the Bank has been involved in litigation relating to its interests in two (2) pools of equipment leases originated by Commercial Money Center, Inc. (“CMC”), a California-based equipment leasing company that is now in bankruptcy. In June and September, 2001, the Bank purchased the income streams from two (2) separate pools of commercial leases totaling $12,003,000. Each lease within each pool was supported by a surety bond issued by one of two (2) insurance companies rated at least “A” by A.M. Best. The bonds guaranteed payment of all amounts due under the leases in the event of default by the lessee. Each pool was sold under the terms of a Sales and Servicing Agreement, which provided for the insurers to service the leases. In each case, the insurers assigned their servicing rights and responsibilities to Commercial Servicing Corporation, (“CSC”), a California-based company, which is now in bankruptcy. When the lease pools went into default, notice was given to each insurer. American Motorists Insurance Company (“AMICO”) made payments pursuant to the leases under a reservation of rights. RLI Insurance Company paid nothing. Both insurers claimed that they were defrauded by CMC, the originator of the leases. Both denied responsibility for payment. The Bank has now settled all claims it has against AMICO arising from the pool of leases it bonded. The litigation continues against RLI. The pool of leases bonded by RLI consists of approximately $6 million worth of lease payments.
During 2005, the Bank collected $1.1 million from the Trustee in the CMC/CSC bankruptcies. These funds were applied to the balance owed in the RLI pool. Some of the lessees in that pool continue to pay and the Bank is receiving approximately $7,000-8,000 each month from them. Those payments will cease in July or August, 2006. It is the Bank’s intent to continue to aggressively pursue its claims against RLI for the principal and interest owed plus attorneys fees, litigation expenses, and damages. The principal amount owed by RLI has not been reduced since our last report. Attorney fees, litigation expenses, interest and damages continue to grow. It is unlikely that the RLI litigation will be resolved in 2006.
ITEM 1.A. -Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2 -Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company repurchased 43,440 shares of common stock for $604,000, at an average cost of $13.90 per share as detailed in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of the Publicly Announced Plans of Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
April | | — | | | — | | — | | — |
May | | 5,000 | | $ | 13.90 | | 5,000 | | 220,000 |
June | | 38,440 | | $ | 13.90 | | 38,440 | | 181,560 |
Total | | 43,440 | | $ | 13.90 | | 43,440 | | 181,560 |
On May 2, 2006, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 225,000 shares of its common shares (approximately 7.1% of outstanding shares). The repurchases will be conducted through open-market purchases or privately negotiated transactions and will be made from time to time depending on market conditions and other factors. No time limit was placed on the duration of the share repurchase program. Any repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes.
(21)
ITEM 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
ITEM 4 -Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company was held on May 18, 2006. The results of the vote were as follows:
| 1. | The following individuals were elected as directors: |
| | | | | | |
| | Term | | Votes For | | Votes Withheld |
Jerome J. Gassen | | One Year | | 2,373,271 | | 346,042 |
R. Scott Hayes | | Three Year | | 2,341,280 | | 378,033 |
Michael E. Kent | | Three Year | | 3,376,680 | | 342,633 |
| 2. | The Ameriana Bancorp 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan was approved as follows: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | For | | Against | | Abstain | | Broker Non-Vote |
| | 1,011,364 | | 686,407 | | 15,058 | | 1,016,511 |
| 3. | The appointment of BKD, LLP as independent auditors of Ameriana Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2006 was ratified by the stockholders as follows: |
| | | | | | |
| | For | | Against | | Abstain |
| | 2,671,564 | | 30,527 | | n/a |
ITEM 5 -Other Information
Not Applicable
ITEM 6 -Exhibits
| | |
No. | | Description |
| |
Exhibit 10, | | Ameriana Bancorp 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s 2006 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 14, 2006) |
| |
Exhibit 31, | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
| |
Exhibit 32, | | Section 1350 Certifications |
(22)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | AMERIANA BANCORP |
| |
DATE: August 8, 2006 | | /s/ Jerome J. Gassen |
| | Jerome J. Gassen |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | (Duly Authorized Representative) |
| |
DATE: August 8, 2006 | | /s/ Bradley L. Smith |
| | Bradley L. Smith |
| | Senior Vice President-Treasurer and |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (Principal Financial Officer |
| | and Accounting Officer) |