Exhibit 99.1
Lenders’ Presentation – Public
July 19, 2011
© 2011 Ocwen Financial Corporation. All rights reserved.
Forward - looking statements and GAAP reconciliation
Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved or whether such performance or results will ever be achieved. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time and management’s good faith belief with respect to future events, and is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. Ocwen Financial Corporation (“the Company”) assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If the Company does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that the Company will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements. SEC rules regulate the use of “non-GAAP financial measures” in public disclosures, such as “EBITDA” and “Adjusted EBITDA”, that are derived on the basis of methodologies other than in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or “GAAP.” These rules govern the manner in which non-GAAP financial measures may be publicly presented and prohibit in all filings with the SEC, among other things:
■ Exclusion of charges or liabilities that require, or will require, cash settlement or would have required cash settlement, absent an ability to settle in another manner, from a non-GAAP financial measure; and
■ Adjustment of a non-GAAP financial measure to eliminate or smooth items identified as non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, when the nature of the charge or gain is such that it has occurred in the past two years or is reasonably likely to recur within the next two years
We have included non-GAAP financial measures in this presentation, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, that may not comply with the SEC rules governing the presentation of non-GAAP financial measures. In addition, the Company’s measurements of Adjusted EBITDA are based on definitions of EBITDA included in certain of the Company’s debt agreements and, as a result, may not be comparable to those of each other and other companies.
For a presentation of Adjusted EBITDA see page 28 of this presentation.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
1
Agenda
Introduction | Barclays Capital |
Ocwen Business Overview | Ocwen – William Erbey |
Litton Acquisition | Ocwen – Ronald Faris |
Key Investment Highlights | Ocwen – Ronald Faris |
Financial Overview | Ocwen – John Van Vlack |
Questions and Answers | Ocwen |
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
2
Introduction
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
3
Presenters
William C. Erbey
Chairman
23 years at Ocwen 38 years of industry experience
■ Ocwen: Chairman of Board since 1996, Chief Executive Officer from 1988 to 2010 and President from 1988 to 1998
■ 1983 to 1995: Managing General Partner of The Oxford Financial Group, a private investment partnership (predecessor of Ocwen)
■ 1975 to 1983: GE Capital in various capacities most recently as President and Chief Operating Officer of GE Mortgage Insurance
■ BA in Economics, Allegheny College and MBA, Harvard University
Ronald M. Faris
President and Chief Executive Officer
20 years at Ocwen 25 years of industry experience
■ Ocwen: Chief Executive Officer since 2010 and President since 2001, Executive Vice President from 1998 to 2001, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from 1995 to 1997
■ 1991 to 1994: Controller for a subsidiary of Ocwen
■ 1986 to 1991: Vice President with Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
■ 1984 to 1986: General Audit Department of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
■ BS in Accounting from The Pennsylvania State University
John Van Vlack
Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer
4 years at Ocwen 24 years of industry experience
■ Ocwen: Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer since 2010, Senior Vice President-Finance from 2008 to 2010, Vice President-Finance from 2007 to 2008
■ 1989 to 2007: BellSouth in various capacities most recently as Chief Financial Officer of Network Operations and Retail Marketing
■ Prior to 1989: Staff Consultant in Deloitte and Touche
■ BS in Accounting, Emory University and MBA, The University of Texas at Austin
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
4
Ocwen Business Overview
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
5
Who we are and what we do
■ Leading provider of residential and commercial mortgage loan servicing and special servicing
♦ Publicly-traded (NYSE: OCN) pure play mortgage servicer with $1.3 billion in market capitalization
♦ 20+ years of innovation in loss mitigation
♦ #1 servicer in third-party studies of servicers
♦ Low cost, scalable servicing platform and technology
■ $112 billion servicing portfolio including pending acquisition of Litton Loan Servicing LP (“Litton”)
■ Employer of over 3,300 professionals and staff worldwide
■ Management and the Board has a 23% ownership in Ocwen and strong alignment of interests
Ocwen maximizes value for mortgage owners by keeping borrowers in their homes…
■ Applies psychological principles to overcome borrower fear and objections
♦ Delivered via artificial intelligence and dialogue engine ensuring reliability and consistency
■ Utilizes advanced models to reduce variability and losses by evaluating loan resolution alternatives
■ Home retention Relationship Managers are hired based on intellect and personality profile – not necessarily experience
…through the intelligent use of scalable technology
■ Ocwen can create a best-in-class collector in three months■ Technology and global resources permit Ocwen to dedicate more staff to keep people in their homes and lower delinquency rates
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
6
Mortgage servicing overview
■ Residential mortgage loan servicing primarily involves:
♦ Collection and transfer of mortgage payments from borrowers
♦ Cash management and escrow account responsibilities
♦ Mitigation of losses through loan modifications, short sales and other options
♦ Administration of foreclosure and real estate owned
■ Servicers receive contractual fees based on the unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of the loans serviced
■ The primary costs are operating expenses and the cost of funding servicer advances
■ In most cases, if there is a shortfall in monthly collections from a delinquent borrower, the servicer is required to “advance” the missed payments and other costs
♦ The right to be repaid for these servicer advances is “top-of-the-waterfall”
OCN advance collateral coverage 3/31/11
$58.1 Billion (Property Value) | $1.8 Billion Servicer Advances | ~3.2% Advance Rate |
$56.3 Billion | ~96.8% | |
The “Properties” | Downside Protection /Cushion for Servicer Advances | EquityCushion |
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
7
Growing demand for high-touch servicers in $11 trillion industry
■ $10.5 trillion in residential mortgages outstanding as of December 31, 2010
♦ $1.4 trillion of delinquent loans
■ Every loan needs a servicer
♦ Top four banks service 54% of total loans, but focused on prime “low touch” loans
♦ Growing number of distressed assets where “high touch” servicers are best equipped to improve loan performance
Top mortgage servicers (1)
($ in billions) | |||
Prime Servicers | |||
Servicer | UPB | ||
Bank of America | $2,041 | ||
Wells Fargo | 1,808 | ||
Chase | 1,233 | ||
Citi | 584 | ||
Ally Financial | 381 |
Subprime Servicers | |
Servicer | UPB |
Ocwen | $112 |
Chase Home Finance | 88 |
BofA (Countrywide) | 81 |
American Home | 76 |
HSBC Finance | 47 |
Increase in distressed assets (2)
30+ Days Delinquent and Foreclosures | 30+ Days Delinquent and Foreclosures (%) | |
2004 | 0.619 | 0.055 |
2005 | 0.637 | 0.057 |
2006 | 0.687 | 0.061 |
2007 | 0.881 | 0.079 |
2008 | 1.241 | 0.112 |
2009 | 1.531 | 0.141 |
2010 | 1.406 | 0.129 |
1. Source: Inside Mortgage Finance as of 3/31/2011. Note: Ocwen subprime servicing includes subservicing UPB and is pro forma for Litton.
2. Source: Mortgage Bankers Association and Inside Mortgage Finance. Delinquent loans reflect end of period data.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
8
Spectrum of Ocwen market opportunities
Factors Affecting Ability to Win New Business: | ||
Cost | Quality | Market Coverage |
þDistinct Competitive Advantage | þDistinct Competitive Advantage | Expanding into New Servicing Markets |
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
9
Litton Acquisition
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
10
Litton acquisition overview
Transaction Overview
■ On June 5, 2011, Ocwen signed a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding partnership interests of Litton and certain interest-only servicing strips from Goldman Sachs, & Co. (the “Seller”)
♦ The Seller will retain certain state and federal contingent liabilities
■ The acquired portfolio had $41.2 billion in UPB and approximately $2.5 billion in servicer advances as of March 31, 2011
♦ Expected UPB at close of $39.0 billion due to natural run-off in the portfolio
Transaction Structure & Financing
■ The Seller will provide financing, up to $2.1 billion, for any or all of the $2.5 billion in advances not financed through third-party sources
♦ Barclays Capital, Bank of America and Royal Bank of Scotland have committed to provide, in aggregate, a $2.1 billion third-party servicer advance facility
■ In addition, Ocwen will raise debt financing in the form of a $575 million Term Loan Facility to provide cash for the Litton acquisition and any other potential acquisitions
Timing
■ The transaction is expected to close on September 1, 2011
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
11
Investment rationale
■ Further expands Ocwen’s servicing portfolio on a pro forma basis to $112 billion in UPB as of March 31, 2011
Top 10 Subprime Servicers – Current | ||
Rank | Servicer | UPB ($bn) |
1 | Chase Home Finance | $88 |
2 | Bank of America (Countrywide) | 81 |
3 | American Home Mortgage Servicing | 76 |
4 | Ocwen Financial Corporation (1) | 71 |
5 | HSBC Finance | 47 |
6 | Litton Loan Servicing | 41 |
7 | Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | 32 |
8 | Ally Financial | 24 |
9 | Citi | 20 |
10 | Select Portfolio Servicing | 19 |
Top 10 Subprime Servicers – Pro Forma | ||
Rank | Servicer | UPB ($bn) |
1 | Ocwen Financial Corporation (1) | $112 |
2 | Chase Home Finance | 88 |
3 | Bank of America | 81 |
4 | American Home Mortgage Servicing | 76 |
5 | HSBC Finance | 47 |
6 | Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | 32 |
7 | Ally Financial | 24 |
8 | Citi | 20 |
9 | Select Portfolio Servicing | 19 |
10 | Saxon Mortgage | 18 |
■ Intend to board the Litton loans onto Ocwen’s servicing platform
♦ Marginal cost of additional servicing is very low at Ocwen
♦ Experienced and successful in boarding servicing portfolios
♦ Expected transition and integration costs of $64 million
■ Attractive acquisition price to achieve Ocwen’s targeted pre-tax ROE
♦ Loss sharing agreement limits Ocwen’s legal and regulatory risk
■ Significant cash flow opportunity by managing delinquency rates to Ocwen’s historical levels
■ Transaction is accretive to Ocwen by 2012
Source: Inside Mortgage Finance as of 3/31/2011.
1. Ocwen UPB includes subservicing.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
12
Acquired servicing portfolio
Generally similar portfolio characteristics…
($ in millions, except loan count data) | |||||||
Delinquency | |||||||
Residential | % 30+ Non- | % 90+ Non- | |||||
UPB | Loan Count | Average FICO | Average LTV | performing | performing | Net Advances | |
Ocwen | $70,543 | 462,192 | 603 | 86.2% | 37.8% | 27.4% | $1,815 |
Litton | 41,246 | 261,685 | 590 | 97.7% | 51.7% | 36.6% | 2,470 |
Pro Forma Total | $111,789 | 723,877 | 598 | 90.4% | 42.9% | 30.8% | $4,285 |
… with differing levels of advances as a % of UPB
Legacy Ocwen(1) | Saxon | HomEq | Litton | |
Apr-10 | 2.70% | 7.90% | ||
May-10 | 2.60% | 7.40% | ||
Jun-10 | 2.60% | 7.20% | ||
Jul-10 | 2.60% | 7.10% | ||
Aug-10 | 2.60% | 6.90% | ||
Sep-10 | 2.60% | 6.70% | 4.90% | |
Oct-10 | 2.60% | 6.50% | 4.70% | |
Nov-10 | 2.60% | 6.30% | 4.60% | |
Dec-10 | 2.60% | 5.90% | 4.40% | |
Jan-11 | 2.50% | 5.70% | 4.20% | |
Feb-11 | 2.50% | 5.40% | 4.10% | |
Mar-11 | 2.50% | 5.20% | 3.90% | 6.00% |
■ Litton servicing portfolio acquisitions present an opportunity for Ocwen to drive down delinquency rates and advances in line with its historical average
1. Based on UPB where Ocwen is required to make servicer advances as of 3/31/2011.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
13
Key Investment Highlights
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
14
Summary of investment highlights
1 Stable business model with recurring revenue streams and attractive growth opportunities
2 Superior servicing and loss mitigation practices effective at driving down delinquencies and advances
3 Substantial cash flow generation
4 Low risk balance sheet and strong collateral protection
5 Highly scalable platform with lowest operating cost in the industry
6 Over two decades of servicing led by an experienced management team
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
15
1 Stable business model with recurring revenue streams…
■ Revenues are fee-based and recurring in nature
♦ Revenues are contractually obligated and are a function of UPB
■ Not exposed to credit risk with respect to the mortgage loans it services
■ Attractive returns on acquisitions
Servicing business has demonstrated consistent profitability despite the credit crisis and recession
(Figures shown as bps of average UPB)
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | |
Revenue | |||||||||
Servicing and subservicing | 16.0 | 13.3 | 13.4 | 14.4 | 13.8 | 12.7 | 14.9 | 14.1 | 14.8 |
Process management | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.1 |
Total revenue | 18.4 | 15.8 | 16.0 | 16.5 | 15.6 | 14.5 | 16.4 | 15.5 | 15.9 |
Income from operations | 10.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 9.5 | 9.4 | 7.6 | 10.3 | 9.8 | 10.2 |
Pre-tax income per UPB | 6.2 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 6.7 | 6.9 | 5.1 | 6.7 | 5.3 | 6.7 |
Source: Company filings.
Note: Operating expenses have been normalized to exclude: $5.2 million litigation accrual for the MDL settlement in Q2 2010, $33.9 million HomEq related acquisition costs in Q3 2010, $17.5 million HomEq related acquisition costs in Q4 2010, and $11.9 million of incremental amortization on the SSTL due to accelerated prepayment in Q1 2011.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
16
1 …and attractive growth opportunities
Ocwen began purchasing non-performing loans in 1992 and has serviced subprime loans since 1996
Track record of growing the business over an extended time period
($ in billions, UPB at period end)
As Reported | |
2001 | 21.9 |
2005 | 42.78 |
2010 | 73.89 |
3/31/11 PF(1) | 112.2 |
Growth opportunities
■ Bank related servicing portfolios
♦ Divestitures of non-core servicing portfolios
♦ Stricter capital constraints on banks for carrying MSRs
■ Implementation of fully on-shore servicing alternative for targeting entities that limit offshore servicing
■ Partnership with Altisource and its Lender’s One business to increase flow servicing
♦ Originated ~6% of new loans originated in the US in 2010
■ Develop servicing capabilities in new segments
♦ Opportunity to service reverse mortgages and home equity lines of credit
Ocwen’s business has demonstrated an ability to withstand multiple economic cycles due to stable assets, recurring revenues, self hedging operating model and low leverage
1. Reflects $41.2 billion in Litton UPB. Assumes Litton transaction closed on 3/31/11.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
17
2 Superior servicing and loss mitigation practices…
Delinquency Percentage (90+ Days) by Portfolio(1)
Subprime Servicer Processing Speeds(2) | ||
FCL / REO processing speeds classification | ||
Fast processors / liquidators | Middle of the pack | Slow processors / liquidators |
Ocwen | JPM (EMC, WAMU) | Countrywide |
Option One | Carrington (REO liquidations) | |
Saxon | Ameriquest | |
Wells | HLS |
60+ processing speeds classification | ||
Fast processors / liquidators | Middle of the pack | Slow processors / liquidators |
Ocwen | Option One | Countrywide / BofA |
Saxon | Natcity | Carrington |
Wells | JPM / EMC | |
HomEq (now Ocwen) | Ameriquest |
Roll rate from 90+ days delinquent to current subprime fixed rate (3)
Column 1 | |
Ocwen | 15.00% |
Option One | 13.00% |
New Century | 11.80% |
WaMu | 11.50% |
Centex | 10.50% |
RFC | 10.00% |
Aurora | 9.50% |
EMC | 7.00% |
Saxon | 7.00% |
Wells | 7.00% |
HomEq | 6.00% |
Chase | 5.00% |
Litton | 4.10% |
Countrywide | 4.00% |
Nat City | 3.90% |
Ameriquest | 3.50% |
GMAC | 3.00% |
Equity One | 2.00% |
Wilshire | 2.00% |
Roll rate from 90+ days delinquent to current subprime adjustable rate (3)
Column 1 | |
Ocwen | 14.00% |
New Century | 13.50% |
Centex | 12.50% |
HFN | 12.50% |
RFC | 11.00% |
Option One | 9.50% |
Aurora | 9.00% |
IndyMac | 8.00% |
WaMu | 7.80% |
Saxon | 7.50% |
Long Beach | 7.00% |
Fremont | 6.50% |
HomEq | 6.00% |
Wells | 6.00% |
ASC | 5.20% |
Chase | 5.00% |
HLS | 5.00% |
MLN | 5.00% |
EMC | 4.50% |
SPS | 4.20% |
Ameriquest | 4.00% |
Fieldstone | 4.00% |
Fairbanks | 3.50% |
Litton | 3.50% |
Countrywide | 3.00% |
Nat City | 3.00% |
Equity One | 1.50% |
Wilshire | 1.00% |
Ameriquest | 0.50% |
1. Source: Ocwen
2. Source: Corelogic LoanPerformance, Barclays Capital, March 2011.
3. Source: Bank of America/Merrill Lynch report dated July 2009, based on 2006 vintage loans on data from December 2008 to May 2009.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
18
2 …Effective at driving down delinquencies and advances
Advances as a % of UPB
Legacy Ocwen(1) | HomEq | Saxon | |
10-Apr | 2.70% | 7.90% | |
10-May | 2.60% | 7.40% | |
10-Jun | 2.60% | 7.20% | |
10-Jul | 2.60% | 7.10% | |
10-Aug | 2.60% | 6.90% | |
10-Sep | 2.60% | 6.70% | 4.90% |
10-Oct | 2.60% | 6.50% | 4.70% |
10-Nov | 2.60% | 6.30% | 4.60% |
10-Dec | 2.60% | 5.90% | 4.40% |
11-Jan | 2.50% | 5.70% | 4.20% |
11-Feb | 2.50% | 5.40% | 4.10% |
11-Mar | 2.50% | 5.20% | 3.90% |
Advances & Previous Term Loan Balance
Advances (LHS) | Term Loan Balance (RHS) | |
9/30/2010 | 2,346 | 341 |
10/31/2010 | 2,270 | 341 |
11/30/2010 | 2,220 | 206 |
12/31/2010 | 2,109 | 198 |
1/31/2011 | 2,005 | 130 |
2/28/2011 | 1,907 | 35 |
11-Mar | 1,815 | 26 |
11-Apr | 1746 | 26 |
11-May | 26 | |
11-Jun | 0 |
■ For acquired portfolios, superior loss mitigation processes enable Ocwen to reduce delinquency rates and advances
Reducing delinquencies and advances creates value through lower capital requirements, lower interest expense and lower operating costs
1. Based on UPB where Ocwen is required to make servicer advances as of 3/31/2011.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
19
3 Substantial cash flow generation
■ Without any new UPB, the existing portfolio, including Litton, is expected to generate substantial free cash flow
♦ Sufficient to prepay the $575 million Term Loan in the near-term, if needed
■ Projected cash generation of approximately $285 million over the next 12 months from existing Ocwen portfolios
■ Assets are self-liquidating and can pay off the debt without accessing the capital markets
■ Even if delinquencies increase 25%, free cash flow would only decrease 15% in 2013 versus base case projections
Free cash flow (1) sensitivity
($ in millions) | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
Prepayment speeds | |||
with 50% immediate decrease in CPR | (8%) | 9% | 19% |
with 50% immediate increase in CPR | 1% | (10%) | (18%) |
Delinquency rates | |||
with 25% lower delinq at end point | 11% | 5% | 1% |
with 25% higher delinq at end point | (15%) | (5%) | (1%) |
1. Reflects cash flow available to prepay the new Senior Secured Term Loan Facility relative to Ocwen’s base case.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
20
4 Low risk balance sheet $930 million of equity supported by high quality assets with limited recourse debt
Highly rated assets (as reported 3/31/11)
($ in millions) | ||
Assets (1) | 3/31/11 | % of Total |
Investment Grade Quality | ||
Advances | $1,815 | 73% |
Cash | 129 | 5% |
Deferred Tax Assets | 138 | 6% |
Total Investment Grade Quality | $2,081 | 83% |
Other Assets | ||
MSR | $185 | 7% |
Receivables and PPE | 55 | 2% |
LHFS and Investment in Subs | 37 | 1% |
Other Assets (2) | 142 | 6% |
Total Other Assets | $418 | 17% |
Total Assets | $2,500 | 100% |
■ The balance sheet consists of high quality / low risk assets consisting primarily of advance receivables
♦ Ocwen has never experienced an impairment of its advances
♦ 83% of assets are investment grade quality assets
■ Even if other assets such as MSRs, DTAs, Net Receivables, and Other Assets all fell to zero, there would still be sufficient equity to cover all debt and other liabilities
■ Ocwen’s second largest operating asset category, MSRs, has never experienced a material impairment
■ Duration matched liabilities and hedged against LIBOR increases
■ Maintains over $894 million of excess advance funding capacity
Source: Company filings.
1. Excludes $65 million of Loans, Net - Restricted for Securitization Investors arising from FAS 167 accounting rule change. 2. Includes $13 million of goodwill.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
21
4 Strong collateral protection
Investment grade quality assets significantly exceed total debt, and they largely consist of advances that are self-liquidating with duration matched funding
Selected collateral is 2.4x the term loan (1)
MSRs | DSF | Advances | Cash | Term Loan | |
Collateral | 320 | 242 | 790 | ||
>=BBB Collateral | 208 | 213 | 236 | ||
Term Loan | 575 |
■ Collateral is valued at >=BBB level as follows:
♦ Advances – 88% of face amount for pledged less projected borrowing; 65% for unpledged
♦ Deferred Servicing Fee – 88% of balance
♦ Mortgage Servicing Rights – 65% of appraised value using industry average cost and ancillary revenue
♦ Cash in excess of $50 million – 100% of balance
■ Excludes additional collateral such as accounts receivable, accrued receivables and DTA that have not traditionally been rated
1. Data as of March 31, 2011. Collateral is shown pro forma to include Litton acquisition.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
22
5 Highly scalable platform with lowest operating cost in the industry
■ Can quickly scale its servicing platform to efficiently board acquired portfolios with only modest additions to infrastructure
■ Lowest operating cost in the subprime mortgage servicing industry
♦ Global locations where per employee cost is one-eighth of a US-based employee
♦ A decade of experience operating in India
■ Achieves its competitive position through the use of a technology-enabled servicing platform and a global workforce
Cost per non-performing loan (1)
Ocwen Cost | Industry Average Cost |
264 | 866 |
Ocwen has a sustainable cost advantage due to superior processes and a global infrastructure which enables it to efficiently board new portfolios and realize significant cost savings
1. Source: Analysis of Nov 2009 MIAC cost per non-performing loan applied to Ocwen’s portfolio relative to Ocwen’s marginal cost study for November 2009.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
23
Financial Overview
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
24
Transaction sources and uses
Sources
($ in millions) | |
New Advance Facility | $2,103 |
Senior Secured Term Loan | 575 |
Cash on Balance Sheet | 113 |
Total Sources | $2,791 |
Uses
Litton Purchase Price (1) | $264 |
Repay Existing Litton Advance Facility | 2,440 |
Transaction Fees and Expenses (2) | 87 |
Total Uses | $2,791 |
Source: Ocwen.
1. Purchase price includes $104 million (approximately 25 bps) for MSRs and interest-only servicing strips.
2. Transaction costs include payment of a $5 million Goldman Sachs intercompany receivable, $39 million of debt issuance costs and $42 million cash designated for the servicer advance facility cash reserve account.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
25
Pro Forma Capitalization
Pro Forma Capitalization Table
($ in millions) | Actual | Pro Forma | ||
3/31/11 | Adjustments | 3/31/11 | ||
Cash (1) | $129 | ($87) | (2) | $42 |
Match Funded Liabilities | $1,289 | $2,155 | (3) | $3,444 |
Line of Credit | 51 | - | 51 | |
Secured Borrowings - Owed to Securitization Investors | 61 | - | 61 | |
Total Funding Debt | $1,401 | $2,155 | $3,556 | |
Existing Senior Secured Term Loan | $26 | ($26) | $0 | |
New Senior Secured Term Loan | - | 575 | 575 | |
Other Corporate Debt | 83 | - | 83 | |
Total Corporate Debt | $109 | $549 | $658 | |
Total Debt | $1,510 | $2,703 | $4,214 | |
Total Equity | $930 | - | $930 | |
Total Capitalization | $2,441 | $2,703 | $5,144 | |
UPB | $70,931 | $41,246 | $112,177 | |
Adjusted EBITDA / UPB | 34.5 bps | 34.5 bps | ||
LTM Adjusted EBITDA | $244 | $142 | (4) | $387 |
Corporate Debt / “Run-rate” Adjusted EBITDA | 0.4 x | 1.7 x | ||
Total Debt / Total Equity | 1.6 x | 4.5 x |
1. Excludes restricted cash.
2. Adjustment reflects a $52 million source of cash from the drawdown of unused advance facility capacity, a $26 million use of cash from the June repayment of the then remaining prior Term Loan and a $113 million use of cash used to complete the acquisition of Litton.
3. Adjustment reflects $52 million drawdown of unused Ocwen advance facility capacity and the $2,103 million new Litton-related servicer advance facility.
4. “Run-rate” Adjusted EBITDA assumes steady state performance for Litton on Ocwen’s servicing platform. Steady state assumes an Ocwen Adjusted EBITDA / UPB ratio of 34.5bps applied to the $41.2 billion of Litton UPB.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
26
Historical financials
Quarterly
Revenue | |
Q1 '09 | 75.3 |
Q2 '09 | 63.044 |
Q3 '09 | 63.344 |
Q4 '09 | 72.748 |
Q1 '10 | 75.586 |
Q2 '10 | 75.953 |
Q3 '10 | 95.569 |
Q4 '10 | 113.273 |
Q1 '11 | 111.006 |
Adjusted EBITDA | |
Q1 '09 | 29.6 |
Q2 '09 | 27.52968844 |
Q3 '09 | 29.94946344 |
Q4 '09 | 33.998574 |
Q1 '10 | 38.019376 |
Q2 '10 | 35.43374 |
Q3 '10 | 52.15392483 |
Q4 '10 | 58.91931545 |
Q1 '11 | 55.92670571 |
Annual
Revenue | |
2008A | 345.9 |
2009A | 274.472 |
2010A | 360.381 |
LTM 3/31/11 Ocwen Standalone | 395.801 |
PF LTM 3/31/11 “Run-rate”(1) | 568.8008555 |
Adjusted EBITDA | |
2008A | 83.2 |
2009A | 115.97763 |
2010A | 184.5263563 |
LTM 3/31/11 Ocwen Standalone | 244.4932243 |
PF LTM 3/31/11 “Run-rate”(1) | 386.6637844 |
Note: All figures exclude Altisource.
1. “Run-rate” Adjusted EBITDA assuming steady state performance for Litton on Ocwen’s servicing platform.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
27
“Run-Rate” 3/31/11 Adjusted EBITDA (1)
3/31/11 LTM Adjusted EBITDA – As Reported | 0.0 | 202.433686 | 202.433686 |
HomEq and Saxon Normalization(2) | 202.433686 | 42.05953832 | 42.05953832 |
LTM Adjusted EBITDA – Ocwen Standalone | 0 | 244.4932243 | 244.4932243 |
Litton LTM Adjusted EBITDA – Covenant | 244.4932243 | 33.02282393 | 33.02282393 |
Litton LTM Adjusted EBITDA – “Run-rate”(3) | 244.4932243 | 142.1705601 | 142.1705601 |
3/31/11 LTM Adjusted EBITDA – “Run-rate” | 0 | 386.6637844 | 386.6637844 |
1. Adjusted EBITDA equals pre-tax income plus corporate interest expense plus depreciation and amortization plus other non-cash charges reducing net income and any restructuring charges relating to acquisitions less interest income on cash. Adjusted EBITDA is after the impact of interest expense on funding debt.
2. HomEq and Saxon normalization to reflect a full year of contribution per existing credit agreement.
3. Total “Run-rate” Adjusted EBITDA of $142 million assuming steady state performance for Litton on Ocwen’s platform. Steady state assumes an Ocwen Adjusted EBITDA / UPB ratio of 34.5bps is applied to the $41.2 billion of Litton UPB.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
28
Pro forma credit statistics
■ The increased leverage associated with the acquisition of Litton will be temporary in nature
♦ The term loan, prepayable at par, will be reduced with excess cash flows
♦ Ocwen intends to use a conservative mix of debt and equity to fund further acquisitions
Corporate Debt / Adjusted EBITDA (1)
2005A | 1.1 |
2006A | 0.713677364 |
2007A | 0.9457398 |
2008A | 1.631241813 |
2009A | 0.823986488 |
2010A | 1.517691053 |
LTM 3/31/11 Ocwen Standalone | 0.445018468 |
PF LTM 3/31/11 “Run-rate”(2) | 1.700583366 |
Total Debt / Total Equity
2005A | 3.2 |
2006A | 1.765451746 |
2007A | 2.544857425 |
2008A | 2.32857613 |
2009A | 0.893943961 |
2010A | 2.070983414 |
3/31/11 Ocwen Standalone | 1.623093149 |
PF 3/31/11(2) | 4.528371896 |
1. Adjusted EBITDA equals pre-tax income plus corporate interest expense plus depreciation and amortization plus other non-cash charges reducing net income and any restructuring charges relating to acquisitions less interest income on cash. Adjusted EBITDA is after the impact of interest expense on funding debt.
2. Pro forma for Litton acquisition. “Run-rate” Adjusted EBITDA assuming steady state performance for Litton on Ocwen’s servicing platform.
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
29
HLSS Transaction Update
HLSS Overview
■ In February 2011, Ocwen announced it was pursuing a strategic opportunity with a newly formed entity called HLSS that could significantly reduce capital needs
♦ HLSS will be structured in a tax efficient manner as a Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”), offering investors yield in the form of dividends
♦ As currently proposed, HLSS will use the proceeds from its IPO to purchase MSR Rights from Ocwen
Transaction Rationale
■ Should the HLSS IPO be effective, Ocwen would begin to migrate to a fee-for-service model with lower leverage and lower balance sheet requirements
■ The transaction could potentially make Ocwen and HLSS more competitive in bidding for servicing
■ The net cash proceeds from sales of any MSR Rights to HLSS will be subject to the asset sale mandatory prepayment provisions in the credit agreement
Economics to Ocwen
■ Ocwen will receive cash from HLSS for the purchase of advances and MSR Rights
■ Ocwen will be retained as subservicer for the pool of MSR Rights sold to HLSS
♦ Ocwen will continue to benefit from a portion of the income stream on the assets, despite sale to HLSS
■ Ocwen will have lower capital requirements given that HLSS will be responsible for making servicer advances
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
30
Key takeaways
Stable business model with recurring revenue streams
Superior servicing and loss mitigation capabilities
Substantial cash flow generation
Strong collateral coverage and conservative balance sheet
Industry leading cost structure
Positioned for growth in core business
Seasoned management team with strong alignment of interests
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
31
Summary Terms and Timeline
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
32
Transaction terms
Summary Terms and Conditions
Issuer: | Ocwen Financial Corporation (“Ocwen” or the “Company”) |
Issue: | $575 million Term Loan (the “Term Loan”) |
Guarantor: | All existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct or indirect wholly-owned restricted subsidiaries of the Borrower (subject to certain exclusions) |
Tenor: | 5 year |
Ratings | B1 / B corporate and facility (stable / stable) |
Security: | A perfected first priority security interest in all unencumbered assets of the Company, and a pledge of the capital stock of all current and future domestic subsidiaries |
Amortization: | 10% per annum |
Optional Prepayments: | Prepayable at par at anytime |
Mandatory Prepayments: | 100% Net Proceeds from Non-Permitted Indebtedness |
100% Net Asset Sale Proceeds (with carve-outs and reinvestment rights) | |
50% Excess Cash Flow (leverage-based step-down to 25% based on a Corporate Leverage Ratio of 1.25x) | |
Use of Proceeds: | Finance the acquisition of Litton Loan Servicing and general corporate purposes |
Financial Covenants: | Maximum Corporate Debt (includes recourse and MSR debt) to EBITDA Ratio |
Maximum Total Consolidated Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio | |
Minimum Interest Coverage Ratio | |
Maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio |
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
33
Transaction timetable
Date | Event | |
July 19th | ■ | Bank Meeting |
August 5th | ■ | Lender Commitments Due |
August 8th | ■ | Loan Documentation Posted to Intralinks for Investor Review |
August 12th | ■ | Comments Due on Loan Documentation |
September 1st | ■ | Close and Fund Credit Facilities |
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
34
Questions and Answers
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
35
Appendix
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
36
What is a servicer advance?
■ When there exists a deficiency in monthly collections due to delinquent borrowers, servicers will “advance” payments to the RMBS trust or third party loan owners. These payments include:
♦ Principal and interest
♦ Taxes and insurance
♦ Property protection and foreclosure costs
■ Servicers incur funding costs on these non-interest bearing advances but do not bear credit risk
♦ Advances are recovered at the “top-of-the-waterfall” first from proceeds at a loan-level, and then if those funds are insufficient, from cash collected from other loans in a RMBS trust
♦ A servicer can “stop advance” if it believes that an advance will not be recoverable from the borrower
OCN advance collateral coverage 3/31/11
$58.1 Billion (Property Value) | $1.8 Billion Servicer Advances | ~3.2% Advance Rate |
$56.3 Billion | ~96.8% | |
The “Properties” | Downside Protection /Cushion for Servicer Advances | Equity Cushion |
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
37
What are deferred servicing fees and mortgage servicing rights?
Deferred servicing fees
■ Deferred servicing fees are contractually-obligated fees earned by and owed to the servicer but not yet collected while a borrower is delinquent
♦ Deferred servicing fees have the highest priority in the waterfall, right above servicer advances
♦ Collected simultaneously with P&I advances which are the advances recovered most rapidly by servicer
■ Why are they not capitalized on Ocwen’s balance sheet like servicer advances?
♦ Ocwen’s conservative cash accounting policies recognize servicing fees only when cash is collected
♦ However, the deferred servicing fees are audited numbers, supported by loan level records and referenced in the MD&A of Ocwen’s quarterly SEC filings
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”)
■ MSRs are the contractual right to receive servicing compensation in exchange for the obligation to perform the servicing function throughout the life of the related mortgage loan
■ This asset is capitalized on the servicer’s balance sheet and marked at fair value on a quarterly basis
♦ Common factors affecting fair value include interest rates, prepayment assumptions, delinquencies of the related mortgage loans, and estimates of float and other income received
■ The MSR is amortized as an expense over the life of the loans
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
38
Collateral Coverage
■ Ocwen currently has $1,352 million of collateral giving rise to a 2.4x collateral coverage ratio
■ Taking a more conservative view on the collateral, total “investment grade quality” collateral is $657mm, which still exceeds the term loan
■ The investment grade quality threshold is determined by market benchmarks for available financing at the BBB rating level
■ For example, Deferred Servicing Fees, which are top of the waterfall and similar in credit characteristics to Advances, are assumed to achieve a BBB funding level up to an advance rate of 88%. Accordingly, 88% of the DSF balance is considered to be investment grade quality
■ A similar concept applies to the MSRs and Unpledged Advances, although the BBB funding level is assumed to be 65% for these assets
■ A different concept applies to the equity in match funded advances. For the $4,110mm of match funded advances, there is $3,495mm of match funded liabilities, which implies an advance rate of ~85%. Assuming that Ocwen could borrow through the BBB level of 88%, this would generate an incremental benefit of $122mm
Total collateral @ 3/31/2011
($ in millions) | |||
Total Collateral | |||
DSF 1 | $242 | ||
MSR 2 | 320 | ||
Excess Cash (>$50mm) | 0 | ||
Unpledged Advances 3 | 175 | ||
Equity in Match Funded Advances 4 | 615 | ||
Total Equity in Advances | $790 | ||
Total Collateral | $1,352 |
Advances | ||||
Match Funded Advances | $4,110 | |||
Less: Match Funded Liabilities | 3,495 | |||
Equity in Match Funded Advances | $615 |
Implied collateral level @ BBB
1 | DSF | |
DSF | $242 | |
BBB Level Funding | 88% | |
DSF Collateral @ BBB Level | $213 |
2 | Unpledged Advances |
Unpledged Advances | $175 |
BBB Level Funding | 65% |
Unpledged Advance Collateral @ BBB Level | $114 |
3 | MSR | |||||||||
MSR | $320 | |||||||||
BBB Level Funding | 65% | |||||||||
MSR Collateral @ BBB Level | $208 |
4 | Pledged Advances |
Match Funded Advances | $4,110 |
Match Funded Liabilities @ 85% | 3,495 |
Match Funded Liabilities @ 88% | 3,617 |
BBB Level Financing | $122 |
Implied Collateral for BBB Level @ 3/31/2011 | $657 |
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
39
Collateral Coverage
Senior Secured Term Loan
Proprietary & Confidential
40