SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
Commission File number 000-24149
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin | 37-1203599 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) | |
N27 W24025 Paul Court, Pewaukee, Wisconsin 53072
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
(262) 695-6010
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes £ No R
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes £ No R
At February 29, 2008 CIB Marine had 18,346,442 shares of common stock outstanding.
FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | Page # |
Part I - Financial Information | | |
| | | | |
Item 1 | | Financial Statements (Unaudited) | | |
| | | | |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 | | 3 |
| | | | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 | | 4 |
| | | | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 | | 5 |
| | | | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 | | 6 |
| | | | |
| | Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements | | 7 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Item 2 | | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | 24 |
| | | | |
Item 3 | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Sensitivity | | 48 |
| | | | |
Item 4 | | Disclosure Controls and Procedures | | 49 |
| | | | |
Part II - Other Information | |
| | | | |
Item 1 | | Legal Proceedings | | 50 |
| | | | |
Item 2 | | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds | | 53 |
| | | | |
Item 3 | | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | | |
| | | | |
Item 4 | | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | | 54 |
| | | | |
Item 5 | | Other Information | | |
| | | | |
Item 6 | | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | | |
| | | | |
Signatures | | 55 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | unaudited | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, except share data) | |
Assets | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 69,031 | | $ | 68,366 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 23,870 | | | 25,625 | |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | | 92,901 | | | 93,991 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 71,532 | | | 229,554 | |
Securities available for sale | | | 574,291 | | | 506,350 | |
Loans | | | 2,566,312 | | | 2,704,006 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (126,999 | ) | | (65,122 | ) |
Net loans | | | 2,439,313 | | | 2,638,884 | |
Premises and equipment, net | | | 29,766 | | | 28,087 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 14,509 | | | 16,669 | |
Foreclosed properties | | | 5,677 | | | 3,678 | |
Assets of companies held for disposal | | | 62,931 | | | 73,274 | |
Goodwill | | | 13,122 | | | 13,122 | |
Other intangible assets | | | 1,324 | | | 1,700 | |
Other assets | | | 59,275 | | | 45,396 | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,364,641 | | $ | 3,650,705 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand | | $ | 215,556 | | $ | 204,267 | |
Interest-bearing demand | | | 67,540 | | | 58,889 | |
Savings | | | 734,658 | | | 574,083 | |
Time | | | 1,866,940 | | | 2,011,165 | |
Total deposits | | | 2,884,694 | | | 2,848,404 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 163,757 | | | 386,945 | |
Long-term borrowings | | | 46,889 | | | 47,141 | |
Guaranteed trust preferred securities | | | 60,000 | | | 60,000 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 8,421 | | | 11,113 | |
Liabilities of companies held for disposal | | | 27,208 | | | 36,603 | |
Other liabilities | | | 25,639 | | | 12,936 | |
Total liabilities | | | 3,216,608 | | | 3,403,142 | |
Stockholders' Equity: | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued | | | — | | | — | |
Common stock, $1 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 18,346,442 and 18,312,242 issued and outstanding, respectively | | | 18,346 | | | 18,312 | |
Capital surplus | | | 158,163 | | | 157,783 | |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | | | (23,202 | ) | | 74,889 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net | | | 2,137 | | | 4,516 | |
Receivables from sale of stock | | | (5,208 | ) | | (7,937 | ) |
Treasury stock at cost, 86,611 shares | | | (2,203 | ) | | — | |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 148,033 | | | 247,563 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 3,364,641 | | $ | 3,650,705 | |
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) | |
Interest and Dividend Income | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 40,213 | | $ | 45,758 | | $ | 129,529 | | $ | 132,069 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 2,202 | | | 746 | | | 5,861 | | | 1,608 | |
Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | | 2,525 | | | 4,511 | | | 9,484 | | | 15,020 | |
Tax-exempt | | | 556 | | | 648 | | | 1,708 | | | 1,909 | |
Dividends | | | 172 | | | 96 | | | 483 | | | 268 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 45 | | | 144 | | | 317 | | | 485 | |
Total interest and dividend income | | | 45,713 | | | 51,903 | | | 147,382 | | | 151,359 | |
Interest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 18,657 | | | 21,888 | | | 59,205 | | | 63,921 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 852 | | | 1,457 | | | 2,904 | | | 4,475 | |
Long-term borrowings | | | 285 | | | 331 | | | 873 | | | 1,050 | |
Junior subordinated debentures/guaranteed trust preferred securities | | | 1,280 | | | 1,072 | | | 3,903 | | | 3,196 | |
Total interest expense | | | 21,074 | | | 24,748 | | | 66,885 | | | 72,642 | |
Net interest income | | | 24,639 | | | 27,155 | | | 80,497 | | | 78,717 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 75,010 | | | 13,459 | | | 134,560 | | | 25,511 | |
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses | | | (50,371 | ) | | 13,696 | | | (54,063 | ) | | 53,206 | |
Noninterest Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan fees | | | 613 | | | 752 | | | 1,884 | | | 2,918 | |
Mortgage banking revenue | | | 2,201 | | | 1,383 | | | 8,934 | | | 3,025 | |
Deposit service charges | | | 910 | | | 834 | | | 2,694 | | | 2,423 | |
Other service fees | | | 93 | | | 87 | | | 282 | | | 230 | |
Other income | | | 1,013 | | | 76 | | | 1,948 | | | 1,572 | |
Gain on investment securities, net | | | — | | | 1,031 | | | — | | | 3,127 | |
Total noninterest income | | | 4,830 | | | 4,163 | | | 15,742 | | | 13,295 | |
Noninterest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation and employee benefits | | | 11,263 | | | 9,317 | | | 33,997 | | | 28,315 | |
Equipment | | | 1,369 | | | 1,201 | | | 4,010 | | | 3,541 | |
Occupancy and premises | | | 1,335 | | | 1,177 | | | 3,895 | | | 3,332 | |
Professional services | | | 474 | | | 846 | | | 2,007 | | | 2,198 | |
Litigation settlements | | | — | | | 1,762 | | | — | | | 1,752 | |
Write down and losses on assets | | | 2,366 | | | 6 | | | 2,467 | | | 41 | |
Other expense | | | 3,607 | | | 3,130 | | | 10,328 | | | 8,868 | |
Total noninterest expense | | | 20,414 | | | 17,439 | | | 56,704 | | | 48,047 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | | (65,955 | ) | | 420 | | | (95,025 | ) | | 18,454 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 6,023 | | | (605 | ) | | (5,511 | ) | | 5,449 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (71,978 | ) | | 1,025 | | | (89,514 | ) | | 13,005 | |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pretax loss from discontinued operations | | | (3,324 | ) | | — | | | (7,049 | ) | | — | |
Income tax expense | | | 1,867 | | | — | | | 1,528 | | | — | |
Loss from discontinued operations | | | (5,191 | ) | | — | | | (8,577 | ) | | — | |
Net Income (loss) | | $ | (77,169 | ) | $ | 1,025 | | $ | (98,091 | ) | $ | 13,005 | |
Earnings (loss) Per Share | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (3.94 | ) | $ | 0.06 | | $ | (4.90 | ) | $ | 0.72 | |
Discontinued operations | | | (0.29 | ) | | — | | | (0.47 | ) | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (4.23 | ) | $ | 0.06 | | $ | (5.37 | ) | $ | 0.72 | |
Diluted | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (3.94 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | (4.90 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |
Discontinued operations | | | (0.29 | ) | | — | | | (0.47 | ) | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (4.23 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | (5.37 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |
Weighted average shares-basic | | | 18,259,831 | | | 18,241,287 | | | 18,295,555 | | | 18,118,695 | |
Weighted average shares-diluted | | | 18,259,831 | | | 18,636,777 | | | 18,295,555 | | | 18,505,571 | |
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Unaudited)
| | | Common Stock | | | | | | Retained Earnings | | | Accumulated Other | | | Stock Receivables and | | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Par Value | | | Capital Surplus | | | (Accumulated Deficit) | | | Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | Treasury Stock | | | Total | |
| | | (Dollars in thousands, except share data) | |
Balance, December 31, 2001 (audited) | | | 17,876,752 | | $ | 17,877 | | $ | 148,972 | | $ | 66,082 | | $ | 4,331 | | $ | (7,437 | ) | $ | 229,825 | |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 13,005 | | | — | | | — | | | 13,005 | |
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized securities holding gains arising during the period | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,517 | | | — | | | 3,517 | |
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,127 | ) | | — | | | (3,127 | ) |
Income tax effect | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (96 | ) | | — | | | (96 | ) |
Total comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13,299 | |
Common stock issuance | | | 341,772 | | | 342 | | | 7,594 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,936 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 57,030 | | | 56 | | | 698 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 754 | |
Receivables from sale of stock | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (500 | ) | | (500 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2002 as restated | | | 18,275,554 | | $ | 18,275 | | $ | 157,264 | | $ | 79,087 | | $ | 4,625 | | $ | (7,937 | ) | $ | 251,314 | |
Balance, December 31, 2002 (audited) | | | 18,312,242 | | $ | 18,312 | | $ | 157,783 | | $ | 74,889 | | $ | 4,516 | | $ | (7,937 | ) | $ | 247,563 | |
Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (98,091 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (98,091 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized securities holding losses arising during the period | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5,319 | ) | | — | | | (5,319 | ) |
Income tax effect | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,849 | | | — | | | 2,849 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 91 | | | — | | | 91 | |
Total comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (100,470 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | | 34,200 | | | 34 | | | 380 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 414 | |
Reduction in receivables from the sale of stock | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,729 | | | 2,729 | |
Acquisition of treasury stock (86,611 shares) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,203 | ) | | (2,203 | ) |
Balance, September 30, 2003 | | | 18,346,442 | | $ | 18,346 | | $ | 158,163 | | $ | (23,202 | ) | $ | 2,137 | | $ | (7,411 | ) | $ | 148,033 | |
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (89,514 | ) | $ | 13,005 | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | (8,577 | ) | | — | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Deferred loan fee amortization | | | (8,482 | ) | | (7,954 | ) |
Depreciation and other amortization | | | 7,878 | | | 4,625 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 134,560 | | | 25,511 | |
Originations of loans held for sale | | | (422,240 | ) | | (198,913 | ) |
Purchases of loans held for sale | | | (1,391,172 | ) | | (555,907 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale | | | 1,969,615 | | | 682,267 | |
Deferred tax expense (benefit) | | | 6,407 | | | (7,534 | ) |
Write down and losses on assets | | | 2,467 | | | 41 | |
Gain on investment securities, net | | | — | | | (3,127 | ) |
Decrease in interest receivable and other assets | | | 722 | | | 3,755 | |
Increase (decrease) in interest payable and other liabilities | | | 6,769 | | | (4,501 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | 208,433 | | | (48,732 | ) |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | | | | | | | |
Maturities of securities available for sale | | | 176,226 | | | 262,136 | |
Purchase of securities available for sale | | | (260,166 | ) | | (363,403 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale | | | 999 | | | 127,528 | |
Repayments of mortgage-backed securities available for sale | | | 181,953 | | | 52,183 | |
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available for sale | | | (174,170 | ) | | (98,136 | ) |
Net increase in other investments | | | (1,452 | ) | | (2,621 | ) |
Net (increase) decrease in loans | | | 38,691 | | | (275,944 | ) |
Decrease in net assets of companies held for disposal | | | 1,039 | | | 436 | |
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed properties | | | 17,460 | | | 2,744 | |
Capital expenditures | | | (4,557 | ) | | (2,949 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (23,977 | ) | | (298,026 | ) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | | | | |
Increase in deposits | | | 37,229 | | | 441,329 | |
Proceeds from issuance of guaranteed trust preferred securities | | | — | | | 19,550 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | — | | | 7,936 | |
Proceeds from stock options exercised | | | 414 | | | 754 | |
Net decrease in short-term borrowings | | | (223,189 | ) | | (105,278 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (185,546 | ) | | 364,291 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (1,090 | ) | | 17,533 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 93,991 | | | 59,000 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 92,901 | | $ | 76,533 | |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 69,577 | | $ | 74,383 | |
Income taxes | | | 6,359 | | | 13,952 | |
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Activities | | | | | | | |
Transfer of loans to foreclosed properties | | | 20,641 | | | 1,206 | |
Treasury shares acquired in loan collections | | | 2,203 | | | — | |
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1-Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. Certain information and footnote disclosures have been omitted or abbreviated. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc.’s (“CIB Marine”) 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K including the restatement of 2002. In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect all adjustments which are necessary to present fairly CIB Marine’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CIB Marine and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, including companies which are held for disposal. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Minority interest in a company held for disposal is immaterial to the consolidated financial statements and is included in liabilities of companies held for disposal.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements are based on various factors, including the current interest rate environment and the general strength of the local economy. Changes in these factors can significantly affect CIB Marine’s net interest income and the value of its recorded assets and liabilities.
Assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal include MICR, Inc. (“MICR”) and CIB Construction, LLC including Canron Corporation (“Canron”) (collectively referred to as “CIB Construction”). MICR and Canron were acquired in full or partial satisfaction of loans. Assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal are carried at the lower of cost or current fair value, less estimated selling costs and the aggregate assets and liabilities are shown as separate categories on the consolidated balance sheets. The net income or loss of companies which meet the criteria as discontinued operations and which are held for disposal at September 30, 2003 are included in income or loss from discontinued operations for all periods presented. At September 30, 2003, CIB Construction met the criteria of a discontinued operation. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal and net income or loss from discontinued operations as presented on the consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications have been made to certain amounts as of December 31, 2002 and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 to be consistent with classifications for 2003.
Note 2- Restatement of the September 30, 2002 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Stockholders’ Equity
The consolidated statements of operations and stockholder’s equity as presented for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 have been restated to reflect the following:
Loan and Other Credit Losses
In the third quarter of 2003, CIB Marine began a comprehensive review of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses in response to deterioration in the credit quality of CIB Marine’s loan portfolio, including a significant increase in nonperforming loans, which was noted by CIB Marine’s banking regulators at certain subsidiary banks. A Special Review Committee of the Board was formed to further review these items and engaged outside advisors to conduct an independent review of loan related matters. As a result of this comprehensive review, CIB Marine identified errors in the timing of loan downgrades. The consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 has been restated to reflect loan downgrades in the appropriate periods, and the impact of this adjustment was an increase in the provision for credit losses of $1.7 million and $2.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively.
Interest Income-Loans
In addition, errors were also identified in the timing of when loans were classified as nonperforming which resulted in loans being placed on nonaccrual status in an incorrect reporting period. The consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 has been restated to reflect loans being placed on nonaccrual status in the appropriate periods. The impact of this adjustment was a reduction in interest income-loans of $0.01 million and $0.1 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively.
Income Tax Expense
The consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 has also been restated to reflect the income tax effect of the above adjustments. The effect of these adjustments on the consolidated statement of operations was an increase in income tax benefit on income from continuing operations of $0.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, and a reduction in income tax expense of $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
Reclassification of Securities and Adjustment to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
During 2005, CIB Marine sold tax exempt held to maturity securities. As a result of this material contradiction related to management’s previous assertion regarding its intent and ability to hold securities to maturity, CIB Marine determined the consolidated financial statements should be restated for all years presented to reclassify all held to maturity securities to available for sale. The effect of this restatement on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity was an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income and total stockholders’ equity of $2.0 million as of September 30, 2002 for the net unrealized gains on the reclassified securities.
Receivables from Sale of Stock
During the regular 2003 regulatory examination, it was noted that certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks had originated loans, the proceeds of which were used to purchase stock of CIB Marine. Loans originated by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to purchase CIB Marine stock should have been accounted for as a reduction in stockholders’ equity unless the loan had been repaid prior to the issuance of the financial statements or the loan had been adequately collateralized exclusive of the value of CIB Marine stock pledged as collateral, if any. The consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2002 has been restated to report these loans as a contra-equity account entitled receivables from sale of stock. The effect of this adjustment was a reduction of loans and a corresponding reduction of stockholders’ equity of $7.9 million at September 30, 2002. See Note 11-Stockholders’ Equity- for further information.
The cumulative impact of the above restatements is a decrease in net income of $1.2 million and $1.4 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. The $8.5 million cumulative decrease in stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2002 includes: the $1.4 million decrease in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002; a $1.2 million decrease in net income due to restatements in calendar year 2001; and the $7.9 million reduction due to receivables from sale of stock, which is partially offset by the $2.0 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income. The above adjustments did not have an impact on the net cash provided by/used in operating activities, investing activities or financing activities.
The following tables present the consolidated statement of operations and the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity as previously reported and restated as of and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002:
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | |
| | | |
| | Quarter Ended September 30, 2002 | |
| | As Previously Reported | | Reclassification Adjustment | | Restatement Adjustment | | As Restated | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest and Dividend Income | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 45,493 | | $ | 309 | | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 45,758 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 746 | | | — | | | — | | | 746 | |
Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | | 4,511 | | | — | | | — | | | 4,511 | |
Tax-exempt | | | 648 | | | — | | | — | | | 648 | |
Dividends | | | 96 | | | — | | | — | | | 96 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 144 | | | — | | | — | | | 144 | |
Total interest and dividend income | | | 51,638 | | | 309 | | | (44 | ) | | 51,903 | |
Interest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 21,886 | | | 2 | | | — | | | 21,888 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 1,459 | | | (2 | ) | | — | | | 1,457 | |
Long-term borrowings | | | 332 | | | (1 | ) | | — | | | 331 | |
Guaranteed trust preferred securities preferred securities | | | 1,071 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 1,072 | |
Total interest expense | | | 24,748 | | | — | | | — | | | 24,748 | |
Net interest income | | | 26,890 | | | 309 | | | (44 | ) | | 27,155 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 11,713 | | | — | | | 1,746 | | | 13,459 | |
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | | | 15,177 | | | 309 | | | (1,790 | ) | | 13,696 | |
Noninterest Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan fees | | | 1,062 | | | (310 | ) | | — | | | 752 | |
Mortgage banking revenue | | | 2,655 | | | (1,272 | ) | | — | | | 1,383 | |
Deposit service charges | | | 813 | | | 21 | | | — | | | 834 | |
Other service fees | | | 149 | | | (62 | ) | | — | | | 87 | |
Other income | | | 70 | | | 6 | | | — | | | 76 | |
Gain on investment securities, net | | | 1,031 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,031 | |
Total noninterest income | | | 5,780 | | | (1,617 | ) | | — | | | 4,163 | |
Noninterest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation and employee benefits | | | 10,053 | | | (736 | ) | | — | | | 9,317 | |
Equipment | | | 1,112 | | | 89 | | | — | | | 1,201 | |
Occupancy and premises | | | 1,348 | | | (171 | ) | | — | | | 1,177 | |
Professional services | | | 846 | | | — | | | — | | | 846 | |
Litigation Settlements | | | 1,762 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,762 | |
Write down and losses on assets | | | — | | | 6 | | | — | | | 6 | |
Other expense | | | 3,626 | | | (496 | ) | | — | | | 3,130 | |
Total noninterest expense | | | 18,747 | | | (1,308 | ) | | — | | | 17,439 | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 2,210 | | | — | | | (1,790 | ) | | 420 | |
Income tax benefit | | | (15 | ) | | — | | | (590 | ) | | (605 | ) |
Income from continuing operations | | | 2,225 | | | — | | | (1,200 | ) | | 1,025 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net income | | $ | 2,225 | | $ | — | | $ | (1,200 | ) | $ | 1,025 | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.06 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net income | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.06 | |
Diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net income | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | |
| | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |
| | As Previously Reported | | Reclassification Adjustment | | Restatement Adjustment | | As Restated | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest and Dividend Income | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 131,943 | | $ | 245 | | $ | (119 | ) | $ | 132,069 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 1,608 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,608 | |
Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | | 15,020 | | | — | | | — | | | 15,020 | |
Tax-exempt | | | 1,909 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,909 | |
Dividends | | | 268 | | | — | | | — | | | 268 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 485 | | | — | | | — | | | 485 | |
Total interest and dividend income | | | 151,233 | | | 245 | | | (119 | ) | | 151,359 | |
Interest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 63,917 | | | 4 | | | — | | | 63,921 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 4,480 | | | (5 | ) | | — | | | 4,475 | |
Long-term borrowings | | | 1,050 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,050 | |
Guaranteed trust preferred securities preferred securities | | | 3,195 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 3,196 | |
Total interest expense | | | 72,642 | | | — | | | — | | | 72,642 | |
Net interest income | | | 78,591 | | | 245 | | | (119 | ) | | 78,717 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 23,476 | | | — | | | 2,035 | | | 25,511 | |
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | | | 55,115 | | | 245 | | | (2,154 | ) | | 53,206 | |
Noninterest Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loan fees | | | 3,167 | | | (249 | ) | | — | | | 2,918 | |
Mortgage banking revenue | | | 6,022 | | | (2,997 | ) | | — | | | 3,025 | |
Deposit service charges | | | 2,407 | | | 16 | | | — | | | 2,423 | |
Other service fees | | | 362 | | | (132 | ) | | — | | | 230 | |
Other income | | | 1,531 | | | 41 | | | — | | | 1,572 | |
Gain on investment securities, net | | | 3,127 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,127 | |
Total noninterest income | | | 16,616 | | | (3,321 | ) | | — | | | 13,295 | |
Noninterest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compensation and employee benefits | | | 30,047 | | | (1,732 | ) | | — | | | 28,315 | |
Equipment | | | 2,876 | | | 665 | | | — | | | 3,541 | |
Occupancy and premises | | | 4,240 | | | (908 | ) | | — | | | 3,332 | |
Professional services | | | 2,198 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,198 | |
Litigation Settlements | | | 1,752 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,752 | |
Write down and losses on assets | | | — | | | 41 | | | — | | | 41 | |
Other expense | | | 10,010 | | | (1,142 | ) | | — | | | 8,868 | |
Total noninterest expense | | | 51,123 | | | (3,076 | ) | | — | | | 48,047 | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 20,608 | | | — | | | (2,154 | ) | | 18,454 | |
Income tax expense | | | 6,221 | | | — | | | (772 | ) | | 5,449 | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 14,387 | | | — | | | (1,382 | ) | | 13,005 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net income | | $ | 14,387 | | $ | — | | $ | (1,382 | ) | $ | 13,005 | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.79 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.72 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net income | | $ | 0.79 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.72 | |
Diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.78 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net income | | $ | 0.78 | | $ | — | | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | September 30, 2002 | |
| | As Previously Reported | | Restatement Adjustment | | As Restated | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Common stock | | $ | 18,275 | | $ | — | | $ | 18,275 | |
Capital surplus | | | 157,264 | | | — | | | 157,264 | |
Retained earnings | | | 81,657 | | | (2,570 | ) | | 79,087 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net | | | 2,593 | | | 2,032 | | | 4,625 | |
Receivables from sale of stock | | | — | | | (7,937 | ) | | (7,937 | ) |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 259,789 | | $ | (8,475 | ) | $ | 251,314 | |
Note 3-Securities Available for Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and approximate fair values of securities available for sale are as follows:
| | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
September 30, 2003 | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | | $ | 20,090 | | $ | 15 | | $ | 5 | | $ | 20,100 | |
U.S. government agencies | | | 238,703 | | | 1,499 | | | 118 | | | 240,084 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 55,708 | | | 2,401 | | | 30 | | | 58,079 | |
Other notes and bonds | | | 1,050 | | | — | | | 6 | | | 1,044 | |
Corporate commercial paper | | | 8,600 | | | 5 | | | — | | | 8,605 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 248,003 | | | 1,392 | | | 3,016 | | | 246,379 | |
Total securities available for sale | | $ | 572,154 | | $ | 5,312 | | $ | 3,175 | | $ | 574,291 | |
December 31, 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | | $ | 10,024 | | $ | 26 | | $ | — | | $ | 10,050 | |
U.S. government agencies | | | 145,185 | | | 1,456 | | | — | | | 146,641 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 62,585 | | | 2,364 | | | 25 | | | 64,924 | |
Other notes and bonds | | | 1,050 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,050 | |
Corporate commercial paper | | | 8,300 | | | 4 | | | — | | | 8,304 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 271,750 | | | 3,745 | | | 114 | | | 275,381 | |
Total securities available for sale | | $ | 498,894 | | $ | 7,595 | | $ | 139 | | $ | 506,350 | |
Securities with a carrying value of $176.8 million and $203.3 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required.
Note 4-Loans
The components of loans are as follows:
| | | September 30, 2003 | | | December 31, 2002 (as restated) | |
| | | Amount | | | % of Total | | | Amount | | | % of Total | |
| | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Commercial | | $ | 744,700 | | | 28.9 | % | $ | 928,992 | | | 34.3 | % |
Factored receivables | | | 11,727 | | | 0.4 | | | 6,780 | | | 0.2 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 1,195,609 | | | 46.5 | | | 1,157,136 | | | 42.7 | |
Commercial real estate construction | | | 526,947 | | | 20.5 | | | 513,804 | | | 18.9 | |
Residential real estate | | | 81,494 | | | 3.2 | | | 91,577 | | | 3.4 | |
Home equity | | | 12,118 | | | 0.5 | | | 15,100 | | | 0.6 | |
Consumer | | | 4,460 | | | 0.2 | | | 6,032 | | | 0.2 | |
Receivables from sale of stock | | | (5,208 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (7,937 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
Gross loans | | | 2,571,847 | | | 100.0 | % | | 2,711,484 | | | 100.0 | % |
Deferred loan fees | | | (5,535 | ) | | | | | (7,478 | ) | | | |
Total loans | | | 2,566,312 | | | | | | 2,704,006 | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (126,999 | ) | | | | | (65,122 | ) | | | |
Loans, net | | $ | 2,439,313 | | | | | $ | 2,638,884 | | | | |
Certain directors and principal officers of CIB Marine and its subsidiaries, as well as companies with which those individuals are affiliated, are customers of, and conduct banking transactions with, CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks in the ordinary course of business. Such loans totaled $60.2 million and $63.5 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine had $23.8 million in outstanding principal balances on loans secured, or partially secured, by CIB Marine stock. Specific reserves on these loans were $0.1 million at September 30, 2003. Loans made specifically to enable the borrower to purchase CIB Marine stock and which were not adequately secured by collateral other than the stock have been classified as receivables from sale of stock, recorded as contra-equity and are not included in this balance.
The following table lists information on nonperforming and certain past due loans:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Nonaccrual loans | | $ | 205,426 | | $ | 38,958 | |
Restructured loans | | | 2,970 | | | 3,210 | |
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing | | | 5,947 | | | 6,396 | |
Information on impaired loans is as follows:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Impaired loans without a specific allowance | | $ | 95,055 | | $ | 3,054 | |
Impaired loans with a specific allowance | | | 166,979 | | | 38,321 | |
Total impaired loans | | $ | 262,034 | | $ | 41,375 | |
Specific allowance related to impaired loans | | $ | 60,528 | | $ | 10,434 | |
Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 90,024 | | $ | 44,028 | | $ | 65,122 | | $ | 35,855 | |
Charge-offs | | | (32,755 | ) | | (3,743 | ) | | (59,657 | ) | | (8,017 | ) |
Recoveries | | | 566 | | | 489 | | | 1,720 | | | 884 | |
Net loan charge-offs | | | (32,189 | ) | | (3,254 | ) | | (57,937 | ) | | (7,133 | ) |
Allowance acquired | | | — | | | 122 | | | — | | | 122 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 69,164 | | | 13,459 | | | 119,814 | | | 25,511 | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 126,999 | | $ | 54,355 | | $ | 126,999 | | $ | 54,355 | |
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans | | | 4.95 | % | | 2.05 | % | | 4.95 | % | | 2.05 | % |
The provision for credit losses consisted of the following:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Provision for loan losses | | $ | 69,164 | | $ | 13,459 | | $ | 119,814 | | $ | 25,511 | |
Provision for losses on unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit | | | 5,846 | | | — | | | 14,746 | | | — | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 75,010 | | $ | 13,459 | | $ | 134,560 | | $ | 25,511 | |
Note 5-Intangible Assets
CIB Marine’s intangible asset values are as follows:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Amortizing Intangible Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core deposit intangibles | | $ | 3,959 | | $ | 2,884 | | $ | 1,075 | | $ | 3,959 | | $ | 2,605 | | $ | 1,354 | |
Other identifiable intangibles | | | 390 | | | 145 | | | 245 | | | 390 | | | 51 | | | 339 | |
Mortgage servicing rights | | | 19 | | | 15 | | | 4 | | | 19 | | | 12 | | | 7 | |
Total amortizing intangible assets | | $ | 4,368 | | $ | 3,044 | | | 1,324 | | $ | 4,368 | | $ | 2,668 | | | 1,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-amortizing goodwill | | | | | | | | | 13,122 | | | | | | | | | 13,122 | |
Total intangible assets, net | | | | | | | | $ | 14,446 | | | | | | | | $ | 14,822 | |
Note 6-Companies Held For Disposal and Discontinued Operations
The net loss from discontinued operations for the quarter and nine-months ended September 30, 2003 is comprised of CIB Construction and was $5.2 million and $8.6 million, respectively. The $8.6 million loss includes $5.8 million of impairment losses recorded to reflect the estimated net realizable value upon liquidation. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated. There were no discontinued operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002.
Assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal are comprised of CIB Construction (including Canron) and MICR at both September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. Intercompany amounts have been eliminated. The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal as shown on the consolidated balance sheets.
Assets/liabilities of companies held for disposal
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets of companies held for disposal: | | | | | |
CIB Construction | | $ | 58,002 | | $ | 67,061 | |
MICR | | | 6,409 | | | 6,545 | |
Intercompany eliminations | | | (1,480 | ) | | (332 | ) |
Total assets of companies held for disposal | | $ | 62,931 | | $ | 73,274 | |
Liabilities of companies held for disposal: | | | | | | | |
CIB Construction | | $ | 59,049 | | $ | 62,238 | |
MICR | | | 621 | | | 558 | |
Intercompany eliminations | | | (32,462 | ) | | (26,193 | ) |
Total liabilities of companies held for disposal | | $ | 27,208 | | $ | 36,603 | |
Banking regulations limit the holding period for assets not considered to be permissible banking activities and which have been acquired in satisfaction of debt previously contracted to five years, unless extended. Both MICR and CIB Construction are subject to this restriction.
CIB Construction (includes Canron)
CIB Construction, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIB Marine, acquired 84% of the outstanding stock of Canron through loan collection activities in the fourth quarter of 2002. During the third quarter of 2003, the Board of Directors of Canron authorized management to cease operating Canron and commence a wind down of its affairs, including a voluntary liquidation of its assets. The gross assets and liabilities of CIB Construction and its subsidiaries are reported at their estimated liquidation values less costs to sell.
The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Construction’s balance sheets. The September 30, 2003 balance sheet reflects estimated liquidation values less costs to sell.
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets: | | | | | |
Cash on deposit at CIB Marine | | $ | 1,882 | | $ | 332 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 28,255 | | | 33,610 | |
Inventories and contracts in progress | | | 6,376 | | | 7,629 | |
Other assets | | | 2,173 | | | 4,195 | |
Current assets | | | 38,686 | | | 45,766 | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 3,135 | | | 4,269 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 16,181 | | | 17,026 | |
Total assets | | $ | 58,002 | | $ | 67,061 | |
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity: | | | | | | | |
Current portion of loans payable to CIB Marine and its affiliates | | $ | 20,861 | | $ | 3,921 | |
Income tax payable | | | 1,574 | | | 3,104 | |
Other liabilities | | | 24,534 | | | 31,127 | |
Current liabilities | | | 46,969 | | | 38,152 | |
Loans payable to CIB Marine and its affiliates | | | 9,979 | | | 22,272 | |
Loans payable to nonaffiliated banks | | | 2,101 | | | 1,814 | |
Total liabilities | | | 59,049 | | | 62,238 | |
Stockholder’s equity | | | (1,047 | ) | | 4,823 | |
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity | | $ | 58,002 | | $ | 67,061 | |
MICR
In 2000, CIB Marine acquired and/or assumed through MICR, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIB Bank (Hillside, Illinois) (“CIB-Chicago”), the business and certain assets and liabilities of a manufacturer of payment processing systems. The gross assets and liabilities of MICR are reported on the consolidated balance sheet as assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal and its results of operations are included in continuing operations for all periods presented. MICR had income before income tax expense of $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In January 2005, CIB Marine retained the services of an investment bank to assist in the marketing and sale of MICR. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, MICR paid CIB-Chicago, its parent, $0.8 million in dividends.
The following table summarizes the composition of MICR's balance sheet:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets: | | | | | |
Cash on deposit at non-affiliates | | $ | 366 | | $ | 495 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 610 | | | 430 | |
Inventory | | | 907 | | | 1,024 | |
Other current assets | | | 12 | | | 7 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 358 | | | 433 | |
Goodwill, net | | | 4,156 | | | 4,156 | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,409 | | $ | 6,545 | |
Liabilities and stockholder's equity: | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | $ | 621 | | $ | 558 | |
Stockholder's equity | | | 5,788 | | | 5,987 | |
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity | | $ | 6,409 | | $ | 6,545 | |
Note 7-Other Assets
The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Marine's other assets:
| | | September 30, 2003 | | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Prepaid expenses | | $ | 1,485 | | $ | 1,293 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 851 | | | 551 | |
Fair value of derivatives | | | 5,432 | | | 8,022 | |
Trust preferred securities underwriting fee, net of amortization | | | 1,514 | | | 1,555 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock | | | 10,954 | | | 10,394 | |
Other investments | | | 10,669 | | | 9,999 | |
Deferred taxes | | | — | | | 9,405 | |
Income tax receivable | | | 28,032 | | | 3,853 | |
Other | | | 338 | | | 324 | |
| | $ | 59,275 | | $ | 45,396 | |
As members of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Home Loan Bank, certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks are required to maintain minimum amounts of Federal Reserve stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock as required by those institutions. These securities are “restricted” in that they are not publicly traded, can only be owned by members of the institutions and can only be sold back to the institutions or transferred to another member in limited circumstances.
The major components of other investments are as follows:
| · | Investments in limited partnership interests in various affordable housing partnerships, which has a carrying value of $5.7 million and $4.2 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. CIB Marine has engaged in these transactions to provide additional qualified investments under the Community Reinvestment Act and to receive related income tax credits. The partnerships provide affordable housing to low income residents within CIB Marine’s markets and other locations. |
| · | Interests in three limited partnerships which had a carrying value of $3.3 million and $3.0 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. |
| · | Investment in shares of the common stock of a closely held information services company, which represents less than a 5% interest in the company. The amount of this investment is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value which was estimated to be $0.5 million and $1.7 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. In the third quarter of 2003, the asset was deemed impaired, and an impairment loss of $1.2 million was recorded in write down and losses on assets. There were no impairment losses in 2002. |
| · | Interest in two companies operating as small business investment companies under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended. CIB Marine committed to a $1.1 million investment in these companies and, as of September 30, 2003, had invested $0.9 million. The amount of this investment is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value which was estimated to be $0.7 million and $0.6 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. |
| · | Investment in shares of the common stock in a non-publicly traded bank holding company, which represents less than a 5% interest in the company. The amount of this investment is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value which was estimated to be $0.2 million at both September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. |
Note 8-Short-term Borrowings
The following table presents information regarding short-term borrowings:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | Balance | | Rate | | Balance | | Rate | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | | $ | 125,523 | | | 1.13 | % | $ | 243,187 | | | 1.27 | % |
Federal Home Loan Bank | | | — | | | — | | | 100,500 | | | 2.20 | |
Revolving lines of credit | | | 31,494 | | | 3.22 | | | 36,685 | | | 3.09 | |
Commercial paper | | | 3,031 | | | 1.66 | | | 4,436 | | | 2.04 | |
Treasury, tax, and loan notes | | | 3,709 | | | 0.78 | | | 2,137 | | | 0.99 | |
| | $ | 163,757 | | | 1.53 | % | $ | 386,945 | | | 1.69 | % |
At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine was not in compliance with certain asset quality, earnings and capital maintenance debt covenants of certain financial standby letters of credit it participated in with other banks. CIB Marine pledged securities to collateralize its obligation for these participated standby letters of credit and entered into forbearance agreements. The total value of securities pledged to other parties related to those participated standby letters of credit was $24.9 million at September 30, 2003. At September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, CIB Marine had a $5.5 million and a $1.0 million accrual for unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit related to these letters of credit, respectively.
CIB Marine had a revolving line of credit at a nonaffiliated commercial bank collateralized by the common stock of all of its subsidiaries. At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine was not in compliance with certain debt covenants of this revolving line of credit and was in the process of negotiating a new line of credit agreement. Additionally, at September 30, 2003, CIB Marine’s factoring subsidiary had a $12.0 million line of credit to support its operating needs.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2003 federal funds borrowings by certain CIB Marine subsidiary banks were discontinued or were contingent on subsidiary bank pledges of fixed income investment securities.
Note 9-Long-Term Borrowings
The following table presents information regarding amounts payable to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago that are included in the consolidated balance sheets as long-term borrowings:
| | | September 30, 2003 | | | December 31, 2002 | | | Callable at Par | |
Scheduled Maturity | | | Balance | | | Rate | | | Balance | | | Rate | | | After | |
| | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
5/01/04 | | $ | 3,500 | | | 5.12 | % | $ | 3,500 | | | 5.12 | % | | N/A | |
5/01/04 | | | 5,000 | | | 5.12 | | | 5,000 | | | 5.12 | | | N/A | |
1/16/08 | | | 3,250 | | | 4.95 | | | 3,250 | | | 4.95 | | | 1/16/01 | |
1/16/08 | | | 2,500 | | | 4.95 | | | 2,500 | | | 4.95 | | | 1/16/01 | |
1/16/08 | | | 2,000 | | | 4.95 | | | 2,000 | | | 4.95 | | | 1/16/01 | |
2/20/08 | | | 2,000 | | | 5.09 | | | 2,000 | | | 5.09 | | | 2/20/01 | |
6/30/08 | | | 23,948 | | | 7.07 | | | 23,810 | | | 7.07 | | | N/A | |
Total before hedged fair value adjustment | | | 42,198 | | | 6.19 | | | 42,060 | | | 6.19 | | | | |
Hedged fair value adjustment | | | 4,691 | | | | | | 5,081 | | | | | | | |
Total after hedged fair value adjustment | | $ | 46,889 | | | | | $ | 47,141 | | | | | | | |
CIB Marine is required to maintain qualifying collateral as security for both the short-term and long-term FHLB borrowings. The debt to collateral ratio is dependent upon the type of collateral pledged. At September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the assets pledged as security for CIB Marine’s FHLB borrowings had a collateral value of $54.7 million and $241.2 million, respectively. These assets consisted of securities with a market value of $55.0 million and $83.3 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, and 1-4 family residential mortgages with balances outstanding of $76.4 million and $275.6 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
Note 10-Other Liabilities
| | September 30 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 3,430 | | $ | 3,357 | |
Accrual for unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit | | | 15,746 | | | 1,000 | |
Accrued real estate taxes | | | 882 | | | 841 | |
Accrued compensation and employee benefits | | | 2,112 | | | 1,665 | |
Accrued professional fees | | | 421 | | | 365 | |
Accrued other expenses | | | 592 | | | 409 | |
Fair value of derivatives | | | 1,289 | | | 4,264 | |
Other liabilities | | | 1,167 | | | 1,035 | |
| | $ | 25,639 | | $ | 12,936 | |
Changes in the accrual for unfunded standby letters of credit are as follows:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 1,000 | | $ | — | |
Provision for losses on unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit | | | 14,746 | | | 1,000 | |
Balance at end of year | | $ | 15,746 | | $ | 1,000 | |
Note 11-Stockholders' Equity
Receivables from Sale of Stock
Loans not sufficiently collateralized by assets other than CIB Marine stock and made by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to borrowers who used the proceeds to acquire CIB Marine stock are accounted for as a reduction of stockholders’ equity and recorded as receivables from sale of stock, unless the loan had been repaid prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Such loans outstanding at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 totaled $5.2 million and $7.9 million, respectively. Interest earned on these loans was $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 31, 2003 and September 30, 2002, respectively, and is included in interest and dividend income-loans.
Treasury Stock
In 2003, certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks acquired 86,611 shares of CIB Marine stock through collection efforts when the borrowers defaulted on their loans. These shares are included in treasury stock at the lower of the loan balance or the estimated fair market value of CIB Marine’s stock at time of acquisition. Any loan balance in excess of the estimated fair market value of the stock and other collateral received was charged to the allowance for loan losses. Treasury stock was $2.2 million at September 30, 2003. Since these shares are not directly owned by CIB Marine they are not excluded from the number of shares outstanding.
Regulatory Capital
CIB Marine and its subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Pursuant to federal holding company and bank regulations, CIB Marine and each bank subsidiary is assigned to a capital category. The assigned capital category is largely determined by three ratios that are calculated in accordance with specific instructions included in the regulations: total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the bank subsidiaries must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the bank’s assets and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The banks’ capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. To be categorized as well capitalized, pursuant to FDIC guidelines in 12 C.F.R. Part 325, the bank subsidiaries must maintain total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 10.0%, 6.0% and 5.0%, respectively.
There are five capital categories defined in the regulations: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Classification of a subsidiary bank in any of the undercapitalized categories can result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
At September 30, 2003, pursuant to FDIC guidelines in 12 C.F.R. Part 325, CIB Bank (Indianapolis, Indiana) (“CIB-Indiana”), Marine Bank (Scottsdale, Arizona) (“Marine FSB”) and Citrus Bank, N.A. (Vero Beach, Florida) (“Citrus Bank”) were classified as well capitalized. Central Illinois Bank and Marine Bank (Wauwatosa, Wisconsin) (“Marine-Wisconsin”) were classified as adequately capitalized, and CIB-Chicago was classified as significantly undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
On January 30, 2003, CIB-Chicago, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) with the Division of Banks and Real Estate of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (the “DBRE”) and the FDIC. The Memorandum was entered into as a result of the deterioration in the credit quality of the loan portfolio, the level of concentrations of credit, and weaknesses in the credit administration process identified during the DBRE’s regular examination of CIB-Chicago, which commenced on August 31, 2002.
Pursuant to the Memorandum, CIB-Chicago agreed to take certain actions to correct the deficiencies noted within the examination report. In addition, during the period in which the Memorandum was in effect, CIB-Chicago agreed to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital level equal to or exceeding 8% of the bank’s total assets. In the event such ratio is less than 8% as of June 30 or December 31 of each calendar year the Memorandum was in effect, the bank was required within 30 days thereof to submit to the regulators a plan for the augmentation of the bank’s capital accounts. Also, unless prior written consent was received from the regulators, CIB-Chicago agreed to restrict its loan growth to no more than 2% during any consecutive three month period and suspend the declaration or payment of dividends. See Note 15-Subsequent Events for further information regarding regulatory Orders and Agreements.
Note 12-Earnings (Loss) Per Share Computations
The following provides a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (71,978 | ) | $ | 1,025 | | $ | (89,514 | ) | $ | 13,005 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 18,259,831 | | | 18,241,287 | | | 18,295,555 | | | 18,118,695 | |
Effect of dilutive stock options outstanding | | | — | | | 395,490 | | | — | | | 386,876 | |
Diluted | | | 18,259,831 | | | 18,636,777 | | | 18,295,555 | | | 18,505,571 | |
Per share income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (3.94 | ) | $ | 0.06 | | $ | (4.90 | ) | $ | 0.72 | |
Effect of dilutive stock options outstanding | | | — | | | (0.01 | ) | | — | | | (0.02 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (3.94 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | (4.90 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |
Note 13-Stock Option Plans
CIB Marine has a nonqualified stock option and incentive plan for its employees and directors. At September 30, 2003, options to purchase 180,774 shares were available for future grant. The plan provides for the options to be exercisable over a ten-year period beginning one year from the date of the grant, provided the participant has remained in the employ of, or on the Board of Directors of CIB Marine and/or one of its subsidiaries. The plan also provides that the exercise price of the options granted may not be less than 100% of fair market value on the option grant date. Options vest over five years.
The following is a reconciliation of stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
| | Number of Shares | | Range of Option Prices per Share | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Shares under option at December 31, 2002 | | | 1,533,251 | | $ | 4.95-25.08 | | $ | 16.27 | |
Granted | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Lapsed or surrendered | | | (51,490 | ) | | 13.07-23.22 | | | 17.90 | |
Exercised | | | (34,200 | ) | | 4.95-13.07 | | | 5.90 | |
Shares under option at September 30, 2003 | | | 1,447,561 | | $ | 8.50-25.08 | | $ | 16.45 | |
Shares exercisable at September 30, 2003 | | | 1,025,393 | | $ | 8.50-23.66 | | $ | 14.67 | |
CIB Marine applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”), and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), companies may elect to recognize stock-based compensation expense based on the fair value method of the awards or continue to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. CIB Marine has elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB 25.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (revised), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123 (R)”). The objective of the SFAS 123(R) is to recognize in an entity’s financial statements the cost of employee services received in exchange for valuable equity instruments issued to employees in share-based payment transactions. A key provision of the statement requires public companies to adopt SFAS 123’s fair-value method of accounting. Under this method, the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity instruments would be measured based on the grant-date fair value of these instruments. The cost would be recognized over the requisite service period. SFAS 123 (R) was applied by CIB Marine prospectively as of January 1, 2006 and did not result in a significant adjustment to the consolidated financial statements.
Had compensation expense for these plans been determined based on the fair value method at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the methodology in SFAS 123, CIB Marine’s net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below:
| | | | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated | |
| | | | (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Net income (loss) | | | As reported | | $ | (77,169 | ) | $ | 1,025 | | $ | (98,091 | ) | $ | 13,005 | |
| | | Assumed compensation cost, net of tax | | | (314 | ) | | (315 | ) | | (941 | ) | | (976 | ) |
| | | Pro forma | | $ | (77,483 | ) | $ | 710 | | $ | (99,032 | ) | $ | 12,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per share | | | As reported | | | (4.23 | ) | | 0.06 | | | (5.37 | ) | | 0.72 | |
| | | Pro forma | | | (4.24 | ) | | 0.04 | | | (5.41 | ) | | 0.66 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | | | As reported | | | (4.23 | ) | | 0.05 | | | (5.37 | ) | | 0.70 | |
| | | Pro forma | | | (4.24 | ) | | 0.04 | | | (5.41 | ) | | 0.65 | |
Fair value has been estimated using the minimum value method as defined in SFAS 123. Key assumptions used were zero percent volatility, zero percent dividend yield, expected lives of ten years and risk-free interest rates averaging 5.04% for 2002. No options were granted in 2003. The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $9.94 on the date of grant. Because the options vest over a five-year period, the pro forma disclosures are not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net income for future years.
Under APB 25, stock based compensation expense includes the excess, if any, of the market price of the stock at grant date or other measurement date, over the exercise price. This expense is recognized over the vesting period of the options. If stock options had an exercise price less than the market price at the measurement date, compensation expense associated with those options would be included in salaries and employee benefits expense with a corresponding increase in capital surplus.
CIB Marine records amounts received upon the exercise of options by crediting common stock and capital surplus. Income tax benefits from the exercise of stock options result in a decrease in current income taxes payable and, to the extent not previously recognized as a reduction in income tax expense, result in an additional increase in capital surplus.
Note 14-Business Segments
CIB Marine has determined that its two reportable business segments are General Banking and Mortgage Banking. General Banking consists of making loans, accepting deposits, and providing other traditional banking services to CIB Marine’s commercial and retail customers. These products and services are provided primarily by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks through its branch network. Mortgage Banking primarily includes the operations of CIB Marine’s mortgage banking subsidiary, Mortgage Services, Inc. Mortgage Services originates and purchases residential mortgages through a network of brokers, correspondent banks, and CIB Marine’s banking facilities. The majority of these loans are sold into the secondary market.
Management reviews the operating performance of these segments using primarily legal entity based financial reports. Management support services are provided to the business segments by the holding company and an information services subsidiary. The remaining unrecovered expenses of the holding company are shown as corporate overhead in the business segment table below.
| | General Banking | | Mortgage Banking | | Corporate Overhead | | Intercompany Eliminations | | Consolidated Income From Continuing Operations | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
At or for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003 | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (loss) | | $ | 25,420 | | $ | 1,065 | | $ | (1,461 | ) | $ | (385 | ) | $ | 24,639 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 75,010 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 75,010 | |
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses | | | (49,590 | ) | | 1,065 | | | (1,461 | ) | | (385 | ) | | (50,371 | ) |
Noninterest income | | | 2,314 | | | 2,200 | | | 5,488 | | | (5,172 | ) | | 4,830 | |
Noninterest expense | | | 17,083 | | | 2,009 | | | 6,487 | | | (5,165 | ) | | 20,414 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | | (64,359 | ) | | 1,256 | | | (2,460 | ) | | (392 | ) | | (65,955 | ) |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 5,598 | | | (885 | ) | | 1,310 | | | — | | | 6,023 | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (69,957 | ) | $ | 2,141 | | $ | (3,770 | ) | $ | (392 | ) | $ | (71,978 | ) |
At or for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (loss) | | $ | 82,436 | | $ | 2,818 | | $ | (4,391 | ) | $ | (366 | ) | $ | 80,497 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 134,560 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 134,560 | |
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses | | | (52,124 | ) | | 2,818 | | | (4,391 | ) | | (366 | ) | | (54,063 | ) |
Noninterest income | | | 6,341 | | | 8,907 | | | 15,784 | | | (15,290 | ) | | 15,742 | |
Noninterest expense | | | 46,908 | | | 6,050 | | | 19,010 | | | (15,264 | ) | | 56,704 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | | (92,691 | ) | | 5,675 | | | (7,617 | ) | | (392 | ) | | (95,025 | ) |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | (6,975 | ) | | 1,591 | | | (127 | ) | | — | | | (5,511 | ) |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (85,716 | ) | $ | 4,084 | | $ | (7,490 | ) | $ | (392 | ) | $ | (89,514 | ) |
Identifiable assets from continuing operations | | $ | 3,289,106 | | $ | 74,270 | | $ | 17,025 | | $ | (78,691 | ) | $ | 3,301,710 | |
Assets of Companies held for disposal | | | 62,931 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 62,931 | |
Total identifiable assets | | $ | 3,352,037 | | $ | 74,270 | | $ | 17,025 | | $ | (78,691 | ) | $ | 3,364,641 | |
At or for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2002 (as restated) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (loss) | | $ | 28,146 | | $ | 308 | | $ | (1,309 | ) | $ | 10 | | $ | 27,155 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 13,459 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 13,459 | |
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses | | | 14,687 | | | 308 | | | (1,309 | ) | | 10 | | | 13,696 | |
Noninterest income | | | 3,406 | | | 1,375 | | | 4,019 | | | (4,637 | ) | | 4,163 | |
Noninterest expense | | | 15,585 | | | 1,156 | | | 5,325 | | | (4,627 | ) | | 17,439 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 2,508 | | | 527 | | | (2,615 | ) | | — | | | 420 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 385 | | | 181 | | | (1,171 | ) | | — | | | (605 | ) |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 2,123 | | $ | 346 | | $ | (1,444 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 1,025 | |
At or for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 (as restated) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income (loss) | | $ | 81,699 | | $ | 715 | | $ | (3,737 | ) | $ | 40 | | $ | 78,717 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 25,511 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 25,511 | |
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses | | | 56,188 | | | 715 | | | (3,737 | ) | | 40 | | | 53,206 | |
Noninterest income | | | 11,097 | | | 2,991 | | | 12,744 | | | (13,537 | ) | | 13,295 | |
Noninterest expense | | | 42,109 | | | 3,450 | | | 15,985 | | | (13,497 | ) | | 48,047 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 25,176 | | | 256 | | | (6,978 | ) | | — | | | 18,454 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 7,716 | | | 50 | | | (2,317 | ) | | — | | | 5,449 | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 17,460 | | $ | 206 | | $ | (4,661 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 13,005 | |
Identifiable assets from continuing operations | | $ | 3,277,372 | | $ | 116,223 | | $ | 14,568 | | $ | (85,682 | ) | $ | 3,322,481 | |
Assets of companies held for disposal | | | 6,648 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,648 | |
Total identifiable assets | | $ | 3,284,020 | | $ | 116,223 | | $ | 14,568 | | $ | (85,682 | ) | $ | 3,329,129 | |
Note 15-Subsequent Events
The following subsequent events information should be read in conjunction with CIB Marine’s 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 Form 10-K’s which were filed with the SEC on October 31, 2005; December 8, 2006; July 18, 2007; and November 7, 2007; respectively.
Regulatory Orders and Agreements
In January 2007, the Cease and Desist Order at Central Illinois Bank was terminated and replaced with a Memorandum of Understanding. Among other items, the Memorandum required Central Illinois Bank to maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital of 8% of total assets as calculated in accordance with Part 325 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations and to obtain regulatory approval prior to the purchase of any loan pools in excess of $3.0 million. The Memoranda at Central Illinois Bank and Marine Bank-Wisconsin were terminated. Following the termination of the Memoranda, none of the subsidiary banks were party to any formal or informal regulatory agreement or order.
At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine was subject to a Written Agreement (“Agreement”) which it entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank in the second quarter of 2004. Among other items, the Agreement restricts dividend payments and redemption of shares of CIB Marine without regulatory approval; restricts distribution of interest or dividends on its trust preferred securities without regulatory approval; restricts borrowings and debt, including debt to stockholders, without regulatory approval; and requires maintenance of minimum capital levels. The Agreement remains effective and enforceable until stayed, modified, terminated or suspended by the Federal Reserve Bank.
Management Changes
In March 2007, Mr. Stanley J. Calderon was elected Chairman of the Board of CIB Marine, replacing Mr. W. Scott Blake, who remains a director. In March 2007, Mr. Calderon also resigned as President and CEO of CIB Marine and was replaced by Mr. John P. Hickey Jr. Mr. Calderon’s employment agreement with CIB Marine terminated upon his resignation as President and CEO. In May 2007, Mr. Hickey was appointed to CIB Marine’s Board of Directors. In January 2008, Mr. Edwin J. Depenbrok was appointed Chief Financial Officer replacing Mr. Steven Klitzing who resigned in November 2007.
Liquidity
During 2007 and into 2008, CIB Marine’s availability of federal funds purchased with correspondent banks continued to be contingent on subsidiary bank pledges of fixed income investment securities. Credit restrictions at the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window were lifted in the first quarter of 2007.
FHLB Stock Investment
In October 2007, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago entered into a consensual cease and desist order (“order”) with the Federal Housing Finance Board which will guide the FHLB Chicago’s operations going forward. The FHLB Chicago states it will continue to provide to its members liquidity and funding through advances and the purchase of mortgages, and continue to support affordable housing and economic development. In addition to several required actions and restrictions agreed to in the order, it also requires the FHLB Chicago to obtain prior written approval from the Federal Housing Finance Board for the redemption or repurchase of any capital stock from members and the payment of any dividends to its shareholders. CIB Marine is a member, shareholder and customer of FHLB Chicago currently utilizing advances from the FHLB Chicago to assist in meeting the funding and liquidity needs of the subsidiary banks of CIB Marine. Additionally, in October 2007 and January 2008, respectively, the FHLB Chicago announced it would not declare a dividend for the third or fourth quarters of 2007. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had $11.5 million in FHLB Chicago stock, of which $4.0 million was categorized as required.
Loan Pool Purchase
CIB Marine has purchased two pools of fixed rate second lien home equity loans from Residential Funding Corporation, a division of General Motors Acceptance Corporation: a $47.8 million pool in June 2006 and a $48.2 million pool in February 2007. The 2006 purchase was funded with $12.0 million in FHLB Chicago borrowings with the remainder coming from cash on hand. The 2007 purchase was funded with cash on hand and $15.0 million in FHLB Chicago borrowings. The June 2006 pool consisted of 989 loans at purchase with a weighted average yield of 9.5%, term to maturity of 17.3 years, loan-to-value ratio of 91%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 39% and FICO score of 713. The February 2007 pool included at purchase 965 loans with a weighted average yield of 10.0%, term to maturity of 17.5 years, loan-to-value ratio of 94%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 40%, and FICO score of 709. The majority of the loans in the purchased pools are not considered to be loans to subprime borrowers. CIB Marine hired an outside consulting firm with experience in home equity loan pool purchases to assist it in selecting the selling company and in the due diligence process performed on a sample of the purchased loans. CIB Marine continues to look at alternative investments including possible further loan purchases in an effort to increase both the balances of loans outstanding and the yield on its interest-earning assets.
In the last half of 2007, CIB Marine increased the loss provision rates on the two home equity pools it purchased during 2006 and 2007, primarily due to the general deterioration in the condition of the housing markets and the housing finance markets. At December 31, 2007, the balance of these loans was $72.2 million and the allowance for loan loss allocated to these loans was $5.3 million, or 7.3% of the outstanding balance of these loans. Additionally, at December 31, 2007, $2.4 million of these loans were classified as nonaccrual.
Other investments
During the third quarter of 2007, CIB Marine’s investment in the common and preferred capital of a limited liability corporation engaged in the development of owner-occupied housing in qualified low-income communities was deemed impaired, and an impairment loss for the entire $0.8 million carrying value of the investment was recognized.
Branch Activities
CIB Marine had 25 branches as of December 31, 2007, holding $0.7 billion in deposits.
During 2007, Marine-Wisconsin sold its Cedarburg and Brookfield, Wisconsin branches, resulting in a total net gain on the sales of $1.1 million. The branches had $49.7 million in deposits at the time of sales. Additionally, CIB Marine closed the Henderson, Nevada; Sun City, Arizona; Indianapolis (Fox Road), Indiana; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin branches. At December 31, 2006, these four branches had total deposits of $46.7 million. Deposits of the closed branches were transferred to other CIB Marine branches.
CIB Marine continues to evaluate the effectiveness of its subsidiary banking networks, which could result in the sale or closure of additional subsidiary bank branches.
Goodwill
At December 31, 2006, CIB Marine had $0.7 million of goodwill. As a result of branch sales during the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine had no goodwill at December 31, 2007.
FDIC Deposit Insurance Premiums
In October 2006, the FDIC Board of Directors approved a One-Time Assessment Credit. This credit, totaling $0.6 million for CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks, will be recorded as a credit against regular FDIC insurance premium expense beginning in January 2007 and continue until the credit is exhausted. Of the $0.6 million, $0.2 million was used to offset the FDIC insurance premium during 2007 and an estimated $0.2 million will be used to offset the FDIC insurance premium during 2008.
Credit Concentrations
At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had one borrowing relationship (loans to one borrower or a related group of borrowers) and loans to five industries or industry groups that exceeded 25% of stockholders’ equity. The decreases subsequent to September 30, 2003 were primarily due to the sale of CIB-Chicago and management’s strategy to reduce these types of exposures.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets were $14.7 million at December 31, 2007 and included nonaccrual loans of $13.4 million, foreclosed properties of $1.3 million and no restructured loans. The decrease in these assets subsequent to September 30, 2003 was primarily due to the sale of CIB-Chicago and management’s initiatives to improve the quality of the loan portfolio.
Late Filing of Tax Returns
CIB Marine did not file all required federal and state tax returns for calendar years 2004, 2005 and 2006 by the required due dates. Although CIB Marine did not report taxable income during these periods, penalties and interest may still be assessed by the Internal Revenue Service and/or applicable state departments of revenue. As of the first quarter of 2008, CIB Marine was current with all its federal and state tax return filings.
Municipal Bond Insurer Rating Downgrades
In January 2008, due to economic conditions, several nationally recognized rating agencies downgraded the credit ratings of several of the investment grade credit insuring companies. Several of the downgraded companies insure municipal obligation investments owned by CIB Marine. The municipal obligations have a par value of $16.5 million and a fair value of $16.4 million as of December 31, 2007. CIB Marine has not recognized any impairment on these affected municipal obligations and the securities are still considered investment grade quality as rated by the rating agencies.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CIB Marine currently plans to hold its 2008 annual meeting of shareholders on May 29, 2008. Any holder of common stock who wishes to submit a proposal to be included in CIB Marine’s proxy materials in connection with the 2008 annual meeting must submit the proposal to CIB Marine’s Secretary and General Counsel, Daniel Rasmussen, by April 2, 2008. The holder submitting the proposal must have owned common stock having a value of at least $2,000 for at least one year prior to submitting the proposal and represent to CIB Marine that the holder intends to hold those shares of common stock through the date of the 2008 annual meeting.
CIB Marine is filing its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 at this point in time because management made the decision to focus its efforts on becoming current on its audited financial statements prior to becoming current on this earlier delinquent filing, and because 2003 third quarter financial results were already available in Note 26-Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information to CIB Marine’s consolidated financial statements filed with its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The following discussion and analysis presents CIB Marine's consolidated financial condition as of September 30, 2003 and results of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003. This discussion should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report, as well as CIB Marine's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed on October 31, 2005, which restated CIB Marine’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002. The impact of the restatement on the December 31, 2002, financials as discussed in the December 31, 2003 Form 10K, is summarized as follows:
| | | 2002 | |
| | | As Previously | | | | | | As | |
| | | Reported | | | Adjustment | | | Restated | |
Selected Income Statement Accounts: | | | (Dollars in thousands, except share data) | |
Interest income - loans | | $ | 178,691 | | $ | (191 | ) | $ | 178,500 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | (35,725 | ) | | (10,785 | ) | | (46,510 | ) |
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | | | 71,132 | | | (10,976 | ) | | 60,156 | |
Income tax expense | | | (6,748 | ) | | 4,152 | | | (2,596 | ) |
Income from continuing operations | | | 16,433 | | | (6,824 | ) | | 9,609 | |
EPS-Diluted from continuing operations | | $ | 0.89 | | $ | (0.37 | ) | $ | 0.52 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected Balance Sheet Accounts: | | | | | | | | | | |
Total securities | | $ | 514,003 | | $ | (7,653 | ) | $ | 506,350 | |
Loans, net of deferred loan fees | | | 2,711,943 | | | (7,937 | ) | | 2,704,006 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (52,369 | ) | | (12,753 | ) | | (65,122 | ) |
Net loans | | | 2,659,574 | | | (20,690 | ) | | 2,638,884 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | $ | 82,901 | | $ | (8,012 | ) | $ | 74,889 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 261,801 | | | (14,238 | ) | | 247,563 | |
RESTATEMENT OF SEPTEMBER 2002 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATONS
Loan and Other Credit Losses
In the third quarter of 2003, CIB Marine began a comprehensive review of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses in response to deterioration in the credit quality of CIB Marine’s loan portfolio, including a significant increase in nonperforming loans, which was noted by CIB Marine’s banking regulators at certain subsidiary banks. A Special Review Committee of the Board was formed to further review these items and engaged outside advisors to conduct an independent review of loan related matters. As a result of this comprehensive review, CIB Marine identified errors in the timing of loan downgrades. The consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 has been restated to reflect loan downgrades in the appropriate period. The impact of this adjustment was an increase in the provision for credit losses of $1.7 million and $2.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively, and a net cumulative increase in the allowance for loan loses of $3.9 million.
Interest Income-Loans
In addition, errors were also identified in the timing of when loans were classified as nonperforming which resulted in loans not being placed on nonaccrual status in the correct reporting period. The consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 has been restated to reflect loans being placed on nonaccrual status in the appropriate periods. The impact of this adjustment was a reduction in interest income-loans of $0.01 million and $0.1 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively, and a corresponding reduction in accrued interest receivable.
Income Tax Expense
The consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 has also been restated to reflect the income tax effect of the above adjustments. The effect of these adjustments on the consolidated statement of operations was an increase in income tax benefit on income from continuing operations of $0.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, and a reduction in income tax expense of $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
Reclassification of Securities and Adjustment to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
During 2005, CIB Marine sold tax exempt held to maturity securities. As a result of this material contradiction related to management’s previous assertion regarding its intent and ability to hold securities to maturity, CIB Marine determined the consolidated financial statements should be restated for all years presented to reclassify all held to maturity securities to available for sale. The effect of this restatement was an increase in securities of $3.3 million and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income and total stockholders’ equity of $2.0 million as of September 30, 2002 for the net unrealized gains on the reclassified securities. The $1.3 million difference in the increase in available for sale securities and the increase in accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2002 is the deferred income tax effect on the net unrealized gain on securities.
Receivables from Sale of Stock
During the regular 2003 regulatory examination, it was noted that certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks had originated loans, the proceeds of which were used to purchase stock of CIB Marine. Loans originated by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to purchase CIB Marine stock should have been accounted for as a reduction in stockholders’ equity unless the loan had been repaid prior to the issuance of the financial statements or the loan had been adequately collateralized exclusive of the value of CIB Marine stock pledged as collateral, if any. The consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2002 has been restated to report these loans as a contra-equity account entitled receivables from sale of stock. The effect of this adjustment was a reduction of loans and a corresponding reduction of stockholders’ equity of $7.9 million at September 30, 2002. See Note 11-Stockholders’ Equity- for further information.
The cumulative impact of the above restatements is a decrease in net income of $1.2 million and $1.4 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. The $8.5 million cumulative decrease in stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2002 includes: the $1.4 million decrease in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002; a $1.2 million decrease in net income due to restatements in calendar year 2001; and the $7.9 million reduction due to receivables from sale of stock, which is partially offset by the $2.0 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income. The above restatement adjustments did not have an impact on the net cash provided by/used in operating activities, investing activities or financing activities.
The following table presents the selected balance sheet items as previously reported and restated as of September 30, 2002. See Note 2-Restatement of the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Stockholders’ Equity in Item 1-Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information on the restatement of the consolidated statement of operations and stockholders equity for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002.
| | As Previously Reported | | Reclassification Adjustments | | Restatement Adjustments | | As Restated | |
Total Assets | | $ | 3,336,208 | | $ | 1,396 | | $ | (8,475 | ) | $ | 3,329,129 | |
Loans | | | 2,661,371 | | | — | | | (7,937 | ) | | 2,653,434 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (50,424 | ) | | — | | | (3,931 | ) | | (54,355 | ) |
Securities | | | 441,018 | | | (8,671 | ) | | 3,294 | | | 435,641 | |
Deposits | | | 2,713,061 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,713,061 | |
Borrowings | | | 339,116 | | | — | | | — | | | 339,116 | |
Total liabilities | | | 3,076,419 | | | 1,396 | | | — | | | 3,077,815 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 259,789 | | | — | | | (8,475 | ) | | 251,314 | |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
CIB Marine has made statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and documents that are incorporated by reference that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. CIB Marine intends these forward-looking statements to be subject to the safe harbor created thereby and is including this statement to avail itself of the safe harbor. Forward-looking statements are identified generally by statements containing words and phrases such as “may,” “project,” “are confident,” “should be,” “will be,” “predict,” “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements reflect CIB Marine’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance, which are subject to many uncertainties and factors relating to CIB Marine’s operations and the business environment, which could change at any time.
There are inherent difficulties in predicting factors that may affect the accuracy of forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties that may affect CIB Marine’s operations, performance, development and business results include the following, which should be read together with the risk factors stated in Item 1A-Risk Factors of CIB Marine’s December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K which was filed on November 7, 2007:
| · | Adverse changes in CIB Marine’s loan and investment portfolios; |
| · | Changes in the financial condition or operating results of one or more borrowers or related groups of borrowers or borrowers within a single industry or small geographic region where CIB Marine has a concentration of credit extended to those borrowers or related groups or to borrowers within that single industry or small geographic region; |
| · | CIB Marine’s ability to maintain adequate capital; |
| | CIB Marine’s ability to operate profitably; |
| · | CIB Marine’s ability to comply with regulatory orders and agreements; |
| · | The costs and effects of outstanding and/or potential litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigations; |
| · | CIB Marine’s ability to bring current its delinquent filings of periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators; |
| · | CIB Marine’s ability to submit a timely filing of its federal and state income tax returns; |
| · | CIB Marine’s ability to attract and retain key personnel; |
| · | CIB Marine’s ability to attract and retain core deposits; |
| · | Adverse changes in business conditions in the banking industry generally and in the markets in which CIB Marine operates; |
| · | Changes in the legislative and regulatory environment which adversely affect CIB Marine; |
| · | Changes in accounting policies and practices; |
| · | Changes in interest rates and changes in monetary and fiscal policies which could negatively affect net interest margins, asset valuations and expense expectations; |
| · | Increased competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions; |
| · | Adverse changes in the valuation of assets held for disposal and/or additional losses resulting from operations or disposition thereof; |
| · | The competitive impact of technological advances in the banking industry; and |
| · | Other risks set forth from time to time in CIB Marine’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. CIB Marine does not assume any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements subsequent to the date on which they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
CIB Marine had a net loss of $77.2 million for the third quarter of 2003 as compared to net income of $1.0 million for the third quarter of 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the net loss was $98.1 million as compared to net income of $13.0 million during the same period in 2002. Net loss includes the results of continuing and discontinued operations. The quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 loss from discontinued operations of $5.2 million and $8.6 million, respectively, is the net loss attributable to CIB Construction which CIB Marine acquired through foreclosure in October of 2002.
In 2003, CIB Marine commenced a comprehensive review of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses. This review resulted from regular examinations by banking regulators at certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks by banking regulators and a deterioration in the credit quality of the loan portfolio, including a significant increase in nonperforming loans. External resources were employed to assist in the review of the loan portfolio and to investigate other loan related matters. As a result of CIB Marine’s review process, CIB Marine increased its loan loss allowance which significantly contributed to the net losses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to the same periods in 2002. Beginning in 2003, in order to improve its financial strength, including liquidity and capital, CIB Marine directed its focus to improving the credit quality of its loan portfolio and enhancing its lending, credit and management culture.
The following table sets forth selected unaudited consolidated financial data. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, including the related notes. Amounts for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002 have been restated. See Note 2-Restatement of 2002 Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further information.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
| | At or For the Quarter Ended September 30, | | At or For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) | |
Selected Statements of Operations Data | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and dividend income | | $ | 45,713 | | $ | 51,903 | | $ | 147,382 | | $ | 151,359 | |
Interest expense | | | 21,074 | | | 24,748 | | | 66,885 | | | 72,642 | |
Net interest income | | | 24,639 | | | 27,155 | | | 80,497 | | | 78,717 | |
Provision for credit losses | | | 75,010 | | | 13,459 | | | 134,560 | | | 25,511 | |
Net interest (loss) income after provision for credit losses | | | (50,371 | ) | | 13,696 | | | (54,063 | ) | | 53,206 | |
Noninterest income(1) | | | 4,830 | | | 4,163 | | | 15,742 | | | 13,295 | |
Noninterest expense | | | 20,414 | | | 17,439 | | | 56,704 | | | 48,047 | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | | (65,955 | ) | | 420 | | | (95,025 | ) | | 18,454 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 6,023 | | | (605 | ) | | (5,511 | ) | | 5,449 | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (71,978 | ) | | 1,025 | | | (89,514 | ) | | 13,005 | |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pretax loss from discontinued operations | | | (3,324 | ) | | — | | | (7,049 | ) | | — | |
Income tax expense | | | 1,867 | | | — | | | 1,528 | | | — | |
Net loss from discontinued operations | | | (5,191 | ) | | — | | | (8,577 | ) | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (77,169 | ) | $ | 1,025 | | $ | (98,091 | ) | $ | 13,005 | |
Common Share Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings(loss) per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (3.94 | ) | $ | 0.06 | | $ | (4.90 | ) | $ | 0.72 | |
Discontinued operations | | | (0.29 | ) | | — | | | (0.47 | ) | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (4.23 | ) | $ | 0.06 | | $ | (5.37 | ) | $ | 0.72 | |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (3.94 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | (4.90 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |
Discontinued operations | | | (0.29 | ) | | — | | | (0.47 | ) | | — | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (4.23 | ) | $ | 0.05 | | $ | (5.37 | ) | $ | 0.70 | |
Dividends | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Book value per share | | $ | 5.93 | | $ | 13.64 | | $ | 5.93 | | $ | 13.64 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic | | | 18,259,831 | | | 18,241,287 | | | 18,295,555 | | | 18,118,695 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted | | | 18,259,831 | | | 18,636,777 | | | 18,295,555 | | | 18,505,571 | |
Financial Condition Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,364,641 | | $ | 3,329,129 | | $ | 3,364,641 | | $ | 3,329,129 | |
Loans | | | 2,566,312 | | | 2,653,434 | | | 2,566,312 | | | 2,653,434 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (126,999 | ) | | (54,355 | ) | | (126,999 | ) | | (54,355 | ) |
Securities | | | 574,291 | | | 435,641 | | | 574,291 | | | 435,641 | |
Deposits | | | 2,884,694 | | | 2,713,061 | | | 2,884,694 | | | 2,713,061 | |
Borrowings, including guaranteed trust preferred securities | | | 270,646 | | | 339,116 | | | 270,646 | | | 339,116 | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 148,033 | | | 251,314 | | | 148,033 | | | 251,314 | |
Financial Ratios and Other Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest margin(2) | | | 2.93 | % | | 3.45 | % | | 3.19 | % | | 3.46 | % |
Net interest spread(3) | | | 2.64 | | | 3.03 | | | 2.88 | | | 3.04 | |
Noninterest income to average assets(4) | | | 0.54 | | | 0.38 | | | 0.59 | | | 0.43 | |
Noninterest expense to average assets | | | 2.28 | | | 2.12 | | | 2.12 | | | 2.03 | |
Efficiency ratio(5) | | | 68.19 | | | 56.61 | | | 58.06 | | | 53.22 | |
Return (loss) on average assets(6) | | | (8.62 | ) | | 0.12 | | | (3.66 | ) | | 0.55 | |
Return (loss) on average equity(7) | | | (135.68 | ) | | 1.60 | | | (54.18 | ) | | 7.08 | |
Asset quality ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total loans | | | 8.35 | % | | 2.17 | % | | 8.35 | % | | 2.17 | % |
Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total assets | | | 6.54 | | | 1.78 | | | 6.54 | | | 1.78 | |
Allowance for loan losses to loans | | | 4.95 | | | 2.05 | | | 4.95 | | | 2.05 | |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing | | | 59.25 | | | 94.55 | | | 59.25 | | | 94.55 | |
Net charge-offs annualized to average loans | | | 4.83 | | | 0.49 | | | 2.86 | | | 0.38 | |
Capital ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity to total assets | | | 4.40 | % | | 7.55 | % | | 4.40 | % | | 7.55 | % |
Total risk-based capital ratio | | | 7.77 | | | 10.94 | | | 7.77 | | | 10.94 | |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | | | 6.04 | | | 9.69 | | | 6.04 | | | 9.69 | |
Leverage capital ratio | | | 5.03 | | | 9.28 | | | 5.03 | | | 9.28 | |
Other data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)(8) | | | 888 | | | 785 | | | 888 | | | 785 | |
Number of banking facilities | | | 57 | | | 51 | | | 57 | | | 51 | |
(1) | Noninterest income includes pretax gains on investment securities of $1.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 and $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. There were no gains or losses on securities during 2003. |
(2) | Net interest margin is the ratio of annualized net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, to average interest-earning assets. |
(3) | Net interest spread is the yield on average interest-earning assets less the rate on average interest-bearing liabilities. |
(4) | Noninterest income to average assets excludes gains and losses on securities. |
(5) | The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, plus noninterest income, excluding gains and losses on securities. |
(6) | Return (loss) on average assets is annualized net income (loss) divided by average total assets. |
(7) | Return (loss) on average equity is annualized net income (loss) divided by average common equity. |
(8) | Does not include employees (full-time equivalent) of companies held for disposal of 711 in 2003 and 40 in 2002. |
Net Interest Income
The following table sets forth information regarding average balances, interest income, or interest expense, and the average rates earned or paid for each of CIB Marine’s major asset, liability and stockholders’ equity categories. Interest income is expressed on a tax-equivalent basis in order to compare the effective yield on earning assets. This means that the interest income on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt securities has been adjusted to reflect the income tax savings at a federal income tax rate of 35% provided by these tax-exempt assets.
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 (as restated) | |
| | Average Balance | | Interest Earned/Paid | | Average Yield/Cost | | Average Balance | | Interest Earned/Paid | | Average Yield/Cost | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | $ | 516,291 | | $ | 2,697 | | | 2.09 | % | $ | 421,231 | | $ | 4,607 | | | 4.37 | % |
Tax-exempt (2) | | | 59,812 | | | 854 | | | 5.71 | | | 62,055 | | | 996 | | | 6.42 | |
Total securities | | | 576,103 | | | 3,551 | | | 2.47 | | | 483,286 | | | 5,603 | | | 4.64 | |
Loans(3)(4): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 750,311 | | | 10,992 | | | 5.81 | | | 797,251 | | | 13,343 | | | 6.64 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 1,845,146 | | | 28,608 | | | 6.15 | | | 1,765,644 | | | 31,550 | | | 7.09 | |
Consumer | | | 49,279 | | | 781 | | | 6.29 | | | 59,648 | | | 1,038 | | | 6.90 | |
Total loans | | | 2,644,736 | | | 40,381 | | | 6.06 | | | 2,622,543 | | | 45,931 | | | 6.95 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 16,026 | | | 45 | | | 1.11 | | | 29,797 | | | 144 | | | 1.92 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 168,390 | | | 2,202 | | | 5.19 | | | 50,386 | | | 746 | | | 5.87 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 3,405,255 | | | 46,179 | | | 5.38 | | | 3,186,012 | | | 52,424 | | | 6.53 | |
Noninterest-earning assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 53,328 | | | | | | | | | 44,592 | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment | | | 29,958 | | | | | | | | | 28,055 | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (91,730 | ) | | | | | | | | (43,786 | ) | | | | | | |
Receivables from sale of stock | | | (7,907 | ) | | | | | | | | (7,937 | ) | | | | | | |
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | | | 163,377 | | | | | | | | | 58,513 | | | | | | | |
Total noninterest-earning assets | | | 147,026 | | | | | | | | | 79,437 | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,552,281 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,265,449 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | $ | 72,259 | | $ | 193 | | | 1.06 | % | $ | 57,685 | | $ | 150 | | | 1.03 | % |
Money market | | | 452,560 | | | 1,773 | | | 1.55 | | | 299,837 | | | 1,689 | | | 2.23 | |
Other savings deposits | | | 267,927 | | | 1,116 | | | 1.65 | | | 142,232 | | | 924 | | | 2.58 | |
Time deposits(5) | | | 1,936,710 | | | 15,575 | | | 3.19 | | | 1,970,193 | | | 19,125 | | | 3.85 | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 2,729,456 | | | 18,657 | | | 2.71 | | | 2,469,947 | | | 21,888 | | | 3.52 | |
Borrowings-short-term | | | 215,830 | | | 852 | | | 1.57 | | | 248,638 | | | 1,457 | | | 2.32 | |
Borrowings-long-term (5) | | | 46,624 | | | 285 | | | 2.43 | | | 45,252 | | | 331 | | | 2.90 | |
Guaranteed trust preferred securities | | | 60,000 | | | 1,280 | | | 8.53 | | | 40,869 | | | 1,072 | | | 10.49 | |
Total borrowed funds | | | 322,454 | | | 2,417 | | | 2.99 | | | 334,759 | | | 2,860 | | | 3.40 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 3,051,910 | | | 21,074 | | | 2.74 | | | 2,804,706 | | | 24,748 | | | 3.50 | |
Noninterest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | | | 212,695 | | | | | | | | | 184,630 | | | | | | | |
Accrued interest and other liabilities | | | 62,034 | | | | | | | | | 21,987 | | | | | | | |
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities | | | 274,729 | | | | | | | | | 206,617 | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 3,326,639 | | | | | | | | | 3,011,323 | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 225,642 | | | | | | | | | 254,126 | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 3,552,281 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,265,449 | | | | | | | |
Net interest income and net interest rate spread(2)(6) | | | | | $ | 25,105 | | | 2.64 | % | | | | $ | 27,676 | | | 3.03 | % |
Net interest-earning assets | | $ | 353,345 | | | | | | | | $ | 381,306 | | | | | | | |
Net interest margin (2)(7) | | | | | | | | | 2.93 | % | | | | | | | | 3.45 | % |
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1.12 | | | | | | | | | 1.14 | | | | | | | |
(1) | Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock are included in average balance and yields |
(2) | Tax-equivalent basis of 35% |
(3) | Loan balance totals include nonaccrual loans. |
(4) | Interest earned on loans includes amortized loan fees of $2.6 million and $2.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
(5) | Interest rates and amounts include the effects of derivatives entered into for interest rate risk management and accounted for as fair value hedges. |
(6) | Net interest spread is the yield on average interest-earning assets less the rate on average interest-bearing liabilities. |
(7) | Net interest margin is the ratio of annualized net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, to average interest-earning assets. |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 (as restated) | |
| | Average Balance | | Interest Earned/Paid | | Average Yield/Cost | | Average Balance | | Interest Earned/Paid | | Average Yield/Cost | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | $ | 487,254 | | $ | 9,967 | | | 2.73 | % | $ | 427,686 | | $ | 15,288 | | | 4.77 | % |
Tax-exempt (2) | | | 61,022 | | | 2,627 | | | 5.74 | | | 59,221 | | | 2,937 | | | 6.61 | |
Total securities | | | 548,276 | | | 12,594 | | | 3.06 | | | 486,907 | | | 18,225 | | | 4.99 | |
Loans(3)(4): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 770,951 | | | 35,218 | | | 6.11 | | | 813,348 | | | 39,685 | | | 6.52 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 1,886,635 | | | 92,267 | | | 6.54 | | | 1,661,536 | | | 89,709 | | | 7.22 | |
Consumer | | | 53,244 | | | 2,552 | | | 6.41 | | | 61,596 | | | 3,043 | | | 6.61 | |
Total loans | | | 2,710,830 | | | 130,037 | | | 6.41 | | | 2,536,480 | | | 132,437 | | | 6.98 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 27,740 | | | 317 | | | 1.53 | | | 34,504 | | | 485 | | | 1.88 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 147,240 | | | 5,861 | | | 5.32 | | | 34,076 | | | 1,608 | | | 6.31 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 3,434,086 | | | 148,809 | | | 5.79 | | | 3,091,967 | | | 152,755 | | | 6.60 | |
Noninterest-earning assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 50,256 | | | | | | | | | 33,278 | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment | | | 29,246 | | | | | | | | | 27,934 | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (78,574 | ) | | | | | | | | (39,525 | ) | | | | | | |
Receivables from sale of stock | | | (7,927 | ) | | | | | | | | (7,772 | ) | | | | | | |
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | | | 153,074 | | | | | | | | | 52,020 | | | | | | | |
Total noninterest-earning assets | | | 146,075 | | | | | | | | | 65,935 | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,580,161 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,157,902 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | $ | 67,694 | | $ | 535 | | | 1.06 | % | $ | 57,944 | | $ | 446 | | | 1.03 | % |
Money market | | | 417,775 | | | 5,364 | | | 1.72 | | | 262,909 | | | 3,997 | | | 2.03 | |
Other savings deposits | | | 241,702 | | | 3,401 | | | 1.88 | | | 102,684 | | | 1,798 | | | 2.34 | |
Time deposits(5) | | | 1,998,695 | | | 49,905 | | | 3.34 | | | 1,952,437 | | | 57,680 | | | 3.95 | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 2,725,866 | | | 59,205 | | | 2.90 | | | 2,375,974 | | | 63,921 | | | 3.60 | |
Borrowings-short-term | | | 239,514 | | | 2,904 | | | 1.62 | | | 266,557 | | | 4,475 | | | 2.24 | |
Borrowings-long-term (5) | | | 46,940 | | | 873 | | | 2.49 | | | 46,211 | | | 1,050 | | | 3.04 | |
Guaranteed trust preferred securities | | | 60,000 | | | 3,903 | | | 8.67 | | | 40,293 | | | 3,196 | | | 10.58 | |
Total borrowed funds | | | 346,454 | | | 7,680 | | | 2.96 | | | 353,061 | | | 8,721 | | | 3.30 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 3,072,320 | | | 66,885 | | | 2.91 | | | 2,729,035 | | | 72,642 | | | 3.56 | |
Noninterest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | | | 204,388 | | | | | | | | | 164,203 | | | | | | | |
Accrued interest and other liabilities | | | 61,414 | | | | | | | | | 19,097 | | | | | | | |
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities | | | 265,802 | | | | | | | | | 183,300 | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 3,338,122 | | | | | | | | | 2,912,335 | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 242,039 | | | | | | | | | 245,567 | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 3,580,161 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,157,902 | | | | | | | |
Net interest income and net interest rate spread (2)(6) | | | | | $ | 81,924 | | | 2.88 | % | | | | $ | 80,113 | | | 3.04 | % |
Net interest-earning assets | | $ | 361,766 | | | | | | | | $ | 362,932 | | | | | | | |
Net interest margin (2)(7) | | | | | | | | | 3.19 | % | | | | | | | | 3.46 | % |
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1.12 | | | | | | | | | 1.13 | | | | | | | |
(1) | Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock are included average balance and yields. |
(2) | Tax-equivalent basis of 35% |
(3) | Loan balance totals include nonaccrual loans. |
(4) | Interest earned on loans includes amortized loan fees of $7.7 million and $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
(5) | Interest rates and amounts include the effects of derivatives entered into for interest rate risk management and accounted for as fair value hedges. |
(6) | Net interest spread is the yield on average interest-earning assets less the rate on average interest-bearing liabilities. |
(7) | Net interest margin is the ratio of annualized net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, to average interest-earning assets. |
Reconciliation of net interest income
| | Quarter ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest income reported in margin table | | $ | 46,179 | | $ | 52,424 | | $ | 148,809 | | $ | 152,755 | |
Taxable equivalent adjustment-tax exempt securities | | | (299 | ) | | (348 | ) | | (920 | ) | | (1,028 | ) |
Taxable equivalent adjustment-tax exempt loans | | | (167 | ) | | (173 | ) | | (507 | ) | | (368 | ) |
Interest income as reported in consolidated statement of operations | | | 45,713 | | | 51,903 | | | 147,382 | | | 151,359 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense reported in margin table | | | 21,074 | | | 24,748 | | | 66,885 | | | 72,642 | |
Interest expense included in discontinued operations | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Interest expense as reported in consolidated statement of operations | | | 21,074 | | | 24,748 | | | 66,885 | | | 72,642 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income reported in margin table | | | 25,105 | | | 27,676 | | | 81,924 | | | 80,113 | |
Taxable equivalent adjustment | | | (466 | ) | | (521 | ) | | (1,427 | ) | | (1,396 | ) |
Net interest income, net of adjustments reported in consolidated statement of operations | | $ | 24,639 | | $ | 27,155 | | $ | 80,497 | | $ | 78,717 | |
Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased $2.6 million, or 9.3%, from $27.7 million for the third quarter of 2002 to $25.1 million in the third quarter of 2003. This decrease was primarily the result of a 115 basis point decline in the yield on average interest-earning assets, partially offset by an increase in the balance of average earning assets and a decline in the average cost of borrowings. Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, increased $1.8 million, or 2.3%, from $80.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, to $81.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This increase in net interest income was primarily volume driven with average earning assets growing by $342.1 million, or 11.1%, over 2002. The principal source of this growth occurred in commercial real estate loans, loans held for sale and securities. Asset growth was primarily funded by deposit liabilities. The reduction in the net interest margin during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was a partially offsetting factor.
CIB Marine’s net interest spread declined by 39 basis points from 3.03% for the third quarter of 2002 to 2.64% for the third quarter of 2003. The net interest spread for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 declined by 16 basis points. The net interest margin declined 52 basis points from 3.45% for the third quarter of 2003 to 2.93% for the third quarter of 2003 and decreased by 27 basis points from 3.46% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to 3.19% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. CIB Marine’s balance sheet is more asset sensitive and the declining interest rates have produced declining net interest margins.
Total interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased $6.2 million, or 11.9%, from $52.4 million in the third quarter of 2002 to $46.2 million in the third quarter of 2003. The decrease was primarily the result of the 115 basis point decline in the yield on average interest-earning assets partially offset by an increase in the balance of average earning assets. Interest income on loans decreased $5.6 million, or 12.1% due to an 89 basis point decrease in the loan yield and the increase in nonaccrual loans. Interest income on securities declined by $2.1 million, or 36.6%, due to lower yields partially offset by higher average investment balances which were increased to offset liquidity risk. Interest income on loans held for sale increased $1.5 million, or 195.2%, due to higher average balances.
Total interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased $3.9 million, or 2.6%, from $152.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to $148.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Interest income on loans decreased $2.4 million, or 1.8%, due to a 57 basis point decrease in the loan yield and the increase in nonaccrual loans, partially offset by an increase in the average balance. Interest income on securities decreased $5.6 million or 30.9% due to lower yields, partially offset by on increase in the average balance of securities. Interest income on loans held for sale increased $4.3 million, or 264.5%, due to the higher average balances.
Total interest expense decreased $3.7 million, or 14.8%, from $24.7 million in the third quarter of 2002 to $21.1 million in the third quarter of 2003. This reduction was primarily the result of a 76 basis point decline in the rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities partially offset by an increase in the average balance of these liabilities. Interest expense on deposits decreased 14.8% due to lower interest rates paid partially offset by an increase in average deposit balances. Interest expense on borrowed funds declined 15.5% primarily as a result of a reduction in the rate paid on borrowed funds and a decrease in average amount of borrowed funds outstanding.
Total interest expense decreased $5.8 million, or 7.9%, from $72.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to $66.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This reduction was primarily the result of a 65 basis point decline in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities. Interest expense on deposits decreased by 7.4% due to a 70 basis point reduction in the average deposit yield, partially offset by an increase in average deposit balances. Interest expense on borrowed funds declined by 11.9% primarily as a result of a reduction in the rate paid on borrowed funds and a decrease in average amount of borrowed funds outstanding.
The following table presents an analysis of changes in net interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, resulting from changes in average volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and average rates earned and paid:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Quarter Ended September 30, 2002 (1) | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 (1) | |
| | Volume | | Rate | | Total | | % Change | | Volume | | Rate | | Total | | % Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities-taxable | | $ | 876 | | $ | (2,786 | ) | $ | (1,910 | ) | | (41.46 | )% | $ | 1,905 | | $ | (7,226 | ) | $ | (5,321 | ) | | (34.81 | )% |
Securities-tax-exempt (2) | | | (35 | ) | | (107 | ) | | (142 | ) | | (14.26 | ) | | 88 | | | (398 | ) | | (310 | ) | | (10.55 | ) |
Total securities (3) | | | 841 | | | (2,893 | ) | | (2,052 | ) | | (36.62 | ) | | 1,993 | | | (7,624 | ) | | (5,631 | ) | | (30.90 | ) |
Commercial | | | (755 | ) | | (1,596 | ) | | (2,351 | ) | | (17.62 | ) | | (2,010 | ) | | (2,457 | ) | | (4,467 | ) | | (11.26 | ) |
Commercial real estate | | | 1,373 | | | (4,315 | ) | | (2,942 | ) | | (9.32 | ) | | 11,479 | | | (8,921 | ) | | 2,558 | | | 2.85 | |
Consumer | | | (169 | ) | | (88 | ) | | (257 | ) | | (24.76 | ) | | (402 | ) | | (89 | ) | | (491 | ) | | (16.14 | ) |
Total loans (including fees) | | | 449 | | | (5,999 | ) | | (5,550 | ) | | (12.08 | ) | | 9,067 | | | (11,467 | ) | | (2,400 | ) | | (1.81 | ) |
Federal funds sold | | | (52 | ) | | (47 | ) | | (99 | ) | | (68.75 | ) | | (86 | ) | | (82 | ) | | (168 | ) | | (34.64 | ) |
Loans held for sale | | | 1,553 | | | (97 | ) | | 1,456 | | | 195.17 | | | 4,542 | | | (289 | ) | | 4,253 | | | 264.49 | |
Total interest income (1) | | | 2,791 | | | (9,036 | ) | | (6,245 | ) | | (11.91 | ) | | 15,516 | | | (19,462 | ) | | (3,946 | ) | | (2.58 | ) |
Interest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 39 | | | 4 | | | 43 | | | 28.67 | | | 77 | | | 12 | | | 89 | | | 19.96 | |
Money market | | | 696 | | | (612 | ) | | 84 | | | 4.97 | | | 2,064 | | | (697 | ) | | 1,367 | | | 34.20 | |
Other savings deposits | | | 609 | | | (417 | ) | | 192 | | | 20.78 | | | 2,016 | | | (413 | ) | | 1,603 | | | 89.15 | |
Time deposits | | | (320 | ) | | (3,230 | ) | | (3,550 | ) | | (18.56 | ) | | 1,339 | | | (9,114 | ) | | (7,775 | ) | | (13.48 | ) |
Total deposits | | | 1,024 | | | (4,255 | ) | | (3,231 | ) | | (14.76 | ) | | 5,496 | | | (10,212 | ) | | (4,716 | ) | | (7.38 | ) |
Borrowings-short-term | | | (175 | ) | | (430 | ) | | (605 | ) | | (41.52 | ) | | (420 | ) | | (1,151 | ) | | (1,571 | ) | | (35.11 | ) |
Borrowings-long-term | | | 10 | | | (56 | ) | | (46 | ) | | (13.90 | ) | | 17 | | | (194 | ) | | (177 | ) | | (16.86 | ) |
Guaranteed trust preferred securities | | | 435 | | | (227 | ) | | 208 | | | 19.40 | | | 1,357 | | | (650 | ) | | 707 | | | 22.12 | |
Total borrowed funds | | | 270 | | | (713 | ) | | (443 | ) | | (15.49 | ) | | 954 | | | (1,995 | ) | | (1,041 | ) | | (11.94 | ) |
Total interest expense | | | 1,294 | | | (4,968 | ) | | (3,674 | ) | | (14.85 | ) | | 6,450 | | | (12,207 | ) | | (5,757 | ) | | (7.93 | ) |
Net interest income (1) | | $ | 1,497 | | $ | (4,068 | ) | $ | (2,571 | ) | | (9.29 | )% | $ | 9,066 | | $ | (7,255 | ) | $ | 1,811 | | | 2.26 | % |
(1) | Variances which were not specifically attributable to volume or rate have been allocated proportionally between volume and rate using absolute values as a basis for the allocation. Nonaccrual |
(2) | Tax-equivalent basis of 35%. |
(3) | Includes Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock. |
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses represents charges made to earnings in order to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses and losses on unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit. As a result of regular examinations at certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks and the deterioration in the credit quality of the loan portfolio, including a significant increase in nonperforming loans, CIB Marine significantly increased its provision for credit losses. The provision was $75.0 million for the third quarter of 2003, as compared to $13.5 million for the third quarter of 2002. The provision for credit losses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003, was $134.6 million, as compared to $25.5 million for the same period of 2002, representing an increase of 427.5%. The increase in the provision was driven by the deteriorating quality of the credit portfolio and was concentrated within a relatively small number of borrowing relationships. Nonaccrual loans increased from $39.0 million as of December 31, 2002 to $205.4 million as of September 30, 2003, and net charge-offs increased from $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to $57.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003,
Noninterest Income
The following table presents the significant components of noninterest income:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Loan fees | | $ | 613 | | $ | 752 | | $ | 1,884 | | $ | 2,918 | |
Mortgage banking revenue | | | 2,201 | | | 1,383 | | | 8,934 | | | 3,025 | |
Deposit service charges | | | 910 | | | 834 | | | 2,694 | | | 2,423 | |
Other service fees | | | 93 | | | 87 | | | 282 | | | 230 | |
Other noninterest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MICR operating income | | | 307 | | | 186 | | | 959 | | | 1,022 | |
Equity income (loss) of unconsolidated partnerships | | | 427 | | | (171 | ) | | 827 | | | 547 | |
Other | | | 279 | | | 61 | | | 162 | | | 3 | |
Total other noninterest income | | | 1,013 | | | 76 | | | 1,948 | | | 1,572 | |
Gain on investment securities, net | | | — | | | 1,031 | | | — | | | 3,127 | |
Total noninterest income | | $ | 4,830 | | $ | 4,163 | | $ | 15,742 | | $ | 13,295 | |
Noninterest income increased $0.7 million, or 16.0%, from $4.2 million for the third quarter of 2002 to $4.8 million for the third quarter 2003; and $2.4 million, or 18.4%, from $13.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to $15.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increases were primarily the result of the following:
| · | Net mortgage banking revenue increased $0.8 million, or 59.1%, from $1.4 million for the third quarter of 2002 to $2.2 million for the third quarter of 2003 and $5.9 million, or 195.3%, from $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to $8.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increases in net mortgage banking revenue was due primarily to increases in the originations and sale of residential mortgage loans, resulting from a relatively low interest rate environment and the expansion of CIB Marine’s mortgage operations. |
| · | Other income increased $0.9 million for the third quarter of 2003 over the third quarter of 2002, and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 over the same period of 2002. The increases were primarily due to increases in the equity income of a limited partnership and royalty fees received by CIB Marine Information Services, Inc. from third parties. |
| · | During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2002, CIB Marine recognized a $1.0 million and $3.1 million, respectively, gain on sale of securities as compared to none during the same periods of 2003. |
| · | Loan fees declined $1.0 million, or 35.4%, from $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The one-time nature of some fees reduced 2003 loan fee revenue. |
Noninterest Expense
The following table presents the significant components of noninterest expense:
| | Quarter Ended September 30 | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Compensation and employee benefits | | $ | 11,263 | | $ | 9,317 | | $ | 33,997 | | $ | 28,315 | |
Equipment | | | 1,369 | | | 1,201 | | | 4,010 | | | 3,541 | |
Occupancy and premises | | | 1,335 | | | 1,177 | | | 3,895 | | | 3,332 | |
Professional services | | | 474 | | | 846 | | | 2,007 | | | 2,198 | |
Litigation Settlements | | | — | | | 1,762 | | | — | | | 1,752 | |
Write down and losses on assets | | | 2,366 | | | 6 | | | 2,467 | | | 41 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other noninterest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Payroll and other processing charges | | | 40 | | | 24 | | | 143 | | | 99 | |
Correspondent bank charges | | | 149 | | | 121 | | | 431 | | | 422 | |
Advertising/marketing | | | 296 | | | 333 | | | 894 | | | 1,097 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | | 122 | | | 125 | | | 372 | | | 338 | |
Communications | | | 567 | | | 463 | | | 1,691 | | | 1,518 | |
Supplies and printing | | | 142 | | | 138 | | | 525 | | | 474 | |
Shipping and handling | | | 332 | | | 277 | | | 941 | | | 811 | |
Collection expense | | | 478 | | | 612 | | | 1,344 | | | 826 | |
FDIC and state assessment | | | 230 | | | 189 | | | 653 | | | 558 | |
Recording and filing fees | | | 93 | | | 58 | | | 228 | | | 173 | |
Foreclosed property | | | 78 | | | 22 | | | 382 | | | 64 | |
Other expense | | | 1,080 | | | 768 | | | 2,724 | | | 2,488 | |
Total other expense | | | 3,607 | | | 3,130 | | | 10,328 | | | 8,868 | |
Total noninterest expense | | $ | 20,414 | | $ | 17,439 | | $ | 56,704 | | $ | 48,047 | |
Total noninterest expense increased $3.0 million, or 17.1%, from $17.4 million for the third quarter of 2002 to $20.4 million for the third quarter of 2003. The increase was primarily due to the following:
| · | Compensation and employee benefits expense is the largest component of noninterest expense and represented 55.2% of total noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2003 compared to 53.4% for the third quarter of 2002. Compensation and employee benefits expense increased $1.9 million, or 20.9%, from $9.3 million for the third quarter of 2002, to $11.3 million for the third quarter of 2003. The increase in compensation and employee benefits is the result of a number of factors, including the hiring of personnel to staff new banking facilities, expansion of mortgage banking operations, the hiring of additional management personnel, and increases in the salaries of existing personnel. The total number of full-time equivalent employees, excluding companies held for disposal, increased 13.1% from 785 at September 30, 2002 to 888 at September 30, 2003. |
| · | Write-downs and losses on assets includes both realized and valuation write-downs necessary to reflect current fair market values. In the third quarter of 2003, a $1.2 million net loss related to foreclosed properties was recorded, mainly due to a $1.1 million market value write-down on two commercial properties. Additionally, a $1.2 million market value loss relating to an unconsolidated interest CIB Marine has in a closely held information services company was recognized. |
| · | Litigation settlements expense was $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2002 as compared to none in the third quarter of 2003. The majority of this expense related to the settlement of two separate but related lawsuits which arose from CIB Marine’s commercial lending business. |
Total noninterest expense increased $8.7 million, or 18.0%, from $48.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 to $56.7 million for nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase was primarily due to the following:
| · | Compensation and employee benefits expense represented 60.0% of total noninterest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to 58.9% for the same period of 2002. Compensation and employee benefits expense increased $5.7 million, or 20.1%, from $28.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, to $34.0 million in the same period of 2003. The increase in compensation and employee benefits is the result of a number of factors, including the hiring of personnel to staff new banking facilities, expansion of mortgage banking operations, the hiring of additional management and technical personnel, and increases in the salaries of existing personnel. The total number of full-time equivalent employees, excluding companies held for disposal, increased 13.1% from 785 at September 30, 2002 to 888 at September 30, 2003. |
| · | Write-downs and losses on assets includes both realized and valuation write-downs necessary to reflect current fair market values. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, a $0.1 million loss on sale of fixed assets was realized and a $1.1 million loss related to foreclosed properties was recorded. The loss on foreclosed properties was mainly due to a $1.1 million market value write-down on two commercial properties. Additionally, a $1.2 million market value loss relating to an unconsolidated interest CIB Marine has in a closely held information services company was recognized and a $0.1 million market value write-down was recorded on an equity investment in a non-publicly traded manufacturer of absorbent paper products. |
Income Taxes
CIB Marine records a provision for income taxes currently payable or currently refundable, along with income taxes payable or receivable in the future. Deferred taxes arise from temporary differences between financial statement and income tax reporting of assets and liabilities. The effective tax rates from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 were (5.8%) and 29.5%, respectively. The 2003 change in the effective tax rate was mainly due to a provision for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Due to significant losses, CIB Marine determined that it was not more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2003 would be realized in their entirety. Therefore in the third quarter of 2003 a valuation allowance was provided by way of a charge to tax expense to reduce the net deferred tax assets.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Overview
At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine had total assets of $3.4 billion, a decrease of $286.1 million, or 7.8%, from $3.7 billion at December 31, 2002. In the second half of 2003, CIB Marine commenced a comprehensive review of the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses resulting from regular examinations at certain of its subsidiary banks by banking regulators and a deterioration in the credit quality of the loan portfolio. As a result of the review process, CIB Marine increased its loan loss allowance from $65.1 million at December 31, 2002, to $127.0 million at September 30, 2003, and experienced an increase in loan charge-offs during the first nine months of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002. Beginning in the second half of 2003, CIB Marine directed its focus to improving the financial strength of CIB Marine including its credit quality, capital and liquidity. Several changes occurred in the senior management of CIB Marine and its subsidiaries and actions were taken to improve the credit underwriting procedures and the overall quality of its credit portfolio. The reduction in assets from December 31, 2002 to September 30, 2003 is primarily due to a reduction in net loans of $199.6 million and a $158.0 million reduction in loans held for sale, partially offset by a $67.9 million increase in securities available for sale resulting from CIB Marine’s liquidity management strategies. The reduction in loans was primarily due to loan collections and charge-offs, and a reduction in new loan originations resulting from CIB Marine’s focus on improving credit quality.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale, which are comprised of primarily residential first mortgage loans, decreased $158.0 million, from $229.6 million at December 31, 2002 to $71.5 million at September 30, 2003. This decrease was due to a decline in the volume of loans in the market place at that time and steps CIB Marine instituted to decrease the number of days the loans were held prior to sale. CIB Marine originated $422.2 million, purchased $1.4 billion and sold $2.0 billion of loans held for sale during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to originations, purchases and sales of $198.9 million, $555.9 million and $682.3 million, respectively, during the same period in 2002. The supply of loans purchased increased primarily due to the lower mortgage rates, which caused higher levels of refinancing activity in 2003.
Securities Available for Sale
Total securities available for sale at September 30, 2003, were $574.3 million, an increase of $67.9 million, or 13.4%, from $506.4 million at December 31, 2002. The increase in the securities portfolio was due primarily to CIB Marine's strategy to maintain an appropriate level of liquid assets in order to mitigate the increased level of liquidity risk. The ratio of total securities available for sale to total assets was 17.1% at September 30, 2003, as compared to 13.9% at December 31, 2002.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, CIB Marine determined it no longer had the intent to hold to maturity its tax-exempt securities classified as held to maturity, and in the first nine months of 2005, CIB Marine sold $9.3 million of these securities. As a result of these actions, CIB Marine’s entire securities portfolio is classified as held for sale for all periods presented. See the restatement discussion for further information.
At September 30, 2003, the net unrealized gain on the available for sale securities was $2.1 million, compared to a net unrealized gain of $4.5 million at December 31, 2002.
Loans
Loans were $2.6 billion at September 30, 2003, a decrease of $137.7 million, or 5.1%, from December 31, 2002, and represented 76.3% of CIB Marine's total assets at September 30, 2003, and 74.1% at December 31, 2002. A significant amount of the decrease in the loan portfolio occurred in the commercial balances which decreased 19.8% from December 31, 2002 to September 30, 2003. The total of all commercial categories, including factored receivables, represented 96.4% of gross loans at September 30, 2003 compared to 96.1% at December 31, 2002. The decrease was due to CIB Marine’s shift in focus from business development to improving the asset quality of the portfolio, including loan charge-offs and reductions in credit concentrations.
Credit Concentrations
At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine had eleven secured borrowing relationships with one borrower or a related group of borrowers that exceeded 25% of stockholder’s equity as compared to four such relationships at December 31, 2002. The increase in the number of concentrations is largely due to a significant decrease in stockholders’ equity, which resulted in a lower threshold for determining credit concentrations. At September 30, 2003, the total outstanding commitments on these borrowing relationships exceeding 25% of stockholders’ equity, including lines of credit not fully drawn, ranged from 25% to 70% of equity and from 1% to 4% of loans. The principal drawn and outstanding on the loans in the borrowing relationships ranged from $34.0 million to $96.7 million and the aggregate balance outstanding on these eleven relationships was $621.4 million. Four of these relationships included loans that were on nonaccrual status or impaired. The outstanding balance of the nonaccrual or impaired loans within these four relationships at September 30, 2003 was $107.3 million and the specific allowance for loss provided on these loans was $12.9 million. See further discussion of these loans under Nonperforming Assets and Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing.
At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine also had credit relationships within nine industries or industry groups that exceeded 25% of its stockholders' equity.
INDUSTRY | | Outstanding Balance | | % of Loans | | % of Stockholders’ Equity | |
| | (Dollars in millions) | |
Commercial Real Estate Developers | | $ | 498.8 | | | 19 | % | | 337 | % |
Residential Real Estate Developers | | | 624.0 | | | 24 | | | 421 | |
Motel and Hotel | | | 220.0 | | | 9 | | | 149 | |
Manufacturing | | | 199.0 | | | 8 | | | 134 | |
Nursing/Convalescent Home | | | 129.3 | | | 5 | | | 87 | |
Health Care Facility | | | 116.5 | | | 5 | | | 79 | |
Retail Trade | | | 93.8 | | | 4 | | | 63 | |
Finance and Insurance | | | 56.2 | | | 2 | | | 38 | |
Administrative, Support, Waste Management and Remediation Services | | | 44.9 | | | 2 | | | 30 | |
Allowance for Loan Losses
CIB Marine monitors and maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb an estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. At September 30, 2003 the allowance for loan losses was $127.0 million, or 4.9% of total loans, compared to $65.1 million, or 2.4% of total loans, at December 31, 2002. The increase in the allowance was primarily due to the deteriorating quality of the credit portfolio which was concentrated within a relatively small number of borrowing relationships and the increased loss rate percentages applied to 2003. The allowance is increased by the amount of provision for loan losses and recoveries of previously charged-off loans, and is decreased by the amount of loans charged-off. Total charge-offs for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 were $32.8 million, while recoveries were $0.6 million, as compared to $3.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. Total charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $59.7 million, while recoveries were $1.7 million, as compared to $8.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
Although CIB Marine believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible, there can be no assurance that the allowance will prove sufficient to cover actual loan losses in the future. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the quality of loans and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Such regulatory agencies may require CIB Marine to make additional provisions to the allowance based upon their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations.
The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, as restated:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 90,024 | | $ | 44,028 | | $ | 65,122 | | $ | 35,855 | |
Loans charged-off | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | (16,259 | ) | | (2,886 | ) | | (29,627 | ) | | (5,998 | ) |
Factored receivables | | | — | | | — | | | (95 | ) | | — | |
Commercial real estate | | | (5,816 | ) | | (823 | ) | | (17,946 | ) | | (1,845 | ) |
Commercial real estate construction | | | (10,666 | ) | | — | | | (11,952 | ) | | — | |
Residential real estate | | | — | | | — | | | (6 | ) | | (61 | ) |
Home equity | | | — | | | (17 | ) | | — | | | (17 | ) |
Consumer | | | (14 | ) | | (17 | ) | | (31 | ) | | (96 | ) |
Total loans charged-off | | | (32,755 | ) | | (3,743 | ) | | (59,657 | ) | | (8,017 | ) |
Recoveries of loans charged-off | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 499 | | | 118 | | | 1,595 | | | 470 | |
Factored receivables | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | |
Commercial real estate | | | 57 | | | 360 | | | 80 | | | 362 | |
Commercial real estate construction | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Residential real estate | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | | | 12 | |
Home equity | | | — | | | 6 | | | — | | | 6 | |
Consumer | | | 10 | | | 5 | | | 41 | | | 34 | |
Total loan recoveries | | | 566 | | | 489 | | | 1,720 | | | 884 | |
Net loans charged-off | | | (32,189 | ) | | (3,254 | ) | | (57,937 | ) | | (7,133 | ) |
Allowance acquired | | | — | | | 122 | | | — | | | 122 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 69,164 | | | 13,459 | | | 119,814 | | | 25,511 | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 126,999 | | $ | 54,355 | | $ | 126,999 | | $ | 54,355 | |
Total loans | | $ | 2,566,312 | | $ | 2,653,434 | | $ | 2,566,312 | | $ | 2,653,434 | |
Average total loans | | | 2,644,736 | | | 2,622,543 | | | 2,710,830 | | | 2,536,480 | |
Ratios | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans | | | 4.95 | % | | 2.05 | % | | 4.95 | % | | 2.05 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing loans | | | 59.25 | | | 94.55 | | | 59.25 | | | 94.55 | |
Net charge-offs annualized to average total loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 8.33 | | | 1.38 | | | 4.88 | | | 0.91 | |
Commercial real estate | | | 3.53 | | | 0.10 | | | 2.11 | | | 0.12 | |
Consumer | | | 0.03 | | | 0.15 | | | (0.03 | ) | | 0.26 | |
Total loans | | | 4.83 | | | 0.49 | | | 2.86 | | | 0.38 | |
Ratio of recoveries to loans charged-off | | | 1.73 | | | 13.06 | | | 2.88 | | | 11.03 | |
The provision for credit losses consisted of the following:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Provision for loan losses | | $ | 69,164 | | $ | 13,459 | | | 119,814 | | $ | 25,511 | |
Provision for losses on unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit | | | 5,846 | | | — | | | 14,746 | | | — | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 75,010 | | $ | 13,459 | | $ | 134,560 | | $ | 25,511 | |
Nonperforming Assets and Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing Interest
The level of nonperforming assets is an important element in assessing CIB Marine’s asset quality and the associated risk in its loan portfolio. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and foreclosed property. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when CIB Marine determines that it is probable that the principal and interest amounts will not be collected according to the terms of the loan agreement. A loan is classified as restructured when a concession is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties that would not otherwise be considered. CIB Marine may restructure the loan by modifying the terms to reduce or defer cash payments required by the borrower, reduce the interest rate below current market rates for new debt with similar risk, reduce the face amount of the debt, or reduce the accrued interest. Foreclosed property represents properties acquired by CIB Marine as a result of loan defaults by customers.
The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Marine’s nonperforming assets, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, and related asset quality ratios:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | | September 30, 2002 | |
| | | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Nonperforming Assets | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual Loans: | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | $ | 59,074 | | $ | 17,329 | | $ | 21,998 | |
Factored receivables | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Commercial real estate | | | 87,241 | | | 15,507 | | | 18,796 | |
Commercial real estate construction | | | 57,410 | | | 5,221 | | | 5,019 | |
Residential real estate | | | 1,681 | | | 756 | | | 1,018 | |
Home equity | | | — | | | 100 | | | 151 | |
Consumer | | | 20 | | | 45 | | | 25 | |
Total nonaccrual loans | | | 205,426 | | | 38,958 | | | 47,007 | |
Foreclosed properties | | | 5,677 | | | 3,678 | | | 1,603 | |
Restructured loans | | | 2,970 | | | 3,210 | | | 3,523 | |
| | $ | 214,073 | | $ | 45,846 | | $ | 52,133 | |
Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | $ | 9 | | $ | 3,022 | | $ | 1,246 | |
Factored receivables | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Commercial real estate | | | 5,811 | | | 2,292 | | | 5,380 | |
Commercial real estate construction | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Residential real estate | | | 126 | | | 1,076 | | | 277 | |
Home equity | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Consumer | | | 1 | | | 6 | | | 57 | |
| | $ | 5,947 | | $ | 6,396 | | $ | 6,960 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | $ | 126,999 | | $ | 65,122 | | $ | 54,355 | |
Total loans | | | 2,566,312 | | | 2,704,006 | | | 2,653,434 | |
Ratios: | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans to total loans | | | 8.00 | % | | 1.44 | % | | 1.77 | % |
Foreclosed properties to total assets | | | 0.17 | | | 0.10 | | | 0.05 | |
Nonperforming assets to total assets | | | 6.36 | | | 1.26 | | | 1.57 | |
Nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total loans | | | 8.35 | | | 1.80 | | | 2.17 | |
Nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total assets | | | 6.54 | | | 1.43 | | | 1.78 | |
As a result of deterioration in the quality of the credit portfolio, nonaccrual loans increased $166.5 million, or 427.3%, from $38.9 million at December 31, 2002 to $205.4 million at September 30, 2003. The ratio of nonaccrual loans to total loans was 8.0% at September 30, 2003, and 1.4% at December 31, 2002.
At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine had thirteen borrowing relationships (loans to one borrower or a group of borrowers) that accounted for $172.0 million, or 83.8%, of total nonaccrual loans and consisted of the following:
| · | Commercial real estate and construction loans totaling $38.1 million to related borrowers secured primarily by second mortgages on condominium development projects in Chicago. As of September 30, 2003 $18.5 million in specific reserves were allocated to this relationship. |
| · | Commercial loans totaling $20.8 million to related borrowers secured by a first lien on business assets and intellectual property. Specific reserves in the amount of $9.4 million were allocated by September 30, 2003. |
| · | Commercial real estate and construction loans totaling $20.2 million to related borrowers secured primarily by second mortgages on condominium development projects in Chicago. As of September 30, 2003, there were $3.5 million in specific reserves allocated to this relationship and $3.6 million in charge offs. |
| · | Commercial real estate loans in the aggregate amount of $16.6 million to related borrowers secured by first mortgages on development projects relating to an office building and a condo conversion. During the first nine months of 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $2.7 million of loans related to this borrowing relationship. At September 30, 2003, there were no specific reserves allocated to this borrowing relationship. |
| · | Commercial and commercial real estate loans totaling $15.5 million to related borrowers secured by first mortgages on multi-family development projects. At September 30, 2003, there were specific reserves of $0.2 million allocated to these loans. During the first nine months of 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $1.5 million of loans related to this borrowing relationship. |
| · | Commercial and commercial real estate loans totaling $12.8 million to related borrowers secured by closely held stock and a first lien mortgage on multi-family zoned undeveloped land. At September 30, 2003, there were specific reserves of $0.4 million allocated to these loans and $0.4 million charged-off. |
| · | Commercial real estate loans totaling $11.1 million to related borrowers secured by first mortgages on a housing project and the adjacent land. At September 30, 2003, there were specific reserves of $1.7 million allocated to this relationship. During the first nine months of 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $0.6 million. |
| · | Commercial real estate loan in the amount of $8.2 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage on a tenanted office building. As of September 30, 2003 there were no specific reserves allocated to this borrower and no charge offs. |
| · | Commercial and commercial real estate loans totaling $7.9 million to a borrower secured by all business assets and a first mortgage on three commercial real estate properties. At September 30, 2003, a specific reserve in the amount of $3.2 million was allocated to these loans. |
| · | Commercial real estate construction loans totaling $6.4 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage on a condominium development project. At September 30, 2003, there were specific reserves of $0.1 million allocated to these loans. During the first nine months of 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $0.7 million with respect to this relationship. |
| · | Commercial and commercial real estate loans in the total amount of $6.4 million to related borrowers secured by business assets and a first mortgage on a hotel. During the first nine months of 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $1.0 million of loans related to this borrowing relationship. At September 30, 2003, the amount of specific reserves relating to loans within this relationship was $0.3 million. |
| · | Commercial real estate loan in the amount of $4.1 million secured by a first mortgage on a restaurant property. As of September 30, 2003, $2.8 million in specific reserves were allocated to this relationship. During the first nine months of 2003, $3.0 million was charged-off. |
| · | Commercial real estate loans aggregating $3.9 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage. As of September 30, 2003, there were no specific reserves allocated to this borrowing relationship. |
Foreclosed properties were $5.7 million at September 30, 2003 and consisted of six properties as compared to $3.7 million and seven properties at December 31, 2002. During the first nine months of 2003, CIB Marine acquired eight properties with a total carrying value of $20.6 million, and sold properties with a combined carrying value of $17.3 million at the time of sale. CIB Marine recognized a $0.02 million net gain on the sale of these properties. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2003, CIB Marine recorded a $1.2 million impairment loss on two of its foreclosed properties.
At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine had three properties with carrying values that exceeded $1.0 million and had a combined carrying value of $4.5 million. These three properties accounted for 78.6% of the carrying value of foreclosed properties at September 30, 2003 and consisted of the following:
| · | A motel located in Michigan which had a carrying value of $1.2 million at September 30, 2003. The property was acquired through foreclosure in the first quarter of 2003 and CIB Marine recorded a $0.7 million impairment loss on the property during the third quarter of 2003. |
| · | A vacant commercial parcel located in Illinois which had a carrying value of $1.4 million and $1.9 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. During the third quarter of 2003, CIB Marine recorded a $0.5 million impairment loss on the property. The property was acquired through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in 2002. |
| · | A commercial property located in Illinois which had a carrying value of $1.9 million at September 30, 2003. The property was acquired through foreclosure in the third quarter of 2003. |
Restructured loans were $3.0 million at September 30, 2003 and consisted of two loans to the same borrower compared to $3.2 million at December 31, 2002. One loan was a commercial loan in the amount of $1.4 million and had specific reserves of $0.8 million allocated to it as of September 30, 2003. The second loan was a commercial real estate loan in the amount of $1.6 million and had $0.1 million of specific reserves allocated to it at September 30, 2003. These loans were classified as restructured in the first quarter of 2002.
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest are loans which are delinquent with respect to the payment of principal and/or interest but which management believes all contractual principal and interest amounts due will be collected. At September 30, 2003, CIB Marine had $5.9 million in loans that were 90 days or more past due and still accruing compared to $6.4 million at December 31, 2002. Two borrowing relationships within this category had outstanding balances in excess of $1.0 million at September 30, 2003. The combined outstanding balances of these two loans was $5.3 million and accounted for 89.7% of the total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing at September 30, 2003 and consisted of the following:
| · | Commercial real estate loan in the amount of $2.8 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage on a condominium and two second mortgages on two commercial properties. As of September 30, 2003, no specific reserves were allocated to this relationship. |
| ·
| Commercial real estate loan in the amount of $2.5 million to a borrower secured by a first mortgage on residential real estate. As of September 30, 2003, no specific reserves were allocated to this relationship. |
The ratio of nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing to total assets was 6.54% at September 30, 2003, compared to 1.43% at December 31, 2002.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CIB Marine will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment records and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, CIB Marine does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures. Impaired loans were $262.0 million at September 30, 2003, an increase of $220.6 million from $41.4 million at December 31, 2002. This increase was due to the higher levels of nonperforming and past due loans that were subject to impairment testing.
The following table sets forth information regarding impaired loans:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | | September 30, 2002 | |
| | | | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Impaired loans without a specific allowance | | $ | 95,055 | | $ | 3,054 | | $ | — | |
Impaired loans with a specific allowance | | | 166,979 | | | 38,321 | | | 28,690 | |
Total impaired loans | | | 262,034 | | | 41,375 | | | 28,690 | |
Specific allowance related to impaired loans | | $ | 60,528 | | $ | 10,434 | | $ | 10,948 | |
Companies Held for Disposal
Assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal are comprised of CIB Construction (including Canron) and MICR at both September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal as shown on the consolidated balance sheets.
Assets/liabilities of companies held for disposal
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets of companies held for disposal: | | | | | | | |
CIB Construction | | $ | 58,002 | | $ | 67,061 | |
MICR | | | 6,409 | | | 6,545 | |
Intercompany eliminations | | | (1,480 | ) | | (332 | ) |
Total assets of companies held for disposal | | $ | 62,931 | | $ | 73,274 | |
Liabilities of companies held for disposal: | | | | | | | |
CIB Construction | | $ | 59,049 | | $ | 62,238 | |
MICR | | | 621 | | | 558 | |
Intercompany eliminations | | | (32,462 | ) | | (26,193 | ) |
Total liabilities of companies held for disposal | | $ | 27,208 | | $ | 36,603 | |
Banking regulations limit the holding period for assets not considered to be permissible banking activities and which have been acquired in satisfaction of debt previously contracted to five years, unless extended. Both MICR and CIB Construction are subject to this restriction.
CIB Construction
CIB Construction, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIB Marine, acquired 84% of the outstanding stock of Canron through loan collection activities in the fourth quarter of 2002. During the third quarter of 2003, the Board of Directors of Canron authorized management to cease operating Canron and commence a wind down of its affairs, including a voluntary liquidation of its assets. The gross assets and liabilities of CIB Construction and its subsidiaries are reported at their estimated liquidation values less costs to sell. Intercompany loan and cash balances and interest income and expense between consolidated CIB Construction and CIB Marine have been eliminated from the totals shown on the consolidated financial statements. The net loss associated with CIB Construction is presented as discontinued operations in CIB Marine’s consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003.
The following table summarizes the composition of CIB Construction’s balance sheets. The September 30, 2003 balance sheet reflects estimated liquidation values less costs to sell.
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets: | | | | | | | |
Cash on deposit at CIB Marine | | $ | 1,882 | | $ | 332 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 28,255 | | | 33,610 | |
Inventories and contracts in progress | | | 6,376 | | | 7,629 | |
Other assets | | | 2,173 | | | 4,195 | |
Current assets | | | 38,686 | | | 45,766 | |
Deferred tax asset | | | 3,135 | | | 4,269 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 16,181 | | | 17,026 | |
Total assets | | $ | 58,002 | | $ | 67,061 | |
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity: | | | | | | | |
Current portion of loans payable to CIB Marine and its affiliates | | $ | 20,861 | | $ | 3,921 | |
Income tax payable | | | 1,574 | | | 3,104 | |
Other liabilities | | | 24,534 | | | 31,127 | |
Current liabilities | | | 46,969 | | | 38,152 | |
Loans payable to CIB Marine and its affiliates | | | 9,979 | | | 22,272 | |
Loans payable to nonaffiliated banks | | | 2,101 | | | 1,814 | |
Total liabilities | | | 59,049 | | | 62,238 | |
Stockholder’s equity | | | (1,047 | ) | | 4,823 | |
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity | | $ | 58,002 | | $ | 67,061 | |
MICR, Inc.
In 2000, CIB Marine acquired and/or assumed through MICR, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIB-Chicago, the business and certain assets and liabilities of a manufacturer of payment processing systems. The gross assets and liabilities of MICR are reported on the consolidated balance sheet as assets and liabilities of companies held for disposal and its results of operations are included in continuing operations for all periods presented.
The following table summarizes the composition of MICR's balance sheet:
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Assets: | | | | | | | |
Cash on deposit at non-affiliates | | $ | 366 | | $ | 495 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 610 | | | 430 | |
Inventory | | | 907 | | | 1,024 | |
Other current assets | | | 12 | | | 7 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 358 | | | 433 | |
Goodwill, net | | | 4,156 | | | 4,156 | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,409 | | $ | 6,545 | |
Liabilities and stockholder's equity: | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | $ | 621 | | $ | 558 | |
Stockholder's equity | | | 5,788 | | | 5,987 | |
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity | | $ | 6,409 | | $ | 6,545 | |
Deposits
Total deposits increased $36.3 million, or 1.3%, from $2.8 billion at December 31, 2002 to $2.9 billion at September 30, 2003. This increase was primarily due to a $160.6 million increase in savings deposits, partially offset by a $144.2 million decrease in time deposits. The increase in total deposits is partially due to economic conditions as funds moved to lower risk investments, and the relationship banking activity actively pursued by CIB Marine during most of 2003. During 2003, the economic conditions favored liquid accounts that paid competitive rates. This, combined with CIB Marine’s active campaign to increase core deposits, resulted in a decrease in time deposits while increasing demand, money market and savings deposits.
Time deposits represent the largest component of deposits. The percentage of time deposits to total deposits was 64.7% at September 30, 2003 and 70.6% at December 31, 2002. The reduction of time deposits, both in balances and percent of total deposits, reflects more reliance placed on savings deposits as a funding source and overall reductions in total assets during the period. At September 30, 2003 time deposits of $100,000 or more amounted to $616.3 million, or 33.0%, of total time deposits, compared to $724.2 million and 36.0% at December 31, 2002. CIB Marine accepts brokered time deposits periodically to meet short-term funding needs and/or when their related costs are at or below those being offered on other deposits. Brokered time deposits were $146.1 million, or 7.8%, of total time deposits at September 30, 2003, and $222.8 million, or 11.1% of total time deposits at December 31, 2002. Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, brokered deposits were restricted by FDIC rules and regulations at certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks defined as less than well capitalized due to lower levels of capital.
Borrowings
CIB Marine utilizes various types of borrowings to meet liquidity needs, fund asset growth and/or when the pricing of these borrowings is more favorable than deposits. Total borrowed funds were $270.6 million at September 30, 2003 compared to $494.1 million at December 31, 2002. The majority of the $223.5 million decrease in total borrowings was in short-term borrowings which decreased by $223.2 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003. The decrease in short-term borrowings was the result of CIB Marine’s liquidity management activity and reduced funding needs of the subsidiary banks due to the net reduction in interest earning assets, especially loans held for sale.
CIB Marine had a revolving line of credit at a nonaffiliated commercial bank collateralized by the common stock of all of its subsidiaries. At September 30, 2003 CIB Marine was not in compliance with certain debt covenants of this revolving line of credit. Additionally, at September 30, 2003, CIB Marine’s factoring subsidiary had a $12.0 million line of credit to support its operating needs.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2003 federal funds borrowings by certain CIB Marine subsidiary banks were discontinued or were contingent on subsidiary bank pledges of fixed income investment securities.
Other Liabilities
Other liabilities increased $12.7 million from $12.9 million at December 31, 2002 to $25.6 million at September 30, 2003. The increase was primarily due to a $14.7 million increase in the accrual for unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit.
Capital and Regulatory Matters
Receivables from Sale of Stock
Loans not sufficiently collateralized by assets other than CIB Marine stock and made by CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks to borrowers who used the proceeds to acquire CIB Marine Stock are accounted for as a reduction of Stockholders’ Equity until such loans have been repaid or are charged-off. Such loans outstanding at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 totaled $5.2 million and $7.9 million, respectively. During the third quarter of 2003, CIB Marine received payments and/or charged off $2.7 million of loans that were classified as receivables from sale of stock at December 31, 2002.
Treasury Stock
In 2003, certain of CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks acquired 86,611 shares of CIB Marine stock through collection efforts when the borrowers defaulted on their loans. These shares are included in treasury stock at the lower of the loan balance or the estimated fair market value of CIB Marine’s stock at time of acquisition. Any loan balance in excess of the estimated fair market value of the stock and other collateral received was charged to the allowance for loan losses. Treasury Stock was $2.2 million at September 30, 2003.
Regulatory Capital
CIB Marine and its subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Pursuant to federal holding company and bank regulations, CIB Marine and each bank subsidiary is assigned to a capital category. The assigned capital category is largely determined by three ratios that are calculated in accordance with specific instructions included in the regulations: total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the bank subsidiaries must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the bank’s assets and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The banks’ capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. To be categorized as well capitalized, pursuant to FDIC guidelines in 12 C.F.R. Part 325, the bank subsidiaries must maintain total risk adjusted capital, Tier 1 capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 10.0%, 6.0% and 5.0%, respectively.
There are five capital categories defined in the regulations: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Classification of a subsidiary bank in any of the undercapitalized categories can result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
At September 30, 2003, pursuant to FDIC guidelines in 12 C.F.R. Part 325, Marine FSB and Citrus Bank were classified as well capitalized. Central Illinois Bank, CIB-Indiana, and Marine-Wisconsin were classified as adequately capitalized, and CIB-Chicago was classified as significantly undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
On January 30, 2003, CIB Marine’s bank subsidiary, CIB-Chicago, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) with the Division of Banks and Real Estate of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (the “DBRE”) and the FDIC. The Memorandum was entered into as a result of the deterioration in the credit quality of the loan portfolio, the level of concentrations of credit, and weaknesses in the credit administration process identified during the DBRE’s regular examination of CIB-Chicago, which commenced on August 31, 2002.
Pursuant to the Memorandum, CIB-Chicago agreed to take certain actions to correct the deficiencies noted within the examination report. In addition, during the period in which the Memorandum was in effect, CIB-Chicago agreed to maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital level equal to or exceeding 8% of the bank’s total assets. In the event such ratio was less than 8% as of June 30 or December 31 of each calendar year the Memorandum was in effect, the bank was required within 30 days thereof to submit to the regulators a plan for the augmentation of the bank’s capital accounts. Also, unless prior written consent was received from the regulators, CIB-Chicago agreed to restrict its loan growth to no more than 2% during any consecutive three-month period and suspend the declaration or payment of dividends. The Memorandum was superseded by a Cease and Desist Order.
The risk-based capital information of CIB Marine at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 is contained in the following table.
| | September 30, 2003 | | December 31, 2002 | |
| | | | (as restated) | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Risk weighted assets | | $ | 2,956,521 | | $ | 3,305,510 | |
Average assets (1) | | | 3,550,957 | | | 3,485,498 | |
Capital components | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity | | | 148,033 | | | 247,563 | |
Guaranteed trust preferred securities and minority interests/minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries | | | 47,242 | | | 61,051 | |
Nonfinancial equity items | | | (54 | ) | | (149 | ) |
Less: disallowed intangibles | | | (14,446 | ) | | (14,822 | ) |
Less: unrealized gain on securities | | | (2,137 | ) | | (4,516 | ) |
Tier 1 capital | | | 178,638 | | | 289,127 | |
Allowable allowance for loan losses | | | 38,263 | | | 41,625 | |
Allowable subordinated debt | | | 12,891 | | | — | |
Total risk-based capital | | $ | 229,792 | | $ | 330,752 | |
| | Actual | | Minimum Required to be Adequately Capitalized | |
| | Amount | | Ratio | | Amount | | Ratio | |
September 30, 2003 | | (Dollars in thousands) |
Total capital to risk weighted assets | | $ | 229,792 | | | 7.77 | % | $ | 236,522 | | | 8.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets | | | 178,638 | | | 6.04 | | | 118,261 | | | 4.00 | |
Tier 1 leverage to average assets | | | 178,638 | | | 5.03 | | | 142,038 | | | 4.00 | |
December 31, 2002 (as restated) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital to risk weighted assets | | $ | 330,752 | | | 10.01 | % | $ | 264,441 | | | 8.00 | % |
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets | | | 289,127 | | | 8.75 | | | 132,220 | | | 4.00 | |
Tier 1 leverage to average assets | | | 289,127 | | | 8.30 | | | 139,420 | | | 4.00 | |
(1) | Average assets as calculated in accordance with 12 C.F.R. Part 325 of the FDIC rules and regulations which requires a quarter to date average and allows for current period adjustments of goodwill and other intangible assets. |
New Accounting Pronouncements
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (Revised) (“FIN 46R”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve financial reporting of special purpose and other entities. In accordance with the interpretation, business enterprises that represent the primary beneficiary of another entity by retaining a controlling financial interest in that entity’s assets, liabilities, and results of operating activities must consolidate the entity in their financial statements. Prior to the issuance of FIN 46R, consolidation generally occurred when an enterprise controlled another entity through voting interests. Adoption of the accounting provisions of FIN 46R in December 2003 did not have a material affect on the consolidated results of operations. The effect of the implementation of FIN 46R on CIB Marine’s consolidated statement of financial condition was to increase investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries by $1.9 million, net of the amounts due to unconsolidated subsidiaries, decrease trust preferred securities by $60.0 million and increase junior subordinated debentures by $61.9 million. Trust preferred securities underwriting fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over a thirty year life.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (“SFAS 149”) to amend and clarify financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In addition, SFAS 149 requires that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 (with certain exceptions) and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. Adoption of SFAS 149 did not materially affect the consolidated results of operations or financial position of CIB Marine.
Liabilities and Equity
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (“SFAS 150”). SFAS 150 establishes standards regarding the manner in which an issuer classifies and measures certain types of financial instruments having characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Pursuant to SFAS 150, such freestanding financial instruments (i.e., those entered into separately from an entity’s other financial instruments or equity transactions or that are legally detachable and separately exercisable) must be classified as liabilities or, in some cases, assets. In addition, SFAS 150 requires that financial instruments containing obligations to repurchase the issuing entity’s equity shares and, under certain circumstances, obligations that are settled by delivery of the issuer’s shares be classified as liabilities. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and for contracts in existence at the start of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. CIB Marine does not have any outstanding financial instruments at September 30, 2003 that would require reclassification as a result of SFAS 150.
Liquidity
The objective of liquidity risk management is to ensure that CIB Marine has adequate funding capacity to fund commitments to extend credit, deposit account withdrawals, maturities of borrowings, and other obligations in a timely manner. CIB Marine actively manages its liquidity position by estimating, measuring, and monitoring its sources and uses of funds. CIB Marine's sources of funding and liquidity include both asset and liability components. CIB Marine's funding requirements are primarily met by the inflow of funds from deposits, loan repayments and investment maturities. CIB Marine also makes use of noncore funding sources in a manner consistent with its liquidity, funding and market risk policies. Noncore funding sources are used to meet funding needs and/or when the pricing and continued availability of these sources presents lower cost funding opportunities. Short-term noncore funding sources utilized by CIB Marine include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Eurodollar deposits, short-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, and short-term brokered and negotiable time deposits. CIB Marine also has established borrowing lines with the Federal Reserve Bank and nonaffiliated banks. Long-term funding sources, other than core deposits, include long-term brokered and negotiable time deposits and long-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Additional sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, federal funds sold, sales of loans held for sale, and the sale of securities.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2003 federal funds borrowings by certain CIB Marine subsidiary banks were discontinued or were contingent on subsidiary bank pledges of fixed income investment securities. Brokered deposits were restricted by FDIC rules and regulations at CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks which were defined as less than well capitalized due to lower levels of capital. Additionally, pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding (“Memorandum”) CIB-Chicago entered into with the Illinois Office of Banks and Real Estate (“OBRE”) and the FDIC in January 2003, CIB-Chicago was required to obtain regulatory approval before paying cash dividends. These restrictions impacted CIB Marine’s liquidity management.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated statements of cash flows contained in the consolidated financial statements.
CIB Marine’s primary source of funds for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 came from $208.4 million in net cash provided by operating activities. Other sources of funds came from an increase in deposits of $37.2 million, a decrease in loans of $38.7 million, $17.5 million in proceeds from the sale of foreclosed properties and a $1.0 million net decrease in assets of companies held for disposal.
A net decrease of $223.2 million in short-term borrowings was CIB Marine’s primary use of funds for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Other uses of funds were a net increase in investment securities of $75.2 million, capital expenditures of $4.6 million and $1.5 million net increase in other investments.
CIB Marine had liquid assets of $92.9 million and $94.0 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
CIB Marine was able to meet its liquidity needs from the end of the third quarter of 2003 through 2007. During 2004, CIB Marine deferred payments on its trust preferred securities outstanding. The deferral period may last as long as 5 years. During 2005, CIB Marine’s primary sources of funding was cash on hand from the sale of CIB-Chicago, operating cash flows from the sale of services to subsidiary banks and the sale of other assets owned by the parent. CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks have higher levels of liquid assets to meet potentially high levels of liquidity needs. During 2008, it is expected that CIB Marine will have adequate funding capacity to meet its obligations.
Subsequent Events
The following subsequent events information should be read in conjunction with CIB Marine’s 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 Form 10-K’s which were filed with the SEC on October 31, 2005; December 8, 2006; July 18, 2007; and November 7, 2007, respectively.
Regulatory Orders and Agreements
In January 2007, the Cease and Desist Order at Central Illinois Bank was terminated and replaced with a Memorandum of Understanding. Among other items, the Memorandum required Central Illinois Bank maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital of 8% of total assets as calculated in accordance with Part 325 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations and to obtain regulatory approval prior to the purchase of any loan pools in excess of $3.0 million. The Memoranda at Central Illinois Bank and Marine Bank-Wisconsin were terminated. Following the termination of the Memoranda, none of the subsidiary banks were party to any formal or informal regulatory agreement or order.
At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine was subject to a Written Agreement (“Agreement”) which it entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank in the second quarter of 2004. Among other items, the Agreement restricts dividend payments and redemption of shares of CIB Marine without regulatory approval; restricts distribution of interest or dividends on its trust preferred securities without regulatory approval; restricts borrowings and debt, including debt to stockholders, without regulatory approval; and requires maintenance of minimum capital levels. The Agreement remains effective and enforceable until stayed, modified, terminated or suspended by the Federal Reserve Bank.
Management Changes
In March 2007, Mr. Stanley J. Calderon was elected Chairman of the Board of CIB Marine, replacing Mr. W. Scott Blake, who remains a director. In March 2007, Mr. Calderon also resigned as President and CEO of CIB Marine and was replaced by Mr. John P. Hickey Jr. Mr. Calderon’s employment agreement with CIB Marine terminated upon his resignation as President and CEO. In May 2007, Mr. Hickey was appointed to CIB Marine’s Board of Directors. In January 2008, Mr. Edwin J. Depenbrok was appointed Chief Financial Officer replacing Mr. Steven Klitzing who resigned in November 2007.
Liquidity
During 2007 and into 2008, CIB Marine’s availability of federal funds purchased with correspondent banks continued to be contingent on subsidiary bank pledges of fixed income investment securities. Credit restrictions at the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window were lifted in the first quarter of 2007.
FHLB Stock Investment
In October 2007, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago entered into a consensual cease and desist order (“order”) with the Federal Housing Finance Board which will guide the FHLB Chicago’s operations going forward. The FHLB Chicago states it will continue to provide to its members liquidity and funding through advances and the purchase of mortgages, and continue to support affordable housing and economic development. In addition to several required actions and restrictions agreed to in the order, it also requires the FHLB Chicago to obtain prior written approval from the Federal Housing Finance Board for the redemption or repurchase of any capital stock from members and the payment of any dividends to its shareholders. CIB Marine is a member, shareholder and customer of FHLB Chicago currently utilizing advances from the FHLB Chicago to assist in meeting the funding and liquidity needs of the subsidiary banks of CIB Marine. Additionally, in October 2007 and January 2008, respectively, the FHLB Chicago announced it would not declare a dividend for the third or fourth quarters of 2007. At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had $11.5 million in FHLB Chicago stock, of which $4.0 million was categorized as required.
Loan Pool Purchase
CIB Marine has purchased two pools of fixed rate second lien home equity loans from Residential Funding Corporation, a division of General Motors Acceptance Corporation: a $47.8 million pool in June 2006 and a $48.2 million pool in February 2007. The 2006 purchase was funded with $12.0 million in FHLB Chicago borrowings with the remainder coming from cash on hand. The 2007 purchase was funded with cash on hand and $15.0 million in FHLB Chicago borrowings. The June 2006 pool consisted of 989 loans at purchase with a weighted average yield of 9.5%, term to maturity of 17.3 years, loan-to-value ratio of 91%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 39% and FICO score of 713. The February 2007 pool included at purchase 965 loans with a weighted average yield of 9.98%, term to maturity of 17.5 years, loan-to-value ratio of 94%, borrower debt service-to-income ratios of 40% and FICO score of 709. The majority of the loans in the purchased pools are not considered to be loans to subprime borrowers. CIB Marine hired an outside consulting firm with experience in home equity loan pool purchases to assist it in selecting the selling company and in the due diligence process performed on a sample of the purchased loans. CIB Marine continues to look at alternative investments including possible further loan purchases in an effort to increase both the balances of loans outstanding and the yield on its interest-earning assets.
In the last half of 2007, CIB Marine increased the loss provision rates on the two home equity pools it purchased during 2006 and 2007, primarily due to the general deterioration in the condition of the housing markets and the housing finance markets. At December 31, 2007, the balance of these loans was $72.2 million and the allowance for loan loss allocated to these loans was $5.3 million, or 7.3% of the outstanding balance of these loans. Additionally, at December 31, 2007, $2.4 million of these loans were classified as nonaccrual.
Other investments
During the third quarter of 2007, CIB Marine’s investment in the common and preferred capital of a limited liability corporation engaged in the development of owner-occupied housing in qualified low-income communities was deemed impaired, and an impairment loss for the entire $0.8 million carrying value of the investment was recognized.
Branch Activities
CIB Marine had 25 branches as of December 31, 2007, holding $0.7 billion in deposits.
During 2007, Marine-Wisconsin sold its Cedarburg and Brookfield, Wisconsin branches, resulting in a total net gain on the sales of $1.1 million. The branches had $49.7 million in deposits at the time of sales. Additionally, CIB Marine closed the Henderson, Nevada; Sun City, Arizona; Indianapolis (Fox Road), Indiana; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin branches. At December 31, 2006, these four branches had total deposits of $46.7 million. Deposits of the closed branches were transferred to other CIB Marine branches.
CIB Marine continues to evaluate the effectiveness of its subsidiary banking network, which could result in the sale or closure of additional subsidiary bank branches.
Goodwill
At December 31, 2006, CIB Marine had $0.7 million of goodwill. As a result of branch sales during the first quarter of 2007, CIB Marine had no goodwill at December 31, 2007.
FDIC Deposit Insurance Premiums
In October 2006, the FDIC Board of Directors approved a One-Time Assessment Credit. This credit, totaling $0.6 million for CIB Marine’s subsidiary banks, will be recorded as a credit against regular FDIC insurance premium expense beginning in January 2007 and continue until the credit is exhausted. Of the $0.6 million, $0.2 million was used to offset the FDIC insurance premium during 2007 and an estimated $0.2 million will be used to offset the FDIC insurance premium during 2008.
Credit Concentrations
At December 31, 2007, CIB Marine had one borrowing relationship (loans to one borrower or a related group of borrowers) and loans to five industries or industry groups that exceeded 25% of stockholders’ equity. The decreases subsequent to September 30, 2003 were primarily due to the sale of CIB-Chicago and management’s strategy to reduce these types of exposures.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets were $14.7 million at December 31, 2007 and included nonaccrual loans of $13.4 million, foreclosed properties of $1.3 million and no restructured loans. The decrease in these assets subsequent to September 30, 2003 was primarily due to the sale of CIB-Chicago and management’s initiatives to improve the quality of the loan portfolio.
Late Filing of Tax Returns
CIB Marine did not file all required federal and state tax returns for calendar years 2004, 2005 and 2006 by the required due dates. Although CIB Marine did not report taxable income during these periods, penalties and interest may still be assessed by the Internal Revenue Service and/or applicable state departments of revenue. As of the first quarter of 2008, CIB Marine was current with all its federal and state tax return filings.
Municipal Bond Insurer Rating Downgrades
In January 2008, due to economic conditions, several nationally recognized rating agencies downgraded the credit ratings of several of the investment grade credit insuring companies. Several of the downgraded companies insure municipal obligation investments owned by CIB Marine. The municipal obligations have a par value of $16.5 million and a fair value of $16.4 million as of December 31, 2007. CIB Marine has not recognized any impairment on these affected municipal obligations and the securities are still considered investment grade quality as rated by the rating agencies.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK SENSITIVITY
There have been no material changes in the market risks faced by CIB Marine since December 31, 2002. For additional information regarding CIB Marine's market risks, refer to its 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The following table illustrates the period and cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap for September 30, 2003:
Repricing Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
| | September 30, 2003 | |
| | 0-3 Months | | 4-6 Months | | 7-12 Months | | 2-5 Years | | Over 5 Years | | Total | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 1,855,194 | | $ | 107,003 | | $ | 128,138 | | $ | 449,110 | | $ | 26,867 | | $ | 2,566,312 | |
Securities (1) | | | 73,808 | | | 39,343 | | | 85,755 | | | 344,305 | | | 42,034 | | | 585,245 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 71,532 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 71,532 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 23,870 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 23,870 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 2,024,404 | | | 146,346 | | | 213,893 | | | 793,415 | | | 68,901 | | | 3,246,959 | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time deposits | | | 415,021 | | | 372,967 | | | 482,849 | | | 538,508 | | | 71,603 | | | 1,880,948 | |
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 802,198 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 802,198 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 146,911 | | | — | | | 2,838 | | | — | | | — | | | 149,749 | |
Long-term borrowings | | | — | | | — | | | 8,500 | | | 38,389 | | | — | | | 46,889 | |
Junior subordinated debentures | | | 20,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 40,000 | | | 60,000 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1,384,130 | | | 372,967 | | | 494,187 | | | 576,897 | | | 111,603 | | | 2,939,784 | |
Interest sensitivity gap (by period) | | $ | 640,274 | | $ | (226,621 | ) | $ | (280,294 | ) | $ | 216,518 | | $ | (42,702 | ) | $ | 307,175 | |
Interest sensitivity gap (cumulative) | | | 640,274 | | | 413,653 | | | 133,359 | | | 349,877 | | | 307,175 | | | 307,175 | |
Adjusted for derivatives: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives (notional, by period) | | | (55,000 | ) | | — | | | — | | | 25,000 | | | 30,000 | | | — | |
Derivatives (notional, cumulative) | | | (55,000 | ) | | (55,000 | ) | | (55,000 | ) | | (30,000 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Interest sensitivity gap (by period) | | | 585,274 | | | (226,621 | ) | | (280,294 | ) | | 241,518 | | | (12,702 | ) | | 307,175 | |
Interest sensitivity gap (cumulative) | | | 585,274 | | | 358,653 | | | 78,359 | | | 319,877 | | | 307,175 | | | 307,175 | |
Cumulative gap as a % of total assets | | | 17.39 | % | | 10.66 | % | | 2.33 | % | | 9.51 | % | | 9.13 | % | | | |
(1) | Includes Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock. |
The following table illustrates the expected percentage change in net interest income over a one-year period due to an immediate change in short-term U.S. prime rate of interest as of September 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002:
| | Basis Point Changes | |
| | +200 | | +100 | | —100 | | —200 | |
Net interest income change over one year: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2003 | | | 6.09 | % | | 3.02 | % | | (3.16 | )% | | (5.73 | )% |
December 31, 2002 | | | 12.01 | % | | 7.20 | % | | (3.36 | )% | | (9.13 | )% |
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
CIB Marine’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of CIB Marine’s disclosure controls and procedures on September 30, 2003, have concluded that because of certain deficiencies identified and described below which were determined to be material weaknesses in internal controls as of such date, CIB Marine did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to CIB Marine and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them and by others within those entities.
(i) CIB Marine’s control environment did not sufficiently promote effective internal control over financial reporting, and this material weakness was a contributing factor in the development of other material weaknesses described below. Specifically, deficiencies in the control environment included insufficient oversight and direction provided by Management and the Board of Directors, promotion of aggressive loan growth irrespective of inadequate human resources as well as the safety and soundness of such growth and a lack of adequate policies and procedures to enable the timely preparation of reliable financial statements.
(ii) CIB Marine’s policies and procedures over the determination of the allowance for loan losses were not effective, due to:
| · | Policies and procedures to identify credit downgrades on a timely basis and establish suitable loan workout plans not being effectively followed; |
| · | Lack of adequate credit procedures to analyze borrowers’ global cash flow; and |
| · | Lack of adequate procedures to monitor loan collateral and valuation on collateral dependent loans. |
As a result of the these internal control deficiencies, pertinent information was not identified, captured and communicated in a form and timeframe that enabled CIB Marine to analyze the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the allowance for loan losses was materially understated in previously issued consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. These consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the correction of the aforementioned errors.
(iii) CIB Marine’s policies and procedures were not effective with regard to coins, jewelry and precious metals loan collateral held, by failing to adequately appraise collateral in its possession, control access by the borrower to such collateral and periodically inspect the collateral using persons with expertise in such collateral. As a result, internal controls designed to prevent and/or detect significant losses were not effective. Consequently, CIB Marine sustained a significant credit loss and did not detect the loss on a timely basis. This deficiency resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of CIB Marine’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
(iv) CIB Marine did not have sufficient policies and procedures to track loans secured by the common stock of CIB Marine or used by borrowers to purchase common stock of CIB Marine. Consequently, information necessary to make credit decisions in conformity with sound and safe banking practices was not identified, captured and communicated. This also resulted in erroneous accounting for and reporting of these loans in the consolidated financial statements of CIB Marine which resulted in a restatement of the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2003 and the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, and caused CIB Marine to be out of compliance with certain banking regulations.
(v) CIB Marine did not have sufficient or adequate policies and procedures over information technology (“IT”) change management. Specifically, CIB Marine did not have policies and procedures designed to prevent unauthorized changes to IT programs, queries and calculations. This deficiency resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of CIB Marine’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
b. Changes in Internal Controls
During the third quarter of 2003, CIB Marine identified and developed a plan to address certain of the deficiencies noted in Item 4.a.-Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures of this form 10-Q.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Material pending litigation, other than that of a routine nature in the ordinary course of business, is as follows:
In August 2003, Keith Burchett, a shareholder of CIB Marine and a borrower of CIB-Chicago, commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against CIB Marine, Central Illinois Bank, CIB-Chicago and two of their now former directors and/or officers for damages arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations relative to the financial condition of Canron and its principal shareholder by defendants to induce the plaintiff to borrow money from CIB-Chicago and make a $0.5 million investment in Canron. Plaintiff asserts claims for fraud and shareholder remedies. The shareholder alleges the defendants violated lending regulations caused a decline in the plaintiff’s investment in CIB Marine. Plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages, requests an order requiring CIB Marine and the banks to repurchase his CIB Marine shares of stock at fair value, and other forms of relief. While the outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend this action. Central Illinois Bank has been removed as a defendant in subsequent amended complaints filed by the plaintiff. On November 30, 2004, CIB Marine sold CIB-Chicago. On January 11, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The court has not ruled on this motion.
In June 2004, Central Illinois Bank commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Champaign County, Illinois, against John C. Hadley and Mary Lydia Hadley, CIB Marine’s largest individual shareholders at the time, for damages arising out of the Hadleys’ default in December 2003 of certain loan obligations (the “State Litigation”) and subsequently obtained a confession of judgment. The loans approximate $9.7 million plus interest and attorneys fees and were secured by CIB Marine stock and the accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other personal property of the borrowers and their restaurant supply and coin businesses. In December 2004, the Hadleys consented to the entry of an order for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois (the “Bankruptcy Case”). The Hadleys stayed the State Litigation and, in the first quarter of 2006, the Hadleys filed a counterclaim against Central Illinois Bank in the dischargeability adversary proceeding that sought to recover $35.0 million in actual damages and punitive damages for the alleged loss or substitution by Central Illinois Bank of certain rare coins and collectibles which the Hadleys alleged were pledged to the bank as collateral, sought to recover certain alleged preferential transfers and sought to equitably subordinate the bank’s claim to those of unsecured creditors. Central Illinois Bank and the Hadleys have settled these matters with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. According to the settlement agreement, the adversary complaint and counterclaims in the Bankruptcy Court and the State Litigation were dismissed with prejudice and without admitting any fault or liability; the parties exchanged mutual general releases of claims among the Hadleys, Central Illinois Bank and its parent and affiliated corporations, preserving only the Hadleys’ claims as members of a putative plaintiff class in an action currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin entitled Dennis Lewis, et al. v. CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc., et al., Case No. 05-C-1008 or as individual plaintiffs in an “opt out” action against some or all of the same parties alleging substantially the same claims; and Central Illinois Bank discharged, waived, released and assigned its claims in the Bankruptcy Case to the Hadleys’ bankruptcy estate, returned to the Hadleys’ bankruptcy estate all collateral security held by Central Illinois Bank and paid the bankruptcy estate $1.75 million in the first quarter of 2007. CIB Marine recorded a $1.75 million contingent liability expense in the first quarter of 2006 related to the settlement.
In June 2004, John C. Ruedi, a former employee of CIB Marine, filed an action against CIB Marine and “Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.” in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial District, Champaign County, Illinois for rescission or damages, including punitive damages, in connection with plaintiff’s October 1, 2002 exercise of options issued by CIB Marine to acquire 36,688 shares of CIB Marine common stock at various exercise prices. Plaintiff claims that but for CIB Marine’s and Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc.’s alleged fraudulent concealment of material facts regarding the financial condition of CIB Marine he would not have exercised his options. Plaintiff also seeks to recover from Central Illinois Bancorp, Inc. and CIB Marine in excess of $40,000 allegedly due Plaintiff pursuant to a purported memorandum providing for the payment of an incentive to Plaintiff in connection with his employment. In March 2005, Plaintiff amended his complaint to add the former President and CEO of CIB Marine as a defendant based upon claims of alleged fraudulent concealment. Claims filed in the action against CIB Marine’s independent registered public accounting firm KPMG LLP (hereinafter “KPMG”) and a now retired partner of KPMG were voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiff. CIB Marine filed a motion to dismiss several of Plaintiff’s claims and answered the others denying liability. That motion to dismiss was denied and CIB Marine answered the remaining counts against it, denying liability. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment seeking recovery of $40,000 from CIB Marine on his incentive payment claim. This motion was denied. All discovery had been stayed in this action by an order of the Federal Court in the Lewis case described later in this section. Plaintiff had filed a motion in the Lewis case to vacate the discovery stay in this case, which CIB Marine and the other defendants in the Lewis case opposed. When defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied in the Lewis case on March 3, 2008, the Court denied the motion to vacate the stay of discovery as moot. While the ultimate outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend the action.
On June 3, 2005, a first consolidated complaint was filed by Dennis Lewis, a shareholder, and other alleged shareholders of CIB Marine in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Urbana Division, against CIB Marine, certain of its current and former officers and directors and KPMG. The filing consolidated two actions that had been filed in January 2005: one filed by Lewis in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Urbana Division and another filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Peoria Division by Elaine Sollberger, a purported shareholder, whose claims were voluntarily dismissed in connection with the consolidation and have not been reasserted in the consolidated complaint. Plaintiffs sought to maintain the action as a class action on behalf of all persons who purchased common stock of CIB Marine between April 12, 1999 and April 12, 2004, claiming violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by CIB Marine and other defendants and liability of certain defendants other than CIB Marine and KPMG under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as controlling persons. The substance of the complaint is that the financial condition of CIB Marine was overstated with the result that members of the purported class acquired their CIB Marine stock at inflated prices. Plaintiffs seek money damages, interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. The federal court in Urbana, Illinois granted the motion of CIB Marine and several other defendants to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where the action is now pending.
All defendants moved to dismiss the action on various grounds. On October 12, 2006 the court denied CIB Marine’s motion to dismiss, granted in part the motions to dismiss filed by the individual defendants and granted the motion to dismiss filed by KPMG. CIB Marine and the individual defendants filed answers to the pending complaint denying any liability. An additional person has moved to intervene as a plaintiff in the action. In light of a recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that addressed the pleading standards that must be satisfied by the plaintiff in a case such as this one, on July 16, 2007 CIB Marine and the individual defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative, a motion for reconsideration of the ruling on the motion to dismiss, seeking dismissal of the action on the ground that the plaintiffs have not satisfactorily pleaded one of the essential elements of their cause of action. On March 3, 2008, the Court denied that motion.
On November 10, 2006, plaintiffs filed a further amended complaint as to KPMG, which KPMG moved to dismiss. On August 13, 2007, the court granted KPMG’s motion and dismissed the action as to it.
As a result of the filing of the initial motions to dismiss, all discovery in this action was stayed automatically. Plaintiffs moved to vacate that stay of discovery, which all defendants opposed based on KPMG’s pending motion to dismiss the further amended complaint filed by plaintiffs against KPMG. In granting KPMG’s motion to dismiss, the court noted the pendency of the motion for judgment on the pleadings described above and ruled that the stay of discovery will remain in place. Plaintiffs filed a separate motion for a limited lift of the stay of discovery, which CIB Marine and the individual defendants opposed in their response filed on September 11, 2007. In denying the motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Court denied the motions to vacate the stay as moot, i.e., with the denial of the motion for judgment on the pleadings discovery may proceed.
CIB Marine intends to vigorously contest certification of any class action and to otherwise vigorously defend this action. The ultimate outcome of this action cannot be determined at this time.
In April 2005, James Fasano and Thomas Arundel, shareholders of CIB Marine and borrowers of CIB-Chicago, commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against CIB Marine, CIB-Chicago and two of their now former directors and/or officers for damages arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations relative to the financial condition of Canron and its principal shareholder to induce the plaintiffs to borrow $0.5 million from CIB-Chicago and invest it in Canron. Plaintiffs assert claims for fraud and shareholder remedies. The shareholder alleges the defendants violated lending regulations which caused a decline in the plaintiffs’ investment in CIB Marine. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages, request an order requiring CIB Marine and the bank to repurchase their CIB Marine shares of stock at fair value and other forms of relief. While the outcome of these claims cannot be determined at this time, CIB Marine intends to vigorously defend this action. On November 30, 2004, CIB Marine sold CIB-Chicago. On January 11, 2008, plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The Court has not ruled on this motion.
In December 2003, CIB-Chicago acquired the title to a commercial office building that was being converted into residential condominiums. The property was acquired through a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Settlement Agreement (“DIL Agreement”) from a borrower who was in default on its obligation. The property was included in foreclosed properties at December 31, 2003. Pursuant to the DIL Agreement, CIB-Chicago acquired the property subject to the first lien held by an unaffiliated financial institution and assumed the borrower’s financial obligation relating to that first lien. At December 31, 2003, the assumed financial obligation was reported as an outstanding non-recourse mortgage note payable. During the second quarter of 2004, CIB-Chicago transferred all of its rights, title and interest in the property, along with the borrower’s obligation under the related mortgage note, to the first lien holder. CIB-Chicago transferred the property based upon its evaluation that the amount of additional funds necessary to complete the project was greater than the financial benefits and risks associated therewith. The property was transferred without any further liability or obligation to the first lien position holder and CIB-Chicago reserved its legal rights to pursue the borrower and guarantors. The transfer to the first lien holder resulted in no additional gain or loss to CIB Marine. During 2003, CIB Marine charged-off $41.7 million of the loan to its allowance for loan loss with respect to this borrowing relationship and also recorded a $1.5 million market value write down on the property. In July 2004, CIB-Chicago commenced litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against the borrower, guarantors and their related interests for collection of the losses incurred by CIB Marine based upon state law claims of breach of agreements, fraud, conversion and other theories of recovery, including Federal RICO violations. In November 2004, CIB-Chicago assigned the loans and claims related to this development to CIB Marine in conjunction with the sale of CIB-Chicago. In April 2005, the United States District Court dismissed the RICO claim and, as a result, lacked jurisdiction over the state law claims. In April 2005, CIB Marine commenced an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, against the defendants on the state law claims. On February 1, 2008, the Court dismissed the action against one of the guarantors on the grounds that CIB-Chicago was precluded from pursuing collection from the guarantor until the first lienholder was paid in full pursuant to the language of a restructuring agreement entered into by CIB-Chicago, the first lienholder and the guarantor. CIB Marine intends to appeal the dismissal. In the event that there are any recoveries with respect to these loans and claims, CIB Marine has agreed to pay the purchaser of CIB-Chicago ten percent of any recovery after collection costs. To date, CIB Marine has not made any recoveries with respect to such loans and claims.
On April 20, 2006, Mark A. Sindecuse filed an action in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division (St. Louis) against CIB Marine, Dean M. Katsaros (“Katsaros”), a former director of CIB Marine, and Katsaros & Associates, Inc. The complaint, as amended, purported to assert common law causes of action against CIB Marine for fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with plaintiff’s purchases of common stock of CIB Marine in private placements in 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998. Plaintiff sought compensatory damages in excess of $2 million and unspecified punitive damages. After a motion to dismiss the amended complaint resulted in the dismissal of the negligent misrepresentation claims against it, CIB Marine filed an answer denying any liability to plaintiff and a motion for summary judgment on the remaining claim. On August 28, 2007, following Plaintiff’s withdrawal of two of the three remaining claims against Katsaros, the Court granted CIB Marine and Katsaros summary judgment on the sole remaining claim and dismissed the lawsuit. On September 24, 2007, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the judgment to the United State Court of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit. The appeal is fully briefed, with no argument currently scheduled.
CIB Marine and the individual defendants in the Ruedi, Burchett, Fasano/Arundel and Lewis cases described above, are insureds under a policy that on its face purports to provide coverage for those cases, including advancement of reimbursement for the costs of defense (payment of which by the insured reduces the remaining coverage under the policy), which include attorneys’ fees, subject to a retention. The insurer had reserved all rights and notified CIB Marine and the other insureds of potential grounds to deny coverage. After CIB Marine exhausted the retention under that policy, the insurer paid substantially all of the costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individual defendants in the Ruedi and Lewis cases through February 17, 2006 subject to its reservation of rights to seek reimbursement (and through March 31, 2007 in the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases). The insurer informed the insureds of its intention to terminate any further funding of the costs of defense.
Negotiations ensued and CIB Marine and the insurer discussed an arrangement in which the insurer would pay 35% of the costs of defense of the Ruedi and Lewis cases incurred by CIB Marine and the individual defendants and CIB Marine would pay the remaining 65% of those reasonable costs. The parties negotiated the terms of their agreement, which was reflected in a written agreement accepted by the insurer, but was not executed by the parties. Pending addressing open issues with regard to expanding the scope of this agreement to include the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases, the insurer informed the insureds that it would not sign the agreement regarding the Lewis and Ruedi cases. The insurer contends that the act of plaintiff’s counsel in Lewis providing an affidavit from Ruedi to the court in connection with one of the pending motions regarding vacating the stay of discovery gives the insurer grounds to invoke an exclusion under the policy that applies when an insured under the policy, which the insurer contends Ruedi is, assists a plaintiff, such as Lewis, in the prosecution of a case against other insureds, such as the Lewis case. Accordingly, the insurer has advised the insureds that it will no longer pay any of the costs of defense of Lewis. CIB Marine understands that this refusal also applies to any judgment that may be entered against any insured in Lewis.
CIB Marine is considering its options in response to this position of the insurer. With respect to the individual defendants, the payment of defense costs by CIB Marine is pursuant to the provision of its by-laws that mandates advancing defense costs of directors and officers under certain circumstances and subject to a full reservation of rights under the insurance policy by both parties. The advances to individuals are subject to repayment by the individual defendants if it is ultimately determined, as provided in the by-laws and applicable Wisconsin law, that they are not entitled to be indemnified. The agreement with the insurer provided that either CIB Marine or the insurer could terminate the funding arrangement under certain circumstances. In the event of termination, CIB Marine would be responsible for all of the reasonable costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individual defendants.
With respect to the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases, after CIB Marine exhausted retention under that policy, the insurer paid substantially all of the costs of defense of CIB Marine and the individuals through March 31, 2007, subject to its reservation of rights. On March 14, 2007, the insurer informed the insureds of its intention to terminate funding of all of the costs of defense in those actions on or after April 1, 2007 and proposed a funding arrangement comparable to that discussed with respect to the Ruedi and Lewis cases. No agreement has been reached with respect to post-April 1, 2007 funding of defense costs in the Burchett and Fasano/Arundel cases. With respect to the individual defendants, the payment of these defense costs by CIB Marine is being made pursuant to the provision of its by-laws that mandates advancing defense costs of directors and officers under certain circumstances and subject to a full reservation of rights under the insurance policy by both parties. The advances to individuals are subject to repayment by the individual defendants if it is ultimately determined, as provided in the by-laws and applicable Wisconsin law, that they are not entitled to be indemnified.
It is not possible to estimate the amount or timing of the defense costs that will be paid by CIB Marine from and after February 17, 2006 in the Ruedi and Lewis cases or in the other cases described above. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those described in the preceding forward-looking statement and affect the amount and timing of the expenses referred to with respect to the Ruedi and Lewis cases: (1) the federal court’s decision on whether to vacate the existing stays of discovery and, if one or both stays are vacated, the scope of discovery that is allowed by the court and/or requested by the plaintiffs; (2) the extent, if any, to which the Lewis case is allowed to proceed and, if so, allowed to proceed as a class action; (3) the scope of discovery pursued by the plaintiffs (and the timing and substance of the court’s rulings on any objections thereto by defendants) if and when discovery proceeds irrespective of the existing stays of discovery; (4) the extent to which CIB Marine and the individual defendants and their respective counsel are able to coordinate their defense of the action and in particular minimize duplication of activities in defense of the case; (5) the final determination by the insurer as to the amounts it is prepared to pay pursuant to the policy referenced above; (6) CIB Marine’s determination of what costs of defense are “reasonable” within the meaning of its by-laws and any claims made by individual defendants whose costs of defense may be rejected in whole or in part on that ground; and (7) the extent to which any individual defendant whose costs of defense are advanced by CIB Marine is ultimately required to repay those costs and, if so, the ability of that person to make repayment.
In July 2007, Mark Swift and M.A. Swift & Associates Ltd., purported minority shareholders of a former loan customer of CIB Marine Capital, LLC (“CIB Capital”), filed a lawsuit in US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against CIB Capital and CIB Marine. Subsequently, the Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Mark Swift assumed the action as plaintiff. In September 2007, the plaintiff amended the complaint and dismissed CIB Marine and CIB Capital as defendants.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not Applicable
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
CIB Marine did not submit any matters to a vote of its shareholders during the third quarter of 2003.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
| a. | Exhibit 31.1-Certification of John P. Hickey Jr., Chief Executive Officer, under Rule 13(a)-14(d)/15d-14(d). |
Exhibit 31.2-Certification of Edwin J. Depenbrok Chief Financial Officer, under Rule 13(a)-14(d)/15d-14(d).
Exhibit 32.1-Certification of John P. Hickey Jr., Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2-Certification of Edwin J. Depenbrok, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
| b. | During the third quarter of 2003, CIB Marine filed the following reports on Form 8-K: |
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, on this 19th day of March, 2008.
| | |
| CIB MARINE BANCSHARES, INC. (Registrant) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ EDWIN J. DEPENBROK |
|
Edwin J. Depenbrok Chief Financial Officer |