Under New York Insurance Law, the Company may pay dividends to XL RE AM, without the prior approval of the Superintendent of the NYID, only from earned statutory policyholders’ surplus subject to the maintenance of the minimum capital and surplus requirement. In addition, the dividend, together with all other dividends declared or distributed by the Company during the preceding twelve months, may not exceed the lesser of 10% of its policyholders’ surplus as shown in the Company’s last filed statement, or adjusted net investment income, as defined, for such twelve-month period. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had no earned surplus available for the payment of dividends during the next twelve months.
On February 22, 2001, XL RE AM acquired all the outstanding shares of The London Assurance of America, Inc. (“LAA”) for $24,154,000. Prior to its purchase by XL RE AM, LAA was a New York-domiciled property and casualty insurance company that was licensed in 44 states and the District of Columbia. The business previously underwritten through LAA, together with all the liabilities of LAA, were ceded effective July 1, 2000 to an affiliate of LAA under an assumption reinsurance arrangement. XL RE AM caused the Company to merge with LAA on the day of acquisition and for LAA to simultaneously adopt the name of XL Capital Assurance Inc. In the merger process, the Company repurchased 500 shares of common stock with a par value of $6,000. The remaining 2,000 outstanding shares of common stock were immediately converted into issued and outstanding shares, $7,500 par value, of the merged company. This transaction had no effect on the Company’s stated capital.
23
XL Capital Assurance Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
On August 23, 2001, the Company received a $25,000,000 cash infusion from XLA, the parent company, as additional paid-in capital. The capital will be used for general working capital purposes and to support the Company’s business strategy.
On May 15, 2002, the Company received a $20,000,000 cash infusion from XLA as additional paid in capital. The funds were used to capitalize XLCA-UK.
17. Credit Default Swaps
Credit default swaps issued by the Company meet the definition of a derivative. The Company has recorded these products at management’s estimate of fair value. The Company determines fair value using a model developed internally which calculates the difference between actual remaining credit enhancement fees and estimated fees under current market conditions. In essence, the model estimates the cost of purchasing an offsetting position to the original credit default swap from another comparable counterparty under the current market environment. The model depends upon a number of factors including changes in interest rates, credit spreads, the rating of individual transactions, and other market factors. Credit default swaps are considered by the Company to be, in substance, financial guaranty contracts as the Company has the intent to hold them to maturity.
The Company’s credit default swap portfolio generally requires the Company to meet payment obligations for referenced credits within the portfolio in the event of specific credit events after exhaustion of various first loss protection levels. These credit events are contract specific, but generally cover bankruptcy, failure to pay and repudiation. The credit default swap portfolio is structured pools of corporate obligations that were awarded investment grade ratings at the deals’ inception. Approximately 77% of the portfolio is rated AAA with the remaining 23% allocated to other investment grade ratings. The weighted average term of the contracts in force was 6.14 years. The portfolios are currently performing as expected.
The Company previously presented changes in fair value of credit derivatives across traditional insurance company accounts including premiums, losses and loss adjustment expenses and net realized gains and losses. In 2002, the Company elected to present net changes in fair value of its credit default swaps in net realized and unrealized gains and losses on credit derivatives. Prior year comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to this presentation with no impact on reported net income or shareholder’s equity.
The net fair value adjustment for the periods ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was an unrealized loss of $24,000 and $138,000, respectively. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had a net credit default swap liability of $882,000 and $192,000, respectfully, classified within Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Information concerning par exposure of the credit default swap portfolio is disclosed in Note 9.
18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity,” in June, 1998. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives), and for hedging activity. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either other assets or other liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. The Company adopted SFAS No. 133, as amended, as of January 1, 2001.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” which states that all business combinations are to be accounted for using one method – the purchase method. It requires that business combinations be accounted for the same way as asset acquisitions are accounted for, based on values exchanged. On February 22, 2001, XL RE AM acquired all the outstanding shares of The London Assurance of America, Inc. for $24,154,000. The fair value of net assets acquired amounted to
24
XL Capital Assurance Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
$24,770,000. The Company estimated the fair value of intangible assets acquired, which represents insurance licenses, to be approximately $11,772,000. The merger with The London Assurance of America, Inc. was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which changes the accounting for goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets in business combinations from an amortization approach to an impairment-only approach. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002 resulted in the Company’s discontinuation of amortization of its intangible asset. However, the Company is required to test its intangible asset for impairment under the new standard, which could require an adjustment of the intangible asset balance if impairment is determined. The implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position and net income as set forth in the table below.
| | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (U.S. Dollars in thousands) | |
Reported net loss | | $ | (5,249 | ) | $ | (6,188 | ) | $ | (1,176 | ) |
Add back Amortization of acquired licenses | | | — | | | 244 | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Adjusted net loss | | $ | (5,249 | ) | $ | (5,944 | ) | $ | (1,176 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”. FIN 45 relates to the accounting for and disclosure of guarantees and requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the entity must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. A guarantee that is issued by a financial guaranty insurance company and accounted for under GAAP for insurance contracts is excluded entirely from the scope of the standard. Accordingly, the Company’s financial guarantee contracts are not subject to the requirements of this standard. Guarantees that are accounted for under FASB Statement of No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” are excluded from the initial recognition and measurement, however, the guarantees are subject to the disclosure requirements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements ending after December 15, 2002. The only contracts requiring specific disclosure under FIN 45 are credit default swaps, hence, the Company has elected to disclose information pertaining to its credit default swap portfolio in Notes 9 and 17.
In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”). SFAS No. 148 amends FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the prior disclosure guidance and requires prominent disclosures in both annual interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on the reported results. XL Capital Ltd. plans to record option expense for options granted subsequent to January 1, 2003, in accordance with SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148. The effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 148 will depend on the level of options awarded to employees of the Company and therefore cannot yet be determined.
25
XL Capital Assurance Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. The interpretation is detailed and based on the underlying concept that companies that control another entity through interest other than voting interest should consolidate the controlled entity. Additionally, if it is reasonably possible that a company has a significant variable interest, the company must describe the nature, purpose, size and activities of the variable interest entities and the maximum exposure to loss. The consolidation requirements of this standard apply to all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. However, the disclosure requirements are applicable to December 31, 2002 financial statements.
In underwriting financial guaranty insurance, the Company believes the risk of any loss to be remote based upon the Company’s requirement that guaranteed obligations be investment grade prior to the provision of credit enhancement. Typically, in the case of asset backed securities and other structured obligations such investment grade ratings are based upon subordination, cash reserves, and other structural protections. Consequently, the Company has determined that it does not have a significant variable interest in such variable interest entities. Accordingly, these variable interest entities will not be consolidated and the disclosure requirements of FIN 46 do not apply. Disclosures of the Company’s maximum loss and nature and size of variable interest entities in which the Company is involved is included in Footnote 9.
26
XL Capital Assurance Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
19. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
(U.S. Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
2002 | | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | | Full Year | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross premiums written | | $ | 14,528 | | $ | 73,526 | | $ | 18,539 | | $ | 47,536 | | $ | 154,129 | |
Net premiums written | | | 1,833 | | | 6,270 | | | 1,254 | | | 1,616 | | | 10,973 | |
Net premiums earned | | | 572 | | | 552 | | | 854 | | | 1,022 | | | 3,000 | |
Net investment income | | | 1,599 | | | 1,317 | | | 1,458 | | | 1,425 | | | 5,799 | |
Net loss and loss expenses | | | 143 | | | 138 | | | 214 | | | 259 | | | 754 | |
Income (loss) before taxes | | | (3,757 | ) | | (1,903 | ) | | (1,656 | ) | | (366 | ) | | (7,682 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | (2,520 | ) | | (1,153 | ) | | (1,085 | ) | | (491 | ) | | (5,249 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(U.S. Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
2001 | | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | | Full Year | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross premiums written | | $ | 1,624 | | $ | 7,778 | | $ | 14,689 | | $ | 27,151 | | $ | 51,242 | |
Net premiums written | | | 130 | | | 727 | | | 1,418 | | | 1,113 | | | 3,388 | |
Net premiums earned | | | 10 | | | 50 | | | 118 | | | 4 | | | 182 | |
Net investment income | | | 941 | | | 1,880 | | | 1,456 | | | 1,442 | | | 5,719 | |
Net loss and loss expenses | | | 3 | | | 12 | | | 30 | | | 1 | | | 46 | |
Income (loss) before taxes | | | (4,988 | ) | | (897 | ) | | (3,576 | ) | | (2,661 | ) | | (12,122 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | (3,444 | ) | | (1,069 | ) | | (206 | ) | | (1,469 | ) | | (6,188 | ) |