Electronics For Imaging (EFII) 10-K 20 Feb 14 2013 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Jan. 28, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Document Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Document Type	'10-K	'	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'	'
Document Period End Date	31-Dec-13	'	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2013	'	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'FY	'	'
Trading Symbol	'EFII	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING INC	'	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0000867374	'	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--12-31	'	'
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	'Yes	'	'
Entity Current Reporting Status	'Yes	'	'
Entity Voluntary Filers	'No	'	'
Entity Filer Category	'Large Accelerated Filer	'	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	46,960,514	'
Entity Public Float	'	'	$1,174,449,533
Board of Directors and Executive Management [Member]	'	'	'
Document Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	'	4,930,877

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Current assets:	'	'
Cash and cash equivalents	$177,084	$283,996
Short-term investments, available for sale	177,957	80,966
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $16.4 and $12.9 million, respectively	130,717	135,110
Inventories	68,345	58,343
Income taxes receivable and deferred tax assets	20,945	54,034
Other current assets	25,516	20,843
Total current assets	600,564	633,292
Property and equipment, net	84,829	86,582
Goodwill	233,203	219,456
Intangible assets, net	68,722	80,244
Deferred tax assets	34,300	52,587
Other assets	4,766	2,810
Total assets	1,026,384	1,074,971
Current liabilities:	'	'
Accounts payable	75,132	63,446
Deferred proceeds from property transaction	183,200	180,216
Accrued and other liabilities	78,515	79,018
Deferred revenue	42,569	40,229
Income taxes payable and deferred tax liabilities	4,654	7,562
Total current liabilities	200,870	370,471
Imputed financing obligation	11,500	'
Noncurrent contingent and other liabilities	6,815	17,742
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities	6,738	6,210
Noncurrent income taxes payable	33,011	29,755
Total liabilities	258,934	424,178
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)	'	'
Stockholders' equity:	'	'
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	'	'
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000 shares authorized; 47,370 and 79,193 shares issued, respectively	474	792
Additional paid-in capital	474,330	764,870
Treasury stock, at cost, 396 and 33,045 shares, respectively	-12,897	-569,576
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	-1,388	269
Retained earnings	306,931	454,438
Total stockholders' equity	767,450	650,793
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$1,026,384	$1,074,971

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Millions, except Share data in Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Statement Of Financial Position [Abstract]	'	'
Accounts receivable, allowances	$16.40	$12.90
Preferred stock, par value	$0.01	$0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000	5,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value	$0.01	$0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	150,000	150,000
Common stock, shares issued	47,370	79,193
Treasury stock, shares	396	33,045

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011
Income Statement [Abstract]	'		'		'
Revenue	$727,693		$652,137		$591,556
Cost of revenue	332,527	[1]	297,316	[1]	260,573	[1]
Gross profit	395,166		354,821		330,983
Operating expenses (gains):	'		'		'
Research and development	128,124	[1]	120,298	[1]	115,901	[1]
Sales and marketing	137,583	[1]	125,513	[1]	119,487	[1]
General and administrative	47,755	[1]	50,727	[1]	53,756	[1]
Amortization of identified intangibles	19,438		18,594		11,248
Restructuring and other (Note 14)	4,834		5,803		3,258
Gain on sale of building and land	-117,216		'		'
Total operating expenses	220,518		320,935		303,650
Income from operations	174,648		33,886		27,333
Interest and other income (expense), net:	-1,510		1,137		3,087
Income before income taxes	173,138		35,023		30,420
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes	-64,031		48,246		-2,955
Net income	$109,107		$83,269		$27,465
Net income per basic common share	$2.34		$1.79		$0.59
Net income per diluted common share	$2.26		$1.74		$0.58
Shares used in basic per-share calculation	46,643		46,453		46,234
Shares used in diluted per-share calculation	48,359		47,734		47,579
[1]	Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: 2013 2012 2011 Cost of revenue $ 1,817 $ 1,193 $ 1,664 Research and development 7,568 5,719 5,724 Sales and marketing 4,500 3,320 4,133 General and administrative 11,885 9,489 11,848

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope1

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Parenthetical) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Cost of Revenue [Member]	'	'	'
Recognized stock-based compensation expense	$1,817	$1,193	$1,664
Research and Development [Member]	'	'	'
Recognized stock-based compensation expense	7,568	5,719	5,724
Sales and Marketing [Member]	'	'	'
Recognized stock-based compensation expense	4,500	3,320	4,133
General and Administrative [Member]	'	'	'
Recognized stock-based compensation expense	$11,885	$9,489	$11,848

Consolidated_Statements_of_Com

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement Of Comprehensive Income [Abstract]	'	'	'
Net income	$109,107	$83,269	$27,465
Net unrealized investment gains (losses):	'	'	'
Unrealized holding gains, net of tax provisions of less than $0.1, $0.1, and less than $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively	66	198	39
Reclassification adjustments included in net income, net of tax benefits of less than $0.1, $0.1, and $0.1million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively	-23	-100	-187
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)	43	98	-148
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax benefits (provisions) of $(0.1), $0.6, and less than $(0.1)million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively	-1,733	-1,304	-1,292
Other	33	28	-68
Comprehensive income	$107,450	$82,091	$25,957

Consolidated_Statements_of_Com1

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Parenthetical) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Statement Of Comprehensive Income [Abstract]	'	'	'
Unrealized holding gains, tax provisions	$0.10	$0.10	$0.10
Reclassification adjustments included in net income, tax benefits	0.1	0.1	0.1
Currency translation adjustments, tax benefits (provisions)	($0.10)	$0.60	($0.10)

Consolidated_Statements_of_Sto

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (USD $)	Total	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]
In Thousands
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	$551,749	$745	$692,904	($488,559)	$2,955	$343,704
Beginning Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2010	'	74,456	'	'	'	'
Balance, shares treasury stock at Dec. 31, 2010	'	'	'	-28,031	'	'
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	25,957	'	'	'	-1,508	27,465
Exercise of common stock options	1,988	2	1,986	'	'	'
Exercise of common stock options, shares	146	146	'	'	'	'
Restricted stock vested	'	13	-13	'	'	'
Restricted stock vested, shares	'	1,317	'	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation	23,369	'	23,369	'	'	'
Stock repurchases	-45,841	'	'	-45,841	'	'
Stock repurchases, shares	'	'	'	-2,933	'	'
Stock issued pursuant to ESPP	6,135	6	6,129	'	'	'
Stock issued pursuant to ESPP, shares	'	646	'	'	'	'
Tax benefit from employee stock plans	1,426	'	1,426	'	'	'
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	564,783	766	725,801	-534,400	1,447	371,169
Balance, shares common stock at Dec. 31, 2011	'	76,565	'	'	'	'
Balance, shares treasury stock at Dec. 31, 2011	'	'	'	-30,964	'	'
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	82,091	'	'	'	-1,178	83,269
Exercise of common stock options	12,201	8	12,193	'	'	'
Exercise of common stock options, shares	785	785	'	'	'	'
Restricted stock vested	'	13	-13	'	'	'
Restricted stock vested, shares	'	1,291	'	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation	19,721	'	19,721	'	'	'
Stock repurchases	-35,176	'	'	-35,176	'	'
Stock repurchases, shares	'	'	'	-2,081	'	'
Stock issued pursuant to ESPP	6,757	5	6,752	'	'	'
Stock issued pursuant to ESPP, shares	'	552	'	'	'	'
Tax benefit from employee stock plans	417	'	417	'	'	'
Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	650,793	792	764,871	-569,576	269	454,438
Balance, shares common stock at Dec. 31, 2012	'	79,193	'	'	'	'
Balance, shares treasury stock at Dec. 31, 2012	33,045	'	'	-33,045	'	'
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	107,450	'	'	'	-1,657	109,107
Exercise of common stock options	5,172	4	5,168	'	'	'
Exercise of common stock options, shares	434	433	'	'	'	'
Restricted stock vested	'	12	-12	'	'	'
Restricted stock vested, shares	'	1,159	'	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation	25,770	'	25,770	'	'	'
Stock repurchases	-35,734	'	'	-35,734	'	'
Stock repurchases, shares	'	'	'	-1,341	'	'
Stock retirement and cancellation	'	-340	-335,459	592,413	'	-256,614
Stock retirements and cancellations, shares	'	-33,990	'	33,990	'	'
Stock issued pursuant to ESPP	7,131	6	7,125	'	'	'
Stock issued pursuant to ESPP, shares	'	575	'	'	'	'
Tax benefit from employee stock plans	6,867	'	6,867	'	'	'
Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	$767,450	$474	$474,330	($12,897)	($1,388)	$306,931
Balance, shares common stock at Dec. 31, 2013	'	47,370	'	'	'	'
Balance, shares treasury stock at Dec. 31, 2013	396	'	'	-396	'	'

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:	'	'	'
Net income	$109,107	$83,269	$27,465
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:	'	'	'
Depreciation and amortization	28,830	27,032	18,765
Deferred taxes	53,846	-52,821	-2,691
Tax benefit from employee stock plans	6,867	417	1,426
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	-7,024	-1,360	-2,038
Provision for bad debts and sales-related allowances	9,595	3,250	2,010
Provision for inventory obsolescence	4,508	3,231	6,991
Stock-based compensation	25,770	19,721	23,369
Contingent consideration payments related to business acquired	-1,563	'	'
Non-cash acquisition-related compensation costs	940	907	'
Gain on sale of minority investment in a privately-held company	-75	'	-2,866
Gain on sale of building and land, net of relocation costs paid	-117,216	'	'
Other non-cash charges and credits	-4,949	1,870	1,426
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquired companies:	'	'	'
Accounts receivable	-4,409	-29,325	-3,386
Inventories	-13,683	-6,853	-6,550
Other current assets	-7,117	-4,840	-1,047
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	11,819	9,464	2,529
Income taxes payable and receivable, net	-4,631	-608	6,793
Net cash provided by operating activities	89,339	53,354	72,196
Cash flows from investing activities:	'	'	'
Purchases of short-term investments	-145,088	-64,528	-99,155
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments	47,375	80,992	101,716
Purchases, net of proceeds from sales, of property and equipment	-49,815	-6,147	-9,828
Proceeds from sale of building and land, net of direct transaction costs	91	179,173	'
Businesses purchased, net of cash acquired, and post-acquisition non-competition agreements	-14,688	-61,591	-36,690
Proceeds from sale of minority investment in a privately-held company	75	'	2,866
Proceeds from notes receivable of acquired businesses	188	5,216	713
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities	-161,862	133,115	-40,378
Cash flows from financing activities:	'	'	'
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	12,303	18,958	8,123
Purchases of treasury stock and net share settlements	-35,734	-35,176	-45,841
Repayment of debt assumed through business acquisitions	-1,860	-6,914	-210
Contingent consideration payments related to businesses acquired	-15,123	-969	-1,746
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	7,024	1,360	2,038
Net cash used for financing activities	-33,390	-22,741	-37,636
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	-999	210	-487
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	-106,912	163,938	-6,305
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	283,996	120,058	126,363
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$177,084	$283,996	$120,058

The_Company_and_Its_Significan

The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]	'
The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies	'
	Note 1: The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies
	The Company
	We are a world leader in customer-centric digital printing innovation focused on the transformation of the printing, packaging, and ceramic tile decoration industries from the use of traditional analog based presses to digital on-demand printing.
	Our products include industrial super-wide, wide format, and label and packaging digital inkjet printers that utilize our digital ink, ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printers, digital inkjet printer parts, and professional services; print production workflow, web-to-print, cross-media marketing, and business process automation solutions; and color DFEs creating an on-demand digital printing ecosystem. Our award-winning business process automation solutions are integrated from creation to print and are vertically integrated with our digital industrial inkjet printers. Our inks include digital UV and LED ink, of which we are the largest world-wide manufacturer, textile dye sublimation, and thermoforming ink. Our product portfolio includes industrial inkjet products (“Industrial Inkjet”), including VUTEk super-wide and EFI wide format industrial digital inkjet printers and related ink, Jetrion label and packaging digital inkjet printing systems and related ink, and Cretaprint digital inkjet printers for ceramic tile decoration; print production workflow, web-to-print, cross-media marketing, and business process automation software (“Productivity Software”), which provides corporate printing, label and packaging, publishing, and mailing and fulfillment solutions for the printing industry; and Fiery DFEs (“Fiery”). Our integrated solutions and award-winning technologies are designed to automate print and business processes, streamline workflow, provide profitable value-added services, and produce accurate digital output.
	Significant Accounting Policies
	Basis of Presentation
	The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EFI and our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
	In accordance with ASC 805, we revised previously issued post-acquisition financial information to reflect adjustments to the preliminary accounting for business acquisitions as if the adjustments occurred on the acquisition date. Accordingly, we have increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities by $1.2 million in the aggregate at December 31, 2012 to reflect opening balance sheet adjustments related to our acquisitions of Cretaprint, OPS, and Technique.
	During 2012, we adjusted our accounting for acquisition-related contingent consideration in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, which affected the year ended December 31, 2011. We concluded the impact was immaterial to the prior periods. We have revised the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2011, which resulted in a decrease of $1.7 million in cash used for investing activities and a corresponding increase in cash used for financing activities. The correction had no impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods presented.
	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, comprehensive income, cash flows, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, inventories and purchase commitments, warranty obligations, litigation, restructuring activities, self-insurance, fair value of financial instruments, stock-based compensation, income taxes, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, business combinations, build-to-suit lease accounting, and contingencies on an ongoing basis. Estimates are based on historical and current experience, the impact of the current economic environment, and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at the time of the estimate, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
	Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-term Investments
	We invest our excess cash on deposit with major banks in money market, U.S. Treasury and government-sponsored entity, corporate debt, municipal, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed residential securities. By policy, we invest primarily in high-grade marketable securities. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions or issuers of these investments to the extent of amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
	We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Typically, the cost of these investments has approximated fair value. Marketable investments with a maturity greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale short-term investments. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of OCI, adjusted for deferred income taxes. The credit portion of any other-than-temporary impairment is included in net income. Realized gains and losses on sales of financial instruments are recognized upon sale of the investments using the specific identification method.
	We review investments in debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment whenever the fair value is less than the amortized cost and evidence indicates the investment’s carrying amount is not recoverable within a reasonable period of time. We assess the fair value of individual securities as part of our ongoing portfolio management. Our other-than-temporary assessment includes reviewing the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than amortized cost; the seniority and durations of the securities; adverse conditions related to a security, industry, or sector; historical and projected issuer financial performance, credit ratings, issuer specific news; and other available relevant information. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, we consider whether we have the intent to sell the impaired security or if it will be more likely than not that we will be required to sell the impaired security before a market price recovery and whether evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary.
	In determining whether a credit loss existed, we used our best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from each debt security. For asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, cash flow estimates, including prepayment assumptions, we rely on data from widely accepted third party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates vary based on assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates, recoveries, and changes in value. Expected cash flows were discounted using the effective interest rate implicit in the securities.
	Based on this analysis, there were no other-than-temporary impairments, including credit-related impairments, during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. We have determined that gross unrealized losses on short-term investments at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are temporary in nature because each investment meets our investment policy and credit quality requirements. We have the ability and intent to hold these investments until they recover their unrealized losses, which may not be until maturity. Evidence that we will recover our investments outweighs evidence to the contrary.
	Restricted Cash
	We are required to maintain restricted cash of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2013 related to customer agreements that were obtained through the Alphagraph acquisition, which is classified as a current asset because the restriction will be released within twelve months.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued and other liabilities, approximate their respective fair values due to the short maturities of these financial instruments. The fair value of our available-for-sale securities, contingent acquisition-related liabilities, self-insurance liability, and derivative instruments are disclosed in Note 6—Investments and Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
	Revenue Recognition
	We derive our revenue primarily from product revenue, which includes hardware (DFEs, design-licensed solutions including upgrades, digital industrial inkjet printers including components replaced under maintenance agreements, and ink), software licensing and development, and royalties. We receive service revenue from software license and printer maintenance agreements, customer support, training, and consulting.
	We recognize revenue on the sale of DFEs, printers, and ink in accordance with the provisions of SAB 104, and when applicable, ASC 605-25. As such, revenue is generally recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered or services have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
	Products generally must be shipped against written purchase orders. We use either a binding purchase order or signed contract as evidence of an arrangement. Sales to some of the leading printer manufacturers are evidenced by a master agreement governing the relationship together with a binding purchase order. Sales to our resellers are also evidenced by binding purchase orders or signed contracts and do not generally contain rights of return or price protection. Our arrangements generally do not include product acceptance clauses. When acceptance is required, revenue is recognized when the product is accepted by the customer.
	Delivery of hardware generally is complete when title and risk of loss is transferred at point of shipment from manufacturing facilities, or when the product is delivered to the customer’s local common carrier. We also sell products and services using sales arrangements with terms resulting in different timing for revenue recognition as follows:
		•		if the title and/or risk of loss is transferred at a location other than our manufacturing facility, revenue is recognized when title and/or risk of loss transfers to the customer, per the terms of the agreement;
		•		if title is retained until payment is received, revenue is recognized when title is passed upon receipt of payment;
		•		if the sales arrangement is classified as an operating lease, revenue is recognized ratably over the lease term;
		•		if the sales arrangement is classified as a sales-type lease, revenue is recognized upon shipment;
		•		if the sales arrangement is a fixed price for performance extending over a long period and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with these agreements, revenue is recognized under the percentage of completion method.
	SAB Topic 13.A.3.c.Q3 requires that “If it is determined that the undelivered service is not essential to the functionality of the delivered product, but a portion of the contract fee is not payable until the undelivered service is delivered, the staff would not consider that obligation to be inconsequential or perfunctory. Generally, the portion of the contract price that is withheld or refundable should be deferred until the outstanding service is delivered because that portion would not be realized or realizable.” We deferred an immaterial amount of revenue during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 because a portion of the customer payment was contingent upon installation.
	We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the terms of the contract or purchase order. We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer, the creditworthiness of the customer, customer concentrations, current economic trends and macroeconomic conditions, changes in customer payment terms, the length of time receivables are past due, and significant one-time events. We may not request collateral from our customers, although down payments or letters of credit are generally required from Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software customers as a means to ensure payment. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue when collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.
	We license our software primarily under perpetual licenses. Revenue from software consists of software licensing, post-contract customer support, and professional consulting. We apply the provisions of ASC 985-605 and, if applicable, SAB 104 and ASC 605-25, to all transactions involving the sale of software products and hardware transactions where the software is not incidental.
	We enter into contracts to sell our products and services and, while the majority of our sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions, there are agreements that contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. As a result, significant contract interpretation is sometimes required to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether the deliverables specified in a multiple element arrangement should be treated as separate units of accounting for revenue recognition purposes, and, if so, how the price should be allocated among the elements and when to recognize revenue for each element. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when the delivered elements have stand-alone value, uncertainties regarding customer acceptance are resolved, and there are no customer-negotiated refund or return rights for the delivered elements. If the arrangement includes a customer-negotiated refund or right of return relative to the delivered item and the delivery and performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control, the delivered element constitutes a separate unit of accounting. We limit revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations, or subject to customer-specified return or refund privileges. Changes in the allocation of the sales price between elements may impact the timing of revenue recognition, but will not change the total revenue recognized on the contract.
	Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements
	We adopted ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 as of the beginning of fiscal 2011 for new and materially modified transactions originating after January 1, 2011.
	ASU 2009-13 eliminated the residual method of allocating revenue in multiple deliverable arrangements. In accordance with ASU 2009-13, we recognize revenue in multiple element arrangements involving tangible products containing software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality by applying the relative sales price method of allocation. The sales price for each element is determined using VSOE, when available (including post-contract customer support, professional services, hosting, and training), or TPE is used. If VSOE or TPE are not available, then BESP is used when applying the relative sales price method for each unit of accounting. When the arrangement includes software and non-software elements, revenue is first allocated to the non-software and software elements as a group based on their relative sales price in accordance with ASC 605-25. Thereafter, the relative sales price allocated to the software elements as a group is further allocated to each unit of accounting in accordance with ASC 985-605. We then defer revenue with respect to the relative sales price that was allocated to any undelivered element.
	We have calculated BESP for software licenses and non-software deliverables. We considered several different methods of establishing BESP including cost plus a reasonable margin and stand-alone sales price of the same or similar products and, if available, targeted rate of return, list price less discount, and company published list prices to identify the most appropriate representation of the estimated sales price of our products. Due to the wide range of pricing offered to our customers, we determined that sales price of the same or similar products, list price less discount, and company published list prices were not appropriate methods to determine BESP for our products. Cost plus a reasonable margin and targeted rate of return were eliminated due to the difficulty in determining the cost associated with the intangible elements of each product’s cost structure. As a result, management believes that the best estimate of the sales price of an element is based on the median sales price of deliverables sold in stand-alone transactions and/or separately priced deliverables contained in bundled arrangements. Elements sold as stand-alone transactions and in bundled arrangements during the last three months of 2012 and twelve months of 2013 were included in the calculation of BESP.
	When historical data is unavailable to calculate and support the determination of BESP on a newly launched or customized product, then BESP of similar products is substituted for revenue allocation purposes. We offer customization for some of our products. Customization does not have a significant impact on the discounting or pricing of our products.
	We have insignificant transactions where tangible and software products are sold together in a bundled arrangement. ASU 2009-14 determined that tangible products containing software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality are not required to follow the software revenue recognition guidance in ASC 985-605 as long as the hardware components of the tangible product substantively contribute to its functionality. In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software components shall always be excluded from the guidance in ASC 985-605. Non-software elements are accounted for in accordance with SAB 104.
	Multiple element arrangements containing only software elements remain subject to the provisions of ASC 985-605 and must follow the residual method. When several elements of a multiple element arrangement, including software licenses, post-contract customer support, hosting, and professional services, are sold to a customer through a single contract, the revenue from such multiple element arrangements are allocated to each element using the residual method in accordance with ASC 985-605. Revenue is allocated to the support elements and professional service elements of an agreement using VSOE and to the software license elements of the agreement using the residual method. We have established VSOE for professional services and hosting based on the rates charged to our customers in stand-alone orders. We have also established VSOE for post-contract customer support based on substantive renewal rates. Accordingly, software license fees are recognized under the residual method for arrangements in which the software was licensed with maintenance and/or professional services, and where the maintenance and professional services were not essential to the functionality of the delivered software.
	Subscription Arrangements
	We have subscription arrangements where the customer pays a fixed fee and receives services over a period of time. We recognize subscription revenue ratably over the service period. Any up front setup fees associated with our subscription arrangements are recognized ratably, generally over one year. Any up front setup fees that are not associated with our subscription arrangements are recognized upon completion.
	Leasing Arrangements
	If the sales arrangement is classified as a sales-type lease, then revenue is recognized upon shipment. Leases that are not classified as sales-type leases are accounted for as an operating lease with revenue recognized ratably over the lease term.
	A lease is classified as a sales-type lease with revenue recognized upon shipment if the lease is determined to be collectible and has no significant uncertainties and if any of the following criteria are satisfied:
		•		present value of all minimum lease payments is greater than or equal to 90% of the fair value of the equipment at lease inception,
		•		noncancellable lease term is greater than or equal to 75% of the economic life of the equipment,
		•		bargain purchase option that allows the lessee to purchase the equipment below fair value, or
		•		transfer of ownership to the lessee upon termination of the lease.
	Long-term Contracts Involving Substantial Customization
	We have established our ability to produce estimates sufficiently dependable to require that we follow the percentage of completion method with respect to fixed price contracts where we provide information technology system development and implementation services.
	Revenue on such fixed price contracts is recognized over the contract term based on the percentage of development and implementation services that are provided during the period compared with the total estimated development and implementation services to be provided over the entire contract using guidance from ASC 605-35. These services require that we perform significant, extensive, and complex design, development, modification, or implementation activities of our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with these agreements.
	The percentage of completion method involves recognizing probable and reasonably estimable revenue using the percentage of services completed based on the current cumulative cost as a percentage of the estimated total cost, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the period. Due to the long-term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity, or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenue, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenue and costs. Such revisions are reflected in net income in the period in which the facts that give rise to that revision become known.
	We recognize losses on long-term fixed price contracts in the period that the contractual loss becomes probable and estimable. We record amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria are met. We record revenue that is earned and recognized in excess of amounts invoiced on fixed price contracts as trade receivables.
	Deferred Revenue and Related Deferred Costs
	Deferred revenue represents amounts received in advance for product support contracts, software customer support contracts, consulting and integration projects, or product sales. Product support contracts include stand-alone product support packages, routine maintenance service contracts, and upgrades or extensions to standard product warranties. We defer these amounts when we invoice the customer and then generally recognize revenue either ratably over the support contract life, upon performing the related services, in accordance with the percentage of completion method, or in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. Deferred cost of revenue related to unrecognized revenue on shipments to customers was $6.6 and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is included in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
	Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales-related Allowances
	We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure that trade receivables are not overstated due to uncollectibility. We record specific reserves for individual accounts when we become aware of specific customer circumstances, such as bankruptcy filings, deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position, or potential unfavorable outcomes from disputes with customers or vendors.
	We perform ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of our printer manufacturer, third-party distributor, reseller, and other customers and require collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances. The past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the contractual payment terms of the receivable. The need to write off a receivable balance depends on the age, size, and determination of collectibility of the receivable. Balances are written off when we deem it probable that the receivable will not be recovered.
	We make provisions for sales rebates and revenue adjustments based on analysis of current sales programs and revenue in accordance with our revenue recognition policy.
	Financing Receivables
ASC 310, Receivables, requires disclosures regarding the credit quality of our financing receivables and allowance for credit losses. ASC 310 further requires disclosure of credit quality indicators, past due information, and modifications of our financing receivables. Our financing receivables were $5.2 and $2.3 million consisting of $4.3 and $0.9 million of sales-type lease receivables, included within other current assets and other assets, and $0.9 and $1.4 million of trade receivables having a contractual maturity in excess of one year at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The credit quality of financing receivables are evaluated on the same basis as trade receivables. We have not experienced material amounts of past due financing receivables.
Concentration of Risk
We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by any of our customers to the extent of amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. We perform ongoing evaluations of the collectibility of accounts receivable balances for our customers and maintain allowances for estimated credit losses. Actual losses have not historically been significant, but have risen over the past several years as our customer base has grown through acquisitions.
Our Fiery products, which constitute approximately 35% of our revenue, are primarily sold to a limited number of leading printer manufacturers. Although end customer and reseller channel preference for Fiery products drives demand, most Fiery revenue relies on these significant printer manufacturer / distributors to design, develop, and integrate Fiery technology into their print engines. We expect that we will continue to depend on a relatively small number of leading printer manufacturers for a significant portion of our revenue, although their significance is expected to decline in future periods as our revenue increases from Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software products. We generally have experienced longer accounts receivable collection cycles in our Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software operating segments compared to our Fiery operating segment as, historically, the leading printer manufacturers have paid on a more timely basis. Down payments are generally required from Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software customers as a means to ensure payment.
Since Europe is composed of varied countries and regional economies, our European risk profile is somewhat more diversified due to the varying economic conditions among the countries. Approximately 28% of our receivables are with European customers as of December 31, 2013. Of this amount, 25% of our European receivables (7% of consolidated net receivables) are in the higher risk southern European countries (mostly Spain, Portugal, and Italy), which are adequately reserved. The ongoing relocation of the ceramic tile industry from southern Europe to the emerging markets of China, India, Brazil, and Indonesia will reduce our exposure to credit risk in southern Europe.
We rely on certain sole-source suppliers for key components of our products. We conduct our business with our component suppliers solely on a purchase order basis. Any disruption in the supply of key components would result in our inability to manufacture our products.
We subcontract the manufacture of our Fiery DFEs, certain Industrial Inkjet subassemblies, and solvent ink. We rely on the ability of our subcontractors to manufacture the products sold to our customers. A high concentration of our Fiery products is manufactured at one subcontractor location. If the subcontractor lost production capabilities at this facility, we would experience delays in delivering product to our customers. We do not maintain long-term agreements with our subcontractors, which could lead to an inability of our subcontractors to fill our orders.
Many of our current Fiery and Productivity Software products include software that we license from Adobe. To obtain licenses from Adobe, Adobe requires that we obtain quality assurance approvals from them for our products that use Adobe software. Although to date we have successfully obtained such quality assurance approvals from Adobe, we cannot be certain Adobe will grant us such approvals in the future. If Adobe does not grant us such licenses or approvals, if the Adobe licenses are terminated, or if our relationship with Adobe is otherwise materially impaired, we would likely be unable to manufacture products that incorporate Adobe PostScript® or other Adobe software.
Accounts Receivable Sales Arrangements
We have facilities in Spain that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. Trade receivables sold without recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than one year, which are secured by international letters of credit. Trade receivables sold under these facilities were $8.3 and $4.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which approximates the cash received.
We have facilities in the U.S. that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables with recourse. The trade receivables sold with recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than 30 days from the date of sale, which are subject to a servicing obligation. Trade receivables sold under these facilities were $12.9 and $2.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which approximates the cash received.
In accordance with ASC 860-20, Transfers and Servicing, trade receivables are derecognized from our Consolidated Balance Sheet when sold to third parties upon determining that such receivables are presumptively beyond the reach of creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding. The recourse obligation is measured using market data from similar transactions and the servicing liability is determined based on the fair value that a third party would charge to service these receivables. Both liabilities were determined to not be material at December 31, 2013 and 2012.
We report collections from the sale of trade receivables to third parties as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, because such receivables are the result of an operating activity and the associated interest rate risk is de minimis.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at standard cost, which approximates the lower of actual cost using the first-in, first-out cost flow assumption, or market. We periodically review our inventories for potential slow-moving or obsolete items and write down specific items to net realizable value as appropriate. Work-in-process inventories consist of our product at various levels of assembly and include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Finished goods inventory represents completed products awaiting shipment.
We estimate potential future inventory obsolescence and purchase commitments to evaluate the need for inventory reserves. Current economic trends, changes in customer demand, product design changes, product life and demand, and the acceptance of our products are analyzed to evaluate the adequacy of such reserves. Material differences may result in changes in the amount and timing of our net income for any period, if we made different judgments or utilized different estimates.
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: desktop and laptop computers (two years); computer server equipment (three years); software under perpetual licenses (three to five years); manufacturing, testing, and other equipment (three years); tooling (lesser of three years or the product life); research and development equipment with alternative future uses (three years); equipment leased to customers on operating leases (three years); furniture (seven years); land improvements such as parking lots or sidewalks (seven years); leasehold improvements (lesser of five years or the lease term); building improvements (five to ten years); building under a build-to-suit lease (forty years); and purchased buildings (forty years).
When assets are disposed, the asset and accumulated depreciation are removed from our records and the related gain or loss is recognized in our results of operations. The cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to property and equipment sold or no longer in service are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in interest and other income (expense), net.
Depreciation expense was $9.4, $8.4, and $7.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Repairs and maintenance expenditures, which are not considered improvements and do not extend the useful life of property and equipment, are expensed as incurred.
Internal Use Software
In accordance with ASC 350-40, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software, software development costs, including costs incurred to purchase third party software, are capitalized during the application development stage when we determine that certain factors are present including, among others, that technology exists to achieve the performance requirements, management has committed to funding the project, and conceptual formulation, design, and testing of possible software alternatives (preliminary project phase) have all been completed. Costs incurred during preliminary project phase, post-implementation / operational phase, process re-engineering, training, and maintenance must be expensed as incurred. The accumulation of software costs to be capitalized ceases when the software is substantially developed and is ready for its intended use. Capitalized internal use software is amortized over an estimated useful life of three years using the straight-line method.
Goodwill
We perform our annual goodwill impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of each year. ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment, provides that a simplified analysis of goodwill impairment may be performed consisting of a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. Due to the significant additions to goodwill resulting from the business combinations completed in recent years, we determined that the quantitative analysis should be performed.
According to the provisions of ASC 350-20-35, a two-step impairment test of goodwill is required. In the first step, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and further testing is not required. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is required to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit, excluding goodwill, from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in the first step. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss must be recorded equal to the difference.
Our goodwill valuation analysis is based on our respective reporting units (Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery), which are consistent with our operating segments identified in Note 15—Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We determined the fair value of our reporting units as of December 31, 2013 by equally weighting the market and income approaches. Under the market approach, we estimated fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings of comparable companies. Under the income approach, we estimated fair value based on a projected cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Based on our valuation results, we have determined that the fair values of our reporting units exceed their carrying values. Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery fair values are $540, $262, and $368 million, respectively, which exceed carrying value by 284%, 209%, and 398%, respectively.
Please see Note 5—Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-lived Assets, including Intangible Assets
We evaluate potential impairment with respect to long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable. No asset impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, or 2011.
Intangible assets are evaluated for impairment based on their estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Based on this analysis, no impairment of intangible assets, excluding goodwill, was recognized in 2013, 2012, or 2011.
Intangible assets acquired to date are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 2 to 18 years. No changes have been made to the useful lives of amortizable identifiable intangible assets in 2013, 2012, or 2011. Intangible amortization expense was $19.4, $18.6, and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, or 2011, respectively.
Other investments, included within other assets, consist of equity and debt investments in privately-held companies that develop products, markets, and services that are strategic to us. In-substance common stock investments in which we exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, but do not have a majority voting interest, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Investments not meeting these requirements are accounted for using the cost method of accounting. As of December 31, 2013, our investments in privately-held companies were accounted for under the cost method.
We previously assessed each investee’s technology pipeline and market conditions in the industry and ability to sustain an earnings capacity that would justify its carrying amount in accordance with ASC 323-10-35-32. We determined it is no longer probable that they will generate sufficient positive future cash flows to recover the carrying amount of each investment. Therefore, we previously fully reserved our equity and debt investments in privately-held companies. We received sales proceeds from certain of these investments of $0.1 and $2.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011, respectively.
Please see Note 5—Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Warranty Reserves
Our Industrial Inkjet printer and Fiery DFE products are generally accompanied by a 12-month limited warranty from date of shipment, which covers both parts and labor. In accordance with ASC 450-30, an accrual is established when the warranty liability is estimable and probable based on historical experience. A provision for estimated future warranty costs is recorded in cost of revenue when revenue is recognized. Warranty reserves were $11.0 and $10.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Litigation Accruals
We may be involved, from time to time, in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations, or proceedings relating to contractual disputes, securities laws, intellectual property rights, employment, or other matters that may arise in the normal course of business. We assess our potential liability in each of these matters by using the information available to us. We develop our views on estimated losses in consultation with inside and outside counsel, which involves a subjective analysis of potential results and various combinations of appropriate litigation and settlement strategies. We accrue estimated losses from contingencies if a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated.
Restructuring Reserves
Restructuring liabilities are established when the costs have been incurred. Severance and other employee separation costs are incurred when management commits to a plan of termination identifying the number of employees impacted, their termination dates, and the terms of their severance arrangements. The liability is accrued at the employee notification date unless service is required beyond the greater of 60 days or the legal notification period, in which case the liability is recognized ratably over the service period. Facility downsizing and closure costs are accrued at the earlier of the lessor notification date, if the lease agreement allows for early termination, or the cease use date. Relocation costs are incurred when the related relocation services are performed. Costs related to contracts without future benefit are incurred at the earlier of the cease use date or the contract cancellation date.
Research and Development
Research and development costs were $128.1, $120.3, and $115.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. We expense research and development costs associated with new software products as incurred until technological feasibility is established. Research and development costs include salaries and benefits of employees performing research and development activities, supplies, and other expenses incurred from research and development efforts. To date, we have not capitalized research and development costs associated with software development as products and enhancements have generally reached technological feasibility, as defined by U.S. GAAP, and have been released for sale at substantially the same time. We have capitalized research and development equipment that has been acquired or constructed for research and development activities and has alternative future uses (in research and development projects or otherwise). Such research and development equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis with a three year useful life.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling costs are included in revenue. Shipping and handling costs are charged to cost of revenue as incurred.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising and promotional expenses were $4.1, $3.5, and $4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, which requires that deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities be determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. We estimate our actual current tax expense, including permanent charges and benefits, and the temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and financial accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income by considering both positive and negative evidence relating to their recoverability. If we believe that recovery of these deferred tax assets is not more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance. Significant judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets.
In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we considered all available evidence, including recent operating results, projections of future taxable income, our ability to utilize loss and credit carryforwards, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. Other than a valuation allowance established in 2013 related to realization of existing California deferred tax assets and valuation allowances established in prior years related to deferred tax assets from foreign tax credits resulting from the 2003 acquisition of Best GmbH and compensation deductions potentially limited by IRC Section 162(m), we have determined that is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit related to all other deferred tax assets. In 2013, we determined that it is more likely than not that our existing deferred tax assets in California would not be realized based on the size of the net operating loss and research and development credits being generated exceeding the utilization of these tax attributes. As a result, we recorded a full valuation allowance against our California deferred tax assets. To the extent we increase a valuation allowance, we include an expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period in which such determination is made.
In accordance with ASC 740-10-25-5 through 17, we account for uncertainty in income taxes by recognizing a tax position only when it is more likely than not that the tax position, based on its technical merits, will be sustained upon ultimate settlement with the applicable tax authority. The tax benefit to be recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the applicable tax authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Tax benefits that are deemed to be less than fifty percent likely of being realized are recorded in noncurrent income taxes payable until the uncertainty has been resolved through either examination by the relevant taxing authority or expiration of the pertinent statutes of limitations.
Business Combinations
We allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, including IPR&D, and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Such a valuation requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. The results of operations for each acquisition are included in our financial statements from the date of acquisition.
These acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805. Key provisions of the acquisition method of accounting include the following:
	•		one hundred percent of assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, are recorded at fair value, regardless of the percentage of the business acquired;
	•		certain contingent assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value at the acquisition date;
	•		contingent consideration is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as assumptions are updated or upon settlement;
	•		IPR&D is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date subject to amortization after product launch or otherwise subject to impairment;
	•		acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs are expensed as incurred;
	•		reversals of valuation allowances related to acquired deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes to acquired income tax uncertainties are recognized in earnings; and
	•		when making adjustments to finalize preliminary accounting, we revise any previously issued post-acquisition financial information in future financial statements to reflect any adjustments as if they occurred on the acquisition date.
At various dates in 2013, we acquired PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix, and Lector, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment and provide business process automation software to small commercial and in-plant printing operations in North America; business process automation software to the printing and packaging industries in the French-speaking regions of Europe and Africa; imposition solutions for estimating, planning, and integrating into prepress and postpress solutions; and business process automation software to the sheetfed and packaging industries in Germany, respectively.
On January 10, 2012, we acquired Cretaprint, which is a leading developer and supplier of inkjet printers for the ceramic tile decoration industry and has been integrated into our Industrial Inkjet operating segment. On April 5, 2012, we acquired the FX Colors business, which develops and provides technology and software for industrial printing and has been integrated into our Fiery operating segment. At various dates in 2012, we acquired Metrics, OPS, and Technique, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment and provide business process automation solutions to medium-sized printing and packaging companies in Latin America; business process automation solutions for web-to-print, publishing, and cross-media marketing; and business process automation solutions for publication, commercial, and direct marketing print industries, respectively.
In 2011, we acquired the Entrac business, which provides self-service and payment solutions for business services including mobile printing and has been integrated into our Fiery operating segment, and we acquired Alphagraph, Prism, and Streamline, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment and provide business process automation solutions for the graphics arts industry; business process automation solutions for the printing and packaging industry, including automated shop floor management and work in progress tracking; and business process automation solutions for mailing and fulfillment services in the printing industry, respectively.
Liability for Self-Insurance
We are partially self-insured for certain losses related to employee medical and dental coverage, excluding employees covered by health maintenance organizations. We generally have an individual stop loss deductible of $125 thousand per enrollee unless specific exposures are separately insured. We have accrued a contingent liability of $2.6 and $1.4 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which is not discounted, based on an examination of historical trends, our claims experience, industry claims experience, actuarial analysis, and estimates. The primary estimates used in the development of our accrual at December 31, 2013 and 2012 include total enrollment (including employee contributions), population demographics, and historical claims costs incurred. Although we do not expect that we will ultimately pay claims significantly different from our estimates, self-insurance reserves could be affected if future claims experience differs significantly from our historical trends and assumptions.
As part of this process, we engaged a third party actuarial firm to assist management in its analysis. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party actuary, the related valuation of our self-insurance liability represents the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party. While we believe these estimates are reasonable based on the information currently available, if actual trends, including the severity of claims and medical cost inflation, differ from our estimates, our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be impacted.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, which requires stock-based compensation expense to be recognized based on the fair value of such awards on the date of grant. We amortize stock-based compensation expense on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period, after assessing the probability of achieving the requisite performance criteria with respect to performance-based awards. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards.
ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the grant date and revised on a cumulative basis, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We use historical data and future expectations of employee turnover to estimate forfeitures. The tax benefit resulting from tax deductions in excess of the tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense recognized for those awards are classified as financing cash flows.
Our determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by various assumptions including volatility, expected term, and interest rates. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over a preceding period commensurate with the expected term of the option. The expected term is based on management’s consideration of the historical life of the options, the vesting period of the options granted, and the contractual period of the options granted. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to do so in the future.
Foreign Currency Translation
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we must remeasure and translate balance sheet and income statement amounts into U.S. dollars. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are remeasured from the transaction currency into the functional currency at current exchange rates, except for non-monetary assets and capital accounts, which are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are remeasured at monthly exchange rates, which approximate average exchange rates in effect during each period. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement are included in interest and other income (expense), net. Net gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions, including hedging gains and losses, are reported in interest and other income (expense), net, and were a gain (loss) of $(0.3), $0.6, and $(1.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
For those subsidiaries that operate in a local currency functional environment, all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates, while revenue and expenses are translated using monthly exchange rates, which approximate the average exchange rates in effect during each period. Resulting translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of OCI, adjusted for deferred income taxes. The cumulative translation adjustment balance, net of tax, at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was an unrealized gain (loss) of $(1.6) and $0.1 million, respectively.
Based on our assessment of the salient economic indicators discussed in ASC 830-10-55-5, we consider the U.S. dollar to be the functional currency for each of our international subsidiaries except for our Brazilian subsidiary, Metrics, for which we consider the Brazilian real to be the subsidiary’s functional currency; our German subsidiaries, EFI GmbH, Alphagraph, and Lector, for which we consider the Euro to be the subsidiaries’ functional currency; our Japanese subsidiary, Electronics For Imaging Japan KK, for which we consider the Japanese yen to be the subsidiary’s functional currency; our Spanish subsidiary, Cretaprint, for which we consider the Euro to be the subsidiary’s functional currency; our New Zealand subsidiary contains the Prism operations in New Zealand for which we consider the New Zealand dollar to the functional currency; our Australian subsidiary contains the Prism, OPS, and Metrix operations in Australia for which we consider the Australian dollar to the functional currency; our U.K. subsidiaries, Electronics For Imaging United Kingdom Limited and Technique, for which we consider the British pound sterling to be the subsidiaries’ functional currency; and our subsidiary in the People’s Republic of China, which contains the operations of our Cretaprint sales and support center for which we consider the renminbi to be the functional currency.
Computation of Net Income per Common Share
Net income per basic common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding non-vested restricted stock. Net income per diluted common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding common stock options having a dilutive effect using the treasury stock method, from non-vested shares of restricted stock having a dilutive effect, from shares to be purchased under our ESPP having a dilutive effect, and from non-vested restricted stock for which the performance criteria have been met. Any potential shares that are anti-dilutive as defined in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, are excluded from the effect of dilutive securities.
ASC 260-10-45-48 requires that performance-based and market-based restricted stock that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the vesting period, if the result would be dilutive, are assumed to be outstanding for purposes of determining net income per diluted common share as of the later of the beginning of the period or the grant date.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Risk Management
We are exposed to market risk and foreign currency exchange risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results, financial position, and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these risks through our regular operating and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are used to hedge monetary assets and liabilities, including intercompany transactions, as well as reduce earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from shifts in market rates. Our objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings or protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. We do not have any leveraged derivatives, nor do we use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires the fair value of all derivative instruments, including those embedded in other contracts, be recorded as assets or liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. As permitted, foreign exchange contracts with notional amounts of $2.5 and $2.7 million and net asset/liability fair values that are immaterial have been designated for cash flow hedge accounting treatment at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The related cash flow impacts of our derivative contracts are reflected as cash flows from operating activities.
Our exposures are related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue in Europe, Japan, the U.K., Latin America, China, Australia, and New Zealand and are primarily related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated operating expenses in Europe, India, Japan, the U.K., Brazil, and Australia. We hedge our operating expense cash flow exposure in Indian rupees. We hedge remeasurement exposure associated with Euro-denominated intercompany loans and Indian rupee net monetary assets. As of December 31, 2013, we had not entered into hedges against any other currency exposures, but we may consider hedging against movements in other currencies in the future.
By their nature, derivative instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movement is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets, and liabilities being hedged (e.g., operating expense exposure in Indian rupees) or the settlement of the Euro-denominated intercompany loans. We do not believe there is a significant risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty associated with these instruments because, by policy, we deal with counterparties having a minimum investment grade or better credit rating. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures to such counterparties.
Variable Interest Entities
In accordance with the Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”) sub-section of ASC 810, Consolidation, we perform a formal assessment at each reporting period regarding whether any consolidated entity is considered the primary beneficiary of a VIE based on the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity and the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits that could be significant to us.
We currently do not have any arrangements that meet the definition of a VIE in accordance with the scope exception contained within ASC 810-10-15-17d.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy as more fully defined in Note 6, Investments and Fair Value Measurements. In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Effective in the first quarter of 2012, the primary provisions of ASU 2011-04 impacting us are the adoption of uniform terminology within U.S. GAAP and IFRS to reference fair value concepts, measuring the fair value of an equity instrument used as consideration in a business combination, and the following additional disclosures concerning fair value measurements classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy:
	•		quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the determination of Level 3 fair value measurements,
	•		the valuation processes used in Level 3 fair value measurements, and
	•		the sensitivity of Level 3 fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs.
Accordingly, the appropriate disclosures have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Other Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Effective in the first quarter of 2012, we have opted to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Under ASU 2011-05, we also have the option to present this information in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income. We previously presented the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) in the footnotes to our interim and annual financial statements and as a component of our statement of stockholders’ equity in our annual financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which requires additional disclosures about amounts reclassified out of OCI by component. Effective in the first quarter of 2013, we are required to present, either on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Operations or in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, significant amounts reclassified out of OCI by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, we are required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. We have provided the required disclosure in Note 4, Balance Sheet Components, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment Assessment. In September 2011 and July 2012, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that simplifies the analysis of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment. The new guidance allows a qualitative assessment to be performed to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. These accounting standards were effective for the year ended December 31, 2012 with respect to the assessment of goodwill and were effective for the year ending December 31, 2013 with respect to the assessment of other indefinite-lived intangible assets. These standards provide an alternative method for determining whether our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets have been impaired, which would not differ materially from the result of the detailed impairment testing methodology required by ASC 350-20-35, Goodwill – Subsequent Measurement.
Joint and Several Liability. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date, which requires accrual of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements when the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the following:
	•		the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and
	•		any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors.
If the amount of the obligation is not fixed at the reporting date, then the related liability should be accrued in accordance with ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies. Examples of obligations subject to ASU 2013-04 include debt arrangements, legal settlements, and contractual obligations.
ASU 2013-04 will be effective in the first quarter of 2014. We are currently evaluating its impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Balance Sheet Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. We currently present our liability for estimated unrecognized tax benefits as noncurrent income taxes payable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets of $33.0 and $29.8 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
We are required to reclassify unrecognized tax benefits as an offset to deferred tax assets to the extent of any net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax loss carryforwards, or tax credit carryforwards that are available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable tax jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. An exception would apply if the tax law of the tax jurisdiction does not require us to use, and we do not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose.
ASU 2013-11 will be effective in the first quarter of 2014 with early adoption allowed. We are currently determining the amount of the required reclassification between noncurrent income taxes payable and deferred tax assets.
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
		For the years ended December 31,
(in thousands)		2013			2012			2011
Net cash paid (refunded) for income taxes		$	7,883		$	4,384		$	(2,998	)
Cash paid for interest expense		$	210		$	99		$	62
Acquisition related activities:
Cash paid for acquisitions, excluding contingent consideration		$	15,541		$	66,050		$	35,299
Cash acquired in acquisitions, excluding restricted cash			(853	)		(5,059	)		(1,554	)
Net cash paid for acquisitions		$	14,688		$	60,991		$	33,745
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Non-cash acquisition of property under a build-to-suit lease		$	11,230		$	—		$	—
Property and equipment received, but accrued in accounts payable			7,210			1,042			240
		$	18,440		$	1,042		$	240

Earnings_Per_Share

Earnings Per Share	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]	'
Earnings Per Share	'
	Note 2: Earnings Per Share
	Net income per basic common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding non-vested restricted stock. Net income per diluted common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding common stock options having a dilutive effect using the treasury stock method, non-vested restricted stock having a dilutive effect, shares to be purchased under our ESPP having a dilutive effect, and non-vested restricted stock for which the performance criteria have been met. Any potential shares that are anti-dilutive as defined in ASC 260 are excluded from the effect of dilutive securities.
	ASC 260-10-45-48 requires that performance-based and market-based restricted stock and stock options that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the vesting period, if the result would be dilutive, are assumed to be outstanding for purposes of determining net income per diluted common share as of the later of the beginning of the period or the grant date. Accordingly, performance-based RSUs, which vested on various dates during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 based on achievement of specified performance criteria related to revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets; performance-based RSAs, which vested on March 15, 2011 based on achievement of a specified percentage of the 2010 operating plan; market-based RSUs and stock options, which vested on various dates during December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 based on achievement of specified stock prices for defined periods; and performance-based RSUs, which vested on January 24, 2014 based on achievement of specified performance criteria related to 2013 revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets upon certification by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors are included in the determination of net income per diluted common share as of the beginning of the period. Performance-based and market-based targets were not met with respect to any other RSUs or stock options as of December 31, 2013.
	Basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are reconciled as follows (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013		2012		2011
	Basic net income per share:
	Net income available to common shareholders	$	109,107	$	83,269	$	27,465
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		46,643		46,453		46,234
	Basic net income per share	$	2.34	$	1.79	$	0.59
	Dilutive net income per share:
	Net income available to common shareholders	$	109,107	$	83,269	$	27,465
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		46,643		46,453		46,234
	Dilutive stock options and non-vested restricted stock		1,716		1,281		1,345
	Weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted net income per share		48,359		47,734		47,579
	Dilutive net income per share	$	2.26	$	1.74	$	0.58
	Potential shares of common stock that are not included in the determination of diluted net income per share because they are anti-dilutive for the periods presented consist of weighted stock options, non-vested restricted stock, and shares to be purchased under our ESPP having an anti-dilutive effect, excluding any performance-based or market-based RSUs and stock options for which the performance criteria were not met, of less than 0.1, 0.4, and 2.2 million shares for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
	ASC 260-10-45 to 65 requires use of the two-class method to calculate earnings per share when non-vested RSAs are eligible to receive dividends (i.e., participating securities), even if we do not intend to declare dividends. Our RSAs vested on March 15, 2011 based on achievement of a specified percentage of the 2010 operating plan. Consequently, there were no RSAs outstanding on December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Acquisitions

Acquisitions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Business Combinations [Abstract]	'
Acquisitions	'
	Note 3: Acquisitions
	We acquired three business process automation businesses and an imposition solution business during 2013, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment. During 2012, we acquired Cretaprint, which has been integrated into our Industrial Inkjet operating segment, three business process automation businesses, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment, and the FX Colors business, which have been integrated into our Fiery operating segment. During 2011, we acquired three business process automation businesses, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment and Entrac, which have been integrated into our Fiery operating segment.
	These acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations. In accordance with ASC 805, the purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their estimated fair values on the acquisition date based on the valuation performed by management with the assistance of a third party. Excess purchase consideration was recorded as goodwill. Factors contributing to a purchase price that results in goodwill include, but are not limited to, the retention of research and development personnel with skills to develop future technology, support personnel to provide maintenance services related to the products, a trained sales force capable of selling current and future products, the opportunity to enter the ceramic tile decoration market through the Cretaprint acquisition, the opportunity to utilize FX Colors technology in the development of our products, the opportunity to cross-sell products of the acquired businesses to existing customers, the opportunity to sell PrintSmith, Pace, Monarch, and Radius products to customers of the acquired businesses, and the positive reputation of each of these companies in the market.
	We engaged a third party valuation firm to aid management in its analyses of the fair value of these acquired businesses. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party valuation firm, the fair value analyses and related valuations represent the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party. The purchase price allocations for the 2013 purchase business combinations are preliminary and subject to change within the respective measurement periods as valuations are finalized. We expect to continue to obtain information to assist us in finalizing the fair value of the net assets acquired at the respective acquisition dates in 2013, during the respective measurement periods, which end at various dates in 2014. Measurement period adjustments determined to be material will be applied retrospectively to the appropriate acquisition date in our consolidated financial statements and, depending on the nature of the adjustments, our operating results subsequent to the respective acquisition period could be affected.
	2013 Acquisitions
	Productivity Software Operating Segment
	At various dates in 2013, we acquired privately-held PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix, and Lector, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment, for cash consideration of an aggregate of $12.9 million, net of cash acquired, $0.6 million payment, which was dependent on account receivable collections, plus additional future cash earnouts contingent on achieving certain performance targets. An additional $1.0 million of accounts receivable payments are dependent on collections.
	The fair value of the PrintLeader, GamSys, and Metrix earnouts were valued at $4.2 million on their respective acquisition dates by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5. Key assumptions include discount rates between 4.5% and 6.0% and probability-adjusted levels of revenue. Probability-adjusted revenue is a significant input that is not observable in the market, which ASC 820-10-35 refers to as a Level 3 input. These contingent liabilities are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013, as current and noncurrent liabilities of $2.0 and $2.2 million, respectively. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date will be recognized in general and administrative expenses.
	PrintLeader, headquartered in Palm City, Florida, provides business process automation software to small commercial and in-plant printing operations in North America. Support and operations of PrintLeader were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, which will also provide PrintSmith products to the PrintLeader customer base, while continuing to support existing PrintLeader customers.
	GamSys, headquartered in LaReid, Belgium, provides business process automation software to the printing and packaging industries in the French-speaking regions of Europe and Africa. Support and operations of GamSys were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, which provides PrintSmith, Pace, Monarch, and Radius products to the GamSys customer base, while continuing to support existing GamSys customers.
	Metrix, headquartered in Edmonds, Washington, is a leading innovator in imposition solutions for estimating, planning, and integrating into prepress and postpress solutions and a pending release that will support wide format imposition. This technology acquisition enhances our existing functionality and allows us to extend our portfolio offerings to bridge the gap between our business process automation software and prepress. Metrix has been integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment.
	Lector, headquartered in Mönchengladbach, Germany, provides German-language business process automation solutions to the sheetfed and packaging industries. Support and operations of Lector were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, which provides PrintSmith, Pace, Monarch, and Radius products to the Lector customer base, while continuing to support existing Lector customers.
	2012 Acquisitions
	Industrial Inkjet Operating Segment
	On January 10, 2012, we purchased privately-held Cretaprint, headquartered in Castellon, Spain, for cash consideration of approximately $28.8 million, net of cash acquired, plus an additional future cash earnout contingent on achieving certain performance targets. We subsequently merged Cretaprint into Electronics for Imaging España S.L.U., which changed its name post-merger to EFI Cretaprint S.L. Cretaprint is a leading developer and supplier of inkjet printers for ceramic tiles. This acquisition allows us to provide ceramic tile decoration as a product offering within our Industrial Inkjet operating segment.
	The fair value of the earnout is currently estimated to be $6.2 million by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5. Acquisition-related executive deferred compensation cost of $1.8 million was expensed during the two years ended December 31, 2013, coinciding with the continuing employment of a former shareholder of an acquired company, thereby increasing the liability for contingent consideration accordingly. Key assumptions include a discount rate of 5.0% and a probability-adjusted level of Cretaprint revenue and gross profit. Probability-adjusted revenue and gross profit are significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which ASC 820-10-35 refers to as Level 3 inputs. This contingent liability is reflected as a current liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013. We paid contingent consideration related to Cretaprint of $8.9 million in 2013. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date will be recognized in general and administrative expenses.
	Productivity Software Operating Segment
	At various dates in 2012, we acquired privately-held Metrics, OPS, and Technique, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment, for cash consideration of an aggregate of $31.1 million, net of cash acquired, plus additional future cash earnouts contingent on achieving certain performance targets.
	The fair value of the earnouts are currently estimated to be $10.6 million by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5. Key assumptions include discount rates between 4.2% and 6.4% and probability-adjusted levels of revenue. Probability-adjusted revenue is a significant input that is not observable in the market, which ASC 820-10-35 refers to as a Level 3 input. These contingent liabilities are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013, as current and noncurrent liabilities of $6.5 and $4.1 million, respectively. We paid contingent consideration related to these acquisitions of $4.5 million in 2013. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date will be recognized in general and administrative expenses.
	Metrics, headquartered in Sao Paolo, Brazil, provides business process automation software to medium-sized printing and packaging companies in Latin America. Support and operations of Metrics were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, which provides PrintSmith, Pace, Monarch, and Radius products, localized for the Latin American market, while continuing to support existing Metrics customers.
	OPS, headquartered in Mosman, Australia, provides web-to-print, publishing, and cross-media marketing solutions. Support and operations of OPS were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, while continuing to support the existing OPS customers. Key OPS features and technologies will be integrated into our Digital StoreFront software and our Fiery DFEs.
	Technique, headquartered in Leeds, U.K., provides business process automation solutions to the publication, commercial, and direct marketing print industries. Support and operations of Technique were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, which provides Pace, Monarch, and Radius products to the Technique customer base, while continuing to support existing Technique customers.
	Fiery Operating Segment
	On April 5, 2012, we acquired the FX Colors business, a societe par actions simplifiee headquartered in Charnay-Les-Macon, France, which has been integrated into our Fiery operating segment, for cash consideration of approximately $0.4 million. A portion of the consideration is contingent upon the achievement of certain milestones. We paid contingent consideration related to FX Colors of $0.1 million in 2012. FX Colors develops and provides technology and software for industrial printing. We accounted for the acquisition of FX Colors for financial reporting purposes as a purchase business combination in accordance with ASC 805. The FX Colors purchase price has been allocated to existing technology, with a useful life of three years.
	2011 Acquisitions
	Productivity Software Operating Segment
	At various dates in 2011, we acquired privately-held Streamline, Prism, and Alphagraph, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment, for cash consideration of an aggregate of $27.8 million, net of cash acquired. The Streamline and Alphagraph purchase prices include additional future cash earnouts contingent on achieving certain performance targets.
	The Streamline and Alphagraph earnouts have been settled as of December 31, 2013. We paid contingent consideration related to these acquisitions of $1.3 and $0.6 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	Streamline, headquartered in San Rafael, California, provides PrintStream business process automation software, which we acquired to establish our Productivity Software operating segment presence in mailing and fulfillment services for the printing industry.
	Prism, headquartered in New Zealand, provides business process automation solutions for the printing and packaging industry including automated shop floor management and work in progress tracking. Support and operations of Prism were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, which provides PrintSmith, Pace, Monarch, and Radius products, while continuing to support existing Prism customers.
	Alphagraph, headquartered in Essen, Germany, provides business process automation solutions for the graphic arts industry. Support and operations of Alphagraph were integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment, which will provides PrintSmith, Pace, Monarch, and Radius products, while continuing to support existing Alphagraph customers.
	Fiery Operating Segment
	On July 25, 2011, we purchased the Entrac business, a Canadian company headquartered near Toronto, Canada, which was a subsidiary of GLIC Corporation Limited, for cash consideration of approximately $6.4 million, net of cash acquired, plus an additional future cash earnout contingent on achieving certain performance targets. Entrac provides self-service and payment solutions for business services including mobile printing and has been incorporated into the Fiery operating segment. The Entrac earnout expired without being earned.
	Valuation Methodologies
	Intangible assets acquired consist of customer relationships, existing technology, trade names, backlog, and IPR&D. Each intangible asset valuation methodology assumes a discount rate between 13% and 24%.
	Customer Relationships and Backlog. With the exception of Entrac, customer relationships and backlog were valued using the excess earnings method, which is an income approach. The value of customer relationships lies in the generation of a consistent and predictable revenue source and the avoidance of costs associated with developing the relationships. Customer relationships were valued by estimating the revenue attributable to existing customer relationships and probability-weighted in each forecast year to reflect the uncertainty of maintaining existing relationships based on historical attrition rates.
	The Cretaprint backlog represents unfulfilled customer purchase orders at the acquisition date that will provide a relatively secure revenue stream, subject only to potential customer cancellation. The backlog has been fulfilled.Entrac customer relationships were valued based on the “with and without” method, which is an income approach. Customer relationships were valued by assessing the profitability improvement resulting from the acquisition of Entrac’s customer relationships assuming that it would take us four years to develop these relationships on our own, assuming reasonable customer development costs. Revenue was also probability-weighted in each forecast year to reflect the uncertainty of maintaining these acquired relationships based on historical attrition rates.
	Trade Names were valued using the relief from royalty method with royalty rates based on various factors including an analysis of market data, comparable trade name agreements, and consideration of historical advertising dollars spent supporting the trade names.
	Existing Technology and IPR&D. With the exception of Entrac, existing technology and IPR&D were valued using the relief from royalty method based on royalty rates for similar technologies. Entrac existing technology and IPR&D were valued using the excess earnings method. The value of existing technology is derived from consistent and predictable revenue, including the opportunity to cross-sell products of the acquired businesses to existing customers, and the avoidance of the costs associated with developing the technology. Revenue related to existing technology was adjusted in each forecast year to reflect the evolution of the technology and the cost of sustaining research and development required to maintain the technology.
	Using each of these methodologies, the value of IPR&D was determined by estimating the cost to develop purchased IPR&D into commercially viable products, estimating the net cash flows resulting from the sale of those products, and discounting the net cash flows back to their present value. Project schedules were based on management’s estimate of tasks completed and tasks to be completed to achieve technical and commercial feasibility.
		GamSys			Technique			Prism			Entrac			Streamline
	Discount rate for IPR&D		17	%		17	%		23	%		22	%		20	%
	IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date		50-53	%		73	%		50	%		48-79	%		78-89	%
	IPR&D percent complete at December 31, 2013		90	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
	IPR&D is subject to amortization after product completion over the product life or otherwise subject to impairment in accordance with acquisition accounting guidance.
	The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands) with respect to each of these acquisitions at their respective acquisition dates is summarized as follows:
		2013 Acquisitions						2012 Acquisitions												2011 Acquisitions
	Operating Segment	Productivity Software						Industrial Inkjet						Productivity Software						Productivity Software					Fiery
	Acquired Business	PrintLeader, GamSys,						Cretaprint						Metrics, OPS,						Streamline, Prism,					Entrac
		Metrix, Lector												Technique						Alphagraph
		Weighted			Purchase			Weighted			Purchase			Weighted			Purchase			Weighted		Purchase			Weighted		Purchase
		average			Price			average			Price			average			Price			average		Price			average		Price
		useful life			Allocation			useful life			Allocation			useful life			Allocation			useful life		Allocation			useful life		Allocation
	Customer relationships		5-6 years		$	5,540			5 years		$	8,000			5-6 years		$	14,880			5-6 years	$	10,150			5 years	$	2,340
	Existing technology		3-4 years			2,060			3 years			7,070			3-4 years			4,580			3-4 years		3,060			2-5 years		1,290
	Trade names		3-4 years			670			6 years			4,970			3-4 years			1,080			4-5 years		1,100			—		—
	IPR&D		3 years			150			—			—			5 years			90			5 years		110			5 years		410
	Backlog		—			—			1 year			1,290			—			—			—		—			—		—
	Goodwill		—			13,365			—			22,794			—			31,100			—		20,020			—		4,611
						21,785						44,124						51,730					34,440					8,651
	Net tangible assets (liabilities)					(3,441	)					3,078						(4,942	)				(1,295	)				579
	Total purchase price				$	18,344					$	47,202					$	46,788				$	33,145				$	9,230
	In accordance with ASC 805, we revised previously issued post-acquisition financial information to reflect adjustments to the preliminary accounting for these business acquisitions as if the adjustments occurred on the acquisition date. We have increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities by $1.2 million in the aggregate at December 31, 2012 to reflect opening balance sheet adjustments related to our acquisitions of Cretaprint, OPS, and Technique.
The initial preliminary allocation of the GamSys purchase price was adjusted during the third quarter of 2013 to reflect a $0.1 million decrease to goodwill, offset by a corresponding increase in other current assets. The initial preliminary allocation of the Cretaprint purchase price was adjusted during the third quarter of 2012 to reflect a $0.2 million increase in goodwill, offset by a corresponding decrease in deferred tax assets, income taxes receivable, and other current assets. The initial preliminary allocation of the Metrics purchase price was adjusted during the fourth quarter of 2012 to reflect a $0.6 million decrease to goodwill, offset by a corresponding decrease in deferred tax liabilities, resulting from a decision to remain on the deemed profit method of reporting income tax liabilities in Brazil through 2013. The initial preliminary allocation of the Prism purchase price was adjusted during the fourth quarter of 2011 to reflect a $0.3 million decrease to goodwill, offset by a corresponding decrease in deferred tax liabilities. These adjustments were recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance sheet of each of these acquired businesses as of the effective date of each acquisition.
In conjunction with the Metrics acquisition, we entered into five-year non-competition agreements with certain selling shareholders. The non-competition agreements were valued at $0.6 million based on the “with and without” method, which is an income approach, by adjusting revenue for the probability of the impact of this potential competition. In assessing the competitive impact without the non-competition agreements in place, it was assumed the selling shareholders could develop a competitive product in approximately three years. In assessing the competitive impact with the non-competition agreements in place, it was assumed that the selling shareholders would compete immediately following the end of the five-year non-compete period. The impact of this competition on our revenue for valuation purposes was assessed based on the cumulative probability of the selling shareholders’ ability, feasibility, and desire to compete and a discount rate of 15%. The value of the non-competition agreements are being amortized over a five-year period as a component of operating expenses.
Pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to our consolidated results of operations. Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, is not deductible for tax purposes.
Significant assumptions used to determine the fair values of the reporting units under the market-based and income-based analyses include the determination of appropriate market comparables, estimated multiples of revenue and EBIT that a willing buyer is likely to pay, estimated control premium a willing buyer is likely to pay, gross profit percentages, and operating expense percentages. Gross profit and operating expenses as a
GamSys and Lector generate revenue and incur operating expenses in Euros. Accordingly, we have adopted the Euro as the functional currencies for GamSys and Lector.
Cretaprint, Metrics, and Technique generate revenue and incur operating expenses in Euros, Brazilian reais, and British pounds sterling, respectively. Accordingly, we have adopted the Euro, Brazilian real, and British pound sterling as the functional currencies for Cretaprint, Metrics, and Technique, respectively. OPS generates revenue and incurs operating expenses in Australian and New Zealand dollars in Australia and New Zealand, respectively. Accordingly, we have adopted those currencies as the functional currencies for OPS in those locations. OPS operation in Ireland generates revenue primarily in U.S. dollars. Upon consideration of the salient economic indicators discussed in ASC 830-10-55-5, we consider the U.S. dollar to be the functional currency for OPS operations in Ireland.
Alphagraph and Prism generate revenue and incur operating expenses in Euros and British pounds sterling, respectively. Accordingly, we have adopted the Euro and British pound sterling as the functional currencies for Alphagraph and Prism, respectively.

Balance_Sheet_Components

Balance Sheet Components	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Text Block [Abstract]	'
Balance Sheet Components	'
	Note 4: Balance Sheet Components
	Selected balance sheet components are as follows (in thousands):
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Inventories:
	Raw materials	$	35,470		$	30,519
	Work in process		3,434			5,847
	Finished goods		29,441			21,977
		$	68,345		$	58,343
	Property and equipment, net:
	Land, buildings, and improvements (including build-to-suit)	$	72,601		$	72,671
	Equipment and purchased software		50,280			55,932
	Furniture and leasehold improvements		12,808			18,387
			135,689			146,990
	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(50,860	)		(60,408	)
		$	84,829		$	86,582
	We entered into a 15-year lease agreement pursuant to which we leased approximately 59,000 square feet in Fremont, California. The lease commenced on September 1, 2013. The leased facility was a cold shell requiring additional build-out and tenant improvements. As explained in Note 8—Commitments and Contingencies, we are deemed to be the accounting owner of the facility. On December 31, 2013, we capitalized $11.1 million in property and equipment based on the estimated replacement cost of the unfinished space, including capitalized interest, reduced by accumulated depreciation.
	On December 31, 2012, Land, buildings, and improvements included $61.6 million of assets that were sold to Gilead on November 1, 2013. Until we vacated the building on October 31, 2013, these assets remained on our balance sheet as depreciable assets. See Note 13—Gain on Sale of Building and Land of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Accrued and other liabilities:
	Accrued compensation and benefits	$	32,375		$	23,387
	Warranty provision		11,047			10,158
	Accrued royalty payments		3,915			4,318
	Contingent liabilities—current		14,803			21,286
	Other accrued liabilities		16,375			19,869
		$	78,515		$	79,018
	In accordance with ASC 805, we revised previously issued post-acquisition financial information to reflect adjustments to the preliminary accounting for these business acquisitions as if the adjustments occurred on the acquisition date. Accordingly, we have increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities by $1.2 million in the aggregate at December 31, 2012 to reflect opening balance sheet adjustments related to our acquisitions of Cretaprint, OPS, and Technique.
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
	Net unrealized investment gains	$	227		$	184
	Currency translation gains (losses)		(1,601	)		132
	Other		(14	)		(47	)
		$	(1,388	)	$	269
	Amounts reclassified out of OCI were less than $0.1 million, $0.1, and $0.2 million, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, and consisted of unrealized gains (losses) from investments in debt securities and are reported within interest and other income (expense), net, in our consolidated statements of operations.

Goodwill_and_LongLived_Intangi

Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets	'
	Note 5: Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets
	Purchased Intangible Assets
	Our purchased identified intangible assets resulting from acquisitions that closed during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands, except for weighted average useful life):
						December 31, 2013											December 31, 2012
			Weighted			Gross			Accumulated			Weighted			Net carrying		Gross carrying		Accumulated			Net carrying
			average			carrying			amortization			remaining			amount		amount		amortization			amount
			useful life			amount						average
			(years)									useful life
												(years)
	Goodwill			—		$	233,203		$	—			—		$	233,203	$	219,456	$	—		$	219,456
	Customer relationships and other			5.6		$	109,906		$	(77,922	)		3.5		$	31,984	$	103,891	$	(69,800	)	$	34,091
	Existing technology			4.3			132,192			(122,857	)		1.5			9,335		129,320		(115,411	)		13,909
	Trademarks and trade names			13.2			58,867			(31,614	)		8.3			27,253		59,235		(27,191	)		32,044
	IPR&D			—			150			—			—			150		200		—			200
	Amortizable intangible assets			6.6		$	301,115		$	(232,393	)		5.1		$	68,722	$	292,646	$	(212,402	)	$	80,244
	Acquired customer relationships and other; existing technology; trademarks and trade names; and IPR&D are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 2 to 18 years using the straight-line method, which approximates the pattern in which the economic benefits of the identified intangible assets are realized. Aggregate amortization expense was $19.4, $18.6, and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
	As of December 31, 2013, future estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years and thereafter related to the amortization of identified intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):
	For the years ended December 31,		Future
			amortization
			expense
	2014		$	19,105
	2015			15,112
	2016			11,252
	2017			7,708
	2018			4,127
	Thereafter			11,418
			$	68,722
	Goodwill Rollforward
	The goodwill rollforward for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 as required by ASC 805 is as follows (in thousands):
			Industrial			Productivity			Fiery			Total
			Inkjet			Software
	Ending Balance, December 31, 2011		$	36,508		$	63,403		$	64,412		$	164,323
	Additions (Cretaprint, Metrics, OPS, and Technique)		$	22,794		$	31,100		$	—		$	53,894
	Cretaprint opening balance sheet adjustment			215			—			—			215
	Metrics opening balance sheet adjustment			—			(588	)		—			(588	)
	Opening balance sheet adjustments recognized in 2013			801			386			—			1,187
	Foreign currency adjustments			427			(116	)		114			425
	Ending Balance, December 31, 2012		$	60,745		$	94,185		$	64,526		$	219,456
	Additions (PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix, and Lector acquisitions)		$	—		$	13,365		$	—		$	13,365
	GamSys opening balance sheet adjustment			—			(52	)		—			(52	)
	Foreign currency adjustments			959			(801	)		276			434
	Ending Balance, December 31, 2013		$	61,704		$	106,697		$	64,802		$	233,203
	Accumulated Impairment, December 31, 2013		$	(103,991	)	$	—		$	—			(103,991	)
	In accordance with ASC 805, we revised previously issued post-acquisition financial information to reflect adjustments to the preliminary accounting for these business acquisitions as if the adjustments occurred on the acquisition date. Accordingly, we have increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities by $1.2 million in the aggregate at December 31, 2012 to reflect opening balance sheet adjustments related to our acquisitions of Cretaprint, OPS, and Technique.
	The initial preliminary allocation of the GamSys purchase price was adjusted during the third quarter of 2013 to reflect a $0.1 million decrease to goodwill, offset by a corresponding increase in other current assets. The initial preliminary allocation of the Cretaprint purchase price was adjusted during the third quarter of 2012 to reflect a $0.2 million increase in goodwill, offset by a corresponding decrease in deferred tax assets, income taxes receivable, and other current assets. The initial preliminary allocation of the Metrics purchase price was adjusted during the fourth quarter of 2012 to reflect a $0.6 million decrease to goodwill, offset by a corresponding decrease in deferred tax liabilities, resulting from a decision to remain on the deemed profit method of reporting income tax liabilities in Brazil through 2013. These adjustments were recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance sheet of each of these acquired businesses as of the effective date of each acquisition.
	Based on the outcome of conditions existing during the fourth quarter of 2008, we determined that a triggering event requiring an interim impairment analysis had occurred relating to the Industrial Inkjet reporting unit. The resulting impairment analysis resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $104 million. The goodwill valuation analysis was performed based on our respective reporting units—Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery—which are consistent with our operating segments identified in Note 15—Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
	Goodwill Assessment
	ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (ASC 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, provides that a simplified analysis of goodwill impairment may be performed consisting of a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. Due to the significant additions to goodwill resulting from the business combinations completed during 2013 and 2012 and because our reporting units are susceptible to fair value fluctuations, we determined that the quantitative analysis should be performed.
	According to the provisions of ASC 350-20-35, a two-step impairment test of goodwill is required. In the first step, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and further testing is not required. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is required to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit, excluding goodwill, from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in the first step. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss must be recorded equal to the difference.
	Our goodwill valuation analysis is based on our respective reporting units (Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery), which are consistent with our operating segments identified in Note 15—Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We determined the fair value of our reporting units as of December 31, 2013 by equally weighting the market and income approaches. Under the market approach, we estimated fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings of comparable companies. Under the income approach, we estimated fair value based on a projected cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Based on our valuation results, we have determined that the fair values of our reporting units exceed their carrying values. Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery fair values are $540, $262, and $368 million, respectively, which exceed carrying value by 284%, 209%, and 398%, respectively.
	To identify suitable comparable companies under the market approach, consideration was given to the financial condition and operating performance of the reporting unit being evaluated relative to companies operating in the same or similar businesses, potentially subject to corresponding economic, environmental, and political factors and considered to be reasonable investment alternatives. Consideration was given to the investment characteristics of the subject company relative to those of similar publicly traded companies (i.e., guideline companies), which are actively traded. In applying the Public Company Market Multiple Method (“PCMMM”), valuation multiples were derived from historical and projected operating data of guideline companies and applied to the appropriate operating data of our reporting units to arrive at an indication of fair value. Four, six, and four suitable guideline companies were identified for the Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery reporting units, respectively.
	As part of this process, we engaged a third party valuation firm to assist management in its analysis. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party valuation firm, the impairment analysis and related valuations represent the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party.
	Solely for purposes of establishing inputs for the income approach to assess the fair value of the Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery reporting units, we made the following assumptions:
		•		Industrial Inkjet revenue growth of 11% in 2013 was comparable to historical normalized growth rates.
		•		Productivity Software revenue growth of 14% in 2013 exceeded historical normalized growth rates due to ten acquisitions completed during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
		•		Fiery revenue growth of 11% in 2013 significantly exceeded historical normalized growth rates in the Fiery operating segment. This significant increase followed a decrease of 15% in 2012, due to the delayed launch of products that utilize our Fiery DFEs by the leading printer manufacturers, which indicates that the growth rate should be normalized in the forecast horizon.
		•		Despite the ongoing economic uncertainty, our reporting units’ revenue is assumed to grow at historical normalized rates between 2014 and 2018 for the following primary reasons:
		•		Our Industrial Inkjet revenue is positioned to outpace the slow economy and achieve historical normalized growth rates due to the ongoing transition from solvent-based to UV curable-based printing and from UV curing to UV/LED curing. This transition is expected to continue through the forecast horizon.
		•		Our Cretaprint industrial inkjet ceramic tile decoration business is in a sector of the market that is growing at a faster rate than the remainder of the industrial inkjet market due to a rapid adoption of digital technology and the ceramic tile industry’s demand for equipment to support its partial geographic relocation to China, India, Brazil, and Indonesia.
		•		Our acquisition strategy in the Productivity Software reporting unit will enable us to achieve historical normalized revenue growth rates through the forecast horizon. Our intention is to continue to explore additional acquisition opportunities in the Productivity Software operating segment to further consolidate the business process automation and cloud-based order entry and order management software industries in both the Americas and world-wide.
		•		Long-term industry growth after 2019.
		•		Gross profit percentages will approximate historical average levels in the Productivity Software and Fiery reporting units. Industrial Inkjet gross profit will remain at the 40 percent level, which is the approximate level achieved in 2013 and 2012, as we have resolved significant warranty issues and exposures.
	Our discounted cash flow projections are five-year financial forecasts, which were based on annual financial forecasts developed internally by management for use in managing our business and through discussions with the valuation firm engaged by us. The significant assumptions utilized in these five-year financial forecasts included consolidated annual revenue growth rates ranging from 6% to 10%, which equates to a consolidated compound annual growth rate of 7%. These are our historical normalized growth rates. Future cash flows were discounted to present value using a mid-year convention and a consolidated discount rate of 10%. Terminal values were calculated using the Gordon growth methodology with a consolidated long-term growth rate of 4.0%, except for Fiery at 2.5%. The sum of the fair values of the Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery reporting units was reconciled to our current market capitalization (based on our stock price) plus an estimated control premium. Percentage of revenue over the five-year forecast horizon were compared to approximate percentages realized by
the guideline companies. To assess the reasonableness of the estimated control premium of 6.5%, we examined the most similar transactions in relevant industries and determined the average premium indicated by the transactions deemed to be most similar to a hypothetical transaction involving our reporting units. We examined the weighted average and median control premiums offered in relevant industries, industry specific control premiums, and specific transaction control premiums to conclude that our estimated control premium is reasonable.
We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles and long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable or the life of the asset may need to be revised. Factors considered important that could trigger an impairment review include:
	•		significant negative industry or economic trends,
	•		significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period,
	•		our market capitalization relative to net book value,
	•		significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets,
	•		significant changes in the strategy for our overall business, and
	•		our assessment of growth and profitability in each reporting unit over the coming years.
Given the uncertainty of the economic environment and the potential impact on our business, there can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions regarding the duration of the ongoing economic downturn, or the period or strength of recovery, made for purposes of our goodwill impairment testing at December 31, 2013 will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding forecasted revenue or gross profit rates are not achieved, we may be required to record additional goodwill impairment charges in future periods relating to any of our reporting units, whether in connection with the next annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2014 or prior to that, if any such change constitutes an interim triggering event. It is not possible to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such charge would be material.
Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate potential impairment with respect to long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable. No asset impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, or 2011.
Intangible assets are evaluated for impairment based on their estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Based on this analysis, no impairment of intangible assets, excluding goodwill, was recognized in 2013, 2012, or 2011.
Other investments, included within other assets, consist of equity and debt investments in privately-held companies that develop products, markets, and services that are strategic to us. In-substance common stock investments in which we exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, but do not have a majority voting interest, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Investments not meeting these requirements are accounted for using the cost method of accounting. As of December 31, 2013, our investments in privately-held companies were accounted for under the cost method.
We previously assessed each investee’s technology pipeline and market conditions in the industry and ability to sustain an earnings capacity that would justify its carrying amount in accordance with ASC 323-10-35-32. We determined it is no longer probable that they will generate sufficient positive future cash flows to recover the carrying amount of each investment. Therefore, we previously fully reserved our equity and debt investments in privately-held companies. We received proceeds from the sale of certain of these investments of $0.1 and $2.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011, respectively.

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea

Investments and Fair Value Measurements	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Text Block [Abstract]	'
Investments and Fair Value Measurements	'
	Note 6: Investments and Fair Value Measurements
	We invest our excess cash on deposit with major banks in money market, U.S. Treasury and government-sponsored entity, foreign government, corporate debt, municipal, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed residential securities. By policy, we invest primarily in high-grade marketable securities. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions or issuers of these investments to the extent of amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets.
	We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Typically, the cost of these investments has approximated fair value. Marketable investments with a maturity greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale short-term investments. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of OCI, adjusted for deferred income taxes. The credit portion of any other-than-temporary impairment is included in net income. Realized gains and losses on sales of financial instruments are recognized upon sale of the investments using the specific identification method.
	Our available-for-sale short-term investments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
		Amortized cost			Gross  unrealized			Gross			Fair value
					gains			unrealized losses
	December 31, 2013
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	28,880		$	36		$	(7	)	$	28,909
	Corporate debt securities		114,333			273			(42	)		114,564
	Municipal securities		15,319			7			(2	)		15,324
	Asset-backed securities		14,148			97			(9	)		14,236
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		4,906			28			(10	)		4,924
	Total short-term investments	$	177,586		$	441		$	(70	)	$	177,957
	December 31, 2012
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	17,371		$	7		$	—		$	17,378
	Corporate debt securities		40,218			194			(17	)		40,395
	Municipal securities		1,710			3			—			1,713
	Asset-backed securities		12,128			66			(2	)		12,192
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		9,237			63			(12	)		9,288
	Total short-term investments	$	80,664		$	333		$	(31	)	$	80,966
	The fair value and duration that investments, including cash equivalents, have been in a gross unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
		Less than 12 Months						More than 12 Months						TOTAL
		Fair			Unrealized			Fair			Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
		Value			Losses			Value			Losses			Value		Losses
	December 31, 2013
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	16,294		$	(7	)	$	—		$	—		$	16,294	$	(7	)
	Corporate debt securities		29,125			(42	)		—			—			29,125		(42	)
	Municipal securities		6,243			(2	)		—			—			6,243		(2	)
	Asset-backed securities		6,705			(9	)		—			—			6,705		(9	)
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		1,659			(8	)		188			(2	)		1,847		(10	)
	Total	$	60,026		$	(68	)	$	188		$	(2	)	$	60,214	$	(70	)
	December 31, 2012
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	15,791		$	(1	)	$	—		$	—		$	15,791	$	(1	)
	Corporate debt securities		11,288			(17	)		—			—			11,288		(17	)
	Asset-backed securities		1,959			(2	)		—			—			1,959		(2	)
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		1,263			(7	)		(300	)		(4	)		963		(11	)
	Total	$	30,301		$	(27	)	$	(300	)	$	(4	)	$	30,001	$	(31	)
	For fixed income securities that have unrealized losses as of December 31, 2013, we have determined that we do not have the intent to sell any of these investments and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell any of these investments before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis. We have evaluated these fixed income securities and determined that no credit losses exist. Accordingly, management has determined that the unrealized losses on our fixed income securities as of December 31, 2013 were temporary in nature.
	Amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments at December 31, 2013 is summarized by maturity date as follows (in thousands):
		Amortized cost			Fair value
	Mature in less than one year	$	97,286		$	97,391
	Mature in one to three years		80,300			80,566
	Total short-term investments	$	177,586		$	177,957
	For the year ended December 31, 2013, $0.1 million was recognized in net realized losses, which was comprised of $0.1 million in realized gains from sale of investments, partially offset by $0.2 million in realized losses. For the year ended December 31, 2012, $0.1 million was recognized in net realized losses, which was comprised of $0.2 million in realized gains from sale of investments, partially offset by $0.3 million in realized losses. For the year ended December 31, 2011, $0.2 million in realized gains from sale of investments were offset by $0.2 million in realized losses. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, net unrealized gains of $0.4 and $0.3 million, respectively, were included in OCI in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
	Fair Value Measurements
	ASC 820 identifies fair value as the exchange price, or exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy as follows:
	Level 1: Inputs that are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date;
	Level 2: Inputs that are other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life or by comparison to similar instruments; and
	Level 3: Inputs that are unobservable or that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. These include management’s own judgments about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
	We utilize the market approach to measure the fair value of our fixed income securities. The market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The fair value of our fixed income securities is obtained using readily-available market prices from a variety of industry standard data providers, large financial institutions, and other third-party sources for the identical underlying securities. The fair value of our investments in certain money market funds is expected to maintain a Net Asset Value of $1 per share and, as such, is priced at the expected market price.
	We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from several third party asset managers, custodian banks, and the accounting service providers. Independently, these service providers use professional pricing services to gather pricing data, which may include quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly.
	As part of this process, we engaged a pricing service to assist management in its pricing analysis and assessment of other-than-temporary impairment. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party pricing service, the impairment analysis and related valuations represent the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party.
	Our investments and liabilities measured at fair value have been presented in accordance with the fair value hierarchy specified in ASC 820 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 in order of liquidity as follows (in thousands):
					Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date using
		Total			Quoted Prices			Significant			Unobservable
					in Active			other			Inputs
					Markets for			Observable			(Level 3)
					Identical Assets			Inputs
					(Level 1)			(Level 2)
	December 31, 2013
	Assets:
	Money market funds	$	52,595		$	52,595		$	—		$	—
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities		28,909			12,712			16,197			—
Corporate debt securities		117,195			—			117,195			—
Municipal securities		17,377			—			17,377			—
Asset-backed securities		14,236			—			14,135			101
Mortgage-backed securities—residential		4,923			—			4,923			—
	$	235,235		$	65,307		$	169,827		$	101
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	$	21,052		$	—		$	—		$	21,052
Self-insurance		2,554			—			—			2,554
	$	23,606		$	—		$	—		$	23,606
December 31, 2012
Assets:
Money market funds	$	112,714		$	112,714		$	—		$	—
U.S. Government and sponsored entities		20,177			15,214			4,963			—
Corporate debt securities		42,069			—			42,069			—
Municipal securities		1,713			—			1,713			—
Asset-backed securities		12,192			—			12,139			53
Mortgage-backed securities—residential		9,288			—			9,288			—
	$	198,153		$	127,928		$	70,172		$	53
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	$	38,050		$	—		$	—		$	38,050
Self-insurance		1,375			—			—			1,375
	$	39,425		$	—		$	—		$	39,425
Money market funds consist of $52.6 and $112.7 million, which have been classified as cash equivalents as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Municipal securities include $2.1 million, which have been classified as cash equivalents at December 31, 2013. Corporate debt securities include $2.6 and $1.7 million, which have been classified as cash equivalents at December 31, 2013and 2012, respectively. U.S. government and sponsored entities securities include $2.8 million, which have been classified as cash equivalents at December 31, 2012.
Investments are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Investments in U.S. Treasury obligations and overnight money market mutual funds have been classified as Level 1 because these securities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets or they are actively traded at $1.00 Net Asset Value. There have been no transfers between Level 1 and 2 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Government agency investments and corporate debt instruments, including investments in asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, have generally been classified as Level 2 because markets for these securities are less active or valuations for such securities utilize significant inputs, which are directly or indirectly observable. We hold asset-backed securities with income payments derived from and collateralized by a specified pool of underlying assets. Predominately, asset-backed securities in the portfolio are collateralized by credit cards and auto loans. We also hold two asset-backed securities collateralized by mortgage loans.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, one corporate debt instrument has been classified as Level 3 due to its significantly low level of trading activity. The rollforward of Level 3 investments is not provided due to immateriality. Changes in unobservable inputs to the fair value measurement of Level 3 investments on a recurring basis will not result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.
We review investments in debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment whenever the fair value is less than the amortized cost and evidence indicates the investment’s carrying amount is not recoverable within a reasonable period of time. We assess the fair value of individual securities as part of our ongoing portfolio management. Our other-than-temporary assessment includes reviewing the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than amortized cost, the seniority and durations of the securities, adverse conditions related to a security, industry, or sector, historical and projected issuer financial performance, credit ratings, issuer specific news, and other available relevant information. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, we consider whether we have the intent to sell the impaired security or if it will be more likely than not that we will be required to sell the impaired security before a market price recovery and whether evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary.
In determining whether a credit loss existed, we used our best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from each debt security. For asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, cash flow estimates, including prepayment assumptions, we rely on data from widely accepted third party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates vary based on assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates, recoveries, and changes in value. Expected cash flows were discounted using the effective interest rate implicit in the securities.
Based on this analysis, there were no other-than-temporary impairments, including credit-related impairments, during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. Accumulated other-than-temporary credit-related impairments charged to retained earnings and interest and other income (expense), net, consists of the following (in thousands):
	Impairments			Impairments			TOTAL
	Charged to			Recognized in
	Retained			Other Income
	Earnings			(Expense), Net
Accumulated impairments, net, attributable to assets still held at December 31, 2013	$	58		$	824		$	882
Minority Investment in Privately-Held Company
Other investments, included within other assets, consist of equity and debt investments in privately-held companies that develop products, markets, and services that are considered to be strategic to us. Each of these investments had been fully impaired in prior years. We received proceeds from the sale of certain of these investments of $0.1 and $2.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011, respectively.
Liabilities for Contingent Consideration
Acquisition-related current and noncurrent liabilities for contingent consideration (i.e., earnouts) are related to the acquisitions of Metrix, GamSys, and PrintLeader in 2013; Technique, OPS, Metrics, FX Colors, and Cretaprint in 2012; Alphagraph, Entrac, and Streamline in 2011; and Radius in 2010. The fair value of these earnouts is estimated to be $21.1 and $38.1 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5. Key assumptions include discount rates between 4.2% and 6.4%, achievement of acquisition-related executive deferred compensation cost, and probability-adjusted revenue and gross profit levels. Probability-adjusted revenue and gross profit are significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which ASC 820-10-35 refers to as Level 3 inputs. Acquisition-related executive deferred compensation cost of $1.8 million was expensed during the two years ended December 31, 2013, coinciding with the continuing employment of a former shareholder of an acquired company, thereby increasing the liability for contingent consideration accordingly. These contingent liabilities have been reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013, as current and noncurrent liabilities of $14.8 and $6.3 million, respectively.
The Cretaprint, Streamline, OPS, and Alphagraph earnout performance probability percentages have been reduced or partially achieved in 2013, partially offset by increased performance probability percentages with respect to the 2013 Metrics and Technique earnout performance targets. The 2013 and 2012 Entrac earnout performance targets were not achieved, primarily due to the delayed launch of the M500 product, which is Entrac’s next generation device. The 2012 Alphagraph earnout performance target was partially achieved. Consequently, the net decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration was $7.1 and $2.1 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, partially offset by $1.4 and $1.7 million of earnout interest accretion related to all acquisitions, respectively. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date have been recognized in general and administrative expense.
Earnout payments during the year ended December 31, 2013 of $8.9, $4.5, $1.9, $0.7, and $0.6 million related to previously accrued Cretaprint, Metrics, Radius, Alphagraph, and Streamline contingent consideration liabilities, respectively. Earnout payments during the year ended December 31, 2012 of $0.6, $0.3, and $0.1 million related to previously accrued Streamline, Radius, and FX Colors contingent consideration liabilities, respectively.
Changes in the contingent liability for contingent consideration are summarized as follows:
Fair value of contingent consideration at January 1, 2012	$	8,704
Fair value of Cretaprint contingent consideration at January 10, 2012		16,445
Fair value of FX Colors contingent consideration at April 5, 2012		190
Fair value of Metrics contingent consideration at April 10, 2012		5,582
Fair value of OPS contingent consideration at October 1, 2012		2,600
Fair value of Technique contingent consideration at November 16, 2012		4,410
Deferred compensation expense dependent on future employment		907
Changes in valuation		(432	)
Payments		(968	)
Foreign currency adjustment		612
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2012	$	38,050
Fair value of PrintLeader contingent consideration at May 8, 2013		389
Fair value of GamSys contingent consideration at May 31, 2013		2,640
Fair value of Metrix contingent consideration at October 16, 2013		1,123
Deferred compensation expense dependent on future employment		940
Changes in valuation		(5,779	)
Payments		(16,683	)
Foreign currency adjustment		372
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2013	$	21,052
ASU 2011-04 requires a narrative description of the sensitivity of recurring fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs if a change in those inputs might result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. Since the primary inputs to the fair value measurement of the contingent consideration liability are the discount rate and probability-adjusted revenue, we reviewed the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in these inputs. Probability-adjusted gross profit was not considered in the sensitivity analysis as its impact on the fair value measurement is conditional on achievement of the revenue performance targets and has significantly less impact on the overall potential earnout payment.
We assessed the probability of achieving the revenue performance targets for the contingent consideration associated with each acquisition at percentage levels between 70% and 100% as of each respective acquisition date based on an assessment of the historical performance of each acquired entity, our expectations of future performance, and other relevant factors. A change in probability-adjusted revenue of 5% from the level assumed in the respective valuations would result in an increase in the earnout liability of $0.6 million or a decrease of $0.7 million resulting in a corresponding adjustment to general and administrative expense. Likewise, a change in the discount rate of one percentage point results in either an increase or decrease of $0.1 million in the fair value of contingent consideration.
Liability for Self-Insurance
We are partially self-insured for certain losses related to employee medical and dental coverage, excluding employees covered by health maintenance organizations. We generally have an individual stop loss deductible of $125 thousand per enrollee unless specific exposures are separately insured. We have accrued a contingent liability of $2.6 and $1.4 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which are not discounted, based upon examination of historical trends, our claims experience, industry claims experience, actuarial analysis, and estimates. The primary estimates used in the development of our accrual as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, include total enrollment (including employee contributions), population demographics, and historical claims costs incurred, which are significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which ASC 820-10-35 refers to as Level 3 inputs.
Changes in the contingent liability for self-insurance are summarized as follows:
Fair value of self-insurance liability at January 1, 2012	$	1,640
Additions to reserve		12,440
Employee contributions		2,340
Less: insurance claims and administrative fees paid		(15,045	)
Fair value of self-insurance liability at December 31, 2012	$	1,375
Additions to reserve		11,590
Employee contributions		2,333
Less: insurance claims and administrative fees paid		(12,744	)
Fair value of self-insurance liability at December 31, 2013	$	2,554
While we believe these estimates are reasonable based on the information currently available, if actual trends, including the severity of claims and medical cost inflation, differ from our estimates, our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be impacted. ASU 2011-04 requires a narrative description of the sensitivity of recurring fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs if a change in those inputs might result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. Since the primary inputs to the fair value measurement of the self-insurance liability are the historical claims costs incurred, we reviewed the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in medical cost assumptions and the severity of claims experienced by employees. A change in the severity of claims experienced and medical cost inflation of 10% results in either an increase or decrease in the fair value of the self-insurance liability of $0.2 million.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
We utilize the income approach to measure the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities under ASC 820. The income approach uses pricing models that rely on market observable inputs such as yield curves, currency exchange rates, and forward prices, and are therefore classified as Level 2 measurements. The notional amount of our derivative assets and liabilities was $27.2 and $3.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities that were designated for cash flow hedge accounting treatment having notional amounts of $2.5 and $2.7 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was not material.

Indebtedness

Indebtedness	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Indebtedness	'
	Note 7: Indebtedness
	Short-term borrowings of $6.9 million, which were assumed in the acquisition of Cretaprint on January 10, 2012, have been repaid. Cretaprint indebtedness consisted primarily of notes payable to banks and lines of credit with weighted average interest rates of 5.0% and 4.5%, respectively.
	Short-term liabilities to a related party of GamSys of $1.2 million, which were assumed in the acquisition of GamSys on May 31, 2013, have been repaid.
	Long-term indebtedness at December 31, 2012, excluding the noncurrent portion of contingent consideration, consisted of the remaining balance of $0.3 million, net of current portion, on a 6.75% building loan assumed upon the acquisition of Technique and $0.1 million of Alphagraph capital lease liabilities. The Technique building mortgage, which was a ten-year loan, was fully paid during the year ended December 31, 2013. Long-term indebtedness at December 31, 2013 consists of approximately $$0.2 million of Cretaprint pre-acquisition financing obligations.

Commitments_and_Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Commitments and Contingencies	'
	Note 8: Commitments and Contingencies
	Contingent Consideration
	We are required to make payments to acquired company stockholders based on the achievement of specified performance targets. The fair value of these earnouts is estimated to be $21.1 and $38.1 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5. These contingent liabilities have been reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, as current and noncurrent liabilities of $14.8 and $6.3 million, respectively. The potential undiscounted amount of future contingent consideration cash payments that we could be required to make related to our business acquisitions, beyond amounts currently accrued, is $2.4 million as of December 31, 2013.
	The Cretaprint, Streamline, OPS, and Alphagraph earnout performance probability percentages have been reduced or partially achieved in 2013, partially offset by increased performance probability percentages with respect to the 2013 Metrics and Technique earnout performance targets. The 2013 and 2012 Entrac earnout performance targets were not achieved, primarily due to the delayed launch of the M500 product, which is Entrac’s next generation device. The 2012 Alphagraph earnout performance target was partially achieved. Consequently, the net decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration was $7.1 and $2.1 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, partially offset by $1.4 and $1.7 million of earnout interest accretion related to all acquisitions, respectively. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date have been recognized in general and administrative expense.
	Liability for Self-Insurance
	We are partially self-insured for certain losses related to employee medical and dental coverage, excluding employees covered by health maintenance organizations. We generally have an individual stop loss deductible of $125 thousand per enrollee unless specific exposures are separately insured. We have accrued a contingent liability of $2.6 and $1.4 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which are not discounted, based upon examination of historical trends, our claims experience, industry claims experience, actuarial analysis, and estimates. The primary estimates used in the development of our accrual as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, include total enrollment (including employee contributions), population demographics, and historical claims costs incurred.
	As part of this process, we engaged a third party actuarial firm to assist management in its analysis. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party actuary, the related valuation of our self-insurance liability represents the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party. While we believe these estimates are reasonable based on the information currently available, if actual trends, including the severity of claims and medical cost inflation, differ from our estimates, our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be impacted.
	Off-Balance Sheet Financing—Synthetic Lease Arrangement
	The Lease covering our Foster City office facility located at 303 Velocity Way, Foster City, California, was terminated on November 1, 2012 in conjunction with the sale of building and land to Gilead. The Lease provided a cost effective means of providing adequate office space for our corporate offices and was scheduled to expire by its terms in July 2014. The Lease included an option allowing us to purchase the facility during or at the end of the lease term for the amount that the lessor paid for the facility ($56.9 million). The funds pledged under the Lease were in LIBOR-based interest bearing accounts, which were restricted as to withdrawal at all times.
	On November 1, 2012, we sold the 294,000 square foot 303 Velocity Way building, along with approximately four acres of land and certain other assets related to the property, for $179.7 million. We exercised our purchase option with respect to the Lease in connection with the sale of the building and land and terminated the corresponding Lease. We continued to use the facility until October 31, 2013 while we located, purchased, and completed building improvements in the new corporate headquarters facility in Fremont, California. Rent was not required to be paid to Gilead for our use of the Foster City facility during this period. This constituted a form of continuing involvement that prevented gain recognition. Until we vacated the building, the proceeds from the sale were accounted for as deferred proceeds from property transaction on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, which was $180.2 million on December 31, 2012, including imputed interest costs. The $56.9 million of previously pledged funds were classified as land, buildings, and improvements within property and equipment, net, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012.
	We were in compliance with all financial and merger-related lease covenants prior to the termination of the Lease. We had guaranteed to the lessor a residual value associated with the building equal to 82% of their funding of the Lease. We were required to maintain a minimum net worth and tangible net worth as of the end of each quarter as well as certain additional covenants regarding mergers. We were liable to the lessor for the financed amount of the buildings if we defaulted on our covenants. We assessed our exposure relating to the first loss guarantee under the Lease and determined there was no deficiency to the guaranteed value. Prior to the termination of the Lease, we were treated as the owner of the building for federal income tax purposes. In conjunction with the Lease, we had been leasing the land on which the building is located to the lessor of the building. This separate ground lease was for approximately 30 years, but was terminated in conjunction with the completion of the sale of the building and land to Gilead.
	Purchase Commitments
	We subcontract with other companies to manufacture our products. During the normal course of business, our subcontractors procure components based on orders placed by us. If we cancel all or part of our orders, we may still be liable to the subcontractors for the cost of the components they purchased to manufacture our products. We periodically review the potential liability compared to the adequacy of the related allowance. Our consolidated financial position and results of operations could be negatively impacted if we were required to compensate the subcontract manufacturers for amounts in excess of the related reserve.
	On April 26, 2013, we purchased an approximately 119,000 square feet cold shell building located at 6750 Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, California, the related land, and certain other property improvements from the Trusts, for a total purchase price of $21.5 million. We have incurred build-out and construction costs, including furniture and equipment, of $20.8 million as of December 31, 2013.
	Lease Commitments
	As of December 31, 2013, we have leased certain of our current facilities under noncancellable operating lease agreements. We are required to pay property taxes, insurance, and nominal maintenance costs for certain of these facilities and any increases over the base year of these expenses on the remainder of our facilities.
	Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, including the build-to-suit lease, and future minimum sublease receipts, for each of the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
		Future Minimum			Future Minimum
	Fiscal Year	Lease Payments			Sublease Income
	2014	$	5,110		$	108
	2015		3,568			108
	2016		2,857			108
	2017		3,569			27
	2018		2,917			—
	Thereafter		17,543			—
	Total	$	35,564		$	351
	Rent expense was approximately $6.1, $7.1, and $6.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Sublease rental income was approximately $3.1, $1.7, and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
	Sublease income results primarily from the imputed sublease of the portion of the building sold to Gilead that they occupied before we vacated the building and the sublease of our facility in the U.K.
	We entered into a 15-year lease agreement with the Trusts, pursuant to which we leased approximately 59,000 square feet of a building located at 6700 Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, California, which is adjacent to the building that we purchased from the Trusts. The lease commenced on September 1, 2013. Minimum lease payments are $18.4 million, net of a full abatement of rent for the first three years of the lease term. During the initial lease term, we also have certain rights of first refusal to (i) lease the remaining portion of the leased facility and/or (ii) purchase the facility. This location now serves as our worldwide corporate headquarters, as well as engineering, marketing, and administrative operations for our Fiery operating segment. We relocated our former corporate headquarters to this location during the fourth quarter of 2013.
	The leased facility was a cold shell requiring additional build-out and tenant improvements. The Trusts paid the costs of the build-out up to $4.5 million, including all structural improvements, and we will pay the costs of tenant improvements beyond that amount. We have incurred $4.9 million, including furniture and equipment, during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Trusts are responsible for any costs related to force majeure events that result in any damage to the facility. We are responsible for cost over-runs, if any, related to force majeure events including strikes, war, and material availability. Since we are responsible for cost overruns related to certain force majeure events, we are in substance offering an indemnification to the Trusts for events outside of our control. As such, we are deemed to be the accounting owner of the facility. As of December 31, 2013, we capitalized $11.1 million in property and equipment based on the estimated replacement cost of the unfinished space, including capitalized interest, reduced by accumulated depreciation.
	Monthly lease payments are allocated between the land element of the lease, which is accounted for as an operating lease upon lease execution, and the imputed financing obligation. The imputed financing obligation is being amortized upon lease commencement in accordance with the effective interest method using the interest rate determined in accordance with the requirements of sale leaseback accounting. The imputed interest cost incurred during the construction period was capitalized as a component of the construction cost upon lease commencement. As of December 31, 2013, the imputed financing obligation in connection with the facility was $11.5 million, including accrued interest, which was classified as a long-term imputed financing obligation in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. If the requirements of sale leaseback accounting are satisfied, or at the end of the initial lease term, we will reverse the net book value of the building and the corresponding imputed financing obligation.
	Guarantees and Product Warranties
	Under ASC 460, Guarantees, we are required to disclose guarantees upon issuance and recognize a liability for the fair value of obligations we assume under such guarantees. ASC 460 applies to both general guarantees and product warranties.
	Our Industrial Inkjet printer and Fiery DFE products are generally accompanied by a 12-month limited warranty from date of shipment, which covers both parts and labor. In accordance with ASC 450-30, an accrual is established when the warranty liability is estimable and probable based on historical experience. A provision for the estimated warranty costs relating to products that have been sold is recorded in cost of revenue upon recognition of revenue and the resulting accrual is reviewed regularly and periodically adjusted to reflect changes in warranty estimates.
	The changes in product warranty reserve for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Balance at January 1,	$	10,158		$	8,877
	Accrued warranty assumed upon acquisition of Cretaprint		—			1,386
	Provisions, net of releases		11,267			10,122
	Settlements		(10,378	)		(10,227	)
	Balance at December 31	$	11,047		$	10,158
	In the normal course of business and in an effort to facilitate the sales of our products, we sometimes indemnify other parties, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with us. When we indemnify these parties, typically those provisions protect other parties against losses arising from our infringement of third party intellectual property rights. Those provisions also often contain various limitations including limits on the amount of protection provided. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our current and former officers and directors. Our amended and restated bylaws also contain similar indemnification obligations for our agents.
	Legal Proceedings
	We may be involved, from time to time, in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations, or proceedings relating to contractual disputes, securities laws, intellectual property rights, employment, or other matters that may arise in the normal course of business. We assess our potential liability in each of these matters by using the information available to us. We develop our views on estimated losses in consultation with inside and outside counsel, which involves a subjective analysis of potential results and various combinations of appropriate litigation and settlement strategies. We accrue estimated losses from contingencies if a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated.
	As of December 31, 2013, we are subject to the various claims, lawsuits, investigations, or proceedings discussed below.
	Componex vs. EFI
	Componex is a manufacturer of rolls used in machines handling continuous sheets of product and is a supplier for certain products in our VUTEk product line. On May 30, 2013, Componex filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin alleging that rolls supplied to EFI by another vendor infringe two patents held by Componex. Because this proceeding is still in its preliminary stages, we have not completed our evaluation of the allegations, determine whether the loss is probable or reasonably possible or, if it is probable or reasonably possible, estimate the amount or range of loss that may be incurred.
	Digitech Patent Litigation
	On August 16, 2012, Digitech initiated litigation against EFI; Konica Minolta Holdings, Inc., Konica Minolta Holdings, U.S.A., Inc., and Konica Minolta Business Solutions, U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “Konica Minolta”); and Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) for infringement of a patent related to the creation of device profiles in digital image reproduction systems in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (“District Court”).
	In addition to its own defenses, EFI has contractual obligations to indemnify certain of its customers to varying degrees subject to various circumstances, including Konica Minolta, Xerox, and others.
	We do not believe that our products infringe any valid claim of Digitech’s patent and in July 2013, the District Court granted summary judgment that the patent at issue is invalid. In August 2013, the District Court entered judgment in favor of EFI and the other defendants and Digitech filed its notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Court of Appeals”). The appeal is currently pending.
	We do not believe that Digitech’s patent or infringement claims based on that patent are valid and we do not believe it is probable that we will incur a material loss in this matter. However, it is reasonably possible that our financial statements could be materially affected if the Court of Appeals reverses the District Court’s summary judgment and the District Court subsequently reaches a different conclusion from its decision that the patent is invalid. We are currently assessing whether we can provide a reasonable estimate of the range of loss. Such an evaluation includes, among other things, a determination of the total sales of the implicated systems in the United States and what a reasonable royalty, if any, might be under the circumstances.
	Durst v. EFI GmbH and EFI, et al.
	On or about June 14, 2011, Durst filed an action against EFI GmbH and EFI in the Regional Court of Dusseldorf, Germany (“Regional Court”), alleging infringement of a German patent. The Regional Court preliminarily determined that the white base coat printing method in our GS and QS super-wide format printer product lines infringes the Durst patent. We appealed this decision to the Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf.
	In a separate action filed in the German Federal Patent Court, we challenged the validity of the Durst patent, whichwe believe is invalid in light of prior art. The Federal Patent Court held a hearing on the validity of the patent on October 23, 2013 and, following the hearing, declared the relevant claims in Durst’s patents to be invalid. Durst has the right to appeal the ruling.
	On November 12, 2013, following the Federal Patent Court’s decision invalidating the patent, the Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf stayed Durst’s infringement action until a final decision in EFI’s nullity proceeding. A hearing previously scheduled for March 20, 2014 has been canceled.
	As a result of the Federal Patent Court’s decision, we do not believe that there is any remaining basis for Durst’s infringement claims and we do not believe it is probable that we will incur a material loss in this matter. It is reasonably possible, however, that our financial statements could be materially affected if the Federal Patent Court’s decision were to be reversed and there is a subsequent assessment of damages or issuance of an injunction in the infringement action. We are currently assessing whether we can provide a reasonable estimate of the range of loss. Such an evaluation includes, among other things, a determination of the number of printers in Germany with the relevant feature at the time the court makes its final determination of infringement, and an assessment of the cost related to an injunction, if an injunction is ultimately issued.
	Perfectproof v. EFI GmbH
	On December 31, 2001, Perfectproof filed a complaint against BEST GmbH, currently EFI GmbH in the Tribunal de Commerce of Brussels, in Belgium (the “Commercial Court”), alleging unlawful unilateral termination of an alleged “exclusive” distribution agreement and claiming damages of approximately EU 0.6 million for such termination and additional damages of EU 0.3 million, or a total of approximately $1.1 million. In a judgment issued by the Commercial Court on June 24, 2002, the court declared that the distribution agreement was not “exclusive” and questioned its jurisdiction over the claim. Perfectproof appealed, and by decision dated November 30, 2004, the Court d’Appel of Brussels (the “Court of Appeal”) rejected the appeal and remanded the case to the Commercial Court. Subsequently, by judgment dated November 17, 2009, the Commercial Court dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction of Belgian courts over the claim. On March 25, 2009, Perfectproof again appealed to the Court of Appeal. On November 16, 2010, the Court of Appeal declared, among other things, that the Commercial Court was competent to hear the case; that the “exclusive” agreement required reasonable notice prior to termination; and that Perfectproof is entitled to damages. The court appointed an expert to review the parties’ records and address certain questions relevant in assessing Perfectproof’s damages claim. On October 19, 2011, the expert issued its final report itemizing damages that are, in the aggregate, significantly less than the amount claimed by Perfectproof. The final determination of damages will not be binding until it is approved or adopted by the court. A decision of the Court of Appeal is pending.
	Although we do not believe that Perfectproof’s claims are founded and we do not believe it is probable that we will incur a material loss in this matter, it is reasonably possible that our financial statements could be materially affected by the court’s decision regarding the assessment of damages. The court may approve the expert’s final report and pronounce the final amount of damages to be paid by us, or require additional analysis, or consider further challenges to the final determination of damages. Accordingly, it is reasonably possible that we could incur a material loss in this matter. We estimate the range of loss to be between one dollar and $1.1 million.
	Kerajet vs. Cretaprint
In May 2011, Jose Vicente Tomas Claramonte, the President of Kerajet, filed an action against Cretaprint in the Commercial Court in Valencia, Spain, alleging, among other things, that certain Cretaprint products infringe a patent held by Mr. Claramonte. In conjunction with our acquisition of Cretaprint, which closed on January 10, 2012, we assumed potential liability in this lawsuit.
A trial was held on October 4, 2012. On January 2, 2013, the court ruled in favor of Cretaprint concluding that the Cretaprint products do not infringe the Claramonte patent. Mr. Claramonte appealed the ruling on January 30, 2013. On July 15, 2013, the Spanish Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s conclusion that the Cretaprint products do not infringe the Claramonte patent. Mr. Claramonte did not appeal the ruling of the Spanish Court of Appeal. Accordingly, EFI no longer has any potential liability in this matter.
In conjunction with our defense of the claims by Mr. Claramonte, EFI filed affirmative actions against Mr. Claramonte in the U.K., Italy, and Germany alleging, among other things, that the Claramonte patent is not valid and/or that Cretaprint’s products do not infringe the patent. The court in the U.K. has issued a default judgment of non-infringement by Cretaprint. The actions in Italy and Germany remain pending.
Because the former owners of Cretaprint agreed to indemnify EFI against any potential liability in the event that Mr. Claramonte were to prevail in his action against Cretaprint, we accrued a contingent liability based on a reasonable estimate of the legal obligation that was probable as of the acquisition date and we accrued a contingent asset based on the portion of any liability for which the former Cretaprint owners would indemnify EFI. The net obligation accrued in the opening balance sheet on the acquisition date is EU 2.5 million (or approximately $3.3 million). We have reversed this liability during the year ended December 31, 2013, which resulted in a reduction of general and administrative expense.
SkipPrint Patent Litigation
SkipPrint is a non-practicing entity with certain rights to a number of patents related to web-to-print, order management, and business process automation software in the print industry. SkipPrint has alleged infringement of these patents by several companies. Although SkipPrint has neither made any claims against nor contacted EFI directly, SkipPrint has made claims against several EFI customers, including customers to whom EFI has contractual indemnification obligations to varying degrees. Although we are not a party to any of the pending litigation and we do not believe that our software infringes the patents-at-issue, it is reasonably possible that we may be obligated to indemnify certain customers under these contractual arrangements.
Each of Skip Print’s actions against third parties is in its preliminary stages and EFI has neither been named as a party to any action nor been contacted directly by SkipPrint. Accordingly, we are not yet in position to fully evaluate the scope of the allegations, if any, that might be made against EFI or our products. We are therefore not in a position to determine whether a loss is probable or reasonably possible, or if it is probable or reasonably possible, the estimate of the amount or range of loss that may be incurred. Such an evaluation includes, among other things, an evaluation of our indemnification obligations, any circumstances or conditions limiting our indemnification obligations, our products that might be implicated, whether our software is combined or used with customer or other third party software, an evaluation of the patents at issue, and other matters.
Other Matters
As of December 31, 2013, we were also subject to various other claims, lawsuits, investigations, and proceedings in addition to those discussed above. There is at least a reasonable possibility that additional losses may be incurred in excess of the amounts that we have accrued. However, we believe that certain of these claims are not material to our financial statements or the range of reasonably possible losses is not reasonably estimable. Litigation is inherently unpredictable, and while we believe that we have valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against us, our financial statements could be materially affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of one or more of these contingencies or because of the diversion of management’s attention and the incurrence of significant expenses.

Common_Stock_Repurchase_Progra

Common Stock Repurchase Programs	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Equity [Abstract]	'
Common Stock Repurchase Programs	'
	Note 9: Common Stock Repurchase Programs
	On August 31, 2012, the board of directors approved the repurchase of $100 million of outstanding common stock. Under this publicly announced plan, we repurchased 0.7 and 1.3 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $19.3 and $22.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	On November 6, 2013, the board of directors cancelled $58 million remaining for repurchase under the 2012 authorization and approved a new authorization to repurchase of $200 million of outstanding common stock. This authorization expires in November 2016. Under this publicly announced plan, we repurchased 0.1 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $2.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2013.
	Our employees have the option to surrender shares of common stock to satisfy their tax withholding obligations that arise on the vesting of RSUs. In addition, certain employees can surrender shares to satisfy the exercise price of certain stock options and any tax withholding obligations incurred in connection with such exercises. Employees surrendered 0.5 and 0.4 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $13.9 and $12.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	These repurchased shares reduce shares outstanding and are recorded as treasury stock under the cost method thereby reducing stockholders’ equity by the cost of the repurchased shares. Our buyback program is limited by SEC regulations and is subject to compliance with our insider trading policy.
	On November 6, 2013, the board of directors approved the retirement of 34.0 million shares of treasury stock. These retired shares are now classified as authorized, but unissued, shares. The retired shares had a carrying value, at cost, of $592.4 million. Under the cost method, the par value of formally retired treasury stock is deducted from common stock, a pro rata share is deducted from additional paid-in capital, and any remaining excess of cost over the par value and the pro rata share of additional paid-in capital is deducted from retained earnings.

Derivatives_and_Hedging

Derivatives and Hedging	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Derivatives and Hedging	'
	Note 10: Derivatives and Hedging
	We are exposed to market risk and foreign currency exchange risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results, financial position, and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these risks through our regular operating and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are used to hedge monetary assets and liabilities, including intercompany transactions, as well as reduce earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from shifts in market rates. Our objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings or protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. We do not have any leveraged derivatives, nor do we use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. ASC 815 requires the fair value of all derivative instruments, including those embedded in other contracts, to be recorded as assets or liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Foreign exchange contracts with notional amounts of $2.5 and $2.7 million and net asset/liability fair values that are immaterial have been designated for cash flow hedge accounting treatment at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The related cash flow impacts of our derivative contracts are reflected as cash flows from operating activities.
	Our exposures are related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue in Europe, Japan, the U.K., Latin America, China, Australia, and New Zealand and are primarily related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated operating expenses in Europe, India, Japan, the U.K., China, Brazil, and Australia. We hedge our operating expense cash flow exposure in Indian rupees. We hedge remeasurement exposure associated with Euro-denominated intercompany loans and Indian rupee net monetary assets. As of December 31, 2013, we had not entered into hedges against any other currency exposures, but we may consider hedging against movements in other currencies in the future.
	By their nature, derivative instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movement is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets, and liabilities being hedged (e.g., operating expense exposure in Indian rupees) or the settlement of the Euro-denominated intercompany loans. We do not believe there is a significant risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty associated with these instruments because, by policy, we deal with counterparties having a minimum investment grade or better credit rating. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures to such counterparties.
	Foreign currency derivative contracts with notional amounts of $2.5 and $2.7 million and net asset/liability amounts that are immaterial have been designated as cash flow hedges of our Indian rupee operating expense exposure at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The changes in fair value of these contracts are reported as a component of OCI and reclassified to operating expense in the periods of payment of the hedged operating expenses. The amount of ineffectiveness that was recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for these designated cash flow hedges was immaterial. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
	Forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments with notional amounts of $24.7 and $0.5 million are used to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. They are not designated for hedge accounting treatment since there is a natural offset for the remeasurement of the underlying foreign currency denominated asset or liability. We recognize changes in the fair value of non-designated derivative instruments in earnings in the period of change. Gains (losses) on foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge balance sheet exposures are recognized in interest and other income (expense), net, in the same period as the remeasurement gain (loss) of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments at December 31, 2013, consist of hedges of Euro-denominated intercompany loans with notional amounts of $24.7 million. Forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments at December 31, 2012 consist of hedges of Indian rupee net monetary assets with a notional amount of $0.5 million.

Income_Taxes

Income Taxes	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Income Taxes	'
	Note 11: Income Taxes
	The components of income before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	U.S.	$	127,232		$	5,615		$	3,143
	Foreign		45,906			29,408			27,277
	Total	$	173,138		$	35,023		$	30,420
	The provision for (benefit from) income taxes is summarized as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Current:
	U.S. Federal	$	6,589		$	(4,788	)	$	1,685
	State		(3,250	)		1,841			1,202
	Foreign		6,845			7,522			2,759
	Total current		10,184			4,575			5,646
	Deferred:
	U.S. Federal		20,875			(35,487	)		(688	)
	State		33,532			(9,648	)		(1,114	)
	Foreign		(560	)		(7,686	)		(889	)
	Total deferred		53,847			(52,821	)		(2,691	)
	Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	$	64,031		$	(48,246	)	$	2,955
	Reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) computed at the federal statutory rate to the actual tax provision (benefit) is as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013						2012					2011
	Tax provision at federal statutory rate	$	60,598			35	%	$	12,257		35	%	$	10,647		35	%
	State income taxes, net of federal benefit		467			0.3			(5,074	)	(14.5	)		57		0.2
	Research and development credits		(6,793	)		(3.9	)		(629	)	(1.8	)		(2,274	)	(7.5	)
	Foreign tax rate differential		(7,417	)		(4.3	)		(300	)	(0.9	)		(4,626	)	(15.2	)
	Non-deductible acquisition & integration costs		58			(0.1	)		720		2			—		—
	Increase in value of intangible assets		—			—			(6,494	)	(18.5	)		—		—
	Reduction in accrual for estimated potential tax assessments		(4,427	)		(2.6	)		(11,431	)	(32.6	)		(2,295	)	(7.6	)
	Capital loss due to liquidation of subsidiary		—			—			(38,859	)	(111.1	)		—		—
	Non-deductible stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718-740		1,764			1			1,528		4.4			2,179		7.2
	Valuation allowance changes affecting provision for income taxes		20,012			11.6			274		0.8			(706	)	(2.3	)
	Benefit related to reassessment of taxes from filing of prior year tax returns		(72	)		(0.1	)		—		—			—		—
	Other		(159	)		(0.1	)		(610	)	(1.7	)		(395	)	(1.3	)
	Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	$	64,031			36.8	%	$	(48,618	)	(138.9	)%	$	2,587		8.5	%
	In the fourth quarter of 2013, we determined that it is more likely than not that our California deferred tax assets will not be realized based on the size of the net operating loss and research and development credits being generated that exceed the utilization of these tax attributes. As a result, we established a valuation allowance of $19.4 million for the estimate of state deferred tax assets that may not be realized as of December 31, 2013.
	Research and development credits include a benefit of $3.2 million resulting from the renewal on January 2, 2013, of the U.S. federal research and development tax credit retroactive to 2012 pursuant to the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. ASC 740-10-45-15 requires the effects of a change in tax law or rates be recognized in the period that includes the enactment date.
	The provision for reassessment of tax exposure related to the filing of prior year tax returns of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, in the table above consists of $1.8 million of tax expense required to correctly state our prior year tax provision, which was partially offset by $1.9 million change in estimate for items recognized in the prior year. The prior year adjustment is required to correctly state our tax provision subsequent to the realignment of the ownership of our intellectual property that is described more fully below. We have determined that the impact of the prior year adjustment is immaterial to our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
	We earn a significant amount of our operating income outside the U.S., which is deemed to be permanently reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. Most of this income is earned in the Netherlands, Spain, and the Cayman Islands, which are jurisdictions with tax rates materially lower than the statutory U.S. tax rate of 35%. In 2012, we realigned the ownership of our Productivity Software and Cretaprint intellectual property to parallel our worldwide intellectual property ownership, which primarily drove the increased benefit related to the foreign rate differential in 2013. In addition to achieving operational synergies, one of the effects of this reorganization was the recognition of a tax benefit of $6.5 million in 2012 related to an increase in the value of intangible assets for Spanish statutory and tax reporting purposes. While we currently do not foresee a need to repatriate the earnings of these operations, should we require more capital in the U.S. than is generated by our U.S. operations, we may elect to repatriate funds held in our foreign jurisdictions or raise capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances. These alternatives could result in higher effective tax rates, the cash payments of taxes and/or increased interest expense. As of December 31, 2013, we have permanently reinvested $70.5 million of unremitted foreign earnings. Should these earnings be remitted to the U.S., the tax on these earnings would be $9.1 million.
	The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows (in thousands):
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Reserves and accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes	$	14,157		$	8,021
	Net operating loss carryforwards		11,264			11,690
	Tax credit carryforwards		57,000			47,347
	Stock-based compensation		8,856			7,066
	Deferred gain on sale of building and land		—			47,866
	Deferred revenue		2,463			2,708
	Other		2,494			(677	)
	Gross deferred tax assets		96,234			124,021
	Depreciation		(3,985	)		(2,554	)
	Amortization of identified intangibles		(13,163	)		(13,788	)
	State taxes		(1,746	)		(4,873	)
	Gross deferred tax liabilities		(18,894	)		(21,215	)
	Deferred tax valuation allowance		(28,845	)		(2,624	)
	Net deferred tax assets	$	48,495		$	100,182
	We have $23.8 million ($50.8 million for state tax purposes) and $30.9 million ($28.6 million for state tax purposes) of loss and credit carryforwards at December 31, 2013 for U.S. federal and state tax purposes. These federal and state losses and credits will expire between 2021 and 2031. A significant portion of these net operating loss and credit carryforwards relate to recent acquisitions. Utilization of these loss and credit carryforwards will be subject to an annual limitation under the IRC. In addition, the decrease in the deferred gain on the sale of building and land is the result of recognizing the deferred gain associated with the sale of our Foster City corporate headquarter building and related land in 2013. We also have a valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits resulting from the 2003 acquisition of Best GmbH, compensation limitations potentially limited by IRC 162(m), and valuation allowance related to California net operating loss and research and development credits. The $26.2 million increase in the valuation allowance resulted primarily from the establishment of a valuation allowance on California deferred tax assets. If these foreign tax credits, compensation deductions, and California deferred tax assets are ultimately utilized, then the resulting benefit would reduce income tax expense.
	As of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, gross unrecognized benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized were $33.0, $29.8, and $35.6 million, respectively, offset by deferred tax benefits of $1.1, $2.4, and $2.5 million related to the federal tax effect of state income taxes for the same periods. Over the next twelve months, our existing tax positions will continue to generate increased liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits.
	A reconciliation of the change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 is as follows (in millions):
		Federal, State,			Accrued			Gross
		and Foreign			Interest and			Unrecognized
Tax		Penalties			Income Tax
					Benefits
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	31.7		$	0.8		$	32.5
Additions for tax positions of prior years		—			0.4			0.4
Additions for tax positions related to 2011		5.6			—			5.6
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(0.1	)		—			(0.1	)
Settlements		(0.6	)		(0.1	)		(0.7	)
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations		(2.0	)		(0.1	)		(2.1	)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	34.6		$	1		$	35.6
Additions for tax positions of prior years		0.1			0.3			0.4
Additions for tax positions related to 2012		5			—			5
Settlements		(0.4	)		—			(0.4	)
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations		(10.3	)		(0.5	)		(10.8	)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	29		$	0.8		$	29.8
Additions for tax positions of prior years		2.7			0.3			3
Additions for tax positions related to 2013		7.3			—			7.3
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(1.9	)		—			(1.9	)
Settlements		(1.1	)		(0.1	)		(1.2	)
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations		(3.6	)		(0.4	)		(4.0	)
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	32.4		$	0.6		$	33
We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. At December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, we have accrued $1.0, $1.2, and $1.7 million, respectively, for potential payments of interest and penalties.
We are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2010-2012 tax years, state tax jurisdictions for the 2009-2012 tax years, the Netherlands tax authority for the 2011 and 2012 tax years, and the Spanish tax authority for the 2009-2012 tax years. It is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease up to $3.3 million in the next 12 months. These adjustments, if recognized, would positively impact our effective tax rate, and would be recognized as additional tax benefits in our income statement. The reduction in unrecognized tax benefits relates primarily to a lapse of the statute of limitations for federal and state tax purposes.

Employee_Benefit_Plans

Employee Benefit Plans	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]	'
Employee Benefit Plans	'
	Note 12: Employee Benefit Plans
	Equity Incentive Plans
	Subsequent to stockholders approved our 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan, no awards may be granted under any of our prior plans. As of December 31, 2013, we had outstanding equity awards under three equity incentive plans, including the 2009 Plan (defined below) and two prior equity incentive plans.
	Our primary equity incentive plans are summarized as follows:
	2009 Stock Plan
	In June 2009, our stockholders approved the 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan and the reservation of an aggregate of 5 million shares of our common stock for issuance pursuant to such plan. In May 2011, our stockholders approved amendments to the 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved under the plan for future issuance from 5 to 7 million shares, provide flexibility with respect to the granting of performance-based awards, and authorize the granting of performance-based awards under the plan through the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. On June 4 2013, our stockholders approved amendments to the Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan (“2009 Plan”) to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved under the plan for future issuance from 7.0 to 11.6 million shares and authorize the granting of performance-based awards under the plan through the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.
	The 2009 Plan provides for grants of stock options (both incentive and nonqualified stock options), RSAs, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, RSUs, and performance-based awards. Options and awards generally vest over a period of three to four years from the date of grant and generally expire seven to ten years from the date of the grant. The terms of the 2009 Plan provide that an option price shall not be less than 100% of fair value on the date of the grant. Our board of directors may grant a stock bonus or stock unit award under the 2009 Plan in lieu of all or a portion of any cash bonus that a participant would have otherwise received for the related performance period.
	The shares of common stock covered by the 2009 Plan may be treasury shares, authorized but unissued shares, or shares purchased in the open market. If an award under the 2009 Plan is forfeited (including a reimbursement of a non-vested award upon a participant’s termination of employment at a price equal to the par value of the common stock subject to the award) or expired, any shares of common stock subject to the award may be used again for new grants under the 2009 Plan.
	The 2009 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“Committee”). The Committee has the exclusive authority to administer the 2009 Plan, including the power to (i) designate participants under the 2009 Plan, (ii) determine the types of awards granted to participants under the 2009 Plan, the number of such awards, and the number of shares of our common stock that is subject to such awards, (iii) determine and interpret the terms and conditions of any awards under the 2009 Plan, including the vesting schedule, exercise price, whether to settle or accept the payment of any exercise price, in cash, common stock, other awards, or other property, and whether an award may be cancelled, forfeited, or surrendered, (iv) prescribe the form of each award agreement, and (v) adopt rules for the administration, interpretation, and application of the 2009 Plan.
	Persons eligible to participate in the 2009 Plan include all of our employees, directors, and consultants, as determined by the Committee. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 2,800 employees and consultants and 5 non-employee directors were eligible to participate in the 2009 Plan.
	There were 2.7, 3.2, and 3.4 million shares outstanding and 4.5, 0.8, and 2.0 million shares available for grant under the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
	2007 Stock Plan
	With the adoption of the 2009 Plan, no additional awards may be granted under the 2007 Equity Incentive Award Plan (“2007 Plan”). Under the 2007 Plan, 3.3 million shares of common stock were reserved and authorized for issuance. The 2007 Plan provides for grants of stock options (both incentive and nonqualified stock options), restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, RSUs, and performance-based awards. Options and awards generally vest over a period of three to four years from date of grant and generally expire seven to ten years from date of the grant. The terms of the 2007 Plan provide that an option price shall not be less than 100% of fair value on the date of the grant.
	The shares of common stock covered by the 2007 Plan may be treasury shares, authorized but unissued shares, or shares purchased in the open market. If an award under the 2007 Plan is forfeited (including reimbursement of a non-vested award upon a participant’s termination of employment at a price equal to the par value of the common stock subject to the award) or expired, any shares of common stock subject to the award may be used again for new grants under the 2007 Plan.
	As of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, there were 0.5, 0.6, and 0.9 million shares outstanding, respectively, under the 2007 Plan.
	2004 Stock Plan
	With the adoption of the 2007 Plan, no additional awards may be granted under the 2004 Stock Plan (the “2004 Plan”). Under the 2004 Plan, 8.4 million shares of common stock were authorized for issuance. This amount includes 0.1 million shares that were consolidated from the acquired Splash, T/R, and Printcafe Plans on June 7, 2006. The terms of the 2004 Plan provide that an option price shall not be less than 100% of fair value on the date of the grant. The vesting period for restricted stock must be at least (a) one year in the case of an RSA subject to a vesting schedule based on the achievement of specified performance goals by the participant or (b) three years in the case of an RSA absent such performance-based vesting. Under this plan, RSAs and RSUs could be granted that did not comply with the preceding minimum vesting requirement as long as the aggregate number of shares of common stock issued with respect to such non-conforming awards granted under the 2004 Plan did not exceed 10% of the shares reserved for issuance. The 2004 Plan provides for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 2004 Plan). Stock options, RSUs, and RSAs generally vest over a 42 to 48 month period and expire from seven to ten years from the date of the grant.
	As of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, there were less than 0.1, 0.1, and 0.6 million shares, respectively, outstanding under the 2004 Plan.
	Amended and Restated 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
	In June 2013 and June 2009, our stockholders approved the Amended and Restated 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan that increased the number of shares authorized for issuance pursuant to such plan by 2 and 3 million shares, respectively. The share increase was intended to ensure that we continue to have a sufficient reserve of common stock available under the ESPP to provide our eligible employees with the opportunity to acquire our common stock through participation in a payroll deduction-based ESPP designed to operate in compliance with Section 423 of the IRC. The amendment and restatement of the ESPP does not provide for an automatic increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP.
	In May 2000, our Board of Directors initially adopted the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which became effective on August 1, 2000 and reserved 0.4 million shares of common stock for issuance under the ESPP. The ESPP, subsequently amended prior to 2009, had an automatic share increase feature pursuant to which the shares reserved under the ESPP automatically increased on the first trading day in January of each year, beginning with calendar year 2006. The increase was equal to three quarters of one percent (0.75%) of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day of December in the immediately preceding calendar year, but in no event could any such increase exceed 2.5 million shares annually.
	The ESPP is qualified under Section 423 of the IRC. Eligible employees may contribute from one to ten percent of their base compensation not to exceed ten percent of the employee’s earnings. Employees are not able to purchase more than the number of shares having a value greater than $25,000 in any calendar year, as measured at the beginning of the offering period under the ESPP. The purchase price shall be the lesser of 85% of the fair value of the stock, either on the offering date or on the purchase date. The offering period shall not exceed 27 months beginning with the offering date. The ESPP provides for offerings of four consecutive, overlapping six-month offering periods, with a new offering period commencing on the first trading day on or after February 1 and August 1 of each year.
	During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, 0.6, 0.6, and 0.6 million shares were issued under the ESPP at an average purchase price of $12.39, $12.24, and $9.49, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, there was $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the ESPP. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.8 years. At December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, there were 2.4, 1.0, and 1.5 million shares, respectively, of our common stock reserved for issuance under the ESPP.
	Employee 401(k) Plan
	We sponsor a 401(k) Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”) to provide retirement and incidental benefits for our employees. Employees may contribute from 1% to 40% of their annual compensation to the 401(k) Plan, limited to a maximum annual amount as set periodically by the IRS. We matched 50% of U.S. employee contributions, up to a maximum of the first 4% of the employee’s compensation contributed to the plan, subject to IRS limitations. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, the maximum employee contribution was increased from 40% to 75%, limited by the maximum annual amount as set periodically by the IRS. All matching contributions vest over four years starting with the hire date of the individual employee. Our matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan totaled $2.0, $1.9, and $1.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The employees’ contributions and our contributions are invested in mutual funds managed by a fund manager, or in self-directed retirement plans.
	Valuation and Expense Information under ASC 718
	We account for stock-based payment awards in accordance with ASC 718, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all equity awards granted to our employees and directors, including employee stock options, RSAs, RSUs, and ESPP purchases related to all stock-based compensation plans based on the fair value of such awards on the date of grant. We amortize stock-based compensation cost on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period, after assessing the probability of achieving the requisite performance criteria with respect to performance-based awards. Stock-based compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards.
	We use the BSM option pricing model to value stock-based compensation for all equity awards, except market-based awards. Market-based awards are valued using a Monte Carlo valuation model.
	The BSM model determines the fair value of stock-based payment awards based on the stock price on the date of grant and is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, expected term, interest rates, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behavior. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over a preceding period commensurate with the expected term of the option. The expected term is based upon management’s consideration of the historical life, vesting period, and contractual period of the options granted. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to do so in the future.
	Option pricing models were developed to estimate the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because our employee stock options and awards have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion, the existing valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value of our employee stock options. Although the fair value of employee stock options is determined in accordance with ASC 718 and SAB 107 using an appropriate option pricing model, the value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
	Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, employee stock purchases under the ESPP, RSUs, and RSAs under ASC 718 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
		2013			2012			2011
	Employee stock options	$	921		$	1,039		$	2,096
	Non-vested RSUs and RSAs		22,026			15,750			17,926
	ESPP		2,823			2,932			3,347
	Total stock-based compensation		25,770			19,721			23,369
	Tax effect of stock-based compensation		(7,535	)		(5,682	)		(7,598	)
	Net effect on net income	$	18,235		$	14,039		$	15,771
	Valuation Assumptions for Stock Options and ESPP Purchases
	Our determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using BSM is affected by various assumptions including volatility, expected term, and interest rates. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over a preceding period commensurate with the expected term of the stock option. The expected term is based on management’s consideration of the historical life of the stock options, the vesting period of the stock options granted, and the contractual period of the stock options granted. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the stock options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to do so in the future.
	No stock options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2013. The estimated per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted and the assumptions used to estimate fair value for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the estimated per share weighted average fair value of ESPP shares issued and the assumptions used to estimate fair value for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:
		Stock Options						ESPP
		Years ended						Years ended December 31,
		December 31,
		2012			2011			2013			2012			2011
	Weighted average fair value per share	$	6.62		$	5.77		$	7.53		$	4.7		$	4.79
	Expected volatility		43.8	%		48	%		25% - 38	%		32% - 49	%		28% - 42	%
	Risk-free interest rate		0.5	%		0.8	%		0.1% - 0.4	%		0.1% - 0.2	%		0.2% - 0.6	%
	Expected term (in years)		4			4			0.5 - 2.0			0.5 - 2.0			0.5 - 2.0
	Stock Option Activity
	Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 and activity for each of the years then ended is as follows (in thousands, except weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual term):
		Shares			Weighted			Weighted			Aggregate
					average			average			intrinsic
					exercise			remaining			value
					price			contractual
								term
								(years)
	Options outstanding at January 1, 2011		2,529		$	14.64
	Options granted		140			15.33
	Options forfeited and expired		(70	)		18.24
	Options granted, net of forfeited and expired		70
	Options exercised		(146	)		13.1
	Options outstanding at December 31, 2011		2,453		$	14.67
Options granted		126			16.57
Options forfeited and expired		(258	)		15.74
Options forfeited and expired, net of granted		(132	)
Options exercised		(785	)		15.56
Options outstanding at December 31, 2012		1,536		$	14.19
Options granted		—			—
Options forfeited and expired		(42	)		25.63
Options forfeited and expired, net of granted		(42	)
Options exercised		(434	)		11.93
Options outstanding at December 31, 2013		1,060		$	14.66			2.86		$	25,526
Options vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013		1,046		$	14.65			2.83		$	25,193
Options exercisable at December 31, 2013		887		$	14.57			2.46		$	21,422
Aggregate stock option intrinsic value represents the difference between the closing price per share of our common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal period and the exercise price of the underlying awards for the options that were in the money at December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. The total intrinsic value of options exercised, determined as of the date of option exercise, was $5.5, $1.4, $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. There was $0.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options expected to vest as of December 31, 2013. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.9 years.
Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows (shares in thousands):
				Options outstanding									Options exercisable
Range of exercise prices				Shares			Weighted			Weighted			Shares			Weighted
							average			average						average
							remaining			exercise price						exercise
							contractual									price
							term (years)
$9.12 to $10.80					73			2.62		$	10.46			56		$	10.36
$11.40 to $11.40					130			3.64			11.4			124			11.4
$11.92 to $13.72					155			3.48			12.83			143			12.75
$14.28 to $15.25					86			4.84			14.28			44			14.29
$15.88 to $15.88					350			1.16			15.88			350			15.88
$16.32 to $16.32					101			1.62			16.32			101			16.32
$16.57 to $16.57					117			5.68			16.57			33			16.57
$17.97 to $26.67					46			3.85			18.87			34			19.15
$28.34 to $28.51					2			0.41			28.51			2			28.51
					1,060			2.86		$	14.66			887		$	14.57
Non-vested RSUs and RSAs
Non-vested RSUs and RSAs were awarded to employees under our equity incentive plans. Non-vested RSUs do not have the voting rights of common stock and the shares underlying non-vested RSUs are not considered issued and outstanding.
Non-vested RSAs have the same voting rights as other common stock and are considered to be currently issued and outstanding. Non-vested RSAs are eligible to receive dividends (i.e., participating securities), although we do not intend to declare dividends.
Non-vested RSUs and RSAs generally vest over a service period of two to four years. The compensation expense incurred for these service-based awards is based on the closing market price of our stock on the date of grant and is amortized on a graded vesting basis over the requisite service period. The weighted average fair value of RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 were $29.11, $16.05, and $15.09, respectively. No RSAs were granted during 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Non-vested RSUs and RSAs as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, and activity for each of the years then ended, is as follows (shares in thousands):
	RSUs						RSAs
	Shares			Weighted			Shares			Weighted
				average						average
				grant						grant
				date fair						date fair
				value						value
Non-vested at January 1, 2011		2,538		$	11.67			101		$	27.21
Restricted stock granted		1,505			15.09			—			—
Restricted stock vested		(1,317	)		11.87			(101	)		(27.21	)
Restricted stock forfeited		(224	)		11.89			—			—
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		2,502		$	13.6			—		$	—
Restricted stock granted		1,281			16.05			—			—
Restricted stock vested		(1,291	)		13.05			—			—
Restricted stock forfeited		(147	)		13.4			—			—
Non-vested at December 31, 2012		2,345		$	15.26			—		$	—
Restricted stock granted		1,222			29.11			—			—
Restricted stock vested		(1,159	)		14.41			—			—
Restricted stock forfeited		(319	)		17.78			—			—
Non-vested at December 31, 2013		2,089		$	23.44			—		$	—
Vested RSUs
The fair value of RSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, determined as of the vesting date, were $14.41, $16.9, and $20.2 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013 was $72.0 million, calculated as the closing price per share of our common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal period multiplied by 1.9 million RSUs vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013. There was approximately $16.4 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to RSUs expected to vest as of December 31, 2013. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years.
Vested RSAs
The performance-based RSAs vested on March 15, 2011 based on achievement of a specified percentage of the 2010 operating plan. The unrecognized compensation expense of $0.1 million related to non-vested RSAs was recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Performance-based and Market-based RSUs and Stock Options
We use the BSM option pricing model to value performance-based awards. Required assumption to value performance-based awards under the BSM model were previously discussed and summarized in the section titled “Valuation Assumptions for Stock Options and ESPP Purchases.”
Our performance-based RSUs generally vest when specified performance criteria are met based on revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets during the service period; otherwise, they are forfeited. The performance criteria for long-term incentive plans must be achieved during four consecutive quarters during the service period. Non-GAAP operating income is defined as operating income determined in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to remove the impact of certain expenses. The grant date fair value determined in accordance with the BSM valuation model is being amortized over the service period of the awards. The probability of achieving the awards was determined based on review of the actual results achieved thus far by each business unit compared with the operating plan during the pertinent service period as well as the overall strength of the business unit within EFI. Stock-based compensation expense was adjusted based on this probability assessment. As actual results are achieved during the service period, the probability assessment is updated and stock-based compensation expense adjusted accordingly.
We use a Monte Carlo option pricing model to value market-based awards. Market-based awards vest when our average closing stock price exceeded defined multiples of the closing stock price on a specified date for 20 consecutive trading days. If these multiples were not achieved by another specified date, the awards are forfeited. The grant date fair value is being amortized over the average derived service period of the awards. The average derived service period and total fair value were determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model based on our assumptions, which include a risk-free interest rate and implied volatility.
Performance-based and market-based RSUs and stock options that were outstanding at any point during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are summarized by year as follows:
	Short-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive
	Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs
	Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts
2013 Grant Dates
Shares Granted		2/21/13			234,519			8/15/13			280,305
		3/27/13			2,660
		3/27/13			5,920
		5/10/13			1,013
Shares Vested					—						—
Shares Forfeited					(15,570	)
Shares Outstanding					228,542						280,305
Service Period (years)					1						4
Grant date fair value (millions)				$	5.7					$	8.6
	Short-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive
	Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs
	Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts
2012 Grant Dates
Shares Granted		2/9/12			51,286			5/18/12			191,594
		2/13/12			207,448
		2/13/12			15,000
		5/11/12			9,116
Shares Vested		2/22/13			(157,140	)		8/15/13			(63,868	)
		5/11/13			(8,016	)
Shares Forfeited					(117,694	)					(18,333	)
Shares Outstanding					—						109,393
Service Period (years)					1						3
Grant date fair value (millions)				$	4.9					$	3
	Short-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive						Market-Based RSUs
	Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs
2011 Grant Dates	Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates		Amounts
Shares Granted		2/9/11			312,097			8/15/11			195,156			8/15/11			8,000			1/5/11		90,000
		2/25/11			1,503
		2/25/11			10,000
Shares Vested		2/9/12			(93,423	)		5/23/12			(64,909	)								5/10/11		(28,000	)
		2/13/12			(185,251	)		8/15/13			(62,201	)								2/7/13		(31,000	)
		2/25/12			(1,503	)														4/1/13		(31,000	)
		2/25/12			(7,750	)
Shares Forfeited					(35,673	)					(14,287	)
Shares Outstanding					—						53,759						8,000					—
Service Period (years)					1						3						7
Derived Service Period (years)																						3.93
Grant date fair value (millions)				$	5					$	3					$	0.1				$	1.1
Risk-free interest rate																						2.9	%
Volatility																						40	%
	2010 Grant Dates						2009 Grant Dates
	Short-Term Incentive						Market-Based RSUs						Market-Based Options						ROE-Driven
	Performance-Based RSUs																		Perf-Based Options
Pre-2011 Grant Dates	Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates		Amounts
Shares Granted		3/2/10			384,875			6/18/09			83,000
		8/1/10			12,000			8/28/09			15,000			8/28/09			294,076			8/28/09		32,674
Shares Vested		3/2/11			(305,940	)		1/1/11			(5,000	)		4/27/11			(59,598	)		2/9/12		(5,298	)
								1/10/11			(24,335	)		1/14/13			(43,706	)
								12/17/12			(24,335	)		2/11/13			(43,706	)
								12/13/13			(24,330	)		3/25/13			(43,706	)
Shares Forfeited					(90,935	)					(20,000	)					(103,360	)				(11,836	)
Shares Outstanding					—						—						—					15,540
Service Period (years)					1
Derived Service Period (years)											4.35						4.88					3.71
Grant date fair value (millions)				$	4.7					$	0.9					$	1.7				$	0.1
Risk-free interest rate											3.5	%					3.1	%
Volatility											50	%					50	%
Shares vested reflect the date that the performance criteria were achieved with the exception of the Compensation Committee certification requirement, which typically occurs at a later date.
Stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2009 included 32,674 performance-based stock options. These performance-based stock options vest when our annual non-GAAP return on equity exceeds defined thresholds of the 2008 non-GAAP return on equity. Non-GAAP return on equity is defined as non-GAAP net income divided by stockholders’ equity. Non-GAAP net income is defined as net income determined in accordance with GAAP adjusted to remove the impact of certain recurring and non-recurring expenses, and the tax effects of these adjustments.

Gain_on_Sale_of_Building_and_L

Gain on Sale of Building and Land	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Real Estate [Abstract]	'
Gain on Sale of Building and Land	'
	Note 13: Gain on Sale of Building and Land
	On November 1, 2012, we sold the 294,000 square foot building located at 303 Velocity Way in Foster City, California, which at that time served as our corporate headquarters, along with approximately four acres of land and certain other assets related to the property, to Gilead for $179.7 million. We used the facility until October 31, 2013, while searching for a new facility, building it out, and relocating our corporate headquarters, for which period rent was not required to be paid. We accounted for this transaction as a financing related to our continued use of the facility and a sublease receivable related to Gilead’s use of a portion of the facility. Our use of the facility during the rent-free period constituted a form of continuing involvement that prevented gain recognition. We imputed interest expense on the financing obligation, which resulted in total deferred proceeds from property transaction of $183.2 million on October 31, 2013. We recorded sublease income and sublease receivable at an implied market rate from Gilead. Because we vacated the facility on October 31, 2013, we have no continuing involvement with the property and have accounted for the transaction as a property sale during the fourth quarter of 2013, thereby recognizing a gain of approximately $117.2 million on the sale of the property. We incurred imputed financing and depreciation expense, net of imputed sublease income, of approximately $1.6 million through October 31, 2013, which commenced during the fourth quarter of 2012, until we vacated the building during the fourth quarter of 2013, partially offset by capitalized interest of $1.1 million related to the Fremont facility.
	Direct transaction costs consist primarily of documentary transfer and title costs, legal and escrow fees, and other expenses. The cost of the land, building, and improvements were included in the determination of the gain on sale of building and land for the year ended December 31, 2013 as follows (in millions):
	Sales proceeds	$	179.7
	Imputed interest obligation		3.5
	Deferred proceeds from property transaction		183.2
	Land, building , and improvements		(60.3	)
	Imputed sublease receivable		(3.6	)
	Relocation costs		(1.3	)
	Deferred lease financing costs		(0.4	)
	Direct transaction costs		(0.4	)
	Gain on sale of building and land	$	117.2
	The gain on sale of building and land is recognized as a component of income from operations as required by ASC 360-10-45-5. Relocation costs include costs incurred to relocate information technology equipment, lab equipment, office furniture, and related overtime.

Restructuring_and_Other

Restructuring and Other	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Restructuring And Related Activities [Abstract]	'
Restructuring and Other	'
	Note 14: Restructuring and Other
	During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, cost reduction actions were taken to lower our quarterly operating expense run rate as we analyzed our cost structure. We announced restructuring plans to better align our costs with revenue levels and to reconcile our cost structure following our business acquisitions. These charges primarily relate to cost reduction actions taken to lower our quarterly operating expense run rate in the Fiery operating segment during the first quarter of 2013, targeted head count reductions in the Industrial Inkjet operating segment, and the integration of Productivity Software head count with acquired entities. Restructuring and other consists primarily of restructuring, severance, retention, facility downsizing and relocation, and acquisition integration expenses. Our restructuring and other plans are accounted for in accordance with ASC 420, ASC 712, and ASC 820.
	Restructuring and other costs for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 were $4.8, $5.8, and $3.3 million, respectively. Restructuring and other charges include severance costs of $2.2, $2.9, and $1.7 million related to head count reductions of 106, 117, and 55 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Severance costs include severance payments, related employee benefits, retention bonuses, outplacement fees, and relocation costs.
	Facilities restructuring and other costs for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 were $0.3, $0.3, and $0.6 million, respectively. Facilities restructuring and other costs are primarily related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters, Japan, Belgium, and certain manufacturing facilities in 2013, facilities downsizing and relocation costs related to various facilities in the Fiery operating segment in 2012, decrease in estimated sublease income necessitated by continuing weakness in the commercial real estate market where these facilities are located of $0.2 million in 2011, and facilities relocations of $0.4 million in 2011.
	Integration expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 of $1.4, $1.7, and $1.0 million, respectively, were required to integrate our business acquisitions. Integration expenses relate primarily to the Cretaprint, Metrics, OPS, Technique, and GamSys acquisitions in 2013; the Cretaprint and Prism acquisitions, including the operational restructuring in Spain, in 2012; and the PrintStream, Entrac, Prism, and Alphagraph acquisitions in 2011. Integration costs are expensed in the period incurred, which may be different from the period that the acquisition closed.
	Retention expenses of $0.9 million were accrued during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 associated with the Cretaprint acquisition.
	Restructuring and other reserve activities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
		2013			2012
	Reserve balance at January 1	$	1,670		$	1,870
	Restructuring charges		1,251			2,525
	Other charges		3,583			3,278
	Non-cash acquisition-related compensation costs		(940	)		(907	)
	Cash payments		(4,691	)		(5,096	)
	Reserve balance at December 31	$	873		$	1,670

Segment_Information_Geographic

Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Segment Reporting [Abstract]	'
Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers	'
	Note 15: Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers
	Operating Segments
	ASC 280, Segment Reporting, requires operating segment information to be presented based on the internal reporting used by the chief operating decision making group to allocate resources and evaluate operating segment performance. Our enterprise management processes use financial information that is closely aligned with our three operating segments at the gross profit level. Relevant discrete financial information is prepared at the gross profit level for each of our three operating segments, which is used by the chief operating decision making group to allocate resources and assess the performance of each operating segment.
	We classify our revenue, operating segment profit (i.e., gross profit), assets, and liabilities in accordance with our operating segments as follows:
	Industrial Inkjet, which consists of our VUTEk super-wide and EFI wide format industrial digital inkjet printers and related ink, Jetrion label and packaging digital inkjet printing systems and related ink, Cretaprint digital inkjet printers for ceramic tile decoration, digital inkjet printer parts, and professional services. Printing surfaces include paper, vinyl, corrugated, textile, glass, plastic, ceramic tile, and many other flexible and rigid substrates.
	Productivity Software, which consists of (i) our business process automation software, including Monarch and Metrics; (ii) Pace, our business process automation software that is available in a cloud-based environment; (iii) Digital StoreFront, our cloud-based e-commerce solution that allows print service providers to accept, manage, and process printing orders over the internet; (iv) Radius, our business process automation software for label and packaging printers; and (v) other business process automation and e-commerce solutions designed for the printing and packaging industries.
	Fiery, which consists of DFEs that transform digital copiers and printers into high performance networked printing devices for the office and commercial printing market. This operating segment is comprised of (i) stand-alone DFEs connected to digital printers, copiers, and other peripheral devices, (ii) embedded DFEs and design-licensed solutions used in digital copiers and multi-functional devices, (iii) optional software integrated into our DFE solutions such as Fiery Central, Command WorkStation, and MicroPress, (iv) Entrac, our self-service and payment solution, (v) PrintMe, our mobile printing application, and (vi) stand-alone software-based solutions such as our proofing and scanning solutions.
	Our chief operating decision making group evaluates the performance of our operating segments based on net sales and gross profit. Gross profit for each operating segment includes revenue from sales to third parties and related cost of revenue attributable to the operating segment. Cost of revenue for each operating segment excludes certain expenses managed outside the operating segments consisting primarily of stock-based compensation expense. Operating income is not reported by operating segment because operating expenses include significant shared expenses and other costs that are managed outside of the operating segments. Such operating expenses include various corporate expenses such as stock-based compensation, corporate sales and marketing, research and development, significant real estate transactions, income taxes, various non-recurring charges, and other separately managed general and administrative expenses.
	Operating segment profit (i.e., gross profit), excluding stock-based compensation expense, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Industrial Inkjet
	Revenue	$	354,614		$	320,228		$	240,318
	Gross profit		140,095			127,783			92,738
	Gross profit percentages		39.5	%		39.9	%		38.6	%
	Productivity Software
	Revenue	$	118,409		$	103,466		$	81,165
	Gross profit		85,246			74,426			56,825
	Gross profit percentages		72	%		71.9	%		70	%
	Fiery
	Revenue	$	254,670		$	228,443		$	270,073
	Gross profit		171,642			153,805			183,084
	Gross profit percentages		67.4	%		67.3	%		67.8	%
	A reconciliation of operating segment gross profit to the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Segment gross profit	$	396,983		$	356,014		$	332,647
	Stock-based compensation expense		(1,817	)		(1,193	)		(1,664	)
	Gross profit	$	395,166		$	354,821		$	330,983
	Tangible and intangible assets, net of liabilities, are summarized by operating segment as follows (in thousands):
		Industrial			Productivity			Fiery
		Inkjet			Software
	December 31, 2013
	Goodwill	$	61,704		$	106,697		$	64,801
	Identified intangible assets, net		33,436			33,271			2,015
	Tangible assets, net of liabilities		95,350			(14,388	)		25,736
	Net tangible and intangible assets	$	190,490		$	125,580		$	92,552
	December 31, 2012
	Goodwill	$	60,745		$	94,185		$	64,526
	Identified intangible assets, net		41,103			36,141			3,000
	Tangible assets, net of liabilities		80,569			(14,312	)		26,304
	Net tangible and intangible assets	$	182,417		$	116,014		$	93,830
	Operating segment assets exclude corporate assets, such as cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, corporate headquarters facility, deferred proceeds from property transaction and related assets, imputed financing obligation, taxes receivable, and taxes payable. In accordance with ASC 805, we revised previously issued post-acquisition financial information to reflect adjustments to the preliminary accounting for business acquisitions as if the adjustments occurred on the acquisition date. Accordingly, we have increased goodwill by $0.8 and $0.4 million at December 31, 2012 to reflect opening balance sheet adjustments in the Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software operating segments, respectively, related to our acquisitions of Cretaprint, OPS, and Technique.
	Information about Geographic Areas
	Our revenue originates in the U.S., China, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Japan, the U.K., Spain, Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand. We report revenue by geographic area based on ship-to destination. Shipments to some of our significant printer manufacturer/distributor customers are made to centralized purchasing and manufacturing locations, which in turn sell through to other locations. As a result of these factors, we believe that sales to certain geographic locations might be higher or lower, as the ultimate destinations are difficult to ascertain.
	Our revenue by sales origin for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Americas	$	412,127		$	354,114		$	345,303
	EMEA		207,665			195,397			178,471
	APAC		107,901			102,626			67,782
	Japan		21,977			27,870			35,655
	APAC, ex Japan		85,924			74,756			32,127
	Total Revenue	$	727,693		$	652,137		$	591,556
	Our tangible long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment, net, of $84.8 million. Of this amount, $80.1 million resides in the Americas, $3.5 million resides in EMEA, consisting primarily of the Technique building and Cretaprint equipment and leasehold improvements, and $1.2 million resides in APAC, consisting primarily of India leasehold improvements and equipment.
	Major Customers
	Xerox provided 12% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Xerox and Ricoh each provided more than 10% of our revenue individually and together accounted for 26% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011.
	One customer, Xerox, had an accounts receivable balance greater than 10% of our net consolidated accounts receivables at December 31, 2013 and 2012, accounting for 13% and 10%, respectively.

Subsequent_Event

Subsequent Event	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Subsequent Events [Abstract]	'
Subsequent Event	'
	Note 16: Subsequent Event
	On January 16, 2014, we acquired privately-held SmartLinc, Inc. (“SmartLinc), headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for approximately $4.4 million in cash, plus additional future cash earnouts contingent on achieving certain performance targets. SmartLinc is a provider of business process automation software for shipping and logistics and will be integrated into the Productivity Software operating segment.

Quarterly_Consolidated_Financi

Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information	'
	Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information
	The following table presents our operating results for each of the quarters in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited, but has been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) have been included that are required to state fairly our unaudited quarterly results when read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.
		2013
	(in thousands except per share data)	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
	Revenue	$	171,359		$	180,298		$	178,823		$	197,213
	Gross profit		93,860			97,983			97,213			106,110
	Income from operations		9,454			11,821			13,876			139,497
	Net income		8,362			9,424			16,141			75,180
	Net income per basic common share	$	0.18		$	0.2		$	0.34		$	1.6
	Net income per diluted common share	$	0.17		$	0.2		$	0.33		$	1.54
	Gain on sale of building and land	$	(76	)	$	(35	)	$	(236	)	$	117,563
		2012
	(in thousands except per share data)	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
	Revenue	$	160,056		$	163,901		$	154,074		$	174,105
	Gross profit		87,667			89,792			83,077			94,285
	Income from operations		7,681			10,379			4,006			11,821
	Net income		6,234			7,005			13,411			56,619
	Net income per basic common share	$	0.14		$	0.15		$	0.29		$	1.22
	Net income per diluted common share	$	0.13		$	0.15		$	0.28		$	1.19
	Tax benefit from capital loss due to liquidation of subsidiary	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	43,600

Schedule_II_Valuation_and_Qual

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Valuation And Qualifying Accounts [Abstract]	'
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	'
	Schedule II
	Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
	(in thousands)		Balance at		Charged to		Charged to			Deductions			Balance at
			beginning		revenue		(from) other						end of
			of period		and		accounts						period
					expenses
	Year Ended December 31, 2013
	Allowance for bad debts and sales-related allowances		$	12,850	$	9,595	$	—		$	(6,012	)	$	16,433
	Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Allowance for bad debts and sales-related allowances			12,031		3,250		—			(2,431	)		12,850
	Year Ended December 31, 2011
	Allowance for bad debts and sales-related allowances			13,167		2,010		346	(1)		(3,492	)		12,031
	(1)	Adjustment due to acquired bad debt allowance: Streamline

The_Company_and_Its_Significan1

The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Basis of Presentation	'
	Basis of Presentation
	The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EFI and our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
	In accordance with ASC 805, we revised previously issued post-acquisition financial information to reflect adjustments to the preliminary accounting for business acquisitions as if the adjustments occurred on the acquisition date. Accordingly, we have increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities by $1.2 million in the aggregate at December 31, 2012 to reflect opening balance sheet adjustments related to our acquisitions of Cretaprint, OPS, and Technique.
	During 2012, we adjusted our accounting for acquisition-related contingent consideration in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, which affected the year ended December 31, 2011. We concluded the impact was immaterial to the prior periods. We have revised the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2011, which resulted in a decrease of $1.7 million in cash used for investing activities and a corresponding increase in cash used for financing activities. The correction had no impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods presented.
Use of Estimates	'
	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, comprehensive income, cash flows, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, inventories and purchase commitments, warranty obligations, litigation, restructuring activities, self-insurance, fair value of financial instruments, stock-based compensation, income taxes, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, business combinations, build-to-suit lease accounting, and contingencies on an ongoing basis. Estimates are based on historical and current experience, the impact of the current economic environment, and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at the time of the estimate, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-term Investments	'
	Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-term Investments
	We invest our excess cash on deposit with major banks in money market, U.S. Treasury and government-sponsored entity, corporate debt, municipal, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed residential securities. By policy, we invest primarily in high-grade marketable securities. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions or issuers of these investments to the extent of amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
	We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Typically, the cost of these investments has approximated fair value. Marketable investments with a maturity greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale short-term investments. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of OCI, adjusted for deferred income taxes. The credit portion of any other-than-temporary impairment is included in net income. Realized gains and losses on sales of financial instruments are recognized upon sale of the investments using the specific identification method.
	We review investments in debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment whenever the fair value is less than the amortized cost and evidence indicates the investment’s carrying amount is not recoverable within a reasonable period of time. We assess the fair value of individual securities as part of our ongoing portfolio management. Our other-than-temporary assessment includes reviewing the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than amortized cost; the seniority and durations of the securities; adverse conditions related to a security, industry, or sector; historical and projected issuer financial performance, credit ratings, issuer specific news; and other available relevant information. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, we consider whether we have the intent to sell the impaired security or if it will be more likely than not that we will be required to sell the impaired security before a market price recovery and whether evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary.
	In determining whether a credit loss existed, we used our best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from each debt security. For asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, cash flow estimates, including prepayment assumptions, we rely on data from widely accepted third party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates vary based on assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates, recoveries, and changes in value. Expected cash flows were discounted using the effective interest rate implicit in the securities.
	Based on this analysis, there were no other-than-temporary impairments, including credit-related impairments, during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. We have determined that gross unrealized losses on short-term investments at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are temporary in nature because each investment meets our investment policy and credit quality requirements. We have the ability and intent to hold these investments until they recover their unrealized losses, which may not be until maturity. Evidence that we will recover our investments outweighs evidence to the contrary.
Restricted Cash	'
	Restricted Cash
	We are required to maintain restricted cash of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2013 related to customer agreements that were obtained through the Alphagraph acquisition, which is classified as a current asset because the restriction will be released within twelve months.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	'
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued and other liabilities, approximate their respective fair values due to the short maturities of these financial instruments. The fair value of our available-for-sale securities, contingent acquisition-related liabilities, self-insurance liability, and derivative instruments are disclosed in Note 6—Investments and Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition	'
	Revenue Recognition
	We derive our revenue primarily from product revenue, which includes hardware (DFEs, design-licensed solutions including upgrades, digital industrial inkjet printers including components replaced under maintenance agreements, and ink), software licensing and development, and royalties. We receive service revenue from software license and printer maintenance agreements, customer support, training, and consulting.
	We recognize revenue on the sale of DFEs, printers, and ink in accordance with the provisions of SAB 104, and when applicable, ASC 605-25. As such, revenue is generally recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered or services have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
	Products generally must be shipped against written purchase orders. We use either a binding purchase order or signed contract as evidence of an arrangement. Sales to some of the leading printer manufacturers are evidenced by a master agreement governing the relationship together with a binding purchase order. Sales to our resellers are also evidenced by binding purchase orders or signed contracts and do not generally contain rights of return or price protection. Our arrangements generally do not include product acceptance clauses. When acceptance is required, revenue is recognized when the product is accepted by the customer.
	Delivery of hardware generally is complete when title and risk of loss is transferred at point of shipment from manufacturing facilities, or when the product is delivered to the customer’s local common carrier. We also sell products and services using sales arrangements with terms resulting in different timing for revenue recognition as follows:
		•	if the title and/or risk of loss is transferred at a location other than our manufacturing facility, revenue is recognized when title and/or risk of loss transfers to the customer, per the terms of the agreement;
		•	if title is retained until payment is received, revenue is recognized when title is passed upon receipt of payment;
		•	if the sales arrangement is classified as an operating lease, revenue is recognized ratably over the lease term;
		•	if the sales arrangement is classified as a sales-type lease, revenue is recognized upon shipment;
		•	if the sales arrangement is a fixed price for performance extending over a long period and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with these agreements, revenue is recognized under the percentage of completion method.
	SAB Topic 13.A.3.c.Q3 requires that “If it is determined that the undelivered service is not essential to the functionality of the delivered product, but a portion of the contract fee is not payable until the undelivered service is delivered, the staff would not consider that obligation to be inconsequential or perfunctory. Generally, the portion of the contract price that is withheld or refundable should be deferred until the outstanding service is delivered because that portion would not be realized or realizable.” We deferred an immaterial amount of revenue during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 because a portion of the customer payment was contingent upon installation.
	We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the terms of the contract or purchase order. We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer, the creditworthiness of the customer, customer concentrations, current economic trends and macroeconomic conditions, changes in customer payment terms, the length of time receivables are past due, and significant one-time events. We may not request collateral from our customers, although down payments or letters of credit are generally required from Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software customers as a means to ensure payment. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue when collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.
	We license our software primarily under perpetual licenses. Revenue from software consists of software licensing, post-contract customer support, and professional consulting. We apply the provisions of ASC 985-605 and, if applicable, SAB 104 and ASC 605-25, to all transactions involving the sale of software products and hardware transactions where the software is not incidental.
	We enter into contracts to sell our products and services and, while the majority of our sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions, there are agreements that contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. As a result, significant contract interpretation is sometimes required to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether the deliverables specified in a multiple element arrangement should be treated as separate units of accounting for revenue recognition purposes, and, if so, how the price should be allocated among the elements and when to recognize revenue for each element. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when the delivered elements have stand-alone value, uncertainties regarding customer acceptance are resolved, and there are no customer-negotiated refund or return rights for the delivered elements. If the arrangement includes a customer-negotiated refund or right of return relative to the delivered item and the delivery and performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control, the delivered element constitutes a separate unit of accounting. We limit revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations, or subject to customer-specified return or refund privileges. Changes in the allocation of the sales price between elements may impact the timing of revenue recognition, but will not change the total revenue recognized on the contract.
	Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements
	We adopted ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 as of the beginning of fiscal 2011 for new and materially modified transactions originating after January 1, 2011.
	ASU 2009-13 eliminated the residual method of allocating revenue in multiple deliverable arrangements. In accordance with ASU 2009-13, we recognize revenue in multiple element arrangements involving tangible products containing software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality by applying the relative sales price method of allocation. The sales price for each element is determined using VSOE, when available (including post-contract customer support, professional services, hosting, and training), or TPE is used. If VSOE or TPE are not available, then BESP is used when applying the relative sales price method for each unit of accounting. When the arrangement includes software and non-software elements, revenue is first allocated to the non-software and software elements as a group based on their relative sales price in accordance with ASC 605-25. Thereafter, the relative sales price allocated to the software elements as a group is further allocated to each unit of accounting in accordance with ASC 985-605. We then defer revenue with respect to the relative sales price that was allocated to any undelivered element.
	We have calculated BESP for software licenses and non-software deliverables. We considered several different methods of establishing BESP including cost plus a reasonable margin and stand-alone sales price of the same or similar products and, if available, targeted rate of return, list price less discount, and company published list prices to identify the most appropriate representation of the estimated sales price of our products. Due to the wide range of pricing offered to our customers, we determined that sales price of the same or similar products, list price less discount, and company published list prices were not appropriate methods to determine BESP for our products. Cost plus a reasonable margin and targeted rate of return were eliminated due to the difficulty in determining the cost associated with the intangible elements of each product’s cost structure. As a result, management believes that the best estimate of the sales price of an element is based on the median sales price of deliverables sold in stand-alone transactions and/or separately priced deliverables contained in bundled arrangements. Elements sold as stand-alone transactions and in bundled arrangements during the last three months of 2012 and twelve months of 2013 were included in the calculation of BESP.
	When historical data is unavailable to calculate and support the determination of BESP on a newly launched or customized product, then BESP of similar products is substituted for revenue allocation purposes. We offer customization for some of our products. Customization does not have a significant impact on the discounting or pricing of our products.
	We have insignificant transactions where tangible and software products are sold together in a bundled arrangement. ASU 2009-14 determined that tangible products containing software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality are not required to follow the software revenue recognition guidance in ASC 985-605 as long as the hardware components of the tangible product substantively contribute to its functionality. In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software components shall always be excluded from the guidance in ASC 985-605. Non-software elements are accounted for in accordance with SAB 104.
	Multiple element arrangements containing only software elements remain subject to the provisions of ASC 985-605 and must follow the residual method. When several elements of a multiple element arrangement, including software licenses, post-contract customer support, hosting, and professional services, are sold to a customer through a single contract, the revenue from such multiple element arrangements are allocated to each element using the residual method in accordance with ASC 985-605. Revenue is allocated to the support elements and professional service elements of an agreement using VSOE and to the software license elements of the agreement using the residual method. We have established VSOE for professional services and hosting based on the rates charged to our customers in stand-alone orders. We have also established VSOE for post-contract customer support based on substantive renewal rates. Accordingly, software license fees are recognized under the residual method for arrangements in which the software was licensed with maintenance and/or professional services, and where the maintenance and professional services were not essential to the functionality of the delivered software.
	Subscription Arrangements
	We have subscription arrangements where the customer pays a fixed fee and receives services over a period of time. We recognize subscription revenue ratably over the service period. Any up front setup fees associated with our subscription arrangements are recognized ratably, generally over one year. Any up front setup fees that are not associated with our subscription arrangements are recognized upon completion.
	Leasing Arrangements
	If the sales arrangement is classified as a sales-type lease, then revenue is recognized upon shipment. Leases that are not classified as sales-type leases are accounted for as an operating lease with revenue recognized ratably over the lease term.
	A lease is classified as a sales-type lease with revenue recognized upon shipment if the lease is determined to be collectible and has no significant uncertainties and if any of the following criteria are satisfied:
		•	present value of all minimum lease payments is greater than or equal to 90% of the fair value of the equipment at lease inception,
		•	noncancellable lease term is greater than or equal to 75% of the economic life of the equipment,
		•	bargain purchase option that allows the lessee to purchase the equipment below fair value, or
		•	transfer of ownership to the lessee upon termination of the lease.
	Long-term Contracts Involving Substantial Customization
	We have established our ability to produce estimates sufficiently dependable to require that we follow the percentage of completion method with respect to fixed price contracts where we provide information technology system development and implementation services.
	Revenue on such fixed price contracts is recognized over the contract term based on the percentage of development and implementation services that are provided during the period compared with the total estimated development and implementation services to be provided over the entire contract using guidance from ASC 605-35. These services require that we perform significant, extensive, and complex design, development, modification, or implementation activities of our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with these agreements.
	The percentage of completion method involves recognizing probable and reasonably estimable revenue using the percentage of services completed based on the current cumulative cost as a percentage of the estimated total cost, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the period. Due to the long-term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity, or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenue, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenue and costs. Such revisions are reflected in net income in the period in which the facts that give rise to that revision become known.
	We recognize losses on long-term fixed price contracts in the period that the contractual loss becomes probable and estimable. We record amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria are met. We record revenue that is earned and recognized in excess of amounts invoiced on fixed price contracts as trade receivables.
	Deferred Revenue and Related Deferred Costs
	Deferred revenue represents amounts received in advance for product support contracts, software customer support contracts, consulting and integration projects, or product sales. Product support contracts include stand-alone product support packages, routine maintenance service contracts, and upgrades or extensions to standard product warranties. We defer these amounts when we invoice the customer and then generally recognize revenue either ratably over the support contract life, upon performing the related services, in accordance with the percentage of completion method, or in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. Deferred cost of revenue related to unrecognized revenue on shipments to customers was $6.6 and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is included in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales-related Allowances	'
	Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales-related Allowances
	We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure that trade receivables are not overstated due to uncollectibility. We record specific reserves for individual accounts when we become aware of specific customer circumstances, such as bankruptcy filings, deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position, or potential unfavorable outcomes from disputes with customers or vendors.
	We perform ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of our printer manufacturer, third-party distributor, reseller, and other customers and require collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances. The past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the contractual payment terms of the receivable. The need to write off a receivable balance depends on the age, size, and determination of collectibility of the receivable. Balances are written off when we deem it probable that the receivable will not be recovered.
	We make provisions for sales rebates and revenue adjustments based on analysis of current sales programs and revenue in accordance with our revenue recognition policy.
Financing Receivables	'
	Financing Receivables
	ASC 310, Receivables, requires disclosures regarding the credit quality of our financing receivables and allowance for credit losses. ASC 310 further requires disclosure of credit quality indicators, past due information, and modifications of our financing receivables. Our financing receivables were $5.2 and $2.3 million consisting of $4.3 and $0.9 million of sales-type lease receivables, included within other current assets and other assets, and $0.9 and $1.4 million of trade receivables having a contractual maturity in excess of one year at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The credit quality of financing receivables are evaluated on the same basis as trade receivables. We have not experienced material amounts of past due financing receivables.
Concentration of Risk	'
	Concentration of Risk
	We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by any of our customers to the extent of amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. We perform ongoing evaluations of the collectibility of accounts receivable balances for our customers and maintain allowances for estimated credit losses. Actual losses have not historically been significant, but have risen over the past several years as our customer base has grown through acquisitions.
	Our Fiery products, which constitute approximately 35% of our revenue, are primarily sold to a limited number of leading printer manufacturers. Although end customer and reseller channel preference for Fiery products drives demand, most Fiery revenue relies on these significant printer manufacturer / distributors to design, develop, and integrate Fiery technology into their print engines. We expect that we will continue to depend on a relatively small number of leading printer manufacturers for a significant portion of our revenue, although their significance is expected to decline in future periods as our revenue increases from Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software products. We generally have experienced longer accounts receivable collection cycles in our Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software operating segments compared to our Fiery operating segment as, historically, the leading printer manufacturers have paid on a more timely basis. Down payments are generally required from Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software customers as a means to ensure payment.
	Since Europe is composed of varied countries and regional economies, our European risk profile is somewhat more diversified due to the varying economic conditions among the countries. Approximately 28% of our receivables are with European customers as of December 31, 2013. Of this amount, 25% of our European receivables (7% of consolidated net receivables) are in the higher risk southern European countries (mostly Spain, Portugal, and Italy), which are adequately reserved. The ongoing relocation of the ceramic tile industry from southern Europe to the emerging markets of China, India, Brazil, and Indonesia will reduce our exposure to credit risk in southern Europe.
	We rely on certain sole-source suppliers for key components of our products. We conduct our business with our component suppliers solely on a purchase order basis. Any disruption in the supply of key components would result in our inability to manufacture our products.
	We subcontract the manufacture of our Fiery DFEs, certain Industrial Inkjet subassemblies, and solvent ink. We rely on the ability of our subcontractors to manufacture the products sold to our customers. A high concentration of our Fiery products is manufactured at one subcontractor location. If the subcontractor lost production capabilities at this facility, we would experience delays in delivering product to our customers. We do not maintain long-term agreements with our subcontractors, which could lead to an inability of our subcontractors to fill our orders.
	Many of our current Fiery and Productivity Software products include software that we license from Adobe. To obtain licenses from Adobe, Adobe requires that we obtain quality assurance approvals from them for our products that use Adobe software. Although to date we have successfully obtained such quality assurance approvals from Adobe, we cannot be certain Adobe will grant us such approvals in the future. If Adobe does not grant us such licenses or approvals, if the Adobe licenses are terminated, or if our relationship with Adobe is otherwise materially impaired, we would likely be unable to manufacture products that incorporate Adobe PostScript® or other Adobe software.
Accounts Receivable Sales Arrangements	'
	Accounts Receivable Sales Arrangements
	We have facilities in Spain that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. Trade receivables sold without recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than one year, which are secured by international letters of credit. Trade receivables sold under these facilities were $8.3 and $4.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which approximates the cash received.
	We have facilities in the U.S. that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables with recourse. The trade receivables sold with recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than 30 days from the date of sale, which are subject to a servicing obligation. Trade receivables sold under these facilities were $12.9 and $2.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which approximates the cash received.
	In accordance with ASC 860-20, Transfers and Servicing, trade receivables are derecognized from our Consolidated Balance Sheet when sold to third parties upon determining that such receivables are presumptively beyond the reach of creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding. The recourse obligation is measured using market data from similar transactions and the servicing liability is determined based on the fair value that a third party would charge to service these receivables. Both liabilities were determined to not be material at December 31, 2013 and 2012.
	We report collections from the sale of trade receivables to third parties as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, because such receivables are the result of an operating activity and the associated interest rate risk is de minimis.
Inventories	'
	Inventories
	Inventories are stated at standard cost, which approximates the lower of actual cost using the first-in, first-out cost flow assumption, or market. We periodically review our inventories for potential slow-moving or obsolete items and write down specific items to net realizable value as appropriate. Work-in-process inventories consist of our product at various levels of assembly and include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Finished goods inventory represents completed products awaiting shipment.
	We estimate potential future inventory obsolescence and purchase commitments to evaluate the need for inventory reserves. Current economic trends, changes in customer demand, product design changes, product life and demand, and the acceptance of our products are analyzed to evaluate the adequacy of such reserves. Material differences may result in changes in the amount and timing of our net income for any period, if we made different judgments or utilized different estimates.
Property and Equipment, Net	'
	Property and Equipment, Net
	Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: desktop and laptop computers (two years); computer server equipment (three years); software under perpetual licenses (three to five years); manufacturing, testing, and other equipment (three years); tooling (lesser of three years or the product life); research and development equipment with alternative future uses (three years); equipment leased to customers on operating leases (three years); furniture (seven years); land improvements such as parking lots or sidewalks (seven years); leasehold improvements (lesser of five years or the lease term); building improvements (five to ten years); building under a build-to-suit lease (forty years); and purchased buildings (forty years).
	When assets are disposed, the asset and accumulated depreciation are removed from our records and the related gain or loss is recognized in our results of operations. The cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to property and equipment sold or no longer in service are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in interest and other income (expense), net.
	Depreciation expense was $9.4, $8.4, and $7.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
	Repairs and maintenance expenditures, which are not considered improvements and do not extend the useful life of property and equipment, are expensed as incurred.
Internal Use Software	'
	Internal Use Software
	In accordance with ASC 350-40, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software, software development costs, including costs incurred to purchase third party software, are capitalized during the application development stage when we determine that certain factors are present including, among others, that technology exists to achieve the performance requirements, management has committed to funding the project, and conceptual formulation, design, and testing of possible software alternatives (preliminary project phase) have all been completed. Costs incurred during preliminary project phase, post-implementation / operational phase, process re-engineering, training, and maintenance must be expensed as incurred. The accumulation of software costs to be capitalized ceases when the software is substantially developed and is ready for its intended use. Capitalized internal use software is amortized over an estimated useful life of three years using the straight-line method.
Goodwill	'
	Goodwill
	We perform our annual goodwill impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of each year. ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment, provides that a simplified analysis of goodwill impairment may be performed consisting of a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. Due to the significant additions to goodwill resulting from the business combinations completed in recent years, we determined that the quantitative analysis should be performed.
	According to the provisions of ASC 350-20-35, a two-step impairment test of goodwill is required. In the first step, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and further testing is not required. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is required to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit, excluding goodwill, from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in the first step. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss must be recorded equal to the difference.
	Our goodwill valuation analysis is based on our respective reporting units (Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery), which are consistent with our operating segments identified in Note 15—Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We determined the fair value of our reporting units as of December 31, 2013 by equally weighting the market and income approaches. Under the market approach, we estimated fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings of comparable companies. Under the income approach, we estimated fair value based on a projected cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Based on our valuation results, we have determined that the fair values of our reporting units exceed their carrying values. Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery fair values are $540, $262, and $368 million, respectively, which exceed carrying value by 284%, 209%, and 398%, respectively.
	Please see Note 5—Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-lived Assets, including Intangible Assets	'
	Long-lived Assets, including Intangible Assets
	We evaluate potential impairment with respect to long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable. No asset impairment charges were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, or 2011.
	Intangible assets are evaluated for impairment based on their estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Based on this analysis, no impairment of intangible assets, excluding goodwill, was recognized in 2013, 2012, or 2011.
	Intangible assets acquired to date are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 2 to 18 years. No changes have been made to the useful lives of amortizable identifiable intangible assets in 2013, 2012, or 2011. Intangible amortization expense was $19.4, $18.6, and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, or 2011, respectively.
	Other investments, included within other assets, consist of equity and debt investments in privately-held companies that develop products, markets, and services that are strategic to us. In-substance common stock investments in which we exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, but do not have a majority voting interest, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Investments not meeting these requirements are accounted for using the cost method of accounting. As of December 31, 2013, our investments in privately-held companies were accounted for under the cost method.
	We previously assessed each investee’s technology pipeline and market conditions in the industry and ability to sustain an earnings capacity that would justify its carrying amount in accordance with ASC 323-10-35-32. We determined it is no longer probable that they will generate sufficient positive future cash flows to recover the carrying amount of each investment. Therefore, we previously fully reserved our equity and debt investments in privately-held companies. We received sales proceeds from certain of these investments of $0.1 and $2.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011, respectively.
	Please see Note 5—Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Warranty Reserves	'
	Warranty Reserves
	Our Industrial Inkjet printer and Fiery DFE products are generally accompanied by a 12-month limited warranty from date of shipment, which covers both parts and labor. In accordance with ASC 450-30, an accrual is established when the warranty liability is estimable and probable based on historical experience. A provision for estimated future warranty costs is recorded in cost of revenue when revenue is recognized. Warranty reserves were $11.0 and $10.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Litigation Accruals	'
	Litigation Accruals
	We may be involved, from time to time, in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations, or proceedings relating to contractual disputes, securities laws, intellectual property rights, employment, or other matters that may arise in the normal course of business. We assess our potential liability in each of these matters by using the information available to us. We develop our views on estimated losses in consultation with inside and outside counsel, which involves a subjective analysis of potential results and various combinations of appropriate litigation and settlement strategies. We accrue estimated losses from contingencies if a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated.
Restructuring Reserves	'
	Restructuring Reserves
	Restructuring liabilities are established when the costs have been incurred. Severance and other employee separation costs are incurred when management commits to a plan of termination identifying the number of employees impacted, their termination dates, and the terms of their severance arrangements. The liability is accrued at the employee notification date unless service is required beyond the greater of 60 days or the legal notification period, in which case the liability is recognized ratably over the service period. Facility downsizing and closure costs are accrued at the earlier of the lessor notification date, if the lease agreement allows for early termination, or the cease use date. Relocation costs are incurred when the related relocation services are performed. Costs related to contracts without future benefit are incurred at the earlier of the cease use date or the contract cancellation date.
Research and Development	'
	Research and Development
	Research and development costs were $128.1, $120.3, and $115.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. We expense research and development costs associated with new software products as incurred until technological feasibility is established. Research and development costs include salaries and benefits of employees performing research and development activities, supplies, and other expenses incurred from research and development efforts. To date, we have not capitalized research and development costs associated with software development as products and enhancements have generally reached technological feasibility, as defined by U.S. GAAP, and have been released for sale at substantially the same time. We have capitalized research and development equipment that has been acquired or constructed for research and development activities and has alternative future uses (in research and development projects or otherwise). Such research and development equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis with a three year useful life.
Shipping and Handling Costs	'
	Shipping and Handling Costs
	Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling costs are included in revenue. Shipping and handling costs are charged to cost of revenue as incurred.
Advertising	'
	Advertising
	Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising and promotional expenses were $4.1, $3.5, and $4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Income Taxes	'
	Income Taxes
	We account for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, which requires that deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities be determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. We estimate our actual current tax expense, including permanent charges and benefits, and the temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and financial accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
	We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income by considering both positive and negative evidence relating to their recoverability. If we believe that recovery of these deferred tax assets is not more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance. Significant judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets.
	In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we considered all available evidence, including recent operating results, projections of future taxable income, our ability to utilize loss and credit carryforwards, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. Other than a valuation allowance established in 2013 related to realization of existing California deferred tax assets and valuation allowances established in prior years related to deferred tax assets from foreign tax credits resulting from the 2003 acquisition of Best GmbH and compensation deductions potentially limited by IRC Section 162(m), we have determined that is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit related to all other deferred tax assets. In 2013, we determined that it is more likely than not that our existing deferred tax assets in California would not be realized based on the size of the net operating loss and research and development credits being generated exceeding the utilization of these tax attributes. As a result, we recorded a full valuation allowance against our California deferred tax assets. To the extent we increase a valuation allowance, we include an expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period in which such determination is made.
	In accordance with ASC 740-10-25-5 through 17, we account for uncertainty in income taxes by recognizing a tax position only when it is more likely than not that the tax position, based on its technical merits, will be sustained upon ultimate settlement with the applicable tax authority. The tax benefit to be recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the applicable tax authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Tax benefits that are deemed to be less than fifty percent likely of being realized are recorded in noncurrent income taxes payable until the uncertainty has been resolved through either examination by the relevant taxing authority or expiration of the pertinent statutes of limitations.
Business Combinations	'
	Business Combinations
	We allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, including IPR&D, and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Such a valuation requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. The results of operations for each acquisition are included in our financial statements from the date of acquisition.
	These acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805. Key provisions of the acquisition method of accounting include the following:
		•	one hundred percent of assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, are recorded at fair value, regardless of the percentage of the business acquired;
		•	certain contingent assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value at the acquisition date;
		•	contingent consideration is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as assumptions are updated or upon settlement;
		•	IPR&D is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date subject to amortization after product launch or otherwise subject to impairment;
		•	acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs are expensed as incurred;
		•	reversals of valuation allowances related to acquired deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes to acquired income tax uncertainties are recognized in earnings; and
		•	when making adjustments to finalize preliminary accounting, we revise any previously issued post-acquisition financial information in future financial statements to reflect any adjustments as if they occurred on the acquisition date.
	At various dates in 2013, we acquired PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix, and Lector, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment and provide business process automation software to small commercial and in-plant printing operations in North America; business process automation software to the printing and packaging industries in the French-speaking regions of Europe and Africa; imposition solutions for estimating, planning, and integrating into prepress and postpress solutions; and business process automation software to the sheetfed and packaging industries in Germany, respectively.
	On January 10, 2012, we acquired Cretaprint, which is a leading developer and supplier of inkjet printers for the ceramic tile decoration industry and has been integrated into our Industrial Inkjet operating segment. On April 5, 2012, we acquired the FX Colors business, which develops and provides technology and software for industrial printing and has been integrated into our Fiery operating segment. At various dates in 2012, we acquired Metrics, OPS, and Technique, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment and provide business process automation solutions to medium-sized printing and packaging companies in Latin America; business process automation solutions for web-to-print, publishing, and cross-media marketing; and business process automation solutions for publication, commercial, and direct marketing print industries, respectively.
	In 2011, we acquired the Entrac business, which provides self-service and payment solutions for business services including mobile printing and has been integrated into our Fiery operating segment, and we acquired Alphagraph, Prism, and Streamline, which have been integrated into our Productivity Software operating segment and provide business process automation solutions for the graphics arts industry; business process automation solutions for the printing and packaging industry, including automated shop floor management and work in progress tracking; and business process automation solutions for mailing and fulfillment services in the printing industry, respectively.
Liability for Self-Insurance	'
	Liability for Self-Insurance
	We are partially self-insured for certain losses related to employee medical and dental coverage, excluding employees covered by health maintenance organizations. We generally have an individual stop loss deductible of $125 thousand per enrollee unless specific exposures are separately insured. We have accrued a contingent liability of $2.6 and $1.4 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which is not discounted, based on an examination of historical trends, our claims experience, industry claims experience, actuarial analysis, and estimates. The primary estimates used in the development of our accrual at December 31, 2013 and 2012 include total enrollment (including employee contributions), population demographics, and historical claims costs incurred. Although we do not expect that we will ultimately pay claims significantly different from our estimates, self-insurance reserves could be affected if future claims experience differs significantly from our historical trends and assumptions.
	As part of this process, we engaged a third party actuarial firm to assist management in its analysis. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party actuary, the related valuation of our self-insurance liability represents the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party. While we believe these estimates are reasonable based on the information currently available, if actual trends, including the severity of claims and medical cost inflation, differ from our estimates, our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be impacted.
Stock-Based Compensation	'
	Stock-Based Compensation
	We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, which requires stock-based compensation expense to be recognized based on the fair value of such awards on the date of grant. We amortize stock-based compensation expense on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period, after assessing the probability of achieving the requisite performance criteria with respect to performance-based awards. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards.
	ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the grant date and revised on a cumulative basis, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We use historical data and future expectations of employee turnover to estimate forfeitures. The tax benefit resulting from tax deductions in excess of the tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense recognized for those awards are classified as financing cash flows.
	Our determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by various assumptions including volatility, expected term, and interest rates. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over a preceding period commensurate with the expected term of the option. The expected term is based on management’s consideration of the historical life of the options, the vesting period of the options granted, and the contractual period of the options granted. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to do so in the future.
Foreign Currency Translation	'
	Foreign Currency Translation
	In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we must remeasure and translate balance sheet and income statement amounts into U.S. dollars. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are remeasured from the transaction currency into the functional currency at current exchange rates, except for non-monetary assets and capital accounts, which are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are remeasured at monthly exchange rates, which approximate average exchange rates in effect during each period. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement are included in interest and other income (expense), net. Net gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions, including hedging gains and losses, are reported in interest and other income (expense), net, and were a gain (loss) of $(0.3), $0.6, and $(1.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
	For those subsidiaries that operate in a local currency functional environment, all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates, while revenue and expenses are translated using monthly exchange rates, which approximate the average exchange rates in effect during each period. Resulting translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of OCI, adjusted for deferred income taxes. The cumulative translation adjustment balance, net of tax, at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was an unrealized gain (loss) of $(1.6) and $0.1 million, respectively.
	Based on our assessment of the salient economic indicators discussed in ASC 830-10-55-5, we consider the U.S. dollar to be the functional currency for each of our international subsidiaries except for our Brazilian subsidiary, Metrics, for which we consider the Brazilian real to be the subsidiary’s functional currency; our German subsidiaries, EFI GmbH, Alphagraph, and Lector, for which we consider the Euro to be the subsidiaries’ functional currency; our Japanese subsidiary, Electronics For Imaging Japan KK, for which we consider the Japanese yen to be the subsidiary’s functional currency; our Spanish subsidiary, Cretaprint, for which we consider the Euro to be the subsidiary’s functional currency; our New Zealand subsidiary contains the Prism operations in New Zealand for which we consider the New Zealand dollar to the functional currency; our Australian subsidiary contains the Prism, OPS, and Metrix operations in Australia for which we consider the Australian dollar to the functional currency; our U.K. subsidiaries, Electronics For Imaging United Kingdom Limited and Technique, for which we consider the British pound sterling to be the subsidiaries’ functional currency; and our subsidiary in the People’s Republic of China, which contains the operations of our Cretaprint sales and support center for which we consider the renminbi to be the functional currency.
Computation of Net Income per Common Share	'
	Computation of Net Income per Common Share
	Net income per basic common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding non-vested restricted stock. Net income per diluted common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding common stock options having a dilutive effect using the treasury stock method, from non-vested shares of restricted stock having a dilutive effect, from shares to be purchased under our ESPP having a dilutive effect, and from non-vested restricted stock for which the performance criteria have been met. Any potential shares that are anti-dilutive as defined in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, are excluded from the effect of dilutive securities.
	ASC 260-10-45-48 requires that performance-based and market-based restricted stock that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the vesting period, if the result would be dilutive, are assumed to be outstanding for purposes of determining net income per diluted common share as of the later of the beginning of the period or the grant date.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Risk Management	'
	Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Risk Management
	We are exposed to market risk and foreign currency exchange risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results, financial position, and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these risks through our regular operating and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are used to hedge monetary assets and liabilities, including intercompany transactions, as well as reduce earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from shifts in market rates. Our objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings or protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. We do not have any leveraged derivatives, nor do we use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires the fair value of all derivative instruments, including those embedded in other contracts, be recorded as assets or liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. As permitted, foreign exchange contracts with notional amounts of $2.5 and $2.7 million and net asset/liability fair values that are immaterial have been designated for cash flow hedge accounting treatment at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The related cash flow impacts of our derivative contracts are reflected as cash flows from operating activities.
	Our exposures are related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue in Europe, Japan, the U.K., Latin America, China, Australia, and New Zealand and are primarily related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated operating expenses in Europe, India, Japan, the U.K., Brazil, and Australia. We hedge our operating expense cash flow exposure in Indian rupees. We hedge remeasurement exposure associated with Euro-denominated intercompany loans and Indian rupee net monetary assets. As of December 31, 2013, we had not entered into hedges against any other currency exposures, but we may consider hedging against movements in other currencies in the future.
	By their nature, derivative instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movement is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets, and liabilities being hedged (e.g., operating expense exposure in Indian rupees) or the settlement of the Euro-denominated intercompany loans. We do not believe there is a significant risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty associated with these instruments because, by policy, we deal with counterparties having a minimum investment grade or better credit rating. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures to such counterparties.
Variable Interest Entities	'
	Variable Interest Entities
	In accordance with the Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”) sub-section of ASC 810, Consolidation, we perform a formal assessment at each reporting period regarding whether any consolidated entity is considered the primary beneficiary of a VIE based on the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity and the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits that could be significant to us.
	We currently do not have any arrangements that meet the definition of a VIE in accordance with the scope exception contained within ASC 810-10-15-17d.
Fair Value Measurements	'
	Fair Value Measurements. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy as more fully defined in Note 6, Investments and Fair Value Measurements. In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Effective in the first quarter of 2012, the primary provisions of ASU 2011-04 impacting us are the adoption of uniform terminology within U.S. GAAP and IFRS to reference fair value concepts, measuring the fair value of an equity instrument used as consideration in a business combination, and the following additional disclosures concerning fair value measurements classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy:
		•	quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the determination of Level 3 fair value measurements,
		•	the valuation processes used in Level 3 fair value measurements, and
		•	the sensitivity of Level 3 fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs.
	Accordingly, the appropriate disclosures have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Other Comprehensive Income	'
	Other Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Effective in the first quarter of 2012, we have opted to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Under ASU 2011-05, we also have the option to present this information in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income. We previously presented the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) in the footnotes to our interim and annual financial statements and as a component of our statement of stockholders’ equity in our annual financial statements.
	In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which requires additional disclosures about amounts reclassified out of OCI by component. Effective in the first quarter of 2013, we are required to present, either on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Operations or in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, significant amounts reclassified out of OCI by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, we are required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. We have provided the required disclosure in Note 4, Balance Sheet Components, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment Assessment	'
	Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment Assessment. In September 2011 and July 2012, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that simplifies the analysis of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment. The new guidance allows a qualitative assessment to be performed to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. These accounting standards were effective for the year ended December 31, 2012 with respect to the assessment of goodwill and were effective for the year ending December 31, 2013 with respect to the assessment of other indefinite-lived intangible assets. These standards provide an alternative method for determining whether our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets have been impaired, which would not differ materially from the result of the detailed impairment testing methodology required by ASC 350-20-35, Goodwill – Subsequent Measurement.
Joint and Several Liability	'
	Joint and Several Liability. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date, which requires accrual of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements when the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the following:
		•	the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and
		•	any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors.
	If the amount of the obligation is not fixed at the reporting date, then the related liability should be accrued in accordance with ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies. Examples of obligations subject to ASU 2013-04 include debt arrangements, legal settlements, and contractual obligations.
	ASU 2013-04 will be effective in the first quarter of 2014. We are currently evaluating its impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Balance Sheet Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits	'
	Balance Sheet Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. We currently present our liability for estimated unrecognized tax benefits as noncurrent income taxes payable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets of $33.0 and $29.8 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
	We are required to reclassify unrecognized tax benefits as an offset to deferred tax assets to the extent of any net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax loss carryforwards, or tax credit carryforwards that are available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable tax jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. An exception would apply if the tax law of the tax jurisdiction does not require us to use, and we do not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose.
	ASU 2013-11 will be effective in the first quarter of 2014 with early adoption allowed. We are currently determining the amount of the required reclassification between noncurrent income taxes payable and deferred tax assets.
Derivatives and Hedging	'
	We are exposed to market risk and foreign currency exchange risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results, financial position, and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these risks through our regular operating and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are used to hedge monetary assets and liabilities, including intercompany transactions, as well as reduce earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from shifts in market rates. Our objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings or protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. We do not have any leveraged derivatives, nor do we use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. ASC 815 requires the fair value of all derivative instruments, including those embedded in other contracts, to be recorded as assets or liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Foreign exchange contracts with notional amounts of $2.5 and $2.7 million and net asset/liability fair values that are immaterial have been designated for cash flow hedge accounting treatment at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The related cash flow impacts of our derivative contracts are reflected as cash flows from operating activities.
	Our exposures are related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue in Europe, Japan, the U.K., Latin America, China, Australia, and New Zealand and are primarily related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated operating expenses in Europe, India, Japan, the U.K., China, Brazil, and Australia. We hedge our operating expense cash flow exposure in Indian rupees. We hedge remeasurement exposure associated with Euro-denominated intercompany loans and Indian rupee net monetary assets. As of December 31, 2013, we had not entered into hedges against any other currency exposures, but we may consider hedging against movements in other currencies in the future.
	By their nature, derivative instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movement is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets, and liabilities being hedged (e.g., operating expense exposure in Indian rupees) or the settlement of the Euro-denominated intercompany loans. We do not believe there is a significant risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty associated with these instruments because, by policy, we deal with counterparties having a minimum investment grade or better credit rating. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures to such counterparties.
	Foreign currency derivative contracts with notional amounts of $2.5 and $2.7 million and net asset/liability amounts that are immaterial have been designated as cash flow hedges of our Indian rupee operating expense exposure at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The changes in fair value of these contracts are reported as a component of OCI and reclassified to operating expense in the periods of payment of the hedged operating expenses. The amount of ineffectiveness that was recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for these designated cash flow hedges was immaterial. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
	Forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments with notional amounts of $24.7 and $0.5 million are used to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. They are not designated for hedge accounting treatment since there is a natural offset for the remeasurement of the underlying foreign currency denominated asset or liability. We recognize changes in the fair value of non-designated derivative instruments in earnings in the period of change. Gains (losses) on foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge balance sheet exposures are recognized in interest and other income (expense), net, in the same period as the remeasurement gain (loss) of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments at December 31, 2013, consist of hedges of Euro-denominated intercompany loans with notional amounts of $24.7 million. Forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments at December 31, 2012 consist of hedges of Indian rupee net monetary assets with a notional amount of $0.5 million.
Segment Reporting	'
	ASC 280, Segment Reporting, requires operating segment information to be presented based on the internal reporting used by the chief operating decision making group to allocate resources and evaluate operating segment performance. Our enterprise management processes use financial information that is closely aligned with our three operating segments at the gross profit level. Relevant discrete financial information is prepared at the gross profit level for each of our three operating segments, which is used by the chief operating decision making group to allocate resources and assess the performance of each operating segment.
Performance-based and market-based restricted stock [Member]	'
Computation of Net Income per Common Share	'
	ASC 260-10-45-48 requires that performance-based and market-based restricted stock and stock options that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the vesting period, if the result would be dilutive, are assumed to be outstanding for purposes of determining net income per diluted common share as of the later of the beginning of the period or the grant date. Accordingly, performance-based RSUs, which vested on various dates during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 based on achievement of specified performance criteria related to revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets; performance-based RSAs, which vested on March 15, 2011 based on achievement of a specified percentage of the 2010 operating plan; market-based RSUs and stock options, which vested on various dates during December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 based on achievement of specified stock prices for defined periods; and performance-based RSUs, which vested on January 24, 2014 based on achievement of specified performance criteria related to 2013 revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets upon certification by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors are included in the determination of net income per diluted common share as of the beginning of the period. Performance-based and market-based targets were not met with respect to any other RSUs or stock options as of December 31, 2013.

The_Company_and_Its_Significan2

The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]	'
Summary of Supplemental Cash Flow Information	'
	Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
		For the years ended December 31,
	(in thousands)	2013			2012			2011
	Net cash paid (refunded) for income taxes	$	7,883		$	4,384		$	(2,998	)
	Cash paid for interest expense	$	210		$	99		$	62
	Acquisition related activities:
	Cash paid for acquisitions, excluding contingent consideration	$	15,541		$	66,050		$	35,299
	Cash acquired in acquisitions, excluding restricted cash		(853	)		(5,059	)		(1,554	)
	Net cash paid for acquisitions	$	14,688		$	60,991		$	33,745
	Non-cash investing and financing activities:
	Non-cash acquisition of property under a build-to-suit lease	$	11,230		$	—		$	—
	Property and equipment received, but accrued in accounts payable		7,210			1,042			240
		$	18,440		$	1,042		$	240

Earnings_Per_Share_Tables

Earnings Per Share (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]	'
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share	'
	Basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are reconciled as follows (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013		2012		2011
	Basic net income per share:
	Net income available to common shareholders	$	109,107	$	83,269	$	27,465
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		46,643		46,453		46,234
	Basic net income per share	$	2.34	$	1.79	$	0.59
	Dilutive net income per share:
	Net income available to common shareholders	$	109,107	$	83,269	$	27,465
	Weighted average common shares outstanding		46,643		46,453		46,234
	Dilutive stock options and non-vested restricted stock		1,716		1,281		1,345
	Weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted net income per share		48,359		47,734		47,579
	Dilutive net income per share	$	2.26	$	1.74	$	0.58

Acquisitions_Tables

Acquisitions (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Business Combinations [Abstract]	'
Schedule of Discount Rate, Percentage of Project Tasks Completed and Tasks to be Completed	'
		GamSys			Technique			Prism			Entrac			Streamline
	Discount rate for IPR&D		17	%		17	%		23	%		22	%		20	%
	IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date		50-53	%		73	%		50	%		48-79	%		78-89	%
	IPR&D percent complete at December 31, 2013		90	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Allocation of Purchase Price to Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed	'
	The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands) with respect to each of these acquisitions at their respective acquisition dates is summarized as follows:
		2013 Acquisitions						2012 Acquisitions												2011 Acquisitions
	Operating Segment	Productivity Software						Industrial Inkjet						Productivity Software						Productivity Software					Fiery
	Acquired Business	PrintLeader, GamSys,						Cretaprint						Metrics, OPS,						Streamline, Prism,					Entrac
		Metrix, Lector												Technique						Alphagraph
		Weighted			Purchase			Weighted			Purchase			Weighted			Purchase			Weighted		Purchase			Weighted		Purchase
		average			Price			average			Price			average			Price			average		Price			average		Price
		useful life			Allocation			useful life			Allocation			useful life			Allocation			useful life		Allocation			useful life		Allocation
	Customer relationships		5-6 years		$	5,540			5 years		$	8,000			5-6 years		$	14,880			5-6 years	$	10,150			5 years	$	2,340
	Existing technology		3-4 years			2,060			3 years			7,070			3-4 years			4,580			3-4 years		3,060			2-5 years		1,290
	Trade names		3-4 years			670			6 years			4,970			3-4 years			1,080			4-5 years		1,100			—		—
	IPR&D		3 years			150			—			—			5 years			90			5 years		110			5 years		410
	Backlog		—			—			1 year			1,290			—			—			—		—			—		—
	Goodwill		—			13,365			—			22,794			—			31,100			—		20,020			—		4,611
						21,785						44,124						51,730					34,440					8,651
	Net tangible assets (liabilities)					(3,441	)					3,078						(4,942	)				(1,295	)				579
	Total purchase price				$	18,344					$	47,202					$	46,788				$	33,145				$	9,230

Balance_Sheet_Components_Table

Balance Sheet Components (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Text Block [Abstract]	'
Schedule of Inventories	'
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Inventories:
	Raw materials	$	35,470		$	30,519
	Work in process		3,434			5,847
	Finished goods		29,441			21,977
		$	68,345		$	58,343
Schedule of Property and Equipment	'
	Property and equipment, net:
	Land, buildings, and improvements (including build-to-suit)	$	72,601		$	72,671
	Equipment and purchased software		50,280			55,932
	Furniture and leasehold improvements		12,808			18,387
			135,689			146,990
	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(50,860	)		(60,408	)
		$	84,829		$	86,582
Schedule of Accrued and Other Liabilities	'
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Accrued and other liabilities:
	Accrued compensation and benefits	$	32,375		$	23,387
	Warranty provision		11,047			10,158
	Accrued royalty payments		3,915			4,318
	Contingent liabilities—current		14,803			21,286
	Other accrued liabilities		16,375			19,869
		$	78,515		$	79,018
Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	'
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
	Net unrealized investment gains	$	227		$	184
	Currency translation gains (losses)		(1,601	)		132
	Other		(14	)		(47	)
		$	(1,388	)	$	269

Goodwill_and_LongLived_Intangi1

Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Schedule of Purchased Identified Intangible Assets Resulting from Acquisitions	'
	Our purchased identified intangible assets resulting from acquisitions that closed during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands, except for weighted average useful life):
					December 31, 2013											December 31, 2012
		Weighted			Gross			Accumulated			Weighted			Net carrying		Gross carrying		Accumulated			Net carrying
		average			carrying			amortization			remaining			amount		amount		amortization			amount
		useful life			amount						average
		(years)									useful life
											(years)
	Goodwill		—		$	233,203		$	—			—		$	233,203	$	219,456	$	—		$	219,456
	Customer relationships and other		5.6		$	109,906		$	(77,922	)		3.5		$	31,984	$	103,891	$	(69,800	)	$	34,091
	Existing technology		4.3			132,192			(122,857	)		1.5			9,335		129,320		(115,411	)		13,909
	Trademarks and trade names		13.2			58,867			(31,614	)		8.3			27,253		59,235		(27,191	)		32,044
	IPR&D		—			150			—			—			150		200		—			200
	Amortizable intangible assets		6.6		$	301,115		$	(232,393	)		5.1		$	68,722	$	292,646	$	(212,402	)	$	80,244
Schedule of Future Amortization Expense	'
	As of December 31, 2013, future estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years and thereafter related to the amortization of identified intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):
	For the years ended December 31,	Future
		amortization
		expense
	2014	$	19,105
	2015		15,112
	2016		11,252
	2017		7,708
	2018		4,127
	Thereafter		11,418
		$	68,722
Schedule of Goodwill Rollforward	'
	The goodwill rollforward for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 as required by ASC 805 is as follows (in thousands):
		Industrial			Productivity			Fiery			Total
		Inkjet			Software
	Ending Balance, December 31, 2011	$	36,508		$	63,403		$	64,412		$	164,323
	Additions (Cretaprint, Metrics, OPS, and Technique)	$	22,794		$	31,100		$	—		$	53,894
	Cretaprint opening balance sheet adjustment		215			—			—			215
	Metrics opening balance sheet adjustment		—			(588	)		—			(588	)
	Opening balance sheet adjustments recognized in 2013		801			386			—			1,187
	Foreign currency adjustments		427			(116	)		114			425
	Ending Balance, December 31, 2012	$	60,745		$	94,185		$	64,526		$	219,456
	Additions (PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix, and Lector acquisitions)	$	—		$	13,365		$	—		$	13,365
	GamSys opening balance sheet adjustment		—			(52	)		—			(52	)
	Foreign currency adjustments		959			(801	)		276			434
	Ending Balance, December 31, 2013	$	61,704		$	106,697		$	64,802		$	233,203
	Accumulated Impairment, December 31, 2013	$	(103,991	)	$	—		$	—			(103,991	)

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea1

Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Text Block [Abstract]	'
Available-for-Sale Short-Term Investments	'
	Our available-for-sale short-term investments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
		Amortized cost			Gross  unrealized			Gross			Fair value
					gains			unrealized losses
	December 31, 2013
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	28,880		$	36		$	(7	)	$	28,909
	Corporate debt securities		114,333			273			(42	)		114,564
	Municipal securities		15,319			7			(2	)		15,324
	Asset-backed securities		14,148			97			(9	)		14,236
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		4,906			28			(10	)		4,924
	Total short-term investments	$	177,586		$	441		$	(70	)	$	177,957
	December 31, 2012
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	17,371		$	7		$	—		$	17,378
	Corporate debt securities		40,218			194			(17	)		40,395
	Municipal securities		1,710			3			—			1,713
	Asset-backed securities		12,128			66			(2	)		12,192
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		9,237			63			(12	)		9,288
	Total short-term investments	$	80,664		$	333		$	(31	)	$	80,966
Summary of Fair Value and Duration of Investments, Including Cash Equivalents, that have been Classified in Gross Unrealized Loss Position	'
	The fair value and duration that investments, including cash equivalents, have been in a gross unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
		Less than 12 Months						More than 12 Months						TOTAL
		Fair			Unrealized			Fair			Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
		Value			Losses			Value			Losses			Value		Losses
	December 31, 2013
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	16,294		$	(7	)	$	—		$	—		$	16,294	$	(7	)
	Corporate debt securities		29,125			(42	)		—			—			29,125		(42	)
	Municipal securities		6,243			(2	)		—			—			6,243		(2	)
	Asset-backed securities		6,705			(9	)		—			—			6,705		(9	)
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		1,659			(8	)		188			(2	)		1,847		(10	)
	Total	$	60,026		$	(68	)	$	188		$	(2	)	$	60,214	$	(70	)
	December 31, 2012
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities	$	15,791		$	(1	)	$	—		$	—		$	15,791	$	(1	)
	Corporate debt securities		11,288			(17	)		—			—			11,288		(17	)
	Asset-backed securities		1,959			(2	)		—			—			1,959		(2	)
	Mortgage-backed securities — residential		1,263			(7	)		(300	)		(4	)		963		(11	)
	Total	$	30,301		$	(27	)	$	(300	)	$	(4	)	$	30,001	$	(31	)
Amortized Cost and Estimated Fair Value of Investments	'
	Amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments at December 31, 2013 is summarized by maturity date as follows (in thousands):
		Amortized cost			Fair value
	Mature in less than one year	$	97,286		$	97,391
	Mature in one to three years		80,300			80,566
	Total short-term investments	$	177,586		$	177,957
Investments in Accordance with Fair Value Hierarchy	'
	Our investments and liabilities measured at fair value have been presented in accordance with the fair value hierarchy specified in ASC 820 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 in order of liquidity as follows (in thousands):
					Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date using
		Total			Quoted Prices in			Significant			Unobservable
					Active Markets			other			Inputs
					for			Observable			(Level 3)
					Identical Assets			Inputs
					(Level 1)			(Level 2)
	December 31, 2013
	Assets:
	Money market funds	$	52,595		$	52,595		$	—		$	—
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities		28,909			12,712			16,197			—
	Corporate debt securities		117,195			—			117,195			—
	Municipal securities		17,377			—			17,377			—
	Asset-backed securities		14,236			—			14,135			101
	Mortgage-backed securities – residential		4,923			—			4,923			—
		$	235,235		$	65,307		$	169,827		$	101
	Liabilities:
	Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	$	21,052		$	—		$	—		$	21,052
	Self-insurance		2,554			—			—			2,554
		$	23,606		$	—		$	—		$	23,606
	December 31, 2012
	Assets:
	Money market funds	$	112,714		$	112,714		$	—		$	—
	U.S. Government and sponsored entities		20,177			15,214			4,963			—
	Corporate debt securities		42,069			—			42,069			—
	Municipal securities		1,713			—			1,713			—
	Asset-backed securities		12,192			—			12,139			53
	Mortgage-backed securities – residential		9,288			—			9,288			—
		$	198,153		$	127,928		$	70,172		$	53
	Liabilities:
	Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	$	38,050		$	—		$	—		$	38,050
	Self-insurance		1,375			—			—			1,375
		$	39,425		$	—		$	—		$	39,425
Schedule of Accumulated Other-than-Temporary Credit-Related Impairments Charged to Retained Earnings and Interest and Other Expense Net	'
	Accumulated other-than-temporary credit-related impairments charged to retained earnings and interest and other income (expense), net, consists of the following (in thousands):
		Impairments			Impairments			TOTAL
		Charged to			Recognized in
		Retained			Other Income
		Earnings			(Expense), Net
	Accumulated impairments, net, attributable to assets still held at December 31, 2013	$	58		$	824		$	882
Summary of Changes in Contingent Liability for Contingent Consideration	'
	Changes in the contingent liability for contingent consideration are summarized as follows:
	Fair value of contingent consideration at January 1, 2012	$	8,704
	Fair value of Cretaprint contingent consideration at January 10, 2012		16,445
	Fair value of FX Colors contingent consideration at April 5, 2012		190
	Fair value of Metrics contingent consideration at April 10, 2012		5,582
	Fair value of OPS contingent consideration at October 1, 2012		2,600
	Fair value of Technique contingent consideration at November 16, 2012		4,410
	Deferred compensation expense dependent on future employment		907
	Changes in valuation		(432	)
	Payments		(968	)
	Foreign currency adjustment		612
	Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2012	$	38,050
	Fair value of PrintLeader contingent consideration at May 8, 2013		389
	Fair value of GamSys contingent consideration at May 31, 2013		2,640
	Fair value of Metrix contingent consideration at October 16, 2013		1,123
	Deferred compensation expense dependent on future employment		940
	Changes in valuation		(5,779	)
	Payments		(16,683	)
	Foreign currency adjustment		372
	Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2013	$	21,052
Summary of Changes in Contingent Liability for Self-Insurance	'
	Changes in the contingent liability for self-insurance are summarized as follows:
	Fair value of self-insurance liability at January 1, 2012	$	1,640
	Additions to reserve		12,440
	Employee contributions		2,340
	Less: insurance claims and administrative fees paid		(15,045	)
	Fair value of self-insurance liability at December 31, 2012	$	1,375
	Additions to reserve		11,590
	Employee contributions		2,333
	Less: insurance claims and administrative fees paid		(12,744	)
	Fair value of self-insurance liability at December 31, 2013	$	2,554

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Future Minimum Lease Payments under Non-Cancellable Operating Leases and Future Minimum Sublease Receipts	'
	Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, including the build-to-suit lease, and future minimum sublease receipts, for each of the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
		Future Minimum			Future Minimum
	Fiscal Year	Lease Payments			Sublease Income
	2014	$	5,110		$	108
	2015		3,568			108
	2016		2,857			108
	2017		3,569			27
	2018		2,917			—
	Thereafter		17,543			—
	Total	$	35,564		$	351
Changes in Product Warranty Reserve	'
	The changes in product warranty reserve for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Balance at January 1,	$	10,158		$	8,877
	Accrued warranty assumed upon acquisition of Cretaprint		—			1,386
	Provisions, net of releases		11,267			10,122
	Settlements		(10,378	)		(10,227	)
	Balance at December 31	$	11,047		$	10,158

Income_Taxes_Tables

Income Taxes (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Components of Income before Income Taxes	'
	The components of income before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	U.S.	$	127,232		$	5,615		$	3,143
	Foreign		45,906			29,408			27,277
	Total	$	173,138		$	35,023		$	30,420
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes	'
	The provision for (benefit from) income taxes is summarized as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Current:
	U.S. Federal	$	6,589		$	(4,788	)	$	1,685
	State		(3,250	)		1,841			1,202
	Foreign		6,845			7,522			2,759
	Total current		10,184			4,575			5,646
	Deferred:
	U.S. Federal		20,875			(35,487	)		(688	)
	State		33,532			(9,648	)		(1,114	)
	Foreign		(560	)		(7,686	)		(889	)
	Total deferred		53,847			(52,821	)		(2,691	)
	Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	$	64,031		$	(48,246	)	$	2,955
Reconciliation Between Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Computed at Federal Statutory Rate and Actual Tax Provision (Benefit)	'
	Reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) computed at the federal statutory rate to the actual tax provision (benefit) is as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013						2012					2011
	Tax provision at federal statutory rate	$	60,598			35	%	$	12,257		35	%	$	10,647		35	%
	State income taxes, net of federal benefit		467			0.3			(5,074	)	(14.5	)		57		0.2
	Research and development credits		(6,793	)		(3.9	)		(629	)	(1.8	)		(2,274	)	(7.5	)
	Foreign tax rate differential		(7,417	)		(4.3	)		(300	)	(0.9	)		(4,626	)	(15.2	)
	Non-deductible acquisition & integration costs		58			(0.1	)		720		2			—		—
	Increase in value of intangible assets		—			—			(6,494	)	(18.5	)		—		—
	Reduction in accrual for estimated potential tax assessments		(4,427	)		(2.6	)		(11,431	)	(32.6	)		(2,295	)	(7.6	)
	Capital loss due to liquidation of subsidiary		—			—			(38,859	)	(111.1	)		—		—
	Non-deductible stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718-740		1,764			1			1,528		4.4			2,179		7.2
	Valuation allowance changes affecting provision for income taxes		20,012			11.6			274		0.8			(706	)	(2.3	)
	Benefit related to reassessment of taxes from filing of prior year tax returns		(72	)		(0.1	)		—		—			—		—
	Other		(159	)		(0.1	)		(610	)	(1.7	)		(395	)	(1.3	)
	Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	$	64,031			36.8	%	$	(48,618	)	(138.9	)%	$	2,587		8.5	%
Tax Effects of Temporary Differences that Give Rise to Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities)	'
	The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows (in thousands):
		December 31,
		2013			2012
	Reserves and accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes	$	14,157		$	8,021
	Net operating loss carryforwards		11,264			11,690
	Tax credit carryforwards		57,000			47,347
	Stock-based compensation		8,856			7,066
	Deferred gain on sale of building and land		—			47,866
	Deferred revenue		2,463			2,708
	Other		2,494			(677	)
	Gross deferred tax assets		96,234			124,021
	Depreciation		(3,985	)		(2,554	)
	Amortization of identified intangibles		(13,163	)		(13,788	)
	State taxes		(1,746	)		(4,873	)
	Gross deferred tax liabilities		(18,894	)		(21,215	)
	Deferred tax valuation allowance		(28,845	)		(2,624	)
	Net deferred tax assets	$	48,495		$	100,182
Reconciliation of Change in Gross Unrecognized Tax Benefits	'
	A reconciliation of the change in the gross unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 is as follows (in millions):
		Federal, State,			Accrued			Gross
		and Foreign			Interest and			Unrecognized
		Tax			Penalties			Income Tax
								Benefits
	Balance at January 1, 2011	$	31.7		$	0.8		$	32.5
	Additions for tax positions of prior years		—			0.4			0.4
	Additions for tax positions related to 2011		5.6			—			5.6
	Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(0.1	)		—			(0.1	)
	Settlements		(0.6	)		(0.1	)		(0.7	)
	Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations		(2.0	)		(0.1	)		(2.1	)
	Balance at December 31, 2011	$	34.6		$	1		$	35.6
	Additions for tax positions of prior years		0.1			0.3			0.4
	Additions for tax positions related to 2012		5			—			5
	Settlements		(0.4	)		—			(0.4	)
	Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations		(10.3	)		(0.5	)		(10.8	)
	Balance at December 31, 2012	$	29		$	0.8		$	29.8
	Additions for tax positions of prior years		2.7			0.3			3
	Additions for tax positions related to 2013		7.3			—			7.3
	Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(1.9	)		—			(1.9	)
	Settlements		(1.1	)		(0.1	)		(1.2	)
	Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations		(3.6	)		(0.4	)		(4.0	)
	Balance at December 31, 2013	$	32.4		$	0.6		$	33

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Tables

Employee Benefit Plans (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]	'
Schedule of Stock-Based Compensation Expense	'
	Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, employee stock purchases under the ESPP, RSUs, and RSAs under ASC 718 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
		2013			2012			2011
	Employee stock options	$	921		$	1,039		$	2,096
	Non-vested RSUs and RSAs		22,026			15,750			17,926
	ESPP		2,823			2,932			3,347
	Total stock-based compensation		25,770			19,721			23,369
	Tax effect of stock-based compensation		(7,535	)		(5,682	)		(7,598	)
	Net effect on net income	$	18,235		$	14,039		$	15,771
Schedule of Estimated Per Share Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Option Granted and Assumptions Used to Estimate Fair Value	'
	The estimated per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted and the assumptions used to estimate fair value for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the estimated per share weighted average fair value of ESPP shares issued and the assumptions used to estimate fair value for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are as follows:
		Stock Options						ESPP
		Years ended						Years ended December 31,
		December 31,
		2012			2011			2013			2012			2011
	Weighted average fair value per share	$	6.62		$	5.77		$	7.53		$	4.7		$	4.79
	Expected volatility		43.8	%		48	%		25% - 38	%		32% - 49	%		28% - 42	%
	Risk-free interest rate		0.5	%		0.8	%		0.1% - 0.4	%		0.1% - 0.2	%		0.2% - 0.6	%
	Expected term (in years)		4			4			0.5 - 2.0			0.5 - 2.0			0.5 - 2.0
Schedule of Stock Options Outstanding and Exercisable	'
	Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 and activity for each of the years then ended is as follows (in thousands, except weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual term):
		Shares			Weighted			Weighted			Aggregate
					average			average			intrinsic
					exercise			remaining			value
					price			contractual
								term
								(years)
	Options outstanding at January 1, 2011		2,529		$	14.64
	Options granted		140			15.33
	Options forfeited and expired		(70	)		18.24
	Options granted, net of forfeited and expired		70
	Options exercised		(146	)		13.1
	Options outstanding at December 31, 2011		2,453		$	14.67
	Options granted		126			16.57
	Options forfeited and expired		(258	)		15.74
	Options forfeited and expired, net of granted		(132	)
	Options exercised		(785	)		15.56
	Options outstanding at December 31, 2012		1,536		$	14.19
	Options granted		—			—
	Options forfeited and expired		(42	)		25.63
	Options forfeited and expired, net of granted		(42	)
	Options exercised		(434	)		11.93
	Options outstanding at December 31, 2013		1,060		$	14.66			2.86		$	25,526
	Options vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013		1,046		$	14.65			2.83		$	25,193
	Options exercisable at December 31, 2013		887		$	14.57			2.46		$	21,422
Summary of Stock Options Outstanding and Exercisable Range of Exercise Prices	'
	Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows (shares in thousands):
					Options outstanding									Options exercisable
	Range of exercise prices				Shares			Weighted			Weighted			Shares			Weighted
								average			average						average
								remaining			exercise price						exercise
								contractual									price
								term (years)
	$9.12 to $10.80					73			2.62		$	10.46			56		$	10.36
	$11.40 to $11.40					130			3.64			11.4			124			11.4
	$11.92 to $13.72					155			3.48			12.83			143			12.75
	$14.28 to $15.25					86			4.84			14.28			44			14.29
	$15.88 to $15.88					350			1.16			15.88			350			15.88
	$16.32 to $16.32					101			1.62			16.32			101			16.32
	$16.57 to $16.57					117			5.68			16.57			33			16.57
	$17.97 to $26.67					46			3.85			18.87			34			19.15
	$28.34 to $28.51					2			0.41			28.51			2			28.51
						1,060			2.86		$	14.66			887		$	14.57
Schedule of Non-Vested Shares of RSUs and RSAs	'
	Non-vested RSUs and RSAs as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, and activity for each of the years then ended, is as follows (shares in thousands):
		RSUs						RSAs
		Shares			Weighted			Shares			Weighted
					average grant						average grant
					date fair value						date fair value
	Non-vested at January 1, 2011		2,538		$	11.67			101		$	27.21
	Restricted stock granted		1,505			15.09			—			—
	Restricted stock vested		(1,317	)		11.87			(101	)		(27.21	)
	Restricted stock forfeited		(224	)		11.89			—			—
	Non-vested at December 31, 2011		2,502		$	13.6			—		$	—
	Restricted stock granted		1,281			16.05			—			—
	Restricted stock vested		(1,291	)		13.05			—			—
	Restricted stock forfeited		(147	)		13.4			—			—
	Non-vested at December 31, 2012		2,345		$	15.26			—		$	—
	Restricted stock granted		1,222			29.11			—			—
	Restricted stock vested		(1,159	)		14.41			—			—
	Restricted stock forfeited		(319	)		17.78			—			—
	Non-vested at December 31, 2013		2,089		$	23.44			—		$	—
Summary of Performance-Based and Market-Based RSUs	'
	Performance-based and market-based RSUs and stock options that were outstanding at any point during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 are summarized by year as follows:
		Short-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive
		Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs
		Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts
	2013 Grant Dates
	Shares Granted		2/21/13			234,519			8/15/13			280,305
			3/27/13			2,660
			3/27/13			5,920
			5/10/13			1,013
	Shares Vested					—						—
	Shares Forfeited					(15,570	)
	Shares Outstanding					228,542						280,305
	Service Period (years)					1						4
	Grant date fair value (millions)				$	5.7					$	8.6
		Short-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive
		Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs
		Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts
	2012 Grant Dates
	Shares Granted		2/9/12			51,286			5/18/12			191,594
			2/13/12			207,448
			2/13/12			15,000
			5/11/12			9,116
	Shares Vested		2/22/13			(157,140	)		8/15/13			(63,868	)
			5/11/13			(8,016	)
	Shares Forfeited					(117,694	)					(18,333	)
	Shares Outstanding					—						109,393
	Service Period (years)					1						3
	Grant date fair value (millions)				$	4.9					$	3
		Short-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive						Long-Term Incentive						Market-Based RSUs
		Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs						Performance-Based RSUs
	2011 Grant Dates	Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates		Amounts
	Shares Granted		2/9/11			312,097			8/15/11			195,156			8/15/11			8,000			1/5/11		90,000
			2/25/11			1,503
			2/25/11			10,000
	Shares Vested		2/9/12			(93,423	)		5/23/12			(64,909	)								5/10/11		(28,000	)
			2/13/12			(185,251	)		8/15/13			(62,201	)								2/7/13		(31,000	)
			2/25/12			(1,503	)														4/1/13		(31,000	)
			2/25/12			(7,750	)
	Shares Forfeited					(35,673	)					(14,287	)
	Shares Outstanding					—						53,759						8,000					—
	Service Period (years)					1						3						7
	Derived Service Period (years)																						3.93
	Grant date fair value (millions)				$	5					$	3					$	0.1				$	1.1
	Risk-free interest rate																						2.9	%
	Volatility																						40	%
		2010 Grant Dates						2009 Grant Dates
		Short-Term Incentive						Market-Based RSUs						Market-Based Options						ROE-Driven
		Performance-Based RSUs																		Perf-Based Options
	Pre-2011 Grant Dates	Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates			Amounts			Dates		Amounts
	Shares Granted		3/2/10			384,875			6/18/09			83,000
			8/1/10			12,000			8/28/09			15,000			8/28/09			294,076			8/28/09		32,674
	Shares Vested		3/2/11			(305,940	)		1/1/11			(5,000	)		4/27/11			(59,598	)		2/9/12		(5,298	)
									1/10/11			(24,335	)		1/14/13			(43,706	)
									12/17/12			(24,335	)		2/11/13			(43,706	)
									12/13/13			(24,330	)		3/25/13			(43,706	)
	Shares Forfeited					(90,935	)					(20,000	)					(103,360	)				(11,836	)
	Shares Outstanding					—						—						—					15,540
	Service Period (years)					1
	Derived Service Period (years)											4.35						4.88					3.71
	Grant date fair value (millions)				$	4.7					$	0.9					$	1.7				$	0.1
	Risk-free interest rate											3.5	%					3.1	%
	Volatility											50	%					50	%

Gain_on_Sale_of_Building_and_L1

Gain on Sale of Building and Land (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Real Estate [Abstract]	'
Summary of Cost of Land, Building, and Improvements Included in Determination of Gain on Sale of Building and Land	'
	Direct transaction costs consist primarily of documentary transfer and title costs, legal and escrow fees, and other expenses. The cost of the land, building, and improvements were included in the determination of the gain on sale of building and land for the year ended December 31, 2013 as follows (in millions):
	Sales proceeds	$	179.7
	Imputed interest obligation		3.5
	Deferred proceeds from property transaction		183.2
	Land, building , and improvements		(60.3	)
	Imputed sublease receivable		(3.6	)
	Relocation costs		(1.3	)
	Deferred lease financing costs		(0.4	)
	Direct transaction costs		(0.4	)
	Gain on sale of building and land	$	117.2

Restructuring_and_Other_Tables

Restructuring and Other (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Restructuring And Related Activities [Abstract]	'
Restructuring and Other Reserve Activities	'
	Restructuring and other reserve activities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
		2013			2012
	Reserve balance at January 1	$	1,670		$	1,870
	Restructuring charges		1,251			2,525
	Other charges		3,583			3,278
	Non-cash acquisition-related compensation costs		(940	)		(907	)
	Cash payments		(4,691	)		(5,096	)
	Reserve balance at December 31	$	873		$	1,670

Segment_Information_Geographic1

Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Segment Reporting [Abstract]	'
Summary of Operating Segment Profit (Gross Profit), Excluding Stock-Based Compensation Expense by Segment	'
	Operating segment profit (i.e., gross profit), excluding stock-based compensation expense, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Industrial Inkjet
	Revenue	$	354,614		$	320,228		$	240,318
	Gross profit		140,095			127,783			92,738
	Gross profit percentages		39.5	%		39.9	%		38.6	%
	Productivity Software
	Revenue	$	118,409		$	103,466		$	81,165
	Gross profit		85,246			74,426			56,825
	Gross profit percentages		72	%		71.9	%		70	%
	Fiery
	Revenue	$	254,670		$	228,443		$	270,073
	Gross profit		171,642			153,805			183,084
	Gross profit percentages		67.4	%		67.3	%		67.8	%
Reconciliation of Operating Segment Gross Profit to Consolidated Statements of Operations	'
	A reconciliation of operating segment gross profit to the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Segment gross profit	$	396,983		$	356,014		$	332,647
	Stock-based compensation expense		(1,817	)		(1,193	)		(1,664	)
	Gross profit	$	395,166		$	354,821		$	330,983
Tangible and Intangible Assets, Net of Liabilities, Summarized by Operating Segment	'
	Tangible and intangible assets, net of liabilities, are summarized by operating segment as follows (in thousands):
		Industrial			Productivity			Fiery
		Inkjet			Software
	December 31, 2013
	Goodwill	$	61,704		$	106,697		$	64,801
	Identified intangible assets, net		33,436			33,271			2,015
	Tangible assets, net of liabilities		95,350			(14,388	)		25,736
	Net tangible and intangible assets	$	190,490		$	125,580		$	92,552
	December 31, 2012
	Goodwill	$	60,745		$	94,185		$	64,526
	Identified intangible assets, net		41,103			36,141			3,000
	Tangible assets, net of liabilities		80,569			(14,312	)		26,304
	Net tangible and intangible assets	$	182,417		$	116,014		$	93,830
Revenue by Sales Origin	'
	Our revenue by sales origin for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
		For the years ended December 31,
		2013			2012			2011
	Americas	$	412,127		$	354,114		$	345,303
	EMEA		207,665			195,397			178,471
	APAC		107,901			102,626			67,782
	Japan		21,977			27,870			35,655
	APAC, ex Japan		85,924			74,756			32,127
	Total Revenue	$	727,693		$	652,137		$	591,556

Quarterly_Consolidated_Financi1

Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Schedule of Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information	'
	The following table presents our operating results for each of the quarters in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited, but has been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) have been included that are required to state fairly our unaudited quarterly results when read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.
		2013
	(in thousands except per share data)	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
	Revenue	$	171,359		$	180,298		$	178,823		$	197,213
	Gross profit		93,860			97,983			97,213			106,110
	Income from operations		9,454			11,821			13,876			139,497
	Net income		8,362			9,424			16,141			75,180
	Net income per basic common share	$	0.18		$	0.2		$	0.34		$	1.6
	Net income per diluted common share	$	0.17		$	0.2		$	0.33		$	1.54
	Gain on sale of building and land	$	(76	)	$	(35	)	$	(236	)	$	117,563
		2012
	(in thousands except per share data)	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
	Revenue	$	160,056		$	163,901		$	154,074		$	174,105
	Gross profit		87,667			89,792			83,077			94,285
	Income from operations		7,681			10,379			4,006			11,821
	Net income		6,234			7,005			13,411			56,619
	Net income per basic common share	$	0.14		$	0.15		$	0.29		$	1.22
	Net income per diluted common share	$	0.13		$	0.15		$	0.28		$	1.19
	Tax benefit from capital loss due to liquidation of subsidiary	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	43,600

The_Company_and_Its_Significan3

The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013		Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Post-acquisition adjustments related to business combination	'		$1,200,000		'
Decrease in cash used for investing activities	15,123,000		969,000		1,746,000
Maturity of highly liquid investments	'Three months or less		'		'
Maturity of marketable investments	'Greater than three months		'		'
Other-than-temporary impairments, including credit-related impairments	0		0		0
Restricted cash related to customer agreements	200,000		'		'
Present value of minimum lease payments	90.00%		'		'
Percentage of economic life of equipment	75.00%		'		'
Deferred cost of revenue	6,600,000		2,200,000		'
Financing receivables	5,200,000		2,300,000		'
Depreciation expense	9,400,000		8,400,000		7,400,000
Long-lived asset impairment charges	0		0		0
Impairment of intangible assets, excluding goodwill	0		0		0
Amortization period of intangible assets	'6 years 7 months 6 days		'		'
Intangible amortization expense	19,438,000		18,594,000		11,248,000
Proceeds from sale of investments	75,000		'		2,866,000
Warranty reserves	11,047,000		10,158,000		8,877,000
Research and development costs	128,124,000	[1]	120,298,000	[1]	115,901,000	[1]
Advertising and promotional expenses	4,100,000		3,500,000		4,800,000
Assets and liabilities of acquired business, including goodwill	100.00%		'		'
Stop loss deductible	125,000		'		'
Self-insurance	2,554,000		1,375,000		1,640,000
Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions	-300,000		600,000		-1,200,000
Cumulated translation adjustment, net of tax, unrealized gain (loss)	-1,601,000		132,000		'
Notional value of foreign exchange contracts	2,500,000		2,700,000		'
Noncurrent income taxes payable	33,011,000		29,755,000		'
Sales-Type Lease [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Financing receivables	4,300,000		900,000		'
Trade Receivables with Original Maturities in Excess of One Year [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Financing receivables	900,000		1,400,000		'
Desktop and Laptop Computers [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'2 years		'		'
Computer Server Equipment [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years		'		'
Manufacturing, Testing, and Other Equipment [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years		'		'
Tooling [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years		'		'
Research and Development Equipment [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years		'		'
Furniture [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'7 years		'		'
Land Improvements [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'7 years		'		'
Building under Build-to-Suit Lease [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'40 years		'		'
Building Purchases [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'40 years		'		'
Internal Use Software [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years		'		'
Equipment Leased to Customers on Operating Leases [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years		'		'
Fiery [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Products revenues	35.00%		'		'
Goodwill fair value	368,000,000		'		'
Goodwill fair value in excess of carrying value	398.00%		'		'
Industrial Inkjet [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Goodwill fair value	540,000,000		'		'
Goodwill fair value in excess of carrying value	284.00%		'		'
Productivity Software [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Goodwill fair value	262,000,000		'		'
Goodwill fair value in excess of carrying value	209.00%		'		'
Minimum [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Amortization period of intangible assets	'2 years		'		'
Minimum [Member] | Software under Perpetual Licenses [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'3 years		'		'
Minimum [Member] | Building Improvements [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'5 years		'		'
Maximum [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Amortization period of intangible assets	'18 years		'		'
Maximum [Member] | Software under Perpetual Licenses [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'5 years		'		'
Maximum [Member] | Leasehold and Land Improvements [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'5 years		'		'
Maximum [Member] | Building Improvements [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Estimated useful lives	'10 years		'		'
Spain [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Trade receivables sold without recourse	8,300,000		4,300,000		'
United States [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Trade receivables sold with recourse	$12,900,000		$2,100,000		'
European [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Percentage of total revenue	28.00%		'		'
Higher Risk Southern European Countries [Member]	'		'		'
Organization Basis Of Presentation And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]	'		'		'
Percentage of European receivables	25.00%		'		'
Percentage of consolidated net receivables	7.00%		'		'
[1]	Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: 2013 2012 2011 Cost of revenue $ 1,817 $ 1,193 $ 1,664 Research and development 7,568 5,719 5,724 Sales and marketing 4,500 3,320 4,133 General and administrative 11,885 9,489 11,848

The_Company_and_Its_Significan4

The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies - Summary of Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Supplemental Cash Flow Elements [Abstract]	'	'	'
Net cash paid (refunded) for income taxes	$7,883	$4,384	($2,998)
Cash paid for interest expense	210	99	62
Acquisition related activities:	'	'	'
Cash paid for acquisitions, excluding contingent consideration	15,541	66,050	35,299
Cash acquired in acquisitions, excluding restricted cash	-853	-5,059	-1,554
Net cash paid for acquisitions	14,688	60,991	33,745
Non-cash investing and financing activities:	'	'	'
Non-cash acquisition of property under a build-to-suit lease	11,230	'	'
Property and equipment received, but accrued in accounts payable	7,210	1,042	240
Total non-cash investing and financing activities	$18,440	$1,042	$240

Earnings_Per_Share_Basic_and_D

Earnings Per Share - Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Basic net income per share:	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Net income available to common shareholders	$75,180	$16,141	$9,424	$8,362	$56,619	$13,411	$7,005	$6,234	$109,107	$83,269	$27,465
Weighted average common shares outstanding	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	46,643	46,453	46,234
Basic net income per share	$1.60	$0.34	$0.20	$0.18	$1.22	$0.29	$0.15	$0.14	$2.34	$1.79	$0.59
Dilutive net income per share:	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Net income available to common shareholders	$75,180	$16,141	$9,424	$8,362	$56,619	$13,411	$7,005	$6,234	$109,107	$83,269	$27,465
Weighted average common shares outstanding	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	46,643	46,453	46,234
Dilutive stock options and non-vested restricted stock	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	1,716	1,281	1,345
Weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted net income per share	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	48,359	47,734	47,579
Dilutive net income per share	$1.54	$0.33	$0.20	$0.17	$1.19	$0.28	$0.15	$0.13	$2.26	$1.74	$0.58

Earnings_Per_Share_Additional_

Earnings Per Share - Additional Information (Detail)	12 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]	'	'	'
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share, amount	0.1	0.4	2.2
Weighted average non-vested RSAs	0	0	0
RSAs vested, date	15-Mar-11	'	'

Acquisitions_2013_Acquisitions

Acquisitions - 2013 Acquisitions Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration	$14,688,000	$61,591,000	$36,690,000
Fair value discount rate	10.00%	'	'
Contingent consideration, current	14,803,000	21,286,000	'
Contingent consideration, noncurrent	6,300,000	'	'
Minimum [Member] | Earnouts [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value discount rate	4.20%	'	'
Maximum [Member] | Earnouts [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value discount rate	6.40%	'	'
Productivity Software [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration	12,900,000	'	'
Payment, Dependent on accounts receivable collections	600,000	'	'
Additional payment, dependent on accounts receivable collections	1,000,000	'	'
Fair value of earnouts	4,200,000	'	'
Contingent consideration, current	2,000,000	'	'
Contingent consideration, noncurrent	$2,200,000	'	'
Productivity Software [Member] | Minimum [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Earnouts [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value discount rate	4.50%	'	'
Productivity Software [Member] | Maximum [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Earnouts [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value discount rate	6.00%	'	'

Acquisitions_2012_Acquisitions

Acquisitions - 2012 Acquisitions Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration	$14,688,000	$61,591,000	$36,690,000
Acquisition-related executive deferred compensation	1,800,000	'	'
Fair value of earnout, discount rate	10.00%	'	'
Estimated fair value of earnouts	21,052,000	38,050,000	8,704,000
Contingent consideration, current	14,803,000	21,286,000	'
Contingent consideration, noncurrent	6,300,000	'	'
Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Contingent consideration paid	1,300,000	600,000	'
Minimum [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Useful life	'2 years	'	'
Maximum [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Useful life	'18 years	'	'
Cretaprint [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Estimated fair value of earnouts	'	16,445,000	'
Cretaprint [Member] | Industrial Inkjet [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration	28,800,000	'	'
Date of acquisition	10-Jan-12	'	'
Fair value of earnouts	'	6,200,000	'
Acquisition-related executive deferred compensation	1,800,000	'	'
Fair value of earnout, discount rate	5.00%	'	'
Contingent consideration paid	8,900,000	'	'
Cretaprint [Member] | Industrial Inkjet [Member] | Existing Technology [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Useful life	'3 years	'	'
Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration	31,100,000	'	'
Contingent consideration paid	4,500,000	'	'
Estimated fair value of earnouts	10,600,000	'	'
Contingent consideration, current	6,500,000	'	'
Contingent consideration, noncurrent	4,100,000	'	'
Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Minimum [Member] | Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value of earnout, discount rate	4.20%	'	'
Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Minimum [Member] | Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Useful life	'3 years	'	'
Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Maximum [Member] | Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value of earnout, discount rate	6.40%	'	'
Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Maximum [Member] | Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Useful life	'4 years	'	'
FX Colors [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration	'	400,000	'
Date of acquisition	5-Apr-12	'	'
Contingent consideration paid	'	100,000	'
Estimated fair value of earnouts	'	$190,000	'
FX Colors [Member] | Fiery [Member] | Existing Technology [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Useful life	'3 years	'	'

Acquisitions_2011_Acquisitions

Acquisitions - 2011 Acquisitions Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration for acquisition	$14,688,000	$61,591,000	$36,690,000
Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Contingent consideration paid	1,300,000	600,000	'
Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member] | Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration for acquisition	27,800,000	'	'
Entrac [Member] | Fiery [Member]	'	'	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash consideration for acquisition	$6,400,000	'	'
Business acquisition purchase date	25-Jul-11	'	'

Acquisitions_Additional_Inform

Acquisitions - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended			3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Apr. 10, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
		Asset Valuation Methodology [Member]	GamSys [Member]	GamSys [Member]	Cretaprint [Member]	Cretaprint [Member]	Metrics [Member]	Metrics [Member]	Metrics [Member]	Metrics [Member]	Prism [Member]
									Noncompete Agreements [Member]	Noncompete Agreements [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Valuation discount rate, minimum	'	13.00%	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Valuation discount rate, maximum	'	24.00%	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities, adjustments	$1,187,000	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Goodwill increase (decrease) adjustment	'	'	-52,000	-52,000	215,000	215,000	-588,000	-588,000	'	'	301,000
Value of non-competition agreements	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$600,000	'
Discount rate related to non-competition agreements	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	15.00%	'	'
Period of Non-compete agreements	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'5 years	'	'
Period for competitors to develop a competitive product	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'3 years	'	'

Acquisitions_Schedule_of_Disco

Acquisitions - Schedule of Discount Rate, Percentage of Project Tasks Completed and Tasks to be Completed (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
Discount rate for IPR&D	10.00%
In Process Research And Developments [Member] | GamSys [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
Discount rate for IPR&D	17.00%
IPR&D percent complete at December 31, 2013	90.00%
In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Entrac [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
Discount rate for IPR&D	22.00%
IPR&D percent complete at December 31, 2013	100.00%
In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Streamline [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
Discount rate for IPR&D	20.00%
IPR&D percent complete at December 31, 2013	100.00%
In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Technique [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
Discount rate for IPR&D	17.00%
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	73.00%
IPR&D percent complete at December 31, 2013	100.00%
In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Prism [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
Discount rate for IPR&D	23.00%
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	50.00%
IPR&D percent complete at December 31, 2013	100.00%
Minimum [Member] | In Process Research And Developments [Member] | GamSys [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	50.00%
Minimum [Member] | In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Entrac [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	48.00%
Minimum [Member] | In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Streamline [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	78.00%
Maximum [Member] | In Process Research And Developments [Member] | GamSys [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	53.00%
Maximum [Member] | In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Entrac [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	79.00%
Maximum [Member] | In Process Research And Developments [Member] | Streamline [Member]	'
In Process Research And Development [Line Items]	'
IPR&D percent complete at acquisition date	89.00%

Acquisitions_Allocation_of_Pur

Acquisitions - Allocation of Purchase Price to Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013
Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'2 years
Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'18 years
Productivity Software [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, goodwill	13,365
Purchase Price Allocation	21,785
Net tangible assets (liabilities)	-3,441
Total purchase price	18,344
Productivity Software [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, goodwill	31,100
Purchase Price Allocation	51,730
Net tangible assets (liabilities)	-4,942
Total purchase price	46,788
Productivity Software [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, goodwill	20,020
Purchase Price Allocation	34,440
Net tangible assets (liabilities)	-1,295
Total purchase price	33,145
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	5,540
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'6 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	14,880
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'6 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	10,150
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'6 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	2,060
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'3 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'4 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	4,580
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'3 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'4 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	3,060
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'3 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'4 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	670
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'3 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'4 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	1,080
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'3 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'4 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	1,100
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'4 years
Productivity Software [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Productivity Software [Member] | IPR&D [Member] | PrintLeader, GamSys, Metrix and Lector Acquisition [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'3 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	150
Productivity Software [Member] | IPR&D [Member] | Metrics, OPS, Technique [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	90
Productivity Software [Member] | IPR&D [Member] | Streamline, Prism, Alphagraph [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	110
Industrial Inkjet [Member] | Cretaprint [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, goodwill	22,794
Purchase Price Allocation	44,124
Net tangible assets (liabilities)	3,078
Total purchase price	47,202
Industrial Inkjet [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Cretaprint [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	8,000
Industrial Inkjet [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Cretaprint [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'3 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	7,070
Industrial Inkjet [Member] | Trade Names [Member] | Cretaprint [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'6 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	4,970
Industrial Inkjet [Member] | Backlog [Member] | Cretaprint [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'1 year
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	1,290
Fiery [Member] | Entrac [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, goodwill	4,611
Purchase Price Allocation	8,651
Net tangible assets (liabilities)	579
Total purchase price	9,230
Fiery [Member] | Customer Relationships [Member] | Entrac [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	2,340
Fiery [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Entrac [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	1,290
Fiery [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Entrac [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'2 years
Fiery [Member] | Existing Technology [Member] | Entrac [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Fiery [Member] | IPR&D [Member] | Entrac [Member]	'
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years
Purchase price allocation, intangible assets	410

Balance_Sheet_Components_Sched

Balance Sheet Components - Schedule of Inventories (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Inventories:	'	'
Raw materials	$35,470	$30,519
Work in process	3,434	5,847
Finished goods	29,441	21,977
Inventory, net	$68,345	$58,343

Balance_Sheet_Components_Sched1

Balance Sheet Components - Schedule of Property and Equipment (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Property and equipment, net:	'	'
Land, buildings, and improvements (including build-to-suit)	$72,601	$72,671
Equipment and purchased software	50,280	55,932
Furniture and leasehold improvements	12,808	18,387
Property, plant and equipment, gross	135,689	146,990
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	-50,860	-60,408
Property, plant and equipment, net	$84,829	$86,582

Balance_Sheet_Components_Addit

Balance Sheet Components - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
	sqft
Statement Of Financial Position [Abstract]	'	'	'
Area of leased property	59,000	'	'
Lease term	'15 years	'	'
Property and equipment capitalized cost	$11,100,000	'	'
Sale of land, buildings and improvements	'	61,600,000	'
Increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities, adjustments	'	1,187,000	'
Reclassified amounts out of OCI, net of tax	$23,000	$100,000	$187,000

Balance_Sheet_Components_Sched2

Balance Sheet Components - Schedule of Accrued and Other Liabilities (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Accrued and other liabilities:	'	'	'
Accrued compensation and benefits	$32,375	$23,387	'
Warranty provision	11,047	10,158	8,877
Accrued royalty payments	3,915	4,318	'
Contingent liabilities-current	14,803	21,286	'
Other accrued liabilities	16,375	19,869	'
Accrued and other liabilities	$78,515	$79,018	'

Balance_Sheet_Components_Sched3

Balance Sheet Components - Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):	'	'
Net unrealized investment gains	$227	$184
Currency translation gains (losses)	-1,601	132
Other	-14	-47
Accumulated other comprehensive income	($1,388)	$269

Goodwill_and_LongLived_Intangi2

Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets - Schedule of Purchased Identified Intangible Assets Resulting from Acquisitions (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Purchased Identified Intangible Assets resulting from Acquisitions [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average useful life	'6 years 7 months 6 days	'	'
Gross carrying amount - Intangible assets	$301,115	$292,646	'
Accumulated amortization	-232,393	-212,402	'
Weighted remaining average useful life	'5 years 1 month 6 days	'	'
Net carrying amount - Intangible assets	68,722	80,244	'
Net carrying amount - Goodwill	233,203	219,456	164,323
Customer Relationships and Other [Member]	'	'	'
Purchased Identified Intangible Assets resulting from Acquisitions [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average useful life	'5 years 7 months 6 days	'	'
Gross carrying amount - Intangible assets	109,906	103,891	'
Accumulated amortization	-77,922	-69,800	'
Weighted remaining average useful life	'3 years 6 months	'	'
Net carrying amount - Intangible assets	31,984	34,091	'
Existing Technology [Member]	'	'	'
Purchased Identified Intangible Assets resulting from Acquisitions [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average useful life	'4 years 3 months 18 days	'	'
Gross carrying amount - Intangible assets	132,192	129,320	'
Accumulated amortization	-122,857	-115,411	'
Weighted remaining average useful life	'1 year 6 months	'	'
Net carrying amount - Intangible assets	9,335	13,909	'
Trademarks and Trade Names [Member]	'	'	'
Purchased Identified Intangible Assets resulting from Acquisitions [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average useful life	'13 years 2 months 12 days	'	'
Gross carrying amount - Intangible assets	58,867	59,235	'
Accumulated amortization	-31,614	-27,191	'
Weighted remaining average useful life	'8 years 3 months 18 days	'	'
Net carrying amount - Intangible assets	27,253	32,044	'
IPR & D [Member]	'	'	'
Purchased Identified Intangible Assets resulting from Acquisitions [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average useful life	'0 years	'	'
Gross carrying amount - Intangible assets	150	200	'
Accumulated amortization	'	'	'
Weighted remaining average useful life	'0 years	'	'
Net carrying amount - Intangible assets	$150	$200	'

Goodwill_and_LongLived_Intangi3

Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)

12 Months Ended

36 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2008

Sep. 30, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Sep. 30, 2012

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Acquisition

GamSys [Member]

GamSys [Member]

Cretaprint [Member]

Cretaprint [Member]

Metrics [Member]

Metrics [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Fiery [Member]

Fiery [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Cretaprint [Member]

GamSys [Member]

Metrics [Member]

Purchased Identified Intangible Assets resulting from Acquisitions [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated useful lives

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'2 years

'18 years

Aggregate amortization expense

$19,438,000

$18,594,000

$11,248,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities, adjustments

'

1,187,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

801,000

'

'

'

386,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

Increased goodwill and accrued and other liabilities, adjustments

'

'

'

'

'

-52,000

-52,000

215,000

215,000

-588,000

-588,000

'

'

'

215,000

'

'

-52,000

-588,000

'

'

'

'

Goodwill impairment charge

103,991,000

'

'

103,991,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

103,991,000

'

103,991,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Fair value of goodwill

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

540,000,000

'

'

'

262,000,000

'

'

'

368,000,000

'

'

'

Goodwill fair value in excess of carrying value percentage

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

284.00%

'

'

'

209.00%

'

'

'

398.00%

'

'

'

Revenue growth rate

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

11.00%

'

'

'

14.00%

'

'

'

11.00%

-15.00%

46.00%

10.00%

Number of acquisitions completed

'

'

'

10

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stated gross profit percentages

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

40.00%

40.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Compound annual growth rate

7.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Fair value of earnout, discount rate

10.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Long-term growth rate of calculated terminal values

4.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2.50%

'

'

'

Estimated control premium rate

6.50%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Forecast horizon

'5 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Long-lived asset impairment charges

0

0

0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Impairment of intangible assets, excluding goodwill

0

0

0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Proceeds from sale of investments

$75,000

'

$2,866,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Goodwill_and_LongLived_Intangi4

Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets - Schedule of Future Amortization Expense (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]	'	'
2014	$19,105	'
2015	15,112	'
2016	11,252	'
2017	7,708	'
2018	4,127	'
Thereafter	11,418	'
Net carrying amount - Intangible assets	$68,722	$80,244

Goodwill_and_LongLived_Intangi5

Goodwill and Long-Lived Intangible Assets - Schedule of Goodwill Rollforward (Detail) (USD $)

12 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2008

Sep. 30, 2012

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2012

Sep. 30, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Cretaprint [Member]

Cretaprint [Member]

Metrics [Member]

Metrics [Member]

GamSys [Member]

GamSys [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Industrial Inkjet [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Productivity Software [Member]

Fiery [Member]

Fiery [Member]

Cretaprint [Member]

Metrics [Member]

GamSys [Member]

Purchased Identified Intangible Assets resulting from Acquisitions [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Beginning Balance

$219,456,000

$164,323,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$60,745,000

$36,508,000

'

'

$94,185,000

$63,403,000

'

'

$64,526,000

$64,412,000

Additions

13,365,000

53,894,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

22,794,000

'

'

13,365,000

31,100,000

'

'

'

'

Opening balance sheet adjustment recognized in 2013

'

1,187,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

801,000

'

'

'

386,000

'

'

'

'

Opening balance sheet adjustment

'

'

'

215,000

215,000

-588,000

-588,000

-52,000

-52,000

'

'

'

215,000

'

'

-588,000

-52,000

'

'

Foreign currency adjustments

434,000

425,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

959,000

427,000

'

'

-801,000

-116,000

'

'

276,000

114,000

Ending Balance

233,203,000

219,456,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

61,704,000

60,745,000

'

'

106,697,000

94,185,000

'

'

64,802,000

64,526,000

Accumulated Impairment, Ending Balance

($103,991,000)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

($103,991,000)

'

($103,991,000)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea2

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Summary of Fair Value and Duration of Investments, Including Cash Equivalents, that have been Classified in Gross Unrealized Loss Position (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]	'	'
Amortized cost	$177,586	$80,664
Gross unrealized gains	441	333
Gross unrealized losses	-70	-31
Fair value	177,957	80,966
Less than 12 Months, Fair Value	60,026	30,301
Less than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-68	-27
More than 12 Months, Fair Value	188	-300
More than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-2	-4
TOTAL, Fair Value	60,214	30,001
TOTAL, Unrealized Losses	-70	-31
U.S. Government and Sponsored Entities [Member]	'	'
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]	'	'
Amortized cost	28,880	17,371
Gross unrealized gains	36	7
Gross unrealized losses	-7	'
Fair value	28,909	17,378
Less than 12 Months, Fair Value	16,294	15,791
Less than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-7	-1
More than 12 Months, Fair Value	'	'
More than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	'	'
TOTAL, Fair Value	16,294	15,791
TOTAL, Unrealized Losses	-7	-1
Corporate Debt Securities [Member]	'	'
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]	'	'
Amortized cost	114,333	40,218
Gross unrealized gains	273	194
Gross unrealized losses	-42	-17
Fair value	114,564	40,395
Less than 12 Months, Fair Value	29,125	11,288
Less than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-42	-17
More than 12 Months, Fair Value	'	'
More than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	'	'
TOTAL, Fair Value	29,125	11,288
TOTAL, Unrealized Losses	-42	-17
Municipal Securities [Member]	'	'
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]	'	'
Amortized cost	15,319	1,710
Gross unrealized gains	7	3
Gross unrealized losses	-2	'
Fair value	15,324	1,713
Less than 12 Months, Fair Value	6,243	'
Less than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-2	'
More than 12 Months, Fair Value	'	'
More than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	'	'
TOTAL, Fair Value	6,243	'
TOTAL, Unrealized Losses	-2	'
Asset-Backed Securities [Member]	'	'
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]	'	'
Amortized cost	14,148	12,128
Gross unrealized gains	97	66
Gross unrealized losses	-9	-2
Fair value	14,236	12,192
Less than 12 Months, Fair Value	6,705	1,959
Less than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-9	-2
More than 12 Months, Fair Value	'	'
More than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	'	'
TOTAL, Fair Value	6,705	1,959
TOTAL, Unrealized Losses	-9	-2
Mortgage-Backed Securities - Residential [Member]	'	'
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]	'	'
Amortized cost	4,906	9,237
Gross unrealized gains	28	63
Gross unrealized losses	-10	-12
Fair value	4,924	9,288
Less than 12 Months, Fair Value	1,659	1,263
Less than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-8	-7
More than 12 Months, Fair Value	188	-300
More than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	-2	-4
TOTAL, Fair Value	1,847	963
TOTAL, Unrealized Losses	($10)	($11)

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea3

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Amortized Cost and Estimated Fair Value of Investments (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Amortized Cost And Fair Value Debt Securities [Abstract]	'	'
Mature in less than one year, Amortized cost	$97,286	'
Mature in one to three years, Amortized cost	80,300	'
Total short-term investments, Amortized cost	177,586	80,664
Mature in less than one year, Fair value	97,391	'
Mature in one to three years, Fair value	80,566	'
Fair value	$177,957	$80,966

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea4

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Available-for-sale securities, net realized losses	$100,000	$100,000	'
Available-for-sale securities, realized gains	100,000	200,000	200,000
Available-for-sale securities, realized losses	200,000	300,000	200,000
Net unrealized gains on sale of securities included in other comprehensive income	400,000	300,000	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	235,235,000	198,153,000	'
Proceeds from the sale of investments	75,000	'	2,866,000
Fair value of liability	21,052,000	38,050,000	8,704,000
Fair value discount rate	10.00%	'	'
Acquisition-related executive deferred compensation	1,800,000	'	'
Contingent liabilities, current	14,803,000	21,286,000	'
Contingent liabilities, noncurrent	6,300,000	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration increase (decrease), net	-1,563,000	'	'
Earnout interest accretion	1,400,000	1,700,000	'
Earnout payments	16,683,000	968,000	'
Probability-adjusted revenue	5.00%	'	'
Increase in earnout liability	600,000	'	'
Decrease in earnout liability	700,000	'	'
Increase or decrease in fair value contingent consideration	100,000	'	'
Percentage of increase or decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration	1.00%	'	'
Stop loss deductible	125,000	'	'
Self-insurance	2,554,000	1,375,000	1,640,000
Severity of claims experienced and medical cost inflation	10.00%	'	'
Increase/Decrease in self-insurance liability	200,000	'	'
Notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities	27,200,000	3,200,000	'
Designated for Cash Flow Hedge [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities	2,500,000	2,700,000	'
Alphagraph [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Earnout payments	700,000	'	'
Streamline [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Earnout payments	600,000	600,000	'
Radius [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Earnout payments	1,900,000	300,000	'
FX Colors [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value of liability	'	190,000	'
Earnout payments	'	100,000	'
Cretaprint [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value of liability	'	16,445,000	'
Earnout payments	8,900,000	'	'
Metrics [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value of liability	'	'	5,582,000
Earnout payments	4,500,000	'	'
Entrac, Cretaprint, Streamline, Ops And Alphagraph [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration increase (decrease), net	-7,100,000	'	'
Entrac and Alphagraph [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration increase (decrease), net	'	-2,100,000	'
Money Market Funds [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	52,595,000	112,714,000	'
Net Asset Value per share	$1	$1	'
U.S. Government and Sponsored Entities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	28,909,000	20,177,000	'
U.S. Government and Sponsored Entities [Member] | Cash Equivalents [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	'	2,800,000	'
Corporate Debt Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	117,195,000	42,069,000	'
Corporate Debt Securities [Member] | Cash Equivalents [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	2,600,000	1,700,000	'
Municipal Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	17,377,000	1,713,000	'
Municipal Securities [Member] | Cash Equivalents [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Cash equivalents and short term investments	2,100,000	'	'
Minimum [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Probability of achieving revenue	70.00%	'	'
Minimum [Member] | Earnouts [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value discount rate	4.20%	'	'
Maximum [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Earnout payments	$2,400,000	'	'
Probability of achieving revenue	100.00%	'	'
Maximum [Member] | Earnouts [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Fair value discount rate	6.40%	'	'

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea5

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Investments in Accordance with Fair Value Hierarchy (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	$235,235	$198,153	'
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	21,052	38,050	8,704
Self-insurance	2,554	1,375	1,640
Liabilities	23,606	39,425	'
Money Market Funds [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	52,595	112,714	'
U.S. Government and Sponsored Entities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	28,909	20,177	'
Corporate Debt Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	117,195	42,069	'
Municipal Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	17,377	1,713	'
Asset-Backed Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	14,236	12,192	'
Mortgage-Backed Securities - Residential [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	4,923	9,288	'
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	65,307	127,928	'
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	'	'	'
Self-insurance	'	'	'
Liabilities	'	'	'
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	52,595	112,714	'
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | U.S. Government and Sponsored Entities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	12,712	15,214	'
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Municipal Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Asset-Backed Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Mortgage-Backed Securities - Residential [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	169,827	70,172	'
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	'	'	'
Self-insurance	'	'	'
Liabilities	'	'	'
Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member] | U.S. Government and Sponsored Entities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	16,197	4,963	'
Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	117,195	42,069	'
Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Municipal Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	17,377	1,713	'
Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Asset-Backed Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	14,135	12,139	'
Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Mortgage-Backed Securities - Residential [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	4,923	9,288	'
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	101	53	'
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	21,052	38,050	'
Self-insurance	2,554	1,375	'
Liabilities	23,606	39,425	'
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | U.S. Government and Sponsored Entities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Corporate Debt Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Municipal Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Asset-Backed Securities [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	101	53	'
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Mortgage-Backed Securities - Residential [Member]	'	'	'
Investments And Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total Investments	'	'	'

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea6

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Schedule of Accumulated Other-than-Temporary Credit-Related Impairments Charged to Retained Earnings and Interest and Other Expense Net (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Other Than Temporary Impairment Losses Investments [Abstract]	'
Impairments Charged to Retained Earnings	$58
Impairments Recognized in Other Income (Expense), Net	824
TOTAL	$882

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea7

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Summary of Changes in Contingent Liability for Contingent Consideration (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	$38,050	$8,704
Deferred compensation expense dependent on future employment	940	907
Changes in valuation	-5,779	-432
Payments	-16,683	-968
Foreign currency adjustment	372	612
Fair value of contingent consideration	21,052	38,050
Cretaprint [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	16,445	'
Payments	-8,900	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	'	16,445
Date of acquisition agreement	'	10-Jan-12
FX Colors [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Payments	'	-100
Fair value of contingent consideration	'	190
Date of acquisition agreement	'	5-Apr-12
Metrics [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	'	5,582
Payments	-4,500	'
Date of acquisition agreement	'	10-Apr-12
Online Print Solutions [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	'	2,600
Date of acquisition agreement	'	1-Oct-12
Technique [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	'	4,410
Date of acquisition agreement	'	16-Nov-12
Print Leader [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	389	'
Date of acquisition agreement	8-May-13	'
GamSys [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	2,640	'
Date of acquisition agreement	31-May-13	'
Metrix [Member]	'	'
Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]	'	'
Fair value of contingent consideration	$1,123	'
Date of acquisition agreement	16-Oct-13	'

Investments_and_Fair_Value_Mea8

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Summary of Changes in Contingent Liability for Self-Insurance (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Liabilities Under Self Insurance Program [Abstract]	'	'
Beginning Balance, Fair value of self-insurance liability	$1,375	$1,640
Additions to reserve	11,590	12,440
Employee contributions	2,333	2,340
Less: insurance claims and administrative fees paid	-12,744	-15,045
Ending Balance, Fair value of self-insurance liability	$2,554	$1,375

Indebtedness_Additional_Inform

Indebtedness - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	0 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	31-May-13	Jan. 10, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Short-term Debt [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Repayment of short-term borrowings	$1,200,000	$6,900,000	$1,860,000	$6,914,000	$210,000
Alphagraph [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Short-term Debt [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Capital lease liabilities	'	'	'	100,000	'
Cretaprint [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Short-term Debt [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Long-term indebtedness consisting of pre-acquisition financing obligations	'	'	200,000	'	'
Technique [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Short-term Debt [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Repayment of short-term borrowings	'	'	'	$300,000	'
Building loan percentage	'	'	'	6.75%	'
Building mortgage, maturity term	'	'	'	'10 years	'
Notes Payable to Banks [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Short-term Debt [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Weighted average interest rate	'	'	5.00%	'	'
Lines of Credit [Member]	'	'	'	'	'
Short-term Debt [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'
Weighted average interest rate	'	'	4.50%	'	'

Commitments_and_Contingencies_1

Commitments and Contingencies - Additional Information (Detail)

0 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Nov. 01, 2012

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2011

Oct. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

USD ($)

USD ($)

USD ($)

USD ($)

USD ($)

California [Member]

April 26, 2013 Purchase Date [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Perfectproof [Member]

Perfectproof [Member]

Kerajet [Member]

Kerajet [Member]

Entrac, Cretaprint, Streamline, Ops And Alphagraph [Member]

Entrac and Alphagraph [Member]

sqft

sqft

USD ($)

California [Member]

USD ($)

USD ($)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

USD ($)

acre

sqft

USD ($)

sqft

Business Acquisition, Contingent Consideration [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Fair value of earnouts

'

$21,052,000

$38,050,000

$8,704,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Contingent liability, current

'

14,803,000

21,286,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Contingent liability, noncurrent

'

6,300,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Potential earnout payment undiscounted

'

16,683,000

968,000

'

'

'

'

2,400,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

Fair value of contingent consideration decreased, net

'

-1,563,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

-7,100,000

-2,100,000

Earnout interest accretion

'

1,400,000

1,700,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stop loss deductible

'

125,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Contingent liability accrued

'

2,554,000

1,375,000

1,640,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Selling price of property and other related assets

179,700,000

91,000

179,173,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Area of real estate property

294,000

'

'

'

'

'

119,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Acres of land sold

4

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Deferred proceeds from property transaction

'

183,200,000

180,216,000

'

183,200,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Pledged funds classified as land, buildings, and improvements within property and equipment, net

'

'

56,900,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Funding of Lease

'

'

82.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Term of ground lease

'

'

'30 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Total cash paid to acquire facility

'

'

'

'

'

'

21,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Build-out and construction costs

'

'

'

'

'

'

20,800,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Rent expenses

'

6,100,000

7,100,000

6,600,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Sublease rental income

'

3,100,000

1,700,000

800,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Lease term

'

'15 years

'

'

'

'15 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Area of leased property

'

59,000

'

'

'

59,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Lease base rent plus other charges and expenses

'

'

'

'

'

18,400,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Build out and structural improvements paid by lessor

'

'

'

'

'

4,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Additional build-out and construction costs

'

4,900,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Property and equipment including capitalized interest

'

11,100,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Imputed financing obligation

'

11,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Damages claimed

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,100,000

600,000

3,300,000

2,500,000

'

'

Additional damages claimed

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

300,000

'

'

'

'

Estimated loss, minimum

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1

'

'

'

'

'

Estimated loss, maximum

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$1,100,000

'

'

'

'

'

Commitments_and_Contingencies_2

Commitments and Contingencies - Future Minimum Lease Payments under Non-Cancellable Operating Leases and Future Minimum Sublease Receipts (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]	'
2014, Future Minimum Lease Payments	$5,110
2015, Future Minimum Lease Payments	3,568
2016, Future Minimum Lease Payments	2,857
2017, Future Minimum Lease Payments	3,569
2018, Future Minimum Lease Payments	2,917
Thereafter, Future Minimum Lease Payments	17,543
Total, Future Minimum Lease Payments	35,564
2014, Future Minimum Sublease Income	108
2015, Future Minimum Sublease Income	108
2016, Future Minimum Sublease Income	108
2017, Future Minimum Sublease Income	27
2018, Future Minimum Sublease Income	'
Thereafter, Future Minimum Sublease Income	'
Total, Future Minimum Sublease Income	$351

Commitments_and_Contingencies_3

Commitments and Contingencies - Changes in Product Warranty Reserve (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]	'	'
Balance at January 1	$10,158	$8,877
Accrued warranty assumed upon acquisition of Cretaprint	'	1,386
Provisions, net of releases	11,267	10,122
Settlements	-10,378	-10,227
Balance at December 31	$11,047	$10,158

Common_Stock_Repurchase_Progra1

Common Stock Repurchase Programs - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	12 Months Ended			1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended				0 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
Share data in Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Nov. 06, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Aug. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Nov. 06, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013
					Share Repurchase Program Two Thousand And Twelve [Member]	Share Repurchase Program Two Thousand And Twelve [Member]	Share Repurchase Program Two Thousand And Twelve [Member]	Net Share Settlement [Member]	Net Share Settlement [Member]	Share Repurchase Program Two Thousand And Thirteen [Member]	Share Repurchase Program Two Thousand And Thirteen [Member]
Stock Repurchase Program [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Repurchase of common stock, authorized amount	'	'	'	'	$100,000,000	'	'	'	'	$200,000,000	'
Aggregate shares purchased	'	'	'	'	'	700	1,300	500	400	'	100
Aggregate purchase price	'	35,734,000	35,176,000	45,841,000	'	19,300,000	22,900,000	'	'	'	2,500,000
Authorized remaining amount of common stock canceled	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	58,000,000	'
Value of shares surrendered to satisfy tax withholding obligations	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	13,900,000	12,300,000	'	'
Retirement of treasury stock	34,000	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Carrying value of treasury stock retired	$592,400,000	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'

Derivatives_and_Hedging_Additi

Derivatives and Hedging - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
Schedule Of Notional Amount Of Derivatives [Line Items]	'	'
Notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities	$27.20	$3.20
Foreign Exchange Contracts [Member]	'	'
Schedule Of Notional Amount Of Derivatives [Line Items]	'	'
Notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities	2.5	2.7
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments [Member] | Euro-denominated Intercompany Loans [Member]	'	'
Schedule Of Notional Amount Of Derivatives [Line Items]	'	'
Notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities	24.7	'
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments [Member] | Indian Rupee Net Monetary Assets [Member]	'	'
Schedule Of Notional Amount Of Derivatives [Line Items]	'	'
Notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities	0.5	'
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments [Member] | Forward Contracts [Member]	'	'
Schedule Of Notional Amount Of Derivatives [Line Items]	'	'
Notional amount of derivative assets and liabilities	$24.70	$0.50

Income_Taxes_Components_of_Inc

Income Taxes - Components of Income before Income Taxes (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'	'	'
U.S.	$127,232	$5,615	$3,143
Foreign	45,906	29,408	27,277
Income before income taxes	$173,138	$35,023	$30,420

Income_Taxes_Provision_for_Ben

Income Taxes - Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'	'	'
U.S. Federal	$6,589	($4,788)	$1,685
State	-3,250	1,841	1,202
Foreign	6,845	7,522	2,759
Total current	10,184	4,575	5,646
U.S. Federal	20,875	-35,487	-688
State	33,532	-9,648	-1,114
Foreign	-560	-7,686	-889
Total deferred	53,846	-52,821	-2,691
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	($64,031)	$48,246	($2,955)

Income_Taxes_Reconciliation_Be

Income Taxes - Reconciliation Between Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Computed at Federal Statutory Rate and Actual Tax Provision (Benefit) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'	'	'
Tax provision at federal statutory rate	$60,598	$12,257	$10,647
State income taxes, net of federal benefit	467	-5,074	57
Research and development credits	-6,793	-629	-2,274
Foreign tax rate differential	-7,417	-300	-4,626
Non-deductible acquisition & integration costs	58	720	'
Increase in value of intangible assets	'	-6,494	'
Reduction in accrual for estimated potential tax assessments	-4,427	-11,431	-2,295
Capital loss due to liquidation of subsidiary	'	-38,859	'
Non-deductible stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718-740	1,764	1,528	2,179
Valuation allowance changes affecting provision for income taxes	20,012	274	-706
Benefit related to reassessment of taxes from filing of prior year tax returns	-72	'	'
Other	-159	-610	-395
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	($64,031)	$48,246	($2,955)
Tax provision at federal statutory rate	35.00%	35.00%	35.00%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit	0.30%	-14.50%	0.20%
Research and development credits	-3.90%	-1.80%	-7.50%
Foreign tax rate differential	-4.30%	-0.90%	-15.20%
Non-deductible acquisition & integration costs	-0.10%	2.00%	'
Increase in value of intangible assets	'	-18.50%	'
Reduction in accrual for estimated potential tax assessments	-2.60%	-32.60%	-7.60%
Capital loss due to liquidation of subsidiary	'	-111.10%	'
Non-deductible stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718-740	1.00%	4.40%	7.20%
Valuation allowance changes affecting provision for income taxes	11.60%	0.80%	-2.30%
Benefit related to reassessment of taxes from filing of prior year tax returns	-0.10%	'	'
Other	-0.10%	-1.70%	-1.30%
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	36.80%	-138.90%	8.50%

Income_Taxes_Additional_Inform

Income Taxes - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax [Line Items]	'	'	'
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$28,845,000	$2,624,000	'
Benefit from renewal of U.S. federal research and development tax credit	3,200,000	'	'
Provision for reassessment of tax exposure related to filing of prior year tax returns	-72,000	'	'
Tax expense required to correctly state the prior year tax provision	1,800,000	'	'
Amount offset in prior year tax provision	1,900,000	'	'
U.S. Statutory income tax rate	35.00%	35.00%	35.00%
Recognition of a tax benefit related to increase of intangible assets	-64,031,000	48,246,000	-2,955,000
Unremitted foreign earnings reinvested	70,500,000	'	'
Amount of tax remitted on foreign earnings	9,100,000	'	'
Unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized	33,000,000	29,800,000	35,600,000
Amounts netted against related deferred tax assets	1,100,000	2,400,000	2,500,000
Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits	1,000,000	1,200,000	1,700,000
Unrecognized tax benefits decrease in next 12 months	3,300,000	'	'
California [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax [Line Items]	'	'	'
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	26,200,000	'	'
Minimum [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax [Line Items]	'	'	'
Losses and credit expire	'2021	'	'
Maximum [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax [Line Items]	'	'	'
Losses and credit expire	'2031	'	'
State tax jurisdictions [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax [Line Items]	'	'	'
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	19,400,000	'	'
U.S. federal [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax [Line Items]	'	'	'
Loss carryforwards	23,800,000	'	'
Credit carryforwards	30,900,000	'	'
State [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax [Line Items]	'	'	'
Loss carryforwards	50,800,000	'	'
Credit carryforwards	$28,600,000	'	'

Income_Taxes_Tax_Effects_of_Te

Income Taxes - Tax Effects of Temporary Differences that Give Rise to Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities) (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'	'
Reserves and accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes	$14,157	$8,021
Net operating loss carryforwards	11,264	11,690
Tax credit carryforwards	57,000	47,347
Stock-based compensation	8,856	7,066
Deferred gain on sale of building and land	'	47,866
Deferred revenue	2,463	2,708
Other	2,494	-677
Gross deferred tax assets	96,234	124,021
Depreciation	-3,985	-2,554
Amortization of identified intangibles	-13,163	-13,788
State taxes	-1,746	-4,873
Gross deferred tax liabilities	-18,894	-21,215
Deferred tax valuation allowance	-28,845	-2,624
Net deferred tax assets	$48,495	$100,182

Income_Taxes_Reconciliation_of

Income Taxes - Reconciliation of Change in Gross Unrecognized Tax Benefits (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax Contingency [Line Items]	'	'	'
Ending Balance	$33,011,000	$29,755,000	'
Federal, State, and Foreign Tax [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax Contingency [Line Items]	'	'	'
Beginning Balance	29,000,000	34,600,000	31,700,000
Additions for tax positions of prior years	2,700,000	100,000	'
Additions for tax positions	7,300,000	5,000,000	5,600,000
Reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1,900,000	'	-100,000
Settlements	-1,100,000	-400,000	-600,000
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations	-3,600,000	-10,300,000	-2,000,000
Ending Balance	32,400,000	29,000,000	34,600,000
Accrued Interest and Penalties [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax Contingency [Line Items]	'	'	'
Beginning Balance	800,000	1,000,000	800,000
Additions for tax positions of prior years	300,000	300,000	400,000
Settlements	-100,000	'	-100,000
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations	-400,000	-500,000	-100,000
Ending Balance	600,000	800,000	1,000,000
Gross Unrecognized Income Tax Benefits [Member]	'	'	'
Income Tax Contingency [Line Items]	'	'	'
Beginning Balance	29,800,000	35,600,000	32,500,000
Additions for tax positions of prior years	3,000,000	400,000	400,000
Additions for tax positions	7,300,000	5,000,000	5,600,000
Reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1,900,000	'	-100,000
Settlements	-1,200,000	-400,000	-700,000
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations	-4,000,000	-10,800,000	-2,100,000
Ending Balance	$33,000,000	$29,800,000	$35,600,000

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Equity_

Employee Benefit Plans - Equity Incentive Plans - Additional Information (Detail)

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Jun. 04, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2011

31-May-11

Jun. 30, 2009

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2011

Jun. 07, 2006

Plans

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2007 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2007 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2007 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2007 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2007 Equity Incentive Award Plan [Member]

2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]

2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]

2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]

2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]

2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]

2004 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]

Employees and Consultants [Member]

Non-Employee Director [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Stock Plan Assumed Through Acquisition [Member]

Employees

Employees

Maximum [Member]

Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of equity incentive plans with outstanding equity awards

3

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of prior equity incentive plans with outstanding equity awards

2

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Common stock reserved under the plan for future issuance

'

'

11,600,000

'

'

7,000,000

5,000,000

'

'

'

'

3,300,000

'

'

'

'

8,400,000

'

'

'

'

100,000

Vesting period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'3 years

'4 years

'

'

'

'3 years

'4 years

'

'42 months

'48 months

'

'

'

Expiration period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'7 years

'10 years

'

'

'

'7 years

'10 years

'

'7 years

'10 years

'

'

'

Option price as percentage of fair market value

'

100.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

100.00%

'

'

'

'

100.00%

'

'

'

'

'

Number of employees eligible to participate in plan

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2,800

5

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Shares outstanding

'

2,700,000

'

3,200,000

3,400,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

500,000

600,000

900,000

'

'

'

'

100,000

100,000

600,000

'

Shares available for grant

'

4,500,000

'

800,000

2,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Vesting period, minimum

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'1 year

'3 years

'

'

'

Percentage of aggregate shares of common stock reserved

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

10.00%

'

'

'

'

'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Amended

Employee Benefit Plans - Amended and Restated 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2009	Aug. 01, 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'
Unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the ESPP, recognition period	'10 months 24 days	'	'	'	'	'
ESPP [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'
Increase in the number of shares available to be sold under the ESPP	'	'	'	2,000,000	3,000,000	'
Common stock reserved under the plan for future issuance	'	'	'	'	'	400,000
Percentage of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day of December in the immediately preceding calendar year	0.75%	'	'	'	'	'
Maximum annual increase in the number of shares available to be sold under ESPP prior to amendment	2,500,000	'	'	'	'	'
Maximum value of shares employees can purchase	$25,000	'	'	'	'	'
Option price as percentage of fair market value	85.00%	'	'	'	'	'
Maximum offering period	'27 months	'	'	'	'	'
Shares issued under the ESPP	600,000	600,000	600,000	'	'	'
Stock issued under ESPP, average purchase price	$12,390,000	$12,240,000	$9,490,000	'	'	'
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the ESPP	$800,000	'	'	'	'	'
Unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the ESPP, recognition period	'1 year 9 months 18 days	'	'	'	'	'
Shares available for issuance under the ESPP	2,400,000	1,000,000	1,500,000	'	'	'
ESPP [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'
Percentage of employee contribution to plan from base salary	1.00%	'	'	'	'	'
ESPP [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'
Percentage of employee contribution to plan from base salary	10.00%	'	'	'	'	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Employe

Employee Benefit Plans - Employee 401(k) Plan - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Percentage employee contribution matched by the Company	50.00%	'	'
Maximum employee contribution matched by the Company	4.00%	'	'
401k vesting period	'4 years	'	'
Employee contribution matched by the company	$2	$1.90	$1.70
Minimum [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Employees contribution out of annual compensation	1.00%	'	'
Maximum [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Employees contribution out of annual compensation	40.00%	'	'
Maximum [Member] | Scenario Forecast [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Employees contribution out of annual compensation	75.00%	'	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Schedul

Employee Benefit Plans - Schedule of Stock-Based Compensation Expense (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total stock-based compensation	$25,770	$19,721	$23,369
Tax effect of stock-based compensation	-7,535	-5,682	-7,598
Net effect on net income	18,235	14,039	15,771
Employee Stock Options [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total stock-based compensation	921	1,039	2,096
Non-vested RSUs and RSAs [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total stock-based compensation	22,026	15,750	17,926
ESPP [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Total stock-based compensation	$2,823	$2,932	$3,347

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Valuati

Employee Benefit Plans - Valuation Assumptions for Stock Options and ESPP Purchases - Additional Information (Detail)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]	'	'	'
Options granted	0	126	140

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Schedul1

Employee Benefit Plans - Schedule of Estimated Per Share Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Option Granted and Assumptions Used to Estimate Fair Value (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Stock Options [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average fair value per share	'	$6.62	$5.77
Expected volatility	'	43.80%	48.00%
Risk-free interest rate	'	0.50%	0.80%
Expected term (in years)	'	'4 years	'4 years
ESPP [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average fair value per share	$7.53	$4.70	$4.79
Minimum [Member] | ESPP [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Expected volatility	25.00%	32.00%	28.00%
Risk-free interest rate	0.10%	0.10%	0.20%
Expected term (in years)	'6 months	'6 months	'6 months
Maximum [Member] | ESPP [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Expected volatility	38.00%	49.00%	42.00%
Risk-free interest rate	0.40%	0.20%	0.60%
Expected term (in years)	'2 years	'2 years	'2 years

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Schedul2

Employee Benefit Plans - Schedule of Stock Options Outstanding and Exercisable (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]	'	'	'
Options outstanding, beginning balance	1,536	2,453	2,529
Weighted average exercise price, Options outstanding, beginning balance	$14.19	$14.67	$14.64
Shares, Options granted	0	126	140
Shares, Options forfeited and expired	-42	-258	-70
Shares, Options forfeited and expired, net of granted	-42	-132	70
Shares, Options exercised	-434	-785	-146
Shares, Options outstanding, ending balance	1,060	1,536	2,453
Shares, Options vested and expected to vest, ending balance	1,046	'	'
Options exercisable, ending balance	887	'	'
Weighted average exercise price, Options granted	'	$16.57	$15.33
Weighted average exercise price, Options forfeited and expired	$25.63	$15.74	$18.24
Weighted average exercise price, Options exercised	$11.93	$15.56	$13.10
Weighted average exercise price, Options outstanding, ending balance	$14.66	$14.19	$14.67
Weighted average exercise price, Options vested and expected to vest, ending balance	$14.65	'	'
Weighted average exercise price, Options exercisable, ending balance	$14.57	'	'
Weighted average remaining contractual term (years), Options outstanding	'2 years 10 months 10 days	'	'
Weighted average remaining contractual term (years), Options vested and expected to vest	'2 years 9 months 29 days	'	'
Weighted average remaining contractual term (years), Options exercisable	'2 years 5 months 16 days	'	'
Aggregate intrinsic value, Options outstanding	$25,526	'	'
Aggregate intrinsic value, Options vested and expected to vest	25,193	'	'
Aggregate intrinsic value, Options exercisable	$21,422	'	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Stock_O

Employee Benefit Plans - Stock Option Activity - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]	'	'	'
Intrinsic value of options exercised	$5.50	$1.40	$0.60
Unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options	$0.30	'	'
Unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options, weighted average period	'10 months 24 days	'	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Summary

Employee Benefit Plans - Summary of Stock Options Outstanding and Exercisable Range of Exercise Prices (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Options outstanding, Shares	1,060
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'2 years 10 months 10 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$14.66
Options exercisable, Shares	887
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$14.57
Range of Exercise Prices $9.12 to $10.80 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$9.12
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$10.80
Options outstanding, Shares	73
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'2 years 7 months 13 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$10.46
Options exercisable, Shares	56
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$10.36
Range of Exercise Prices $11.40 to $11.40 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$11.40
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$11.40
Options outstanding, Shares	130
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'3 years 7 months 21 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$11.40
Options exercisable, Shares	124
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$11.40
Range of Exercise Prices $11.92 to $13.72 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$11.92
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$13.72
Options outstanding, Shares	155
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'3 years 5 months 23 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$12.83
Options exercisable, Shares	143
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$12.75
Range of Exercise Prices $14.28 to $15.25 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$14.28
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$15.25
Options outstanding, Shares	86
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'4 years 10 months 2 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$14.28
Options exercisable, Shares	44
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$14.29
Range of Exercise Prices $15.88 to $15.88 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$15.88
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$15.88
Options outstanding, Shares	350
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'1 year 1 month 28 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$15.88
Options exercisable, Shares	350
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$15.88
Range of Exercise Prices $16.32 to $16.32 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$16.32
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$16.32
Options outstanding, Shares	101
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'1 year 7 months 13 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$16.32
Options exercisable, Shares	101
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$16.32
Range of Exercise Prices $16.57 to $16.57 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$16.57
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$16.57
Options outstanding, Shares	117
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'5 years 8 months 5 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$16.57
Options exercisable, Shares	33
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$16.57
Range of Exercise Prices $17.97 to $26.67 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$17.97
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$26.67
Options outstanding, Shares	46
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'3 years 10 months 6 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$18.87
Options exercisable, Shares	34
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$19.15
Range of Exercise Prices $28.34 to $28.51 [Member]	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'
Range of exercise price, lower limit	$28.34
Range of exercise price, upper limit	$28.51
Options outstanding, Shares	2
Options outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)	'4 months 28 days
Options outstanding, Weighted average exercise price	$28.51
Options exercisable, Shares	2
Options exercisable, Weighted average exercise price	$28.51

Employee_Benefit_Plans_NonVest

Employee Benefit Plans - Non-Vested RSUs and RSAs - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
RSUs [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average fair value of restricted stock units granted	$29.11	$16.05	$15.09
Restricted Stock Awards [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Weighted average fair value of restricted stock units granted	$0	$0	$0
Minimum [Member] | RSUs [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Vesting period	'2 years	'	'
Minimum [Member] | Restricted Stock Awards [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Vesting period	'2 years	'	'
Maximum [Member] | RSUs [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Vesting period	'4 years	'	'
Maximum [Member] | Restricted Stock Awards [Member]	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'
Vesting period	'4 years	'	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Schedul3

Employee Benefit Plans - Schedule of Non-Vested Shares of RSUs and RSAs (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
RSUs [Member]	'	'	'
Nonvested Restricted Stock Units Activity [Line Items]	'	'	'
Shares, Non-vested, beginning balance	2,345	2,502	2,538
Shares, Restricted stock granted	1,222	1,281	1,505
Shares, Restricted stock vested	-1,159	-1,291	-1,317
Shares, Restricted stock forfeited	-319	-147	-224
Shares, Non-vested, ending balance	2,089	2,345	2,502
Weighted average grant date fair value, Non-vested, beginning balance	$15.26	$13.60	$11.67
Weighted average grant date fair value, Restricted stock granted	$29.11	$16.05	$15.09
Weighted average grant date fair value, Restricted stock vested	$14.41	$13.05	$11.87
Weighted average grant date fair value, Restricted stock forfeited	$17.78	$13.40	$11.89
Weighted average grant date fair value, Non-vested, ending balance	$23.44	$15.26	$13.60
RSAs [Member]	'	'	'
Nonvested Restricted Stock Units Activity [Line Items]	'	'	'
Shares, Non-vested, beginning balance	'	'	101
Shares, Restricted stock vested	'	'	-101
Weighted average grant date fair value, Non-vested, beginning balance	'	'	$27.21
Weighted average grant date fair value, Restricted stock vested	'	'	($27.21)

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Vested_

Employee Benefit Plans - Vested RSUs and RSAs - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended				12 Months Ended
In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
				Restricted Stock Awards [Member]	Performance-Based Stock Options [Member]	RSUs [Member]	RSUs [Member]	RSUs [Member]
Fair value of RSUs vested during the year	'	'	'	'	'	$14.41	$16.90	$20.20
Aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs vested and expected to vest	'	'	'	'	'	72	'	'
Number of RSUs vested and expected to vest	'	'	'	'	'	1,900,000	'	'
Unrecognized compensation expense other than options	'	'	'	$0.10	'	$16.40	'	'
Weighted average period of recognition of unrecognized compensation cost	'10 months 24 days	'	'	'	'	'1 year 1 month 6 days	'	'
Options granted during the period	0	126,000	140,000	'	32,674	'	'	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Summary1

Employee Benefit Plans - Summary of Performance-Based and Market-Based RSUs 2012 and 2013 Grants (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted	0	126,000	140,000	'
Shares Vested, Dates	15-Mar-11	'	'	'
Shares Outstanding	1,060,000	1,536,000	2,453,000	2,529,000
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2013 Grants [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Forfeited	-15,570	'	'	'
Shares Outstanding	228,542	'	'	'
Service Period (years)	'1 year	'	'	'
Grant date fair value	5.7	'	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2013 Grants [Member] | 2/21/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	21-Feb-13	'	'	'
Shares Granted	234,519	'	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2013 Grants [Member] | 3/27/2013 [Member] | Shares Grant One [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	27-Mar-13	'	'	'
Shares Granted	2,660	'	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2013 Grants [Member] | 3/27/2013 [Member] | Shares Grant Two [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	27-Mar-13	'	'	'
Shares Granted	5,920	'	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2013 Grants [Member] | 5/10/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	10-May-13	'	'	'
Shares Granted	1,013	'	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Forfeited	'	-117,694	'	'
Service Period (years)	'	'1 year	'	'
Grant date fair value	'	4.9	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 2/9/2012 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	9-Feb-12	'	'
Shares Granted	'	51,286	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 2/13/2012 [Member] | Shares Grant One [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	13-Feb-12	'	'
Shares Granted	'	207,448	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 2/13/2012 [Member] | Shares Grant Two [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	13-Feb-12	'	'
Shares Granted	'	15,000	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 5/11/2012 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	11-May-12	'	'
Shares Granted	'	9,116	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 2/22/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	22-Feb-13	'	'
Shares Vested	'	-157,140	'	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 5/11/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	11-May-13	'	'
Shares Vested	'	-8,016	'	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2013 Grants [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Outstanding	280,305	'	'	'
Service Period (years)	'4 years	'	'	'
Grant date fair value	8.6	'	'	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2013 Grants [Member] | 8/15/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	15-Aug-13	'	'	'
Shares Granted	280,305	'	'	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Forfeited	'	-18,333	'	'
Shares Outstanding	'	109,393	'	'
Service Period (years)	'	'3 years	'	'
Grant date fair value	'	3	'	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 8/15/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	15-Aug-13	'	'
Shares Vested	'	-63,868	'	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2012 Grants [Member] | 5/18/2012 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	18-May-12	'	'
Shares Granted	'	191,594	'	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Summary2

Employee Benefit Plans - Summary of Performance-Based and Market-Based RSUs 2011 Grants (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	15-Mar-11	'	'	'
Shares Granted	0	126,000	140,000	'
Shares Outstanding	1,060,000	1,536,000	2,453,000	2,529,000
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Forfeited	'	'	-35,673	'
Service Period (years)	'	'	'1 year	'
Grant date fair value	'	'	5	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/9/2011 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	'	9-Feb-11	'
Shares Granted	'	'	312,097	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/25/2011 [Member] | Shares Grant One [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	'	25-Feb-11	'
Shares Granted	'	'	1,503	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/25/2011 [Member] | Shares Grant Two [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	'	25-Feb-11	'
Shares Granted	'	'	10,000	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/9/2012 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	9-Feb-12	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-93,423	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/13/2012 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	13-Feb-12	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-185,251	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/25/2012 [Member] | Shares Grant One [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-1,503	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/25/2012 [Member] | Shares Grant Two [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-7,750	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/25/2012 [Member] | Shares Vested One [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	25-Feb-12	'
Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/25/2012 [Member] | Shares Vested Two [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	25-Feb-12	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Forfeited	'	'	-14,287	'
Shares Outstanding	'	'	53,759	'
Service Period (years)	'	'	'3 years	'
Grant date fair value	'	'	3	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 8/15/2011 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Outstanding	'	'	8,000	'
Service Period (years)	'	'	'7 years	'
Grant date fair value	'	'	0.1	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 8/15/2011 [Member] | Shares Grant One [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	'	15-Aug-11	'
Shares Granted	'	'	195,156	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 8/15/2011 [Member] | Shares Grant Two [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	'	15-Aug-11	'
Shares Granted	'	'	8,000	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 5/23/2012 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	23-May-12	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-64,909	'
Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 8/15/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	15-Aug-13	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-62,201	'
Market-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Derived Service Period (years)	'	'	'3 years 11 months 5 days	'
Grant date fair value	'	'	1.1	'
Risk-free interest rate	'	'	2.90%	'
Volatility	'	'	40.00%	'
Market-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 1/5/2011 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Granted, Dates	'	'	5-Jan-11	'
Shares Granted	'	'	90,000	'
Market-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 5/10/2011 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	10-May-11	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-28,000	'
Market-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 2/7/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	7-Feb-13	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-31,000	'
Market-Based RSUs [Member] | 2011 Grants [Member] | 4/1/2013 [Member]	'	'	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Shares Vested, Dates	'	'	1-Apr-13	'
Shares Vested	'	'	-31,000	'

Employee_Benefit_Plans_Summary3

Employee Benefit Plans - Summary of Performance-Based and Market-Based RSUs 2009 and 2010 Grants (Detail) (USD $)

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified

Dec. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2010

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2010

Dec. 31, 2010

Dec. 31, 2010

Dec. 31, 2010

Roe Driven Performance Based Rsus [Member]

Roe Driven Performance Based Rsus [Member]

Roe Driven Performance Based Rsus [Member]

Market-Based Options [Member]

Market-Based Options [Member]

Market-Based Options [Member]

Market-Based Options [Member]

Market-Based Options [Member]

Market-Based Options [Member]

Market-Based RSUs [Member]

Market-Based RSUs [Member]

Market-Based RSUs [Member]

Market-Based RSUs [Member]

Market-Based RSUs [Member]

Market-Based RSUs [Member]

Market-Based RSUs [Member]

Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member]

Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member]

Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member]

Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based RSUs [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2009 Grants [Member]

2010 Grants [Member]

2010 Grants [Member]

2010 Grants [Member]

2010 Grants [Member]

8/28/2009 [Member]

2/9/2012 [Member]

8/28/2009 [Member]

4/27/2011 [Member]

1/14/2013 [Member]

2/11/2013 [Member]

3/25/2013 [Member]

8/28/2009 [Member]

6/18/2009 [Member]

1/1/2011 [Member]

1/10/2011 [Member]

12/17/2012 [Member]

12/13/2013 [Member]

3/2/2010 [Member]

8/1/2010 [Member]

3/2/2011 [Member]

Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Shares Granted, Dates

'

'

'

'

'

28-Aug-09

'

'

28-Aug-09

'

'

'

'

'

28-Aug-09

18-Jun-09

'

'

'

'

'

2-Mar-10

1-Aug-10

'

Shares Vested, Dates

15-Mar-11

'

'

'

'

'

9-Feb-12

'

'

27-Apr-11

14-Jan-13

11-Feb-13

25-Mar-13

'

'

'

1-Jan-11

10-Jan-11

17-Dec-12

13-Dec-13

'

'

'

2-Mar-11

Shares Granted

0

126,000

140,000

'

'

32,674

'

'

294,076

'

'

'

'

'

15,000

83,000

'

'

'

'

'

384,875

12,000

'

Shares Vested

'

'

'

'

'

'

-5,298

'

'

-59,598

-43,706

-43,706

-43,706

'

'

'

-5,000

-24,335

-24,335

-24,330

'

'

'

-305,940

Shares Forfeited

'

'

'

'

-11,836

'

'

-103,360

'

'

'

'

'

-20,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

-90,935

'

'

'

Shares Outstanding

1,060,000

1,536,000

2,453,000

2,529,000

15,540

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Derived Service Period (years)

'

'

'

'

'3 years 8 months 16 days

'

'

'4 years 10 months 17 days

'

'

'

'

'

'4 years 4 months 6 days

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Service Period (years)

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'1 year

'

'

'

Grant date fair value

'

'

'

'

$0.10

'

'

$1.70

'

'

'

'

'

$0.90

'

'

'

'

'

'

$4.70

'

'

'

Risk-free interest rate

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

3.10%

'

'

'

'

'

3.50%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Volatility

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

50.00%

'

'

'

'

'

50.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Gain_on_Sale_of_Building_and_L2

Gain on Sale of Building and Land - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	3 Months Ended				12 Months Ended	13 Months Ended
	Nov. 01, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
	sqft
	acre
Property Plant And Equipment Useful Life And Values [Abstract]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Area of real estate property	294,000	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Acres of land sold	4	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Selling price of property and other related assets	$179,700,000	'	'	'	'	$179,700,000	'	'
Deferred proceeds from property transaction	'	183,200,000	'	'	'	183,200,000	183,200,000	180,216,000
Gain on sale of property	'	117,563,000	-236,000	-35,000	-76,000	117,216,000	'	'
Imputed financing and depreciation expenses, net of imputed sublease income	'	'	'	'	'	'	1,600,000	'
Building partially offset by capitalized interest	'	$1,100,000	'	'	'	'	'	'

Gain_on_Sale_of_Building_and_L3

Gain on Sale of Building and Land - Summary of Cost of Land, Building, and Improvements Included in Determination of Gain on Sale of Building and Land (Detail) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	3 Months Ended				12 Months Ended
	Nov. 01, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Sales proceeds	$179,700,000	'	'	'	'	$179,700,000	'	'
Imputed interest obligation	'	3,500,000	'	'	'	3,500,000	'	'
Deferred proceeds from property transaction	'	183,200,000	'	'	'	183,200,000	183,200,000	180,216,000
Gain on sale of building and land	'	-117,563,000	236,000	35,000	76,000	-117,216,000	'	'
Deferred Lease Financing Costs [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property subject to a sales agreement	'	-400,000	'	'	'	-400,000	'	'
Imputed Sublease Receivable [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property subject to a sales agreement	'	-3,600,000	'	'	'	-3,600,000	'	'
Relocation Costs [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property subject to a sales agreement	'	-1,300,000	'	'	'	-1,300,000	'	'
Direct Transaction Costs [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property subject to a sales agreement	'	-400,000	'	'	'	-400,000	'	'
Land, Building and Improvements [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Property subject to a sales agreement	'	($60,300,000)	'	'	'	($60,300,000)	'	'

Restructuring_and_Other_Additi

Restructuring and Other - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
	Employees	Employees	Employees
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]	'	'	'
Restructuring and other costs	$4,834,000	$5,803,000	$3,258,000
Severance costs	2,200,000	2,900,000	1,700,000
Reductions in number of head count	106	117	55
Facilities restructuring and other costs	300,000	300,000	600,000
Facilities relocation cost	'	'	400,000
Integration expenses	1,400,000	1,700,000	1,000,000
Commercial Real Estate Market [Member]	'	'	'
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]	'	'	'
Charges resulting from decrease in estimated sublease income	'	'	200,000
Cretaprint [Member]	'	'	'
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]	'	'	'
Retention expenses	$900,000	$900,000	'

Restructuring_and_Other_Restru

Restructuring and Other - Restructuring and Other Reserve Activities (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Restructuring And Related Activities [Abstract]	'	'
Reserve balance at January 1	$1,670	$1,870
Restructuring charges	1,251	2,525
Other charges	3,583	3,278
Non-cash acquisition-related compensation costs	-940	-907
Cash payments	-4,691	-5,096
Reserve balance at December 31	$873	$1,670

Segment_Information_Geographic2

Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		12 Months Ended						12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013
			Xerox [Member]	Xerox [Member]	Xerox and Ricoh [Member]	United States [Member]	Europe, Middle East, and Africa ('EMEA") [Member]	APAC [Member]	Industrial Inkjet [Member]	Productivity Software [Member]	Operating Segment [Member]
											Segment
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Number of operating segments	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	3
Increase in goodwill	$1,187	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$801	$386	'
Property and equipment, net	$86,582	$84,829	'	'	'	$80,100	$3,500	$1,200	'	'	'
Customers providing more than 10% of revenues	'	'	12.00%	12.00%	26.00%	'	'	'	'	'	'
Accounts receivable greater than 10% of net consolidated receivable	10.00%	13.00%	13.00%	10.00%	'	'	'	'	'	'	'

Segment_Information_Geographic3

Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers - Summary of Operating Segment Profit (Gross Profit), Excluding Stock-Based Compensation Expense by Segment (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Revenue	$197,213	$178,823	$180,298	$171,359	$174,105	$154,074	$163,901	$160,056	$727,693	$652,137	$591,556
Industrial Inkjet [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Gross profit percentages	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	40.00%	40.00%	'
Operating Segment [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Gross profit	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	396,983	356,014	332,647
Operating Segment [Member] | Industrial Inkjet [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	354,614	320,228	240,318
Gross profit	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	140,095	127,783	92,738
Gross profit percentages	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	39.50%	39.90%	38.60%
Operating Segment [Member] | Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	118,409	103,466	81,165
Gross profit	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	85,246	74,426	56,825
Gross profit percentages	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	72.00%	71.90%	70.00%
Operating Segment [Member] | Fiery [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	254,670	228,443	270,073
Gross profit	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$171,642	$153,805	$183,084
Gross profit percentages	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	67.40%	67.30%	67.80%

Segment_Information_Geographic4

Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers - Reconciliation of Operating Segment Gross Profit to Consolidated Statements of Operations (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Gross profit	$106,110	$97,213	$97,983	$93,860	$94,285	$83,077	$89,792	$87,667	$395,166	$354,821	$330,983
Operating Segment [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment gross profit	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	396,983	356,014	332,647
Segment Reconciling Items [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation expense	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	($1,817)	($1,193)	($1,664)

Segment_Information_Geographic5

Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers - Tangible and Intangible Assets, Net of Liabilities, Summarized by Operating Segment (Detail) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Goodwill	$233,203	$219,456	$164,323
Identified intangible assets, net	68,722	80,244	'
Industrial Inkjet [Member]	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Goodwill	61,704	60,745	36,508
Industrial Inkjet [Member] | Operating Segment [Member]	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Goodwill	61,704	60,745	'
Identified intangible assets, net	33,436	41,103	'
Tangible assets, net of liabilities	95,350	80,569	'
Net tangible and intangible assets	190,490	182,417	'
Productivity Software [Member]	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Goodwill	106,697	94,185	63,403
Productivity Software [Member] | Operating Segment [Member]	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Goodwill	106,697	94,185	'
Identified intangible assets, net	33,271	36,141	'
Tangible assets, net of liabilities	-14,388	-14,312	'
Net tangible and intangible assets	125,580	116,014	'
Fiery [Member]	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Goodwill	64,802	64,526	64,412
Fiery [Member] | Operating Segment [Member]	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'
Goodwill	64,801	64,526	'
Identified intangible assets, net	2,015	3,000	'
Tangible assets, net of liabilities	25,736	26,304	'
Net tangible and intangible assets	$92,552	$93,830	'

Segment_Information_Geographic6

Segment Information, Geographic Regions, and Major Customers - Revenue by Sales Origin (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total Revenue	$197,213	$178,823	$180,298	$171,359	$174,105	$154,074	$163,901	$160,056	$727,693	$652,137	$591,556
Reportable Geographical Components [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	727,693	652,137	591,556
Reportable Geographical Components [Member] | Americas [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	412,127	354,114	345,303
Reportable Geographical Components [Member] | Europe, Middle East, and Africa ('EMEA") [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	207,665	195,397	178,471
Reportable Geographical Components [Member] | APAC [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	107,901	102,626	67,782
Reportable Geographical Components [Member] | Japan [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	21,977	27,870	35,655
Reportable Geographical Components [Member] | APAC, ex Japan [Member]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total Revenue	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	$85,924	$74,756	$32,127

Subsequent_Event_Additional_In

Subsequent Event - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended			0 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jan. 16, 2014
				SmartLinc, Inc. [Member]
				Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Total cash paid to acquire business	$15,541	$66,050	$35,299	$4,400

Quarterly_Consolidated_Financi2

Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information - Schedule of Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Revenue	$197,213	$178,823	$180,298	$171,359	$174,105	$154,074	$163,901	$160,056	$727,693	$652,137	$591,556
Gross profit	106,110	97,213	97,983	93,860	94,285	83,077	89,792	87,667	395,166	354,821	330,983
Income from operations	139,497	13,876	11,821	9,454	11,821	4,006	10,379	7,681	174,648	33,886	27,333
Net income	75,180	16,141	9,424	8,362	56,619	13,411	7,005	6,234	109,107	83,269	27,465
Net income per basic common share	$1.60	$0.34	$0.20	$0.18	$1.22	$0.29	$0.15	$0.14	$2.34	$1.79	$0.59
Net income per diluted common share	$1.54	$0.33	$0.20	$0.17	$1.19	$0.28	$0.15	$0.13	$2.26	$1.74	$0.58
Gain on sale of building and land	117,563	-236	-35	-76	'	'	'	'	117,216	'	'
Tax benefit from capital loss due to liquidation of subsidiary	'	'	'	'	$43,600	'	'	'	'	'	'

Schedule_II_Valuation_and_Qual1

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Valuation And Qualifying Accounts [Abstract]	'	'	'
Balance at beginning of period	$12,850	$12,031	$13,167
Charged to revenue and expenses	9,595	3,250	2,010
Charged to (from) other accounts	'	'	346
Deductions	-6,012	-2,431	-3,492
Balance at end of period	$16,433	$12,850	$12,031