Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 001-08029
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | | 52-0849948 |
(State of Incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
24025 Park Sorrento, Suite 400
Calabasas, California 91302
818-223-7500
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one:)
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting o company |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The number of shares of common stock of The Ryland Group, Inc. outstanding on July 31, 2008, was 42,612,267.
Table of Contents
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
| Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |
| | JUNE 30, | | JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands, except share data) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | | $ | 472,283 | | $ | 722,578 | | $ | 871,883 | | $ | 1,413,941 | |
Financial services | | 15,598 | | 21,156 | | 32,164 | | 40,907 | |
TOTAL REVENUES | | 487,881 | | 743,734 | | 904,047 | | 1,454,848 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 558,742 | | 731,420 | | 931,143 | | 1,359,214 | |
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | 35,606 | | (84 | ) | 42,707 | | (119 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative | | 65,062 | | 82,762 | | 128,847 | | 178,577 | |
Financial services | | 10,112 | | 11,364 | | 20,091 | | 23,092 | |
Corporate | | 8,130 | | 7,097 | | 17,196 | | 13,550 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 677,652 | | 832,559 | | 1,139,984 | | 1,574,314 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
EARNINGS (LOSS) | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before taxes | | (189,771 | ) | (88,825 | ) | (235,937 | ) | (119,466 | ) |
Tax expense (benefit) | | 51,868 | | (36,394 | ) | 35,018 | | (42,590 | ) |
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) | | $ | (241,639 | ) | $ | (52,431 | ) | $ | (270,955 | ) | $ | (76,876 | ) |
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (5.70 | ) | $ | (1.25 | ) | $ | (6.40 | ) | $ | (1.82 | ) |
Diluted | | (5.70 | ) | (1.25 | ) | (6.40 | ) | (1.82 | ) |
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | 42,421,753 | | 42,010,783 | | 42,326,968 | | 42,248,112 | |
Diluted | | 42,421,753 | | 42,010,783 | | 42,326,968 | | 42,248,112 | |
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.24 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
| Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
| | JUNE 30, | | DECEMBER 31, | |
(in thousands, except share data) | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | (Unaudited | ) | | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 199,356 | | $ | 243,614 | |
Housing inventories | | | | | |
Homes under construction | | 726,640 | | 717,992 | |
Land under development and improved lots | | 705,024 | | 949,726 | |
Inventory held-for-sale | | 81,360 | | 69,225 | |
Consolidated inventory not owned | | 60,328 | | 76,734 | |
Total inventories | | 1,573,352 | | 1,813,677 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 65,908 | | 75,538 | |
Net deferred taxes | | 86,971 | | 158,065 | |
Other | | 235,798 | | 260,426 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | 2,161,385 | | 2,551,320 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | 128,942 | | 114,050 | |
Accrued and other liabilities | | 334,502 | | 404,545 | |
Debt | | 791,615 | | 839,080 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 1,255,059 | | 1,357,675 | |
| | | | | |
MINORITY INTEREST | | 53,322 | | 68,919 | |
| | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
Common stock, $1.00 par value: | | | | | |
Authorized–200,000,000 shares | | | | | |
Issued–42,485,267 shares at June 30, 2008 (42,151,085 shares at December 31, 2007) | | 42,485 | | 42,151 | |
Retained earnings | | 806,859 | | 1,078,521 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 3,660 | | 4,054 | |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | 853,004 | | 1,124,726 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 2,161,385 | | $ | 2,551,320 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
| | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |
| | JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) | | $ | (270,955 | ) | $ | (76,876 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash | | | | | |
provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 18,674 | | 33,057 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 4,149 | | 7,769 | |
Inventory and other asset impairments and write-offs | | 208,422 | | 212,674 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Decrease in inventories | | 60,930 | | 24,184 | |
Net change in other assets, payables and other liabilities | | (5,876 | ) | (307,163 | ) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | | (2,239 | ) | (4,469 | ) |
Other operating activities, net | | (580 | ) | (15,799 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | | 12,525 | | (126,623 | ) |
| | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
Net additions to property, plant and equipment | | (6,510 | ) | (22,027 | ) |
Other investing activities, net | | 18 | | 732 | |
Net cash used for investing activities | | (6,492 | ) | (21,295 | ) |
| | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
Repayment of long-term debt | | (50,000 | ) | - | |
Net borrowings against revolving credit facilities | | 6,732 | | 75,000 | |
Decrease in short-term borrowings | | (4,197 | ) | (4,906 | ) |
Common stock dividends | | (10,187 | ) | (10,245 | ) |
Common stock repurchases | | - | | (59,281 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation | | 5,122 | | 12,347 | |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | | 2,239 | | 4,469 | |
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | | (50,291 | ) | 17,384 | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | (44,258 | ) | (130,534 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 243,614 | | 215,037 | |
| | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 199,356 | | $ | 84,503 | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
Decrease in consolidated inventory not owned related to land options | | $ | (14,777 | ) | $ | (29,917 | ) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
| Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) |
| The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
| | | | | | ACCUMULATED | | | |
| | | | | | OTHER | | TOTAL | |
| | COMMON | | RETAINED | | COMPREHENSIVE | | STOCKHOLDERS’ | |
(in thousands, except per share data) | | STOCK | | EARNINGS | | INCOME | | EQUITY | |
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 | | $ | 42,151 | | $ | 1,078,521 | | $ | 4,054 | | $ | 1,124,726 | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) | | | | (270,955 | ) | | | (270,955 | ) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | |
Change in net unrealized gain on cash flow hedging instruments and available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $244 | | | | | | (394 | ) | (394 | ) |
Total comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | (271,349 | ) |
Common stock dividends (per share $0.24) | | | | (10,251 | ) | | | (10,251 | ) |
Stock-based compensation and related income tax benefit | | 334 | | 9,544 | | | | 9,878 | |
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2008 | | $ | 42,485 | | $ | 806,859 | | $ | 3,660 | | $ | 853,004 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Note 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Ryland Group, Inc. and its 100 percent-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation. See Note A, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of its accounting policies.
The consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2008, the consolidated statements of earnings for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normally recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows at June 30, 2008, and for all periods presented, have been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements have been condensed or omitted. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company has historically experienced, and expects to continue to experience, variability in quarterly results. Accordingly, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Note 2. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net earnings or losses and the increase or decrease in unrealized gains or losses on the Company’s available-for-sale securities, as well as the decrease in unrealized gains associated with its treasury locks, net of applicable taxes. Comprehensive income totaled losses of $241.8 million and $52.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Comprehensive income totaled losses of $271.3 million and $77.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Note 3. Segment Information
The Company is a leading national homebuilder and mortgage-related financial services firm. As one of the largest single-family on-site homebuilders in the United States, it operates in 17 states and 21 homebuilding divisions across the country. The Company consists of six segments: four geographically determined homebuilding regions; financial services; and corporate. The Company’s homebuilding operations consists of four regional reporting segments, referred to as North, Southeast, Texas and West. The homebuilding segments specialize in the sale and construction of single-family attached and detached housing. Its financial services segment includes Ryland Mortgage Company and its subsidiaries (“RMC”), Ryland Homes Insurance Company (“RHIC”), LPS Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries (“LPS”) and Columbia National Risk Retention Group, Inc. (“CNRRG”). The Company’s financial services segment provides loan origination and offers mortgage, title, escrow and insurance services. Corporate is a nonoperating business segment with the sole purpose of supporting operations. Certain corporate expenses are allocated to the homebuilding and financial services segments, while certain assets relating to employee benefit plans are attributed to other segments in order to best reflect the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on a number of factors, including segment pretax earnings. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Consolidated Financial Statements.”
7
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |
| | | | JUNE 30, | | | | JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | | | | | | | | | |
North | | $ | 167,072 | | $ | 225,418 | | $ | 289,154 | | $ | 419,433 | |
Southeast | | 132,649 | | 221,859 | | 265,373 | | 461,047 | |
Texas | | 95,780 | | 142,101 | | 180,080 | | 268,450 | |
West | | 76,782 | | 133,200 | | 137,276 | | 265,011 | |
Financial services | | 15,598 | | 21,156 | | 32,164 | | 40,907 | |
Total | | $ | 487,881 | | $ | 743,734 | | $ | 904,047 | | $ | 1,454,848 | |
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES | | | | | | | | | |
Homebuilding | | | | | | | | | |
North | | $ | (69,973 | ) | $ | 20,714 | | $ | (86,236 | ) | $ | 29,162 | |
Southeast | | (55,977 | ) | 8,010 | | (59,987 | ) | 16,866 | |
Texas | | (3,286 | ) | 8,984 | | (3,830 | ) | 14,916 | |
West | | (57,891 | ) | (129,228 | ) | (80,761 | ) | (184,675 | ) |
Financial services | | 5,486 | | 9,792 | | 12,073 | | 17,815 | |
Corporate and unallocated | | (8,130 | ) | (7,097 | ) | (17,196 | ) | (13,550 | ) |
Total | | $ | (189,771 | ) | $ | (88,825 | ) | $ | (235,937 | ) | $ | (119,466 | ) |
Note 4. Earnings Per Share Reconciliation
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED | | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |
| | | | JUNE 30, | | | | JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands, except share data) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
NUMERATOR | | | | | | | | | |
Net earnings (loss) | | $ | (241,639 | ) | $ | (52,431 | ) | $ | (270,955 | ) | $ | (76,876 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
DENOMINATOR | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share—weighted-average shares | | 42,421,753 | | 42,010,783 | | 42,326,968 | | 42,248,112 | |
Effect of dilutive securities | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
Diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted-average | | | | | | | | | |
shares and assumed conversions | | 42,421,753 | | 42,010,783 | | 42,326,968 | | 42,248,112 | |
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (5.70 | ) | $ | (1.25 | ) | $ | (6.40 | ) | $ | (1.82 | ) |
Diluted | | (5.70 | ) | (1.25 | ) | (6.40 | ) | (1.82 | ) |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the effect of outstanding restricted stock units and stock options was not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation as their effect would have been antidilutive due to the Company’s net loss for the respective periods.
Note 5. Inventories
Housing inventories consist principally of homes under construction; land under development and improved lots; and inventory held-for-sale. Inventory includes land and development costs; direct construction costs; capitalized indirect construction costs; capitalized interest; and real estate taxes. The costs of acquiring and developing land and constructing certain related amenities are allocated to the parcels to which these costs relate. Interest and taxes are capitalized during active development. Inventories to be held and used are stated at cost unless a community is determined to be impaired, in which case the impaired inventories are written down to fair
8
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
value. Inventories held-for-sale are stated at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by that asset or by the sales of comparable assets. For inventory held and used, undiscounted cash flow projections are generated at a community level based on estimates of revenues, costs and other factors. The Company’s analysis of these communities generally assumes flat revenues when compared with current sales orders for particular or comparable communities. The Company’s determination of fair value is primarily based on discounting estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with inherent risks that are associated with assets and related estimated cash flow streams. When determining the value of inventory held-for-sale, the Company considers recent offers, comparable sales and/or estimated cash flows. Inventories to be held and used or disposed of are reported net of valuation reserves. Write-downs of impaired inventories to fair value are recorded as adjustments to the cost basis of the respective inventory. Valuation reserves related to impaired inventories amounted to $585.9 million and $488.1 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The net carrying values of the related inventories amounted to $442.8 million and $388.3 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Capitalized interest is amortized in construction and land costs as the related inventories are delivered to homebuyers.
The following table is a summary of capitalized interest:
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Capitalized interest at January 1 | | $ | 119,267 | | $ | 98,932 | |
Interest capitalized | | 23,541 | | 31,928 | |
Interest amortized to cost of sales | | (16,272 | ) | (16,498 | ) |
Capitalized interest at June 30 | | $ | 126,536 | | $ | 114,362 | |
The following table summarizes each reporting segment’s total number of lots owned and lots controlled under option agreements:
| | JUNE 30, 2008 | | DECEMBER 31, 2007 | |
| | LOTS | | LOTS | | | | LOTS | | LOTS | | | |
| | OWNED | | OPTIONED | | TOTAL | | OWNED | | OPTIONED | | TOTAL | |
North | | 5,328 | | 3,809 | | 9,137 | | 5,999 | | 5,787 | | 11,786 | |
Southeast | | 9,246 | | 1,408 | | 10,654 | | 9,957 | | 3,192 | | 13,149 | |
Texas | | 5,619 | | 2,117 | | 7,736 | | 5,784 | | 3,434 | | 9,218 | |
West | | 4,129 | | 696 | | 4,825 | | 4,907 | | 840 | | 5,747 | |
Total | | 24,322 | | 8,030 | | 32,352 | | 26,647 | | 13,253 | | 39,900 | |
Note 6. Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”)
Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” requires a VIE to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE’s activities and/or entitled to receive a majority of the VIE’s residual returns. FIN 46 also requires disclosures about VIEs that the Company is not obligated to consolidate but in which it has a significant, though not primary, variable interest.
The Company enters into joint ventures, from time to time, for the purpose of acquisition and co-development of land parcels and lots. Its investment in these joint ventures may create a variable interest in a VIE, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into lot option purchase contracts in order to procure land for the construction of homes. Under such lot option purchase contracts, the Company funds stated deposits in consideration for the right to purchase lots at a future point in time, usually at predetermined prices. In accordance with the requirements of FIN 46, certain of the Company’s lot option purchase contracts may result in the creation of a variable interest in a VIE.
9
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In compliance with the provisions of FIN 46, the Company consolidated $60.5 million of inventory not owned pertaining to land and lot option purchase contracts, representing the fair value of the optioned property; and a $168,000 credit balance, representing cost to complete for one of its homebuilding joint ventures at June 30, 2008. (See Note 7, “Investments in Joint Ventures.”) While the Company may not have had legal title to the optioned land or guaranteed the seller’s debt associated with that property, under FIN 46 it had the primary variable interest and was required to consolidate the particular VIE’s assets under option at fair value. Additionally, to reflect the fair value of the inventory consolidated under FIN 46, the Company eliminated $7.4 million of its related cash deposits for lot option purchase contracts, which are included in “Consolidated inventory not owned.” Minority interest totaling $53.1 million was recorded with respect to the consolidation of these contracts, representing the selling entities’ ownership interests in these VIEs. At June 30, 2008, the Company had cash deposits and letters of credit totaling $11.0 million relating to lot option purchase contracts that were consolidated, representing its current maximum exposure to loss. Creditors of these VIEs, if any, have no recourse against the Company. At June 30, 2008, the Company had cash deposits and/or letters of credit totaling $34.3 million that were associated with lot option purchase contracts having an aggregate purchase price of $283.4 million and relating to VIEs in which it did not have a primary variable interest.
Note 7. Investments in Joint Ventures
The Company enters into joint ventures, from time to time, for the purpose of acquisition and co-development of land parcels and lots. Currently, the Company actively participates in six homebuilding joint ventures in the Austin, Chicago, Dallas, Denver and Orlando markets. It participates in a number of joint ventures in which it has less than a controlling interest. The Company recognizes its share of the respective joint ventures’ earnings from the sale of lots to other homebuilders. It does not, however, recognize earnings from lots that it purchases from the joint ventures. Instead, it reduces its cost basis in these lots by its share of the earnings from the lots.
The following table summarizes each reporting segment’s total estimated share of lots owned and controlled by the Company under its joint ventures:
| | JUNE 30, 2008 | | DECEMBER 31, 2007 | |
| | LOTS | | LOTS | | | | LOTS | | LOTS | | | |
| | OWNED | | OPTIONED | | TOTAL | | OWNED | | OPTIONED | | TOTAL | |
North | | 641 | | - | | 641 | | 681 | | - | | 681 | |
Southeast | | - | | - | | - | | 45 | | - | | 45 | |
Texas | | 163 | | - | | 163 | | 189 | | - | | 189 | |
West | | 410 | | 1,209 | | 1,619 | | 410 | | 1,209 | | 1,619 | |
Total | | 1,214 | | 1,209 | | 2,423 | | 1,325 | | 1,209 | | 2,534 | |
The Company’s investments in its unconsolidated joint ventures were negative $11.7 million at June 30, 2008 and were classified in the consolidated balance sheets under “Other” liabilities, compared to $30.8 million that was classified in the consolidated balance sheets under “Other” assets at December 31, 2007. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company’s equity in losses from unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $35.6 million and $42.7 million, respectively, compared to equity in earnings of $84,000 and $119,000, respectively, for the same periods in 2007. The current quarter loss was primarily attributable to a $35.8 million impairment of inventory within a joint venture in the Company’s North region, partially offset by earnings from its other unconsolidated joint ventures.
The aggregate assets of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company participated were $719.8 million and $785.9 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The aggregate debt of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company participated totaled $486.2 million and $508.4 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
10
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
One of its joint ventures had assets of $645.1 million and $644.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, this same joint venture had debt of $435.3 million. In this joint venture, the Company and its partners provided limited payment guarantees of debt on a pro rata basis. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had a 3.3 percent pro rata obligation that is only triggered in limited circumstances for this debt. This obligation represents $14.5 million of total potential exposure for the Company. The debt related to this joint venture has been declared in default by the lenders to the joint venture. In another joint venture, the Company had aggregate assets of $42.5 million and $80.9 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to a $35.8 million impairment of the Company’s share of inventory within the venture. Additionally, the Company has guaranteed up to 50.0 percent of a $55.0 million revolving credit facility for this venture. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the actual borrowings against the revolving credit facility for this joint venture were $50.7 million and $50.6 million, respectively, of which the Company’s pro rata share of debt was $25.4 million and $25.3 million, respectively. These limited payment guarantees are subject to certain conditions before they mature.
At June 30, 2008, certain of the joint ventures in which the Company participated were consolidated in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46, as the Company was determined to have the primary variable interest in the entities. In association with these consolidated joint ventures, the Company did not record any pretax earnings or losses for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008. The Company recorded pretax earnings of $31,000 and $108,000 for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The Company did not consolidate any assets at June 30, 2008. Total assets of $782,000, including consolidated inventory not owned, and minority interest of $1.1 million were consolidated at December 31, 2007.
Note 8. Debt
Debt consists of the following at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
| | JUNE 30, | | DECEMBER 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Senior notes | | $ | 750,000 | | $ | 800,000 | |
Secured notes payable | | 34,883 | | 39,080 | |
RMC warehouse line of credit | | 6,732 | | - | |
Total debt | | $ | 791,615 | | $ | 839,080 | |
At June 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding (a) $250.0 million of 5.4 percent senior notes due May 2012; (b) $250.0 million of 6.9 percent senior notes due June 2013; and (c) $250.0 million of 5.4 percent senior notes due January 2015. Each of the senior notes pays interest semiannually and may be redeemed at a stated redemption price, at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company’s $50.0 million of 5.4 percent senior notes matured and were repaid. (See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Financial Condition and Liquidity.”)
The senior notes and indenture agreements are subject to certain covenants that include, among other things, restrictions on additional secured debt and the sale of assets. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at June 30, 2008.
In June 2008, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility. The amendment included, among other things: a) a decrease in the Company’s borrowing availability from $750.0 million to $550.0 million; b) a reduction in the base amount for the minimum consolidated tangible net worth covenant to $600.0 million; c) an increase in the pricing grid, which is based on the Company’s leverage ratio and public debt rating;
11
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
d) an adjustment in the permitted leverage ratio to no less than 55.0 percent for the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, 52.5 percent for the second, third and fourth quarters of 2009, and 50.0 percent thereafter; and e) a change in the restriction of the Company’s book value of unsold land to 1.15x its consolidated tangible net worth. The facility matures in January 2011 and provides access to additional financing through an accordion feature, under which the aggregate commitment may be increased up to $1.5 billion, subject to the availability of additional lending commitments. The revolving credit facility includes a $75.0 million swing-line facility and the ability to issue standby letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit agreement are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of the Company’s 100 percent-owned homebuilding subsidiaries. Such guarantees are full and unconditional. Interest rates on outstanding borrowings are determined either by reference to LIBOR, with margins determined based on changes in the Company’s leverage ratio and credit ratings, or by reference to an alternate base rate.
The credit facility is used for general corporate purposes and contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated tangible net worth requirement of $600.0 million; and a permitted leverage ratio of 57.5 percent at June 30, 2008; and limitations on unsold home units, unsold land, lot inventory, investments and senior debt. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at June 30, 2008. There were no borrowings outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007. Letters of credit aggregating $135.3 million and $157.8 million were outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Under the facility, the unused borrowing capacity totaled $414.7 million and $592.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. At June 30, 2008, the $550.0 million facility was subject to a borrowing base limitation covenant, which restricted its borrowing capacity to $442.5 million, of which $307.2 million was available. (See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Financial Condition and Liquidity.”)
At June 30, 2008, the Company’s obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under its $550.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility; 5.4 percent senior notes due May 2012; 6.9 percent senior notes due June 2013; and 5.4 percent senior notes due January 2015 are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of its wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiaries. Such guarantees are full and unconditional. (See Note 15, “Supplemental Guarantor Information.”)
To finance its land purchases, the Company may also use seller-financed nonrecourse secured notes payable. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, outstanding seller-financed nonrecourse notes payable were $34.9 million and $39.1 million, respectively.
In January 2008, RMC entered into a mortgage warehouse line of credit with Guaranty Bank (the “RMC Credit Agreement”). The RMC Credit Agreement, which matures in January 2009, provides for borrowings up to $40.0 million to fund RMC’s mortgage loan origination operations. It is secured by underlying mortgage loans and by other assets of RMC. Facility balances are repaid as loans funded under the agreement are sold to third parties. The RMC Credit Agreement’s interest rate is set at LIBOR plus 0.9 percent, with a commitment fee of 0.125 percent. The RMC Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants and provisions defining events of default. The covenants require RMC to maintain certain financial ratios, including a tangible net worth minimum of $13.0 million; an adjusted tangible net worth minimum of $5.0 million; a ratio of total indebtedness to adjusted tangible net worth of 12:1; and consolidated net income for the four preceding fiscal quarters. At June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants, and there was $6.7 million in outstanding borrowings against this credit facility. (See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Financial Condition and Liquidity.”)
12
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Note 9. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments are based on quoted market prices, where available, or are estimated using other valuation techniques. Estimated fair values are significantly affected by assumptions used. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair-Value Measurements,” categorizes fair value measurements as level 1, level 2 or level 3, based on the type of inputs used in estimating fair value. The table below sets forth information regarding the Company’s fair value measurement methods and values.
| | | | | | | | | | JUNE 30, 2008 | |
| | | | QUOTED | | VALUATION | | VALUATION | | | |
| | | | PRICES | | UTILIZES | | UTILIZES | | | |
| | LOWER OF | | IN ACTIVE | | OBSERVABLE | | UNOBSERVABLE | | | |
| | COST OR | | MARKETS | | INPUTS | | INPUTS | | | |
(in thousands) | | MARKET | | (LEVEL 1) | | (LEVEL 2) | | (LEVEL 3) | | TOTAL | |
Loans held-for-sale | | $ | 1,082 | | $ | - | | $ | 17,594 | | $ | - | | $ | 18,676 | |
Interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) | | - | | - | | - | | 2,483 | | 2,483 | |
Forward delivery contracts | | - | | - | | (594 | ) | - | | (594 | ) |
Options on futures contracts | | - | | 1,129 | | - | | - | | 1,129 | |
Investor financing commitments (“IFCs”) | | - | | - | | - | | 2,006 | | 2,006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options on futures contracts are exchange-traded and are valued based on quoted market exit prices (level 1). Loans held-for-sale and forward delivery contracts are based on quoted market prices of similar instruments (level 2). Contractual principal amounts of loans held-for-sale as of June 30, 2008, totaled $18.8 million. IRLCs are valued at their aggregate market price premium or deficit, plus servicing premium, multiplied by the projected close ratio. The market price premium or deficit is based on quoted market prices of similar instruments (level 2); the servicing premium is based on contractual investor guidelines for each product (level 2); and the projected close ratio is determined utilizing an external modeling system used widely within the industry that estimates customer behavior at an individual loan level (level 3). Investor financing commitments are valued based on their intrinsic value, which is determined with reference to movements in market interest rates (level 2), plus a time value factor that is extrapolated from current market prices of similar contracts (level 3).
In 2008, the Company implemented Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109 (“SAB 109”), “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings,” which revises and rescinds portions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments” and requires that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of a loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. The provisions of SAB 109 were applicable to written loan commitments issued or modified beginning on January 1, 2008 and SAB 109 was adopted effective January 1, 2008. At June 30, 2008, servicing rights of $3.2 million were included in net gains on the sale of mortgages and mortgage servicing rights, in accordance with SAB 109.
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), “The Fair-Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” on a prospective basis for mortgage loans held-for-sale, effective January 1, 2008. Accordingly, mortgage loans held-for-sale that were originated subsequent to January 1, 2008, are measured at fair value. Loans originated prior to that date are held at the lower of cost or market on an aggregate basis in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 65, “Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities.” The application of SFAS 159 to loans held-for-sale improves the consistency of loan valuation between the date of borrower lock and the date of loan sale. The difference between the aggregate fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance as of June 30, 2008, for loans measured at fair value, was $133,000. Consequently, this amount has been recognized as a gain in current earnings within financial services revenues. The Company held two loans with payments 90 days or more past due, with an aggregate carrying value of $145,000.
13
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
While recorded fair values represent management’s best estimate based on data currently available, future changes in interest rates or in market prices for mortgage loans, among other factors, could have a material impact on the value of these items.
The following table represents a reconciliation of changes in fair values of level 3 items included in revenues under “Financial services” within the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
(in thousands) | | IRLCs | | IFCs | |
Fair value at January 1, 2008 | | $ | 298 | | $ | 15 | |
(Gain) loss recognized on conversion to loans | | (1,856 | ) | - | |
Additions | | 4,661 | | 1,497 | |
Change in valuation of items held | | (620 | ) | 494 | |
Fair value at June 30, 2008 | | $ | 2,483 | | $ | 2,006 | |
Note 10. Postretirement Benefits
The Company has supplemental nonqualified retirement plans, which generally vest over five-year periods beginning in 2003, pursuant to which the Company will pay supplemental pension benefits to key employees upon retirement. In connection with these plans, the Company has purchased cost-recovery life insurance on the lives of certain employees. Insurance contracts associated with the plans are held by trusts established as part of the plans to implement and carry out their provisions and finance their related benefits. The trusts are owners and beneficiaries of such contracts. The amount of coverage is designed to provide sufficient revenue to cover all costs of the plans if assumptions made as to employment term, mortality experience, policy earnings and other factors are realized. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the cash surrender value of these contracts was $29.5 million and $28.5 million, respectively, and is included in “Other” assets. The net periodic benefit cost of these plans for the three months ended June 30, 2008, was $1.6 million and included service costs of $934,000, interest costs of $417,000 and investment losses of $288,000. The net periodic benefit cost of these plans for the three months ended June 30, 2007, was $454,000 and included service costs of $959,000, interest costs of $299,000 and investment earnings of $804,000. The net periodic benefit cost of these plans for the six months ended June 30, 2008, was $4.6 million and included service costs of $1.6 million, interest costs of $763,000 and investment losses of $2.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the net periodic benefit cost was $1.6 million and included service costs of $1.9 million, interest costs of $576,000 and investment earnings of $871,000. The $26.1 million and $24.0 million projected benefit obligations at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, were equal to the net liability recognized in the balance sheet at those dates. The weighted-average discount rate used for the plans was 7.8 percent and 7.7 percent for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Note 11. Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets are recognized for estimated tax effects that are attributable to deductible temporary differences and tax carryforwards related to tax credits and operating losses. They are realized when existing temporary differences are carried back to profitable year(s) and/or carried forward to future years having taxable income. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if an assessment of their components indicates that it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. This assessment considers, among other things, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses; forecasts of future profitability; the duration of the statutory carryforward periods; the Company’s experience with loss carryforwards not expiring unused; and tax planning alternatives. The Company generated additional deferred tax assets in the second quarter of 2008 due to inventory impairments. In light of the additional inventory impairments, the continued downturn in the housing market and the uncertainty as to its duration, which limits
14
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
the Company’s ability to predict future taxable income, the Company determined that an additional allowance against its deferred tax assets was required. Therefore, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $124.0 million against its deferred tax assets during the second quarter of 2008, which was reflected as a noncash charge to income tax expense. The valuation allowance taken in the second quarter of 2008 was comprised of $5.2 million of net state taxes and $118.8 million of federal taxes. To the extent that the Company generates sufficient taxable income in the future to utilize the tax benefits of related deferred tax assets, it expects to experience a reduction in its effective tax rate as the valuation allowance is reversed.
The Company’s effective tax rate was 27.3 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to 41.0 percent for the same period in 2007. The change in the tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily due to a noncash tax charge of $124.0 million for the Company’s valuation allowance related to its deferred tax assets.
Note 12. Stock-Based Compensation
All outstanding stock options, stock awards and restricted stock awards have been granted in accordance with the terms of the Company’s plans, all of which were approved by its stockholders. Refer to Note I, “Stock-Based Compensation,” in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding its stock plans.
The Company recorded $2.0 million and $4.1 million of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company recorded $4.1 million and $7.8 million of stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Stock-based compensation expenses have been allocated to the Company’s business units and are reported in “Corporate,” “Financial services” and “Selling, general and administrative” expenses.
Excess tax benefits of $2.2 million and $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, have been classified as financing cash inflows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
At the Annual Stockholders’ meeting in April 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The approval of the Plan permits the granting of an additional 1,300,000 stock options, restricted stock awards, stock units or any combination of the foregoing to employees. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, stock options, or other stock awards or stock units available for grant under the Plan and its predecessor plans totaled 2,379,014 and 1,587,725, respectively.
15
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
A summary of stock option activity in accordance with the Company’s plans as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and changes for the six-month periods then ended follows:
| | SHARES | | | WEIGHTED- AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE | | | WEIGHTED-AVERAGE REMAINING CONTRACTUAL LIFE (in years) | | AGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE (in thousands) | |
Options outstanding at January 1, 2007 | | 4,164,142 | | | $ | 31.29 | | | 5.02 | | | |
Granted | | 563,500 | | | 44.65 | | | | | | |
Exercised | | (330,792 | ) | | 13.90 | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | (52,390 | ) | | 59.35 | | | | | | |
Options outstanding at June 30, 2007 | | 4,344,460 | | | $ | 34.00 | | | 4.66 | | $ | 47,906 | |
Available for future grant | | 1,677,871 | | | | | | | | | |
Total shares reserved at June 30, 2007 | | 6,022,331 | | | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at June 30, 2007 | | 3,459,048 | | | $ | 29.64 | | | 4.74 | | $ | 47,906 | |
Options outstanding at January 1, 2008 | | 4,034,166 | | | $ | 35.44 | | | 4.31 | | | |
Granted | | 398,000 | | | 33.14 | | | | | | |
Exercised | | (272,520 | ) | | 9.13 | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | (137,953 | ) | | 49.45 | | | | | | |
Options outstanding at June 30, 2008 | | 4,021,693 | | | $ | 36.51 | | | 4.07 | | $ | 10,928 | |
Available for future grant | | 2,451,014 | | | | | | | | | |
Total shares reserved at June 30, 2008 | | 6,472,707 | | | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable at June 30, 2008 | | 3,112,783 | | | $ | 35.26 | | | 4.04 | | $ | 10,928 | |
The Company has determined the grant-date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula. Expected volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected dividend yield is based on an annual dividend rate of $0.48 per common share. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award is based upon the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the stock option is granted, with a maturity equal to the expected option life of the stock option granted. The expected option life is derived from historical experience under the Company’s share-based payment plans and represents the period of time that stock option awards granted are expected to be outstanding.
The following table summarizes the weighted-average inputs used and fair values determined for stock options granted during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Expected volatility | | 43.7 | % | 35.8 | % |
Expected dividend yield | | 1.5 | % | 1.1 | % |
Expected term (in years) | | 3.8 | | 3.4 | |
Risk-free rate | | 2.8 | % | 4.6 | % |
Weighted-average grant-date fair value | | $ | 10.85 | | $ | 13.00 | |
| | | | | | | |
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to stock options of $940,000 and $1.3 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was $2.5 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
16
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, the total intrinsic values of stock options exercised were $3.3 million and $6.2 million, respectively. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007, the total intrinsic values of stock options exercised were $5.9 million and $11.8 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
The Company has made several restricted stock awards to senior executives under the Plan and its predecessor plans. Compensation expense recognized for such awards was $924,000 and $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company recorded expense related to restricted stock awards of $1.3 million and $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following is a summary of activity relating to restricted stock awards:
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Restricted shares at January 1 | | 242,000 | | 435,664 | |
Shares awarded | | 340,000 | | 25,000 | |
Shares vested | | (81,331 | ) | (182,664 | ) |
Shares forfeited | | (50,667 | ) | (36,000 | ) |
Restricted shares at June 30 | | 450,002 | | 242,000 | |
At June 30, 2008, the outstanding restricted shares will vest as follows: 2009–236,672; 2010–126,665; and 2011–86,665.
The Company has granted stock awards to its non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of The Ryland Group, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (the “Director Plan”). The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to stock awards granted pursuant to the Director Plan in the amount of $156,000 and $286,000 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to such grants in the amount of $263,000 and $531,000 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, stock options or other stock awards or stock units available for grant under the Director Plan totaled 72,000 and 93,000, respectively.
Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company acquires rights under option agreements to purchase land or lots for use in future homebuilding operations. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, it had cash deposits and letters of credit outstanding that totaled $57.8 million and $74.7 million, respectively, for land options pertaining to land purchase contracts with an aggregate purchase price of $458.4 million and $721.4 million, respectively. At June 30, 2008, the Company had commitments with respect to option contracts having specific performance provisions of approximately $17.6 million, compared to $24.2 million at December 31, 2007.
As an on-site housing producer, the Company is often required by some municipalities to obtain development or performance bonds and letters of credit in support of its contractual obligations. At June 30, 2008, total development bonds were $233.5 million, while total related deposits and letters of credit were $48.8 million. In the event that any such bonds or letters of credit are called, the Company would be required to reimburse the issuer; however, it does not expect that any currently outstanding bonds or letters of credit will be called.
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, one of the joint ventures in which the Company participates had debt of $435.3 million. In this joint venture, the Company and its partners provided limited payment guarantees of debt on a pro rata basis. The Company had a 3.3 percent pro rata obligation that is only triggered in limited circumstances for the debt. This obligation represents $14.5 million of total potential exposure for the Company at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
17
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
These limited payment guarantees are subject to certain conditions before they mature. The joint venture, which is controlled by homebuilders other than the Company, has made an affirmative decision not to fund interest on an ongoing basis and, therefore, precipitated the declaration of an event of default and demand on completion guarantees by the lenders. In another of its joint ventures, the Company has guaranteed up to 50.0 percent of a $55.0 million revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the actual borrowings against the revolving credit facility for this joint venture were $50.7 million and $50.6 million, respectively, of which the Company’s pro rata share of debt was $25.4 million and $25.3 million, respectively.
IRLCs represent loan commitments with customers at market rates generally up to 180 days before settlement. The Company had outstanding IRLCs totaling $203.5 million at June 30, 2008. Hedging contracts are utilized to mitigate the risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on IRLCs.
Under rare circumstances, RMC is required to indemnify loan investors for losses incurred on sold loans. In general, this obligation arises if the losses are due to origination errors made by RMC; if the borrower does not make their first payment; or if there is undiscovered fraud on the part of the borrower. Reserves for losses related to future indemnification or repurchase of sold loans were $1.6 million at June 30, 2008 and $2.7 million at December 31, 2007.
The Company provides product warranties covering workmanship and materials for one year, certain mechanical systems for two years and structural systems for ten years. The Company estimates and records warranty liabilities based upon historical experience and known risks at the time a home closes, and in the case of unexpected claims, upon identification and quantification of the obligations. Actual future warranty costs could differ from current estimates.
Changes in the Company’s product liability reserve during the period are as follows:
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Balance at January 1 | | $ | 36,557 | | $ | 44,102 | |
Warranties issued | | 2,135 | | 7,875 | |
Settlements made | | (6,957 | ) | (11,448 | ) |
Balance at June 30 | | $ | 31,735 | | $ | 40,529 | |
The Company requires substantially all of its subcontractors to have general liability insurance, which includes construction defect coverage, and workmans compensation insurance. These insurance policies protect the Company against a portion of its risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured retentions, deductibles and other coverage limits. However, with fewer insurers participating, general liability insurance for the homebuilding industry had become more difficult to obtain over the past several years. As a result, RHIC provided insurance services to the homebuilding segments’ subcontractors in certain markets. At June 30, 2008, RHIC had $35.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, of which $13.5 million was restricted, and $29.4 million in subcontractor product liability reserves, which are included in the consolidated balance sheets under “Cash and cash equivalents” and “Accrued and other liabilities,” respectively. At December 31, 2007, RHIC had $34.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, of which $13.5 million was restricted, and $28.3 million in subcontractor product liability reserves, which are included in the consolidated balance sheets.
Changes in the Company’s insurance reserves during the period are as follows:
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Balance at January 1 | | $ | 28,293 | | $ | 22,521 | |
Insurance expense provisions | | 1,078 | | 2,493 | |
Balance at June 30 | | $ | 29,371 | | $ | 25,014 | |
18
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The Company is party to various legal proceedings generally incidental to its businesses. Litigation reserves have been established based on discussions with counsel and the Company’s analysis of historical claims. The Company has, and requires the majority of its subcontractors to have, general liability insurance to protect it against a portion of its risk of loss and cover it against construction-related claims. The Company establishes reserves to cover its self-insured retentions and deductible amounts under those policies. Due to the high degree of judgment required in determining these estimated reserve amounts and the inherent variability in predicting future settlements and judicial decisions, actual future litigation costs could differ from the Company’s current estimates. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had legal reserves of $14.8 million and $15.3 million, respectively. (See “Part II. Item 1. Legal Proceedings.”)
Note 14. New Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS 158
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 (“SFAS 158”), “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans–an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS 158 requires that the funded status of defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans be recognized in the balance sheet, along with a corresponding after-tax adjustment to stockholders’ equity. The recognition of the funded status provision of SFAS 158 applies prospectively and was effective December 31, 2007. SFAS 158 also requires measurement of plan assets and benefit obligations at the entity’s fiscal year-end, effective December 31, 2008. SFAS 158 did not and is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
SFAS 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (“SFAS 160”), “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards pertaining to ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent; the amount of net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest; changes in a parent’s ownership interest; and the valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is required to be adopted prospectively for the first annual reporting period after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently reviewing this statement and has not yet determined the impact, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 161
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (“SFAS 161”), “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities–an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS 161 expands the disclosure requirements in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” regarding an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 161 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 161 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
19
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Note 15. Supplemental Guarantor Information
The Company’s obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under its $550.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility; 5.4 percent senior notes due May 2012; 6.9 percent senior notes due June 2013; and 5.4 percent senior notes due January 2015 are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of its 100 percent-owned homebuilding subsidiaries (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Such guarantees are full and unconditional.
In lieu of providing separate financial statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the accompanying condensed consolidating financial statements have been included. Management does not believe that separate financial statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries are material to investors and are, therefore, not presented.
The following information presents the consolidating statements of earnings, financial position and cash flows for (a) the parent company and issuer, The Ryland Group, Inc. (“TRG, Inc.”); (b) the Guarantor Subsidiaries; (c) the non-Guarantor Subsidiaries; and (d) the consolidation eliminations used to arrive at the consolidated information for The Ryland Group, Inc. and subsidiaries.
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
REVENUES | | $ | 290,915 | | $ | 191,807 | | $ | 15,598 | | $ | (10,439 | ) | $ | 487,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate, general and administrative | | 426,179 | | 251,800 | | 10,112 | | (10,439 | ) | 677,652 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 426,179 | | 251,800 | | 10,112 | | (10,439 | ) | 677,652 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before taxes | | (135,264 | ) | (59,993 | ) | 5,486 | | - | | (189,771 | ) |
Tax expense (benefit) | | 29,120 | | 20,599 | | 2,149 | | - | | 51,868 | |
Equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries | | (77,255 | ) | - | | - | | 77,255 | | - | |
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) | | $ | (241,639 | ) | $ | (80,592 | ) | $ | 3,337 | | $ | 77,255 | | $ | (241,639 | ) |
20
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
| | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
REVENUES | | $ | 539,427 | | $ | 352,194 | | $ | 32,164 | | $ | (19,738 | ) | $ | 904,047 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate, general and administrative | | 700,324 | | 439,307 | | 20,091 | | (19,738 | ) | 1,139,984 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 700,324 | | 439,307 | | 20,091 | | (19,738 | ) | 1,139,984 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before taxes | | (160,897 | ) | (87,113 | ) | 12,073 | | - | | (235,937 | ) |
Tax expense (benefit) | | 19,764 | | 10,701 | | 4,553 | | - | | 35,018 | |
Equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries | | (90,294 | ) | - | | - | | 90,294 | | - | |
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) | | $ | (270,955 | ) | $ | (97,814 | ) | $ | 7,520 | | $ | 90,294 | | $ | (270,955 | ) |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
REVENUES | | $ | 457,216 | | $ | 275,652 | | $ | 21,156 | | $ | (10,290 | ) | $ | 743,734 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate, general and administrative | | 447,180 | | 384,305 | | 11,364 | | (10,290 | ) | 832,559 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 447,180 | | 384,305 | | 11,364 | | (10,290 | ) | 832,559 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before taxes | | 10,036 | | (108,653 | ) | 9,792 | | - | | (88,825 | ) |
Tax expense (benefit) | | 1,062 | | (42,185 | ) | 4,729 | | - | | (36,394 | ) |
Equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries | | (61,405 | ) | - | | - | | 61,405 | | - | |
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) | | $ | (52,431 | ) | $ | (66,468 | ) | $ | 5,063 | | $ | 61,405 | | $ | (52,431 | ) |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
| | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
REVENUES | | $ | 888,586 | | $ | 546,565 | | $ | 42,508 | | $ | (22,811 | ) | $ | 1,454,848 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate, general and administrative | | 894,858 | | 677,574 | | 24,693 | | (22,811 | ) | 1,574,314 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 894,858 | | 677,574 | | 24,693 | | (22,811 | ) | 1,574,314 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) before taxes | | (6,272 | ) | (131,009 | ) | 17,815 | | - | | (119,466 | ) |
Tax expense (benefit) | | (2,236 | ) | (46,705 | ) | 6,351 | | - | | (42,590 | ) |
Equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries | | (72,840 | ) | - | | - | | 72,840 | | - | |
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) | | $ | (76,876 | ) | $ | (84,304 | ) | $ | 11,464 | | $ | 72,840 | | $ | (76,876 | ) |
21
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
| | JUNE 30, 2008 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 10,802 | | $ | 134,492 | | $ | 54,062 | | $ | - | | $ | 199,356 | |
Consolidated inventories owned | | 997,805 | | 515,219 | | - | | - | | 1,513,024 | |
Consolidated inventories not owned | | 990 | | 6,426 | | 52,912 | | - | | 60,328 | |
Total inventories | | 998,795 | | 521,645 | | 52,912 | | - | | 1,573,352 | |
Investment in subsidiaries/ intercompany receivables | | 662,998 | | - | | - | | (662,998 | ) | - | |
Other assets | | 268,036 | | 79,643 | | 40,998 | | - | | 388,677 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | 1,940,631 | | 735,780 | | 147,972 | | (662,998 | ) | 2,161,385 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | | 305,024 | | 105,760 | | 52,660 | | - | | 463,444 | |
Debt | | 782,603 | | 2,280 | | 6,732 | | - | | 791,615 | |
Intercompany payables | | - | | 311,433 | | 6,891 | | (318,324 | ) | - | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 1,087,627 | | 419,473 | | 66,283 | | (318,324 | ) | 1,255,059 | |
MINORITY INTEREST | | - | | - | | 53,322 | | - | | 53,322 | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | 853,004 | | 316,307 | | 28,367 | | (344,674 | ) | 853,004 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 1,940,631 | | $ | 735,780 | | $ | 147,972 | | $ | (662,998 | ) | $ | 2,161,385 | |
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
| | DECEMBER 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 12,908 | | $ | 172,363 | | $ | 58,343 | | $ | - | | $ | 243,614 | |
Consolidated inventories owned | | 1,166,824 | | 570,119 | | - | | - | | 1,736,943 | |
Consolidated inventories not owned | | 1,179 | | 6,940 | | 68,615 | | - | | 76,734 | |
Total inventories | | 1,168,003 | | 577,059 | | 68,615 | | - | | 1,813,677 | |
Investment in subsidiaries/ intercompany receivables | | 758,282 | | - | | - | | (758,282 | ) | - | |
Other assets | | 362,697 | | 95,239 | | 36,093 | | - | | 494,029 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | 2,301,890 | | 844,661 | | 163,051 | | (758,282 | ) | 2,551,320 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | | 342,090 | | 114,842 | | 61,663 | | - | | 518,595 | |
Debt | | 835,074 | | 4,006 | | - | | - | | 839,080 | |
Intercompany payables | | - | | 311,692 | | 4,428 | | (316,120 | ) | - | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 1,177,164 | | 430,540 | | 66,091 | | (316,120 | ) | 1,357,675 | |
MINORITY INTEREST | | - | | - | | 68,919 | | - | | 68,919 | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | 1,124,726 | | 414,121 | | 28,041 | | (442,162 | ) | 1,124,726 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 2,301,890 | | $ | 844,661 | | $ | 163,051 | | $ | (758,282 | ) | $ | 2,551,320 | |
22
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Ryland Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
| | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating earnings (loss) | | $ | (270,955 | ) | $ | (97,814 | ) | $ | 7,520 | | $ | 90,294 | | $ | (270,955 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities | | 158,531 | | 72,180 | | 534 | | - | | 231,245 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | 173,169 | | (6,274 | ) | (21,547 | ) | (90,294 | ) | 55,054 | |
Other operating activities, net | | (2,819 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (2,819 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | | 57,926 | | (31,908 | ) | (13,493 | ) | - | | 12,525 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net additions to property, plant and equipment | | (2,531 | ) | (3,978 | ) | (1 | ) | - | | (6,510 | ) |
Other investing activities, net | | - | | - | | 18 | | - | | 18 | |
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities | | (2,531 | ) | (3,978 | ) | 17 | | - | | (6,492 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Decrease) increase in debt | | (52,471 | ) | (1,726 | ) | 6,732 | | - | | (47,465 | ) |
Common stock dividends, repurchases and stock-based compensation | | (2,826 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (2,826 | ) |
Intercompany balances | | (2,204 | ) | (259 | ) | 2,463 | | - | | - | |
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | | (57,501 | ) | (1,985 | ) | 9,195 | | - | | (50,291 | ) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | (2,106 | ) | (37,871 | ) | (4,281 | ) | - | | (44,258 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | 12,908 | | 172,363 | | 58,343 | | - | | 243,614 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 10,802 | | $ | 134,492 | | $ | 54,062 | | $ | - | | $ | 199,356 | |
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
| | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | NON- | | | | | |
| | | | GUARANTOR | | GUARANTOR | | CONSOLIDATING | | CONSOLIDATED | |
(in thousands) | | TRG, INC. | | SUBSIDIARIES | | SUBSIDIARIES | | ELIMINATIONS | | TOTAL | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating earnings (loss) | | $ | (76,876 | ) | $ | (84,304 | ) | $ | 11,464 | | $ | 72,840 | | $ | (76,876 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities | | 119,383 | | 133,312 | | 805 | | - | | 253,500 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | (139,923 | ) | (39,253 | ) | (30,963 | ) | (72,840 | ) | (282,979 | ) |
Other operating activities, net | | (20,268 | ) | - | | - | | - | | (20,268 | ) |
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities | | (117,684 | ) | 9,755 | | (18,694 | ) | - | | (126,623 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net additions to property, plant and equipment | | (13,419 | ) | (8,688 | ) | 80 | | - | | (22,027 | ) |
Other investing activities, net | | - | | - | | 732 | | - | | 732 | |
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities | | (13,419 | ) | (8,688 | ) | 812 | | - | | (21,295 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in debt | | 75,121 | | (5,027 | ) | - | | - | | 70,094 | |
Common stock dividends, repurchases and stock-based compensation | | (52,707 | ) | - | | (3 | ) | - | | (52,710 | ) |
Intercompany balances | | 94,241 | | (116,642 | ) | 22,401 | | - | | - | |
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | | 116,655 | | (121,669 | ) | 22,398 | | - | | 17,384 | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | (14,448 | ) | (120,602 | ) | 4,516 | | - | | (130,534 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | 43,129 | | 129,079 | | 42,829 | | - | | 215,037 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 28,681 | | $ | 8,477 | | $ | 47,345 | | $ | - | | $ | 84,503 | |
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Note: Certain statements in this quarterly report may be regarded as “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and may qualify for the safe harbor provided for in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements represent the Company’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events, and no assurance can be given that the results described in this quarterly report will be achieved. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “foresee,” “goal,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will” or other similar words or phrases. All forward-looking statements contained herein are based upon information available to the Company on the date of this quarterly report. Except as may be required under applicable law, the Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. The factors and assumptions upon which any forward-looking statements herein are based are subject to risks and uncertainties which include, among others:
· economic changes nationally or in the Company’s local markets, including volatility and increases in interest rates, inflation, changes in consumer demand and confidence levels and the state of the market for homes in general;
· instability and uncertainty in the mortgage lending market, including revisions to underwriting standards for borrowers;
· the availability and cost of land and the future value of land held or under development;
· increased land development costs on projects under development;
· shortages of skilled labor or raw materials used in the production of houses;
· increased prices for labor, land and raw materials used in the production of houses;
· increased competition;
· failure to anticipate or react to changing consumer preferences in home design;
· increased costs and delays in land development or home construction resulting from adverse weather conditions;
· potential delays or increased costs in obtaining necessary permits as a result of changes to laws, regulations or governmental policies (including those that affect zoning, density, building standards and the environment);
· delays in obtaining approvals from applicable regulatory agencies and others in connection with the Company’s communities and land activities;
· changes in the Company’s effective tax rate and assumptions and valuations related to its tax accounts;
· the risk factors set forth in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K; and
· other factors over which the Company has little or no control.
24
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Overview
The Company consists of six operating business segments: four geographically determined homebuilding regions; financial services; and corporate. The Company’s operations span all significant aspects of the homebuying process–from design, construction and sale to mortgage origination, title insurance, escrow and insurance services. The homebuilding operations are, by far, the most substantial part of its business, comprising approximately 97 percent of consolidated revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The homebuilding segments generate nearly all of their revenues from the sale of completed homes, with a lesser amount from the sale of land and lots.
In recent years, the price appreciation of homes was relatively high in most markets and, in turn, attracted speculation. Beginning in 2006, as appreciation slowed, declining consumer confidence and demand caused national homebuilders to experience increasing inventories, which resulted in a dramatic rise in the number of homes available for sale and a softening of demand for new homes. During the latter half of 2007, a significant decrease in the availability of mortgage products resulting from an industry-wide increase in loan delinquencies and foreclosure rates, and the related tightening of credit standards, further impacted the industry and the Company’s ability to attract qualified homebuyers. These factors exacerbated already high inventory levels of new and resale homes, increased cancellation levels and weakened consumer confidence. Consequently, the Company continued to report declines in the volume of homes sold, decreases in prices, high sales contract cancellation rates and additional valuation adjustments. In an effort to compensate for these developments, the Company has amended its operating strategy to focus on cash generation and risk moderation through increased sales price discounts and other incentives; opportunistic land sales; reductions in excess inventory and commitments to purchase land in the future through contract renegotiations and cancellations; controlled development spending; renegotiations of contracts with subcontractors and suppliers; and reductions in overhead expense to more closely match projected volume levels.
Due to increased use of price reductions and sales incentives, evaluation of its inventory through a quarterly impairment analyses during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, resulted in $134.5 million of inventory valuation adjustments. The second quarter charges of $9.9 million related to the abandonment of land purchase option contracts reflect the deterioration of specific related returns and the assumption that recent price reductions are indicative of price levels for the foreseeable future. Additionally, the Company recorded charges of $36.0 million for impairments of joint venture and other assets, and a noncash tax charge of $124.0 million for a tax valuation allowance related to its deferred tax assets, during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
The Company reported a consolidated net loss of $241.6 million, or $5.70 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2008, compared to a net loss of $52.4 million, or $1.25 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in earnings for 2008, compared to 2007, was primarily due to the impact of inventory and tax valuation adjustments and other write-offs; a decline in revenues and margins; and a more competitive sales environment in most markets.
The Company’s revenues were $487.9 million for the second quarter of 2008, down 34.4 percent from the second quarter of 2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in closings and average closing price. Revenues for the homebuilding and financial services segments were $472.3 million and $15.6 million, respectively, for the second quarter of 2008, compared to $722.6 million and $21.2 million, respectively, for the same period in 2007.
As a result of a 20.3 percent reduction in the Company’s selling communities and a difficult sales environment, new orders decreased 18.9 percent to 2,045 units for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, from 2,521 units for the same period in 2007. New order dollars decreased 27.8 percent for the second quarter of 2008, compared to the second quarter of 2007, primarily reflecting reduced demand in the housing market and a decline in home prices.
25
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Consolidated inventories owned by the Company, which include homes under construction; land under development and improved lots; and inventory held-for-sale, declined 12.9 percent to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2008, from $1.7 billion at December 31, 2007. Homes under construction increased by 1.2 percent to $726.6 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $718.0 million at December 31, 2007. Land under development and improved lots decreased by 25.8 percent to $705.0 million, compared to $949.7 million at December 31, 2007. Inventory held-for-sale increased 17.5 percent and totaled $81.4 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $69.2 million at December 31, 2007.
The Company did not repurchase any stock during the second quarter of 2008. At June 30, 2008, outstanding shares were 42,485,267, versus 42,151,085 at December 31, 2007.
The Company’s balance sheet continues to reflect its conservative strategy and transparency. The Company ended the quarter with $199.4 million in cash and no borrowings against its $550.0 million revolving credit facility. The Company was not a significant participant in off-balance sheet financing outside of traditional option contracts with land developers, and its investments in joint ventures at June 30, 2008, represented less than one percent of its total assets. The Company’s net debt-to-capital ratio was 41.0 percent at June 30, 2008, compared to 34.6 percent at December 31, 2007. As a result of valuation adjustments and a loss from operations, stockholders’ equity per share declined to $20.08 as of June 30, 2008, compared to $26.68 as of December 31, 2007. The Company’s book value at June 30, 2008, was 99.7 percent tangible.
Homebuilding Overview
The Company’s homes are built on-site and marketed in four major geographic regions, or segments. The Company operated in the following metropolitan areas at June 30, 2008:
Region/Segment | | Major Markets Served |
North | | Baltimore, Chicago, Cincinnati, Delaware, Indianapolis, Minneapolis and Washington, D.C. |
Southeast | | Atlanta, Charleston, Charlotte, Fort Myers, Greensboro, Greenville, Jacksonville, Myrtle Beach, Orlando and Tampa |
Texas | | Austin, Dallas, Houston and San Antonio |
West | | California’s Central Valley, California’s Coachella Valley, California’s Inland Empire, Denver, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Sacramento |
The combined homebuilding operations reported pretax losses of $187.1 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to pretax losses of $91.5 million for the second quarter of 2007. Homebuilding results in 2008 decreased from 2007 primarily due to the impact of inventory, joint venture and other valuation adjustments and write-offs, as well as a decline in closings and margins.
26
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS | | | | | | | | | |
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands, except units) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | |
Housing | | $ | 463,635 | | $ | 719,610 | | $ | 860,413 | | $ | 1,405,372 | |
Land | | 8,648 | | 2,968 | | 11,470 | | 8,569 | |
TOTAL REVENUES | | 472,283 | | 722,578 | | 871,883 | | 1,413,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | | | | | | | |
Housing | | 406,039 | | 583,293 | | 755,709 | | 1,141,016 | |
Land | | 8,521 | | 2,374 | | 10,394 | | 7,476 | |
Valuation adjustments and write-offs | | 144,182 | | 145,753 | | 165,040 | | 210,722 | |
Total cost of sales | | 558,742 | | 731,420 | | 931,143 | | 1,359,214 | |
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | 35,606 | | (84 | ) | 42,707 | | (119 | ) |
Selling, general and administrative | | 65,062 | | | 82,762 | | 128,847 | | | 178,577 | |
TOTAL EXPENSES | | 659,410 | | 814,098 | | 1,102,697 | | 1,537,672 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
PRETAX EARNINGS (LOSS) | | $ | (187,127 | ) | $ | (91,520 | ) | $ | (230,814 | ) | $ | (123,731 | ) |
Closings (units) | | 1,828 | | 2,461 | | 3,371 | | 4,763 | |
Housing gross profit margins | | (18.2 | ) % | 4.6 | % | (7.4 | ) % | 8.3 | % |
Selling, general and administrative | | 13.8 | % | 11.5 | % | 14.8 | % | 12.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” inventory is reviewed for potential write-downs on an ongoing basis. SFAS 144 requires that, in the event that impairment indicators are present, impairment charges are required to be recorded if the fair value of such assets is less than their carrying amounts. For inventory held and used, undiscounted cash flow projections are generated at a community-level based on estimates of revenues, costs and other factors. The Company’s analysis of these communities generally assumes flat revenues when compared with current sales orders for particular or comparable communities. The Company’s determination of fair value is primarily based on discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with inherent risks that are associated with assets and related estimated cash flow streams. When determining the value of inventory held-for-sale, the Company considers recent offers, comparable sales and/or estimated cash flows. Valuation adjustments are recorded against homes completed or under construction, land under development and improved lots when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying values are greater than the fair values. Due to continued pressure on home prices, symptomatic of excess home inventories in many markets, and the industry’s recent predisposition toward a reduction in land option pipelines, the Company recorded inventory impairment charges of $134.5 million and $152.7 million during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in order to reduce the carrying value of the impaired communities to their estimated fair values. Approximately 89 percent of these impairment charges were recorded to residential land and lots and land held for development and approximately 11 percent of these charges were recorded to residential construction in progress and finished homes in inventory. At June 30, 2008, the fair value of the Company’s inventory subject to valuation adjustments during the quarter was $128.8 million, net of $134.5 million of impairments. A total of 45 communities were written down during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. The inventory impairment charges and write-offs of deposits and acquisition costs reduced total housing gross profit margins by 30.7 percent in the second quarter of 2008 and 14.4 percent in the second quarter of 2007. Should market conditions deteriorate or costs increase, it is possible that the Company’s estimates of undiscounted cash flows from its communities could decline, resulting in additional future inventory impairment charges.
27
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company periodically writes off earnest money deposits and feasibility costs related to land and lot option contracts that it no longer plans to pursue. The Company wrote off $9.9 million and $20.2 million of these earnest money deposits and feasibility costs during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company wrote off $12.0 million and $21.3 million of earnest money deposits and feasibility costs during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Should weak homebuilding market conditions persist and the Company be unsuccessful in its efforts to renegotiate certain land purchase contracts, it may write off additional earnest money deposits and feasibility costs in future periods.
Three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to three months ended June 30, 2007
The homebuilding segments reported pretax losses of $187.1 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to pretax losses of $91.5 million for the same period in the prior year. Homebuilding results for the second quarter of 2008 decreased from the same period in 2007 primarily due to inventory and other valuation adjustments and write-offs; a decline in closing volume; and increased sales incentives. Sales incentives averaged 14.9 percent for the second quarter of 2008, versus 16.0 percent for the first quarter of 2008 and 10.5 percent for the second quarter of 2007.
Homebuilding revenues were $472.3 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to $722.6 million for the second quarter of 2007, due to a 25.7 percent decrease in closings and a 13.0 percent decline in the average closing price of a home.
Consistent with its policy of managing land investments according to return and risk targets, the Company executed land sales during the second quarter of 2008. Homebuilding revenues for the second quarter of 2008 included $8.6 million from land sales, compared to $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2007, which contributed net gains of approximately $124,000 and $595,000 to pretax earnings in the second quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The gross profit percentage from land sales was 1.5 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 20.0 percent for the same period in the prior year. The fluctuations in revenues and gross profit percentages from land sales were a result of local market conditions and land portfolios. The Company generally purchases land and lots with the intent to build homes on those lots and sell them; however, the Company occasionally sells a portion of its land to other homebuilders and commercial developers.
For the second quarter of 2008, housing gross profit margins averaged 12.5 percent prior to inventory and other valuation adjustments and write-offs, compared to 19.0 percent for the same period in 2007. Subsequent to these adjustments, housing gross profit margins averaged negative 18.2 percent for the second quarter of 2008, compared to 4.6 percent for the same period in 2007. The decrease was due to inventory and other valuation adjustments and write-offs totaling $142.2 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives related to homes delivered during the second quarter of 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 13.8 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 11.5 percent for the same period in the prior year. This increase was mainly attributable to a decline in revenues, as well as to a rise in marketing and advertising costs per unit and litigation expense.
Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $11.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $16.5 million for the same period in 2007. The homebuilding segments capitalized all interest incurred during the second quarters of 2008 and 2007.
28
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to six months ended June 30, 2007
The homebuilding segments reported pretax losses of $230.8 million for the first six months of 2008, compared to pretax losses of $123.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Homebuilding results for the first six months of 2008 decreased from the same period in 2007 primarily due to inventory and other valuation adjustments and write-offs; a decline in closing volume; and increased sales incentives.
Homebuilding revenues were $871.9 million for the first six months of 2008, compared to $1.4 billion for the first six months of 2007, due to a 29.2 percent decrease in closings and a 13.6 percent decline in the average closing price of a home.
The Company executed land sales during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Homebuilding revenues for the first six months of 2008 included $11.5 million from land sales, compared to $7.0 million for the first six months of 2007, which contributed net gains of approximately $1.1 million to pretax earnings in each of the first six months of 2008 and 2007. The gross profit percentage from land sales was 9.4 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 15.7 percent for the same period in the prior year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, housing gross profit margins averaged 12.2 percent prior to inventory and other valuation adjustments and write-offs, compared to 18.8 percent for the same period in 2007. Subsequent to these adjustments, housing gross profit margins averaged negative 7.4 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 8.3 percent for the same period in 2007. The decrease was due to inventory and other valuation adjustments and write-offs totaling $168.8 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives related to homes delivered during the second quarter of 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, were 14.8 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 12.6 percent for the same period in the prior year. This increase was mainly attributable to a decline in revenues, as well as to a rise in marketing and advertising costs per unit and litigation expense, partially offset by an impairment of goodwill and higher severance charges taken in the first half of 2007.
Interest, which was incurred principally to finance land acquisitions, land development and home construction, totaled $23.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $31.9 million for the same period in 2007. The homebuilding segments capitalized all interest incurred during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Homebuilding Segment Information
Conditions have continued to be challenging in geographical areas that have previously experienced the highest price appreciation, such as the California, Florida, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Washington, D.C., markets. As a result of declining affordability, decreased demand and changes in buyer perception, the excess supply of housing inventory has been greater in these areas. In an attempt to maintain market share and reduce inventory investment to better match current sales volume levels, the Company has increased its use of sales discounting and incentives and has taken additional impairments. To date, discounting has been most pronounced in the Company’s West region due to dramatic price declines resulting from decreased affordability and mortgage financing difficulties. Of the Company’s total lots or homes with valuation adjustments during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, 25.3 percent of total impairments were taken in the North, 24.7 percent in the Southeast, 1.3 percent in Texas and 48.7 percent in the West regions, respectively.
29
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following table is a summary of impairments taken during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
NORTH | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory valuation adjustments | | $ | 32,911 | | $ | - | | $ | 45,005 | | $ | 7,998 | |
Option deposit and feasibility cost write-offs | | 1,797 | | 3,010 | | 2,346 | | 3,580 | |
Joint venture and other* impairments | | 35,858 | | - | | 35,858 | | - | |
Total | | 70,566 | | 3,010 | | 83,209 | | 11,578 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
SOUTHEAST | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory valuation adjustments | | 47,807 | | 13,116 | | 48,169 | | 31,980 | |
Option deposit and feasibility cost write-offs | | 6,094 | | 4,491 | | 7,612 | | 4,827 | |
Joint venture and other* impairments | | 24 | | - | | 581 | | - | |
Total | | 53,925 | | 17,607 | | 56,362 | | 36,807 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TEXAS | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory valuation adjustments | | 669 | | - | | 729 | | - | |
Option deposit and feasibility cost write-offs | | 1,813 | | 35 | | 1,814 | | 203 | |
Joint venture and other* impairments | | 113 | | - | | 193 | | - | |
Total | | 2,595 | | 35 | | 2,736 | | 203 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
WEST | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory valuation adjustments | | 53,111 | | 113,816 | | 58,756 | | 151,350 | |
Option deposit and feasibility cost write-offs | | 187 | | 12,624 | | 187 | | 12,690 | |
Joint venture and other* impairments | | - | | - | | 7,172 | | 15,429 | |
Total | | 53,298 | | 126,440 | | 66,115 | | 179,469 | |
TOTAL | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory valuation adjustments | | 134,498 | | 126,932 | | 152,659 | | 191,328 | |
Option deposit and feasibility cost write-offs | | 9,891 | | 20,160 | | 11,959 | | 21,300 | |
Joint venture and other* impairments | | 35,995 | | - | | 43,804 | | 15,429 | |
Total | | $ | 180,384 | | $ | 147,092 | | $ | 208,422 | | $ | 228,057 | |
* Other includes impairments to other assets.
New Orders
New order dollars decreased 27.8 percent for the second quarter of 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year. New order dollars for the three months ended June 30, 2008, rose 4.3 percent in Texas and fell 32.6 percent in the North, 30.0 percent in the Southeast and 47.6 percent in the West, compared to the second quarter of 2007. New orders for the second quarter of 2008 decreased 18.9 percent to 2,045 units from 2,521 units for the same period in 2007 primarily due to a 20.3 percent decline in selling communities, a softening demand in most markets and a more competitive sales environment.
The Company experiences seasonal variations in its quarterly operating results and capital requirements. Historically, new order activity is higher in the spring and summer months. As a result, it typically has more homes under construction, closes more homes, and has greater revenues and operating income in the third and fourth quarters of its fiscal year.
30
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following table is a summary of the Company’s new orders (units and aggregate sales value) for the periods presented:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |
($s in millions) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | % CHG | | 2008 | | 2007 | | % CHG | |
UNITS | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North | | 524 | | 653 | | (19.8) | % | 1,129 | | 1,489 | | (24.2) | % |
Southeast | | 536 | | 705 | | (24.0) | | 1,186 | | 1,494 | | (20.6) | |
Texas | | 668 | | 682 | | (2.1) | | 1,221 | | 1,511 | | (19.2) | |
West | | 317 | | 481 | | (34.1) | | 668 | | 1,016 | | (34.3) | |
Total | | 2,045 | | 2,521 | | (18.9) | % | 4,204 | | 5,510 | | (23.7) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DOLLARS | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North | | $ | 142 | | $ | 210 | | (32.6) | % | $ | 307 | | $ | 479 | | (36.0) | % |
Southeast | | 136 | | 195 | | (30.0) | | 288 | | 426 | | (32.3) | |
Texas | | 145 | | 139 | | 4.3 | | 262 | | 313 | | (16.2) | |
West | | 80 | | 153 | | (47.6) | | 172 | | 351 | | (51.0) | |
Total | | $ | 503 | | $ | 697 | | (27.8) | % | $ | 1,029 | | $ | 1,569 | | (34.4) | % |
The following table provides the Company’s cancellation percentages for the periods presented:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
North | | 31.6 | % | 33.4 | % | 31.3 | % | 29.5 | % |
Southeast | | 26.8 | | 36.4 | | 26.8 | | 34.5 | |
Texas | | 26.0 | | 33.0 | | 26.4 | | 28.6 | |
West | | 35.6 | | 33.9 | | 33.6 | | 31.4 | |
Total | | 29.3 | % | 34.3 | % | 29.1 | % | 31.0 | % |
The cancellation rate for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, was 29.3 percent, compared to 28.9 percent and 34.3 percent for the first quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2007, respectively.
The following table provides the number of the Company’s selling communities at June 30, 2008 and 2007:
| | | | 2008 | | 2007 | | % CHG | |
North | | | | 97 | | 122 | | (20.5) | % |
Southeast | | | | 107 | | 139 | | (23.0) | |
Texas | | | | 90 | | 97 | | (7.2) | |
West | | | | 43 | | 65 | | (33.8) | |
Total | | | | 337 | | 423 | | (20.3) | % |
31
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Closings
The following table provides the Company’s closings and average closing prices for the periods presented:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |
($s in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | % CHG | | 2008 | | 2007 | | % CHG | |
UNITS | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North | | 563 | | 699 | | (19.5) | % | 986 | | 1,306 | | (24.5) | % |
Southeast | | 535 | | 725 | | (26.2) | | 1,046 | | 1,482 | | (29.4) | |
Texas | | 446 | | 659 | | (32.3) | | 833 | | 1,243 | | (33.0) | |
West | | 284 | | 378 | | (24.9) | | 506 | | 732 | | (30.9) | |
Total | | 1,828 | | 2,461 | | (25.7) | % | 3,371 | | 4,763 | | (29.2) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVERAGE PRICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North | | $ | 288 | | $ | 320 | | (10.0) | % | $ | 286 | | $ | 318 | | (10.1) | % |
Southeast | | 248 | | 303 | | (18.2) | | 253 | | 308 | | (17.9) | |
Texas | | 215 | | 214 | | 0.5 | | 216 | | 215 | | 0.5 | |
West | | 258 | | 351 | | (26.5) | | 264 | | 362 | | (27.1) | |
Total | | $ | 254 | | $ | 292 | | (13.0) | % | $ | 255 | | $ | 295 | | (13.6) | % |
Outstanding Contracts
Outstanding contracts denote the Company’s backlog of homes sold but not closed, which are generally built and closed, subject to cancellation, over the subsequent two quarters. At June 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding contracts for 3,702 units, representing a 29.0 percent increase from 2,869 units at December 31, 2007, and a 25.3 percent decrease from 4,953 units at the end of the second quarter of 2007. The $955.8 million value of outstanding contracts at June 30, 2008, represented an increase of 21.5 percent from $786.4 million at December 31, 2007 and a decrease of 34.5 percent from June 30, 2007. The decrease from June 30, 2007, was primarily due to a 23.7 percent decline in unit orders. Decreases in average sales price resulted primarily from slowing market trends, a competitive sales environment and changes in product mix.
The following table provides the Company’s outstanding contracts (units and aggregate dollar value) and average prices at June 30, 2008 and 2007:
| | JUNE 30, 2008 | | JUNE 30, 2007 | |
| | UNITS | | DOLLARS (in millions) | | AVERAGE PRICE (in thousands) | | UNITS | | DOLLARS (in millions) | | AVERAGE PRICE (in thousands) | |
North | | 1,109 | | $ | 323 | | $ | 291 | | 1,340 | | $ | 450 | | $ | 334 | |
Southeast | | 1,086 | | 281 | | 259 | | 1,651 | | 496 | | 301 | |
Texas | | 1,064 | | 238 | | 223 | | 1,288 | | 274 | | 212 | |
West | | 443 | | 114 | | 257 | | 674 | | 239 | | 354 | |
Total | | 3,702 | | $ | 956 | | $ | 258 | | 4,953 | | $ | 1,459 | | $ | 294 | |
32
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
The following summary provides results for the homebuilding segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
NORTH | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 167,072 | | $ | 225,418 | | $ | 289,154 | | $ | 419,433 | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 181,824 | | 182,422 | | 302,389 | | 347,313 | |
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | 35,749 | | (356) | | 35,696 | | (356) | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 19,472 | | 22,638 | | 37,305 | | 43,314 | |
Total expenses | | 237,045 | | 204,704 | | 375,390 | | 390,271 | |
Pretax earnings (loss) | | $ | (69,973 | ) | $ | 20,714 | | $ | (86,236 | ) | $ | 29,162 | |
Housing gross profit margins | | (31.1 | ) % | 19.1 | % | (17.7 | ) % | 17.2 | % |
SOUTHEAST | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 132,649 | | $ | 221,859 | | $ | 265,373 | | $ | 461,047 | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 168,890 | | 188,830 | | 287,010 | | 394,018 | |
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | - | | (44) | | - | | (49) | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 19,736 | | 25,063 | | 38,350 | | 50,212 | |
Total expenses | | 188,626 | | 213,849 | | 325,360 | | 444,181 | |
Pretax earnings (loss) | | $ | (55,977 | ) | $ | 8,010 | | $ | (59,987 | ) | $ | 16,866 | |
Housing gross profit margins | | (20.8 | ) % | 14.9 | % | (4.9 | ) % | 14.7 | % |
TEXAS | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 95,780 | | $ | 142,101 | | $ | 180,080 | | $ | 268,450 | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 84,442 | | 116,951 | | 155,728 | | 222,116 | |
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | (143 | ) | (6) | | (149 | ) | (10) | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 14,767 | | 16,172 | | 28,331 | | 31,428 | |
Total expenses | | 99,066 | | 133,117 | | 183,910 | | 253,534 | |
Pretax earnings (loss) | | $ | (3,286 | ) | $ | 8,984 | | $ | (3,830 | ) | $ | 14,916 | |
Housing gross profit margins | | 12.7 | % | 17.7 | % | 14.0 | % | 17.3 | % |
WEST | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 76,782 | | $ | 133,200 | | $ | 137,276 | | $ | 265,011 | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 123,586 | | 243,217 | | 186,016 | | 395,767 | |
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | - | | 322 | | 7,160 | | 296 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 11,087 | | 18,889 | | 24,861 | | 53,623 | |
Total expenses | | 134,673 | | 262,428 | | 218,037 | | 449,686 | |
Pretax earnings (loss) | | $ | (57,891 | ) | $ | (129,228) | | $ | (80,761 | ) | $ | (184,675) | |
Housing gross profit margins | | (25.2 | ) % | (51.0) | % | (19.5 | ) % | (25.6) | % |
TOTAL | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 472,283 | | $ | 722,578 | | $ | 871,883 | | $ | 1,413,941 | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | 558,742 | | 731,420 | | 931,143 | | 1,359,214 | |
(Earnings) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | 35,606 | | (84) | | 42,707 | | (119) | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 65,062 | | 82,762 | | 128,847 | | 178,577 | |
Total expenses | | 659,410 | | 814,098 | | 1,102,697 | | 1,537,672 | |
Pretax earnings (loss) | | $ | (187,127 | ) | $ | (91,520) | | $ | (230,814 | ) | $ | (123,731) | |
Housing gross profit margins | | (18.2 | ) % | 4.6 | % | (7.4 | ) % | 8.3 | % |
33
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to three months ended June 30, 2007
North–Homebuilding revenues decreased by 25.9 percent to $167.1 million in 2008 from $225.4 million in 2007 primarily due to a 19.5 percent decline in the number of homes delivered and a 10.0 percent decrease in average sales price. Gross margins on home sales were negative 31.1 percent in 2008, compared to 19.1 percent in 2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to inventory and joint venture valuation adjustments and write-offs of $70.5 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 18.8 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, versus 11.7 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the North region incurred $70.0 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $20.7 million of pretax earnings in 2007.
Southeast–Homebuilding revenues were $132.6 million in 2008, compared to $221.9 million in 2007, a decrease of 40.2 percent, primarily due to a 26.2 percent decline in the number of homes delivered and an 18.2 percent decrease in average sales price. Gross margins on home sales were negative 20.8 percent in 2008, compared to 14.9 percent in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to inventory valuation adjustments and write-offs of $45.3 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 12.9 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, versus 11.1 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the Southeast region incurred $56.0 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $8.0 million of pretax earnings in 2007.
Texas–Homebuilding revenues decreased by 32.6 percent to $95.8 million in 2008 from $142.1 million in 2007 primarily due to a 32.3 percent decline in the number of homes delivered, partially offset by a slight increase in average sales price. Gross margins on home sales were 12.7 percent in 2008, compared to 17.7 percent in 2007. The change was primarily due to inventory valuation adjustments and write-offs of $1.9 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 9.3 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to 6.1 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the Texas region incurred $3.3 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $9.0 million of pretax earnings in 2007.
West–Homebuilding revenues decreased by 42.4 percent to $76.8 million in 2008, compared to $133.2 million in 2007, primarily due to a 24.9 percent decline in the number of homes delivered and to a 26.5 percent decrease in average sales price. Gross margins from home sales were negative 25.2 percent in 2008, compared to negative 51.0 percent in 2007. The change was primarily due to lower inventory valuation adjustments and write-offs, which totaled $24.6 million in the second quarter of 2008 compared to $83.6 million in 2007, partially offset by a rise in price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 16.0 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to 11.8 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the West region incurred $57.9 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $129.2 million of pretax losses in 2007.
Six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to six months ended June 30, 2007
North–Homebuilding revenues decreased by 31.1 percent to $289.2 million in 2008 from $419.4 million in 2007 primarily due to a 24.5 percent decline in the number of homes delivered and a 10.1 percent decrease in average sales price. Gross margins on home sales were negative 17.7 percent in 2008, compared to 17.2 percent in 2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to inventory and joint venture valuation adjustments and write-offs of $83.1 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 18.6 percent for the first six months ended June 30, 2008, versus 11.5 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the North region incurred $86.2 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $29.2 million of pretax earnings in 2007.
Southeast–Homebuilding revenues were $265.4 million in 2008, compared to $461.0 million in 2007, a decrease of 42.4 percent, primarily due to a 29.4 percent decline in the number of homes delivered and a 17.9 percent decrease in average sales price. Gross margins on home sales were negative 4.9 percent in 2008, compared to 14.7 percent in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to inventory valuation adjustments and write-offs of $47.7 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 14.4 percent for the first six months ended June 30, 2008, versus 10.4 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the Southeast region incurred $60.0 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $16.9 million of pretax earnings in 2007.
34
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Texas–Homebuilding revenues decreased by 32.9 percent to $180.1 million in 2008 from $268.5 million in 2007 primarily due to a 33.0 percent decline in the number of homes delivered, partially offset by a slight increase in average sales price. Gross margins on home sales were 14.0 percent in 2008, compared to 17.3 percent in 2007. The change was primarily due to inventory valuation adjustments and write-offs of $2.0 million, as well as to increased price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 9.7 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 6.1 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the Texas region incurred $3.8 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $14.9 million of pretax earnings in 2007.
West–Homebuilding revenues decreased by 48.2 percent to $137.3 million in 2008, compared to $265.0 million in 2007, primarily due to a 30.9 percent decline in the number of homes delivered and to a 27.1 percent decrease in average sales price. Gross margins from home sales were negative 19.5 percent in 2008, compared to negative 25.6 percent in 2007. The change was primarily due to inventory and joint venture valuation adjustments and write-offs of $35.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008, partially offset by a rise in price concessions and sales incentives that totaled 17.4 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 12.1 percent for the same period in 2007. As a result, the West region incurred $80.8 million of pretax losses in 2008, compared to $184.7 million of pretax losses in 2007.
Financial Services
The Company’s financial services segment provides mortgage-related products and services, as well as title, escrow and insurance services, to its homebuyers and subcontractors. By aligning its operations with the Company’s homebuilding segments, the financial services segment leverages this relationship to offer its lending services to homebuyers. In addition to being a valuable asset to customers, the financial services segment generates a profit for the Company. Providing mortgage financing and other services to its customers allows the Company to better monitor its backlog and closing process. The majority of all loans are sold within one business day of the date they close. The third party purchaser then services and manages the loans, assuming the credit risk of borrower default. The Company had also provided construction-related insurance to subcontractors in its western markets. Additionally, the financial services segment offers insurance for liability risks, specifically homeowners’ warranty coverage, arising in connection with the homebuilding business of the Company.
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
| | THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | | SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |
(in thousands, except units) | | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | |
Net gains on sales of mortgages | | $ | 7,236 | | $ | 8,105 | | $ | 14,574 | | $ | 15,319 | |
Origination fees | | 4,187 | | 6,470 | | 7,954 | | 12,230 | |
Title/escrow/insurance | | 3,873 | | 6,378 | | 9,007 | | 12,903 | |
Interest and other | | 302 | | 203 | | 629 | | 455 | |
TOTAL REVENUES | | 15,598 | | 21,156 | | 32,164 | | 40,907 | |
EXPENSES | | 10,112 | | 11,364 | | 20,091 | | 23,092 | |
PRETAX EARNINGS | | $ | 5,486 | | $ | 9,792 | | $ | 12,073 | | $ | 17,815 | |
Originations (units) | | 1,413 | | 1,848 | | 2,597 | | 3,562 | |
Ryland Homes origination capture rate | | 82.9 | % | 79.9 | % | 82.6 | % | 79.5 | % |
Mortgage backed securities and notes receivable average balance | | $ | 366 | | $ | 419 | | $ | 377 | | $ | 490 | |
Origination fees are recognized upon loan origination and are recorded under “Origination fees” with the related costs recorded under “Expenses.” Prior to adoption of SFAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008, origination fees were recognized upon the sale of related mortgage loans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 91 (“SFAS 91”), “Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.”
35
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to three months ended June 30, 2007
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the financial services segment reported pretax earnings of $5.5 million, compared to $9.8 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 23.5 percent decline in the number of mortgages originated due to a slowdown in the homebuilding market, as well as to a 13.8 percent decrease in average loan size.
Revenues for the financial services segment decreased 26.3 percent to $15.6 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to $21.2 million for the same period in the prior year. The decline was primarily attributable to a reduced volume of loans originated and sold. The capture rate of mortgages originated for customers of the Company’s homebuilding operations was 82.9 percent and 79.9 percent for the second quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, expenses were $10.1 million, versus $11.4 million for the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to personnel reductions, which were made in an effort to align overhead with lower production volumes.
Six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to six months ended June 30, 2007
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the financial services segment reported pretax earnings of $12.1 million, compared to $17.8 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 27.1 percent decline in the number of mortgages originated due to a slowdown in the homebuilding markets, as well as to a 13.5 percent decrease in average loan size. This decline was partially offset by the recognition of a $3.2 million gain resulting from the 2008 implementation of SAB 109, which requires servicing rights related to interest rate lock commitments to be recorded at fair value as a component of the locked loan pipeline.
Revenues for the financial services segment decreased 21.4 percent to $32.2 million for the first half of 2008, compared to $40.9 million for the same period in the prior year. The decline was primarily attributable to a reduced volume of loans originated and sold. The capture rate of mortgages originated for customers of the Company’s homebuilding operations was 82.6 percent and 79.5 percent for the first six months of 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, expenses were $20.1 million, versus $23.1 million for the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to personnel reductions, which were made in an effort to align overhead with lower production volumes.
Corporate
Three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to three months ended June 30, 2007
Corporate expenses were $8.1 million and $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. This increase was primarily due to a $1.1 million decline in the market value of investments included within the Company’s benefit plans.
Six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to six months ended June 30, 2007
Corporate expenses were $17.2 million and $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. This increase was primarily due to a $3.1 million decline in the market value of investments included within the Company’s benefit plans.
36
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Income Taxes
The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis to determine whether a valuation allowance is required. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was required and therefore recorded a valuation allowance of $124.0 million, which was reflected as a noncash charge to income tax expense.
The Company’s effective tax rate was 27.3 percent for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to 41.0 percent tax benefit rate for the same period in 2007. The change in the tax rate for the second quarter of 2008, compared to the second quarter ended June 30, 2007, was primarily attributable to the noncash tax charge of $124.0 million for the Company’s valuation allowance related to its deferred tax assets. Due to the uncertainty of current market conditions, the Company is unable to provide precise annual effective rate guidance at this time. (See Note 11, “Income Taxes.”)
37
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Financial Condition and Liquidity
The Company has historically funded its homebuilding and financial services operations with cash flows from operating activities, borrowings under its revolving credit facilities and the issuance of new debt securities. In light of market conditions in 2008, the Company continued its efforts in generating cash, reducing debt levels and strengthening its balance sheet by selling excess land inventory; paying off a maturing senior note; terminating or renegotiating land option contracts; consolidating or exiting underperforming markets; and restructuring and downsizing operating teams. As a result of this strategy, the Company generated $37.1 million in operating cash flow and repaid $50.0 million of long-term debt during the quarter, ending with $199.4 million in cash and cash equivalents.
At June 30, 2008, the Company’s net debt-to-capital ratio was 41.0 percent, an increase from 34.6 percent at December 31, 2007. This increase was primarily due to a decrease in retained earnings, mainly as a result of inventory and tax valuation adjustments. The Company remains focused on maintaining its liquidity so that it can be flexible in reacting to changing market conditions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company provided $12.5 million of cash from its operations. The Company invested $6.5 million in property, plant and equipment and used $50.3 million in financing activities, which included the payments of $50.0 million of long-term debt and $10.2 million of dividends. The net cash used during the six months ended June 30, 2008, was $44.3 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company used $126.6 million of cash in its operations. The Company invested $22.0 million in property, plant and equipment and generated $17.4 million from financing activities, which included net proceeds of $70.1 million from additional debt and outflows for stock repurchases of $59.3 million and dividends of $10.2 million. The net cash used during the six months ended June 30, 2007, was $130.5 million.
Dividends totaled $0.12 per share for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Consolidated inventories owned by the Company decreased by 12.9 percent to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2008, compared to $1.7 billion at December 31, 2007. The Company attempts to maintain a projected four- to five-year supply of land. At June 30, 2008, the Company controlled 32,352 lots, with 24,322 lots owned and 8,030 lots, or 24.8 percent, under option. As a result of its efforts to match controlled inventory with current unit volume levels, lots controlled declined by 18.9 percent and 40.4 percent, respectively, compared to 39,900 lots and 54,283 lots under control at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively. The Company continues to evaluate its option contracts for changes in the viability of communities and abandonment potential. In an effort to increase liquidity, models have been sold and leased back on a selective basis for generally 3 to 18 months. The Company owned 82.1 percent of its model homes at June 30, 2008, compared to 76.1 percent and 72.0 percent at December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively.
The homebuilding segments’ borrowing arrangements included senior notes, an unsecured revolving credit facility and nonrecourse secured notes payable. Senior notes outstanding totaled $750.0 million at June 30, 2008, compared to $800.0 million at December 31, 2007.
In June 2008, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility. The amendment included, among other things: a) a decrease in the Company’s borrowing availability from $750.0 million to $550.0 million; b) a reduction in the base amount for the minimum consolidated tangible net worth covenant to $600.0 million; c) an increase in the pricing grid, which is based on the Company’s leverage ratio and public debt rating; d) an adjustment in the permitted leverage ratio to no less than 55.0 percent for the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, 52.5 percent for the second, third and fourth quarters of 2009, and 50.0 percent thereafter; and e) a change in the restriction of the Company’s book value of unsold land to 1.15x its consolidated tangible net worth.
38
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The facility matures in January 2011 and provides access to additional financing through an accordion feature, under which the aggregate commitment may be increased up to $1.5 billion, subject to the availability of additional lending commitments. The revolving credit facility includes a $75.0 million swing-line facility and the availability to issue standby letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit agreement are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of the Company’s 100 percent-owned homebuilding subsidiaries. Such guarantees are full and unconditional. Interest rates on outstanding borrowings are determined either by reference to LIBOR, with margins determined based on changes in the Company’s leverage ratio and credit ratings, or by reference to an alternate base rate. The credit facility is used for general corporate purposes and contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated tangible net worth requirement of $600.0 million; and a permitted leverage ratio of 57.5 percent at June 30, 2008; and limitations on unsold home units, unsold land, lot inventory, investments and senior debt. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at June 30, 2008. (See Note 8, “Debt.”) The Company uses its unsecured revolving credit facility to finance increases in its homebuilding inventory and working capital, when necessary.
There were no borrowings outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007. Under the facility, the Company had letters of credit outstanding that totaled $135.3 million and $157.8 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Unused borrowing capacity under the facility totaled $414.7 million and $592.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. At June 30, 2008, the $550.0 million facility was subject to a borrowing base limitation covenant, which restricted its borrowing capacity to $442.5 million, of which $307.2 million was available.
The $250.0 million of 5.4 percent senior notes due May 2012; the $250.0 million of 6.9 percent senior notes due June 2013; and the $250.0 million of 5.4 percent senior notes due January 2015 are subject to certain covenants that include, among other things, restrictions on additional secured debt and the sale of assets. At June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company’s $50.0 million of 5.4 percent senior notes matured and were repaid. (See Note 8, “Debt.”)
To finance its land purchases, the Company may also use seller-financed nonrecourse secured notes payable. At June 30, 2008, such notes payable outstanding amounted to $34.9 million, compared to $39.1 million at December 31, 2007.
The financial services segment uses cash generated internally and borrowings against the RMC Credit Agreement to finance its operations.
In January 2008, RMC entered into the RMC Credit Agreement. The RMC Credit Agreement matures in January 2009 and provides for borrowings up to $40.0 million to fund RMC’s mortgage loan origination operations. It is secured by underlying mortgage loans and by other assets of RMC. Facility balances are repaid as loans funded under the agreement are sold to third parties. The RMC Credit Agreement’s interest rate is set at LIBOR plus 0.9 percent, with a commitment fee of 0.125 percent. The RMC Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants and provisions defining events of default. The covenants require RMC to maintain certain financial ratios, including a tangible net worth minimum of $13.0 million; an adjusted tangible net worth minimum of $5.0 million; a ratio of total indebtedness to adjusted tangible net worth of 12:1; and consolidated net income for the four preceding fiscal quarters. At June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants, and there was $6.7 million of outstanding borrowings against this warehouse line of credit.
The Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC for up to $1.0 billion of its debt and equity securities on April 11, 2005. At June 30, 2008, $600.0 million remained available under this registration statement.
39
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The registration statement provides that securities may be offered, from time to time, in one or more series and in the form of senior, subordinated or convertible debt; preferred stock; preferred stock represented by depository shares; common stock; stock purchase contracts; stock purchase units; and warrants to purchase both debt and equity securities. In the future, the Company intends to continue to maintain effective shelf registration statements that will facilitate access to the capital markets. The timing and amount of future offerings, if any, will depend on market and general business conditions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its outstanding common stock. The Company had existing authorization from its Board of Directors to purchase approximately 6.5 million additional shares at a cost of $142.3 million, based on the Company’s stock price at June 30, 2008. Outstanding shares at June 30, 2008, were 42,485,267, versus 42,151,085 at December 31, 2007.
While the Company expects challenging economic conditions to continue, it is focused on managing overhead, land acquisitions, development and construction activity in order to generate cash flow and maintain debt levels commensurate with its business.
Off–Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land and lot option purchase contracts in order to procure land or lots for the construction of homes. Land and lot option purchase contracts enable the Company to control significant lot positions with a minimal capital investment, thereby reducing the risks associated with land ownership and development. At June 30, 2008, the Company had $57.8 million in cash deposits and letters of credit to purchase land and lots with a total purchase price of $458.4 million. Only $17.6 million of the $458.4 million in land and lot option purchase contracts contain specific performance provisions. Additionally, the Company’s liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the nonrefundable deposits, letters of credit and other nonrefundable amounts incurred.
Pursuant to FIN 46, as amended, the Company consolidated $60.5 million of inventory not owned pertaining to land and lot option purchase contracts, representing the fair value of the optioned property; and a $168,000 credit balance, representing cost to complete for one of its homebuilding joint ventures at June 30, 2008. (See Note 6, “Variable Interest Entities” and Note 7, “Investments in Joint Ventures.”)
At June 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding letters of credit under its revolving credit facility totaling $135.3 million. Additionally, it had development or performance bonds totaling $233.5 million, issued by third parties, to secure performance under various contracts and obligations relating to land or municipal improvements, as compared to $313.2 million at December 31, 2007. The Company expects that the obligations secured by these letters of credit and performance bonds will generally be satisfied in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with applicable contractual terms. To the extent that the obligations are fulfilled, the related letters of credit and performance bonds will be released, and the Company will not have any continuing obligations.
The Company has no material third-party guarantees other than those associated with its revolving credit facility, senior notes and investments in joint ventures. (See Note 13, “Commitments and Contingencies” and Note 15, “Supplemental Guarantor Information.”)
Critical Accounting Policies
Preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires the use of judgment in the application of accounting policies and estimates of inherently uncertain matters. There were no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, compared to those policies disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
40
Table of Contents
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Outlook
During the first six months of the year, the Company experienced a decline in sales orders for new homes, compared to the same period last year. The Company believes its sales orders simulate broader market trends that reflect soft demand for residential housing. Nearly all markets have been affected by reductions in the affordability of homes, the availability of mortgage products and consumer demand for homes, leading to the continued buildup of new and resale home inventories. At June 30, 2008, the Company’s backlog of orders for new homes totaled 3,702 units, or a projected dollar value of $955.8 million, reflecting a 21.5 percent increase in dollar value from December 31, 2007. As long as the imbalance of housing supply and demand continues, the Company will remain focused on its liquidity and balance sheet, while seeking to optimize its earnings and positioning itself for a return to a more favorable economic environment.
41
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the Company’s market risk since December 31, 2007. For information regarding the Company’s market risk, refer to “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
At the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was performed by the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2008.
The Company has a committee consisting of key officers, including the chief accounting officer and general counsel, to ensure that all information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports is accumulated and communicated to those individuals responsible for the preparation of the reports, as well as to all principal executive and financial officers, in a manner that will allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
At December 31, 2007, the Company completed a detailed evaluation of its internal control over financial reporting, including the assessment, documentation and testing of its controls, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. No material weaknesses were identified. The Company’s management summarized its assessment process and documented its conclusions in the “Report of Management,” which appears in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm summarized its review of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting in an attestation report, which also appears in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, has evaluated any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, and has concluded that there was no change during this period that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Contingent liabilities may arise from obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business or from the usual obligations of on-site housing producers for the completion of contracts.
The Company is party to various other legal proceedings generally incidental to its businesses. Based on evaluation of these matters and discussions with counsel, management believes that liabilities arising from these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors set forth in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company did not purchase any of its own equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
42
Table of Contents
On December 6, 2006, the Company announced that it had received authorization from its Board of Directors to purchase shares totaling $175.0 million, or approximately 3.1 million shares, based on the Company’s stock price on that date. At June 30, 2008, there was $142.3 million available for purchase in accordance with this authorization, or approximately 6.5 million shares, based on the Company’s stock price on that date. This authorization does not have an expiration date.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held on April 23, 2008. Proxies were solicited by the Company, pursuant to Regulation 14 under the Exchange Act, to elect directors of the Company for the ensuing year; to approve The Ryland Group, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan; to re-approve its Senior Executive Performance Plan, TRG Incentive Plan and Performance Award Program to comply with requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code; to consider a stockholder proposal for adopting quantitative goals for reducing greenhouse emissions from its products and operations; and to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
Proxies representing 37,453,517 shares of common stock eligible to vote at the meeting, or 88.7 percent of the 42,237,765 outstanding shares, were voted.
The eight incumbent directors nominated by the Company were re-elected. The following is a separate tabulation with respect to the vote for each nominee:
Name | | Total Votes For | | Total Votes Withheld | |
R. Chad Dreier | | 37,029,381 | | 424,136 | |
Leslie M. Frécon | | 37,126,169 | | 327,348 | |
Roland A. Hernandez | | 36,563,865 | | 889,652 | |
William L. Jews | | 27,730,062 | | 9,723,455 | |
Ned Mansour | | 37,166,551 | | 286,966 | |
Robert E. Mellor | | 36,575,993 | | 877,524 | |
Norman J. Metcalfe | | 27,739,386 | | 9,714,131 | |
Charlotte St. Martin | | 27,738,632 | | 9,714,885 | |
The Ryland Group, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by 88.9 percent of the shares voting. The following is a breakdown of the vote on such matter:
Total Votes For | | Total Votes Against | | Abstain | |
29,186,486 | | 3,636,861 | | 36,280 | |
The Ryland Group, Inc. Senior Executive Performance Plan was re-approved by 94.0 percent of the shares voting. The following is a breakdown of the vote on such matter:
Total Votes For | | Total Votes Against | | Abstain | |
33,524,044 | | 2,127,145 | | 1,802,328 | |
The Ryland Group, Inc. TRG Incentive Plan was re-approved by 97.8 percent of the shares voting. The following is a breakdown of the vote on such matter:
Total Votes For | | Total Votes Against | | Abstain | |
34,890,204 | | 771,421 | | 1,791,892 | |
43
Table of Contents
The Ryland Group, Inc. Performance Award Program was re-approved by 90.5 percent of the shares voting. The following is a breakdown of the vote on such matter:
Total Votes For | | Total Votes Against | | Abstain | |
33,857,747 | | 3,559,527 | | 36,243 | |
A proposal from The Nathan Cummings Foundation (a stockholder) requesting adoption of quantitative goals for reducing gas emissions from the Company’s products and operations was not approved by 74.6 percent of the shares voting. The following is a breakdown of the vote on such matter:
Total Votes For | | Total Votes Against | | Abstain | |
6,411,461 | | 18,826,772 | | 7,621,393 | |
The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, was approved by 99.9 percent of the shares voting. The following is a breakdown of the vote on such matter:
Total Votes For | | Total Votes Against | | Abstain | |
37,403,916 | | 28,545 | | 21,056 | |
44
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
| | 12.1 | | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| | | | (Filed herewith) |
| | | | |
| | 31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | (Filed herewith) |
| | | | |
| | 31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | (Filed herewith) |
| | | | |
| | 32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | (Furnished herewith) |
| | | | |
| | 32.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | (Furnished herewith) |
45
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| THE RYLAND GROUP, INC. | |
| Registrant |
| |
| |
| |
August 1, 2008 | | By: | /s/ Gordon A. Milne | |
Date | Gordon A. Milne |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
| |
| |
| |
August 1, 2008 | | By: | /s/ David L. Fristoe | |
Date | David L. Fristoe |
| Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
| (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | | | | | |
46
Table of Contents
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | | |
| | |
12.1 | | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| | (Filed herewith) |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | (Filed herewith) |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | (Filed herewith) |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | (Furnished herewith) |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | (Furnished herewith) |
| | | | |
47