UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_______________
FORM 10-Q
_______________
|
|
|
|
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ______to______.
CHINA GRAND RESORTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEVADA |
| 0-27246 |
| 62-1407521 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
| (Commission File No.) |
| (IRS Employee Identification No.) |
RM 905, Reignwood Center
No.8 Yong’an Dongli Jianguomen Outer Street,
Chaoyang District Beijing, 100022,
People’s Republic of China
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
_______________
(86-10) 8528 8755
(Issuer Telephone number)
_______________
(Former Name or Former Address if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o
Smaller Reporting Company [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act [ ]Yes [X]No
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of March 31, 2010: 3,272,311 shares of common stock
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | Page
| |
|
| |
Item 1. | Financial Statements | 3 |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation | 16 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II -OTHER INFORMATION | ||
| ||
Item 6. | Exhibits. | 25 |
SIGNATURES |
| 26 |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHINA GRAND RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”)) | |||||||
|
| As of | |||||
|
| March 31, 2010 |
|
| September 30, 2009 | ||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
| 83,688 |
|
|
| 26,424 |
Other receivables |
|
| 20,376 |
|
|
| 7,751 |
Total Current Assets |
| $ | 104,064 |
|
| $ | 34,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
| 33,661 |
|
|
| 6,809 |
Intangible assets, net |
| 1,438 |
|
|
| - | |
|
| $ | 139,163 |
|
| $ | 40,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other payables |
|
| 54,544 |
|
|
| 106,491 |
Shareholders payable |
|
| 416,200 |
|
|
| 65,281 |
Related party payables |
|
| - |
|
|
| 49,072 |
Total Current Liabilities |
| $ | 470,744 |
|
| $ | 220,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
| - |
|
|
| - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value, authorized 1,750,000,000 shares, 3,272,311 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 |
|
| 3,272 |
|
|
| 3,272 |
Additional paid-in capital – common stock |
|
| 9,346,133 |
|
|
| 9,346,143 |
Additional paid-in capital – warrants |
|
| 752,907 |
|
|
| 752,907 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
| 65,043 |
|
|
| 65,152 |
Accumulated deficit |
|
| (10,498,936) |
|
|
| (10,347,324) |
Treasury stock |
|
| - |
|
|
| (10) |
Total Stockholders' Deficiency |
|
| (331,581) |
|
|
| (179,860) |
|
| $ | 139,163 |
|
| $ | 40,984 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
3
CHINA GRAND RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Six Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||
|
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 | |||||
|
|
| (unaudited) |
|
| (restated) (unaudited |
|
| (unaudited) |
|
| (restated) (unaudited) | |
CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
General and administrative expenses |
| $ | 78,755 |
| $ | 149,873 |
| $ | 145,497 |
| $ | 372,927 | |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 2,459 |
|
| 46,834 |
|
| 2,857 |
|
| 184,234 | |
|
|
| (81,214) |
|
| (196,707) |
|
| (148,354) |
|
| (557,160) | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS |
|
| (81,214) |
|
| (196,707) |
|
| (148,354) |
|
| (557,160) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest (expense) income |
|
| (2,048) |
|
| (229) |
|
| (3,258) |
|
| 4,604 | |
Income from revaluation of liquidated damages |
|
| - |
|
| 163,000 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,903,000 | |
Impairment loss on intangible assets |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (95,568) | |
|
|
| (2,048) |
|
| 162,771 |
|
| (3,258) |
|
| 1,812,036 | |
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | (83,262) |
|
| (33,936) |
|
| (151,612) |
|
| 1,254,876 | |||
Income tax expenses |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - | |
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
| (83,262) |
|
| (33,936) |
|
| (151,612) |
|
| 1,254,876 | |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Impairment loss on goodwill due to disposal |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (4,172,982) | |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (18,993) | |
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
| - |
|
| 189,230 |
|
| - |
|
| 189,230 | |
GAIN (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
| - |
|
| 189,230 |
|
| - |
|
| (4,002,745) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
|
| (83,262) |
|
| 155,294 |
|
| (151,612) |
|
| (2,747,869) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
| (92) |
|
| (214,144) |
|
| (109) |
|
| (192,056) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
| $ | (83,355) |
| $ | (58,850) |
| $ | (151,722) |
| $ | (2,939,925) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Weighted average number of common stock outstanding -basic and diluted |
|
| 3,272,311 |
| 325,056 |
|
|
3,272,311 |
|
|
324,712 | ||
Net (loss) earnings per share |
| $ | (0.03) |
| $ | 0.48 |
| $ | (0.05) |
| $ | (8.46) | |
(Loss) earnings per share from continuing operations -basic and diluted |
| $ | (0.03) |
| $ | (0.10) |
| $ | (0.05) |
| $ | 3.87 | |
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations -basic and diluted |
| $ | - |
| $ | 0.58 |
| $ | - |
| $ | (12.33) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
4
CHINA GRAND RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
(Currency expressed in United States Dollars (“US$”))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months Ended March 31, | |||||
|
| 2010 |
|
| 2009 | ||
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
| (Restated) (Unaudited) | ||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
| $ | (151,612) |
|
| $ | (2,747,869) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 2,857 |
|
|
| 184,234 |
Impairment loss on goodwill and intangible assets |
|
| - |
|
|
| 4,268,550 |
Income from revaluation of liquidated damages |
|
| - |
|
|
| (1,903,000) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
| - |
|
|
| 18,993 |
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
| - |
|
|
| (189,230) |
Increase in other receivable |
|
| (12,625) |
|
|
| (33,639) |
Decrease in other payable |
|
| (51,947) |
|
|
| (281,372) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
| (213,327) |
|
|
| (683,333) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Purchase of ) proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
| (27,964) |
|
|
| 383,942 |
Purchase of intangible assets |
|
| (1,569) |
|
|
| - |
Prepayments from related parties |
|
| - |
|
|
| 493,945 |
Net cash acquired from acquisition of a subsidiary |
|
| - |
|
|
| 181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
| (29,533) |
|
|
| 878,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Repayment to) loan from related parties |
|
| (49,072) |
|
|
| 86,627 |
Loan from shareholders |
|
| 350,919 |
|
|
| - |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
| 301,847 |
|
|
| 86,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuation on cash and cash equivalents |
|
| (1,723) |
|
|
| (249,819) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
| 57,264 |
|
|
| 31,543 |
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
| - |
|
|
| (18,993) |
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
| 57,264 |
|
|
| 12,550 |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
| 26,424 |
|
|
| 42,780 |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
| $ | 83,688 |
|
| $ | 55,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
Income taxes paid |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Liquidated damage share issued |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | 15,000 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
5
CHINA GRAND RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of China Grand Resort, Inc. (f.k.a Asia Premium Television Group, Inc) and its subsidiaries (“CGND”, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. The information furnished in the interim consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such consolidated financial statements. Although management believes the disclosures and information presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these interim consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company's most recent audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 filed on January 13, 2009. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for longer periods or the entire year.
Organization
The Company was incorporated in the state of Nevada on September 21, 1989 under the name Fulton Ventures, Inc.
In June 2001, we acquired American Overseas Investment Co., Ltd. (“AOI”), a company incorporated in Macau, the special administrative region of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”). With our acquisition of AOI, we began to focus our business on acquiring and developing companies with the goal of building a broad network of media, marketing and advertising companies in the PRC. On September 19, 2002, we changed our name to Asia Premium Television Group, Inc. to more accurately reflect our business at the time.
In July 2004, we completed the acquisition of 100% of Beijing Asia Hongzhi Advertising (“BAHA”), a company organized under the laws of the PRC, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. In July 2004, we also completed the acquisition of 100% of BAHA’s other subsidiary, Beijing Hongzhi Century Advertising (“BHCA”), a company organized under the laws of the PRC. As a result of these transactions, we became engaged in advertising production, and media consultation providing marketing, brand management, advertising, media planning, public relations and direct marketing services to clients in the PRC. In September 2005, we sold our interest in AOI to an unaffiliated third party.
In March 2007, we effected a 1,000 for 1 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock.
In July 2007, the Company acquired 100% ofSun New Media Transaction Service Ltd. (“SNMTS”), a company incorporated in Hong Kong, and its wholly owned subsidiary China Focus Channel Development Co., Ltd (“CFCD”), a company incorporated in People’s Republic of China, from NextMart Inc. (OTB: NXMR) for limited consideration.
On December 31, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with Nanchang Hongcheng Mansion Limited, an unaffiliated company, to acquire a 70% equity interest in Jiangxi Hongcheng Tengyi Telecommunication Company, Ltd ("JXHC"), a local reseller of mobile minutes in Jiangxi Province. As consideration, we paid the seller 2 million RMB (approximately $282,486 USD).
On January 3, 2008, we entered into an agreement with Union Max Enterprises Ltd. to acquire a Provincial Class One Full Service Operator license for the Jiangxi Province, PRC. On that same date, we divested our traditional advertising business and focused on our new mobile phone-based marketing and advertising business, In this regard, we effected the divestiture of our traditional advertising business through a sale and purchase agreement with Fanya Advertising Company Ltd. ("Fanya"). Pursuant to the agreement, we sold BAHA and its wholly-owned Chinese subsidiaries, including BHCA ("BAHA Group") to Fanya for a total consideration of $4.8 million which was completed on January 10, 2008. Under the agreement with Union Max, we paid them the sum of $6 million, of which $4.5 million was paid in cash and $1.5 million was paid in the form of our common stock. The acquisition was completed on March 31, 2008. As a result of that transaction, we acquired a Provincial Cl ass One Full Service Operator license for the Jiangxi Province. Union Max was a subsidiary of China Mobile and Communications Association ("CMCA"). CMCA is China's leading association of telecommunications and telecommunication-related companies. Subsequently, in December 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company resolved to terminate the Company’s top up services in Jiangxi Province, and, on May 11, 2009, we entered into a share transfer agreement with an unaffiliated third party wherein we sold our ownership in JXHC for a total consideration of US$100. The transaction was effective March 31, 2009.
6
On March 30, 2009, we completed an acquisition agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”) with GlobStream Technology Inc. (“GlobStream”) and its shareholders to acquire 100% of GlobStream, a Cayman Islands corporation. GlobStream was founded by Dr. Wenjun Luo, one of our previous directors and was an internet developer of unique mobile Internet software called Total Mobile Media. In May 2009, we terminated the operations related to GlobStream. Effective on August 1, 2009, the Company sold its ownership in GlobStream to Beijing Hua Hui Hengye Investment Limited.
On July 9, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Redrock Capital Venture Limited (“Redrock”), a BVI company, to satisfy and cancel $223,529 in outstanding loans in exchange for the issuance of 1,853,659 shares of our common stock.
On August 1, 2009, the Company entered into a subscription and asset sale agreement (the “Agreement”) with Beijing Hua Hui Hengye Investment Ltd. (“Hua Hui”), an unaffiliated PRC company. Hua Hui is an affiliate of The Beijing Hua Hui Corporation, a PRC real estate construction and development conglomerate that specializes in constructing and developing travel, resort, hotel, and apartment properties in popular tourist and other destinations within the PRC. Under the Agreement, we received from Hua Hui the commercial income rights to 10,000 square meters to a 17 story apartment building in the Huadun Changde International Hotel’s Apartment Complex located in the city of Changde, Hunan Province (“Project”). The Project is currently under development by Hua Hui. In exchange, we agreed to issue to Hua Hui 55,487,805 shares of our common stock valued at US$0.12 per share (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the transaction date) for a t otal stock value of RMB 45,500,000 (or US$6,658,536), and transferred to Hua Hui certain other company assets valued at approximately RMB 4,500,000 (US$658,241.18). These assets consisted of all of our shares of the GlobStream, certain assets of both Sun New Media Transaction Services Limited and China Focus Channel Development Co., Ltd, and other miscellaneous assets of us. On September 8, 2009, we issued 16,646,342 shares of our common stock to Wise Gold Investment Ltd., a British Virgin Island company acting on behalf of Hua Hui. On that same date, we also issued 38,841,463 shares of common stock to Blossom Grow Holdings Limited, a British Virgin Island company, as escrow agent under an escrow agreement by and among our company, the escrow agent, and Hua Hui. The escrow agent will hold the escrow shares pending completion of the Project which is expected to occur at or near the end of calendar 2010. If the escrow agent receives written instructions from the Company that the Project is completed in accorda nce with the terms of the Agreement, the escrow agent will release the escrow shares to Hua Hui. However, if after projected completion date, the Project has not been completed, the escrow shares will continue to be held at escrow for one year. If after one year, the project still has not been completed, then the Company and Hua Hui will negotiate an agreement to deal with the escrow shares. During the escrow period, Hua Hui will be able to vote such shares provided it has reached an agreement with us on such matter(s). As a result, Hua Hui and Mr. Menghua Liu, Hua Hui’s Chairman and sole shareholder and the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Office, are deemed the beneficial owner of such shares. After giving effect to the transaction, Hua Hui became the Company’s majority shareholder and beneficially owns approximately 84.77% Company’s outstanding shares.
Effective on November 16, 2009, we changed our name to China Grand Resorts Inc. to better reflect our new business efforts and effected a 20 for 1 reverse split of our issued and outstanding common stock. The par value and our total number of authorized shares were unaffected by the reverse stock split.
In December 2009, the Company acquired 100% shareholdings of Key Prosper Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in the British virgin Islands on December 8, 2009.
Subsidiaries
On July 1, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of Sun New Media Transaction Service Ltd. (“SNMTS”), a company incorporated in Hong Kong, and its wholly owned subsidiary China Focus Channel Development Co., Ltd (“CFCD”), a company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China, from NextMart Inc. (OTB: NXMR) for limited consideration. In December 2009, the Company acquired 100% shareholdings of Key Prosper Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands on December 8, 2009. On the date of acquisition, Key Prosper Holdings Limited had no assets or liabilities.
Nature of Prior Businesses and Hua Hui Transaction
From 2004 through January 2008, as a result of our acquisitions of the BAHA Group, we were engaged in traditional advertising production, and media consultation providing marketing, brand management, advertising, media planning, public relations and direct marketing services in the People’s Republic of China. As disclosed above, we ceased those operations when we sold our interest in BAHA Group in January 2008.
In January 2008, we changed our business focus when we acquired our interest in JXHC and the Provincial Class One Full Service Operator license for the Jiangxi Province from Union Max. We attempted to provide top-up services for cell-phone customers in Jiangxi Province whereby customers could buy minutes on the fly using their debit card or bank account. However, in December 2008, due to third party issues which negatively affected our ability to launch that business, we determined to terminate that business which resulted
7
in a sale of our interests to an unaffiliated third party effective in March 2009.
On August 1, 2009, we entered into the agreement with Hua Hui described above. Under the agreement, we received the commercial income rights to the Project. In the PRC, local and central governments own all of the real property, however, they grant land use rights to third parties. Hua Hui owns the land use rights to the Project and is responsible for the construction costs associated with the Project; however, we own the commercial income rights to the Project. Commercial income rights means the exclusive right to own and/or receive any and all income and proceeds derived from the Project in any capacity.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its subsidiaries- SNMTS, CFCD and Key Prosper Holdings Limited. All inter-company balances and transactions between parent and subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation - Going Concern and Management Plan
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had an accumulated deficit totaling $10,498,936 and negative working capital of $331,581. The Company suffered a loss of $83,355 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 which is mainly due to the lack of revenues and the occurrence of general and administrative expenses for such period. In view of the matters described above, the appropriateness of the going concern basis is dependent upon continuing operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company's ability to raise additional capital, obtain financing and succeed in its future operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverabili ty and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
In connection with its August 1, 2009 agreement with Hua Hui, the Company sold to Hua Hui its equity interest in GlobStream and certain other Company assets of Sun New Media Transaction Services Limited and China Focus Channel Development Co., Ltd.
As a result of the transaction with Hua Hui, the Company’s new business goal is to become a leading specialty real estate sales company in China for tourism developments, however, in addition, we intend to market and sell the ownership rights to the Project received from Hua Hui. We do not expect to invest directly in any development project but rather expect to contribute our existing resources and know how to: 1) assist real estate developers to acquire prime land from local governments for development; and/or 2) act as the marketing and sales arm for real estate development projects, including those of Hua Hui and its affiliates.
The Company is actively pursuing additional capital in an effort to fund its ongoing capital requirements, as well as seeking agreements with potential strategic partners to develop its new business strategy. The Company’s working capital requirements for the next 12 month is approximately $1,100,000 (please refer to “Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations - Capital Requirements For The Next 12 Months”) Management is hopeful that it will receive sufficient funding to allow the Company to continue its operations through the fiscal year.
`
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company's consolidated financial statements include allowance for doubtful accounts, estimated useful lives and impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended revenue recognition guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables (ASU No. 2009-13) (ASC No. 605). The new guidance eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition and allows the use of management’s best estimate of selling price for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), vendor objective evidence (VOE) or third-party evidence (TPE) is unavailable. For the Company, this guidance is effective for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after January 1, 2011 with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year. Full retrospective application of the new guidance is optional. The Company is currently assessing its implementation of this new guidance, but does not expect a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends the scope of existing software revenue recognition accounting (ASU No. 2009-14) (ASC No. 985). Tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality would be scoped out of the accounting guidance on software and accounted for based on other appropriate revenue recognition guidance. For the Company, this guidance is effective for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after January 1, 2011 with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year. Full retrospective application of the new guidance is optional. This guidance must be adopted in the same period that the Company adopts the amended accounting for arrangements with multiple deliverables described in the preceding paragraph. The Company is currently assessing its implementatio n of this new guidance, but does not expect a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance concerning fair value measurements of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent) (ASU No. 2009-12) (ASC No. 820). If fair value is not readily determinable, the amended guidance permits, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) provided by the investee without further adjustment. The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements due to the adoption of this amended guidance.
In August 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the measurement of liabilities at fair value (ASU No. 2009-5) (ASC No. 820). The guidance provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted market price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair value using a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset or, if unavailable, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar assets when traded as assets. If none of this information is available, an entity should use a valuation technique in accordance with existing fair valuation principles. The Company adopted this guidance in the year ended November 30, 2009 and there was no material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2009-02. “Amendments to Various Topics for Technical corrections.” ASU No. 2009-2 is an omnibus update that is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after July 1, 2009. This Statement did not impact the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168 (ASC No. 105), “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (the Codification). The Codification, which was launched on July 1, 2009, became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. The Codification eliminates the GAAP hierarchy contained in SFAS No. 162 and establishes one level of authoritative GAAP. All other literature is considered non-authoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this Statement for its year ende d November 30, 2009. There was no change to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements due to the implementation of this Statement.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 (ASC No. 810), “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” and SFAS No. 166 (ASC No. 860), “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (ASC No. 860).” SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation 46(R) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and requires ongoing qualitative reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 166 amends SFAS No. 140 by removing the exemption from consolidation for Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs). This Statement also limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire original financial asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. The Company will adopt these Statements for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of these standards to have any material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 (ASC No. 855), “Subsequent Events.” This Statement sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this Statement in the year ended November 30, 2009. This Statement did not impact the consolidated financial results.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (“FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2”) (ASC No. 958), “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” The FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing
9
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not currently believe that adopting this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4 ("FSP FAS 157-4") (ASC No. 820), “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” The FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not currently believe that adopting this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Financial Accounting Standard 141R-1 (“FSP FAS 141R-1”) (ASC No.805), “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies.” FSP FAS 141R-1 amends SFAS 141R to require that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value of such an asset acquired or liability assumed cannot be determined, the acquirer should apply the provisions of SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, to determine whether the contingency should be recognized at the acquisition date or after such date. FSP FAS 141R-1 is effective for business combinations whose acquisition date is on or after the first reporting period beg inning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”) (ASC No. 270), “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” The FSP amends SFAS 107, “Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009in the second quarter of 2009. The Company does not currently believe that adopting this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1 (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”) (ASC No 715), “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” The FSP expands the disclosure requirements about plan assets for defined benefit pension plans and postretirement plans. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, for disclosures about plan assets. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (ASC No. 815), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No.161 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued “Effective Date of FASB Statement No.157” FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2 (FSP No. 157-2) (ASC No. 820). FSP No.157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007) (“SFAS 141R”) (ASC No.805), “Business Combinations”, which applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Company will apply SFAS 141R to any business combinations subsequent to adoption.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 (ASC No. 825), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (FAS 159). The statement, which is expected to expand fair value measurement, permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain others items at fair value. FAS 159 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2009. This pronouncement should not have a material impact on our financial statements.
10
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurement (FAS 157) (ASC No. 820). While this statement does not require new fair value measurements, it provides guidance on applying fair value and expands required disclosures. FAS 157 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. This pronouncement should not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
NOTE 2 –PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of property and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 31 2010 |
|
| September 30 2009 |
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Office equipment | $ | 19,810 |
| $ | 8,879 |
Leasehold improvement |
| 18,647 |
|
| - |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| 4,796 |
|
| 2,070 |
| $ | 33,661 |
| $ | 6,809 |
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $2,459 and $46,834 respectively.
NOTE 3 – OTHER PAYABLES
The following table summarizes other payables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 31, 2010 |
|
| September 30, 2009 | |
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Other payables | $ | 54,544 |
| $ | 106,491 |
As of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the balances of other payables mainly include audit fees and other office expenses payables.
.NOTE 4—STOCKHOLDERS PAYABLES
The balance of stockholders payables are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 31, 2010 |
| September 30, 2009 | |
|
| (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Redrock Capital Venture Limited | $ | 100,280 |
| $ | 65,281 |
Beijing Hua Hui Hengye Investment Limited |
| 315,920 |
|
| - |
| $ | 416,200 |
| $ | 65,281 |
Commencing in June 2009, we began receiving loans from Redrock Capital Venture Limited. As of March 31, 2010, the amounts due to Redrock is $100,280, which amounts is due on demand and bears no interest. Commencing in October 2009, we began receiving loans from Beijing Hua Hui Hengye Investment Limited. As of March 31, 2010, the amount is $315,920. The amounts due to Hua Hui are due on demand and bear interest at the prevailing rate charged by the PRC Central Bank on the payment date. Hua Hui is a majority shareholder and Redrock is a greater than 10% shareholder.
NOTE 5 – CAPITAL STOCK
Common Stock
On January 4, 2009, the Company received a notice of claims (the “Default Notice”) from certain investors (the “Investors”) with
11
respect to a private placement transaction dated June 4, 2007 (the “Financing Transaction”), pursuant to which the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 common stock warrants to the Investors. The Default Notice was made by the Investors due to the Company’s failure to fulfill its registration statement obligation under the Financing Transaction. The Default Notice demanded the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as liquidated damages under the agreement. After due consideration and reasonable deliberation, the Company agreed to issue to each of the Investors 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which represented a total of 1,000,000 shares. The shares of common stock were issued to the Investors in March and April 2009. In connection with its audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company decided to restate its financial statements for the 2 008 fiscal year end period to reflect the issuance of these shares as liquidated damages (see NOTE 9 – RESTATEMENT below).
On February 1, 2009, the Company cancelled 19,989 shares returned from Her Village pursuant to an Asset Transfer Agreement.
In May 2009, the Company issued 884,377 shares of common stock and 155,623 warrants as consideration for the acquisition of Globestream. At the same time, the Company cancelled 240,000 common stock then held by Globstream on acquisition.
On July 9, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Redrock Capital Venture Limited which cancelled outstanding loans in the amount of $223,529 in favor of Redrock for the issuance of 1,853,659 shares of its common stock.
On September 8, 2009, pursuant to the transaction with Beijing Hua Hui on August 1, 2009, the Company issued 16,646,342 shares of its common stock to Wise Gold Investment Ltd., a British Virgin Island company acting on behalf of Hua Hui. In addition, on that same date, it issued 38,841,463 shares of common stock to Blossom Grow Holdings Limited, a British Virgin Island company, as escrow agent under an escrow agreement by and among the Company, the escrow agent, and Hua Hui.
Effective on November 16, 2009, we effected a 20 for 1 reverse split of our issued and outstanding common stock.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had 3,272,311 shares issued and outstanding.
Warrants / Options
On July 22, 2007, 1,200,000 common stock warrants were issued to the Investors. Under the warrants, the Investors have the right, for a period of three years from the date of such warrants, to purchase a total of 1,200,000 (60,000 split-adjusted) shares of the Company’s common stock. The per share exercise price of the Warrant is $1.65.
On June 28, 2009, pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement made and entered into by the Company and Globstream,, the Company issued warrants to Mr. Luo Wenjun for the option to purchase 155,623 (7,782 split-adjusted) shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.15 and an expiration after March 23, 2019.
These Warrants may be exercised, in whole or in part, by the Holder during the Exercise Period by (i) the presentation and surrender of this Warrant to the Company along with a duly executed Notice of Exercise specifying the number of Warrant Shares to be purchased, and (ii) delivery of payment to the Company of the Exercise Price for the number of Warrant Shares specified in the Notice of Exercise.
At March 31, 2010, the Company hadwarrants issued and outstanding to purchase 67,782 common shares.
2001 Stock Plan
In 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) adopted a Stock Plan (“Plan”). Under the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Board is empowered to grant stock options to employees, consultants, officers, and directors of the Company. Additionally, the Board will determine at the time of granting the vesting provisions and whether the options will qualify as Incentive Stock Options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 422 provides certain tax advantages to the employee recipients). The Plan was approved by the shareholders of the Company on September 15, 2001. The total number of shares of common stock available under the Plan may not exceed 2,000. As of March 31, 2010, no options were granted under the Plan.
Development Fund
In 2004, certain shareholders, directors, and officers entered into an agreement to establish a fund wherein 0.65 million shares of common stock would be returned by the shareholders to the Company for cancellation and reissuance as incentives to compensate new officers, directors and other management team members based on the management effort and performance decided by the three shareholders.
On July 28, 2005, one of the shareholders returned 10,000 shares to the Company, which are treated as treasury stock at the face value
12
and the premium as additional paid-in capital. The shares have been valued at a predecessor cost value of $0.001 per share and were held by the Company. And only 10,000 shares have been returned to the Company. On November 14, 2009, the Board of Directors resolved to cancel and retire these 10,000 shares.
NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES
Related party payables
We have no related party payables as of March 31, 2010. The balance of $49,072 at September 30, 2009 was a loan from Oxus (Beijing) Cancer Research Ltd (“Oxus”). Hua Hui, our majority shareholder, is the controlling party of Oxus. The balance was due on demand and bore no interests.
NOTE 7 – LOSS PER SHARE
The Company accounts for loss per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128 (ASC No. 260), “Earnings Per Share”, which requires the Company to present basic income per share and dilutive income per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing (loss) income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods.
The following data show the amounts used in computing loss per share and the weighted average number of shares for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. As the Company had losses, presenting diluted net earnings (loss) per share is considered anti-dilutive. Therefore they are not included in the statement of operations.
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended |
| Six months ended | ||||||||
| March 31, |
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 | ||||
| (Unaudited) |
| (Restated) (Unaudited) |
| (Unaudited) |
| (Restated) (Unaudited) | ||||
NET (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (83,262) |
| $ | 155,294 |
| $ | (151,612) |
| $ | (2,747,869) |
(Loss) income from continuing operations (Numerator) | $ | (83,262) |
| $ | (33,936) |
| $ | (151,612) |
| $ | 1,254,876 |
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations (Numerator) | $ | - |
| $ | 189,230 |
| $ | - |
| $ | (4,002,745) |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in earnings per share during the period (Denominator) |
| 3,272,311 |
|
| 325,056 |
|
| 3,272,311 |
|
| 324,712 |
Net (loss) earnings per share | $ | (0.03) |
| $ | 0.48 |
| $ | (0.05) |
| $ | (8.46) |
(Loss) earnings per share from continuing operations - basic and diluted | $ | (0.03) |
| $ | (0.10) |
| $ | (0.05) |
| $ | 3.87 |
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations - basic and diluted | $ | - |
| $ | 0.58 |
| $ | - |
| $ | (12.33) |
NOTE 8– COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Lease Obligations
In December 2009, we relocated our office to a new office lease in Beijing. The term of the old lease was from September 1, 2009 to July 31, 2011; however, we terminated the old lease on December 11, 2009. The new Beijing office lease is from December 11, 2009 to December 10, 2011 and provides for monthly lease payment of $5,333 with two months period of free rent. In connection with the sale of our interest in JXHC in March 31, 2009, we are no longer responsible for the Jianxi office lease since such date. As of March 31,
13
2010, our total future commitments for minimum lease payments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lease commitments | |
September 30, 2010 |
| $ | 32,003 |
September 30, 2011 |
| $ | 58,672 |
September 30, 2012 |
| $ | 12,446 |
Total |
| $ | 117,344 |
Rental expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled approximately $21,138 and $9,337 respectively.
NOTE 9 – RESTATEMENT
On January 4, 2009, the Company received a notice of claims (the “Default Notice”) from certain investors (the “Investors”) with respect to a private placement transaction dated June 4, 2007 (the “Financing Transaction”), pursuant to which the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares of common stock and 1,000,000 common stock warrants to the Investors. The Default Notice was made by the Investors due to the Company’s failure to fulfill its registration obligations under a registration rights agreement commencing in August 2007. The Default Notice demanded the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for such failure. After due consideration and reasonable deliberation, the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares to the investors in March and April 2009. The Company should have reported probable damages in the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 pursuant to FSP EITF 00-19-2 (AS C No. 825-20) based on the number of shares to be issued at the stock price at each reporting date since the default date was August 22, 2007. The Company already restated the audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2008 to reflect this obligation. As a result, the Company recognized a liability of $1,990,000 as liquidated damages on a registration payment obligation on September 30, 2008. The subsequent reduction in the price of the common stock caused a concurrent reduction of $873,000 in the liability as of March 31, 2009 and resulted in an income of $1,903,000 from the revaluation of liquidated damages for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and $163,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
During this period, the Company decided to restate its financial statements for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2009 to reflect this obligation. The effect of the restatement on the Company’s previously issued financial statements as of March 31, 2009 is as follows:
Restated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 | |||||
| As reported |
| Adjustments |
| Restated |
| (unaudited) (US$) |
| (US$) |
| (unaudited) (US$) |
Other payables | 1,018,849 |
| (873,000) |
| 145,849 |
Total current liabilities | 1,072,462 |
| (873,000) |
| 199,462 |
Common stock | 6,567 |
| (6,239) |
| 328 |
Additional paid-in capital – common stock | 9,592,178 |
| (83,761) |
| 9,508,417 |
Accumulated deficit | (9,674,598) |
| 963,000 |
| (8,711,598) |
Total stockholders' equity | 359,381 |
| 873,000 |
| 1,232,381 |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | 1,431,843 |
| - |
| 1,431,843 |
14
Restated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||
| As reported |
| Adjustments |
| Restated |
| (unaudited) (US$) |
| (US$) |
| (unaudited) (US$) |
Income from revaluation of liquidated damages | - |
| 163,000 |
| 163,000 |
Liquidated damages on registration payment arrangement | (1,050,000) |
| 1,050,000 | �� | - |
Loss from continuing operations | (1,246,936) |
| 1,213,000 |
| (33,936) |
Net Loss (income) | (1,057,706) |
| 1,213,000 |
| 155,294 |
Total comprehensive loss | (1,271,850) |
| 1,213,000 |
| (58,850) |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted | 325,056 |
|
|
| 325,056 |
Loss per share from continuing operations- basic and diluted | (3.84) |
|
|
| (0.10) |
Earnings per share from discontinued operations- basic and diluted | 0.58 |
|
|
| 0.58 |
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the U. S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”). Such statements relate to, among other things, our future plans of operations, business strategy, operating results and financial position and are often, though not always, indicated by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “outlook,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements include statements other than historical information or statements of current condition, but instead represent only our belief regarding future events, many of which by their nature are inherently uncerta in and outside of our control. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those described in the section titled “Risk Factors” previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as well as the following:
|
|
|
|
| • |
| our ability to implement and execute our current business plan, including the ability to sell the apartment units of the Project and the ability to attract customers for our consulting and marketing business; |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| the economic conditions in the Changde market, the location of the apartment units and elsewhere in the PRC for our consulting and marketing business, |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| our reliance on our major shareholders ; |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| our ability to execute key strategies; |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| actions by our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| our ability to raise additional funds to execute our new business plan ; |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| risks associated with assumptions we make in connection with our critical accounting estimates; |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| potential adverse accounting related developments; |
|
|
|
|
| • |
| other matters discussed in this Quarterly Report generally. |
Consequently, readers of this Quarterly Report should not rely upon these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we access the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement in this Quarterly Report to reflect any new events or any change in conditions or circumstances. All of the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.
Overview
We were organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 21, 1989. We went through various name changes prior to November 2009 when the name was changed to China Grand Resort, Inc. We were originally formed to purchase, merge with or acquire any business or assets which management believes has potential for being profitable.
On January 3, 2008, in order to divest from our traditional advertising business and focus on our new mobile phone-based marketing and advertising business, we entered into a sale and purchase agreement with Fanya Advertising Company Ltd. ("Fanya") to sell Beijing Asia Hongzhi Advertising (“BAHA”), a company organized under the laws of the PRC and its wholly-owned Chinese subsidiaries ("BAHA Group"). We sold the BAHA Group to Fanya for a total consideration of $4.8 million which was completed on January 10, 2008.
On January 3, 2008, we entered into an agreement with Union Max Enterprises Ltd. to acquire a Provincial Class One Full Service Operator license for the Jiangxi Province, PRC. As consideration, we paid Union Max the sum of $6 million, of which $4.5 million was paid in cash and $1.5 million was paid in the form of our common stock. As a result of that transaction, we acquired a Provincial Class One Full Service Operator license for the Jiangxi Province. Union Max was a subsidiary of China Mobile and Communications Association ("CMCA"). CMCA is China's leading association of telecommunications and telecommunication-related companies. The acquisition was completed on March 31, 2008. In December 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company resolved to terminate the Company’s top up services in Jiangxi Province, and, on May 11, 2009, we entered into a share transfer agreement with an unaffiliated
16
third party wherein we sold our ownership in JXHC for a total consideration of US$100, effective March 31, 2009.
On March 30, 2009, we completed an acquisition agreement with GlobStream Technology Inc. (“GlobStream”) and its shareholders to acquire 100% of GlobStream, a Cayman Islands corporation. GlobStream was founded by Dr. Wenjun Luo, one of our previous directors and was a developer of unique mobile Internet software called Total Mobile Media. In May 2009, we terminated the operations related to GlobStream. Effective on August 1, 2009, the Company sold its ownership in GlobStream to Beijing Hua Hui Hengye Investment Limited (“Hua Hui”).
As previously disclosed, on August 1, 2009, we entered into the agreement with Beijing Hua Hui Hengye Investment Ltd. (“Hua Hui”), an unaffiliated PRC company. Under the agreement, we received the commercial income rights to 10,000 square meters to a 17 story apartment building in the Huadun Changde International Hotel’s Apartment Complex located in the city of Changde, Hunan Province (“Project”). In the PRC, local and central governments own all of the real property, however, they grant land use rights to third parties. Hua Hui owns the land use rights to the Project, and granted the commercial income rights to the Project to us under our agreement. Commercial income rights means the exclusive right to own and/or receive any and all income and proceeds derived from the Project in any capacity. As described inOur Current Business Strategybelow, we intend to market and sell commercial rights to the Project and to provide consulting an d marketing services to the real estate industry in the PRC..
Our Current Business Strategy
General
Hua Hui and its affiliates, including The Beijing Hua Hui Corporation, are a PRC real estate construction and development group that specializes in constructing and developing travel, resort, hotel, and apartment properties in popular tourist and other destinations within the PRC.As a result of the transaction with Hua Hui, our new business goal is to become a leading specialty real estate consulting and marketing company for tourism projects in the PRC. Initially, we intend to market the commercial rights to the Project that we received from Hua Hui. We also expect to expand our business by using existing resources and know how of our affiliates and other parties to: 1) consult with developers and assist them to acquire prime land from local governments for development projects and/or 2) act as an independent marketing arm for the developer’s real estate projects. These projects may be Hua Hui generated projects or third party projects. With Hua Hui and its affiliates as our ancho r client(s), we expect to generate revenues from: 1) the sale of the Project; 2) marketing commission on over 100,000 square meters of mixed use real estate scheduled to be developed in 2012 on sites located in Shaanxi and Hunan provinces currently held by the Beijing Hua Hui Corporation; 3) future development projects that the Beijing Hua Hui Corporation is currently negotiating at Huang Shan Mountain, the Yabuli Ski resort, the Thousand Lakes area of Zhejiang province, Sanya, located in Hainan Province, and Hangzhou, located in Zhejiang Province. We will seek to leverage our relationships with Hua Hui and its affiliates and promote our services to other developers of tourism projects throughout the country.
Consulting and Marketing Services
Project Consulting and Real Estate Acquisition
Through arrangements with our affiliates and others, we will offer developers extensive market research for each real estate project undertaken by us. In so doing, we intend to collect, process, and provide material information concerning a particular project including highest and best use analysis, real estate trends, existing and proposed infrastructure, absorption rates, environmental issues, feasibility studies, along with identifying the best demographics for prospective purchasers. We believe that this information will be critical to developers in establishing the timing, size and pricing parameters of any project.
There is no private land ownership in PRC. In the PRC, land ownership is held by the government and cannot be sold to any individual or entity. Instead, the government grants or allocates landholders a “land use right,” which is sometimes referred to informally as land ownership. Land use rights are granted for specific purposes and for limited periods. Each period may be renewed at the expiration of the initial and any subsequent terms. Granted land use rights are transferable and may be used as security for borrowings and other obligations. We will utilize our consulting reports and our project management capability to assist real estate developers to acquire first rate land designated by local and central governments for development. Wewould lead and manage the land acquisition process for our developer partners to acquire the most suitable land for development at a competitive price. In China, as mentioned above, land use rights for undeveloped land are often acquired from the local and provincial governments. Buying rights to undeveloped land for simple residential and commercial uses often is a timely, expensive, and uncertain bidding process. However, developers that offer unique development concepts like eco-buildings, future communities, retirement/health/recovery, and entertainment/shopping, are able to by-pass the bidding process through direct negotiations with the local government. We will work directly with our partners to create and produce thematic property development concepts and strategies, present the development concepts to the relevant governments, and negotiate directly with the governments to ensure a successful acquisition. For our efforts, we expect to charge a successful efforts fee between 3% to 5% of the acquisition cost.
Project Marketing
17
We intend offer client developers integrated marketing strategies and platforms to reach their developments’ target markets and increase rates of sales. Through arrangements with our affiliates and others, we have access to an extensive media outlet platform. This platform includes magazines and newspapers such asLan Magazine andWide Angle Press and over 700 web-sites, such aswww.tiannv.com, some of which may also push content to subscribers. These marketing outlets are owned and/or operated by affiliates of Redrock Capital Ventures Limited, a controlling shareholder. Our target audiences are affluent individuals in many cases seeking to acquire a second home or a vacation getaway or businesses. We will be required to pay Redrock a fee for utilizing their marketing outlets which has yet to be determined.
We will not be engaged in the actual sale transaction, rather, we expect developers, including Hua Hui, to perform the actual unit sales. We expect to be compensated from developers, including Hua Hui, on a commission basis ranging from 2% to 5% of the project sales. With respect to the Project, we will be responsible for project marketing and Hua Hui will perform the actual unit sales. We expect to pay Hua Hui a sales commission of between 8% to 10% of sales and the remainder of the selling price will be retained by us. As of the date of this report, we do not have any formal agreements or arrangements with any developer or Hua Hui for fees that we will earn, or fees that we will pay Hua Hui.
The Project
As mentioned above, the Project consists of 10,000 square meters of apartment space in Building #1 of the Huadun Changde International Hotel’s Apartment Complex, a 17 story building, located in the city of Changde, Hunan Province (“Project”). The Project is currently under construction by Hua Hui. Changde is a popular tourist destination located in China’s central Hunan province. Upon completion, the Complex will consist of a total of 215,000 square meters that sits on an approximately 3.6 acre piece of land that has access roads on the North, East, and West. The city is accessible by rail and air and is in close proximity to several tourist, scenic, and commercial areas. The Project is in close proximity to several tourist, scenic, and commercial areas. Construction began on June 1, 2009 and is expected to be completed on December 31, 2010. All permits concerning the Project have been acquired from governmental authorities, and the constru ction of the Project is approximately 40% completed. We also have acquired the pre-sale permits for the sale of the apartments from the local real estate authority.
The Project when completed will be the site of a total 128 apartments, of which we will have the commercial rights to 64 units. The units are expected to range in size from 120 square meters to 210 square meters. Under current market conditions, we expect prices of the apartment units to range from RMB5,500 ($805 USD) per square meter to RMB 6,500 ($950 USD) per square meter. We expect to begin pre-completion marketing efforts in the mid-calendar 2010. In this regard, we have initiated outdoor advertisements; printed sales brochures; visited with potential buyers; commenced website design for the Project; and built a sales center with respect to the Project. In any pre-completion sale, the amount of the down payment that we will be able to obtain from a buyer is subject to the housing policy of governing real estate authorities. The current policy allows for a down payment ranging from 30% to 50% of the sales price dependent on the property size.
Our budget for the next 12 month is approximately $1,100,000 in working capital for the next 12 months, of which $600,000 is working capital for our executive offices, and $500,000 is working capital to launch our new business. Working capital for our executive offices is comprised of $250,000 in salaries and related personnel costs, $200,00 in professional fees, $100,000 for executive office rent, and $50,000 in miscellaneous expenses. Working capital to launch our new business is comprised of $200,000 for data and market research expenses, $150,000 for travel expenses, and $150,000 for marketing and public relationship related expenses. We expect to generate revenues from the sale of the apartment units in the third quarter of calendar year 2010 provided that we have funds available for the marketing of the Project. Thereafter, subject to the foregoing, we believe that revenues from the Project will be sufficient to fund our ongoing working capital needs.
Our business strategies are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including our ability to raise additional funds in the future. We cannot predict whether we will successful with any of business strategies. We do not anticipate seasonal fluctuations in our business.
Results of Operations
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts are in U.S. Dollars.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Total Revenues and Gross Margin
For the three month period ended March 31, 2010, we were developing our new business strategy discussed above. As a result, we had no revenues from operations or gross margin. During the comparable period in 2009, we had no revenues from operations or gross profit attributable to our mobile phone based business.
Income (Loss) from Operations
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we incurred general and administrative expenses of $78,755 compared with $149,873 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease ingeneral and administrative expenses is primarily due to reduced overhead
18
at the corporate level. Commencing in 2009, we made an effort to reduce our ongoing overhead expenditures, which includes personnel reductions and office expense, due to our reduced operations. We also had $2,459 in depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with $46,834 for the comparable three months ended March 31, 2009. Our loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $81,214 compared to $196,707 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The difference between the periods is due to lower depreciation and amortization expenses and the reduction of general and administrative expenses discussed above.
Other Income (Expense)
Other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is $2,048, which is the interest expense for the period. For the corresponding period in year 2009, other income mainly includes an income of $ 162,771 from revaluation of liquidated damages as discussed in Note 9.
Loss Before Income Taxes from Continuing Operations
Our loss from continuing operations was $83,262 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to a loss of $33,936 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The difference is due to the reasons discussed above.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations was $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. However, during the comparable period in 2009, we had a gain of $189,230, net of tax, on the disposal of a subsidiary attributable to the sale of our 70% equity interest in Jiangxi Hongcheng Tengyi Telecommunications which was effective as of March 31, 2009.
Net (Loss) Income
As a result of the foregoing, our net loss was $83,262 for the three months endedMarch 31, 2010 compared to an income of $155,294 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Comprehensive Loss .
During three months ended March 31, 2010, we had a foreign currency translation loss of $92 compared with a loss of $214,144 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The difference is due to fluctuation of value of US dollar against RMB. As a result of all of the issues mentioned above, we had a comprehensive loss of $83,355 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with a comprehensive loss of $58,850 for the comparable three months ended March 31, 2009.
Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2009
For the six month period ended March 31, 2010, we were developing our new business strategy discussed above. As a result, we had no revenues from operations. During the comparable period in 2009, we had no revenues from operations or gross profit attributable to our mobile phone based business.
Income (Loss) from Operations
During the six months ended March 31, 2010, we incurred general and administrative expenses of $145,497 compared with $372,927 for the six months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to reduced overhead at the corporate level. Commencing in 2009, we made an effort to reduce our ongoing overhead expenditures, which includes personnel reductions and office expense, due to our reduced operations. We also had $2,857 in depreciation and amortization for the six months ended March 31, 2010 compared with $184,234 for the comparable six months ended March 31, 2009. Our loss from operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $148,354 compared to a loss of $557,160 for the six months ended March 31, 2009. The difference between the periods is due to lower depreciation and amortization expenses and the reduction of general and administrative expenses discussed above.
Other Income (Expense)
Other net expense for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $3,258, which was the accrued interest for the period. For the six month period ended March 31, 2009, we had an income of $1,903,000 from revaluation of liquidated damages. Please refer to Note 9 for more information.
Loss Before Income Taxes from Continuing Operations
Our loss from continuing operations was $151,612 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 compared to a loss of $1,254,876for the six months ended March 31, 2009 for the reasons discussed above.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations was $0 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 compared to a loss of $4,002,745 for the six months ended March 31, 2009 for the reasons discussed above.
19
Net Loss
As a result of the foregoing, our net loss was $151,612 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 compared to a loss of $2,747,869 for the six months ended March 31, 2009.
Comprehensive Loss
During six months ended March 31, 2010, we had a foreign currency translation loss of $109 compared to a translation loss of $192,056 for the six months ended March 31, 2009. The difference is due to fluctuation of value of US dollar against RMB. As a result of all of the above, we had a comprehensive loss of $151,722 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 compared with a comprehensive loss of $2,939,925 for the six months ended March 31, 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We finance our operations primarily through cash generated from operating activities, a mixture of short and long-term loans (including loans from affiliates) and issuance of common stock.
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months Ended March 31, | |||||
|
| 2010 |
|
| 2009 | ||
Net cash used in operating activities |
| $ | (213,327) |
|
| $ | (683,333) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
| $ | (29,533) |
|
| $ | 878,068 |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| $ | 301,847 |
|
| $ | 86,627 |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | (1,723) |
|
| $ | (249,819) |
Net decrease in cash from discontinued operations |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | (18,993) |
Net increase in cash from continuing operations |
| $ | 57,264 |
|
| $ | 31,543 |
Cash and cash equivalents (closing balance) |
| $ | 83,688 |
|
| $ | 55,330 |
The net cash used in operating activities forthe six months ended March 31, 2010 was $213,327, compared with net cash used in operating activities of $683,333for the six months ended March 31, 2009. The difference is due to the reduction of general and administrative expenses discussed above during the six months ended March 31, 2010.
The net cash used in investing activities for the six month ended March 31, 2010 was $29,533, compared with net cash provided by investing activities of $878,068 for the six month ended March 31, 2009. The cash decrease difference of $907,601 is primarily caused by the proceeds from the sale of plant and equipment and reduction in related party receivables in the 2009 period.
The net cash provided by financing activities for the six month ended March 31, 2010 was $301,847, compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $86,627 for the six month ended March 31, 2009. The difference of $215,220 is mainly due to increased shareholder loans for the six months ended March 31, 2010.
The effect of the exchange rate on cash was a loss of $1,723 for the six months ended March 31, 2010, compared with a loss of $249,819 for the six months ended March 31, 2009. The difference is due to reduction in foreign currency transactions.
The difference in the closing balance of cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is due to the reasons mentioned above.
Capital Requirements for the Next 12 Months
We continue to experience significant losses from operations. We are uncertain as to when we will achieve profitable operations. We have an immediate need for capital to conduct our new business endeavors as well as our ongoing working capital needs. We anticipate raising capital through additional private placements of our equity securities, and, if available on satisfactory terms, debt financing. It is conceivable that funding of all or part of the budget required above may come from Hua Hui , our largest shareholder,. However, we do not have any agreements, arrangements or commitments with or guarantees from any party, including our largest shareholder, to
20
provide funding to us. We can not guarantee that we will be successful in our efforts to enhance our liquidity. If we are unable to raise sufficient funds to meet our cash requirements as described above, we may be required to curtail, suspend, or discontinue our current and/or proposed operations. Our inability to raise additional funds as described above may force us to restructure, file for bankruptcy, sell assets or cease operations, any of which could adversely impact our business and business strategy, and the value of our capital stock. Due to the current price of our common stock, any common stock based financing, including transactions with affiliates which may include equity conversions of outstanding loans, will likely create significant dilution to the then existing shareholders. In addition, in order to conserve capital and to provide incentives for our employees and service providers, it is conceivable that we may issue stock for services in the f uture which also may create significant dilution to existing shareholders.
Our capital budget for the next 12 months is as follows:
·
$ 600,000 for our executive offices expenditures, which includes $250,000 in salaries and related costs of personnel, $200,000 in professional fees, $100,000 in executive office rent, and $50,000 in miscellaneous office expenditures.
·
$500,000 for costs related to the launch of our consulting and marketing business. This amount is comprised of $200,000 for data and market research expenses, $150,000 for travel expenses, and $150,000 for marketing and public relationship related expenses.
We expect to generate revenues from the sale of the apartment units in the third quarter of calendar year 2010 provided that we have funds available for the marketing of the Project. Thereafter, the Company believes that revenues from the Project will be sufficient to support our consulting and marketing business for the ensuing six to twelve month period. However, our projections are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including our ability to raise additional funds in the near future. We cannot predict whether we will successful with any of business strategies.
Contractual Obligations
The Company relocated its offices in December 2009 by terminating its then outstanding office lease, and entering into a new lease in Beijing on December 11, 2009. The monthly rental payment under the terminated lease was $2,676 and under the new lease, the monthly rental is $5,333. The lease expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 amounted to $13,056 and the total lease commitment for our current fiscal year period is $58,672.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in the annual report for the year ended September 30, 2009. We prepare our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities on the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the financial reporting period. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of our accounting policies require higher degrees of judgment than others in their application. We consider the policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our financial statements as their application places the most significant demands on our management’s judgment.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended revenue recognition guidance for arrangements with multiple deliverables (ASU No. 2009-13) (ASC No. 605). The new guidance eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition and allows the use of management’s best estimate of selling price for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), vendor objective evidence (VOE) or third-party evidence (TPE) is unavailable. For the Company, this guidance is effective for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after January 1, 2011 with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year. Full retrospective application of the new guidance is optional. The Company is currently assessing its implementation of this new guidance, but does not expect a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends the scope of existing software revenue recognition accounting (ASU No. 2009-14) (ASC No. 985). Tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality would be scoped out of the accounting guidance on software and accounted for based on other appropriate revenue recognition guidance. For the Company, this guidance is effective for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after January 1, 2011 with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year. Full retrospective application of the new guidance is optional. This guidance must be adopted in the same period that the Company adopts the amended accounting for arrangements with multiple deliverables described in the preceding paragraph. The Company is currently assessing its implementation of this new guidance, bu t does not expect a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
21
In September 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance concerning fair value measurements of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent) (ASU No. 2009-12) (ASC No. 820). If fair value is not readily determinable, the amended guidance permits, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) provided by the investee without further adjustment. The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements due to the adoption of this amended guidance.
In August 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the measurement of liabilities at fair value (ASU No. 2009-5) (ASC No. 820). The guidance provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted market price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair value using a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset or, if unavailable, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar assets when traded as assets. If none of this information is available, an entity should use a valuation technique in accordance with existing fair valuation principles. The Company adopted this guidance in the year ended November 30, 2009 and there was no material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2009-02. “Amendments to Various Topics for Technical corrections.” ASU No. 2009-2 is an omnibus update that is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after July 1, 2009. This Statement did not impact the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168 (ASC No. 105), “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (the Codification). The Codification, which was launched on July 1, 2009, became the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. The Codification eliminates the GAAP hierarchy contained in SFAS No. 162 and establishes one level of authoritative GAAP. All other literature is considered non-authoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this Statement for its year ende d November 30, 2009. There was no change to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements due to the implementation of this Statement.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 (ASC No. 810), “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” and SFAS No. 166 (ASC No. 860), “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (ASC No. 860).” SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation 46(R) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and requires ongoing qualitative reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 166 amends SFAS No. 140 by removing the exemption from consolidation for Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs). This Statement also limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire original financial asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. The Company will adopt these Statements for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of these standards to have any material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 (ASC No. 855), “Subsequent Events.” This Statement sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this Statement in the year ended November 30, 2009. This Statement did not impact the consolidated financial results.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (“FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2”) (ASC No. 958), ”Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” The FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not currently believe that adopting this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4 ("FSP FAS 157-4") (ASC No. 820), “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” The FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also includes
22
guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not currently believe that adopting this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Financial Accounting Standard 141R-1 (“FSP FAS 141R-1”) (ASC No.805), “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies.” FSP FAS 141R-1 amends SFAS 141R to require that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value of such an asset acquired or liability assumed cannot be determined, the acquirer should apply the provisions of SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, to determine whether the contingency should be recognized at the acquisition date or after such date. FSP FAS 141R-1 is effective for business combinations whose acquisition date is on or after the first reporting period beg inning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”) (ASC No. 270), “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” The FSP amends SFAS 107, “Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009in the second quarter of 2009. The Company does not currently believe that adopting this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1 (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”) (ASC No 715), “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” The FSP expands the disclosure requirements about plan assets for defined benefit pension plans and postretirement plans. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, for disclosures about plan assets. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (ASC No. 815), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No.161 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued “Effective Date of FASB Statement No.157” FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2 (FSP No. 157-2) (ASC No. 820). FSP No.157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
In December 2007, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007) (“SFAS 141R”) (ASC No.805), “Business Combinations”, which applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Company will apply SFAS 141R to any business combinations subsequent to adoption.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 (ASC No. 825), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (FAS 159). The statement, which is expected to expand fair value measurement, permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain others items at fair value. FAS 159 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2009. This pronouncement should not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurement (FAS 157) (ASC No. 820). While this statement does not require new fair value measurements, it provides guidance on applying fair value and expands required disclosures. FAS 157 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. This pronouncement should not have a material impact on our financial statements.
23
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS AND ARRANGEMENTS
We have not entered into any financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. In addition, we have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our own shares and classified as shareholder’s equity, or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. Moreover, we do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.
Revenue Recognition
We rely on SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin: No. 101 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" ("SAB 101") (ASC No605) to recognize our revenue. SAB 101 in establishing our accounting policy states that revenue generally is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109 (ASC No 740), "Accounting for Income Taxes," as described in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. In the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their recorded amount, an adjustment to our deferred tax assets would increase our income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, if we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to our deferred tax assets would be charged to our income in the period such determination is made. We record income tax expense on our taxable income using the balance sheet liability method at the effect ive rate applicable in China in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. There is no income tax expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 due to the net loss incurred.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Company’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s man agement, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in internal controls
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| China Grand Resorts, Inc. | |
|
| |
Date: May 12, 2010 | By: | /s/Menghua Liu |
|
| Menghua Liu Chief Executive Officer |
Date: May 12, 2010 | By: | /s/Xiaojun He |
|
| Xiaojun He Chief Financial Officer |
25