N-CSR
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-06153
Integrity Managed Portfolios
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
1 Main Street North, Minot, ND |
| 58703 |
(Address of principal offices) |
| (Zip code) |
Brent Wheeler and/or Kevin Flagstad, PO Box 500, Minot, ND 58702
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 701-852-5292
Date of fiscal year end: July 31
Date of reporting period: January 29, 2010
Item 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
[Logo]
INTEGRITY MANAGED PORTFOLIOS
Kansas Municipal Fund
Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund
Maine Municipal Fund
Nebraska Municipal Fund
New Hampshire Municipal Fund
Oklahoma Municipal Fund
Semi-Annual Report
January 29, 2010
|
|
Investment Adviser | Principal Underwriter |
Transfer Agent | Custodian |
| |
| |
*The Fund is distributed through Integrity Funds Distributor, LLC. Member FINRA | |
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDERS:
Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Kansas Municipal Fund, Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund, Nebraska Municipal Fund, Oklahoma Municipal Fund, Maine Municipal Fund, and New Hampshire Municipal Fund (each a "Fund", and collectively the "Funds") for the six-months ended January 29, 2010. The Funds' portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.
In a decade in which we have seen the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the U.S. economy was infused with a massive $2.5 trillion dose of fiscal and monetary stimulus over the past five quarters. Encouraged by government efforts to restart the financial system and stimulate the economy, investors who had fled from all but the safest investments in 2008 dove back into the markets during the period. The market benefited from the Federal Reserve's pledge to keep interest rates low for an extended period and the federal government's stimulus dollars.
While we expect 2010 to show positive signs, there maybe some bumps along the way. A major unknown is how the markets will react once the Federal Reserve slows the unprecedented amounts of dollars it has pumped into the economy. Close attention will be paid to the Federal Reserve's exit strategy in the housing market as it slows its purchases of mortgage-backed securities which have kept mortgage rates low through the period. Any rise in the inflation rate due to massive government spending and keeping rates too low for an extended period could lead to a rise in long-term rates that could hurt the housing market and business lending.
Despite these concerns, there are legitimate reasons to be optimistic in 2010 as the natural healing properties of the business cycle should allow for a self-reinforcing recovery to gain traction. During the worst periods of the downturn, businesses aggressively shed workers, liquidated inventories and postponed capital investments as global and domestic demand slowed. While these adjustments were painful, they set the stage for a markedly improved economic cycle to develop.
As is often the case in the financial world, one year of extremes in one direction can often be followed by an equally powerful swing in the other direction. The municipal markets experienced one of its best performances on record during the period from one of gloom and panic that the market experienced in 2008.
As with most investments, municipals began the period with a very negative and uncertain outlook because of investors concerns over states and municipalities ability to pay due to decreased tax revenues and balancing states budgets. However, as U.S. government treasury yields approached historic lows, yields offered by municipal bonds as a percentage of treasuries approached historic highs and investors saw opportunities not seen in decades and demand for municipal bonds took off providing much of the force for the strong returns for the period.
Another factor affecting the municipal market was the creation of the administration's "Build America Bonds" program. This program allows municipalities to issue bonds on a taxable basis while the federal government rebates 35% of the interest rate cost to the issuer. The effect of the Build America Bonds program as more of these taxable issues were brought to market was to reduce supply of tax-free municipals. This reduction in supply also increased the demand tax-free bonds.
The Kansas Municipal Fund began the period at $10.45 per share and ended the period at $10.61 per share for a total return of 3.38%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index's return of 4.90%. A primary function of the Fund is to search the primary and secondary markets for high quality issues for the Fund. Some recent purchases during the period include: Junction City General Obligations, 4.40% coupon, due 2022; Manhattan North Project, 5.00% coupon, due 2026; and Kansas Development Finance Authority State Projects, 5.00% coupon, due 2034.
The Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund began the period at $11.09 per share and ended the period at $11.15 per share for a total return of 2.27%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal 7-Year Bond Index's return of 3.15%. A primary function of the Fund is to search the primary and secondary markets for high quality issues for the Fund. Some recent purchases during the period include: Dodge City Sales Tax, 5.00% coupon, due 2021; Topeka Utility 4.25% coupon, due 2021; and Leavenworth County USD #453, 5.25% coupon, due 2024.
The Nebraska Municipal Fund began the period at $10.01 per share and ended the period at $10.11 per share for a total return of 2.71%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index's return of 4.90%. A primary function of the Fund is to search the primary and secondary markets for high quality issues for the Fund. Some recent purchases during the period include: Madison County Schools, 5.00% coupon, due 2025; Omaha General Obligations, 5.00% coupon, due 2025; and Scottsbluff County Schools, 4.30% coupon, due 2029.
The Oklahoma Municipal Fund began the period at $10.78 per share and ended the period at $11.00 per share for a total return of 3.86%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index's return of 4.90%. A primary function of the Fund is to search the primary and secondary markets for high quality issues for the Fund. Some recent purchases during the period include: Tulsa Airport, 5.75% coupon, due 2031; Pawnee County Sales Tax, 4.875% coupon, due 2030; and Sallisaw Utility, 4.45% coupon, due 2028.
The Maine Municipal Fund began the period at $10.62 per share and ended the period at $10.73 per share for a total return of 2.66%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index's return of 4.90%. A primary function of the Fund is to search the primary and secondary markets for high quality issues for the Fund. Some recent purchases during the period include: Maine Housing Authority, 4.70% coupon, due 2027; Portland Water District, 4.25% coupon, due 2027; and University of Maine, 4.635% coupon, due 2029.
The New Hampshire Municipal Fund began the period at $10.50 per share and ended the period at $10.61 per share for a total return of 2.57%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index's return of 4.90%. A primary function of the Fund is to search the primary and secondary markets for high quality issues for the Fund. Some recent purchases during the period include: New Hampshire Health & Education, 5.00% coupon, due 2024; New Hampshire Housing, 4.625% coupon, due 2025; and New Hampshire Municipal Bond Bank, 4.00% coupon, due 2025.
Income exempt from federal income tax and each Fund's respective state tax (interest and dividend tax with respect to New Hampshire) with preservation of capital remains the primary objective of the Funds.
As we enter 2010, we feel improving economics will support the outlook for tax-free investments. While state budget balancing and lower municipality revenues continue to persist, economic recovery will eventually put more people to work who will consume and pay taxes. This, with the possibility of higher taxes on the federal and possibly the state level, will continue to support the need for tax-free investing.
If you would like more frequent updates, please visit the Funds' website at www.integrityvikingfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.
Sincerely,
Monte Avery
Senior Portfolio Manager
The views expressed are those of Monte Avery, Senior Portfolio Manager with Viking Fund Management, LLC ("Viking Fund Management", "VFM", or the "Adviser"). The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector, the markets generally, or any of the funds in the Integrity Viking family of funds.
*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance. For Kansas Municipal Fund, Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund, Nebraska Municipal Fund, Oklahoma Municipal Fund, Maine Municipal Fund, and New Hampshire Municipal Fund, the total annual fund operating expense ratio (before expense waivers and reimbursements and including acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.36%, 1.36%, 1.58%, 1.42%, 3.21%, and 1.36%, respectively. The net annual fund operating expense ratio (after expense waivers and reimbursements and excluding acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.07%, 0.75%, 1.07%, 1.07%, 1.07%, and 1.07%, respectively.
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
Bond prices and therefore the value of bond funds decline as interest rates rise. Because each Fund invest in securities of a single state, the Funds are more susceptible to factors adversely impacting the respective state securities more so than a municipal bond fund that does not concentrate its securities in a single state.
For investors subject to the alternative minimum tax, a portion of the each Fund's dividends may be taxable. Distributions of capital gains are generally taxable.
KANSAS MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund and the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index
| Kansas Municipal Fund without Sales Charge | Kansas Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
7/30/1999 | $10,000 | $ 9,576 | $10,000 |
7/31/2000 | $10,169 | $ 9,738 | $10,431 |
7/31/2001 | $10,996 | $10,530 | $11,484 |
7/31/2002 | $11,378 | $10,896 | $12,255 |
7/31/2003 | $11,293 | $10,815 | $12,695 |
7/30/2004 | $11,487 | $11,000 | $13,429 |
7/29/2005 | $11,511 | $11,024 | $14,284 |
7/31/2006 | $12,016 | $11,507 | $14,649 |
7/31/2007 | $12,384 | $11,859 | $15,273 |
7/31/2008 | $12,743 | $12,203 | $15,708 |
7/31/2009 | $13,260 | $12,698 | $16,510 |
1/29/2010 | $13,708 | $13,128 | $17,319 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ending January 29, 2010
| 1 year | 3 year | 5 year | 10 year | Since Inception |
Without sales charge | 8.91% | 3.91% | 3.54% | 3.37% | 4.48% |
With sales charge (4.25%) | 4.26% | 2.42% | 2.65% | 2.92% | 4.25% |
Putting Performance into Perspective
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund's performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund's total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.
The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
KANSAS INSURED INTERMEDIATE FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund and the Barclays Capital Municipal Seven-Year Maturity Bond Index
| Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund without Sales Charge | Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund with Maximum Sales Charge | Barclays Capital Municipal Seven-Year Maturity Bond Index |
7/30/1999 | $10,000 | $ 9,724 | $10,000 |
7/31/2000 | $10,215 | $ 9,934 | $10,459 |
7/31/2001 | $10,903 | $10,602 | $11,419 |
7/31/2002 | $11,352 | $11,038 | $12,233 |
7/31/2003 | $11,495 | $11,178 | $12,705 |
7/30/2004 | $11,761 | $11,436 | $13,283 |
7/29/2005 | $11,673 | $11,351 | $13,808 |
7/31/2006 | $12,147 | $11,812 | $14,105 |
7/31/2007 | $12,553 | $12,207 | $14,660 |
7/31/2008 | $13,133 | $12,770 | $15,515 |
7/31/2009 | $13,818 | $13,437 | $16,757 |
1/29/2010 | $14,131 | $13,741 | $17,285 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ending January 29, 2010
| 1 year | 3 year | 5 year | 10 year | Since Inception |
Without sales charge | 5.37% | 4.57 % | 3.82% | 3.56% | 4.01% |
With sales charge (2.75%) | 2.47% | 3.60% | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.84% |
Putting Performance into Perspective
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund's performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund's total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.
The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
NEBRASKA MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund and the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index
| Nebraska Municipal Fund without Sales Charge | Nebraska Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
7/30/1999 | $10,000 | $ 9,574 | $10,000 |
7/31/2000 | $10,228 | $ 9,793 | $10,431 |
7/31/2001 | $11,253 | $10,774 | $11,484 |
7/31/2002 | $11,710 | $11,211 | $12,255 |
7/31/2003 | $11,616 | $11,121 | $12,695 |
7/30/2004 | $12,032 | $11,520 | $13,429 |
7/29/2005 | $12,010 | $11,498 | $14,284 |
7/31/2006 | $12,599 | $12,062 | $14,649 |
7/31/2007 | $12,997 | $12,443 | $15,273 |
7/31/2008 | $13,359 | $12,790 | $15,708 |
7/31/2009 | $13,854 | $13,264 | $16,510 |
1/29/2010 | $14,230 | $13,624 | $17,319 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ending January 29, 2010
| 1 year | 3 year | 5 year | 10 year | Since Inception |
Without sales charge | 7.10% | 3.49% | 3.46% | 3.75% | 3.80% |
With sales charge (4.25%) | 2.59% | 2.01% | 2.56% | 3.30% | 3.52% |
Putting Performance into Perspective
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund's performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund's total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.
The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund and the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index
| Oklahoma Municipal Fund without Sales Charge | Oklahoma Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
7/30/1999 | $10,000 | $ 9,571 | $10,000 |
7/31/2000 | $ 9,988 | $ 9,560 | $10,431 |
7/31/2001 | $10,965 | $10,495 | $11,484 |
7/31/2002 | $11,563 | $11,067 | $12,255 |
7/31/2003 | $11,595 | $11,098 | $12,695 |
7/30/2004 | $12,020 | $11,505 | $13,429 |
7/29/2005 | $12,383 | $11,852 | $14,284 |
7/31/2006 | $12,927 | $12,373 | $14,649 |
7/31/2007 | $13,328 | $12,756 | $15,273 |
7/31/2008 | $13,462 | $12,885 | $15,708 |
7/31/2009 | $14,038 | $13,437 | $16,510 |
1/29/2010 | $14,580 | $13,955 | $17,319 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ending January 29, 2010
| 1 year | 3 year | 5 year | 10 year | Since Inception |
Without sales charge | 10.79% | 3.36% | 3.50% | 4.14% | 4.07% |
With sales charge (4.25%) | 6.06% | 1.89% | 2.61% | 3.69% | 3.73% |
Putting Performance into Perspective
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund's performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund's total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.
The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
MAINE MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund and the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index
| Maine Municipal Fund without Sales Charge | Maine Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
7/30/1999 | $10,000 | $ 9,575 | $10,000 |
7/31/2000 | $10,381 | $ 9,940 | $10,431 |
7/31/2001 | $11,205 | $10,728 | $11,484 |
7/31/2002 | $11,784 | $11,283 | $12,255 |
7/31/2003 | $12,047 | $11,535 | $12,695 |
7/30/2004 | $12,523 | $11,990 | $13,429 |
7/29/2005 | $12,430 | $11,901 | $14,284 |
7/31/2006 | $12,942 | $12,391 | $14,649 |
7/31/2007 | $13,316 | $12,750 | $15,273 |
7/31/2008 | $13,772 | $13,186 | $15,708 |
7/31/2009 | $14,491 | $13,875 | $16,510 |
1/29/2010 | $14,876 | $14,243 | $17,319 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ending January 29, 2010
| 1 year | 3 year | 5 year | 10 year | Since Inception |
Without sales charge | 5.12% | 4.14% | 3.56% | 4.17% | 4.85% |
With sales charge (4.25%) | 0.63% | 2.64% | 2.68% | 3.72% | 4.60% |
Putting Performance into Perspective
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund's performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund's total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.
The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund and the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index
| New Hampshire Municipal Fund without Sales Charge | New Hampshire Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge | Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
7/30/1999 | $10,000 | $ 9,573 | $10,000 |
7/31/2000 | $10,354 | $ 9,912 | $10,431 |
7/31/2001 | $11,116 | $10,641 | $11,484 |
7/31/2002 | $11,696 | $11,196 | $12,255 |
7/31/2003 | $11,970 | $11,458 | $12,695 |
7/30/2004 | $12,537 | $12,001 | $13,429 |
7/29/2005 | $12,310 | $11,784 | $14,284 |
7/31/2006 | $12,773 | $12,227 | $14,649 |
7/31/2007 | $13,159 | $12,597 | $15,273 |
7/31/2008 | $13,648 | $13,065 | $15,708 |
7/31/2009 | $14,282 | $13,672 | $16,510 |
1/29/2010 | $14,649 | $14,023 | $17,319 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ending January 29, 2010
| 1 year | 3 year | 5 year | 10 year | Since Inception |
Without sales charge | 6.14% | 4.03% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 4.46% |
With sales charge (4.25%) | 1.60% | 2.52% | 2.55% | 3.56% | 4.20% |
Putting Performance into Perspective
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund's performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund's total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.
The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
KANSAS MUNICIPAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
MUNICIPAL BONDS (100.3%) |
| Principal |
| Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Education (8.1%) |
|
|
|
|
Hutchinson, KS Community College 5.000% 10/1/25 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 357,518 |
Hutchinson, KS Community College 5.250% 10/1/30 |
| 300,000 |
| 304,188 |
Hutchinson, KS Community College 5.250% 10/1/33 |
| 450,000 |
| 453,978 |
KS Dev. Fin. Auth. Sales Tax Rev. K-St-Olathe Innovation-L1 5.000% 9/1/39 |
| 200,000 |
| 204,800 |
KS St Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev Univ Kansas Tenant 5.000% 6/15/39 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 997,840 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (Univ. KS Research Cent.) 5.000% 02/01/26 |
| 500,000 |
| 517,000 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (Athletic Facs. University of KS) 5.000% 6/1/33 |
| 250,000 |
| 254,000 |
Washburn Univ. (Living Learning Ctr.) Bldg. Rev. 5.000% 7/1/19 |
| 700,000 |
| 745,465 |
|
|
|
| 3,834,789 |
General Obligation (26.9%) |
|
|
|
|
Cowley Cnty., KS USD #465 (Winfield) 5.250% 10/1/14 |
| 250,000 |
| 286,402 |
Dickinson Cnty, KS USD #473 09/01/27 5.000% 9/1/27 |
| 325,000 |
| 354,526 |
Dodge, KS School District #443 5.000% 9/1/11 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,052,580 |
Douglas Cty., KS Sales Tax Ref. 5.000% 8/1/19 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,068,280 |
Douglas Cnty, KS Uni Sch Dist 491 Eudora Sch Bldg 5.125% 9/1/29 |
| 250,000 |
| 258,402 |
Harvey Cty., KS USD #373 (Newton) 5.000% 9/1/23 |
| 200,000 |
| 216,874 |
Harvey Cty., KS USD #373 (Newton) 5.000% 9/1/25 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,059,580 |
*Johnson Cty., KS USD #231 Gardner-Edgerton 5.000% 10/1/24 |
| 1,135,000 |
| 1,160,503 |
Johnson Cty., KS USD #232 (Desoto) 5.250% 9/1/23 |
| 500,000 |
| 542,280 |
Junction City, KS Ref & Impt 5.000% 9/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,330 |
Junction City, KS Unlimited GO 4.100% 9/1/20 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,490 |
Junction City, KS Unlimited GO 4.250% 9/1/21 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,805 |
Junction City, KS Unlimited GO 4.400% 9/1/22 |
| 100,000 |
| 104,921 |
Lawrence, KS (Unlimited Tax) Refunding G.O. 5.375% 9/1/20 |
| 500,000 |
| 512,030 |
Leavenworth Cnty. USD #453 GO Improvement & Refunding 5.125% 3/1/29 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,068,660 |
Manhattan, KS General Obligation 5.000% 11/1/28 |
| 130,000 |
| 141,188 |
Montgomery County, KS USD #446 09/01/33 5.000% 9/1/33 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,587 |
Newton, KS Unlimited G.O. 4.750% 9/1/29 |
| 435,000 |
| 452,826 |
Park City, KS 6.000% 12/1/29 |
| 500,000 |
| 552,345 |
Park City, KS General Obligation Ref & Impr. 5.375% 12/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 244,115 |
Reno Cty., KS USD #308 Hutchinson 4.500% 9/1/23 |
| 500,000 |
| 521,965 |
Salina, KS (General Obligation) 4.625% 10/1/27 |
| 200,000 |
| 207,458 |
Sedgwick Cnty Kans Uni Sch Dist #262 5.000% 9/1/28 |
| 500,000 |
| 531,865 |
Shawnee Cty., KS G.O. 5.000% 9/1/16 |
| 655,000 |
| 746,779 |
Topeka, KS G.O. 5.000% 8/15/21 |
| 400,000 |
| 407,432 |
Wyandotte Cnty., KS General Obligation 5.000% 8/1/27 |
| 500,000 |
| 532,795 |
|
|
|
| 12,750,018 |
Health Care (20.4%) |
|
|
|
|
Coffeyville, KS Pub. Bldg. (Coffeyville Medl. Center) Rev. 5.000% 8/1/22 |
| 250,000 |
| 255,065 |
KS Devl. Fin. Auth. Sisters of Charity Leavenworth 5.125% 12/1/18 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,026 |
KS ST Dev Fin Auth. Hosp. Rev. Adventist Health 5.150% 11/15/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 262,668 |
KS St Dev Fin Auth Rev Adventist Health 5.250% 11/15/24 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,653 |
KS St Dev Fin Auth Hosp Rev Adventist Health 5.500% 11/15/29 |
| 100,000 |
| 102,212 |
KS St Dev Fin Auth. Adventist Health 5.750% 11/15/34 |
| 250,000 |
| 254,373 |
KS Devl. Fin. Auth. (Sisters of Charity) Hlth. Rev. 6.125% 12/1/20 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,022,150 |
KS Devl. Fin. Auth. (Hays Medical Center) 5.000% 11/15/22 |
| 500,000 |
| 513,840 |
*KS Devl. Fin. Auth. (Stormont Vail) Hlth. Care Rev. - Unref. 5.375% 11/15/24 |
| 1,365,000 |
| 1,378,200 |
Lawrence, KS (Memorial Hospital) Rev. 5.125% 7/1/26 |
| 500,000 |
| 501,370 |
Lawrence, KS (Memorial Hospital) Rev. 5.125% 7/1/36 |
| 300,000 |
| 275,490 |
Lincoln Cnty., KS Public Bldg (Lincoln County Hosp) 5.000% 3/1/28 |
| 125,000 |
| 137,309 |
Manhattan, KS Hosp. Rev. Mercy Health Center 5.500% 8/15/20 |
| 250,000 |
| 253,052 |
Olathe, KS (Medl. Ctr.) Hlth. Facs. Rev. 5.500% 9/1/25 |
| 235,000 |
| 236,384 |
Olathe, KS (Medl. Ctr.) Hlth. Facs. Rev. 5.500% 9/1/30 |
| 500,000 |
| 501,510 |
Olathe, Health Fac Rev (Med Center) 5.000% 9/1/29 |
| 500,000 |
| 483,885 |
Sedgwick Cnty, KS (Catholic Care Center) Hlth Care Rev 5.800% 11/15/26 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,002,460 |
Sedgwick Cnty, KS Health Care Rev. (Catholic Care Center) 5.000% 8/1/25 |
| 1,100,000 |
| 988,270 |
Wichita, KS (Via Christi Health System) Rev. 5.625% 11/15/31 |
|
|
| 1,108,569 |
|
|
|
| 9,636,486 |
Housing (11.0%) |
|
|
|
|
*Olathe, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Bristol Pointe) Rev. Ref. 5.700% 11/1/27 |
| 2,210,000 |
| 2,211,525 |
Wichita, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Broadmoor Chelsea) Rev. 5.650% 7/1/16 |
| 990,000 |
| 990,465 |
Wichita, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Broadmoor Chelsea) Rev. 5.700% 7/1/22 |
| 2,000,000 |
| 2,000,740 |
|
|
|
| 5,202,730 |
Other Revenue (11.9%) |
|
|
|
|
Butler Cnty., KS Public Bldg. 5.550% 10/1/21 |
| 300,000 |
| 308,418 |
Dodge City, KS Sales Tax Rev 5.250% 6/1/31 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,057,100 |
Kansas City, KS Mrtge. Rev. 5.900% 11/1/27 |
| 200,000 |
| 200,244 |
KS St Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev (Juvenile Justice) 5.250% 5/1/13 |
| 570,000 |
| 601,378 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. (KS St. Projects) Rev. 5.000% 10/1/17 |
| 250,000 |
| 261,810 |
*KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (KS St. Projects) 5.000% 5/1/26 |
| 1,335,000 |
| 1,408,612 |
KS St Dev Fin Auth Rev State of KS Projects 5.000% 11/1/34 |
| 500,000 |
| 519,620 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (KS St. Projects) 5.250% 11/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 273,428 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (KS St. Projects) 5.000% 5/1/35 |
| 250,000 |
| 258,400 |
Manhattan, KS Sales Tax Rev. Downtown Redevelopment 5.250% 12/1/26 |
| 250,000 |
| 249,233 |
Manhattan, KS Spl Oblig Rev North Proj Area - Downtown A 5.000% 12/1/26 |
| 500,000 |
| 495,635 |
|
|
|
| 5,633,878 |
Prerefunded (0.8%) |
|
|
|
|
KS St Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev (Dept of Admin Cap Rest) 5.375% 10/1/20 |
| 370,000 |
| 382,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation (5.2%) |
|
|
|
|
Kansas Dept. Transportation Highway Rev. 5.000% 3/1/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 265,367 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (Dept. Admin.) 5.000% 11/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 266,478 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (Road Revolving Fund) 4.625% 10/1/26 |
| 250,000 |
| 264,275 |
KS Turnpike Auth. Rev. 5.250% 9/1/21 |
| 500,000 |
| 527,395 |
KS Turnpike Auth. Rev. 5.000% 9/1/24 |
| 330,000 |
| 341,289 |
KS Turnpike Auth. Rev. 5.000% 9/1/25 |
| 750,000 |
| 773,325 |
|
|
|
| 2,438,129 |
Utilities (16.0%) |
|
|
|
|
Burlington, KS PCR (Gas & Elec.) 5.300% 6/1/31 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 986,060 |
Burlington, KS PCR (Gas & Elec.) 4.850% 6/1/31 |
| 500,000 |
| 483,600 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. (Water Pollution Control) Rev. 5.250% 5/1/11 |
| 250,000 |
| 250,152 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. (Water Pollution Control) Rev. 5.250% 11/1/22 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,054,740 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. (Water Pollution Control) 5.000% 11/1/23 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,039,810 |
*KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (Water Pollution) 5.000% 11/1/28 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,570 |
Wamego, KS PCR (Kansas Gas & Electric Project) 5.300% 6/1/31 |
| 750,000 |
| 752,528 |
Wichita, KS Water & Sewer Util. Rev. 5.250% 10/1/18 |
| 1,465,000 |
| 1,570,949 |
Wichita, KS Water & Sewer Util. Rev. 5.000% 10/1/28 |
| 500,000 |
| 509,750 |
Wichita, KS Water & Sewer Rev. 5.000% 10/1/23 |
| 100,000 |
| 109,123 |
Wyandotte Cnty/Kansas City, KS Govt Utilitiy Sys Rev. 5.000% 9/1/29 |
| 500,000 |
| 541,125 |
|
|
|
| 7,557,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $46,310,930) |
|
| $ | 47,436,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (0.8%) |
| Shares |
|
|
Wells Fargo Advantage National Tax-Free Money Market (COST: $383,033) | 383,033 | $ | 383,033 | |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $46,693,963) |
|
| $ | 47,819,120 |
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES |
|
|
| (508,861) |
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
| $ | 47,310,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Indicates bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. | ||||
As of January 29, 2010, the Fund had one when-issued purchase: |
|
| ||
1,000,000 of Sedgwick County Health Care Rev., 5.000%; 08/01/25 |
|
| ||
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
KANSAS INSURED INTERMEDIATE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
MUNICIPAL BONDS (94.9%) |
| Principal |
| Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Education (4.5%) |
|
|
|
|
Johnson Cty., KS Community College Student Commons & Parking 5.000% 11/15/19 | $ | 235,000 | $ | 246,202 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. (Wichita Univ.) 5.900% 4/1/15 |
| 305,000 |
| 307,580 |
Washburn Univ. (Living Learning Ctr.) Bldg. Rev. 5.000% 7/1/19 |
| 255,000 |
| 271,562 |
|
|
|
| 825,344 |
General Obligation (46.9%) |
|
|
|
|
*Butler Cnty, KS USD #385 5.000% 9/1/18 |
| 500,000 |
| 566,320 |
Butler Cnty., KS USD #402 5.250% 9/1/21 |
| 250,000 |
| 283,535 |
Cowley Cnty., KS USD #465 (Winfield) 5.250% 10/1/14 |
| 140,000 |
| 160,385 |
Cowley Cnty., KS USD #470 4.750% 9/1/23 |
| 100,000 |
| 106,397 |
Crawford Cnty., KS School Distist 5.000% 9/1/20 |
| 300,000 |
| 336,417 |
Dickinson Cnty, KS USD #473 4.500% 9/1/22 |
| 215,000 |
| 231,598 |
Douglas Cnty, KS Uni Sch Dist 491 Eudora Sch Bldg 5.000% 9/1/23 |
| 375,000 |
| 402,536 |
Ford Cnty., KS Sales Tax - Ser A 4.500% 9/1/24 |
| 500,000 |
| 524,885 |
Harvey Cty., KS USD #373 (Newton) 4.000% 9/1/18 |
| 250,000 |
| 256,960 |
Johnson Cty., KS USD #232 (Desoto) 5.000% 9/1/15 |
| 100,000 |
| 115,402 |
Junction City., KS Unlimited GO 4.500% 9/1/23 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,325 |
Leavenworth Cnty. KS, USD #453 4.750% 3/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 263,233 |
Leavenworth Cnty. USD #453 GO Improvement & Refunding 5.250% 3/1/24 |
| 200,000 |
| 219,440 |
Leavenworth Cnty. USD#453 4.750% 9/1/25 |
| 300,000 |
| 315,636 |
Leavenworth Cnty., KS USD #458 4.500% 9/1/28 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,455 |
Leoti, KS USD #467 5.000% 10/1/18 |
| 100,000 |
| 111,996 |
Montgomery County, KS USD #446 4.000% 9/1/19 |
| 150,000 |
| 155,237 |
Montgomery County, KS USM #445 5.000% 4/1/21 |
| 100,000 |
| 101,168 |
Morton Cty., KS USD #217 4.000% 9/1/10 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,068 |
Neosho County, KS USD #413 5.000% 9/1/20 |
| 345,000 |
| 366,742 |
Newton, KS Unlimited G.O. 5.000% 9/1/21 |
| 100,000 |
| 110,811 |
Olathe, Kansas General Obligation 4.000% 10/1/19 |
| 100,000 |
| 105,050 |
Park City, KS 5.100% 12/1/20 |
| 200,000 |
| 220,782 |
Park City, KS 5.500% 12/1/24 |
| 100,000 |
| 111,790 |
Puerto Rico Commonwealth Public Improvement 5.500% 7/1/21 |
| 500,000 |
| 513,110 |
Saline Cty., KS USD #305 (Salina) G.O. Ref. 5.500% 9/1/15 |
| 190,000 |
| 204,505 |
Sedgwick Cnty USD #266 Maize School 5.250% 9/1/20 |
| 360,000 |
| 407,668 |
Sedgwick Cnty., KS USD #265 (Goddard) 4.250% 10/1/20 |
| 250,000 |
| 256,547 |
Sedgwick Cnty., KS USD #265 (Goddard) 4.500% 10/1/26 |
| 250,000 |
| 262,555 |
Sedgwick County KS UNI School Dist. #262 5.000% 9/1/18 |
| 100,000 |
| 115,175 |
Shawnee Cty., KS USD #437 (Auburn-Washburn) G.O. Ref. 5.000% 9/1/14 |
| 485,000 |
| 514,556 |
Wichita, KS GO 4.500% 9/1/22 |
| 150,000 |
| 158,918 |
Wichita, KS GO 4.750% 9/1/27 |
| 180,000 |
| 188,915 |
Wyandotte Cnty, KS. GO 5.000% 8/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 270,780 |
Wyandotte Cnty., KS USD #500 G.O. 5.250% 9/1/13 |
| 250,000 |
| 286,312 |
|
|
|
| 8,701,209 |
Health Care (6.9%) |
|
|
|
|
*KS Devl. Finance Auth. (Stormont Vail) Hlth. Care Rev. 5.750% 11/15/12 |
| 595,000 |
| 639,815 |
Lincoln Cnty., KS Public Bldg (Lincoln County Hosp) 5.000% 3/1/28 |
| 125,000 |
| 137,309 |
Manhattan, KS Hosp. Rev. Mercy Health Center 5.500% 8/15/20 |
| 500,000 |
| 506,105 |
|
|
|
| 1,283,229 |
Housing (9.3%) |
|
|
|
|
KS Devl. Finance Auth. (Sec. 8) Rev. Ref. 6.400% 1/1/24 |
| 255,000 |
| 255,089 |
*Mission, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Lamar Place) Rev. 5.000% 10/1/14 |
| 520,000 |
| 520,556 |
Mission, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Lamar Place) Rev. 5.180% 10/1/23 |
| 445,000 |
| 445,031 |
Olathe, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Bristol Pointe) Rev. Ref. 5.250% 11/1/12 |
| 310,000 |
| 310,481 |
*Shawnee, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Thomasbrooks Apts.) Rev. 5.250% 10/1/14 |
| 150,000 |
| 150,078 |
Wichita, KS Multifamily Hsg. (Broadmoor Chelsea) Rev. 5.375% 7/1/10 |
| 55,000 |
| 55,024 |
|
|
|
| 1,736,259 |
Other Revenue (12.9%) |
|
|
|
|
Dodge City, KS Sales Tax Rev 5.000% 6/1/21 |
| 310,000 |
| 337,714 |
Dodge City, KS Sales Tax Rev 4.400% 6/1/25 |
| 350,000 |
| 359,237 |
KS Devl Fin. Auth. Kansas Projects 5.250% 10/1/22 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,860 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. (KS St. Projects) Rev. 5.000% 10/1/17 |
| 250,000 |
| 261,810 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (KS St. Projects) 4.100% 5/1/19 |
| 250,000 |
| 260,553 |
KS Devl. Finance Auth. Rev. (KS St. Projects) 5.250% 11/1/25 |
| 100,000 |
| 109,371 |
Neosho County, KS Sales Tax Rev 4.000% 10/1/23 |
| 500,000 |
| 498,215 |
Sumner Cnty., KS Sales Tax Rev. 5.000% 10/1/14 |
| 400,000 |
| 456,480 |
|
|
|
| 2,387,240 |
Prerefunded (4.5%) |
|
|
|
|
Chisholm Creek Util. Auth. (Bel Aire & Park City, KS Pj.) 5.250% 9/1/16 |
| 770,000 |
| 842,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation (1.1%) |
|
|
|
|
KS Turnpike Auth. Rev. 5.000% 9/1/24 |
| 200,000 |
| 206,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (8.8%) |
|
|
|
|
Burlington, KS PCR (Gas & Elec.) 5.300% 6/1/31 |
| 100,000 |
| 98,606 |
Kansas City, KS Util. Syst. Ref. & Impvt. 6.300% 9/1/16 |
| 440,000 |
| 440,198 |
Topeka, KS Utilities Rev 4.250% 8/1/21 |
| 150,000 |
| 151,347 |
Wichita, KS Water & Sewer Rev. 5.000% 10/1/23 |
| 200,000 |
| 218,246 |
*Wyandotte Cnty/Kansas City, KS Govt Utilitiy Sys Rev 5.125% 9/1/13 |
| 500,000 |
| 505,335 |
Wyandotte Cnty/Kansas City, KS Govt Utilitiy Sys Rev. 5.000% 9/1/24 |
| 200,000 |
| 224,452 |
|
|
|
| 1,638,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $17,105,220) |
|
| $ | 17,621,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (2.4%) |
| Shares |
|
|
Wells Fargo Advantage National Tax-Free Money Market (COST: $440,140) |
| 440,140 | $ | 440,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $17,545,360) |
|
| $ | 18,061,435 |
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES |
|
|
| 504,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
| $ | 18,566,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Indicates bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
NEBRASKA MUNICIPAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
MUNICIPAL BONDS (96.9%) |
| Principal |
| Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Education (12.8%) |
|
|
|
|
Douglas Cty., NE SD #010 (Elkhorn Public Schools) 4.500% 12/15/26 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 509,175 |
University of NE Fac. Corp. Deferred Maintenance 5.000% 7/15/20 |
| 500,000 |
| 537,480 |
Univ. of NE Board of Regents Student Facs. 5.000% 5/15/32 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,928 |
Univ. of NE Board of Regents (Heath & Rec. Proj.) 5.000% 5/15/33 |
| 600,000 |
| 626,250 |
University NE University Rev. Lincoln Student Fee 4.000% 7/1/24 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,580 |
Univ. of NE (U. of NE - Lincoln Student Fees) Rev. 5.125% 7/1/32 |
| 250,000 |
| 255,563 |
University of NE University Rev. Lincoln Student Facs. 5.000% 7/1/28 |
| 250,000 |
| 257,798 |
University of Puerto Rico 5.000% 6/1/17 |
| 1,250,000 |
| 1,247,263 |
|
|
|
| 3,946,037 |
General Obligation (38.5%) |
|
|
|
|
Dawson Cnty, NE SID #1 G.O. Ref (IBP, Inc. Proj.) 5.650% 2/1/22 |
| 700,000 |
| 595,686 |
Dawson Cty., NE School Dist. #20 (Gothenburg) G.O. 4.500% 12/15/25 |
| 405,000 |
| 405,174 |
*Dodge Cty., NE SD #001 (Fremont Public Schools) 5.500% 12/15/20 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,046,000 |
Douglas Cty., NE G.O. 4.750% 12/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 251,095 |
Douglas Cty, NE Hosp. Methodist Health 5.500% 11/1/38 |
| 250,000 |
| 251,400 |
Douglas Cty., NE SID #397 (Linden Estates II) 5.600% 4/1/23 |
| 500,000 |
| 500,060 |
Douglas Cty., NE SD #010 (Elkhorn Pub. Schools) G.O. 4.500% 12/15/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,770 |
Douglas Cnty School Dist #59 Bennington Public Schools 4.000% 12/15/28 |
| 250,000 |
| 239,690 |
Hall Cty., NE School Dist. #2 Grand Island 5.000% 12/15/23 |
| 500,000 |
| 544,775 |
Lancaster Cty., NE School Dist. #1 (Lincoln Public Schools) 5.250% 1/15/21 |
| 500,000 |
| 515,390 |
Lancaster Cty., NE School Dist. #1 (Lincoln Public Schools) G.O. 5.250% 1/15/22 |
| 500,000 |
| 526,170 |
Lancaster Cnty School Dist #160 Norris Schools 4.250% 12/15/25 |
| 400,000 |
| 398,600 |
Madison County School Dist #2 (Norfolk) 5.000% 12/15/25 |
| 1,545,000 |
| 1,630,485 |
Metropolitan Community College South Omaha Bldg. Proj. 4.500% 3/1/26 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,022,550 |
Omaha, NE Various Purpose 5.000% 5/1/22 |
| 250,000 |
| 264,248 |
Omaha, NE Various Purpose 4.250% 10/15/26 |
| 500,000 |
| 515,080 |
Omaha, NEB Unlimited GO 5.000% 10/15/25 |
| 500,000 |
| 558,785 |
Papillion, NE G.O. 4.350% 12/15/27 |
| 250,000 |
| 251,103 |
Puerto Rico Commonwealth Public Improvement 5.500% 7/1/21 |
| 500,000 |
| 513,110 |
Sarpy Count School Dist.#27 Papillion-LA Vista GO 5.000% 12/1/28 |
| 250,000 |
| 264,462 |
Saunders Cty., NE G.O. 5.000% 11/1/30 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,007 |
Saunders Cty., NE G.O. 4.250% 12/15/21 |
| 515,000 |
| 521,777 |
Scotts Bluff Cnty NE Sch Dist #32 GO Building Bonds 4.300% 12/15/29 |
| 440,000 |
| 435,186 |
Washington Cnty S/D#1 (Blair) 3.750% 12/15/13 |
| 105,000 |
| 111,366 |
|
|
|
| 11,866,969 |
Health Care (12.8%) |
|
|
|
|
Adams Cnty, NE Hosp Auth #1 Hosp Rev (Mary Lanning Memorial Hosp.) 5.300% 12/15/18 |
| 250,000 |
| 250,207 |
Adams Cnty, NE Hosp Auth #1 Hosp Rev (Mary Lanning Memorial Hosp.) 5.250% 12/15/33 |
| 250,000 |
| 232,402 |
Douglas Cty., NE Hosp. Auth. #001 (Alegent Hlth - Immanuel Med. Ctr.) Rev. 5.250% 9/1/21 |
| 250,000 |
| 236,057 |
Douglas Cty., NE Hosp. Auth. #002 (Nebraska Medical Center) 5.000% 11/15/16 |
| 250,000 |
| 269,257 |
Douglas Cty., NE (Catholic Health Corp.) Rev. 5.375% 11/15/15 |
| 160,000 |
| 160,402 |
Douglas County, NE Hosp. Methodist Health 5.500% 11/1/38 |
| 500,000 |
| 471,265 |
Lancaster Cnty Neb Hosp Auth No 1 (Bryanlg Med Center) 4.000% 6/1/10 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,100 |
*Lancaster Cty., NE Hosp. Auth. #1 (BryanLGH Medical Center Project) 4.750% 6/1/21 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 962,250 |
NE Invmt. Finance Auth. (Great Plains Regional Medical Center) Rev. 5.450% 11/15/22 |
| 750,000 |
| 762,675 |
Platte Cty., NE Hosp. Auth. No. 1 (Columbus Community Hospital Proj.) Hosp. Rev. 5.650% 5/1/12 |
| 100,000 |
| 101,940 |
Platte Cty., NE Hosp. Auth. No. 1 (Columbus Community Hospital Proj.) Hosp. Rev. 6.150% 5/1/30 |
| 250,000 |
| 251,137 |
|
|
|
| 3,949,692 |
Housing (0.4%) |
|
|
|
|
NE Invmt. Finance Auth. Multifamily Hsg. Rev. 6.200% 6/1/28 |
| 135,000 |
| 135,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue (4.5%) |
|
|
|
|
Lincoln-Lancaster County Neb. Pub. Bldg. Lease Rev. 4.000% 10/15/30 |
| 100,000 |
| 97,616 |
*Omaha, NE (Riverfront Project) Special Obligation 5.500% 2/1/29 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,032,000 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing First Sub-SER A 5.000% 8/1/24 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,722 |
|
|
|
| 1,382,338 |
Prerefunded (1.6%) |
|
|
|
|
Omaha, NE Public Power Dist. Elec. Syst. Rev. 5.200% 2/1/22 |
| 500,000 |
| 500,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (26.3%) |
|
|
|
|
Cornhusker Public Power Dist. Electric Rev. |
| 250,000 |
| 252,783 |
Dawson Cty. Public Power Electric Sys. Rev. 4.750% 12/1/32 |
| 250,000 |
| 250,905 |
Fremont, NE Combined Utilities Rev. 5.000% 10/15/21 |
| 500,000 |
| 512,210 |
*Lincoln, NE Elec. Syst. Rev. 5.000% 9/1/21 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,044,280 |
Lincoln, NE San. Swr. Rev. 4.500% 6/15/29 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,765 |
Lincoln, NE Water Rev. 5.000% 8/15/22 |
| 575,000 |
| 595,326 |
Lincoln, NE Water Rev. 4.000% 8/15/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 255,708 |
Lincoln, NE Water Rev. 4.500% 8/15/34 |
| 250,000 |
| 255,108 |
Municipal Energy Agy of NE Power Supply Rev. 5.125% 4/1/24 |
| 195,000 |
| 211,608 |
NE Educ. Finance Auth. (Wesleyan Univ.) Rev. 5.500% 4/1/27 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,001,530 |
Omaha Public Power Electric Rev. 5.250% 2/1/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 274,270 |
Omaha, NE Public Power Electric Rev. 5.000% 2/1/34 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,019,960 |
Omaha, NE Public Power Dist. Elec. Syst. Rev. 6.200% 2/1/17 |
| 650,000 |
| 765,193 |
Omaha, NE Public Power Dist. (Electric Rev) 4.750% 2/1/25 |
| 250,000 |
| 263,598 |
Omaha, NE Public Power Dist. (Electric Rev) 4.300% 2/1/31 |
| 100,000 |
| 95,852 |
Public Power Generation Agy Whelan Energy Rev 5.000% 1/1/32 |
| 500,000 |
| 510,970 |
Public Power Generation Agy. Whelan Energy Center 5.000% 1/1/27 |
| 250,000 |
| 264,765 |
Southern Public Power Dist. 5.000% 12/15/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 266,970 |
|
|
|
| 8,093,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $29,443,289) |
|
| $ | 29,874,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (2.5%) |
| Shares |
|
|
Wells Fargo Advantage National Tax-Free Money Market (COST: $769,201) | 769,201 | $ | 769,201 | |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $30,212,490) |
|
| $ | 30,643,321 |
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES |
|
|
| 188,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
| $ | 30,832,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Indicates bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
MUNICIPAL BONDS (97.0%) |
| Principal |
| Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Education (34.8%) |
|
|
|
|
Board of Regents (OK Univ. Science Center) 5.000% 7/1/36 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,027,450 |
Claremore, OK Student Hsg. Rev. (Rogers University) 5.750% 9/1/34 |
| 500,000 |
| 402,490 |
Edmond Economic Dev. Auth., OK Student Housing Rev. 5.375% 12/1/19 |
| 200,000 |
| 182,874 |
Edmond Economic Dev. Auth., OK Student Housing Rev. 5.500% 12/1/28 |
| 865,000 |
| 717,500 |
McClain Cnty, OK Econ Dev Auth Ed Lease Rev (Purcell Schs) 4.250% 9/1/20 |
| 585,000 |
| 603,041 |
OK Agric. & Mech. Colleges (OK St. Univ.) Athletic Facs. 5.000% 8/1/24 |
| 150,000 |
| 150,006 |
OK Board of Regents (Univ. of Central OK) 5.600% 8/1/20 |
| 150,000 |
| 155,642 |
OK Board of Regents (Univ. of Central OK) 5.700% 8/1/25 |
| 390,000 |
| 401,567 |
OK Board of Regents (Univ. of OK) 4.125% 7/1/26 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,542 |
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (Higher Ed. Project) 5.000% 7/1/24 |
| 250,000 |
| 261,848 |
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (Higher Ed. Project) Rev. 5.000% 7/1/22 |
| 500,000 |
| 528,330 |
*OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (Higher Ed. Project) Rev. 5.000% 7/1/30 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,030,800 |
OK Colleges Board of Regents (NE State Univ. Ctr.) Rev. 5.100% 3/1/16 |
| 140,000 |
| 140,097 |
OK Colleges Board of Regents (NE State Univ. Ctr.) Rev. 5.150% 3/1/21 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,041 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth Lease Rev Master St Higher Ed 4.400% 12/1/29 |
| 250,000 |
| 248,015 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. (Langston Univ. Stadium) 5.000% 7/1/27 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,875 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. (OK State Syst. Higher Ed.) 4.900% 12/1/22 |
| 200,000 |
| 207,146 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. (Seminole State College) 5.125% 12/1/27 |
| 150,000 |
| 155,544 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. OK State Higher Ed (Master Lease) 4.500% 6/1/26 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,235 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc Okmulgee Student Hsg Proj 5.750% 12/1/30 |
| 250,000 |
| 201,453 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc Okmulgee Student Hsg Proj Ser A 5.625% 12/1/20 |
| 140,000 |
| 126,678 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc Okmulgee Student Hsg Proj Ser A 5.700% 12/1/25 |
| 220,000 |
| 189,086 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc. Student Hsg. (Connors College) 5.550% 11/1/21 |
| 250,000 |
| 223,038 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc. Student Hsg. (Connors College) 5.650% 11/1/31 |
| 375,000 |
| 305,554 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc. USAOF Student Housing 5.550% 11/1/21 |
| 250,000 |
| 219,738 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc. USAOF Student Housing 5.650% 11/1/31 |
| 250,000 |
| 192,380 |
Texas Cty., OK Dev. Auth. (OPSU Student Hsg.) 5.250% 11/1/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 201,190 |
University of OK Board of Regents (Multi Facs.) Rev. 4.750% 6/1/29 |
| 250,000 |
| 253,800 |
University of OK Board of Regents (Research Fac.) Rev. 4.800% 3/1/28 |
| 670,000 |
| 684,311 |
University of OK Board of Regents Student Hsg. Rev. 5.000% 11/1/27 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,014,750 |
University of OK Student Hsg. (Cameron Univ.) Rev. 5.500% 7/1/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 269,212 |
University of Puerto Rico 5.000% 6/1/17 |
| 750,000 |
| 748,357 |
|
|
|
| 11,713,590 |
General Obligation (2.5%) |
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma City, OK 4.250% 3/1/22 |
| 110,000 |
| 113,099 |
Tulsa, OK General Obligation 4.500% 3/1/23 |
| 700,000 |
| 732,634 |
|
|
|
| 845,733 |
Health Care (3.6%) |
|
|
|
|
Norman, OK (Regl. Hospital) Auth. 5.250% 9/1/16 |
| 180,000 |
| 176,922 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. (St. Ann's Retirement Village) Rev. 5.000% 12/1/28 |
| 500,000 |
| 481,540 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. (St. John Health Syst.) 5.750% 2/15/25 |
| 50,000 |
| 50,028 |
OK Devl. Fin. Auth. (St. John Health Syst.) Rev. Ref. - Unref 5.750% 2/15/25 |
| 125,000 |
| 125,036 |
OK Devl. Fin. Auth. (St. John Health Syst.) Rev. Ref. - Unref 6.000% 2/15/29 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,021 |
Rural Enterprises, OK Inc. OK Govt. Fin. (Cleveland Cty. Hlth.) 5.000% 11/1/21 |
| 250,000 |
| 259,788 |
|
|
|
| 1,193,335 |
Housing (6.0%) |
|
|
|
|
OK Housing Finance Agency Single Family Homeownership 5.250% 9/1/21 |
| 70,000 |
| 70,178 |
OK Housing Finance Agency Single Family Homeownership 5.850% 9/1/20 |
| 15,000 |
| 15,065 |
Oklahoma Housing Fin. Agy. Single Family Mtg. Rev 5.100% 3/1/17 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,961 |
Oklahoma Housing Fin. Agy. Single Family Mtg. Rev. 5.100% 9/1/17 |
| 100,000 |
| 101,365 |
*Oklahoma Housing Finance 5.050% 9/1/23 |
| 880,000 |
| 881,179 |
Oklahoma Housing Finance 5.150% 9/1/29 |
| 440,000 |
| 432,890 |
Oklahoma Housing Finance 5.200% 9/1/32 |
| 440,000 |
| 427,684 |
|
|
|
| 2,029,322 |
Other Revenue (16.4%) |
|
|
|
|
Durant, OK Community Fac. Auth. Sales Tax Rev. 5.500% 11/1/19 |
| 500,000 |
| 536,105 |
Garfield Cty., Criminal Justice Auth. (Enid, OK) Rev. 4.500% 4/1/18 |
| 250,000 |
| 252,393 |
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (OK St. Bureau of Investigation) 4.375% 7/1/22 |
| 100,000 |
| 104,126 |
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (OK St. Bureau of Investigation) 4.375% 7/1/23 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,398 |
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (OK St. Bureau of Investigation) 4.500% 7/1/24 |
| 200,000 |
| 208,740 |
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (Supreme Court Proj.) 4.500% 7/1/26 |
| 500,000 |
| 511,355 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. (DHS Lease Rev.) Series 2000A 5.600% 3/1/15 |
| 280,000 |
| 285,012 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. (Lease Rev.) Law Enforcement 5.100% 6/1/27 |
| 120,000 |
| 123,272 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. OK Dept. of Corrections (McLoud Fac.) 4.600% 4/1/22 |
| 250,000 |
| 257,062 |
OK Devl. Finance Auth. OK Dept. of Corrections (McLoud Fac.) 4.650% 4/1/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 256,177 |
*OK State Student Loan Auth. 5.625% 6/1/31 |
| 685,000 |
| 672,533 |
OK State Student Loan Auth. 5.300% 12/1/32 |
| 450,000 |
| 399,155 |
OK State Student Loan Auth. 6.350% 9/1/25 |
| 280,000 |
| 294,552 |
Oklahoma City, OK Public Auth. (OKC Fairgrounds Fac.) 5.500% 10/1/19 |
| 250,000 |
| 276,175 |
Pawnee Cnty OK Pub Programs Auth Sales Tax Rev 4.875% 2/1/30 |
| 250,000 |
| 247,313 |
Tulsa Cty, OK Indl. Auth. Recreation Facs. 4.700% 9/1/24 |
| 500,000 |
| 511,055 |
Tulsa Oklahoma Pub. Facs. Auth. 4.750% 11/15/37 |
| 500,000 |
| 496,465 |
|
|
|
| 5,534,888 |
Prerefunded (0.1%) |
|
|
|
|
OK Transportation Auth. Turnpike Sys. Rev. - Prerefunded 5.000% 1/1/21 |
| 10,000 |
| 10,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation (6.4%) |
|
|
|
|
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (State Highway) Rev. 5.000% 6/1/14 |
| 250,000 |
| 282,728 |
OK Capital Impvt. Auth. (State Highway) Rev. 4.000% 7/1/18 |
| 250,000 |
| 262,420 |
OK Transportation Auth. Turnpike Sys. Rev. - Unrefunded 5.000% 1/1/21 |
| 90,000 |
| 93,283 |
Oklahoma City Airport Trust Jr. Lien Refunding Series B 5.000% 7/1/21 |
| 250,000 |
| 270,207 |
Oklahoma City Airport Trust Jr. Lien Refunding Series B. 5.000% 7/1/19 |
| 250,000 |
| 272,895 |
Tulsa, OK Arpts Impt Tr Gen Rev Ref 5.000% 6/1/19 |
| 125,000 |
| 123,881 |
Tulsa, OK Arpts Impt Tr Gen Rev Ref 5.000% 6/1/19 |
| 125,000 |
| 123,881 |
Tulsa, OK Arpts Impt Tr Gen Rev Ref 5.750% 6/1/31 |
| 500,000 |
| 489,120 |
Tulsa, OK Arpts Impt Tr Gen Rev Ref 6.000% 6/1/23 |
| 250,000 |
| 244,440 |
|
|
|
| 2,162,855 |
Utilities (27.2%) |
|
|
|
|
*Drumright, OK Utility Sys. Rev. 4.750% 2/1/36 |
| 950,000 |
| 915,629 |
Edmond, OK Pub Wks Auth Sales Tax & Util Sys Rev 4.750% 7/1/23 |
| 200,000 |
| 207,314 |
Edmond, OK Pub Wks Auth Util Rev 4.850% 1/1/24 |
| 155,000 |
| 162,060 |
Edmond, OK Pub Wks Auth Util Rev 4.750% 7/1/24 |
| 250,000 |
| 260,190 |
Jenks Aquarium Auth. Rev. 5.250% 7/1/29 |
| 500,000 |
| 517,035 |
McAlester, OK Public Works Auth. 5.100% 2/1/30 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,533 |
Midwest City, OK Capital Impvt. 5.375% 9/1/24 |
| 500,000 |
| 516,310 |
*OK Municipal Power Auth. Power Supply Rev. 4.500% 1/1/47 |
| 600,000 |
| 513,960 |
*OK Municipal Power Auth. Rev. 5.750% 1/1/24 |
| 2,230,000 |
| 2,557,476 |
*OK State Water (Loan Program) Rev. 5.100% 9/1/16 |
| 40,000 |
| 40,020 |
Oklahoma City, OK Water Utility Rev. 5.000% 7/1/34 |
| 250,000 |
| 255,242 |
Oklahoma City, OK Water Utility Trust (Water & Sewer) Rev. 5.000% 7/1/29 |
| 425,000 |
| 441,613 |
Oklahoma City, OK Water Utility Trust (Water & Sewer) Rev. 4.000% 7/1/34 |
| 250,000 |
| 234,365 |
Okmulgee Public Works Auth. Capital Improvement Rev. 5.125% 8/1/30 |
| 750,000 |
| 808,905 |
Okmulgee Public Works Auth. Capital Improvement Rev. 4.800% 10/1/27 |
| 500,000 |
| 539,405 |
Sallisaw, OK Mun Auth Util Sys Rev Ref 4.450% 1/1/28 |
| 100,000 |
| 96,594 |
Sapulpa Municipal Authority Utility Rev. 5.125% 1/1/32 |
| 250,000 |
| 256,505 |
Tulsa Metropolitan Util. Auth. Utility Revs 4.250% 5/1/26 |
| 100,000 |
| 101,553 |
Tulsa Metropolitan Util. Auth. Utility Revs 4.500% 5/1/27 |
| 610,000 |
| 623,938 |
|
|
|
| 9,151,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $32,777,425) |
|
| $ | 32,642,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (2.8%) |
| Shares |
|
|
Wells Fargo Advantage National Tax-Free Money Market (COST: $929,599) |
| 929,599 | $ | 929,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $33,707,024) |
|
| $ | 33,571,804 |
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES |
|
|
| 88,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
| $ | 33,659,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Indicates bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
MAINE MUNICIPAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
MUNICIPAL BONDS (99.7%) |
| Principal |
| Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Education (10.3%) |
|
|
|
|
Maine Health & Higher Educ. Auth. (Maine Maritime Academy) 5.000% 7/1/25 | $ | 340,000 | $ | 354,712 |
Maine Health & Higher Edl Facsauth Rev Unrefunded Bal 5.000% 7/1/23 |
| 135,000 |
| 144,280 |
University of Maine System Rev. 4.625% 3/1/29 |
| 100,000 |
| 98,743 |
University of Maine System Rev. 4.750% 3/1/37 |
| 550,000 |
| 551,232 |
University of Puerto Rico 5.000% 6/1/17 |
| 500,000 |
| 498,905 |
|
|
|
| 1,647,872 |
General Obligation (31.6%) |
|
|
|
|
Bangor, ME 4.000% 9/1/24 |
| 155,000 |
| 160,551 |
Brewer, ME GO 4.600% 11/1/17 |
| 210,000 |
| 219,284 |
Freeport, ME GO 7.250% 9/1/10 |
| 20,000 |
| 20,809 |
Gorham, ME Unlimited Tax G.O. 4.300% 2/1/23 |
| 155,000 |
| 163,925 |
Gorham, ME Unlimited Tax G.O. 4.350% 2/1/24 |
| 155,000 |
| 163,793 |
Gray, ME Unlimited GO 4.000% 10/15/26 |
| 280,000 |
| 288,705 |
Gray, ME Unlimited GO 4.000% 10/15/27 |
| 280,000 |
| 286,401 |
Lewiston, ME G.O. 5.000% 4/1/22 |
| 500,000 |
| 528,710 |
Lewiston, ME G.O. 5.000% 4/1/24 |
| 250,000 |
| 265,470 |
Lewiston, ME G.O. 4.500% 1/15/25 |
| 200,000 |
| 207,496 |
Maine State (Highway) 5.000% 6/15/11 |
| 200,000 |
| 212,352 |
Portland, ME 4.250% 5/1/29 |
| 250,000 |
| 255,845 |
City of Portland, ME 4.125% 10/1/29 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,429 |
Scarborough, ME G.O. 4.400% 11/1/31 |
| 250,000 |
| 251,085 |
Scarborough, ME G.O. 4.400% 11/1/32 |
| 480,000 |
| 481,781 |
Maine School Administrative Dist # 51 General Obligation 4.250% 10/15/29 |
| 250,000 |
| 254,922 |
South Portland, ME 5.800% 9/1/11 |
| 40,000 |
| 43,416 |
Westbrook, ME G.O. 4.250% 10/15/20 |
| 180,000 |
| 188,788 |
Windham, ME G.O. 4.000% 11/1/14 |
| 415,000 |
| 442,145 |
*Yarmouth, ME 5.000% 11/15/19 |
| 500,000 |
| 536,760 |
|
|
|
| 5,072,667 |
Health Care (8.7%) |
|
|
|
|
*Maine Health & Higher Educ. Facs. Auth. (Blue Hill Mem. Hosp) 5.250% 7/1/10 |
| 410,000 |
| 411,193 |
Maine Health & Higher Educ. Facs. Auth. 6.000% 10/1/13 |
| 195,000 |
| 220,859 |
Maine Health & Higher Educ. Facs. Rev. 5.000% 7/1/22 |
| 250,000 |
| 267,530 |
Maine Health & Higher Ed. Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 7/1/39 |
| 510,000 |
| 494,379 |
|
|
|
| 1,393,961 |
Housing (3.8%) |
|
|
|
|
Guam Hsg. Corp. Single Family Mtg. 5.750% 9/1/31 |
| 10,000 |
| 10,219 |
Maine State Hsg. Auth. 5.000% 11/15/29 |
| 350,000 |
| 354,910 |
Maine State Hsg. Auth. 4.700% 11/15/27 |
| 250,000 |
| 246,425 |
|
|
|
| 611,554 |
Other Revenue (17.9%) |
|
|
|
|
Maine Governmental Facs. Auth Lease 5.375% 10/1/16 |
| 250,000 |
| 264,232 |
Maine Governmental Facs. Auth Lease Rent Rev. 5.000% 10/1/23 |
| 125,000 |
| 130,990 |
*Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp. Commonwealth Appropriations 5.375% 6/1/18 |
| 710,000 |
| 815,982 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Fin. Corp. Sales Tax Rev. 5.000% 8/1/26 |
| 200,000 |
| 198,658 |
Skowhegan, ME Pollution Ctl. Rev. (Scott Paper Co. Prj.) 5.900% 11/1/13 |
| 1,465,000 |
| 1,466,670 |
|
|
|
| 2,876,532 |
Prerefunded (3.7%) |
|
|
|
|
Maine Health & Higher Edl Facsauth Rev Prerefunded -Ser B 5.000% 7/1/23 |
| 65,000 |
| 76,393 |
*Maine State Turnpike Auth. Rev. 5.750% 7/1/28 |
| 500,000 |
| 513,955 |
|
|
|
| 590,348 |
Transportation (12.9%) |
|
|
|
|
Maine Municipal Bond Bank Transportation Infustructure Rev 5.000% 9/1/24 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 1,098,770 |
Maine State Turnpike Auth. 5.000% 7/1/33 |
| 450,000 |
| 458,316 |
Portland, ME Airport Rev 5.000% 7/1/32 |
| 500,000 |
| 504,430 |
|
|
|
| 2,061,516 |
Utilities (10.8%) |
|
|
|
|
Houlton, ME Water District 4.600% 5/1/14 |
| 85,000 |
| 85,909 |
Kennebunk, ME Power & Light Dist. 5.000% 8/1/22 |
| 500,000 |
| 536,315 |
Maine Municipal Bond Bank (Sewer & Water) Rev. 4.900% 11/1/24 |
| 100,000 |
| 105,574 |
Portland, ME Water District Rev 4.250% 11/1/27 |
| 500,000 |
| 504,900 |
Virgin Islands Water & Power Auth. Elec. Syst. Rev. 5.300% 7/1/21 |
| 500,000 |
| 502,075 |
|
|
|
| 1,734,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $15,565,734) |
|
| $ | 15,989,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (0.8%) |
| Shares |
|
|
Wells Fargo Advantage National Tax-Free Money Market (COST: $121,513) |
| 121,513 | $ | 121,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $15,687,247) |
|
| $ | 16,110,736 |
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES |
|
|
| (78,171) |
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
| $ | 16,032,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Indicates bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. | ||||
As of January 29, 2010, the Fund had one when-issued purchase: |
|
|
|
|
200,000 of Puerto Rico Sales Tax Fin. 5.000%; 08/01/26 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUNICIPAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
MUNICIPAL BONDS (97.6%) |
| Principal |
| Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Education (6.5%) |
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Hlth. & Educ. Facs. Auth. (Univ. Sys. of NH) 5.500% 7/1/13 | $ | 95,000 | $ | 102,564 |
University of Puerto Rico 5.000% 6/1/17 |
| 150,000 |
| 149,671 |
|
|
|
| 252,235 |
General Obligation (44.8%) |
|
|
|
|
Concord, NH G.O. 4.600% 10/15/14 |
| 100,000 |
| 106,086 |
*Derry, NH 4.800% 2/1/18 |
| 115,000 |
| 119,488 |
Gorham, NH G.O. 4.850% 4/1/14 |
| 65,000 |
| 65,423 |
Hampton, NH G.O. 4.000% 12/15/20 |
| 200,000 |
| 204,104 |
Hillsborough, NH G.O. 4.000% 11/1/20 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,541 |
Hillsborough, NH G.O. 4.000% 11/1/21 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,214 |
Merrimack Cty., NH G.O. 4.250% 12/1/19 |
| 100,000 |
| 108,108 |
Merrimack Cty., NH G.O. 4.500% 12/1/27 |
| 100,000 |
| 104,999 |
*New Hampshire State Capital Improvement G.O. 5.000% 4/15/13 |
| 250,000 |
| 280,203 |
New Hampshire State Capital Improvement G.O. 4.750% 3/1/27 |
| 100,000 |
| 106,724 |
Portsmouth, NH G.O. 4.000% 8/1/19 |
| 100,000 |
| 104,881 |
*Rochester, NH G.O. 4.750% 7/15/20 |
| 300,000 |
| 318,441 |
|
|
|
| 1,725,212 |
Health Care (19.0%) |
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Hlth. & Educ. Facs. Auth. (Exeter) 5.100% 10/1/10 |
| 100,000 |
| 102,739 |
New Hampshire Hlth. & Educ. Facs. Auth. (Exeter) 5.200% 10/1/11 |
| 60,000 |
| 63,406 |
*New Hampshire Hlth. & Educ. Facs. Auth. (Exeter) 5.500% 10/1/15 |
| 120,000 |
| 125,633 |
New Hampshire Hlth. & Educ. Facs. Auth. (Exeter) 5.625% 10/1/16 |
| 20,000 |
| 20,991 |
New Hampshire Hlth & Ed. Conway Hosp. 5.250% 6/1/16 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,554 |
NH Hlth & Ed. Facs. Auth Rev. Healthcare Sys-Covenant Hlth-B 5.000% 7/1/24 |
| 100,000 |
| 101,244 |
NH Health & Educ. Facs Auth Rev Dartmouth-Hitchcock 6.000% 8/1/33 |
| 115,000 |
| 117,819 |
New Hampshire Health & Educ Concord Hosp. 5.875% 10/1/16 |
| 100,000 |
| 100,002 |
|
|
|
| 732,388 |
Housing (6.6%) |
|
|
|
|
Guam Hsg. Corp. Single Family Mtg. 5.750% 9/1/31 |
| 10,000 |
| 10,219 |
New Hampshire State Hsg. Single Fam. Rev. 4.900% 7/1/25 |
| 100,000 |
| 97,494 |
New Hampshire State Hsg Finance Auth. Single Family Mtg. Rev. 4.625% 7/1/25 |
| 150,000 |
| 147,689 |
|
|
|
| 255,402 |
Other Revenue (8.7%) |
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Muni Bond Bank 2009 Series D 4.000% 7/15/25 |
| 175,000 |
| 182,326 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing First Sub-SER A 5.000% 8/1/24 |
| 150,000 |
| 151,633 |
|
|
|
| 333,959 |
Transportation (2.7%) |
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire State Turnpike System 5.125% 10/1/19 |
| 100,000 |
| 104,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (9.3%) |
|
|
|
|
Manchester, NH Water Rev. 5.000% 12/1/28 |
| 100,000 |
| 103,274 |
Manchester, NH Water Works Rev. 5.000% 12/1/34 |
| 250,000 |
| 256,635 |
|
|
|
| 359,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $3,650,877) |
|
| $ | 3,763,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (1.7%) |
| Shares |
|
|
Wells Fargo Advantage National Tax-Free Money Market (Cost: $66,177) |
| 66,177 | $ | 66,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $3,717,054) |
|
| $ | 3,829,695 |
OTHER ASSETS MINUS LIABILITIES |
|
|
| 25,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS |
|
| $ | 3,855,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
*Indicates bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed delivery purchases. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
| Kansas | Kansas | Nebraska | |||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at cost | $ | 46,693,963 | $ | 17,545,360 | $ | 30,212,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at value | $ | 47,819,120 | $ | 18,061,435 | $ | 30,643,321 |
Cash |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 3,486 |
Accrued dividends receivable |
| 12 |
| 18 |
| 36 |
Accrued interest receivable |
| 731,383 |
| 346,881 |
| 376,081 |
Prepaid expenses |
| 2,877 |
| 2,647 |
| 4,563 |
Receivable for Fund shares sold |
| 0 |
| 323,268 |
| 14,937 |
Total assets | $ | 48,553,394 | $ | 18,734,249 | $ | 31,042,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses | $ | 6,904 | $ | 6,248 | $ | 7,129 |
Disbursements in excess of demand deposit cash |
| 0 |
| 100,727 |
| 0 |
Dividends payable |
| 139,251 |
| 49,173 |
| 81,023 |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed |
| 58,950 |
| 4,000 |
| 0 |
Payable to affiliates |
| 37,613 |
| 8,034 |
| 23,569 |
Securities purchases payable |
| 1,000,417 |
| 0 |
| 98,612 |
Total liabilities | $ | 1,243,135 | $ | 168,182 | $ | 210,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS | $ | 47,310,259 | $ | 18,566,067 | $ | 30,832,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets are represented by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock outstanding, no par | $ | 54,237,845 | $ | 19,286,391 | $ | 33,340,586 |
Accumulated undistributed net realized |
| (8,055,482) |
| (1,237,363) |
| (2,976,246) |
Accumulated undistributed net |
| 2,739 |
| 964 |
| 36,920 |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
| 1,125,157 |
| 516,075 |
| 430,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS | $ | 47,310,259 | $ | 18,566,067 | $ | 30,832,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding |
| 4,457,463 |
| 1,665,172 |
| 3,048,420 |
Net asset value per share | $ | 10.61 | $ | 11.15 | $ | 10.11 |
Public offering price (sales charge of | $ | 11.08 | $ | 11.47 | $ | 10.56 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities January 29, 2010 (unaudited)
| Oklahoma | Maine | New | |||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at cost | $ | 33,707,024 | $ | 15,687,247 | $ | 3,717,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at value | $ | 33,571,804 | $ | 16,110,736 | $ | 3,829,695 |
Cash |
| 14,625 |
| 164 |
| 702 |
Accrued dividends receivable |
| 16 |
| 4 |
| 8 |
Accrued interest receivable |
| 386,069 |
| 179,886 |
| 41,405 |
Prepaid expenses |
| 2,313 |
| 1,244 |
| 361 |
Receivable for Fund shares sold |
| 326,000 |
| 2,208 |
| 0 |
Total assets | $ | 34,300,827 | $ | 16,294,242 | $ | 3,872,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses | $ | 7,910 | $ | 6,691 | $ | 6,093 |
Dividends payable |
| 98,410 |
| 43,514 |
| 9,047 |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed |
| 115 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
Payable to affiliates |
| 29,260 |
| 11,472 |
| 1,738 |
Securities purchases payable |
| 505,166 |
| 200,000 |
| 0 |
Total liabilities | $ | 640,861 | $ | 261,677 | $ | 16,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS | $ | 33,659,966 | $ | 16,032,565 | $ | 3,855,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets are represented by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock outstanding, no par | $ | 36,317,236 | $ | 16,000,524 | $ | 3,879,944 |
Accumulated undistributed net realized |
| (2,524,287) |
| (408,284) |
| (139,333) |
Accumulated undistributed net |
| 2,237 |
| 16,836 |
| 2,041 |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
| (135,220) |
| 423,489 |
| 112,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS | $ | 33,659,966 | $ | 16,032,565 | $ | 3,855,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding |
| 3,060,872 |
| 1,494,639 |
| 363,337 |
Net asset value per share | $ | 11.00 | $ | 10.73 | $ | 10.61 |
Public offering price (sales charge of | $ | 11.49 | $ | 11.21 | $ | 11.08 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Operations For the six months ended January 29, 2010
| Kansas | Kansas | Nebraska | |||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest | $ | 1,116,725 | $ | 361,161 | $ | 664,888 |
Dividends |
| 733 |
| 435 |
| 1,311 |
Total investment income | $ | 1,117,458 | $ | 361,596 | $ | 666,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees | $ | 118,591 | $ | 43,359 | $ | 74,488 |
Distribution (12b-1) fees |
| 59,295 |
| 0 |
| 37,244 |
Transfer agent fees |
| 47,436 |
| 17,344 |
| 29,795 |
Accounting service fees |
| 23,793 |
| 16,269 |
| 19,382 |
Administrative service fees |
| 29,648 |
| 11,934 |
| 18,622 |
Professional fees |
| 7,902 |
| 3,246 |
| 5,346 |
Reports to shareholders |
| 1,988 |
| 790 |
| 1,116 |
License, fees, and registrations |
| 873 |
| 2,146 |
| 1,686 |
Audit fees |
| 4,277 |
| 4,076 |
| 4,106 |
Trustees' fees |
| 2,507 |
| 1,462 |
| 1,983 |
Transfer agent out-of-pockets |
| 1,772 |
| 354 |
| 745 |
Custodian fees |
| 4,083 |
| 2,174 |
| 2,701 |
Legal fees |
| 7,004 |
| 2,682 |
| 4,400 |
Insurance expense |
| 1,806 |
| 619 |
| 1,094 |
Total expenses | $ | 310,975 | $ | 106,455 | $ | 202,708 |
Less expenses waived or reimbursed |
| (57,191) |
| (41,416) |
| (43,303) |
Total net expenses | $ | 253,784 | $ | 65,039 | $ | 159,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 863,674 | $ | 296,557 | $ | 506,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) from | $ | 68,965 | $ | 4,428 | $ | 32,180 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
| 674,153 |
| 74,775 |
| 268,286 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 743,118 | $ | 79,203 | $ | 300,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET | $ | 1,606,792 | $ | 375,760 | $ | 807,260 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Operations For the six months ended January 29, 2010
| Oklahoma | Maine | New | |||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest | $ | 751,852 | $ | 339,020 | $ | 78,580 |
Dividends |
| 1,268 |
| 416 |
| 129 |
Total investment income | $ | 753,120 | $ | 339,436 | $ | 78,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees | $ | 81,391 | $ | 39,486 | $ | 9,554 |
Distribution (12b-1) fees |
| 40,695 |
| 19,743 |
| 4,777 |
Transfer agent fees |
| 32,556 |
| 15,795 |
| 11,934 |
Accounting service fees |
| 20,073 |
| 15,882 |
| 12,889 |
Administrative service fees |
| 20,348 |
| 11,934 |
| 11,934 |
Professional fees |
| 5,866 |
| 3,160 |
| 1,518 |
Reports to shareholders |
| 1,029 |
| 857 |
| 392 |
License, fees, and registrations |
| 2,025 |
| 1,050 |
| 675 |
Audit fees |
| 4,276 |
| 4,076 |
| 3,774 |
Trustees' fees |
| 2,107 |
| 1,402 |
| 904 |
Transfer agent out-of-pockets |
| 289 |
| 568 |
| 102 |
Custodian fees |
| 2,939 |
| 1,856 |
| 889 |
Legal fees |
| 4,519 |
| 2,321 |
| 564 |
Insurance expense |
| 1,432 |
| 563 |
| 149 |
Total expenses | $ | 219,545 | $ | 118,693 | $ | 60,055 |
Less expenses waived or reimbursed |
| (45,368) |
| (34,192) |
| (39,610) |
Total net expenses | $ | 174,177 | $ | 84,501 | $ | 20,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 578,943 | $ | 254,935 | $ | 58,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) from | $ | 3,746 | $ | 56,420 | $ | 8,730 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
| 646,423 |
| 88,985 |
| 32,724 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 650,169 | $ | 145,405 | $ | 41,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET | $ | 1,229,112 | $ | 400,340 | $ | 99,718 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| Kansas Municipal Fund | Kansas Insured | ||||||
| Six | Year | Six | Year | ||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 863,674 | $ | 1,815,715 | $ | 296,557 | $ | 514,982 |
Net realized gain (loss) from |
| 68,965 |
| 172,956 |
| 4,428 |
| 14,823 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
| 674,153 |
| (197,097) |
| 74,775 |
| 200,646 |
New increase (decrease) in net assets | $ | 1,606,792 | $ | 1,791,574 | $ | 375,760 | $ | 730,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income | $ | (863,248) | $ | (1,814,848) | $ | (296,375) | $ | (514,404) |
Net realized gain on investments |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
Total distributions | $ | (863,248) | $ | (1,814,848) | $ | (296,375) | $ | (514,404) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares | $ | 706,725 | $ | 2,473,521 | $ | 3,112,378 | $ | 6,917,416 |
Proceeds from reinvested dividends |
| 567,549 |
| 1,206,706 |
| 232,244 |
| 381,344 |
Cost of shares redeemed |
| (2,072,365) |
| (4,878,949) |
| (1,037,479) |
| (3,695,403) |
Net increase (decrease) in net | $ | (798,091) | $ | (1,198,722) | $ | 2,307,143 | $ | 3,603,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN | $ | (54,547) | $ | (1,221,996) | $ | 2,386,528 | $ | 3,819,404 |
NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF | $ | 47,364,806 | $ | 48,586,802 |
| 16,179,539 |
| 12,360,135 |
NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD | $ | 47,310,259 | $ | 47,364,806 | $ | 18,566,067 | $ | 16,179,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income | $ | 2,739 | $ | 2,312 | $ | 964 | $ | 782 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
| ||||||
| Six | Year | Six | Year | ||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 506,794 | $ | 1,052,749 | $ | 578,943 | $ | 1,446,145 |
Net realized gain (loss) from |
| 32,180 |
| 17,216 |
| 3,746 |
| (245,833) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
| 268,286 |
| (79,241) |
| 646,423 |
| 19,774 |
New increase (decrease) in net assets | $ | 807,260 | $ | 990,724 | $ | 1,229,112 | $ | 1,211,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income | $ | (505,046) | $ | (1,048,177) | $ | (578,690) | $ | (1,444,737) |
Net realized gain on investments |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
Total distributions | $ | (505,046) | $ | (1,048,177) | $ | (578,690) | $ | (1,444,737) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares | $ | 2,834,751 | $ | 3,005,898 | $ | 3,931,547 | $ | 2,178,842 |
Proceeds from reinvested dividends |
| 358,722 |
| 728,780 |
| 325,754 |
| 920,824 |
Cost of shares redeemed |
| (1,576,718) |
| (1,993,266) |
| (3,266,933) |
| (12,872,462) |
Net increase (decrease) in net | $ | 1,616,755 | $ | 1,741,412 | $ | 990,368 | $ | (9,772,796) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN | $ | 1,918,969 | $ | 1,683,959 | $ | 1,640,790 | $ | (10,006,447) |
NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF |
| 28,913,122 |
| 27,229,163 |
| 32,019,176 |
| 42,025,623 |
NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD | $ | 30,832,091 | $ | 58,913,122 | $ | 33,659,966 | $ | 32,019,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income | $ | 36,920 | $ | 35,172 | $ | 2,237 | $ | 1,984 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| Maine Municipal Fund | New Hampshire | ||||||
| Six | Year | Six | Year | ||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 254,935 | $ | 504,793 | $ | 58,264 | $ | 106,083 |
Net realized gain (loss) from |
| 56,420 |
| 199,698 |
| 8,730 |
| 0 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
| 88,985 |
| 41,579 |
| 32,724 |
| 63,745 |
New increase (decrease) in net assets | $ | 400,340 | $ | 746,070 | $ | 99,718 | $ | 169,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income | $ | (253,127) | $ | (499,720) | $ | (57,461) | $ | (104,834) |
Net realized gain on investments |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
Total distributions | $ | (253,127) | $ | (499,720) | $ | (57,461) | $ | (104,834) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of shares | $ | 780,235 | $ | 1,234,481 | $ | 121,514 | $ | 283,154 |
Proceeds from reinvested dividends |
| 154,933 |
| 302,836 |
| 25,488 |
| 51,823 |
Cost of shares redeemed |
| (462,667) |
| (2,250,581) |
| (150,209) |
| (264,627) |
Net increase (decrease) in net | $ | 472,501 | $ | (713,264) | $ | (3,207) | $ | 70,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN | $ | 619,714 | $ | (466,914) | $ | 39,050 | $ | 135,344 |
NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF |
| 15,412,851 |
| 15,879,765 |
| 3,816,243 |
| 3,680,899 |
NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD | $ | 16,032,565 | $ | 15,412,851 | $ | 3,855,293 | $ | 3,816,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net investment income | $ | 16,836 | $ | 15,028 | $ | 2,041 | $ | 1,237 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: Organization
Integrity Managed Portfolios (the "Trust") and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a open-end management investment company, consisting of six series (the "Funds").
The Kansas Municipal Fund ("KS Muni Fund"), Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund ("KS Insured Fund"), Nebraska Municipal Fund ("NE Muni Fund"), Oklahoma Municipal Fund ("OK Muni Fund"), Maine Municipal Fund ("ME Muni Fund"), and New Hampshire Municipal Fund ("NH Muni Fund"), each a non-diversified Fund, seek the highest level of current income that is exempt from both federal income tax and each Fund's respective state income tax (interest and dividend tax with respect to New Hampshire) and is consistent with preservation of capital.
NOTE 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Codification—In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification(TM) (the "Codification") as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The Codification supersedes existing non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The Codification did not change GAAP but rather organized it into a hierarchy where all guidance within the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification became effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification did not have a material effect on the Funds' financial statements.
Investment security valuation—Securities for which quotations are not readily available are valued using a matrix system at fair value as determined by VFM. The matrix system has been developed based on procedures approved by the Board of Trustees and includes consideration of the following: yields or prices of municipal bonds of comparable quality; type of issue, coupon, maturity, and rating; indications as to value from dealers; and general market conditions. Because the market value of securities can only be established by agreement between parties in a sales transaction, and because of the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, the fair values as determined may differ from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed.
When-issued securities—The Funds may purchase securities on a when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. The price of the underlying securities and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. The values of the securities purchased on a when-issued basis are identified as such in the Fund's Schedule of Investments. With respect to purchase commitments, the Fund identifies securities as segregated in its records with a value at least equal to the amount of the commitment. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities, if the counterparty does not perform under the contract's terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic, or other factors.
Contingent deferred sales charge—In the case of investments of $1 million or more (excluding KS Insured Fund), a 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge may be assessed on shares redeemed within 24 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).
Federal and state income taxes—Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund's policy is to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code that are applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and any net realized gain on investments to its shareholders; therefore, no provision for income taxes is required.
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions, management of the Funds has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are those that are open for examination by taxing authorities (i.e., generally the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then). Furthermore, management of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
Premiums and discounts—Premiums and discounts on municipal securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes.
Security Transactions, Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions—Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. The Funds declare dividends from net investment income daily and pay such dividends monthly. Capital gains, when available, are distributed at least annually. Dividends are reinvested in additional shares of the Funds at net asset value or paid in cash. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount and capital loss carryforwards.
Use of estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE 3: Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds' investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels: Level 1 inputs are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 inputs are based on significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) Level 3 inputs are based on significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments.) The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds' investments as of January 29, 2010:
|
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total |
KS Muni Fund | Short-Term Securities | $383,033 | $0 | $0 | $383,033 |
Municipal Bonds | 0 | 47,436,087 | 0 | 47,436,087 | |
| Total | $383,033 | $47,436,087 | $0 | $47,819,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS Insured Fund | Short-Term Securities | $440,140 | $0 | $0 | $440,140 |
Municipal Bonds | 0 | 17,621,295 | 0 | 17,621,295 | |
| Total | $440,140 | $17,621,295 | $0 | $18,061,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NE Muni Fund | Short-Term Securities | $769,201 | $0 | $0 | $769,201 |
Municipal Bonds | 0 | 29,874,120 | 0 | 29,874,120 | |
| Total | $769,201 | $29,874,120 | $0 | $30,643,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK Muni Fund | Short-Term Securities | $929,599 | $0 | $0 | $929,599 |
Municipal Bonds | 0 | 32,642,205 | 0 | 32,642,205 | |
| Total | $929,599 | $32,642,205 | $0 | $33,571,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ME Muni Fund | Short-Term Securities | $121,513 | $0 | $0 | $121,513 |
Municipal Bonds | 0 | 15,989,223 | 0 | 15,989,223 | |
| Total | $121,513 | $15,989,223 | $0 | $16,110,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NH Muni Fund | Short-Term Securities | $66,177 | $0 | $0 | $66,177 |
Municipal Bonds | 0 | 3,763,518 | 0 | 3,763,518 | |
| Total | $66,177 | $3,763,518 | $0 | $3,829,695 |
NOTE 4: Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) for the six months ended January 29, 2010, were as follows:
| KS Muni | KS Insured | NE Muni | OK Muni | ME Muni | NH Muni |
Purchases | $3,688,728 | $3,715,940 | $6,087,476 | $2,840,609 | $3,837,531 | $568,675 |
Sales | $2,740,000 | $1,807,143 | $3,120,000 | $1,958,715 | $2,548,498 | $470,522 |
NOTE 5: Capital Share Transactions
Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
Six Months Ended 1/29/10: | KS Muni | KS Insured | NE Muni | OK Muni | ME Muni | NH Muni |
Shares sold | 66,545 | 278,820 | 279,579 | 359,076 | 72,596 | 11,531 |
Shares issued on | 53,524 | 20,805 | 354,08 | 29,708 | 14,424 | 2,404 |
Shares redeemed | (195,120) | (93,102) | (154,966) | (299,119) | (43,057) | (14,188) |
Net increase (decrease) | (75,051) | 206,523 | 160,021 | 89,665 | 43,963 | (253) |
Shares outstanding | 4,457,463 | 1,665,172 | 3,048,420 | 3,060,872 | 1,494,639 | 363,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended 7/31/09: | KS Muni | KS Insured | NE Muni | OK Muni | ME Muni | NH Muni |
Shares sold | 241,562 | 631,527 | 303,135 | 208,121 | 117,082 | 27,565 |
Shares issued on | 118,228 | 34,927 | 74,481 | 88,660 | 29,104 | 5,048 |
Shares redeemed | (480,924) | (337,735) | (205,193) | (1,235,502) | (217,108) | (25,530) |
Net increase (decrease) | (121,134) | 328,719 | 172,423 | (938,721) | (70,922) | 7,083 |
Shares outstanding | 4,532,514 | 1,458,649 | 2,888,399 | 2,971,207 | 1,450,676 | 363,590 |
NOTE 6: Income Tax Information
At January 29, 2010, the net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) based on the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was as follows:
| Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | Net* | ||||
KS Muni Fund | $ | 46,693,963 | $ | 1,236,984 | $ | (111,827) | $ | 1,125,157 |
KS Insured Fund | $ | 17,545,360 | $ | 550,756 | $ | (34,681) | $ | 516,075 |
NE Muni Fund | $ | 30,212,490 | $ | 678,531 | $ | (247,700) | $ | 430,831 |
OK Muni Fund | $ | 33,707,024 | $ | 676,617 | $ | (811,837) | $ | (135,220) |
ME Muni Fund | $ | 15,687,247 | $ | 445,057 | $ | (21,568) | $ | 423,489 |
NH Muni Fund | $ | 3,717,054 | $ | 117,427 | $ | (4,786) | $ | 112,641 |
*Differences between financial reporting-basis and tax-basis are due to differing treatment of market discount, capital loss deferral, wash sales, and futures transactions.
Tax-exempt income distributions paid or accrued were as follows:
| KS Muni | KS Insured | NE Muni | OK Muni | ME Muni | NH Muni | ||||||
Year Ended 7/31/09 | $ | 1,814,848 | $ | 514,404 | $ | 1,048,177 | $ | 1,444,737 | $ | 499,720 | $ | 104,834 |
Year Ended 7/31/08 | $ | 1,945,509 | $ | 441,023 | $ | 1,039,415 | $ | 1,723,635 | $ | 562,812 | $ | 112,395 |
As of July 31, 2009, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
| Undistributed | Accumulated Capital | Unrealized Appreciation | Total Accumulated | ||||
KS Muni Fund | $ | 2,312 | $ | (8,124,446) | $ | 451,004 | $ | (7,671,130) |
KS Insured Fund | $ | 782 | $ | (1,236,337) | $ | 441,300 | $ | (794,255) |
NE Muni Fund | $ | 35,172 | $ | (3,008,426) | $ | 162,545 | $ | (2,810,709) |
OK Muni Fund | $ | 1,984 | $ | (2,245,430) | $ | (781,643) | $ | (3,025,089) |
ME Muni Fund | $ | 15,028 | $ | (464,704) | $ | 334,504 | $ | (115,172) |
NH Muni Fund | $ | 1,237 | $ | (148,062) | $ | 79,917 | $ | (66,908) |
*Differences between financial reporting-basis and tax-basis are due to differing treatment of market discount, capital loss deferral, wash sales, and futures transactions.
Capital loss carryforwards may be used to offset future capital gains. The capital loss carryforwards amounts will expire in each of the years ended July 31 as shown in the following table.
Year |
| KS Muni |
| KS Insured |
| NE Muni |
| OK Muni |
| ME Muni |
| NH Muni |
2010 | $ | 1,444,860 | $ | 178,976 | $ | 59,993 | $ | 138,150 | $ | - | $ | - |
2011 |
| 1,970,032 |
| 209,757 |
| 713,949 |
| 412,304 |
| - |
| - |
2012 |
| 1,399,598 |
| 303,542 |
| 579,276 |
| 547,833 |
| - |
| - |
2013 |
| 2,680,173 |
| 544,062 |
| 1,123,208 |
| 1,147,143 |
| 464,704 |
| 147,534 |
2014 |
| 388,935 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
2015 |
| 240,848 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
2016 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| 528 |
Total | $ | 8,124,446 | $ | 1,236,337 | $ | 3,008,426 | $ | 2,245,430 | $ | 464,704 | $ | 148,062 |
| For the year ended July 31, 2009, | For the year ended July 31, 2009, | ||
KS Muni Fund | $ | 395,067 | $ | - |
KS Insured Fund | $ | 58,511 | $ | 5,454 |
NE Muni Fund | $ | 131,770 | $ | - |
OK Muni Fund | $ | - | $ | 282,603 |
ME Muni Fund | $ | - | $ | - |
NH Muni Fund | $ | - | $ | - |
*Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards.
NOTE 7: Investment Advisory Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Viking Fund Management, the Funds' investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, LLC ("Integrity Funds Distributor" or "IFD"), the Funds' underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, the Funds' transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Corridor Investors, LLC ("Corridor Investors" or "Corridor"), the Funds' sponsor.
VFM provides investment advisory and management services to the Funds. The Investment Advisory Agreement (the "Advisory Agreement") provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Funds' average daily net assets. Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, VFM agreed to pay all the expenses of the Funds (excluding taxes, brokerage fees, commissions, and acquired fund fees and expenses, if any) that exceed 1.15% (0.75% for KS Insured Fund) of the Funds' average daily net assets on an annual basis up to the amount of the investment advisory and management fee. VFM may also voluntarily waive fees or reimburse expenses not required under the advisory or other contracts from time to time. Certain Officers of the Funds are also Officers and Governors of VFM.
| Annual Advisory Fee % | Advisory Fees | Advisory Fees | ||
KS Muni Fund | 1.07% | $ | 103,220 | $ | 19,115 |
KS Insured Fund | 0.75% | $ | 29,377 | $ | 7,327 |
NE Muni Fund | 1.07% | $ | 62,209 | $ | 12,327 |
OK Muni Fund | 1.07% | $ | 68,698 | $ | 13,347 |
ME Muni Fund | 1.07% | $ | 28,788 | $ | 6,478 |
NH Muni Fund | 1.07% | $ | 2,840 | $ | 942 |
* After waivers and reimbursements, if any. |
|
|
|
|
IFD serves as the principal underwriter for the Funds. The Funds (excluding KS Insured Fund) have adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. Distribution plans permit the Funds to reimburse its principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Funds and for various other services. These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Funds, are paid by shareholders through expenses called "Distribution Plan expenses." The Funds (excluding KS Insured Fund) currently pay an annual distribution fee of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets. Certain Officers of the Funds are also Officers and Governors of IFD.
| Distribution Fees | Distribution Fees | ||
KS Muni Fund | $ | 59,295 | $ | 9,557 |
NE Muni Fund | $ | 37,244 | $ | 6,163 |
OK Muni Fund | $ | 40,696 | $ | 6,674 |
ME Muni Fund | $ | 19,743 | $ | 3,239 |
NH Muni Fund | $ | 4,777 | $ | 774 |
IFS acts as the Fund's transfer agent for a variable fee equal to 0.20% of the Funds' average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Funds' first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. IFS also acts as the Funds' accounting services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000 and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Funds' average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Funds' first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. IFS also acts as the Funds' administrative services agent for a variable fee equal to 0.125% of the average daily net assets for the Tax-Free Fund for Montana and Tax-Free Fund for North Dakota and 0.15% of the average daily net assets for the Large-Cap Fund and Small Cap Fund on an annual basis for the Funds' first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. Certain Officers of the Funds are also Officers and Governors of IFS.
| Six Months Ended 1/29/10 |
| Payable 1/29/10 | ||||||||||
| Transfer | Accounting | Admin. |
| Transfer | Accounting | Admin. | ||||||
KS Muni Fund | $ | 27,769 | $ | 13,931 | $ | 17,356 |
| $ | 3,241 | $ | 1,630 | $ | 2,026 |
KS Insured Fund | $ | 6,807 | $ | 6,504 | $ | 4,802 |
| $ | 221 | $ | 201 | $ | 146 |
NE Muni Fund | $ | 16,147 | $ | 10,538 | $ | 10,092 |
| $ | 1,713 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 1,071 |
OK Muni Fund | $ | 17,967 | $ | 11,106 | $ | 11,229 |
| $ | 2,062 | $ | 1,262 | $ | 1,289 |
ME Muni Fund | $ | 7,257 | $ | 7,337 | $ | 5,523 |
| $ | 528 | $ | 526 | $ | 394 |
NH Muni Fund | $ | 4,313 | $ | 4,659 | $ | 4,313 |
| $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
* After waivers and reimbursements, if any. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8: New Accounting Standards
During January 2010, the FASB issued amendments to professional standards that require new disclosures and clarify existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. The new disclosures require an organization to separately disclose the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. The new disclosures also require separate information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements.
The FASB amendments also clarify exiting disclosures. Organizations are to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. Organizations also should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.
The amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the implications of this guidance and the impact it will have on the financial statement amounts and disclosures, if any.
NOTE 9: Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued changes to authoritative guidance under GAAP for subsequent events. This guidance requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet. This guidance is intended to establish general standards of accounting and for disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date--that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Funds have performed an evaluation of subsequent events through March 16, 2010, (the date the financial statements were issued) and have determined that no significant subsequent events have occurred through this date that would require additional disclosure.
KANSAS MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
| Six | Year | Year | Year | Year | Year | ||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, | $ | 10.45 | $ | 10.44 | $ | 10.54 | $ | 10.62 | $ | 10.57 | $ | 10.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | .19 | $ | .40 | $ | .40 | $ | .40 | $ | .41 | $ | .38 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
| .16 |
| .01 |
| (.10) |
| (.08) |
| .05 |
| (.36) |
Total from investment operations | $ | .35 | $ | .41 | $ | .30 | $ | .32 | $ | .46 | $ | .02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from net investment income | $ | (.19) | $ | (.40) | $ | (.40) | $ | (.40) | $ | (.41) | $ | (.38) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 10.61 | $ | 10.45 | $ | 10.44 | $ | 10.54 | $ | 10.62 | $ | 10.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | 6.80%3 | 4.06% | 2.90% | 3.06% | 4.39% | 0.22% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $47,310 | $47,365 | $48,587 | $52,996 | $59,093 | $67,470 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.07%3 | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 0.97% | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.31%3 | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.15% | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income to | 3.64%3 | 3.88% | 3.81% | 3.77% | 3.82% | 3.56% | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 5.89% | 16.73% | 6.52% | 4.77% | 12.31% | 44.85% |
1 | Excludes any applicable sales charge. |
2 | This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers by the then-current investment adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
3 | Annualized. |
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
KANSAS INSURED INTERMEDIATE FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
| Six | Year | Year | Year | Year | Year | ||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, | $ | 11.09 | $ | 10.94 | $ | 10.87 | $ | 10.95 | $ | 10.94 | $ | 11.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | .19 | $ | .41 | $ | .42 | $ | .44 | $ | .43 | $ | .42 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
| .06 |
| .15 |
| .07 |
| (.08) |
| .01 |
| (.50) |
Total from investment operations | $ | .25 | $ | .56 | $ | .49 | $ | .36 | $ | .44 | $ | (.08) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from net investment income | $ | (.19) | $ | (.41) | $ | (.42) | $ | (.44) | $ | (.43) | $ | (.42) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 11.15 | $ | 11.09 | $ | 10.94 | $ | 10.87 | $ | 10.95 | $ | 10.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | 4.56%3 | 5.22% | 4.62% | 3.34% | 4.06% | (0.75%) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $18,566 | $16,180 | $12,360 | $10,686 | $12,419 | $14,480 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 0.75%3 | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.75% | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.23%3 | 1.35% | 1.48% | 1.40% | 1.23% | 1.10% | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income to | 3.42%3 | 3.70% | 3.86% | 4.02% | 3.89% | 3.71% | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 10.83% | 14.00% | 21.80% | 9.18% | 4.15% | 1.81% |
1 | Excludes any applicable sales charge. |
2 | This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers by the then-current investment adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
3 | Annualized. |
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
NEBRASKA MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
| Six | Year | Year | Year | Year | Year | ||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, | $ | 10.01 | $ | 10.03 | $ | 10.13 | $ | 10.20 | $ | 10.11 | $ | 10.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | .17 | $ | .38 | $ | .38 | $ | .39 | $ | .40 | $ | .42 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
| .10 |
| (.02) |
| (.10) |
| (.07) |
| .09 |
| (.44) |
Total from investment operations | $ | .27 | $ | .36 | $ | .28 | $ | .32 | $ | .49 | $ | (.02) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from net investment income | $ | (.17) | $ | (.38) | $ | (.38) | $ | (.39) | $ | (.40) | $ | (.42) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 10.11 | $ | 10.01 | $ | 10.03 | $ | 10.13 | $ | 10.20 | $ | 10.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | 5.46%3 | 3.71% | 2.79% | 3.16% | 4.90% | (0.18%) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $30,832 | $28,913 | $27,229 | $28,381 | $30,742 | $32,488 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.07%3 | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 0.98% | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.36%3 | 1.41% | 1.43% | 1.34% | 1.24% | 1.22% | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income to | 3.39%3 | 3.84% | 3.74% | 3.81% | 3.89% | 4.07% | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 11.05% | 6.71% | 10.42% | 17.42% | 14.63% | 4.36% |
1 | Excludes any applicable sales charge. |
2 | This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers by the then-current investment adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
3 | Annualized. |
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
| Six | Year | Year | Year | Year | Year | ||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, | $ | 10.78 | $ | 10.75 | $ | 11.03 | $ | 11.08 | $ | 11.00 | $ | 11.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 0.19 | $ | .41 | $ | .39 | $ | .39 | $ | .39 | $ | .40 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
| 0.22 |
| .03 |
| (.28) |
| (.05) |
| .08 |
| (.07) |
Total from investment operations | $ | 0.41 | $ | .44 | $ | .11 | $ | .34 | $ | .47 | $ | .33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from net investment income | $ | (0.19) | $ | (.41) | $ | (.39) | $ | (.39) | $ | (.39) | $ | (.40) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 11.00 | $ | 10.78 | $ | 10.75 | $ | 11.03 | $ | 11.08 | $ | 11.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | 7.77%3 | 4.28% | 1.01% | 3.10% | 4.39% | 3.02% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $33,660 | $32,019 | $42,026 | $47,847 | $43,563 | $34,887 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.07%3 | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 0.98% | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.35%3 | 1.36% | 1.35% | 1.28% | 1.19% | 1.20% | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income to | 3.56%3 | 3.91% | 3.55% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.60% | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 6.32% | 3.48% | 10.37% | 11.97% | 4.65% | 8.69% |
1 | Excludes any applicable sales charge. |
2 | This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers by the then-current investment adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
3 | Annualized. |
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
MAINE MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
| Six | Year | Year | Year | Year | Year | ||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, | $ | 10.62 | $ | 10.44 | $ | 10.45 | $ | 10.52 | $ | 10.45 | $ | 11.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | .17 | $ | .35 | $ | .36 | $ | .37 | $ | .35 | $ | .35 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
| .11 |
| .18 |
| (.01) |
| (.07) |
| .07 |
| (.43) |
Total from investment operations | $ | .28 | $ | .53 | $ | .35 | $ | .30 | $ | .42 | $ | (.08) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from net investment income | $ | (.17) | $ | (.35) | $ | (.36) | $ | (.37) | $ | (.35) | $ | (.35) |
Distributions from net realized gains |
| .00 |
| .00 |
| .00 |
| .00 |
| .00 |
| (.22) |
Total distributions | $ | (.17) | $ | (.35) | $ | (.36) | $ | (.37) | $ | (.35) | $ | (.57) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 10.73 | $ | 10.62 | $ | 10.44 | $ | 10.45 | $ | 10.52 | $ | 10.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | 5.34%3 | 5.22% | 3.43% | 2.89% | 4.12% | (.74%) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $16,033 | $15,413 | $15,880 | $16,707 | $18,728 | $24,975 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.07%3 | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.02% | 0.97% | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.50%3 | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.44% | 1.30% | 1.27% | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income to | 3.21%3 | 3.38% | 3.46% | 3.52% | 3.35% | 3.24% | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 16.50% | 15.39% | 4.44% | 8.50% | 1.60% | 4.87% |
1 | Excludes any applicable sales charge. |
2 | This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers by the then-current investment adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
3 | Annualized. |
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
| Six | Year | Year | Year | Year | Year | ||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, | $ | 10.50 | $ | 10.32 | $ | 10.24 | $ | 10.25 | $ | 10.20 | $ | 10.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) | $ | .16 | $ | .29 | $ | .30 | $ | .32 | $ | .33 | $ | .33 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
| .11 |
| .18 |
| .08 |
| (.01) |
| .05 |
| (.52) |
Total from investment operations | $ | .27 | $ | .47 | $ | .38 | $ | .31 | $ | .38 | $ | (.19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from net investment income | $ | (.16) | $ | (.29) | $ | (.30) | $ | (.32) | $ | (.33) | $ | (.33) |
Distributions from net realized gains |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| (.10) |
Total distributions | $ | (.16) | $ | (.29) | $ | (.30) | $ | (.32) | $ | (.33) | $ | (.43) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 10.61 | $ | 10.50 | $ | 10.32 | $ | 10.24 | $ | 10.25 | $ | 10.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | 5.16%3 | 4.64% | 3.72% | 3.02% | 3.76% | (1.81%) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | $3,855 | $3,816 | $3,681 | $4,188 | $5,317 | $6,363 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 1.07%3 | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 0.98% | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | 3.14%3 | 3.19% | 3.20% | 2.72% | 2.22% | 1.80% | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income to | 3.01%3 | 2.81% | 2.87% | 3.09% | 3.19% | 3.14% | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 12.88% | 15.93% | 12.56% | 11.83% | 8.10% | 17.94% |
1 | Excludes any applicable sales charge. |
2 | This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers by the then-current investment adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
3 | Annualized. |
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
EXPENSE EXAMPLE (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from July 31, 2009 to January 29, 2010.
Actual expenses—The section in the table under the heading "Actual" provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns together with the amount you invested to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an account value of $8,600 divided by $1,000 equals 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class in the column entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes—The section in the table under the heading "Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)" provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading "Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)" is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses | Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,033.82 | $5.41 | 1.07% |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,019.68 | $5.37 | 1.07% |
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund |
|
|
|
|
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,022.68 | $3.77 | 0.75% |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,046.27 | $3.82 | 0.75% |
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,027.14 | $5.39 | 1.07% |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,019.68 | $5.37 | 1.07% |
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,038.61 | $5.42 | 1.07% |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,019.68 | $5.37 | 1.07% |
|
|
|
|
|
Maine Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,026.56 | $5.39 | 1.07% |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,019.68 | $5.37 | 1.07% |
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,025.68 | $5.39 | 1.07% |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,019.68 | $5.37 | 1.07% |
|
|
|
|
|
*Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, and then multiplied by 179/360 days.
TRANSACTION WITH CORRIDOR INVESTORS, LLC
Corridor Investors, located at 1 Main Street North, Minot, North Dakota 58703, is a North Dakota limited liability company that was organized in January 2009 by Robert E. Walstad, the chairman of the Board of Trustees of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and Shannon D. Radke, president of VFM and Viking Mutual Funds. Mr. Walstad and Mr. Radke are Governors of Corridor, and Mr. Radke is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Corridor. On March 6, 2009, VFM and Corridor entered into an agreement (the "Corridor Agreement") with Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. ("Integrity") and Integrity Money Management, Inc. ("Integrity Money Management"), among others, to complete certain transactions (collectively, the "Transaction"), certain of which are described below. The Transaction was completed on July 31, 2009, and VFM assumed responsibility for the daily management of the Funds' assets.
Prior to the closing of the Transaction, Integrity Money Management served as investment adviser to the Funds. Pursuant to the Corridor Agreement, Integrity (as seller) generally sold its mutual fund services business to Corridor and VFM (collectively, as buyer). More specifically, Corridor and VFM acquired, among other things, certain assets of Integrity Money Management and VFM became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Corridor. Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (the Funds' principal underwriter) and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (the Funds' transfer agent and accounting and administrative services provider) also became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Corridor as a result of the Transaction.
To complete the Transaction, numerous conditions needed to be met, including shareholder approval of advisory contracts with VFM (the "New Agreements"). Shareholders approved, among other things, the New Agreements at meetings held on June 29, 2009 (and, for certain Funds, at meetings adjourned to July 24, 2009) (collectively, the "Shareholder Meetings").
With the completion of the Transaction, Corridor now provides investment advisory, distribution and other services to the Funds, as well as to the four series of Viking Mutual Funds, the three series of The Integrity Funds, and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., primarily through its subsidiaries, including VFM, IFD, and IFS.
BOARD APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The approval and the continuation of a fund's investment advisory agreement must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by a vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or "Interested Persons" of any party ("Independent Trustees"), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the Fund's adviser. The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals. At a meeting held on October 19, 2009, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement ("Advisory Agreement") between the Funds and VFM.
The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory Agreements nor "interested persons" of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory Agreement. In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion. In connection with the approval of the Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities Exchange Commission directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:
(a) | the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund; |
(b) | the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications; |
(c) | the relevant fund's investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data; |
(d) | the adviser's costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund; |
(e) | the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund; |
(f) | an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds; |
(g) | the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and |
(h) | information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called "fallout" benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds. |
In evaluating the Adviser's services and its fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of each Fund, the recent financial statements of the Adviser and its parent, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds. In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Funds, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund's past performance, the nature and quality of the services provided, the profitability of the Adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to each Fund), and the expense waivers by the Adviser. The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to each Fund. In this regard, the Trustees noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements involving the Adviser and the only benefits to affiliates were the fees earned for services provided. The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling. The Trustees also considered the Adviser's commitment to voluntarily limit Fund expenses and the skills and capabilities of the Adviser.
The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services: The Adviser currently provides services to fourteen funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds. The experience and expertise of the Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund's future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board.
Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications: The portfolio manager of the Funds has over 25 years experience in the advisory and money management area adding significant expertise to the Adviser of the Funds. A detailed biography of the portfolio manager was presented to the Trustees. This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Funds.
Investment Performance: Upon a review of the total return history and category rankings of each Fund, the Trustees deemed the performance of each Fund to be satisfactory. In addition, each of the Funds has been meeting its investment objective. As of July 31, 2009, the Fund performance for: (1) Kansas Municipal Fund returns for the 1, 3, 5 and 10-year periods were below its index, and the returns for the 1, 3 and 5 year periods were above its median classification, but were below for its 10 year period; (2) Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund returns for the 1, 3, and 5-year periods were above its index and the 10 year period was slightly below its index, and the returns for the 1 and 3 year periods were above its median classification but below for its 5 and 10 year period; (3) Nebraska Municipal Fund returns for the 1, 3, 5 and 10-year periods were below its index, and the 1 and 3 year periods were above its median classification but slightly below for its 5 and 10 year period; (4) Oklahoma Municipal Fund returns for the 1, 3, 5 and 10-year periods were below its index, and for the 1, 3 and 5 year periods were above its median classification but slightly below for its 10 year period; (5) New Hampshire Municipal Fund returns for the 1, 3, 5 and 10-year periods were below its index, and the 1 and 3 year periods were above its median classification but slightly below for its 5 and 10 year period. (6) Maine Municipal Fund returns for the 1-year period was above its index while the 3, 5, and 10 year periods were slightly below its index, and the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year periods were above its median classification.
Profitability: In connection with its review of fees, the Board also considered the profitability of VFM for its advisory activities. In this regard, the Board reviewed information regarding the finances of Corridor and VFM and estimated revenues. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the level of profitability was reasonable in light of the services provided.
Economies of Scale: The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Funds as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as each of the Funds grow larger, but the size of the Funds has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale. The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund. The Adviser has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if a Fund reaches an asset level where it could benefit from economies of scale. The Trustees discussed the fact that the Adviser does not benefit from economies of scale due to its relationship to the Funds as the Funds are relatively small and are its only advisory clients.
Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds: A comparison of the management fees charged by the Adviser seemed reasonable to the Trustees when compared to similar funds in objective and size. The Adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees to a certain degree due to the small size of the Funds.
Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds: Each of the Fund's (except for Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund) net expense ratio of 1.07% was comparable to the average expense ratio of other funds of similar objective and size but slightly higher than the median of other funds of similar objective and size. The Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund net expense ratio of 0.75% was lower than the average and median expense ratio of other funds of similar objective and size.
Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called "fallout" benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds: The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund. The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.
In voting unanimously to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance. The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of VFM, the strategic plan involving the Funds, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Funds. They determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Advisory Agreements would be in the best interest of the Funds and their shareholders.
Potential Conflicts of Interest—Adviser
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:
• | The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund. VFM seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds. The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. |
|
|
• | Mr. Walstad and Mr. Radke own membership interests of approximately 10% and 5%, respectively, in Corridor. They received their membership interests, without a cash investment, in exchange for their contributions to Corridor (including experience in the mutual fund industry and their personal guaranties of bank financing) and, in addition, with respect to Mr. Radke, in exchange for his interest in VFM. Other current employees of Corridor own, in the aggregate, approximately 23% of the total membership interests in Corridor, with each employee individually owning an interest of approximately 1%. They received their membership interests in exchange for their experience and role in the operations of Corridor, and without a cash investment. |
|
|
• | With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction. The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds. |
|
|
• | The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund but not all funds with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts. One of the portfolio manager's numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of Fund shares. The compensation of Monte Avery (the "Portfolio Manager" of the Funds), is based on salary paid every other week. He is not compensated for client retention. In addition, Corridor sponsors a 401(k) plan for all its employees. This plan is funded by employee elective deferrals. |
|
|
• | Although the portfolio manager generally does not trade securities in his own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts. Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts. |
The Adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
PRIVACY POLICY
Corridor Investors understands your concerns about safeguarding information about you and your account(s) and considers the privacy of our shareholders to be of fundamental importance. We have established the following standards to safeguard the personal and confidential information you entrust to us.
1. Collection of Information—While we do not sell any nonpublic personal information about our customers to third parties, we do collect and retain such information about you including:
| • | information from applications or other forms, such as you and your spouse's names, occupations, street address and social security numbers; |
| • | information regarding your financial position, investment experience and objectives; and |
| • | information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others, such as your account balance and transaction detail. |
2. Disclosure of Information—Disclosure of nonpublic personal information to affiliates is often necessary to conduct our business. We have also disclosed such information to third parties as permitted by law. Some instances when we have provided information to non-affiliates include:
| • | disclosing information necessary to process and service account transactions that you authorize; |
| • | disclosing your name and address to third parties who assist with mailing fund-related materials such as shareholder reports; and |
| • | disclosing information as required by regulatory or law enforcement agencies or with others as permitted by law. |
3. Confidentiality and Security—We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to ensure the integrity of your personal information.
4. Limited Access to Information—Access to your nonpublic personal information is limited to authorized employees, affiliates and third parties. The information will then only be used for authorized purposes such as maintaining or servicing your account(s) or as otherwise permitted by law.
5. Further Information—If you have any questions about our privacy policy, please call us at 800-276-1262.
PROXY VOTING OF FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in each Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 800-276-1262. A report on Form N-PX of how the Funds voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through the Funds' website at www.integrityvikingfunds.com. The information is also available from the Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval ("EDGAR") database on the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE
Within 60 days of the end of its second and fourth fiscal quarters, the Funds provide a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in their semi-annual and annual reports on the Form N-CSR(S). These reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the shareholders of the Funds. The Funds also file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. The Funds' Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 202-942-8090. You may also access this information from the Funds' website at www.integrityvikingfunds.com.
SHAREHOLDER INQUIRIES AND MAILINGS
Direct inquiries regarding the Funds to: | Direct inquiries regarding account information to: |
To reduce their expenses, the Funds may mail only one copy of its prospectus and each annual and semi-annual report to those addresses shared by two or more accounts. If you wish to receive additional copies of these documents, please call Integrity Funds Distributor at 800-276-1262 or contact your financial institution. Integrity Funds Distributor will begin sending you individual copies 30 days after receiving your request.
[Logo]
Equity Funds
Williston Basin/Mid-North America Stock Fund
Integrity Growth & Income Fund
Viking Large-Cap Value Fund
Viking Small-Cap Value Fund
Corporate Bond Fund
Integrity High Income Fund
Specialty Fund
Integrity Fund of Funds
State-Specific Tax-Exempt Bond Funds
Viking Tax-Free Fund for North Dakota
Viking Tax-Free Fund for Montana
Kansas Municipal Fund
Kansas Insured Intermediate Fund
Maine Municipal Fund
Nebraska Municipal Fund
New Hampshire Municipal Fund
Oklahoma Municipal Fund
Integrity Viking Funds are sold by prospectus only. An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the investment company. You may obtain a prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser or at www.integrityvikingfunds.com. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.
Item 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
The information required in this Item is only required in an annual report on Form N-CSR.
Item 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
The information required in this Item is only required in an annual report on Form N-CSR.
Item 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
The information required by this Item is only required in an annual report on Form N-CSR.
Item 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable
Item 6. INVESTMENTS.
The Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable
Item 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable
Item 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATEDPURCHASERS.
Not applicable
Item 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant's board of trustees in the last fiscal half-year.
Item 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
| (a) | Based on their evaluation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR (the "Report"), the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer believe that the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effectively designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the Report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by the filing date, including ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Report is accumulated and communicated to the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer who are making certifications in the Report, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
|
|
|
| (b) | There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal half-year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. EXHIBITS.
| (a) | (1) | The registrant's code of ethics filed pursuant to Item 2 of the N-CSR is filed with the registrant's annual N-CSR. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (2) | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed and attached hereto. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (3) | Not applicable. |
|
|
| |
| (b) | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed and attached hereto. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Integrity Managed Portfolios
By: /s/ Shannon D. Radke
Shannon D. Radke
President
March 31, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Shannon D. Radke
Shannon D. Radke
President
March 31, 2010
By: /s/ Adam Forthun
Adam Forthun
Treasurer
March 31, 2010