In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 the decrease in Wireline Security product and service sales and revenues resulted from the combined impact of the ongoing decline in residual derived channel sales activity resulting from the divestment of the Company’s Derived Channel technology, the de-emphasizing of the sale and marketing of Derived Channel technology and one-time product and service contract sales and revenues generated from Australia in the three-month period ended March 31, 2000. Excluding the Australian one-time product and services contract sales and revenues, residual Derived Channel Wireline Security product and service sales and revenues decreased 53.5%.
Wireless Data Communications product and service sales and revenues increased 41.8% to $2,716,000 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $1,916,000 in the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 net sales increased 47.6% to $4,754,000 as compared to $3,222,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 the increase in Wireless Data Communications product and service sales and revenues resulted from the continued growth in product and service sales and revenues resulting from the marketing and sales effort to establish the Company as a recognized national and international wireless data communications service provider.
Cost of sales increased 39.0% to $3,935,000 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $2,831,000 for the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 cost of sales increased 36.8% to $7,189,000 as compared to $5,257,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
The principal reason for the increase in cost of sales in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 resulted from the combined impact of the increased level of sales activity and increased levels of product sales from Digital Multimedia and Wireless Data Communications.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 the increase in cost of sales resulted from the combined impact of the increased level of sales activity and increased levels of product sales from Digital Multimedia and Wireless Data Communications and the impact of the Wireline Security one-time product and service contract sales and revenues generated from Australia in the three-month period ended March 31, 2000.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to 35.4% in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to 42.6% for the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 gross profit decreased to 36.9% as compared to 47.8% in the comparable period in 2000.
The principal reason for the decrease in gross profit in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 resulted primarily from the combined impact of the increased level of sales activity and increased levels of product sales from Digital Multimedia and Wireless Data Communications.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 the decrease in gross profit resulted primarily from the combined impact of the increased level of sales activity and increased levels of product sales from Digital Multimedia and Wireless Data Communications and the impact of the Wireline Security one-time product and service contract sales and revenues generated from Australia in the three-month period ended March 31, 2000. Excluding the impact of the Wireline Security one-time product and service contract sales and revenues generated from Australia in the three-month period ended March 31, 2000 gross profit decreased to 36.9% in the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to 41.3% for the comparable period in 2000.
Research and development expenses decreased 26.7% to $689,000 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $940,000 for the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 research and development expenses decreased 11.2% to $1,533,000 as compared to $1,726,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
The principal reason for the decrease in research and development expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 resulted primarily from decreased Digital Multimedia and Wireless Data Communications expenditures following the completion of a number of projects.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 the decrease in research and development expenses resulted from decreased Digital Multimedia and Wireless Data Communications expenditures following the completion of a number of projects.
Selling, general, administrative and other expenses decreased 4.2% to $3,572,000 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $3,728,000 for the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 selling, general, administrative and other expenses increased 0.3% to $6,946,000 as compared to $6,927,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
The principal reason for the decrease in selling, general, administrative and other expenses in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable periods in 2000 resulted from a decrease in administration, management and organizational expenses offset by increased Wireless Data Communications expenditure on sales, marketing and network system support activities.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 the increase in selling, general, administrative and other expenses resulted from increased expenditure on network system support activity offset by decreased expenditure on administration, management and organizational expenses.
Business restructuring charges amounted to $508,000 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 business restructuring charges amounted to $609,000. There was no business restructuring charges in the comparable three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2000.
The business restructuring charges of $508,000 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 comprised a charge of $317,000 to cover employee separation costs and a one-time non-cash charge of $191,000 to cover the write down of excess and obsolete Digital Multimedia analog product inventory.
The business restructuring charges of $609,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 comprised the charges taken in the three-month period to June 30, 2001 of $508,000 and an additional charge of $101,000 incurred in the three-month period to March 31, 2001 to cover employee separation costs.
Interest and other income in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 decreased 31.6% to $295,000 as compared to $431,000 in the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 interest and other income decreased 11.0% to $659,000 as compared to $740,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
The decrease in interest and other income was primarily related to interest income earned on cash balances.
Minority interest in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 increased 23.3% to $867,000 as compared to $703,000 in the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 minority interest increased 36.2% to $1,749,000 as compared to $1,284,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
Minority interest represents that portion of the losses of the Company’s Wireless Data Communications business that is not accounted for by the Company.
The Company, due to the loss position from operations, did not record a tax provision in the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively. However, a provision for the recovery of income tax of $115,000 has been recorded in the three-month period to June 30, 2001 following the completion and submittal of the Company’s federal income tax returns in connection with an assessed over payment of federal income tax installments in connection with the sale of the Company’s Derived Channel technology.
The Company recorded a net loss of $1,337,000 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to net loss of $1,432,000 in the comparable period in 2000. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 the Company recorded a net loss of $2,362,000 as compared to a net loss $1,814,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
The principal reason for the decrease in the net loss for the three-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 was the increase in product and service sales and revenues and associated gross profit, the decrease in operating expenses and the provision for the recovery of income tax offset by the Company’s business restructuring charges.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in 2000 the increase in net loss resulted from the impact of the Wireline Security one-time product and service contract sales and revenues generated from Australia in the three-month period ended March 31, 2000 partially off-set by the increase in product and service sales and revenues and associated gross profit, the decrease in operating expenses, the provision for the recovery of income tax offset by the Company’s business restructuring charges.
The weighted average and diluted shares outstanding increased to 10,393,608 for the period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to weighted average and diluted shares outstanding of 10,607,509 in the comparable period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company
The Company has been able to fund its operations and working capital requirements from cash flow generated by operations, the proceeds from a public offering completed in April 1995 and the proceeds from the sale of its Derived Channel technology in November 1999.
Net cash used in operating activities decreased 42.3% to $1,698,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $2,942,000 in the comparable period in 2000. The decrease in cash used was primarily due to changes in working capital.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased 19.0% to $500,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $617,000 in the comparable period in 2000. The decrease in cash used was the result of decreased investment in tangible and intangible assets.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased 106.4% to $93,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2001 as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $1,453,000 in the comparable period in 2000.
The increase in cash used was primarily accounted for by the receipt of $46,000 in the six-month period to June 30, 2001 from the exercise of stock options which resulted in the issue of an additional 8,360 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock against the receipt of $1,593,000 in the six-month period to June 30, 2000 from the exercise of stock options which resulted in the issue of an additional 438,050 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, respectively.
The Company had working capital balances of $13,613,000 and $16,876,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000.
The Company’s business has not been capital intensive and, accordingly, capital expenditures have not been material. To date, the Company has funded all capital expenditures from working capital, proceeds from the public offering and the proceeds from the sale of its Derived Channel technology in November 1999.
The Company is obligated under the First Amendment to the Operating Agreement of Cellemetry LLC (“Cellemetry”) to fund the operations of Cellemetry to an amount of $5,500,000 by way of interest bearing debt financing to be available to fund the operations of Cellemetry and its wholly owned subsidiary Uplink Security, Inc.
The Company has provided the full amount of the facility to Cellemetry and the Company may, but is not obligated, to continue to fund Cellemetry with additional interest bearing debt financing. All borrowings carry the Prime Rate of interest. At June 30, 2001 the Company had provided total interest bearing debt-financing amounting to $12,750,000.
Expansion of the Company’s Digital Multimedia business in fiscal 2001, including the establishment and increased market penetration of PowerPlay™, may require greater capital investments than in the past.
The Company believes that its cash and cash equivalents, including funds available from the divestment of its Derived Channel technology will be sufficient to finance its operating and capital requirements through fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2002.
Cash requirements for future expansion of the Company’s operations will be evaluated on an as-needed basis and may involve external financing. The Company does not expect that such expansion, should it occur, will have a materially negative impact on the Company’s ability to fund its existing operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks.
At June 30, 2001 the Company was not invested in any material balances of market risk sensitive instruments held for either trading purposes or for purposes other than trading. As a result, the Company is not subject to interest rate risk, foreign currency rate risk, commodity price risk, or other relevant market risks, such as equity price risk.
The Company invests cash balances in excess of operating requirements. At June 30, 2001 the Company had no outstanding borrowings payable except for obligations under capital leases. The Company believes that the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows should not be material.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
As previously reported in the Company’s Form 10-K for the years-ended December 31, 2000 and October 31, 1999 and Form 10 – Q for the periods ended July 31, 1999, December 31, 1999, January 31, 2000, June 30, 2000, September 30, 2000, and March 31, 2001respectively, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the entire equity interest in Uplink Security, Inc. (“Uplink”) a petition was filed by Uplink in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia seeking an appraisal of the value of a minority stockholders shares. The minority stockholder has alleged that the acquisition of Uplink was procedurally improper and should be set aside and that Uplink and certain of its officers (together with the Company and certain of its officers) conspired to oppress the minority stockholder of Uplink and acted fraudulently in effectuating the acquisition. The case is in the discovery phase.
Neither the Company nor its officers are parties to the litigation. The Company believes however, that the value the minority stockholder is claiming for the shares is in excess of the fair value of those shares. The Company also believes that the minority stockholder’s other claims are without merit, and Uplink intends to vigorously defend the litigation.
Item 2. Changes in Securities.
None - - not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None - - not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on May 4, 2001 (the “Meeting”). Three proposals were presented for a vote at the Meeting.
Proposal 1 – The election of six directors, George Benson, Matthew J. Flanigan, Allan H. Liu, Stratton J. Nicolaides, John G. Raos and Andrew J. Ryan, each to serve as a director of the Company for a one-year term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2002 and until the election and qualification of each successor.
The proposal was approved as follows:
| For | | Withheld |
|
| |
|
George Benson | 8,842,264 | | 9,270 |
Matthew J. Flanigan | 8,842,264 | | 9,270 |
Allan H. Liu | 8,842,264 | | 9,270 |
Stratton J. Nicolaides | 8,842,264 | | 9,270 |
John G. Raos | 8,842,264 | | 9,270 |
Andrew J. Ryan | 8,842,264 | | 9,270 |
Proposal 2 – The approval of the Company’s 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The proposal was approved as follows:
For | | Against | | Abstain |
8,717,684 | | 95,350 | | 38,500 |
Proposal 3 – The ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s independent public accountants for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2001.
The proposal was approved as follows:
For | | Against | | Abstain |
8,841,234 | | 10,170 | | 130 |
Item 5. Other Information.
None - not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
None - not applicable.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | NUMEREX CORP.
| |
| |
| |
| | (Registrant) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: August 14, 2001 | | By: /s/ Stratton J. Nicolaides | |
| |
| |
| | | STRATTON J. NICOLAIDES | |
| | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: August 14, 2001 | | By: /s/ Peter J. Quinn | |
| |
| |
| | | PETER J. QUINN | |
| | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
| | | | | |