Basis of Presentation | 6 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Presentation | ' |
Note 1. Basis of Presentation |
|
The accounting policies followed by Abraxas Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) are set forth in the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 17, 2014. Such policies have been continued without change. Also, refer to the notes to those financial statements for additional details of the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. All material items included in those notes have not changed except as a result of normal transactions in the interim, or as disclosed within this report. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have not been audited by our independent registered public accountants, but in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations. Any and all adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Although management believes the unaudited interim related disclosures in these condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The results of operations and the cash flows for the period ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
|
Consolidation Principles |
|
The terms “Abraxas,” “Abraxas Petroleum,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Abraxas Petroleum Corporation and all of its subsidiaries, including Raven Drilling, LLC (“Raven Drilling”) and a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, Canadian Abraxas Petroleum, ULC (“Canadian Abraxas”). |
|
Canadian Abraxas’ assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the period. Translation adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. |
|
Rig Accounting |
|
In accordance with SEC Regulation S-X, no income is to be recognized in connection with contractual drilling services performed in connection with properties in which the Company or its affiliates holds an ownership, or other economic interest. Any income not recognized as a result of this limitation is to be credited to the full cost pool and recognized through lower amortization as reserves are produced. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
New Accounting Standards and Disclosures |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) in May 2014 which provides accounting guidance for all revenue arising from contracts to provide goods or services to customers. The requirements from the new ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. The standard allows for either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption. At this time, we are evaluating the guidance to determine the method of adoption and the impact of this ASU on our financial statements and related disclosures, if any. |
|
|
Stock-based Compensation and Option Plans |
|
Stock Options |
|
The Company currently utilizes a standard option-pricing model (i.e., Black-Scholes) to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors. |
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for the periods presented: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
June 30, | June 30, |
2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
$ | 807 | | | $ | 558 | | | $ | 1,114 | | | $ | 920 | |
|
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014: |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | | |
Number | Average | Average | | |
of | Option | Grant | | |
Shares | Exercise | Date Fair | | |
| Price Per | Value | | |
| Share | Per Share | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2013 | | 5,400 | | | $ | 2.77 | | | $ | 1.98 | | | | |
| |
Granted | | 1,020 | | | $ | 3.36 | | | $ | 2.43 | | | | |
| |
Exercised | | (351 | ) | | $ | 2.69 | | | $ | 1.86 | | | | |
| |
Canceled | | (67 | ) | | $ | 2.97 | | | $ | 2.11 | | | | |
| |
Outstanding, June 30, 2014 | | 6,002 | | | $ | 2.87 | | | $ | 2.06 | | | | |
| |
|
Additional information related to stock options at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows: |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | December 31, | | | | | | | | |
2014 | 2013 | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable | | 4,069 | | | 3,828 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
As of June 30, 2014, there was approximately $3.3 million of unamortized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options that will be recognized in 2014 through 2017. |
|
Restricted Stock Awards |
|
Restricted stock awards are awards of common stock that are subject to restrictions on transfer and to a risk of forfeiture if the awardee terminates employment with the Company prior to the lapse of the restrictions. The fair value of such stock was determined using the closing price on the grant date and compensation expense is recorded over the applicable vesting periods. |
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014: |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number | | Weighted | | | | | | | |
of | Average | | | | | | |
Shares | Grant Date | | | | | | |
| Fair Value | | | | | | |
| Per Share | | | | | | |
Unvested, December 31, 2013 | | 355 | | | $ | 3.24 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Granted | | 762 | | | 3.15 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Vested/Released | | (5 | ) | | 2.94 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Forfeited | | (20 | ) | | 3.47 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Unvested, June 30, 2014 | | 1,092 | | | $ | 3.18 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock for the periods presented: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
June 30, | June 30, |
2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
$ | 222 | | | $ | 111 | | | $ | 354 | | | $ | 222 | |
|
|
As of June 30, 2014, there was approximately $2.5 million of unamortized compensation expense relating to outstanding restricted shares that will be recognized in 2014 through 2017. |
|
Common Stock Offering |
|
On June 24, 2014, we completed a public offering of 11.5 million common shares at $5.00 per share. The offering was made pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 previously filed by the Company with the SEC. We received proceeds of approximately $54.0 million after deducting discounts and offering costs. The proceeds from this offering were used to repay indebtedness under our credit facility. |
|
Oil and Gas Properties |
|
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Under this method, all direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition of properties and successful, as well as unsuccessful, exploration and development activities are capitalized. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of capitalized oil and gas properties and estimated future development costs, excluding unproved properties, are based on the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves. Net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, less related deferred taxes, are limited by country, to the lower of the unamortized capitalized cost or the cost ceiling. The cost ceiling is calculated as PV-10, plus the cost of properties not being amortized, if any, plus the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized, if any, less related income taxes. We calculate the projected income tax effect using the “short-cut” method for the cost ceiling test calculation. Costs in excess of the cost ceiling are charged to proved property impairment expense. No gain or loss is recognized upon sale or disposition of oil and gas properties, except where the sale or disposition causes a significant change in the relationship between capitalized cost and the estimated quantity of proved reserves. We apply the full cost ceiling test on a quarterly basis on the date of the latest balance sheet presented. At June 30, 2013, our net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties in the United States did not exceed the cost ceiling of our estimated proved reserves; however, the net capitalized cost of oil and gas properties in Canada exceeded the cost ceiling by $2.0 million resulting in a write down for the six months ended June 30, 2013. At June 30, 2014, our net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties in the United States and Canada did not exceed the cost ceiling of our estimated proved reserves. |
|
Restoration, Removal and Environmental Liabilities |
|
The Company is subject to extensive federal, provincial, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may require the Company to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of petroleum substances at various sites. Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefit are expensed. |
|
Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the timing of cash payments for the liability or component are fixed or reliably determinable. |
|
The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations based on the guidance of ASC 410 which addresses accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. ASC 410 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset's retirement obligation be recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. For all periods presented, we have included estimated future costs of abandonment and dismantlement in our full cost amortization base and amortize these costs as a component of our depletion expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s asset retirement obligation transactions for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013: |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | December 31, | | | | | | |
2014 | 2013 | | | | | |
Beginning asset retirement obligation | | $ | 9,888 | | | $ | 11,381 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
New wells placed on production and other | | 151 | | | 222 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deletions related to property disposals and plugging costs | | (437 | ) | | (2,491 | ) | | | | | | |
Accretion expense | | 290 | | | 638 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Revisions and other | | (145 | ) | | 138 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Ending asset retirement obligation | | $ | 9,747 | | | $ | 9,888 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |