Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2020 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, ImmunoGen Securities Corp., ImmunoGen Europe Limited, ImmunoGen BioPharma (Ireland) Limited, and Hurricane, LLC. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Subsequent Events | Subsequent Events The Company has evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after December 31, 2020 up through the date the Company issued these financial statements. Pursuant to an Open Market Sale Agreement SM under which the Company may issue and sell shares of its common stock, from time to time for an aggregate sales price of up to $150.0 million, subsequent to December 31, 2020 and through the date the Company issued these financial statements, the Company has sold 4,544,424 shares of its common stock generating net proceeds of $33.6 million after deducting offering commissions and expenses. The Company did not have any other material recognized or unrecognized subsequent events. |
Adoption of ASC Topic 842, Leases | Adoption of ASC 842, Leases The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-2, Leases (Topic 842) Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements the previous lease guidance of ASC 840, Leases |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition The Company enters into licensing and development agreements with collaborators for the development of ADCs. The terms of these agreements contain multiple promised goods and services which may include (i) licenses, or options to obtain licenses, to the Company’s ADC technology, (ii) rights to future technological improvements, (iii) technology transfer services and other activities to be performed on behalf of the collaborative partner, and (iv) delivery of cytotoxic agents and/or the manufacture of preclinical and clinical materials for the collaborative partner. Payments to the Company under these agreements may include upfront fees, option fees, exercise fees, payments for services, payments for preclinical or clinical materials, payments based upon the achievement of certain milestones, and royalties on product sales. The Company follows the provisions of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under the agreements, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when or as the Company satisfies each performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the Company will collect the consideration to which it is entitled in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are performance obligations based on its assessment of whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when or as the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company exercises judgment in assessing those promised goods and services that are distinct and thus representative of performance obligations. To the extent the Company identifies multiple performance obligations in a contract, the Company must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the estimated standalone selling price for each performance obligation in order to allocate the transaction price among the identified performance obligations. These judgments and assumptions are discussed in further detail below. At December 31, 2020, the Company had the following types of material agreements with the parties identified below: ● Development and commercialization licenses, which provide the counterparty with the right to use the Company’s ADC technology and/or certain other intellectual property to develop and commercialize compounds to a specified antigen target: Bayer (one exclusive single-target license) CytomX (two exclusive single-target licenses) Debiopharm (one exclusive single-compound license) Fusion Pharmaceuticals (one exclusive single-target license) Hangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (one territory-specific exclusive single-compound license) Novartis (five exclusive single-target licenses) Oxford BioTherapeutics/Menarini (one exclusive single-target license sublicensed from Amgen) Roche, through its Genentech unit (five exclusive single-target licenses) Viridian (one exclusive single-target license) ● Collaboration and license agreement to co-develop and co-commercialize a specified anticancer compound on established terms: MacroGenics During the year ended December 31, 2020, pursuant to notices received, the exclusive development and commercialization licenses granted to each of Biotest and Takeda and the collaboration and option agreement with Jazz were terminated. There are no performance, cancellation, termination, or refund provisions in any of the arrangements that contain material financial consequences to the Company. Development and Commercialization Licenses The obligations under a development and commercialization license agreement generally include the license to the Company’s ADC technology with respect to a specified antigen target or compound, and may also include obligations related to rights to future technological improvements and other activities to be performed on behalf of the collaborative partner. Generally, development and commercialization licenses contain non-refundable terms for payments and, depending on the terms of the agreement, provide that the Company will earn payments upon the achievement of certain milestones and royalty payments, generally until the later of the last applicable patent expiration or a fixed period of years after product launch. Royalty rates may vary over the royalty term depending on the Company’s intellectual property rights and/or the presence of comparable competing products. In the case of Debiopharm, no royalties will be received. In certain instances, the Company may also provide cytotoxic agents and/or clinical materials or other services in addition to the development and commercialization licenses. For example, the Company may provide technology transfer services in connection with the out-licensing of product candidates initially developed by the Company, and may also provide technical assistance and share any technology improvements with its collaborators during the term of the collaboration agreements. The Company does not directly control when or whether any collaborator will request certain services, achieve milestones, or become liable for royalty payments. In determining the performance obligations for these arrangements, management evaluates whether the license is distinct and has significant standalone functionality either alone or with other readily available resources based on the consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances for each arrangement. Factors considered in this determination include the research capabilities of the partner and the availability of ADC technology research expertise and ADC manufacturing capabilities in the general marketplace and whether technological improvements are required for the continued functionality of the license. If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct, the Company recognizes revenues from non-refundable, upfront fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. If the license is not distinct, the license is combined with other goods or services into a single performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time. The Company estimates the standalone selling prices of the license and all other performance obligations based on market conditions, similar arrangements entered into by third parties, and entity-specific factors such as the terms of the Company’s previous collaborative agreements, recent preclinical and clinical testing results of therapeutic products that use the Company’s ADC technology, the Company’s pricing practices and pricing objectives, the likelihood that technological improvements will be made, and, if made, will be used by the Company’s collaborators, and the nature of the other services to be performed on behalf of its collaborators and market rates for similar services. The Company recognizes revenue related to technology transfer activities and other services as the services are performed. The Company is generally compensated for these activities at negotiated rates that are consistent with what other third parties would charge. The Company records amounts recognized for research materials provided or services performed as a component of research and development support revenue. The Company may also provide cytotoxic agents and/or preclinical and clinical materials (drug substance/drug product) to its collaborators at negotiated prices generally consistent with what other third parties would charge. The Company recognizes revenue on cytotoxic agents and on preclinical and clinical materials when control transfers to the collaborator. The Company recognizes revenue related to the rights to future technological improvements over the estimated term of the applicable license. The Company’s development and commercialization license agreements have milestone payments which for reporting purposes are aggregated into two categories: (i) development and regulatory milestones, and (ii) sales milestones. Development milestones are typically payable when a product candidate initiates or advances into different clinical trial phases. Regulatory milestones are typically payable upon submission for marketing approval with the FDA or other countries’ regulatory authorities or on receipt of actual marketing approvals for the compound or for additional indications. Sales milestones are typically payable when annual sales reach certain levels. At the inception of each arrangement, the Company evaluates any development and regulatory milestone payments to determine whether the milestone is considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price to be allocated; otherwise, such amounts are considered constrained and excluded from the transaction price. As part of its evaluation of the constraint, the Company considers numerous factors, including whether the achievement of the milestone is outside the control of the Company and contingent upon the future success of clinical trials, the collaborator’s efforts, or the receipt of regulatory approval. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company re-evaluates the probability of achievement of such development or regulatory milestones and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjusts the estimate of the transaction price. In addition, the Company evaluates whether the achievement of each milestone specifically relates to the Company’s efforts to satisfy a performance obligation or transfer a distinct good or service within a performance obligation. If the achievement of a milestone is considered a direct result of the Company’s efforts to satisfy a performance obligation or transfer a distinct good or service and the receipt of the payment is based upon the achievement of the milestone, the associated milestone value is allocated to that distinct good or service. If the milestone payment is not specifically related to the Company’s effort to satisfy a performance obligation or transfer a distinct good or service, the amount is allocated to all performance obligations using the relative standalone selling price method. Amounts allocated to a satisfied performance obligation are recognized as revenue, or as a reduction of revenue, in the period in which the transaction price changes. For development and commercialization license agreements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied) in accordance with the royalty recognition constraint. Under the Company’s development and commercialization license agreements, except for the Debiopharm license, the Company receives royalty payments based upon its licensees’ net sales of covered products. Generally, under the development and commercialization agreements, the Company receives royalty reports and payments from its licensees approximately one quarter in arrears. The Company estimates the amount of royalty revenue to be recognized based on historical and forecasted sales and/or sales information from its licensees if available. Collaboration and Option Agreements/Right-to-Test Agreements The Company’s right-to-test agreements provide collaborators the right to test the Company’s ADC technology for a defined period of time through a research, or right-to-test, license. Under both right-to-test agreements and collaboration and option agreements, collaborators may (a) “take” options, for a defined period of time, to specified targets and (b) upon exercise of those options, secure or “take” licenses to develop and commercialize products for the specified targets on established terms. Under these agreements, fees may be due to the Company (i) at the inception of the arrangement (referred to as “upfront” fees or payments), (ii) upon the opt-in to acquire a development and commercialization license(s) (referred to as exercise fees or payments earned, if any, when the development and commercialization license is “taken”), (iii) after providing services at the collaborator’s request at negotiated prices, which are generally consistent with what other third parties would charge, or (iv) upon some combination of all of these fees. The accounting for collaboration and option agreements and right-to-test agreements is dependent on the nature of the options granted to the collaborative partner. Options are considered distinct performance obligations if they provide a collaborator with a material right. Factors that are considered in evaluating whether options convey a material right include the overall objective of the arrangement, the benefit the collaborator might obtain from the agreement without exercising the options, the cost to exercise the options relative to the fair value of the licenses, and the additional financial commitments or economic penalties imposed on the collaborator as a result of exercising the options. As of December 31, 2020, all option and right-to-test agreements have expired or terminated. If the Company concludes that an option provides the customer a material right, and therefore is a separate performance obligation, the Company then determines the estimated standalone selling price of the option using the following inputs: (a) estimated fair value of the license underlying each option, (b) the amount the partner would pay to exercise the option to obtain the license, and (c) probability of exercise. The Company does not control when or if any collaborator will exercise its options for development and commercialization licenses. As a result, the Company cannot predict when or if it will recognize revenues in connection with any of the foregoing. Upfront payments on development and commercialization licenses may be recognized upon delivery of the license if facts and circumstances dictate that the license is distinct from the other promised goods and services. In determining whether a collaboration and option agreement is within the scope of ASC 808, Collaborative Arrangements Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations Deferred revenue under ASC 606 represents the portion of the transaction price received under various contracts for which work has not been performed (or has been partially performed) and includes unexercised contract options that are considered material rights. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations comprising deferred revenue was $110.1 million. The Company expects to recognize revenue on approximately 27%, 65%, and 8% of the remaining performance obligations over the next 12 months , 13 to 60 months , and 61 to 120 months , respectively, however, it does not control when or if any collaborator will terminate existing development and commercialization licenses. Contract Balances from Contracts with Customers The following tables present changes in the Company’s contract assets and contract liabilities during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands): Balance at Balance at Year ended December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Additions Deductions Impact of Netting December 31, 2020 Contract asset $ 3,631 $ — $ (8,000) $ 4,369 $ — Contract liabilities (deferred revenue) $ 127,432 $ 42,050 $ (63,742) $ 4,369 $ 110,109 Balance at Balance at Year ended December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Additions Deductions Impact of Netting December 31, 2019 Contract asset $ 500 $ 8,000 $ (500) $ (4,369) $ 3,631 Contract liabilities (deferred revenue) $ 80,802 $ 65,816 $ (14,817) $ (4,369) $ 127,432 During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 the Company recognized the following revenues as a result of changes in contract asset and contract liability balances in the respective periods (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2020 2019 2018 Revenue recognized in the period from: Amounts included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the period $ 61,872 $ 14,817 $ 14,139 Performance obligations satisfied in previous periods $ — $ 12,672 $ 1,476 During 2020, the Company recognized $60.5 million of previously deferred license revenue upon Jazz’s opt-out of its right to the last remaining license under the agreement and $3.2 million of upfront fees previously received from other partners, of which $1.4 million was included in contract liabilities at the beginning of 2020. A $40.0 million upfront payment received in 2020 pursuant to a license agreement executed with Huadong was recorded as deferred revenue and none of this amount was recognized as revenue during 2020. Additionally, a contract asset of $3.6 million, net of $4.4 million in related contract liabilities, was recorded for two probable milestones in 2019 pursuant to license agreements with CytomX and Novartis, which were subsequently achieved and paid during 2020. The Company recorded the following during the year ended December 31, 2019: (i) license and milestone fee revenue of $7.7 million for probable development milestones pursuant to license agreements with CytomX and Novartis, with another $0.3 million deferred which represents the amount allocated to future rights to technological improvements; a $3.6 million contract asset was recorded in December 2019 related to these probable milestones, net of a $4.4 million reduction in related contract liabilities; (ii) a $5 million regulatory milestone payment earned under its license agreement with Genentech, a member of the Roche Group; the full amount of the milestone was recognized as revenue in the period as the amount allocated to future rights to technological improvements was not material; (iii) $14.5 million of previously deferred license revenue recognized upon the opt-out of the right to execute a license by Jazz; (iv) $65.2 million was recorded as deferred revenue as a result of a sale of the Company’s residual rights to receive royalty payments on commercial sales of Kadcyla ® As a result of adoption of ASC 606, a contract asset of $5.0 million was recorded for a probable milestone which was subsequently earned and paid during the year ended December 31, 2018. Additionally the Company recorded the following during 2018: (i) a contract asset and related revenue of $0.5 million for a probable milestone pursuant to a license agreement with Fusion Pharmaceuticals, which was subsequently paid in 2019; (ii) a $1 million development milestone earned under a sublicense agreement with Oxford BioTherapeutics Ltd. as license and milestone fee revenue, which was included in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2018; (iii) $10.9 million of revenue previously deferred, with a net reduction in deferred revenue of $5.9 million due to contract asset and contract liability netting as a result of Takeda not executing a second license it had available, or extending or expanding its right-to-test agreement; (iv) $0.8 million of revenue previously deferred upon completion of Debiopharm and another collaborator’s performance obligations; (v) $2.1 million of revenue previously deferred related to numerous collaborators’ rights to technological improvements; and (vi) $0.3 million of revenue previously deferred upon shipment of clinical materials to a partner which is included in clinical material revenue. The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in billed receivables, unbilled receivables, contract assets, and contract liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. When consideration is received, or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior to transferring goods or services to the customer under the terms of a contract, a contract liability is recorded (under the caption deferred revenue). Contract liabilities are recognized as revenue after control of the products or services is transferred to the customer and all revenue recognition criteria have been met. |
Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk | Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk Cash and cash equivalents are primarily maintained with three financial institutions in the U.S. Deposits with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds with underlying investments primarily being U.S. Government-issued securities and high quality, short-term commercial paper. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. The Company held no marketable securities as of December 31, 2020 or 2019. The Company’s investment policy, approved by the Board of Directors, limits the amount it may invest in any one type of investment, thereby reducing credit risk concentrations. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company held $293.9 million and $176.2 million, respectively, in cash and money market funds consisting principally of U.S. Government-issued securities and high quality, short-term commercial paper which were classified as cash and cash equivalents. |
Non-cash Investing | Non-cash Investing Activities The Company had $0.7 million of accrued capital expenditures as of December 31, 2020 which have been treated as a non-cash investing activity and, accordingly, not reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company had no accrued capital expenditures as of December 31, 2019. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement ● Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. ● Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. ● Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The following tables represent the fair value hierarchy for the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of each date (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using Quoted Prices in Significant Active Markets for Significant Other Unobservable Identical Assets Observable Inputs Inputs Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Cash equivalents $ 194,525 $ 194,525 $ — $ — Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using Quoted Prices in Significant Active Markets for Significant Other Unobservable Identical Assets Observable Inputs Inputs Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Cash equivalents $ 163,674 $ 163,674 $ — $ — The fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents is based primarily on quoted prices from active markets. The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable, unbilled receivable, contract assets, non-cash royalty receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation, and other accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. |
Unbilled Revenue/Reimbursement | Unbilled receivable primarily represents research funding earned based on actual resources utilized and external expenses incurred under certain of the Company’s collaborator agreements. |
Clinical Trial Accruals | Clinical Trial Accruals Clinical trial expenses are a significant component of research and development expenses, and the Company outsources a significant portion of these activities to third parties. Third-party clinical trial expenses include investigator fees, site costs (patient cost), clinical research organization costs, and costs for central laboratory testing and data management. The accrual for site and patient costs includes inputs such as estimates of patient enrollment, patient cycles incurred, clinical site activations, and other pass-through cost. These inputs are required to be estimated due to a lag in receiving the actual clinical information from third parties. . Non-refundable advance clinical payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future R&D activities are recorded as a prepaid asset and recognized as expense as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed. |
Leases | Leases Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-2, the details of which are further discussed in Note J. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases include right-of-use (ROU) assets and operating lease liabilities (current and non-current), which are recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Single payment capital leases for equipment that are considered finance leases are included in property and equipment in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As the single payment obligations have all been made, there is no related liability recorded. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses the implicit rate when readily determinable. As a number of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate applicable to the Company based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. As the Company has no existing or proposed collateralized borrowing arrangements, to determine a reasonable incremental borrowing rate, the Company considers collateral assumptions, the lease term, the Company’s current credit risk profile, and rates for existing borrowing arrangements for comparable peer companies. The operating lease ROU assets were netted against any lease incentive and straight-line lease liability balances at January 1, 2019 upon adoption of ASC 842. The Company accounts for the lease and fixed non-lease components as a single lease component. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for operating lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. |
Other Accrued Liabilities | Other Accrued Liabilities Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following at December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands): December 31, December 31, 2020 2019 Accrued contract payments $ 15,576 $ 5,188 Accrued clinical trial costs 11,401 6,418 Accrued professional services 1,200 1,274 Accrued employee benefits 39 314 Accrued public reporting charges 319 180 Other current accrued liabilities 785 558 Total $ 29,320 $ 13,932 |
Research and Development Expenses | The Company’s research and development expenses are charged to expense as incurred and relate to (i) research to evaluate new targets and to develop and evaluate new antibodies, linkers, and cytotoxic agents, (ii) preclinical testing of its own and, in certain instances, its collaborators’ product candidates, and the cost of its own clinical trials, (iii) development related to clinical and commercial manufacturing processes, and (iv) external manufacturing operations and, prior to 2019, internal manufacturing operations, which also included raw materials. Payments made by the Company in advance for research and development services not yet provided and/or materials not yet delivered and accepted are recorded as prepaid expenses and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as prepaid and other current assets. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as net operating loss carry forwards and tax credits and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences reverse. A valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets is recorded if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. |
Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. The Company provides for depreciation based upon expected useful lives using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Machinery and equipment 5 years Computer hardware and software 3 years Furniture and fixtures 5 years Leasehold improvements Shorter of remaining lease term or 7 years Equipment under capital leases is amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter, and included in depreciation expense. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of disposed assets and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statement of operations. The Company recorded net gains (losses) of $0.7 million, $(1.7) million, and $(0.1) million related to impairment charges and the sale/disposal of certain furniture and equipment during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company continually evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful life of its long-lived assets may warrant revision or that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired if impairment indicators are present. The Company evaluates the realizability of its long-lived assets based on cash flow expectations for the related asset. Any write-downs to fair value are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a $2.5 million asset impairment charge resulting from restructuring activities, the details of which are further discussed in Note I. Based on this evaluation, except for the impairment recognized during 2019, the Company believes that none of the Company’s remaining long-lived assets were impaired. |
Computation of Net Loss per Common Share | Computation of Net Loss per Common Share Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. During periods of income, participating securities are allocated a proportional share of income determined by dividing total weighted average participating securities by the sum of the total weighted average common shares and participating securities (the “two-class method”). Shares of the Company’s restricted stock participate in any dividends that may be declared by the Company and are therefore considered to be participating securities. Participating securities have the effect of diluting both basic and diluted earnings per share during periods of income. During periods of loss, no loss is allocated to participating securities since they have no contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. Diluted (loss) income per share is computed after giving consideration to the dilutive effect of stock options, convertible notes, and restricted stock that are outstanding during the period, except where such non-participating securities would be anti-dilutive. The Company’s common stock equivalents, as calculated in accordance with the treasury-stock method for the options and unvested restricted stock and the if-converted method for the convertible notes, are shown in the following table (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2020 2019 2018 Options outstanding to purchase common stock, shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan, and unvested restricted stock/units at end of period 20,873 14,815 17,380 Common stock equivalents under treasury stock method for options, shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan, and unvested restricted stock 1,301 1,020 3,001 Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes at end of period 501 501 501 Common stock equivalents under if-converted method for convertible notes 501 501 501 The Company’s common stock equivalents have not been included in the net loss per share calculation because their effect is anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss position. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-based Compensation As of December 31, 2020, the Company is authorized to grant future awards under three employee share-based compensation plans, which are the ImmunoGen, Inc. 2018 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2018 Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, and the ImmunoGen Inducement Equity Incentive Plan, or the Inducement Plan. At the annual meeting of shareholders on June 20, 2018, the 2018 Plan was approved and provides for the issuance of Stock Grants, the grant of Options, and the grant of Stock-Based Awards for up to 7,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, as well as up to 19,500,000 shares of common stock which represent awards granted under the previous stock option plans, the ImmunoGen, Inc. 2016 and 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Equity Incentive Plans, or the 2016 and 2006 Plans, that forfeit, expire, or cancel without delivery of shares of common stock or which resulted in the forfeiture of shares of common stock back to the Company subsequent to June 19, 2018. The Inducement Plan was approved the by Board of Directors in December 2019, and pursuant to subsequent amendments, provides for the issuance of non-qualified option grants for up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Options awarded under the two plans are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Options vest at various periods of up to four years and may be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. The stock-based awards are accounted for under ASC 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation.” Pursuant to ASC 718, the estimated grant date fair value of awards is charged to the statement of operations over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black- Scholes option-pricing model with the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table. As the Company has not paid dividends since inception, nor does it expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future, the expected dividend yield assumption is zero. Expected volatility is based exclusively on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected term of stock options granted is based exclusively on historical data and represents the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term is calculated for and applied to one group of stock options as the Company does not expect substantially different exercise or post-vesting termination behavior amongst its employee population. The risk-free rate of the stock options is based on the U.S. Treasury rate in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the stock options. December 31, 2020 2019 2018 Dividend None None None Volatility 85.07% 76.67% 71.02% Risk-free interest rate 1.21% 2.20% 2.73% Expected life (years) 6.0 6.0 6.0 Using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the weighted average grant date fair values of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, were $3.28, $2.81, and $6.70 per share, respectively. A summary of option activity under the option plans for 2020 is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data): Weighted- Weighted- Number Average Average Aggregate of Stock Exercise Remaining Intrinsic Options Price Life in Yrs. Value Outstanding at December 31, 2019 13,518 $ 7.53 Granted 7,421 4.60 Exercised (336) 2.94 Forfeited/Canceled (2,205) 10.28 Outstanding at December 31, 2020 18,398 6.10 7.66 $ 31,110 Outstanding at December 31, 2020—vested or unvested and expected to vest 17,830 $ 6.15 7.61 $ 29,990 Exercisable at December 31, 2020 6,983 $ 8.15 5.82 $ 9,222 In September 2018, the Company granted 295,200 performance-based stock options to certain employees that will vest in two equal installments upon the achievement of specified performance goals. At December 31, 2020, 128,700 of these options are still outstanding. In the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 2.6 million additional performance stock options that will vest in four installments upon the achievement of specified performance goals. The Company determined it is not currently probable that any of these performance goals will be achieved and, therefore, no expense has been recorded to date. The fair value of the performance-based options that could be expensed in future periods is $9.4 million. A summary of restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity under the option plans as for 2020 is presented below (in thousands, except weighted-average data): Number of Weighted- Restricted Average Grant Stock Shares Date Fair Value Unvested at December 31, 2019 1,297 $ 2.97 Vested (749) 2.60 Forfeited (487) 3.62 Unvested at December 31, 2020 61 $ 2.47 In 2016, 2017, and 2019, the Company granted shares of performance-based restricted common stock to certain employees of the Company. All but 57,400 of these granted shares have since been forfeited. The restrictions on these shares will lapse in three equal installments upon the achievement of specified performance goals. The Company determined it is not currently probable that these performance goals will be achieved and, therefore, no expense has been recorded to date. The fair value of the performance-based shares that could be expensed in future periods is $0.1 million. In June 2018, the Company's Board of Directors, with shareholder approval, adopted the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Following the automatic share increase on January 1, 2021 under the ESPP’s “evergreen” provision, an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the ESPP. Under the ESPP, eligible participants purchase shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of the closing price of the Company's common stock on the first business day and the final business day of the applicable plan purchase period. Plan purchase periods are six months and begin on January 1 and July 1 of each year, with purchase dates occurring on the final business day of the given purchase period. The fair value of each ESPP award is estimated on the first day of the offering period using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense equal to the fair value of the ESPP awards on a straight-line basis over the offering period. During 2020 and 2019, approximately 122,000 and 356,000 shares, respectively, were issued to participating employees at fair values ranging from $1.20 to $2.14 per share. Stock compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards granted under the option plans and the ESPP was $14.0 million, $13.8 million, and $16.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the estimated fair value of unvested employee awards was $17.8 million. The weighted-average remaining vesting period for these awards is approximately 2.6 years. Also included in stock and deferred stock unit compensation expense in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 is $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0.4 million, respectively, of expense recorded for directors’ deferred share units, the details of which are discussed in Note H. A summary of option activity for options vested during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 is presented below (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2020 2019 2018 Total fair value of options vested $ 11,465 $ 13,747 $ 7,496 Total intrinsic value of options exercised 746 556 3,787 Cash received for exercise of stock options 1,471 2,873 4,301 |
Comprehensive Loss | Comprehensive Loss The Company presents comprehensive loss in accordance with ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. |
Segment Information | Segment Information During all periods presented, the Company continued to operate in one reportable business segment under the management approach of ASC 280, Segment Reporting The percentages of revenues recognized from significant customers of the Company in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 are included in the following table: Years Ended December 31, Collaborative Partner: 2020 2019 2018 CytomX -% 13% 8% Roche 53% 64% 60% Takeda 1% -% 23% Jazz 46% 18% -% There were no other customers of the Company with significant revenues in the periods presented. |
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements | Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments Recently issued accounting pronouncements, not yet adopted In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes No other recently issued or effective ASUs had, or are expected to have, a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. |