Immunogen (IMGN) 10-K 28 Aug 14 2014 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Aug. 20, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Document and Entity Information	'	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'IMMUNOGEN INC	'	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0000855654	'	'
Document Type	'10-K	'	'
Document Period End Date	30-Jun-14	'	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--06-30	'	'
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	'Yes	'	'
Entity Voluntary Filers	'No	'	'
Entity Current Reporting Status	'Yes	'	'
Entity Filer Category	'Large Accelerated Filer	'	'
Entity Public Float	'	'	$1,252,547,383
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	85,907,896	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'FY	'	'

CONSOLIDATED_BALANCE_SHEETS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
ASSETS	'	'
Cash and cash equivalents	$142,261	$194,960
Accounts receivable	1,896	'
Unbilled revenue	1,329	2,121
Inventory	2,950	703
Restricted cash	'	319
Prepaid and other current assets	2,320	2,581
Total current assets	150,756	200,684
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	14,349	10,783
Long-term restricted cash	'	1,912
Other assets	213	217
Total assets	165,318	213,596
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	'	'
Accounts payable	4,819	4,498
Accrued compensation	6,865	6,153
Other accrued liabilities	6,668	6,049
Current portion of deferred lease incentive	528	979
Current portion of deferred revenue	2,374	1,494
Total current liabilities	21,254	19,173
Deferred lease incentive, net of current portion	5,679	5,626
Deferred revenue, net of current portion	58,969	63,384
Other long-term liabilities	3,717	3,566
Total liabilities	89,619	91,749
Commitments and contingencies (Note H)	'	'
Shareholders' equity:	'	'
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 5,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding	'	'
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 150,000 shares; issued and outstanding 85,903 and 84,725 shares as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively	859	847
Additional paid-in capital	722,971	697,767
Accumulated deficit	-648,131	-576,767
Total shareholders' equity	75,699	121,847
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$165,318	$213,596

CONSOLIDATED_BALANCE_SHEETS_Pa

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS	'	'
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$0.01	$0.01
Preferred stock, authorized shares	5,000	5,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$0.01	$0.01
Common stock, authorized shares	150,000	150,000
Common stock, issued shares	85,903	84,725
Common stock, outstanding shares	85,903	84,725

CONSOLIDATED_STATEMENTS_OF_OPE

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Revenues:	'	'	'
License and milestone fees	$39,455	$24,227	$9,161
Royalty revenue	10,346	592	'
Research and development support	7,187	7,873	4,517
Clinical materials revenue	2,908	2,843	2,679
Total revenues	59,896	35,535	16,357
Operating Expenses:	'	'	'
Research and development	106,958	87,073	69,192
General and administrative	24,469	21,471	20,422
Total operating expenses	131,427	108,544	89,614
Loss from operations	-71,531	-73,009	-73,257
Investment income, net	44	126	66
Other income (expense), net	123	72	-128
Net loss	-71,364	-72,811	-73,319
Basic and diluted net loss per common share (in dollars per share)	($0.83)	($0.87)	($0.95)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (in shares)	85,481	84,063	76,814
Total Comprehensive Loss	($71,364)	($72,811)	($73,319)

CONSOLIDATED_STATEMENTS_OF_SHA

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (USD $)	Total	Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Accumulated Deficit
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Balance at Jun. 30, 2011	$139,969	$763	$569,843	($430,637)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2011	'	76,281	'	'
Increase (Decrease) in Shareholders' Equity	'	'	'	'
Net loss	-73,319	'	'	-73,319
Stock options exercised	6,988	14	6,974	'
Stock options exercised (in shares)	'	1,432	'	'
Stock-based compensation expense	9,938	'	9,938	'
Directors' deferred share units converted	'	1	-1	'
Directors' deferred share units converted (in shares)	'	46	'	'
Directors' deferred share unit compensation	314	'	314	'
Balance at Jun. 30, 2012	83,890	778	587,068	-503,956
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2012	'	77,759	'	'
Increase (Decrease) in Shareholders' Equity	'	'	'	'
Net loss	-72,811	'	'	-72,811
Stock options exercised	4,026	6	4,020	'
Stock options exercised (in shares)	'	666	'	'
Restricted stock award (in shares)	'	50	'	'
Stock-based compensation expense	12,400	'	12,400	'
Issuance of common stock in a public offering, net of issuance costs	93,991	63	93,928	'
Issuance of common stock in a public offering, net of issuance costs (in shares)	'	6,250	'	'
Directors' deferred share unit compensation	351	'	351	'
Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	121,847	847	697,767	-576,767
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2013	84,725	84,725	'	'
Increase (Decrease) in Shareholders' Equity	'	'	'	'
Net loss	-71,364	'	'	-71,364
Stock options exercised	9,136	11	9,125	'
Stock options exercised (in shares)	'	1,134	'	'
Stock-based compensation expense	15,647	'	15,647	'
Directors' deferred share units converted	'	1	-1	'
Directors' deferred share units converted (in shares)	'	44	'	'
Directors' deferred share unit compensation	433	'	433	'
Balance at Jun. 30, 2014	$75,699	$859	$722,971	($648,131)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2014	85,903	85,903	'	'

CONSOLIDATED_STATEMENTS_OF_CAS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:	'	'	'
Net loss	($71,364)	($72,811)	($73,319)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:	'	'	'
Depreciation and amortization	4,598	4,641	4,633
Loss (Gain) on sale/disposal of fixed assets	20	-21	51
(Gain) Loss on forward contracts	-2	-197	173
Non-cash licensing fee	12,830	'	'
Stock and deferred share unit compensation	16,080	12,751	10,252
Deferred rent	297	-109	-109
Change in operating assets and liabilities:	'	'	'
Accounts receivable	-1,896	129	4,539
Unbilled revenue	792	-925	292
Inventory	-2,247	585	-808
Prepaid and other current assets	571	-181	253
Restricted cash	2,231	319	1,018
Other assets	4	-43	-16
Accounts payable	321	1,103	182
Accrued compensation	712	1,211	219
Other accrued liabilities	-394	481	133
Deferred revenue, net of non-cash upfront license payment	-16,675	-7,232	18,219
Proceeds from landlord for tenant improvements	472	'	'
Net cash used for operating activities	-53,650	-60,299	-34,288
Cash flows from investing activities:	'	'	'
Purchases of property and equipment, net	-8,184	-3,770	-2,908
(Payments) proceeds from settlement of forward contracts	-1	74	-60
Net cash used for investing activities	-8,185	-3,696	-2,968
Cash flows from financing activities:	'	'	'
Proceeds from stock options exercised	9,136	4,026	6,988
Proceeds from common stock issuance, net	'	93,991	'
Net cash provided by financing activities	9,136	98,017	6,988
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	-52,699	34,022	-30,268
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	194,960	160,938	191,206
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$142,261	$194,960	$160,938

Nature_of_Business_and_Plan_of

Nature of Business and Plan of Operations	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Nature of Business and Plan of Operations	'
Nature of Business and Plan of Operations	'
	A.    Nature of Business and Plan of Operations
	ImmunoGen, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in Massachusetts in 1981 and is focused on the development of antibody-based anticancer therapeutics. The Company has incurred operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception, incurred a net loss of approximately $71.4 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, and has an accumulated deficit of approximately $648.1 million as of June 30, 2014. The Company has primarily funded these losses through payments received from its collaborations and equity financings. To date, the Company has no product revenue and management expects operating losses to continue for the foreseeable future.
	At June 30, 2014, the Company had $142.3 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand. The Company may raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or generate revenues from collaborative partners through a combination of upfront license payments, milestone payments, royalty payments, research funding, and clinical material reimbursement. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing or generate revenues from collaborative partners on terms acceptable to the Company or at all. The failure of the Company to obtain sufficient funds on acceptable terms when needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition and require the Company to defer or limit some or all of its research, development and/or clinical projects.
	The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology industry including, but not limited to, the development by its competitors of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, manufacturing and marketing limitations, collaboration arrangements, third-party reimbursements and compliance with governmental regulations.

Summary_of_Significant_Account

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
	B.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	Principles of Consolidation
	The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, ImmunoGen Securities Corp., and ImmunoGen Europe Limited. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Subsequent Events
	The Company has evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2014 up through the date the Company issued these financial statements. In July 2014, Sanofi initiated a Phase IIb clinical trial for SAR650984 which triggered a $3 million milestone payment to the Company. Effective July 2014, Janssen Biotech (formerly known as Centocor) terminated its exclusive development and commercialization license with the Company. As a result, in July 2014, the Company recognized the remaining $241,000 of the $1 million upfront fee received upon execution of the license which had been previously deferred. The Company did not have any other material recognizable or unrecognizable subsequent events.
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company enters into licensing and development agreements with collaborative partners for the development of monoclonal antibody-based anticancer therapeutics. The terms of these agreements contain multiple deliverables which may include (i) licenses, or options to obtain licenses, to the Company's antibody-drug conjugate, or ADC, technology, (ii) rights to future technological improvements, (iii) research activities to be performed on behalf of the collaborative partner, (iv) delivery of cytotoxic agents and (v) the manufacture of preclinical or clinical materials for the collaborative partner. Payments to the Company under these agreements may include upfront fees, option fees, exercise fees, payments for research activities, payments for the manufacture of preclinical or clinical materials, payments based upon the achievement of certain milestones and royalties on product sales. The Company follows the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605-25, "Revenue Recognition—Multiple-Element Arrangements," and ASC Topic 605-28, "Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method," in accounting for these agreements. In order to account for these agreements, the Company must identify the deliverables included within the agreement and evaluate which deliverables represent separate units of accounting based on if certain criteria are met, including whether the delivered element has stand-alone value to the collaborator. The consideration received is allocated among the separate units of accounting, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate units.
	At June 30, 2014, the Company had the following two types of agreements with the parties identified below:
	•
	Development and commercialization licenses to use the Company's ADC technology and/or certain other intellectual property to develop compounds to a specified target antigen (referred to as development and commercialization licenses, as distinguished from the Company's right-to-test agreements described elsewhere):
	Amgen (four exclusive single-target licenses*)
	Bayer HealthCare (one exclusive single-target license)
	Biotest (one exclusive single-target license)
	Lilly (one exclusive single-target license)
	Novartis (two exclusive single-target licenses and one license to two related targets: one target on an exclusive basis and the second target on a non-exclusive basis)
	Roche, through its Genentech unit (five exclusive single-target licenses)
	Sanofi (one exclusive single-target license and one exclusive license to multiple individual targets)
	*
	Amgen has sublicensed one of its exclusive single-target licenses to Oxford BioTherapeutics Ltd.
	•
	Option/research agreement for a defined period of time to secure development and commercialization licenses to use the Company's ADC technology to develop anticancer compounds to specified targets on established terms (referred to herein as right-to-test agreements):
	Sanofi
	Novartis
	Lilly
	CytomX
	There are no performance, cancellation, termination or refund provisions in any of the arrangements that contain material financial consequences to the Company.
	Development and Commercialization Licenses
	The deliverables under a development and commercialization license agreement generally include the license to the Company's ADC technology with respect to a specified antigen target, and may also include deliverables related to rights to future technological improvements, research activities to be performed on behalf of the collaborative partner and the manufacture of preclinical or clinical materials for the collaborative partner.
	Generally, development and commercialization licenses contain non-refundable terms for payments and, depending on the terms of the agreement, provide that the Company will (i) at the collaborator's request, provide research services at negotiated prices which are generally consistent with what other third parties would charge, (ii) at the collaborator's request, manufacture and provide to it preclinical and clinical materials or deliver cytotoxic agents at negotiated prices which are generally consistent with what other third parties would charge, (iii) earn payments upon the achievement of certain milestones and (iv) earn royalty payments, generally until the later of the last applicable patent expiration or 10 to 12 years after product launch. In the case of Kadcyla, however, the minimum royalty term is 10 years and the maximum royalty term is 12 years on a country-by-country basis, regardless of patent protection. Royalty rates may vary over the royalty term depending on the Company's intellectual property rights and/or the presence of comparable competing products. The Company may provide technical assistance and share any technology improvements with its collaborators during the term of the collaboration agreements. The Company does not directly control when or whether any collaborator will request research or manufacturing services, achieve milestones or become liable for royalty payments. As a result, the Company cannot predict when or if it will recognize revenues in connection with any of the foregoing.
	In determining the units of accounting, management evaluates whether the license has stand-alone value from the undelivered elements to the collaborative partner based on the consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances for each arrangement. Factors considered in this determination include the research capabilities of the partner and the availability of ADC technology research expertise in the general marketplace. If the Company concludes that the license has stand-alone value and therefore will be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting, the Company then determines the estimated selling prices of the license and all other units of accounting based on market conditions, similar arrangements entered into by third parties, and entity-specific factors such as the terms of the Company's previous collaborative agreements, recent preclinical and clinical testing results of therapeutic products that use the Company's ADC technology, the Company's pricing practices and pricing objectives, the likelihood that technological improvements will be made, and, if made, will be used by the Company's collaborators and the nature of the research services to be performed on behalf of its collaborators and market rates for similar services.
	Upfront payments on development and commercialization licenses are deferred if facts and circumstances dictate that the license does not have stand-alone value. Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables" on July 1, 2010, the Company determined that its licenses lacked stand-alone value and were combined with other elements of the arrangement and any amounts associated with the license were deferred and amortized over a certain period, which the Company refers to as the Company's period of substantial involvement. The determination of the length of the period over which to defer revenue is subject to judgment and estimation and can have an impact on the amount of revenue recognized in a given period. Historically the Company's involvement with the development of a collaborator's product candidate has been significant at the early stages of development, and lessens as it progresses into clinical trials. Also, as a drug candidate gets closer to commencing pivotal testing the Company's collaborators have sought an alternative site to manufacture their products, as the Company's facility does not produce pivotal or commercial drug product. Accordingly, the Company generally estimates this period of substantial involvement to begin at the inception of the collaboration agreement and conclude at the end of non-pivotal Phase II testing. The Company believes this period of substantial involvement is, depending on the nature of the license, on average six and one-half years. Quarterly, the Company reassesses its periods of substantial involvement over which the Company amortizes its upfront license fees and makes adjustments as appropriate. In the event a collaborator elects to discontinue development of a specific product candidate under a development and commercialization license, but retains its right to use the Company's technology to develop an alternative product candidate to the same target or a target substitute, the Company would cease amortization of any remaining portion of the upfront fee until there is substantial preclinical activity on another product candidate and its remaining period of substantial involvement can be estimated. In the event that a development and commercialization license were to be terminated, the Company would recognize as revenue any portion of the upfront fee that had not previously been recorded as revenue, but was classified as deferred revenue, at the date of such termination.
	Subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13, the Company determined that its research licenses lack stand-alone value and are considered for aggregation with the other elements of the arrangement and accounted for as one unit of accounting.
	Upfront payments on development and commercialization licenses may be recognized upon delivery of the license if facts and circumstances dictate that the license has stand-alone value from the undelivered elements, which generally include rights to future technological improvements, research services, delivery of cytotoxic agents and the manufacture of preclinical and clinical materials.
	The Company recognizes revenue related to research services that represent separate units of accounting as they are performed, as long as there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is probable. The Company recognizes revenue related to the rights to future technological improvements over the estimated term of the applicable license.
	The Company may also provide cytotoxic agents to its collaborators or produce preclinical and clinical materials at negotiated prices which are generally consistent with what other third parties would charge. The Company recognizes revenue on cytotoxic agents and on preclinical and clinical materials when the materials have passed all quality testing required for collaborator acceptance and title and risk of loss have transferred to the collaborator. Arrangement consideration allocated to the manufacture of preclinical and clinical materials in a multiple-deliverable arrangement is below the Company's full cost, and the Company's full cost is not expected to ever be below its contract selling prices for its existing collaborations. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the difference between the Company's full cost to manufacture preclinical and clinical materials on behalf of its collaborators as compared to total amounts received from collaborators for the manufacture of preclinical and clinical materials was $2.3 million, $755,000 and $85,000, respectively. The majority of the Company's costs to produce these preclinical and clinical materials are fixed and then allocated to each batch based on the number of batches produced during the period. Therefore, the Company's costs to produce these materials are significantly impacted by the number of batches produced during the period. The volume of preclinical and clinical materials the Company produces is directly related to the number of clinical trials the Company and its collaborators are preparing for or currently have underway, the speed of enrollment in those trials, the dosage schedule of each clinical trial and the time period such trials last. Accordingly, the volume of preclinical and clinical materials produced, and therefore the Company's per-batch costs to manufacture these preclinical and clinical materials, may vary significantly from period to period.
	The Company may also produce research material for potential collaborators under material transfer agreements. Additionally, the Company performs research activities, including developing antibody specific conjugation processes, on behalf of its collaborators and potential collaborators during the early evaluation and preclinical testing stages of drug development. The Company records amounts received for research materials produced or services performed as a component of research and development support revenue. The Company also develops conjugation processes for materials for later stage testing and commercialization for certain collaborators. The Company is compensated at negotiated rates and may receive milestone payments for developing these processes which are recorded as a component of research and development support revenue.
	The Company's development and commercialization license agreements have milestone payments which for reporting purposes are aggregated into three categories: (i) development milestones, (ii) regulatory milestones, and (iii) sales milestones. Development milestones are typically payable when a product candidate initiates or advances into different clinical trial phases. Regulatory milestones are typically payable upon submission for marketing approval with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or other countries' regulatory authorities or on receipt of actual marketing approvals for the compound or for additional indications. Sales milestones are typically payable when annual sales reach certain levels.
	At the inception of each agreement that includes milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether each milestone is substantive and at risk to both parties on the basis of the contingent nature of the milestone. This evaluation includes an assessment of whether (a) the consideration is commensurate with either (1) the entity's performance to achieve the milestone, or (2) the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the entity's performance to achieve the milestone, (b) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (c) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the respective milestone, the level of effort and investment required to achieve the respective milestone and whether the milestone consideration is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement in making this assessment.
	Non-refundable development and regulatory milestones that are expected to be achieved as a result of the Company's efforts during the period of substantial involvement are considered substantive and are recognized as revenue upon the achievement of the milestone, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Milestones that are not considered substantive because we do not contribute effort to the achievement of such milestones are generally achieved after the period of substantial involvement and are recognized as revenue upon achievement of the milestone, as there are no undelivered elements remaining and no continuing performance obligations, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
	Under the Company's development and commercialization license agreements, the Company receives royalty payments based upon its licensees' net sales of covered products. Generally, under these agreements the Company is to receive royalty reports and payments from its licensees approximately one quarter in arrears, that is, generally in the second month of the quarter after the licensee has sold the royalty bearing product or products. The Company recognizes royalty revenues when it can reliably estimate such amounts and collectability is reasonably assured. As such, the Company generally recognizes royalty revenues in the quarter reported to the Company by its licensees, or one quarter following the quarter in which sales by the Company's licensees occurred.
	Right-to-Test Agreements
	The Company's right-to-test agreements provide collaborators the right to (a) test the Company's ADC technology for a defined period of time through a research, or right-to-test, license, (b) take options, for a defined period of time, to specified targets and (c) upon exercise of those options, secure or "take" licenses to develop and commercialize products for the specified targets on established terms. Under these agreements, fees may be due to the Company (i) at the inception of the arrangement (referred to as "upfront" fees or payments), (ii) upon taking an option with respect to a specific target (referred to as option fees or payments earned, if any, when the option is "taken"), (iii) upon the exercise of a previously taken option to acquire a development and commercialization license(s) (referred to as exercise fees or payments earned, if any, when the development and commercialization license is "taken"), or (iv) some combination of all of these fees.
	The accounting for right-to-test agreements is dependent on the nature of the options granted to the collaborative partner. Options are considered substantive if, at the inception of a right-to-test agreement, the Company is at risk as to whether the collaborative partner will choose to exercise the options to secure development and commercialization licenses. Factors that are considered in evaluating whether options are substantive include the overall objective of the arrangement, the benefit the collaborator might obtain from the agreement without exercising the options, the cost to exercise the options relative to the total upfront consideration, and the additional financial commitments or economic penalties imposed on the collaborator as a result of exercising the options.
	For right-to-test agreements where the options to secure development and commercialization licenses to the Company's ADC technology are considered substantive, the Company does not consider the development and commercialization licenses to be a deliverable at the inception of the agreement. For those right-to-test agreements entered into prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 where the options to secure development and commercialization licenses are considered substantive, the Company has deferred the upfront payments received and recognizes this revenue over the period during which the collaborator could elect to take options for development and commercialization licenses. These periods are specific to each collaboration agreement. If a collaborator takes an option to acquire a development and commercialization license under these agreements, any substantive option fee is deferred and recognized over the life of the option, generally 12 to 18 months. If a collaborator exercises an option and takes a development and commercialization license to a specific target, the Company attributes the exercise fee to the development and commercialization license. Upon exercise of an option to acquire a development and commercialization license, the Company would also attribute any remaining deferred option fee to the development and commercialization license and apply the multiple-element revenue recognition criteria to the development and commercialization license and any other deliverables to determine the appropriate revenue recognition, which will be consistent with the Company's accounting policy for upfront payments on single-target licenses. In the event a right-to-test agreement were to be terminated, the Company would recognize as revenue any portion of the upfront fee that had not previously been recorded as revenue, but was classified as deferred revenue, at the date of such termination. None of the Company's right-to-test agreements entered into subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 has been determined to contain substantive options.
	For right-to-test agreements where the options to secure development and commercialization licenses to the Company's ADC technology are not considered substantive, the Company considers the development and commercialization licenses to be a deliverable at the inception of the agreement and applies the multiple-element revenue recognition criteria to determine the appropriate revenue recognition. None of the Company's right-to-test agreements entered into prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 has been determined to contain non-substantive options.
	The Company does not directly control when or if any collaborator will exercise its options for development and commercialization licenses. As a result, the Company cannot predict when or if it will recognize revenues in connection with any of the foregoing.
	Inventory
	Inventory costs relate to clinical trial materials being manufactured for sale to the Company's collaborators. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market as determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis.
	Inventory at June 30, 2014 and 2013 is summarized below (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013
	Raw materials	$	437		$	75
	Work in process		2,513			628
	Total	$	2,950		$	703
	Raw materials inventory consists entirely of DM1 and DM4, proprietary cell-killing agents the Company developed as part of its ADC technology. All raw materials inventory is currently procured from a single supplier.
	Work in process inventory consists of conjugate manufactured for sale to the Company's collaborators to be used in preclinical and clinical studies. All conjugate is made to order at the request of the collaborators and subject to the terms and conditions of respective supply agreements. As such, no excess reserve for work in process inventory is required.
	Raw materials inventory cost is stated net of write-downs of $661,000 and $810,000 as of June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. The write-downs represent the cost of raw materials that the Company considers to be in excess of a twelve-month supply based on firm, fixed orders and projections from its collaborators as of the respective balance sheet date.
	Due to yield fluctuations, the actual amount of raw materials that will be produced in future periods under third-party supply agreements is highly uncertain. As such, the amount of raw materials produced could be more than is required to support the development of the Company's collaborators' product candidates. Such excess supply, as determined under the Company's inventory reserve policy, is charged to research and development expense.
	The Company produces preclinical and clinical materials for its collaborators either in anticipation of or in support of preclinical studies and clinical trials, or for process development and analytical purposes. Under the terms of supply agreements with its collaborators, the Company generally receives rolling six-month firm, fixed orders for conjugate that the Company is required to manufacture, and rolling twelve-month manufacturing projections for the quantity of conjugate the collaborator expects to need in any given twelve-month period. The amount of clinical material produced is directly related to the number of collaborator anticipated or on-going clinical trials for which the Company is producing clinical material, the speed of enrollment in those trials, the dosage schedule of each clinical trial and the time period, if any, during which patients in the trial receive clinical benefit from the clinical materials. Because these elements are difficult to estimate over the course of a trial, substantial differences between collaborators' actual manufacturing orders and their projections could result in the Company's usage of raw materials varying significantly from estimated usage at an earlier reporting period. To the extent that a collaborator has provided the Company with a firm, fixed order, the collaborator is required by contract to reimburse the Company the full negotiated price of the conjugate, even if the collaborator subsequently cancels the manufacturing run.
	The Company capitalizes raw material as inventory upon receipt and accounts for the raw material inventory as follows:
	a)
to the extent that the Company has up to twelve months of firm, fixed orders and/or projections from its collaborators, the Company capitalizes the value of raw materials that will be used in the production of conjugate subject to these firm, fixed orders and/or projections;
b)
the Company considers more than a twelve month supply of raw materials that is not supported by firm, fixed orders and/or projections from its collaborators to be excess and establishes a reserve to reduce to zero the value of any such excess raw material inventory with a corresponding charge to research and development expense; and
c)
the Company also considers any other external factors and information of which it becomes aware and assesses the impact of such factors or information on the net realizable value of the raw material inventory at each reporting period.
During fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company obtained additional amounts of DMx from its supplier which yielded more material than would be required by the Company's collaborators over the next twelve months and as a result, the Company recorded $364,000, $798,000 and $748,000 respectively, of charges to research and development expense related to raw material inventory identified as excess. The Company also recorded $38,000 as research and development expense to write down certain raw material inventory to its net realizable value in fiscal year 2012. No similar charges were recorded during fiscal years 2014 and 2013. Increases in the Company's on-hand supply of raw materials, or a reduction to the Company's collaborators' projections, could result in significant changes in the Company's estimate of the net realizable value of such raw material inventory. Reductions in collaborators' projections could indicate that the Company has excess raw material inventory and the Company would then evaluate the need to record write-downs as charges to research and development expense.
Unbilled Revenue
The majority of the Company's unbilled revenue at June 30, 2014 and 2013 represents research funding earned based on actual resources utilized under the Company's various collaborator agreements.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash at June 30, 2013 is a cash balance securing irrevocable letters of credit required for security deposits for the Company's leased facilities. This cash balance security was no longer needed at June 30, 2014 due to a change in creditors.
Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following at June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
	June 30,
	2014			2013
Accrued contract payments	$	2,914		$	2,406
Accrued clinical trial costs		1,778			1,849
Accrued professional services		833			678
Accrued employee benefits		454			411
Accrued public reporting charges		183			179
Other current accrued liabilities		506			526
Total	$	6,668		$	6,049
Research and Development Expenses
The Company's research and development expenses are charged to expense as incurred and relate to (i) research to evaluate new targets and to develop and evaluate new antibodies, linkers and cytotoxic agents, (ii) preclinical testing of its own and, in certain instances, its collaborators' product candidates, and the cost of its own clinical trials, (iii) development related to clinical and commercial manufacturing processes and (iv) manufacturing operations which also include raw materials. Payments made by the Company in advance for research and development services not yet provided and/or materials not yet delivered and accepted are recorded as prepaid expenses and are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as prepaid and other current assets.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as net operating loss carry forwards and tax credits and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences reverse. A valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets is recorded if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk
Cash and cash equivalents are primarily maintained with three financial institutions in the U.S. Deposits with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company's cash equivalents consist of money market funds with underlying investments primarily being U.S. Government-issued securities and high quality, short-term commercial paper. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company held no marketable securities as of June 30, 2014. The Company's investment policy, approved by the Board of Directors, limits the amount it may invest in any one type of investment, thereby reducing credit risk concentrations.
Derivative instruments include a portfolio of short duration foreign currency forward contracts intended to mitigate the risk of exchange fluctuations for existing or anticipated receivable and payable balances denominated in foreign currency. Derivatives are recorded at fair value and classified as other current assets or liabilities. The fair value of these instruments represents the present value of estimated future cash flows under the contracts, which are a function of underlying interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of the contracts. Changes in these factors or a combination thereof may affect the fair value of these instruments.
The Company does not designate foreign currency forward contracts as hedges for accounting purposes, and changes in the fair value of these instruments are recognized in earnings during the period of change. Because the Company enters into forward contracts only as an economic hedge, any gain or loss on the underlying foreign-denominated existing or anticipated receivable or payable balance would be offset by the loss or gain on the forward contract. Net gains (losses) on forward contracts for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $2,000, $197,000 and $(173,000), respectively, and are included in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations as other income (expense), net. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had no outstanding forward contracts. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had an outstanding forward contract with a notional amount equivalent to approximately $57,000 (€41,000), maturing on October 7, 2013. The Company does not anticipate using derivative instruments for any purpose other than hedging exchange rate exposure.
Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, cash equivalents consisted of money market funds with underlying investments primarily being U.S. Government-issued securities and high quality, short-term commercial paper.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC Topic 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy to measure fair value which is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:
•
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•
Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
•
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
As of June 30, 2014, the Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands):
	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2014 Using
				Quoted Prices in			Significant Other			Significant
				Active Markets for			Observable Inputs			Unobservable
				Identical Assets						Inputs
	Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	142,261		$	142,261		$	—		$	—
As of June 30, 2013, the Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using
				Quoted Prices in			Significant Other			Significant
				Active Markets for			Observable Inputs			Unobservable
				Identical Assets						Inputs
	Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	197,191		$	197,191		$	—		$	—
The fair value of the Company's cash equivalents is based primarily on quoted prices from active markets.
The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable, unbilled revenue, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation, and other accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. The Company provides for depreciation based upon expected useful lives using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Machinery and equipment	5 years
Computer hardware and software	3 years
Furniture and fixtures	5 years
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of remaining lease term or 7 years
Equipment under capital leases is amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter, and included in depreciation expense.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of disposed assets and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statement of operations. The Company recorded $(20,000), $21,000 and $(51,000) of (losses) gains on the sale/disposal of certain furniture and equipment during the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC Topic 360, "Property, Plant, and Equipment," the Company continually evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful life of its long-lived assets may warrant revision or that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired. The Company evaluates the realizability of its long-lived assets based on cash flow expectations for the related asset. Any write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets. Based on this evaluation, the Company believes that, as of each of the balance sheet dates presented, none of the Company's long-lived assets were impaired.
Computation of Net Loss per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. During periods of income, participating securities are allocated a proportional share of income determined by dividing total weighted average participating securities by the sum of the total weighted average common shares and participating securities (the "two-class method"). The Company's restricted stock participates in any dividends that may be declared by the Company and are therefore considered to be participating securities. Participating securities have the effect of diluting both basic and diluted earnings per share during periods of income. During periods of loss, no loss is allocated to participating securities since they have no contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. Diluted (loss) income per share is computed after giving consideration to the dilutive effect of stock options that are outstanding during the period, except where such non-participating securities would be anti-dilutive.
The Company's common stock equivalents, as calculated in accordance with the treasury-stock method, are shown in the following table (in thousands):
	June 30,
	2014			2013			2012
Options outstanding to purchase common stock and unvested restricted stock		8,486			7,703			6,442
Common stock equivalents under treasury stock method		1,820			2,149			2,194
The Company's common stock equivalents have not been included in the net loss per share calculation because their effect is anti-dilutive due to the Company's net loss position.
Stock-based Compensation
As of June 30, 2014, the Company is authorized to grant future awards under one employee share-based compensation plan, which is the ImmunoGen, Inc. 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2006 Plan. At the annual meeting of shareholders on November 13, 2012, an amendment to the 2006 Plan was approved and an additional 3,500,000 shares were authorized for issuance under this plan. As amended, the 2006 Plan provides for the issuance of Stock Grants, the grant of Options and the grant of Stock-Based Awards for up to 12,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, as well as any shares of common stock that are represented by awards granted under the previous stock option plan, the ImmunoGen, Inc. Restated Stock Option Plan, or the Former Plan, that are forfeited, expire or are cancelled without delivery of shares of common stock; provided, however, that no more than 5,900,000 shares shall be added to the 2006 Plan from the Former Plan, pursuant to this provision. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company's stock at the date of grant. Options vest at various periods of up to four years and may be exercised within ten years of the date of grant.
The stock-based awards are accounted for under ASC Topic 718, "Compensation—Stock Compensation." Pursuant to Topic 718, the estimated grant date fair value of awards is charged to the statement of operations over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. Such amounts have been reduced by an estimate of forfeitures of all unvested awards. The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black- Scholes option-pricing model with the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table. As the Company has not paid dividends since inception, nor does it expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future, the expected dividend yield assumption is zero. Expected volatility is based exclusively on historical volatility data of the Company's stock. The expected term of stock options granted is based exclusively on historical data and represents the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term is calculated for and applied to one group of stock options as the Company does not expect substantially different exercise or post-vesting termination behavior amongst its employee population. The risk-free rate of the stock options is based on the U.S. Treasury rate in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the stock options.
	Year Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2012
Dividend		None			None			None
Volatility		60.44	%		60.44	%		59.7	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.74	%		0.87	%		2.16	%
Expected life (years)		6.3			6.3			7.1
Using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the weighted average grant date fair values of options granted during fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $10.50, $8.60, and $9.00 per share, respectively.
A summary of option activity under the 2006 Plan as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the twelve month period then ended is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data):
	Number of			Weighted-			Weighted-			Aggregate
	Stock			Average			Average			Intrinsic
	Options			Exercise			Remaining			Value
				Price			Life in Yrs
Outstanding at June 30, 2013		7,653		$	10.79
Granted		2,391		$	18.18
Exercised		(1,134	)	$	8.05
Forfeited/Canceled		(461	)	$	16.7
Outstanding at June 30, 2014		8,449		$	12.93			6.88		$	14,351
Outstanding at June 30, 2014—vested or unvested and expected to vest		8,233		$	12.83			6.82		$	14,346
Exercisable at June 30, 2014		4,637		$	9.79			5.48		$	14,211
In November 2012, the Company granted an officer of the Company 50,000 shares of restricted stock upon hire. Pursuant to the agreement, the shares vest ratably in quarterly installments over the subsequent four years. The fair value of the restricted stock was determined by the closing price on the date of grant. A summary of restricted stock activity under the 2006 Plan as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the twelve month period then ended is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data):
	Number of			Weighted-
	Restricted			Average
	Stock			Exercise
				Price
Unvested at June 30, 2013		50,000		$	11.93
Vested		(12,500	)	$	11.93
Unvested at June 30, 2014		37,500		$	11.93
Stock compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards granted under the 2006 Plan was $15.6 million, $12.4 million and $9.9 million during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the estimated fair value of unvested employee awards was approximately $22.2 million, net of estimated forfeitures. The weighted-average remaining vesting period for these awards is approximately two years.
A summary of option activity for options vested during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is presented below (in thousands):
	Year Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2012
Total fair value of options vested	$	12,535		$	9,670		$	5,647
Total intrinsic value of options exercised		9,961			6,737			12,476
Cash received for exercise of stock options		9,136			4,026			6,988
Comprehensive Loss
The Company presents comprehensive loss in accordance with ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive loss is comprised of the Company's net loss for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Segment Information
During the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, the Company continued to operate in one reportable business segment under the management approach of ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, which is the business of discovery of monoclonal antibody-based anticancer therapeutics.
The percentages of revenues recognized from significant customers of the Company in the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are included in the following table:
	Year Ended
	June 30,
Collaborative Partner:	2014			2013			2012
Amgen		6	%		6	%		30	%
Bayer HealthCare		—	%		4	%		15	%
Biotest		3	%		5	%		14	%
Lilly		18	%		2	%		2	%
Novartis		38	%		49	%		16	%
Roche		34	%		30	%		—	%
Sanofi		1	%		3	%		23	%
There were no other customers of the Company with significant revenues in the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue. This update provides a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for annual reporting and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective application, with early adoption not permitted. Accordingly, the standard is effective for the Company on July 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption method it will apply and the impact that this guidance will have on our financial statements and related disclosures.
In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance to address the diversity in practice related to the financial statement presentation of unrecognized tax benefits as either a reduction of a deferred tax asset or a liability when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. This guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Agreements

Agreements	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Agreements	'
Agreements	'
	C.    Agreements
	Significant Collaborative Agreements
	Roche
	In May 2000, the Company granted Genentech, now a unit of Roche, an exclusive license to use the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology with antibodies, such as trastuzumab, or other proteins that target HER2. Under the terms of this agreement, Roche has exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize maytansinoid ADC compounds targeting HER2. In February 2013, the US FDA granted marketing approval to the HER2-targeting ADC compound, Kadcyla. Roche received marketing approval for Kadcyla in Japan and in the European Union (EU) in September 2013 and November 2013, respectively. They have also received marketing approval in various other countries around the world. Roche is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any products resulting from the agreement. The Company is compensated for any preclinical and clinical materials that the Company manufactures under the agreement. The Company received a $2 million non-refundable upfront payment from Roche upon execution of the agreement. The Company is also entitled to receive up to a total of $44 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of Kadcyla or any other resulting products. Total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$13.5 million; and regulatory milestones—$30.5 million. Through June 30, 2014, the Company has received and recognized $13.5 million and $20.5 million in development and regulatory milestone payments, respectively, related to Kadcyla. The US marketing approval of Kadcyla in February 2013 triggered a $10.5 million regulatory milestone payment to the Company, which is included in license and milestone fees for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 The Company received two $5 million regulatory milestone payments in connection with marketing approval of Kadcyla in Japan and in the EU, which is included in license and milestone fees for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 Based on an evaluation of the effort contributed to the achievement of these milestones in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, the Company determined these milestones were not substantive. In consideration that there were no undelivered elements remaining, no continuing performance obligations and all other revenue recognition criteria had been met, the Company recognized the non-refundable payments as revenue upon achievement of the milestones. The next potential milestone the Company will be entitled to receive will be a $5 million regulatory milestone for marketing approval of Kadcyla for a first extended indication as defined in the agreement. Based on an evaluation of the effort contributed towards the achievement of this future milestone, the Company determined this milestone is not substantive.
	The Company receives royalty reports and payments related to sales of Kadcyla from Roche one quarter in arrears. In accordance with our revenue recognition policy, $10.3 million of royalties on net sales of Kadcyla for the twelve-month period ended March 31, 2014 were recorded and included in royalty revenue for the year ended June 30, 2014. The Company recorded $592,000 of royalties on net sales of Kadcyla for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 in its fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. No royalty revenue was recorded in fiscal year 2012.
	Roche, through its Genentech unit, also has licenses for the exclusive right to use the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology with antibodies to four undisclosed targets, which were granted under the terms of a separate May 2000 right-to-test agreement with Genentech. For each of these licenses the Company received a $1 million license fee and is entitled to receive up to a total of $38 million in milestone payments and also royalties on the sales of any resulting products. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$8 million; regulatory milestones—$20 million; and sales milestones—$10 million. The Company has not received any milestone payments from these agreements through June 30, 2014. Roche is responsible for the development, manufacturing, and marketing of any products resulting from these licenses. The next potential milestone the Company will be entitled to receive under any of these agreements will be a development milestone for filing of an IND application which will result in a $1 million payment being due. At the time of execution of each of these development and commercialization licenses, there was significant uncertainty as to whether this milestone would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's past involvement in the research and manufacturing these products, this milestone was deemed substantive. Roche no longer has the right to take additional licenses under the right-to-test agreement. The Company received non-refundable technology access fees totaling $5 million for the eight-year term of the right-to-test agreement. The upfront fees were deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which Genentech could elect to obtain product licenses.
	Amgen
	Under a now-expired right-to-test agreement, in September 2009, November 2009 and December 2012, Amgen took three exclusive development and commercialization licenses, for which the Company received an exercise fee of $1 million for each license taken. In May 2013, Amgen took one non-exclusive development and commercialization license, for which the Company received an exercise fee of $500,000. In October 2013, the non-exclusive license was amended and converted to an exclusive license, for which Amgen paid an additional $500,000 fee to the Company. Amgen has sublicensed its rights under this license to Oxford BioTherapeutics Ltd. For each development and commercialization license taken, the Company is entitled to receive up to a total of $34 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The total milestones per license are categorized as follows: development milestones—$9 million; regulatory milestones—$20 million; and sales milestones—$5 million. Amgen (or its sublicensee(s)) is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any products resulting from these development and commercialization licenses.
	Since a deliverable to the original right-to-test agreement was determined to be materially modified at the time the non-exclusive license was converted to exclusive in October 2013, the Company accounted for the multiple-element agreement in accordance with ACS 605-25 (as amended by ASU No. 2009-13). As a result, all of the deferred revenue recorded on the date of the modification and the new consideration received as part of the modification was allocated to all of the remaining deliverables at the time of amendment of the right-to-test agreement based on the estimated selling price of each element. The remaining amount represents consideration for previously delivered elements and was recognized upon the execution of the modification.
	The outstanding licenses, including the exclusive license delivered upon the signing of the amendment, contain the rights to future technological improvements as well as options to purchase materials and research and development services. The Company concluded that additional materials and research and development services would be paid at a contractual price equal to the estimated selling price based estimated prices that would be charged by third parties for similar services. The estimated selling price of the right to technological improvements is the Company's best estimate of selling price and was determined by estimating the probability that technological improvements will be made and the probability that such technological improvements made will be used by Amgen. In estimating these probabilities, we considered factors such as the technology that is the subject of the development and commercialization licenses, our history of making technological improvements, and when such improvements, if any, were likely to occur relative to the stage of development of any product candidates pursuant to the development and commercialization licenses. The Company's estimate of probability considered the likely period of time that any improvements would be utilized, which was estimated to be ten years following delivery of a commercialization and development license. The value of any technological improvements made available after this ten year period was considered to be de minimis due to the significant additional costs that would be incurred to incorporate such technology into any existing product candidates. The estimate of probability was multiplied by the estimated selling price of the development and commercialization licenses and the resulting cash flow was discounted at a rate of 13%, representing the Company's estimate of its cost of capital at the time of amendment of the right-to-test agreement.
	The $430,000 determined to be the estimated selling price of the future technological improvements is being recognized as revenue ratably over the period the Company is obligated to make available any technological improvements, which is equivalent to the estimated term of the agreement. The Company estimates the term of a development and commercialization license to be approximately 25 years, which reflects management's estimate of the time necessary to develop and commercialize products pursuant to the license plus the estimated royalty term. The Company reassesses the estimated term at the end of each reporting period.
	After accounting for the undelivered elements at the estimated selling price, the Company had $2.2 million of remaining allocable consideration which was determined to represent consideration for the previously delivered elements, including the exclusive license that was delivered upon the execution of the modification. This amount was recorded as revenue and is included in license and milestone fees for the year ended June 30, 2014.
	In November 2011, the IND applications to the FDA for two compounds developed under the 2009 development and commercialization licenses became effective, which triggered two $1 million milestone payments to the Company. These payments are included in license and milestone fees for the year ended June 30, 2012. The next potential milestone the Company will be entitled to receive under the 2009 development and commercialization licenses will be a development milestone for the first dosing of a patient in a Phase II clinical trial, which will result in a $3 million payment being due. The next potential milestones the Company will be entitled to receive under the December 2012 and May 2013 development and commercialization licenses will be a $1 million development milestone for an IND becoming effective. At the time of execution of each of these development and commercialization licenses, there was significant uncertainty as to whether these milestones would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's past involvement in the research and manufacturing of these product candidates, these milestones were deemed substantive.
	Costs directly attributable to the Amgen collaborative agreement are comprised of compensation and benefits related to employees who provided research and development services on behalf of Amgen as well as costs of clinical materials sold. Indirect costs are not identified to individual collaborators. The costs related to the research and development services amounted to approximately $179,000, $174,000 and $423,000 for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The costs related to clinical materials sold were approximately $664,000, $670,000 and $649,000 for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	Sanofi
	In July 2003, the Company entered into a broad collaboration agreement with Sanofi (formerly Aventis) to discover, develop and commercialize antibody-based products. The collaboration agreement provides Sanofi with worldwide development and commercialization rights to new antibody-based products directed to targets that are included in the collaboration, including the exclusive right to use the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology in the creation of products developed to these targets. The product candidates (targets) as of June 30, 2014 in the collaboration include SAR3419 (CD19), SAR650984 (CD38), SAR566658 (CA6), SAR408701 (CEACAM5) and one earlier-stage compound that has yet to be disclosed.
	The Company is entitled to receive milestone payments potentially totaling $21.5 million, per target, payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$7.5 million; and regulatory milestones—$14 million. Through June 30, 2014, the Company has received and recognized an aggregate of $16.5 million in milestone payments for compounds covered under this agreement now or in the past, including a $500,000 development milestone related to an undisclosed target which is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the year ended June 30, 2013 and a $3 million milestone payment related to the initiation of a Phase IIb clinical trial (as defined in the agreement) for SAR3419, which is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the year ended June 30, 2012. In July 2014, Sanofi initiated a Phase II clinical trial for SAR650984 which triggered a $3 million payment to the Company. The next potential milestone the Company will be entitled to receive with respect to SAR566658 will be a development milestone for initiation of a Phase IIb clinical trial (as defined in the agreement), which will result in a $3 million payment being due. The next potential milestone the Company will be entitled to receive with respect to both SAR3419 and SAR650984 will be for initiation of a Phase III clinical trial, which will result in each case in a $3 million payment being due. The next potential milestone the Company will be entitled to receive for each of SAR408701 and the unidentified target will be a development milestone for commencement of a Phase I clinical trial, which will result in each case in a $1 million payment being due. At the time of execution of this agreement, there was significant uncertainty as to whether these milestones would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's past involvement in the research and manufacturing of these product candidates, these milestones were deemed substantive.
	In December 2006, the Company entered into a right-to-test agreement with Sanofi. The agreement provides Sanofi with the right to (a) test the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology with Sanofi's antibodies to targets under a right-to-test, or research, license, (b) take exclusive options, with certain restrictions, to specified targets for specified option periods and (c) upon exercise of those options, take exclusive licenses to use the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology to develop and commercialize products directed to the specified targets on terms agreed upon at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. For each development and commercialization license taken, the Company is entitled to receive an exercise fee of $2 million and up to a total of $30 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$10 million; and regulatory milestones—$20 million.
	In December 2013, Sanofi took its first exclusive development and commercialization license under the right-to-test agreement, for which the Company received an exercise fee of $2 million. The Company has deferred the exercise fee and is recognizing the $2 million as revenue ratably over the Company's estimated period of its substantial involvement. The next payment the Company could receive would either be a $2 million development milestone payment with the initiation of a Phase I clinical trial under the first development and commercialization license taken, or a $2 million exercise fee for the execution of a second license. At the time of execution of this agreement, there was significant uncertainty as to whether the milestone related to initiation of a Phase I clinical trial under the first development and commercialization license would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's expected involvement in the research and manufacturing of these product candidates, this milestone was deemed substantive. Sanofi is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any products resulting from the agreement.
	In addition to the $2 million exercise fee received for the development and commercialization license taken, the Company received upfront payments of $4 million under the right-to-test agreement, of which $500,000 was received in December 2006 upon execution of the agreement and $3.5 million was received in August 2008 upon Sanofi's activation of its rights under the agreement. The right-to-test agreement had a three-year original term from the activation date and was renewed by Sanofi in August 2011 for its final three-year term by payment of a $2 million fee. The Company has deferred the $2 million extension fee and is recognizing this amount as revenue over the period during which Sanofi can take additional options for development and commercialization licenses.
	Biotest
	In July 2006, the Company granted Biotest an exclusive development and commercialization license to our maytansinoid ADC technology for use with antibodies that target CD138. The product candidate BT-062 is in development under this agreement. Biotest is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any products resulting from the agreement. The Company received a $1 million upfront payment upon execution of the agreement and could receive up to $35.5 million in milestone payments, as well as royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$4.5 million; and regulatory milestones—$31 million. The Company receives payments for manufacturing any preclinical and clinical materials made at the request of Biotest. In September 2008, Biotest began Phase I evaluation of BT062 which triggered a $500,000 milestone payment to the Company. The next potential milestone we will be entitled to receive will be a development milestone for commencement of a Phase IIb clinical trial (as defined in the agreement) which will result in a $2 million payment being due. At the time of execution of this agreement, there was significant uncertainty as to whether these milestones would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's past involvement in the research and manufacturing of this product, these milestones were deemed substantive.
	The agreement also provided the Company with the right to elect at specific stages during the clinical evaluation of any compound created under this agreement, to participate in the U.S. development and commercialization of that compound in lieu of receiving the milestone payments not yet earned and royalties on sales in the U.S. Currently, the Company can exercise this right during an exercise period specified in the agreement by notice and payment to Biotest of an agreed upon opt-in fee of $15 million. Upon exercise of this right, the Company would share equally with Biotest the associated further costs of product development and commercialization in the U.S. along with the profit, if any, from product sales in the U.S. The Company would also be entitled to receive royalties, on a reduced basis, on product sales outside the U.S.
	Costs directly attributable to the Biotest collaborative agreement are comprised of compensation and benefits related to employees who provided research and development services on behalf of Biotest as well as costs of clinical materials sold. Indirect costs are not identified to individual collaborators. The costs related to the research and development services amounted to approximately $305,000, $339,000 and $233,000 for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The costs related to clinical materials sold were approximately $670,000, $577,000 and $1.3 million for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	Bayer HealthCare
	In October 2008, the Company granted Bayer HealthCare an exclusive development and commercialization license to the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology for use with antibodies or other proteins that target mesothelin. Bayer HealthCare is responsible for the research, development, manufacturing and marketing of any products resulting from the license. The Company received a $4 million upfront payment upon execution of the agreement, and—for each compound developed and marketed by Bayer HealthCare under this collaboration—the Company is entitled to receive a total of $170.5 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$16 million; regulatory milestones—$44.5 million; and sales milestones—$110 million. Through June 30, 2014, the Company has received and recognized an aggregate of $3 million in milestone payments under this agreement. At the time of execution of this agreement, there was significant uncertainty as to whether these received and recognized milestones would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's past involvement in the research and supply of cytotoxic agent for this product candidate, these milestones were deemed substantive. The next potential milestone the Company will be entitled to receive will be a development milestone for commencement of a non-pivotal Phase II clinical trial, which will result in a $4 million payment being due. At the time of execution of this agreement, there was significant uncertainty as to whether this milestone would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's past involvement in the research and supply of cytotoxic agent for this product candidate, this milestone was deemed substantive.
	The Company had previously deferred the $4 million upfront payment received and was recognizing this amount as revenue ratably over the estimated period of substantial involvement. The Company had previously estimated this development period would conclude at the end of non-pivotal Phase II testing. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, Bayer HealthCare initiated Phase I clinical testing of its product candidate. In reaching this stage of clinical testing, Bayer HealthCare developed its own processes for manufacturing required clinical material and produced clinical material in its own manufacturing facility. Considering that Bayer HealthCare was able to accomplish this without significant reliance on the Company, and considering that the Company's expected future involvement would be primarily supplying Bayer HealthCare with small quantities of cytotoxic agents for a limited period of time, the Company believed its period of substantial involvement would end prior to the completion of non-pivotal Phase II testing. As a result of this determination, beginning in September 2011, the Company recognized the balance of the upfront payment as revenue ratably through September 2012. This change in estimate resulted in an increase to license and milestone fees of approximately $1.2 million for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012 compared to amounts that would have been recognized pursuant to the Company's previous estimate. Costs directly attributable to the Bayer collaborative agreement related to costs of clinical materials sold, which were approximately $297,000 and $213,000 for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no similar costs recorded in fiscal year 2014.
	Novartis
	In October 2010, the Company entered into a three-year right-to-test agreement with Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc. (Novartis). The agreement provides Novartis with the right to (a) test the Company's ADC technology with individual antibodies provided by Novartis under a right-to-test, or research, license, (b) take exclusive options, with certain restrictions, to individual targets selected by Novartis for specified option periods and (c) upon exercise of those options, take exclusive licenses to use the Company's ADC technology to develop and commercialize products for a specified number of individual targets on terms agreed upon at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. The initial three-year term of the right-to-test agreement was extended by Novartis in October 2013 for an additional one-year period by payment of a $5 million fee to the Company. In addition to the one-year extension taken in October 2013, the terms of the right-to-test agreement allow Novartis to extend the research term for one additional one-year period by payment of additional consideration. The terms of the right-to-test agreement require Novartis to exercise its options for the development and commercialization licenses by the end of the term of the research license. The Company received a $45 million upfront payment in connection with the execution of the right-to-test agreement, and for each development and commercialization license for a specific target, the Company is entitled to receive an exercise fee of $1 million and up to a total of $199.5 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$22.5 million; regulatory milestones—$77 million; and sales milestones—$100 million. The Company also is entitled to receive payments for research and development activities performed on behalf of Novartis. Novartis is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any products resulting from this agreement.
	In March 2013, the Company and Novartis amended the right-to-test agreement so that Novartis can take a license to develop and commercialize products directed at two pre-defined and related undisclosed targets, one target licensed on an exclusive basis and the other target initially licensed on a non-exclusive basis. The target licensed on a non-exclusive basis may be converted to an exclusive target by notice and payment to the Company of an agreed-upon fee of at least $5 million, depending on specific circumstances. The Company received a $3.5 million fee in connection with the execution of the amendment to the agreement. The Company may be required to credit this fee against future milestone payments if Novartis discontinues the development of a specified product under certain circumstances.
	In connection with the amendment, in March 2013, Novartis took the license referenced above under the right-to-test agreement, as amended, enabling it to develop and commercialize products directed at the two targets. The Company received a $1 million upfront fee with the execution of this license. Additionally, the execution of this license provides the Company the opportunity to receive milestone payments totaling $199.5 million (development milestones—$22.5 million; regulatory milestones—$77 million; and sales milestones—$100 million) or $238 million (development milestones—$22.5 million; regulatory milestones—$115.5 million; and sales milestones—$100 million), depending on the composition of any resulting products.
	In October 2013 and November 2013, Novartis took its second and third exclusive licenses to single targets, each triggering a $1 million payment to the Company and the opportunity to receive milestone payments totaling $199.5 million for each license taken, as outlined above, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The next payment the Company could receive would either be a $5 million development milestone for commencement of a Phase I clinical trial under any of these three licenses, or a $1 million exercise fee for the execution of a fourth license. At the time of execution of these agreements, there was significant uncertainty as to whether these milestones would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's past involvement in the research and manufacturing of these product candidates, these milestones were deemed substantive. Additionally, the Company is entitled to receive royalties on product sales, if any. Novartis also has the right to convert the noted non-exclusive license to an exclusive license, in which case the Company would be entitled to receive, depending on the composition of resultant products, an upward adjustment on milestone payments.
	In accordance with ACS 605-25 (as amended by ASU No. 2009-13), the Company identified all of the deliverables at the inception of the right-to-test agreement and subsequently when amended. The significant deliverables were determined to be the right-to-test, or research, license, the development and commercialization licenses, rights to future technological improvements, and the research services. The options to obtain development and commercialization licenses in the right-to-test agreement were determined not to be substantive and, as a result, the exclusive development and commercialization licenses were considered deliverables at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. Factors that were considered in determining the options were not substantive included (i) the overall objective of the agreement was for Novartis to obtain development and commercialization licenses, (ii) the size of the exercise fee of $1 million for each development and commercialization license obtained is not significant relative to the $45 million upfront payment that was due at the inception of the right-to-test agreement, (iii) the limited economic benefit that Novartis could obtain from the right-to-test agreement unless it exercised its options to obtain development and commercialization licenses, and (iv) the lack of economic penalties as a result of exercising the options.
	The Company has determined that the research license together with the development and commercialization licenses represent one unit of accounting as the research license does not have stand-alone value from the development and commercialization licenses due to the lack of transferability of the research license and the limited economic benefit Novartis would derive if they did not obtain any development and commercialization licenses. The Company has also determined that this unit of accounting does have stand-alone value from the rights to future technological improvements and the research services. The rights to future technological improvements and the research services are considered separate units of accounting as each of these was determined to have stand-alone value. The rights to future technological improvements have stand-alone value as Novartis would be able to use those items for their intended purpose without the undelivered elements. The research services have stand-alone value as similar services are sold separately by other vendors.
	The estimated selling prices for the development and commercialization licenses are the Company's best estimate of selling price and were determined based on market conditions, similar arrangements entered into by third parties, including the Company's understanding of pricing terms offered by its competitors for single-target development and commercialization licenses that utilize ADC technology, and entity-specific factors such as the pricing terms of the Company's previous single-target development and commercialization licenses, recent preclinical and clinical testing results of therapeutic products that use the Company's ADC technology, and the Company's pricing practices and pricing objectives. The estimated selling price of the right to technological improvements is the Company's best estimate of selling price and was determined by estimating the probability that technological improvements will be made and the probability that such technological improvements made will be used by Novartis. In estimating these probabilities, we considered factors such as the technology that is the subject of the development and commercialization licenses, our history of making technological improvements, and when such improvements, if any, were likely to occur relative to the stage of development of any product candidates pursuant to the development and commercialization licenses. The Company's estimate of probability considered the likely period of time that any improvements would be utilized, which was estimated to be ten years following delivery of a commercialization and development license. The value of any technological improvements made available after this ten year period was considered to be de minimis due to the significant additional costs that would be incurred to incorporate such technology into any existing product candidates. The estimate of probability was multiplied by the estimated selling price of the development and commercialization licenses and the resulting cash flow was discounted at a rate of 16%, representing the Company's estimate of its cost of capital at the time. The estimated selling price of the research services was based on third-party evidence given the nature of the research services to be performed for Novartis and market rates for similar services.
	Upon payment of the extension fee in October 2013, the total arrangement consideration of $60.2 million (which comprises the $45 million upfront payment, the amendment fee of $3.5 million, the $5 million extension fee, the exercise fee for each license, and the expected fees for the research services to be provided under the remainder of the arrangement) was reallocated to the deliverables based on the relative selling price method as follows: $55 million to the delivered and undelivered development and commercialization licenses; $4.5 million to the rights to future technological improvements; and $710,000 to the research services. The Company recorded $17.2 million of the $55 million of the arrangement consideration outlined above for the two development and commercialization licenses taken by Novartis in October 2013 and November 2013, which is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the year ended June 30, 2014. The Company also recorded a cumulative catch-up of $1 million for the license delivered in March 2013 and the delivered portion of the license covering future technological improvements, which is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the year ended June 30, 2014. Upon execution of the development and commercialization license taken by Novartis in March 2013, the Company recorded $11.1 million of the arrangement consideration outlined above, which is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.
	Since execution of the first development and commercialization license taken in March 2013, the amount of the total arrangement consideration allocated to future technological improvements is being recognized as revenue ratably over the period the Company is obligated to make available any technological improvements, which is equivalent to the estimated term of the agreement. The Company estimates the term of a development and commercialization license to be approximately 25 years, which reflects management's estimate of the time necessary to develop and commercialize products pursuant to the license plus the estimated royalty term. The Company reassesses the estimated term at the end of each reporting period. The Company does not control when Novartis will exercise its options for development and commercialization licenses. As a result, the Company cannot predict when it will recognize the related remaining license revenue except that it will be within the term of the research license. The Company will recognize research services revenue as the related services are delivered.
	Costs directly attributable to the Novartis collaborative agreement are comprised of compensation and benefits related to employees who provided research and development services on behalf of Novartis as well as costs of clinical materials sold. Indirect costs are not identified to individual collaborators. The costs related to the research and development services amounted to $1.4 million, $2.4 million and $1.1 million for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The costs related to clinical materials sold were approximately $1.3 million, $134,000 and $14,000 for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	Lilly
	In December 2011, the Company entered into a three-year right-to-test agreement with Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly). The agreement provides Lilly with the right to (a) take exclusive options, with certain restrictions, to individual targets selected by Lilly for specified option periods, (b) test the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology with Lilly's antibodies directed to the optioned targets under a right-to-test, or research, license, and (c) upon exercise of those options, take exclusive licenses to use the Company's maytansinoid ADC technology to develop and commercialize products for a specified number of individual targets on terms agreed upon at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. The terms of the right-to-test agreement require Lilly to exercise its options for the development and commercialization licenses by the end of the term of the research license. In August 2013, Lilly took its first exclusive license to a single target.
	The Company received a $20 million upfront payment in connection with the execution of the right-to-test agreement, and for the first development and commercialization license taken in August 2013 and amended in December 2013, the Company received an exercise fee in the amount of $2 million and is entitled to receive up to a total of $199 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. Lilly has the right to elect, at its discretion, which of the two additional development and commercialization licenses it has a right to take under the right-to-test agreement will have no exercise fee and which will have an exercise fee of $2 million. With respect to any subsequent development and commercialization license taken, if Lilly elects that the $2 million exercise fee is payable, the Company is entitled to receive, in addition to the exercise fee, up to a total of $199 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. If Lilly elects that no exercise fee is payable when it takes a development and commercialization license, the Company is entitled to receive up to a total of $200.5 million in milestone payments, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting products. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$29 million for the development and commercialization licenses with respect to which the $2 million exercise fee is paid, and $30.5 million for the development and commercialization license with respect to which no exercise fee is payable; regulatory milestones—$70 million in all cases; and sales milestones—$100 million in all cases. The next payment the Company could receive would either be a $5 million development milestone payment with the initiation of a Phase I clinical trial under the first development and commercialization license taken, or a $2 million exercise fee for the execution of an additional license if Lilly elects to pay the exercise fee with respect to such license. At the time of execution of this agreement, there was significant uncertainty as to whether the milestone related to initiation of a Phase I clinical trial under the first development and commercialization license would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's expected involvement in the research and manufacturing of these product candidates, this milestone was deemed substantive. The Company also is entitled to receive payments for delivery of cytotoxic agents to Lilly and research and development activities performed on behalf of Lilly. Lilly is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any products resulting from this collaboration.
	In accordance with ASC 605-25 (as amended by ASU No. 2009-13), the Company identified all of the deliverables at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. The significant deliverables were determined to be the right-to-test, or research, license, the exclusive development and commercialization licenses, rights to future technological improvements, delivery of cytotoxic agents and the research services. The options to obtain development and commercialization licenses in the right-to-test agreement were determined not to be substantive and, as a result, the exclusive development and commercialization licenses were considered deliverables at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. Factors that were considered in determining the options were not substantive included (i) the overall objective of the agreement was for Lilly to obtain development and commercialization licenses, (ii) the size of the exercise fees of $2 million for each development and commercialization license taken beyond the first license is not significant relative to the $20 million upfront payment that was due at the inception of the right-to-test agreement, (iii) the limited economic benefit that Lilly could obtain from the right-to-test agreement unless it exercised its options to obtain development and commercialization licenses, and (iv) the lack of economic penalties as a result of exercising the options.
	The Company has determined that the research license together with the development and commercialization licenses represent one unit of accounting as the research license does not have stand-alone value from the development and commercialization licenses due to the lack of transferability of the research license and the limited economic benefit Lilly would derive if they did not obtain any development and commercialization licenses. The Company has also determined that this unit of accounting has stand-alone value from the rights to future technological improvements, the delivery of cytotoxic agents and the research services. The rights to future technological improvements, delivery of cytotoxic agents and the research services are considered separate units of accounting as each of these was determined to have stand-alone value. The rights to future technological improvements have stand-alone value as Lilly would be able to use those items for their intended purpose without the undelivered elements. The research services and cytotoxic agents have stand-alone value as similar services and products are sold separately by other vendors.
	The estimated selling prices for the development and commercialization licenses are the Company's best estimate of selling price and were determined based on market conditions, similar arrangements entered into by third parties, including pricing terms offered by our competitors for single-target development and commercialization licenses that utilize antibody-drug conjugate technology, and entity-specific factors such as the pricing terms of the Company's previous single-target development and commercialization licenses, recent preclinical and clinical testing results of therapeutic products that use the Company's ADC technology, and the Company's pricing practices and pricing objectives. The estimated selling price of the rights to technological improvements is the Company's best estimate of selling price and was determined by estimating the probability that technological improvements will be made, and the probability that technological improvements made will be used by Lilly. In estimating these probabilities, we considered factors such as the technology that is the subject of the development and commercialization licenses, our history of making technological improvements, and when such improvements, if any, were likely to occur relative to the stage of development of any product candidates pursuant to the development and commercialization licenses. The Company's estimate of probability considered the likely period of time that any improvements would be utilized, which was estimated to be ten years following delivery of a commercialization and development license. The value of any technological improvements made available after this ten year period was considered to be de minimis due to the significant additional costs that would be incurred to incorporate such technology into any existing product candidates. The estimate of probability was multiplied by the estimated selling price of the development and commercialization licenses and the resulting cash flow was discounted at a rate of 16%, representing the Company's estimate of its cost of capital at the time. The estimated selling price of the cytotoxic agent was based on third-party evidence given market rates for the manufacture of such cytotoxic agents. The estimated selling price of the research services was based on third-party evidence given the nature of the research services to be performed for Lilly and market rates for similar services.
	The total arrangement consideration of $28.2 million (which comprises the $20 million upfront payment, the exercise fee, if any, for each license, the expected fees for the research services to be provided and the cytotoxic agent to be delivered under the arrangement) was allocated to the deliverables based on the relative selling price method as follows: $23.5 million to the development and commercialization licenses; $0.6 million to the rights to future technological improvements, $0.8 million to the sale of cytotoxic agent; and $3.3 million to the research services. Upon execution of the development and commercialization license taken by Lilly in August 2013, the Company recorded $7.8 million of the $23.5 million of the arrangement consideration outlined above, which is included in license and milestone fee revenue for the year ended June 30, 2014. With this first development and commercialization license taken, the amount of the total arrangement consideration allocated to future technological improvements will commence to be recognized as revenue ratably over the period the Company is obligated to make available any technological improvements, which is the equivalent to the estimated term of the license. The Company estimates the term of a development and commercialization license to be approximately 25 years, which reflects management's estimate of the time necessary to develop and commercialize therapeutic products pursuant to the license plus the estimated royalty term. The Company will reassess the estimated term at each subsequent reporting period. The Company will recognize as license revenue an equal amount of the total remaining $15.7 million of arrangement consideration allocated to the development and commercialization licenses as each individual license is delivered to Lilly upon Lilly's exercise of its remaining options to such licenses. The Company does not control when Lilly will exercise its options for development and commercialization licenses. As a result, the Company cannot predict when it will recognize the related license revenue except that it will be within the term of the research license. The Company will recognize research services revenue and revenue from the delivery of cytotoxic agents as the related services and cytotoxic agents are delivered.
	In December 2013, the Company and Lilly amended the right-to-test agreement and the first development and commercialization license. Under these amendments, Lilly now has the right to extend the three-year research period under the right-to-test agreement for up to two nine-month periods by payment to the Company of additional consideration prior to the expiration of both the original term or the first extended term of that agreement. In addition, Lilly retroactively paid the Company an exercise fee of $2 million for the first development and commercialization license, and has the right to elect, at its discretion, which of the additional development and commercialization licenses, if any, taken under the right-to-test agreement will have no exercise fee and which will have an exercise fee of $2 million. The application of the $2 million exercise fee to the first license granted under the arrangement did not impact the total arrangement consideration, only the timing of payment of the consideration. Due to the contingent nature of the extension fees, the lack of overall change in the total consideration for the licenses and the Company's conclusion that there has been no change in the relative selling prices originally used in the allocation of the consideration, there was no accounting impact upon the execution of the amendment.
	Costs directly attributable to the Lilly collaborative agreement are comprised of compensation and benefits related to employees who provided research and development services on behalf of Lilly as well as costs of clinical materials sold. Indirect costs are not identified to individual collaborators. The costs related to the research and development services amounted to approximately $1.2 million, $310,000 and $94,000 for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012 respectively. The costs related to clinical materials sold were approximately $26,000 and $10,000 for fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were no similar costs recorded in fiscal year 2012.
	CytomX
	In January 2014, the Company entered into a reciprocal right-to-test agreement with CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CytomX). The agreement provides CytomX with the right to test the Company's ADC technology with CytomX Probodies™ to create Probody-drug conjugates (PDCs) directed to a specified number of targets under a right-to-test, or research, license, and to subsequently take an exclusive, worldwide license to use the Company's ADC technology to develop and commercialize PDCs directed to the specified targets on terms agreed upon at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. The Company received no upfront cash payment in connection with the execution of the right-to-test agreement. Instead, the Company received reciprocal rights to CytomX's Probody technology whereby the Company was provided the right to test CytomX's Probody technology to create PDCs directed to a specified number of targets and to subsequently take exclusive, worldwide licenses to develop and commercialize PDCs directed to the specified targets on terms agreed upon at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. The terms of the right-to-test agreement require the Company and CytomX to each take its respective development and commercialization licenses by the end of the term of the research licenses. In addition, both the Company and CytomX are required to perform specific research activities under the right-to-test agreement on behalf of the other party for no monetary consideration.
	With respect to the development and commercialization license that may be taken by CytomX, the Company is entitled to receive up to a total of $160 million in milestone payments plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting product. The total milestones are categorized as follows: development milestones—$10 million; regulatory milestones—$50 million; and sales milestones—$100 million. Assuming no annual maintenance fee is payable as described below, the next payment the Company could receive would be a $1 million development milestone payment with commencement of a Phase I clinical trial. At the time of execution of the right-to-test agreement, there was significant uncertainty as to whether the milestone related to the Phase I clinical trial would be achieved. In consideration of this, as well as the Company's expected involvement in the research and manufacturing of any product candidate, this milestone was deemed substantive. CytomX is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any PDC resulting from the development and commercialization license taken by CytomX under this collaboration.
	With respect to any development and commercialization license that may be taken by the Company, the Company will potentially be required to pay up to a total of $80 million in milestone payments per license, plus royalties on the commercial sales of any resulting product. The total milestones per license are categorized as follows: development milestones—$7 million; regulatory milestones—$23 million; and sales milestones—$50 million. Assuming no annual maintenance fee is payable as described below, the next payment the Company could be required to make is a $1 million development milestone payment with commencement of a Phase I clinical trial. The Company is responsible for the manufacturing, product development and marketing of any PDC resulting from any development and commercialization license taken by the Company under this collaboration.
	In addition, each party may be liable to pay annual maintenance fees to the other party if the licensed PDC product candidate covered under each development and commercialization license has not progressed to a specified stage of development within a specified time frame.
	The arrangement was accounted for based on the fair value of the items exchanged. The items to be delivered to CytomX under the arrangement are accounted for under the Company's revenue recognition policy. The items to be received from CytomX are recorded as research and development expenses as incurred.
	In accordance with ASC 605-25 (as amended by ASU No. 2009-13), the Company identified all of the deliverables at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. The significant deliverables were determined to be the right-to-test, or research, license, the exclusive development and commercialization license, rights to future technological improvements, and the research services. The research license in the right-to-test agreement was determined not to be substantive and, as a result, the exclusive development and commercialization license was considered a deliverable at the inception of the right-to-test agreement. Factors that were considered in determining the research license was not substantive included (i) the overall objective of the agreement is for CytomX to obtain a development and commercialization license, (ii) there are no exercise fees payable upon taking the development and commercialization license, (iii) the limited economic benefit that CytomX could obtain from the right-to-test agreement unless CytomX was able to take the development and commercialization license, and (iv) the lack of economic penalties as a result of taking the license.
	The Company has determined that the research license from the Company to CytomX together with the development and commercialization license from the Company to CytomX represent one unit of accounting as the research license does not have stand-alone value from the development and commercialization license due to the lack of transferability of the research license and the limited economic benefit CytomX would derive if they did not obtain any development and commercialization license. The Company has also determined that this unit of accounting has stand-alone value from the rights to future technological improvements and the research services. The rights to future technological improvements and the research services are considered separate units of accounting as each of these was determined to have stand-alone value. The rights to future technological improvements have stand-alone value as CytomX would be able to use those items for their intended purpose without the undelivered elements. The research services have stand-alone value as similar services are sold separately by other vendors.
	The estimated selling price for the development and commercialization license is the Company's best estimate of selling price and was determined based on market conditions, similar arrangements entered into by third parties, including pricing terms offered by the Company's competitors for single-target development and commercialization licenses that utilize antibody-drug conjugate technology, and entity-specific factors such as the pricing terms of the Company's previous single-target development and commercialization licenses, recent preclinical and clinical testing results of therapeutic products that use the Company's ADC technology, and the Company's pricing practices and pricing objectives. In order to determine the best estimate of selling price, the Company determined the overall value of a license by calculating a risk-adjusted net present value of a recent, comparable transaction the Company entered into with another collaborator. This overall value was then decreased by risk-adjusting the net present value of the contingent consideration (the milestones and royalties) payable by CytomX under the development and commercialization license. This amount represents the value that a third party would be willing to pay as an upfront payment for this license to the Company's technology.
	The estimated selling price of the rights to technological improvements is the Company's best estimate of selling price and was determined by estimating the probability that technological improvements will be made, and the probability that technological improvements made will be used by CytomX. In estimating these probabilities, the Company considered factors such as the technology that is the subject of the development and commercialization license, the Company's history of making technological improvements, and when such improvements, if any, were likely to occur relative to the stage of development of the product candidate pursuant to the development and commercialization license. The Company's estimate of probability considered the likely period of time that any improvements would be utilized, which was estimated to be ten years following delivery of the commercialization and development license. The value of any technological improvements made available after this ten year period was considered to be de minimis due to the significant additional costs that would be incurred to incorporate such technology into any existing product candidate. The estimate of probability was multiplied by the estimated selling price of the development and commercialization license and the resulting cash flow was discounted at a rate of 13%, representing the Company's estimate of its cost of capital at the time.
	The estimated selling price of the research services was based on third-party evidence given the nature of the research services to be performed for CytomX and market rates for similar services.
	The total allocable consideration of $13.1 million (which comprises the $13.0 million that a third party would be willing to pay as an upfront payment for this license to the Company's technology plus $140,000 for the fair value of fees for the research services to be provided) was allocated to the deliverables based on the relative selling price method as follows: $12.7 million to the development and commercialization license; $350,000 to the rights to future technological improvements and $140,000 to the research services. The Company will recognize as license revenue the amount of the total allocable consideration allocated to the development and commercialization license when the development and commercialization license is delivered to CytomX. At the time the license is taken, the amount of the total allocable consideration allocated to future technological improvements will commence to be recognized as revenue ratably over the period the Company is obligated to make available any technological improvements, which is the equivalent to the estimated term of the license. The Company estimates the term of a development and commercialization license to be approximately 25 years, which reflects management's estimate of the time necessary to develop and commercialize therapeutic products pursuant to the license plus the estimated royalty term. The Company will be required to reassess the estimated term at each subsequent reporting period. The Company does not control when CytomX will take the development and commercialization license. As a result, the Company cannot predict when it will recognize the related license revenue except that it will be within the term of the research license. The Company will recognize research services revenue as the related services are delivered.
	No license fee revenue has been recognized related to this agreement through June 30, 2014 as the research license was not considered to be substantive and the development and commercialization license had not been delivered at this time. Accordingly, $13.0 million of allocated arrangement consideration is included in long-term deferred revenue at June 30, 2014.
	The $13.1 million of total allocable consideration to be accounted for as revenue described above is also the amount that was used to account for the expense of the licenses and research services the Company received or will receive from CytomX. Based on an estimate of the research services that CytomX will be providing to the Company for no monetary consideration, $310,000 was allocated to such services and will be expensed over the period the services are provided. The balance of $12.8 million pertains to technology rights received and these amounts have been charged to research and development expense during the year ended June 30, 2014 upon execution of the research agreement.
	Other Collaborative Agreements
	In December 2004, the Company entered into a development and license agreement with a predecessor to Janssen Biotech (formerly known as Centocor), a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. Under the terms of this agreement, Janssen was granted exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize anticancer therapeutics that consist of the Company's maytansinoid cell-killing agent attached to an av integrin-targeting antibody that was developed by Janssen. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received an upfront payment of $1 million upon execution of the agreement.
In December 2007, the Company licensed from Janssen the exclusive, worldwide right to develop and commercialize an ADC compound, IMGN388, that consists of an av integrin-targeting antibody developed by them and one of the Company's maytansinoid cell-killing agents. This license reallocated the parties' respective responsibilities and financial obligations from the license referenced above. In November 2011, the Company announced its decision to discontinue development of IMGN388. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the 2007 license agreement was terminated with rights to the product candidate reverting back to Janssen. Per notice to the Company, effective July 2014, Janssen relinquished its rights to the product candidate. Accordingly, the remaining $241,000 of the $1 million upfront fee received from Janssen upon execution of the 2004 license agreement is included in short-term deferred revenue at June 30, 2014.

Cash_and_Cash_Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Cash and Cash Equivalents	'
Cash and Cash Equivalents	'
	D.    Cash and Cash Equivalents
	As of June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, the Company held $142.3 million and $195.0 million, respectively, in cash and money market funds consisting principally of U.S. Government-issued securities and high quality, short-term commercial paper which were classified as cash and cash equivalents.

Property_and_Equipment

Property and Equipment	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Property and Equipment	'
Property and Equipment	'
	E.    Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment consisted of the following at June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013
	Leasehold improvements	$	28,464		$	26,777
	Machinery and equipment		16,724			14,741
	Computer hardware and software		5,846			4,894
	Furniture and fixtures		1,876			1,540
	Assets under construction		3,688			814
		$	56,598		$	48,766
	Less accumulated depreciation		(42,249	)		(37,983	)
	Property and equipment, net	$	14,349		$	10,783
	Depreciation expense was approximately $4.6 million for each of the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Included in the table above, the Company's investment in equipment under capital leases was $574,000, net of accumulated amortization of $50,000, at June 30, 2014 and $110,000, net of accumulated amortization of $22,000, at June 30, 2013.

Income_Taxes

Income Taxes	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Income Taxes	'
Income Taxes	'
	F.    Income Taxes
	The difference between the Company's expected tax benefit, as computed by applying the U.S. federal corporate tax rate of 34% to loss before the benefit for income taxes, and actual tax is reconciled in the following chart (in thousands):
		Year Ended June 30,
		2014			2013			2012
	Loss before income tax expense	$	(71,364	)	$	(72,811	)	$	(73,319	)
	Expected tax benefit at 34%	$	(24,264	)	$	(24,756	)	$	(24,928	)
	Permanent differences		1,953			1,540			1,470
	State tax benefit net of federal benefit		(4,062	)		(3,921	)		(4,204	)
	Increase in valuation allowance, net		26,011			25,624			25,274
	Federal research credit		(1,002	)		(2,260	)		(603	)
	Expired loss and credit carryforwards		1,364			3,773			2,991
	Benefit for income taxes	$	—		$	—		$	—
	At June 30, 2014, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $388.8 million available to reduce federal taxable income, if any, that expire in 2019 through 2034 and $227.9 million available to reduce state taxable income, if any, that expire in fiscal 2019 through fiscal 2034. Included in the federal and state carryforwards is $24.6 million and $21.2 million, respectively, related to deductions from the exercise of stock options and the related tax benefit will result in an increase in additional paid-in capital if and when realized through a reduction of taxes paid in cash. The Company also has federal and state research tax credits of approximately $16.8 million available to offset federal and state income taxes, which expire beginning in fiscal 2015. Due to the degree of uncertainty related to the ultimate use of the loss carryforwards and tax credits, the Company has established a valuation allowance to fully reserve these tax benefits.
	Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013
	Net operating loss carryforwards	$	144,230		$	121,937
	Research and development tax credit carryforwards		14,453			12,806
	Property and other intangible assets		2,386			2,077
	Deferred revenue		24,095			25,484
	Stock-based compensation		9,047			6,534
	Deferred lease incentive		3,908			3,996
	Other liabilities		1,234			508
	Total deferred tax assets	$	199,353		$	173,342
	Valuation allowance		(199,353	)		(173,342	)
	Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—
	The valuation allowance increased by $26.0 million during 2014 due primarily to the additional net loss recognized during the year, partially offset by the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards.
	Utilization of the NOL and R&D credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future as provided by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as well as similar state and foreign provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL and R&D credit carry forwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain shareholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. Since the Company's formation, it has raised capital through the issuance of capital stock on several occasions (both pre and post initial public offering) which, combined with the purchasing shareholders' subsequent disposition of those shares, may have resulted in a change of control, as defined by Section 382, or could result in a change of control in the future upon subsequent disposition. The Company has not currently completed a study to assess whether a change of control has occurred or whether there have been multiple changes of control since its formation due to the significant complexity, costs associated with such study and the possibility that there could be additional changes in control in the future. If the Company has experienced a change of control at any time since its formation, utilization of its NOL or R&D credit carry forwards would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 which is determined by first multiplying the value of the Company's stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate, and then could be subject to additional adjustments, as required. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the NOL or R&D credit carry forwards before utilization. Further, until a study is completed and any limitation known, no amounts are being presented as an uncertain tax position. The Company does not expect to have any taxable income for at least the next several years.
	Interest and penalties related to the settlement of uncertain tax positions, if any, will be reflected in income tax expense. The Company did not recognize any interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect any material changes to the unrecognized benefits within 12 months of the reporting date. Due to existence of the valuation allowance, future changes in the Company's unrecognized tax benefits will not impact our effective tax rate. The Company's loss carryforwards are subject to adjustment by state and federal taxing authorities, commencing when those losses are utilized to reduce taxable income.

Capital_Stock

Capital Stock	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Capital Stock	'
Capital Stock	'
	G.    Capital Stock
	Sale of Common Stock
	On May 19, 2011, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to the shelf registration statement, in July 2012, the Company issued and sold a total of 6,250,000 shares of its common stock at $16.00 per share through a public offering resulting in gross proceeds of $100 million.
	Common Stock Reserved
	At June 30, 2014, the Company has reserved 11.39 million shares of authorized common stock for the future issuance of shares under the 2006 Plan and the 2004 Director Plan. See "Stock-Based Compensation" in Note B for a description of the 2006 Plan and the Former Plan and Note G below for a description of the 2004 Director Plan.
	Stock Options
	As of June 30, 2014, the 2006 Plan was the only employee share-based compensation plan of the Company. During the year ended June 30, 2014, holders of options issued under the 2006 Plan and the Former Plan exercised their rights to acquire an aggregate of 1.1 million shares of common stock at prices ranging from $3.19 to $15.83 per share. The total proceeds to the Company from these option exercises were approximately $9.1 million.
	The Company granted options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of such grant. The following options and their respective weighted- average exercise prices per share were exercisable at June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
		Exercisable		Weighted-
		(in thousands)		Average
				Exercise Price
	June 30, 2014		4,637	$	9.79
	June 30, 2013		4,202	$	7.97
	June 30, 2012		3,416	$	6.34
	2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan
	In November 2001, the Company's shareholders approved the establishment of the 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan, or the 2001 Director Plan, and 50,000 shares of common stock to be reserved for grant thereunder. The 2001 Director Plan provided for the granting of awards to Non-Employee Directors and, at the election of Non-Employee Directors, to have all or a portion of their awards in the form of cash, stock, or stock units. All stock or stock units are immediately vested. The number of stock or stock units issued was determined by the market value of the Company's common stock on the last date of the Company's fiscal quarter for which the services are rendered. The 2001 Director Plan was administered by the Board of Directors which was authorized to interpret the provisions of the 2001 Director Plan, determine which Non-Employee Directors would be granted awards, and determine the number of shares of stock for which a stock right will be granted. The 2001 Director Plan was replaced in 2004 by the 2004 Non-Employee Director Compensation and Deferred Share Unit Plan.
	During the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded approximately $(30,000), $(1,000), and $29,000 in (expense reduction) compensation expense, respectively, related to approximately 6,000 stock units outstanding under the 2001 Director Plan. The value of the stock units is adjusted to market value at each reporting period. No stock units have been issued under the 2001 Plan subsequent to June 30, 2004. Pursuant to the 2001 Plan, in November 2011, the Company paid a retiring director approximately $115,000 to settle outstanding stock units.
	2004 Non-Employee Director Compensation and Deferred Share Unit Plan
	In June 2004, the Board of Directors approved the establishment of the 2004 Non-Employee Director Compensation and Deferred Share Unit Plan, or the 2004 Director Plan. The 2004 Director Plan provided for the compensation of Non-Employee Directors, awarding their annual retainers in the form of deferred share units, and, at their discretion, to have all or a portion of their other compensation such as meeting fees in the form of cash or deferred share units. The deferred share units for annual retainers vested one-twelfth monthly over the next year after the award; other deferred share units vested immediately upon issuance. The number of deferred share units issued was determined by the market value of the Company's common stock on the last date of the Company's fiscal year prior to the fiscal year for which services were rendered. The deferred share units were to be paid out in cash to each non-employee director based upon the market value of the Company's common stock on the date of such director's retirement from the Board of Directors of the Company. The 2004 Director Plan was administered by the Board of Directors.
	The 2004 Director Plan was amended on September 5, 2006. Under the terms of the amended 2004 Director Plan, the redemption amount of deferred share units will be paid in shares of common stock of the Company under the 2006 Plan in lieu of cash. As a result of the change in payout structure, the value of the vested awards was transferred to additional paid-in capital as of the modification date and the total value of the awards, as calculated on the modification date, was expensed over the remainder of the vesting period. Accordingly, the value of the share units is fixed and will no longer be adjusted to market value at each reporting period. In addition, the amended 2004 Director Plan changed the vesting for annual retainers to take place quarterly over the three years after the award and the number of deferred share units awarded for all compensation is now based on the market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the award.
	Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors
	On September 16, 2009, the Board adopted a new Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors, which superseded the 2004 Plan and made certain changes to the compensation of its non-employee directors. The policy was amended on November 11, 2009 to provide that, whenever the Board has a non-employee Chairman in lieu of a Lead Director, the cash payment for the non-employee Chairman of the Board shall be the same as the cash compensation that would otherwise have been payable to the Lead Director. Effective November 12, 2009, non-employee directors became entitled to receive annual meeting fees and committee fees under the new policy. The new policy made changes to the equity portion of the non-employee director compensation, but left the cash portion unchanged. Effective November 11, 2009, non-employee directors became entitled to receive deferred stock units under the new policy as follows:
	•
	New non-employee directors will be initially awarded a number of deferred stock units having an aggregate market value of $65,000, based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of their initial election to the Board. These awards will vest quarterly over three years from the date of grant, contingent upon the individual remaining a director of ImmunoGen as of each vesting date.
	•
	On the first anniversary of a non-employee director's initial election to the Board, such non-employee director will be awarded a number of deferred stock units having an aggregate market value of $30,000, based on the closing price of our common stock on such date of grant and pro-rated based on the number of whole months remaining between the first day of the month in which such grant date occurs and the first October 31 following the grant date. These awards will generally vest quarterly over approximately the period from the grant date to the first November 1 following the grant date, contingent upon the individual remaining a director of ImmunoGen as of each vesting date.
	•
	Thereafter, non-employee directors in general will be annually awarded a number of deferred stock units having an aggregate market value of $30,000, based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders. These awards will vest quarterly over approximately one year from the date of grant, contingent upon the individual remaining a director of ImmunoGen as of each vesting date.
	As with the 2004 Plan, vested deferred stock units are redeemed on the date a director ceases to be a member of the Board, at which time such director's deferred stock units will be settled in shares of our common stock issued under our 2006 Plan at a rate of one share for each vested deferred stock unit then held. Any deferred stock units that remain unvested at that time will be forfeited. The new policy provides that all unvested deferred stock units will automatically vest immediately prior to the occurrence of a change of control, as defined in the 2006 Plan. Pursuant to the Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors, the Company issued two retiring directors an aggregate 46,298 shares of common stock of the Company to settle outstanding deferred share units in November 2011, and 43,615 shares of common stock to a retiring director in November 2013.
	In connection with the adoption of the new compensation policy, the Board also amended the 2004 Plan as follows:
	•
	All unvested deferred stock awards (other than any unvested initial awards) were vested in full on September 16, 2009 unless the date such deferred stock units were credited to the non-employee director was less than one year prior to September 16, 2009, in which case such unvested deferred stock units will vest on the first anniversary of the date such deferred stock units were credited to the non-employee director.
	•
	All unvested deferred stock awards will automatically vest immediately prior to the occurrence of a change of control.
	On September 22, 2010, the Board revised the Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors to provide that, in addition to the compensation they received previously, they would also become entitled to receive stock option awards having a grant date fair value of $30,000, determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model measured on the date of grant, which would be the date of the annual meeting of shareholders.
	On November 12, 2013, the Board amended the Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors to make certain changes to the compensation of its non-employee directors, including an increase in the fees paid in cash to the non-employee directors. Under the terms of the amended policy, the redemption amount of deferred share units issued will continue to be paid in shares of common stock of the Company on the date a director ceases to be a member of the Board. Annual retainers vest quarterly over approximately one year from the date of grant, contingent upon the individual remaining a director of ImmunoGen as of each vesting date. The number of deferred share units awarded is now fixed per the plan on the date of the award and is no longer based on the market price of the Company's common stock on the date of the award. All unvested deferred stock awards will automatically vest immediately prior to the occurrence of a change of control.
	In addition to the deferred share units, the Non-Employee Directors are now also entitled to receive a fixed number of stock options instead of a fixed grant date fair value of options, determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model measured on the date of grant, which would be the date of the annual meeting of shareholders. These options vest quarterly over approximately one year from the date of grant. Any new directors will receive a pro-rated award, depending on their date of election to the Board. The directors received a total of 80,000, 41,805 and 33,187 options in fiscal years ended 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and the related compensation expense is included in the amounts discussed in the "Stock-Based Compensation" section of footnote B above.
	Pursuant to the Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors, as amended, the Company recorded approximately:
	•
	$433,000 in compensation expense during the year ended June 30, 2014 related to the grant of 28,000 deferred share units and 19,000 deferred share units previously granted;
	•
	$351,000 in compensation expense during the year ended June 30, 2013 related to the grant of 26,000 deferred share units and 21,000 deferred share units previously granted; and
	•
	$314,000 in compensation expense during the year ended June 30, 2012 related to the grant of 33,000 deferred share units and 19,000 deferred share units previously granted.

Commitments_and_Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies	'
Commitments and Contingencies	'
	H.    Commitments and Contingencies
	Leases
	Effective July 27, 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Intercontinental Fund III for the rental of approximately 89,000 square feet of laboratory and office space at 830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA through March 2020. The Company uses this space for its corporate headquarters and other operations. In December 2013, the Company modified its lease agreement at 830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA to include approximately 19,000 square feet of additional office space through 2020, concurrent with the remainder of the original lease term. As part of the lease amendment, the Company will receive a construction allowance of approximately $746,000 to build out office space to the Company's specifications. The Company obtained physical control of the additional space to begin construction in January 2014. In April, 2014, the Company again modified its lease agreement at this site to extend the lease to 2026. The Company may extend the lease for two additional terms of five years. As part of this lease amendment, the Company will receive a construction allowance of approximately $1.1 million to build out office space to the Company's specifications. The Company is required to pay certain operating expenses for the leased premises subject to escalation charges for certain expense increases over a base amount. The Company entered into a sublease in December 2009 for 14,100 square feet of this space in Waltham through January 2015, with the sublessee having a conditional option to extend the term for an additional two years. However, the Company has notified the sublessee that it does not intend to allow them to extend the term beyond January 2015.
	Effective April 2012, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for the rental of 7,310 square feet of laboratory and office space at 830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA from Histogenics Corporation. The term of the sublease is for three years and the Company is required to pay certain operating expenses for the leased premises subject to escalation charges for certain expense increases over a base amount.
	The Company also leases manufacturing and office space at 333 Providence Highway, Norwood, MA under an agreement through 2018 with an option to extend the lease for an additional term of five years. The Company is required to pay certain operating expenses for the leased premises subject to escalation charges for certain expense increases over a base amount.
	Effective April 2013, the Company entered into a lease agreement with River Ridge Limited Partnership for the rental of 7,507 square feet of additional office space at 100 River Ridge Drive, Norwood, MA. The initial term of the lease is for five years and two months commencing in July 2013 with an option for the Company to extend the lease for an additional term of five years. The Company is required to pay certain operating expenses for the leased premises subject to escalation charges for certain expense increases over a base amount.
	Facilities rent expense, net of sublease income, was approximately $5.4 million, $4.8 million and $4.8 million during fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	As of June 30, 2014, the minimum rental commitments, including real estate taxes and other expenses, for the next five fiscal years and thereafter under the non-cancelable operating lease agreements discussed above are as follows (in thousands):
	2015	$	7,150
	2016		6,924
	2017		6,941
	2018		7,046
	2019		6,235
	Thereafter		43,887
	Total minimum lease payments	$	78,183
	Total minimum rental income from subleases		(408	)
	Total minimum lease payments, net	$	77,775
	There are no obligations under capital leases as of June 30, 2014, as all of the capital leases were single payment obligations which have all been made.
	Collaborations
	The Company is contractually obligated to make potential future success-based regulatory milestone payments in conjunction with certain collaborative agreements. These payments are contingent upon the occurrence of certain future events and, given the nature of these events, it is unclear when, if ever, the Company may be required to pay such amounts. Further, the timing of any future payment is not reasonably estimable. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company's license agreement with Janssen Biotech was terminated and, accordingly, the Company is no longer obligated to make $41.0 million of potential future success-based milestone and third-party payments under such agreement. As of June 30, 2014, the maximum amount that may be payable in the future under the Company's current collaborative agreements is $162 million, $1.4 million of which is reimbursable by a third party under a separate agreement.
	Litigation
	The Company is not party to any material litigation.

Employee_Benefit_Plans

Employee Benefit Plans	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Employee Benefit Plans	'
Employee Benefit Plans	'
	I.    Employee Benefit Plans
	The Company has a deferred compensation plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the 401(k) Plan). Under the 401(k) Plan, eligible employees are permitted to contribute, subject to certain limitations, up to 100% of their gross salary and the Company's matching contribution is 50% of the first 6% of the eligible employees' contributions. In fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company's contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaled approximately $710,000, $593,000, and $548,000, respectively.

Quarterly_Financial_Informatio

Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)	'
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)	'
	J.    Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
		Fiscal Year 2014
		First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
		Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
		September 30, 2013			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2014			June 30, 2014
		(In thousands, except per share data)
	Revenues:
	License and milestone fees	$	13,167		$	25,678		$	305		$	305
	Royalty revenue		2,053			2,335			2,558			3,400
	Research and development support		1,990			1,922			1,948			1,327
	Clinical materials revenue		8			125			2,064			711
	Total revenues		17,218			30,060			6,875			5,743
	Expenses:
	Research and development		22,029			20,862			38,280			25,787
	General and administrative		6,526			5,447			6,040			6,456
	Total expenses		28,555			26,309			44,320			32,243
	Loss from operations		(11,337	)		3,751			(37,445	)		(26,500	)
	Other income (expense), net		111			62			(7	)		1
	Net (loss) income	$	(11,226	)	$	3,813		$	(37,452	)	$	(26,499	)
	Basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.13	)	$	0.04		$	(0.44	)	$	(0.31	)
		Fiscal Year 2013
		First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
		Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
		September 30, 2012			December 31, 2012			March 31, 2013			June 30, 2013
		(In thousands, except per share data)
	Revenues:
	License and milestone fees	$	933		$	429		$	22,010		$	855
	Royalty revenue		—			—			—			592
	Research and development support		1,377			2,036			2,257			2,203
	Clinical materials revenue		1,781			147			734			181
	Total revenues		4,091			2,612			25,001			3,831
	Expenses:
	Research and development		23,700			21,656			21,318			20,399
	General and administrative		5,639			5,464			4,995			5,373
	Total expenses		29,339			27,120			26,313			25,772
	Loss from operations		(25,248	)		(24,508	)		(1,312	)		(21,941	)
	Other income (expense), net		56			115			(39	)		66
	Net loss	$	(25,192	)	$	(24,393	)	$	(1,351	)	$	(21,875	)
	Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)

SCHEDULE_IIVALUATION_AND_QUALI

SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS	'
SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS	'
	SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
	(In thousands)
	COLUMN A—DESCRIPTION	COLUMN B		COLUMN C—		COLUMN D			COLUMN E
				ADDITIONS
	Inventory Valuation Allowance	Balance at		Charged		Use of			Balance at
		Beginning		to Costs		Zero			End of
		of Period		and		Value			Period
				Expenses		Inventory
	Year End June 30, 2014	$	810	$	364	$	(513	)	$	661
	Year End June 30, 2013	$	1,291	$	798	$	(1,279	)	$	810
	Year End June 30, 2012	$	1,993	$	786	$	(1,488	)	$	1,291

Summary_of_Significant_Account1

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

'

Principles of Consolidation

'

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, ImmunoGen Securities Corp., and ImmunoGen Europe Limited. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

'

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Subsequent Events

'

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2014 up through the date the Company issued these financial statements. In July 2014, Sanofi initiated a Phase IIb clinical trial for SAR650984 which triggered a $3 million milestone payment to the Company. Effective July 2014, Janssen Biotech (formerly known as Centocor) terminated its exclusive development and commercialization license with the Company. As a result, in July 2014, the Company recognized the remaining $241,000 of the $1 million upfront fee received upon execution of the license which had been previously deferred. The Company did not have any other material recognizable or unrecognizable subsequent events.

Revenue Recognition

'

Revenue Recognition

The Company enters into licensing and development agreements with collaborative partners for the development of monoclonal antibody-based anticancer therapeutics. The terms of these agreements contain multiple deliverables which may include (i) licenses, or options to obtain licenses, to the Company's antibody-drug conjugate, or ADC, technology, (ii) rights to future technological improvements, (iii) research activities to be performed on behalf of the collaborative partner, (iv) delivery of cytotoxic agents and (v) the manufacture of preclinical or clinical materials for the collaborative partner. Payments to the Company under these agreements may include upfront fees, option fees, exercise fees, payments for research activities, payments for the manufacture of preclinical or clinical materials, payments based upon the achievement of certain milestones and royalties on product sales. The Company follows the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605-25, "Revenue Recognition—Multiple-Element Arrangements," and ASC Topic 605-28, "Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method," in accounting for these agreements. In order to account for these agreements, the Company must identify the deliverables included within the agreement and evaluate which deliverables represent separate units of accounting based on if certain criteria are met, including whether the delivered element has stand-alone value to the collaborator. The consideration received is allocated among the separate units of accounting, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate units.

At June 30, 2014, the Company had the following two types of agreements with the parties identified below:

•

Development and commercialization licenses to use the Company's ADC technology and/or certain other intellectual property to develop compounds to a specified target antigen (referred to as development and commercialization licenses, as distinguished from the Company's right-to-test agreements described elsewhere):

Amgen (four exclusive single-target licenses*)

Bayer HealthCare (one exclusive single-target license)

Biotest (one exclusive single-target license)

Lilly (one exclusive single-target license)

Novartis (two exclusive single-target licenses and one license to two related targets: one target on an exclusive basis and the second target on a non-exclusive basis)

Roche, through its Genentech unit (five exclusive single-target licenses)

Sanofi (one exclusive single-target license and one exclusive license to multiple individual targets)

*

Amgen has sublicensed one of its exclusive single-target licenses to Oxford BioTherapeutics Ltd.

•

Option/research agreement for a defined period of time to secure development and commercialization licenses to use the Company's ADC technology to develop anticancer compounds to specified targets on established terms (referred to herein as right-to-test agreements):

Sanofi

Novartis

Lilly

CytomX

There are no performance, cancellation, termination or refund provisions in any of the arrangements that contain material financial consequences to the Company.

Development and Commercialization Licenses

The deliverables under a development and commercialization license agreement generally include the license to the Company's ADC technology with respect to a specified antigen target, and may also include deliverables related to rights to future technological improvements, research activities to be performed on behalf of the collaborative partner and the manufacture of preclinical or clinical materials for the collaborative partner.

Generally, development and commercialization licenses contain non-refundable terms for payments and, depending on the terms of the agreement, provide that the Company will (i) at the collaborator's request, provide research services at negotiated prices which are generally consistent with what other third parties would charge, (ii) at the collaborator's request, manufacture and provide to it preclinical and clinical materials or deliver cytotoxic agents at negotiated prices which are generally consistent with what other third parties would charge, (iii) earn payments upon the achievement of certain milestones and (iv) earn royalty payments, generally until the later of the last applicable patent expiration or 10 to 12 years after product launch. In the case of Kadcyla, however, the minimum royalty term is 10 years and the maximum royalty term is 12 years on a country-by-country basis, regardless of patent protection. Royalty rates may vary over the royalty term depending on the Company's intellectual property rights and/or the presence of comparable competing products. The Company may provide technical assistance and share any technology improvements with its collaborators during the term of the collaboration agreements. The Company does not directly control when or whether any collaborator will request research or manufacturing services, achieve milestones or become liable for royalty payments. As a result, the Company cannot predict when or if it will recognize revenues in connection with any of the foregoing.

In determining the units of accounting, management evaluates whether the license has stand-alone value from the undelivered elements to the collaborative partner based on the consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances for each arrangement. Factors considered in this determination include the research capabilities of the partner and the availability of ADC technology research expertise in the general marketplace. If the Company concludes that the license has stand-alone value and therefore will be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting, the Company then determines the estimated selling prices of the license and all other units of accounting based on market conditions, similar arrangements entered into by third parties, and entity-specific factors such as the terms of the Company's previous collaborative agreements, recent preclinical and clinical testing results of therapeutic products that use the Company's ADC technology, the Company's pricing practices and pricing objectives, the likelihood that technological improvements will be made, and, if made, will be used by the Company's collaborators and the nature of the research services to be performed on behalf of its collaborators and market rates for similar services.

Upfront payments on development and commercialization licenses are deferred if facts and circumstances dictate that the license does not have stand-alone value. Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables" on July 1, 2010, the Company determined that its licenses lacked stand-alone value and were combined with other elements of the arrangement and any amounts associated with the license were deferred and amortized over a certain period, which the Company refers to as the Company's period of substantial involvement. The determination of the length of the period over which to defer revenue is subject to judgment and estimation and can have an impact on the amount of revenue recognized in a given period. Historically the Company's involvement with the development of a collaborator's product candidate has been significant at the early stages of development, and lessens as it progresses into clinical trials. Also, as a drug candidate gets closer to commencing pivotal testing the Company's collaborators have sought an alternative site to manufacture their products, as the Company's facility does not produce pivotal or commercial drug product. Accordingly, the Company generally estimates this period of substantial involvement to begin at the inception of the collaboration agreement and conclude at the end of non-pivotal Phase II testing. The Company believes this period of substantial involvement is, depending on the nature of the license, on average six and one-half years. Quarterly, the Company reassesses its periods of substantial involvement over which the Company amortizes its upfront license fees and makes adjustments as appropriate. In the event a collaborator elects to discontinue development of a specific product candidate under a development and commercialization license, but retains its right to use the Company's technology to develop an alternative product candidate to the same target or a target substitute, the Company would cease amortization of any remaining portion of the upfront fee until there is substantial preclinical activity on another product candidate and its remaining period of substantial involvement can be estimated. In the event that a development and commercialization license were to be terminated, the Company would recognize as revenue any portion of the upfront fee that had not previously been recorded as revenue, but was classified as deferred revenue, at the date of such termination.

Subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13, the Company determined that its research licenses lack stand-alone value and are considered for aggregation with the other elements of the arrangement and accounted for as one unit of accounting.

Upfront payments on development and commercialization licenses may be recognized upon delivery of the license if facts and circumstances dictate that the license has stand-alone value from the undelivered elements, which generally include rights to future technological improvements, research services, delivery of cytotoxic agents and the manufacture of preclinical and clinical materials.

The Company recognizes revenue related to research services that represent separate units of accounting as they are performed, as long as there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is probable. The Company recognizes revenue related to the rights to future technological improvements over the estimated term of the applicable license.

The Company may also provide cytotoxic agents to its collaborators or produce preclinical and clinical materials at negotiated prices which are generally consistent with what other third parties would charge. The Company recognizes revenue on cytotoxic agents and on preclinical and clinical materials when the materials have passed all quality testing required for collaborator acceptance and title and risk of loss have transferred to the collaborator. Arrangement consideration allocated to the manufacture of preclinical and clinical materials in a multiple-deliverable arrangement is below the Company's full cost, and the Company's full cost is not expected to ever be below its contract selling prices for its existing collaborations. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the difference between the Company's full cost to manufacture preclinical and clinical materials on behalf of its collaborators as compared to total amounts received from collaborators for the manufacture of preclinical and clinical materials was $2.3 million, $755,000 and $85,000, respectively. The majority of the Company's costs to produce these preclinical and clinical materials are fixed and then allocated to each batch based on the number of batches produced during the period. Therefore, the Company's costs to produce these materials are significantly impacted by the number of batches produced during the period. The volume of preclinical and clinical materials the Company produces is directly related to the number of clinical trials the Company and its collaborators are preparing for or currently have underway, the speed of enrollment in those trials, the dosage schedule of each clinical trial and the time period such trials last. Accordingly, the volume of preclinical and clinical materials produced, and therefore the Company's per-batch costs to manufacture these preclinical and clinical materials, may vary significantly from period to period.

The Company may also produce research material for potential collaborators under material transfer agreements. Additionally, the Company performs research activities, including developing antibody specific conjugation processes, on behalf of its collaborators and potential collaborators during the early evaluation and preclinical testing stages of drug development. The Company records amounts received for research materials produced or services performed as a component of research and development support revenue. The Company also develops conjugation processes for materials for later stage testing and commercialization for certain collaborators. The Company is compensated at negotiated rates and may receive milestone payments for developing these processes which are recorded as a component of research and development support revenue.

The Company's development and commercialization license agreements have milestone payments which for reporting purposes are aggregated into three categories: (i) development milestones, (ii) regulatory milestones, and (iii) sales milestones. Development milestones are typically payable when a product candidate initiates or advances into different clinical trial phases. Regulatory milestones are typically payable upon submission for marketing approval with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or other countries' regulatory authorities or on receipt of actual marketing approvals for the compound or for additional indications. Sales milestones are typically payable when annual sales reach certain levels.

At the inception of each agreement that includes milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether each milestone is substantive and at risk to both parties on the basis of the contingent nature of the milestone. This evaluation includes an assessment of whether (a) the consideration is commensurate with either (1) the entity's performance to achieve the milestone, or (2) the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the entity's performance to achieve the milestone, (b) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (c) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the respective milestone, the level of effort and investment required to achieve the respective milestone and whether the milestone consideration is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement in making this assessment.

Non-refundable development and regulatory milestones that are expected to be achieved as a result of the Company's efforts during the period of substantial involvement are considered substantive and are recognized as revenue upon the achievement of the milestone, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Milestones that are not considered substantive because we do not contribute effort to the achievement of such milestones are generally achieved after the period of substantial involvement and are recognized as revenue upon achievement of the milestone, as there are no undelivered elements remaining and no continuing performance obligations, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Under the Company's development and commercialization license agreements, the Company receives royalty payments based upon its licensees' net sales of covered products. Generally, under these agreements the Company is to receive royalty reports and payments from its licensees approximately one quarter in arrears, that is, generally in the second month of the quarter after the licensee has sold the royalty bearing product or products. The Company recognizes royalty revenues when it can reliably estimate such amounts and collectability is reasonably assured. As such, the Company generally recognizes royalty revenues in the quarter reported to the Company by its licensees, or one quarter following the quarter in which sales by the Company's licensees occurred.

Right-to-Test Agreements

The Company's right-to-test agreements provide collaborators the right to (a) test the Company's ADC technology for a defined period of time through a research, or right-to-test, license, (b) take options, for a defined period of time, to specified targets and (c) upon exercise of those options, secure or "take" licenses to develop and commercialize products for the specified targets on established terms. Under these agreements, fees may be due to the Company (i) at the inception of the arrangement (referred to as "upfront" fees or payments), (ii) upon taking an option with respect to a specific target (referred to as option fees or payments earned, if any, when the option is "taken"), (iii) upon the exercise of a previously taken option to acquire a development and commercialization license(s) (referred to as exercise fees or payments earned, if any, when the development and commercialization license is "taken"), or (iv) some combination of all of these fees.

The accounting for right-to-test agreements is dependent on the nature of the options granted to the collaborative partner. Options are considered substantive if, at the inception of a right-to-test agreement, the Company is at risk as to whether the collaborative partner will choose to exercise the options to secure development and commercialization licenses. Factors that are considered in evaluating whether options are substantive include the overall objective of the arrangement, the benefit the collaborator might obtain from the agreement without exercising the options, the cost to exercise the options relative to the total upfront consideration, and the additional financial commitments or economic penalties imposed on the collaborator as a result of exercising the options.

For right-to-test agreements where the options to secure development and commercialization licenses to the Company's ADC technology are considered substantive, the Company does not consider the development and commercialization licenses to be a deliverable at the inception of the agreement. For those right-to-test agreements entered into prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 where the options to secure development and commercialization licenses are considered substantive, the Company has deferred the upfront payments received and recognizes this revenue over the period during which the collaborator could elect to take options for development and commercialization licenses. These periods are specific to each collaboration agreement. If a collaborator takes an option to acquire a development and commercialization license under these agreements, any substantive option fee is deferred and recognized over the life of the option, generally 12 to 18 months. If a collaborator exercises an option and takes a development and commercialization license to a specific target, the Company attributes the exercise fee to the development and commercialization license. Upon exercise of an option to acquire a development and commercialization license, the Company would also attribute any remaining deferred option fee to the development and commercialization license and apply the multiple-element revenue recognition criteria to the development and commercialization license and any other deliverables to determine the appropriate revenue recognition, which will be consistent with the Company's accounting policy for upfront payments on single-target licenses. In the event a right-to-test agreement were to be terminated, the Company would recognize as revenue any portion of the upfront fee that had not previously been recorded as revenue, but was classified as deferred revenue, at the date of such termination. None of the Company's right-to-test agreements entered into subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 has been determined to contain substantive options.

For right-to-test agreements where the options to secure development and commercialization licenses to the Company's ADC technology are not considered substantive, the Company considers the development and commercialization licenses to be a deliverable at the inception of the agreement and applies the multiple-element revenue recognition criteria to determine the appropriate revenue recognition. None of the Company's right-to-test agreements entered into prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 has been determined to contain non-substantive options.

The Company does not directly control when or if any collaborator will exercise its options for development and commercialization licenses. As a result, the Company cannot predict when or if it will recognize revenues in connection with any of the foregoing.

Inventory

'

Inventory

Inventory costs relate to clinical trial materials being manufactured for sale to the Company's collaborators. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market as determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis.

Inventory at June 30, 2014 and 2013 is summarized below (in thousands):

June 30,

2014

2013

Raw materials

$

437

$

75

Work in process

2,513

628

Total

$

2,950

$

703

Raw materials inventory consists entirely of DM1 and DM4, proprietary cell-killing agents the Company developed as part of its ADC technology. All raw materials inventory is currently procured from a single supplier.

Work in process inventory consists of conjugate manufactured for sale to the Company's collaborators to be used in preclinical and clinical studies. All conjugate is made to order at the request of the collaborators and subject to the terms and conditions of respective supply agreements. As such, no excess reserve for work in process inventory is required.

Raw materials inventory cost is stated net of write-downs of $661,000 and $810,000 as of June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. The write-downs represent the cost of raw materials that the Company considers to be in excess of a twelve-month supply based on firm, fixed orders and projections from its collaborators as of the respective balance sheet date.

Due to yield fluctuations, the actual amount of raw materials that will be produced in future periods under third-party supply agreements is highly uncertain. As such, the amount of raw materials produced could be more than is required to support the development of the Company's collaborators' product candidates. Such excess supply, as determined under the Company's inventory reserve policy, is charged to research and development expense.

The Company produces preclinical and clinical materials for its collaborators either in anticipation of or in support of preclinical studies and clinical trials, or for process development and analytical purposes. Under the terms of supply agreements with its collaborators, the Company generally receives rolling six-month firm, fixed orders for conjugate that the Company is required to manufacture, and rolling twelve-month manufacturing projections for the quantity of conjugate the collaborator expects to need in any given twelve-month period. The amount of clinical material produced is directly related to the number of collaborator anticipated or on-going clinical trials for which the Company is producing clinical material, the speed of enrollment in those trials, the dosage schedule of each clinical trial and the time period, if any, during which patients in the trial receive clinical benefit from the clinical materials. Because these elements are difficult to estimate over the course of a trial, substantial differences between collaborators' actual manufacturing orders and their projections could result in the Company's usage of raw materials varying significantly from estimated usage at an earlier reporting period. To the extent that a collaborator has provided the Company with a firm, fixed order, the collaborator is required by contract to reimburse the Company the full negotiated price of the conjugate, even if the collaborator subsequently cancels the manufacturing run.

The Company capitalizes raw material as inventory upon receipt and accounts for the raw material inventory as follows:

a)

to the extent that the Company has up to twelve months of firm, fixed orders and/or projections from its collaborators, the Company capitalizes the value of raw materials that will be used in the production of conjugate subject to these firm, fixed orders and/or projections;

b)

the Company considers more than a twelve month supply of raw materials that is not supported by firm, fixed orders and/or projections from its collaborators to be excess and establishes a reserve to reduce to zero the value of any such excess raw material inventory with a corresponding charge to research and development expense; and

c)

the Company also considers any other external factors and information of which it becomes aware and assesses the impact of such factors or information on the net realizable value of the raw material inventory at each reporting period.

During fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company obtained additional amounts of DMx from its supplier which yielded more material than would be required by the Company's collaborators over the next twelve months and as a result, the Company recorded $364,000, $798,000 and $748,000 respectively, of charges to research and development expense related to raw material inventory identified as excess. The Company also recorded $38,000 as research and development expense to write down certain raw material inventory to its net realizable value in fiscal year 2012. No similar charges were recorded during fiscal years 2014 and 2013. Increases in the Company's on-hand supply of raw materials, or a reduction to the Company's collaborators' projections, could result in significant changes in the Company's estimate of the net realizable value of such raw material inventory. Reductions in collaborators' projections could indicate that the Company has excess raw material inventory and the Company would then evaluate the need to record write-downs as charges to research and development expense.

Unbilled Revenue

'

Unbilled Revenue

The majority of the Company's unbilled revenue at June 30, 2014 and 2013 represents research funding earned based on actual resources utilized under the Company's various collaborator agreements.

Restricted Cash

'

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash at June 30, 2013 is a cash balance securing irrevocable letters of credit required for security deposits for the Company's leased facilities. This cash balance security was no longer needed at June 30, 2014 due to a change in creditors.

Other Accrued Liabilities

'

Other Accrued Liabilities

Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following at June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

June 30,

2014

2013

Accrued contract payments

$

2,914

$

2,406

Accrued clinical trial costs

1,778

1,849

Accrued professional services

833

678

Accrued employee benefits

454

411

Accrued public reporting charges

183

179

Other current accrued liabilities

506

526

Total

$

6,668

$

6,049

Research and Development Expenses

'

Research and Development Expenses

The Company's research and development expenses are charged to expense as incurred and relate to (i) research to evaluate new targets and to develop and evaluate new antibodies, linkers and cytotoxic agents, (ii) preclinical testing of its own and, in certain instances, its collaborators' product candidates, and the cost of its own clinical trials, (iii) development related to clinical and commercial manufacturing processes and (iv) manufacturing operations which also include raw materials. Payments made by the Company in advance for research and development services not yet provided and/or materials not yet delivered and accepted are recorded as prepaid expenses and are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as prepaid and other current assets.

Income Taxes

'

Income Taxes

The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as net operating loss carry forwards and tax credits and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences reverse. A valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets is recorded if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk

'

Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are primarily maintained with three financial institutions in the U.S. Deposits with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company's cash equivalents consist of money market funds with underlying investments primarily being U.S. Government-issued securities and high quality, short-term commercial paper. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company held no marketable securities as of June 30, 2014. The Company's investment policy, approved by the Board of Directors, limits the amount it may invest in any one type of investment, thereby reducing credit risk concentrations.

Derivative instruments include a portfolio of short duration foreign currency forward contracts intended to mitigate the risk of exchange fluctuations for existing or anticipated receivable and payable balances denominated in foreign currency. Derivatives are recorded at fair value and classified as other current assets or liabilities. The fair value of these instruments represents the present value of estimated future cash flows under the contracts, which are a function of underlying interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of the contracts. Changes in these factors or a combination thereof may affect the fair value of these instruments.

The Company does not designate foreign currency forward contracts as hedges for accounting purposes, and changes in the fair value of these instruments are recognized in earnings during the period of change. Because the Company enters into forward contracts only as an economic hedge, any gain or loss on the underlying foreign-denominated existing or anticipated receivable or payable balance would be offset by the loss or gain on the forward contract. Net gains (losses) on forward contracts for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $2,000, $197,000 and $(173,000), respectively, and are included in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations as other income (expense), net. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had no outstanding forward contracts. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had an outstanding forward contract with a notional amount equivalent to approximately $57,000 (€41,000), maturing on October 7, 2013. The Company does not anticipate using derivative instruments for any purpose other than hedging exchange rate exposure.

Cash Equivalents

'

Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, cash equivalents consisted of money market funds with underlying investments primarily being U.S. Government-issued securities and high quality, short-term commercial paper.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

'

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC Topic 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy to measure fair value which is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, as follows:

•

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

•

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2014 Using

Quoted Prices in

Significant Other

Significant

Active Markets for

Observable Inputs

Unobservable

Identical Assets

Inputs

Total

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Cash and cash equivalents

$

142,261

$

142,261

$

—

$

—

As of June 30, 2013, the Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using

Quoted Prices in

Significant Other

Significant

Active Markets for

Observable Inputs

Unobservable

Identical Assets

Inputs

Total

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

$

197,191

$

197,191

$

—

$

—

The fair value of the Company's cash equivalents is based primarily on quoted prices from active markets.

The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable, unbilled revenue, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation, and other accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

Property and Equipment

'

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. The Company provides for depreciation based upon expected useful lives using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Machinery and equipment

5 years

Computer hardware and software

3 years

Furniture and fixtures

5 years

Leasehold improvements

Shorter of remaining lease term or 7 years

Equipment under capital leases is amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter, and included in depreciation expense.

Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of disposed assets and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statement of operations. The Company recorded $(20,000), $21,000 and $(51,000) of (losses) gains on the sale/disposal of certain furniture and equipment during the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

'

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, "Property, Plant, and Equipment," the Company continually evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful life of its long-lived assets may warrant revision or that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired. The Company evaluates the realizability of its long-lived assets based on cash flow expectations for the related asset. Any write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets. Based on this evaluation, the Company believes that, as of each of the balance sheet dates presented, none of the Company's long-lived assets were impaired.

Computation of Net Loss per Common Share

'

Computation of Net Loss per Common Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. During periods of income, participating securities are allocated a proportional share of income determined by dividing total weighted average participating securities by the sum of the total weighted average common shares and participating securities (the "two-class method"). The Company's restricted stock participates in any dividends that may be declared by the Company and are therefore considered to be participating securities. Participating securities have the effect of diluting both basic and diluted earnings per share during periods of income. During periods of loss, no loss is allocated to participating securities since they have no contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. Diluted (loss) income per share is computed after giving consideration to the dilutive effect of stock options that are outstanding during the period, except where such non-participating securities would be anti-dilutive.

The Company's common stock equivalents, as calculated in accordance with the treasury-stock method, are shown in the following table (in thousands):

June 30,

2014

2013

2012

Options outstanding to purchase common stock and unvested restricted stock

8,486

7,703

6,442

Common stock equivalents under treasury stock method

1,820

2,149

2,194

The Company's common stock equivalents have not been included in the net loss per share calculation because their effect is anti-dilutive due to the Company's net loss position.

Stock-Based Compensation

'

Stock-based Compensation

As of June 30, 2014, the Company is authorized to grant future awards under one employee share-based compensation plan, which is the ImmunoGen, Inc. 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2006 Plan. At the annual meeting of shareholders on November 13, 2012, an amendment to the 2006 Plan was approved and an additional 3,500,000 shares were authorized for issuance under this plan. As amended, the 2006 Plan provides for the issuance of Stock Grants, the grant of Options and the grant of Stock-Based Awards for up to 12,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, as well as any shares of common stock that are represented by awards granted under the previous stock option plan, the ImmunoGen, Inc. Restated Stock Option Plan, or the Former Plan, that are forfeited, expire or are cancelled without delivery of shares of common stock; provided, however, that no more than 5,900,000 shares shall be added to the 2006 Plan from the Former Plan, pursuant to this provision. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company's stock at the date of grant. Options vest at various periods of up to four years and may be exercised within ten years of the date of grant.

The stock-based awards are accounted for under ASC Topic 718, "Compensation—Stock Compensation." Pursuant to Topic 718, the estimated grant date fair value of awards is charged to the statement of operations over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. Such amounts have been reduced by an estimate of forfeitures of all unvested awards. The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black- Scholes option-pricing model with the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table. As the Company has not paid dividends since inception, nor does it expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future, the expected dividend yield assumption is zero. Expected volatility is based exclusively on historical volatility data of the Company's stock. The expected term of stock options granted is based exclusively on historical data and represents the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term is calculated for and applied to one group of stock options as the Company does not expect substantially different exercise or post-vesting termination behavior amongst its employee population. The risk-free rate of the stock options is based on the U.S. Treasury rate in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the stock options.

Year Ended June 30,

2014

2013

2012

Dividend

None

None

None

Volatility

60.44

%

60.44

%

59.7

%

Risk-free interest rate

1.74

%

0.87

%

2.16

%

Expected life (years)

6.3

6.3

7.1

Using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the weighted average grant date fair values of options granted during fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $10.50, $8.60, and $9.00 per share, respectively.

A summary of option activity under the 2006 Plan as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the twelve month period then ended is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data):

Number of

Weighted-

Weighted-

Aggregate

Stock

Average

Average

Intrinsic

Options

Exercise

Remaining

Value

Price

Life in Yrs

Outstanding at June 30, 2013

7,653

$

10.79

Granted

2,391

$

18.18

Exercised

(1,134

)

$

8.05

Forfeited/Canceled

(461

)

$

16.7

Outstanding at June 30, 2014

8,449

$

12.93

6.88

$

14,351

Outstanding at June 30, 2014—vested or unvested and expected to vest

8,233

$

12.83

6.82

$

14,346

Exercisable at June 30, 2014

4,637

$

9.79

5.48

$

14,211

In November 2012, the Company granted an officer of the Company 50,000 shares of restricted stock upon hire. Pursuant to the agreement, the shares vest ratably in quarterly installments over the subsequent four years. The fair value of the restricted stock was determined by the closing price on the date of grant. A summary of restricted stock activity under the 2006 Plan as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the twelve month period then ended is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data):

Number of

Weighted-

Restricted

Average

Stock

Exercise

Price

Unvested at June 30, 2013

50,000

$

11.93

Vested

(12,500

)

$

11.93

Unvested at June 30, 2014

37,500

$

11.93

Stock compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards granted under the 2006 Plan was $15.6 million, $12.4 million and $9.9 million during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the estimated fair value of unvested employee awards was approximately $22.2 million, net of estimated forfeitures. The weighted-average remaining vesting period for these awards is approximately two years.

A summary of option activity for options vested during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is presented below (in thousands):

Year Ended June 30,

2014

2013

2012

Total fair value of options vested

$

12,535

$

9,670

$

5,647

Total intrinsic value of options exercised

9,961

6,737

12,476

Cash received for exercise of stock options

9,136

4,026

6,988

Comprehensive Loss

'

Comprehensive Loss

The Company presents comprehensive loss in accordance with ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive loss is comprised of the Company's net loss for the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Segment Information

'

Segment Information

During the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, the Company continued to operate in one reportable business segment under the management approach of ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, which is the business of discovery of monoclonal antibody-based anticancer therapeutics.

The percentages of revenues recognized from significant customers of the Company in the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are included in the following table:

Year Ended

June 30,

Collaborative Partner:

2014

2013

2012

Amgen

6

%

6

%

30

%

Bayer HealthCare

—

%

4

%

15

%

Biotest

3

%

5

%

14

%

Lilly

18

%

2

%

2

%

Novartis

38

%

49

%

16

%

Roche

34

%

30

%

—

%

Sanofi

1

%

3

%

23

%

There were no other customers of the Company with significant revenues in the years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

'

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue. This update provides a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for annual reporting and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective application, with early adoption not permitted. Accordingly, the standard is effective for the Company on July 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption method it will apply and the impact that this guidance will have on our financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2013, the FASB issued guidance to address the diversity in practice related to the financial statement presentation of unrecognized tax benefits as either a reduction of a deferred tax asset or a liability when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. This guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Summary_of_Significant_Account2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
Schedule of inventory	'
	Inventory at June 30, 2014 and 2013 is summarized below (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013
	Raw materials	$	437		$	75
	Work in process		2,513			628
	Total	$	2,950		$	703
Schedule of components of other accrued liabilities	'
	Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following at June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013
	Accrued contract payments	$	2,914		$	2,406
	Accrued clinical trial costs		1,778			1,849
	Accrued professional services		833			678
	Accrued employee benefits		454			411
	Accrued public reporting charges		183			179
	Other current accrued liabilities		506			526
	Total	$	6,668		$	6,049
Schedule of assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis	'
	The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands):
		Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2014 Using
					Quoted Prices in			Significant Other			Significant
					Active Markets for			Observable Inputs			Unobservable
					Identical Assets						Inputs
		Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	142,261		$	142,261		$	—		$	—
	The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
		Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using
					Quoted Prices in			Significant Other			Significant
					Active Markets for			Observable Inputs			Unobservable
					Identical Assets						Inputs
		Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	197,191		$	197,191		$	—		$	—
Schedule of estimated useful lives of property and equipment	'
	Machinery and equipment	5 years
	Computer hardware and software	3 years
	Furniture and fixtures	5 years
	Leasehold improvements	Shorter of remaining lease term or 7 years
Schedule of common stock equivalents, as calculated in accordance with the treasury-stock method	'
	The Company's common stock equivalents, as calculated in accordance with the treasury-stock method, are shown in the following table (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013			2012
	Options outstanding to purchase common stock and unvested restricted stock		8,486			7,703			6,442
	Common stock equivalents under treasury stock method		1,820			2,149			2,194
Schedule of weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each stock option	'
		Year Ended June 30,
		2014			2013			2012
	Dividend		None			None			None
	Volatility		60.44	%		60.44	%		59.7	%
	Risk-free interest rate		1.74	%		0.87	%		2.16	%
	Expected life (years)		6.3			6.3			7.1
Summary of stock option activity	'
	A summary of option activity under the 2006 Plan as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the twelve month period then ended is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data):
		Number of			Weighted-			Weighted-			Aggregate
		Stock			Average			Average			Intrinsic
		Options			Exercise			Remaining			Value
					Price			Life in Yrs
	Outstanding at June 30, 2013		7,653		$	10.79
	Granted		2,391		$	18.18
	Exercised		(1,134	)	$	8.05
	Forfeited/Canceled		(461	)	$	16.7
	Outstanding at June 30, 2014		8,449		$	12.93			6.88		$	14,351
	Outstanding at June 30, 2014—vested or unvested and expected to vest		8,233		$	12.83			6.82		$	14,346
	Exercisable at June 30, 2014		4,637		$	9.79			5.48		$	14,211
Summary of restricted stock activity	'
	A summary of restricted stock activity under the 2006 Plan as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the twelve month period then ended is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data):
		Number of			Weighted-
		Restricted			Average
		Stock			Exercise
					Price
	Unvested at June 30, 2013		50,000		$	11.93
	Vested		(12,500	)	$	11.93
	Unvested at June 30, 2014		37,500		$	11.93
Summary of vested stock option activity	'
	A summary of option activity for options vested during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is presented below (in thousands):
		Year Ended June 30,
		2014			2013			2012
	Total fair value of options vested	$	12,535		$	9,670		$	5,647
	Total intrinsic value of options exercised		9,961			6,737			12,476
	Cash received for exercise of stock options		9,136			4,026			6,988
Schedule of percentage of total revenue recognized from each significant customer	'
		Year Ended
		June 30,
	Collaborative Partner:	2014			2013			2012
	Amgen		6	%		6	%		30	%
	Bayer HealthCare		—	%		4	%		15	%
	Biotest		3	%		5	%		14	%
	Lilly		18	%		2	%		2	%
	Novartis		38	%		49	%		16	%
	Roche		34	%		30	%		—	%
	Sanofi		1	%		3	%		23	%

Property_and_Equipment_Tables

Property and Equipment (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Property and Equipment	'
Schedule of components of property and equipment	'
	Property and equipment consisted of the following at June 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013
	Leasehold improvements	$	28,464		$	26,777
	Machinery and equipment		16,724			14,741
	Computer hardware and software		5,846			4,894
	Furniture and fixtures		1,876			1,540
	Assets under construction		3,688			814
		$	56,598		$	48,766
	Less accumulated depreciation		(42,249	)		(37,983	)
	Property and equipment, net	$	14,349		$	10,783

Income_Taxes_Tables

Income Taxes (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Income Taxes	'
Reconciliation of the Company's expected tax benefit, as computed by applying the U.S. federal corporate tax rate to loss before the benefit for income taxes, and actual tax	'
	The difference between the Company's expected tax benefit, as computed by applying the U.S. federal corporate tax rate of 34% to loss before the benefit for income taxes, and actual tax is reconciled in the following chart (in thousands):
		Year Ended June 30,
		2014			2013			2012
	Loss before income tax expense	$	(71,364	)	$	(72,811	)	$	(73,319	)
	Expected tax benefit at 34%	$	(24,264	)	$	(24,756	)	$	(24,928	)
	Permanent differences		1,953			1,540			1,470
	State tax benefit net of federal benefit		(4,062	)		(3,921	)		(4,204	)
	Increase in valuation allowance, net		26,011			25,624			25,274
	Federal research credit		(1,002	)		(2,260	)		(603	)
	Expired loss and credit carryforwards		1,364			3,773			2,991
	Benefit for income taxes	$	—		$	—		$	—
Schedule of significant components of deferred tax assets	'
	Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
		June 30,
		2014			2013
	Net operating loss carryforwards	$	144,230		$	121,937
	Research and development tax credit carryforwards		14,453			12,806
	Property and other intangible assets		2,386			2,077
	Deferred revenue		24,095			25,484
	Stock-based compensation		9,047			6,534
	Deferred lease incentive		3,908			3,996
	Other liabilities		1,234			508
	Total deferred tax assets	$	199,353		$	173,342
	Valuation allowance		(199,353	)		(173,342	)
	Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

Capital_Stock_Tables

Capital Stock (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Capital Stock	'
Schedule of options exercisable and their respective weighted average exercise prices per share	'
	The following options and their respective weighted- average exercise prices per share were exercisable at June 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
		Exercisable		Weighted-
		(in thousands)		Average
				Exercise Price
	June 30, 2014		4,637	$	9.79
	June 30, 2013		4,202	$	7.97
	June 30, 2012		3,416	$	6.34

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies	'
Minimum rental commitments for the next five fiscal years and thereafter under the non-cancelable operating lease agreements	'
	As of June 30, 2014, the minimum rental commitments, including real estate taxes and other expenses, for the next five fiscal years and thereafter under the non-cancelable operating lease agreements discussed above are as follows (in thousands):
	2015	$	7,150
	2016		6,924
	2017		6,941
	2018		7,046
	2019		6,235
	Thereafter		43,887
	Total minimum lease payments	$	78,183
	Total minimum rental income from subleases		(408	)
	Total minimum lease payments, net	$	77,775

Quarterly_Financial_Informatio1

Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)	'
Schedule of Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)	'
		Fiscal Year 2014
		First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
		Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
		September 30, 2013			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2014			June 30, 2014
		(In thousands, except per share data)
	Revenues:
	License and milestone fees	$	13,167		$	25,678		$	305		$	305
	Royalty revenue		2,053			2,335			2,558			3,400
	Research and development support		1,990			1,922			1,948			1,327
	Clinical materials revenue		8			125			2,064			711
	Total revenues		17,218			30,060			6,875			5,743
	Expenses:
	Research and development		22,029			20,862			38,280			25,787
	General and administrative		6,526			5,447			6,040			6,456
	Total expenses		28,555			26,309			44,320			32,243
	Loss from operations		(11,337	)		3,751			(37,445	)		(26,500	)
	Other income (expense), net		111			62			(7	)		1
	Net (loss) income	$	(11,226	)	$	3,813		$	(37,452	)	$	(26,499	)
	Basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.13	)	$	0.04		$	(0.44	)	$	(0.31	)
		Fiscal Year 2013
		First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter
		Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
		September 30, 2012			December 31, 2012			March 31, 2013			June 30, 2013
		(In thousands, except per share data)
	Revenues:
	License and milestone fees	$	933		$	429		$	22,010		$	855
	Royalty revenue		—			—			—			592
	Research and development support		1,377			2,036			2,257			2,203
	Clinical materials revenue		1,781			147			734			181
	Total revenues		4,091			2,612			25,001			3,831
	Expenses:
	Research and development		23,700			21,656			21,318			20,399
	General and administrative		5,639			5,464			4,995			5,373
	Total expenses		29,339			27,120			26,313			25,772
	Loss from operations		(25,248	)		(24,508	)		(1,312	)		(21,941	)
	Other income (expense), net		56			115			(39	)		66
	Net loss	$	(25,192	)	$	(24,393	)	$	(1,351	)	$	(21,875	)
	Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)

Nature_of_Business_and_Plan_of1

Nature of Business and Plan of Operations (Details) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

396 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2011

Nature of Business and Plan of Operations

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Net loss

($26,499,000)

($37,452,000)

$3,813,000

($11,226,000)

($21,875,000)

($1,351,000)

($24,393,000)

($25,192,000)

($71,364,000)

($72,811,000)

($73,319,000)

'

'

Accumulated deficit

-648,131,000

'

'

'

-576,767,000

'

'

'

-648,131,000

-576,767,000

'

-648,131,000

'

Product Revenue

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

0

'

Cash and cash equivalents

$142,261,000

'

'

'

$194,960,000

'

'

'

$142,261,000

$194,960,000

$160,938,000

$142,261,000

$191,206,000

Summary_of_Significant_Account3

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

40 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

31 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

31 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

36 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

132 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

21 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2004

Jul. 31, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2012

31-May-13

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2011

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Nov. 30, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2010

Jun. 30, 2014

31-May-05

Jul. 31, 2003

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Aug. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2006

Aug. 31, 2008

Jul. 31, 2014

item

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Right-to-Test Agreements

Right-to-Test Agreements

Janssen

Janssen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Bayer HealthCare

Biotest

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Roche

Roche

Sanofi

Sanofi

Sanofi

Sanofi

Sanofi

Sanofi

Phase IIb clinical trial

item

Minimum

Maximum

Roche's Kadcyla

Roche's Kadcyla

Minimum

Maximum

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Oxford BioTherapeutics Ltd

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Right-to-Test Agreements

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Right-to-Test Agreements

Right-to-Test Agreements

Right-to-Test Agreements

Right-to-Test Agreements

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Right-to-Test Agreements

Right-to-Test Agreements

Right-to-Test Agreements

SAR650984

Minimum

Maximum

Maytansinoid agent

Maytansinoid agent

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Non-exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

item

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Sanofi

Subsequent event

item

item

item

item

item

item

item

item

item

Roche's Kadcyla

item

item

Development and Commercialization License

Exclusive license

Subsequent event

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Portion of upfront payment recognized

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$241,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments received under collaboration agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

28,200,000

2,000,000

'

23,500,000

'

20,000,000

60,200,000

55,000,000

'

1,000,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

45,000,000

'

2,000,000

'

'

16,500,000

3,500,000

500,000

4,000,000

3,000,000

Number of types of licensing and development agreements with collaborative partners

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of single-target licenses

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

4

3

1

1

1

1

'

'

2

'

1

'

'

'

2

'

'

'

'

5

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

Number of licenses to multiple individual targets

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

Number of licenses to two related targets

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of related targets

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

Period after product launch in which the company will earn royalty payments

'

'

'

'

'10 years

'12 years

'10 years

'12 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Average involvement period over which the upfront payments on single-target licenses are amortized

'

'6 years 6 months

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Difference between the full cost to manufacture and amounts received from collaborators for preclinical and clinical materials

'

$2,300,000

$755,000

$85,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of types of milestone payments under collaborative arrangements

'

3

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Average period over which upfront payments are deferred and recognized

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'12 months

'18 months

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of quarters in arrear for revenue recognition

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Summary_of_Significant_Account4

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details 2)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013
	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	EUR (€)
	item
Inventory	'	'	'	'
Raw materials	$437,000	$75,000	'	'
Work in process	2,513,000	628,000	'	'
Total	2,950,000	703,000	'	'
Raw materials inventory write-downs	661,000	810,000	'	'
Minimum supply period of raw materials that is not supported by firm, fixed orders and/or projections from collaborators considered to expense inventory	'12 months	'	'	'
Rolling period of firm, fixed orders for conjugate that the company is required to manufacture	'6 months	'	'	'
Rolling period of manufacturing projections for the quantity of conjugate the collaborator expects to need	'12 months	'	'	'
Maximum period of firm, fixed orders and/or projections from collaborators considered for capitalizing inventory	'12 months	'	'	'
Charges to research and development expense related to raw material inventory identified as excess	364,000	798,000	748,000	'
Charges to research and development expense to write-down certain raw material inventory to its net realizable value	0	0	38,000	'
Other Accrued Liabilities	'	'	'	'
Accrued contract payments	2,914,000	2,406,000	'	'
Accrued clinical trial costs	1,778,000	1,849,000	'	'
Accrued professional services	833,000	678,000	'	'
Accrued employee benefits	454,000	411,000	'	'
Accrued public reporting charges	183,000	179,000	'	'
Other current accrued liabilities	506,000	526,000	'	'
Total	6,668,000	6,049,000	'	'
Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk	'	'	'	'
Number of financial institutions in the U.S. in which cash and cash equivalents are primarily maintained	3	'	'	'
Marketable securities held by entity	0	'	'	'
Net gains (losses) on forward contracts	2,000	197,000	-173,000	'
Notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts	$0	$57,000	'	€ 41,000

Summary_of_Significant_Account5

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details 3) (Recurring basis, USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Total	'	'
Fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value	'	'
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$142,261	$197,191
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	'	'
Fair value hierarchy for the Company's financial assets measured at fair value	'	'
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$142,261	$197,191

Summary_of_Significant_Account6

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details 4) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Share data in Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
(Losses) gain on the sale/disposal of furniture and equipment (in dollars)	($20,000)	$21,000	($51,000)
Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Common Share	'	'	'
Options outstanding to purchase common stock and unvested restricted stock (in shares)	8,486	7,703	6,442
Common stock equivalents under treasury stock method (in shares)	1,820	2,149	2,194
Machinery and equipment	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Estimated useful lives	'5 years	'	'
Computer hardware and software	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years	'	'
Furniture and fixtures	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Estimated useful lives	'5 years	'	'
(Losses) gain on the sale/disposal of furniture and equipment (in dollars)	($20,000)	$21,000	($51,000)
Leasehold improvements | Maximum	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Estimated useful lives	'7 years	'	'

Summary_of_Significant_Account7

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details 5) (USD $)

12 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Nov. 13, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Nov. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

item

Maximum

Stock options

Stock options

Stock options

Stock options

Restricted stock

Restricted stock

item

Maximum

Officer

Officer

Stock-based Compensation

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of employee share-based compensation plans

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Additional number of shares authorized for issuance

'

'

'

3,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Common stock authorized for issuance (in shares)

'

'

'

12,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of shares of common stock added to the Plan from the Former Plan

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

5,900,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

Vesting period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'4 years

'4 years

'

Exercise period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'10 years

'

'

Weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each stock option

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of group of awards for which expected term is calculated for and applied

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

Dividend (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

'

'

'

Volatility (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

60.44%

60.44%

59.70%

'

'

'

Risk-free interest rate (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1.74%

0.87%

2.16%

'

'

'

Expected life

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'6 years 3 months 18 days

'6 years 3 months 18 days

'7 years 1 month 6 days

'

'

'

Weighted-average grant date fair values of options granted (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$10.50

$8.60

$9

'

'

'

Number of Stock Options

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Outstanding at the beginning of the period (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

7,653,000

'

'

'

'

'

Granted (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2,391,000

'

'

'

'

'

Exercised (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

-1,134,000

'

'

'

'

'

Forfeited/Canceled (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

-461,000

'

'

'

'

'

Outstanding at the end of the period (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

8,449,000

7,653,000

'

'

'

'

Vested or unvested and expected to vest at the end of the period (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

8,233,000

'

'

'

'

'

Exercisable at the end of the period (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

4,637,000

4,202,000

3,416,000

'

'

'

Weighted-Average Exercise Price

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Outstanding at the beginning of the period (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$10.79

'

'

'

'

'

Granted (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$18.18

'

'

'

'

'

Exercised (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$8.05

'

'

'

'

'

Forfeited/Canceled (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$16.70

'

'

'

'

'

Outstanding at the end of the period (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$12.93

$10.79

'

'

'

'

Vested or unvested and expected to vest at the end of the period (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$12.83

'

'

'

'

'

Exercisable at the end of the period (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$9.79

$7.97

$6.34

'

'

'

Weighted-Average Remaining Life (in years)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Outstanding at the end of the period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'6 years 10 months 17 days

'

'

'

'

'

Vested or unvested and expected to vest at the end of the period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'6 years 9 months 25 days

'

'

'

'

'

Exercisable at the end of the period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'5 years 5 months 23 days

'

'

'

'

'

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Outstanding at the end of the period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$14,351,000

'

'

'

'

'

Vested or unvested and expected to vest at the end of the period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

14,346,000

'

'

'

'

'

Exercisable at the end of the period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

14,211,000

'

'

'

'

'

Granted (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

50,000

'

Number of Restricted Stock

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Unvested at the beginning of the period (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

50,000,000

Vested (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

-12,500,000

Unvested at the end of the period (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

37,500,000

Weighted-Average Exercise Price

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Unvested at the beginning of the period (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$11.93

Vested (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$11.93

Unvested at the end of the period (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$11.93

Additional disclosure for options

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock compensation expense

'

'

'

'

15,600,000

12,400,000

9,900,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated fair value of unvested employee awards, net of estimated forfeitures

'

'

'

'

22,200,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Weighted average vesting period of unvested employee awards

'

'

'

'

'2 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Summary of option activity for options vested

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Total fair value of options vested

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

12,535,000

9,670,000

5,647,000

'

'

'

Total intrinsic value of options exercised

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

9,961,000

6,737,000

12,476,000

'

'

'

Cash received for exercise of stock options

$9,136,000

$4,026,000

$6,988,000

'

'

'

'

'

$9,136,000

$4,026,000

$6,988,000

'

'

'

Summary_of_Significant_Account8

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details 6)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Segment Reporting	'	'	'
Number of operating segments	1	'	'
Amgen | Revenues	'	'	'
Collaborative Partner:	'	'	'
Percentages of revenue recognized	6.00%	6.00%	30.00%
Bayer HealthCare | Revenues	'	'	'
Collaborative Partner:	'	'	'
Percentages of revenue recognized	'	4.00%	15.00%
Biotest | Revenues	'	'	'
Collaborative Partner:	'	'	'
Percentages of revenue recognized	3.00%	5.00%	14.00%
Lilly | Revenues	'	'	'
Collaborative Partner:	'	'	'
Percentages of revenue recognized	18.00%	2.00%	2.00%
Novartis | Revenues	'	'	'
Collaborative Partner:	'	'	'
Percentages of revenue recognized	38.00%	49.00%	16.00%
Roche | Revenues	'	'	'
Collaborative Partner:	'	'	'
Percentages of revenue recognized	34.00%	30.00%	'
Sanofi | Revenues	'	'	'
Collaborative Partner:	'	'	'
Percentages of revenue recognized	1.00%	3.00%	23.00%

Agreements_Details

Agreements (Details) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

170 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

170 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

31-May-05

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2012

31-May-00

Jun. 30, 2014

31-May-00

Feb. 28, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

31-May-00

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

31-May-00

31-May-00

31-May-00

31-May-00

Jun. 30, 2014

31-May-00

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Roche

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Undisclosed Target

Undisclosed Target

Undisclosed Target

Undisclosed Target

Undisclosed Target

Undisclosed Target

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

Kadcyla

item

Maximum

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

IND application filed

Sales milestones

Maximum

Development milestones

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

Regulatory milestones

Regulatory milestones

Regulatory milestones

Regulatory milestones in Japan

Regulatory milestones in Europe

item

Collaborative Agreements disclosures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments received under collaboration agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$2,000,000

'

'

'

'

$13,500,000

'

$10,500,000

'

$20,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

License exercise fee, per license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments receivable

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

44,000,000

'

13,500,000

'

5,000,000

5,000,000

30,500,000

5,000,000

5,000,000

'

38,000,000

8,000,000

20,000,000

1,000,000

10,000,000

Amount of arrangement consideration included in license and milestone fees

305,000

305,000

25,678,000

13,167,000

855,000

22,010,000

429,000

933,000

39,455,000

24,227,000

9,161,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of milestone payments received

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Period in arrears to receive royalty reports and payments related to sales of Kadcyla

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'3 months

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Royalties on net sales of Kadcyla

3,400,000

2,558,000

2,335,000

2,053,000

592,000

'

'

'

10,346,000

592,000

'

'

592,000

10,300,000

0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of undisclosed targets with exclusive licenses

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

4

'

'

'

'

'

Payment received and deferred

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$5,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

Term of agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'8 years

'

'

'

'

'

Agreements_Details_2

Agreements (Details 2) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

40 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Nov. 30, 2009

Sep. 30, 2009

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2012

Nov. 30, 2011

31-May-13

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Amgen

Future Technological Improvements

Exclusive license

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development milestones

Maximum

Development milestones

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

Sales milestones

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Non-exclusive license

Phase II clinical trial

IND application effective

item

item

Undisclosed Target

item

IND application effective

item

Collaborative Agreements disclosures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments receivable

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$3,000,000

'

$34,000,000

$9,000,000

$1,000,000

$20,000,000

$5,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of single-target licenses

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

4

3

'

1

Fee received per license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,000,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

'

'

1,000,000

500,000

Fee received on conversion of non-exclusive license agreement to an exclusive license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated utilization period after commercialization

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'10 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Discount rate (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

13.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Remaining arrangement consideration to be recognized as license revenue

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

430,000

'

2,200,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated term of development and commercialization license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'25 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of compounds under development and commercialization licenses

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

'

Number of milestone payments

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

'

Costs related to the research and development services

25,787,000

38,280,000

20,862,000

22,029,000

20,399,000

21,318,000

21,656,000

23,700,000

106,958,000

87,073,000

69,192,000

179,000

174,000

423,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Costs related to clinical materials sold

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$664,000

$670,000

$649,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Agreements_Details_3

Agreements (Details 3) (Sanofi, USD $)

1 Months Ended

21 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

132 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

Aug. 31, 2011

Aug. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2006

Aug. 31, 2008

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2006

Dec. 31, 2006

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2006

Dec. 31, 2006

Dec. 31, 2013

Jul. 31, 2003

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 31, 2003

Jul. 31, 2003

Jul. 31, 2003

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 31, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Maximum

Phase I clinical trial

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

Exclusive license

item

Maximum

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

Undisclosed Target

Undisclosed Target

SAR3419

SAR3419

SAR566658

SAR650984

SAR650984

SAR408701

Phase I clinical trial

Phase IIb clinical trial

Development milestones

Development milestones

Phase IIb clinical trial

Development milestones

Phase I clinical trial

Phase III clinical trial

Phase IIb clinical trial

Subsequent event

Phase III clinical trial

Collaborative Agreements disclosures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of undisclosed compounds with exclusive licenses

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments receivable

'

'

'

'

$2,000,000

'

$30,000,000

$2,000,000

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

'

'

'

$21,500,000

$7,500,000

$14,000,000

'

$1,000,000

'

$3,000,000

$3,000,000

'

$3,000,000

$1,000,000

Payments received under collaboration agreement

'

3,500,000

500,000

4,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

16,500,000

'

'

'

500,000

'

3,000,000

'

'

3,000,000

'

'

License exercise fee, per license

'

'

'

'

'

2,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Fee received per license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Term of agreement

'3 years

'

'3 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments for extension of agreement

$2,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Agreements_Details_4

Agreements (Details 4) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jul. 31, 2006

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 31, 2006

Sep. 30, 2008

Jul. 31, 2006

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 31, 2006

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Biotest

Exclusive development and commercialization license

Exclusive development and commercialization license

Exclusive development and commercialization license

Exclusive development and commercialization license

Exclusive development and commercialization license

Exclusive development and commercialization license

Exclusive development and commercialization license

Maximum

Phase I clinical trial

Development milestones

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

BT062

Phase IIb clinical trial

Collaborative Agreements disclosures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments received under collaboration agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$1,000,000

'

'

$500,000

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments receivable

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

35,500,000

'

4,500,000

2,000,000

31,000,000

Opt-in-fee payable on exercise of right

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

15,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

Costs related to the research and development services

25,787,000

38,280,000

20,862,000

22,029,000

20,399,000

21,318,000

21,656,000

23,700,000

106,958,000

87,073,000

69,192,000

305,000

339,000

233,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Costs related to clinical materials sold

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$670,000

$577,000

$1,300,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Agreements_Details_5

Agreements (Details 5) (Bayer HealthCare, USD $)	12 Months Ended		24 Months Ended	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	69 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Oct. 31, 2008	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2014	Oct. 31, 2008	Jun. 30, 2014	Oct. 31, 2008	Oct. 31, 2008	Oct. 31, 2008
				Exclusive license	Exclusive license	Exclusive license	Exclusive license	Exclusive license	Exclusive license	Exclusive license	Exclusive license
							Maximum	Phase II clinical trial	Development milestones	Regulatory milestones	Sales milestones
Collaborative Agreements disclosures	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Payments received under collaboration agreement	'	'	'	$4,000,000	'	$3,000,000	'	'	'	'	'
Potential milestone payments receivable	'	'	'	'	'	'	170,500,000	4,000,000	16,000,000	44,500,000	110,000,000
Estimated increase in license and milestone fees recognized due to change in estimate	'	'	'	'	1,200,000	'	'	'	'	'	'
Costs related to clinical materials sold	$0	$297,000	$213,000	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'

Agreements_Details_6

Agreements (Details 6) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

36 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

36 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Nov. 30, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2010

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2010

Nov. 30, 2013

Oct. 31, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2010

Mar. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2010

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2010

Mar. 31, 2013

Oct. 31, 2010

Jun. 30, 2014

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Novartis

Future Technological Improvements

Research Services

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Right-to-test agreement

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

item

Undisclosed Target

Minimum

Exclusive license

Maximum

Maximum

Maximum

Maximum

Development milestones

Development milestones

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

Regulatory milestones

Sales milestones

Sales milestones

Exclusive license

item

Undisclosed Target

Undisclosed Target

Phase I clinical trial

item

item

item

Collaborative Agreements disclosures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Term of agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'3 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Term of extension of the agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'1 year

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments for extension of agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$5,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of extension terms

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Additional term of extension of the agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'1 year

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments received under collaboration agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

60,200,000

4,500,000

710,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

1,000,000

45,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

55,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

License exercise fee, per license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments receivable

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

199,500,000

199,500,000

199,500,000

199,500,000

22,500,000

22,500,000

5,000,000

77,000,000

77,000,000

100,000,000

100,000,000

'

Number of development and commercialization licenses taken

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

3

'

'

'

'

2

Number of pre-defined and related undisclosed targets

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

License exercise fee, for the fourth license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Agreed upon fee receivable on conversion of non-exclusive target to an exclusive target

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

5,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments received under collaboration agreement in connection with amended agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

3,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments under second option

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

238,000,000

'

22,500,000

'

'

115,500,000

'

100,000,000

'

'

Amount of arrangement consideration included in license and milestone fees

305,000

305,000

25,678,000

13,167,000

855,000

22,010,000

429,000

933,000

39,455,000

24,227,000

9,161,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

17,200,000

11,100,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Cumulative catch-up amount included in license and milestone fees

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated utilization period after commercialization

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'10 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Discount rate (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

16.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated term of development and commercialization license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'25 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Costs related to the research and development services

25,787,000

38,280,000

20,862,000

22,029,000

20,399,000

21,318,000

21,656,000

23,700,000

106,958,000

87,073,000

69,192,000

1,400,000

2,400,000

1,100,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Costs related to clinical materials sold

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$1,300,000

$134,000

$14,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Agreements_Details_7

Agreements (Details 7) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

31 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

31 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Lilly

Sales milestones

Future Technological Improvements

Research Services

Right-to-test agreement

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

item

No exercise fee

No exercise fee

Exercise fee of $2 million

Exercise fee of $2 million

Development milestones

Development milestones

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

Sales milestones

Maximum

Maximum

No exercise fee

Exercise fee of $2 million

Phase I clinical trial

Collaborative Agreements disclosures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Term of agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'3 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payments received under collaboration agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$28,200,000

$800,000

$600,000

$3,300,000

$20,000,000

$2,000,000

'

'

$23,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments for each subsequent license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2,000,000

2,000,000

'

200,500,000

'

199,000,000

30,500,000

29,000,000

5,000,000

70,000,000

100,000,000

Number of development and commercialization licenses taken

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

License exercise fee, per subsequent license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2,000,000

'

'

0

'

2,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated utilization period after commercialization

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'10 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Discount rate (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

16.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Amount of arrangement consideration included in license and milestone fees

305,000

305,000

25,678,000

13,167,000

855,000

22,010,000

429,000

933,000

39,455,000

24,227,000

9,161,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

7,800,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated term of development and commercialization license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'25 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Remaining arrangement consideration to be recognized as license revenue

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

15,700,000

15,700,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Costs related to the research and development services

25,787,000

38,280,000

20,862,000

22,029,000

20,399,000

21,318,000

21,656,000

23,700,000

106,958,000

87,073,000

69,192,000

1,200,000

310,000

94,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Costs related to clinical materials sold

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$26,000

$10,000

$0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Agreements_Details_8

Agreements (Details 8) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Mar. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jan. 31, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

Jan. 31, 2014

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

CytomX

Future Technological Improvements

Research Services

Right-to-test agreement

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Development and Commercialization License

Maximum

Development milestones

Development milestones

Regulatory milestones

Sales milestones

Phase I clinical trial

Collaborative Agreements disclosures

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Upfront payments received under collaboration agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments receivable

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

160,000,000

10,000,000

1,000,000

50,000,000

100,000,000

Potential milestone payments to be paid

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

80,000,000

7,000,000

1,000,000

23,000,000

50,000,000

Discount rate (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

13.00%

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated utilization period after commercialization

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'10 years

'

'

'

'

'

Fair value of consideration for services provided

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

13,100,000

'

350,000

140,000

13,000,000

12,700,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated term of development and commercialization license

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'25 years

'

'

'

'

'

License fee revenue

305,000

305,000

25,678,000

13,167,000

855,000

22,010,000

429,000

933,000

39,455,000

24,227,000

9,161,000

'

0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Arrangement consideration included in long-term deferred revenue

58,969,000

'

'

'

63,384,000

'

'

'

58,969,000

63,384,000

'

'

13,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Fair value of consideration for services received

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$310,000

$12,800,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Agreements_Details_9

Agreements (Details 9) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2004
			Janssen	Janssen
			IMGN388	Exclusive license
				Maytansinoid agent
Collaborative Agreements disclosures	'	'	'	'
Payments received under collaboration agreement	'	'	'	$1,000,000
Upfront fee received upon execution of the 2004 license agreement, included in long-term deferred revenue	$2,374,000	$1,494,000	$241,000	'

Cash_and_Cash_Equivalents_Deta

Cash and Cash Equivalents (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Cash and Cash Equivalents	'	'	'	'
Cash and cash equivalents	$142,261	$194,960	$160,938	$191,206

Property_and_Equipment_Details

Property and Equipment (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Property and equipment, gross	$56,598,000	$48,766,000	'
Less accumulated depreciation	-42,249,000	-37,983,000	'
Property and equipment, net	14,349,000	10,783,000	'
Depreciation expense	4,598,000	4,641,000	4,633,000
Leasehold improvements	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Property and equipment, gross	28,464,000	26,777,000	'
Machinery and equipment	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Property and equipment, gross	16,724,000	14,741,000	'
Computer hardware and software	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Property and equipment, gross	5,846,000	4,894,000	'
Furniture and fixtures	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Property and equipment, gross	1,876,000	1,540,000	'
Assets under construction	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Property and equipment, gross	3,688,000	814,000	'
Equipment under capital leases	'	'	'
Property and Equipment	'	'	'
Less accumulated depreciation	-50,000	-22,000	'
Property and equipment, net	$574,000	$110,000	'

Income_Taxes_Details

Income Taxes (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Reconciliation of the Company's expected tax benefit, as computed by applying the U.S. federal corporate tax rate to loss before the benefit for income taxes, and actual tax	'	'	'
U.S. federal corporate tax rate (as a percent)	34.00%	34.00%	34.00%
Loss before income tax expense	($71,364,000)	($72,811,000)	($73,319,000)
Expected tax benefit at 34%	-24,264,000	-24,756,000	-24,928,000
Permanent differences	1,953,000	1,540,000	1,470,000
State tax benefit net of federal benefit	-4,062,000	-3,921,000	-4,204,000
Increase in valuation allowance, net	26,011,000	25,624,000	25,274,000
Federal research credit	-1,002,000	-2,260,000	-603,000
Expired loss and credit carryforwards	1,364,000	3,773,000	2,991,000
Federal	'	'	'
Net operating loss carryforwards	'	'	'
Operating loss carryforward	388,800,000	'	'
Operating loss carryforward related to deductions from the exercise of stock options	24,600,000	'	'
State	'	'	'
Net operating loss carryforwards	'	'	'
Operating loss carryforward	227,900,000	'	'
Operating loss carryforward related to deductions from the exercise of stock options	$21,200,000	'	'

Income_Taxes_Details_2

Income Taxes (Details 2) (Research, USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Research	'
Tax credits	'
Federal and state research tax credits	$16.80

Income_Taxes_Details_3

Income Taxes (Details 3) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Components of deferred tax assets	'	'
Net operating loss carryforwards	$144,230,000	$121,937,000
Research and development tax credit carryforwards	14,453,000	12,806,000
Property and other intangible assets	2,386,000	2,077,000
Deferred revenue	24,095,000	25,484,000
Stock-based compensation	9,047,000	6,534,000
Deferred lease incentive	3,908,000	3,996,000
Other liabilities	1,234,000	508,000
Total deferred tax assets	199,353,000	173,342,000
Valuation allowance	-199,353,000	-173,342,000
Income taxes, additional disclosures	'	'
Increase in valuation allowance	$26,000,000	'
Minimum increase in the ownership of certain shareholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation for an ownership change as defined by Section 382 (as a percent)	50.00%	'
Period over which increase in ownership of certain shareholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation for an ownership change as defined by Section 382	'3 years	'

Capital_Stock_Details

Capital Stock (Details) (USD $)

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Nov. 13, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Nov. 30, 2001

Nov. 30, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2004

Sep. 30, 2006

Nov. 11, 2009

Nov. 11, 2009

Nov. 11, 2009

Sep. 22, 2010

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Nov. 11, 2009

Nov. 30, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Nov. 30, 2013

2006 Plan and 2004 Director Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2006 Plan

2001 Director Plan

2001 Director Plan

2001 Director Plan

2001 Director Plan

2001 Director Plan

2004 Director Plan

2004 Amended Director Plan

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Stock options

Stock options

Stock options

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Initial equity grant upon election to the Board

Equity grant on first anniversary of initial election to the board

Annual equity grant

Stock options

Stock options

Stock options

Stock options

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

Deferred share units

item

Sale of Common Stock

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Issuance of common stock through a public offering (in shares)

6,250,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Price at which common stock is issued through a public offering (in dollars per share)

$16

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Gross proceeds from issuance

$100,000,000

'

$93,991,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock-based Compensation

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Aggregate number of common shares reserved for future issuance

'

'

'

'

11,390,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Options exercised (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,134,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Exercise price (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$3.19

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Exercise price (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$15.83

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Proceeds from stock options exercised

'

9,136,000

4,026,000

6,988,000

'

'

'

'

'

9,136,000

4,026,000

6,988,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Exercisable (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

4,637,000

4,202,000

3,416,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Weighted-Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$9.79

$7.97

$6.34

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Common stock reserved for grant (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

12,000,000

'

'

'

50,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

(Expense reduction) compensation expense

'

'

'

'

'

15,600,000

12,400,000

9,900,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

-30,000

-1,000

29,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

433,000

351,000

314,000

'

Stock units outstanding (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

6,000

6,000

6,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Payment to retiring director to settle outstanding stock units

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

115,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Monthly vesting rights (as a percent)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

8.30%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Vesting period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'3 years

'3 years

'

'1 year

'1 year

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Aggregate market value of award

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

65,000

30,000

30,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Maximum vesting period from the date units were credited to the non-employee director for the award to be vested on September 16, 2009

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'1 year

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of shares of common stock issued under 2009 Compensation Policy for each vested deferred stock unit held on the date a director ceases to be a member

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

Number of retiring directors to whom common stock is issued

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2

'

'

'

'

Grant date fair value

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$30,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock options granted to directors (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2,391,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

80,000

41,805

33,187

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock units granted (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

28,000

26,000

33,000

'

Stock units previously granted (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

19,000

21,000

19,000

'

Common stock issued to settle retiring director's share units (in shares)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

46,298

'

'

'

43,615

Commitments_and_Contingencies_1

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2012

Apr. 30, 2014

Apr. 30, 2012

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2013

Jul. 27, 2007

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 31, 2013

Apr. 30, 2013

830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA

830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA

830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA

830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA

830 Winter Street, Waltham, MA

Norwood, MA

100 River Ridge Drive, Norwood, MA

100 River Ridge Drive, Norwood, MA

item

sqft

sqft

sqft

sqft

sqft

Operating leases

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Area of space leased (in square feet)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

89,000

'

'

7,507

Initial lease term period

'

'

'

'

'

'3 years

'

'

'

'

'5 years 2 months

'

Additional area of space leased (in square feet)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

19,000

'

'

'

'

Construction allowance receivable

'

'

'

'

$1,100,000

'

'

$746,000

'

'

'

'

Number of additional terms for which lease agreement can be extended

'

'

'

'

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Additional term period for which lease agreement can be extended

'

'

'

'

'5 years

'

'

'

'

'5 years

'5 years

'

Area of property covered under sublease agreement (in square feet)

'

'

'

'

'

7,310

14,100

'

'

'

'

'

Additional period for which sublease agreement can be extended

'

'

'

'

'

'

'2 years

'

'

'

'

'

Facilities rent expense, net of sublease income

'

5,400,000

4,800,000

4,800,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Minimum rental commitments under the non-cancelable operating lease agreements

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2015

'

7,150,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2016

'

6,924,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2017

'

6,941,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2018

'

7,046,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2019

'

6,235,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Thereafter

'

43,887,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Total minimum lease payments

'

78,183,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Total minimum rental income from subleases

'

-408,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Total minimum lease payments, net

'

77,775,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Obligations under capital leases

'

0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Collaborations

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential future success-based milestone and third-party payments cancelled under license agreement with Janssen Biotech

41,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential milestone payments receivable

'

162,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Amount reimbursable by a third party

'

$1,400,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Details

Employee Benefit Plans (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Employee Benefit Plans	'	'	'
Maximum employees' contribution (as a percent)	100.00%	'	'
Matching contribution of first 6% of eligible employees' contributions (as a percent)	50.00%	'	'
Percentage of eligible employees' contributions matched by the company	6.00%	'	'
Company's contribution	$710,000	$593,000	$548,000

Quarterly_Financial_Informatio2

Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Revenues:	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
License and milestone fees	$305	$305	$25,678	$13,167	$855	$22,010	$429	$933	$39,455	$24,227	$9,161
Royalty revenue	3,400	2,558	2,335	2,053	592	'	'	'	10,346	592	'
Research and development support	1,327	1,948	1,922	1,990	2,203	2,257	2,036	1,377	7,187	7,873	4,517
Clinical materials revenue	711	2,064	125	8	181	734	147	1,781	2,908	2,843	2,679
Total revenues	5,743	6,875	30,060	17,218	3,831	25,001	2,612	4,091	59,896	35,535	16,357
Operating Expenses:	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Research and development	25,787	38,280	20,862	22,029	20,399	21,318	21,656	23,700	106,958	87,073	69,192
General and administrative	6,456	6,040	5,447	6,526	5,373	4,995	5,464	5,639	24,469	21,471	20,422
Total operating expenses	32,243	44,320	26,309	28,555	25,772	26,313	27,120	29,339	131,427	108,544	89,614
Loss from operations	-26,500	-37,445	3,751	-11,337	-21,941	-1,312	-24,508	-25,248	-71,531	-73,009	-73,257
Other income (expense), net	1	-7	62	111	66	-39	115	56	'	'	'
Net loss	($26,499)	($37,452)	$3,813	($11,226)	($21,875)	($1,351)	($24,393)	($25,192)	($71,364)	($72,811)	($73,319)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share (in dollars per share)	($0.31)	($0.44)	$0.04	($0.13)	($0.26)	($0.02)	($0.29)	($0.30)	($0.83)	($0.87)	($0.95)

SCHEDULE_IIVALUATION_AND_QUALI1

SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (Details) (Inventory Valuation Allowance, USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Inventory Valuation Allowance	'	'	'
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS	'	'	'
Balance at Beginning of Period	$810	$1,291	$1,993
Charged to Costs and Expenses	364	798	786
Use of Zero Value Inventory	-513	-1,279	-1,488
Balance at End of Period	$661	$810	$1,291