Electronics For Imaging (EFII) 10-Q 2016 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to            

Commission File Number: 000-18805

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	94-3086355
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6750 Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, CA 94555

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(650) 357-3500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 18, 2016 was 46,767,667.

Electronics For Imaging, Inc.

INDEX

		Page No.
PART I – Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015		6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		29
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		50
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		51
PART II – Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		52
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		52
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		53
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		53
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure		53
Item 5.	Other Information		53
Item 6.	Exhibits		53
Signatures			54
Exhibit 3.1
Exhibit 3.2
Exhibit 12.1
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 101

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Electronics For Imaging, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

(in thousands)	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	143,003		$	164,091
Short-term investments, available for sale		306,144			333,276
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $23.1 and $22.0 million, respectively		222,127			193,121
Inventories		106,929			106,378
Income taxes receivable		4,774			473
Assets held for sale		3,781			—
Other current assets		29,886			29,675
Total current assets		816,644			827,014
Property and equipment, net		102,243			97,779
Restricted investments and cash equivalents		3,750			—
Goodwill		368,997			338,793
Intangible assets, net		132,477			135,552
Deferred tax assets		54,513			41,043
Other assets		10,806			9,970
Total assets	$	1,489,430		$	1,450,151
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	102,383		$	113,541
Accrued and other liabilities		91,159			74,425
Deferred revenue		56,878			48,767
Income taxes payable		5,923			3,594
Total current liabilities		256,343			240,327
Convertible senior notes, net		300,977			290,734
Imputed financing obligation related to build-to-suit lease		14,060			13,480
Noncurrent contingent and other liabilities		56,106			51,101
Deferred tax liabilities		19,106			19,003
Noncurrent income taxes payable		12,265			11,312
Total liabilities		658,857			625,957
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000 shares authorized; 52,903 and 51,808 shares issued, respectively		529			518
Additional paid-in capital		699,877			657,354
Treasury stock, at cost; 6,046 and 4,476 shares, respectively		(255,793	)		(190,439	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(13,319	)		(17,424	)
Retained earnings		399,279			374,185
Total stockholders’ equity		830,573			824,194
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,489,430		$	1,450,151

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Electronics For Imaging, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenue	$	245,575		$	228,694		$	725,358		$	625,969
Cost of revenue(1)		120,381			112,409			356,720			295,841
Gross profit		125,194			116,285			368,638			330,128
Operating expenses:
Research and development(1)		36,933			36,125			111,731			103,913
Sales and marketing(1)		43,060			39,814			127,360			114,117
General and administrative (1)		24,088			18,223			66,366			54,210
Restructuring and other (Note 11)		1,308			584			5,733			2,544
Amortization of identified intangibles		10,395			8,759			29,360			18,120
Total operating expenses		115,784			103,505			340,550			292,904
Income from operations		9,410			12,780			28,088			37,224
Interest expense		(4,510	)		(4,634	)		(13,243	)		(12,870	)
Interest income and other income (expense), net		915			(645	)		1,114			(1,046	)
Income before income taxes		5,815			7,501			15,959			23,308
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes		11,847			2,756			9,041			(97	)
Net income	$	17,662		$	10,257		$	25,000		$	23,211
Net income per basic common share	$	0.38		$	0.22		$	0.53		$	0.49
Net income per diluted common share	$	0.37		$	0.21		$	0.52		$	0.48
Shares used in basic per-share calculation		46,794			47,473			46,983			47,104
Shares used in diluted per-share calculation		47,621			48,501			47,791			48,161

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows:

	2016		2015		2016		2015
Cost of revenue	$	642	$	785	$	1,873	$	2,357
Research and development		2,061		2,397		6,987		7,749
Sales and marketing		2,260		1,891		6,159		6,461
General and administrative		3,590		4,455		11,923		11,520

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Electronics For Imaging, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	Three months  ended September 30,						Nine months  ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2016			2015			2016		2015
Net income	$	17,662		$	10,257		$	25,000	$	23,211
Net unrealized investment gains (losses):
Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax benefit of $0.2 million and tax provision of $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and tax provisions of less than $0.1 and $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively		(316	)		30			785		317
Reclassification adjustments included in net income, net of tax benefit and tax provision of less than $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and less than $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015		(98	)		(12	)		16		(42	)
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		(414	)		18			801		275
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax provisions of $0.4 and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and net of no tax benefit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015		1,509			(4,192	)		3,293		(7,077	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges		27			(19	)		11		17
Comprehensive income	$	18,784		$	6,064		$	29,105	$	16,426

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Electronics For Imaging, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Nine months ended
	September 30,
(in thousands)	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	25,000		$	23,211
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		40,734			27,902
Deferred taxes		(22,127	)		(7,933	)
Tax benefit from employee stock plans		—			1,820
Provision for bad debts and sales-related allowances		7,558			3,724
Provision for inventory obsolescence		4,492			3,627
Stock-based compensation, net of cash settlements		26,743			27,777
Non-cash accretion of interest expense on convertible notes and imputed financing obligation		9,991			9,692
Other non-cash charges and credits		5,920			1,220
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquired companies		(42,487	)		(49,753	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		55,824			41,287
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments		(195,904	)		(243,065	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments		223,206			247,821
Purchases of restricted investments and cash equivalents		(3,745	)		—
Purchases, net of proceeds from sales, of property and equipment		(17,611	)		(13,146	)
Businesses purchased, net of cash acquired		(19,614	)		(65,480	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(13,668	)		(73,870	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		10,359			11,352
Purchases of treasury stock and net share settlements		(65,354	)		(50,892	)
Repayment of debt assumed through business acquisitions and debt issuance costs		(8,539	)		(22,589	)
Contingent consideration payments related to businesses acquired		(1,868	)		(3,034	)
Net cash used for financing activities		(65,402	)		(65,163	)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		2,158			(1,435	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(21,088	)		(99,181	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		164,091			298,133
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	143,003		$	198,952

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Electronics For Imaging, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements (“condensed consolidated financial statements”) include the accounts of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“EFI” or “Company”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP” or “GAAP”) for interim financial information, rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements, and accounting policies consistent in all material respects with those applied in preparing our audited annual consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. These condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with our annual consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, these condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, management considers necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position, operating results, comprehensive income, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Our results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Debt Issuance Costs. In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which became effective in the first quarter of 2016. ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt, which is consistent with the presentation of debt discounts and premiums. Retrospective application is required, which resulted in the reclassification of $5.8 million of debt issuance costs from other current assets and other assets to a direct reduction of our 0.75% Convertible Senior Notes, net, due 2019 (“Notes”) in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015.

Measurement Period Adjustments. The FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments, in September 2015, which became effective in the first quarter of 2016. The acquirer of a business is required to retrospectively adjust provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. These adjustments are required when new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date and, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts initially recognized or would have resulted in the recognition of additional assets or liabilities. Under previous guidance, the acquirer also must revise comparative prior period information, including depreciation, amortization, or other income effects as a result of changes made to provisional amounts. ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. The impact on our financial statements will be determined in the future if measurement period adjustments are identified.

Inventory Valuation. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which is effective in the first quarter of 2017. ASU 2015-11 requires that inventory be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We currently value inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value less a reasonable profit margin as allowed by current inventory valuation guidance. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We are evaluating the impact of ASU 2015-11 on our inventory valuation and results of operations.

Stock-based Compensation. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Stock Compensation – Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting, which is effective in the first quarter of 2017 with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt this standard in the second quarter of 2016, which required retroactive application of this standard as of the first quarter in 2016 resulting in the following:

• Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefits and deficiencies are recognized as income tax expense. Excess tax benefits of less than $0.1 million that were charged to additional paid-in capital in the first quarter of 2016 were reversed upon adoption. We recorded $2.2 million of deferred tax assets related to excess tax benefits for federal research and development income tax credits not previously benefitted.

7

• The requirement to reclassify gross excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation from operating to financing activities in the statement of cash flows is eliminated. The reclassification of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2016 has been reversed upon adoption. We applied this guidance retrospectively to all prior periods to maintain the comparability of presentation between periods, which resulted in a $0.3 million increase in cash flows provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and a corresponding decrease in cash flows provided by financing activities.

• We have elected to account for forfeitures when they occur instead of estimating the expected forfeiture rate. Adoption of this provision during the second quarter resulted in a retroactive net income adjustment of $0.2 million, net of tax effect, in the first quarter of 2016 and a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $2.1 million, net of tax, as of January 1, 2016.

• Statutory tax withholding will be permitted up to the maximum statutory tax rate in applicable jurisdictions. The retrospective impact of this provision on prior period financial statements is not material.

Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, issued in June 2016, amends current guidance regarding other-than-temporary impairment of available-for-sale debt securities. The new guidance requires an estimate of expected credit loss when fair value is below the amortized cost of the asset without regard for the length of time that the fair value has been below the amortized cost or the historical or implied volatility of the asset. In addition, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities will be limited to the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value. The use of an allowance to record estimated credit losses (and subsequent recoveries) will also be required under the new guidance.

ASU 2016-13 will be effective in the first quarter of 2020. We are evaluating its impact on the carrying value of our available-for-sale securities and results of operations.

Revenue Recognition. ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, issued in May 2014, and ASU 2016-10, and subsequent amendments, enhances the comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets. The principles-based guidance provides a framework for addressing revenue recognition issues comprehensively. The standard requires that revenue should be recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for goods or services, which are referred to as performance obligations.

The guidance requires comprehensive annual and interim disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of recognized revenue. Qualitative and quantitative disclosures will be required regarding:

• contracts with customers, including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation, and information about contract balances and performance obligations,

• significant judgments and changes in judgments required to determine the transaction price, amounts allocated to performance obligations, and the timing for recognizing revenue resulting from the satisfaction of performance obligations, and

• assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

The guidance will be effective in the first quarter of 2018. We are evaluating its impact on our revenue and results of operations.

Principal vs Agent. ASU 2016-08, Principal vs. Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross vs Net), issued in March 2016, streamlines and clarifies the criteria for identifying whether an entity is satisfying a performance obligation as the principal or agent in the transaction. The entity that is responsible for fulfilling the contractual obligations related to the good or service is acting as the principal and recognizes the gross amount of consideration. The entity that is responsible only for arranging delivery to the customer is acting as the agent and recognizes revenue in the amount of the fee or commission related to arranging for the delivery of the good or service.

A number of indicators of the nature of the relationship that are considered under current guidance have been streamlined and clarified in the new guidance by focusing more specifically on the performance obligations that must be fulfilled in the transaction, which entity carries the inventory risk in the transaction, and which entity controls the pricing of the good or service. Credit risk will no longer be a criterion. This guidance will be effective in the first quarter of 2018. We are evaluating its impact on our revenue and results of operations.

Lease Arrangements. Under current guidance, the classification of a lease by a lessee as either an operating lease or a capital lease determines whether an asset and liability is recognized on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02, issued in February 2016 and effective in the first quarter of 2019, requires that a lessee recognize an asset and liability on its balance sheet related to all leases with terms in excess of one year. For all leases, a lessee will be required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position. The right-to-use asset represents the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term.

8

The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. There continues to be a differentiation between finance leases and operating leases. The criteria for determining whether a lease is a financing or operating lease are substantially the same as existing guidance except that the “bright line” percentages have been removed.

• For finance leases, interest is recognized on the lease liability separately from depreciation of the right-of-use asset in the statement of operations. Principal repayments are classified within financing activities and interest payments are classified as operating activities in the statement of cash flows.

• For operating leases, a lessee is required to recognize lease expense generally on a straight-line basis. All operating lease payments are classified as operating activities in the statement of cash flows.

The current build-to-suit lease accounting guidance will be rescinded by the new guidance, although simplified guidance will remain regarding lessee control during the construction period. Consequently, the accounting for build-to-suit leases will be the same as finance leases unless the lessee control provisions are applicable.

Settlement of Convertible Debt. ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, issued in August 2016, requires that cash settlements of principal amounts of debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the debt must classify the portion of the principal payment attributable to the accreted interest related to the debt discount as cash outflows from operating activities. This is consistent with the classification of the coupon interest payments.

ASU 2016-15 will be effective in the first quarter of 2018. Accordingly, $63.6 million debt discount attributable to the difference between the 0.75% coupon interest rate on our Notes and the 4.98% (5.46% inclusive of debt issuance costs) effective interest rate will be classified as an operating cash outflow in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows upon cash settlement in 2019.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

	Nine months ended
	September 30,
(in thousands)	2016			2015
Net cash paid for income taxes	$	5,787		$	5,860
Cash paid for interest expense	$	3,285		$	2,806
Acquisition of businesses:
Cash paid for businesses purchased, excluding contingent consideration	$	21,242		$	71,869
Cash acquired in acquisitions		(1,628	)		(6,389	)
Net cash paid for businesses purchased, net of cash acquired	$	19,614		$	65,480
Common stock issued in connection with the Reggiani acquisition	$	73		$	26,858
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Non-cash settlement of vacation liabilities by issuing restricted stock units (“RSUs”)	$	2,758		$	1,353
Property and equipment received, but not paid		1,004			1,497
	$	3,762		$	2,850

2. Earnings Per Share

Net income per basic common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income per diluted common share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding common stock options having a dilutive effect using the treasury stock method, non-vested shares of restricted stock having a dilutive effect, non-vested restricted stock for which the performance criteria have been met, shares to be purchased under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) having a dilutive effect, the assumed release of shares from escrow related to the acquisition of Corrugated Technologies, Inc. (“CTI”), the assumed conversion of our Notes having a dilutive effect using the treasury stock method when the stock price exceeds the conversion price of the Notes, and the assumed exercise of our warrants having a dilutive effect using the treasury stock method when the stock price exceeds the warrant strike price. Any potential shares that are anti-dilutive as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, Earnings Per Share, are excluded from the effect of dilutive securities.

9

Performance-based and market-based restricted stock and stock options that would be issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the vesting period, if the result would be dilutive, are assumed to be outstanding for purposes of determining net income per diluted common share as of the later of the beginning of the period or the grant date in accordance with ASC 260-10-45-48. Accordingly, performance-based RSUs, which vested on various dates during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, based on achievement of specified performance criteria related to revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets, and performance-based stock options, which vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 based on achievement of specified targets related to non-GAAP return on equity are included in the determination of net income per diluted common share as of the beginning of each period.

Basic and diluted earnings per share during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are reconciled as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Basic net income per share:
Net income available to common shareholders	$	17,662	$	10,257	$	25,000	$	23,211
Weighted average common shares outstanding		46,794		47,473		46,983		47,104
Basic net income per share	$	0.38	$	0.22	$	0.53	$	0.49
Dilutive net income per share:
Net income available to common shareholders	$	17,662	$	10,257	$	25,000	$	23,211
Weighted average common shares outstanding		46,794		47,473		46,983		47,104
Dilutive stock options and non-vested restricted stock		826		1,028		808		1,057
Weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing diluted net income per share		47,621		48,501		47,791		48,161
Dilutive net income per share	$	0.37	$	0.21	$	0.52	$	0.48

Potential shares of common stock that are not included in the determination of diluted net income per share because they are anti-dilutive consist of ESPP purchase rights having an anti-dilutive effect of less than 0.1 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and the assumed vesting of RSUs having an anti-dilutive effect of less than 0.1 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and less than 0.1 million shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding does not include the effect of the potential common shares from conversion of our Notes and exercise of our Warrants. The effects of these potentially outstanding shares were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive since the conversion price of the Notes and the strike price of the warrants exceeded the average market price of our common stock. We have the option to pay cash, issue shares of common stock, or any combination thereof for the aggregate amount due upon conversion of the Notes. Our intent is to settle the principal amount of the Notes in cash upon conversion. As a result, only amounts payable in excess of the principal amount of the Notes are considered in diluted net income per share under the treasury stock method. The Note Hedges are also not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share because the effect of any exercise of the Note Hedges would be anti-dilutive. Please refer to Note 6 – Convertible Senior Notes, Note Hedges, and Warrants of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

3. Balance Sheet Details

Inventories

Inventories, net of allowances, as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Raw materials	$	53,045	$	53,783
Work in process		4,631		6,646
Finished goods		49,253		45,949
	$	106,929	$	106,378

10

Deferred Cost of Revenue

Deferred cost of revenue related to unrecognized revenue on shipments to customers was $3.2 and $8.7 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and is included in other current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Product Warranty Reserves

The changes in product warranty reserves during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

	2016			2015
Balance at January 1,	$	9,635		$	9,682
Liability assumed through business acquisition		—			1,006
Provisions, net of releases		9,678			8,670
Settlements		(9,156	)		(9,799	)
Balance at September 30,	$	10,157		$	9,559

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (“OCI”)

OCI classified within stockholders’ equity in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is as follows (in thousands):

	September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)	$	425		$	(376	)
Currency translation losses		(13,756	)		(17,049	)
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges		12			1
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(13,319	)	$	(17,424	)

Amounts reclassified out of OCI were $0.1 million, net of tax, and less than $0.1 million, net of tax, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, and were less than $0.1 million, net of tax, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and consisted of unrealized gains and losses from investments in debt securities that are reported within interest income and other income (expense), net, in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

4. Acquisitions

We acquired Optitex Ltd. (“Optitex”) and Rialco Limited (“Rialco”) during 2016, which have been included in our Productivity Software and Industrial Inkjet operating segments, respectively. Acquisition-related transaction costs were $0.4 and $1.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $1.6 and $4.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

These acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations. We allocated the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their estimated fair value on their respective acquisition dates. Excess purchase consideration was recorded as goodwill. Factors contributing to a purchase price that results in goodwill include, but are not limited to, the retention of research and development personnel with skills to develop future technology, support personnel to provide maintenance services related to the products, a trained sales force capable of selling current and future products, the opportunity to cross-sell products of the acquired businesses to existing customers, the positive reputation of Optitex and Rialco in the market, and the opportunity to expand our presence in the digital inkjet textile printing market through the synergy of Optitex technology with the Reggiani Macchine SpA (“Reggiani”) digital inkjet textile printer business. Rialco’s technical and commercial capabilities benefit the Industrial Inkjet operating segment in the sourcing, specification, and purification of high quality dyes and expand our research, development, and innovation base to develop ink for the signage, ceramic, and packaging markets.

We engaged a third party valuation firm to aid management in its analyses of the fair value of these acquired businesses. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party valuation firm, the fair value analyses and related valuations represent the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party.

The purchase price allocations are preliminary and subject to change within the respective measurement periods as the valuations are finalized. We expect to continue to obtain information to assist us in finalizing the fair value of the net assets acquired during the respective measurement periods, which end at various dates in 2017. Measurement period adjustments will be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, if any.

11

Productivity Software Segment

Optitex, a privately-held Israeli company headquartered in Rosh Ha’Ayin, Israel, was acquired on June 16, 2016. Optitex has been included in the Productivity Software operating segment.

We purchased Optitex for cash consideration of $11.6 million, net of cash acquired, plus an additional potential future cash earnout, which is contingent on achieving certain revenue and operating profit performance targets over three consecutive 12-month periods. Optitex has developed and markets integrated two-dimensional (“2D”) and three-dimensional (“3D”) design software that is shortening the design cycle, reducing our customers’ costs, and accelerating the adoption of fast fashion.

The fair value of the earnout related to the Optitex acquisition is currently estimated to be $24.0 million by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5, Business Combinations, adjusted for the impact of post-acquisition foreign currency translation changes. Key assumptions include a risk-free discount rate of 2.3% and probability-adjusted revenue and operating profit levels. Probability-adjusted revenue and operating profit are significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which are referred to as Level 3 inputs in ASC 820-10-35, Fair Value Measurement. This contingent liability is reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016, as a noncurrent liability with the first payment due in the fourth quarter of 2017, if earned. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are recognized in general and administrative expenses

Industrial Inkjet Operating Segment

Rialco, a private limited liability company incorporated in England and Wales and headquartered in Bradford, U.K., was acquired on March 1, 2016. Rialco has been included in the Industrial Inkjet operating segment.

We purchased Rialco for cash consideration of $8.4 million, net of cash acquired, plus an additional potential future cash earnout, which is contingent on achieving certain revenue and gross profit performance targets over three consecutive 12-month periods. Rialco is a leading European supplier of dye powders and color products for the textile, digital print, and other decorating industries. Rialco’s pure disperse dyes are particularly important in the manufacture of high-quality dye sublimation inkjet inks for textile applications, which is a key growth area in the global migration from analog to digital print.

The fair value of the earnout related to the Rialco acquisition is currently estimated to be $2.0 million by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5, adjusted for the impact of post-acquisition foreign currency translation changes. Key assumptions include a risk-free discount rate of 0.8% and probability-adjusted revenue and gross profit levels. Probability-adjusted revenue and gross profit are significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which ASC 820-10-35, refers to as Level 3 inputs. This contingent liability is reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016, as a current and noncurrent liability of $0.8 and $1.2 million, respectively, with the first payment due in the third quarter of 2017, if earned. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are recognized in general and administrative expenses.

Valuation Methodologies

Intangible assets acquired consist of customer relationships, customer backlog, trade names, existing technology, and in-process research & development (“IPR&D”).

Customer Relationships and Backlog were valued using the excess earnings method, which is an income approach. The value of customer relationships lies in the generation of a consistent and predictable revenue source without incurring the costs normally required to develop the relationships. Customer relationships were valued by estimating the revenue attributable to existing customer relationships and probability-weighted in each forecast year to reflect the uncertainty of maintaining existing relationships based on historical attrition rates using discount rates of 25% and 30% for Optitex and Rialco, respectively.

Customer backlog represents unfulfilled customer purchase orders at the acquisition date that will provide a relatively secure revenue stream, subject only to potential customer cancellation and discount rates of 23% and 19% for Optitex and Rialco, respectively. These backlogs are expected to be fulfilled within one year.

Trade Names were valued using the relief from royalty method with royalty rates based on various factors including an analysis of market data, comparable trade name agreements, historical advertising dollars spent supporting the trade name, and discount rates of 25% and 30% for Optitex and Rialco, respectively.

Existing Technology for Optitex was valued using the relief from royalty method based on royalty rates for similar technologies. The value of existing Optitex technology is derived from consistent and predictable revenue, including the opportunity to cross-sell to existing customers, and the avoidance of the costs associated with developing the technology. Revenue related to existing technology was adjusted in each forecast year to reflect the evolution of the technology and the cost of sustaining research and development required to maintain the technology using a 25% discount rate.

12

Rialco existing technology was valued using the cost approach. The value of existing technology is estimated based on the historical time and cost to develop the technology, the estimated man-years required to recreate the technology, historical employee compensation and benefits, and a reasonable mark-up based on profit for companies with similar operations.

The preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands) with respect to these acquisitions at their respective acquisition dates is summarized as follows:

	Optitex					Rialco
	Weighted average useful life		Purchase Price Allocation			Weighted average useful life		Purchase Price Allocation
Customer relationships		3-6 years	$	8,890			5 years	$	2,512
Existing technology		4 years		7,760			5 years		846
Trade names		4 years		2,020			4 years		763
Backlog		less than one year		370			less than one year		56
Goodwill		—		28,147			—		1,426
			$	47,187					5,603
Net tangible liabilities				(11,924	)				5,177
Total purchase price			$	35,263				$	10,780

Pro forma results of operations for Optitex and Rialco have not been presented because their pre-acquisition revenue and net income are not material to our Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, that was generated by our acquisition of Rialco is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill that was generated by our acquisition of Optitex is deductible for U.S. tax purposes, but is not deductible for tax purposes in Israel.

Rialco generates revenue and incurs operating expenses primarily in British pounds sterling. Upon consideration of the salient economic indicators discussed in ASC 830-10-55-5, Foreign Currency Matters, we consider the British pounds sterling to be the functional currency for Rialco.

Optitex generates revenue and incurs operating expenses primarily in local currencies. Upon consideration of the salient economic indicators, we consider the local currency in each of Optitex’s primary locations (shekel, rupee, Euro, and U.S. dollar) to be the functional currencies for Optitex.

5. Investments and Fair Value Measurements

We invest our excess cash on deposit with major banks in money market, U.S. Treasury and government-sponsored entity, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed residential debt securities. By policy, we invest primarily in high-grade marketable securities. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions or issuers of these investments to the extent of amounts recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Typically, the cost of these investments has approximated fair value. Marketable investments with a maturity greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale short-term investments. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of OCI, adjusted for deferred income taxes. The credit portion of any other-than-temporary impairment is included in net income. Realized gains and losses on sales of financial instruments are recognized upon sale of the investments using the specific identification method.

13

Our available-for-sale short-term investments as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Fair value
September 30, 2016
U.S. government and sponsored entities	$	76,150	$	232	$	(44	)	$	76,338
Corporate debt securities		199,444		496		(148	)		199,792
Asset-backed securities		27,887		150		(10	)		28,027
Mortgage-backed securities – residential		1,984		6		(3	)		1,987
Total short-term investments	$	305,465	$	884	$	(205	)	$	306,144
December 31, 2015
U.S. government and sponsored entities	$	98,411	$	12	$	(137	)	$	98,286
Corporate debt securities		198,498		20		(510	)		198,008
Asset-backed securities		35,276		195		(174	)		35,297
Mortgage-backed securities – residential		1,689		2		(6	)		1,685
Total short-term investments	$	333,874	$	229	$	(827	)	$	333,276

The fair value and duration that investments, including cash equivalents, have been in a gross unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

	Less than 12 Months					More than 12 Months					TOTAL
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2016
U.S. government and sponsored entities	$	41,474	$	(44	)	$	—	$	—		$	41,474	$	(44	)
Corporate debt securities		59,274		(70	)		23,079		(78	)		82,353		(148	)
Asset-backed securities		214		—			5,627		(10	)		5,841		(10	)
Mortgage-backed securities – residential		235		—			208		(3	)		443		(3	)
Total	$	101,197	$	(114	)	$	28,914	$	(91	)	$	130,111	$	(205	)
December 31, 2015
U.S. government and sponsored entities	$	82,366	$	(137	)	$	—	$	—		$	82,366	$	(137	)
Corporate debt securities		136,274		(448	)		16,940		(62	)		153,214		(510	)
Asset-backed securities		27,928		(103	)		7,131		(71	)		35,059		(174	)
Mortgage-backed securities – residential		764		(2	)		269		(4	)		1,033		(6	)
Total	$	247,332	$	(690	)	$	24,340	$	(137	)	$	271,672	$	(827	)

For fixed income securities that have unrealized losses as of September 30, 2016, we have determined that we do not have the intent to sell any of these investments and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell any of these investments before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis. We have evaluated these fixed income securities and determined that no credit losses exist. Accordingly, management has determined that the unrealized losses on our fixed income securities as of September 30, 2016 were temporary in nature.

Amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments as of September 30, 2016 are summarized by maturity date as follows (in thousands):

	Amortized cost		Fair value
Mature in less than one year	$	107,936	$	107,888
Mature in one to three years		197,529		198,256
Total short-term investments	$	305,465	$	306,144

Net realized gains of $0.1 and $0.3 million from sales of investments were recognized in interest income and other income (expense), net, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Net realized gains of less than $0.1 million from sales of investments were recognized in interest income and other income (expense), net, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. Net unrealized gains of $0.7 million and net unrealized losses of $0.6 million, respectively, were included in OCI in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

14

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 identifies fair value as the exchange price, or exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1: Inputs that are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date;

Level 2: Inputs that are other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life or by comparison to similar instruments; and

Level 3: Inputs that are unobservable or reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. These include management’s own judgments about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

We utilize the market approach to measure the fair value of our fixed income securities. The market approach is a valuation technique that uses the prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The fair value of our fixed income securities is obtained using readily-available market prices from a variety of industry standard data providers, large financial institutions, and other third-party sources for the identical underlying securities. The fair value of our investments in certain money market funds is expected to maintain a Net Asset Value of $1 per share and, as such, is priced at the expected market price.

We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from several third party asset managers, custodian banks, and the accounting service providers. Independently, these service providers use professional pricing services to gather pricing data, which may include quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly. As part of this process, we engaged a pricing service to assist management in its pricing analysis and assessment of other-than-temporary impairment. All estimates, key assumptions, and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by us. While we chose to utilize a third party pricing service, the impairment analysis and related valuations represent conclusions of management and not conclusions or statements of any third party.

Our investments and liabilities measured at fair value have been presented in accordance with the fair value hierarchy specified in ASC 820 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 in order of liquidity as follows (in thousands):

	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
September 30, 2016
Assets:
Money market funds	$	15,742	$	15,742	$	—	$	—
U.S. government and sponsored entities		76,338		53,483		22,855		—
Corporate debt securities		200,027		—		200,027		—
Asset-backed securities		28,027		—		27,956		71
Mortgage-backed securities – residential		1,987		—		1,987		—
	$	322,121	$	69,225	$	252,825	$	71
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	$	85,396	$	—	$	—	$	85,396
Self-insurance		598		—		—		598
	$	85,994	$	—	$	—	$	85,994
December 31, 2015
Assets:
Money market funds	$	13,221	$	13,221	$	—	$	—
U.S. government and sponsored entities		98,286		34,712		63,574		—
Corporate debt securities		198,778		—		198,778		—
Asset-backed securities		35,297		—		35,113		184
Mortgage-backed securities – residential		1,684		—		1,684		—
	$	347,266	$	47,933	$	299,149	$	184
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration, current and noncurrent	$	54,796	$	—	$	—	$	54,796
Self-insurance		1,268		—		—		1,268
	$	56,064	$	—	$	—	$	56,064

15

Money market funds consist of $15.7 and $13.2 million, which have been classified as cash equivalents as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Corporate debt securities include $0.2 and $0.7 million, which have been classified as cash equivalents as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Investments are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Investments in U.S. Treasury obligations and overnight money market mutual funds have been classified as Level 1 because these securities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets or are actively traded at $1.00 Net Asset Value. There have been no transfers between Level 1 and 2 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

Government agency investments and corporate debt instruments, including investments in asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, have generally been classified as Level 2 because markets for these securities are less active or valuations for such securities utilize significant inputs, which are directly or indirectly observable. We hold asset-backed securities with income payments derived from and collateralized by a specified pool of underlying assets. Asset-backed securities in the portfolio are predominantly collateralized by credit cards and auto loans. We also hold two asset-backed securities collateralized by mortgage loans, which have been fully reserved.

Liabilities for Contingent Consideration

Acquisition-related liabilities for contingent consideration (i.e., earnouts) are related to the purchase business combinations of Optitex and Rialco in 2016; Shuttleworth Business Systems Limited and CDM Solutions Limited (collectively, “Shuttleworth”), CTI, and Reggiani in 2015; DiMS! organizing print BV (“DIMS”), DirectSmile GmbH (“DirectSmile”), and SmartLinc, Inc. (“SmartLinc”) in 2014; Outback Software Pty. Ltd. doing business as Metrix Software (“Metrix”), GamSys Software SPRL (“GamSys”), and PrintLeader Software (“PrintLeader”) in 2013; and Technique, Inc. and Technique Business Systems Limited (collectively, “Technique”) in 2012.

The fair value of these earnouts is estimated to be $85.4 and $54.8 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, by applying the income approach in accordance with ASC 805-30-25-5. Key assumptions include risk-free discount rates between 0.6% and 4.98% (Monte Carlo valuation method) and discount rates between 4.2% and 6.0% (probability-adjusted method), as well as probability-adjusted revenue, gross profit, operating profit, and earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) levels. Probability-adjusted revenue, gross profit, operating profit, and EBIT are significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which ASC 820-10-35 refers to as Level 3 inputs. These contingent liabilities have been reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016 as current and noncurrent liabilities of $30.3 and $55.1 million, respectively.

The fair value of contingent consideration increased by $6.3 million, including $1.9 million of earnout interest accretion related to all acquisitions, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Optitex, Reggiani, DirectSmile, and CTI earnout performance probabilities increased while the DIMS earnout performance probability decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The fair value of contingent consideration decreased by $2.1 million, which is net of $1.4 million of earnout interest accretion related to all acquisitions, during the year ended December 31, 2015. The DIMS, DirectSmile, GamSys, and Metrix earnout performance probabilities decreased in 2015. In accordance with ASC 805-30-35-1, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date have been recognized in general and administrative expense.

Earnout payments during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $1.2, $0.4, and $0.2 million are primarily related to the previously accrued DirectSmile, SmartLinc, and Metrix contingent consideration liabilities, respectively. Earnout payments during the year ended December 31, 2015 of $2.0, $1.1, $0.6, and $0.3 million are primarily related to the previously accrued Technique, GamSys, Metrix, and SmartLinc contingent consideration liabilities, respectively.

Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Liability for Contingent Consideration
Fair value of contingent consideration at January 1, 2015	$	12,277
Fair value of Reggiani contingent consideration at July 1, 2015		43,170
Fair value of CTI contingent consideration at October 6, 2015		2,551
Fair value of Shuttleworth contingent consideration at November 4, 2015		5,077
Changes in valuation		(3,575	)
Payments		(4,093	)
Foreign currency adjustment		(611	)
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2015	$	54,796
Fair value of Rialco contingent consideration at March 1, 2016	$	2,109
Fair value of Optitex contingent consideration at June 16, 2016		22,300
Changes in valuation		6,308
Payments		(1,868	)
Foreign currency adjustment		1,751
Fair value of contingent consideration at September 30, 2016	$	85,396

16

Since the primary inputs to the fair value measurement of contingent consideration liability are the discount rate and probability-adjusted revenue, we reviewed the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in these inputs. We assessed the probability of achieving the revenue performance targets for contingent consideration associated with each acquisition at percentage levels between 60% and 100% as of each respective acquisition date based on an assessment of the historical performance of each acquired entity, our current expectations of future performance, and other relevant factors. A change in probability-adjusted revenue of five percentage points from the level assumed in the current valuations would result in an increase in the fair value of contingent consideration of $2.7 million or a decrease of $6.2 million resulting in a corresponding adjustment to general and administrative expense. A change in the discount rate of one percentage point results in an increase in the fair value of contingent consideration of $0.3 million or a decrease of $1.9 million. The potential undiscounted amount of future contingent consideration cash payments that we could be required to make related to our business acquisitions, beyond amounts currently accrued, is $23.3 million as of September 30, 2016.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

We utilize the income approach to measure the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities. The income approach uses pricing models that rely on market observable inputs such as yield curves, currency exchange rates, and forward prices, and are therefore classified as Level 2 measurements. The notional amount of our derivative assets and liabilities was $156.8 and $118.6 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities that were designated for cash flow hedge accounting treatment having notional amounts of $3.2 and $3.2 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, was not material.

Fair Value of Convertible Senior Notes

In September 2014, we issued $345 million aggregate principal amount of our Notes. The Notes are carried at their original issuance value, net of unamortized debt discount, and are not marked to market each period. The approximate fair value of the Notes as of September 30, 2016 was approximately $383 million and was considered a Level 2 fair value measurement. Fair value was estimated based upon actual quotations obtained at the end of the reporting period or the most recent date available. A substantial portion of the market value of our Notes in excess of the outstanding principal amount relates to the conversion premium.

6. Convertible Senior Notes (“Notes”), Note Hedges, and Warrants

0.75% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2019

In September 2014, we completed a private placement of $345 million principal amount of 0.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 (“Notes”). The Notes were sold to the initial purchasers for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The net proceeds from this offering were approximately $336.3 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ commissions and the offering expenses paid by us. We used approximately $29.4 million of the net proceeds to purchase the Note Hedges described below, net of the proceeds from the Warrant transactions also described below.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of EFI with interest payable semiannually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing March 1, 2015. The Notes are not callable and will mature on September 1, 2019, unless previously purchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. Holders of the Notes who convert in connection with a “fundamental change,” as defined in the indenture governing the Notes (“Indenture”), may require us to purchase for cash all or any portion of their Notes at a purchase price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

The initial conversion rate is 18.9667 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $52.72 per share of common stock. Upon conversion of the Notes, holders will receive cash, shares of common stock or a combination thereof, at our election. Our intent is to settle the principal amount of the Notes in cash upon conversion. If the conversion value exceeds the principal amount, we would deliver shares of our common stock for our conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount. As of September 30, 2016, none of the conditions listed below allowing holders of the Notes to convert had been met.

Throughout the term of the Notes, the conversion rate may be adjusted upon the occurrence of certain events. Holders of the Notes will not receive any cash payment representing accrued and unpaid interest upon conversion of a Note. Holders may convert their Notes only under the following circumstances:

• if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day;

17

• during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period (“Notes Measurement Period”) in which the “trading price” (as the term is defined in the Indenture) per $1,000 principal amount of Notes for each trading day of such Notes Measurement Period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported stock price on such trading day and the conversion rate on each such trading day;

• upon the occurrence of specified corporate events; or

• at any time on or after March 1, 2019 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date.

We separated the Notes into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was calculated by measuring the estimated fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component representing the conversion option was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the face value of the Notes as a whole. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount (“debt discount”) is amortized to interest expense over the term of the Notes using the effective interest method with an effective interest rate of 4.98% per annum (5.46% inclusive of debt issuance costs). The equity component is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.

We allocated the total transaction costs incurred by the Note issuance to the liability and equity components based on their relative values. Issuance costs of $7.0 million attributable to the $281.4 million liability component are being amortized to expense over the term of the Notes, and issuance costs of $1.6 million attributable to the $63.6 million equity component were offset against the equity component in stockholders’ equity. Additionally, we recorded a deferred tax liability of $23.7 million on the debt discount, which is not deductible for tax purposes.

The Notes consist of the following as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
Liability component	$	345,000		$	345,000
Debt discount, net of amortization		(39,363	)		(48,515	)
Debt issuance costs, net of amortization		(4,660	)		(5,751	)
Net carrying amount	$	300,977		$	290,734
Equity component	$	63,643		$	63,643
Less: debt issuance costs allocated to equity		(1,582	)		(1,582	)
Net carrying amount	$	62,061		$	62,061

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03, $5.8 million of debt issuance costs have been reclassified from other current assets and other assets to a direct reduction of convertible senior notes, net, in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015.

Interest expense recognized related to the Notes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
0.75% coupon	$	654	$	654	$	1,941	$	1,948
Amortization of debt issuance costs		373		354		1,092		1,042
Amortization of debt discount		3,126		2,961		9,152		8,698
	$	4,153	$	3,969	$	12,185	$	11,688

Note Hedges

We paid an aggregate of $63.9 million in convertible note hedge transactions with respect to our common stock (“Note Hedges”) in September 2014. The Note Hedges will expire upon maturity of the Notes. The Note Hedges are intended to offset the potential dilution upon conversion and/or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount upon conversion of the Notes in the event that the market value per share of our common stock, as measured under the terms of the Note Hedges, is greater than the strike price of the Note Hedges. The strike price of the Note Hedges initially correspond to the conversion price of the Notes and is subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the conversion price of the Notes. The Note Hedges are separate transactions and are not part of the Notes. Holders of the Notes will not have any rights with respect to the Note Hedges.

18

Warrants

Concurrently with entering into the Note Hedges, we separately entered into warrant transactions (“Warrants”), whereby we sold warrants to acquire shares of our common stock at a strike price of $68.86 per share. We received aggregate proceeds of $34.5 million from the sale of the Warrants. If the average market value per share of our common stock for the reporting period, as measured under the Warrants, exceeds the strike price of the Warrants, the Warrants will have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share. The Warrants are separate transactions and are not part of the Notes or the Note Hedges and are accounted for as a component of additional paid-in capital. Holders of the Notes and Note Hedges will not have any rights with respect to the Warrants.

7. Income taxes

We recognized tax benefits of $11.8 and $9.0 million on pretax net income of $5.8 and $15.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. We recognized a tax benefit of $2.8 million and a tax provision of $0.1 million on pretax net income of $7.5 and $23.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The provisions for income taxes before discrete items reflected in the table below were $3.3 and $6.1 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $3.5 and $7.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The decrease in the provision for income taxes before discrete items for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared with the same periods in the prior year, is primarily due to the decrease in profitability before income taxes.

Primary differences between our provision for income taxes before discrete items and the income tax provision at the U.S. statutory rate of 35% include lower taxes on permanently reinvested foreign earnings and the tax effects of stock-based compensation expense pursuant to ASC 718-740, Stock Compensation – Income Taxes, which are non-deductible for tax purposes.

Our tax provision before discrete items is reconciled to our recorded provision for income taxes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Provision for income taxes before discrete items	$	3.3		$	3.5		$	6.1		$	7.6
Interest related to unrecognized tax benefits		—			0.1			0.3			0.3
Benefit related to U.S. transfer pricing adjustment		—			—			—			(0.4	)
Benefit related to Spanish statutory and tax intangibles write-off		—			—			—			(0.3	)
Benefit related to stock based compensation, including ESPP dispositions		(1.4	)		(0.2	)		(1.7	)		(0.4	)
Benefit from reassessment of tax provision upon filing tax return		(0.2	)		(1.8	)		(0.2	)		(1.8	)
Benefit from reversals of uncertain tax positions due to statute of limitation expirations		(13.5	)		(4.4	)		(13.5	)		(4.9	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	$	(11.8	)	$	(2.8	)	$	(9.0	)	$	0.1

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, gross unrecognized benefits that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized were $35.8 and $43.5 million, respectively. Over the next twelve months, our existing tax positions will continue to generate increased liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. It is reasonably possible that our gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease up to $4.8 million in the next twelve months primarily due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for federal and state tax purposes. These adjustments, if recognized, would positively impact our effective tax rate, and would be recognized as additional tax benefits in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In accordance with ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, Similar Tax Loss, or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, we recorded $23.5 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits as an offset to deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2016, and the remaining $12.3 million has been recorded as noncurrent income taxes payable.

We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we have accrued $0.8 and $0.5 million, respectively, for potential payments of interest and penalties.

In accordance with ASU 2016-09, which was adopted in the second quarter of 2016, we recorded $2.2 million of deferred tax assets related to excess tax benefits for federal research and development income tax credits not previously benefitted and $0.6 million of deferred tax assets for the tax benefit on the cumulative effect adjustment associated with the change in accounting for RSU forfeitures.

19

We are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the 2013-2015 tax years, state tax jurisdictions for the 2011-2015 tax years, the Netherlands tax authority for the 2014-2015 tax years, the Spanish tax authority for the 2012-2015 tax years, and the Italian tax authority for the 2012-2015 tax years.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingent Consideration

We are required to make payments to the former stockholders of acquired companies based on the achievement of specified performance targets as more fully explained in Note 5 – Investments and Fair Value Measurements.

Lease Commitments and Contractual Obligations

As of September 30, 2016, we have leased certain of our current facilities under noncancellable operating lease agreements. We are required to pay property taxes, insurance, and nominal maintenance costs for certain of these facilities and any increases over the base year of these expenses on the remainder of our facilities.

Assets Held for Sale

Management has approved a plan to sell approximately 5.6 acres of land and the office building located at 1340 Corporate Center Curve, Eagan, Minnesota, consisting of 43,682 square feet. We intend to enter into a lease agreement with the purchaser of the facility whereby we will lease 22,000 square feet under a ten-year lease agreement at market rental rates. The gain on the sale of the facility and land will be deferred over the lease term.

Assets held for sale of $3.8 million have been reclassified to Other Current Assets as of September 30, 2016 consisting of $2.9 million net book value of the facility and $0.9 million of related land. Management expects the sale and related lease-back to be completed in the next nine months.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing - Synthetic Lease Arrangements

On August 26, 2016, we entered into a 48.5 year lease agreement, inclusive of two renewal options, with the City of Manchester to lease 16.9 acres adjacent to the Manchester Regional Airport. This lease agreement is subject to a sublease agreement with Bank of Tokyo – Mitsubishi UFJ Leasing & Finance LLC (“BTMU”) during the term of the synthetic lease related to the manufacturing facility that is being constructed on the site. Minimum lease payments are $13.1 million during the 48.5 year term, excluding the portion financed into the synthetic lease related to the manufacturing facility. We are treated as the owner of the construction project for federal income tax purposes.

On August 26, 2016, we entered into a six-year synthetic lease with BTMU whereby a 225,000 square foot manufacturing and warehouse facility is under construction related to our super-wide format industrial digital inkjet printer business in the Industrial Inkjet operating segment at a projected cost of $40 million and a construction period of 18 months. Minimum lease payments during the initial term are $1.8 million. Upon completion of the initial term, we have the option to renew the lease, purchase the facility, or return the facility to BTMU subject to an 89% residual value guarantee under which we would recognize additional rent expense in the form of a variable rent payment. We have assessed our exposure in relation to the residual value guarantee and believe that there is no deficiency to the guaranteed value with respect to funds expended by BTMU as of September 30, 2016.

The funds pledged under the lease represent 115% of the total expenditures made by BTMU through September 30, 2016. The funds are invested in $3.1 and $0.7 million of U.S. government securities and cash equivalents, respectively, with a third party trustee and will be restricted during the construction period. Upon completion of construction, the funds will be released as cash and cash equivalents. The portion of released funds that represents 100% of the total expenditures made by BTMU will be deposited with BTMU and restricted as collateral until the end of the underlying synthetic lease period.

The funds pledged as collateral are invested in U.S. government securities and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2016, and are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy as more fully defined in Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements. Net unrealized gains of less than $0.1 million were included in OCI in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016.

We have applied the accounting and disclosure requirements set forth in ASC 810-10, Consolidation, for variable interest entities (“VIEs”). We have evaluated the synthetic lease agreement to determine if the arrangement qualifies as a VIE under ASC 810-10. We have determined that the synthetic lease agreement does not qualify as a VIE, and as such, we are not required to consolidate the VIE in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

20

Legal Proceedings

We may be involved, from time to time, in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations, or proceedings relating to contractual disputes, securities laws, intellectual property rights, employment, or other matters that may arise in the normal course of business. We assess our potential liability in each of these matters by using the information available to us. We develop our views on estimated losses in consultation with inside and outside counsel, which involves a subjective analysis of potential results and various combinations of appropriate litigation and settlement strategies. We accrue estimated losses from contingencies if a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated.

As of September 30, 2016, we are subject to the matter discussed below.

Matan Digital Printing (“MDG”) Matter

EFI acquired Matan Digital Printers (“Matan”) in 2015 from sellers (the “2015 Sellers”) that acquired Matan Digital Printing Ltd. from other sellers in 2001 (the “2001 Sellers”). The 2001 Sellers have asserted a claim against the 2015 Sellers and Matan asserting that they are entitled to a portion of the 2015 Sellers’ proceeds from EFI’s acquisition. The 2015 Sellers dispute this claim and have agreed to indemnify EFI against the 2001 Sellers’ claim.

Although we are fully indemnified and we do not believe that it is probable that we will incur a loss, it is reasonably possible that our financial statements could be materially affected by the unfavorable resolution of this matter. Accordingly, it is reasonably possible that we could incur a material loss in this matter. We estimate the range of loss to be between one dollar and $9.6 million. If we incur a loss in this matter, it will be offset by a receivable of an equal amount representing a claim for indemnification against the escrow account established in connection with the Matan acquisition.

Other Matters

As of September 30, 2016, we were subject to various other claims, lawsuits, investigations, and proceedings in addition to the matter discussed above. There is at least a reasonable possibility that additional losses may be incurred in excess of the amounts that we have accrued. However, we believe that these claims are not material to our financial statements or the range of reasonably possible losses is not reasonably estimable. Litigation is inherently unpredictable, and while we believe that we have valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against us, our financial statements could be materially affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of one or more of these contingencies or because of the diversion of management’s attention and the incurrence of significant expenses.

9. Segment Information and Geographic Data

Operating segment information is required to be presented based on the internal reporting used by the chief operating decision making group (“CODM”) to allocate resources and evaluate operating segment performance. Our CODM is comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The CODM group is focused on assessment and resource allocation among the Industrial Inkjet, Productivity Software, and Fiery operating segments.

Our operating segments are integrated through their reporting and operating structures, shared technology and practices, shared sales and marketing, and combined production facilities. Our enterprise management processes use financial information that is closely aligned with our three operating segments at the gross profit level. Relevant discrete financial information is prepared at the gross profit level for each of our three operating segments, which is used by the CODM to allocate resources and assess the performance of each operating segment.

We classify our revenue, operating segment profit (i.e., gross profit), assets, and liabilities in accordance with our operating segments as follows:

Industrial Inkjet, which consists of our VUTEk and Matan super-wide and wide format, Reggiani textile, Jetrion label and packaging, and Cretaprint ceramic tile decoration industrial digital inkjet printers; digital ultra-violet (“UV”), light-emitting diode (“LED”), ceramic, and thermoforming ink, as well as a variety of textile ink including dye sublimation, pigmented, reactive dye, acid dye, pure disperse dye, and water-based dispersed printing ink; digital inkjet printer parts; and professional services. Printing surfaces include paper, vinyl, corrugated, textile, glass, plastic, aluminum composite, ceramic tile, wood, and many other flexible and rigid substrates.

21

Productivity Software, which consists of a complete software suite that enables efficient and automated end-to-end business and production workflows for the print and packaging industry. ThisProductivity Suite also provides tools to enable revenue growth, efficient scheduling, and optimization of processes, equipment, and personnel. Customers are provided the financial and technical flexibility to deploy locally within their business or to be hosted in the cloud. The Productivity Suite addresses all segments of the print industry and consists of the: (i)Packaging Suite, with Radius at its core, for tag & label, cartons, and flexible packaging businesses; (ii)Corrugated Packaging Suite, with CTI at its core, for corrugated packaging businesses; (iii)Enterprise Commercial Print Suite, with Monarch at its core, for enterprise print businesses; (iv)Publication Print Suite, with Monarch or Technique at its core, for publication print businesses; (v)Mid-market Print Suite, with Pace at its core, for medium size print businesses; (vi)Quick Print Suite, with PrintSmith at its core, for small printers and in-plant sites; and (vii)Value Added Products, available with the suite and standalone, such as web-to-print, e-commerce, cross media marketing, warehousing, fulfillment, shop floor data collection, and shipping to reduce costs, increase profits, and offer new products and services to their existing and future customers. We also market Optitex fashion design software, which facilitates fast fashion in the textile industry.

Fiery, which consists of digital front ends (“DFEs”) that transform digital copiers and printers into high performance networked printing devices for the office, industrial, and commercial printing markets. This operating segment is comprised of (i) stand-alone DFEs connected to digital printers, copiers, and other peripheral devices, (ii) embedded DFEs and design-licensed solutions used in digital copiers and multi-functional devices, (iii) optional software integrated into our DFE solutions such as Fiery Central and Command WorkStation, (iv) Fiery Self Serve, our self-service and payment solution, (v) PrintMe, our mobile printing application, and (vi) stand-alone software-based solutions such as our proofing and scanning solutions.

Our CODM evaluates the performance of our operating segments based on net sales and gross profit. Gross profit for each operating segment includes revenue from sales to third parties and related cost of revenue attributable to the operating segment. Cost of revenue for each operating segment excludes certain expenses managed outside the operating segments consisting primarily of stock-based compensation expense. Operating income is not reported by operating segment because operating expenses include significant shared expenses and other costs that are managed outside of the operating segments. Such operating expenses include various corporate expenses such as stock-based compensation, corporate sales and marketing, research and development, amortization of identified intangibles, various non-recurring charges, and other separately managed general and administrative expenses.

Operating segment profit (i.e., gross profit), excluding stock-based compensation expense, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is summarized as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Industrial Inkjet
Revenue	$	143,004		$	122,566		$	408,926		$	305,815
Gross profit		50,433			42,428			141,927			104,863
Gross profit percentages		35.3	%		34.6	%		34.7	%		34.3	%
Productivity Software
Revenue	$	39,663		$	31,706		$	108,554		$	96,497
Gross profit		30,041			23,142			80,961			70,173
Gross profit percentages		75.7	%		73.0	%		74.6	%		72.7	%
Fiery
Revenue	$	62,908		$	74,422		$	207,878		$	223,657
Gross profit		45,362			51,500			147,938			157,562
Gross profit percentages		72.1	%		69.2	%		71.2	%		70.4	%

Operating segment profit (i.e., gross profit) is reconciled to our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Segment gross profit	$	125,836		$	117,070		$	370,826		$	332,598
Stock-based compensation expense		(642	)		(785	)		(1,873	)		(2,357	)
Other items excluded from segment profit		—			—			(315	)		(113	)
Gross profit	$	125,194		$	116,285		$	368,638		$	330,128

22

Tangible and intangible assets, net of liabilities, are summarized by operating segment as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2016	Industrial Inkjet		Productivity Software			Fiery		Corporate and Unallocated Net Assets		Total
Goodwill	$	146,657	$	158,716		$	63,624	$	—	$	368,997
Identified intangible assets, net		89,432		42,937			108		—		132,477
Tangible assets, net of liabilities		151,132		(36,941	)		32,974		181,934		329,099
Net tangible and intangible assets	$	387,221	$	164,712		$	96,706	$	181,934	$	830,573
December 31, 2015
Goodwill	$	142,183	$	133,128		$	63,482	$	—	$	338,793
Identified intangible assets, net		101,623		33,432			497		—		135,552
Tangible assets, net of liabilities		102,351		(10,023	)		23,954		233,567		349,849
Net tangible and intangible assets	$	346,157	$	156,537		$	87,933	$	233,567	$	824,194

Corporate and unallocated assets consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, restricted investments, corporate headquarters facility, convertible notes, imputed financing obligation, taxes receivable, and taxes payable.

Geographic Regions

Our revenue originates in the U.S., China, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, France, the U.K., Spain, Israel, Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand. We report revenue by geographic region based on ship-to destination. Shipments to some of our significant printer manufacturer/distributor customers are made to centralized purchasing and manufacturing locations, which in turn sell through to other locations. As a result of these factors, we believe that sales to certain geographic locations might be higher or lower, as the ultimate destinations are difficult to ascertain.

Our revenue by ship-to destination during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Americas	$	128,252	$	121,116	$	363,977	$	337,050
Europe, Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”)		85,009		79,934		264,469		205,191
Asia Pacific (“APAC”)		32,314		27,644		96,912		83,728
Total revenue	$	245,575	$	228,694	$	725,358	$	625,969

10. Derivatives and Hedging

We are exposed to market risk and foreign currency exchange risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect operating results, financial position, and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these risks through our regular operating and financing activities and, when appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are used to hedge monetary assets and liabilities, intercompany balances, trade receivables, anticipated cash flows, and to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from shifts in market rates. Our objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with losses and gains on the derivative contracts used to hedge them, thereby reducing volatility of earnings or protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. We do not have any leveraged derivatives, nor do we use derivative contracts for speculative purposes. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires the fair value of all derivative instruments, including those embedded in other contracts, to be recorded as assets or liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The related cash flow impacts of our derivative contracts are reflected as cash flows from operating activities.

Our exposures are primarily related to non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue in Europe, the U.K., Latin America, China, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, and to non-U.S. dollar-denominated operating expenses in Europe, India, Japan, the U.K., China, Israel, Brazil, and Australia. We hedge our operating expense cash flow exposure in Indian rupees. We hedge balance sheet remeasurement exposure associated with Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Israeli shekel, Australian dollar, Japanese yen, Chinese renminbi, and Euro-denominated intercompany balances; Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Australian dollar, Israeli shekel, and Euro-denominated trade receivables, and British pound sterling, Indian rupee, and Euro-denominated net monetary assets.

23

By their nature, derivative instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk. The market risk associated with these instruments resulting from currency exchange movement is expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets, and liabilities being hedged (i.e., operating expense exposure in Indian rupees; the collection of trade receivables denominated in currencies other than their functional currency and the settlement of intercompany balances denominated in currencies other than their functional currency). We do not believe there is significant risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty associated with these instruments because, by policy, we deal with counterparties having a minimum investment grade or better credit rating. Credit risk is managed through the continuous monitoring of exposures to such counterparties.

Cash Flow Hedges

Foreign currency derivative contracts with notional amounts of $3.2 million have been designated as cash flow hedges of our Indian rupee operating expense exposure at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The fair value of the net assets (liabilities) related to these cash flow hedges are not material. The changes in fair value of these contracts are reported as a component of OCI and reclassified to operating expense in the periods of payment of the hedged operating expenses. The amount of ineffectiveness that was recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for these designated cash flow hedges was immaterial. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

Balance Sheet Hedges

Forward contracts not designated for hedge accounting treatment with notional amounts of $153.6 and $115.4 million are used to hedge foreign currency balance sheet exposures at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. They are not designated for hedge accounting treatment since there is a natural offset for the remeasurement of the underlying foreign currency denominated asset or liability. We recognize changes in the fair value of non-designated derivative instruments in earnings in the period of change. Gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge balance sheet exposures are recognized in interest income and other income (expense), net, in the same period as the remeasurement gain or loss of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Forward contracts not designated for hedge accounting treatment consist of hedges of Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Israeli shekel, Australian dollar, Japanese yen, Chinese renminbi, and Euro-denominated intercompany balances with notional amounts of $84.6 and $63.7 million; hedges of Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Australian dollar, Israeli shekel, and Euro-denominated trade receivables with notional amounts of $56.1 and $49.1 million; and hedges of British pounds sterling, Indian rupee, and Euro-denominated other net monetary assets with notional amounts of $12.9 and $2.6 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

11. Restructuring and Other

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, cost reduction actions were taken to lower our operating expense run rate as we analyze and re-align our cost structure following our business acquisitions. These charges primarily relate to cost reduction actions undertaken to integrate recently acquired businesses, consolidate facilities, and lower our operating expense run rate. Restructuring and other consists primarily of restructuring, severance, retention, facility downsizing and relocation, and acquisition integration expenses. Our restructuring and other plans are accounted for in accordance with ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, ASC 712, Compensation – Non-Retirement Postemployment Benefits, and ASC 820.

Restructuring and other costs were $1.3 and $5.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.6 and $2.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Restructuring and other costs include severance charges of $0.6 and $3.7 million related to reductions in head count of 16 and 114 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.5 and $1.8 million related to reduction in head count of 17 and 65 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Severance costs include severance payments, related employee benefits, outplacement fees, and employee relocation costs.

Facilities relocation and downsizing expenses were $0.6 and $0.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, primarily related to the relocation of certain manufacturing and administrative locations to accommodate space requirements. Integration expenses of $0.6 and $1.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.1 and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, were required to integrate our business acquisitions.

24

Restructuring and other reserve activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	2016			2015
Reserve balance at January 1,	$	3,019		$	2,102
Restructuring		2,878			1,554
Other		2,856			991
Non-cash restructuring and other		(403	)		—
Cash payments		(6,174	)		(2,699	)
Reserve balance at September 30,		2,176			1,948

12. Stock-based Compensation

We account for stock-based payment awards in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all equity awards granted to our employees and directors, including employee stock options, RSUs, and ESPP purchase rights related to all stock-based compensation plans based on the fair value of such awards on the date of grant. We amortize stock-based compensation cost on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period reduced by forfeitures, after assessing the probability of achieving the requisite performance criteria with respect to performance-based awards. Stock-based compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards. Prior to adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2016 as explained more fully in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, stock-based compensation expense included estimated forfeitures.

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, ESPP purchase rights, and RSUs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is summarized as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Stock -based compensation expense by type of award:
RSUs	$	7,979		$	8,209		$	24,931		$	24,485
ESPP		574			990			1,932			3,217
Employee stock options		—			329			79			385
Total stock-based compensation expense		8,553			9,528			26,942			28,087
Income tax effect		(3,649	)		(2,787	)		(7,895	)		(7,451	)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	4,904		$	6,741		$	19,047		$	20,636

Valuation Assumptions for Stock Options and ESPP Purchase Rights

We use the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option pricing model to value stock-based compensation for all equity awards, except market-based awards, which are valued using the Monte Carlo valuation model.

The BSM model determines the fair value of stock-based payment awards based on the stock price on the date of grant and is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, expected term, interest rates, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behavior. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over a preceding period commensurate with the expected term of the option. The expected term is based upon management’s consideration of the historical life, vesting period, and contractual period of the options granted. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to do so in the future.

25

Stock options were not granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. The estimated weighted average fair value per share of ESPP purchase rights issued and the underlying weighted average assumptions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Weighted average fair value per share	$	12.00		$	11.35		$	10.69		$	10.28
Expected volatility		26%-32	%		19%-25	%		22%-32	%		19%-28	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.4%-0.7	%		0.1%-0.7	%		0.4%-0.8	%		0.1%-0.7	%
Expected term (in years)		0.5-2.0			0.5-2.0			0.5-2.0			0.5-2.0

Stock options outstanding and exercisable, including performance-based and market-based options, as of September 30, 2016 and activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are summarized below (in thousands, except weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual term):

	Shares outstanding			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)		Aggregate intrinsic value
Options outstanding at January 1, 2016		443		$	13.20
Options forfeited and expired		(12	)		10.77
Options exercised		(51	)		11.69
Options outstanding at September 30, 2016		380		$	13.48		1.54	$	13,467
Options vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2016		380		$	13.48		1.54	$	13,467
Options exercisable at September 30, 2016		380		$	13.48		1.54	$	13,467

Aggregate intrinsic value for stock options represents the difference between the closing price per share of our common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal period and the option exercise price multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, and exercisable at September 30, 2016.

Non-vested RSUs, including performance-based and market-based RSUs, as of September 30, 2016 and activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are summarized below (shares in thousands):

Non-vested shares	Shares			Weighted average grant date fair value
Non-vested at January 1, 2016		1,814		$	40.53
Restricted stock granted		1,222			43.16
Restricted stock vested		(717	)		37.78
Restricted stock forfeited		(290	)		39.30
Non-vested at September 30, 2016		2,029		$	43.26

Vested RSUs

Performance-based RSUs that vested based on financial results are included in the period that the performance and related service criteria were met. The grant date fair value of RSUs vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $27.1 million. The aggregate intrinsic value at September 30, 2016 for RSUs expected to vest was $72.1 million and the remaining weighted average vesting period was 1.28 years. Aggregate intrinsic value for RSUs vested and expected to vest represents the closing price per share of our common stock on the last trading day of the fiscal period, multiplied by the number of RSUs vested and expected to vest as of September 30, 2016. RSUs expected to vest represent time-based RSUs unvested and outstanding at September 30, 2016, and performance-based RSUs for which the requisite service period has not been rendered, but are expected to vest based on the achievement of performance conditions.

26

Performance-based and Market-based RSUs and Stock Options

Performance-based and market-based RSUs and stock options included in the tables above as of September 30, 2016 and activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are summarized below (in thousands):

	Performance-based						Market-based
	RSUs			Stock Options			RSUs
Non-vested at December 31, 2015		920			16			23
Granted		730			—			—
Vested		(223	)		(4	)		—
Forfeited		(244	)		(12	)		—
Non-vested at September 30, 2016		1,183			—			23

Performance-based and market-based stock options were not granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. We use the BSM option pricing model to value performance-based RSUs. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of performance-based RSUs granted and the assumptions used to estimate grant date fair value during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

	Performance-based				Market-based
	RSUs				RSUs
	Short-term		Long-term
Nine months ended September 30, 2016 Grants
Grant date fair value per share	$	39.79	$	45.62
Service period (years)		1.0		2.0 - 3.0
Nine months ended September 30, 2015 Grants
Grant date fair value per share	$	38.77	$	42.76	$	33.84
Service period (years)		1.0		2.0 - 3.0
Derived service period (years)						1.6
Implied volatility						30.0	%
Risk-free interest rate						1.7	%

Our performance-based RSUs generally vest when specified performance criteria are met based on bookings, revenue, cash provided by operating activities, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP earnings per share, revenue growth compared to market comparables, non-GAAP earnings per share growth compared to cash flow from operating activities growth, or other targets during the service period; otherwise, they are forfeited. Non-GAAP operating income is defined as operating income determined in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to remove the impact of certain expenses. Non-GAAP earnings per share is defined as net income determined in accordance with GAAP, adjusted to remove the impact of certain expenses, divided by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period as more fully defined in Note 2 – Earnings Per Share of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The grant date fair value per share determined in accordance with the BSM valuation model is being amortized over the service period of the performance-based awards. The probability of achieving the awards was determined based on review of the actual results achieved thus far by each business unit compared with the operating plan during the pertinent service period as well as the overall strength of the business unit. Stock-based compensation expense was adjusted based on this probability assessment. As actual results are achieved during the service period, the probability assessment is updated and stock-based compensation expense adjusted accordingly.

13. Common Stock Repurchase Programs

On November 6, 2013, the board of directors approved the repurchase of $200 million of outstanding common stock. Under this publicly announced plan, we repurchased 1.5 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $65.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.

On November 9, 2015, the board of directors cancelled $54.9 million remaining for repurchase under the 2013 authorization and approved a new authorization to repurchase $150 million of outstanding common stock commencing January 1, 2016. This authorization expires December 31, 2018. We repurchased 0.4 and 1.4 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $18.0 and $57.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

27

Our employees have the option to surrender shares of common stock to satisfy their tax withholding obligations that arise on the vesting of RSUs. In connection with stock option exercises, certain employees can surrender shares to satisfy the exercise price of certain stock options and any tax withholding obligations incurred in connection with such exercises. Employees surrendered less than 0.1 and 0.2 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $3.4 and $7.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and 0.1 and 0.2 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 and $10.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

These repurchased shares reduce shares outstanding and are recorded as treasury stock under the cost method thereby reducing stockholders’ equity by the cost of the repurchased shares. Our buyback program is limited by SEC regulations and is subject to compliance with our insider trading policy.

14. Accounts Receivable

Financing Receivables

ASC 310, Receivables, requires disclosure regarding the credit quality of our financing receivables and allowance for credit losses including disclosure of credit quality indicators, past due information, and modifications of our financing receivables. We had financing receivables of $24.1 and $14.8 million consisting of $11.7 and $10.2 million of sales-type lease receivables, included within other current assets and other assets at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and $12.4 and $4.6 million of trade receivables having an original contractual maturity in excess of one year, included within accounts receivable, net of allowance, at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The trade receivables of $12.4 and $4.6 million having an original total contractual maturity in excess of one year at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, include $7.4 and $3.2 million, respectively, which are scheduled to be received in less than one year. The credit quality of financing receivables is evaluated on the same basis as trade receivables. We do not have material past due financing receivables.

Accounts Receivable Sales Arrangements

In accordance with ASC 860-20, Transfers and Servicing, trade receivables are derecognized from our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet when sold to third parties upon determining that such receivables are presumptively beyond the reach of creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding. The recourse obligation is measured using market data from similar transactions and the servicing liability is determined based on the fair value that a third party would charge to service these receivables. These liabilities were determined to not be material at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

We have facilities in the U.S. and Italy that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables with recourse. Trade receivables sold with recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than 10 days from the date of sale, which are subject to a servicing obligation. Trade receivables sold under these facilities were $3.0 and $15.4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $ 23.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, which approximates the cash received.

We have facilities in Spain and Italy that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. Trade receivables sold without recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than one year, which are secured by international letters of credit. Trade receivables sold under these facilities were $1.0 and $2.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $3.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, which approximates the cash received.

We report collections from the sale of trade receivables to third parties as operating cash flows in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

28

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Report”), including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future results of the Company that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industry in which the Company operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the management of the Company. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company and its management with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company’s actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Report under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report and Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and elsewhere and in other reports the Company files with the SEC. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report. The Company assumes no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, events, or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

Business Overview

We are a world leader in customer-centric digital printing innovation focused on the transformation of the printing, packaging, ceramic tile decoration, and textile industries from the use of traditional analog based printing to digital on-demand printing.

Our products include industrial super-wide and wide format, label and packaging, textile, and ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printers that utilize our digital ink, industrial digital inkjet printer parts, and professional services; print production workflow, web-to-print, cross-media marketing, fashion design, and business process automation solutions; and color DFEs creating an on-demand digital printing ecosystem. Our ink includes digital UV, LED, ceramic, and thermoforming ink, as well as a variety of textile ink including dye sublimation, pigmented, reactive dye, acid dye, pure disperse dye, and water-based dispersed printing ink. Our award-winning business process automation solutions are integrated from creation to print and are vertically integrated with our industrial digital inkjet printers and products produced by the leading printer manufacturers that are driven by our Fiery DFEs.

Our product portfolio includes industrial super-wide and wide format digital inkjet products (“Industrial Inkjet”) including VUTEk and Matan super-wide and wide format, Reggiani textile, Jetrion label and packaging, and Cretaprint digital ceramic tile decoration industrial digital inkjet printers; print production workflow, web-to-print, cross-media marketing, fashion design, and business process automation software (“Productivity Software”), which provides corporate printing, label and packaging, publishing, and mailing and fulfillment solutions for the printing and packaging industry; and Fiery DFEs (“Fiery”). Our integrated solutions and award-winning technologies are designed to automate print and business processes, streamline workflow, provide profitable value-added services, and produce accurate digital output.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably possible could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes there have been no significant changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements including the respective expected dates of adoption.

29

Overview

Key financial results during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were as follows:

• Our results of operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 reflect revenue growth, reduced gross profit as a percentage of revenue, and decreased operating expenses as a percentage of revenue. We completed our acquisitions of Rialco and Optitex in the first and second quarter of 2016, respectively. We completed our acquisitions of Reggiani, Matan, CTI, and Shuttleworth in 2015. Their results are included in our results of operations commencing on their respective acquisition dates.

• Our consolidated revenue increased by 7% and 16%, or $16.9 and $99.4 million, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared with the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software increased by $20.4 and $8.0 million, respectively, partially offset by decreased Fiery revenue, during the three months ended September 30, 2016. Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software increased by $103.1 and $12.1 million, respectively, partially offset by decreased Fiery revenue, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared with the same periods in the prior year. Recurring ink and maintenance revenue increased by 22% and 25% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the same periods in the prior year and represented 32% and 31% of consolidated revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

• Our gross profit percentage was 51% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to 51% and 53% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. Gross profit margin decreased to 51% during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, from 53% during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to increased Industrial Inkjet revenue at a lower gross profit percentage (35%) compared with Productivity Software (76%) and Fiery (72%). The gross profit percentages increased in the Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software operating segments compared with the same periods in the prior year.

• Operating expenses increased by $12.3 and $47.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared with the same periods in the prior year. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was comparable to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 at 47%. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to head count increases related to our business acquisitions, prototype and non-recurring engineering expenses related to future product launches, trade show and marketing program expenses, amortization of intangible assets, increased reserves for litigation and uncollectible accounts, restructuring and other charges, and increased fair value of contingent consideration.

• Interest expense decreased by $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to repayments of debt assumed through business acquisitions. Interest expense increased by $0.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to interest accretion on our Notes.

• Interest income and other income (expense), net, increased to gains of $0.9 and $1.1 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, from losses of $0.6 million and $1.0 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, primarily due to increased investment income of $0.5 and $1.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and decreased foreign exchange losses of $0.9 and $0.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, resulting primarily from revaluation of foreign currency denominated net assets (mainly denominated in Euros, British pounds sterling, and Indian rupees).

• We recognized tax benefits of $11.8 and $9.0 million on pre-tax net income of $5.8 and $15.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to a tax benefit of $2.8 million and a tax provision of $0.1 million on pre-tax net income of $7.5 and $23.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The changes in the income tax provision are primarily due to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared with September 30, 2015.

30

Results of Operations

Our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of total revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenue		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Gross profit		51			51			51			53
Operating expenses:
Research and development		15			16			15			17
Sales and marketing		17			17			18			18
General and administrative		10			8			9			9
Restructuring and other		1			—			1			—
Amortization of identified intangibles		4			4			4			3
Total operating expenses		47			45			47			47
Income from operations		4			6			4			6
Interest expense		(2	)		(2	)		(2	)		(2	)
Interest income and other income (expense), net		—			—			—			—
Income before income taxes		2			4			2			4
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes		5			1			1			—
Net income		7	%		5	%		3	%		4	%

Revenue

We classify our revenue, gross profit, assets, and liabilities in accordance with our three operating segments as follows:

“Industrial Inkjet,” which consists of our VUTEk and Matan super-wide and wide format, Reggiani textile, Jetrion label and packaging, and Cretaprint ceramic tile decoration industrial digital inkjet printers; digital UV, LED, ceramic, and thermoforming ink, as well as a variety of textile ink including dye sublimation, pigmented, reactive dye, acid dye, pure disperse dye, and water-based dispersed printing ink; digital inkjet printer parts; and professional services. Printing surfaces include paper, vinyl, corrugated, textile, glass, plastic, aluminum composite, ceramic tile, wood, and many other flexible and rigid substrates.

“Productivity Software,” which consists of a complete software suite that enables efficient and automated end-to-end business and production workflows for the print and packaging industry. ThisProductivity Suite also provides tools to enable revenue growth, efficient scheduling, and optimization of processes, equipment, and personnel. Customers are provided the financial and technical flexibility to deploy locally within their business or to be hosted in the cloud. The Productivity Suite addresses all segments of the print industry and consists of the: (i)Packaging Suite, with Radius at its core, for tag & label, cartons, and flexible packaging businesses; (ii)Corrugated Packaging Suite, with CTI at its core, for corrugated packaging businesses; (iii)Enterprise Commercial Print Suite, with Monarch at its core, for enterprise print businesses; (iv)Publication Print Suite, with Monarch or Technique at its core, for publication print businesses; (v)Mid-market Print Suite, with Pace at its core, for medium size print businesses; (vi)Quick Print Suite, with PrintSmith at its core, for small printers and in-plant sites; and (vii)Value Added Products, available with the suite and standalone, such as web-to-print, e-commerce, cross media marketing, warehousing, fulfillment, shop floor data collection, and shipping to reduce costs, increase profits, and offer new products and services to their existing and future customers. We also market Optitex fashion design software, which facilitates fast fashion in the textile industry.

“Fiery,” which consists of DFEs that transform digital copiers and printers into high performance networked printing devices for the office, industrial, and commercial printing markets. This operating segment is comprised of (i) stand-alone DFEs connected to digital printers, copiers, and other peripheral devices, (ii) embedded DFEs and design-licensed solutions used in digital copiers and multi-functional devices, (iii) optional software integrated into our DFE solutions such as Fiery Central and Command WorkStation, (iv) Fiery Self Serve, our self-service and payment solution, (v) PrintMe, our mobile printing application, and (vi) stand-alone software-based solutions such as our proofing and scanning solutions.

Ex-Currency. To better understand trends in our business, we believe it is helpful to adjust our statement of operations to exclude the impact of year-over-year changes in the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars. This is a non-GAAP measure that is calculated by adjusting revenue, gross profit, and operating expenses by using historical exchange rates in effect during the comparable prior period and removing the balance sheet currency remeasurement impact from interest income and other income (expense), net, including removal of any hedging gains and losses. We refer to these adjustments as “ex-currency.” The year-over-year currency impact can be determined as the difference between year-over-year actual growth rates and year-over-year ex-currency growth rates.

31

Management believes the ex-currency measures provide investors with an additional perspective on year-over-year financial trends and enables investors to analyze our operating results in the same way management does. A reconciliation of the ex-currency adjustments to GAAP results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and an explanation of how management uses non-GAAP financial information to evaluate its business, the substance behind management’s decision to use this non-GAAP financial information, the material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial information, the manner in which management compensates for those limitations, and the substantive reasons management believes that this non-GAAP financial information provides useful information to investors is included under “Non-GAAP Financial Information” below.

Revenue by Operating Segment during the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

Our revenue by operating segment during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

			Percent					Percent			Change
	2016		of total			2015		of total			$			%
Industrial Inkjet	$	143,004		58	%	$	122,566		54	%	$	20,438			17	%
Productivity Software		39,663		16			31,706		14			7,957			25
Fiery		62,908		26			74,422		32			(11,514	)		(15	)
Total revenue	$	245,575		100	%	$	228,694		100	%	$	16,881			7	%

Overview

Our consolidated revenue increased by 7% (9 % ex-currency), or $16.9 million, during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to increased Reggiani textile and Cretaprint ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printer revenue, increased ink revenue, and post-acquisition Rialco revenue in the Industrial Inkjet operating segment and increased Radius license revenue and post-acquisition Optitex, CTI, and Shuttleworth revenue in the Productivity Software operating segment.

Industrial Inkjet

Industrial Inkjet revenue increased by 17% (19 % ex-currency) during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015. Industrial Inkjet revenue in the super-wide and wide format product lines is benefiting from the ongoing analog to digital technology and solvent to UV ink migration primarily due to:

• the complementary impact of the Industrial Inkjet business acquisitions including Reggiani textile and Matan super-wide format industrial digital inkjet printers and Rialco ink products,

• the FabriVu 180/340 soft signage super wide-format roll-to-roll digital inkjet graphics printer manufactured in our Reggiani facility in Italy,

• the C4 ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printer,

• the M4, which is a wider-format ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printer, which can print with a variety of print heads,

• increased UV and LED ink revenue as a result of the high utilization that our UV printers are experiencing in the field, partially offset by decreased solvent printer installed base demand measured by solvent ink usage,

• ink product revenue from our acquisition of Rialco, which closed in the first quarter of 2016, and

• increased ceramic ink revenue as our internally formulated ceramic ink gains market share.

Productivity Software

Productivity Software revenue increased by 25% (27% ex-currency) during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to post-acquisition Optitex, CTI, and Shuttleworth revenue; increased Radius, PrintFlow, Technique, and Metrics license revenue; and annual price increases related to our maintenance contracts.

Fiery

Fiery revenue decreased by 15% (15% ex-currency) during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015. Although end customer and reseller preference for Fiery products drives demand, most Fiery revenue relies on printer manufacturers to design, develop, and integrate Fiery technology into their print engines. Fiery revenue decreased primarily due to one significant printer manufacturer purchasing less inventory and weak APAC demand.

32

Revenue by Operating Segment during the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

Our revenue by operating segment during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

			Percent					Percent			Change
	2016		of total			2015		of total			$			%
Industrial Inkjet	$	408,926		56	%	$	305,815		49	%	$	103,111			34	%
Productivity Software		108,554		15			96,497		15			12,057			12
Fiery		207,878		29			223,657		36			(15,779	)		(7	)
Total revenue	$	725,358		100	%	$	625,969		100	%	$	99,389			16	%

Overview

Our consolidated revenue increased by 16% (17 % ex-currency), or $99.4 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to increased Reggiani textile and Cretaprint ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printer revenue, increased ink revenue, and post-acquisition Rialco revenue in the Industrial Inkjet operating segment and increased Radius license revenue and post-acquisition Optitex, CTI, and Shuttleworth revenue in the Productivity Software operating segment.

Industrial Inkjet Revenue

Industrial Inkjet revenue increased by 34% (35% ex-currency) during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Industrial Inkjet revenue in the super-wide and wide format product lines is benefiting from the ongoing analog to digital technology and solvent to UV ink migration primarily due to the complementary impact of the Industrial Inkjet business acquisitions. Increased revenue resulted from nine months of Reggiani textile and Matan super-wide format industrial digital inkjet printer revenue in 2016 compared with three months in 2015, post-acquisition Rialco ink product revenue, the FabriVu 180/340 soft signage super wide-format roll-to-roll digital inkjet graphics printer manufactured in our Reggiani facility, increased ceramic ink revenue as our internally formulated ceramic ink gains market share, and increased UV and LED ink revenue as a result of the high utilization that our UV printers are experiencing in the field, partially offset by decreased solvent printer installed base demand measured by solvent ink usage.

Productivity Software

Productivity Software revenue increased by 12% (14% ex-currency) during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to post-acquisition Optitex, CTI, and Shuttleworth revenue; increased Pace, Radius, PrintFlow, and Technique license revenue; and annual price increases related to our maintenance contracts.

Fiery

Fiery revenue decreased by 7% (7% ex-currency) during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Although end customer and reseller preference for Fiery products drives demand, most Fiery revenue relies on printer manufacturers to design, develop, and integrate Fiery technology into their print engines. Fiery revenue decreased primarily due to one significant printer manufacturer purchasing less inventory and weak APAC demand.

Revenue by Geographic Area

Shipments to some of our significant printer manufacturer customers are made to centralized purchasing and manufacturing locations, which in turn ship to other locations, making it difficult to obtain accurate geographical shipment data. Accordingly, we believe that export sales of our products into each region may differ from what is reported.

Revenue by Geographic Area during the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

Our revenue by geographic area during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

			Percent					Percent			Change
	2016		of total			2015		of total			$		%
Americas	$	128,252		52	%	$	121,116		53	%	$	7,136		6	%
EMEA		85,009		35			79,934		35			5,075		6
APAC		32,314		13			27,644		12			4,670		17
Total revenue	$	245,575		100	%	$	228,694		100	%	$	16,881		7	%

33

Overview

Our consolidated revenue increased by approximately 7% (9% ex-currency), or $16.9 million, to $245.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $228.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 due to increased Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software revenue in all geographic regions.

Americas

Americas revenue increased by $7.1 million, or 6% (6% ex-currency), during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to increased UV and LED ink revenue; increased Reggiani industrial digital inkjet textile printer, Vutek industrial digital inkjet super-wide format printer, label and packaging digital inkjet printer, and Productivity Software revenue. Increased Productivity Software revenue resulted primarily from our 2016 acquisition of Optitex; our 2015 acquisition of CTI, and increased Radius and Metrics license revenue. Fiery revenue decreased primarily due to one significant printer manufacturer purchasing less inventory.

EMEA

EMEA revenue increased by $5.1 million, or 6% (9% ex-currency), during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to increased Reggiani industrial digital inkjet textile printer and post-acquisition Rialco ink products revenue and Productivity Software revenue, consisting primarily of post-acquisition Optitex and Shuttleworth revenue, partially offset by decreased Fiery revenue.

APAC

APAC revenue increased by $4.7 million, or 17% (19% ex-currency), during the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to increased ceramic tile decoration, Matan industrial digital inkjet super-wide format, Reggiani textile digital inkjet printer revenue; and Productivity Software revenue; partially offset by decreased Fiery revenue. Increased Productivity Software revenue resulted from our 2016 acquisition of Optitex and increased Technique and PrintFlow license revenue.

Revenue by Geographic Area during the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

Our revenue by geographic area during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

			Percent					Percent			Change
	2016		of total			2015		of total			$		%
Americas	$	363,977		50	%	$	337,050		54	%	$	26,927		8	%
EMEA		264,469		37			205,191		33			59,278		29
APAC		96,912		13			83,728		13			13,184		16
Total revenue	$	725,358		100	%	$	625,969		100	%	$	99,389		16	%

Overview

Our consolidated revenue increased by approximately 16% (17% ex-currency), or $99.4 million, to $725.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $626.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily from increased Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software revenue in all three geographic areas.

Americas

Americas revenue increased by $26.9 million, or 8% (8% ex-currency), during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015 resulting from increased revenue due to increased UV and LED ink revenue; increased Reggiani textile, Vutek and Matan super-wide format, label and packaging, and ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printer revenue; and increased Productivity Software revenue; partially offset by decreased Fiery revenue. Increased Productivity Software revenue resulted primarily from our 2016 acquisition of Optitex; our 2015 acquisition of CTI, and increased Radius and Metrics license revenue. Fiery revenue decreased primarily due to one significant printer manufacturer purchasing less inventory.

34

EMEA

EMEA revenue increased by $59.3 million, or 29% (31% ex-currency), during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to increased Reggiani textile, Matan super-wide format, and ceramic tile decoration digital inkjet printer revenue; post-acquisition revenue from our 2016 acquisitions of Rialco and Optitex; revenue from our 2015 acquisition of Shuttleworth; and increased Pace license revenue; partially offset by decreased Fiery revenue.

APAC

APAC revenue increased by $13.2 million, or 16% (18% ex-currency), during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to increased Matan super-wide format, ceramic tile decoration, and Reggiani digital inkjet printer revenue; and Optitex post-acquisition revenue; partially offset by decreased Fiery revenue.

Revenue Concentration

A substantial portion of our revenue over the years has been attributable to sales of products through the leading printer manufacturers and independent distributor channels. We have a direct relationship with several leading printer manufacturers and work closely to design, develop, and integrate Fiery technology into their print engines. The printer manufacturers act as distributors and sell Fiery products to end customers through reseller channels. End customer and reseller channel preference for the Fiery DFE and software solutions drive demand for Fiery products through the printer manufacturers.

Although end customer and reseller channel preference for Fiery products drives demand, most Fiery revenue relies on printer manufacturers to design, develop, and integrate Fiery technology into their print engines. A significant portion of our revenue is, and has been, generated by sales of our Fiery DFE products to a relatively small number of leading printer manufacturers. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we did not have any customers contributing more than 10% of our consolidated revenue. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, Xerox provided 13% of our consolidated revenue. We expect that if we increase our revenue in the Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software operating segments in the future, the percentage of our revenue from the leading printer manufacturer customers will decrease.

Gross Profit

Gross profit by operating segment, excluding stock-based compensation, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Industrial Inkjet
Revenue	$	143,004		$	122,566		$	408,926		$	305,815
Gross profit		50,433			42,428			141,927			104,863
Gross profit percentages		35.3	%		34.6	%		34.7	%		34.3	%
Productivity Software
Revenue	$	39,663		$	31,706		$	108,554		$	96,497
Gross profit		30,041			23,142			80,961			70,173
Gross profit percentages		75.7	%		73.0	%		74.6	%		72.7	%
Fiery
Revenue	$	62,908		$	74,422		$	207,878		$	223,657
Gross profit		45,362			51,500			147,938			157,562
Gross profit percentages		72.1	%		69.2	%		71.2	%		70.4	%

A reconciliation of our segment gross profit to our condensed consolidated statements of operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Segment gross profit	$	125,836		$	117,070		$	370,826		$	332,598
Stock-based compensation expense		(642	)		(785	)		(1,873	)		(2,357	)
Other items excluded from segment profit		—			—			(315	)		(113	)
Gross profit	$	125,194		$	116,285		$	368,638		$	330,128

35

Overview

Our gross profit percentage was 51% (51% ex-currency) during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and decreased to 51% (51% ex-currency) during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from 53% during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to increased Industrial Inkjet revenue at a gross profit percentage of 34.7% compared with Productivity Software and Fiery gross profit percentages of 74.6% and 71.2%, respectively. Industrial Inkjet revenue increased as a percentage of revenue to 58% and 56% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, from 54% and 49% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

Industrial Inkjet Gross Profit

The Industrial Inkjet gross profit percentage increased to 35.3% and 34.7% (35.7% and 34.9% ex-currency) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, from 34.6% and 34.3% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Gross profit percentages improved by leveraging efficiencies in our worldwide digital inkjet printer manufacturing operations, centralizing super wide-format textile digital inkjet printer production in Italy, transferring production of super wide-format roll-to-roll digital inkjet printers to Israel to leverage the lower cost platform that Matan provides, reducing warranty expense as a percentage of revenue due to engineering and quality improvements, and increasing ink revenue as a percentage of consolidated Industrial Inkjet revenue. Our ink business generates a higher gross profit percentage than other elements of our Industrial Inkjet operating segment.

Productivity Software Gross Profit

The Productivity Software gross profit percentages increased to 75.7% and 74.6% (75.5% and 74.4% ex-currency) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, from 73.0% and 72.7% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, primarily due to efficiencies gained through increased revenue on a relatively fixed cost base, achievement of certain post-acquisition cost synergies, and price increases on annual maintenance renewal contracts.

Fiery Gross Profit

The Fiery gross profit percentage increased to 72.1% and 71.2% (72.1% and 71.2% ex-currency) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, from 69.2% and 70.4% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The revenue mix between lower margin DFEs compared with higher margin professional services and software solutions accounts for this margin fluctuation between the periods.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,									Nine months ended September 30,
					Change									Change
	2016		2015		$		%			2016		2015		$		%
Research and development	$	36,933	$	36,125	$	808		2	%	$	111,731	$	103,913	$	7,818		8	%
Sales and marketing		43,060		39,814		3,246		8			127,360		114,117		13,243		12
General and administrative		24,088		18,223		5,865		32			66,366		54,210		12,156		22
Restructuring and other		1,308		584		724		124			5,733		2,544		3,189		125
Amortization of identified intangibles		10,395		8,759		1,636		19			29,360		18,120		11,240		62
Total operating expenses	$	115,784	$	103,505	$	12,279		12	%	$	340,550	$	292,904	$	47,646		16	%

Operating expenses increased by $12.3 and $47.6 million, or 12% and 16% (13% and 18% ex-currency), Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was comparable to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 at 47%.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses include personnel, consulting, travel, research and development facilities, prototype materials, and non-recurring engineering expenses.

36

Research and development expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $36.9 million, or 15% of revenue, compared to $36.1 million, or 16% of revenue, during the three months ended September 30, 2015, which is an increase of $0.8 million, or 2% (3% ex-currency). Personnel-related expenses increased by $1.6 million primarily due to head count increases related to our business acquisitions. Prototypes and non-recurring engineering, consulting, contractor, freight, and related travel expenses decreased by $0.3 million primarily due to the timing of trade show support by engineering personnel. Stock-based compensation expense decreased by $0.3 million primarily because actual forfeitures were greater than the previous forfeiture estimate that was used prior to implementation of ASU 2016-09 as more fully explained in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, as well as reduced probability of achieving performance awards and decreased ESPP participation by employees compared to the prior year.

Research and development expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $111.7 million, or 15% of revenue, compared to $103.9 million, or 17% of revenue, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which is an increase of $7.8 million, or 8% (9% ex-currency). Personnel-related expenses increased by $6.7 million primarily due to head count increases related to our business acquisitions, partially offset by reduced variable compensation expense. Prototypes and non-recurring engineering, consulting, contractor, freight, and related travel expenses increased by $0.6 million primarily due to product development efforts in advance of product launches. Stock-based compensation expense decreased by $0.8 million primarily because actual forfeitures were greater than the previous forfeiture estimate that was used prior to implementation of ASU 2016-09 as more fully explained in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, as well as reduced probability of achieving performance awards and decreased ESPP participation by employees compared to the prior year. Facilities and information technology expenses related to our research and development activities increased by $1.3 million.

We expect that if the U.S. dollar remains volatile against the Indian rupee, Euro, British pound sterling, Israeli shekel, Canadian dollar or Brazilian real, research and development expenses reported in U.S. dollars could fluctuate, although we hedge our operating expense exposure to the Indian rupee, which partially mitigates this risk.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses include personnel, trade shows, marketing programs and promotional materials, sales commissions, travel and entertainment, depreciation, and worldwide sales office expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $43.1 million, or 17% of revenue, compared to $39.8 million, or 17% of revenue, during the three months ended September 30, 2015, which is an increase of $3.3 million, or 8% (9% ex-currency). Personnel-related expenses increased by $1.5 million primarily due to head count increases related to our business acquisitions and increased commission payments due to increased revenue. Trade show and marketing program spending, including consulting, contractor, travel, and freight, increased by $0.8 million. Stock-based compensation expense increased by $0.4 million primarily because actual forfeitures were less than the previous forfeiture estimate that was used prior to implementation of ASU 2016-09 as more fully explained in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, partially offset by reduced probability of achieving performance awards and decreased ESPP participation by employees compared to the prior year. Facilities and information technology expenses related to our sales and marketing activities increased by $0.5 million.

Sales and marketing expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $127.4 million, or 18% of revenue, compared to $114.1 million, or 18% of revenue, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which is an increase of $13.3 million, or 12% (13% ex-currency). Personnel-related expenses increased by $7.2 million primarily due to head count increases related to our business acquisitions and commissions due to increased revenue. Trade show and marketing program spending, including consulting, contractor, travel, and freight, increased by $6.2 million. Stock-based compensation expense decreased by $0.3 million primarily because actual forfeitures were greater than the previous forfeiture estimate that was used prior to implementation of ASU 2016-09 as more fully explained in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, as well as decreased ESPP participation by employees compared to the prior year.

Over time, our sales and marketing expenses may increase in absolute terms if revenue increases in future periods as we continue to actively promote our products and introduce new services and products. We expect that if the U.S. dollar remains volatile against the Euro, British pound sterling, Brazilian real, Israeli shekel, Australian dollar, and other currencies, sales and marketing expenses reported in U.S. dollars could fluctuate.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of human resources, legal, and finance expenses.

37

General and administrative expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $24.1 million, or 10% of revenue, compared to $18.2 million, or 8% of revenue, during the three months ended September 30, 2015, which is an increase of $5.9 million, or 32% (33% ex-currency). Personnel-related expenses increased by $0.8 million primarily due to head count increases related to our business acquisitions. Acquisition costs decreased by $1.2 million primarily due to lower expenses in 2016 related to the Optitex acquisition, which closed on June 16, 2016, and anticipated acquisitions compared with acquisition costs related to the Reggiani and Matan acquisitions, which closed on July 1, 2015. Reserves for litigation and uncollectible accounts increased by $0.8 million. Legal expenses increased by $0.7 million due to an increase in litigation and settlement activity from the prior year. Stock-based compensation expense decreased by $0.9 primarily because actual forfeitures were greater than the previous forfeiture estimate that was used prior to implementation of ASU 2016-09 as more fully explained in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, reduced probability of achieving performance awards, and decreased ESPP participation by employees compared to the prior year.

The estimated probability of achieving the Optitex, Reggiani, DirectSmile, and CTI earnout performance targets increased during the three months ended September 30, 2016, resulting in an increase in the associated liability and a charge to general and administrative expense of $4.3 million, including accretion of interest. A similar change in the estimated probability or actual achievement of several earnout performance targets was reduced during the three months ended September 30, 2015, resulting in a reduction of the associated liability and a credit to general and administrative expense of $1.1 million, including accretion of interest.

General and administrative expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $66.4 million, or 9% of revenue, compared to $54.2 million, or 9% of revenue, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which is an increase of $12.2 million, or 22% (25% ex-currency). Personnel-related expenses increased by $1.3 million primarily due to head count increases related to our business acquisitions and variable compensation due to improved profitability. Acquisition costs decreased by $2.5 million primarily due to lower expenses in 2016 related to the Optitex and Rialco acquisitions, which closed in 2016, and anticipated acquisitions compared with acquisition costs related to the Reggiani and Matan acquisitions, which closed in 2015. Reserves for litigation and uncollectible accounts increased by $1.8 million. Legal expenses increased by $0.5 million due to an increase in litigation and settlement activity from the prior year. Stock-based compensation expense increased by $0.4 million primarily due to prior year forfeitures resulting from the resignation of our chief financial officer in January 2015, partially offset by reduced probability of achieving performance awards in the current year, decreased ESPP participation by employees compared to the prior year, and the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 because actual forfeitures were greater than the previous forfeiture estimate that was used prior to implementation of ASU 2016-09 as more fully explained in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies. Facilities and information technology expenses increased by $2.0 million.

The estimated probability of achieving the Optitex, Reggiani, DirectSmile, and CTI earnout performance targets increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, partially offset by a reduced probability of achieving the DIMS earnout performance target, resulting in an increase in the associated liability and a credit to general and administrative expense of $6.3 million, net of accretion of interest. A similar change in the estimated probability or actual achievement of several earnout performance targets during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 resulted in a reduction of the associated liability and a credit to general and administrative expense of $2.4 million in the prior year.

We expect that if the U.S. dollar remains volatile against the Euro, British pound sterling, Indian rupee, Israeli shekel, Brazilian real, or other currencies, general and administrative expenses reported in U.S. dollars could fluctuate.

Stock-based Compensation

We account for stock-based payment awards in accordance with ASC 718, which requires stock-based compensation expense to be recognized based on the fair value of such awards on the date of grant. We amortize compensation cost on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period, after assessing the probability of achieving requisite performance criteria with respect to performance-based and market-based awards. Stock-based compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as though the award were, in substance, multiple awards. This has the impact of greater stock-based compensation expense during the initial years of the vesting period.

Stock-based compensation expenses were $8.6 and $9.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of $0.9 million. Stock-based compensation expenses were $26.9 and $28.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of $1.2 million. Stock-based compensation expense decreased primarily because actual forfeitures were greater than the previous forfeiture estimate that was used prior to implementation of ASU 2016-09 as more fully explained in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, prior year forfeitures resulting from the resignation of our chief financial officer in January 2015, reduced probability of achieving performance awards, and decreased ESPP participation by employees compared to the prior year.

38

Restructuring and Other

Restructuring and other costs were $1.3 and $5.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.6 and $2.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Restructuring and other costs include severance charges of $0.6 and $3.7 million related to reductions in head count of 16 and 114 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.5 and $1.8 million related to reduction in head count of 17 and 65 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Severance costs include severance payments, related employee benefits, outplacement fees, and employee relocation costs.

Facilities relocation and downsizing expenses were $0.6 and $0.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, primarily related to the relocation of certain manufacturing and administrative locations to accommodate space requirements. Integration expenses of $0.6 and $1.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.1 and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, were required to integrate our business acquisitions.

Amortization of Identified Intangibles

Amortization of identified intangibles during the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $10.4 million, or 4% of revenue, compared to $8.8 million, or 4% of revenue, during the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $ 1.6 million, or 19%. The intangible amortization increase was primarily due to intangible amortization of identified intangibles resulting from the CTI, Shuttleworth, Rialco, and Optitex acquisitions, partially offset by decreased amortization due to certain intangible assets from prior year acquisitions becoming fully amortized.

Amortization of identified intangibles during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $29.4 million, or 4% of revenue, compared to $18.1 million, or 3% of revenue, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $11.2 million, or 62%. The intangible amortization increase was primarily due to intangible amortization of identified intangibles resulting from the Reggiani, Matan, CTI, Shuttleworth, Rialco, and Optitex acquisitions, partially offset by decreased amortization due to certain intangible assets from prior year acquisitions becoming fully amortized.

Interest Expense

Interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $4.5 and $13.2 million compared to $4.6 and $12.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $0.1 million primarily due to repayments of debt assumed through business acquisitions and an increase of $0.4 million, respectively, which is primarily due to interest accretion on our Notes.

Interest Income and Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest income and other income (expense), net, includes interest income on our cash equivalents and short-term investments, gains and losses from sales of our cash equivalents and short-term investments, and net foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

Interest income and other income (expense), net, increased to gains of $0.9 and $1.1 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, from losses of $0.6 million and $1.0 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, primarily due to increased investment income of $0.5 and $1.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and decreased foreign exchange losses of $0.9 and $0.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, resulting primarily from revaluation of foreign currency denominated net assets (mainly denominated in Euros, British pounds sterling, and Indian rupees).

Income Before Income Taxes

The components of income before income taxes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months  Ended September 30,						Nine Months  Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016		2015
U.S.	$	(210	)	$	(4,425	)	$	7,247	$	5,546
Foreign		6,025			11,926			8,712		17,762
Total	$	5,815		$	7,501		$	15,959	$	23,308

39

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, pretax net income of $5.8 million consisted of U.S. pretax net loss of $0.2 million and foreign pretax net income of $6.0 million, respectively. Pretax net loss attributable to U.S. operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $1.9 million, stock-based compensation of $8.6 million, restructuring and other of $0.9 million, acquisition-related costs of $0.4 million, change in fair value of contingent consideration of $0.5 million, and interest expense related to our Notes of $4.2 million. Pretax net income attributable to foreign operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $8.5 million, restructuring and other of $0.4 million, and change in fair value of contingent consideration of $3.8 million. The exclusion of these items from pretax net income would result in U.S. and foreign pretax net income of $16.3 and $18.7 million, respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2016.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, pretax net income of $16.0 million consisted of U.S. and foreign pretax net income of $7.3 and $8.7 million, respectively. Pretax net income attributable to U.S. operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $5.8 million, stock-based compensation of $26.9 million, restructuring and other of $3.1 million, acquisition-related costs of $1.4 million, litigation settlement expense of $0.9 million, change in fair value of contingent consideration of $0.5 million, and interest expense related to our Notes of $12.2 million. Pretax net income attributable to foreign operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $23.6 million, restructuring and other of $2.6 million, acquisition-related costs of $0.3 million, and change in fair value of contingent consideration of $5.8 million. The exclusion of these items from pretax net income would result in U.S. and foreign pretax net income of $58.1 and $41.0.million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, pretax net income of $7.5 million consisted of U.S. pretax net loss of $4.4 million and foreign pretax net income of $11.9 million, respectively. Pretax net loss attributable to U.S. operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $1.8 million, stock-based compensation of $9.5 million, acquisition-related costs of $1.0 million, and interest expense related to our Notes of $4.0 million. Pretax net income attributable to foreign operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $7.0 million and acquisition-related costs of $0.6 million, partially offset by change in fair value of contingent consideration of $1.2 million. The exclusion of these items from U.S. pretax net loss and foreign pretax net income would result in U.S. and foreign pretax net income of $11.9 and $18.3 million, respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, pretax net income of $23.3 million consisted of U.S. and foreign pretax net income of $5.5 and $17.8 million, respectively. Pretax net income attributable to U.S. operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $5.7 million, stock-based compensation of $28.1 million, restructuring and other of $1.2 million, acquisition-related costs of $3.5 million, litigation settlement expense of $0.6 million, and interest expense related to our Notes of $11.7 million. Pretax net income attributable to foreign operations included amortization of identified intangibles of $12.4 million, restructuring and other of $1.3 million, and acquisition-related costs of $0.8 million, partially offset by change in fair value of contingent consideration of $2.4 million. The exclusion of these items from pretax net income would result in U.S. and foreign pretax net income of $56.3 and $29.9 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Provision for Income Taxes

We recognized tax benefits of $11.8 and $9.0 million on pretax net income of $5.8 and $15.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. We recognized a tax benefit of $2.8 million and a tax provision of $0.1 million on pretax net income of $7.5 and $23.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The provisions for income taxes before discrete items reflected in the table below were $3.3 and $6.1 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $3.5 and $7.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The decrease in the provision for income taxes before discrete items during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared with the same periods in the prior year, is primarily due to the decrease in profitability before income taxes.

Primary differences between our provision for income taxes before discrete items and the income tax provision at the U.S. statutory rate of 35% include lower taxes on permanently reinvested foreign earnings and the tax effects of stock-based compensation expense pursuant to ASC 718-740, which are non-deductible for tax purposes.

Our tax provision before discrete items is reconciled to our recorded provision for income taxes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Provision for income taxes before discrete items	$	3.3		$	3.5		$	6.1		$	7.6
Interest related to unrecognized tax benefits		—			0.1			0.3			0.3
Benefit related to U.S. transfer pricing adjustment		—			—			—			(0.4	)
Benefit related to Spanish statutory and tax intangibles write-off		—			—			—			(0.3	)
Benefit related to stock based compensation, including ESPP dispositions		(1.4	)		(0.2	)		(1.7	)		(0.4	)
Benefit from reassessment of tax provision upon filing tax return		(0.2	)		(1.8	)		(0.2	)		(1.8	)
Benefit from reversals of uncertain tax positions due to statute of limitation expirations		(13.5	)		(4.4	)		(13.5	)		(4.9	)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes	$	(11.8	)	$	(2.8	)	$	(9.0	)	$	0.1

40

We earn a significant amount of our operating income outside the U.S., which is deemed to be permanently reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. Most of this income is earned in the Netherlands, Spain, and the Cayman Islands, which are jurisdictions with tax rates materially lower than the statutory U.S. tax rate of 35%. Our effective tax rate could fluctuate significantly and be adversely impacted if anticipated earnings in the Netherlands, Spain, and the Cayman Islands are proportionally lower than current projections and earnings in all other jurisdictions are proportionally higher than current projections.

While we currently do not foresee a need to repatriate the earnings of these operations, should we require more capital in the U.S. than is generated by our U.S. operations, we may elect to repatriate funds held in our foreign jurisdictions or raise capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances. These alternatives could result in higher effective tax rates, the cash payment of taxes, and/or increased interest expense.

In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we realized tax benefits of $13.5 million resulting from the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to a lapse of the statute of limitations in the United States and Spain, primarily due to $10.3 million associated with the 2012 sale of our Foster City building and land. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we realized tax benefits of $4.4 and $4.9 million, respectively, primarily resulting from the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to a lapse of the statute of limitations in the United States.

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, gross unrecognized tax benefits were $35.8 and $43.5 million, respectively, which would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized. Over the next twelve months, our existing tax positions will continue to generate increased liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. It is reasonably possible that our gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease up to $4.8 million in the next twelve months. These adjustments, if recognized, would positively impact our effective tax rate, and would be recognized as additional tax benefits in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The reduction in unrecognized tax benefits relates primarily to a lapse of the statute of limitations for federal and state tax purposes.

In accordance with ASU 2013-11, we recorded $23.5 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits as an offset to deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2016, and the remaining $12.3 million has been recorded as noncurrent income taxes payable.

We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we have accrued $0.8 and $0.5 million, respectively, for potential payments of interest and penalties.

As of September 30, 2016, we were subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2013-2015 tax years, state tax jurisdictions for the 2011-2015 tax years, the Netherlands tax authority for the 2014-2015 tax years, the Spanish tax authority for the 2012-2015 tax years, and the Italian tax authority for the 2012-2015 tax years.

In Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, the U.S Tax Court issued an opinion on July 27, 2015, related to the treatment of stock-based compensation expense in an intercompany cost-sharing arrangement. To date, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has not withdrawn the requirement to include stock-based compensation in intercompany cost-sharing arrangements from its regulations. Due to the uncertainty related to the status of the current regulations and the basis of the appeal that has been filed by the Internal Revenue Service, we have not recorded any benefit as of September 30, 2016 in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. We will continue to monitor ongoing developments and potential impacts to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income by considering both positive and negative evidence relating to their recoverability. If we believe that recovery of these deferred tax assets is not more likely than not, we establish a valuation allowance.

Significant judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we considered all available evidence, including recent operating results, projections of future taxable income, our ability to utilize loss and credit carryforwards, and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. Other than valuation allowances on deferred tax assets related to California and Luxembourg deferred tax assets that will not be realized based on the size of the net operating loss and research and development credits being generated, we have determined that is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit related to all other deferred tax assets. To the extent we increase a valuation allowance, we will include an expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period in which such determination is made.

Non-GAAP Financial Information

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information

To supplement our condensed consolidated financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP, we use non-GAAP measures of net income and earnings per diluted share that are GAAP net income and earnings per diluted share adjusted to exclude certain costs, expenses, and gains.

41

We believe the presentation of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per diluted share provides important supplemental information regarding certain costs, expenses, gains, and significant items that we believe are important to understanding financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per diluted share are among the primary indicators used by management as a basis for planning and forecasting future periods and by management and our Board of Directors to determine whether our operating performance has met specified targets and thresholds. Management uses non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per diluted share when evaluating operating performance because it believes the exclusion of the items described below, for which the amounts and/or timing may vary significantly depending on our activities and other factors, facilitates comparability of our operating performance from period to period. We have chosen to provide this information to investors so they can analyze our operating results in the same way that management does and use this information in their assessment of our business and the valuation of our Company.

Use and Economic Substance of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We compute non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per diluted share by adjusting GAAP net income and GAAP earnings per diluted share to remove the impact of the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, stock-based compensation expense, non-cash settlement of vacation liabilities, restructuring and other expense, acquisition-related transaction expenses, costs to integrate such acquisitions into our business, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration including the related foreign exchange fluctuation impact, litigation settlement charges, and non-cash interest expense related to our Notes. We use a static non-GAAP tax rate of 19%, which we believe reflects the long-term average tax rate based on our international structure and geographic distribution of revenue and profit.

Ex-Currency. To better understand trends in our business, we believe it is helpful to adjust our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations to exclude the impact of year-over-year changes in the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars. This is a non-GAAP measure that is calculated by adjusting revenue, gross profit, and operating expenses by using historical exchange rates in effect during the comparable prior period and removing the balance sheet currency remeasurement impact from interest income and other income (expense), net, including removal of any hedging gains and losses. We refer to these adjustments as “ex-currency.” Management believes the ex-currency measures provide investors with an additional perspective on year-over-year financial trends and enables investors to analyze our operating results in the same way management does. The year-over-year currency impact can be determined as the difference between year-over-year actual growth rates and year-over-year ex-currency growth rates.

These excluded items are described below:

• Intangible assets acquired to date are being amortized on a straight-line basis.

• Stock-based compensation expense recognized in accordance with ASC 718.

• Non-cash settlement of vacation liabilities through the issuance of RSUs, which are not included in the GAAP presentation of our stock-based compensation expense.

• Restructuring and other consists of:

• Restructuring charges incurred as we consolidate the number and size of our facilities and, as a result, reduce the size of our workforce.

• Expenses incurred to integrate businesses acquired of $0.6 and $1.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.1 and $0.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

• Acquisition-related transaction costs associated with businesses acquired during the periods reported and anticipated transactions of $0.4 and $1.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $1.6 and $4.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

• Changes in fair value of contingent consideration. Our management determined that we should analyze the total return provided by the investment when evaluating operating results of an acquired entity. The total return consists of operating profit generated from the acquired entity compared to the purchase price paid, including the final amounts paid for contingent consideration without considering any post-acquisition adjustments related to changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration. Because our management believes the final purchase price paid for the acquisition reflects the accounting value assigned to both contingent consideration and to the intangible assets, we exclude the GAAP impact of any adjustments to the fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration from the operating results of an acquisition in subsequent periods, including the related foreign exchange fluctuation impact. We believe this approach is useful in understanding the long-term return provided by our acquisitions and that investors benefit from a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the impact of this adjustment.

42

• Non-cash interest expense on our Notes. Our Notes may be settled in cash on conversion. We are required to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the Notes in a manner that reflects our non-convertible debt borrowing rate. Accordingly, for GAAP purposes, we are required to amortize a debt discount equal to the fair value of the conversion option as interest expense on our $345 million of 0.75% convertible senior notes that were issued in a private placement in September 2014 over the term of the Notes.

• Litigation Settlements. We settled, or accrued reserves related to, litigation claims of $0.9 and $0.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

• Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments. We use a constant non-GAAP tax rate of 19%, which we believe reflects the long-term average tax rate based on our international structure and geographic distribution of revenue and profit. The long-term average tax rate is calculated in accordance with the principles of ASC 740 to estimate the non-GAAP income tax provision in each jurisdiction in which we operate, after excluding the tax effect of the non-GAAP items described above and $10.3 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits associated with the 2012 sale of our Foster City building and land which we recognized in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Usefulness of Non-GAAP Financial Information to Investors

These non-GAAP measures, including ex-currency, are not in accordance with or an alternative to GAAP and may be materially different from other non-GAAP measures, including similarly titled non-GAAP measures, used by other companies. The presentation of this additional information should not be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or superior to, revenue, gross profit, operating expenses, net income, or earnings per diluted share prepared in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations in that they do not reflect certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. We expect to continue to incur expenses of a nature similar to the non-GAAP adjustments described above, and exclusion of these items from our non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per diluted share should not be construed as an inference that these costs are unusual, infrequent, or non-recurring.

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP NET INCOME TO NON-GAAP NET INCOME

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
							Ex-Currency									Ex-Currency
(in millions, except per share data)	2016			2015			2016			2016			2015			2016
Net income	$	17.7		$	10.3		$	17.7		$	25.0		$	23.2		$	25.0
Amortization of identified intangibles		10.4			8.8			10.4			29.4			18.1			29.4
Ex-currency adjustment		—			—			1.0									0.4
Restructuring and other		1.3			0.6			1.3			5.7			2.5			5.7
Stock-based compensation expense		8.6			9.5			8.6			26.9			28.1			26.9
Non-cash settlement of vacation liabilities by issuing RSUs		0.1			—			0.1			2.8			1.3			2.8
General and administrative:
Acquisition-related transaction costs		0.4			1.6			0.4			1.7			4.2			1.7
Change in fair value of contingent consideration		4.2			(1.1	)		4.2			6.3			(2.4	)		6.3
Litigation reserves		0.1			—			0.1			0.9			0.6			0.9
Interest income and other income (expense), net
Non-cash interest expense related to our Notes		3.1			3.0			3.1			9.2			8.8			9.2
Foreign exchange fluctuation related to contingent consideration		—			—			—			0.5			—			0.5
Balance sheet currency remeasurement impact		—			—			0.2			—			—			1.7
Tax effect on non-GAAP net income		(18.3	)		(8.5	)		(18.5	)		(27.9	)		(16.0	)		(28.3	)
Non-GAAP net income	$	27.5		$	24.2		$	28.5		$	80.5		$	68.5		$	82.2
Non-GAAP net income per diluted share	$	0.58		$	0.50		$	0.60		$	1.68		$	1.42		$	1.72
Shares for purposes of computing diluted non-GAAP net income per share		47.6			48.5			47.6			47.8			48.2			47.8

43

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP REVENUE BY OPERATING SEGMENT TO

NON-GAAP EX-CURRENCY

(UNAUDITED)

	Three months ended September 30,
(in millions)	GAAP					Ex-Currency							GAAP											Ex-Currency
			Percent			Ex-Currency				Percent			GAAP		Percent			Change from 2015  GAAP						Change from 2015  GAAP
	2016		of total			Adjustments		2016		of total			2015		of total			$			%			$			%
Industrial Inkjet	$	143.0		58	%	$	2.5	$	145.5		59	%	$	122.6		54	%	$	20.4			17	%	$	23.0			19	%
Productivity Software		39.7		16			0.5		40.2		16			31.7		14			8.0			25			8.5			27
Fiery		62.9		26			0.0		62.9		25			74.4		33			(11.5	)		(15	)		(11.5	)		(15	)
Total revenue	$	245.6		100	%	$	3.1	$	248.6		100	%	$	228.7		100	%	$	16.9			7	%	$	19.9			9	%
	Nine months ended September 30,
(in millions)	GAAP					Ex-Currency							GAAP											Ex-Currency
			Percent			Ex-Currency				Percent			GAAP		Percent			Change from 2015  GAAP						Change from 2015  GAAP
	2016		of total			Adjustments		2016		of total			2015		of total			$			%			$			%
Industrial Inkjet	$	408.9		56	%	$	5.4	$	414.3		57	%	$	305.8		49	%	$	103.1			34	%	$	108.5			35	%
Productivity Software		108.6		15			1.6		110.2		15			96.5		15			12.1			12			13.7			14
Fiery		207.9		29			—		207.9		28			223.7		36			(15.8	)		(7	)		(15.8	)		(7	)
Total revenue	$	725.4		100	%	$	7.0	$	732.4		100	%	$	626.0		100	%	$	99.4			16	%	$	106.4			17	%

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA TO

NON-GAAP EX-CURRENCY

(UNAUDITED)

	Three months ended September 30,
(in millions)	GAAP					Ex-Currency							GAAP										Ex-Currency
			Percent			Ex-Currency				Percent			GAAP		Percent			Change from 2015 GAAP					Change from 2015 GAAP
	2016		of total			Adjustments		2016		of total			2015		of total			$		%			$		%
Americas	$	128.3		52	%	$	—	$	128.3		52	%	$	121.1		53	%	$	7.1		6	%	$	7.1		6	%
EMEA		85.0		35			2.5		87.5		35			79.9		35			5.1		6			7.6		9
APAC		32.3		13			0.6		32.9		13			27.6		12			4.7		17			5.3		19
Total revenue	$	245.6		100	%	$	3.1	$	248.7		100	%	$	228.7		100	%	$	16.9		7	%	$	20.0		9	%
	Nine months ended September 30,
(in millions)	GAAP					Ex-Currency							GAAP										Ex-Currency
			Percent			Ex-Currency				Percent			GAAP		Percent			Change from 2015 GAAP					Change from 2015 GAAP
	2016		of total			Adjustments		2016		of total			2015		of total			$		%			$		%
Americas	$	364.0		50	%	$	0.5	$	364.5		50	%	$	337.1		54	%	$	26.9		8	%	$	27.4		8	%
EMEA		264.5		37			4.8		269.3		37			205.2		33			59.3		29			64.1		31
APAC		96.9		13			1.7		98.6		14			83.7		13			13.2		16			14.9		18
Total revenue	$	725.4		100	%	$	7.0	$	732.4		100	%	$	626.0		100	%	$	99.4		16	%	$	106.4		17	%

44

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP REVENUE & GROSS PROFIT BY OPERATING SEGMENT TO

NON-GAAP EX-CURRENCY

(UNAUDITED)

	Three months ended September 30,											Nine months ended September 30,
	GAAP			Ex-Currency		Ex-Currency			GAAP			GAAP			Ex-Currency		Ex-Currency			GAAP
(in millions)	2016			Adjustments		2016			2015			2016			Adjustments		2016			2015
Industrial Inkjet
Revenue	$	143.0		$	2.5	$	145.5		$	122.6		$	408.9		$	5.4	$	414.3		$	305.8
Gross profit		50.4			1.5		51.9			42.4			141.9			2.7		144.6			104.9
Gross profit percentages		35.3	%				35.7	%		34.6	%		34.7	%				34.9	%		34.3	%
Productivity Software
Revenue	$	39.7		$	0.5	$	40.2		$	31.7		$	108.6		$	1.6	$	110.2		$	96.5
Gross profit		30.0			0.3		30.3			23.1			81.0			1.0		81.9			70.2
Gross profit percentages		75.7	%				75.5	%		73.0	%		74.6	%				74.4	%		72.7	%
Fiery
Revenue	$	62.9		$	0.0	$	62.9		$	74.4		$	207.9		$	0.1	$	207.9		$	223.7
Gross profit		45.4			0.0		45.4			51.5			147.9			0.1		148.0			157.6
Gross profit percentages		72.1	%				72.1	%		69.2	%		71.2	%				71.2	%		70.4	%

A reconciliation of our segment gross profit to our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

	Three months ended September 30,											Nine months ended September 30,
	GAAP			Ex-Currency		Ex-Currency			GAAP			GAAP			Ex-Currency		Ex-Currency			GAAP
(in millions)	2016			Adjustments		2016			2015			2016			Adjustments		2016			2015
Segment gross profit	$	125.8		$	1.8	$	127.6		$	117.1		$	370.8		$	3.6	$	374.5		$	332.6
Stock-based compensation expense		(0.6	)		—		(0.6	)		(0.8	)		(1.9	)		—		(1.9	)		(2.4	)
Other items excluded from segment profit		—			—		—			—			(0.3	)		—		(0.3	)		(0.1	)
Gross profit	$	125.2		$	1.8	$	127.0		$	116.3		$	368.6		$	3.6	$	372.3		$	330.1

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP OPERATING EXPENSES TO

NON-GAAP EX-CURRENCY

(UNAUDITED)

		Three months ended September 30,
(in thousands)		GAAP		Ex-Currency				GAAP							Ex-Currency
				Ex-Currency						Change from 2015 GAAP					Change from 2015 GAAP
		2016		Adjustments		2016		2015		$		%			$		%
Research and development		$	36,933	$	242	$	37,175	$	36,125	$	808		2	%	$	1,050		3	%
Sales and marketing	��		43,060		299		43,359		39,814		3,246		8			3,545		9
General and administrative			24,088		208		24,296		18,223		5,865		32			6,073		33
Restructuring and other			1,308		4		1,312		584		724		124			728		125
Amortization of identified intangibles			10,395		1		10,396		8,759		1,636		19			1,637		19
Total operating expenses		$	115,784	$	754	$	116,538	$	103,505	$	12,279		12	%	$	13,033		13	%
		Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)		GAAP		Ex-Currency				GAAP							Ex-Currency
				Ex-Currency						Change from 2015 GAAP					Change from 2015 GAAP
		2016		Adjustments		2016		2015		$		%			$		%
Research and development		$	111,731	$	1,118	$	112,849	$	103,913	$	7,818		8	%	$	8,936		9	%
Sales and marketing			127,360		1,594		128,954		114,117		13,243		12			14,837		13
General and administrative			66,366		1,188		67,554		54,210		12,156		22			13,344		25
Restructuring and other			5,733		131		5,864		2,544		3,189		125			3,320		131
Amortization of identified intangibles			29,360		253		29,613		18,120		11,240		62			11,493		63
Total operating expenses		$	340,550	$	4,284	$	344,834	$	292,904	$	47,646		16	%	$	51,930		18	%

45

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments decreased by $48.2 million to $449.1 million as of September 30, 2016 from $497.4 million as of December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to cash consideration paid for the acquisition of Optitex and Rialco, net of cash acquired, of $19.6 million, repayment of debt assumed through business acquisitions of $8.5 million, treasury stock purchases of $57.7 million, settlement of shares for employee common stock related tax liabilities and the stock option exercise price of certain stock options of $7.6 million, cash payments for property and equipment of $17.6 million, funding $3.7 million in the restricted collateral account related to our synthetic lease, acquisition-related contingent consideration payments of $1.9 million, partially offset by cash flows provided by operating activities of $55.8 million, proceeds from ESPP purchases and stock option exercises of $10.4 million, and the impact of foreign exchange rate changes of $2.2 million.

(in thousands)	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			Change
Cash and cash equivalents	$	143,003		$	164,091		$	(21,088	)
Short term investments		306,144			333,276			(27,132	)
Total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments	$	449,147		$	497,367		$	(48,220	)
	Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2016			2015			Change
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	55,824		$	41,287		$	14,537
Net cash used for investing activities		(13,668	)		(73,870	)		60,202
Net cash used for financing activities		(65,402	)		(65,163	)		(239	)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		2,158			(1,435	)		3,593
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(21,088	)	$	(99,181	)	$	78,093

Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments held outside of the U.S. in various foreign subsidiaries were $97.3 and $106.0 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, will be used to fund local operations and finance international acquisitions. If these funds are needed for our operations in the U.S., we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. federal and state income taxes on some or all of these funds. However, our intent is to indefinitely reinvest these funds outside of the U.S. and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate them to fund our U.S. operations.

Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash generated from operating activities will satisfy our working capital, capital expenditure, investment, stock repurchase, commitments (see Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through at least the next twelve months. We believe that the most strategic uses of our cash resources include business acquisitions, strategic investments to gain access to new technologies, repurchases of shares of our common stock, and working capital. At September 30, 2016, cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments available were $449.1 million. We believe that our liquidity position and capital resources are sufficient to meet our operating and working capital needs.

Operating Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, our cash provided by operating activities was approximately $55.8 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities consists primarily of net income of $25.0 million and non-cash charges and credits of $73.3 million, partially offset by the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $42.5 million. Non-cash charges and credits of $73.3 million consist primarily of $40.7 million in depreciation and amortization, $26.7 million of stock-based compensation expense, net of cash settlements, non-cash accretion of interest expense of $10.0 million, provision for bad debts and sales-related allowances of $7.6 million, and provision for inventory obsolescence of $4.5 million, and other non-cash charges and credits of $5.9 million, partially offset by deferred tax credits of $22.1 million. The net change in operating assets and liabilities of $42.5 million consists primarily of increased gross accounts receivable of $27.7 million, increased other current assets of $1.2 million, and decreased accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $19.8 million, partially offset by decreased taxes receivable, net, of $5.8 million and decreased gross inventories of $0.4 million.

Accounts Receivable

Our primary source of operating cash flow is the collection of accounts receivable from our customers. One measure of the effectiveness of our collection efforts is average days sales outstanding for accounts receivable (“DSO”). DSOs were 83 and 69 days at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. We calculate DSO by dividing net accounts receivable at the end of the quarter by revenue recognized during the quarter, multiplied by the total days in the quarter.

46

DSOs increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared with December 31, 2015, primarily due to increased Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software revenue as a percentage of consolidated revenue, sales with extended payment terms, and a non-linear sales cycle resulting in significant billings at the end of the quarter. Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software were 74% and 70% of consolidated revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. By comparison, Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software were 64% of consolidated revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

We expect DSOs to vary from period to period because of changes in the mix of business between direct customers and end user demand driven through the leading printer manufacturers, the effectiveness of our collection efforts both domestically and overseas, and variations in the linearity of our sales. As the percentage of Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software related revenue increases, we expect DSOs will trend higher. Our DSOs related to the Industrial Inkjet and Productivity Software operating segments are traditionally higher than those related to the significant printer manufacturer customers / distributors in our Fiery operating segment as, historically, these Fiery customers have been granted shorter payment terms and have paid on a more timely basis.

We have facilities in the U.S. and Italy that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables with recourse. Trade receivables sold with recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than 10 days from date of sale, which are subject to a servicing obligation. We also have facilities in Spain and Italy that enable us to sell to third parties, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. Trade receivables sold without recourse are generally short-term receivables with payment due dates of less than one year, which are secured by international letters of credit.

Trade receivables sold cumulatively under these facilities were $15.4 and $2.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 on a recourse and nonrecourse basis, respectively, which approximates the cash received. The receivables that were sold to third parties were removed from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and were reflected as cash provided by operating activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Inventories

Our inventories are procured primarily in support of the Industrial Inkjet and Fiery operating segments. The majority of our Industrial Inkjet products are manufactured internally, while Fiery production is primarily outsourced. The result is lower inventory turnover for Industrial Inkjet inventories compared with Fiery inventories.

Our net inventories increased by $0.5 million to $106.9 million at September 30, 2016 from $106.4 million at December 31, 2015 primarily due to the acquisition of Rialco. Inventory turnover was 4.4 during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared with 4.7 turns during the quarter ended December 31, 2015. We calculate inventory turnover by dividing annualized current quarter cost of revenue by ending inventories.

Investing Activities

Acquisitions

On June 16, 2016, we purchased Optitex for cash consideration of $11.6 million, net of cash acquired, plus an additional potential future cash earnout, which is contingent on achieving revenue and operating profit performance targets. Optitex has developed and markets integrated 2D and 3D design software that is shortening the design cycle, reducing our customers’ costs, and accelerating the adoption of fast fashion.

On March 1, 2016, we purchased Rialco for cash consideration of $8.4 million, net of cash acquired, plus an additional potential future cash earnout, which is contingent on achieving revenue and gross profit targets. Rialco is a leading European supplier of dye powders and color products for the textile, digital print, and other decorating industries.

The escrow of $1.5 million related to the Reggiani acquisition was remitted to us in return for the issuance of shares of common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

A tax recovery liability of $1.0 million related to the Cretaprint acquisition was paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

On July 1, 2015, we acquired Matan for approximately $38.9 million in cash, net of cash acquired.

On July 1, 2015, we acquired Reggiani for approximately $26.6 million in cash, net of cash acquired, $26.9 million in shares of EFI stock, plus an additional future potential cash earnout contingent on achieving certain performance targets.

47

Investments

Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, net of purchases, were $27.3 and $4.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We have classified our investment portfolio as “available for sale.” Our investments are made with a policy of capital preservation and liquidity as primary objectives. We may hold investments in fixed income debt securities to maturity; however, we may sell an investment at any time if the quality rating of the investment declines, the yield on the investment is no longer attractive, or we have better uses for the cash. Since we invest primarily in investment securities that are highly liquid with a ready market, we believe the purchase, maturity, or sale of our investments has no material impact on our overall liquidity.

Property and Equipment, Net

Our property and equipment additions have historically been funded from operating activities. Net purchases of property and equipment were $17.6 and $13.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, including the purchase of aqueous single pass digital inkjet printer manufacturing and engineering equipment in the Americas and Spain.

Financing Activities

Stock Option and ESPP Proceeds

Historically, our recurring cash flows provided by financing activities have been from the receipt of cash from the issuance of common stock through the exercise of stock options and employee purchases of ESPP shares. We received proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $0.6 and $1.9 million and employee purchases of ESPP shares of $9.8 and $9.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. While we may continue to receive proceeds from these plans in future periods, the timing and amount of such proceeds are difficult to predict and are contingent on a number of factors including the price of our common stock, the timing and number of stock options exercised by employees that had participated in these plans, net settlement options, employee participation in our ESPP, and general market conditions. We anticipate that cash provided from the exercise of stock options will decline over time as we have shifted to issuance of RSUs, rather than stock options.

Treasury Stock Purchases

The primary use of funds for financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $65.3 and $50.9 million, respectively, of cash used to repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock. Such repurchases included $7.6 and $10.5 million used for net settlement of shares for the exercise price of certain stock options and any tax withholding obligations incurred in connection with such exercises and tax withholding obligations that arose on the vesting of RSUs during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

On November 6, 2013, the board of directors approved the repurchase of $200 million of outstanding common stock. Under this publicly announced plan, we repurchased 1.0 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $40.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

On November 9, 2015, the board of directors cancelled $54.9 million remaining for repurchase under the 2013 authorization and approved a new authorization to repurchase $150 million of outstanding common stock commencing January 1, 2016. This authorization expires December 31, 2018. We repurchased 1.4 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $57.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Earnout Payments

Earnout payments during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $1.9 million are primarily related to the previously accrued DirectSmile, SmartLinc, and Metrix contingent consideration liabilities. Earnout payments during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 of $2.9 million are primarily related to the previously accrued Technique, Metrix, and SmartLinc contingent consideration liabilities.

We paid approximately $8.3 million of indebtedness, which was assumed in the Optitex and Matan acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. We paid approximately $22.5 million of indebtedness, which was assumed in the Reggiani acquisition during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Other Commitments

Our Industrial Inkjet inventories consist of materials required for our internal manufacturing operations and finished goods and sub-assemblies purchased from third party contract manufacturers. Raw materials and finished goods, print heads, frames, digital UV ink, ceramic digital ink, various textile printing inks, and other components are required to support our internal manufacturing operations. Label and packaging digital inkjet printers, solvent ink formulation, branded textile ink, and certain sub-assemblies are purchased from third party contract manufacturers and branded third party ink manufacturers.

48

Our Fiery inventory consists primarily of raw materials and finished goods, memory subsystems, processors, and ASICs, which are sold to third party contract manufacturers responsible for manufacturing our products. Should we decide to purchase components and manufacture Fiery DFEs internally, or should it become necessary for us to purchase and sell components other than memory subsystems, processors, and ASICs to our contract manufacturers, inventory balances and potentially property and equipment would increase significantly, thereby reducing our available cash resources. Further, the inventories we carry could become obsolete, thereby negatively impacting our financial condition and results of operations.

We are also reliant on several sole source suppliers for certain key components and could experience a further significant negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations if such supplies were reduced or not available. We may be required to compensate our subcontract manufacturers for components purchased for orders subsequently cancelled by us. We periodically review the potential liability and the adequacy of the related allowance.

We may be required to compensate our subcontract manufacturers for components purchased for orders subsequently cancelled by us. We periodically review the potential liability and the adequacy of the related allowance.

Indemnifications

In the normal course of business and in an effort to facilitate the sales of our products, we sometimes indemnify other parties, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with us. When we indemnify these parties, typically those provisions protect other parties against losses arising from our infringement of third party intellectual property rights or other claims made by third parties arising from the use or distribution of our products. Those provisions often contain various limitations including limits on the amount of protection provided.

As permitted under Delaware law, pursuant to our bylaws, charter, and indemnification agreements with our current and former executive officers, directors, and general counsel, we are required, subject to certain limited qualifications, to indemnify our executive officers, directors, and general counsel for certain events or occurrences while the executive officer, director, or general counsel is or was serving at our request in such capacity. The indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the executive officer’s, director’s, or general counsel’s lifetime. The maximum potential future payments we may be obligated to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and may enable us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.

Legal Proceedings

Please refer to “Part II – Other Information, Item 1: Legal Proceedings” in this Report for more information regarding our legal proceedings.

Synthetic Lease Arrangement

On August 26, 2016, we entered into a 48.5 year lease agreement, inclusive of two renewal options, with the City of Manchester to lease 16.9 acres adjacent to the Manchester Regional Airport. This lease agreement is subject to a sublease agreement with BTMU during the term of the synthetic lease related to the manufacturing facility that is being constructed on the site. Minimum lease payments are $13.3 million, excluding the portion financed into the synthetic lease related to the manufacturing facility. We are treated as the owner of the construction project for federal income tax purposes.

On August 26, 2016, we entered into a six-year synthetic lease with BTMU whereby a 225,000 square foot manufacturing and warehouse facility is under construction related to our super-wide format industrial digital inkjet printer business in the Industrial Inkjet operating segment at a projected cost of $40 million and a construction period of 18 months. Minimum lease payments during the initial term are $1.8 million. Upon completion of the initial term, we have the option to renew the lease, purchase the facility, or return the facility to BTMU subject to an 89% residual value guarantee under which we would recognize additional rent expense in the form of a variable rent payment. We have assessed our exposure in relation to the residual value guarantee and believe that there is no deficiency to the guaranteed value with respect to funds expended by BTMU as of September 30, 2016.

The funds pledged under the lease represent 115% of the total expenditures made by BTMU through September 30, 2016. The funds are invested in $3.1 and $0.7 of million U.S. government securities and cash equivalents, respectively, with a third party trustee and will be restricted during the construction period. Upon completion of construction, the funds will be released as cash and cash equivalents. The portion that represents 100% of the total expenditures made by BTMU will be deposited with BTMU and restricted as collateral until the end of the underlying synthetic lease period.

Contractual Obligations

Please refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Contractual Obligations” presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K during the year ended December 31, 2015.

49

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, general credit, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, liquidity, and interest rate risks, which may be exacerbated by the tight global credit market and increase in economic uncertainty that have affected various sectors of the financial market and continue to cause credit and liquidity issues. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We may enter into financial instrument contracts to manage and reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on earnings and cash flows. The counterparties to such contracts are major financial institutions. We hedge our operating expense exposure in Indian rupees. The notional amount of our Indian rupee cash flow hedge was $3.2 million at September 30, 2016. We hedge balance sheet remeasurement exposures using forward contracts not designated for hedge accounting treatment with notional amounts of $153.6 million at September 30, 2016 consisting of hedges of Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Israeli shekel, Australian dollar, Japanese yen, Chinese renminbi, and Euro-denominated intercompany balances with notional amounts of $84.6 million, hedges of Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, and Euro-denominated trade receivables with notional amounts of $56.1 million, and hedges of British pounds sterling, Indian rupee, and Euro-denominated other net monetary assets with notional amounts of $12.9 million.

Since Europe represents a significant portion of our revenue and cash flow, SEC encourages disclosure of our European concentrations of credit risk regarding gross receivables, related reserves, and aging on a region or country basis, and the impact on liquidity with respect to estimated timing of receivable payments. Since Europe is composed of varied countries and regional economies, our European risk profile is somewhat more diversified due to the varying economic conditions among the countries. Approximately 27 % of our receivables are with European customers as of September 30, 2016. Of this amount, 30% of our European receivables (8 % of consolidated net receivables) are in the higher risk southern European countries (mostly Italy, Spain, and Portugal), which are adequately reserved.

Marketable Securities

We maintain an investment portfolio of short-term fixed income debt securities of various holdings, types, and maturities. These short-term investments are generally classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of OCI. We attempt to limit our exposure to interest rate risk by investing in securities with maturities of less than three years; however, we may be unable to successfully limit our risk to interest rate fluctuations. At any time, a sharp rise in interest rates could have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. Conversely, declines in interest rates could have a material favorable impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. Increases or decreases in interest rates could have a material impact on interest earnings related to new investments during the period. We do not currently hedge these interest rate exposures.

Interest Rate Risk

Hypothetical changes in the fair values of financial instruments held by us at September 30, 2016 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates are presented below. The modeling technique measures the change in fair value arising from selected potential changes in interest rates. Market changes reflect immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 100 basis points over a twelve month time horizon (in thousands):

Valuation of securities given an interest rate decrease of 100 basis points		No change in interest rates		Valuation of securities given an interest rate increase of 100 basis points
$	325,993	$	322,121	$	318,023

The SEC encourages the discussion of exposure to the uncertainty in the European economy. Specifically, European debt by counterparty (i.e., sovereign and non-sovereign) and by country should be addressed. We have no European sovereign debt investments. Our European debt and investments consist of non-sovereign corporate debt securities of $30.7 million, which represents 15% of our corporate debt instruments (10% of our short-term investments) at September 30, 2016. European debt investments are with corporations domiciled in the northern and central European countries of Sweden, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Norway, France, and the U.K. We do not have any short-term investments with corporations domiciled in the higher risk “southern European” countries (i.e., Italy, Spain, Greece, and Portugal) or in Ireland. We believe that we do not have significant exposure with respect to our money market and corporate debt investments in Europe.

50

As of September 30, 2016, we have $345 million principal amount of Notes outstanding. We carry these instruments at face value less unamortized discount on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Since these instruments bear interest at fixed rates, we have no financial statement risk associated with changes in interest rates. Although the fair value of these instruments fluctuates when interest rates change, a substantial portion of the market value of our Notes in excess of the outstanding principal amount relates to the conversion premium. Please refer to Note 5 – Investments and Fair Value Measurements and Note 6 – Convertible Senior Notes, Note Hedges, and Warrants of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

A large portion of our business is conducted in countries other than the U.S. We are primarily exposed to changes in exchange rates for the Euro, British pound sterling, Indian rupee, Japanese yen, Brazilian real, Chinese renminbi, Israeli shekel, New Zealand dollar, and Australian dollar. Although the majority of our receivables are invoiced and collected in U.S. dollars, we have exposure from non-U.S. dollar-denominated sales (consisting of the Euro, British pound sterling, Brazilian real, Chinese renminbi, Israeli shekel, Australian dollar, and Canadian dollar) and operating expenses (primarily the Euro, British pound sterling, Brazilian real, Chinese renminbi, Israeli shekel, Japanese yen, Indian rupee, and Australian dollar) in foreign countries. We can benefit from or be adversely affected by either a weaker or stronger U.S. dollar relative to major currencies worldwide with respect to our condensed consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, we can benefit from a stronger U.S. dollar due to the corresponding reduction in our foreign operating expenses translated in U.S. dollars and at the same time we can be adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar due to the corresponding reduction in foreign revenue translated in U.S. dollars.

We hedge our operating expense exposure in Indian rupees. The notional amount of our Indian rupee cash flow hedge was $3.2 million at September 30, 2016. We hedge balance sheet remeasurement exposures using forward contracts not designated for hedge accounting treatment with notional amounts of $153.6 million at September 30, 2016 consisting of hedges of Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Israeli shekel, Australian dollar, Japanese yen, Chinese renminbi, and Euro-denominated intercompany balances with notional amounts of $84.6 million, hedges of Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, and Euro-denominated trade receivables with notional amounts of $56.1 million, and hedges of British pounds sterling, Indian rupee, and Euro-denominated other net monetary assets with notional amounts of $12.9 million.

The impact of hypothetical changes in foreign exchanges rates on revenue and income from operations are presented below. The modeling technique measures the change in revenue and income from operations resulting from changes in selected foreign exchange rates with respect to the Euro and British pound sterling of plus or minus one percent during the three months ended September 30, 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	Impact of a foreign exchange rate decrease of one percent		No change in foreign exchange rates		Impact of a foreign exchange rate increase of one percent
Revenue	$	727,851	$	725,358	$	722,865
Income from operations	$	28,311	$	28,088	$	27,865

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the quarter ended September 30, 2016, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial and accounting officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2016 to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial and accounting officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the third quarter of 2016, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

51

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

We may be involved, from time to time, in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations, or proceedings relating to contractual disputes, securities laws, intellectual property rights, employment, or other matters that may arise in the normal course of business. We assess our potential liability in each of these matters by using the information available to us. We develop our views on estimated losses in consultation with inside and outside counsel, which involves a subjective analysis of potential results and various combinations of appropriate litigation and settlement strategies. We accrue estimated losses from contingencies if a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated.

As of September 30, 2016, we are subject to the matter discussed below.

MDG Matter

EFI acquired Matan in 2015 from sellers (the “2015 Sellers”) that acquired Matan Digital Printing Ltd. from other sellers in 2001 (the “2001 Sellers”). The 2001 Sellers have asserted a claim against the 2015 Sellers and Matan asserting that they are entitled to a portion of the 2015 Sellers’ proceeds from EFI’s acquisition. The 2015 Sellers dispute this claim and have agreed to indemnify EFI against the 2001 Sellers’ claim.

Although we are fully indemnified and we do not believe that it is probable that we will incur a loss, it is reasonably possible that our financial statements could be materially affected by the unfavorable resolution of this matter. Accordingly, it is reasonably possible that we could incur a material loss in this matter. We estimate the range of loss to be between one dollar and $9.6 million. If we incur a loss in this matter, it will be offset by a receivable of an equal amount representing a claim for indemnification against the escrow account established in connection with the Matan acquisition.

Other Matters

As of September 30, 2016, we were subject to various other claims, lawsuits, investigations, and proceedings in addition to the matter discussed above. There is at least a reasonable possibility that additional losses may be incurred in excess of the amounts that we have accrued. However, we believe that these claims are not material to our financial statements or the range of reasonably possible losses is not reasonably estimable. Litigation is inherently unpredictable, and while we believe that we have valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against us, our financial statements could be materially affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of one or more of these contingencies or because of the diversion of management’s attention and the incurrence of significant expenses.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

In addition to information regarding risk factors that appears in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Forward-looking Statements” in Part I, Item 2, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, and Part II, Items 7 and 7A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Form 10-K”), which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results. The risks described herein and in our 2015 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

52

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Our stock repurchases during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

							Approximate
					Total Number of Shares		Dollar Value of
	Total Number of				Purchased as Part of		Shares that May Yet
	Shares		Average Price		Publicly Announced		Be Purchased Under
Total	Purchased (2)		Paid per Share		Plans		the Plans (1)
July 2016		142	$	43.60		142	$	104,084
August 2016		267		43.95		216		94,596
September 2016		75		46.97		49		92,282
Total		484	$	44.31		407	$	92,282

(1) In November 2015, our board of directors authorized $150 million for the repurchase of our outstanding common stock commencing January 1, 2016. This authorization expires December 31, 2018. Under this publicly announced plan, we repurchased 0.4 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $18.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016. We had previously repurchased 1.0 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $39.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

(2) Includes 0.1 million shares purchased from employees to satisfy the exercise price of certain stock options and any tax withholding obligations incurred in connection with such exercises and minimum tax withholding obligations that arose on the vesting of RSUs.

Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4: Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 5: Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6: Exhibits

No.	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (as amended August 12, 2009) (2)
12.1	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-57382) and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference.

53

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.
Date: October 31, 2016	/s/ Guy Gecht
	Guy Gecht
	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: October 31, 2016	/s/ Marc Olin
	Marc Olin
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

54

EXHIBIT INDEX

No.	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Electronics For Imaging, Inc. (as amended August 12, 2009) (2)
12.1	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-57382) and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference.

55