Seacor (CKH) 10-Q 2013 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 ________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

________________________________________ 

(Mark One)

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013              or             

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 1-12289

SEACOR Holdings Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

________________________________________ 

Delaware	13-3542736
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
2200 Eller Drive, P.O. Box 13038,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida	33316
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

954-523-2200

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

________________________________________ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ý     No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  x Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ¨    No  ý

The total number of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of July 25, 2013 was 20,230,727. The Registrant has no other class of common stock outstanding.

1

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.

Table of Contents

Part I.	Financial Information		1
	Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	1
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	2
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013	4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	5
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	44
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	44
Part II.	Other Information		45
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	45
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	45
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	45
	Item 6.	Exhibits	45

i

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except share data, unaudited)
	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	394,783		$	248,204
Restricted cash	16,776			28,285
Marketable securities	27,264			21,668
Receivables:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,153 and $1,201 in 2013 and 2012, respectively	188,128			224,944
Other	37,204			45,334
Inventories	22,955			25,787
Deferred income taxes	3,530			3,530
Prepaid expenses and other	11,715			12,719
Discontinued operations	—			108,153
Total current assets	702,355			718,624
Property and Equipment:
Historical cost	2,212,929			2,238,383
Accumulated depreciation	(806,672		)	(763,803		)
	1,406,257			1,474,580
Construction in progress	133,985			110,296
Net property and equipment	1,540,242			1,584,876
Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies	293,793			272,535
Construction Reserve Funds & Title XI Reserve Funds	150,375			195,629
Goodwill	17,978			17,978
Intangible Assets, Net	14,594			15,305
Other Assets	48,996			55,123
Discontinued Operations	—			840,724
	$	2,768,333		$	3,700,794
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	25,109		$	21,920
Current portion of capital lease obligations	10			2,900
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	73,185			107,892
Other current liabilities	112,310			93,093
Discontinued operations	—			39,836
Total current liabilities	210,614			265,641
Long-Term Debt	674,444			655,309
Capital Lease Obligations	24			59
Deferred Income Taxes	421,623			426,027
Deferred Gains and Other Liabilities	115,078			120,342
Discontinued Operations	—			490,741
Total liabilities	1,421,783			1,958,119
Equity:
SEACOR Holdings Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued nor outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized; 37,035,464 and 36,740,324 shares issued in 2013 and 2012, respectively	370			367
Additional paid-in capital	1,347,909			1,330,324
Retained earnings	1,066,697			1,473,509
Shares held in treasury of 16,851,335 and 16,852,391 in 2013 and 2012, respectively, at cost	(1,089,061		)	(1,088,560		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax	(4,243		)	(1,986		)
	1,321,672			1,713,654
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries	24,878			29,021
Total equity	1,346,550			1,742,675
	$	2,768,333		$	3,700,794

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

and should be read in conjunction herewith.

1

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (in thousands, except share data, unaudited)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Operating Revenues	$	315,563		$	309,225		$	582,627		$	607,074
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	240,113			244,545			441,026			452,964
Administrative and general	34,718			36,301			70,363			71,292
Depreciation and amortization	33,783			33,220			67,331			62,922
	308,614			314,066			578,720			587,178
Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net	12,305			3,342			14,320			7,119
Operating Income (Loss)	19,254			(1,499		)	18,227			27,015
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income	3,218			7,392			6,385			10,035
Interest expense	(7,922		)	(10,012		)	(20,762		)	(19,999		)
Debt extinguishment losses, net	—			—			—			(160		)
Marketable security gains, net	6,557			11,596			10,552			14,954
Derivative gains (losses), net	(825		)	2,554			(2,932		)	(404		)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net	(916		)	(1,024		)	(4,927		)	637
Other, net	195			443			198			359
	307			10,949			(11,486		)	5,422
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense and Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies	19,561			9,450			6,741			32,437
Income Tax Expense	7,975			3,250			5,322			12,710
Income from Continuing Operations Before Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies	11,586			6,200			1,419			19,727
Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	7,710			295			6,841			7,956
Income from Continuing Operations	19,296			6,495			8,260			27,683
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax	—			4,804			(211		)	19,989
Net Income	19,296			11,299			8,049			47,672
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries	25			50			(348		)	(65		)
Net Income attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.	$	19,271		$	11,249		$	8,397		$	47,737
Net Income (Loss) attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
Continuing operations	$	19,271		$	6,445		$	8,508		$	27,748
Discontinued operations	—			4,804			(111		)	19,989
	$	19,271		$	11,249		$	8,397		$	47,737
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share of SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
Continuing operations	$	0.97		$	0.31		$	0.43		$	1.35
Discontinued operations	—			0.24			(0.01		)	0.97
	$	0.97		$	0.55		$	0.42		$	2.32
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share of SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
Continuing operations	$	0.91		$	0.31		$	0.42		$	1.33
Discontinued operations	—			0.23			—			0.96
	$	0.91		$	0.54		$	0.42		$	2.29
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic	19,825,229			20,584,567			19,782,318			20,552,114
Diluted	24,392,312			20,871,380			20,114,904			20,883,570

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

and should be read in conjunction herewith.

2

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (in thousands, unaudited)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net Income	$	19,296		$	11,299		$	8,049		$	47,672
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)	(340		)	(1,415		)	(4,538		)	1,785
Reclassification of foreign currency translation losses to foreign currency gains (losses), net	—			—			—			758
Derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges	331			(195		)	380			(671		)
Reclassification of derivative losses on cash flow hedges to interest expense	—			660			—			1,296
Reclassification of derivative losses on cash flow hedges to equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies	151			145			318			219
Other	—			—			—			42
	142			(805		)	(3,840		)	3,429
Income tax (expense) benefit	(41		)	249			1,186			(1,145		)
	101			(556		)	(2,654		)	2,284
Comprehensive Income	19,397			10,743			5,395			49,956
Comprehensive Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries	48			(44		)	(800		)	92
Comprehensive Income attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.	$	19,349		$	10,787		$	6,195		$	49,864

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

and should be read in conjunction herewith.

3

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (in thousands, unaudited)
	SEACOR Holdings Inc. Stockholders’ Equity														Non- Controlling Interests In Subsidiaries			Total Equity
	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Shares Held In Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
December 31, 2012	$	367	$	1,330,324		$	1,473,509		$	(1,088,560	)	$	(1,986	)	$	29,021		$	1,742,675
Issuance of common stock:
Employee Stock Purchase Plan	—		—			—			978			—			—			978
Exercise of stock options	1		7,829			—			—			—			—			7,830
Director stock awards	—		125			—			—			—			—			125
Restricted stock and restricted stock units	2		(27		)	—			—			—			—			(25		)
Distribution of Era Group stock to shareholders	—		—			(415,209		)	—			(55		)	(107		)	(415,371		)
Share award settlements for Era Group employees and directors	—		(631		)	—			—			—			—			(631		)
Amortization of share awards	—		8,810			—			—			—			—			8,810
Cancellation of restricted stock	—		1,479			—			(1,479		)	—			—			—
Issuance of noncontrolling interests	—		—			—			—			—			40			40
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—		—			—			—			—			(3,276		)	(3,276		)
Net income	—		—			8,397			—			—			(348		)	8,049
Other comprehensive loss	—		—			—			—			(2,202		)	(452		)	(2,654		)
Six months ended June 30, 2013	$	370	$	1,347,909		$	1,066,697		$	(1,089,061	)	$	(4,243	)	$	24,878		$	1,346,550

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

and should be read in conjunction herewith.

4

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands, unaudited)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities of Continuing Operations	$	78,235		$	65,293
Cash Flows from Investing Activities of Continuing Operations:
Purchases of property and equipment	(87,931		)	(99,507		)
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment	125,432			7,394
Investments in and advances to 50% or less owned companies	(26,822		)	(31,906		)
Return of investments and advances from 50% or less owned companies	8,315			25,641
Net advances on revolving credit line to 50% or less owned companies	—			(300		)
Principal payments received on third party notes receivable, net	4,509			18,970
Net decrease in restricted cash	11,509			2,934
Net decrease in construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds	45,254			67,554
Payments received on third party leases, net	1,731			1,793
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(10,540		)	(148,084		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations	71,457			(155,511		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities of Continuing Operations:
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations	(10,027		)	(64,712		)
Net borrowings (repayments) under inventory financing arrangements	2,365			(14,798		)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	6			134
Common stock acquired for treasury	—			(17,431		)
Share award settlements for Era Group employees and directors	(357		)	—
Proceeds and tax benefits from share award plans	8,779			6,659
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests, net of issuances	(3,236		)	(1,715		)
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations	(2,470		)	(91,863		)
Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents	(2,565		)	910
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents from Continuing Operations	144,657			(181,171		)
Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:
Operating Activities	24,298			76,624
Investing Activities	(8,502		)	5,715
Financing Activities	(14,017		)	6,606
Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents	143			595
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents from Discontinued Operations	1,922			89,540
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	146,579			(91,631		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period	248,204			381,482
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period	$	394,783		$	289,851

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

and should be read in conjunction herewith.

5

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICY

The condensed consolidated financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 has been prepared by the Company and has not been audited by its independent registered public accounting firm. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SEACOR Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made to fairly present the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2013, its results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, its comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, its changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2013, and its cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year or any future periods.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Unless the context otherwise indicates, any reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the “Company” refers to SEACOR Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and any reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “SEACOR” refers to SEACOR Holdings Inc.

Discontinued Operations. On January 31, 2013, the Company completed the spin-off ("Spin-off") of Era Group Inc. (“Era Group”), the company that operated SEACOR's Aviation Services business segment, by means of a dividend to SEACOR's stockholders of all the issued and outstanding common stock of Era Group. Era Group filed a Registration Statement on Form 10 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, describing the Spin-off, that was declared effective on January 14, 2013. Era Group is now an independent company whose common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "ERA." Discontinued operations includes the historical financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Era Group as well as the operations previously reported as discontinued in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (see Note 14).

Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue that does not meet these criteria is deferred until the criteria are met. Deferred revenues, included in other current liabilities, for the six months ended June 30 were as follows (in thousands):

	2013		2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	6,592	$	9,845
Revenues deferred during the period	—		2,600
Revenues recognized during the period	—		(5,927		)
Balance at end of period	$	6,592	$	6,518

As of June 30, 2013, deferred revenues of $6.6 million were related to the time charter of several offshore support vessels scheduled to be paid through the conveyance of an overriding royalty interest (the "Conveyance") in developmental oil and gas producing properties operated by a customer in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Payments under the Conveyance, and the timing of such payments, are contingent upon production and energy sale prices. On August 17, 2012, the customer filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Company is vigorously defending its interest in connection with the bankruptcy filing; however, payments received under the Conveyance subsequent to August 17, 2012 are subject to bankruptcy court approval. The Company will continue to recognize revenues as cash is received and approved by the bankruptcy court or earlier should future collection become reasonably assured. All costs and expenses related to these charters were recognized as incurred.

6

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

	SEACOR Holdings Inc. Stockholders Equity												Noncontrolling Interests
	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Derivative Losses on Cash Flow Hedges, net			Other			Total			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Other			Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
December 31, 2012	$	(1,238	)	$	(732	)	$	(16	)	$	(1,986	)	$	321		$	(10	)
Distribution of Era Group stock to shareholders	(55		)	—			—			(55		)	—			—
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(4,086		)	698			—			(3,388		)	(452		)	—			$	(3,840	)
Income tax (expense) benefit	1,430			(244		)	—			1,186			—			—			1,186
Six months ended June 30, 2013	$	(3,949	)	$	(278	)	$	(16	)	$	(4,243	)	$	(131	)	$	(10	)	$	(2,654	)

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications of prior period information have been made to conform to the presentation of the current period information. These reclassifications had no effect on net income as previously reported.

2. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value and defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs derived from observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2013 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Marketable securities(1)	$	27,264	$	—	$	—
Derivative instruments (included in other receivables)	820		5,961		—
Construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds	150,375		—		—
LIABILITIES
Short sale of marketable securities (included in other current liabilities)	7,809		—		—
Derivative instruments (included in other current liabilities)	703		4,770		—

 ______________________

(1) Marketable security gains, net include unrealized gains of $6.5 million and unrealized losses of $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to marketable security positions held by the Company as of June 30, 2013. Marketable security gains, net include unrealized gains of $10.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, related to marketable security positions held by the Company as of June 30, 2013. Unrealized gains or losses for the six months ended June 30, 2012, related to marketable security positions held by the Company as of June 30, 2013 were not material.

7

The estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):

			Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	411,559	$	411,559	$	—	$	—
Investments, at cost, in 50% or less owned companies (included in other   assets)	9,315		see below
Notes receivable from other business ventures (included in other   receivables and other assets)	21,674		see below
LIABILITIES
Long-term debt, including current portion(1)	699,553		—		813,568		—

______________________

(1) The estimated fair value includes the conversion option on the Company's 2.5% Convertible Notes.

The carrying value of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates fair value. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated based upon quoted market prices or by using discounted cash flow analyses based on estimated current rates for similar types of arrangements. It was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s investments, at cost, in 50% or less owned companies because of the lack of quoted market prices and the inability to estimate fair value without incurring excessive costs. It was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s notes receivable from other business ventures as the overall returns are uncertain due to certain provisions for additional payments contingent upon future events. Considerable judgment was required in developing certain of the estimates of fair value and, accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

The Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value during the six months ended June 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
ASSETS
Long-lived assets under construction(1)	$	17,494	$	—	$	—
Investment in C-Lift LLC(2)	—		13,290		—

______________________

(1) During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized impairment charges of $3.0 million related to two of Shipping Services' harbor tugs while under construction, which were sold and leased back upon their completion (see Note 5).

(2) During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company marked its equity investment in C-Lift LLC ("C-Lift") to fair value following its acquisition of a controlling interest (see Note 4). The investment's fair value was determined based on the Company's purchase price of the acquired interest.

3. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING STRATEGIES

Derivative instruments are classified as either assets or liabilities based on their individual fair values. Derivative assets and liabilities are included in other receivables and other current liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments as of June 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):

	Derivative Asset		Derivative Liability
Options on equities and equity indices	$	415	$	—
Forward currency exchange, option and future contracts	298		390
Interest rate swap agreements	—		4,271
Commodity swap, option and future contracts:
Exchange traded	554		703
Non-exchange traded	5,514		109
	$	6,781	$	5,473

8

Cash Flow Hedges. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had no interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges. As of June 30, 2013, one of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned companies had an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2015 that has been designated as a cash flow hedge. This instrument calls for the joint venture to pay a fixed interest rate of 1.48% on the amortized notional value of $17.5 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. As of June 30, 2013, one of the Company’s Inland River Services 50% or less owned companies had four interest rate swap agreements with maturities ranging from 2013 through 2015 that have been designated as cash flow hedges. These instruments call for the joint venture to pay fixed rates of interest ranging from 1.53% to 4.16% on the aggregate amortized notional value of $38.8 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the aggregate amortized notional value. Additionally, as of June 30, 2013, one of the Company’s Shipping Services 50% or less owned companies had an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2017 that has been designated as a cash flow hedge. The instrument calls for the joint venture to pay a fixed interest rate of 2.79% on the amortized notional value of $38.4 million and received a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. By entering into these interest rate swap agreements, the Company's joint ventures have converted the variable LIBOR component of certain of their outstanding borrowings to a fixed interest rate.

The Company recognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for the six months ended June 30 as follows (in thousands):

	2013		2012
Interest rate swap agreements, effective portion in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	380	$	(671	)
Interest rate swap agreements, ineffective portion in derivative gains (losses), net	—		(19		)
	$	380	$	(690	)

Other Derivative Instruments. The Company recognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments in derivative gains (losses), net for the six months ended June 30 as follows (in thousands):

	2013			2012
Options on equities and equity indices	$	(3,012	)	$	(910	)
Forward currency exchange, option and future contracts	(592		)	373
Interest rate swap agreements	237			(237		)
Commodity swap, option and future contracts:
Exchange traded	(821		)	(1,863		)
Non-exchange traded	1,256			2,252
	$	(2,932	)	$	(385	)

The Company, from time to time, holds positions in publicly traded equity options that convey the right or obligation to engage in a future transaction on the underlying equity security or index. The Company’s investment in equity options primarily includes positions in energy, marine, transportation and other related businesses. These contracts are typically entered into to mitigate the risk of changes in the market value of marketable security positions that the Company is either about to acquire, has acquired or is about to dispose of.

The Company enters and settles forward currency exchange, option and future contracts with respect to various foreign currencies. As of June 30, 2013, the outstanding forward currency exchange contracts translated into a net purchase of foreign currencies with an aggregate U.S. dollar equivalent of $13.1 million. These contracts enable the Company to buy currencies in the future at fixed exchange rates, which could offset possible consequences of changes in currency exchange rates with respect to the Company’s business conducted outside of the United States. The Company generally does not enter into contracts with forward settlement dates beyond twelve to eighteen months.

The Company has entered into various interest rate swap agreements with maturities ranging from 2013 through 2018 that call for the Company to pay fixed interest rates ranging from 2.25% to 3.05% on an aggregate amortized notional value of $221.1 million (including an amortized notional value of €10.9 million or $14.4 million) and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on these notional values. In addition, one of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned companies has entered into an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2018 that calls for the joint venture to pay a fixed interest rate of 1.30% on the amortized notional value of $108.0 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. The general purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to provide protection against increases in interest rates, which might lead to higher interest costs for the Company or its joint venture.

9

The Company enters and settles positions in various exchange and non-exchange traded commodity swap, option and future contracts. The Company's ethanol and industrial alcohol manufacturing facility enters into exchange traded positions (primarily corn) to protect its raw material and finished goods inventory balance from market changes. In the Company’s agricultural trading business, fixed price future purchase and sale contracts for sugar are included in the Company’s non-exchange traded derivative positions. The Company enters into exchange traded positions to protect these purchase and sale contracts as well as its inventory balances from market changes. As of June 30, 2013, the net market exposure to corn and sugar under these contracts was not material. The Company also enters into exchange traded positions (primarily natural gas, heating oil, crude oil, gasoline, corn and sugar) to provide value to the Company should there be a sustained decline in the price of commodities that could lead to a reduction in the market values and cash flows of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services, Inland River Services and Shipping Services businesses. As of June 30, 2013, these positions were not material.

4. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

C-Lift Acquisition. On June 6, 2013, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in C-Lift through the acquisition of its partner's 50% interest for $12.7 million in cash subject to certain working capital adjustments (see Note 6). C-Lift owns and operates two liftboats in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The Company performed a fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The preliminary fair value analysis is pending completion of a final valuation for the acquired assets and liabilities.

Pantagro Acquisition. On June 25, 2012, the Company acquired a 95% controlling interest in Pantagro-Pantanal Produtos Agropecuarious Ltda. ("Pantagro") for $0.4 million ($0.2 million in cash and $0.2 million in a note payable). Pantagro is an Argentine agricultural trading company focusing primarily on salt. The Company performed a fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The fair value analysis was finalized in March 2013.

Superior Lift Boats Acquisition. On March 30, 2012, the Company acquired 18 lift boats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. (“Superior”) for $142.5 million. The Company performed a fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The fair value analysis was finalized in March 2013.

Purchase Price Allocation. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price for the Company’s business acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

Trade and other receivables	$	3,250
Other current assets	32
Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies	(13,290		)
Property and Equipment	43,521
Intangible Assets	1,599
Accounts payable	(264		)
Other current liabilities	(1,640		)
Long-Term Debt	(22,668		)
Purchase price(1)	$	10,540

______________________

(1) Purchase price is net of cash acquired of $2.2 million.

5. EQUIPMENT ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS AND DEPRECIATION AND IMPAIRMENT POLICIES

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, capital expenditures were $87.9 million. Equipment deliveries during the period included one specialty offshore support vessel, two liftboats, two wind farm utility vessels, two liquid tank barges and three U.S.-flag harbor tugs.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company sold two crew boats, one mini-supply vessel, one supply vessel, one specialty offshore support vessel, three liftboats, sixteen dry-cargo barges, eight liquid tank barges, two U.S.-flag harbor tugs and other property and equipment for net proceeds of $132.4 million ($125.1 million in cash, $0.2 million in vendor credits and $7.1 million in seller financing) and gains of $15.2 million, of which $12.9 million were recognized currently and $2.3 million were deferred. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $1.4 million. The specialty offshore support vessel and the supply vessel were sold to certain of the Company's Offshore Marine Services' joint ventures for $60.5 million (see Note 6). During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company also received $0.3 million in deposits on future equipment sales.

10

The Company has sold certain equipment to 50% or less owned companies, entered into vessel sale-leaseback transactions with finance companies, and provided seller financing on sales of its equipment to third parties and its 50% or less owned companies. A portion of the gains realized from these transactions were deferred and recorded in deferred gains and other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Deferred gain activity related to these transactions for the six months ended June 30 was as follows (in thousands):

	2013			2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	111,514		$	117,192
Deferred gains arising from asset sales	2,289			7,280
Amortization of deferred gains included in operating expenses as a reduction to rental expense	(5,192		)	(9,526		)
Amortization of deferred gains included in gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net	(1,431		)	(2,039		)
Balance at end of period	$	107,180		$	112,907

Equipment, stated at cost, is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset to an estimated salvage value. With respect to each class of asset, the estimated useful life is based upon a newly built asset being placed into service and represents the point at which it is typically not justifiable for the Company to continue to operate the asset in the same or similar manner. From time to time, the Company may acquire older assets that have already exceeded the Company’s useful life policy, in which case the Company depreciates such assets based on its best estimate of remaining useful life, typically the next survey or certification date.

As of June 30, 2013, the estimated useful life (in years) of each of the Company’s major categories of new equipment was as follows:

Offshore support vessels (excluding wind farm utility)	20
Wind farm utility vessels	10
Inland river dry cargo and deck barges	20
Inland river liquid tank barges	25
Inland river towboats	25
U.S.-flag product tankers	25
RORO(1) vessels	20
Harbor tugs	25
Ocean liquid tank barges	25
Terminal and manufacturing facilities	20

______________________ 

(1) Roll on/Roll off ("RORO").

The Company performs an impairment analysis of long-lived assets used in operations, including intangible assets, when indicators of impairment are present. If the carrying value of the assets is not recoverable, as determined by the estimated undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value of the assets is reduced to fair value. Generally, fair value is determined using valuation techniques, such as expected discounted cash flows or appraisals, as appropriate. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized impairment charges of $3.0 million related to two of Shipping Services' harbor tugs while under construction, which were sold and leased back upon their completion.

6. INVESTMENTS, AT EQUITY, AND ADVANCES TO 50% OR LESS OWNED COMPANIES

C-Lift. C-Lift was a 50-50 joint venture established to construct and operate liftboats. On June 6, 2013, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in C-Lift through its acquisition of its partner's 50% interest for $12.7 million in cash subject to certain working capital adjustments (see Note 4). Upon the acquisition, the Company adjusted its investment in C-Lift to fair value resulting in the recognition of a gain of $4.2 million, net of tax, which is included in equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.

Sea-Cat Crewzer II. On January 23, 2013 the Company and another offshore support vessel operator formed Sea-Cat Crewzer II LLC (“Sea-Cat Crewzer II”), a 50-50 joint venture to own and operate two high speed offshore catamaran crew boats. Upon formation, the Company and its partner each contributed capital of $11.5 million in cash. Sea-Cat Crewzer II then immediately purchased one high speed offshore catamaran crew boat from the Company for $24.1 million ($23.0 million in cash and $1.1 million in seller financing).

11

MexMar. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company made an additional cash investment of $5.9 million in Mantenimiento Express Maritimo, S.A.P.I. de C.V. ("MexMar"), an Offshore Marine Services Mexican joint venture. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, MexMar purchased one offshore support vessel from the Company for $36.4 million ($30.4 million in cash and $6.0 million in seller financing). During the six months ended June 30, 2013, MexMar repaid the $6.0 million of seller financing and the Company provided an additional $1.7 million advance for the purchase of another offshore support vessel.

SCFCo Holdings. SCFCo Holdings LLC (“SCFCo”) was established to operate towboats and dry cargo barges on the Parana-Paraguay Rivers and a terminal facility at Port Ibicuy, Argentina. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company contributed additional capital of $2.9 million to fund SCFCo’s operations, provided net temporary working capital advances of $1.8 million and received working capital repayments of $1.8 million. As of June 30, 2013, the total outstanding balance of working capital advances was $2.3 million.

Bunge-SCF Grain. Bunge-SCF Grain LLC (“Bunge-SCF Grain”) was established to construct and operate a terminal grain elevator in Fairmont City, Illinois. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company and its partner each made a working capital advance of $2.5 million to Bunge-SCF Grain and received $0.5 million of repayments on working capital advances. As of June 30, 2013, the total outstanding balance of working capital advances was $7.0 million.

Witt O'Brien's. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company received dividends of $1.2 million from Witt O'Brien's LLC.

Other. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company made a $0.5 million capital contribution to one of its industrial aviation businesses in Asia and received dividends of $0.4 million from certain offshore marine services joint ventures.

Subsequent to June 30, 2013, the Company contributed $42.1 million in net cash and other consideration valued at $14.9 million that included certain progress payments made toward the construction of two Liquefied Petroleum Gas tankers (Very Large Gas Carriers, otherwise known as "VLGC's"), the construction contracts for the two VLGC's and the related options to construct additional VLGC's to Dorian LPG Ltd. in exchange for a noncontrolling ownership interest.

Guarantees. The Company has guaranteed the payment of amounts owed by one of its joint ventures under a vessel charter and has guaranteed amounts owed under banking facilities by certain of its joint ventures. As of June 30, 2013, the total amount guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was $14.9 million. In addition, as of June 30, 2013, the Company had uncalled capital commitments to two of its joint ventures for a total of $2.4 million.

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s unfunded capital commitments were $150.1 million and included: 17 offshore support vessels for $128.2 million; two inland river liquid tank barges for $2.9 million; five inland river towboats for $10.9 million; one U.S.-flag harbor tug for $1.6 million and other equipment and improvements for $6.5 million. Of these commitments, $55.6 million is payable during the remainder of 2013 with the balance payable through 2015. These unfunded capital commitments exclude $139.4 million related to two VLGC's that the Company's Shipping Services business segment committed to construct during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, the Company contributed $42.1 million in net cash and other consideration valued at $14.9 million that included certain progress payments made toward the construction of the two VLGC's, the construction contracts for the VLGC's and the related options to construct additional VLGC's to Dorian LPG Ltd. in exchange for a noncontrolling ownership interest (see Note 6).

On July 14, 2010, a group of individuals and entities purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Terry G. Robin, et al. v. Seacor Marine, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:10-CV-01986 (E.D. La.) (the “Robin Case”), in which they asserted that support vessels, including vessels owned by the Company, responding to the explosion and resulting fire that occurred aboard the semi-submersible drilling rig, the Deepwater Horizon, were negligent in their efforts to save lives and put out the fire and contributed to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon and subsequent oil spill. The action was part of the overall multi-district litigation, In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, MDL No. 2179 (“MDL”). The complaint sought compensatory, punitive, exemplary, and other damages. In response to this lawsuit, the Company filed petitions seeking exoneration from, or limitation of liability in relation to, any actions that may have been taken by vessels owned by the Company to extinguish the fire. On June 8, 2011, the Company moved to dismiss these claims (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee) on various legal grounds. On October 12, 2011, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss in its entirety, dismissing with prejudice all claims that had been filed against the Company in the limitation actions (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee that was not subject to the motion to dismiss). The Court entered final judgments in favor of the Company in the Robin Case and each of the limitation actions on November 21, 2011. On December 12, 2011, the claimants appealed each of those judgments to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit"). The claimants' opening brief was submitted on May 7, 2012, and the claimants filed a reply brief on June 1, 2012. Oral argument was not requested by the Fifth Circuit. On December 13, 2012, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district

12

court. The claimants have not petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari and their deadline to do so has expired.

With respect to the one claim filed by a Company employee, that individual also commenced a separate action in the MDL entitled DuWayne Mason v. Seacor Marine, LLC, No. 2:11-CV-00826 (E.D. La.), in which he alleges sustaining personal injuries not only in connection with responding to the explosion and fire, but also in the months thereafter in connection with the clean-up of oil and dispersants while a member of the crew of the M/V Seacor Vanguard. Although the case is subject to the MDL Court's stay of individual proceedings, on July 16, 2012 the employee sought to sever his case from the MDL. On March 5, 2013, the Court denied the motion, and on April 2, 2013, the employee filed a motion asking the Court to reconsider. The Company filed its response opposing the employee's motion on April 30, 2013, and on May 3, 2013, the Court denied the motion.  On May 22, 2013, the employee filed a Notice of Appeal to the Fifth Circuit.  On July 24, 2013, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The Company intends to vigorously defend the action should it ever proceed and the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend the Company in connection with this matter. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On July 20, 2010, two individuals purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in the State of Louisiana, John Wunstell, Jr. and Kelly Blanchard v. BP, et al., No. 2010-7437 (Division K) (the “Wunstell Action”), in which they assert, among other theories, that Mr. Wunstell suffered injuries as a result of his exposure to certain noxious fumes and chemicals in connection with the provision of remediation, containment and response services by O'Brien's Response Management Inc. ("ORM"), a subsidiary of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012). The action now is part of the overall MDL. The complaint also seeks to establish a “class-wide court-supervised medical monitoring program” for all individuals “participating in BP's Deepwater Horizon Vessels of Opportunity Program and/or Horizon Response Program” who allegedly experienced injuries similar to those of Mr. Wunstell. The Company believes this lawsuit has no merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action and pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM in connection with the Wunstell Action and claims asserted in the MDL, discussed further below. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On December 15, 2010, ORM and National Response Corporation ("NRC"), subsidiaries of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction and SES Business Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012), respectively, were named as defendants in one of the several consolidated “master complaints” that have been filed in the overall MDL. The master complaint naming ORM and NRC asserts various claims on behalf of a putative class against multiple defendants concerning the clean-up activities generally, and the use of dispersants specifically. By court order, the Wunstell Action has been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint. The Company believes that the claims asserted against ORM and NRC in the master complaint have no merit and on February 28, 2011, ORM and NRC moved to dismiss all claims against them in the master complaint on legal grounds. On September 30, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss that ORM and NRC had filed (an amended decision was issued on October 4, 2011 that corrected several grammatical errors and non-substantive oversights in the original order). Although the Court refused to dismiss the referenced master complaint in its entirety at that time, the Court did recognize the validity of the “derivative immunity” and “implied preemption” arguments that ORM and NRC advanced and directed ORM and NRC to (i) conduct limited discovery to develop evidence to support those arguments and (ii) then re-assert the arguments. The Court did, however, dismiss all state-law claims and certain other claims that had been asserted in the referenced master complaint, and dismissed the claims of all plaintiffs that have failed to allege a legally-sufficient injury. A schedule for limited discovery and motion practice was established by the Court and, in accordance with that schedule, ORM and NRC filed for summary judgment re-asserting their derivative immunity and implied preemption arguments on May 18, 2012. Those motions were argued on July 13, 2012 and are still pending decision. In addition to the indemnity provided to ORM, pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM and NRC in connection with these claims in the MDL. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

Subsequent to the filing of the referenced master complaint, nine additional individual civil actions have been filed in or removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana concerning the clean-up activities generally, which name the Company, ORM and/or NRC as defendants or third-party defendants and are part of the overall MDL. On April 8, 2011, ORM was named as a defendant in Johnson Bros. Corporation of Louisiana v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00781 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual business seeking damages allegedly caused by a delay on a construction project alleged to have resulted from the clean-up operations. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in James and Krista Pearson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. ("BP Exploration"), et al., No. 2:11-CV-00863 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife, who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and are seeking damages for personal injury, property damage to their boat, and

13

amounts allegedly due under contract. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in Thomas Edward Black v. BP Exploration, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00867 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual who is seeking damages for lost income because he allegedly could not find work in the fishing industry after the oil spill. On April 20, 2011, a complaint was filed in Darnell Alexander, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00951 (E.D. La.) on behalf of 117 individual plaintiffs that seek to adopt the allegations made in the referenced master complaint against ORM and NRC (and the other defendants). Plaintiffs in this matter have been since been granted leave to amend their complaint to include 410 additional individual plaintiffs. On October 3, 2012, ORM and NRC were served with a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint by Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C. and Jambon Marine Holdings L.L.C. in their Limitation of Liability action, In the Matter of Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:12-CV-00426 (E.D. La.). This Third-Party Complaint alleges that if claimant David Dinwiddie, who served as a clean-up crewmember aboard the M/V JAMBON SUPPLIER II vessel during the clean-up efforts, was injured as a result of his exposure to dispersants and chemicals during the course and scope of his employment, then said injuries were caused by the third-party defendants. On November 25, 2012, ORM was named as a defendant in Victoria Sanchez v. American Pollution Control Corp. et al., No. 2:12-CV-00164 (E.D. La.), a maritime suit filed by an individual who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and sustained personal injuries during the course of such employment. On December 17, 2012, the Court unsealed a False Claims Act lawsuit naming ORM as a defendant, Dillon v. BP, PLC et al., No. 2:12-CV-00987 (E.D. La.)., which is a suit by an individual seeking damages and penalties arising from alleged false reports and claims made to the federal government with respect to the amount of oil burned and dispersed during the clean-up. The federal government has declined to intervene in this suit. On April 8, 2013, the Company, ORM, and NRC were named as defendants in William and Dianna Fitzgerald v. BP Exploration et al., No. 2:13-CV-00650 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife whose son allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and became ill as a result of his exposure to oil and dispersants. Finally, on April 17, 2013, ORM was named as a defendant in Danos et al. v. BP America Production Co. et al., No. 2:13-CV-03747 (removed to E.D. La.), which is a suit by eight individuals seeking damages for dispersant exposure either as a result of their work during clean-up operations or as a result of their residence in the Gulf. By court order, all nine of these additional individual cases have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that they will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On February 18, 2011, Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Transocean Deepwater Inc. (collectively “Transocean”) named ORM and NRC as third-party defendants in a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint in Transocean's own Limitation of Liability Act action, which is part of the overall MDL, tendering to ORM and NRC the claims in the referenced master complaint that have already been asserted against ORM and NRC. Transocean, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., and M-I L.L.C. also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC for contribution and tort indemnity should they be found liable for any damages in Transocean's Limitation of Liability Act action and ORM and NRC have asserted counterclaims against those same parties for identical relief. Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc. (collectively "Weatherford") had also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC, but recently moved to voluntarily dismiss these cross-claims without prejudice. The Court granted Weatherford's motion on February 8, 2013. As indicated above, the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these actions but believes they are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On November 16, 2012, 668 individuals who served as beach clean-up workers in Escambia County, Florida during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response commenced a civil action in the Circuit Court for the First Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Escambia County, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 2012-CA-002947, in which they allege, among other things, that ORM and other defendants engaged in the contamination of Florida waters and beaches in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 376 and injured the plaintiffs by exposing them to dispersants during the course and scope of their employment. The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida on January 13, 2013, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et la., No. 3:13-CV-00024 (N.D. Fla.), and on January 16, 2013, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) issued a Conditional Transfer Order (“CTO”) transferring the case to the MDL, subject to any timely-filed notice of objection from the plaintiffs. Upon receipt of a notice of objection from the plaintiffs, a briefing schedule was set by the JPML, and so a stay of proceedings and suspension of deadlines was sought and obtained by the Court in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Following briefing before the JPML, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on April 2, 2013. On April 22, 2013, a companion case to this matter was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Abood et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 3:13-CV-00284 (N.D. Fla.), which alleges identical allegations against the same parties but names an additional 174 plaintiffs, all of whom served as clean-up workers in various Florida counties during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response.  A CTO was issued by the JPML on May 2, 2013, no objection was filed by the plaintiffs, and the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on May 10, 2013.  By court order, both of these matters have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

14

Separately, on March 2, 2012, the Court announced that BP Exploration and BP America Production Company ("BP America") (collectively "BP") and the plaintiffs had reached an agreement on the terms of two proposed class action settlements that will resolve, among other things, plaintiffs' economic loss claims and clean-up related claims against BP. The parties filed their proposed settlement agreements on April 18, 2012 along with motions seeking preliminary approval of the settlements. The Court held a hearing on April 25, 2012 to consider those motions and preliminarily approved both settlements on May 2, 2012. A final fairness hearing took place on November 8, 2012. The Court granted final approval to the Economic and Property Damages Class Action Settlement on December 21, 2012, and granted final approval to the Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement on January 11, 2013. Both class action settlements are currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Although neither the Company, ORM, or NRC are parties to the settlement agreements, the Company, ORM, and NRC are listed as released parties on the releases accompanying both settlement agreements. As the releases for both settlements have been deemed valid and enforceable by the district court, if the Fifth Circuit affirms these decisions, class members who did not file timely requests for exclusion will be barred from pursuing economic loss, property damage, personal injury, medical monitoring, and/or other released claims against the Company, ORM, and NRC. At this time, the Company expects these settlements to reduce ORM's potential exposure, if any, from some of the pending actions described above, and continues to evaluate the settlements' impacts on these cases.

On January 29, 2013, HEPACO, LLC ("HEPACO"), served a demand for arbitration upon ORM, in which HEPACO claims that ORM owes HEPACO an additional fee of $20,291,178.92 under the parties' Management Services Agreement (“MSA”), dated June 1, 2010.  According to HEPACO, the MSA requires ORM to pay HEPACO an additional fee of 30% of total charges paid under the MSA ("Surcharge") to compensate HEPACO for U.S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' insurance or Jones Act insurance and related risks attendant to the work when contract requires labor to be performed over, adjoining and/or in water. ORM denies liability for the Surcharge, intends to vigorously defend against the claim, and has sought indemnity for any resulting judgment and related attorneys fees from BP America and BP Exploration. ORM has advised BP that, pursuant to the Bridge Agreement HOU-WL4-3066 between BP and ORM, effective as of June 1, 2010, under which ORM managed and oversaw, for BP, subcontractors, such as HEPACO, in connection with on-shore services related to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP ultimately is responsible for the payment of the Surcharge should HEPACO be determined to be entitled to recover it under the MSA.

ORM is defending against three collective action lawsuits, each asserting failure to pay overtime with respect to individuals who provided service on the Deepwater Horizon spill response (the “DPH FLSA Actions”) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  These cases - Dennis Prejean v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01045) (the “Prejean Action”); Baylor Singleton et. al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et. al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01716) (the “Singleton Action”); and Himmerite et al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01533) (the “Himmerite Action”) - were each brought on behalf of certain individuals who worked on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response and who were classified as independent contractors.  The Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton Actions were each filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and then subsequently consolidated with the overall MDL.  The Himmerite and Singleton Actions have since been automatically stayed pending further scheduling by the Court, pursuant to the procedures in the MDL.  In the Prejean Action, ORM has answered the complaint, a scheduling order has been issued, and plaintiffs have, among other things, filed a Motion for Conditional Certification to which ORM's response is due by August 22, 2013.  The limitations periods for potential plaintiffs to opt-in to the Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton actions have all been tolled pending further action by the Court.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from any of these DPH FLSA Actions, but believes they are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against them.

In the course of the Company's business, it may agree to indemnify the counterparty to an agreement.  If the indemnified party makes a successful claim for indemnification, the Company would be required to reimburse that party in accordance with the terms of the indemnification agreement.  Indemnification agreements generally are subject to threshold amounts, specified claim periods and other restrictions and limitations.

In connection with the SES Business Transaction and the ORM Transaction, the Company remains contingently liable for certain indemnification obligations, including potential liabilities relating to work performed in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response. In the case of the SES Business Transaction, such potential liabilities may not exceed the purchase consideration received by the Company for the SES Business Transaction and in the case of the ORM Transaction, are subject to a negotiated cap. The Company currently is indemnified under contractual agreements with BP with respect to such potential liabilities.

In the normal course of its business, the Company becomes involved in various other litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages and personal injuries. Management has used estimates in determining the Company's potential exposure to these matters and has recorded reserves in its financial statements related thereto where appropriate. It is possible that a change in the Company's estimates of that exposure could occur, but the Company does not expect such changes in estimated costs would have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

15

8. MULTI-EMPLOYER PENSION PLANS

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company received notification from the American Maritime Officers Pension Plan (the "AMOPP”) that based on an actuarial valuation performed as of September 30, 2012, if the Company chooses to withdraw from the AMOPP, its withdrawal liability will be $45.6 million. That liability may change in future years based on various factors, primarily employee census. As of June 30, 2013, the Company has no intention to withdraw from the AMOPP and no deficit amounts have been invoiced. Depending upon the results of the future actuarial valuations and the ten-year rehabilitation plan, it is possible that the AMOPP will experience further funding deficits, requiring the Company to recognize additional payroll related operating expenses in the periods invoices are received or contribution levels are increased.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company also received notification from the United Kingdom Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund ("MNOPF") that the results of a 2012 actuarial valuation indicated that an additional net funding deficit of $182.6 million (£120.0 million) had developed since the previous actuarial valuation in 2009 and the Company's allocable share of the additional deficit is $2.7 million (£1.8 million). The Company will recognize additional payroll related operating expenses in the period the deficit invoice is received from the MNOPF, which is expected to be before the end of 2013. Depending upon the results of the future actuarial valuations, it is possible that the MNOPF will experience further funding deficits, requiring the Company to recognize additional payroll related operating expenses in the periods invoices are received.

9. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

As of June 30, 2013, the remaining availability under the SEACOR revolving credit facility was $359.0 million, net of issued letters of credit of $1.0 million. In addition, as of June 30, 2013, the Company had other outstanding letters of credit totaling $27.1 million with various expiration dates through 2016.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company made scheduled payments on other long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $10.0 million and made net repayments of $2.4 million under inventory financing arrangements.

SEACOR’s Board of Directors has previously authorized the Company to purchase any or all of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company did not repurchase any of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019.

10. STOCK REPURCHASES

SEACOR’s Board of Directors previously approved a securities repurchase plan that authorizes the Company to acquire Common Stock, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company did not acquire any shares of Common Stock for treasury. As of June 30, 2013, the remaining authority under the repurchase plan was $100.0 million.

11. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE OF SEACOR

Basic earnings per common share of SEACOR are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the relevant periods. Diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding plus the effect of potentially dilutive securities through the application of the treasury stock and if-converted methods. Dilutive securities for this purpose assumes restricted stock grants have vested, common shares have been issued pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options and common shares have been issued pursuant to the conversion of all outstanding convertible notes.

16

Computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR were as follows (in thousands, except share data):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,					For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Net Income Attributable to SEACOR		Average O/S Shares	Per Share		Net Income Attributable to SEACOR		Average O/S Shares	Per Share
2013
Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding	$	19,271	19,825,229	$	0.97	$	8,397	19,782,318	$	0.42
Effect of Dilutive Share Awards:
Options and Restricted Stock(1)	—		366,558			—		332,586
Convertible Notes(2)	3,044		4,200,525			—		—
Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding	$	22,315	24,392,312	$	0.91	$	8,397	20,114,904	$	0.42
2012
Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding	$	11,249	20,584,567	$	0.55	$	47,737	20,552,114	$	2.32
Effect of Dilutive Share Awards:
Options and Restricted Stock(1)	—		286,813			—		331,456
Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding	$	11,249	20,871,380	$	0.54	$	47,737	20,883,570	$	2.29

______________________ 

(1) For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR excluded 355,490 and 593,344 of certain share awards, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, diluted earnings per share of SEACOR excluded 503,726 and 531,101 of certain share awards, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive.

(2) For the six months ended June 30, 2013, diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR excluded 4,200,525 common shares issuable pursuant to the Company's 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive.

12. SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

Transactions in connection with the Company’s share based compensation plans during the six months ended June 30, 2013 were as follows:

Director stock awards granted	1,500
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) shares issued	18,056
Restricted stock awards granted	147,800
Restricted stock awards canceled	17,000
Shares released from Deferred Compensation Plan	—
Stock Option Activities:
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012	1,281,821
Granted(1)	431,662
Exercised	(145,840	)
Forfeited	—
Expired	(1,576	)
Outstanding as of June 30, 2013	1,566,067
Shares available for future grants and ESPP purchases as of June 30, 2013	937,987

______________________ 

(1) During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company granted 318,012 stock options to existing option holders under make-whole provisions upon the Spin-off of Era Group.

17

13.    SEGMENT INFORMATION

Accounting standards require public business enterprises to report information about each of their operating business segments that exceed certain quantitative thresholds or meet certain other reporting requirements. Operating business segments have been defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Certain reclassifications of prior period information have been made to conform to the current period's reportable segment presentation as a result of the Company's presentation of discontinued operations (see Notes 1 and 14). The Company’s basis of measurement of segment profit or loss is as previously described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The following tables summarize the operating results, capital expenditures and assets of the Company's reportable segments.

	Offshore Marine Services $’000		Inland River Services $’000	Shipping Services $’000		Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol $’000	Other $’000		Corporate and Eliminations $’000		Total $’000
For the three months ended June 30, 2013
Operating Revenues:
External customers	138,650		46,780	48,103		61,378	20,652		—		315,563
Intersegment	28		577	—		—	—		(605	)	—
	138,678		47,357	48,103		61,378	20,652		(605	)	315,563
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	97,581		35,193	29,554		59,402	18,960		(577	)	240,113
Administrative and general	14,235		3,921	6,124		477	1,323		8,638		34,718
Depreciation and amortization	16,460		7,078	7,907		1,489	96		753		33,783
	128,276		46,192	43,585		61,368	20,379		8,814		308,614
Gains on Asset Dispositions, Net	7,895		4,296	114		—	—		—		12,305
Operating Income (Loss)	18,297		5,461	4,632		10	273		(9,419	)	19,254
Other Income (Expense):
Derivative gains (losses), net	175		—	—		473	(450	)	(1,023	)	(825	)
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net	(833	)	219	(8	)	—	(169	)	(125	)	(916	)
Other, net	11		—	188		—	—		(4	)	195
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	7,694		1	(403	)	—	418		—		7,710
Segment Profit	25,344		5,681	4,409		483	72
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit											1,853
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit											(7,710	)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations											19,561

18

	Offshore Marine Services $’000		Inland River Services $’000		Shipping Services $’000		Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol(1)(2) $’000		Other $’000		Corporate and Eliminations $’000		Total $’000
For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Operating Revenues:
External customers	262,642		96,203		94,579		94,227		34,976		—		582,627
Intersegment	52		1,231		—		—		—		(1,283	)	—
	262,694		97,434		94,579		94,227		34,976		(1,283	)	582,627
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	187,612		71,582		56,168		93,447		33,448		(1,231	)	441,026
Administrative and general	29,062		7,945		11,301		1,138		2,979		17,938		70,363
Depreciation and amortization	32,747		14,162		15,704		2,978		195		1,545		67,331
	249,421		93,689		83,173		97,563		36,622		18,252		578,720
Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions   and Impairments, Net	10,234		4,993		(2,955	)	—		1,907		141		14,320
Operating Income (Loss)	23,507		8,738		8,451		(3,336	)	261		(19,394	)	18,227
Other Income (Expense):
Derivative gains (losses), net	325		—		—		512		392		(4,161	)	(2,932	)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net	(4,097	)	82		(15	)	—		(336	)	(561	)	(4,927	)
Other, net	11		—		202		—		54		(69	)	198
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	9,007		(2,386	)	(1,908	)	—		2,128		—		6,841
Segment Profit (Loss)	28,753		6,434		6,730		(2,824	)	2,499
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)													(3,825	)
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit (Loss)													(6,841	)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations													6,741
Capital Expenditures	49,764		9,238		27,048		217		357		1,307		87,931
As of June 30, 2013
Property and Equipment:
Historical cost	1,151,751		466,553		517,409		44,006		3,989		29,221		2,212,929
Accumulated depreciation	(439,211	)	(134,235	)	(214,372	)	(8,614	)	(531	)	(9,709	)	(806,672	)
	712,540		332,318		303,037		35,392		3,458		19,512		1,406,257
Construction in progress	90,847		17,700		22,037		—		2,087		1,314		133,985
	803,387		350,018		325,074		35,392		5,545		20,826		1,540,242
Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies	84,418		55,875		66,786		—		86,714		—		293,793
Inventories	5,885		2,260		1,427		12,164		1,219		—		22,955
Goodwill	13,367		2,759		1,852		—		—		—		17,978
Intangible Assets	4,584		8,416		1,134		50		410		—		14,594
Other current and long-term assets, excluding cash and near cash assets(3)	146,551		37,260		16,021		10,925		56,591		22,225		289,573
Segment Assets	1,058,192		456,588		412,294		58,531		150,479
Cash and near cash assets(3)													589,198
Total Assets													2,768,333

______________________

(1) Operating revenues includes $92.7 million of tangible product sales and operating expenses includes $91.9 million of costs of goods sold.

(2) Inventories includes raw materials of $2.8 million and work in process of $2.2 million.

(3) Cash and near cash assets includes cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds.

19

	Offshore Marine Services $’000		Inland River Services $’000		Shipping Services $’000		Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol $’000		Other $’000		Corporate and Eliminations $’000		Total $’000
For the three months ended June 30, 2012
Operating Revenues:
External customers	123,359		53,302		42,716		58,938		30,910		—		309,225
Intersegment	(83	)	—		108		—		(17	)	(8	)	—
	123,276		53,302		42,824		58,938		30,893		(8	)	309,225
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	94,084		37,463		28,214		57,201		27,566		17		244,545
Administrative and general	13,146		3,773		5,505		434		5,899		7,544		36,301
Depreciation and amortization	15,859		7,244		7,362		1,578		711		466		33,220
	123,089		48,480		41,081		59,213		34,176		8,027		314,066
Gains on Asset Dispositions	624		858		1,860		—		—		—		3,342
Operating Income (Loss)	811		5,680		3,603		(275	)	(3,283	)	(8,035	)	(1,499	)
Other Income (Expense):
Derivative gains (losses), net	—		—		—		(236	)	2,516		274		2,554
Foreign currency losses, net	(354	)	(71	)	(4	)	—		(84	)	(511	)	(1,024	)
Other, net	11		—		257		—		—		175		443
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	1,001		439		(774	)	—		(371	)	—		295
Segment Profit (Loss)	1,469		6,048		3,082		(511	)	(1,222	)
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)													8,976
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit (Loss)													(295	)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations													9,450

20

	Offshore Marine Services $’000		Inland River Services $’000		Shipping Services $’000		Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol(1)(2) $’000		Other $’000		Corporate and Eliminations $’000		Total $’000
For the six months ended June 30, 2012
Operating Revenues:
External customers	244,310		106,792		88,449		98,557		68,966		—		607,074
Intersegment	52		—		108		—		35		(195	)	—
	244,362		106,792		88,557		98,557		69,001		(195	)	607,074
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	169,424		72,646		55,786		94,606		60,643		(141	)	452,964
Administrative and general	25,002		7,755		10,372		859		10,697		16,607		71,292
Depreciation and amortization	28,741		14,251		14,979		2,630		1,400		921		62,922
	223,167		94,652		81,137		98,095		72,740		17,387		587,178
Gains on Asset Dispositions	2,469		2,785		1,860		—		5		—		7,119
Operating Income (Loss)	23,664		14,925		9,280		462		(3,734	)	(17,582	)	27,015
Other Income (Expense):
Derivative gains (losses), net	—		—		—		(721	)	1,099		(782	)	(404	)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net	769		(93	)	9		—		15		(63	)	637
Other, net	11		—		287		—		—		61		359
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	2,830		689		(991	)	6,154		(726	)	—		7,956
Segment Profit (Loss)	27,274		15,521		8,585		5,895		(3,346	)
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)													4,830
Less Equity Earnings (Losses) included in Segment Profit (Loss)													(7,956	)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Discontinued Operations													32,437
Capital Expenditures	64,383		13,108		12,921		—		6,314		2,781		99,507
As of June 30, 2012
Property and Equipment:
Historical cost	1,075,935		481,045		518,258		43,693		22,704		26,471		2,168,106
Accumulated depreciation	(393,813	)	(116,509	)	(188,148	)	(2,595	)	(3,587	)	(10,078	)	(714,730	)
	682,122		364,536		330,110		41,098		19,117		16,393		1,453,376
Construction in progress	107,709		12,790		14,065		—		2,864		5,672		143,100
	789,831		377,326		344,175		41,098		21,981		22,065		1,596,476
Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies	68,081		53,859		90,626		—		69,426		—		281,992
Inventories	5,738		2,038		1,288		12,822		5,362		—		27,248
Goodwill	13,367		4,345		1,852		—		37,138		—		56,702
Intangible Assets	5,029		8,377		1,677		135		5,898		—		21,116
Other current and long-term assets, excluding cash and near cash assets(3)	148,525		49,890		16,410		7,154		83,664		35,858		341,501
Segment Assets	1,030,571		495,835		456,028		61,209		223,469
Cash and near cash assets(3)													533,439
Discontinued operations													987,343
Total Assets													3,845,817

 ______________________

(1) Operating revenues includes $96.6 million of tangible product sales and operating expenses includes $92.7 million of costs of goods sold.

(2) Inventories includes raw materials of $2.8 million and work in process of $2.4 million.

(3) Cash and near cash assets includes cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds.

21

14. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Summarized selected operating results of the Company's discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012
SES Business
Operating Revenues	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	22,387
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	—		—			—			18,234
Administrative and general	—		567			—			4,587
Depreciation and amortization	—		—			—			1,428
	—		567			—			24,249
Losses on Asset Dispositions	—		—			—			(71		)
Operating Loss	—		(567		)	—			(1,933		)
Other Income (Expense), Net (including gain on sale of business)	—		5			(1,537		)	24,971
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	—		(197		)	(538		)	4,305
Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies	—		—			—			302
Net Income (Loss)	$	—	$	(365	)	$	(999	)	$	19,035
SEI
Operating Revenues	$	—	$	153,388		$	—		$	316,318
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	—		150,837			—			310,800
Administrative and general	—		1,626			—			3,136
Depreciation and amortization	—		1			—			(4		)
	—		152,464			—			313,932
Operating Income	—		924			—			2,386
Other Income (Expense), Net (including gain on sale of business)	—		1,136			(143		)	5
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	—		864			(50		)	1,103
Net Income (Loss)	$	—	$	1,196		$	(93	)	$	1,288
Era Group
Operating Revenues	$	—	$	62,985		$	22,892		$	124,037
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	—		39,002			14,076			78,678
Administrative and general	—		7,195			2,653			16,872
Depreciation and amortization	—		10,464			3,875			20,094
	—		56,661			20,604			115,644
Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net	—		1,077			548			2,842
Operating Income	—		7,401			2,836			11,235
Other Income (Expense), Net	—		(2,323		)	(1,316		)	(3,136		)
Income Tax Expense	—		1,861			704			2,770
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies	—		756			65			(5,663		)
Net Income (Loss)	$	—	$	3,973		$	881		$	(334	)
Eliminations
Operating Revenues	$	—	$	(31,176	)	$	—		$	(55,124	)
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	—		(31,174		)	—			(55,122		)
Administrative and general	—		(2		)	—			(2		)
	—		(31,176		)	—			(55,124		)
Operating Income	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—

22

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements discussed in this release as well as in other reports, materials and oral statements that the Company releases from time to time to the public constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Generally, words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “plan,” “target,” “forecast” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements concern management's expectations, strategic objectives, business prospects, anticipated economic performance and financial condition and other similar matters. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual events or results may differ significantly from these statements. Actual events or results are subject to significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors, including decreased demand and loss of revenues as a result of U.S. government implemented moratoriums directing operators to cease certain drilling activities and any extension of such moratoriums (the “Moratoriums”), weakening demand for the Company’s services as a result of unplanned customer suspensions, cancellations, rate reductions or non-renewals of vessel charters or failures to finalize commitments to charter vessels in response to Moratoriums, increased government legislation and regulation of the Company’s businesses could increase cost of operations, increased competition if the Jones Act is repealed, liability, legal fees and costs in connection with the provision of emergency response services, including the Company’s involvement in response to the oil spill as a result of the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon in April 2010, decreased demand for the Company’s services as a result of declines in the global economy, declines in valuations in the global financial markets and a lack of liquidity in the credit sectors, including, interest rate fluctuations, availability of credit, inflation rates, change in laws, trade barriers, commodity prices and currency exchange fluctuations, the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry, activity in foreign countries and changes in foreign political, military and economic conditions, changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration and production activity, safety record requirements related to Offshore Marine Services and Shipping Services, decreased demand for Shipping Services due to construction of additional refined petroleum product, natural gas or crude oil pipelines or due to decreased demand for refined petroleum products, crude oil or chemical products or a change in existing methods of delivery, compliance with U.S. and foreign government laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations, the dependence of Offshore Marine Services and Shipping Services on several customers, consolidation of the Company's customer base, the ongoing need to replace aging vessels, industry fleet capacity, restrictions imposed by the Shipping Acts on the amount of foreign ownership of the Company's Common Stock, operational risks of Offshore Marine Services, Inland River Services and Shipping Services, effects of adverse weather conditions and seasonality, the level of grain export volume, the effect of fuel prices on barge towing costs, variability in freight rates for inland river barges, the effect of international economic and political factors in Inland River Services' operations, sudden and unexpected changes in commodity prices, futures and options, global weather conditions, political instability, changes in currency exchanges rates, and product availability in agriculture commodity trading and logistics activities, adequacy of insurance coverage, the attraction and retention of qualified personnel by the Company, and various other matters and factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control as well as those discussed in Item 1A (Risk Factors) of the Company's Annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, these statements constitute the Company's cautionary statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. It should be understood that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, the preceding should not be considered to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the document in which they are made. The Company disclaims any obligation or undertaking to provide any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in the Company's expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which the forward-looking statement is based, except as required by law. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the Company’s businesses, particularly those mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 on the Company’s Form 10-K and SEACOR’s periodic reporting on Form 8-K (if any), which are incorporated by reference.

Overview

The Company’s operations are divided into four main business segments – Offshore Marine Services, Inland River Services, Shipping Services, and Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol. The Company also has activities that are referred to and described under Other that primarily includes Emergency and Crisis Services, Agricultural Commodity Trading and Logistics, various other investments in joint ventures and lending and leasing activities.

Discontinued Operations. On January 31, 2013, the Company completed the spin-off ("Spin-off") of Era Group Inc. (“Era Group”), the company that operated SEACOR's Aviation Services business segment, by means of a dividend to SEACOR's stockholders of all the issued and outstanding common stock of Era Group. Era Group filed a Registration Statement on Form 10 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, describing the Spin-off, that was declared effective on January 14, 2013. Era Group is now an independent company whose common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "ERA." Discontinued operations includes the historical financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Era Group as well as the

23

operations previously reported as discontinued in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The sections below provide an analysis of the Company’s operations by business segment for the three months (“Current Year Quarter”) and six months ("Current Six Months") ended June 30, 2013, compared with the three months (“Prior Year Quarter”) and six months ("Prior Six Months") ended June 30, 2012. See “Item 1. Financial Statements—Note 13. Segment Information” included in Part I for consolidating segment tables for each period presented.

Offshore Marine Services
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013				2012
	$’000		%	$’000		%	$’000		%		$’000	%
Operating Revenues:
United States, primarily U.S. Gulf of Mexico	66,349		48	53,839		44	130,447		50		101,156	42
Africa, primarily West Africa	14,819		11	16,186		13	31,377		12		33,273	14
Middle East	12,493		9	13,051		11	24,300		9		25,070	10
Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America	15,343		11	11,533		9	20,503		8		29,820	12
Europe, primarily North Sea	24,655		18	25,613		21	48,196		18		49,674	20
Asia	5,019		3	3,054		2	7,871		3		5,369	2
	138,678		100	123,276		100	262,694		100		244,362	100
Costs and Expenses:
Operating:
Personnel	45,561		33	46,606		38	90,741		35		83,655	34
Repairs and maintenance	13,695		10	13,591		11	26,148		10		25,279	10
Drydocking	14,804		11	10,810		9	26,028		10		16,138	7
Insurance and loss reserves	4,243		3	4,559		4	7,790		3		8,197	3
Fuel, lubes and supplies	7,114		5	7,632		6	14,407		5		13,626	6
Leased-in equipment	7,249		5	5,145		4	13,511		5		10,883	4
Brokered vessel activity	—		—	247		—	—		—		532	—
Other	4,915		3	5,494		4	8,987		3		11,114	5
	97,581		70	94,084		76	187,612		71		169,424	69
Administrative and general	14,235		10	13,146		11	29,062		11		25,002	10
Depreciation and amortization	16,460		12	15,859		13	32,747		12		28,741	12
	128,276		92	123,089		100	249,421		94		223,167	91
Gains on Asset Dispositions	7,895		5	624		—	10,234		4		2,469	1
Operating Income	18,297		13	811		—	23,507		10		23,664	10
Other Income (Expense):
Derivative income, net	175		—	—		—	325		—		—	—
Foreign currency gains (losses), net	(833	)	—	(354	)	—	(4,097	)	(2	)	769	—
Other, net	11		—	11		—	11		—		11	—
Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	7,694		5	1,001		1	9,007		3		2,830	1
Segment Profit	25,344		18	1,469		1	28,753		11		27,274	11

24

Operating Revenues by Type. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned by type.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013			2012
	$’000	%	$’000	%	$’000		%	$’000	%
Operating Revenues:
Time charter:
United States, primarily U.S. Gulf of Mexico	63,173	45	50,470	41	124,365		47	95,123	39
Africa, primarily West Africa	13,515	10	15,576	13	29,843		11	32,169	13
Middle East	11,306	8	11,016	9	21,563		8	21,357	9
Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America	12,538	9	9,682	8	16,223		6	25,631	10
Europe, primarily North Sea	24,315	18	25,718	21	47,626		18	49,280	20
Asia	4,439	3	2,920	2	7,012		3	5,291	2
Total time charter	129,286	93	115,382	94	246,632		93	228,851	93
Bareboat charter	876	1	701	—	1,765		1	1,406	1
Brokered vessel activity	—	—	174	—	(2	)	—	488	—
Other marine services	8,516	6	7,019	6	14,299		6	13,617	6
	138,678	100	123,276	100	262,694		100	244,362	100

25

Time Charter Operating Data. The table below sets forth the average rates per day worked, utilization and available days data for each group of Offshore Marine Services’ vessels operating under time charters for the periods indicated. The rate per day worked is the ratio of total time charter revenues to the aggregate number of days worked. Utilization is the ratio of aggregate number of days worked to total calendar days available for work. Available days represents the total calendar days during which owned and chartered-in vessels are operated by the Company.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Rates Per Day Worked:
Anchor handling towing supply	$	23,635		$	24,541		$	25,145		$	28,051
Crew	7,719			7,134			7,691			7,462
Mini-supply	7,721			7,424			7,696			7,417
Standby safety	9,621			9,679			9,631			9,453
Supply	16,864			14,354			15,949			15,593
Towing supply	9,156			9,269			9,263			9,285
Specialty	24,822			14,557			21,076			13,637
Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked   (excluding liftboats and wind farm utility)	12,394			11,272			12,255			12,246
Liftboats	22,062			17,454			20,384			17,454
Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked   (excluding wind farm utility)	13,588			12,068			13,240			12,956
Wind farm utility	2,302			2,802			2,229			2,627
Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked	11,010			10,019			10,839			10,409
Utilization:
Anchor handling towing supply	74		%	63		%	74		%	70		%
Crew	90		%	84		%	90		%	81		%
Mini-supply	97		%	98		%	85		%	98		%
Standby safety	86		%	87		%	87		%	87		%
Supply	83		%	75		%	77		%	80		%
Towing supply	79		%	51		%	89		%	49		%
Specialty	54		%	45		%	39		%	54		%
Overall Fleet Utilization   (excluding liftboats and wind farm utility)	84		%	79		%	83		%	80		%
Liftboats	69		%	70		%	67		%	70		%
Overall Fleet Utilization (excluding wind farm utility)	82		%	77		%	80		%	79		%
Wind farm utility	93		%	93		%	87		%	90		%
Overall Fleet Utilization	84		%	80		%	82		%	81		%
Available Days:
Anchor handling towing supply	1,547			1,547			3,077			3,094
Crew	3,057			3,276			6,117			6,639
Mini-supply	565			637			1,195			1,274
Standby safety	2,184			2,195			4,344			4,470
Supply	1,538			1,649			3,119			3,354
Towing supply	182			360			362			724
Specialty	364			273			724			546
Overall Fleet Available Days   (excluding liftboats and wind farm utility)	9,437			9,937			18,938			20,101
Liftboats	1,614			1,656			3,234			1,656
Overall Fleet Available Days   (excluding wind farm utility)	11,051			11,593			22,172			21,757
Wind farm utility	2,889			2,730			5,679			5,377
Overall Fleet Available Days	13,940			14,323			27,851			27,134

26

Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter

Operating Revenues. Operating revenues were $15.4 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Excluding the contribution of the wind farm utility vessels, time charter revenues were $14.9 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Overall fleet utilization was 82% compared with 77% in the Prior Year Quarter and average day rates were $13,588 per day compared with $12,068 per day in the Prior Year Quarter. The number of days available for charter was 11,051 compared with 11,593 in the Prior Year Quarter, a 542 day or 5% reduction.

In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, time charter revenues were $12.7 million higher, of which $1.7 million was due to improved utilization and $3.7 million was due to higher average day rates. Net fleet additions and the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions increased time charter revenues by $1.6 million and $5.7 million respectively. As of June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the Company had no vessels cold-stacked in this region.

In Africa, time charter revenues were $2.1 million lower, of which $1.6 million was due to reduced utilization and $0.5 million was due to a decrease in average day rates.

In the Middle East, time charter revenues were $0.3 million higher, primarily due to improved utilization.

In Brazil, Mexico and Central and South America, time charter revenues were $2.9 million higher. Improved utilization, higher average day rates, and fleet additions increased time charter revenues by $2.0 million, $0.5 million and $2.4 million respectively. Time charter revenues decreased by $2.0 million due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions.

In Europe, excluding the wind farm utility vessels, time charter revenues were $0.4 million lower. Higher average day rates increased time charter revenues by $0.4 million. Lower utilization and unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates reduced time charter revenues by $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

In Asia, time charter revenues were $1.5 million higher, of which $0.6 million was due to improved utilization and $0.9 million was due to higher average day rates.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $3.5 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Personnel costs were $1.0 million lower primarily due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions. Drydocking expenses were $4.0 million higher primarily due to an increase in drydocking activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Fuel, lubes and supplies expenses were $0.5 million lower primarily due to a decrease in fuel consumption related to vessel repositioning between geographic regions. Leased-in equipment expense was $2.1 million higher primarily due to the expiration of amortized deferred gains upon the extension of leases for vessels previously sold and leased back.

Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Year Quarter, the Company sold six offshore support vessels and other equipment for net proceeds of $14.7 million and gains of $7.9 million. During the Prior Year Quarter, the Company sold three offshore support vessels and other equipment for net proceeds of $48.7 million and gains of $7.4 million, of which $0.1 million were recognized currently and $7.3 million were deferred. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.5 million.

Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions and the impact of brokered vessel activity, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 8% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 0% in the Prior Year Quarter. The increase was primarily due to the improvement in operating revenues in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, as noted above.

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. Equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies, net of tax, increased by $6.7 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. During the Current Year Quarter, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in its C-Lift joint venture through the acquisition of its partner's 50% interest and recognized a $4.2 million gain, net of tax, upon marking its investment to fair value.

Current Six Months compared with Prior Six Months

Operating Revenues. Operating revenues were $18.3 million higher in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. The increase was primarily from the Company's liftboat fleet that contributed $25.8 million of additional operating revenues in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months.

Excluding the contribution of the liftboats and the wind farm utility vessels, time charter revenues were $4.4 million lower in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. Overall fleet utilization was 83% compared with 80% in the Prior Six Months and average day rates were $12,255 per day compared with $12,246 per day in the Prior Six Months. The number of days available for charter was 18,938 compared with 20,101 in the Prior Six Months, a 1,163 day or 6% reduction.

27

In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, time charter revenues were $29.2 million higher, of which $23.8 million was due to the contribution of the liftboat fleet. Excluding the impact of the liftboats, time charter revenues were $2.6 million higher due to improved utilization, $1.8 million higher due to an increase in average day rates, and $11.0 million higher due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions. Time charter revenues were $4.5 million lower due to net fleet dispositions and $4.7 million lower due to the net effect of cold-stacking vessels, primarily two anchor handling towing supply vessels. Time charter revenues were $0.6 million lower due to other changes in fleet mix.

In Africa, time charter revenues were $2.3 million lower, of which $1.4 million was due to reduced utilization and $0.9 million was due to a decrease in average day rates.

In the Middle East, time charter revenues were $0.2 million higher. Time charter revenues were $0.5 million higher due to improved average day rates, and $0.3 million lower due a reduction in utilization.

In Brazil, Mexico and Central and South America, time charter revenues were $9.4 million lower, of which $3.1 million was due to lower utilization and $7.8 million was due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions. Higher average day rates and net fleet additions increased time charter revenues by $0.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

In Europe, excluding the wind farm utility vessels, time charter revenues were unchanged. Time charter revenues were $0.1 million higher due to increased average day rates, and $1.3 million higher due to an improvement in utilization. Time charter revenues were $0.6 million lower due to fleet dispositions and $0.8 million lower due to unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates.

In Asia, time charter revenues were $1.7 million higher, of which $1.2 million was due to improved utilization and $0.5 million was due to higher average day rates.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $18.2 million higher in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months, of which $21.2 million was attributable to the liftboat fleet.

Excluding the impact of the liftboat fleet, operating expenses were $3.0 million lower during the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. Repair and maintenance expenses were $1.8 million lower primarily due to decreases in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and the Middle East. Drydocking expenses were $1.4 million higher primarily due to an increase in drydocking activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Insurance and loss reserves were $1.5 million lower primarily due to net fleet dispositions and lower loss reserves. Fuel, lubes and supplies expenses were $1.0 million lower primarily due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions. Leased-in equipment expense was $2.6 million higher primarily due to the expiration of amortized deferred gains upon the extension of leases for vessels previously sold and leased back. Other operating expenses were $2.2 million lower primarily due to the repositioning of vessels between geographic regions.

Administrative and General Expenses. Administrative and general expenses were $4.1 million higher in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months, of which $1.1 million was attributable to the liftboat business, $1.3 million was related to increased management compensation and benefits and $0.5 million was due to higher professional fees.

Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Six Months, the Company sold eight offshore support vessels and other equipment for net proceeds of $75.3 million and gains of $10.2 million. During the Prior Six Months, the Company sold four offshore support vessels and other equipment for net proceeds of $50.6 million and gains of $9.1 million, of which $1.8 million were recognized currently and $7.3 million were deferred. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.6 million.

Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions and the impact of brokered vessel activity, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 5% in the Current Six Months compared with 9% in the Prior Six Months. The decrease was primarily due to weaker market conditions during the first quarter of 2013 in Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America, which negatively impacted operating revenues.

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. Equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies, net of tax, increased by $6.2 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. During the Current Year Quarter, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in its C-Lift joint venture through the acquisition of its partner's 50% interest and recognized a $4.2 million gain, net of tax, upon marking its investment to fair value.

28

Fleet Count

The composition of Offshore Marine Services’ fleet as of June 30 was as follows:

	Owned	Joint Ventured	Leased-in	Pooled or Managed	Total
2013
Anchor handling towing supply	14	1	3	—	18
Crew	28	7	7	3	45
Mini-supply	4	2	2	—	8
Standby safety	24	1	—	—	25
Supply	9	3	9	5	26
Towing supply	2	1	—	—	3
Liftboats	17	—	—	—	17
Specialty	4	4	—	4	12
Wind farm utility	31	—	1	—	32
	133	19	22	12	186
2012
Anchor handling towing supply	14	2	3	—	19
Crew	31	7	7	3	48
Mini-supply	5	2	2	—	9
Standby safety	24	1	—	—	25
Supply	9	2	9	8	28
Towing supply	2	1	—	—	3
Liftboats(1)	18	2	—	—	20
Specialty	3	3	—	3	9
Wind farm utility	29	—	1	—	30
	135	20	22	14	191

______________________ 

(1) On March 30, 2012, Offshore Marine Services acquired 18 liftboats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. for $142.5 million.

29

Inland River Services
	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012			2013				2012
	$’000	%	$’000		%	$’000		%		$’000		%
Operating Revenues:
United States	46,880	99	53,002		99	96,546		99		106,378		100
Foreign	477	1	300		1	888		1		414		—
	47,357	100	53,302		100	97,434		100		106,792		100
Costs and Expenses:
Operating:
Barge logistics	17,363	37	23,540		44	36,519		37		43,277		41
Personnel	5,850	12	5,557		10	11,831		12		10,935		10
Repairs and maintenance	2,097	4	472		1	3,769		4		2,664		2
Insurance and loss reserves	890	2	854		2	1,847		2		1,559		1
Fuel, lubes and supplies	1,561	3	2,079		4	3,036		3		3,222		3
Leased-in equipment	3,418	7	2,790		5	7,195		7		6,152		6
Other	4,014	9	2,171		4	7,385		8		4,837		5
	35,193	74	37,463		70	71,582		73		72,646		68
Administrative and general	3,921	8	3,773		7	7,945		8		7,755		7
Depreciation and amortization	7,078	15	7,244		14	14,162		15		14,251		14
	46,192	97	48,480		91	93,689		96		94,652		89
Gains on Asset Dispositions	4,296	9	858		2	4,993		5		2,785		3
Operating Income	5,461	12	5,680		11	8,738		9		14,925		14
Other Income (Expense):
Foreign currency gains (losses), net	219	—	(71	)	—	82		—		(93	)	—
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less   Owned Companies, Net of Tax	1	—	439		—	(2,386	)	(2	)	689		1
Segment Profit	5,681	12	6,048		11	6,434		7		15,521		15

Operating Revenues by Service Line. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, operating revenues earned by service line.

	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012				2013				2012
	$’000		%		$’000		%		$’000		%		$’000		%
Operating Revenues:
Dry cargo barge pools	16,694		35		25,679		48		38,931		40		50,752		47
Charter-out of dry cargo barges	1,455		3		1,940		4		2,952		3		4,142		4
Liquid unit tow operations	10,624		22		9,331		18		21,131		22		18,483		17
10,000 barrel liquid tank barge operations	6,328		13		5,272		10		11,685		12		10,388		10
Terminal operations	5,150		11		5,059		9		9,288		10		10,454		10
Fleeting operations	5,566		12		4,325		8		9,984		10		9,330		9
Inland river towboat operations and other activities	4,952		11		5,006		9		10,055		10		9,323		9
Inland river eliminations	(3,412	)	(7	)	(3,310	)	(6	)	(6,592	)	(7	)	(6,080	)	(6	)
	47,357		100		53,302		100		97,434		100		106,792		100

30

Dry Cargo Barge Pools Operating Data. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, Inland River Services’ interest in tons moved and its available barge days in the dry cargo barge pools. Available barge days represents the total calendar days during which the Company’s owned and chartered-in barges were in the pool.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	Tons	%	Tons	%	Tons	%	Tons	%
Tons Moved (in thousands):
Grain	677	56	805	56	1,348	54	1,769	63
Non-Grain	526	44	644	44	1,166	46	1,030	37
	1,203	100	1,449	100	2,514	100	2,799	100
	Days		Days		Days		Days
Available barge days	51,917		51,643		104,015		102,294

Operating Revenues. Operating revenues were $5.9 million lower in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and $9.4 million lower in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. Operating revenues from the dry cargo barge pools were lower in both comparable periods primarily due to more difficult operating conditions and weaker demand for barge freight related to drought conditions throughout the Prior Six Months that impacted crop yields. Barge loadings were 21% lower in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and 12% lower in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. Operating revenues from the liquid unit tow and 10,000 barrel liquid tank barge operations were higher in both comparable periods primarily due to higher rates and the placement of additional equipment in service. Operating revenues from terminal operations were lower in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months primarily due to the conversion of the Company's high-speed multi-modal liquid terminal facility to accommodate crude oil transfer and storage. Operating revenues from fleeting operations were higher in both comparable periods due to increased activity in the Port of St. Louis. Operating revenues from inland river towboat operations and other activities were higher in the Current Six Months compared to the Prior Six Months primarily due to start up activities in the Company's Colombian operation and increased repair service activities.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $2.3 million lower in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and $1.1 million lower in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. The reductions in both comparable periods were primarily due to lower barge logistics expenses as a result of the decreased activity in the dry cargo barge pools partially offset by higher repair and maintenance expenses and higher leased-in equipment expenses due to additional equipment for liquid unit tow operations. Other expenses were higher in both comparable periods primarily due to costs associated with United States Coast Guard inspections for certain liquid unit tow equipment.

Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Year Quarter and the Current Six Months, the Company sold 16 dry cargo barges and eight 30,000 barrel tank barges for proceeds of $27.3 million and gains of $6.0 million, of which $3.6 million were recognized currently and $2.4 million were deferred. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.7 million and $1.4 million during the Current Year Quarter and Current Six Months, respectively.

During the Prior Year Quarter, the Company sold other equipment for net proceeds of $0.2 million and recognized gains of $0.2 million. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.7 million. During the Prior Six Months, the company sold one towboat and other equipment for net proceeds of $5.2 million and gains of $1.4 million. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $1.4 million.

Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 3% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 9% in the Prior Year Quarter and 4% in the Current Six Months compared to 11% in the Prior Six Months. The decrease in the Current Year Quarter was primarily due to the reduction in operating revenues for dry cargo barge pools discussed above. The decrease in the Current Six Months was primarily due to the reductions in operating revenues for the dry cargo barge pools and terminal operations.

Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. During the Current Six Months, the Company recognized $2.4 million in equity losses including $1.5 million from its Argentinian joint venture as a result of difficult operating conditions caused by low water and $1.1 million from its Bunge-SCF Grain joint venture as a result of difficult operating conditions caused by flooding and the impact of drought conditions in the Prior Six Months that impacted activity levels.

31

Fleet Count

The composition of Inland River Services’ fleet as of June 30 was as follows:

	Owned	Joint Ventured	Leased-in	Pooled or Managed	Total
2013
Inland river dry cargo barges	667	172	2	572	1,413
Inland river liquid tank barges	65	—	8	2	75
Inland river deck barges	20	—	—	—	20
Inland river towboats:
4,000 hp - 6,250 hp	3	13	—	—	16
3,300 hp - 3,900 hp	1	—	—	—	1
Less than 3,200 hp	12	2	—	—	14
Dry cargo vessel(1)	—	1	—	—	1
	768	188	10	574	1,540
2012
Inland river dry cargo barges	692	172	2	587	1,453
Inland river liquid tank barges	71	—	—	7	78
Inland river deck barges	20	—	—	—	20
Inland river towboats:
4,000 hp - 6,250 hp	3	13	—	—	16
3,300 hp - 3,900 hp	1	—	—	—	1
Less than 3,200 hp	12	2	—	—	14
Dry cargo vessel(1)	—	1	—	—	1
	799	188	2	594	1,583

 ______________________

(1) Argentine-flag.

32

Shipping Services
	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013				2012				2013				2012
	$’000		%		$’000		%		$’000		%		$’000		%
Operating Revenues:
United States	40,054		83		31,200		73		78,969		83		65,345		74
Foreign	8,049		17		11,624		27		15,610		17		23,212		26
	48,103		100		42,824		100		94,579		100		88,557		100
Costs and Expenses:
Operating:
Personnel	8,609		18		8,170		19		17,035		18		16,205		18
Repairs and maintenance	2,377		5		3,772		9		5,015		5		6,115		7
Drydocking	4,120		9		1,347		3		5,463		6		2,500		3
Insurance and loss reserves	974		2		875		2		1,739		2		2,374		2
Fuel, lubes and supplies	4,328		9		4,399		10		8,670		9		8,886		10
Leased-in equipment	4,575		9		4,449		11		9,252		10		9,139		10
Other	4,571		9		5,202		12		8,994		9		10,567		12
	29,554		61		28,214		66		56,168		59		55,786		62
Administrative and general	6,124		13		5,505		13		11,301		12		10,372		12
Depreciation and amortization	7,907		16		7,362		17		15,704		17		14,979		17
	43,585		90		41,081		96		83,173		88		81,137		91
Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net	114		—		1,860		4		(2,955	)	(3	)	1,860		2
Operating Income	4,632		10		3,603		8		8,451		9		9,280		11
Other Income (Expense):
Foreign currency gains (losses), net	(8	)	—		(4	)	—		(15	)	—		9		—
Other, net	188		—		257		1		202		—		287		—
Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	(403	)	(1	)	(774	)	(2	)	(1,908	)	(2	)	(991	)	(1	)
Segment Profit	4,409		9		3,082		7		6,730		7		8,585		10

Operating Revenues by Line of Service. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned from charter arrangements.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	$’000	%	$’000	%	$’000	%	$’000	%
Operating Revenues:
Petroleum Transportation:
Time charter	10,832	22	8,635	20	20,996	22	17,801	20
Bareboat charter	8,649	18	8,649	20	17,202	18	17,297	20
Harbor towing and bunkering	19,096	40	17,119	40	38,224	41	36,657	41
Short-sea and liner transportation	9,406	20	8,314	20	17,923	19	16,600	19
Technical management services	120	—	107	—	234	—	202	—
	48,103	100	42,824	100	94,579	100	88,557	100

33

Operating Revenues.   Operating revenues were $5.3 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and $6.0 million higher in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. The increases in both periods were primarily due to an increase in time charter rates for three of the Company's U.S.-flag product tankers, an increase in harbor traffic for harbor towing and bunkering and higher cargo shipping demand for short-sea and liner transportation.

Operating Expenses.  Operating expenses were $1.3 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and $0.4 million higher in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. The increases in both periods were primarily due to union pay rate increases for vessel crews and the drydocking of one of the Company's U.S.-flag product tankers. Repair and maintenance costs were lower in both periods primarily due to topside repairs for one of the Company's U.S.-flag product tankers in the Prior Year Quarter. Insurance expenses were lower in the Prior Six Months primarily due to reduced insurance deductible costs. Other operating expenses were lower in both periods primarily due to a reduction in stevedoring expenses for short-sea and liner transportation vessels.

Administrative and General.  Administrative and general expenses were $0.6 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter and $0.9 million higher in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months primarily due to higher compensation costs.

Gains (Losses) on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net.  During the Current Six Months, the Company recognized impairment charges of $3.0 million related to two harbor tugs while under construction, which were sold and leased back upon their completion. During the Prior Year Quarter and Prior Six Months, the Company sold two harbor tugs for proceeds of $4.9 million and recognized gains of $1.9 million.

Operating Income.  Excluding the impact of gains (losses) on asset dispositions and impairments, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 10% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 4% in the Prior Year Quarter and 12% in the Current Six Months compared with 8% in the Prior Six Months.  The increases were primarily due to the improvements in operating revenues discussed above.

Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax.  Equity in losses in all periods reflect losses incurred by the Company's Jones Act liner transportation joint venture, partially offset by earnings from another of the Company's joint ventures that began operating a U.S.-flag articulated tug-barge on the Great Lakes in April 2012.

34

Fleet Count

The composition of Shipping Services’ fleet⁽¹⁾ as of June 30 was as follows:

	Owned	Joint Ventured	Leased-in	Total
2013
U.S.-flag:
Product tankers(2)	5	—	2	7
RORO/deck barges	—	7	—	7
Dry bulk articulated tug-barge	—	1	—	1
Harbor tugs	20	—	4	24
Ocean liquid tank barges	5	—	—	5
Foreign-flag:
Harbor tugs	4	—	—	4
Short Sea Container/RORO	7	—	1	8
	41	8	7	56
2012
U.S.-flag:
Product tankers(2)	5	—	2	7
RORO/deck barges	—	7	—	7
Dry bulk articulated tug-barge	—	1	—	1
Harbor tugs	22	—	1	23
Ocean liquid tank barges	5	—	—	5
Foreign-flag:
Harbor tugs	4	—	—	4
Short Sea Container/RORO	8	—	—	8
	44	8	3	55

 ______________________

(1) For each of the periods presented, the Company provided technical management services for two additional vessels.

(2) As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, four were operating under long-term bareboat charters and three were operating under time charters.

35

Ethanol and Industrial Alcohol
	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012			2013				2012
	$’000	%	$’000		%	$’000		%		$’000		%
Operating Revenues:
United States	61,378	100	58,938		100	94,227		100		98,557		100
Costs and Expenses:
Operating	59,402	97	57,201		97	93,447		99		94,606		96
Administrative and general	477	1	434		—	1,138		1		859		1
Depreciation and amortization	1,489	2	1,578		3	2,978		3		2,630		3
	61,368	100	59,213		100	97,563		103		98,095		100
Operating Income (Loss)	10	—	(275	)	—	(3,336	)	(3	)	462		—
Other Income (Expense):
Derivative gains (losses), net(1)	473	1	(236	)	—	512		—		(721	)	—
Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax	—	—	—		—	—		—		6,154		6
Segment Profit (Loss)	483	1	(511	)	—	(2,824	)	(3	)	5,895		6

______________________

(1) Alcohol Manufacturing routinely enters into exchange traded positions (primarily corn futures) to offset its net commodity market exposure on raw material and finished goods inventory balances. As of June 30, 2013, the net market exposure to corn under its contracts and its raw material and inventory balances was not material.

Segment Profit (Loss). Segment profit in the Prior Six Months included a $6.0 million gain, net of tax resulting from the Company marking its investment in Illinois Corn Processing LLC ("ICP") to fair value upon acquiring a controlling interest on February 1, 2012.

Other Segment Profit
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Operating Revenues:
Emergency and crisis services	125		8,439		125		18,654
Agricultural commodity trading and logistics	20,527		22,041		34,851		49,527
Other activities	—		413		—		820
	20,652		30,893		34,976		69,001
Segment Profit (Loss):
Emergency and crisis services	870		(1,944	)	1,334		(2,254	)
Agricultural commodity trading and logistics	(189	)	1,426		(932	)	177
Other activities(1)	(609	)	(704	)	2,097		(1,269	)
	72		(1,222	)	2,499		(3,346	)

 ______________________

(1) The components of segment profit do not include interest income, which is a significant component of the Company's lending and leasing activities.

Other Activities. Segment profit in the Current Six Months is primarily due to the gain on the sale of real property.

36

Corporate and Eliminations
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Corporate Expenses	(9,419	)	(8,035	)	(19,394	)	(17,582	)
Eliminations	—		—		—		—
Operating Loss	(9,419	)	(8,035	)	(19,394	)	(17,582	)
Other Income (Expense):
Derivative gains (losses), net	(1,023	)	274		(4,161	)	(782	)
Foreign currency losses, net	(125	)	(511	)	(561	)	(63	)
Other, net	(4	)	175		(69	)	61

Derivative gains (losses), net. Derivative gains (losses), net in the Current Six Months were primarily due to losses from equity indices and forward currency exchange, option and future contracts.

Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	$’000		$’000		$’000		$’000
Interest income	3,218		7,392		6,385		10,035
Interest expense	(7,922	)	(10,012	)	(20,762	)	(19,999	)
Debt extinguishment losses, net	—		—		—		(160	)
Marketable security gains, net	6,557		11,596		10,552		14,954
	1,853		8,976		(3,825	)	4,830

Interest Income. Interest income was higher in the Prior Six Months primarily due to a prepayment penalty received following the early redemption of a note receivable in the Company's lending and leasing portfolio and additional interest earned on notes receivable from the Company's 50% or less owned companies.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense remained relatively flat in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. The changes in interest expense reflects the issuance of the Company's 2.5% Convertible Notes on December 11, 2012, the maturity of the Company's 5.875% Senior Notes on October 1, 2012, reduced borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility, lower other debt outstanding and higher capitalized interest.   The Current Year Quarter includes a reduction in interest expense of $2.5 million to correct an overstatement recorded in the preceding quarter.

Marketable Security Gains, net. Marketable security gains, net in the Current Six Months were primarily attributable to gains on the Company's long marketable security positions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

The Company's ongoing liquidity requirements arise primarily from working capital needs, capital commitments and its obligations to repay debt obligations. The Company may use its liquidity to fund acquisitions, repurchase shares of SEACOR common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), for treasury or to make other investments. Sources of liquidity are cash balances, marketable securities, construction reserve funds, Title XI reserve funds, cash flows from operations and borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility. From time to time, the Company may secure additional liquidity through asset sales or the issuance of debt, shares of Common Stock or common stock of its subsidiaries, preferred stock or a combination thereof.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s unfunded capital commitments were $150.1 million and included: seventeen offshore support vessels for $128.2 million; two inland river liquid tank barges for $2.9 million; five inland river towboats for $10.9 million; one U.S.-flag harbor tug for $1.6 million and other equipment and improvements for $6.5 million. Of these commitments, $55.6 million is payable during the remainder of 2013 with the balance payable through 2015. These unfunded capital commitments exclude $139.4 million related to two Liquefied Petroleum Gas tankers (Very Large Gas Carriers, otherwise known as "VLGC's") that the Company's Shipping Services business segment committed to construct during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, the Company contributed $42.1 million in net cash and other consideration valued at $14.9 million

37

that included certain progress payments made toward the construction of the two VLGC's, the construction contracts for the VLGC's and the related options to construct additional VLGC's to Dorian LPG Ltd. in exchange for a noncontrolling ownership interest.

As of June 30, 2013, construction reserve funds of $140.8 million were classified as non-current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as the Company has the intent and ability to use the funds to acquire equipment.

SEACOR’s Board of Directors previously approved a securities repurchase plan that authorizes the Company to acquire Common Stock, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. As of June 30, 2013, the remaining authority under the repurchase plan was $100.0 million.

SEACOR’s Board of Directors has previously authorized the Company to purchase any or all of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company did not repurchase any of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the SEACOR revolving credit facility. The remaining availability under this facility as of June 30, 2013 was $359.0 million, net of issued letters of credit of $1.0 million. In addition, the Company had other outstanding letters of credit totaling $27.1 million with various expiration dates through 2016.

Summary of Cash Flows
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
	$’000		$’000
Cash flows provided by or (used in):
Operating Activities - Continuing Operations	78,235		65,293
Operating Activities - Discontinued Operations	24,298		76,624
Investing Activities - Continuing Operations	71,457		(155,511	)
Investing Activities - Discontinued Operations	(8,502	)	5,715
Financing Activities - Continuing Operations	(2,470	)	(91,863	)
Financing Activities - Discontinued Operations	(14,017	)	6,606
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents	(2,422	)	1,505
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	146,579		(91,631	)

Operating Activities

Cash flows provided by operating activities decreased by $39.4 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. The components of cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities during the Current Year Quarter and Prior Year Quarter were as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
	$’000		$’000
Operating income from continuing operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net	71,238		82,818
Operating income from discontinued operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net	6,163		30,435
Changes in operating assets and liabilities before interest and income taxes	32,019		67,103
Purchases of marketable securities	(4,045	)	(25,077	)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities	8,301		17,032
Cash settlements on derivative transactions, net	(4,784	)	(2,770	)
Dividends received from 50% or less owned companies	1,605		2,050
Interest paid, excluding capitalized interest	(18,289	)	(23,530	)
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	(629	)	(18,565	)
Other	10,954		12,421
Total cash flows provided by operating activities	102,533		141,917

38

Operating income from continuing operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net was $11.6 million lower in the Current Six Months compared with the Prior Six Months. See “Consolidated Results of Operations” included above for a discussion of the results of each of the Company's business segments.

Operating income from discontinued operations before depreciation, amortization and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net was $24.3 million lower in the Current Six Months compared with Prior Six Months as a result of the sale of the SES Business on March 16, 2012, the sale of SEI on December 31, 2012 and the Spin-off of Era Group on January 31, 2013.

Changes in operating assets and liabilities before interest and income taxes in the Current Six Months of $32.0 million is primarily due to reduced working capital needs of Inland River Services and the Spin-off of Era Group.

During the Current Six Months, cash used in operating activities included $4.0 million to purchase marketable security long positions. During the Current Six Months, cash provided by operating activities included $8.3 million received from the sale of marketable security long positions.

During the Prior Six Months, cash used in operating activities included $14.3 million to purchase marketable security long positions and $10.8 million to cover marketable security short positions. During the Prior Six Months, cash provided by operating activities included $14.5 million received from the sale of marketable security long positions and $2.5 million received upon entering into marketable security short positions.

Investing Activities

During the Current Six Months, net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations was $71.5 million primarily as follows:

• Capital expenditures were $87.9 million. Equipment deliveries included one specialty offshore support vessel, two liftboats, two wind farm utility vessels, two liquid tank barges and three U.S.-flag harbor tugs.

• The Company sold two crew boats, one mini-supply vessel, one supply vessel, one specialty offshore support vessel, three liftboats, sixteen dry-cargo barges, eight liquid tank barges, two U.S.-flag harbor tugs and other property and equipment for net proceeds of $132.4 million ($125.1 million in cash, $0.2 million in vendor credits and $7.1 million in seller financing). The Company also received $0.3 million in deposits on future equipment sales.

• Construction reserve funds account transactions included withdrawals of $55.8 million and deposits of $10.6 million.

• The Company released restricted cash of $11.5 million.

• The Company made net investments in its 50% or less owned companies of $26.8 million, including $11.5 million in Sea-Cat Crewzer II LLC and $7.6 million in Mantenimiento Express Maritimo, S.A.P.I. de C.V.

• On June 6, 2013, the Company acquired a 100% controlling interest in C-Lift LLC through its acquisition of its partner's interest for $12.7 million in cash subject to certain working capital adjustments.

During the Prior Six Months, net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was $155.5 million primarily as follows:

• Capital expenditures were $99.5 million. Equipment deliveries included one offshore support vessel, one wind farm utility vessel, three inland river dry cargo barges, two liquid tank barges and one inland river towboat.

• The Company sold four offshore support vessels, one inland river towboat, two harbor tugs and other equipment for net proceeds of $7.2 million and received $0.2 million in deposits related to future expected sales. Total net proceeds of $60.7 million on equipment sold included $5.0 million in cash deposits previously received and $48.5 million in seller financing.

• The Company made investments in its 50% or less owned companies of $31.9 million.

• Construction reserve funds account transactions included withdrawals of $74.1 million and deposits of $6.5 million.

• The Company received returns on investments in its 50% or less owned companies of $25.3 million.

• The Company received principal payments on third party notes receivable of $19.0 million, net.

• The Company released restricted cash of $2.9 million.

• The Company acquired 18 lift boats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. for $142.5 million.

• The Company obtained a 70% controlling interest in ICP through its acquisition of a portion of its partner's interest for $9.1 million in cash.

39

During the Prior Six Months, net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations was $5.7 million primarily as follows:

• The company sold certain companies and assets that were part of its Environmental Services business segment for a net sales price of $99.9 million. Net cash proceeds received were $88.8 million.

• Era Group's investing activities included capital expenditures of $87.0 million and $4.5 million in proceeds from the sale of six helicopters and other equipment.

Financing Activities

During the Current Six Months, net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations was $2.5 million. The Company:

• made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $10.0 million;

• had net borrowings on inventory financing arrangements of $2.4 million; and

• received $8.8 million for share award plans.

During the Current Six Months, net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations was $14.0 million primarily representing Era Group's cash balance distributed in the Spin-off.

During the Prior Six Months, net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations was $91.9 million. The Company:

• repaid $50.0 million under the revolving credit facility;

• purchased $5.5 million, in principal amount, of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2012 for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 million;

• made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $5.8 million;

• repaid $3.2 million of acquired debt;

• received proceeds from other debt of $0.1 million;

• had net borrowings on inventory financing arrangements of $14.8 million;

• received $6.7 million from share award plans; and

• acquired for Treasury 199,766 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $17.4 million.

During the Prior Six Months, net cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations was $6.6 million primarily representing borrowings under Era Group's senior secured revolving credit facility.

Short and Long-Term Liquidity Requirements

To date, the Company’s liquidity has not been materially impacted by the current credit environment and management does not expect that it will be materially impacted in the near future. The Company anticipates it will continue to generate positive cash flows from operations and that these cash flows will be adequate to meet the Company’s working capital requirements. In support of the Company’s capital expenditure program or other liquidity requirements, the Company may: use its cash balances; sell securities; utilize construction reserve funds; sell assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions for equipment; borrow under its revolving credit facility; issue debt, shares of Common Stock, common stock of its subsidiaries or preferred stock; or a combination thereof. The Company's revolving credit facility matures in November 2013 and the Company does not plan to replace this facility in the near future.

The Company’s long-term liquidity is dependent upon its ability to generate operating profits sufficient to meet its requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and a reasonable return on shareholders’ investment. The Company believes that earning such operating profits will permit it to maintain its access to favorably priced debt, equity or off-balance sheet financing arrangements. Management will continue to closely monitor the Company’s liquidity and the credit and capital markets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For a discussion of the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements, refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There has been no material change in the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements during the Current Six Months.

40

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

For a discussion of the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments, refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There has been no material change in the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments (excluding Aviation Services) during the Current Six Months.

Contingencies

On July 14, 2010, a group of individuals and entities purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Terry G. Robin, et al. v. Seacor Marine, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:10-CV-01986 (E.D. La.) (the “Robin Case”), in which they asserted that support vessels, including vessels owned by the Company, responding to the explosion and resulting fire that occurred aboard the semi-submersible drilling rig, the Deepwater Horizon, were negligent in their efforts to save lives and put out the fire and contributed to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon and subsequent oil spill. The action was part of the overall multi-district litigation, In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, MDL No. 2179 (“MDL”). The complaint sought compensatory, punitive, exemplary, and other damages. In response to this lawsuit, the Company filed petitions seeking exoneration from, or limitation of liability in relation to, any actions that may have been taken by vessels owned by the Company to extinguish the fire. On June 8, 2011, the Company moved to dismiss these claims (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee) on various legal grounds. On October 12, 2011, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss in its entirety, dismissing with prejudice all claims that had been filed against the Company in the limitation actions (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee that was not subject to the motion to dismiss). The Court entered final judgments in favor of the Company in the Robin Case and each of the limitation actions on November 21, 2011. On December 12, 2011, the claimants appealed each of those judgments to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit"). The claimants' opening brief was submitted on May 7, 2012, and the claimants filed a reply brief on June 1, 2012. Oral argument was not requested by the Fifth Circuit. On December 13, 2012, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court. The claimants have not petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari and their deadline to do so has expired.

With respect to the one claim filed by a Company employee, that individual also commenced a separate action in the MDL entitled DuWayne Mason v. Seacor Marine, LLC, No. 2:11-CV-00826 (E.D. La.), in which he alleges sustaining personal injuries not only in connection with responding to the explosion and fire, but also in the months thereafter in connection with the clean-up of oil and dispersants while a member of the crew of the M/V Seacor Vanguard. Although the case is subject to the MDL Court's stay of individual proceedings, on July 16, 2012 the employee sought to sever his case from the MDL. On March 5, 2013, the Court denied the motion, and on April 2, 2013, the employee filed a motion asking the Court to reconsider. The Company filed its response opposing the employee's motion on April 30, 2013, and on May 3, 2013, the Court denied the motion.  On May 22, 2013, the employee filed a Notice of Appeal to the Fifth Circuit.  On July 24, 2013, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The Company intends to vigorously defend the action should it ever proceed and the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend the Company in connection with this matter. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On July 20, 2010, two individuals purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in the State of Louisiana, John Wunstell, Jr. and Kelly Blanchard v. BP, et al., No. 2010-7437 (Division K) (the “Wunstell Action”), in which they assert, among other theories, that Mr. Wunstell suffered injuries as a result of his exposure to certain noxious fumes and chemicals in connection with the provision of remediation, containment and response services by O'Brien's Response Management Inc. ("ORM"), a subsidiary of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012). The action now is part of the overall MDL. The complaint also seeks to establish a “class-wide court-supervised medical monitoring program” for all individuals “participating in BP's Deepwater Horizon Vessels of Opportunity Program and/or Horizon Response Program” who allegedly experienced injuries similar to those of Mr. Wunstell. The Company believes this lawsuit has no merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action and pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM in connection with the Wunstell Action and claims asserted in the MDL, discussed further below. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On December 15, 2010, ORM and National Response Corporation ("NRC"), subsidiaries of the Company prior to the ORM Transaction and SES Business Transaction (as defined in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012), respectively, were named as defendants in one of the several consolidated “master complaints” that have been filed in the overall MDL. The master complaint naming ORM and NRC asserts various claims on behalf of a putative class against multiple defendants concerning the clean-up activities generally, and the use of dispersants specifically. By court order, the Wunstell Action has been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint. The Company believes that the claims asserted against

41

ORM and NRC in the master complaint have no merit and on February 28, 2011, ORM and NRC moved to dismiss all claims against them in the master complaint on legal grounds. On September 30, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss that ORM and NRC had filed (an amended decision was issued on October 4, 2011 that corrected several grammatical errors and non-substantive oversights in the original order). Although the Court refused to dismiss the referenced master complaint in its entirety at that time, the Court did recognize the validity of the “derivative immunity” and “implied preemption” arguments that ORM and NRC advanced and directed ORM and NRC to (i) conduct limited discovery to develop evidence to support those arguments and (ii) then re-assert the arguments. The Court did, however, dismiss all state-law claims and certain other claims that had been asserted in the referenced master complaint, and dismissed the claims of all plaintiffs that have failed to allege a legally-sufficient injury. A schedule for limited discovery and motion practice was established by the Court and, in accordance with that schedule, ORM and NRC filed for summary judgment re-asserting their derivative immunity and implied preemption arguments on May 18, 2012. Those motions were argued on July 13, 2012 and are still pending decision. In addition to the indemnity provided to ORM, pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend ORM and NRC in connection with these claims in the MDL. Although the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter, the Company does not expect it will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

Subsequent to the filing of the referenced master complaint, nine additional individual civil actions have been filed in or removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana concerning the clean-up activities generally, which name the Company, ORM and/or NRC as defendants or third-party defendants and are part of the overall MDL. On April 8, 2011, ORM was named as a defendant in Johnson Bros. Corporation of Louisiana v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00781 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual business seeking damages allegedly caused by a delay on a construction project alleged to have resulted from the clean-up operations. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in James and Krista Pearson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. ("BP Exploration"), et al., No. 2:11-CV-00863 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife, who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and are seeking damages for personal injury, property damage to their boat, and amounts allegedly due under contract. On April 15, 2011, ORM and NRC were named as defendants in Thomas Edward Black v. BP Exploration, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00867 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual who is seeking damages for lost income because he allegedly could not find work in the fishing industry after the oil spill. On April 20, 2011, a complaint was filed in Darnell Alexander, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-CV-00951 (E.D. La.) on behalf of 117 individual plaintiffs that seek to adopt the allegations made in the referenced master complaint against ORM and NRC (and the other defendants). Plaintiffs in this matter have been since been granted leave to amend their complaint to include 410 additional individual plaintiffs. On October 3, 2012, ORM and NRC were served with a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint by Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C. and Jambon Marine Holdings L.L.C. in their Limitation of Liability action, In the Matter of Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:12-CV-00426 (E.D. La.). This Third-Party Complaint alleges that if claimant David Dinwiddie, who served as a clean-up crewmember aboard the M/V JAMBON SUPPLIER II vessel during the clean-up efforts, was injured as a result of his exposure to dispersants and chemicals during the course and scope of his employment, then said injuries were caused by the third-party defendants. On November 25, 2012, ORM was named as a defendant in Victoria Sanchez v. American Pollution Control Corp. et al., No. 2:12-CV-00164 (E.D. La.), a maritime suit filed by an individual who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and sustained personal injuries during the course of such employment. On December 17, 2012, the Court unsealed a False Claims Act lawsuit naming ORM as a defendant, Dillon v. BP, PLC et al., No. 2:12-CV-00987 (E.D. La.)., which is a suit by an individual seeking damages and penalties arising from alleged false reports and claims made to the federal government with respect to the amount of oil burned and dispersed during the clean-up. The federal government has declined to intervene in this suit. On April 8, 2013, the Company, ORM, and NRC were named as defendants in William and Dianna Fitzgerald v. BP Exploration et al., No. 2:13-CV-00650 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife whose son allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and became ill as a result of his exposure to oil and dispersants. Finally, on April 17, 2013, ORM was named as a defendant in Danos et al. v. BP America Production Co. et al., No. 2:13-CV-03747 (removed to E.D. La.), which is a suit by eight individuals seeking damages for dispersant exposure either as a result of their work during clean-up operations or as a result of their residence in the Gulf. By court order, all nine of these additional individual cases have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that they will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On February 18, 2011, Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Transocean Deepwater Inc. (collectively “Transocean”) named ORM and NRC as third-party defendants in a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint in Transocean's own Limitation of Liability Act action, which is part of the overall MDL, tendering to ORM and NRC the claims in the referenced master complaint that have already been asserted against ORM and NRC. Transocean, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., and M-I L.L.C. also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC for contribution and tort indemnity should they be found liable for any damages in Transocean's Limitation of Liability Act action and ORM and NRC have asserted counterclaims against those same parties for identical relief. Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc. (collectively "Weatherford") had also filed cross-claims against ORM and NRC, but recently moved to voluntarily dismiss these cross-claims without prejudice. The Court granted Weatherford's motion on February 8, 2013. As indicated above, the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these actions but believes they

42

are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On November 16, 2012, 668 individuals who served as beach clean-up workers in Escambia County, Florida during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response commenced a civil action in the Circuit Court for the First Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Escambia County, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 2012-CA-002947, in which they allege, among other things, that ORM and other defendants engaged in the contamination of Florida waters and beaches in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 376 and injured the plaintiffs by exposing them to dispersants during the course and scope of their employment. The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida on January 13, 2013, Abney et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et la., No. 3:13-CV-00024 (N.D. Fla.), and on January 16, 2013, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) issued a Conditional Transfer Order (“CTO”) transferring the case to the MDL, subject to any timely-filed notice of objection from the plaintiffs. Upon receipt of a notice of objection from the plaintiffs, a briefing schedule was set by the JPML, and so a stay of proceedings and suspension of deadlines was sought and obtained by the Court in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Following briefing before the JPML, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on April 2, 2013. On April 22, 2013, a companion case to this matter was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Abood et al. v. Plant Performance Services, LLC et al., No. 3:13-CV-00284 (N.D. Fla.), which alleges identical allegations against the same parties but names an additional 174 plaintiffs, all of whom served as clean-up workers in various Florida counties during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response.  A CTO was issued by the JPML on May 2, 2013, no objection was filed by the plaintiffs, and the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and consolidated with the MDL on May 10, 2013.  By court order, both of these matters have been stayed until further notice. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these matters but believes they are without merit and does not expect that these matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

Separately, on March 2, 2012, the Court announced that BP Exploration and BP America Production Company ("BP America") (collectively "BP") and the plaintiffs had reached an agreement on the terms of two proposed class action settlements that will resolve, among other things, plaintiffs' economic loss claims and clean-up related claims against BP. The parties filed their proposed settlement agreements on April 18, 2012 along with motions seeking preliminary approval of the settlements. The Court held a hearing on April 25, 2012 to consider those motions and preliminarily approved both settlements on May 2, 2012. A final fairness hearing took place on November 8, 2012. The Court granted final approval to the Economic and Property Damages Class Action Settlement on December 21, 2012, and granted final approval to the Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement on January 11, 2013. Both class action settlements are currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Although neither the Company, ORM, or NRC are parties to the settlement agreements, the Company, ORM, and NRC are listed as released parties on the releases accompanying both settlement agreements. As the releases for both settlements have been deemed valid and enforceable by the district court, if the Fifth Circuit affirms these decisions, class members who did not file timely requests for exclusion will be barred from pursuing economic loss, property damage, personal injury, medical monitoring, and/or other released claims against the Company, ORM, and NRC. At this time, the Company expects these settlements to reduce ORM's potential exposure, if any, from some of the pending actions described above, and continues to evaluate the settlements' impacts on these cases.

On January 29, 2013, HEPACO, LLC ("HEPACO"), served a demand for arbitration upon ORM, in which HEPACO claims that ORM owes HEPACO an additional fee of $20,291,178.92 under the parties' Management Services Agreement (“MSA”), dated June 1, 2010.  According to HEPACO, the MSA requires ORM to pay HEPACO an additional fee of 30% of total charges paid under the MSA ("Surcharge") to compensate HEPACO for U.S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' insurance or Jones Act insurance and related risks attendant to the work when contract requires labor to be performed over, adjoining and/or in water. ORM denies liability for the Surcharge, intends to vigorously defend against the claim, and has sought indemnity for any resulting judgment and related attorneys fees from BP America and BP Exploration. ORM has advised BP that, pursuant to the Bridge Agreement HOU-WL4-3066 between BP and ORM, effective as of June 1, 2010, under which ORM managed and oversaw, for BP, subcontractors, such as HEPACO, in connection with on-shore services related to the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP ultimately is responsible for the payment of the Surcharge should HEPACO be determined to be entitled to recover it under the MSA.

ORM is defending against three collective action lawsuits, each asserting failure to pay overtime with respect to individuals who provided service on the Deepwater Horizon spill response (the “DPH FLSA Actions”) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  These cases - Dennis Prejean v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01045) (the “Prejean Action”); Baylor Singleton et. al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et. al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01716) (the “Singleton Action”); and Himmerite et al. v. O'Brien's Response Management Inc. et al. (E.D. La., Case No.: 2:12-cv-01533) (the “Himmerite Action”) - were each brought on behalf of certain individuals who worked on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response and who were classified as independent contractors.  The Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton Actions were each filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana and then subsequently consolidated with the overall MDL.  The Himmerite and Singleton Actions have since been automatically stayed pending further scheduling by the Court, pursuant to the procedures in the MDL.  In the Prejean Action, ORM has answered the complaint, a scheduling order has been issued, and plaintiffs have,

43

among other things, filed a Motion for Conditional Certification to which ORM's response is due by August 22, 2013.  The limitations periods for potential plaintiffs to opt-in to the Prejean, Himmerite and Singleton actions have all been tolled pending further action by the Court.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from any of these DPH FLSA Actions, but believes they are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against them.

In the course of the Company's business, it may agree to indemnify the counterparty to an agreement.  If the indemnified party makes a successful claim for indemnification, the Company would be required to reimburse that party in accordance with the terms of the indemnification agreement.  Indemnification agreements generally are subject to threshold amounts, specified claim periods and other restrictions and limitations.

In connection with the SES Business Transaction and the ORM Transaction, the Company remains contingently liable for certain indemnification obligations, including potential liabilities relating to work performed in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill response. In the case of the SES Business Transaction, such potential liabilities may not exceed the purchase consideration received by the Company for the SES Business Transaction and in the case of the ORM Transaction, are subject to a negotiated cap. The Company currently is indemnified under contractual agreements with BP with respect to such potential liabilities.

In the normal course of its business, the Company becomes involved in various other litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages and personal injuries. Management has used estimates in determining the Company's potential exposure to these matters and has recorded reserves in its financial statements related thereto where appropriate. It is possible that a change in the Company's estimates of that exposure could occur, but the Company does not expect such changes in estimated costs would have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For a discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There has been no significant change in the Company’s exposure to market risk during the Current Six Months except as described below.

As of January 31, 2013, the Company completed the Spin-off of Era Group. As a result, the Company reduced its capital purchase commitments denominated in euros and no longer has variable LIBOR-based borrowings under Era Group's Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

With the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of June 30, 2013. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2013.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Current Year Quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

44

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a description of developments with respect to pending legal proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, see Part I, Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Contingencies".

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the Company’s businesses, particularly those mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 on the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, "Risk Factors" in Item 1A on the Company's 2012 Annual report of Form 10-K and SEACOR’s periodic reporting on Form 8-K (if any), which are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c) This table provides information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of its Common Stock during the Current Year Quarter:

Period	Total Number  Of Shares Purchased	Average Price  Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly  Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Value of Shares that may Yet be Purchased under  the Plans or Programs(1)
April 1 – 30, 2013	—	$	—	—	$	100,000,000
May 1 – 31, 2013	—	$	—	—	$	100,000,000
June 1 – 30, 2013	—	$	—	—	$	100,000,000

 ______________________

(1) Since February 1997, SEACOR’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of Common Stock, certain debt or a combination thereof. From time to time thereafter, and most recently on February 26, 2013, SEACOR's Board of Directors increased the authority to repurchase Common Stock.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
31.2	Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
32.1	Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

______________________ 

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

45

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

			SEACOR Holdings Inc. (Registrant)
DATE:	July 30, 2013	By:	/S/ CHARLES FABRIKANT
			Charles Fabrikant, Executive Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
DATE:	July 30, 2013	By:	/S/ RICHARD RYAN
			Richard Ryan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

46

EXHIBIT INDEX

31.1	Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
31.2	Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
32.1	Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

______________________ 

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

47