UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one) | |
[x] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended | March 31, 2013 |
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from | to |
Commission File Number: | 0-26844 |
RADISYS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
OREGON | 93-0945232 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
5435 N.E. Dawson Creek Drive, Hillsboro, OR | 97124 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
(503) 615-1100 | ||
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) | ||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | [ ] | Accelerated filer | [x] | |
Non-accelerated filer | [ ] | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes [ ] No [x]
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2013: 28,613,467
RADISYS CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) | ||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | ||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | ||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | ||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 | ||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | ||
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | ||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | ||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | ||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item 1A. Risk Factors | ||
Item 6. Exhibits | ||
Signatures |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 68,178 | $ | 75,487 | |||
Cost of sales: | |||||||
Cost of sales | 46,306 | 50,005 | |||||
Amortization of purchased technology | 2,217 | 2,442 | |||||
Total cost of sales | 48,523 | 52,447 | |||||
Gross margin | 19,655 | 23,040 | |||||
Research and development | 11,535 | 12,546 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | 11,096 | 12,000 | |||||
Intangible asset amortization | 1,304 | 1,304 | |||||
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net | 1,270 | 1,444 | |||||
Loss from operations | (5,550 | ) | (4,254 | ) | |||
Interest expense | (332 | ) | (421 | ) | |||
Other income | 147 | 164 | |||||
Loss before income tax expense | (5,735 | ) | (4,511 | ) | |||
Income tax expense | 822 | 304 | |||||
Net loss | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | (4,815 | ) | |
Net loss per share: | |||||||
Basic | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | |
Diluted | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | |||||||
Basic | 28,470 | 26,656 | |||||
Diluted | 28,470 | 26,656 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, unaudited)
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | (4,815 | ) | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||
Translation adjustments | (194 | ) | 220 | ||||
Net adjustment for fair value of hedge derivatives | 108 | 173 | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (86 | ) | 393 | ||||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (6,643 | ) | $ | (4,422 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, unaudited)
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 31,748 | $ | 33,182 | |||
Accounts receivable, net | 50,467 | 51,289 | |||||
Other receivables | 2,498 | 2,986 | |||||
Inventories, net | 16,461 | 20,071 | |||||
Inventory deposit, net | 7,573 | 8,836 | |||||
Other current assets | 3,578 | 4,248 | |||||
Deferred tax assets, net | 5,395 | 5,376 | |||||
Total current assets | 117,720 | 125,988 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 17,698 | 17,713 | |||||
Intangible assets, net | 66,763 | 70,284 | |||||
Long-term deferred tax assets, net | 10,781 | 11,161 | |||||
Other assets | 3,329 | 7,248 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 216,291 | $ | 232,394 | |||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 37,462 | $ | 41,191 | |||
Accrued wages and bonuses | 5,446 | 7,168 | |||||
Deferred income | 7,480 | 9,222 | |||||
Convertible senior notes | — | 16,919 | |||||
Line of credit | 15,000 | — | |||||
Other accrued liabilities | 8,478 | 9,601 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 73,866 | 84,101 | |||||
Long-term liabilities: | |||||||
Convertible senior notes | 18,000 | 18,000 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities | 4,314 | 4,851 | |||||
Total long-term liabilities | 22,314 | 22,851 | |||||
Total liabilities | 96,180 | 106,952 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) | |||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | |||||||
Common stock — no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 28,607 and 28,471 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | 305,036 | 303,724 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (186,243 | ) | (179,686 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive income: | |||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments | 1,975 | 2,169 | |||||
Unrealized loss on hedge instruments | (657 | ) | (765 | ) | |||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income | 1,318 | 1,404 | |||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 120,111 | 125,442 | |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 216,291 | $ | 232,394 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
RADISYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | (4,815 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 5,524 | 5,527 | |||||
Inventory valuation allowance | 397 | 453 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 373 | 75 | |||||
Non-cash interest expense | 28 | 111 | |||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 69 | 76 | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 1,099 | 922 | |||||
Write off of purchased computer software | 3,068 | — | |||||
Net gain from sale of software assets | (1,575 | ) | — | ||||
Other | (402 | ) | 115 | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | 1,330 | 1,898 | |||||
Other receivables | 464 | 963 | |||||
Inventories | 5,360 | 4,386 | |||||
Inventory deposit | (979 | ) | 352 | ||||
Other current assets | 641 | 547 | |||||
Accounts payable | (4,231 | ) | (1,496 | ) | |||
Accrued wages and bonuses | (1,705 | ) | (3,555 | ) | |||
Accrued restructuring | 11 | (1,053 | ) | ||||
Deferred income | (1,775 | ) | (3,380 | ) | |||
Other accrued liabilities | (223 | ) | (1,988 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 917 | (862 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Capital expenditures | (1,699 | ) | (3,574 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of software assets | 1,180 | — | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (519 | ) | (3,574 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Borrowings on line of credit | 15,000 | — | |||||
Repurchase of convertible subordinated notes | (16,919 | ) | — | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 219 | 431 | |||||
Other financing activities | (18 | ) | (14 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (1,718 | ) | 417 | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (114 | ) | 90 | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (1,434 | ) | (3,929 | ) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 33,182 | 47,770 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 31,748 | $ | 43,841 | |||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||
Cash paid during the year for: | |||||||
Interest | $ | 705 | $ | 619 | |||
Income taxes | $ | 207 | $ | 181 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
RADISYS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies
Radisys Corporation (the “Company” or “Radisys”) has adhered to the accounting policies set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 in preparing the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Additionally, the accompanying financial data as of March 31, 2013 and for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The financial information included herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for interim periods.
Note 2 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company measures at fair value certain financial assets and liabilities. GAAP specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:
Level 1— Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2— Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3— Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
Foreign currency forward contracts are measured at fair value using models based on observable market inputs such as foreign currency exchange rates; therefore, they are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The cash surrender value of life insurance contracts and deferred compensation liability are measured at fair value using quoted market prices for similar instruments; therefore, they are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
The Company has obligations ("contingent consideration"), to be paid in cash, related to the acquisition of Continuous Computing Corporation ("Continuous Computing") based on the amount of product royalty revenues to be generated by a specified set of contracts associated with certain of Continuous Computing's products over a period of 36 months after closing. The contingent consideration liability was established at the time of acquisition and is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. As the significant inputs used in determining the fair value are unobservable, this liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of this contingent consideration is determined by calculating the net present value of the expected payments using significant inputs that are not observable in the market, including revenue projections and discount rates consistent with the level of risk of achievement; therefore the Company developed its own assumptions for the expected product royalty revenues generated under the arrangement. The fair value of the contingent consideration is affected most significantly by changes in the amount and timing of the revenue projections. If the revenue projections increase or decrease,
7
the fair value of the contingent consideration will increase or decrease accordingly, in amounts that will vary based on the timing of the projected revenues and the timing of the expected payments.
The following table summarizes the fair value measurements for the Company's financial instruments (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance contracts (A) | $ | 2,346 | $ | — | $ | 2,346 | $ | — | |||||||
Deferred compensation liability | (1,111 | ) | — | (1,111 | ) | — | |||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts | (65 | ) | — | (65 | ) | — | |||||||||
Contingent consideration liability | (1,801 | ) | — | — | (1,801 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (631 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1,170 | $ | (1,801 | ) |
(A) | Net of $1.1 million loan against the cash-surrender value of certain life insurance contracts which afford the Company the right of offset. |
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance contracts | $ | 3,398 | $ | — | $ | 3,398 | $ | — | |||||||
Deferred compensation liability | (1,395 | ) | — | (1,395 | ) | — | |||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts | (297 | ) | — | (297 | ) | — | |||||||||
Contingent consideration liability | (2,541 | ) | — | — | (2,541 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (835 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1,706 | $ | (2,541 | ) |
The following table summarizes our Level 3 activity for the Company's contingent consideration liability (in thousands):
Level 3 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 2,541 | |
Change in estimate | (803 | ) | |
Accretion | 63 | ||
Balance at March 31, 2013 | $ | 1,801 |
The Company records all changes in estimates and accretion on the contingent consideration liability to restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Of the $1.8 million contingent consideration liability at March 31, 2013, $0.7 million is recorded in other accrued liabilities and $1.1 million is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2013.
Note 3 — Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
Accounts receivable consists of sales to the Company's customers which are generally based on standard terms and conditions. Accounts receivable balances consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, gross | $ | 50,936 | $ | 52,068 | |||
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts | (469 | ) | (779 | ) | |||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 50,467 | $ | 51,289 |
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the balance in other receivables was $2.5 million and $3.0 million. Other receivables consisted primarily of non-trade receivables including receivables for value-added taxes and inventory transferred to the Company's contract manufacturing partners on which the Company does not recognize revenue.
8
Note 4 — Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Raw materials | $ | 8,860 | $ | 10,420 | |||
Work-in-process | 440 | 605 | |||||
Finished goods | 9,540 | 11,245 | |||||
18,840 | 22,270 | ||||||
Less: inventory valuation allowance | (2,379 | ) | (2,199 | ) | |||
Inventories, net | $ | 16,461 | $ | 20,071 |
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Inventory deposit (A) | $ | 10,659 | $ | 11,637 | |||
Less: inventory deposit valuation allowance | (3,086 | ) | (2,801 | ) | |||
Inventory deposit, net | $ | 7,573 | $ | 8,836 |
(A) | The Company is contractually obligated to reimburse its contract manufacturer for the cost of excess inventory that has been purchased as a result of the Company's forecasted demand when there is no alternative use. The Company's inventory deposit represents a cash deposit paid to its contract manufacturer for inventory in excess of near term demand. The deposit is recorded net of adverse purchase commitment liabilities, and therefore the net balance of the deposit represents inventory the Company believes will be utilized. The deposit will be applied against future adverse purchase commitments owed to the Company's contract manufacturers or reduced based on the usage of inventory. See Note 8 - Commitments and Contingencies for additional information regarding the Company's adverse purchase commitment liability. |
Consigned inventory is held at third-party locations, including the Company's contract manufacturing partner and customers. The Company retains title to the inventory until purchased by the third-party. Consigned inventory, consisting of raw materials and finished goods, was $1.5 million and $0.7 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 .
The Company recorded the following charges associated with the valuation of inventory, inventory deposit and the adverse purchase commitment liability (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Inventory, net | $ | 397 | $ | 453 | |||
Inventory deposit, net | 641 | 299 | |||||
Adverse purchase commitments | (32) | 74 |
9
Note 5 — Accrued Restructuring and Acquisition-Related Charges
The following table summarizes the Company's restructuring and acquisition-related charges as presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Net gain from sale of OS-9 software assets | $ | (1,575 | ) | $ | — | ||
Write off of purchased computer software | 3,068 | — | |||||
Fair value adjustments to Continuous Computing contingent consideration liability | (740 | ) | 255 | ||||
Employee-related restructuring expenses | 517 | 613 | |||||
Integration-related expenses | — | 576 | |||||
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net | $ | 1,270 | $ | 1,444 |
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges typically consist of costs incurred for employee terminations due to a reduction of personnel resources driven by modifications of business strategy or business emphasis. Employee severance and related costs include severance benefits, notice pay and outplacement services. Restructuring and acquisition related charges may also include expenses incurred related to acquisitions, excess facility costs and asset related charges.
In the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded the following restructuring and acquisition-related charges:
• | $1.6 million net gain from the sale of the Company's OS-9 software assets; |
• | $3.1 million expense relating to the write off of the Company's Security Gateway ("SEG") purchased computer software due to management's decision to abandon future development of this technology; |
• | $0.7 million gain due to the decrease in fair value of Continuous Computing contingent consideration liability. The Company assesses the fair value of the contingent consideration liability on a quarterly basis, adjusting the liability to fair value based on a detailed analysis of all expected contingent consideration eligible revenues; and |
• | $0.5 million net expense for the severance of nine employees, net of reduction resulting from changes in previously estimated amounts for employee severance and associated payroll costs. |
In the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded the following restructuring and acquisition-related charges:
• | $0.3 million expense due to accretion of the Continuous Computing contingent consideration liability; |
• | $0.6 million net severance related expense including the severance for a named executive officer and other employees relating to the Continuous Computing integration; and |
• | $0.6 million integration-related costs, including $0.5 million associated with the Company transitioning R&D activities to lower cost geographies. |
Accrued restructuring, which is included in other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Severance, payroll taxes and other employee benefits | Facility reductions | Total | |||||||||
Balance accrued as of December 31, 2012 | $ | 198 | $ | 990 | $ | 1,188 | |||||
Additions | 575 | — | 575 | ||||||||
Reversals | (58 | ) | — | (58 | ) | ||||||
Expenditures | (415 | ) | (92 | ) | (507 | ) | |||||
Balance accrued as of March 31, 2013 | $ | 300 | $ | 898 | $ | 1,198 |
10
Of the $1.2 million accrued restructuring at March 31, 2013, $0.6 million represents the long-term portion of accrued lease abandonment charges, with the remaining balance representing the short-term portion of accrued restructuring.
The Company evaluates the adequacy of the accrued restructuring charges on a quarterly basis. Reversals are recorded in the period in which the Company determines that expected restructuring obligations are less than the amounts accrued.
Note 6 — Short-Term Borrowings
Silicon Valley Bank
The Company has a $40.0 million secured revolving line of credit agreement (as amended, the “Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) maturing on September 30, 2014. On October 29, 2012, the Agreement was amended to revise the minimum two quarter rolling EBITDA financial covenant and the calculation of the Availability Amount (as defined in the agreement) under the Agreement such that all permitted borrowings under the Agreement are subject to the borrowing base formula in the Agreement. In addition, the amendment modified the frequency of liquidity testing from quarterly to monthly, all as more particularly described below. The secured revolving credit facility is available for cash borrowings and subject to a borrowing formula based upon eligible accounts receivable. Eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the Agreement) include 80% of domestic and 65% of foreign accounts receivable for our U.S. companies, limited to concentration by certain customers, not greater than 60 days past due and no greater than 120 days from original invoice date. Borrowings under the Agreement bear interest at the prime rate, which was 3.25% as of March 31, 2013, or LIBOR, which was 0.20% as of March 31, 2013, plus 1.25%, with either interest rate determined by the Company's election. The Company is required to make interest payments monthly. The Company was further required to pay a commitment fee equal to $35,000 on the closing date of the Agreement and annually thereafter and to pay quarterly in arrears an unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.375% per year of the unused amount of the facility.
The Agreement requires the Company to make and maintain certain financial covenants, representations, warranties and other agreements that are customary in credit agreements of this type. The Agreement also requires the Company to maintain the following specific financial covenants:
• | minimum monthly liquidity ratio of 1.25 during the term of the Agreement. The liquidity ratio is defined as cash, cash equivalents and short term investments (with cash and cash equivalents held by the Company's foreign subsidiaries not to exceed $10.0 million and excluding any investments held by the Company's foreign subsidiaries) plus eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the Agreement), divided by the sum of obligations owing to SVB under the Agreement; |
• | minimum two quarter rolling EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, stock based compensation, goodwill impairment charges, and non-cash restructuring and integration expenses associated with the acquisition of Continuous Computing) of $3.0 million beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2013. Prior to June 30, 2013, the minimum two quarter rolling EBITDA requirements increase on a quarterly basis with the quarter ending December 31, 2012 as follows: ($3.5) million, and ($1.0) million; and |
• | capital expenditures may not exceed $20.0 million during the period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012 and $8.0 million in subsequent years. |
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had outstanding balances of $15.0 million and $0.0 million issued on its behalf under the Agreement. At March 31, 2013, the Company had $14.4 million of total borrowing availability remaining under the Agreement. As of March 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
Note 7 — Convertible Debt
2013 Convertible Senior Notes
On February 15, 2013, the Company repaid at maturity the entire outstanding balance of the 2.75% convertible senior notes due 2013 (the "2013 convertible senior notes") in accordance with the terms thereof.
2015 Convertible Senior Notes
On June 20, 2012, the Company entered into subscription agreements with certain holders of the Company's 2013 convertible senior notes. Pursuant to the subscription agreements, on June 29, 2012 the Company exchanged $18.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2013 convertible senior notes for $18.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Company's 4.50% convertible senior notes due 2015 (the "2015 convertible senior notes"). The 2015 convertible senior notes mature on
11
February 15, 2015. Holders of the 2015 convertible senior notes may convert their notes into a number of shares of the Company's common stock determined as set forth in the indenture governing the notes at their option on any day to and including the business day prior to the maturity date. The 2015 convertible senior notes are initially convertible into 117.2333 shares of the Company's common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the notes (which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $8.53 per share), subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, holders of the 2015 convertible senior notes may require the Company to repurchase some or all of their notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, if certain fundamental changes occur, the Company may be required in certain circumstances to increase the conversion rate for any 2015 convertible senior notes converted in connection with such fundamental changes by a specified number of shares of the Company's common stock. The 2015 convertible senior notes are the Company's general unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to all of its existing and future senior indebtedness, and senior in right of payment to the Company's future subordinated debt. The Company's obligations under the 2015 convertible senior notes are not guaranteed by, and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future obligations of its subsidiaries and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to its future secured indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing such debt.
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had outstanding 2015 convertible senior notes with a face value of $18.0 million. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of our 2015 convertible senior notes was $17.7 million, which is based on quoted prices of the Company's publicly traded debt on each balance sheet date.
The following table outlines the effective interest rate, contractually stated interest costs, and costs related to the amortization of issuance costs for the Company's 2013 and 2015 convertible senior notes:
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Effective interest rate of 2013 convertible senior notes | 3.73 | % | 3.73 | % | |||
Effective interest rate of 2015 convertible senior notes | 4.50 | % | NA | ||||
Contractually stated interest costs | $ | 261 | $ | 309 | |||
Amortization of issuance costs | $ | 28 | $ | 110 |
Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies
Adverse Purchase Commitments
The Company is contractually obligated to reimburse its contract manufacturer for the cost of excess inventory used in the manufacture of the Company's products, if there is no alternative use. This liability, referred to as adverse purchase commitments, is presented in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimates for adverse purchase commitments are derived from reports received on a quarterly basis from the Company's contract manufacturer. Increases to this liability are charged to cost of sales. If and when the Company takes possession of inventory reserved for in this liability, the liability is transferred from other accrued liabilities to the excess and obsolete inventory valuation allowance (Note 4 —Inventories).
Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations
As permitted under Oregon law, the Company has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers, directors and certain finance employees for certain events or occurrences while an officer, director or employee is or was serving in such capacity at the request of the Company. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer's, director's or employee's lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a Director and Officer insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. To date, the Company has not incurred any costs associated with these indemnification agreements and, as a result, management believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of March 31, 2013.
The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in its ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or
12
incurred by the indemnified party, generally the Company's business partners or customers, in connection with patent, copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by any third party with respect to the Company's current products, as well as claims relating to property damage or personal injury resulting from the performance of services by us or the Company's subcontractors. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is generally limited. Historically, the Company's costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims relating to such indemnity agreements have been minimal and accordingly management believes the estimated fair value of the agreements is immaterial.
Accrued Warranty
The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time it recognizes revenue. Products are generally sold with warranty coverage for a period of 12 or 24 months after shipment. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the warranty agreement. The workmanship of the Company’s products produced by the contract manufacturer is covered under warranties provided by the contract manufacturer for 12 months. The warranty provision is based on historical experience by product family. The Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its components suppliers; however ongoing failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failure, as well as specific product class failures out of the Company’s baseline experience, affect the estimated warranty obligation. If actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.
The following is a summary of the change in the Company's warranty accrual reserve (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Warranty liability balance, beginning of the period | $ | 3,954 | $ | 3,438 | |||
Product warranty accruals | 1,147 | 808 | |||||
Utilization of accrual | (1,212 | ) | (1,182 | ) | |||
Warranty liability balance, end of the period | $ | 3,889 | $ | 3,064 |
At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $3.1 million of the warranty liability balance are included in other accrued liabilities and $0.8 million are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
13
Note 9 — Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share
A reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Numerator — Basic | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | (4,815 | ) | |
Numerator — Diluted | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | (4,815 | ) | |
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax benefit (B) | — | — | |||||
Net loss, diluted | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | (4,815 | ) | |
Denominator — Basic | |||||||
Weighted average shares used to calculate net loss per share, basic | 28,470 | 26,656 | |||||
Denominator — Diluted | |||||||
Weighted average shares used to calculate net loss per share, basic | 28,470 | 26,656 | |||||
Effect of escrow shares (A) | — | — | |||||
Effect of convertible notes (B) | — | — | |||||
Effect of dilutive restricted stock units (C) | — | — | |||||
Effect of dilutive stock options (C) | — | — | |||||
Weighted average shares used to calculate net loss per share, diluted | 28,470 | 26,656 | |||||
Net loss per share | |||||||
Basic | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | |
Diluted (B) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) |
(A) | For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, 0.1 million and 1.3 million contingently issuable shares were excluded from the calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
(B) | For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, 2.8 million and 3.5 million as-if converted shares associated with the Company's convertible senior notes were excluded from the calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
(C) | For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the following equity awards, by type, were excluded from the calculation, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands): |
Three Months Ended | |||||
March 31, | |||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||
Stock options | 2,892 | 2,651 | |||
Restricted stock units | 488 | 502 | |||
Performance based restricted stock units (D) | 2,101 | 835 | |||
Total equity award shares excluded | 5,481 | 3,988 |
(D) | For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company excluded restricted stock units granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") and the overlay plan of the 2007 Stock Plan (the "Overlay Plan"), as the performance criteria required for issuance of the awards was not satisfied as of these dates. |
Note 10 — Income Taxes
The Company's effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 differs from the statutory rate primarily due to a full valuation allowance provided against its United States (“U.S.”) net deferred tax assets, Canadian research and experimental development claims, the impact of stock option expense, and taxes on foreign income that differ from the U.S. tax rate. The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. The Company records deferred tax assets to the extent it believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such
14
determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial performance. Based upon the Company's review of all positive and negative evidence, including its three year U.S. cumulative pre-tax book loss and taxable loss, it concluded that a full valuation allowance should continue to be recorded against its U.S. net deferred tax assets at March 31, 2013. In certain other foreign jurisdictions, where the Company does not have cumulative losses or other negative evidence, the Company had net deferred tax assets of $16.2 million and $16.5 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. In the future, if the Company determines that it is more likely than not that it will realize its U.S. net deferred tax assets, it will reverse the applicable portion of the valuation allowance and recognize an income tax benefit in the period in which such determination is made.
The Company's unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties during the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by $12,000 primarily due to the additional accrual of interest on uncertain tax positions. The ending balance for the unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $3.0 million at March 31, 2013. The related interest and penalties were $0.4 million and $0.3 million. The uncertain tax positions that are reasonably possible to decrease in the next twelve months are insignificant.
The Company is currently under tax examination in India. The periods covered under examination are the Company's financial years 2005 through 2007 and 2009. The examination is in various stages of appellate proceedings and all material uncertain tax positions associated with the examination have been taken into account in the ending balance of the unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2013. As of March 31, 2013, the Company is not under examination by tax authorities in any other jurisdictions.
Note 11 — Stock-based Compensation
The following table summarizes the awards granted under the Radisys Corporation 2007 and LTIP Stock Plans (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||
March 31, | |||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||
Stock options | 490 | 44 | |||
Restricted stock units | 3 | 14 | |||
Performance based restricted stock units | 36 | — | |||
Total | 529 | 58 |
Stock-based compensation was recognized and allocated as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Cost of sales | $ | 130 | $ | (71 | ) | ||
Research and development | 249 | 327 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative | 720 | 666 | |||||
Total | $ | 1,099 | $ | 922 |
Note 12 — Hedging
The Company’s activities expose it to a variety of market risks, including the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company manages these risks through the use of forward exchange contracts, designated as foreign-currency cash flow hedges, in an attempt to reduce the potentially adverse effects of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations that occur in the normal course of business. As such, the Company’s hedging activities are all employed solely for risk management purposes. All hedging transactions are conducted with, in the opinion of management, financially stable and reputable financial institutions. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the only hedge instruments executed by the Company are associated with its exposure to fluctuations in the Indian Rupee, which result from obligations such as payroll and rent paid in this currency.
15
These derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. Unrealized gain positions are recorded as other current assets and unrealized loss positions are recorded as other current liabilities. Changes in the fair values of the outstanding derivatives that are highly effective are recorded in other comprehensive income until net income is affected by the variability of the cash flows of the hedged transaction. Typically, hedge ineffectiveness could result when the amount of the Company’s hedge contracts exceed the Company’s forecasted or actual transactions for which the hedge contracts were designed to hedge. Once a hedge contract matures, the associated gain (loss) on the contract will remain in other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying hedged transaction affects net income (loss), at which time the gain (loss) will be reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded to the expense line item being hedged. The Company only enters into derivative contracts in order to hedge foreign currency exposure, and these contracts do not exceed two years from inception. If the Company entered into a contract for speculative reasons or if the Company’s current hedge position becomes ineffective, changes in the fair values of the derivatives would be recognized in earnings in the current period.
The Company assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives are expected to remain highly effective in future periods. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company had no hedge ineffectiveness.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company entered into 12 new foreign currency forward contracts with total notional contractual values of $2.5 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company entered into 21 new foreign currency forward contracts with total notional contractual values of $4.5 million.
A summary of the aggregate contractual or notional amounts, balance sheet location and estimated fair values of derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges at March 31, 2013 is as follows (in thousands):
Contractual/Notional Amount | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Classification | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||
Type of Cash Flow Hedge | Asset | (Liability) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ | 13,966 | Other accrued liabilities | $ | — | $ | (65 | ) |
A summary of the aggregate contractual or notional amounts, balance sheet location and estimated fair values of derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges at December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
Contractual/Notional Amount | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Classification | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||
Type of Cash Flow Hedge | Asset | (Liability) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ | 13,986 | Other accrued liabilities | $ | — | $ | (297 | ) |
The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was as follows (in thousands):
Effective Portion | Ineffective Portion | |||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Hedge Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized | Hedge Gain (Loss) Recognized | |||||||||
Cost of sales | $ | 89 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Research and development | 51 | — | — | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 38 | — | — |
16
The effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was as follows (in thousands):
Effective Portion | Ineffective Portion | |||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Hedge Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized | Hedge Gain (Loss) Recognized | |||||||||
Cost of sales | $ | (8 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Research and development | 9 | — | — | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 9 | — | — |
The following is a summary of the change in the Company's other comprehensive income (loss) associated with the Company's hedging activities (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Beginning balance of unrealized loss on forward exchange contracts | $ | (765 | ) | $ | (774 | ) | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (70 | ) | 163 | ||||
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income | 178 | 10 | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 108 | 173 | |||||
Ending balance of unrealized loss on forward exchange contracts | $ | (657 | ) | $ | (601 | ) |
Over the next twelve months, the Company expects to reclassify into earnings a loss of approximately $0.4 million currently recorded as other comprehensive loss, as a result of the maturity of currently held forward exchange contracts.
The bank counterparties in these contracts expose the Company to credit-related losses in the event of their nonperformance. However, to mitigate that risk, the Company only contracts with counterparties who meet its minimum requirements regarding counterparty credit worthiness. In addition, the Company monitors credit ratings, credit spreads and potential downgrades prior to entering into any new hedging contracts.
Note 13 — Segment Information
The Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker, our Chief Executive Officer, reviews our results of operations on a consolidated level. Key resources, decisions, and assessment of performance are also analyzed on a company-wide level and therefore, the Company is one operating segment.
Generally, the Company's customers are not the end-users of its products. The Company ultimately derives revenues from the following four product groups (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
ATCA Platforms | $ | 34,818 | $ | 37,672 | |||
Software-Solutions | 11,649 | 12,060 | |||||
COM Express and Rackmount Server | 14,627 | 13,150 | |||||
Other Products | 7,084 | 12,605 | |||||
Total revenues | $ | 68,178 | $ | 75,487 |
17
Revenues by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
United States | $ | 26,050 | $ | 28,761 | |||
Other North America | 652 | 800 | |||||
China | 6,745 | 10,540 | |||||
Japan | 8,560 | 6,633 | |||||
Other Asia Pacific | 11,217 | 9,305 | |||||
Asia Pacific ("APAC") | 26,522 | 26,478 | |||||
Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) | 14,954 | 19,448 | |||||
Foreign Countries | 42,128 | 46,726 | |||||
Total | $ | 68,178 | $ | 75,487 |
Long-lived assets by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | |||||||
United States | $ | 9,017 | $ | 8,572 | |||
Other North America | 829 | 953 | |||||
China | 4,462 | 4,685 | |||||
India | 3,066 | 3,110 | |||||
Other APAC | 297 | 358 | |||||
APAC | 7,825 | 8,153 | |||||
EMEA | 27 | 35 | |||||
Foreign Countries | 8,681 | 9,141 | |||||
Total property and equipment, net | $ | 17,698 | $ | 17,713 | |||
Intangible assets, net | |||||||
United States | $ | 65,553 | $ | 68,903 | |||
Other North America | 168 | 211 | |||||
EMEA | 1,042 | 1,170 | |||||
Foreign Countries | 1,210 | 1,381 | |||||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 66,763 | $ | 70,284 |
The following customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company's total revenues: | |||
Three Months Ended | |||
March 31, | |||
2013 | 2012 | ||
Nokia Siemens Networks | 17.4% | 25.4% | |
NEC | 14.5% | NA | |
Danaher | NA | 14.1% |
18
The following customers accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable: | |||
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||
NEC | 16.5% | NA | |
Nokia Siemens Networks | 16.2% | 24.7% | |
Philips Medical | 10.6% | NA |
19
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in this Report on Form 10-Q and with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. This report contains forward-looking statements including:
• | expectations and goals for revenues, gross margin, research and development ("R&D") expenses, selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses and profits; |
• | the impact of our restructuring events on future operating results; |
• | our projected liquidity; |
• | future operations and market conditions; |
• | industry trends or conditions and the business environment; |
• | future levels of inventory and backlog and new product introductions; |
• | financial performance, revenue growth, management changes or other attributes of Radisys following acquisition or divestiture activities; and |
• | other statements that are not historical facts. |
All statements that relate to future events or to our future performance are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plans,” “seeks,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “seek to continue,” “consider”, “intends,” or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results or our industries’ actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
These factors include, among others, the Company's high degree of customer concentration, the use of a single contract manufacturer for a significant portion of the production of our products, key employee attrition, the anticipated amount and timing of revenues from design wins due to the Company's customers' product development schedule, cancellations or delays, market conditions, matters affecting the embedded system industry, including changes in industry standards, changes in customer requirements and new product introductions, currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes in tariff and trade policies and other risks associated with foreign operations, actions by regulatory authorities or other third parties, actions by Continuous Computing's former shareholders, costs and difficulties related to integration of acquired businesses, the Company's ability to successfully manage the transition from 10G to 40G Advanced Telecommunications Computing Architecture ("ATCA") product technologies, performance and customer acceptance of the Trillium line of products and other factors described in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as updated in the subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Although forward-looking statements help provide additional information about us, investors should keep in mind that forward-looking statements are only predictions, at a point in time, and are inherently less reliable than historical information.
We do not guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and we do not assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are made and based on information as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update any of these statements based on information after the date of this report.
Unless required by context, or as otherwise indicated, “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms, as well as references to the “Company” and “Radisys” refer to Radisys Corporation and include all of our consolidated subsidiaries.
20
Overview
Radisys Corporation is a leader in enabling wireless infrastructure solutions for the telecom, aerospace, and defense markets. Our market-leading ATCA, market-leading Media Resource Function ("MRF"), world-renowned Trillium software, Computer-on-Module ("COM") Express and Network Appliance coupled with an expert professional services organization enable our customers to bring high-value products and services to the telecom market faster and with lower investment and risk. These products are targeted throughout the telecommunication network from Radio Access Network ("RAN") to the Evolved Packet Core to the IP Multimedia Subsystem ("IMS"). Our MRF, an application built on ATCA platforms, provides audio conferencing, Voice over Long-Term Evolution ("VoLTE"), and video conferencing functions into the network IMS. Additionally, when these products are combined with our professional service organization of network experts we can enable our customers to bring to market solutions such as compact packet cores, intelligent gateways (security, femto, and LTE gateways), edge routers and load balancers that are critical elements within the networks at a cost and time to market advantage when compared to internally developed solutions. Our Trillium software is the foundation for a complete turn-key application for small cells in both the 3G (Femototality) and LTE RAN (TotalEnodeB). ATCA and Network Appliance products are the platforms necessary to control and move data in the network core, and enable applications such as Deep Packet Inspection and policy management.
First Quarter 2013 Summary
• | Revenues decreased $7.3 million to $68.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $75.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decline was caused by an expected decrease in revenue from our Other Products product group as these products continue to trend towards end of life as our largest customer transitions to newer next-generation network elements. ATCA revenues decreased due to stronger than usual shipments to one customer during the first quarter 2012. In our Software-Solutions product group, revenue from Trillium declined due to the timing of deployments and delays in small-cell projects which were offset by growth in MRF revenues including the first sale and successful implementation of our MPX-12000 MRF product. We also experienced increased revenue in our COM Express and Rackmount Server product group. |
• | Our gross margin decreased 1.7 percentage points in the three months ended March 31, 2013 to 28.8% from 30.5% of revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2012. This decrease was the result of a change in our sales mix with proportionally less revenues from our higher margin ATCA and Software-Solutions product groups. |
• | R&D expense decreased $1.0 million to $11.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $12.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This decrease was driven by the transition of R&D headcount to lower cost geographies. |
• | SG&A expense decreased $0.9 million to $11.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $12.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease was the result of a reduction in headcount and overhead expenses. |
• | During the first quarter 2013 we recorded two non-recurring items. We finalized the sales agreement for our OS-9 software assets which were sold for a net gain of $1.6 million. Additionally, we exited the Security Gateway ("SEG") product line and thus recorded an asset write off of $3.1 million. The gain and charge for these events are recorded within restructuring and acquisition related charges, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
• | Cash and cash equivalents decreased $1.5 million to $31.7 million at March 31, 2013 from $33.2 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was due to the repurchase of $16.9 million of our 2013 convertible senior notes offset by a $15.0 million draw from our secured revolving line of credit. |
21
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
Three Months Ended | |||||
March 31, | |||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||
Revenues | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |
Cost of sales: | |||||
Cost of sales | 67.9 | 66.3 | |||
Amortization of purchased technology | 3.3 | 3.2 | |||
Total cost of sales | 71.2 | 69.5 | |||
Gross margin | 28.8 | 30.5 | |||
Research and development | 16.9 | 16.6 | |||
Selling, general, and administrative | 16.2 | 15.9 | |||
Intangible asset amortization | 1.9 | 1.7 | |||
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net | 1.9 | 1.9 | |||
Loss from operations | (8.1 | ) | (5.6 | ) | |
Interest expense | (0.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | |
Other income, net | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||
Loss before income tax expense | (8.4 | ) | (6.0 | ) | |
Income tax expense | 1.2 | 0.4 | |||
Net loss | (9.6 | )% | (6.4 | )% |
Revenues
The following table sets forth our revenues by product group for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Change | ||||||||
ATCA Platforms | $ | 34,818 | $ | 37,672 | (7.6 | )% | ||||
Software-Solutions | 11,649 | 12,060 | (3.4 | ) | ||||||
COM Express and Rackmount Server | 14,627 | 13,150 | 11.2 | |||||||
Other Products | 7,084 | 12,605 | (43.8 | ) | ||||||
Total revenues | $ | 68,178 | $ | 75,487 | (9.7 | )% |
Revenues in the ATCA product group decreased $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012. This decrease was driven by stronger than usual shipments to a top five customer who deployed network optimization equipment in the first quarter 2012 which was not repeated in the first quarter 2013.
Revenues in the Software-Solutions product group decreased $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012. Our customers have continued to experience delays in small cell deployments containing our Trillium products, which has resulted in decreased revenues over the comparable period in 2012. This decrease was offset by revenue from the first sale and successful implementation of our MPX-12000 ATCA-based MRF product and continued strong deployments to our existing audio-conferencing customers.
Revenues in the COM Express and Rackmount Server product group increased $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012. In 2011, we made the strategic decision to begin re-investing in this
22
product group and expected the related revenues to increase in 2013. This increase in revenue is related to deployments by a specific end-customer that we expect to be relatively short-term in nature.
Revenues in the Other Products product group decreased $5.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012, as these hardware-centric products trend towards end of life as our largest customers continue to transition to our newer next-generation network elements.
Revenue by Geography
The following tables outline overall revenue dollars and the percentage of revenues, by geographic region, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Change | ||||||||
North America | $ | 26,702 | $ | 29,561 | (9.7 | )% | ||||
Asia Pacific | 26,522 | 26,478 | 0.2 | |||||||
Europe, the Middle East and Africa ("EMEA") | 14,954 | 19,448 | (23.1 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 68,178 | $ | 75,487 | (9.7 | )% |
Three Months Ended | |||||
March 31, | |||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||
North America | 39.2 | % | 39.1 | % | |
Asia Pacific | 38.9 | 35.1 | |||
EMEA | 21.9 | 25.8 | |||
Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
North America. Revenues from the North America region decreased $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012. This decrease was driven by stronger than usual ATCA shipments to a top five customer who deployed network optimization equipment in the first quarter of 2012 which was not repeated in the first quarter 2013.
Asia Pacific. Revenues from the Asia Pacific region were flat for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012. Revenues from our ATCA and Software-Solutions product groups increased by $4.2 million and $1.0 million in this region due to deployments by our customers to support next generation wireless networks primarily in Japan. This increase was offset by a $5.2 million decrease in Other Products revenue due to the expected decline in revenues as these hardware-centric products trend towards end of life.
EMEA. Revenues from the EMEA region decreased $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012. The decrease is attributable to continued softening demand from telecom providers due to economic uncertainty in Europe.
We currently expect continued fluctuations in the revenue contribution from each geographic region. Additionally, we expect non-U.S. revenues to remain a significant portion of our revenues.
23
Gross Margin
The following table summarizes our cost of sales and gross margin for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Change | ||||||||
Cost of Sales | $ | 46,306 | $ | 50,005 | (7.4 | )% | ||||
Amortization of Purchased Technology | 2,217 | 2,442 | (9.2 | ) | ||||||
Total Cost of Sales | $ | 48,523 | $ | 52,447 | (7.5 | ) | ||||
Gross Margin | 28.8 | % | 30.5 | % | (5.6 | )% |
Gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased 1.7% percentage points for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012 as the result of proportionally more revenue contributed from lower margin COM Express products and less revenue contributed from our higher margin ATCA and Software-Solutions product groups. Additionally, decreased shipment volumes caused our fixed overhead expenses to represent a larger proportional share of total cost of sales.
Operating Expenses
The following table summarizes our operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Change | ||||||||
Research and development | $ | 11,535 | $ | 12,546 | (8.1 | )% | ||||
Selling, general and administrative | 11,096 | 12,000 | (7.5 | ) | ||||||
Intangible asset amortization | 1,304 | 1,304 | — | |||||||
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net | 1,270 | 1,444 | (12.0 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 25,205 | $ | 27,294 | (7.7 | )% |
Research and Development
R&D expenses decreased $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012 as we completed the transition of a large portion of our R&D employees to lower-cost geographies during 2012. In addition, the decrease is due to lower project-related spend for new product introductions specifically related to our ATCA 40G products, which were substantially released by the end of 2012. R&D headcount decreased to 443 at March 31, 2013 from 475 at March 31, 2012.
Selling, General, and Administrative
SG&A expenses consist primarily of salary, commissions, bonuses and benefits for sales, marketing, executive and administrative personnel, as well as professional services and costs of other general corporate activities. SG&A expenses decreased $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012 due to a $0.8 million decrease in payroll expenses and a $0.2 million decrease in travel-related expenses. SG&A headcount decreased to 196 at March 31, 2013 from 222 at March 31, 2012 as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to right-size our SG&A organizations.
Intangible Asset Amortization
Intangible asset amortization remained flat for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012. We perform reviews for impairment of the purchased intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
24
Restructuring and Acquisition-Related Charges, Net
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net includes expenses associated with restructuring activities and other non-recurring gains and losses. We evaluate the adequacy of the accrued restructuring charges on a quarterly basis. As a result, we record reversals to the accrued restructuring in the period in which we determine that expected restructuring and other obligations are less than the amounts accrued.
The decrease in restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from the comparable period in 2012 is due to the fact that restructuring activities related to our acquisition of Continuous Computing which were largely completed during 2012.
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges, net for the three months ended March 31, 2013 include the following:
• | $3.1 million - write off of our SEG purchased technology asset due to management's decision to abandon future development of this technology; |
• | ($1.6) million - net gain from the sale of our OS-9 software assets; |
• | ($0.7) million - decrease in fair value of Continuous Computing contingent consideration liability. We assess the fair value of the contingent consideration liability on a quarterly basis, adjusting the liability to fair value based on a detailed analysis of all expected contingent consideration eligible revenues. The decrease over prior quarter estimate is the result of the continued delay of small-cell deployments; and |
• | $0.5 million - severance and benefits provided to restructured employees. |
Stock-based Compensation Expense
Included within cost of sales, R&D and SG&A are expenses associated with stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation expense consists of amortization of stock-based compensation associated with unvested stock options, restricted stock units and the employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP"). We incurred and recognized stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Change | ||||||||
Cost of sales | $ | 130 | $ | (71 | ) | 283.1 | % | |||
Research and development | 249 | 327 | (23.9 | ) | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 720 | 666 | 8.1 | |||||||
Total | $ | 1,099 | $ | 922 | 19.2 | % |
Stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased $0.2 million due over the comparable period in 2012 due to recognition of LTIP and Overlay Plan restricted stock unit awards in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the reversal of $0.5 million of LTIP expense for a named executive officer which was recognized in cost of sales and SG&A in the same period of the previous year.
Non-Operating Expenses
The following table summarizes our non-operating expenses (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Change | ||||||||
Interest expense | $ | (332 | ) | $ | (421 | ) | (21.1 | )% | ||
Interest Income | 11 | 4 | 175.0 | |||||||
Other income, net | 136 | 160 | (15.0 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | (185 | ) | $ | (257 | ) | (28.0 | )% |
25
Interest Expense
Interest expense includes interest incurred on our convertible senior notes and our line of credit. The decrease in interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, was due to the repayment of our 2013 convertible senior notes on February 15, 2013.
Other Income, Net
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, other income from the comparable period in 2012 decreased by $24,000 as a result of unfavorable currency movement against the US Dollar and was offset by an increase in the recognition of forward points associated with our hedge contracts for the Indian Rupee.
Income Tax Provision
The following table summarizes our income tax provision (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Change | ||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 822 | $ | 304 | 170.4 | % |
We recorded tax expense of $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Our effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were (14.3%) and (6.7%). The effective tax rate fluctuation is mainly due to the jurisdictions in which pretax income (loss) is being earned and income tax rate differences among the jurisdictions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes selected financial information as of the dates indicated (in thousands):
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 31,748 | $ | 33,182 | $ | 43,841 | |||||
Working capital | 43,854 | 41,887 | 25,858 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 50,467 | 51,289 | 47,272 | ||||||||
Inventories, net | 16,461 | 20,071 | 22,058 | ||||||||
Accounts payable | 37,462 | 41,191 | 36,081 | ||||||||
Line of credit | 15,000 | — | — | ||||||||
2013 convertible senior notes | — | 16,919 | 45,000 | ||||||||
2015 convertible senior notes | 18,000 | 18,000 | — |
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $1.5 million to $31.7 million as of March 31, 2013 from $33.2 million as of December 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2013, the amount of cash held by our foreign subsidiaries was $14.0 million. It is no longer our intent to permanently reinvest funds in certain of our foreign entities and we expect to continue to repatriate cash from these foreign entities on an ongoing basis in future periods. Repatriation of funds from these foreign entities is not expected to result in actual cash tax payments due to the utilization of previously generated operating losses and credits of our U.S. entity.
26
Activities impacting cash and cash equivalents were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Operating Activities | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | (4,815 | ) | |
Non-cash adjustments | 8,581 | 7,279 | |||||
Changes in working capital | (1,107 | ) | (3,326 | ) | |||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 917 | (862 | ) | ||||
Cash used in investing activities | (519 | ) | (3,574 | ) | |||
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (1,718 | ) | 417 | ||||
Effects of exchange rate changes | (114 | ) | 90 | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (1,434 | ) | $ | (3,929 | ) |
Cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $0.9 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 primary impacts to changes in our working capital consisted of the following:
• | Net trade accounts receivable decreased $1.3 million as the result of decreased revenues compared to fourth quarter 2012 and the timing of payments received from our customers; |
• | Inventories decreased $5.4 million due to our continued focus on reducing our buffer stock inventory that was built up in anticipation of our transition to one contract manufacturer; |
• | Deferred income decreased $1.8 million due to the recognition of previously deferred Software-Solutions revenue as the undelivered elements or acceptance provisions contained in certain arrangements were satisfied; |
• | Accounts payable decreased by $4.2 million due to the timing of payments to vendors; and |
• | Accrued wages and bonuses decreased $1.7 million due to payment of the 2012 cash-based incentive compensation plan and timing of payroll-related accruals. |
Cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2013 of $0.5 million was due to capital expenditures related principally to test fixtures and R&D equipment for the continued development of our MPX-12000 ATCA-based MRF product and 40G ATCA products. These additions were offset by cash received from the sale of our OS-9 software assets of $1.2 million.
Cash used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2013 of $1.7 million relates to cash used for the repayment of $16.9 million of 2013 convertible senior notes, which was offset by $15.0 million of cash received from draws on our line of credit.
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, working capital was $43.9 million and $41.9 million. The increase in our working capital from December 31, 2012 is primarily due to the $5.4 million and $4.2 million decreases in inventory and accounts payable.
Line of Credit
Silicon Valley Bank
We have a $40.0 million secured revolving line of credit agreement (as amended, the “Agreement”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) maturing on September 30, 2014. On October 29, 2012, the Agreement was amended to revise the minimum two quarter rolling EBITDA financial covenant and the calculation of the Availability Amount (as defined in the Agreement) under the Agreement such that all permitted borrowings under the Agreement are subject to the borrowing base formula in the Agreement. In addition, the amendment modified the frequency of liquidity testing from quarterly to monthly, all as more particularly described below. The secured revolving credit facility is available for cash borrowings and subject to a borrowing formula based upon eligible accounts receivable. Eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the Agreement) include 80% of US and 65% of foreign accounts receivable for our U.S. companies, limited to concentration by certain customers, not greater than 60 days past due and no greater than 120 days from original invoice date. Borrowings under the Agreement bear interest at the prime rate, which was 3.25% as of March 31, 2013, or LIBOR, which was 0.20% as of March 31, 2013, plus 1.25%, with either interest rate determined by our election. We are required to make interest payments monthly. We were further required to pay a
27
commitment fee equal to $35,000 on the closing date of the Agreement and annually thereafter and to pay quarterly in arrears an unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.375% per year of the unused amount of the facility.
The Agreement requires us to make and maintain certain financial covenants, representations, warranties and other agreements that are customary in credit agreements of this type. The Agreement also requires us to maintain the following specific financial covenants:
• | minimum monthly liquidity ratio of 1.25 during the term of the Agreement. The liquidity ratio is defined as cash, cash equivalents and short term investments (with cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries not to exceed $10.0 million and excluding any investments held by our foreign subsidiaries) plus eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the Agreement), divided by the sum of obligations owing to SVB under the Agreement; |
• | minimum two quarter rolling EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, stock based compensation, goodwill impairment charges, and non-cash restructuring and integration expenses associated with the acquisition of Continuous Computing) of $3.0 million beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2013. Prior to June 30, 2013, the minimum two quarter rolling EBITDA requirements increase on a quarterly basis with the quarter ending December 31, 2012 as follows: ($3.5) million, and ($1.0) million; and |
• | capital expenditures may not exceed $20.0 million during the period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012 and $8.0 million in subsequent years. |
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had drawn a total of $15.0 million and $0 against our line of credit. At March 31, 2013, we had $14.4 million of total borrowing availability remaining under the Agreement. As of March 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants.
2013 Convertible Senior Notes
On February 15, 2013, we repaid at maturity the entire outstanding balance of the 2.75% convertible senior notes due 2013 (the "2013 convertible senior notes") in accordance with the terms thereof.
2015 Convertible Senior Notes
On June 20, 2012, we entered into subscription agreements with certain holders of the 2013 convertible senior notes. Pursuant to the subscription agreements, on June 29, 2012 we exchanged $18.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2013 convertible senior notes for $18.0 million aggregate principal amount of the new 2015 convertible senior notes. The 2015 convertible senior notes mature on February 15, 2015. Holders of the 2015 convertible senior notes may convert their notes into a number of shares of our common stock determined as set forth in the indenture governing the notes at their option on any day to and including the business day prior to the maturity date. The 2015 convertible senior notes are initially convertible into 117.2333 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the notes (which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $8.53 per share), subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, holders of the 2015 convertible senior notes may require us to repurchase some or all of their notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, if certain fundamental changes occur, we may be required in certain circumstances to increase the conversion rate for any 2015 convertible senior notes converted in connection with such fundamental changes by a specified number of shares of our common stock. The 2015 convertible senior notes are general unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior indebtedness, and senior in right of payment to our future subordinated debt. Our obligations under the 2015 convertible senior notes are not guaranteed by, and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future obligations of its subsidiaries and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to its future secured indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing such debt.
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had outstanding 2015 convertible senior notes with a face value of $18.0 million. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of our 2015 convertible senior notes was $17.7 million, which is based on the most recent quoted prices of our publicly traded debt on each balance sheet date.
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012 are summarized in Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Contractual Obligations," of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, there have been no material changes in our contractual obligations outside the ordinary course of business, except for the
28
repayment of $16.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 2013 convertible senior notes and the $15.0 million draw against our line of credit. As of March 31, 2013, we have agreements regarding foreign currency forward contracts with total contractual values of $14.0 million that mature through 2014.
In addition to the above, we have approximately $3.0 million associated with unrecognized tax benefits. We are not able to reasonably estimate when we would make any cash payments required to settle these liabilities, but do not believe the ultimate settlement of our obligations will materially affect our liquidity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any activity involving special purpose entities or off-balance sheet financing.
Liquidity Outlook
At March 31, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents amounted to $31.7 million. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, the cash expected to be generated from operations and the remaining credit available under our line of credit facility will satisfy our short and long-term expected working capital needs, capital expenditures, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing business operations. We expect our current working capital to be sufficient to satisfy our short-term obligations, including repayment of the borrowing against our line of credit with SVB.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We reaffirm our critical accounting policies and use of estimates as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no significant changes during the three months ended March 31, 2013 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
29
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and equity trading prices, which could affect our financial position and results of operations.
Foreign Currency Risk. We pay the expenses of our international operations in local currencies, namely, the Canadian Dollar, Euro, Chinese Yuan, Indian Rupee, Japanese Yen, Malaysian Ringgit, and British Pound Sterling. Our international operations are subject to risks typical of an international business, including, but not limited to: differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, foreign exchange rate volatility and other regulations and restrictions. Accordingly, future results could be materially and adversely affected by changes in these or other factors. We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the balance sheets and income statements of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars during the consolidation process. Because exchange rates vary, these results, when translated, may vary from expectations and adversely affect overall expected profitability.
Based on our policy, we have established a foreign currency exposure management program which uses derivative foreign exchange contracts to address nonfunctional currency exposures. In order to reduce the potentially adverse effects of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, we have entered into forward exchange contracts. These hedging transactions limit our exposure to changes in the U.S. Dollar to the Indian Rupee exchange rate, and as of March 31, 2013 the total notional or contractual value of the contracts we held was $14.0 million. These contracts will mature over the next 20 months.
Holding other variables constant, a 10% adverse fluctuation, in relation to our hedge positions, of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Indian Rupee would require an adjustment of $1.4 million and increase our Indian Rupee hedge liability as of March 31, 2013, to $1.5 million. A 10% favorable fluctuation, in relation to our hedge positions, of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Indian Rupee would result in an adjustment of $1.4 million, reversing our Indian Rupee hedge liability and creating a hedge asset as of March 31, 2013, in the amount of $1.3 million. We do not expect a 10% fluctuation to have any material impact on our operating results as the underlying hedged transactions will move in an equal and opposite direction. If there is an unfavorable movement in the Indian Rupee relative to our hedged positions this would be offset by reduced expenses, after conversion to the U.S. Dollar, associated with obligations paid for in the Indian Rupee.
Convertible Notes. The fair value of the 2015 convertible senior notes is sensitive to interest rate changes as well as changes in our stock price. Interest rate changes would result in an increase or decrease in the fair value of the 2015 convertible senior notes due to differences between market interest rates and rates in effect at the inception of the obligation. Fluctuations in our stock price would result in an increase or decrease in the fair value of the 2015 convertible senior notes due to the value of the notes derived from the conversion feature. Unless we elect to repurchase our 2015 convertible senior notes in the open market, changes in the fair value of the 2015 convertible senior notes have no impact on our cash flows or consolidated financial statements. The estimated fair value of the 2015 convertible senior notes was $17.7 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective.
During our most recent fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013, no change occurred in the Company's "internal control over financial reporting" (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are many factors that affect our business and the results of our operations, many of which are beyond our control. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
31
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit 10.1 | Amended and Restated Executive Severance Agreement dated February 1, 2013 between Radisys Corporation and Allen Muhich. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2013 (SEC File No. 000-26844). |
Exhibit 10.2 | Amended and Restated Executive Change of Control Agreement dated February 1, 2013 between Radisys Corporation and Allen Muhich. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2013 (SEC File No. 000-26844). |
Exhibit 31.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 31.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 32.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS** | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
101.CAL** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
101.LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
101.PRE** | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase |
101.DEF** | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase |
* | Filed herewith |
** | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
RADISYS CORPORATION | ||||
Dated: | May 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Brian Bronson | |
Brian Bronson | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Dated: | May 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Allen Muhich | |
Allen Muhich | ||||
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
33
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit 10.1 | Amended and Restated Executive Severance Agreement dated February 1, 2013 between Radisys Corporation and Allen Muhich. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2013 (SEC File No. 000-26844). |
Exhibit 10.2 | Amended and Restated Executive Change of Control Agreement dated February 1, 2013 between Radisys Corporation and Allen Muhich. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2013 (SEC File No. 000-26844). |
Exhibit 31.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 31.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 32.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS** | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
101.CAL** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
101.LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
101.PRE** | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase |
101.DEF** | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase |
* | Filed herewith |
** | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
34