PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | ' |
Interim Financial Statements [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Interim Financial Statements |
The consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2014 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 are unaudited. However, in the opinion of management of the Company, these consolidated financial statements reflect all material adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and results of operations for such interim periods. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full year. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X for smaller reporting companies. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. |
| | |
Liquidity Disclosure [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Liquidity and Going Concern |
Going Concern – The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company generated net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 of approximately $3,042,000, primarily from a non-cash gain on the extinguishment of debt , had negative working capital of approximately $3,254,000 and a stockholders’ deficiency of approximately $3,311,000 at September 30, 2014. Since inception the Company’s growth has been funded through a combination of convertible and non-convertible debt from private investors and from cash advances from its former parent Technology Innovations, LLC. These factors, among others, may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations, to obtain additional financing, renegotiate the terms of existing financing obligations and ultimately to attain successful operations. The ability to successfully achieve those items is uncertain. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the uncertainty. |
|
As of September 30, 2014, the Company continued to require waivers for debt covenant violations and extensions of maturity dates. Refer to Note 2 for lenders waivers and maturity extensions received from the lenders. |
| | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NaturalNano, Inc. (“NaturalNano” or the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries NaturalNano Research, Inc. (“NN Research”) a Delaware corporation and Bitcoin Bidder, Inc. a Nevada corporation. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
NaturalNano established its subsidiary, Bitcoin Bidder, Inc. in June, 2014 for the sole purpose of bidding on bitcoins which were seized by the FBI and were sold at auction June 27, 2014. Bitcoin Bidder, Inc. was not successful at the auction and is expected to be dissolved in 2014. |
| | |
Business Description [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Description of the Business |
NaturalNano (the “Company”), located in Rochester, New York, is engaged in the development and commercialization of material science technologies with an emphasis on additives to polymers and other industrial and consumer products by taking advantage of technology advances developed in-house. The Company’s current activities are directed toward research, development, production and marketing of its proprietary technologies relating to the treatment and separation of nanotubes from halloysite clay and the development of related commercial applications for: |
|
| • | cosmetics, health and beauty products; and |
| • | polymers, plastics and composites |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 the Company derived 93% of its total revenue from one customer. |
| | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Estimates |
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate such estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. |
| | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Fair Value Measurement Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). These tiers include: |
|
| · | Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| · | Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
| · | Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. |
|
A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet of cash, accounts receivable, prepaids, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of notes payable approximates their carrying value as the terms of this debt reflects market conditions. The Company’s derivative liability was determined utilizing Level 3 inputs. |
| | |
Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair market value and then is revalued at each reporting date, with changes in fair value reported in the consolidated statement of operations. For stock based derivative financial instruments, the Company estimated the total enterprise value based upon trending the firm value from December 2006 to September 2014 considering company specific factors including the changes in forward estimated revenues and market factors, market multiples for comparable companies, and the Company’s market share price, all equally weighted. Once the enterprise value was determined an option pricing model was used to allocate the enterprise value to the individual derivative securities in the Company’s capital structure. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date. |
| | |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Reclassifications |
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. |
| | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income Taxes |
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 which requires the recognition of estimated income taxes payable or refundable on income tax returns for the current year and for the estimated future tax effect attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards. Measurement of deferred income items is based on enacted tax laws including tax rates, with the measurement of deferred income tax assets being reduced by available tax benefits not expected to be realized. The Company recognizes penalties and accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Income tax expense was $0 for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2014 and 2013. |
| | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income (Loss) Per Share |
Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted income or loss per common share gives effect to dilutive convertible preferred stock, convertible debt, options and warrants outstanding during the period. Shares to be issued upon the exercise of these instruments have not been included in the computation of diluted loss per share as their effect is anti-dilutive based on the net loss incurred. |
|
As of September 30, 2014 and 2013 there were 1,682,479,014 and 6,412,911,665 shares, respectively, underlying preferred stock, convertible debt, outstanding options and warrants that could potentially dilute future earnings. In addition to these potentially dilutive shares as of September 30, 2014 were an additional 2 billion reserved shares underlying the July 23, 2014 Exchange and Right to Shares Agreement with Cape One Master Fund II LLP further described in Note 2 below. |
|
These potentially dilutive shares have been limited by certain debt and equity agreements with lenders. These agreements provide limitations on the conversion of the dilutive instruments such that the number of shares of Common Stock that may be acquired by the holder upon conversion of such instruments shall be limited to ensure that following such conversion the total number of shares of Common Stock then beneficially owned by the holder does not exceed 4.99% of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Company does not have sufficient authorized shares to satisfy conversion of all the potentially dilutive instruments. Approximately 84 million shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 and 4.9 million shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. |
| | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, ”Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern”, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity will be required to provide certain disclosures if conditions of events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-15 on our consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined when we will adopt the standard. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” an updated standard on revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods and services to customers. The updated guidance will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. We have not yet selected a transition method and we are currently evaluating the effect the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. |
| | |