(2) Basis of Presentation | 6 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2013 |
Notes to Financial Statements | ' |
Basis of Presentation | ' |
The Company, previously an operating stage company, became a development stage company on April 1, 2012, the date of inception as a development stage company for financial reporting. A development stage company, as defined by ASC-915-10 “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprise”, is an entity that devotes substantially all of its efforts to establish a business and either of the following conditions exists: 1) the principal operations have not commenced, or 2) the principal operations have commenced, but there has been no significant revenue therefrom. |
|
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include complete footnotes and financial statement presentations. As a result, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read along with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In our opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for those periods presented. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Moreover, the results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. |
|
The Company maintains a website at www.appliedvs.com, which makes available free of charge our recent annual report and other filings with the SEC. In addition to its website, the Company also disseminates material non-public information on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/appliedvs, and on Twitter at https://mobile.twitter.com/appliedvs. |
|
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and, accordingly, do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our independent registered public accounting firm’s reports on the consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, contains an explanatory paragraph wherein it expressed an opinion that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, careful consideration of such opinion should be given in determining whether to continue or become our stockholder. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
The Company, previously an operating stage company, became a development stage company on April 1, 2012, the date of inception as a development stage company for financial reporting. A development stage company, as defined by ASC-915-10 “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprise”, is an entity that devotes substantially all of its efforts to establish a business and either of the following conditions exists: 1) the principal operations have not commenced, or 2) the principal operations have commenced, but there has been no significant revenue therefrom. |
|
As disclosed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements. These judgments can be subjective and complex and, consequently, actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Since December 31, 2012, there have been no significant changes to the assumptions and estimates related to those critical accounting policies. The Company has disclosed in Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures of this report that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective during the period, as a result of the Company filing its December 31, 2012 Form 10-K on May 13, 2013, which was due on March 31, 2013, and the late filing of this report on Form 10-Q, which was due on August 14, 2013. |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, RJL Marketing Services, Guardian Technologies International, Inc., Signature Mapping Medical Sciences, Inc., Instasis Imaging, Inc., Guardian Healthcare Systems UK, Ltd., and Wise Systems Ltd., in which it has the controlling interest. Subsidiaries acquired are consolidated from the date of acquisition. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and embedded conversion features and detachable warrants approximates fair value based on the liquidity of these financial instruments and their short-term nature. |
|
The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt and equity securities for indications requiring bifurcation, and separate accounting, for the embedded conversion feature. Under guidelines of ASC 815-40, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock,” public companies that are required, or that could be required, to deliver shares of common stock as part of a physical settlement or a net-share settlement, under a freestanding financial instrument, are required to initially measure the contract at fair value (or allocate on a fair value basis if issued as part of a debt financing), and report the value in permanent equity. However, in certain circumstances (e.g. the company could not ascertain whether sufficient authorized shares exist to settle the contract), permanent equity classification should be reassessed. The classification of the contract as permanent equity should be reassessed at each balance sheet date and, if necessary, reclassified as a liability on the date of the event causing the reclassification. If a reclassification occurs from permanent equity to a liability, the fair value of the financial instrument should be removed from permanent equity as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. Any portion of the contract that could be net-share settled as of the balance sheet date would remain classified in permanent equity. Subsequent to the initial reclassification event, changes in fair value of the instrument are charged to expense until the conditions giving rise to the reclassification are resolved. When a company has more than one contract subject to reclassification, it must determine a method of reclassification that is systematic, rational, and consistently applied. The Company adopted a reclassification policy that reclassifies contracts with the latest inception date first. To the extent that changes in fair value of equity instruments relates to financings since November 8, 2006 (the date of first closing under the debenture financing with reset provisions that made the number of potentially issuable shares indeterminable), the increase or decrease in the fair value of the warrants is charged or credited to interest expense. To the extent the equity instruments relate to other transactions (e.g. consulting expense), the increases or decreases are charged or credited based on the nature of the transaction. The number of additional shares potentially issuable under the November 8, 2006, outstanding convertible debentures and related outstanding warrants and other subsequent warrants issued was determinable as of the debentures’ final milestone reset date on May 20, 2008, and, therefore, the outstanding fair value of the warrants issued to the debenture holders, other subsequent warrants issued through May 20, 2008, and the warrants’ related beneficial conversion feature were reclassified as stockholders’ equity in accordance with currently effective generally accepted accounting principles. |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Certain reclassifications of previously reported amounts have been made to conform to the current period presentation. These classifications had no effect on the previously reported net loss. |
|
Segment Data and Related Information |
|
ASC 280-10, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” establishes standards for the manner in which public companies report information about operating segments in annual and interim financial statements. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method for determining what information to report is based on the way management organizes the operating segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is considered to be the Company’s chief executive officer (“CEO”). The CEO reviews financial information presented on an entity level basis accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by product type and certain information about geographic regions for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The entity level financial information is identical to the information presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
The Company has two groups of products and services - Security (PinPoint™) and Healthcare (Signature Mapping™ Medical Computer Aided Detection (“Medical CAD”), and operates in three geographic markets. The Company has determined that as of the balance sheet date, it operates as a single operating unit since the two products make up a slight revenue stream to the Company. |
|
The Company operates in North America, and Africa and Asia. In general, revenues are attributed to the country in which the contract originates. There were no revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Our product and service categories would include software licenses, research funding, maintenance support, and hardware. The Company continues to focus efforts in developing the Signature Mapping™ imaging technologies, while at the same time pursuing opportunities for our security product/services. The following information represents software license activities. The Company continues to present the segmentation as they continue to develop their services by product and geographic location. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Cumulative From | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | | 1-Apr-12 | | | | |
GEOGRAPHIC DATA | | 30-Jun | | 30-Jun | | (date of inception) | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | To June 30, 2013 | | | | |
Net revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
Africa and Asia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Total net revenue | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
Africa and Asia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | $ | (631,813 | ) | | $ | (404,743 | ) | | $ | (1,237,126 | ) | | $ | (925,895 | ) | | $ | (2,468,228 | ) | | | | |
Africa and Asia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Total operating loss | | $ | (631,813 | ) | | $ | (404,743 | ) | | $ | (1,237,126 | ) | | $ | (925,895 | ) | | $ | (2,468,228 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | $ | 18,684 | | | $ | 24,682 | | | $ | 37,368 | | | $ | 49,363 | | | $ | 104,450 | | | | | |
Africa and Asia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Total depreciation and amortiz | | $ | 18,684 | | | $ | 24,682 | | | $ | 37,368 | | | $ | 49,363 | | | $ | 104,450 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | | | | | | | | | $ | 401,579 | | | $ | 550,311 | | | | | | | | | |
Africa and Asia | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | | | | | | | $ | 401,579 | | | $ | 550,311 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-lived assets, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Americas | | | | | | | | | | $ | 389,334 | | | $ | 537,635 | | | | | | | | | |
Africa and Asia | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Total long-lived assets, net | | | | | | | | | | $ | 389,334 | | | $ | 537,635 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Long-lived assets, net: consists of software, goodwill, patents, property and equipment, and other noncurrent assets. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company has two active equity compensation plans which include the Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2009 Stock Compensation Plan (collectively, the “Plans”). A total of 50,000,000 shares have been reserved for issuance under these Plans in the form of stock-based awards to employees, non-employee directors and outside consultants of the Company, of which 4,871,353 shares remain available for issuance thereunder as of June 30, 2013. The grant of awards under the Plans require approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (or the Board of Directors, in the absence of such a committee) (the “Committee”), and the Committee is authorized under the Plans to take all actions that it determines to be necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the Plans. |
|
The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 718-10, “Share-Based Payment” to account for its share-based payments. ASC 718-10 requires all share-based payments to employees, or to non-employee directors as compensation for service on the Board of Directors, to be recognized as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements based on the estimated fair values of such options as calculated using the Black-Scholes model, and the related expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period to vesting for each grant, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company’s estimated forfeiture rates are based on its historical experience within separate groups of employees. In accordance with ASC 718-10, the Company recognized total stock-based compensation expense for employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors for the six months ended June 30, 2013 of $508,837 and $0 for the same period during 2012. |
|
The Company accounts for stock options granted to non-employees in accordance with ASC 718-10 and ASC 505-50, “Accounting For Equity Instruments That Are Issued To Other Than Employees For Acquiring, Or In Conjunction With Selling, Goods Or Services.” ASC 505-50 establishes the measurement principles for transactions in which equity instruments are issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services. The Company has relied upon the guidance provided under ASC 505-50 to determine the measurement date and the fair value re-measurement principles to be applied, and recognizes as an expense the estimated fair value of such options as calculated using the Black-Scholes model. The fair value is remeasured during the service period at each balance sheet date, and is amortized over the remaining service period to vesting for each option or the remaining term of the recipient’s contractual arrangement, whichever is shorter. The Company recognizes compensation costs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a pro rata basis over the requisite service period of each vesting tranche of each award. The Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as trends of actual option forfeitures when estimating the forfeiture rate. Total stock-based compensation expense for consultants during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the same period in 2012 were $5,500 and $11,125, respectively. |
|
The Black-Scholes Merton option valuation model (Black-Scholes model) was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are not transferable. The fair value of each option granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions: |
|
Black-Scholes Model Assumptions | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate (1) | | | 0.99 | % | | 2.27 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected volatility (2) | | | 163.6 | % | | 136.7 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividend yield (3) | | | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expected life (4) | | 5.4 years | | | 6.5 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(1) | The risk-free interest rate is based on US Treasury debt securities with maturities similar to the expected term of the option. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(2) | Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock factoring in daily share price observations. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(3) | No cash dividends have been declared on the Company’s common stock since the Company’s inception, and the Company currently does not anticipate paying cash dividends over the expected term of the option. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(4) | The expected term of stock option awards granted is derived from historical exercise experience under the Company’s stock option plan and represents the period of time that stock option awards granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term assumption incorporates the contractual term of an option grant, which is usually ten years, as well as the vesting period of an award, which is generally pro rata vesting over two years. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
The Board of Directors adopted the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan on August 29, 2003. The plan may be modified or terminated at any time, and any such amendment or termination will not affect outstanding options without the consent of the optionee. The Board of Directors amended and restated the plan on December 2, 2003. The Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (“2003 Plan”) was approved by the shareholders on February 13, 2004, pursuant to which it grants stock-based compensation in the form of options, which will result in the issuance of up to an aggregate of 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 2003 Stock Incentive Plan terminates on August 29, 2013. The aggregate number of shares and the number of shares in an award (as well as the option price) may be adjusted if the outstanding shares of the Company are increased, decreased or exchanged through merger or other stock transaction. The Plan provides for options which qualify as Incentive Stock Options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as well as the issuance of Non-Qualified Options, which do not so qualify. Pursuant to the terms of the 2003 Plan, the Company, as determined by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by the Board, may grant Non-Qualified Stock Options (“NQSOs”) to its executive officers, non-employee directors, or consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries at any time, and from time to time. The 2003 Plan also provides for Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) to be granted to any officer or other employee of the Company or its subsidiaries at any time, and from time to time, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Such stock options granted allow a grantee to purchase a fixed number of shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed exercise price not be less than the quoted market price (or 110% thereof for Incentive Stock Options issued to a holder of 10% or greater beneficial ownership) of the shares on the date granted. The options may vest on a single date or over a period of time, but normally they do not vest unless the grantee is still employed by, or a director of, the Company on the vesting date. Generally for all employees, the options vest 50% after the first year from the date of grant and the remaining 50% after the second year from the date of grant. Stock options granted to independent board of directors vest 100% after the service period, which generally is one year from the date of grant. |
|
Factors considered in granting stock options included: (i) the general policy during the past five, and in the foreseeable future, of not increasing base salaries of all employees, (ii) the performance of employees, (iii) the employees’ increasing responsibilities in a dynamic, and shrinking organization, and (iv) the accomplishments achieved by the Company during the prior year. The 2003 Plan has been the principal method for our employees and executive officers to acquire equity interests in the Company. We believe that the annual aggregate value of these awards should be set near competitive median levels for comparable companies. We may provide a greater portion of total compensation to our executives and employees through stock options given the general policy of not increasing base salaries in the foreseeable future. Our Compensation Committee administers the 2003 Plan based on the above factors, and the Committee approved the grant of stock options to all current employees, including its named executives, during 2007 through 2009 as an incentive for continued contributions in moving our product development efforts forward. Stock options were not granted to employees, including its named executives, during 2012 and 2011, as the Company did not achieve the desired results during 2010 and 2011. Also, the Compensation Committee, based on management’s recommendation and discussions with the Committee, may grant stock options to new employees. There were no stock options granted to new employees during the first six months of 2013, since there were no new employees hired during this period. |
|
Options granted under the Plan must be evidenced by a stock option agreement in a form consistent with the provisions of the 2003 Plan. Each option shall expire on the earliest of (a) ten (10) years from the date it is granted, (b) sixty (60) days after the optionee dies or becomes disabled, (c) immediately upon the optionee's termination of employment or service or cessation of Board service, whichever is applicable, or (d) such date as the Committee shall determine, as set forth in the relevant option agreement; provided, however, that no ISO which is granted to an optionee who, at the time such option is granted, owns stock possessing more than ten (10) percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, shall be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date such option is granted. |
|
To exercise an option, the 2003 Plan participant, in accordance with the relevant option agreement, must provide the Company a written notice setting forth the number of options being exercised and their underlying shares, and tender an amount equal to the total exercise value of the options being exercised. The right to purchase shares is cumulative so that once the right to purchase any shares has vested; those shares or any portion of those shares may be purchased at any time thereafter until the expiration or termination of the option. ISOs and NQSOs that are not exercised in accordance with the terms and provisions of the stock option agreement, or as amended, will expire as to any then unexercised portion. Stock options that expire, are cancelled, or forfeited will again become available for issuance under the 2003 Plan as described below. The aggregate number of shares and the number of shares in an award (as well as the option price) may be adjusted if the outstanding shares of the Company are increased, decreased or exchanged through merger or other stock transaction. The shares issued by the Company under the 2003 Plan may be either treasury shares or authorized but unissued shares as the Company’s board of directors or the Compensation Committee may determine from time to time. Except as specifically provided in an option agreement, options granted under the 2003 Plan may not be sold, pledged, transferred or assigned in any way, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of a participant to whom the ISOs is granted, and the ISOs may only be exercised by the participant. |
|
The Board of Directors granted 14,650,000 stock options to all employees, including its named executives, under the 2003 Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2013, and the fair value of the options is $439,500, of which $402,875 was recognized as stock-based compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The stock options were granted in consideration for the continued deferral of salaries during 2012 and 2013 to-date, as well as for the incentive for ongoing contributions in moving our product development efforts forward. The Company has reserved under the plan 24,159,347 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and 3,536,353 remain available for future awards. Compensation expense for stock options granted is recognized over the requisite service period, which is typically the period over which the stock-based compensation awards vest. |
|
Stock Options Exercised under the 2003 Plan |
|
There were no stock options exercised during the first six months of 2013, and during the same period in 2012. |
|
Summary of stock option activity under the 2003 Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2013 issued to employees, non-employee members of the Board of Directors and consultants is as follows: |
|
| | Weighted- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year and Activity | | Exercise Price | | | Number of Options | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding December 31, 2012 | | $ | 0.32 | | | | 9,509,347 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2013 activity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Granted | | | 0.03 | | | | 14,650,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cancelled | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding June 30, 2013 | | | 0.15 | | | | 24,159,347 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reserved for future issuance at June 30, 2013 | | | | | | | 3,536,353 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The following table summarizes additional information about the 2003 Plan stock options outstanding at June 30, 2013: |
|
Issued and Outstanding | | | Exercisable | |
| | | | | | | | Weighted- | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Average | | | Weighted- | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Remaining | | | Average | | | | | | Weighted- | |
| | | | | Number of | | | Contractual | | | Exercise | | | Number of | | | Average | |
Type of Option and Range of Exercise Prices | | | Options | | | Life (Yrs) | | | Price | | | Options | | | Price | |
Nonqualified Stock Options | | $ | 0.3 | (1) (5) | | | 850,000 | | | | 0.5 | | | $ | 0.3 | | | | 850,000 | | | $ | 0.3 | |
Nonqualified Stock Options | | $ | 0.3 | (2) (5) | | | 44,000 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 44,000 | | | | 0.3 | |
Incentive Stock Options | | $ | 0.15 - $4.05 | -3 | | | 649,300 | | | | 4.3 | | | | 0.98 | | | | 649,300 | | | | 0.98 | |
Incentive Stock Options | | $ | 0.03 - $0.30 | (4) (5) | | | 22,616,047 | | | | 7.7 | | | | 0.12 | | | | 15,291,049 | | | | 0.29 | |
Total | | | | | | | 24,159,347 | | | | 7.4 | | | $ | 0.15 | | | | 16,834,349 | | | $ | 0.34 | |
|
(1) | Initially issued to employees below fair value during the period of July 2003 through February 2004. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(2) | Initially issued to directors below fair value during the period of February 2004 through September 2005. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(3) | Issued to consultants at fair value. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(4) | Issued to directors and employees at fair value, or above fair value for those individuals with greater than 10% beneficial ownership. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(5) | The exercise price reflects the repricing of stock options as approved by the Compensation Committee on April 24, 2010. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
The 2009 Stock Compensation Plan |
|
On June 4, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Stock Compensation Plan (“2009 Plan) which provides for the grant or issuance of up to an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock rights (“RSRs”), or common stock awards (“Common Stock Awards”) (a NQSO, RSA, RSR or Common Stock Award, individually, an “Award;” collectively, “Awards”). Our Board of Directors has delegated its authority to administer the 2009 Plan to the Compensation Committee. |
|
The purpose of the 2009 Plan is to foster our success and the success of our subsidiaries and affiliates by providing incentives to employees, directors, officers and consultants to promote our long-term financial success. The Plan complements our 2003 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan”) and provides greater flexibility to us in that it permits us to compensate and award employees, directors, officers and consultants through the issuance of certain options, RSAs, RSRs, and stock awards in addition, or as an alternative, to the incentive and non-qualified stock options that may be awarded under the 2003 Plan. The 2009 Plan terminates on June 4, 2019, and no award may be made after that date, however, awards made before that date may extend beyond that date. If an award under the 2009 Plan is cancelled, expires, forfeited, settled in cash or otherwise terminates without being exercised in full, the shares of common stock not acquired pursuant to the award will again become available for issuance under the 2009 Plan. The Board may amend, terminate, or modify the 2009 Plan at any time, without shareholder approval, unless required by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, pursuant to Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or by any national securities exchange or system on which our common stock is then listed or reported, or by any regulatory body. |
|
Subject to the provisions of the 2009 Plan, the Compensation Committee has the power to: |
|
| · | Prescribe, amend, and rescind rules and regulations relating to the 2009 Plan and to define terms not otherwise defined therein; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | Determine which persons are eligible to participate, to which of such participants, if any, awards shall be granted, and the timing of any such awards; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | Grant awards to participants and determine the terms and conditions thereof, including the number of shares subject to awards and the exercise or purchase price of such shares and the circumstances under which awards become exercisable or vested or are forfeited or expire; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | Establish any performance goals or other conditions applicable to the grant, issuance, exercisability, vesting and/or ability to retain any award; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | Prescribe and amend the terms of the agreements or other communications evidencing awards made under the 2009 Plan (which need not be identical) and the terms or form of any document or notice required to be delivered to us by participants under the 2009 Plan; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | Determine the appropriate adjustment, if any, required as a result of any reorganization, reclassification, combination of shares, stock split, reverse stock split, spin-off or dividend (other than regular, quarterly cash dividends), or other changes in the number or kind of outstanding shares or any stock or other securities into which such shares shall have been exchanged; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | Interpret and construe the 2009 Plan, any rules and regulations under the 2009 Plan and the terms and conditions of any award granted thereunder, and to make exceptions to any such provisions in good faith and for the benefit of the Company; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| · | Make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2009 Plan. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Unless the Board expressly provides otherwise prior to a change of control or in an award agreement, in the event of a change of control of the Company, all outstanding options under the 2009 Plan vest and become exercisable on the date immediately before the change of control and all restrictions under RSAs and RSRs shall lapse or be deemed satisfied on the date immediately prior to the change of control. A change of control is deemed to have occurred upon the occurrence of one of the following events: (i) any person or group of persons becomes the beneficial owner of shares of the Company to which 50% or more of the total number of votes for the election of directors may be cast; (ii) as a result of a cash tender offer, exchange offer, merger or other business combination, sale of assets or contested election, persons who were directors immediately prior to the event cease to constitute a majority of the board; (iii) stockholders approve an agreement providing either that the Company will cease to be an independent publicly owned corporation or for sale or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Company; or (iv) a tender offer or exchange offer is made for shares of our common stock (other than one made by us) and shares of common stock are acquired. |
|
The Compensation Committee determines all awards to non-employee directors and such awards are not subject to management’s discretion. From time to time, the committee will set the amount and the type of award that will be granted to non-employee directors on a periodic, nondiscriminatory basis, including pursuant to any plan adopted by the Compensation Committee or Board for the compensation of non-employee directors. The committee may set additional awards to be granted to non-employee directors also on a periodic, nondiscriminatory basis based on one or more of the following criteria: (i) service as the chair of a Board committee; (ii) service as chairman of the Board; (iii) the number or type of Board committees on which a director serves; or (iv) the first selection or appointment of an individual to the Board. |
|
Non-qualified stock options may be granted pursuant to non-qualified stock option award agreements and certificates adopted by the Board, as amended by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determines the terms of each stock option granted under the 2009 Plan, including the number of shares covered by an option, exercise price and means of payment, the vesting and exercisability of the option, and restrictions on transfer and the term. The exercise price of an option granted under the Plan may not be less than the fair market value on the date of option grant and may only be exercised at such times as may be specified by the Committee and provided for in an award agreement. The options expire on the earliest of ten years after the date of grant, 90 days after the death or disability of the recipient, immediately upon termination of employment or service other than by death or disability, or such date as the Compensation Committee determines. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may change by agreement the post-termination rights of a recipient, including accelerating the date or dates on which the option becomes vested and is exercisable following termination of employment or service, or extend the period. Options granted under the plan may be exercised by delivering cash, a cashless exercise, or by delivering to us the proceeds of shares of our common stock issuable under an option. Compensation expense for non-qualified stock options is recognized over the period they vest. |
|
An award of restricted stock consists of a specified number of shares of our common stock that are, or may be, subject to restrictions, forfeiture conditions, and any other terms and conditions for periods determined by the Committee. The Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the terms of any award of restricted stock, including the number of shares subject to the award, and the minimum period over which the award may vest, and the acceleration of any vesting in the event of death, disability or change of control. RSAs are not transferable or assignable unless provided otherwise by the Compensation Committee with respect to certain specified family-related transfers. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, once the restricted stock vests, the shares of common stock specified in the Award will be free of restriction, subject to any applicable lock up period. Prior to the termination of the restrictions under a RSA, a participant may vote and receive dividends on the restricted stock unless the Committee determines otherwise, but may not sell or otherwise transfer the shares until such time as the restrictions of the award have been satisfied. Compensation expense for restricted stock awards is recognized over the period they vest. |
|
An award of restricted stock rights entitles a participant to receive a specified number of shares of our common stock that are, or may be, subject to restrictions, forfeiture conditions, and any other terms and conditions for periods determined by the Committee. It may also include the right to dividend equivalents if and as so determined by the committee. The Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the terms of any award of restricted stock or RSRs, including the number of shares subject to the award, and the minimum period over which the award may vest, and the acceleration of any vesting in the event of death, disability or change of control. RSRs are not transferable or assignable unless provided otherwise by the Compensation Committee with respect to certain specified family-related transfers. Unless the committee determines otherwise, once a RSR vests, the shares of common stock specified in the award will be issued to the participant. A participant who has been awarded RSRs may not vote the shares of common stock subject to the rights until the shares are issued. Until the vesting period applicable to a RSRs award expires and the shares are issued, the participant also may not transfer or encumber any interest in the RSRs or in any related dividend equivalents. Compensation expense for restricted stock rights is recognized over the period they vest. |
|
The Compensation Committee may also make stock awards of common stock without restrictions, except that if the award is in lieu of salary, service fee, cash bonus or other cash compensation, the number of shares covered by an award shall be based on the fair market value of such shares on the date of grant. Common Stock Awards under the plan may be issued free of restriction and may vest immediately; however, the Committee may impose vesting and other restrictions related to the grant of such common stock awards. Compensation expense for common stock awards is recognized over the period they vest, although generally the awards vest immediately. |
|
The following is a summary of the number and type of awards granted to, or exercised or forfeited by, employees, non-employee members of the Board of Directors and consultants pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Stock Compensation Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2013: |
|
| Weighted-Average | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Grant or Exercise | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year and Activity | | Price Per Share | | | Number of Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reserved for future issuance as of December 31, 2012 | | | | | | 6,668,333 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal 2013 activity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock awards | | $ | 0.03 | | | | 5,333,333 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted stock awards | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted stock rights | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-qualified stock options | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued during 2013 | | | 0.03 | | | | 5,333,333 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reserved for future issuance as of June 30, 2013 | | | | | | | 1,335,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options or restricted stock rights outstanding | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Stock Issued under the 2009 Plan |
|
In March 2013, an employee converted $25,001 of accrued wages for 833,333 shares of common stock. The shares were issued under the 2009 Stock Compensation Plan. Common stock was increased by $834 for the par value of the shares, and paid-in capital was increased by $24,167. |
|
In January 2013, the Company issued 4,500,000 shares of common stock to three of its named executives, which vest 50% three months from the date of issuance and 50% upon six months from date of issuance. The shares were issued under the 2009 Stock Compensation Plan in consideration for the continued deferral of salaries during 2012 and 2013 to-date, as well as for the incentive for ongoing contributions in moving our product development efforts forward. Our Compensation Committee, under the direction of the Board of Directors, administers the 2009 Plan based on the above factors, and the Board approved the grant of stock options to all current employees, including its named executives. Common stock was increased by $4,500 for the par value of the shares, paid-in capital was increased by $130,500, and $135,000 was recorded as deferred stock compensation. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, $146,250 was expensed as stock compensation, and an aggregate of $41,250 was recorded for the revaluation of such shares outstanding at each period end until fully vested. |
|
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. For financial statement purposes, depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset ranging from 3 to 10 years. |
|
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset (Useful Life) | | 30-Jun-13 | | 31-Dec-12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Software (3 years) | | $ | 84,224 | | | $ | 84,224 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Computer equipment (3 to 5 years) | | | 329,861 | | | | 329,861 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures (7 to 10 years) | | | 231,033 | | | | 323,639 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equipment (7 to 10 years) | | | 80,727 | | | | 80,727 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 725,845 | | | | 818,451 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | 651,219 | | | | 702,316 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equipment, net | | $ | 74,626 | | | $ | 116,135 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $20,913 and $32,907 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company sold furniture in March 2013 for $28,934, which had a net book value of $20,596 and resulted in a gain from the sale of fixed assets of $8,338. |
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
|
Intangible Assets – Intangible assets consist of acquired software and patents. Under ASC 350, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” such assets acquired including software technology is considered to have a finite life. Management has estimated the useful life of acquired software technology to be 5 years and amortized such costs on a straight-line basis over this period. In addition, ASC 985-20, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” requires the Company to consider whether or not the software technology is impaired using a net realizable value analysis based on projected discounted cash flows. The Company prepared this analysis as of June 30, 2013, and concluded that the intangible assets are not impaired. Patent acquisition costs pertaining to the Company’s 3i technology that covers its PinPoint™ and Signature Mapping™ intellectual property (technology not acquired through acquisition), have been capitalized as of the date incurred, and are being amortized over the 20-year legal life of the patents. The Company has been granted by the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) six patents related to its 3i technology. The Company evaluates the periods of amortization continually to determine whether later events or circumstances require revised estimates of useful lives. The Company’s intangible acquired software technology was fully amortized as of December 31, 2009. Therefore, there was no amortization costs associated with acquired software during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization expense for patent acquisition costs was $16,455 and $16,456 during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company anticipates incurring additional patent acquisition costs during 2013. |
|
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Period Cost | | | | | | Net Book Value | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Additions | | | | Reductions | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intangibles with finite lives: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Patent acquisition costs | | $ | 331,163 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 16,455 | | | $ | 314,708 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Excess of Purchase Price over Net Assets Acquired (Goodwill) – The Company follows the provisions of ASC 805-10, “Business Combinations” and ASC 350-10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” These statements establish financial accounting and reporting standards for acquired goodwill. Specifically, the standards address how acquired intangible assets should be accounted for both at the time of acquisition and after they have been recognized in the financial statements. Effective January 1, 2002, with the adoption of ASC 350-10, goodwill must be evaluated for impairment and is no longer amortized. Excess of purchase price over net assets acquired (“goodwill”) represents the excess of acquisition purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. To the extent possible, a portion of the excess purchase price is assigned to identifiable intangible assets. There was no goodwill on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company during Fiscal 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, as a net realizable value analysis was made for goodwill in prior years and such asset was considered fully impaired during those prior years. Therefore, there was no amortization expense of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2013, or during the same period in 2012. |
|
Impairment of Excess Purchase Price over Net Assets Acquired – The Company follows the provisions of ASC 350-10 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” for the impairment of goodwill. The Company determines impairment by comparing the fair value of the goodwill, using the undiscounted cash flow method, with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Impairment is tested annually or whenever indicators of impairment arise. There was no goodwill on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company during Fiscal 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, as a net realizable value analysis was made for goodwill in prior years and such asset was considered fully impaired during those prior years. |
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets – The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset within the scope of ASC 360-10, “Accounting of the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” may not be recoverable. The Company’s assessment for impairment of assets involves estimating the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. An impairment loss recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, and considers year-end the date for its annual impairment testing. |
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement |
|
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its authoritative guidance related to testing goodwill for impairment. Under the revised guidance, entities testing goodwill for impairment have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more-likely-than-not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. This guidance became effective in the beginning of the Company’s fiscal 2012, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
In June 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income, requiring entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement or in two separate consecutive statements. This guidance also required entities to present reclassification adjustments for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income in both net income and other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued an update to this guidance deferring the requirement to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements. However, the Company is still required to present reclassification adjustments on either the face of the financial statement where comprehensive income is reported or disclose the reclassification adjustments in the notes to the financial statements. This guidance, including the deferral, becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2013 first quarter, with early adoption permitted and full retrospective application required. The guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2011, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to fair value measurements to provide a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). This guidance clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and expands the existing disclosure requirements. This guidance became effective in the beginning of the Company’s fiscal 2012. This guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows. As a result of the adoption of this guidance, the Company did not change its valuation techniques, but may make additional disclosures as needed. |
|
In December 2010, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to business combinations entered into by an entity that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. These amendments clarify existing guidance that if an entity presents comparative financial statements that include a material business combination, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This guidance became effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first day of the Company’s fiscal 2012. This disclosure-only guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement |
|
In July 2012, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance related to testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. Under the revised guidance, entities testing their indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before performing further impairment testing. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that it is more-likely-than-not that the asset is impaired, a quantitative test is required. The guidance becomes effective in the beginning of the Company's fiscal 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adopting this guidance which is not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. |
|
In December 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that creates new disclosure requirements about the nature of an entity’s rights of offset and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. This revised guidance helps reconcile differences in the offsetting requirements under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). These requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This disclosure-only guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2013 third quarter, with retrospective application required. The Company currently does not hold any financial or derivative instruments that are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement. However, the Company currently utilizes the right of offset when netting certain negative cash balances in its statement of financial position. This guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows, but may require certain additional disclosures if such balances are material or if the Company enters into additional arrangements that fall under the provisions of this guidance. |
|
Other ASU’s that have been issued or proposed by the FASB ASC that do not require adoption until a future date and are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption. |